As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2026
Registration No. 333-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 7370 | 01-0627671 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1 Rocket Road
Starbase, Texas 78521
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Elon Musk
Chief Executive Officer
1 Rocket Road
Starbase, Texas 78521
Tel: (310) 363-6000
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
With copies to:
George J. Sampas Hillary H. Holmes Harrison Tucker Atma J. Kabad Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 811 Main Street, Suite 3000 Houston, Texas 77002 Tel: (346) 718-6600 | Bret Johnsen Michael Smith Space Exploration Technologies Corp. 1 Rocket Road Hawthorne, California 90250 Tel: (310) 363-6000 | Byron B. Rooney Alan F. Denenberg Stephen A. Byeff Joze Vranicar Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 Tel: (212) 450-4000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following
box. ☐
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number
of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number
of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further
amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to such Section 8(a), may
determine.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED , 2026
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
Shares
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Class A Common Stock
This is the initial public offering of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Space Exploration Technologies
Corp., a Texas corporation. We are offering shares of our Class A common stock.
Currently, no public market exists for our Class A common stock. We expect the initial public offering price to be between $ and
$ per share. We have applied to list our Class A common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and Nasdaq Texas,
Inc. (“Nasdaq Texas”) under the symbol “SPCX.”
Following the completion of this offering, we will have two classes of common stock issued and outstanding: Class A common stock
and Class B common stock. Each share of Class A common stock will entitle its holder to one vote per share. Each share of Class B
common stock will entitle its holder to 10 votes per share. Class A shareholders and Class B shareholders will vote together as a
single class on all matters to be voted on by shareholders, except Class B shareholders will be entitled to elect a majority of our board
of directors in addition to having certain other class votes as described under “Description of Capital Stock.”
Assuming an offering size as set forth above and an initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the estimated
price range set forth above), Elon Musk, our founder, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of our board,
will hold approximately % of the voting power of our common stock (or approximately % if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full) immediately after the completion of this offering through his
ownership of shares of our Class A and Class B common stock of which approximately % he controls through his ownership of
our Class B common stock. As a result, Mr. Musk will be able to control the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval. This
includes the election of (i) a majority of our board, through his ownership of Class B shares (as Class B Directors), for so long as he
holds a majority of the voting power of the Class B common stock, and (ii) the remainder of our board, for so long as he holds a
majority of the combined voting power of the Class A and Class B common stock. As a result, we will be a “controlled company”
under the corporate governance rules of Nasdaq following the completion of this offering and, as a result, we intend to rely on
exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. Please refer to “Management—Controlled Company Exemption.”
Investing in our Class A common stock involves risks. Please refer to “Risk Factors” beginning on page 26 of this
prospectus.
The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The securities described herein may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell such securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Per Share | Total | ||
Initial public offering price ...................................................................................................... | $ | $ | |
Underwriting discounts and commissions(1) ............................................................................ | $ | $ | |
Proceeds, before expenses, to Space Exploration Technologies Corp. ................................... | $ | $ |
________________
(1)Please refer to “Underwriting” for a description of all underwriting compensation payable in connection with this offering.
The underwriters may also exercise an option to purchase up to an additional shares of our Class A common stock from us, at the
initial public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions, for 30 days after the date of this prospectus.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to percent of the shares of Class A common stock to be issued by the
Company and offered by this prospectus for sale, at the initial public offering price, to . Please refer to “Underwriting—
Directed Share Program.” Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
The shares of Class A common stock will be ready for delivery on or about , 2026.
Joint Book-Running Managers
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | Morgan Stanley | BofA Securities | Citigroup | J.P. Morgan |
Barclays | Deutsche Bank Securities | RBC Capital Markets | UBS Investment Bank | Wells Fargo Securities |
Allen & Company LLC | Cantor | Needham & Company | Raymond James | Societe Generale | Stifel | William Blair |
BTG Pactual | ING | Macquarie Capital | Mirae Asset Securities | Mizuho | Santander |
Prospectus Dated , 2026.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |
GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................................................. | |
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ | |
RISK FACTORS .............................................................................................................................................. | |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ........................... | |
USE OF PROCEEDS ....................................................................................................................................... | |
DIVIDEND POLICY ........................................................................................................................................ | |
CAPITALIZATION ......................................................................................................................................... | |
DILUTION ....................................................................................................................................................... | |
OF OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ | |
BUSINESS ........................................................................................................................................................ | |
MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................................. | |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION .................................................................................................................... | |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS ............................................. | |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT .................... | |
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK .......................................................................................................... | |
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE .................................................................................................... | |
CLASS A COMMON STOCK ..................................................................................................................... | |
UNDERWRITING ........................................................................................................................................... | |
LEGAL MATTERS .......................................................................................................................................... | |
EXPERTS ......................................................................................................................................................... | |
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ........................................................................ | |
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ...................................................................................................... |
Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information other than that contained in
this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus authorized by us. We and the underwriters take no responsibility
for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the
underwriters are not making an offer to sell, or seeking offers to buy, our Class A common stock in any jurisdiction
where an offer or sale is not permitted. The information contained in this prospectus or any free writing prospectus is
accurate only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery or of any sale of shares of our Class A common stock.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects may have changed since that date.
For investors outside of the United States: Neither we nor the underwriters have done anything that would permit
this offering, or possession or distribution of this prospectus, in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is
required, other than the United States. Persons outside of the United States who come into possession of this
prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of our
Class A common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond our control. Please refer to “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-
Looking Statements.”
ii
General Information
Except as otherwise indicated or required by the context, all references to “SpaceX,” the “Company,” “we,” “our”
and “us” or similar terms refer to Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries. For the
definitions of certain terms and abbreviations used in this prospectus, please refer to “Glossary of Terms” beginning
on page iv of this prospectus.
References to (i) our “bylaws” are to the form of amended and restated bylaws of the Company (as amended and
restated from time to time) to be effective upon the completion of this offering, (ii) our “charter” are to the form of
restated certificate of formation of the Company to be effective upon the completion of this offering and (iii) “our
board” or “the board” are to the board of directors of the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of SpaceX have been retrospectively recast for all periods presented to include
(i) the historical results of X.AI Holdings Corp., which was acquired by SpaceX, effective February 2, 2026 (the
“xAI Merger”), and X Holdings Corp. (“X Holdings”), which was acquired by xAI, effective March 28, 2025 (the
“X Merger”), because these transactions were between entities under common control, and (ii) a five-for-one stock
split of the Company’s Class A, Class B, and Class C Common Stock, effective May 4, 2026 (the “2026 Stock
Split”). Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, all share and per share information included in this
prospectus have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2026 Stock Split. Refer to Note 1, Nature of Business, to
the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Industry and Market Data
Certain market and industry data and forecasts used in this prospectus have been obtained from, are based on, or use
data from, the following reports and sources, among others: (i) Breaking Barriers to Data Center Growth, dated
January 20, 2025, by Boston Consulting Group; (ii) Looming Spectrum Shortfall Could Cost America’s GDP $1.4T,
Jeopardize Continued Function of U.S. Networks, New Report Finds, dated March 27, 2025, by the Cellular
Telecommunications and Internet Association; (iii) Top 50 Countries by Number of Business Aircraft Registered,
dated January 27, 2026, by Corporate Jet Investor; (iv) Digital Economy Trends 2026, dated December 2025, by the
Digital Cooperation Organization; (v) Global Fixed Broadband Market Outlook, Ericsson Mobility Report, dated
November 1, 2025, by Ericsson; (vi) Households by Number of Households and by Country, Euromonitor
International Passport 2026 Edition, dated November 5, 2025, by Euromonitor International; (vii) Satellite Solutions
for Universal Service, dated March 2025, by the Global Satellite Operators Association; (viii) Broadband Services
Market Analysis Segment Forecast to 2027, dated April 2025, by Grand View Research; (ix) Consumer Market
Model H2 2025 – Worldwide Household Internet Penetration, dated March 2026, by International Data Corporation;
(x) World Energy Outlook Special Report: Energy and AI, dated April 2025, by the International Energy Agency;
(xi) The 175 GW Crisis: America’s Power Grid Cannot Keep Up with AI Data Centers, dated January 21, 2026, by
Introl; (xii) As Wireless Network Quality Competition Increases, Customers Benefit, dated July 17, 2025, by J.D.
Power; (xiii) Satellite Statistics: Satellite and Debris Population, dated April 2026, by Jonathan McDowell; (xiv)
2026 Global Data Center Outlook: Navigating AI Demand, Power Constraints and Global Opportunities, dated
January 5, 2026, by JLL; (xv) Global Ship Tracking Intelligence, at marinetraffic.com, as updated from time to time
and last accessed April 13, 2026, by Marine Traffic Dashboard; (xvi) The Cost of Compute: A $7 Trillion Race to
Scale Data Centers, dated April 28, 2025, by McKinsey & Company; (xvii) What is Multimodal AI?, dated June 10,
2025, by McKinsey & Company; (xviii) NASA: Enabling America on the Space Frontier, dated December 2024, by
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”); (xix) Space Act Agreement, dated April 2015, by
NASA; (xx) The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost, dated July 8, 2018, by NASA; (xxi) 12th Edition
Space Economy Report, dated January 29, 2026, by Novaspace; (xxii) Global Fleet and MRO Market Forecast
2025–2035, dated February 2025, by Oliver Wyman; (xxiii) Broadband Op Subs by Technology – Forecasts
Summary, dated March 31, 2026, by Omdia; (xxiv) Mobile Forecasts Summary – February 2026, dated February
18, 2026, by Omdia; (xxv) Data Center Rules and Regulations, dated September 8, 2025, by QTS; (xxvi) AI’s
Power Requirements Under Exponential Growth, dated January 28, 2025, by RAND Corporation; (xxvii) Data
Center Grid-Power Demand to Rise 22% in 2025, Nearly Triple by 2030, dated October 14, 2025, by S&P Global
Market Intelligence; (xxviii) NVIDIA GTC 2025 – Built for Reasoning, Vera Rubin, Kyber, CPO, Dynamo
iii
Inference, Jensen Math, Feynman, dated March 18, 2025, by SemiAnalysis; (xxix) NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra
Datasheet, dated February 16, 2026, by SemiAnalysis; (xxx) H100 Rental Price Over Time (2023–2025): A
Complete Market Analysis, dated December 21, 2025, by Silicon Data; (xxxi) Data Centers – Understanding the
Power Consumption of Data Centers, at socomec.us, as updated from time to time and last accessed April 13, 2026,
by Socomec; (xxxii) The Space Report 2025 Q2 Highlights Record $613 Billion Global Space Economy for 2024,
dated July 22, 2025, by the Space Foundation; (xxxiii) Median Country Speeds Updated February 2026, dated
February 2026, by the Speedtest Global Index; (xxxiv) Data Center (Russian Market) Commercial Data Centers,
dated January 28, 2026, by TAdviser; (xxxv) Merchant Fleet by Flag of Registration and by Type of Ship, dated
June 10, 2025, by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development; (xxxvi) U.S. Electricity Generation in
2025 Hit a Record, Again, dated March 5, 2026, by the U.S. Energy Information Administration; (xxxvii)
GAO-25-107555, In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options,
dated July 2025, by the U.S. Government Accountability Office; (xxxviii) GDP (current US$), at
data.worldbank.data.org, as updated from time to time and last accessed April 13, 2026, by the World Bank; (xxxix)
Rural population (% of total population), at data.worldbank.org, as updated from time to time and last accessed May
2, 2026, by the World Bank; (xl) How Data Centres in Space Sustainably Enable the AI Revolution, dated January
16, 2026, by Philip Johnston Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Starcloud, published by the World Economic
Forum; and (xli) Most Americans Use AI but Still Don’t Trust It, dated December 9, 2025, by YouGov. We did not
commission the preparation of any of these reports or sources.
Some market data and statistical information contained in this prospectus are also based on management’s estimates
and calculations, which are derived from our review and interpretation of publicly available industry publications,
our internal research and our knowledge of the markets in which we currently, and will in the future, operate, as well
as the sources referred to above. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are
cautioned not to give undue weight to such information. The estimates and assumptions used in determining our
total addressable markets are further detailed in the section titled “Business—Our Market Opportunity,” and you are
urged to read the risk factor titled “The estimates of future market opportunity and forecasts of market growth, and
our ability to capture such markets, included in this prospectus may prove to be inaccurate.” Forecasts and other
forward-looking information obtained from the sources named above are subject to the same qualifications and
uncertainties as the other forward-looking statements in this prospectus.
Statements as to market position, market opportunity and market size are based on data currently available to us, as
well as management’s estimates, judgments, assessments, and assumptions. While we are not aware of any
misstatements regarding market position, market opportunity, and market size information included in this
prospectus, such information, which is derived in part from management’s estimates and beliefs, is inherently
uncertain and imprecise. Projections, assumptions and estimates of estimated market position and market
opportunity and the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree
of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors,” “Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this prospectus. These and other factors could
cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by third parties and by us. Investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on statements of expected future market size or opportunity.
Trademarks and Trade Names
We own or have rights to various trademarks, service marks and trade names that we use in connection with the
operation of our business. This prospectus may also contain trademarks, service marks and trade names of third
parties, which are the property of their respective owners. Our use or display of third parties’ trademarks, service
marks, trade names or products in this prospectus is not intended to, and does not imply, a relationship with us or an
endorsement or sponsorship by or of us. Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks and trade names
referred to in this prospectus may appear without the ®, ™ or SM symbols, but such references are not intended to
indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the right of the
applicable licensor to these trademarks, service marks and trade names.
iv
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The terms and abbreviations defined in this section are used throughout this prospectus:
•“AI” or “artificial intelligence” refers to advanced computational technologies and systems enabling machines
to learn, comprehend reality, solve complex problems, exhibit creativity, make critical decisions, and function
with growing autonomy.
•“AI compute” or “compute” refers to the computing infrastructure required to train and operate artificial
intelligence models, including, without limitation, specialized processors, networking, storage, and power
systems deployed in data centers or other computing environments.
•“AI compute satellite” refers to a satellite equipped with onboard artificial intelligence processing capabilities
designed to perform data analysis, inference, or other machine learning, automated decision-making and
artificial intelligence algorithms, models and technologies workloads in orbit.
•“AI ecosystem” refers to a complex, multi-layered network of technologies, products, systems, and
infrastructure that develop, leverage, and deploy intelligent systems.
•“AI segment” refers to our AI business, which we acquired in connection with our acquisition of xAI in
February 2026, and includes our AI compute, Grok, and X.
•“AI training cluster” refers to an integrated system that provides computational power required for training and
running advanced AI models.
•“The Algorithm” refers to our five-step iterative process that we use to rapidly innovate and optimize,
emphasizing making the requirements less dumb, deleting unnecessary processes or parts, optimizing the
necessary processes or parts, accelerating cycle timesteps, and automating only proven processes after the first
four steps are completed.
•“Application Programming Interface” or “API” refers to a defined set of rules and protocols that allows
different software systems to communicate with and interact with each other programmatically.
•“ARPU” refers to service revenue generated from Starlink Subscribers during a period divided by (i) the
average number of Starlink Subscribers during the period and by (ii) the number of months in the period.
•“Artemis program” refers to a NASA program aimed at landing humans on the Moon by the late 2020s.
•“booster” refers to the first-stage rocket that provides the primary thrust during launch.
•“booster catch” refers to a recovery method in which a returning first-stage rocket booster is captured mid-air by
mechanical arms on the launch tower rather than on legs at a landing zone or at sea.
•“booster launch” refers to a rocket launch in which a booster stage provides the primary thrust during liftoff and
the initial phase of ascent before separating from the vehicle.
•“bps” refers to bits per second.
•“COLOSSUS” refers to our flagship data center, located on Paul R. Lowry Road in Memphis, Tennessee.
•“COLOSSUS II” refers to our data centers in Memphis, Tennessee and in Southaven, Mississippi. These data
centers are part of our coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster.
•“Connectivity segment” refers to our Connectivity segment, which includes Starlink and associated offerings.
•“Credit Agreements” refers to our SpaceX Credit Facility and SpaceX Bridge Loan.
•“crewmember” refers to a person who has traveled on our spacecraft, measuring by each mission.
v
•“daily posts” on X and Grok refers to the aggregate volume of original posts, replies, reposts, quotes and media
shared daily by users on the X platform, and the real-time interactions, analysis and generative capabilities
provided to a user by Grok. This may include posts generated by AI or accounts managed by AI.
•“downlink capacity” refers to the maximum rate at which data can be transmitted from a satellite to users over a
network or communication link in a given period of time.
•“Draco thrusters” refers to thrusters used in Dragon spacecraft for precise orbital maneuvering and adjustments.
•“Dragon” refers to our Dragon spacecraft.
•“Falcon 1” refers to our two-stage, liquid-fueled small-lift launch vehicle that operated from 2006 to 2009.
•“Falcon 9” refers to our orbital-class rocket with reusable boosters, first launched in 2010, which has a payload
capacity to LEO of approximately 23 metric tons.
•“Falcon Heavy” refers to our partially reusable super heavy-lift launch vehicle, first launched in 2018, which
has a payload capacity to LEO of approximately 64 metric tons.
•“flight-proven booster launches” refers to a mission utilizing a booster that has previously completed at least
one successful launch and recovery.
•“frontier model” refers to a leading-edge, sophisticated large language model, such as Grok, designed for
rigorous reasoning and real-time information synthesis.
•“Gbps” refers to gigabits per second.
•“geostationary orbit” refers to a high Earth orbit that allows satellites to match Earth’s rotation, appearing
stationary from the ground, often used for communication satellites.
•“geosynchronous transfer orbit” refers to an elliptical orbit used to transfer a spacecraft from a lower orbit to a
geostationary orbit.
•“gigawatt” refers to one billion watts.
•“gigawatt-scale” refers to infrastructure, systems, or facilities that are designed to generate, transmit, or
consume approximately one gigawatt or more of electrical power capacity.
•“GPU” refers to a graphics processing unit.
•“Grok” refers to our family of frontier models, which represents a core pillar of our mission to advance
humanity’s understanding of the universe through the development of truth-seeking artificial intelligence.
•“Grok API” refers to our application programming interface that enables developers to access and integrate
Grok models into external software applications and workflows.
•“Grok Business” refers to our subscription-based offering that provides organizations with access to Grok
models and related tools for use in internal business applications and workflows, designed for deployment by
small-to-medium teams.
•“Grok Enterprise” refers to our subscription-based offering that provides organizations with access to Grok
models and related tools for use in internal business applications and workflows, designed for deployment by
enterprise organizations.
•“Grok Voice” refers to the Grok real-time speech engine.
•“high-density compute” refers to compute infrastructure designed to deliver a large amount of processing power
within a limited physical footprint, typically characterized by high processor concentration and elevated power
usage per unit of space.
vi
•“Imagine” refers to our image and video generation system.
•“inference” refers to the process by which a trained artificial intelligence model generates outputs (such as text,
images, or predictions) from new input data.
•“International Docking System Standard” refers to a standard for autonomous docking capabilities used by
spacecraft like Dragon.
•“IoT” refers to the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the
purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems over the internet.
•“Kardashev Type II” refers to a civilization that harnesses the full energy output of its local star, like our Sun, to
power unprecedented growth and sustain the civilization’s existence.
•“large language model” or “LLM” refers to a sophisticated artificial intelligence model designed for advanced
reasoning and natural language processing.
•“large-scale LEO broadband satellite constellation” refers to a satellite constellation network of over 1,000
satellites.
•“latency” refers to the time delay between the transmission of data from a source and its receipt at a destination,
typically measured in milliseconds.
•“launch payload mass” refers to the theoretical payload mass that a particular spacecraft is capable of delivering
to a specified orbit under specific conditions, which is derived from advanced computer simulations and
performance modeling that apply to particular mission scenarios and trajectory assumptions. Actual payload
that can be delivered for a given mission may be different and will vary depending on numerous mission
parameters and operational factors, including mission-specific trajectory requirements, atmospheric conditions,
vehicle and payload configuration, risk profile, and applicable regulatory or range-safety limitations.
•“launch system” refers to a comprehensive system comprising rockets and associated ground infrastructure used
to launch spacecraft and payloads into space.
•“launch vehicle” refers to a rocket designed to transport payloads from terrestrial bodies (e.g., Earth, Moon, or
Mars) to space or to a designated orbital trajectory.
•“LEO satellite constellation” refers to a network of numerous satellites operating in Low-Earth Orbit, typically
deployed to provide services such as broadband connectivity, including Starlink.
•“Low-Earth Orbit” or “LEO” refers to an orbit relatively close to Earth’s surface, typically used by satellites for
applications like broadband internet due to its lower latency compared to higher orbits.
•“low-latency network” refers to a network with latency below 70 milliseconds.
•“lunar mass driver” refers to a launch system that we intend to build on the Moon’s surface that will be
designed to use electromagnetic acceleration to propel payloads into space without the use of rockets.
•“Macrohard” refers to a platform we are currently developing that is designed to emulate digital workflows,
augment human operation of computers, and create a fully AI-operated software company.
•“mass to orbit” refers to the total kilograms of payload deployed to orbit in a given period, and is a key indicator
of our capacity and scalability that supports Space revenue and drives expansion across our Connectivity and AI
segments.
•“MAU” (or monthly active users) refers to the total number of users who have interacted with Grok or X
through web browsers or mobile applications at least once during the 30-day period ending on the date of
measurement (“active users”). In presenting combined MAUs across the two platforms, we seek to identify and
account for users who access both Grok and X based on sign-in traffic so that such users are not double-counted
vii
when measuring MAU. Furthermore, only users who have registered for an X or Grok account are included.
While we believe our methodologies provide a reasonable approximation of MAU based on the number of
unique users, they may not fully capture all instances of duplication, and our reported MAU should be viewed
as an estimate of unique users across our Grok and X platforms for the applicable period. We track the subset of
users who used Grok’s AI features and those who have not based on the source of their server requests.
•“Mbps” refers to megabits per second.
•“Megapack” refers to a containerized, utility-scale lithium-ion battery energy storage system produced by Tesla
and designed to stabilize power grids, store renewable energy, and replace fossil fuel peaker plants.
•“megawatt” refers to one million watts.
•“Merlin” refers to the Merlin family of engines, which include vacuum and sea level variants and are fully
developed and produced by the Company.
•“microgravity” refers to very weak gravity, such as that experienced in orbiting spacecraft, which allows for
unique manufacturing processes like creating ultra-pure materials.
•“Mid-Earth Orbit” or “MEO” refers to an orbital region between approximately 2,000 km and 35,786 km above
Earth’s surface.
•“mission success rate” refers to the proportion of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy missions that achieve their
primary objectives. This term does not include Starship flight tests.
•“mobile network operators” or “MNOs” refers to the local entities of the companies that provide mobile phone
services to customers, with whom SpaceX partners to offer satellite-to-mobile connectivity. The term may also
include mobile virtual network operators, where applicable.
•“Mobile Satellite Service” refers to providing wireless voice, messaging, and data connectivity to, from, or
between mobile devices by using orbiting satellites rather than terrestrial cell towers.
•“Moore’s Law” refers to an observation, not a physical law, that the number of transistors on a microchip
doubles roughly every two years, leading to exponentially faster, smaller, and cheaper electronics.
•“orbital AI compute” refers to artificial intelligence computing infrastructure contemplated to be deployed in
space, consisting of satellite constellations that act as orbital data centers, harnessing solar energy for power and
leveraging the space environment for cooling. We expect to begin deploying our orbital AI compute satellites as
early as 2028.
•“payload” refers to the portion of a vehicle’s total mass that consists of the cargo, passengers, satellites, or other
mission-specific items being transported and that reaches the target orbit or destination. Payload is distinct from
total mass (also referred to as gross mass or initial mass) which is the entire weight of the vehicle, including the
payload, fuel / propellant, structure, engines, and any other items, at the start of a journey.
•“payload capacity to orbit” refers to a theoretical payload capacity that a particular launch vehicle is capable of
delivering to a specified orbit (e.g., LEO or GEO) or celestial body (e.g., Mars) under specific conditions, which
orbit is derived from advanced computer simulations and performance modelling that apply to particular
mission scenarios and trajectory assumptions. Actual payload capacity for a given mission may be different and
will vary depending on numerous mission parameters and operational factors, including mission-specific
trajectory requirements, atmospheric conditions, vehicle and payload configuration, risk profile, and applicable
regulatory or range-safety limitations.
•“Power Usage Effectiveness” refers to the global standard metric for data center efficiency, calculated as the
ratio of total facility power to IT equipment power.
viii
•“propellant” refers to the chemical substance or combination of substances consumed by a rocket engine to
produce thrust by generating high-velocity exhaust gases.
•“propulsive landing” refers to the process of landing a rocket or spacecraft using its engines to control descent
and achieve a soft, vertical touchdown.
•“radiative cooling” refers to a cooling method that dissipates heat by radiating it into space, often passively, and
is expected to be used in orbital AI compute infrastructure.
•“Raptor engines” refers to high-performance family of engines developed and produced by the Company, such
as those powering the Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage, designed for efficiency and reusability.
•“reflight” refers to the reuse of a flight-proven rocket booster or upper stage that has successfully completed a
prior space mission, and has been recovered, refurbished, and certified for subsequent launches.
•“return payload mass” refers to the theoretical payload mass that a particular spacecraft is capable of bringing
back to Earth from a specified orbit under specific conditions, which is derived from advanced computer
simulations and performance modelling that apply to particular mission scenarios and trajectory assumptions.
Actual payload that can be returned for a given mission may be different and will vary depending on numerous
mission parameters and operational factors, including mission-specific trajectory requirements, atmospheric
conditions, vehicle and payload configuration, risk profile, and applicable regulatory or range-safety limitations.
•“rideshare” refers to a type of space mission where multiple satellites or payloads from different customers are
launched together on a single rocket, sharing the cost.
•“satellite-to-mobile” refers to a service that provides global cellular connectivity directly to everyday
smartphones via satellites, supplementing terrestrial networks and eliminating mobile dead zones.
•“Service Line” refers to an individual instance of Starlink broadband internet service provisioned under a
subscription plan, generally associated with a specific Starlink User Terminal or group of terminals, and billed
according to Starlink’s service plans and terms of service. The number of Service Lines is distinct from the
number of unique devices, account holders, end users, or physical persons.
•“space economy” refers to economic activities related to the development, production, and operation of goods
and services that utilize or support space-based infrastructure and capabilities, including launch services,
satellite systems, and space-enabled technologies.
•“Space segment” refers to our Space segment, which includes our customer launch operations and offerings
such as Falcon, Dragon, and Starship.
•“SpaceX Bridge Loan” refers to the Bridge Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2026, by and among
the Company, as borrower, the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party
thereto and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as administrative agent and a lender.
•“SpaceX Credit Facility” refers to our Credit Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2025, by and among the
Company, as borrower, the guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party
thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, as amended by the First Amendment to Credit
Agreement and Waiver, dated as of March 2, 2026, by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto, and
the other L/C Issuers party thereto. In May 2026, the SpaceX Credit Facility was amended to increase the
borrowing capacity and extends the maturity date.
•“spectrum” refers to the range of electromagnetic frequencies used for wireless communication, with licensed
spectrum granting use for specific services.
•“Starlink” refers to our global Low-Earth Orbit satellite constellation and broadband network designed to
deliver high-speed, low-latency internet connectivity worldwide.
ix
•“Starlink Consumer Broadband” refers to a category of Starlink active users encompassing both individual
residential users (households and personal use) and small-to-medium-sized businesses.
•“Starlink Fixed Site” refers to a category of Starlink active users encompassing exclusively enterprise
businesses.
•“Starlink Kit” refers to a set of products needed to connect to the Starlink network, typically including a Starlink
User Terminal and accessories.
•“Starlink Mobile” refers to a service that provides cellular connectivity directly to everyday smartphones via
satellites, supplementing terrestrial networks and substantially reducing mobile dead zones.
•“Starlink Subscriber” refers to a unique Service Line that is directly assigned to a Starlink.com account
registered to a person or entity that does not have a direct, negotiated agreement with the Starlink sales team.
•“Starlink User Terminal” refers to a device developed by the Company that connects to the Starlink satellite
constellation to deliver high-speed, low-latency internet.
•“Starshield” refers to a secure satellite network designed specifically for government customers and national
security applications.
•“Starship” refers to a fully reusable, super heavy-lift launch vehicle. Starship can be used to describe the stacked
vehicle (booster and upper stage) or upper stage only. We expect Starship to commence payload delivery to
orbit in the second half of 2026.
•“Sun-synchronous orbit” refers to a type of polar orbit around a planet in which a satellite passes over any given
point of the planet’s surface at the same local mean solar time, allowing for consistent solar energy capture.
•“Super Heavy” refers to the reusable first-stage booster for the Starship launch vehicle, powered by 33 Raptor
engines.
•“SuperGrok” refers to our subscription-based Grok service that provides users with expanded access to Grok
models and related tools.
•“SuperGrok Heavy” refers to our subscription-based Grok service tier that provides users with expanded access
to Grok models and related tools, including higher usage limits relative to SuperGrok.
•“SuperGrok Lite” refers to our subscription-based Grok service tier that provides users with basic access to
Grok models and related tools.
•“supported accounts” refers to, when used in the context of our X platform and Grok, a human, bot or similar
account that logged into the X platform or Grok. The total number of supported accounts may include fake,
spam or bot accounts if they are active.
•“Tbps” refers to terabits per second.
•“Terafab” refers to a chip manufacturing initiative with a long-term goal of producing one terawatt of compute
hardware each year.
•“terawatt” refers to one trillion watts.
•“terawatt-scale” refers to infrastructure, systems, or facilities that are designed to generate, transmit, or consume
approximately one terawatt or more of electrical power capacity.
•“terrestrial AI compute” refers to artificial intelligence computing infrastructure located on Earth, such as data
centers and supercomputers, used for training and running AI models.
x
•“throughput” refers to the rate at which data or material can be processed or transferred, often referring to
network capacity or production output.
•“tokens” refers to the basic units of text or images processed and generated by an AI model, used to measure AI
workload, throughput, and computational output.
•“watt” is the International System of Units (SI) unit for measuring power, representing the rate of which energy
is transferred, used or generated.
•“X” refers to our real-time information, entertainment, and free speech platform that serves as a foundational
distribution and data engine for the AI ecosystem.
•“xAI” refers to X.AI Holdings LLC or, prior to the xAI Merger, X.AI Holdings Corp., together with its
subsidiaries, as applicable.
•“xAI Gov” refers to our offering that provides government customers with access to Grok models and related
tools for use in governmental applications, workflows, and services.
•“X Premium+” refers to our highest subscription tier for X.
Our Satellite Names
We use a “V” naming convention for our Starlink satellites (such as V1, V2 Mini, and V3). Although we use a
similar “V” naming convention for both our broadband and mobile satellite constellations, these are distinct systems.
Our broadband satellites are designed to deliver high-speed internet services to homes, businesses, and vehicles,
while our mobile satellites are designed to connect directly to cell phones from space. These constellations have
different performance requirements and technical specifications. Please see below the terms used for our satellites
throughout this prospectus:
•“V1 Mobile satellites” refers to our mobile satellites that provide light data, text messaging (SMS), and over-
the-top voice services (e.g., WhatsApp and FaceTime) to mobile devices. V1 Mobile satellites are currently in
orbit and are launched on our Falcon rockets.
•“V2 Mini satellites” refers to our current broadband satellites that provide high-speed internet to homes,
businesses, and vehicles. V2 Mini satellites are currently in orbit and are launched on our Falcon rockets.
•“V2 Mobile satellites” refers to our next-generation mobile satellites, which are designed to provide more
comprehensive satellite-to-mobile services, including broadband data and IoT connectivity and which we expect
to begin deploying on Starship in 2027.
•“V3 satellites” refers to our next-generation Starlink broadband satellites, which are designed to offer one Tbps
of downlink capacity per satellite and which we expect to begin deploying on Starship in the second half of
2026.
1
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and
does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our Class A common stock. You
should read this entire prospectus carefully before making an investment decision. You should carefully consider,
among other things, the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. Some of the statements in this summary constitute forward-looking statements. Please
carefully consider “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
“You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great—and that’s what being a space-faring
civilization is all about. It’s about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And
I can’t think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars.”
—Elon Musk
Our Mission
Our mission is to build the systems and technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary, to understand the true
nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars. To do this, we have formed the most
ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth with unmatched capabilities to rapidly
manufacture and launch space-based communications that connect the world, to harness the Sun to power a truth-
seeking artificial intelligence that advances scientific discovery, and ultimately to build a base on the Moon and
cities on other planets.
Overview
Founded in 2002, SpaceX is the only company building the integrated hardware and software infrastructure of the
future across space, connectivity, and AI. At our core, we are builders. We design, manufacture, launch, and operate
products and services built on cutting-edge technologies, including the world’s most advanced rockets and
spacecraft. We safely and reliably transport astronauts, satellites, and other payloads on missions that benefit life on
Earth. Since 2023, we have launched more than 80% of mass to orbit for the world each year with an over 99%
mission success rate with Falcon rockets. We also operate a high-speed, low-latency global broadband data and
communications network powered by approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth
Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers across 164 countries,
territories, and other markets, as of March 31, 2026. Using our dedicated satellite-to-mobile constellation, we offer
connectivity services, supplementing terrestrial networks and substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across
approximately 30 countries.
With the potential to improve both space exploration and life on Earth, AI accelerates SpaceX’s mission to make life
multiplanetary, to understand the true nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars.
xAI, which was founded in 2023 and acquired by SpaceX in early 2026, is now an integral pillar of our vertically
integrated company. We are rapidly constructing AI compute infrastructure—starting on Earth with the goal of
extending to space—at industry-leading pace and cost efficiency. Our infrastructure supports training and inference
for Grok, which has emerged as one of the world’s most advanced frontier models. Grok is designed as a truth-
seeking AI model, built on our founder Elon Musk’s mission to enable humanity to understand the universe. We
believe that accomplishing this mission requires a truth-seeking approach to AI. We define truth seeking as the
active, relentless pursuit of what is objectively true about reality, and grounded in evidence, logic, empirical data,
and first principles thinking. Our goal is to understand and explain what the universe appears to be doing, as
accurately as current knowledge allows. Within two years of its initial model release, Grok achieved frontier-level
performance in scientific reasoning, as measured by its GPQA Diamond score, an industry benchmark that evaluates
AI models on a standardized set of questions written and validated by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by
other leading model providers. Grok also benefits from integration with X, our real-time information, entertainment,
and free speech platform, which serves as a foundational distribution and data engine for our AI ecosystem and
further enhances Grok’s truth-seeking objective.
2
We believe that space represents the largest economic frontier in human history. Connectivity infrastructure in space
is designed to help everyone on Earth have access to education, healthcare, entertainment, and communications, and
to enable people to overcome many traditional limits, such as physical and political borders. We believe AI
infrastructure in space can utilize the virtually limitless power of the Sun and thereby enable the use of AI as a
transformative force for understanding the universe and improving the daily lives of all humans. We believe the
convergence of these areas will enable an unprecedented expansion in the global economy, leading to an age of
abundance. Our innovations and technological advancements are redefining industries on Earth, while we aim to
create new ones on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. We are truly building the infrastructure of the future.
•Space. SpaceX is the only company that has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, revolutionizing an
industry characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures.
SpaceX upended this paradigm through the application of first-principles thinking, which rejects industry
assumptions and builds solutions based on the fundamental laws of physics. Our intense, mission-driven,
engineering-first culture and focus on extreme vertical integration have propelled us to achieve what many
deemed impossible. We pioneered high-cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space with our Falcon family
of rockets. In 2015, we established at least a 10-year lead over the industry by successfully landing our first
Falcon 9 booster back from space before anyone else. Space flight that historically cost billions per launch now
costs in the tens of millions, fundamentally reducing the cost of space access and providing the opportunity to
build new enterprises in space.
•Connectivity. Since activating service for customers in 2020, Starlink has rapidly expanded global access to
high-speed internet, prioritizing underserved rural and remote communities worldwide. While building
terrestrial networks in such communities can be prohibitively expensive, Starlink is capable of delivering
broadband connectivity anywhere on Earth with just a Starlink Kit. As of March 31, 2026, we had
approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, operating the world’s most
advanced broadband constellation providing internet connectivity to approximately 10.3 million Starlink
Subscribers across 164 countries, territories, and other markets. In January 2024, we also began deploying our
Starlink Mobile constellation that utilizes separate Starlink satellites with satellite-to-mobile capabilities,
substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” around the world. As of March 31, 2026, our dedicated satellite-to-
mobile constellation of approximately 650 V1 Mobile satellites provides satellite-to-mobile data, over-the-top
voice, and messaging services to approximately 7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30
countries.
•AI. We were the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. For complex reasoning
and agentic workloads, compute is directly correlated with the quality of intelligence and task completion speed.
In under two years, we have established a dual advantage in both cost efficiency and deployment speed at scale.
By owning the compute infrastructure and vertically integrating across the full AI stack, we can train and iterate
our frontier models at lower cost and higher velocity and accelerate development cycles. This eliminates
external bottlenecks and drives rapid, continuous improvements in model performance. We believe this
combination of our state-of-the-art AI compute infrastructure, our truth-seeking frontier model, and our access
to real-time data on X creates a significant strategic advantage. Our integrated AI platforms across Grok and X
have over 1.3 billion supported accounts active in the last twelve months ended March 31, 2026, including
approximately 550 million MAUs and generating approximately 350 million daily posts. Of our MAUs, we had
approximately 117 million MAUs that used Grok’s AI features as of March 31, 2026. Grok’s deep integration
with X enables freshness, relevance, and contextual awareness that we believe is a competitive differentiator.
This direct, real-time access to the information and human discourse on X enhances Grok’s truth-seeking
capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse viewpoints. As a result, we believe Grok
can deliver the most objective and relevant insights and best serve high-frequency, high-value use cases across
consumer and enterprise AI applications.
We have created distinct new markets across the space, connectivity, and AI industries by building the integrated
hardware and software infrastructure of the future and by combining our broad range of capabilities. For example,
SpaceX’s recent acquisition of xAI unites SpaceX’s launch capabilities and global connectivity network with xAI’s
AI development capabilities. Specifically, we believe SpaceX’s reusable rockets, scaled satellite manufacturing, and
operational expertise can enable the cost-effective and rapid deployment of massive AI compute satellite
3
constellations—with potentially millions of satellites—for orbital data centers. We believe these AI compute
satellites in Sun-synchronous orbit will be able to handle energy-intensive AI workloads, such as inference demand,
at far greater scale and efficiency than terrestrial alternatives, with Starlink providing low-latency, global
connectivity linking these orbital AI systems to people around the world and delivering real-time intelligence. We
expect to begin deploying our orbital AI compute satellites as early as 2028.
Our financial results reflect the strength of our operating model and our ability to create and scale multiple new
businesses:
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we generated revenue on a consolidated basis of $4,694 million,
loss from operations of $(1,943) million and Adjusted EBITDA of $1,127 million. In 2025, we generated
revenue on a consolidated basis of $18,674 million, loss from operations of $(2,589) million and Adjusted
EBITDA of $6,584 million. Our Space and Connectivity segments contributed the substantial majority of our
consolidated revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
demonstrating the benefits of their scale and operating leverage in our vertically integrated business model;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Space segment generated revenue of $619 million, loss from
operations of $(662) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(351) million. In 2025, our Space segment
generated revenue of $4,086 million, loss from operations of $(657) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of
$653 million. Additionally, our Space segment funded $930 million and $3,004 million in research and
development expense during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
respectively, for our next-generation Starship launch vehicle program. Starship is designed to enable a step-
function change in our launch capability across reusability, payload capacity, and launch cadence, and is the key
enabler of our long-term growth strategy by unlocking entirely new categories of missions;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Connectivity segment generated revenue of $3,257 million,
income from operations of $1,188 million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $2,087 million. Our Connectivity
segment, primarily driven by Starlink, generated revenue of $11,387 million, income from operations of $4,423
million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $7,168 million in 2025, representing year-over-year growth of
49.8%, 120.4%, and 86.2%, respectively, benefiting from subscriber growth, increasing enterprise adoption, and
continued improvement in network efficiency;
•In our newly acquired AI segment, we plan to prioritize growth and investment to capture significant
opportunities in AI applications and compute infrastructure. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our AI
segment generated revenue of $818 million, loss from operations of $(2,469) million, and Segment Adjusted
EBITDA of $(609) million. In 2025, our AI segment generated revenue of $3,201 million, loss from operations
of $(6,355) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(1,237) million, reflecting its earlier stage of
development and continued investments to support long-term growth opportunities in AI; and
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, capital expenditures for our Space segment was $1,052 million, for
our Connectivity segment was $1,332 million and for our AI segment was $7,723 million. In 2025, capital
expenditures for our Space segment was $3,832 million, for our Connectivity segment was $4,178 million and
for our AI segment was $12,727 million.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional
information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations of Segment Adjusted EBITDA to
segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Why This Matters Now
For the entirety of its existence, human civilization has lived on a single celestial body: Earth. The current paradigm,
in which human civilization is confined to one planet, exposes humanity to existential threats that are unpredictable
and uncontrollable on a planetary scale. By moving beyond the only home we have ever known, we ensure species-
level redundancy and that the light of consciousness will not be tied to a single planet subject to the inevitable
hazards of a harsh and vast universe. We do not want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs. We want to give
4
them a reason to look ahead with excitement, with the prospect that we are entering an age of abundance with an
endlessly prosperous and exciting future.
For decades, a reality where humanity travels between the planets and the stars has felt tantalizingly close but still
locked in the pages and screens of science fiction. We are capable of better understanding the universe, exploring the
universe, and ultimately making life multiplanetary across the universe. We are becoming a civilization with the
ability to reach beyond Earth’s cradle and begin to inhabit other worlds. While we remain dedicated to this
fundamental mission, our progress in accessing space continues to yield opportunities that enrich life on Earth. For
example, by dramatically reducing the cost of access to space, we have been able to expand our mission to address
some of the Earth’s most pressing challenges, including bridging the digital divide by aiming to connect over three
billion unconnected people to the internet and humanity’s collective knowledge.
The rapid emergence of the AI era intensifies the urgency of our mission, as AI has the potential to accelerate not
only space exploration, but also transformative societal advancements on Earth. However, AI’s ability to
revolutionize human potential is directly dependent on meeting exponentially increasing resource demands. On
Earth, the massive expansion of data center capacity to support growing compute demand is significantly outpacing
electricity generation, which was effectively flat in the United States for approximately 15 years, growing at a
compound annual growth rate of 0.1% from 2008 to 2023. Despite the recent increase in electricity demand from AI
data centers, electricity generation in the United States has grown at an annual rate of less than 3% between 2023
and 2025, while electricity generation in China has grown at approximately twice that rate in the same time period.
This supply and demand imbalance is already imposing unsustainable strains on terrestrial power grids, supply
chains, and the environment. The Sun contains approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy and, as a result,
we believe it is the only truly scalable solution to terrestrial energy constraints in the age of AI. Harnessing this
energy in space is considerably more efficient than on land. Space-based solar arrays can generate more than five
times the energy per unit area of terrestrial solar due to continuous illumination, lack of atmospheric interference,
and optimal orientation. SpaceX is well-positioned to capture this space-based solar energy through our ability to
rapidly access Sun-synchronous orbit through our satellite manufacturing scale and launch capability. As a result,
we are expanding our footprint and harnessing the vast resources of space that are essential to sustaining
technological development. Our goal is to ensure that AI becomes a force for human flourishing and a benefit to
civilization, rather than a catalyst for terrestrial resource depletion and instability.
We believe that our current space efforts will catalyze transformative breakthroughs that could reshape terrestrial
industries and lead to the emergence of new trillion-dollar markets on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. In particular, we
believe our goal of establishing a lunar presence will enable terawatt-scale annual AI compute growth, support
deeper space exploration and industrialization, and serve as a stepping stone to establishing a civilization on Mars.
We believe the next paradigm shift for humanity is the creation of a resilient, perpetually expanding spacefaring
civilization that drives continuous innovation across new frontiers, ultimately propelling us to Kardashev Type II
status—we believe we are capable of unlocking an era of unprecedented economic expansion, while also
contributing to the safeguards of humanity’s future against existential risk.
Who We Are
SpaceX combines the most transformative and critical technologies in human history, including reusable rockets, a
fully global internet service, satellite-to-mobile communications, a real-time information, entertainment and free
speech platform, and a truth-seeking AI system designed to accelerate scientific discovery and augment human
capabilities.
Our Unparalleled Launch Capabilities
Since our founding in 2002, SpaceX has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, transforming an industry
characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures. We design,
manufacture, launch, and refurbish reusable launch vehicles that provide cost-efficient, reliable, and high-cadence
access to space for our own purposes as well as for third-party commercial and government customers. Our
extensive vertical integration and end-to-end control over the entire value chain, from design to launch to operations,
allows us to achieve unprecedented speed and cost efficiency.
5
As of March 31, 2026, SpaceX had launched a total mass to orbit of approximately 7,400 metric tons with an over
99% mission success rate across our Falcon rockets. We have completed approximately 650 orbital space launches,
and over 540 of those launches were completed by a flight-proven Falcon rocket. With the first successful launch of
Falcon 1 in 2008, we became the first private company to successfully launch a liquid-fueled rocket to Earth’s orbit.
In December 2015, we achieved what many deemed impossible: landing a rocket launched to space back on Earth.
By 2017, we were routinely recovering and reusing the Falcon 9 first-stage booster post-launch, delivering another
step-function drop in space access costs via groundbreaking reusability. As of March 31, 2026, our Falcon 9 rockets
have demonstrated the ability to refly a first-stage 34 times. With the future deployment of Starship, which is
designed to be the world’s first fully and rapidly reusable spacecraft, we aim to reduce the cost to reach orbit by 99%
or more relative to the historical average launch cost, establishing the most affordable and scalable path to creating
new opportunities in space, such as orbital AI compute and Mars exploration.
Our principal launch vehicles and spacecraft include:
•Falcon 9. As the world’s first orbital-class rapidly reusable rocket, Falcon 9 was first launched in 2010 and has
a payload capacity to LEO of approximately 23 metric tons when fully expendable. Falcon 9 has completed
approximately 620 orbital space launches as of March 31, 2026, and an over 99% mission success rate.
According to NASA, the first version of Falcon 9 in 2010 reduced launch cost to approximately $2,700 per
kilogram, approximately 85% less than the historical average launch cost of $18,500 per kilogram.
•Falcon Heavy. Falcon Heavy first launched in 2018 when it put a Tesla all-electric sports car (“Tesla
Roadster”) and its mannequin passenger, known as Starman, into orbit around the Sun. With a payload capacity
to LEO of approximately 64 metric tons, Falcon Heavy is a partially reusable super heavy-lift launch vehicle
designed to deliver large payloads to orbit. Falcon Heavy is one of the most powerful operational rockets in the
world measured by liftoff thrust, with 11 launches as of March 31, 2026 and a 100% mission success rate.
•Dragon. Launched by Falcon 9 in 2012, our Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial spacecraft to
deliver cargo to and from the International Space Station, an orbiting laboratory that serves as a research facility
and destination for human spaceflight, and, eight years later, the first privately built vehicle to fly humans to the
orbiting laboratory. Since 2020, our Dragon spacecraft has safely flown 78 crewmembers from 20 countries.
•Starship. First launched in 2023, Starship is designed to be a fully reusable, super heavy-lift launch vehicle.
Starship V3 is designed to deliver 100 metric tons to Earth’s orbit in a fully reusable configuration while
enabling rapid turnaround times akin to commercial aviation. Future generations of Starship are being designed
to double this payload capacity. To date, we have executed 11 Starship flight tests. We have also scheduled a
12th flight test, which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster, powered by the
next evolution of our Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad at Starbase. We expect Starship
to commence payload delivery to orbit in the second half of 2026. We have achieved innovative milestones
such as catching a booster using “chopstick” arms on the same tower it launched from. We expect this
capability will facilitate rapid refurbishment and reuse, allowing for multiple launches per day at reduced costs.
Upon achieving rocket reusability, we recognized the immense potential of our launch business to enable new
revenue streams. This led to the development of Starlink, our global satellite internet constellation, consisting of
thousands of LEO satellites designed to provide high-speed, low-latency broadband connectivity to underserved
areas worldwide. Although the concept of using satellites for global internet connectivity dates back decades,
technical challenges and the prohibitive cost of accessing space and deploying the satellites required for capacity and
global coverage historically rendered attempts to provide such connectivity economically unviable. Within three
years of our first satellite launch in 2019, we solved the technical and production challenges of the satellites, and
within five years, we had deployed the largest LEO constellation in existence. Today, Starlink is the sole low-
latency network available globally. By combining increasing launch cadence, expanding cargo capacity, and
declining unit costs—driven by rapid reusability—we have generated a compounding competitive advantage. This
not only fortifies our core business, but also provides vast new market opportunities uniquely enabled by space.
6
Our Leading Capabilities Across Space, Connectivity, and AI
Space. While our launch capabilities support our other businesses, such as Starlink Consumer Broadband and
Starlink Mobile, we also sell launches to third-party customers. We offer launch services to commercial, civil,
international and government customers through our reusable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets for satellite, cargo,
and crew missions. We are the primary launch provider for the U.S. government. In 2025, we launched 11 of 12
National Security Space Launch (“NSSL”) medium and heavy lift missions and all five U.S. crew and cargo
missions to the International Space Station for NASA.
Connectivity. Our Connectivity business includes Starlink Consumer Broadband, Enterprise Solutions, Government
Solutions, and Starlink Mobile.
•Starlink Consumer Broadband. We operate the world’s largest and most advanced space-based internet
broadband service. We provide fiber-like download speeds—at a median of 225 Mbps during peak hours for
residential users as of March 31, 2026—and the technological capability to provide service everywhere on
Earth, including the poles. This service quality is enabled by our vast network of approximately 9,600 Starlink
broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, which accounted for approximately 75% of all active
maneuverable satellites in orbit as of March 31, 2026. We expect to commence deploying our next-generation
V3 satellites, designed to offer one Tbps of downlink capacity per satellite, using Starship in the second half of
2026. We expect that a single Starship launch will be capable of deploying up to 60 V3 satellites to LEO,
representing a potential twenty-fold increase in Starlink downlink capacity deployed relative to a Falcon 9
launch.
•Enterprise Solutions. SpaceX is a critical partner to a wide array of enterprises. We offer Starlink’s high-
speed, low-latency, reliable internet services to enterprise customers across industries including construction,
agriculture, retail, telecom, hospitality, aviation, maritime, and land mobility. Starlink’s unique capabilities are
well‑suited for deployments across field offices, remote worksites, research stations, drilling rigs, rural
hospitals, aircraft, cruise ships, trains, and hotels. We also serve a broad fixed‑site customer base across
industries such as retail and financial services that require high availability for critical operations as well as
reliable connectivity in remote or hard-to-serve locations.
•Government Solutions. For our government customers, we provide high-speed, resilient connectivity for
public services, social impact, humanitarian efforts, and disaster response in even the most remote and
challenging environments. Separately with Starshield, we have leveraged our commercial LEO satellite
constellation engineering learnings and operational experiences to develop a secure, dedicated satellite network
designed specifically for United States Government customers and national security applications.
•Starlink Mobile. We provide satellite-to-mobile connectivity, supplementing terrestrial networks and
substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across approximately 30 countries. Through our partnerships with
approximately 30 MNOs on six continents, we enable consumers, businesses, and public-sector customers to
use their existing phones in more places, support critical connectivity during disasters and power outages, and
open new applications for low-bandwidth mobile and IoT devices.
AI. We operate a highly vertically integrated AI platform.
•AI Compute Infrastructure. xAI has established a leading position in building and scaling terrestrial AI
compute infrastructure, becoming the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. We
own and operate what we believe to be the largest AI training data center clusters on Earth, including
COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II. The addition of Terafab, a chip manufacturing initiative with Tesla and Intel,
aims to further extend our vertical integration to chip design and manufacturing to alleviate potential future chip
shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute performance, and potentially reduce overall compute costs. In
connection with such collaboration, we have agreed with Tesla on a general framework for the future
development of Terafab. Any specific projects undertaken pursuant to this framework will be subject to separate
negotiations and agreements (including any development timelines, milestones and capital expenditures) and
have not yet been determined. We believe that the key constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical—
7
chip manufacturing, data center infrastructure, and power generation; the future of AI will be determined by the
control of the physical stack.
•Truth-Seeking Frontier Model. Since launching Grok-1 in November 2023, we have released four major
versions and notable variations thereof, achieving one of the fastest iteration cycles in the industry. Within two
years of its initial model release, Grok achieved frontier-level performance in scientific reasoning, as measured
by its GPQA Diamond score, an industry benchmark that evaluates AI models on a standardized set of
questions written and validated by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by other leading model providers.
Building on this trajectory, we expect to continue scaling Grok through subsequent generations. Ongoing
training of next‑generation models is expected to scale toward multiple trillions of parameters, which could
represent a step change in reasoning in depth and overall intelligence. In this context, the number of parameters
refers to the scale of the model, where parameters are the internal numerical values, such as “weights,” that are
adjusted during training to enable the model to recognize patterns and relationships in data. A larger number of
parameters generally allows the model to capture more complex relationships, store greater amounts of
knowledge, and achieve higher levels of reasoning capability. This accelerated rate of innovation stems from
our highly vertically integrated stack: full ownership of training infrastructure; access to the world’s most
powerful compute clusters; and relentless focus on truth seeking and real-world utility. A key competitive
differentiator is Grok’s deep integration with X, enabling proprietary access to a real-time information stream of
approximately 350 million daily posts, which enhances freshness, relevance, and contextual awareness for
Grok. This direct, real-time access to the information and human discourse on X enhances Grok’s truth-seeking
capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse viewpoints.
•Consumer and Enterprise Applications. We leverage our leading frontier models and compute infrastructure
to deliver consumer and enterprise applications. Together with Tesla, we are also developing Macrohard, an
agentic AI platform designed to be capable of fully emulating digital workflows and augmenting human
operation of computers using sophisticated autonomous agents. We believe Macrohard will have the potential to
fundamentally transform how companies are structured and operate, thereby allowing dramatic increases in
human productivity.
Our Repeatable Business Model
Our business model is built on a repeatable, engineering-driven framework that combines our unparalleled launch
capabilities, extreme vertical integration, rapid iteration, and disciplined capital investment to create durable, large-
scale businesses. We execute this framework through the following core principles:
1.Leverage our unparalleled launch capabilities to enable massive scale;
2.Identify and create new trillion-dollar market opportunities;
3.Design a solution with world-class engineering and first-principles thinking;
4.Apply “The Algorithm” (make less dumb, delete, optimize, accelerate, automate);
5.Vertically integrate all the way to the end customer;
6.Continuously drive cost down and throughput up; and
7.Generate significant cash flow and reinvest in the future.
Our Engineering-First Culture
We are able to achieve transformative technological breakthroughs because we accept only the laws of physics as
the limiting factors to our work and mission. Our core approach is deeply rooted in first-principles thinking, which
rejects any preconceived notions or experience-based norms. We have a track record of achieving what many have
deemed impossible. Some of our industry-defining achievements and historic milestones include:
•The first private company to develop and launch a liquid-fuel rocket to reach orbit (2008);
•The first private company to successfully dock a private spacecraft with the International Space Station (2012);
•The first to successfully propulsively land (2015) and refly orbital-class rocket boosters (2017);
•The first to begin deploying a large-scale LEO broadband satellite constellation (2019);
•The first private company to transport astronauts to orbit, returning America’s ability to fly astronauts to and
from the International Space Station (2020);
8
•The first to manufacture consumer-grade phased-array user terminals at scale (2022);
•The first to deploy a large-scale LEO satellite-to-mobile constellation (2025);
•The first to build a gigawatt-scale AI training cluster and largest coherent supercomputer (2026);
•The first gigawatt-scale Megapack battery installation (2026); and
•The only company capable of building orbital AI compute at scale.
Our AI Compute Infrastructure Advantage and Growth Strategy
Why Compute Matters. We believe AI leadership will be defined by the ability to rapidly scale compute capacity to
support exponential usage growth and frontier intelligence. The training and inference demanded by advanced AI
models require substantial computational resources. Reasoning models introduced in 2024 demonstrated that
allocating more computational resources and giving models more time to process during inference directly leads to
higher-quality intelligence. In addition, compute infrastructure with end-to-end, cluster-level coherence through tight
integration across software and hardware systems enables more efficient, stable, and higher-fidelity training and
inference at scale—ultimately enhancing model intelligence and performance. Within inference, we expect
computationally-intensive reasoning, agentic, and multi-modal workloads will continue to grow as a portion of
overall usage. We therefore believe operators with superior model-to-compute integration—the ability to efficiently
support and allocate compute across both training and inference workloads—are best positioned to win the AI race.
Self-Reinforcing Network Effects Among Lower Cost Per Token, Model Quality, and User Adoption. AI systems
are ultimately constrained or differentiated by the cost, speed, and scale at which they can generate and process
tokens. A “token” represents the fundamental unit of data consumed and produced by modern AI models. This is
because lower cost per token enables more frequent model training, larger and more sophisticated models, longer
chains of processing for reasoning and agentic workloads, and significantly higher inference volumes at
economically viable prices. This dynamic directly impacts model quality, responsiveness, and accessibility, while
also determining the ability to serve the rising global demand across consumer, enterprise, and mission-critical AI
applications. This creates a self-reinforcing advantage in which lower token costs drive greater model quality and
user adoption, reinforcing AI leadership.
Cost of Compute is the Main Driver of Cost Per Token. The total cost per token is determined by the efficiency,
availability, and unit economics of the underlying compute and the cost of building and operating compute
infrastructure. Improvement in the cost of building and operating this compute infrastructure—whether through
lower data center construction cost, lower power infrastructure cost, shorter time to grid interconnection, or higher
cluster-level throughput—translates directly into lower cost per token. Accordingly, for a given level of intelligence,
we expect the long-term economics of AI companies to be driven by the ability to consistently deliver bleeding-edge
compute at the lowest possible cost per token. Put simply, we view cost per token as a function of three primary
inputs—the underlying AI model, the compute hardware, and energy, and we expect to have a competitive
advantage in the latter two cost components. We believe we have a pathway over time that will significantly reduce
compute hardware costs through continued vertical integration and development of proprietary chips, building on
our experience designing custom silicon for our Starlink satellites. We also expect that the marginal cost of energy
for our AI compute satellites will be minimal because our satellites are powered by solar arrays in space. By driving
the energy component to minimal levels and pursuing improvements in compute hardware cost, we believe we can
achieve a meaningfully lower overall cost per token in the future.
We Have a Dual Speed and Cost Advantage in Terrestrial AI Compute. We own and operate what we believe to be
the largest AI training data center clusters on Earth. Our AI compute facilities, COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II,
collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of compute power, with additional power capacity available for data
center operations. Our first-principles thinking enables us to build coherent compute at scale and at rapid speed with
lower costs than most other companies in the industry. In order to bring compute clusters online as fast as possible,
we employ a vertically integrated, nimble approach to construction. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS
online in 122 days, repurposing the shell of an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even
faster in 91 days. As an illustrative comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield
data center is approximately two years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency,
achieving data center construction costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on
a per megawatt basis.
9
We Believe Orbital AI Can Accelerate Time to Power and Reduce Token Costs. The Sun contains approximately
99.8% of the solar system’s energy and offers what we believe is the only truly scalable solution to the challenge of
accelerating demand for compute relative to terrestrial energy constraints. The logical path forward is to move
power-intensive AI workloads into orbit, where solar energy is near-constant and uninterrupted. With such
accessibility to energy, we believe that our launch business will enable us to consistently activate the highest
performing hardware before our competitors without such access, shrinking the timeline to useful tokens on
bleeding-edge hardware and sustaining our token cost advantage. We believe SpaceX is uniquely positioned to
deploy and operate data centers in orbit that can eventually achieve a lower cost than terrestrial data centers over
time due to our extreme vertically integrated approach across launch, satellite manufacturing at scale, network
connectivity, and terrestrial data center expertise.
We Believe We Are Well-Positioned to Deliver Orbital AI Compute. We believe orbital AI compute is an incredibly
difficult technical challenge that only we can solve at scale in the near term. We are the only company that has
already accomplished the key technical challenges associated with evolving connectivity satellites into AI compute
satellites. In our view, we are well-positioned to deliver a full-scale AI compute satellite constellation. Significant
work remains, but we are confident in our singular leadership position.
•We have unmatched satellite launch capabilities to enable deployment at scale. Deployment of 100
gigawatts per year via satellites carrying over 100 kilowatts of compute power per metric ton will require
thousands of launches per year and the transport of approximately one million metric tons to orbit annually. The
fully reusable nature of Starship positions us to be capable of launching this level of mass. Starlink Broadband
V1 and V2 Mini satellites have already demonstrated launch survivability and high reliability under vibration,
shock, g-loads, acoustic stress, and vacuum exposure, achieving 99.9% average uptime.
•We have already solved many of the significant technical hurdles to evolving connectivity satellites into
AI compute satellites. Through our leading expertise of connectivity satellites—including mass production,
deployment, network operations, and inter-satellite lasers and mesh connectivity—we have already solved the
hardest part in the development of AI compute satellites. Because AI compute satellites represent an evolution
of spacecraft engineering already demonstrated through Starlink, we believe development of AI compute
satellites will be easier for us than for anyone else. Our existing Starlink constellation is another crucial enabler
of orbital AI compute, as its global network allows data from our AI compute satellites to reach ground stations
anywhere on Earth.
•We will use our proven Starlink in-orbit technology to optimize our orbital AI compute. In order to
operate orbital AI compute satellites, we plan to build on our vast experience of operating approximately 9,600
Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit. In 2025 alone, Starlink satellites proactively
performed over 1,000 automated collision avoidance maneuvers per day guided by this technology to safely and
efficiently operate the constellation. This operating model gives us control over workload placement across
Earth and space while maintaining resilience through redundancy and fail safe systems. A high degree of
controllability will allow the satellite to be optimized for brightness mitigation, disposal, and other modes of
operation.
•We can manufacture our AI compute constellations at scale with rapid upgrade cycles. We have built one
of the largest satellite manufacturing operations in the world. Our vertically integrated approach with limited
reliance on third-party suppliers will be key to our mass-scaling efforts and should allow us to deploy the latest
AI processors. We believe SpaceX will be the first and only company to manufacture satellites at the scale of
automotive manufacturing.
•We are building chip manufacturing capabilities to scale our access to AI compute hardware. We
announced a collaboration with Tesla in March 2026 to build the Terafab initiative with a long-term goal of
producing one terawatt of compute hardware each year. In connection with such collaboration, we have agreed
with Tesla on a general framework for the future development of Terafab. Intel joined the project in April 2026
and is expected to contribute its expertise in designing, fabricating, and packaging ultra-high performance chips
to help Terafab scale. Any specific projects undertaken pursuant to this framework will be subject to separate
negotiations and agreements (including any development timelines, milestones and capital expenditures) and
10
have not yet been determined. With this internal manufacturing capability, we plan to alleviate potential future
chip shortages at SpaceX, especially as we develop orbital AI at scale, and design chips that are optimized for
the space environment.
•We can leverage our terrestrial experience to build and operate compute clusters and AI workloads at
scale. We believe our experience operating compute infrastructure on Earth provides the technical and
operational foundation to extend these capabilities into orbit. For example, we plan to subject compute hardware
to extensive pre-deployment testing on Earth to identify early life failures before launch to reduce in-orbit
disruption. For compute hardware that does fail, we plan to leverage existing Starlink fleet management
software to reallocate traffic to other satellites and prevent cluster-level downtime.
We Believe Our Infrastructure is a Distinct Advantage in Delivering Superior AI. We expect the combination of
competitive cost per token, our ability to deploy and operate data centers in orbit, and our strength in connectivity to
result in more scalable intelligence that is accessible globally at high speeds.
Our Strengths
•Global Leadership in Orbital Launch Services
•Unrivaled Satellite and Connectivity Platform across Design, Manufacturing, Deployment, and Operations
•Truth-Seeking AI Model Enhanced by Real-Time Data
•Extreme Vertical Integration Enabling High Velocity and Superior Cost Efficiency at Scale
•Unique Ability to Scale New Trillion-Dollar Markets Across Space, Connectivity, and AI
•Business Models that Are Incredibly Difficult to Replicate
•Mission-Driven Culture and World-Class Talent
Our Growth Strategies
Space
•Increase launch payload capacity
•Establish the lunar economy, including cargo transport, manufacturing, and energy production on the Moon
Connectivity
•Grow Starlink Broadband customers
•Expand our Starlink Mobile offering
•Increase the capacity of our constellations
AI
•Grow consumer AI platform monetization
•Grow X monetization
•Deepen enterprise and government adoption
•Increase the scale of our terrestrial power and AI compute infrastructure
•Deploy orbital AI compute at scale
•Design and manufacture our own chips
•Launch digital human augmentation
Future Markets
•Point-to-point terrestrial travel
•Space tourism
•In-orbit manufacturing
•Passenger and cargo transport to the Moon and Mars
•Energy production on the Moon and Mars
•Manufacturing capabilities on the Moon and Mars
•Asteroid mining
11
Our Market Opportunity
We believe we have identified the largest actionable total addressable market (“TAM”) in human history. We
estimate that our quantifiable TAM is $28.5 trillion, consisting of $370 billion in Space from space-enabled
solutions; $1.6 trillion in Connectivity across $870 billion in Starlink Broadband and $740 billion in Starlink Mobile
as well as additional opportunities in enterprise and government; $26.5 trillion in AI across $2.4 trillion in AI
infrastructure, $760 billion in consumer subscriptions, $600 billion in digital advertising, and $22.7 trillion in
enterprise applications. For illustrative purposes of sizing our addressable market opportunity, we exclude China and
Russia from our global estimates.
SpaceX’s Estimated TAM by Segment
Our Challenges
We face a number of challenges relating to our business and growth strategy and, ultimately, the achievement of our
mission to make life multiplanetary, understand the true nature of the universe, and extend the light of consciousness
to the stars. The pursuit of our mission drives our decision-making and forms the foundation of our business plan,
which is predicated on building, commercializing, and operating services and products at a scale that has not
previously been achieved. This objective requires us to develop and integrate complex and novel technologies,
develop new processes and infrastructure, and coordinate across multiple suppliers, contractors, regulators, and
stakeholders. Because we are attempting to execute at a scale for which there is no precedent, we face heightened
uncertainty with respect to design, engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and operational
performance. In particular, our ability to execute our growth strategy is highly dependent on the successful
development and scaling of Starship and the ability to increase our launch cadence, both of which are subject to
challenges and uncertainties inherent in the development and deployment of new and complex technologies.
Additionally, many of our initiatives described above under “Our Growth Strategies,” including those to develop
orbital AI compute at scale, manufacture AI chips at scale, establish a lunar economy, transport humans and cargo to
the Moon and Mars, and develop human augmentation systems, involve significant technical complexity, unproven
technologies or technologies that do not exist, and such initiatives may not achieve commercial viability. Many of
the innovative products and services described elsewhere in this prospectus may ultimately be unsuccessful and may
require great expense, innovations not yet achieved or technologies not yet developed. As a result, the timeline for
certain of our initiatives involving unproven or new innovations, including our goal of deploying 100 gigawatts of
12
annual compute power to orbit, the establishment of a lunar economy and interplanetary industrialization, and the
launch cadence required to achieve these goals may be difficult or impossible to determine. Our growth strategy may
take longer to execute than anticipated, and you may not realize a return on your investment within the timeframe
you anticipate, or at all.
In addition, a portion of our anticipated market opportunities is associated with industries described above under
“Future Markets.” Certain of these industries, such as space tourism and cargo transport to the Moon, are still
emerging. Others, including in-orbit manufacturing, passenger transport to the Moon, passenger and cargo transport
to Mars, energy production on the Moon and Mars, manufacturing capabilities on the Moon and Mars, and asteroid
mining, do not exist today. While we believe these industries will develop over time, the manner in which they
emerge, including the timing of commercialization, the scale and pace of adoption, and the applicable competitive,
technical, regulatory, geopolitical, and economic frameworks may differ materially from our current expectations.
Our Space, Connectivity, and AI segments are also subject to the following challenges and uncertainties, among
others.
•Space: Our growth strategy depends on our ability to increase our launch cadence and payload capacity, which
is dependent on the successful development of Starship at scale. Unexpected design modifications, supply chain
disruptions, anomalies, environmental issues, and other unforeseen technical challenges could result in delays or
failures to deploy Starship on our anticipated schedule, which would delay or impede our ability to achieve our
other business objectives, such as the deployment of our next-generation satellites, the expansion of our
satellite-to-mobile connectivity services, and deployment of in-orbit AI compute infrastructure.
•Connectivity: Our satellite connectivity, including our global satellite-to-mobile connectivity services under
Starlink Mobile, depend on access to radio frequency spectrum and authorizations from the Federal
Communications Commission (the “FCC”) in the United States and telecommunications regulators in other
countries. Acquiring the necessary authorizations can be a complex and time-consuming process. Without these
licenses and approvals, we cannot generally offer connectivity services in a given market. Spectrum access itself
is limited and highly regulated. Additionally, the growth of our connectivity services depends on our ability to
increase market awareness and acceptance of connectivity through Starlink across numerous international
markets, each with its unique challenges.
•AI: Our AI business is in a relatively early stage, it is being integrated into our organization, its business
strategy is still developing, and it will require significant capital expenditures to fund compute, infrastructure
and power generation, model training, and product development. Additionally, our AI business is subject to
challenges inherent in a nascent, highly competitive, capital intensive and rapidly changing industry. These
include the potential for disruptive technological change, evolving industry and regulatory standards, the
emergence of new and well-funded competitors, frequent new product and service introductions, and changing
customer demands.
Any number of these challenges, and others that may be currently unknown to us, could have a negative impact on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations. For a discussion of the challenges, risks, and limitations
that could harm our future prospects, please refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,”
“Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Recent Developments
Collaboration with Cursor
In April 2026, we entered into a compute and option agreement with Anysphere, Inc., doing business as Cursor, a
San Francisco-based private software company (“Cursor”), which we view as a compelling extension of our strategy
to vertically integrate compute infrastructure, models, and applications. Under the compute agreement, we will
provide Cursor with certain GPU cluster compute capacity and collaborate to improve existing models, including
Grok, and potentially to jointly develop AI models and related model-specific deliverables or products. With the
option agreement, we have the right, but not obligation, to acquire Cursor at a predetermined price or pay a fee. We
13
consider software development as a strategically important use case for AI given its combination of high-quality
structured data, rapid feedback cycles and frequent, mission-critical usage. AI-assisted coding workflows generate
context-rich, verifiable data that can enhance model training and performance, while also driving sustained inference
demand. The depth of Cursor’s integration with a high-frequency coding workflow generates valuable developer
interaction data, including coding generation prompts, iteration cycles, and software architecture decisions. We
expect that access to this data will enhance our model training and inference, including with respect to Grok.
Meanwhile, by providing access to our large-scale compute infrastructure, we believe we can help Cursor deliver
faster and higher quality user experiences. The collaboration with Cursor may also accelerate our AI strategy by
integrating our AI models more directly into developer workflows and expanding the distribution of our AI
capabilities through high-engagement software interfaces.
The consideration for the acquisition of Cursor, if any, after the closing of this offering would consist of shares of
our Class A common stock based on an implied equity value of Cursor of $60.0 billion, and the price of our Class A
common stock that equals the volume-weighted average closing price thereof over the seven consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition. If either (i) we decide to terminate the option agreement
or (ii) Cursor is eligible to and decides to terminate due to our material breach of the option agreement (subject to
notice and cure provisions), Cursor is entitled to a $1.5 billion termination fee under the option agreement and an
$8.5 billion deferred services fee under the compute agreement. These fees are payable in cash (or Class A common
stock, if this offering has not been consummated at the time the fees become payable). For more information about
our arrangement with Cursor, including our option to acquire the company, please refer to “Business—Collaboration
with Cursor” included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Compute Services Agreements with Third Parties
We believe our compute infrastructure and related strategy provides us with substantial flexibility in how we
allocate and monetize capacity. We have the ability to use compute resources to support our proprietary AI
applications (such as Grok 5, which is currently being trained at COLOSSUS II), while also providing access to
select compute capacity to third-party customers. For example, in May 2026, we entered into Cloud Services
Agreements with Anthropic PBC (“Anthropic”), an AI research and development public benefit corporation, with
respect to access to compute capacity across COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II. Pursuant to these agreements, the
customer has agreed to pay us $1.25 billion per month through May 2029, with capacity ramping in May and June
2026 at a reduced fee. The agreements may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ notice. The customer will
retain ownership and intellectual property rights in its content, AI models, and related data. This structure allows us
to monetize unused compute capacity in our infrastructure, while still permitting reallocation of the capacity for our
own internal initiatives if needed in the future. We have sufficient capacity to provide compute for our own AI
models, including support of our training and inference demands, and to satisfy the obligations under these
agreements. We expect to enter into additional similar services contracts. We believe this opportunity highlights the
increasing importance of large-scale, frontier-level AI infrastructure and positions us as a differentiated provider of
high-performance compute capacity to both internal and third-party AI workloads. We believe our dual monetization
strategy provides multiple pathways to generate returns on invested capital.
Founder, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of Our Board
Mr. Musk is our founder, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and the Chairman of our board.
Assuming a size as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and an initial public offering price of $
per share (the midpoint of the estimated price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), Mr. Musk will
hold approximately % of the voting power of our common stock (or % if the underwriters exercise
their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full) immediately after this offering through
his ownership of shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class B common
stock, which comprises approximately % of our Class B common stock. Under our charter, the holders of our
Class B common stock will have the right to elect a majority of our board (such directors, the “Class B Directors”),
for so long as any shares of Class B common stock remain outstanding. As the holder of a majority of our shares of
Class B common stock, Mr. Musk will be able to elect, remove or fill any vacancy among the Class B Directors. In
addition, for so long as he beneficially owns more than 50% of the voting power of our common stock, Mr. Musk
will control the voting power over the selection of our board. As a result, Mr. Musk will have the power to control
14
the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval, including election of all our directors, and to control our
business and affairs.
Our Controlled Company Status
We will be a controlled company as of the completion of this offering under Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas listing rules.
A controlled company is not required to have a majority of its board composed of independent directors or to
establish independent compensation and nominating committees. As a controlled company, we will remain subject
to rules that require us to have an audit committee composed entirely of independent directors.
Corporate Information
We were founded and incorporated as Space Exploration Technologies Corp., a Delaware corporation, on March 14,
2002 and reincorporated as a Texas corporation on February 14, 2024. Our principal executive offices are located at
1 Rocket Road, Starbase, Texas 78521. Our website address is www.spacex.com. Information contained on our
website or linked therein or otherwise connected thereto does not constitute part of nor is it incorporated by
reference into this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
15
Summary of Risk Factors
An investment in our Class A common stock involves risks and uncertainties. The following is a summary of the
principal factors that make an investment in our Class A common stock speculative or risky, all of which are more
fully described below in the section titled “Risk Factors.” This summary should be read in conjunction with the
“Risk Factors” section and should not be relied upon as an exhaustive summary.
•Any failure or delay in the development of Starship at scale or in achieving the required launch cadence,
reusability and capabilities thereafter would delay or limit our ability to execute our growth strategy, including
the deployment of next-generation satellites, global satellite-to-mobile connectivity, and orbital AI compute,
which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
•Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining or renewing required regulatory approvals and licenses
required for our space-related activities, including the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) launch
and reentry licenses, would materially delay or disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability to
execute our business strategy.
•Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining or renewing required communications licenses and
spectrum authorizations for our satellite connectivity services, including international and FCC satellite
spectrum licenses, could materially delay or disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability to
execute our business strategy.
•Our AI products and X platform are subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations that
are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and we could be required to make changes to our products
and business practices, and be exposed to monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, declines in user
growth or engagement, or loss of customers, or other harm to our AI products and X platform.
•Our business strategy depends on successfully designing, developing, and deploying our products and services,
as well as related platforms, infrastructure, and other strategic initiatives, at an unprecedented scale, which
presents significant execution, cost, and timing risks.
•We have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, launch delays and failures that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•Our satellites, launch vehicles, and other space-related technologies operate, and in the case of orbital AI
compute, will operate, in the harsh and unpredictable environment of space, exposing them to a wide and
unique range of space-related risks that could cause them to malfunction or fail, and any such malfunction or
failure could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•The continued proliferation of satellite constellations in Low-Earth Orbit, as well as the risk of collisions with
space debris or other spacecraft, could limit or impair our launch flexibility and satellite deployment, which
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•Interruptions in the operation of critical satellite network, ground station, launch, manufacturing, or spacecraft
or data center infrastructure could result in significant downtime, operational delays or loss of service, each of
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
•Manufacturing, testing and launching rockets, satellites, and spacecraft, including our efforts to reuse rockets
and spacecraft, involve inherent risks that could result in human injury or death, property damage and
environmental damage or other adverse environmental impacts due to accidents or equipment failures. Any such
events could result in substantial losses, including reputational harm and legal liability, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
•Although we are focused on the vertical integration of our businesses, we depend on third parties to
manufacture and supply certain key components necessary for the provision of our launch, connectivity, and AI
16
services, and any supply shortages or disruptions or failures in their performance could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•Our ability to scale our AI products relies on our terrestrial and orbital AI compute infrastructure, which
depends on the availability of power, AI processors, and other critical components, telecommunications
services, and any shortages or disruptions thereof would materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•We face intense competition in the markets in which we operate, and while we have historically outperformed
certain competitors in our Space and Connectivity segments, we may not continue to do so, which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
•The Company’s AI segment is recently formed, still being integrated, operates in a rapidly evolving industry
and is subject to integration, execution, competitive and operational risks.
•Adverse global macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions may negatively affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and future prospects.
•We depend on our ability to recruit and retain employees who have advanced engineering and technical skills,
and intense competition for such employees may increase costs and affect our ability to meet development and
production timelines.
•Any significant disruption in, or unauthorized access to, our computer and data systems or those of third parties
that we utilize in our operations could result in a loss or degradation of service, loss of trust in us and harm to
our business.
•The development and maintenance of the technologies and infrastructure necessary to support our current and
future operations will require significant capital expenditures, and if we are unable to generate sufficient cash
flow from operations or obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
•Our substantial level of indebtedness could materially adversely affect our financial condition.
•Our future revenue and operating results depend upon our ability to develop new technologies and respond to
changes in customer demands and industry standards in highly competitive markets, and if we are unable to do
so, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects may be materially and adversely
affected.
•The estimates of future market opportunity and forecasts of market growth, and our ability to capture such
markets, included in this prospectus may prove to be inaccurate.
•Many of our initiatives, including those to develop orbital AI compute at scale, manufacture AI chips at scale,
establish a lunar economy, develop human augmentation systems, and transport humans and cargo to the Moon
and Mars, involve significant technical complexity, unproven technologies, or technologies that do not exist or
may require significant advancement, and such initiatives may not achieve commercial viability.
•The global nature of our business poses risks with respect to unstable, malicious or arbitrary legal regimes and
authorities.
•Our bylaws place restrictions on the forum, venue and procedures for legal actions or proceedings initiated by
our shareholders, including certain requirements for mandatory arbitration. These provisions could limit our
shareholders’ ability to pursue certain claims and/or increase the cost of doing so and could also affect the
procedures, rights, and remedies available to our shareholders in such legal actions or proceedings.
•Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will serve as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer,
and Chairman of our board and control the election of our directors, and our dual class structure concentrates
voting control with Mr. Musk and other holders of our Class B common stock. This will limit or preclude your
ability to influence corporate matters and the election of our directors.
17
The Offering
Issuer ...................................................................... | Space Exploration Technologies Corp. |
Class A common stock offered by us ..................... | shares (or shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full). |
Class A common stock outstanding immediately after this offering ................................................ | shares (or shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full). |
Class B common stock outstanding immediately after this offering ................................................ | shares. |
Voting power of Class A common stock after giving effect to this offering ............................... | % (or % if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full). |
Voting power of Class B common stock after giving effect to this offering ............................... | % (or % if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full). |
Voting rights ........................................................... | Each share of Class A common stock will entitle its holder to one vote per share. Each share of Class B common stock will entitle its holder to 10 votes per share. Class A shareholders and Class B shareholders will vote together as a single class on all matters to be voted on by shareholders under our charter, except the holders of our Class B common stock will have the right to elect a majority of our board and have certain other voting rights as a class. Each share of Class B common stock will be convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of our Class A common stock. In addition, each share of Class B common stock will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon a Transfer (as defined in the charter) of that share of Class B common stock, whether or not for value, except for Permitted Transfers (as defined in the charter). Please refer to “Description of Capital Stock.” |
Use of proceeds ...................................................... | We expect to receive approximately $ of net proceeds from this offering (or $ if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full), based upon the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Please refer to “Underwriting.” We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to fund our growth strategy, including the expansion of our AI compute infrastructure, enhancements to our launch infrastructure and launch vehicles, increases in the scale and capacity of our satellite constellations, and any remaining amounts for general corporate purposes. Please refer to “Use of Proceeds” for a more complete description of the intended use of proceeds from this offering. |
18
Dividend policy ...................................................... | We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the growth of our business. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board and will depend upon then-existing conditions, including our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, investment opportunities, statutory restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, restrictions in our existing and any future debt agreements and other factors our board may deem relevant. Covenants under our Credit Agreements also restrict our ability to pay dividends, and we may enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends or make distributions in the future. |
Directed share program .......................................... | At our request, the underwriters have reserved percent of the shares of Class A common stock to be issued by the Company and offered by this prospectus for sale, at the initial public offering price, to employees of the Company and certain other designated individuals. If purchased by these persons, these shares of Class A common stock will not be subject to a lock-up restriction. The number of shares of Class A common stock available for sale to the general public will be reduced to the extent these individuals purchase such reserved shares of Class A common stock. Any reserved shares of Class A common stock that are not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as the other shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus. |
Controlled company ............................................... | Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will beneficially own a majority of the voting power of our common stock and the Class B common stock, which elects a majority of the board. As a result, we expect to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas corporate governance standards, and intend to rely on exemptions from certain of the corporate governance listing requirements. Please refer to “Management—Controlled Company Exemption” and “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” |
Risk factors ............................................................. | You should carefully read and consider the information set forth in the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 26, together with all of the other information set forth in this prospectus, before deciding whether to invest in our Class A common stock. |
Listing and trading symbol ..................................... | We have applied to list our Class A common stock on Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas under the symbol “SPCX.” |
The number of shares of our Class A and Class B common stock that will be outstanding after this offering is based
on shares of Class A common stock and shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of March
31, 2026, after giving effect to (i) the sale of shares of Class A common stock in this offering, (ii) the
Class C Reclassification (as defined below), and (iii) the Preferred Conversion (as defined below).
Unless otherwise noted, common stock outstanding after the offering and other information based thereon in this
prospectus does not reflect any of the following:
• shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase
additional shares from us;
• shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options granted
under the Equity Plans (as defined below) that were outstanding as of March 31, 2026 with a weighted-average
exercise price of $ per share;
19
• shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options granted
under the Equity Plans (as defined below) granted after March 31, 2026 with a weighted-average exercise price
of $ per share;
• shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the vesting and settlement of restricted stock units that
were outstanding as of March 31, 2026 under the Equity Plans (none of which will vest in connection with this
offering);
• shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the vesting and settlement of restricted stock units
granted after March 31, 2026 under the Equity Plans (none of which will vest in connection with this offering);
• shares of Class A common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2024 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “A&R 2024 Plan”), excluding shares subject to outstanding awards thereunder as described
above, which we plan to adopt in connection with this offering;
• shares of Class A common stock reserved for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2017 Equity
Stock Purchase Plan (the “A&R 2017 ESPP”), which we plan to adopt in connection with this offering; and
• shares of Class A common stock reserved for future issuance upon the conversion of shares of
Class B common stock on a one-for-one basis.
The term “Equity Plans” refers to our 2015 Plan, our A&R 2017 ESPP and our A&R 2024 Plan as well as (i) xAI’s
2023 Equity Incentive Plan, 2023 Incentive Plan and 2025 Equity Incentive Plan, each of which we assumed in the
xAI Merger and (ii) the 2017 Stock Plan, as amended, of Swarm Technologies, Inc. (“Swarm”), which we assumed
in our acquisition of Swarm in 2021.
The information in this prospectus also does not reflect:
•the payment of shares of Class A common stock and cash consideration which would occur upon
closing of our agreement with EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”) to purchase certain AWS-3, AWS-4, and H-
Block spectrum licenses pursuant to the License Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2025 (as
amended and restated on November 5, 2025), by and among SpaceX, Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1 and
EchoStar (the “Spectrum Transaction”), which transaction was approved by the FCC on May 12, 2026 and is
subject to other closing conditions prior to completion; and
•the issuance of shares of our Class A common stock if in the future our board determines to exercise our option
to acquire Cursor as such option is described under “Business—Collaboration with Cursor,” which, as an
example, assuming the volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock over the seven consecutive
trading days immediately preceding the closing of such acquisition were equal to the initial public offering price
of $ per share (which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus),
would equal approximately shares. The actual number of shares that may be issued will be
determined based on a future trading price and is subject to customary adjustments for reclassifications,
recapitalization, stock splits or any other similar event affecting the outstanding capital stock of Cursor or the
Company.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information contained in this prospectus assumes or gives effect to:
•the 2026 Stock Split;
•prior to the completion of this offering, pursuant to the terms of our certificate of formation in effect as a private
company prior to this offering, the reclassification of all of the outstanding shares of our Class C common stock
into an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock (the “Class C Reclassification”) and the
conversion of the outstanding shares of all our preferred stock into an aggregate of shares of our
Class A common stock and shares of our Class B common stock (the “Preferred Conversion”);
•the effectiveness of our charter and bylaws, which will become effective upon the completion of this offering;
20
•an initial public offering price of $ per share of Class A common stock (the midpoint of the price range
set forth on the cover of this prospectus);
•that the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock from
us; and
•no purchase of shares of Class A common stock in this offering by our directors, officers or existing
shareholders.
21
Summary Historical Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
The following table sets forth the summary historical consolidated financial and operating data for the periods and as
of the dates presented. The summary historical consolidated financial data as of March 31, 2026 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (except for pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock
attributable to common shareholders and weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic and diluted net
loss per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders) has been derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023
(except for pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders and
weighted average shares used in computing pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock
attributable to common shareholders) has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical consolidated financial and operating data presented below is
not indicative of the results to be expected for any future period, and the results for any interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal period.
The summary historical consolidated financial and operating data of SpaceX has been prepared to reflect the
retrospective combination of the companies for all periods presented to include the historical results of xAI, which
was acquired by SpaceX, effective February 2, 2026, and X Holdings, which was acquired by xAI, effective
March 28, 2025, because these transactions were between entities under common control.
The following information should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical consolidated financial data included in this section is not
intended to replace the consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Statements of Operations Data:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
(in millions, except per share data) | (unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenue ............................................. | $4,694 | $4,067 | $18,674 | $14,015 | $10,387 | ||||
Total costs and expenses ........... | 6,637 | 4,040 | 21,263 | 13,549 | 13,892 | ||||
Income (loss) from operations ........... | (1,943) | 27 | (2,589) | 466 | (3,505) | ||||
Net income (loss) .............................. | $(4,276) | $(528) | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | ||||
Net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders (1) | |||||||||
Basic .............................................. | $(1.27) | $(0.18) | $(1.69) | $0.01 | $(1.68) | ||||
Diluted ........................................... | $(1.27) | $(0.18) | $(1.69) | $0.00 | $(1.68) | ||||
Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share of common stock (1) | |||||||||
Basic .............................................. | 3,884 | 2,875 | 2,926 | 2,848 | 2,759 | ||||
Diluted ........................................... | 3,884 | 2,875 | 2,926 | 9,956 | 2,759 | ||||
__________________
(1)Please refer to Note 14, Earnings per Share to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus for an
explanation of our calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders.
22
The following table sets forth the computation of unaudited pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share of
common stock attributable to common shareholders for the period presented:
(in millions, except per share data) | Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 | Year Ended December 31, 2025 | |
Numerator: | |||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted ......................... | $(4,947) | $(4,937) | |
Pro forma adjustment to reverse the deemed dividend on SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, basic and diluted ................................................ | 565 | — | |
Pro Forma net loss attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted ........ | $(4,382) | $(4,937) | |
Denominator: | |||
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted ..................................................................................... | 3,884 | 2,926 | |
Pro forma adjustment to reflect the Preferred Conversion as if the conversion occurred on January 1, 2025, basic and diluted ................................................ | 6,723 | 6,723 | |
Weighted average shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted ...................................................................... | 10,607 | 9,649 | |
Pro forma net loss per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted (2) .......................................................................... | $(0.41) | $(0.51) |
__________________
(2)Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders and weighted-average number of
shares used in the computation of the per share amount gives effect to (i) the Preferred Conversion as if such conversion had occurred as of
January 1, 2025, (ii) the Class C Reclassification as if such reclassification had occurred as of January 1, 2025, and (iii) the effectiveness of
our charter, which will become effective upon the completion of this offering.
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
(in millions) | (unaudited) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities .......................................... | $1,047 | $727 | $6,785 | $5,776 | $4,520 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities .. | $(16,724) | $(4,170) | $(19,575) | $(10,796) | $(4,867) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities .......................................... | $7,125 | $354 | $26,350 | $11,830 | $422 | ||||
Capital Expenditures:
The following table presents our capital expenditures by segment:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
(in millions) | (unaudited) | ||||||||
Space .................................................. | $1,052 | $759 | $3,832 | $2,032 | $1,497 | ||||
Connectivity ....................................... | 1,332 | 814 | 4,178 | 3,498 | 2,455 | ||||
AI ........................................................ | 7,723 | 2,567 | 12,727 | 5,633 | 463 | ||||
Total Capital Expenditures ................. | $10,107 | $4,140 | $20,737 | $11,163 | $4,415 | ||||
23
Balance Sheet Data:
March 31, | December 31, | ||||
2026 | 2025 | 2024 | |||
(in millions) | (unaudited) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................................. | $15,852 | $24,747 | $11,385 | ||
Total current assets ......................................................................... | 29,732 | 30,952 | 16,108 | ||
Property, plant, and equipment, net ................................................ | 53,879 | 42,602 | 21,147 | ||
Total assets .................................................................................... | 102,094 | 92,079 | 57,062 | ||
Debt and finance leases, current .................................................... | 1,538 | 928 | 372 | ||
Total current liabilities ................................................................... | 24,436 | 21,400 | 11,791 | ||
Total liabilities ................................................................................ | 60,512 | 50,754 | 31,258 | ||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock ........................................ | 7,049 | 38,752 | 20,941 | ||
Total shareholders’ equity ............................................................. | 34,533 | 2,573 | 4,863 | ||
Segment Operating and Financial Data (unaudited)
Space:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
Mass to Orbit (in metric tons) (1) ........ | 556 | 450 | 2,213 | 1,699 | 1,210 | ||||
Launches (number) (1) ......................... | 40 | 38 | 170 | 138 | 98 | ||||
Segment income (loss) from operations (in millions) ................... | $(662) | $(70) | $(657) | $21 | $(1) | ||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) (2) ...................................... | $(351) | $224 | $653 | $1,154 | $997 | ||||
Connectivity:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
Starlink Subscribers (in millions) (1) ... | 10.3 | 5.0 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 2.3 | ||||
Starlink ARPU (dollars per month) (1) | $66 | $86 | $81 | $91 | $99 | ||||
Segment income from operations (in millions) .......................................... | $1,188 | $1,033 | $4,423 | $2,006 | $469 | ||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) (2) ...................................... | $2,087 | $1,618 | $7,168 | $3,849 | $1,602 | ||||
AI:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
Nameplate compute draw (in gigawatts) (1) .................................... | 1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0 | ||||
Segment loss from operations (in millions) .......................................... | $(2,469) | $(936) | $(6,355) | $(1,561) | $(3,973) | ||||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) (2) ...................................... | $(609) | $(112) | $(1,237) | $347 | $1,222 | ||||
______________
(1)Please refer to the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Key Business
Metrics” for additional information on our key business metrics.
(2)Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures,
including reconciliations of Segment Adjusted EBITDA to segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP
measure.
26
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and
uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information contained in this prospectus, including our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, before making a decision to invest in our Class A
common stock. The disclosures in this section reflect our beliefs and opinions as to factors that could materially and
adversely affect us in the future. We may not be able to accurately predict, control, or mitigate these risks.
References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a
representation as to whether or not such factors have or have not occurred in the past or their likelihood of
occurring in the future. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are
not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect us. Many of the risks and uncertainties that
could materially adversely affect us or our prospects are beyond our control or relate to portions of our business
strategy that have a lengthy time horizon or involve unprecedented ventures. This can make assessment of certain
risks more difficult and you should factor these uncertainties into your assessment of an investment in our Class A
common stock. If any of the following risks and uncertainties occur, the price of our Class A common stock could
decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
Any failure or delay in the development of Starship at scale or in achieving the required launch cadence,
reusability and capabilities thereafter would delay or limit our ability to execute our growth strategy, including
the deployment of next-generation satellites, global satellite-to-mobile connectivity, and orbital AI compute,
which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
If we are unable to successfully complete the development, testing, and deployment of Starship at scale in
accordance with our anticipated schedule, or at all, or if we are unable to achieve sufficient launch cadence,
reusability, and capability, our ability to execute our growth strategy (such as the deployment of our next-generation
V3 satellites, V2 satellite-to-mobile connectivity, and providing orbital AI compute infrastructure) would be
materially and adversely affected. The commercial deployment of Starship, particularly at scale, is subject to
substantial risks and uncertainties inherent in the development of new and complex technologies and systems.
Delays or challenges in the Starship program have in the past occurred, and may occur in the future due to a variety
of factors, including unforeseen technical challenges, supply chain disruptions, manufacturing difficulties, delays in
the development, construction or commissioning of launch and fueling infrastructure (such as launch pads, air
separation units and other propellant production systems), unavailability of such launch and fueling infrastructure
(including launch pads) in sufficient number and in operable condition (including as a result of mishaps), loss or
damage to the vehicle or other components, regulatory hurdles, or the need for additional design modifications. If we
are required to undertake unanticipated redesigns, conduct additional testing, replace lost vehicles or components, or
address operational setbacks, we may experience delays and incur significant additional costs, or be forced to
reallocate critical resources from other projects. If our launch pads are not available for an extended period of time
for any reason, we may not be able to achieve our development, testing and deployment goals. Such delays could
have cascading effects on our ability to achieve the scale we need to timely achieve future objectives. In addition, a
critical part of our growth strategy involves increasing our launch cadence, reusability and capability, including
increasing our payload per launch. This will require, among other things, the successful development and operation
of reusable launch vehicles, substantially increased access to raw materials and components like steel, fuel and
propellant, the construction of additional facilities and securing of additional launch sites or rights to additional
launches from existing sites, and navigating complex and evolving regulatory requirements and environmental and
technological issues as we seek to increase our launch cadence. Our rocket programs have historically required
substantial time and resources to reach the cadence and cost thresholds necessary for commercial viability, and the
development of Starship may face similar or greater challenges. Any significant delay in achieving key development
milestones, obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals or increasing and maintaining our launch cadence,
reusability, and capability would impede the expansion of our service offerings, defer anticipated revenue streams,
and negatively impact our growth trajectory and competitive positioning in rapidly evolving markets.
27
Our ability to execute our growth strategy is highly dependent on Starship. If we are unable to achieve the
commercial development, anticipated performance, launch cadence, or cost efficiencies associated with Starship
within expected timeframes, our ability to deploy next-generation V3 satellites, V2 Mobile satellites, and orbital AI
compute infrastructure at scale, reduce capital and operating costs (including cost per token), realize projected
revenue growth, and retain existing customers from these initiatives could be materially and adversely affected. This
includes our expectations with respect to completion of flight testing of Starship and commencement of payload
delivery to orbit. Our current operational rockets, including Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, are not capable of
deploying V3 satellites and V2 Mobile satellites.
In addition, our ability to pursue new initiatives and capture emerging business opportunities—particularly those
requiring high launch cadence, large payload capacity, or advanced in-space capabilities, such as lunar operations
and interplanetary missions—depends on the timely and successful deployment of Starship and achieving our
targeted launch cadence. Achieving our targeted launch cadence will require significant progress on several key
milestones and the continued investment of significant capital resources. These include: securing additional land and
developing high-rate launch sites and supporting infrastructure across multiple locations; scaling production of
Starship vehicles and Raptor engines; constructing propellant production facilities, including air separation units and
methane liquefaction plants co-located with launch sites; securing sufficient power supply; and obtaining the
necessary regulatory approvals, particularly from the FAA, to support a high launch cadence while addressing public
safety and environmental considerations. We face a number of material challenges and uncertainties in achieving
these milestones, such as achieving reliable high-cadence return-to-launch-site operations for the full vehicle stack,
developing durable reusable heat shields capable of withstanding repeated high-velocity reentries, ensuring rapid
refurbishment and high-rate reusability of engines and other vehicle components, managing public and regulatory
tolerance for anomalies during the transition to frequent operational flights, securing sufficient power for both
manufacturing and launch operations, and obtaining timely regulatory approvals from the FAA and other agencies.
Orbital refueling involves technical complexities associated with cryogenic propellant transfer in microgravity,
propellant settling, and boil-off management and is required for lunar and interplanetary objectives.
If Starship does not achieve full reusability or rapid turnaround, we may experience higher per-launch costs, slower
deployment timelines for our large-scale constellations (including our orbital AI compute program), delayed revenue
growth, and increased overall capital requirements, and our brand and reputation may suffer. AI compute satellites at
scale need full Starship reusability to be economically compelling. Without full reusability and rapid turnaround,
Starship would still be capable of enabling progress on our next-generation Starlink, direct-to-cell, initial lunar
objectives, and early AI compute satellite deployments, but such progress would be at a slower pace and higher cost.
Any inability to deliver Starship to market as planned could constrain our participation in new or expanding
addressable markets, limit our competitive differentiation, and hinder our efforts to attract and retain customers.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our objectives with respect to Starship within the expected
timeframes, if at all, or that delays or setbacks will not materially impact our strategic plans.
Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining or renewing required regulatory approvals and licenses
required for our space-related activities, including FAA launch and reentry licenses, would materially delay or
disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability to execute our business strategy.
Our launch services are subject to extensive regulation in the United States and internationally. We must secure and
maintain numerous governmental approvals to launch our rockets and conduct related launch and reentry activities.
Any failure or significant delay in obtaining required licenses and permits or failure to maintain them could disrupt
our operations, constrain our growth, and adversely affect our ability to serve our customers. Our plans to deploy
large-scale orbital infrastructure, including orbital AI compute systems, will require the operation of very large
satellite constellations, potentially numbering up to one million satellites. These plans will depend on obtaining a
wide range of domestic and international approvals, including spectrum authorizations, orbital debris mitigation
approvals, and coordination and authorization requirements relating to space situational awareness and international
regulatory regimes, and there can be no assurance that such approvals will be obtained on acceptable timelines,
terms, or at all.
We depend on timely approvals from the FAA to conduct our launch operations. If we do not receive FAA launch
licenses or related approvals on the schedules we anticipate or if we are subject to regulatory delays, we could be
28
forced to delay or cancel planned launches, which could cause missed customer commitments, increased costs, and
underutilization of our launch resources. Obtaining a launch license involves rigorous safety and environmental
reviews, and unforeseen issues in meeting these requirements or additional conditions imposed during the review
process could also impact our launch timelines. For example, current FAA regulations do not permit return-to-
launch-site reentries for Starship, requiring us to obtain a waiver from the FAA, which is not guaranteed and could
delay or restrict such operations. Following an anomaly, mishap, or failure, the FAA or other authorities may require
investigations, impose corrective actions, or restrict or delay our ability to conduct launch operations. We have in the
past been, and may in the future become, subject to such actions, impacting our ability to increase launch cadence.
The regulatory framework governing commercial launches may also evolve over time. The FAA or other authorities
could introduce new or more stringent requirements for launch licensing – for instance, heightened safety standards,
environmental mitigation measures, or other operational restrictions – that could require us to invest in new
technologies, adjust our procedures, or otherwise incur additional compliance burdens. Moreover, as the frequency
of our launches and industry activity overall continues to grow, the FAA’s resources may become strained, which
could lead to longer application processing times and other difficulties obtaining FAA licenses. Any significant
delay in receiving required FAA licenses, the imposition of onerous new licensing conditions, or failure to obtain an
approval for a key launch, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations,
and future prospects.
Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining or renewing required communications licenses and spectrum
authorizations for our satellite connectivity services, including international and FCC satellite spectrum licenses,
could materially delay or disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability to execute our business
strategy.
Our satellite connectivity services are subject to extensive regulation in the United States and internationally.
Obtaining and maintaining communications licenses and approvals from U.S. and foreign regulatory authorities is
critical to our connectivity services. Our satellite connectivity, including our global satellite-to-mobile connectivity
services under Starlink Mobile, depend on access to radio frequency spectrum and authorizations from the FCC in
the United States and telecommunications regulators in other countries. Without these licenses and approvals, we
generally cannot offer connectivity services in a given market. Acquiring the necessary authorizations can be a
complex and time-consuming process, often involving technical coordination, public-interest or national security
reviews, and cross-border considerations, including in certain jurisdictions where regulatory processes may be
influenced by protectionist policies or preferences. Spectrum access itself is limited and highly regulated. In
September 2025, we announced a definitive agreement with EchoStar to purchase its AWS-4 and H-block spectrum
licenses. The Spectrum Transaction was approved by the FCC on May 12, 2026 and is subject to other closing
conditions prior to completion. We expect the Spectrum Transaction to close in November 2027. There can be no
assurance that these conditions will be satisfied or waived in a timely manner, or at all. Even if the transaction is
completed, there can be no assurance that our purchase of licenses from EchoStar will be sufficient to meet our
growing need for spectrum licenses and we may be unable to find other parties to provide us with additional
spectrum licenses on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We may in the future pursue additional acquisitions, leases, or
other arrangements relating to spectrum rights in order to support the expansion of our connectivity services, and
there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into or complete any such transactions or arrangements on
acceptable terms, or at all. Any such future transactions or arrangements could require significant capital
commitments, ongoing payment obligations, and regulatory approvals. In addition, we must secure the global right
to use the spectrum acquired from EchoStar from a number of international telecommunications regulators in order
to make our V2 satellite-to-mobile services usable worldwide, and there can be no assurance that such authorizations
will be granted on acceptable terms, or at all. Moreover, our rights to use certain frequencies are coordinated through
the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) and are subject to international agreements to prevent harmful
interference. We must comply with ITU rules and coordination procedures, and changes in international spectrum
allocations or adverse decisions in global regulatory forums could also reduce the frequencies available to us or
attach conditions that degrade our network’s performance. Additionally, third parties have in the past, and may in
the future, obtain spectrum rights for the purpose of blocking market entry.
Regulatory regimes for communications services vary widely across different countries and are continuously
evolving. Each country may impose its own licensing conditions and operating requirements on satellite internet
29
providers – for example, mandates to partner with a local entity, to host certain infrastructure within its borders, or to
adhere to specific standards relating to data privacy and cybersecurity (including data localization) and, in some
cases, regulators may deny, delay or decline to grant authorization for us to operate or use our spectrum in their
jurisdiction at all. Regimes in certain of our target markets may also favor incumbent or legacy telecommunications
companies, which may impede, delay, or prevent our ability to enter such markets. Compliance with the different
requirements of applicable regulatory regimes can be challenging and costly, and any failure to comply with local
laws and regulations could lead to penalties or the loss of our authorization to operate in that region. Furthermore,
communications regulatory authorizations often require periodic renewal and ongoing compliance with conditions
such as deployment milestones, fee payments, and interference mitigation obligations. If we are unable to obtain,
retain, and renew the necessary spectrum rights and service licenses on acceptable terms in each of our target
markets, or if regulatory bodies significantly delay our authorizations or impose burdensome requirements, our
ability to expand and continue our connectivity services would be jeopardized, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Our AI products and X platform are subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations
regarding privacy, cybersecurity, data use, data combination, data protection, content, AI, competition, youth
protection, safety, consumer protection and notification, advertising, e-commerce, sanctions, export controls, and
other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and we
could be required to make changes to our products and business practices, and be exposed to monetary penalties,
increased cost of operations, declines in user growth or engagement, or loss of customers, or other harm to our
AI products and X platform.
Our AI products and X platform are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and abroad,
including privacy, cybersecurity, data use, data combination, data protection and personal information, the provision
of our services to younger users, biometrics, encryption, rights of publicity and related concepts, content, integrity,
intellectual property, advertising, marketing, distribution, data security, data retention and deletion, data localization
and storage, data disclosure, AI and machine learning, electronic contracts and other communications, competition,
protection of minors, consumer protection, sanctions, export controls, and notification, civil rights, accessibility,
product liability, e-commerce, taxation and online payment services, as well as contractual requirements imposed by
app stores, payment processors, and other partners. The introduction of new products or services, expansion of our
activities in certain jurisdictions, or other actions that we may take may subject us to additional laws, regulations, or
other government scrutiny and, in some cases, such laws, regulations, or government scrutiny may limit or delay our
ability to introduce new products or services or expand our activities in certain jurisdictions. Particularly, our
leadership position in various markets, especially in orbital launch services, could subject us to heightened
regulatory scrutiny under competition laws. In addition, these U.S. and foreign laws and regulations may impose
different obligations from each other. As a result of these laws, regulations, and requirements, we are exposed to the
risk of significant fines and penalties or other adverse consequences, such as changes to our products, services, or
business practices.
Our social media and AI-related activities expose us to a variety of risks related to harmful, misleading or illegal
content, accuracy, misinformation and deepfakes, bias, discrimination, toxicity, sycophancy, AI deception,
consumer protection and notification, products liability, intellectual property infringement or misappropriation,
defamation, data privacy, cybersecurity, and sanctions and export controls. Social media and AI are the subject of
increasing legislative and regulatory activity by various governmental and regulatory agencies in jurisdictions
around the world, which are applying, or are considering applying, platform moderation, intellectual property,
product liability, data privacy, age restrictions, data disclosure, cybersecurity, export controls, consumer protection,
or other existing laws and regulations or new general legal frameworks to AI (such as the EU’s AI Act, California’s
Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act and New York’s Responsible AI Safety and Education Act). In the United States,
an increasing amount of legislative and regulatory activity regarding AI is taking place at the state level. Various
other jurisdictions have enacted or are considering enacting regulations focused on AI. Restrictions under such laws
or regulations, if implemented, could increase the costs and burdens to our AI segment and its customers, delay or
halt deployment of new systems using our AI segment’s products, require us to modify, restrict, or discontinue
certain features (including less constrained modes), and reduce the number of new entrants and customers,
negatively impacting our AI segment’s business and financial results. If we do not adequately address concerns and
30
regulations relating to the responsible use of AI, public confidence in AI could be undermined, adoption of our AI
products and services could slow, and we may suffer reputational or financial harm.
Certain of our AI products, including Grok, offer features or modes designed to generate more candid, direct, or less
reserved or irreverent outputs, such as “Spicy” Imagine Mode and “Unhinged” Voice Mode. These features are
intended to provide users with greater flexibility and control in how they use our tools. Because these modes may be
more irreverent and harsher than our standard offerings, they present heightened risks, including reputational harm,
the generation of potentially explicit content and misinformation or deceptive outputs, potential nonconsensual or
exploitative imagery, intellectual property infringement, or content that could be viewed as exploitative, harmful,
harassing, abusive, or discriminatory. The availability of such features may also increase the risk of regulatory
scrutiny, enforcement actions, litigation, or claims of harm, as well as reputational damage, user or advertiser
backlash, or limitations on our ability to distribute or monetize our products in certain jurisdictions or through
certain partners.
In addition, various regulatory authorities and agencies around the world are actively investigating and making
inquiries relating to social media or the use of AI concerning a variety of matters, including investigations and
inquiries relating to harmful or illegal content, recommendations, advertising, and consumer protection and
notification, which have resulted in, and may in the future result in additional or further investigations and
proceedings being brought against us. Certain features that enable more user-directed or less constrained outputs
may increase the risk of regulatory scrutiny. For example, we are subject to investigations and inquiries from
regulators and law enforcement authorities in the United States and internationally concerning allegations that our
AI products were used to create nonconsensual explicit images or content representing children in sexualized
contexts, and similar matters. We are subject to ongoing litigation, including putative class action lawsuits, relating
to such allegations, and we may be subject to additional litigation in the future concerning these types of allegations.
These regulatory inquiries, including those related to misuse of our AI products, such as Grok, and those related to
the X platform, could expose us to additional investigations, proceedings, and litigation, regulatory sanctions
(including loss of access to certain markets, which has occurred in the past), liability and adverse publicity, any of
which would adversely affect our business.
For example, in February 2026, the Irish Data Protection Commission, our AI segment’s privacy regulator in
Europe, launched a large-scale inquiry to determine whether our AI segment has complied with its obligations under
the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). This inquiry involves the processing of
personal data of European Union data subjects, including children, using generative AI functionality associated with
the Grok model within the X platform. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission has undertaken an
inquiry into the chatbots of our AI segment and other major technology companies to understand how these
companies have evaluated the safety of their chatbots when acting as companions to children and teens. Regulatory
requirements applicable to online platforms and content moderation, and to AI systems, could require us to
implement costly compliance measures, restrict certain features or jurisdictions, or expose us to significant fines,
liability, penalties, or operational constraints. We are also subject to developer agreements and guidelines imposed
by third-party app stores, such as the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Failure to comply with these
agreements and guidelines, including those relating to content, could result in the suspension or removal of our
mobile applications from such app stores. Any such suspension or removal could materially limit our ability to
distribute our mobile applications, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Authorities around the world have adopted or are considering adopting a number of legislative and regulatory
proposals concerning data protection and privacy. Additionally, the increasing adoption of AI technologies, which
often rely on the collection of large amounts of data and use of such data to train, fine-tune or otherwise develop AI
models, has led data protection authorities around the world to consider and adopt new and evolving interpretations
of data protection laws, imposing specific obligations with respect to the processing of personal data, including
required notices, consents and opt-outs. Adverse legal rulings, legislation or regulations related to such data privacy
matters may result in fines and orders requiring that we change our practices, which could have an adverse effect on
how we provide services, and could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and future
prospects. These compliance obligations could also cause us to incur substantial costs or harm the quality and
operations of our products and services in ways that harm our business. Further, we are subject to evolving laws and
regulations that dictate whether, how, and under what circumstances we can transfer, receive or otherwise process
31
personal data. The validity of various data transfer mechanisms we currently rely upon remains subject to legal,
regulatory and political developments globally, which may require us to adapt our existing arrangements. Evolving
data protection laws and regulations such as the GDPR and ePrivacy Directive, and regulatory actions affecting our
AI segment may restrict or adversely affect the X platform’s advertising services, Grok’s development and training,
or the ability to offer certain products and services in certain jurisdictions.
We are also subject to tax laws, regulations, and policies of the U.S. federal, state, and local governments and of
comparable taxing authorities in foreign jurisdictions where we conduct business. Changes in tax laws or in their
interpretation or enforcement could result in fluctuations in our effective tax rate, exposure to new or additional tax
liabilities, or adversely affect our after-tax profitability or financial position. These U.S. federal and state, EU, and
other international laws and regulations, which in some cases can be enforced by private parties in addition to
government entities, are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change. As a result, the application,
interpretation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly
evolving industry in which we operate, and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. For example, regulatory or legislative actions
or litigation concerning the manner in which we display content to our users, moderate content, provide our services
to younger users, or are able to use data in various ways, including for advertising, have in the past and could in the
future adversely affect user growth and engagement, affect the manner in which we provide our services, or
adversely affect our financial results, including by imposing significant fines that increasingly may be calculated
based on global revenue. For example, the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023 and Australia’s Online Safety Amendment
(Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 impose risk mitigation and age-related requirements on certain online
platforms. These laws and regulations, as well as any associated claims, inquiries, or investigations or any
government actions, have led to, and may in the future lead to, unfavorable outcomes including increased
compliance costs, changes to our products, loss of revenue, delays or impediments in the development of new
products, negative publicity and reputational harm, increased operating costs, diversion of management time and
attention, and remedies that harm our business, including fines, damages, or orders that we modify or cease existing
business practices. In addition, our AI products and the X platform have historically been, and may continue to be,
subject to claims and investigations relating to misinformation and deepfakes, defamation, intellectual property
infringement or misappropriation, data privacy, cybersecurity, employment matters, advertising practices, and user
harms; defending such matters could be costly and divert management attention.
Our Starlink and other satellite services are subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and
regulations, particularly relating to data privacy, cybersecurity, and telecommunications.
Our Starlink and other satellite services are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and
abroad covering cybersecurity, privacy, data use, data combination, data protection, data security, data retention and
deletion, data localization and storage, and data disclosure to law enforcement agencies. As a satellite internet and
communications provider, we collect and otherwise process various kinds of data in connection with our services,
such as customer personal information, account registration information, device identifiers, network and
connectivity data, and government information. These laws and regulations govern how we handle such information,
and they may, among others, impose requirements relating to cybersecurity and privacy governance, data security
measures, data security breach notification, cross border data transfers, and customer consent obligations.
In particular, the California Consumer Privacy Act (as amended), the GDPR (and its equivalent in the United
Kingdom) and other data privacy laws and regulations impose stringent and burdensome requirements in connection
with the processing of personal information and include significant penalties for non-compliance. Additionally, as a
government contractor, we are also subject to the Department of War’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification
requirements, which requires companies that do business with the Department of War to, depending on the level of
scrutiny required, meet or exceed certain specified cybersecurity standards to be eligible for new contract awards.
Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and their application may
vary significantly across jurisdictions. Compliance may require us to modify our policies, procedures, and controls,
and increase our compliance costs and operational complexity. We may post public privacy policies and other
statements regarding our collection, storage, sharing and other processing of personal information, and any actual or
perceived failure to comply with such privacy policies and other statements, as well as the foregoing data privacy
32
and cybersecurity laws and regulations, may subject us to enforcement actions, investigations, litigation, reputational
harm or requirements to modify or cease our business practices.
Our business strategy depends on successfully designing, developing, and deploying our products and services, as
well as related platforms, infrastructure, and other strategic initiatives, at an unprecedented scale, which presents
significant execution, cost, and timing risks.
Our business plan, and ultimately, the achievement of our mission, is predicated on building, commercializing, and
operating products and services, as well as related infrastructure and strategic initiatives at a scale that has not
previously been achieved. This objective requires us to integrate complex technologies, develop new processes and
infrastructure, and coordinate across multiple suppliers, contractors, regulators, and stakeholders. Because we are
attempting to execute at a scale for which there is limited precedent, we face heightened uncertainty with respect to
design, engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and operational performance, which is further
heightened by the novel nature of the technologies underlying the products and services we intend to develop.
As a result, timelines for developing and deploying our products and services may be longer than we currently
anticipate, and we may encounter delays due to, among other things, technical challenges, including those resulting
from the nascent state of certain of our products and services, the unavailability or immaturity of key technologies,
supply chain constraints, energy shocks, including related price volatility, labor availability, permitting and
regulatory approvals, or the need to redesign or reengineer key components. In addition, the costs associated with
developing and deploying our products and services and related platforms, infrastructure and strategic initiatives at
scale may exceed our current estimates, including due to inflationary pressures, energy prices, unforeseen
engineering complexities, the cost of developing or licensing technologies that are not yet commercially available,
competitive dynamics, changes in scope, or the need for additional capital expenditures, contingency reserves or
working capital.
If we are unable to successfully execute our growth strategy on the anticipated timeline or within our expected cost
parameters, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Delays
or cost overruns could also impact our ability to achieve projected returns, meet contractual commitments, access
additional financing on acceptable terms, or maintain investor confidence. Moreover, even if we successfully deploy
our growth strategy, including Starship, Terafab, orbital AI, and the creation of the lunar economy, they may not
perform as expected at scale, which could result in operational inefficiencies, increased costs, reduced revenues, or
declines in our stock price.
We have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, launch delays and failures that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Launch vehicle underperformance, propulsion anomalies, structural failures, software errors, or other malfunctions
could result in launch delays or partial or total mission failures, including the loss of satellites or payloads. The
occurrence of mission failures or other significant operational disruptions could also expose us to litigation as well
as increased scrutiny from regulatory authorities, lead to the imposition of additional compliance requirements, and
adversely affect our brand and reputation, and our ability to obtain future licenses, permits, or government contracts.
We do not typically obtain insurance coverage for our satellites, payloads, or launch vehicles, and as a result we bear
the full financial cost of any such losses. Repeated anomalies or high visibility mission failures could also negatively
affect our brand, reputation, ability to win new business, and our customers’ ability to procure launch and in-orbit
insurance at competitive rates (to the extent we decide to pursue it). Such repeated anomalies or mission failures
could also result in, regulators delaying, conditioning or denying approvals, waivers or licenses required for future
launches or reentries, which could reduce our launch cadence and delay the deployment of our satellites and other
services. In the past, certain of our launch vehicles have experienced partial or total mission failures, including
anomalies that resulted in the loss of payloads and damage to launch vehicles. In certain circumstances, such
mission failures could result in, debris from our launch vehicles causing significant damage to persons or property
on the ground as well as environmental damage. There can be no assurance that similar or other failures will not
occur with future launches. In addition, satellites may be deployed into incorrect or suboptimal orbits due to vehicle
performance issues, separation events, or guidance, navigation and control errors. Incorrect orbital placement can
33
materially reduce a satellite’s operational life, impair performance, increase fuel consumption, or render the satellite
unusable.
Our satellites, launch vehicles, and other space-related technologies operate, and in the case of orbital AI
compute, will operate, in the harsh and unpredictable environment of space, exposing them to a wide and unique
range of space-related risks that could cause them to malfunction or fail, and any such malfunction or failure
could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Operating in space subjects our satellites, launch vehicles, spacecraft, and related systems to extreme and highly
variable conditions that can adversely affect performance, reduce useful life, or result in total mission failure. Space
is inherently hostile. Hardware must withstand: significant vibration and acoustic loads during launch; wide-ranging
thermal cycles; radiation from solar and cosmic sources; micrometeoroids and orbital debris; and other
environmental hazards, each of which testing cannot fully replicate. In particular, we have not, and no one else has,
previously operated or attempted to operate orbital AI compute, and the conditions of space on such AI
infrastructure have not been tested. Once deployed, orbital AI compute infrastructure will not be readily accessible,
and as a result, will not be easily repaired or upgraded, such that any component failures could result in permanent
capacity loss, accelerated depreciation, decommissioning or need for replacement of the infrastructure.
In addition, space weather events, such as geomagnetic storms, solar flares, and other forms of radiation activity,
have in the past disrupted and could in the future disrupt satellite propulsion, power systems, and communications
equipment, potentially leading to reduced performance or permanent damage. Although we incorporate certain
radiation-hardened components, shielding, and redundancy into our systems, these measures may not be sufficient to
prevent material adverse impacts in all scenarios. Failures or performance degradation resulting from these risks
could delay deployments, reduce available capacity, increase operating costs, require significant capital expenditures
to replace affected assets, or interrupt or degrade services provided to customers. Furthermore, the useful life of our
satellites is inherently shorter than that of the information technology systems and infrastructure they host. As a
result, we must periodically launch replacement satellites as existing satellites reach the end of their useful lives and
are decommissioned, which may truncate the effective lifespan of those underlying information technology systems
and infrastructure. Any such events could adversely affect our reputation, compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
The continued proliferation of satellite constellations in Low-Earth Orbit, as well as the risk of collisions with
space debris or other spacecraft, could limit or impair our launch flexibility and satellite deployment, which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
The continued proliferation of Low-Earth Orbit constellations can increase the risk of collisions with space debris or
other spacecraft if operators fail to adhere to responsible space safety, debris mitigation, or coordination practices.
Our growth strategy depends, in part, on continuing to launch additional satellites into Low-Earth Orbit. As the
number of satellites and other objects in Low-Earth Orbit continues to grow, the probability of accidental collisions,
fragmentation events, or other in-orbit incidents increases, which could result in the loss or degradation of our
satellites, increased costs for collision avoidance maneuvers, or the need to replace or reposition assets on an
accelerated schedule. Not all satellite operators or other space actors adhere to the same rigorous space safety, debris
mitigation, or coordination practices that we adhere to, which may increase the likelihood of congestion,
conjunctions, or other operational risks outside of our control and, in extreme cases, could contribute to
fragmentation events or cascading debris effects that further increase collision risks in Low-Earth Orbit.
In addition, some domestic and international authorities have applied heightened regulatory scrutiny as interest in
utilizing Low-Earth Orbit for satellite operations has increased. Debris mitigation regulations may emerge if
congestion increases. Failure to meet debris requirements could result in monetary penalties or loss of licensing
authority, which would adversely affect our satellite constellation deployment and expansion plans, and future
regulatory actions could impose more restrictive operational, deployment, or debris mitigation requirements that
could limit our ability to launch or operate satellites in Low-Earth Orbit. In addition, there is a burgeoning effort to
further regulate Low-Earth Orbit, MEO, and GSO and establish liability regimes for operators, including regimes
similar to those under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which imposes
strict liability for environmental contamination or remediation costs, as well as growing concern over the potential
34
environmental effects of emissions and other byproducts from rocket launches in Earth’s upper atmosphere.
Additional regulation in this area could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and
future prospects.
Furthermore, any damage to our satellites or impairment of their functionality resulting from collisions with space
debris or other spacecraft could materially and adversely affect our ability to deliver reliable services to our
customers, harm our reputation, and expose us to potential contractual liabilities or insurance claims. The growing
challenges associated with space debris management may require us to invest in additional technologies or processes
to safeguard our assets and maintain compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Interruptions in the operation of critical satellite network, ground station, launch, manufacturing, or spacecraft
or data center infrastructure could result in significant downtime, operational delays or loss of service, each of
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future
prospects.
Our ability to provide reliable services across our Space, Connectivity, and AI business segments depends on the
uninterrupted operation of our critical infrastructure, including but not limited to satellite and communications
networks, ground stations, launch facilities, and data centers. An interruption or failure affecting any aspect of this
infrastructure, whether due to equipment malfunctions, power outages, disruptions in, or unauthorized access to, our
computer systems (such as software or hardware failures, or cyberattacks), natural disasters (such as earthquakes,
floods, fires, or severe weather events), terrorism, war, sabotage, pandemics, epidemics, or other unforeseen
circumstances, could result in significant downtime, operational delays, or complete loss of service. Any such attack
could destroy or disable a significant number of our satellites and, depending on its scale, could trigger a cascading
collision event that renders our licensed orbits, and potentially other orbits, unusable for an extended period.
Similarly, the use of our satellites to enable communications access in conflict zones may expose us to retaliation
from foreign governments and non-state actors. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. These events may disrupt power, damage facilities,
interrupt service despite contingency plans or compromise our ability to deliver services to customers as promised,
hinder our ability to meet regulatory or contractual requirements, and erode trust among our customers, partners,
regulators and stakeholders. In particular, an interruption or failure affecting our critical infrastructure could result in
outages of service to our Starlink Subscribers. Any such outage could erode the trust of existing and potential
Starlink Subscribers in our service, which could result in the loss of existing or potential subscribers. In addition, the
complexity and interdependence of our engineering, manufacturing, assembly and terrestrial, space transportation,
and infrastructure systems mean that a disruption in one component can have cascading effects throughout our
operations. For example, an outage at a data center or ground station could impact command and control functions,
mission planning, or real-time telemetry, while interruptions at launch facilities could cause postponements or
cancellations of scheduled launches.
Adverse global macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions may negatively affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and future prospects.
Adverse global or regional economic and geopolitical conditions could reduce demand for certain of our products
and services, which may negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future
prospects. Economic downturns, inflation, higher interest rates, tighter credit conditions, reduced consumer
spending, lower business or government investment, or geopolitical developments may negatively affect demand for
our offerings. Reduced consumer or enterprise spending for each of our Starlink connectivity services or our AI-
related offerings would limit our ability to grow our business, which may slow the pace at which we deploy satellites
and expand our constellation or adversely affect the utilization of our launch capabilities.
35
Manufacturing, testing and launching rockets, satellites, and spacecraft, including our efforts to reuse rockets
and spacecraft, involve inherent risks that could result in human injury or death, property damage and
environmental damage or other adverse environmental impacts due to accidents or equipment failures. Any such
events could result in substantial losses, including reputational harm and legal liability, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
The manufacturing, testing, launching, and recovery of our rockets, satellites, and spacecraft are complex activities
that are conducted under challenging conditions and involve a high degree of risk. Our reusable vehicles will reenter
Earth’s atmosphere and fly over populated land for extended periods, which carries inherent risks to populations in
the event of failure, such as structural breakup, loss of control, or debris dispersal. Although we implement extensive
safety protocols and operational safeguards designed to protect personnel and the public, these protocols and
safeguards may not in all circumstances prevent exposure of our personnel and potentially members of the public to
hazards such as explosions, structural failures or debris dispersal. A manufacturing defect, testing anomaly, launch
failure, recovery incident, or similar event involving injury to humans, any human fatalities, property damage, or
environmental damage or other adverse environmental impacts could result in substantial losses, including
reputational harm and legal liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Although we are focused on the vertical integration of our businesses, we depend on third parties to manufacture
and supply certain key components necessary for the provision of our launch, connectivity, and AI services, and
any supply shortages or disruptions or failures in their performance could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Disruptions in the supply chain for essential raw materials or components, challenges in the supplier qualification
process, or increases in the prices of inputs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects. Despite our supply chain being largely vertically integrated, our reliance
on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for key components introduces risks related to supply chain continuity,
quality assurance, and vendor performance. We depend on both domestic and international suppliers for certain
specialized materials, components, and services that are essential to the production and operation of our launch
vehicles, spacecraft, satellites, user terminals (including Starlink consumer terminals), AI segment and related
infrastructure. Any failure or delay by these partners to deliver components in the required quantities, within
specifications, or on schedule has in the past and may in the future adversely affect our production schedules,
operational reliability, and our ability to meet contractual obligations. In addition, disruptions in the supply chain
due to shortages, quality issues, natural disasters, geopolitical events, labor disputes, pandemics, epidemics, tariffs or
trade restrictions, criminal activity (including terrorism, sabotage or cyberattacks) or other factors outside our
control could result in significant delays, increased costs, or an inability to deliver products and services to
customers in a timely and cost-effective manner. The process of qualifying new suppliers or transitioning to
alternative vendors can be time-consuming and may not be successful, further increasing our exposure to supply
chain interruptions. Furthermore, our limited pool of qualified vendors for certain critical products or services
exposes us to increased pricing pressures and quality risks. In particular, certain materials and products that are key
inputs in our Space, Connectivity, and AI segments are available from a limited number of suppliers, including sole
or limited-source suppliers, and our direct chip suppliers are dependent on a concentrated group of advanced
semiconductor fabrication facilities. For additional information regarding supply chain risk relating to our AI
processors, please see “Our ability to scale our AI products relies on our terrestrial and orbital AI compute
infrastructure, which depends on the availability of power, AI processors, and other critical components,
telecommunications services, and any shortages or disruptions thereof would materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.” The inability of these suppliers to deliver
necessary components of the products in a timely manner and at prices, quality levels, and volumes acceptable to us,
or interruptions in supply of materials or products on which these suppliers rely, could have an adverse effect on our
ability to meet customer demands and contractual obligations, execute on our growth strategy, or manage our
expenses or timelines as expected, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and future prospects.
36
Our ability to scale our AI products relies on our terrestrial and orbital AI compute infrastructure, which
depends on the availability of power, AI processors, and other critical components, telecommunications services,
and any shortages or disruptions thereof would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects.
Our ability to scale our data center infrastructure, which supports our AI segment, is increasingly constrained by the
availability of power at economically feasible prices, long lead times, availability of materials, and changing
regulatory requirements. For example, energy supply is constrained globally due to the significant increase in
demand for, and limited availability of, energy to power AI compute. Securing this capacity can involve entering
into complex, long-lead-time arrangements or proceeding with alternative sources of power generation. We
currently rely significantly on natural gas and gas turbine technology to power our data center operations. As such,
our ability to scale our infrastructure depends in part on our continued access to natural gas supply at economically
feasible prices, the availability of gas turbines and related equipment, and the maintenance of a regulatory
environment that permits and supports the use of natural gas for large-scale power generation. Our AI products also
rely on GPUs and other processors, servers, network equipment and other critical components sourced from third-
party suppliers for use in our data centers. Manufacturing and supply of servers and network equipment for our
technical infrastructure, particularly for GPUs and other specialized components, is limited to a small number of
qualified suppliers. We do not have any long-term or other material contractual arrangements with our direct chip
suppliers, instead procuring all of our GPUs on a purchase-order basis. Our direct chip suppliers are dependent on a
concentrated group of advanced semiconductor fabrication facilities, or “fabs.” Any disruption to our upstream
supply chain, including fab capacity constraints, manufacturing issues, shortages of raw materials such as silicon
wafers or rare earth elements, geopolitical tensions affecting fab operations, or natural disasters impacting key
fabrication regions, could limit our chip suppliers’ ability to fulfill our orders, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our ability to achieve orbital AI at scale
depends on our ability to access a sufficient number of AI chips, significantly more than are currently available to
us. While we expect to construct Terafab to address such supply constraints, Terafab may not be successful, in
which case we may not have other sources of sufficient AI chips to meet our orbital AI compute demands. While
Terafab is intended to expand our internal chip manufacturing capabilities and alleviate potential future AI chip
shortages at SpaceX, particularly as we pursue orbital AI at scale, we expect to continue sourcing a significant
portion of our compute hardware from third-party suppliers, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to
achieve our objectives with respect to Terafab within the expected timeframes, or at all. While we have a framework
agreement with Tesla, neither Tesla nor Intel are obligated to remain a part of the project, and we may not enter into
any such definitive agreements. Our AI segment also relies on services from third-party telecommunications
providers, including connectivity to the cloud, and internet bandwidth suppliers to provide uninterrupted and error-
free services through their networks. We may be unable to obtain AI processors or other necessary components or
telecommunications services at prices or volumes that are acceptable to us or in a timely manner. Our suppliers and
telecommunications and internet service providers also serve other customers, including certain of our competitors,
and such suppliers or providers may prioritize capacity for such other customers, increase prices on short notice,
require onerous prepayments, or reduce or delay deliveries to us. Any failure by our suppliers and service providers
to meet our cost, quality, volume, or delivery requirements, or any shortage or disruption in the supply of chips,
telecommunications services or other components required for our AI segment, could result in service disruption or
outages, delay critical data center or network infrastructure upgrades or expansions, impair our ability to train our AI
models and meet customer demand for our AI segment products and materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
We also rely on third-party cloud compute providers for a portion of the compute used for the X platform and may
from time to time rely on third-party data center providers, which exposes us to several risks that are beyond our
direct control, including vulnerability to outages, performance issues, and cyberattacks. We have non-cancellable,
multi-year capacity commitments to cloud compute providers, requiring payment regardless of usage. A termination
or lapse in service from third-party cloud compute and data center providers could expose us to service interruptions,
significant delays, and additional expenses to re-architect products for a different provider. Additionally, in the event
of nonperformance by us or our providers, or an industry downturn, we may incur liabilities, have excess capacity
that we cannot easily redeploy, and fail to receive payments from our counterparties or customers.
37
We face intense competition in the markets in which we operate, and while we have historically outperformed
certain competitors in our Space and Connectivity segments, we may not continue to do so, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
The markets in which we operate are rapidly evolving and intensely competitive, and we face competition from a
range of established and emerging companies, including large, well-capitalized technology companies and aerospace
firms, including foreign competitors. Some competitors are investing significant capital to develop and deploy
satellite constellations and related infrastructure that compete directly with our offerings, and companies based in
China and other jurisdictions may benefit from government support, favorable regulatory environments, or strategic
national prioritization.
Some of our current and potential competitors, particularly in our AI segment, have greater financial, technical,
manufacturing, or other resources than we do, and may devote more resources to the development and
commercialization of competing products and services. Competitors may adopt more aggressive pricing, secure
more favorable supplier or distribution arrangements, bundle services, form strategic alliances or otherwise take
actions that enhance their competitive position in ways that could adversely affect our business. In certain markets,
regulatory or geopolitical factors may result in preferential treatment for domestic competitors or otherwise limit our
ability to compete effectively.
Competition continues to intensify as new technologies are developed and new entrants emerge. While we have
historically outperformed certain competitors in aspects of our business, such as our Space and Connectivity
segments, there can be no assurance that we will maintain this position.
We depend on our ability to recruit and retain employees who have advanced engineering and technical skills,
and intense competition for such employees may increase costs and affect our ability to meet development and
production timelines.
We depend on our ability to recruit and retain employees who have advanced engineering and technical skills and, in
some cases, employees with the necessary national security clearances to perform under our government contracts or
win new business. These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource in the
foreseeable future. The current tight labor market has adversely impacted our ability to recruit qualified personnel,
including engineers, particularly with respect to our AI segment. Increased restrictions on the import or retention of
foreign labor may also increase demand for engineering personnel and adversely impact our ability to hire and retain
qualified personnel. Continued turnover may impact employee morale and create other challenges as we attempt to
scale our AI business. In addition, significant amounts of time and resources are required to train technical and other
personnel, and we have in the past lost and may in the future lose new employees to our competitors or other
companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. Our ability to recruit and
retain qualified employees depends on a number of things, including our ability to pay market compensation,
provide opportunities for advancement, and secure visa sponsorships and work permits for qualified international
candidates. If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of these employees, then our ability to maintain
our competitiveness and grow our business could be negatively affected. In addition, because of the highly technical
nature of our products and services, the loss of any significant number of our existing engineering personnel could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. A
significant portion of the talent pool for advanced engineering and technical roles is international, and changes in
immigration laws or policies in the jurisdictions in which we operate could limit our ability to hire and retain such
candidates and intensify competition for talent.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, investigations, and other regulatory proceedings which could be
costly, time-consuming, and divert management attention, materially adversely affecting our business.
From time to time, we have been and may in the future become involved in various legal proceedings relating to a
variety of matters, including intellectual property, commercial, regulatory, product liability, employment, personal
injury, class action, employee or contractor health and safety, environmental, whistleblower, securities and other
litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings, including tax
examinations. Additionally, our share price may be volatile and, in the past, companies that have experienced
38
volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities litigation, including class action litigation.
Such matters could be costly, time-consuming, and divert management’s attention from executing our strategic
initiatives and operating our business. The industries in which we operate have historically experienced significant
litigation and regulatory scrutiny, and with our public profile, expanding operations and the novel nature of some of
our offerings, including our AI solutions, we may face an increased risk of such actions. Litigation and regulatory
proceedings are inherently unpredictable. Any adverse judgments, settlements, or regulatory penalties could result in
substantial financial costs, reputational harm, and operational disruptions. Certain of our hardware products are new
and relatively unproven. If a product defect were to arise, especially one leading to product liability claims, the
resulting warranty and damage claims, together with any associated harm to our reputation, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. Even if we prevail in
these matters, the defense and resolution of litigation and regulatory proceedings may require significant resources
and management attention, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and future prospects. Additionally, the mere initiation of litigation or government inquiries, regardless of
the outcome, could negatively impact investor confidence and our stock price. As we continue to innovate and
pursue new commercial and government contracts, expand our product offerings, and enter new markets, the
likelihood of facing legal and regulatory challenges may increase, further exposing us to these risks. Please refer to
“Business—Legal Proceedings” and Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies, in our audited consolidated
financial statements and Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies in our unaudited consolidated financial
statements include elsewhere in this prospectus.
Any significant disruption in, or unauthorized access to, our computer and data systems or those of third parties
that we utilize in our operations could result in a loss or degradation of service, loss of trust in us and harm to
our business.
An operational disruption in, or unauthorized access to, our computer and data systems or those of third parties that
we utilize in our operations could compromise sensitive (including classified or otherwise government-controlled),
proprietary, confidential, or personal information, impede operations, and result in financial losses, legal liabilities,
reputational harm, and erosion of our competitive position in launch services, space-based internet, and mobile
phone services. Our business depends on the continuous and secure operation of our information technology systems
and infrastructure, including those that support our launch operations, manufacturing facilities, Starlink services,
government services, employee databases, and mission-critical communications. Our systems and infrastructure may
also be subject to cyberattacks, including sophisticated hacking attempts by nation-states, state-sponsored actors,
cybercriminals, or other malicious third parties, which could result in unauthorized access to, disruption of, or
degradation of our satellite systems, ground infrastructure, or data networks. Such disruptions or unauthorized
access, which may result from a wide variety of incidents or activities, including inadvertent compromises arising
from process, coding or human errors, cyberattacks, data breaches, exploitation of known or unknown software or
hardware vulnerabilities, malware, ransomware, credential harvesting, computer viruses, social engineering (such as
phishing), denial of service attacks, software or hardware failure, or other malicious or disruptive incidents or
activities—whether perpetrated by external actors, including nation-states, state-sponsored organizations, or
cybercriminal groups, insiders, or other threat actors, any of whom may see their efforts enhanced by the use of AI
—could lead to the theft, destruction, or unauthorized disclosure of sensitive (including classified or otherwise
government-controlled), proprietary, confidential or personal information, including technical data, customer or
partner information, and intellectual property, particularly because some of our products and services involve the
collection, storage, and processing of such data and information. Our development and deployment of AI models,
internal and third-party AI tools, and other AI applications expose us to increased and novel risks and
vulnerabilities, including prompt injection, hallucinations, errors, and other issues related to AI agents, as well as the
risk of compromise of valuable intellectual property including source code, model weights, and other assets. Certain
internal and external threat actors, such as nation-states, state-sponsored organizations, organized threat networks
and corporate espionage actors, among others have and will continue to sustain malicious activities for extended
periods and deploy significant resources to attempt, and in some cases succeed, at causing significant disruptions in,
or unauthorized access to, our computer systems or those of third parties that we utilize in our operations. Such
incidents have in the past and may in the future also disrupt or degrade our ability to design, produce, launch, or
manage our products and services, resulting in operational delays, violations of applicable data privacy and
39
cybersecurity laws and regulations, disruptions in, or unauthorized access to, our customers’ computer systems,
increased costs, loss of revenue, loss of trust, litigation or regulatory penalties.
As the scale, frequency, sophistication, or intensity of cyber and data privacy threats continue to evolve, and as our
reliance on interconnected systems and third-party vendors grows, we remain exposed to vulnerabilities despite our
efforts to implement security measures, monitoring, and incident response protocols. There can be no assurance that
our cybersecurity risk management processes, including our policies, procedures, and controls, will be effective in
promptly or effectively detecting, containing, or remediating cybersecurity attacks. Any significant security and data
breach or system failure could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations,
and future prospects, and could result in loss of trust among customers, regulators, government agencies, and
partners. Furthermore, our efforts to investigate, mitigate, contain, and remediate the harm caused by a significant
disruption in, or unauthorized access to, our computer and data systems or those of third parties that we utilize in our
operations may be costly and time-consuming and may not be successful, and we may make errors or fail to take
necessary actions. Remediation efforts, litigation, regulatory investigations, and compliance obligations (including
obligations to notify appropriate regulators and affected parties) arising from such incidents could require substantial
management attention and resources, and we rely on our own funds to cover such losses or liabilities. In addition,
rapid changes to U.S. and international cybersecurity and privacy laws and regulations have expanded regulatory
regimes and compliance requirements, and regulators continue to undertake enforcement actions in these areas. We
expect the regulatory environment to grow more complicated, which may increase our operational and compliance
expenditures, as well as those of our suppliers. Moreover, some third parties we utilize in our operations may receive
or store information provided by us or by our customers. If these third parties fail to adopt or adhere to adequate data
privacy and security practices, or their systems or networks are breached in the manner described above, our data or
our customers’ data may be improperly accessed, used, or disclosed to unauthorized recipients, which could result in
financial losses, legal liabilities, reputational harm, and additional compliance obligations. We do not control the
privacy and cybersecurity measures put in place by such third parties, and any contractual protections with such
third parties, such as obligations to indemnify us, if any, may be ineffective or otherwise inadequate.
The development and maintenance of the technologies and infrastructure necessary to support our current and
future operations will require significant capital expenditures, and if we are unable to generate sufficient cash
flow from operations or obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
Our business requires substantial capital expenditures to design, develop, expand, and maintain our technologies and
infrastructure to support our operations. For example, we have incurred significant capital expenditures and expect
to increase our capital expenditures substantially in the future in connection with the design, development, and
deployment of our satellite constellations, launch vehicles, ground stations, manufacturing facilities, and programs,
including Terafab, AI compute infrastructure, data centers, and other supporting infrastructure. These expenditures
include, but are not limited to, costs associated with research and development, construction and expansion of
production capabilities, acquisition of property and equipment, and ongoing maintenance and upgrades to ensure
reliability and competitiveness. In particular, the development, testing, and deployment of Starship in accordance
with our anticipated schedule, as well as our pursuit of orbital AI, other space-related services, and lunar and
interplanetary missions, will require the investment of significant additional capital resources. In addition, we have
made and intend to continue to make substantial capital expenditures to support the growth of our AI products,
including costs related to obtaining third-party GPUs, manufacturing our own GPUs, and constructing, leasing,
maintaining, enhancing, and expanding our data centers. We may choose to increase or accelerate the pace of any of
these investments at any time, which could result in periods of reduced profitability or increased losses as we
prioritize long-term growth over near-term financial performance. Many of the products and services that are
important for our growth prospects are novel and untested, and therefore our estimates of capital expenditures may
prove to be inaccurate.
If we raise additional capital through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our shareholders
could suffer significant dilution and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges
superior to those of holders of our Class A common stock. The agreements governing our indebtedness contain
various restrictive covenants and any additional debt financing secured by us in the future could involve restrictive
covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which could limit our
40
operational flexibility and make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business
opportunities. Our ability to access the capital markets or secure other sources of financing may be adversely
affected by factors beyond our control, including fluctuations in market conditions, changes in investor sentiment,
increases in interest rates, or adverse events affecting the broader industry or economy.
Our substantial level of indebtedness could materially adversely affect our financial condition.
We have significant indebtedness that could materially adversely affect our business by increasing our vulnerability
to general adverse economic and industry conditions; requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund
operations, our growth strategy, product development and strategic initiatives; limiting our flexibility in planning
for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and exposing us to the risk of
increased interest rates as our borrowings are, and may in the future be, at variable interest rates. As of March 31,
2026, we had total principal indebtedness outstanding of $29,132 million. Our substantial indebtedness may also
adversely affect our credit ratings or outlook, which may increase our cost of capital, limit our access to financing,
and impair our ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, or at all. The occurrence of any one of
these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and
ability to satisfy our obligations under the agreements governing our indebtedness. If we fail to comply with the
terms of our debt agreements, our lenders could declare a default and accelerate our repayment obligations, which
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Our future revenue and operating results depend upon our ability to develop new technologies and respond to
changes in customer demands and industry standards in highly competitive markets, and if we are unable to do
so, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects may be materially and adversely
affected.
Our future revenue growth and operating results are highly dependent on our ability to design, develop and
successfully commercialize new and innovative technologies, products, and services on a timely and cost-effective
basis. The markets in which we operate are characterized by rapid and disruptive technological change, evolving
industry standards, the emergence of new and well-funded competitors, frequent new product and service
introductions, changing customer demands and regulatory changes. In addition, we may expand into new markets,
which may lead to similar or additional challenges that we cannot foresee and may require novel innovations to
navigate or overcome. As a result, we may from time to time rapidly adjust, modify or change our strategic
priorities, capital allocation, product or service focus or operational initiatives across our business in response to
these other changes or new markets. In particular, the AI industry is nascent, highly competitive, capital intensive
and rapidly changing. There are a number of companies today that develop or may develop products or services that
compete with our AI segment, and new competitors may emerge over time. Some of our current or potential
competitors in the AI market are large technology companies that have significant financial, technical and marketing
resources, and in some cases greater access to data, and others are smaller specialized companies that possess
specialized expertise and may have greater flexibility than we do. We also have a limited number of customers for
our AI products when compared to certain of our competitors. Current and potential competitors have established, or
may in the future establish, cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability
of their AI technologies to address the needs of current and prospective users of our AI products. Furthermore,
current or prospective users may decide to develop competing products for particular use cases or to establish
strategic relationships with our competitors for such use cases. Current and potential competitors and bad actors,
may also attempt to reverse engineer or otherwise replicate our AI technology, including through model extraction
or distillation techniques. Increased competition with our AI products could result in price reductions, revenue
shortfalls, loss of customers and loss of market share, which may harm our business, financial condition results of
operations and future prospects.
In our Connectivity segment, including Starlink broadband and Starlink Mobile, we face competition from terrestrial
fixed network providers, mobile network operators, and other satellite providers, and our services may be less
competitive in certain markets, including dense urban areas where terrestrial fiber and wireless networks may offer
higher capacity, lower cost, or more consistent performance. In addition, our Starlink Mobile offering operates in a
highly competitive and evolving market, and may be affected by the pace of technological development, spectrum
41
availability, and the success of our partnerships with mobile carriers. In addition, the X platform faces intense
competition from social media, messaging and media companies and traditional media outlets, such as television,
radio and print, for advertising budgets. Advertisers generally do not have long-term commitments to the X platform
and may reduce or discontinue their advertising spending for a variety of reasons outside our control. We are
expending resources to improve the X platform and improve its attractiveness to users and advertisers. While we
have introduced new user interface enhancements, algorithm updates, and other product features, improvements to
the X platform, introducing new products and services on the X platform and other initiatives may be costly and
difficult to implement, and we cannot be sure that they will be positively received by users, content creators, or
advertisers, or provide positive returns on our investment. Losing users who migrate to other platforms may
negatively impact our potential subscription or advertising revenue. Additionally, if users do not continue to
contribute content and otherwise engage with the X platform, we are unable to provide users with valuable and
timely content, or if content that is considered to be problematic or offensive is made available on the X platform,
the size of the X platform’s user base and their engagement may decline, leading to a decline in monetizable usage
and the loss of potential subscription revenue from such users, and the X platform may experience brand or
reputational harm. A decline in users on the X platform, or the volume or quality of their content on the X platform,
could also impact the ongoing development of our AI product, which in part utilizes data and user-generated content
from the X platform. We plan to publicly launch the Money product on the X platform (the “Money Product”);
however, we are competing against large, established companies with significantly greater resources and market
presence than us. If we are unable to anticipate technological trends, respond to technological advancements or
changing customer demands, or successfully develop and commercialize new or enhanced offerings, we may be
unable to establish or maintain a meaningful market position and our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
The estimates of future market opportunity and forecasts of market growth, and our ability to capture such
markets, included in this prospectus may prove to be inaccurate.
Our estimates for the total addressable market for our Space, Connectivity and AI businesses, as well as estimates
regarding the growth of AI and its impacts, contained elsewhere in this prospectus are based on a number of internal
and third-party estimates. For example, our estimates of market opportunity for our Space, Connectivity and AI
businesses rely in part on third-party data and a number of internal assumptions. With respect to our Space segment,
these estimates rely in part on estimates published by Novaspace regarding the size of the global market for space-
enabled solutions, including spacecraft manufacturing, launch services and related activities. Our connectivity
market estimates are based in part on estimates of the number of households, businesses, aircraft and maritime
vessels globally derived from third-party sources, together with assumptions regarding ARPU and monthly service
revenue derived from third-party industry data and our internal expectations regarding pricing, adoption rates and
service penetration across different geographic regions and economic environments. Our AI market estimates are
based in part on projections of global data center compute demand from third-party sources, including estimates
published by RAND Corporation, together with internal assumptions regarding the portion of global compute
capacity that may be utilized for AI workloads and other operational assumptions such as power usage, utilization
rates and pricing.
These estimates require us to make numerous assumptions and judgments regarding factors that are inherently
uncertain and subject to change, including the pace of technological development, future demand for launch,
connectivity and AI services, the rate of adoption of satellite connectivity and AI technologies, the availability and
cost of power and computing hardware, the evolution of regulatory frameworks, and broader macroeconomic
conditions.
While we believe our assumptions and the data underlying our estimates are reasonable, these assumptions and
estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time,
thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. As a result, our estimates of the total
addressable market for our services, as well as the expected growth rate for the total addressable market for our
services, may prove to be inaccurate.
42
Many of our initiatives, including those to develop orbital AI compute at scale, manufacture AI chips at scale,
establish a lunar economy, develop human augmentation systems, and transport humans and cargo to the Moon
and Mars, involve significant technical complexity, unproven technologies, or technologies that do not exist or
may require significant advancement, and such initiatives may not achieve commercial viability.
Our initiatives to develop orbital AI compute at scale, establish a lunar economy, develop human augmentation
systems, and transport humans and cargo to the Moon and Mars are in early stages of conception, design and
development and have not yet been proven at commercial scale, or at all, and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In
particular, the timeline for these initiatives, and the launch cadence required to achieve them may be difficult or
impossible to determine. These efforts require substantial and ongoing investments of financial, technical, and
human resources over extended time horizons, including, but not limited to, research and development, testing,
infrastructure, regulatory approvals, and mission execution. The technologies, systems, and operational capabilities
required for each of these initiatives involve significant technical complexity and are subject to design, engineering,
and performance risks, many of which may only become apparent as development and testing progress. Many of
these technologies, systems and operational capabilities are novel and untested, and we expect to incur significant
capital expenditures over a period of years before our AI products and services and other strategic initiatives,
including AI compute infrastructure and in-orbit, lunar, and interplanetary industrialization efforts, become
profitable, which may never occur. In addition, in-orbit refueling of Starship is essential to our lunar, Mars, asteroid
mining, and other deep space ambitions beyond geostationary Earth orbit. In-orbit refueling is complex, and we have
not yet demonstrated or attempted it. We may not be able to develop, commercialize, scale, or successfully
implement these or other strategic initiatives on the timelines we currently anticipate, or at all. Furthermore, the
viability of orbital AI compute depends in part on the cost advantages of solar energy relative to existing terrestrial
energy sources. To the extent that breakthrough developments in terrestrial energy access, such as advances in
nuclear energy, significantly reduce energy costs or alleviate infrastructure constraints, the viability of our orbital AI
compute infrastructure may be materially diminished. Even if our orbital AI compute infrastructure proves to be
commercially viable, a material slowdown in the growth of AI applications and related compute demand could result
in existing terrestrial data centers sufficiently meeting such demand, thereby reducing the need for our orbital AI
compute infrastructure. As a result, we may be required to devote financial, technical, human or other resources in
excess of our current expectations, and there can be no assurance that these investments will generate adequate
revenue, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Several of our anticipated market opportunities, including certain AI, orbital, lunar, and interplanetary
transportation and industrial activities, are still emerging and evolving or do not currently exist, and such
markets may not develop as we expect, or at all.
A portion of our anticipated market opportunities is associated with industries described in the section entitled
“Business—Future Markets.” Certain of these industries, such as space tourism, human augmentation, and cargo
transport to the Moon, are still emerging. Others, including in-orbit manufacturing, passenger transport to the Moon,
an established human presence or gateway hub on the Moon, passenger and cargo transport to Mars, energy
production on the Moon or Mars, manufacturing capabilities on the Moon or Mars, and asteroid mining do not exist
today. Any estimate we make regarding the size or timing of our anticipated market opportunities is inherently
uncertain and necessarily involves significant assumptions about future customer demand, adoption, technological
development, regulatory conditions and the emergence of a broader commercial market that does not currently exist.
While we believe these industries will develop over time, the manner in which they emerge, including the timing of
commercialization, the scale and pace of adoption, and the applicable technical, regulatory, geopolitical and
economic frameworks may differ materially from our current expectations. If these industries do not develop,
develop on slower timelines, at smaller scales, or under different economic or regulatory conditions than we
anticipate, this could require us to modify, delay, or abandon certain of our business plans, or cause such plans not to
develop at all, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations,
and future prospects.
43
The global nature of our business poses risks with respect to unstable, malicious or arbitrary legal regimes and
authorities.
We, particularly through Starlink, maintain global operations. As a result, we may face risks that our operations will
be subject to unstable, capricious, or malicious legal regimes and authorities. The increasing militarization of space
and the potential development of space-based warfare capabilities may expose our assets and operations to
heightened geopolitical and security risks, including the risk that foreign governments or other actors could target
our satellites or related infrastructure. Certain foreign governments have publicly discussed the potential use of anti-
satellite weapons against the Starlink constellation. These and other actions by foreign governments, whether
through military, regulatory or other means, may adversely affect our operations and assets. Even if we attempt to
comply with known local laws, our assets (both physical, intangible and financial) may be subject to seizure or other
expropriation. There is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain operations in any jurisdiction, and, if our assets
or properties are subject to seizure or other expropriation, there can be no assurances that we will be able to recover
our assets or properties. Any such legal or other governmental action could have an adverse effect on us. For
example, in August 2024, Starlink received an order from Brazil’s Supreme Court that froze Starlink’s Brazilian
financial assets and prevented Starlink from conducting financial transactions in Brazil (the “Brazil Asset Seizure”).
The action taken by the Brazilian Supreme Court arose out of purported violations of Brazilian law by X, which at
the time was not owned by us and was only affiliated with Mr. Musk. It is possible that we may be subject to actions
like the Brazil Asset Seizure in the future (whether in Brazil or another country) and, regardless of whether any such
action is consistent with local and international law, we may never recover assets seized in any similar action.
Additionally, actions that we take to minimize the impact of actions such as the Brazil Asset Seizure to our
customers, for example, by continuing to provide service without charge or otherwise altering payment processes
and methods to permit customers to maintain service, may have a material impact on our financial performance. As
evidenced by the Brazil Asset Seizure, we may be subject to adverse actions from governmental actors on the basis
of assumptions, facts or events that are not directly related to our operations and instead relate to the actions of our
directors, officers, or shareholders or operations of businesses that are affiliated with them.
Our services are subject to risks related to supplying services to the U.S. government.
Supplying services to the U.S. government subjects us to unique risks, including compliance with complex
regulations, vulnerability to changes in government priorities or funding levels, and exposure to contractual disputes
or audits. In 2025, approximately one-fifth of our revenue was attributable to agencies within the U.S. federal
government. As a contractor to various U.S. government agencies, we are subject to extensive federal procurement
regulations, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS), as well as other rules governing cost accounting, cybersecurity, ethics, and national security.
These regulations impose stringent requirements on our operations, business practices, and reporting, and
noncompliance could result in civil or criminal penalties, suspension or debarment from government contracting, or
loss of existing or future business. These requirements, although customary in U.S. government contracts, increase
our performance and compliance costs. These costs might increase in the future. For those reasons and in order to
achieve our orbital compute goals, we may prioritize our own launch payloads over additional U.S. government
contracts or third-party customers. This prioritization of launch capacity may limit revenue growth in our Space
segment, and impact our relationship with regulators, and could invite litigation from customers or competitors. In
addition, government contracts are susceptible to unilateral termination, reduction in scope, or delays at the
government’s convenience, which may occur due to shifting budgetary priorities, changes in defense or space
policy, or the reallocation of funding to other programs. The termination or reduction of funding for a government
program could result in a loss of anticipated future revenue attributable to that program. The actual receipt of
revenue on awards may never occur or may change because a program schedule could change or the program could
be canceled, or a contract could be reduced, modified, or terminated early. In addition, in certain circumstances,
governments or other customers may be reluctant to rely on our satellite connectivity or defense-related services if
they believe the availability of such services could be restricted or suspended based on geopolitical considerations,
conflicts, sanctions, or other policy determinations, which could adversely affect our ability to win or retain
contracts. In addition, our significant business relationships with U.S. defense and government agencies may cause
us to be perceived as closely aligned with the U.S. government or military. This perception could discourage certain
consumers, enterprises, or foreign governments from purchasing our products and services which could adversely
44
affect our sales in the United States and internationally. We and our facilities could also be targeted by foreign
adversaries and non-state actors due to such perception. Government customers may also subject our contracts to
rigorous audits and investigations, which can result in disputes regarding contract performance, cost allowability, or
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Adverse audit findings or contractual disputes could lead to
repayments, financial penalties, or restrictions on our ability to compete for future contracts.
Certain of our government contracts also require that we maintain facility security clearances and that certain of our
employees obtain and maintain personnel security clearances. Obtaining and maintaining these clearances involves a
lengthy and uncertain process and depends on factors outside of our control, and we may experience delays in
receiving required clearances or be unable to hire or retain a sufficient number of employees with the necessary
clearances to perform under certain contracts. If we are unable to obtain or maintain required facility or personnel
security clearances, we may be unable to bid on, win, or perform certain classified programs, and existing contracts
could be terminated or not renewed, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects.
Further, our business is subject to economic sanctions and trade embargo laws, various import regulations, including
tariffs, and stringent U.S. import and export control laws. Any failure by us to comply with any of the foregoing
could result in our debarment from government contracts, limitations on our ability to enter into contracts with the
U.S. government, civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, more onerous compliance requirements, or loss of
export privileges.
We derive significant revenue from U.S. government contracts that are subject to competitive bidding, funding
approvals and other government budgetary processes, which factors could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
We derive significant revenue from U.S. government contracts that were awarded through a competitive bidding
process. Competitive bidding presents a number of risks, including: the need to bid on programs in advance of the
completion of their design, which may result in unforeseen technological difficulties and cost overruns; the
substantial cost and managerial time and effort that must be spent to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that
may not be awarded to us; the need to estimate accurately the resources and cost structure that will be required to
service any contract we are awarded; and the expense and delay that may arise if interested parties or our
competitors protest or challenge contract awards made to us pursuant to competitive bidding, and the risk that any
such protest or challenge could result in the delay of our contract performance, the distraction of management, the
resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in termination, reduction or modification of the awarded
contract.
Our business with governmental entities is subject to changes in policies, priorities, regulations, mandates, and
funding levels, any of which could materially impact our operations and financial results. U.S. government program
funding is subject to Congressional appropriations on a fiscal year basis even though contract performance may take
more than one year. As a result, at the outset of a major program, the contract is usually incrementally funded and
additional funds are normally committed to the contract only as Congress makes appropriations in future fiscal
years. U.S. government contracts may also be undefinitized at the time of the start of performance. Under
undefinitized contract actions, the U.S. government has the ability to unilaterally definitize contracts and, absent a
successful appeal of such action, the unilateral definitization of the contract would obligate us to perform under
terms and conditions imposed by the U.S. government. Such unilaterally imposed contract terms could include less
favorable pricing or terms and conditions more burdensome than those negotiated in other circumstances. U.S.
government contracts typically involve long lead times for design and development and are subject to significant
changes in contract scheduling.
Additionally, the U.S. government’s budget deficit and the national debt, as well as any inability of the U.S.
government to complete its budget process for any government fiscal year and consequently having to shut down or
operate on funding levels equivalent to its prior fiscal year pursuant to a “continuing resolution,” could have a
material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Moreover, if we fail to establish and maintain important relationships with U.S. government agencies, our ability to
successfully maintain and develop new business could be materially and adversely affected. The current political
45
environment in the United States is highly polarized, and shifts in the composition of the U.S. Congress or changes
in the presidential administration can result in significant changes in government spending priorities, regulatory
posture, and the allocation of contracts and resources across industries and programs. Our relationships with U.S.
government agencies and the favorability of the regulatory and procurement environment in which we operate may
be affected by which political party controls the presidency or one or both chambers of the U.S. Congress. As a
result, there can be no assurance that current government relationships, contracts, or levels of funding will be
maintained, and any significant adverse developments could have a material and adverse impact on our growth and
competitive position.
In addition, our Space segment revenue is primarily derived from fixed-price contracts, under which we agree to
deliver specified products or services at a predetermined price regardless of the actual costs incurred. As a result, if
we experience cost overruns on these contracts, including from factors outside our control, we are required to absorb
the excess costs, which may reduce profitability or result in losses, strain cash flows, and impact our ability to invest
in future growth. Any unanticipated increases in labor, material, or other direct or indirect costs—including those
arising from inflation, supply chain disruptions, design changes, regulatory requirements, or unforeseen technical
challenges—must be borne by us. When these overruns occur, our margins on affected contracts may be
significantly reduced or eliminated, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and future prospects. Additionally, absorbing excess costs may limit our ability to allocate resources to
other strategic initiatives, delay investment in research and development, or constrain our capacity to pursue new
business opportunities. In addition, we sometimes receive advanced payments and billings in excess of the amount
of revenue we recognize, which we record as deferred revenue. As a result, our cash flows may be subject to
fluctuation across periods in a manner that may be unrelated to our underlying performance.
Our ability to expand our Starlink consumer and enterprise connectivity services depends on our ability to
increase market awareness and acceptance of connectivity through Starlink, and any failure to do so could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
Our ability to expand our Starlink consumer and enterprise connectivity services depends on our ability to increase
market awareness and acceptance of connectivity through Starlink. There can be no assurance that our efforts to
increase awareness will be successful. In particular, such efforts may not be successful if we are unable to offer
Starlink services at competitive prices. Additionally, constraints in the distribution of user terminals could delay
service activations, increase costs, or otherwise limit our ability to scale such services as anticipated. Consumer
acceptance may also be hindered by the presence of well-established terrestrial broadband alternatives, as well as
lingering perceptions regarding service reliability, latency, and the complexity of satellite-based internet compared
to traditional fixed-line solutions.
The expansion of our satellite-to-mobile connectivity services depends substantially on our ability to secure and
maintain partnerships with mobile network operators and on the adoption of necessary hardware and software
modifications by device manufacturers, and any failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
The expansion of our global satellite-to-mobile connectivity offerings depends substantially on our ability to enter
into and maintain successful partnerships with telecommunications carriers and spectrum licensees globally, and to
obtain country-specific authorizations to offer such connectivity using satellite spectrum bands for which we have
international coordination rights. In the United States, we expect to be able to provide 5G-like connectivity to a
meaningful portion of existing unmodified devices through our Starlink Mobile Gen2 service utilizing our V2
Mobile satellites, either by operating on spectrum leased to us by MNO partners or by utilizing our own domestic
spectrum holdings. However, achieving full 5G NR-NTN compliance and optimal performance would likely require
handset manufacturers to implement hardware and software modifications, primarily to the radio-frequency front
end, in future devices. The spectrum frequencies in the FCC licenses to be acquired from EchoStar are standardized
for terrestrial 5G mobile broadband (3GPP bands n66 and n70). But the 5G NR-NTN bands for these same
frequencies, such as n252 and n256, are not currently supported by RF front-end hardware for the provision of 5G-
like service in any commercially available mobile devices. We do not have direct contractual arrangements with
handset manufacturers; instead, we expect MNO partners, as major purchasers of mobile devices, to encourage or
46
drive such adoption. There can be no assurance that these modifications will be adopted on our preferred timeline, or
at all.
Internationally, we face similar constraints until handset manufacturers implement hardware and software
modifications to support the international spectrum authorizations to be obtained from EchoStar. As a result, our
near-term international service strategy depends on our ability to establish MNO spectrum partnerships on a market-
by-market basis, which does not require device hardware modifications but is subject to the successful negotiation
and execution of commercial agreements in each jurisdiction. Until device manufacturers incorporate support for our
international spectrum bands into future handsets, we will be unable to offer 5G-like direct-to-consumer service on
our own international spectrum.
The provision of our satellite-to-mobile services also requires regulatory approvals from the FCC and foreign
regulatory authorities. Our Gen1 service, utilizing our existing constellation of V1 Mobile satellites, is fully licensed
in the United States but requires additional country-by-country approvals to operate internationally. We have signed
MNO partnerships for our Gen1 service in over 30 countries. These partnerships represent commercial agreements
with carriers but do not, by themselves, provide the regulatory approvals necessary to offer service. In addition to at
least one MNO partnership, we have obtained required approvals to offer commercial Gen1 service in the United
States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia, as well as in several additional countries.
Our Gen2 service, which will utilize 2 GHz S-band spectrum and a new satellite constellation, requires a license
transfer, a constellation license, and spectrum usage approvals in each country in which we seek to operate. For the
United States, we have received the relevant license transfer approval from the FCC, and we expect to receive the
remaining necessary regulatory authorizations in the second or third quarter of 2026. While these authorizations
would be sufficient from a United States regulatory perspective, we still require our V2 Mobile satellites to be in
orbit and must complete the acquisition of the relevant spectrum from EchoStar before we can commence our
planned commercial Gen2 service in the United States. Internationally, we have filed applications in nearly every
country in which we intend to operate our Gen2 service, and approvals have been granted in a limited number of
these jurisdictions to date. Each jurisdiction presents its own regulatory process and timeline, and we cannot predict
when or whether approvals will be granted in any given market. Subject to regulatory approvals, we are receiving
from EchoStar certain assets and authorizations that provide very senior ITU priority for international frequency
coordination for our V2 Mobile constellation. Until such approvals are obtained, we also signed a coordination
agreement with EchoStar to obtain the protection of its senior ITU priority rights until the authorizations transfer.
However, some countries have signaled through public consultations or other actions that they are considering
ignoring or diminishing ITU priority as a mechanism to decide which operators are licensed to operate in their
country. Several countries and regions have open inquiries that invite input on whether factors other than ITU
priority (such as whether the operator originates from the country) should govern the issuance of spectrum licenses,
and we cannot be certain the outcome of these proceedings. Delays or failures to obtain necessary approvals could
materially delay the deployment and commercialization of our Gen2 service. The failure to enter into or successfully
maintain such partnerships, or the failure of device manufacturers to adopt the necessary hardware modifications, or
the failure to obtain required regulatory approvals, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
If the recommendations, forecasts, content, analyses or other output that our AI technologies, including Grok,
assist in producing are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, harmful, illegal, or used for an improper
purpose, we could continue to be subjected to claims and investigations, and we could be subjected to legal
liability and brand, reputational, or competitive harm.
AI technologies, the models, algorithms, prompts and datasets on which they rely, and the recommendations,
forecasts, analyses or other output that such AI technologies assist in producing, may be flawed, insufficient, of poor
quality, rely upon incorrect, inaccurate, harmful or illegal data, reflect unwanted forms of bias, hallucinate,
misrepresent, mislead or contain other errors or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable. Although
we devote significant resources to develop, test, and maintain our AI technologies, we may not be able to identify or
resolve all AI-related issues, deficiencies, and failures before they arise. AI technologies have been known to
produce mischaracterized or “hallucinatory” inferences or outputs, and certain of our AI products, such as Grok,
have been alleged to be susceptible to “data poisoning” in the past. We may not have insight into, or control over,
47
the practices of third parties who may utilize our AI technologies. As such, third parties have in the past used, and
may in the future use, such AI technologies for improper purposes, including through the dissemination of illegal,
inaccurate, defamatory or harmful content, intellectual property infringement or misappropriation, furthering bias or
discrimination, cybersecurity attacks, including spear phishing and social engineering attacks, data privacy
violations, other societal harms, including activities that threaten people’s safety, financial security, or mental well-
being on- or offline, or to develop competing technologies. Inappropriate or controversial data practices by data
scientists, engineers, and end users of AI technologies, including our AI segment’s systems, could impair the
acceptance of AI technologies generally, including our AI products. If the recommendations, forecasts, content, or
analyses that our AI technologies assist in producing are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, offensive, illegal,
or otherwise harmful, we could be subjected to claims and investigations, and we could be subjected to legal liability
and brand, reputational or competitive harm. We have in the past been, and may in the future be, subject to
regulatory investigations and litigation related to such claims regarding our recommendations, forecasts, content or
analyses. Also please refer to “—Our AI products, X platform, and Starlink services are subject to complex and
evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, cybersecurity, data use, data combination, data
protection, content, AI, competition, youth protection, safety, consumer protection and notification, advertising, e-
commerce, sanctions, export controls, and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change
and uncertain interpretation, and we could be required to make changes to our products and business practices, and
be exposed to monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, declines in user growth or engagement, or loss of
customers, or other harm to our AI products, X platform, and Starlink services.” In addition, if we do not have
sufficient rights to use the models, algorithms, prompts and datasets on which our AI technologies rely, or the
recommendations, forecasts, content, analyses or other output that our AI technologies assist in producing, we could
also incur liability through the violation of applicable laws and regulations, third-party intellectual property, privacy
or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party. Furthermore, failure to properly disclose the use of consumer-
facing AI technologies may result in consumer protection or regulatory enforcement activity. Use of AI
technologies, including our AI products, may result in disruptions in, or unauthorized access to, users’ computer
systems, which could also lead to the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive (including classified), proprietary,
confidential or personal information, new potential cyberattack methods for third parties or an increase in the
frequency, sophistication or intensity of cyberattacks. Moreover, if AI technologies are perceived to be significantly
disruptive to society, it could lead to governmental or regulatory restrictions or prohibitions on their use, societal
concerns or unrest, or both, any of which could materially and adversely affect our ability to develop, deploy, or
commercialize AI technologies and execute our business strategy. Our implementation of AI technologies, including
through our AI segment’s systems, could result in legal liability, regulatory action, operational disruption, brand,
reputational or competitive harm, or other adverse impacts.
Environmental laws, regulations, litigation, liabilities and proceedings may adversely affect our operations,
including our launch operations, manufacturing activities, fuel storage and handling operations, launch facilities
and ground infrastructure, and data center operations and expansion plans.
Our operations, including our launch operations, manufacturing activities, fuel storage and handling operations,
launch facilities and ground infrastructure, and data center operations and expansion plans are subject to a variety of
state and federal environmental laws and regulations governing matters such as air emissions, wastewater discharges
and the discharge, treatment, storage, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and wastes, including the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and permitting requirements of federal, state and local
environmental authorities. Liability under these laws imposes strict liability for environmental contamination or
remediation costs. Changing regulatory requirements for permits and approvals relating to operational infrastructure,
including energy generation assets (e.g., renewables, generators or grid connections), manufacturing facilities,
launch facilities, fuel storage and handling facilities, and data centers may cause delays, higher costs or denials, and
a failure to comply with these requirements may result in fines, shutdowns or competitive harm. In addition,
growing scrutiny of data centers’ overall ecological footprint could lead to community opposition, fines or mandates
for changing existing practices. We are or may become subject to environmental lawsuits and proceedings, and
various parties have threatened or brought lawsuits that allege we are unlawfully operating natural gas-fired turbines
without required permits at facilities in Southaven, Mississippi. While we have obtained such permits, the outcome
of these legal actions is uncertain. Injunctive relief or the rescission of issued permits would prevent our ability to
48
utilize power generation sources that are required for the operation of these data centers and would adversely affect
our AI business. We cannot predict with certainty how future legislative or regulatory developments will affect our
business, but compliance with new or modified environmental requirements could require us to incur significant
unanticipated expenditures that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, speed of
deployment and cash flows.
In addition, our launch facilities and related operations are subject to environmental permitting, land use, wetlands,
coastal management and other environmental review requirements, such as the National Environmental Policy Act
or related federal and state laws, that may give rise to litigation, regulatory enforcement actions or permitting
disputes. Environmental groups, regulatory authorities or other stakeholders may challenge our launch activities,
launch cadence, construction or expansion of facilities, fuel storage or handling practices, or other operational
activities under federal, state or local environmental laws. Such actions may seek injunctive relief, civil penalties or
additional environmental review and mitigation measures, any of which could delay launches, restrict operations,
increase compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
future prospects.
We may face substantial potential liability and operational disruptions if we violate the intellectual property rights
or other rights of third parties, and if we fail to adequately protect, maintain, defend or enforce our intellectual
property and other similar rights, we could lose an important competitive advantage, in each case which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, customer trust and
future prospects.
Our success and ability to compete also depends in part on our ability to operate without infringing,
misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of third parties. Companies in the AI and
technology industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, and frequently enter
into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property or
other rights, including in novel areas such as those relating to AI training and AI outputs. Plaintiffs have in the past
and may in the future file infringement or other litigation or administrative or adversarial actions relating to the
training or development of our AI models. We cannot guarantee that the operation of our business does not and will
not infringe or violate the rights of third parties, and we may be unaware of the intellectual property rights that
others may claim cover some or all of our products or services. Moreover, we may not have the freedom to operate
unimpeded by the patent or other rights of others. Third parties may have dominating, blocking or other patents or
other rights relevant to our technology, of which we are not aware.
Intellectual property and related laws are constantly evolving, can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal
and factual questions for which important principles remain unresolved. For example, in the United States and in
many foreign jurisdictions, policies regarding the breadth of claims allowed in patents and scope of protections for
content can be inconsistent. We cannot predict future changes in the interpretation of patent, intellectual property
and other related laws or changes to patent, intellectual property and other related laws that might be enacted into
law by U.S. and foreign legislative bodies.
We rely on statutory safe harbors, including those set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Section 230
of the Communications Decency Act in the United States and the Digital Services Act in the EU, to protect against
liability for various activities, including linking, caching, ranking, recommending and hosting. Legislation or court
rulings affecting these safe harbors may harm us and may impose significant operational challenges. There are
legislative proposals and pending litigation in the United States, EU, and around the world that could diminish or
eliminate safe harbor protection for websites and online platforms.
If we violate, or are alleged to have violated, the intellectual property rights of third parties, including patents,
copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, or other intellectual property rights and related rights, we may be subject to
costly and time-consuming litigation, substantial financial penalties, and reputational harm, any of which could
materially disrupt our operations, product development and strategic initiatives. As we continue to develop new or
update existing technologies, products, and services, there is a risk that third parties may allege that our operations
or offerings infringe upon their intellectual property rights. For example, we are currently a defendant in litigation
alleging copyright infringement relating to the claimed use of copyrighted works to train our AI models. Other
49
plaintiffs may file infringement or other litigation relating to the training or development of our AI models. In
addition, we are currently subject to, and in the future may be subject to claims from various “non-practicing
entities” or other companies that own patents and other intellectual property rights that often attempt to aggressively
assert their rights in order to extract value from technology companies by threatening costly litigation or that have
minimal operations or relevant product revenue and against whom our patents may provide little or no deterrence or
protection. We are and may in the future be subject to additional copyright litigation or other litigation, including
litigation relating to allegations that we have trained or developed our AI models on copyrighted works in a manner
that infringes on copyrights, or in a manner that otherwise violates the intellectual property or other rights of third
parties, or that our models produce outputs in a manner that infringes on copyrights or other intellectual property or
other rights. Moreover, the impact of AI on intellectual property ownership and licensing rights, including
copyrights, has not been fully addressed by U.S. or international courts or other federal, state or international laws or
regulations (or by courts, laws or regulations in foreign jurisdictions), and our use of AI models may reduce our
ability to protect our own intellectual property. In addition, former employers of our current, former, or future
employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us confidential or proprietary
information of these former employers. Any such claims or allegations, whether or not they have merit, could result
in costly litigation, substantial damages, injunctions against the use of certain technologies, or the need to obtain
licenses on unfavorable terms. In addition, certain of our contracts with customers, suppliers, and partners contain
indemnification provisions that could require us to defend against infringement or other claims and pay damages or
settlements, thereby increasing our financial exposure. The outcome of intellectual property litigation is inherently
uncertain, and adverse judgments could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations, and future prospects. If we are unable to obtain necessary licenses, non-infringing substitute
technologies, or otherwise mitigate these risks, we may be forced to discontinue certain products or services, delay
or curtail research and development activities, or limit our expansion into new markets.
Additionally, failure to adequately protect, maintain, defend, or enforce our intellectual property—including patents,
copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and proprietary technologies—may lead to loss of competitive advantage,
weakened market position, and financial harm from unauthorized use or infringement. We rely and expect to
continue to rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality procedures,
contractual commitments and other legal rights to establish and protect our intellectual property. However, the steps
we take to protect our intellectual property and other rights may be inadequate due to various circumstances. We
may be unable or choose not to pursue or maintain certain types of intellectual property protection or registration for
our intellectual property in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, and the measures we do take may not prevent
our competitors or other third parties from independently developing products, services, and technology similar to or
duplicative of our products and services. We will not be able to protect our intellectual property if we are unable to
enforce our rights or if we do not detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property. In addition, our patents or
other intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable, and
pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. While it is our policy to enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees, contractors and other third parties to limit and control access to and
disclosure of our trade secrets, intellectual property and confidential information, we may fail to enter into such
agreements with all relevant entities and any such agreements may be breached, or this intellectual property may
otherwise be disclosed or become known to our competitors, including through hacking, theft, or other
misappropriation, including by employees, which could cause us to lose any competitive advantage resulting from
these trade secrets, intellectual property and proprietary information. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that the
steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be adequate to prevent infringement of our rights or
misappropriation of our technology, trade secrets or know-how.
Additionally, to protect our intellectual property rights, we may be required to spend significant resources to
monitor, defend, enforce and protect these rights. Monitoring unauthorized uses of our intellectual property is
difficult and costly. We may not be able to detect unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our
intellectual property rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights and
to protect our trade secrets, and any such litigation may be costly and time consuming, result in the diversion of time
and attention of our management team, and may not be successful or could result in the impairment or loss of
portions of our intellectual property. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met
with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property
50
rights. Despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent unauthorized use, copy, reverse engineering,
misappropriation of our technology or intellectual property rights to create technology that compete with ours, or
independent development of similar technologies. Insufficient protection could force us into costly and uncertain
litigation or enforcement actions, allowing competitors to launch rival products and eroding our revenue and
profitability.
Acquisitions, divestitures, or other strategic transactions we pursue may not achieve the anticipated benefits,
synergies or strategic objectives.
We may not achieve the anticipated benefits, synergies, or strategic objectives of any acquisition, divestiture, or
other strategic transaction in a timely manner, or at all, including those we expect from the recent acquisition of xAI,
the acquisition of spectrum assets and licenses from EchoStar in connection with our Starlink Mobile initiatives, our
collaboration on Terafab with Tesla, Intel or any future partners, project and our recent collaboration with Cursor
and any potential acquisition of Cursor, if consummated. Acquisitions, divestitures, or other strategic transactions
may present unforeseen liabilities or disruptions to our operations, which could adversely impact our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. We may assume unexpected obligations or incur
costs associated with acquired businesses, including litigation, regulatory compliance, environmental liabilities, or
contractual disputes, which could result in material losses or divert management focus from ongoing operations.
Integrating acquired businesses, partnerships, or joint ventures may present significant challenges, including
aligning operations, systems, and cultures, which could result in inefficiencies, increased costs, or failure to realize
anticipated benefits. The process of integration is often complex and time-consuming, and we may encounter
unforeseen difficulties in harmonizing business practices, integrating technologies and IT systems, retaining key
personnel, or reconciling differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies. In addition, the integration
of acquired entities or new partners exposes us to disruptions in, or unauthorized access to, our computer systems
and data or may divert management attention and resources from our core operations, potentially impacting our
ability to execute on other strategic initiatives or maintain existing customer relationships. We may also face
challenges in achieving expected synergies, cost savings, or strategic objectives within anticipated timeframes, or at
all, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. If we
are unable to successfully integrate acquisitions, partnerships, or joint ventures, or if the anticipated benefits of these
transactions do not materialize as expected, we could experience operational disruptions, loss of key personnel or
customers, increased costs, and diminished competitive position. Any failure to effectively integrate acquired
businesses, partnerships, or joint ventures could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects.
Similarly, divestitures could result in the loss of revenue, disruption of customer or partner relationships, or
challenges in separating assets and personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify,
consummate, or integrate future acquisitions, divestitures, or other strategic transactions on favorable terms, or at all,
and any such activities may heighten our exposure to operational, financial, and regulatory risks unique to our
industry.
We have experienced, and will likely continue to experience, development and manufacturing delays and damage
or destruction during pre-launch operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
The development, manufacturing, and operation of launch vehicles and satellites are complex and capital-intensive
activities that are subject to numerous risks. Our launch vehicles, satellites, and related systems have in the past
experienced and may in the future experience delays, damage or destruction during design and manufacturing,
including delays in fabrication, assembly, inspection, testing, and component qualification. These issues may arise
from engineering challenges, supplier performance problems, quality control shortcomings, unexpected design
modifications, or disruptions in our manufacturing facilities. Any of these factors may delay development or
production schedules, increase costs, or result in hardware that must be reworked or replaced.
Our operations also involve significant risks during pre-launch preparation. Launch vehicles and satellites can be
damaged or destroyed during transport, fueling, integration, or ground testing. Furthermore, the early retirement or
51
inoperability of satellites or related infrastructure may require us to accelerate depreciation or recognize impairment
charges, thereby adversely affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
Even minor anomalies may require extensive troubleshooting or repairs, resulting in launch delays, increased
mission costs, or the loss of flight hardware. Because launch operations require coordination across multiple systems
—including propulsion, avionics, ground infrastructure, and third-party range providers—issues in any one area can
lead to postponements or mission cancellations.
Our ability to continue and expand launch and satellite operations depends upon our ability to obtain new and
leverage existing U.S. export control and sanctions authorizations, and any significant changes to the geopolitical
landscape or U.S. government regulatory approach to licensing could materially and adversely impact our
international business operations by compromising existing licenses or limiting our ability to engage in
commercial dealings in or involving geopolitically sensitive countries.
The launch and satellite operations are subject to stringent export control and economic and trade sanctions laws,
including the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”), the Export Administration Regulations, and
sanctions administered and enforced by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control
(“OFAC”). Under U.S. export control laws, we are required to obtain export authorizations from the Departments of
Commerce or State to export or share any controlled goods, technology, or software with foreign persons, including
foreign person employees, or to foreign destinations. The availability of such authorizations may be impacted by
significant changes to the geopolitical landscape. The U.S. government may revise export control regulations,
restrict exports to new or additional locations, or otherwise change its approach to licensing in ways that, while
outside of our control, materially impact our international supply chain, existing export licenses, and business
operations. For example, under the ITAR, we are required to determine the proper licensing jurisdiction and
classification of products, software and technology; and obtain licenses or other forms of U.S. government
authorizations to engage in certain activities related to and that support our business operations. The authorization
requirements include the need to get permission to release controlled technology to foreign person employees and
other foreign persons.
In addition, we are required to obtain OFAC authorization in certain situations, including to provide connectivity
services or engage in other business operations in certain global markets that may be subject to economic sanctions
or trade embargoes. While we have been successful in obtaining such authorizations in the past, there can be no
assurances that authorizations or licenses will be available in the future. In addition, significant changes to the
geopolitical landscape, such as the outbreak of armed conflict, could result in the imposition of new or expanded
economic or trade sanctions that may impact or prevent our ability to provide services or otherwise operate in certain
markets. Failures by us to comply with import, export control, or sanctions laws and regulations could result in civil
or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, more onerous compliance requirements, loss of export privileges,
debarment from government contracts, or limitations on our ability to enter into contracts with the U.S. government.
Other regulators, such as the EU or UK, may also impose restrictions on our ability to operate in geopolitically
sensitive countries or territories.
Our use of open source technology could impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our space-based
internet and mobile phone services, AI products, and X platform, or otherwise negatively affect our business.
We use open source technology in some of our software, including in our Starlink products and services, and in our
AI segment’s and X platform’s software and products, and we expect to continue to use open source technology in
the future. Open source technology is licensed by its authors or other third parties under open source licenses, which
in some instances may subject us to certain unfavorable conditions. For example, certain open source licenses may
give rise to requirements to disclose or license our proprietary source code or make available any derivative works
or modifications of the open source code on unfavorable terms or at no cost. Although we monitor and have
implemented policies relating to our use of open source technology to avoid subjecting our products and services to
conditions we do not intend, we cannot guarantee such efforts will be successful and we may face allegations from
others alleging ownership of, or seeking to enforce the terms of, an open source license, including by demanding
release of the open source software, derivative works or modifications, or our proprietary source code that was
developed using such technology, or demanding access to our software free of charge or on other unfavorable terms.
These allegations could also result in litigation. Additionally, our AI products are trained on data sets that may
52
include open source software, and it is possible that certain outputs of our AI products may be subject to open source
license restrictions or obligations. The terms of many open source licenses are ambiguous and have not been
interpreted by United States or foreign courts. There is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a way that
could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our AI segment’s products. In
such an event, we may be required to seek licenses from third parties to continue commercially offering our AI
segment’s products, to make our proprietary code generally available in source code form, to re-engineer our AI
segment’s products or to discontinue the sale of our AI segment’s products or such other products if re-engineering
could not be accomplished on a timely basis, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects.
In addition, the use of open source technology may entail greater technical and legal risks than those associated with
the use of third-party commercial software as open source licensors generally do not provide support, warranties,
controls on origin of the software, indemnification or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or
the quality of the code, including the existence of security vulnerabilities. Many of the risks associated with usage of
open source technology, such as the lack of warranties or assurance of title, cannot be eliminated and could, if not
properly addressed, negatively affect our business. To the extent that our technologies and other business operations
depend upon the successful and secure operation of the open source technology we use, any undetected errors or
defects in this open source software could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our software, delay
the introduction of new technological capabilities, result in a failure of our technologies, and injure our brand and
reputation. For example, undetected errors or defects in open source software could render it vulnerable to breaches
or security attacks and make our AI segment’s products more vulnerable to data breaches or security attacks. Any of
the foregoing would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and
future prospects.
Payment, banking, and other financial service-related activities may subject us to additional regulatory
requirements, regulatory actions, and other risks that could be costly and difficult to comply with or that could
harm our business.
We plan to publicly launch the Money Product, which will offer payment, banking and other financial services
functionalities, including enabling our users to purchase tangible, virtual, and digital goods from merchants and send
money to other users, among other activities. These activities will subject us to a variety of laws and regulations in
the United States, Europe, and elsewhere globally, including those governing anti-money laundering and counter-
terrorism financing, money transmission, stored value, gift cards and other prepaid access instruments, electronic
funds transfer, virtual currency, consumer protection, charitable fundraising, global and local economic sanctions,
and import and export restrictions. In addition, we could become subject to new consumer protection laws and
regulations that may be adopted or amended, including those related to payment, banking, and other financial
services activities as well as sharing, collection, and use of payment, banking, and other financial services-related
data. Depending on how the Money Product evolves, we may also be subject to other laws and regulations including
those governing gambling, cryptocurrencies, brokerage, banking, credit, and lending. In some jurisdictions, the
application or interpretation of these laws and regulations is not clear. We have received certain payments licenses in
the United States and other jurisdictions for our anticipated regulated payments-related products and activities.
These licenses increase flexibility in how our use of payments may evolve, help mitigate regulatory uncertainty, and
will generally require us to demonstrate compliance with many domestic and foreign laws in relation to our licensed
payments products and activities. Our efforts to comply with these laws and regulations may still not guarantee
compliance. In the event that we are found to be in violation of any such legal or regulatory requirements, we may
be subject to monetary fines or other penalties such as a cease and desist order, or we may be required to make
product changes, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and future prospects.
In addition, we will be subject to a variety of additional risks as a result of payment, banking, and other financial
services transactions, including: increased costs and other resources to address errors in transactions or customer
disputes; potential fraudulent or otherwise illegal activity by users, developers, employees, or third parties;
restrictions on the investment of consumer funds used to transact payments; and additional disclosure and reporting
requirements. We plan to publicly launch the Money Product and may in the future undertake additional payment,
53
banking, and other financial services initiatives, which may subject us to many of the foregoing risks and additional
licensing requirements.
Our efforts to support the creation of permanent installations on the Moon and Mars depend on the successful
development and deployment of next-generation capabilities.
Activities related to the industrialization and development of the Moon and Mars require the successful development
and deployment of next-generation capabilities such as fully reusable launch vehicles, including Starship, in-space
refueling and propellant storage, in space communications systems, and other capabilities required for operations
beyond Earth’s orbit. These systems involve significant technological, engineering, and operational challenges,
including the need to develop habitable transportation and surface environments, and perform complex in-orbit
operations. Solving these challenges will require developing solutions that are novel or untested and will require
substantial capital investment. If these efforts take longer than anticipated, or if technical, operational, or engineering
challenges arise in connection with these efforts, our goals with respect to the Moon and Mars, including
government contracts, and other and multiplanetary initiatives could be delayed, modified, or cancelled and could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even if such goals are
achieved, they may not generate meaningful revenue or achieve profitability for an extended period of time.
Our AI segment is recently formed, is still being fully integrated and optimized, operates in a rapidly evolving
industry and is subject to significant execution, competitive and operational risks.
We acquired xAI in February 2026 as the foundational platform for our AI segment and as part of our ambitious
vertical integration strategy intended to combine artificial intelligence capabilities with our established Space and
Connectivity businesses. Prior to its acquisition by the Company, xAI itself was an early-stage company. As a result,
our AI segment remains in a relatively early stage of organizational and operational maturity and is subject to
integration, scaling and execution risks.
The successful integration of acquired businesses, technologies, strategic partners, and employees is inherently
complex, costly and time-consuming, and may result in operational inefficiencies, delays, disruptions, increased
costs, loss of knowledge and diversion of management attention. As is common in large acquisitions, we have had to
take significant steps to integrate xAI’s operations into our broader corporate structure as part of our AI segment,
including putting in place the management team and organizational structure needed to execute at the scale and pace
our strategy demands, as well as controls and procedures appropriate for a larger organization like ours. Many of
these steps are not yet complete.
We have undertaken, and continue to undertake, changes in personnel, strategic partnerships, infrastructure-sharing
arrangements, organizational restructurings, acquisitions and other integration initiatives intended to accelerate
development of our AI capabilities, compute infrastructure and commercial offerings. Management believes these
initiatives may create long-term strategic advantages through the combination of engineering talent, compute
infrastructure, proprietary data, software capabilities and integrated operational platforms across the Company’s
businesses, among others. However, the successful integration of acquired businesses, management teams,
employees, strategic partners, technologies and evolving product architectures is inherently complex, costly and
time-consuming and may result in operational inefficiencies, delays, disruptions or the failure to realize anticipated
synergies or commercial benefits.
We have also pursued evolving commercial and technical strategies, including coding and software development
(such as through our partnership with Cursor) and monetization of unused compute capacity (such as through our
cloud compute services agreements with Anthropic), while simultaneously continuing to invest heavily in expanding
datacenter and compute capacity for our own internal AI initiatives and products. These efforts may require
substantial capital expenditures and management attention and may create operational complexity relating to
infrastructure allocation, prioritization of internal versus external compute usage, integration of third-party
technologies and partnerships, cybersecurity, data governance and commercialization strategy. We may elect to
allocate capital and resources to long-term initiatives even if alternative uses with more short-term upside are
available. There can be no assurance that these initiatives will achieve their intended operational or financial
objectives.
54
The artificial intelligence industry is highly dynamic and rapidly evolving. We face significant uncertainty relating
to technological developments, changing customer preferences, evolving regulatory and legal frameworks,
increasing public scrutiny, and intense competition for engineering talent, compute capacity, infrastructure,
customers and capital. In addition, the consumer AI market is characterized by rapid model iteration, frequent new
entrants and intense competition for user attention; as a result, download and other usage metrics for any individual
AI application, including Grok, can fluctuate significantly (including periods of decreased Grok app downloads and
user activity) in response to competitor model releases, product update cycles, and broader shifts in user behavior.
As a result of these market dynamics, we may need to modify our AI strategy, organizational structure,
infrastructure deployment and capital allocation decisions in response to technological change, competitive
pressures, regulatory developments or commercial adoption trends. Initiatives that management believes are
strategically beneficial over the long term may nevertheless experience near-term operational disruptions, integration
inefficiencies, product delays, technical setbacks, leadership turnover, employee attrition, infrastructure constraints,
increased costs or uneven customer adoption during periods of transition or rapid scaling.
Management believes that our recent organizational restructuring efforts, infrastructure investments and strategic
collaborations position the AI segment favorably for long-term growth and are consistent with the maturation
process of rapidly scaling AI platforms and optimization of acquired companies. However, there can be no assurance
that we will successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies, retain key personnel, execute our AI
strategy within anticipated timeframes, achieve meaningful commercial adoption, generate anticipated revenues or
returns on investment, or compete effectively in a rapidly evolving and increasingly competitive and consolidated AI
market. If we are unable to successfully execute our AI strategy, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected.
Our AI segment is capital intensive, has incurred significant operating losses, and operates in a nascent and
rapidly evolving market in which the potential of AI remains uncertain.
AI is a nascent and rapidly evolving technology, and although we believe AI holds significant promise for
consumers and enterprises, its long-term impact will depend on the degree to which AI products and services prove
to be broadly useful in real-world applications. There can be no assurance that demand for AI solutions will develop
or be sustained at the levels we anticipate, or at all. While industry interest in AI has grown substantially, the
commercial value proposition of frontier AI models remains largely unproven, and long-term market acceptance of
our AI products and services is uncertain. Developing, training, and providing inference for frontier AI models
requires substantial and growing capital expenditures, including investments in specialized computing hardware,
data center infrastructure, energy procurement, and technical personnel, and we expect these costs to continue to
increase for the foreseeable future. In addition, we plan to allocate substantial capital to build our AI compute
infrastructure, and we expect a multi-year investment horizon before these deployments translate into sustained
positive AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Our AI segment has incurred significant operating losses since inception,
and we may not achieve profitability in this segment, or, if achieved, sustain it, and there can be no assurance that
the returns on our AI investments will be adequate to justify the capital deployed. Furthermore, the continued
improvement of AI model capabilities has historically depended in part on scaling laws, the empirical observation
that model performance improves with increased compute, data, and model size, but there is uncertainty as to how
long these scaling relationships will continue to hold. As a result of these factors, our AI segment may not achieve
the growth or returns we expect.
We have a history of net losses and may not achieve profitability in the future.
We incurred net losses of $(4,937) million and $(4,628) million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2023,
respectively, and a net loss of $(4,276) million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. We may not achieve or,
if achieved, sustain profitability in the future. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $41,311
million. While we have experienced significant growth in revenue over the last three years, we cannot predict
whether we will maintain this level of growth or when we will achieve profitability again. We also expect our capital
expenditures and operating expenses to increase in the future, including our general and administrative expenses as a
result of increased costs associated with operating as a public company and as we continue to invest for our future
growth, including substantial capital expenditures to design, develop, expand, and maintain our technologies and
infrastructure to support our operations. Our revenue could decline for a number of reasons, including if we are
55
unable to execute on our growth strategy and as a result of the other risks described in this prospectus. Furthermore,
if we fail to maintain or increase our revenue to offset increases in our operating expenses or manage our costs as we
invest in our business, including if we do not maintain or improve our operating efficiencies, we may not achieve or
sustain profitability. Any failure by us to achieve or sustain profitability on a consistent basis could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cause the market price of our Class
A common stock to decline.
The timing of our revenue and cost recognition may fluctuate due to factors outside of our control, which could
cause our periodic results of operations to fluctuate and make our results difficult to predict.
In our financial results, we recognize revenue and costs for a majority of customer payloads at the launch or
deployment of the customer’s payload to its intended orbit. While we plan launches and schedule payloads in
advance, the timing of these launches or deployments may vary and can be delayed or otherwise affected by a
number of factors outside of our control, including the customer’s delay in delivering their payload for integration
onto the launch vehicle, adverse weather, and other operational considerations. As a result, the timing of revenue
recognition may shift between reporting periods. For example, if the launch of a customer’s payload was expected to
occur near the end of a reporting period but instead occurs shortly thereafter (e.g., on April 1 instead of March 30),
the associated revenue would be recognized in the subsequent quarter. In addition, if a significant number of
launches or deployments occur within a short period of time, the concentration of those events may result in greater
variability in the timing of revenue recognition between reporting periods. These factors may cause our quarterly or
annual results of operations to fluctuate and may make our results difficult to predict.
Failure to comply with requirements to design, implement, and maintain effective internal controls could have a
material adverse effect on our business and stock price.
As a privately held company, we were not required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting in a
manner that meets the standards of publicly traded companies required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(“Section 404”).
As a public company, we will have significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls.
The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to
anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend
significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as
a public company. If we are unable to establish or maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and
procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material
misstatements in our consolidated financial statements, and harm our results of operations. In addition, we will be
required, pursuant to Section 404, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting in the second annual report following the completion of this offering.
This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our
internal control over financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management to
assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing, and
possible remediation. Testing and maintaining internal controls may divert our management’s attention from other
matters that are important to our business. Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm will be
required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis, beginning
with our second annual report.
We are currently in the process of updating our control processes and automating certain of our procedures and
systems in anticipation of becoming a public company, but our internal controls over financial reporting currently do
not meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 that we will eventually be required to meet. Because we
currently do not have comprehensive documentation of our internal controls and have not yet tested our internal
controls in accordance with Section 404, we cannot conclude in accordance with Section 404 that we do not have a
material weakness in our internal controls or a combination of significant deficiencies that could result in the
conclusion that we have a material weakness in our internal controls. In connection with updating our control
processes and the implementation of the necessary procedures and practices related to internal control over financial
reporting, we have identified deficiencies and may identify deficiencies in the future that we may not be able to
56
remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of
Section 404. In addition, we may encounter problems or delays in completing the remediation of any deficiencies
identified by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the issuance of their attestation
report. Our testing, or the subsequent testing (if required) by our independent registered public accounting firm, may
reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses. Any
material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly consolidated financial
statements or disclosures that may not be prevented or detected.
Our insurance coverage strategy may not be adequate to protect us from all business risks.
We may be subject, in the ordinary course of business, to losses resulting from accidents, acts of God and other
claims against us, for which we may have no insurance coverage. As a general matter, we do not maintain as much
insurance coverage as many other companies do, and in some cases, we do not maintain any at all, including with
respect to our in-orbit satellites, which we currently do not insure and do not expect to insure in the future.
Additionally, the policies that we do have may include significant deductibles or self-insured retentions, policy
limitations and exclusions, and we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover all future
losses or claims against us. A loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits may require us to pay substantial
amounts, which may harm our financial condition and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure, Ownership of our Class A Common Stock and This Offering
Conflicts of interest could arise in the future between us, on the one hand, and Mr. Musk and entities owned by
or affiliated with him, on the other hand, concerning among other things, business transactions, potential
competitive activities or other business opportunities.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the future between us, on the one hand, and Mr. Musk and entities owned by or
affiliated with him, on the other hand, concerning among other things, business transactions, potential competitive
business activities or other opportunities. In the normal course of business, we have engaged in a variety of
transactions with some of these companies. Please refer to “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.”
In addition, we have previously engaged, are currently engaged, and expect to continue to engage in the future in a
number of strategic collaborations with Tesla, including with respect to Macrohard and Terafab. Certain of these
projects, including Macrohard and Terafab, are in the very early stages, as a result of which we and Tesla have not
finalized a variety of details relating to our collaboration, including, but not limited to, financial terms, intellectual
property rights, and the ultimate term of our collaboration. Furthermore, Mr. Musk and other businesses owned by
or affiliated with him may now, or in the future, directly or indirectly, compete with us for investment or business
opportunities.
Mr. Musk or his affiliates may become aware, from time to time, of certain business opportunities (such as
acquisition opportunities or technological developments) and may direct such opportunities to other businesses in
which they have invested, in which case we may not become aware of or otherwise have the ability to pursue such
opportunity. In addition, Mr. Musk and his affiliates may dispose of their interests in other companies or other assets
in the future, without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase any of those interests or assets.
Under our charter, Mr. Musk and his affiliates are not restricted from owning assets or engaging in businesses that
compete directly or indirectly with us and will not have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in
the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us, including those business activities or lines of
business deemed to be competing with us, or doing business with any of our customers or vendors. Moreover, we
have in the past entered into, and may in the future enter into, transactions with entities affiliated with Mr. Musk. We
may enter into such transactions in lieu of pursuing other opportunities that some other shareholders may prefer or
that may prove to be more accretive than the opportunities we elect to pursue. In any of these matters, the interests
of Mr. Musk and entities owned by or affiliated with him may differ or conflict with the interests of our other
shareholders. Any actual or perceived conflicts of interest with respect to the foregoing could have an adverse
impact on the trading price of our Class A common stock.
57
Certain of our directors and key employees may have conflicts of interest because they are also employees or
directors of affiliates of Mr. Musk or other large shareholders. The resolution of these conflicts of interest may
not be in our or your best interests.
Certain of our directors and key employees may have conflicts of interest because they are also employees or
directors of affiliates of Mr. Musk or other large shareholders. Such directors may have interests in, serve on the
boards of, or have financial or other relationships with other companies, ventures, or initiatives that are related to or
competitive with our business, including but not limited to other space or AI companies, technology ventures,
satellite communications businesses, and government or commercial space contracts. Please refer to “Management.”
These relationships and interests could create actual or perceived conflicts of interest, particularly with respect to the
allocation of time, resources, business opportunities, or strategic decisions. In addition, our charter provides that, to
the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, we renounce certain corporate opportunities that may be presented to
Mr. Musk and certain of our directors and their respective affiliates, and such persons may have no duty to present
such opportunities to us. Please refer to “Description of Capital Stock—Corporate Opportunities.” Any actual or
perceived conflicts of interest could harm our reputation, lead to disputes, divert management attention, or result in
decisions that are not in the best interests of us or our shareholders, which could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
We are highly dependent on the continued services of Mr. Musk, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Technical Officer, and other key personnel, and the loss or reduced involvement of one or more of these
individuals could adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy.
We are highly dependent on the continued service and performance of Mr. Musk, whose leadership, vision, and
expertise are critical to the development of our technologies and the execution of our business strategy. Mr. Musk
has been, and continues to be, a driving force behind our growth, innovation, and operational success. The loss of
Mr. Musk, whether due to death, disability, or otherwise, or his inability or unwillingness to continue in his current
roles, could significantly disrupt our management structure, adversely affect our ability to execute our strategic
plans, and negatively impact our reputation and relationships with customers, partners, and other stakeholders. Our
intense, mission-driven, engineering-first culture has been a key driver of our growth and execution, and any erosion
of this culture, including as a result of the loss or reduced involvement of Mr. Musk, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. We do not maintain key-
person life insurance on Mr. Musk. Further, although Mr. Musk devotes significant time to our businesses and is
highly active in our management, he does not devote his full time and attention to our businesses and devotes time
and attention to other significant roles (and may in the future serve in additional roles). For instance, Mr. Musk
currently serves as Technoking and Chief Executive Officer of Tesla and is involved in other emerging technology
ventures, including Neuralink and The Boring Company. Mr. Musk has also previously served as Senior Advisor to
the President of the United States. Any such loss or reduced involvement in our business could result in a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects. The process of
identifying and recruiting a successor with the combination of skills and experience possessed by Mr. Musk, as well
as the ability to maintain the confidence of the market, could be lengthy and uncertain, and there can be no assurance
that we would be able to attract or retain a suitable replacement in a timely manner or at all.
We, Mr. Musk, and other companies Mr. Musk is affiliated with frequently receive an immense amount of media
attention. The actions and statements of Mr. Musk and his affiliated ventures, whether or not directly relating to us,
may draw significant public attention and scrutiny to us and could potentially have a positive or negative impact on
our business, relationships with customers and regulators, or stock price.
In addition to Mr. Musk, we have key personnel who are invaluable to our businesses. We rely upon their
knowledge, expertise, and leadership to develop, manufacture, launch, sell, and support our products and services.
None of our key employees are bound by an employment agreement for any specific term and we may not be able to
successfully attract and retain the senior leadership necessary to continue to grow our business. Our compensation
arrangements, such as our equity award programs, may not always be successful in attracting new employees and
retaining and motivating existing key personnel. Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain key
personnel and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations, and future prospects.
58
A significant reduction by Mr. Musk or other existing shareholders of their ownership interest in us could
adversely affect us.
We believe that Mr. Musk’s substantial ownership interest in us provides him with an economic incentive to assist
us to be successful. Upon the expiration or earlier waiver of the lock-up restrictions on transfers or sales of our
securities following the completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will not be subject to any obligation to maintain his
ownership interest in us and may elect at any time thereafter to sell all or a substantial portion of or otherwise reduce
his ownership interest in us. If Mr. Musk sells all or a substantial portion of his ownership interest in us, he may
have less incentive to assist in our success, which could adversely affect our future prospects. Additionally, future
resales of our Class A common stock by Mr. Musk or other existing shareholders, or the perception that such sales
may occur, could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline significantly, regardless of our
actual business performance. In particular, subject to the expiration or waiver of any applicable lock-up period,
parties to the Investors’ Rights Agreement described in “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—
Investors’ Rights Agreement” will have the right, subject to certain exceptions and conditions, to require us to
register approximately shares of Class A common stock under the Securities Act, and they will have the
right to participate in certain future registrations of securities by us. Registration of any of such shares would result
in such shares becoming freely tradable without compliance with Rule 144 limitations upon effectiveness of the
registration statement. In addition, approximately shares of Class A common stock will generally be
available for resale under Rule 144 starting 90 days after this offering, subject to lock-up restrictions described
elsewhere in this prospectus. See “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Investors’ Rights
Agreement” and “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Registration Rights.”
Following the consummation of this offering, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas listing rules and, as a result, will qualify for and rely on exemptions from certain
corporate governance requirements.
Because Mr. Musk will beneficially own shares of Class A common stock and shares of
Class B common stock, which represents greater than 50% of the voting power of our common stock with respect to
director elections and moreover, holders of our Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, will be entitled
to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors constituting our board (rounded up to the nearest whole
number), following the completion of this offering, we will be a controlled company under the listing rules of
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas.
Under the listing rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power with
respect to director elections is held by another person or group of persons acting together is a “controlled company”
and may elect not to comply with certain Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas corporate governance requirements, including
the requirements that:
•a majority of such company’s board of directors consist of independent directors as defined under the listing
rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas;
•director nominees be selected or recommended for board of directors’ selection by a nominating committee
composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter addressing the nominations process as
required under the listing rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas;
•the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing
the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and
•annual performance evaluations of the compensation and nominating committees be conducted.
Following the completion of this offering, we intend to utilize certain of these exemptions. As a result, we do not
expect to have a compensation and nominating committee that is composed entirely of independent directors or that
has a committee charter that addresses all Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas requirements applicable to companies that are
not controlled companies. Additionally, we may elect to take advantage of certain other exemptions in the future for
as long as we remain a “controlled company.” Accordingly, our Class A shareholders will not have the same
protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of
59
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas. In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company” and our shares continue to be
listed on Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas, we will be required to comply with all of the applicable governance
requirements within the applicable transition periods. Please refer to “Management.”
Our ability to provide returns to shareholders will depend on appreciation in our share price, as we do not plan to
pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
The ability of investors to realize a return on their investment will depend largely on the appreciation of the price of
our Class A common stock, as we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. We have never
declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we currently intend to retain all available funds and
any future earnings to support the growth and operation of our business, including investment in new technologies
and commercial opportunities. As a result, investors seeking cash returns from their investment will not receive any
dividend income, and the only way to realize a return may be through an increase in the market price of our Class A
common stock, which may not occur. The trading price of our Class A common stock may be volatile and subject to
wide fluctuations in response to various factors, including our financial condition and operating results, changes in
our business or future prospects, technological innovations, announcements by us or our competitors, changes in the
regulatory environment, harm to our brand and reputation, broader market or economic conditions, and the fact that
a number of shares of our Class A common stock are expected to be allocated to retail investors in this offering.
Additionally, high retail investor interest in our Class A common stock may occur following this offering, which
may lead to increased volatility of the trading price. Some of these factors are outside of our control, and the trading
price of our Class A common stock may not reflect our actual operating performance. Accordingly, investors may
not be able to realize a gain on their investment and could lose all or part of their investment in our Class A common
stock.
Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will serve as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer,
and Chairman of our board and control the election of our directors, and our dual class structure concentrates
voting control with Mr. Musk and other holders of our Class B common stock. This will limit or preclude your
ability to influence corporate matters and the election of our directors.
Our Class B common stock will have ten votes per share; our Class A common stock will have one vote per share;
and, except as summarized here, our Class A common stock will vote together with our Class B common stock on
any matter submitted to the shareholders for a vote. Under our charter, holders of our Class B common stock, voting
separately as a class, will be entitled to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors constituting our board
(rounded up to the nearest whole number) and will have the ability to remove those directors for as long as there is at
least one share of Class B common stock outstanding. As a result, holders of our Class B common stock will have
control over the composition of our board and significant influence over the outcome of matters requiring
shareholder approval. Please refer to “Description of Capital Stock” for certain other actions that will require
approval of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock voting separately as a
class. This concentration of voting power will limit or preclude the ability of holders of our Class A common stock,
including purchasers of Class A common stock in this offering, to influence corporate matters and the election of our
directors.
Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will beneficially own a majority of the outstanding shares of our
Class B common stock and a majority of the voting power of the common stock (the Class A common stock and the
Class B common stock voting together) and therefore will be able to elect all the members of our board. Mr. Musk,
who will serve as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board under our charter and can only be
removed from our board or these positions by the vote of Class B holders, as set forth in our charter, will exert
significant influence over our business and affairs.
Class B common stock will continue to have ten votes per share, except that, subject to exceptions for certain inter-
family transfers and transfers to certain entities that qualify as “permitted transferees” (as described elsewhere in this
prospectus), transfers by holders of our Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to
Class A common stock. The conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock will have the effect,
over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares.
60
If Mr. Musk retains a significant portion of his holdings of Class B common stock for an extended period of time, he
could continue to control the election and removal of a majority of our board.
However, other persons will also hold shares of Class B common stock. If Mr. Musk were to sell, transfer or
otherwise dispose of a sufficient number of his shares of Class B common stock such that he no longer holds a
majority of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock, another holder or group of holders of Class B common
stock could obtain the ability to elect and remove a majority of our board and thereby effectively control the
Company. Any such change in control could result in changes to our strategic direction, management, business plans
or policies that may not be aligned with the interests of holders of our Class A common stock.
In addition, our charter will provide that other than for specified class votes by the Class B common stock or any
rights granted to other classes in the future, classes of stock will not be entitled to any separate class votes provided
for under the Texas Business Organizations Code (the “TBOC”), including among others (i) the increase or decrease
of the aggregate number of authorized shares of a class outstanding, (ii) the exchange, reclassification, or
cancellation of all or part of the shares of a class, (iii) a change of shares of a class, with or without par value, into
the same or a different number of shares of the same or another class, with or without par value, (iv) the creation of a
new class of shares with rights and preferences equal, prior, or superior to the shares of the class and (v) cancellation
or other effectuation of the dividends on the shares of the class or series that have accrued but have not been
declared.
The TBOC and our charter include provisions that may limit shareholders’ ability to bring a cause of action
against our directors or officers for certain acts or omissions in their capacity as directors or officers of the
Company, including minimum share ownership for derivative proceedings and the presumption of the business
judgment rule.
The TBOC and our governing documents include certain provisions that may limit our shareholders’ ability to bring
certain derivative claims against our officers and directors. For example, the TBOC provides that, if a corporation
has a class of stock listed on a national securities exchange, the governing documents may provide that the minimum
ownership threshold for a shareholder or group of shareholders to institute or maintain such derivative proceeding is
3% of shares outstanding. A similar ownership threshold provision based on this 2025 TBOC provision has already
been challenged in court proceedings involving another Texas corporation and, although the federal district court
found the provision enforceable in that case, its enforceability or governing documents containing its provisions
could be subject to further challenges or interpretation. The TBOC also permits corporations to request a court, at
the start of a transaction (including a related party transaction) or inquiry into a derivative claim, to determine the
independence and disinterestedness of directors serving on a special committee reviewing the transaction or
directors or other individuals on panels reviewing derivative claims. Subsequent challenges to independence or
disinterestedness would require new facts. Our bylaws will provide that these TBOC provisions will apply to us.
In addition, Section 21.419 of the TBOC sets forth certain presumptions concerning compliance by directors and
officers with respect to their duties to a corporation, including the duty of care and duty of loyalty. Specifically, in
taking or declining to take any action on any matters of a corporation’s business, Section 21.419, which applies to
us, provides that a director or officer is presumed to have acted (i) in good faith, (ii) on an informed basis, (iii) in
furtherance of the interests of the corporation and (iv) in obedience to the law and the corporation’s governing
documents. These provisions are described as codifying the “business judgment rule.” In order to succeed in a cause
of action against a director or officer, the Company or a shareholder pursuing such an action must rebut one or more
of the foregoing presumptions and prove with particularity the director or officer’s act or omission constituted a
breach of duty as a director or officer and that such breach involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act
or a knowing violation of law.
Our bylaws will impose minimum stock ownership and solicitation requirements on shareholders seeking to
submit proposals for shareholder approval, which could limit the ability of our shareholders to bring matters
before a meeting of shareholders.
Upon the completion of this offering, we will qualify as a “nationally listed corporation” under Section 21.373 of the
TBOC, and our bylaws will provide that the shareholder proposal requirements permitted by that section will apply
61
immediately upon qualifying as a “nationally listed corporation.” As a result, except with respect to director
nominations and procedural resolutions ancillary to the conduct of a shareholders’ meeting, a shareholder or group
of shareholders seeking to submit a proposal for approval at a meeting of shareholders will be required to satisfy
specified ownership, holding-period and solicitation requirements. Under these provisions, the proposing
shareholder or shareholder group must hold an amount of voting shares (determined as of the date of submission of
the proposal) equal to at least 3% of our voting shares, must have held that amount continuously for at least six
months before the date of the meeting and throughout the entire duration of the meeting, and must solicit holders of
shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote on the proposal at the shareholder
meeting. For the purpose of this paragraph, “voting shares” means shares that entitle the holder of the shares to vote
on the proposal. These requirements are more restrictive than the requirements that would otherwise apply absent
such a bylaw provision and may make it more difficult, or in some cases impracticable, for shareholders to submit
proposals for consideration at a shareholders’ meeting. As a result, our shareholders may have fewer opportunities to
present proposals for shareholder approval, even on matters they believe are important, which could limit
shareholder influence over corporate governance and other matters. Section 21.373 of the TBOC was enacted in
2025 and, while its enforceability has not yet been challenged in court and we do not have any material concerns
related to enforceability of Section 21.373 or the related bylaws provision, like many new laws, we expect the
enforceability of TBOC Section 21.373 will eventually be challenged.
Our bylaws place restrictions on the forum, venue and procedures for legal actions or proceedings initiated by
our shareholders, including certain requirements for mandatory arbitration. These provisions could limit our
shareholders’ ability to pursue certain claims and/or increase the cost of doing so and could also affect the
procedures, rights, and remedies available to our shareholders in such legal actions or proceedings.
Our bylaws will contain a section (the “Forum Section Bylaw”) that will provide that, unless the Company consents
in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for the filing, adjudication, and trial
of all disputes between (i) one or more shareholders and (ii) the Company or its directors, officers, or controlling
persons, or any underwriter of securities issued by the Company (or controlling person thereof) relating to any of the
following: (1) any derivative proceeding, meaning a civil dispute brought in the right of the Company; (2) any action
based on the governance, governing documents, or internal affairs of the Company; (3) any action based on state or
federal securities or trade regulation laws; (4) any action based on the alleged act(s) or omission(s) by a person in its
capacity as a shareholder, controlling person, director, officer or other managerial official of the Company; (5) any
action based on the alleged breach(es) by one or more shareholders, controlling persons, directors, officers, or other
managerial officials of a duty owed, in his or her capacity as such, to the Company or to any shareholder thereof; (6)
an action seeking to hold a shareholder, controlling person, director, officer, or other managerial official of the
Company liable for an obligation of the Company, other than on account of a written contract signed by the person
to be held liable in a capacity other than as a shareholder or managerial official; and (7) any action arising out of the
TBOC, will be the Texas Business Court, Eleventh Division (the “Business Court”) (for purposes of this summary,
each, an “Internal Dispute”).
The selection of the Business Court as the exclusive forum for Internal Disputes may limit a shareholder’s ability to
bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, other
managerial officials, or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, other
managerial officials, and other employees. Except to the extent that the Company consents in writing, or a court of
competent jurisdiction determines in a final and unappealable judgment, that an Internal Dispute is not subject to the
sole and exclusive venue and forum or jurisdiction of the Business Court or arbitration (as described further below),
a shareholder will not be permitted to litigate an Internal Dispute in federal court or in any state court other than the
Business Court, and will not be able to avail itself of any potential advantages or procedural protections of such
other forums. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our shares of capital stock will
be deemed to have notice of and have consented to these provisions. For more information, please refer to
“Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of Our Charter, our Bylaws and Texas Law.”
SpaceX maintains that the Forum Selection Bylaw, including without limitation the selection of the Business Court
as the sole and exclusive forum for all actions brought under federal securities laws, accords with the law and is
enforceable. However, the law governing the selection of a forum other than a federal court for certain actions
brought under the federal securities laws is unsettled, and there is some risk that, if an Internal Dispute were filed
62
under the Exchange Act (or the rules and regulations thereunder) in a court other than the Business Court, that court
could deny a motion to transfer the action to the Business Court pursuant to the Forum Selection Bylaw.
Accordingly, the bylaws provide that to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction were to determine in a final
and unappealable judgment that an Internal Dispute is not subject to the sole and exclusive venue and forum or
jurisdiction of the Business Court (such Internal Dispute, an “Other Dispute”), such Other Dispute would be
exclusively and finally settled by arbitration, pursuant to the Texas Arbitration Act, under the Expedited Procedure
Provisions of the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, pursuant to Article 30 thereof. To be clear,
absent Company consent, a shareholder would not be able to file an arbitration demand pursuant to the Dispute
Resolution Clause without first obtaining a final and unappealable judgment that the shareholder’s Internal Dispute
is not subject to the sole and exclusive venue and forum or jurisdiction of the Business Court. The governing law of
such Other Dispute would be the federal law of the United States or the law of the State of Texas, as applicable to
the issues raised in the Other Dispute, including without limitation the pleading and discovery limitations of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
Given the unsettled nature of the law in this area, there is also some risk that a court that has denied a motion to
transfer an Internal Dispute to the Business Court pursuant to the Forum Selection Bylaw would also deny a motion
to compel arbitration of such Other Dispute pursuant to the Forum Selection Bylaw. Accordingly, the Forum
Selection Bylaw further provides that to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction determines in a final and
unappealable judgment that such Other Dispute cannot be compelled to arbitration pursuant to the Forum Selection
Bylaw, the sole and exclusive forum for the adjudication and trial of such Other Dispute will be the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the “Federal Court”).
Finally, the Forum Selection Bylaw provides that to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction determines in a
final and unappealable judgment that the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction over any such Other Dispute, the sole and
exclusive forum and venue for such Other Dispute will be the state district courts of Harris County, Texas.
Regardless of the forum, venue, or procedures selected for an Internal Dispute or Other Dispute, our bylaws shall
require that any Internal Dispute or Other Disputes be brought only as an individual action or derivative proceeding,
and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall prohibit shareholders from bringing such an Internal Dispute or
Other Dispute as a class action, mass action, or other form of collective action or from being consolidated or joined,
in whole or in part, consistent with the Arbitration Rules. However, the Company, at its sole option, may elect to
seek consolidation or joinder of matters as consistent with the Arbitration Rules.
In addition, our bylaws will provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any
interest in shares of stock of the Company shall be deemed to have irrevocably and unconditionally waived any right
it may have to a trial by jury in any Internal Dispute. This will prevent a shareholder from requesting that a jury
decide disputed issues of fact and may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, other managerial
officials, and other employees.
These dispute resolution rules that our bylaws will establish for Internal Disputes, as well as the Arbitration Rules to
the extent they will apply, are different from the procedural rules that would normally apply to the litigation of
Internal Disputes in state or federal court. They may prevent a shareholder from availing itself of procedural
protections that would be available under litigation in state or federal court and may render available or affect
adversely the rights and remedies available to shareholders in such proceedings. Particularly in the case of
arbitration, including its prohibition on class or collective actions, these dispute resolution rules may also result in
greater costs being imposed on shareholders to litigate Internal Disputes, and in some cases involving lower amounts
in controversy, the additional costs that may be imposed on shareholders to litigate Internal Disputes could exceed
the potential recovery from such litigation.
It is possible that one or more provisions of our bylaws, including those regarding the exclusive forum for Internal
Disputes, mandatory arbitration for Other Disputes, or waiver of the right to proceed on a class, mass, or collective
basis, may be found by a court to be inapplicable or unenforceable. In addition, the mandatory arbitration provision
in our bylaws could be subject to litigation or regulatory scrutiny, which could result in the provision being enjoined
or in additional costs or uncertainty. In such case, we may incur additional costs or delays associated with resolving
63
such actions, including in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
64
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include those that express a
belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking
statements contained in this prospectus include information regarding our future operating results and financial
position, our business strategy and plans and our objectives for future operations. Forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus also include, but are not limited to, statements about:
•the development and deployment of Starship in accordance with our anticipated schedule (including
commencement of payload delivery to orbit in 2026) and launch cadence and our ability to achieve expected
performance, reusability, and cost efficiencies;
•the size and growth of our various existing and future markets, including the markets for commercial launch
services, satellite connectivity services, our AI platforms, AI compute infrastructure (terrestrial and orbital),
lunar-related activities and interplanetary activities, including the extent to which such markets develop,
particularly emerging or unproven markets that may not materialize as expected or on anticipated timelines;
•demand for our products and services, including our launch, connectivity, and AI offerings, and our ability to
grow our customer base and generate revenue;
•the deployment of our next-generation Starlink satellites, satellite-to-mobile connectivity, and orbital AI
compute infrastructure (including potential deployment of our orbital AI compute satellites as early as 2028),
including our ability to successfully develop, scale, and commercialize such technologies, which are subject to
significant technical complexity, capital requirements, new innovations and regulatory approvals;
•our target launch cadence and expansion of our manufacturing and operational capacity necessary to support our
strategies, including our ability to scale production, supply chain, infrastructure, and workforce efficiently;
•our ability to execute our growth strategy and scale our operations efficiently, including managing costs,
timelines, and operational complexity;
•our ability to solve novel issues and navigate and monetize technologies and environments that have never been
accessed or economized before;
•our ability to design, develop and successfully commercialize new and innovative technologies, products, and
services, including our AI platforms and Terafab, and our ability to achieve and maintain a low cost per token,
in each case in rapidly evolving and competitive markets;
•our ability to scale and monetize our AI products and services, including the development, performance, and
adoption of our frontier models and related applications, and to realize benefits from related acquisitions and
initiatives, such as our arrangement with Cursor;
•the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures and the impact of such capital expenditures on our
growth and performance, including our ability to fund such expenditures, manage costs, strategically reduce
costs and achieve expected returns on investment;
•our ability to obtain sufficient power, GPUs, and other critical components and manage our supply chain to
support our operations and growth;
•our ability to obtain and maintain required regulatory approvals, licenses and spectrum authorizations in the
United States and internationally, and the timing, scope, and conditions of such approvals;
•the competitive landscape in the industries in which we operate and our ability to compete effectively;
•the implementation, interpretation, and impact of current or future regulations including laws and regulations
relating to space operations, communications, AI, data privacy, and other areas;
•our ability to realize benefits and manage risks of being a public company; and
65
•general economic conditions.
These forward-looking statements may be accompanied by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,”
“likely,” “future,” “budget,” “goal,” “commit,” “pursue,” “target,” “seek,” “objective” or the negative of these
words, or similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events or trends that do not relate to historical
matters. We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this
prospectus.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus speak only as of the date of this prospectus, or such other date as
specified herein. We undertake no obligation to update these statements unless required by law, and we caution you
not to place undue reliance on them. Forward-looking statements are not assurances of future performance and
involve risks and uncertainties. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and
assumptions about future events. Forecasts, goals, milestones, and expectations that cover multi-year time horizons,
or unknown timelines, inherently involve increased risks with respect to predictability and actual results may differ
materially from current expectations. While our management considers these expectations and assumptions to be
reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory, technological,
environmental, political, and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict and many of
which are beyond our control. These risks, contingencies, and uncertainties and other important factors are described
in the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” sections of this prospectus. Should one or more of such risks or uncertainties occur, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance, achievements or plans could differ
materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. In addition, because we operate in
rapidly evolving and certain highly competitive markets, we may from time to time rapidly adjust, modify or change
our strategic priorities, capital allocation, product or service focus or operational initiatives in response to
technological developments, competitive dynamics, regulatory changes or other factors, which could cause actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. New
risks emerge from time to time, some risks are inherently unknown to us, and it is not possible for our management
to predict all such risks. Many of the risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect us or our prospects
are beyond our control or relate to portions of our business strategy that have a lengthy time horizon or involve
unprecedented ventures. This can make assessment of certain risks more difficult and you should factor these
uncertainties into your assessment of an investment in our Class A common stock. All forward-looking statements in
this prospectus are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this section.
66
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive approximately $ of net proceeds from this offering (or $ if the underwriters
exercise their option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock in full), based upon the assumed initial
public offering price of $ per share (which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus) after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to fund our growth strategy, including the expansion of our AI
compute infrastructure, enhancements to our launch infrastructure and launch vehicles, increases in the scale and
capacity of our satellite constellations, and any remaining amounts for general corporate purposes.
Assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, each $1.00 change in the assumed
initial public offering price of $ per share (which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus) would cause the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, to change by approximately $ million, assuming
no change to the number of shares of our Class A common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus. Similarly, an increase (decrease) of one million shares of Class A common stock sold in this offering by
us would increase (decrease) our net proceeds by $ million, assuming the initial public offering price of
$ per share (which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) remains
the same, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable
by us. If the net proceeds increase for any reason, we would use the additional net proceeds for the purposes set forth
above. If the net proceeds decrease for any reason, then we expect that we would use the lower amount of net
proceeds for the purposes set forth above.
The expected use of net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our present plans and
business conditions. We cannot predict with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds from this offering
or the amounts that we will actually spend on each of the uses set forth above. Accordingly, our management will
have significant flexibility in applying the net proceeds from this offering. The timing and amount of our actual
expenditures will be based on many factors, including cash flows and the anticipated growth of our business.
67
DIVIDEND POLICY
We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable
future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the growth of our business. Our future
dividend policy is within the discretion of our board and will depend upon then-existing conditions, including our
results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, investment opportunities, statutory restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends, restrictions in our existing and any future debt agreements and other factors our board may
deem relevant. Covenants under our Credit Agreements also restrict our ability to pay dividends, and we may enter
into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that restrict our ability to declare or pay cash
dividends or make distributions in the future. Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a description of the restrictions on our
ability to pay dividends.
Please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure, Ownership of our Class A Common Stock
and This Offering—Our ability to provide returns to shareholders will depend on appreciation in our share price, as
we do not plan to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.”
68
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2026:
•on an actual basis;
•on a pro forma basis, giving effect to (i) the Preferred Conversion as if such conversion had occurred on March
31, 2026, (ii) the Class C Reclassification as if such reclassification had occurred on March 31, 2026, and (iii)
the effectiveness of our charter, which will become effective upon the completion of this offering; and
•on a pro forma as adjusted basis, giving effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments set forth above, (ii) the sale of
shares of our Class A common stock in this offering at an assumed initial offering price of $ per share,
which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and (iii) the application of the
net proceeds from this offering as described under “Use of Proceeds.”
The table below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Description of Capital Stock” and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
As of March 31, 2026 | ||||||
(Dollars in millions, except par values) | Actual | Pro Forma | Pro Forma as Adjusted | |||
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................................. | $15,852 | $15,852 | $ | |||
Long-term debt: | ||||||
SpaceX Credit Facility (1) ......................................................... | $— | $— | ||||
SpaceX Bridge Loan (2) ............................................................ | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
X 2027 and X 2030 Notes ........................................................ | 27 | 27 | ||||
Other Financings (3) .................................................................. | 9,105 | 9,105 | ||||
Unamortized deferred financing costs ...................................... | (21) | (21) | ||||
Total long-term debt ............................................................ | $29,111 | $29,111 | ||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock: | ||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 189,155,861 shares issued and 134,451,267 shares outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted ............... | $7,049 | $— | ||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||
Class A common stock, par value $0.001; 2,964,501,353 shares issued and 2,882,444,444 shares outstanding, actual; 36,132,150,000 shares authorized, 6,824,581,339 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma; 36,132,150,000 shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted ............................................................ | 3 | 6 | ||||
Class B common stock, par value $0.001; 2,421,276,530 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 6,125,000,000 shares authorized, 5,695,729,430 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted ................................................................................. | 3 | 6 | ||||
Class C common stock, par value $0.001; 494,026,445 shares issued and outstanding, actual; 10,000,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted .......................................... | 0 | — | ||||
Class D common stock, par value $0.0001; no shares issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted ............... | — | — | ||||
69
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; no shares issued and outstanding, actual; 2,400,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted ................................................................................. | — | — | ||||
Additional paid-in capital ......................................................... | 74,083 | 81,126 | ||||
Accumulated deficit ................................................................. | (41,311) | (41,311) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income ............................. | 1,755 | 1,755 | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity ................................................... | $34,533 | $41,582 | ||||
Total capitalization ........................................................................ | $70,693 | $70,693 |
________________
(1)As of April 30, 2026, we had no borrowings outstanding under the SpaceX Credit Facility. In May 2026, the SpaceX Credit Facility was
amended to increase the borrowing capacity up to $5,000 million (“Amended SpaceX Credit Facility”). The Amended SpaceX Credit
Facility terminates, and all outstanding loans become due and payable, on May 19, 2031, unless the parties agree to an extension in
accordance with the terms of the Amended SpaceX Credit Facility. For more information on the SpaceX Credit Facility and Amended
SpaceX Credit Facility, please see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity
and Capital Resources—Debt Agreements.”
(2)As of April 30, 2026, we had $20,000 million of borrowings outstanding under the SpaceX Bridge Loan. The SpaceX Bridge Loan matures
on September 2, 2027, subject to extension in accordance with the terms of the agreement. For more information on the SpaceX Bridge
Loan, please see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital
Resources—Debt Agreements.”
(3)Includes obligations related to certain AI infrastructure assets recorded as failed sale-leaseback transactions.
70
DILUTION
Purchasers of the Class A common stock in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the
net tangible book value per share of the Class A common stock for accounting purposes. Our net tangible book value
as of March 31, 2026 was approximately $ , or $ per share of Class A common stock. Net tangible
book value per share is determined by dividing our tangible net worth (tangible assets less total liabilities) by the
total number of outstanding shares of all classes of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the completion
of this offering. After giving effect to the sale of shares of Class A common stock in this offering, the payment of
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses by us, the Class C Reclassification and the
Preferred Conversion as if such reclassification and conversion occurred on March 31, 2026, our adjusted pro forma
net tangible book value as of March 31, 2026 would have been approximately $ , or $ per share of
Class A common stock. This represents an immediate decrease in the net tangible book value of $ per share
of Class A common stock to Mr. Musk and other existing investors and an immediate dilution (i.e., the difference
between the offering price and the adjusted pro forma net tangible book value immediately after this offering) to
new investors purchasing shares of Class A common stock in this offering of $ per share. The following
table illustrates the per share dilution to new investors purchasing shares of Class A common stock in this offering:
Initial public offering price per share ........................................................................ | $ | ||
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2026 .......................... | $ | ||
Decrease per share attributable to new investors in this offering .............................. | |||
As adjusted pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving further effect to this offering ........................................................................................................ | |||
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering (1) ............................................................................................................... | $ |
_______________
(1)If the initial public offering price were to increase or decrease by $1.00 per share, then dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per
share of Class A common stock to new investors in this offering would equal $ or $ , respectively. Similarly, if the
number of shares of Class A common stock offered by us were to increase or decrease by shares, then dilution in pro forma net
tangible book value per share of Class A common stock to new investors in this offering would be $ or $ , respectively.
The following table summarizes, on an adjusted pro forma basis as of March 31, 2026, the total number of shares of
Class A and Class B common stock owned by Mr. Musk and other existing investors and to be owned by new
investors in this offering, the total consideration paid, and the average price per share paid by Mr. Musk and other
existing investors and to be paid by new investors in this offering at $ , calculated before deduction of
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
Shares Acquired(1) | Total Consideration(2) | Average Price Per Share | |||||||
Number | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||
Elon Musk and other existing investors ............................................ | % | $ | % | $ | |||||
New investors in this offering ............ | % | $ | % | $ | |||||
Total ................................................... | 100.0% | $ | 100.0% | $ | |||||
______________
(1)If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, Mr. Musk and other existing investors would own
approximately % and our new investors in this offering would own approximately % of the total number of shares of our
common stock outstanding after this offering.
(2)If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, the total consideration paid by our new investors would be
approximately $ (or %).
Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price would increase or decrease, as
applicable, the total consideration paid by new investors and the total consideration paid by all shareholders by
$ million, assuming that the number of shares of Class A common stock offered by us remains the same and
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
Similarly, an increase or decrease of shares in the number of shares of Class A common stock offered
by us would increase or decrease, as applicable, the total consideration paid by new investors and the total
71
consideration paid by all shareholders by $ million, assuming that the assumed initial public offering price
remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
74
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information
included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following
discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Our actual results
could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. You should review the sections titled
“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of forward-looking statements and
“Risk Factors” for a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis and
elsewhere in this prospectus. Our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared to
reflect the retrospective combination of the companies for all periods presented as the acquisitions of xAI and X
Holdings were accounted for as transactions between entities under common control.
Our Mission
Our mission is to build the systems and technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary, to understand the true
nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars. To do this, we have formed the most
ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth with unmatched capabilities to rapidly
manufacture and launch space-based communications that connect the world, to harness the Sun to power a truth-
seeking artificial intelligence that advances scientific discovery, and ultimately to build a base on the Moon and
cities on other planets.
Starship Flight Test
Overview
Founded in 2002, SpaceX is the only company building the integrated hardware and software infrastructure of the
future across space, connectivity, and AI. At our core, we are builders. We design, manufacture, launch, and operate
products and services built on cutting-edge technologies, including the world’s most advanced rockets and
spacecraft. We safely and reliably transport astronauts, satellites, and other payloads on missions that benefit life on
75
Earth. Since 2023, we have launched more than 80% of mass to orbit for the world each year with an over 99%
mission success rate with Falcon rockets. We also operate a high-speed, low-latency global broadband data and
communications network powered by approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth
Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers across 164 countries,
territories, and other markets, as of March 31, 2026. Using our dedicated satellite-to-mobile constellation, we offer
connectivity services, supplementing terrestrial networks and substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across
approximately 30 countries.
With the potential to improve both space exploration and life on Earth, AI accelerates SpaceX’s mission to make life
multiplanetary, to understand the true nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars.
xAI, which was founded in 2023 and acquired by SpaceX in early 2026, is now an integral pillar of our vertically
integrated company. We are rapidly constructing AI compute infrastructure—starting on Earth with the goal of
extending to space—at industry-leading pace and cost efficiency. Our infrastructure supports training and inference
for Grok, which has emerged as one of the world’s most advanced frontier models. Grok is designed as a truth-
seeking AI model, built on our founder Elon Musk’s mission to enable humanity to understand the universe. We
believe that accomplishing this mission requires a truth-seeking approach to AI. We define truth seeking as the
active, relentless pursuit of what is objectively true about reality, and grounded in evidence, logic, empirical data,
and first principles thinking. Our goal is to understand and explain what the universe appears to be doing, as
accurately as current knowledge allows. Within two years of its initial model release, Grok achieved frontier-level
performance in scientific reasoning, as measured by its GPQA Diamond score, an industry benchmark that evaluates
AI models on a standardized set of questions written and validated by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by
other leading model providers. Grok also benefits from integration with X, our real-time information, entertainment,
and free speech platform, which serves as a foundational distribution and data engine for our AI ecosystem and
further enhances Grok’s truth-seeking objective.
We believe that space represents the largest economic frontier in human history, unlocking unprecedented
opportunities in orbit and on Earth. Earth has limits, so we must build infrastructure and industries in space,
expanding human capabilities to improve life on Earth and to establish life beyond. Connectivity infrastructure in
space is designed to help everyone on Earth have access to education, healthcare, entertainment, and
communications, and to enable people to overcome many traditional limits, such as physical and political borders.
We believe AI infrastructure in space can utilize the virtually limitless power of the Sun and thereby enable the use
of AI as a transformative force for understanding the universe and improving the daily lives of all humans. We
believe the convergence of these areas will enable an unprecedented expansion in the global economy, leading to an
age of abundance. Our innovations and technological advancements are redefining industries on Earth, while we aim
to create new ones on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. We are truly building the infrastructure of the future.
SpaceX is the only company that has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, revolutionizing an industry
characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures. SpaceX upended
this paradigm through the application of first-principles thinking, which rejects industry assumptions and builds
solutions based on the fundamental laws of physics. Our intense, mission-driven, engineering-first culture and focus
on extreme vertical integration have propelled us to achieve what many deemed impossible. We have demonstrated
the ability to achieve groundbreaking technological innovations with speed, quality control, and precision. We
pioneered high-cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space with our Falcon family of rockets, with a goal to
transform the rocket launch industry into airline-like operations. In 2015, we established at least a 10-year lead over
the industry by successfully landing our first Falcon 9 booster back from space before anyone else. We have
continued to invest significantly in further increasing our lead by pursuing full and rapid reusability at scale,
including investing over $15 billion in our next-generation rocket, Starship.
We believe rocket launches and landings should be as routine and commonplace as airplanes taking off and landing.
To achieve this sort of cadence, our iterative approach emphasizes rapid designing, testing, and process
optimization, putting flight hardware in the flight environment as often as possible. This allows us to accelerate our
learning by repeatedly using and improving our systems. This has resulted in a significantly higher flight rate at
costs that are much lower than launch programs that existed before SpaceX. For example, according to NASA, the
first version of Falcon 9 in 2010 had a launch cost of approximately $2,700 per kilogram, which represented a
reduction of approximately 85% compared to the historical average launch cost per kilogram of $18,500. The first
76
version of Falcon Heavy in 2018 further reduced this cost to approximately $1,400 per kilogram, a reduction of
approximately 92% compared to the historical average cost. With the future deployment of Starship, which is
designed to be the world’s first fully and rapidly reusable spacecraft, we aim to further reduce the cost to reach orbit
by 99% or more relative to the historical average launch cost. Central to our cost advantage is the reusability of key
hardware—most notably boosters—which we recover, refurbish, and refly many times instead of discarding after
single use. This dramatically lowers per-launch costs by minimizing hardware replacement expenses and spreading
fixed production costs across repeated uses. Space flight that historically cost billions per launch now costs in the
tens of millions, fundamentally reducing the cost of space access, providing the opportunity to build new enterprises
in space.
Similarly, xAI has cracked the code in the complexities of building and scaling AI compute infrastructure, becoming
the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. We believe the combination of our
proprietary AI infrastructure capability, our truth-seeking frontier model, Grok, and our access to real-time data on
X creates a formidable competitive advantage, allowing us to maintain a leading position in the development of
advanced artificial intelligence. This advantage stems from our complete vertical integration and the common vision
infused by our founder, Elon Musk. In just a few years, we have demonstrated an ability to build coherent compute
at scale and rapid speed with lower cost. COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II collectively provide approximately 1.0
gigawatt of compute power, with additional power capacity available for data center operations. We believe speed is
a competitive advantage. In order to bring compute clusters online as fast as possible, we employ a vertically
integrated, nimble approach to construction. At COLOSSUS, we brought online the first cluster of approximately
100,000 H100 processors, approximately 130 megawatts of compute power, in just 122 days, repurposing the shell
of an existing factory. At COLOSSUS II, we brought online the first cluster of approximately 110,000 GB200
processors, approximately 210 megawatts of compute power, even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative comparison,
an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two years.
Furthermore, in the case of COLOSSUS II, following the initial cluster, we brought online the second cluster of
110,000 GB300 processors and 220 megawatts of compute power in 64 days, demonstrating our ability to rapidly
scale our facilities once built. We expect that once fully operational, the next phase of expansion at COLOSSUS II
will bring online at least 220,000 additional GB300 processors and over 400 additional megawatts of compute
power. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center construction costs
for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis.
We are able to deploy power and compute significantly faster than other AI companies through first-principles
thinking, behind-the-meter power generation, coupled with what we believe is the world’s largest network of
sustainable battery storage systems, and innovations in advanced liquid cooling, high-density rack layouts, and
efficient networking. Our facilities also incorporate innovative design features that limit the effects on regional
electricity pricing for neighbors and include advanced water cleaning, reclamation, and recycling processes to
support sustainable operations. We partner with utilities and communities to connect to and enhance the grid over
time, and do so while pledging to cover costs of all new power delivery infrastructure upgrades to service our data
centers, including adequate network upgrade costs, to ensure that these expenses are not passed on to the ordinary
household. Our ability to rapidly and cost-effectively scale with the latest processors keeps us ahead of competitors
who deploy traditional and more expensive methods. As a result, we believe COLOSSUS II became one of the
world’s first data centers to deploy GB200s and GB300s, the most advanced AI processors available at the time, at
significant scale, and is currently powering training for our next frontier models, including Grok-5. Furthermore,
through our Terafab initiative together with Tesla to build a manufacturing facility capable of producing 1 terawatt
per year of compute hardware, we intend to further extend our vertical integration to chip design and manufacturing
to alleviate potential future chip shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute performance, and potentially reduce overall
compute costs. Intel, which has the ability to design, fabricate, and package ultra-high-performance chips at scale,
also joined the Terafab project in early April 2026. Our shovels-to-tokens approach allows us to train and iterate our
frontier models at high velocity, accelerating development cycles, eliminating external bottlenecks, and driving
rapid, continuous improvements in model performance.
We were the first private company to develop and launch a liquid-fuel rocket to reach orbit with the successful
launch of Falcon 1 in 2008. In 2019, we were the first to begin deploying a large-scale LEO broadband satellite
77
constellation. In February 2026, we acquired xAI, the first company to build a gigawatt-scale AI training cluster and
largest coherent supercomputer. The graphic below illustrates key milestones for our business.
78
Our Repeatable Business Model
Our business model is built on a repeatable, engineering-driven framework that combines our unparalleled launch
capabilities, extreme vertical integration, rapid iteration, and disciplined capital investment to create durable, large-
scale businesses. We execute this framework through the following core principles:
1.Leverage our unparalleled launch capabilities to enable massive scale. Our rockets—with unmatched
launch cadence, best-in-class reliability, and dramatically reduced cost-to-orbit—are the foundation that we
expect will enable us to create economic opportunities in space and deliver a diversified portfolio of services.
Our launch capabilities enable large-scale deployment of assets that would not otherwise be economically
viable.
2.Identify and create new trillion-dollar market opportunities. We focus on market opportunities that are
useful for humanity and that present trillion-dollar opportunities, including global broadband and mobile
connectivity for consumers, enterprises, and governments; and AI applications and computational infrastructure.
We prioritize opportunities where structural inefficiencies or legacy technological limitations have constrained
supply.
3.Design a solution with world-class engineering and first-principles thinking. We apply physics-based
engineering and first-principles thinking to design products and systems from the ground up—boiling things
down to the most fundamental truths and reasoning up from there. This helps us drive massive, step-function
improvements in performance, scalability, and cost.
4.Apply “The Algorithm” (make less dumb, delete, optimize, accelerate, automate). We operate under a set
of core execution principles that we refer to as “The Algorithm,” a five-step iterative process that we use as our
guiding principles day-to-day. We make the requirements less dumb, delete unnecessary processes or parts
(embracing the principle that the best part is no part), only then optimize the necessary processes or parts, and
then accelerate cycle time (many entities have launched once; no one other than us has ever launched over 100
times per year), and automate only proven processes after the first four steps are completed. We apply the
Algorithm across every aspect of our organization, creating a cultural and operational standard of excellence
that has defined SpaceX since inception.
5.Vertically integrate all the way to the end customer. We design and manufacture a significant portion of our
components in-house, including engines, avionics, structures, and software, even producing the “tools that make
the tools,” enabling us to test, fail, and iterate rapidly. We can then release newer, more advanced hardware with
speed and cost efficiency.
6.Continuously drive cost down and throughput up. Through rocket reusability, manufacturing at scale,
advanced automation, and rigorous operational discipline, we continuously reduce unit costs while increasing
launch cadence, satellite network, and AI hosting capacity.
7.Generate significant cash flow and reinvest in the future. As our businesses scale, they generate significant
cash flow, which we reinvest into nascent market opportunities—driving a self-reinforcing cycle of constant
innovation and potentially creating significant additional value.
Segments in Our Vertically-Integrated Innovation Engine
We have three reportable segments in our vertically integrated innovation engine: Space, Connectivity, and AI. In
our Space segment, we design, manufacture, and launch reusable rockets to provide high cadence, reliable, and
affordable access to space at unprecedented scale. In our Connectivity segment, we operate a worldwide high-speed,
low-latency broadband data and communications network powered by over 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile
satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers
across 164 countries, territories, and other markets. In our AI segment, we operate a highly vertically integrated AI
platform spanning our truth-seeking frontier model Grok, AI solutions for consumer and enterprise customers, X—
our real-time information, entertainment, and free speech platform—and AI computational infrastructure.
79
Our financial results reflect the strength of our operating model and our ability to create and scale multiple new
businesses:
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we generated revenue on a consolidated basis of $4,694 million,
loss from operations of $(1,943) million and Adjusted EBITDA of $1,127 million. In 2025, we generated
revenue on a consolidated basis of $18,674 million, loss from operations of $(2,589) million and Adjusted
EBITDA of $6,584 million. Our Space and Connectivity segments contributed the substantial majority of our
consolidated revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
demonstrating the benefits of their scale and operating leverage in our vertically integrated business model;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Space segment generated revenue of $619 million, loss from
operations of $(662) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(351) million. In 2025, our Space segment
generated revenue of $4,086 million, loss from operations of $(657) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of
$653 million. Additionally, our Space segment funded $930 million and $3,004 million in research and
development expense during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
respectively, for our next-generation Starship launch vehicle program. Starship is designed to enable a step-
function change in our launch capability across reusability, payload capacity, and launch cadence, and is the key
enabler of our long-term growth strategy by unlocking entirely new categories of missions;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Connectivity segment generated revenue of $3,257 million,
income from operations of $1,188 million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $2,087 million. Our Connectivity
segment, primarily driven by Starlink, generated revenue of $11,387 million, income from operations of $4,423
million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $7,168 million in 2025, representing year-over-year growth of
49.8%, 120.4%, and 86.2%, respectively, benefiting from subscriber growth, increasing enterprise adoption, and
continued improvement in network efficiency;
•In our newly acquired AI segment, we plan to prioritize growth and investment to capture significant
opportunities in AI applications and compute infrastructure. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our AI
segment generated revenue of $818 million, loss from operations of $(2,469) million, and Segment Adjusted
EBITDA of $(609) million. In 2025, our AI segment generated revenue of $3,201 million, loss from operations
of $(6,355) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(1,237) million, reflecting its earlier stage of
development and continued investments to support long-term growth opportunities in AI; and
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, capital expenditures for our Space segment was $1,052 million, for
our Connectivity segment was $1,332 million and for our AI segment was $7,723 million. In 2025, capital
expenditures for our Space segment was $3,832 million, for our Connectivity segment was $4,178 million and
for our AI segment was $12,727 million.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “—Non-GAAP Financial
Measures” for additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations of Segment
Adjusted EBITDA to segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Space
Since our founding in 2002, SpaceX has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, transforming an industry
characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures. We design,
manufacture, launch, and refurbish reusable launch vehicles that provide cost-efficient, reliable, and high-cadence
access to space for our own purposes as well as for third-party commercial and government customers. In 2025, we
launched from four primary launch pads in the United States and successfully recovered boosters across seven
landing facilities including autonomous drone ships and catch towers based on the vehicle type and mission profile.
Our extensive vertical integration and end-to-end control over the entire value chain, from design to launch to
operations, allows us to achieve unprecedented speed and cost efficiency.
80
Falcon 9 First Stage Booster Landing
As of March 31, 2026, SpaceX had launched a total mass to orbit of approximately 7,400 metric tons with an over
99% mission success rate across our Falcon rockets. We have completed approximately 650 orbital space launches,
and over 540 of those launches were completed by a flight-proven Falcon rocket. In 2025 alone, SpaceX completed
170 missions across Falcon and Starship vehicles and 159 flight-proven booster launches with an over 99% success
rate on attempted booster recoveries. We launched over 2,200 metric tons, representing over 80% of mass to orbit
for the world in 2025. With the first successful launch of Falcon 1 in 2008, we became the first private company to
successfully launch a liquid-fueled rocket to Earth’s orbit. Just two years later, in 2010, the commercial debut of the
Falcon 9 rocket revolutionized space access by delivering unprecedented cost efficiency. For example, according to
NASA, the first version of Falcon 9 in 2010 reduced launch cost to approximately $2,700 per kilogram, which
represented a reduction of approximately 85% compared to the historical average launch cost per kilogram of
$18,500. The first version of Falcon Heavy in 2018 further reduced this cost to $1,400 per kilogram, a reduction of
approximately 92% compared to the historical average. We have also reduced our internal cost of launch through a
combination of engineering improvements, manufacturing efficiencies, and economies of scale—most notably,
through our ability to drive more frequent reuse of rockets.
We generate Space revenue primarily through launch and mission services of Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, and Dragon
provided to commercial and government customers. We fly to LEO, MEO, GEO, lunar, and interplanetary
trajectories, as well as the International Space Station. Our Space segment revenue is derived from fixed-price
contracts related to the development and provision of launch services for both commercial customers and
governmental agency space programs, either at a “point in time” or “over time.”
We manage our Space segment to support our businesses and those of our customers. We plan launches and allocate
payloads in advance, although it can be difficult to manage the timing of customer payload arrivals. When an
expected customer payload for a planned launch is not available, we instead use launch capacity for our satellites. As
a result, we adjust expected launch payloads frequently, impacting period-to-period financial comparison. For a
majority of customer payloads, revenue and costs are primarily recognized at the launch or deployment of the
customer’s spacecraft to its intended orbit, with some revenues and costs being recognized over time. For launches
dedicated to deploying our Starlink satellites, we capitalize the associated costs within our Connectivity segment and
depreciate them over time, and we do not recognize revenue for those launches in our Space segment. We allocate a
81
significant amount of launch capacity to our Connectivity segment, and expect to allocate a significant amount to
our AI segment in the future. Our Space segment revenue only reflects customer launches and other customer
activities. As a result, notwithstanding an increasing launch cadence, our Space segment has relatively lower
revenue scale and revenue growth compared to our other segments, though its financial results do not reflect the
foundational strategic value that it provides to us in bolstering the growth of our Connectivity and AI segments.
Connectivity. Starlink provides global access to high-speed internet, including underserved rural and remote
communities worldwide. As of March 31, 2026, we had approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile
satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, providing broadband connectivity to approximately 10.3 million Starlink Subscribers
across 164 countries, territories, and other markets. We also provide satellite-to-mobile texting and over-the-top
voice services to approximately 7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30 countries.
Starlink Mini
•Starlink Consumer Broadband. We operate the world’s largest and most advanced space-based internet
broadband service with median latency at approximately 25 milliseconds as of March 31, 2026. We provide
fiber-like download speeds—at a median of 225 Mbps during peak hours for residential users as of March 31,
2026—and the technological capability to provide service everywhere on Earth, including the poles. This
service quality is enabled by our vast network of approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites
in Low-Earth Orbit, which accounted for approximately 75% of all active maneuverable satellites in orbit as of
March 31, 2026. We expect to commence deploying our next-generation V3 satellites, designed to offer one
Tbps of downlink capacity per satellite, using Starship in the second half of 2026. We expect that a single
Starship launch will be capable of deploying up to 60 V3 satellites to LEO, representing a potential twenty-fold
increase in Starlink downlink capacity deployed relative to a Falcon 9 launch. As of March 31, 2026, we had
approximately 10.3 million Starlink Subscribers, up approximately 105% from 5.0 million subscribers a year
prior. We charge our Starlink Subscribers a monthly subscription fee, which varies based on geographic market
and download speed, plus typically a one-time upfront terminal cost.
•Enterprise Solutions. SpaceX is a critical partner to a wide array of enterprises. We offer Starlink’s high-
speed, low-latency, reliable internet services to enterprise customers across industries including construction,
agriculture, retail, telecom, hospitality, aviation, maritime, and land mobility. Starlink’s unique capabilities are
well‑suited for deployments across field offices, remote worksites, research stations, drilling rigs, rural
82
hospitals, aircraft, cruise ships, trains, and hotels. Our enterprise customers include companies such as United
Airlines, Carnival, Maersk, and John Deere, among others. We also serve a broad fixed‑site customer base
across industries such as retail and financial services that require high availability for critical operations as well
as reliable connectivity in remote or hard-to-serve locations. As companies continue to invest in secure and
resilient networks and backup systems to keep critical infrastructure online—such as point‑of‑sale and payment
processing systems—we often start as a backup solution and then transition to being the primary solution. Our
enterprise contracts are based on a combination of subscriptions, data consumption, capacity, or other pricing
models depending on each customer’s particular needs. Since 2023, no Starlink Enterprise customer having
contributed more than $750,000 of annual revenue has voluntarily discontinued their service, demonstrating the
strong performance and value of our offering. This is despite the ability of our customers to cancel the service at
any time.
•Government Solutions. For our government customers, we provide high-speed, resilient connectivity for
public services, social impact, humanitarian efforts, and disaster response in even the most remote and
challenging environments. Examples include support for the FEMA in coordinating disaster recovery after
hurricanes and wildfires, the NOAA for at-sea testing and environmental monitoring, the Government of the
Philippines for linking remote islands, schools, and public institutions, the Government of Jamaica for
improving digital access in remote and maritime areas, and the Government of Ecuador for supporting
education and healthcare connectivity in isolated communities. Separately with Starshield, we have leveraged
our commercial LEO satellite constellation engineering learnings and operational experiences to develop a
secure, dedicated satellite network designed specifically for United States Government customers and national
security applications.
•Starlink Mobile. We provide satellite-to-mobile connectivity, supplementing terrestrial networks and
substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across approximately 30 countries. We partner with MNOs
including major wireless carriers like T-Mobile in the United States, and other international operators including
One NZ, Optus, Telstra, Rogers, KDDI, Salt, Entel, Kyivstar, and VMO2. Through these partnerships, we
enable consumers, businesses, and public-sector customers to use their existing phones in more places, support
critical connectivity during disasters and power outages, and open new applications for low-bandwidth mobile
and IoT devices. Our current capabilities under our “V1” constellation (consisting of approximately 650 V1
Mobile satellites in orbit) include light data, text messaging (SMS), and over-the-top voice services (e.g.,
WhatsApp and FaceTime). We are developing more comprehensive satellite-to-mobile services, including
broadband data and IoT connectivity, which are expected to deliver resilient, infrastructure-independent
connectivity worldwide and enable 5G connectivity. We have partnerships with approximately 30 MNOs on six
continents, covering an area that is home to approximately 1.9 billion people. We charge MNOs either a fixed
fee or a per-mobile user fee-based amount, which is typically passed through to the customer via the carrier as
an “add-on” feature.
We generate revenue in our Connectivity segment primarily through subscription fees from consumer subscribers.
We drive consumer revenue through monthly subscription fees based on geographic market and download speed,
recognizing revenue ratably over the service period, plus typically a one-time sale of a kit. In addition, we generate
revenue from enterprises through contracts structured as a combination of subscriptions, data consumption, and
capacity, or on a percentage-of-completion basis, depending on each customer’s particular needs. We generate
government revenue via long term contracts for Starshield, a secure satellite network designed specifically for
government customers and national security applications. We also earn Starlink Mobile revenue through revenue-
sharing arrangements with MNO partners, based on connectivity services included in their plans.
In 2025, revenue from consumer subscribers represented over 60% of Connectivity segment revenue. We expect
revenue from consumer subscribers, as well as enterprise and government customers, to be the primary driver of
Connectivity segment growth, and that Starlink Mobile will become a significant new contributor of Connectivity
segment revenue.
AI. We operate a highly vertically integrated AI platform spanning gigawatt-scale AI compute infrastructure, our
truth-seeking frontier AI model, Grok, AI solutions for consumer and enterprise customers, and X, our real-time
information, entertainment, and free speech platform. We believe AI is rapidly converging toward AGI, where
83
human cognitive capabilities can be replicated and scaled at machine speeds, profoundly augmenting human
productivity. Once an AGI system exists, its true value derives from the ability to create limitless duplicates of
human-like intelligence, necessitating vast computational resources and cost-efficient deployment to achieve
meaningful scale. Without large-scale, power-efficient infrastructure, AGI cannot be deployed broadly or
economically—making such infrastructure a critical strategic differentiator.
COLOSSUS II Facility in Memphis, Tennessee
•AI Compute Infrastructure. xAI has established a leading position in building and scaling terrestrial AI
compute infrastructure, becoming the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. Our
AI compute facilities, COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II, collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of
compute power, with additional power capacity available for data center operations. Our first-principles
thinking enables us to build coherent compute at scale and at rapid speed with lower costs than most other
companies in the industry. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS online in 122 days, repurposing the shell
of an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative
comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two
years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center construction
costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis. This
dual speed and cost advantage stems from our complete vertical integration and the shared culture infused by
our founder, Mr. Musk, across our Space, Connectivity, and AI segments. The addition of Terafab, an initiative
together with Tesla to build a manufacturing facility capable of producing 1 terawatt per year of compute
hardware, aims to further extend our vertical integration to chip design and manufacturing to alleviate potential
future chip shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute performance, and potentially reduce overall compute costs.
Intel, which has the ability to design, fabricate, and package ultra-high-performance chips at scale, has also
joined the Terafab project. We believe that the key constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical—chip
manufacturing, data center infrastructure, and power generation; the future of AI will be determined by the
control of the physical stack.
•Truth-Seeking Frontier Model. xAI has developed one of the world’s most advanced, truth-seeking frontier
models with Grok. Since launching Grok-1 in November 2023, we have released four major versions and
notable variations thereof, achieving one of the fastest iteration cycles in the industry, culminating in Grok-4.3
84
(April 2026). Building on this trajectory, we expect to continue scaling Grok through subsequent generations.
Ongoing training of next‑generation models is expected to scale toward multiple trillions of parameters, which
could represent a step change in reasoning in depth and overall intelligence. In this context, the number of
parameters refers to the scale of the model, where parameters are the internal numerical values, such as
“weights,” that are adjusted during training to enable the model to recognize patterns and relationships in data.
A larger number of parameters generally allows the model to capture more complex relationships, store greater
amounts of knowledge, and achieve higher levels of reasoning capability. Within two years of its initial model
release, Grok achieved frontier-level performance in scientific reasoning, as measured by its GPQA Diamond
score, an industry benchmark that evaluates AI models on a standardized set of questions written and validated
by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by other leading model providers. This accelerated rate of
innovation stems from our highly vertically integrated stack: full ownership of training infrastructure, access to
the world’s most powerful compute clusters, and relentless focus on truth seeking and real-world utility. A key
competitive differentiator is Grok’s deep integration with X, enabling proprietary access to a real-time
information stream of approximately 350 million daily posts, which enhances freshness, relevance, and
contextual awareness for Grok. This direct, real-time access to the information and human discourse on X
enhances Grok’s truth-seeking capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse
viewpoints. We believe that this combination of compute infrastructure scale and the massive dataset available
to us through X, subject to some limitations for certain content, has allowed us to achieve industry-leading
performance and provide model outputs that analyze real-time information on global events. We expect that our
compute infrastructure and direct access to real-time data via X constitute substantial performance advantages
for Grok that will result in increasingly rapid and dramatic iteration cycles.
•Consumer and Enterprise Applications. We leverage our leading frontier models and compute infrastructure
to deliver consumer and enterprise applications. In under six months, we developed Grok Voice, a real-time
speech engine, including in multilingual performance. Our image and video generation system, Imagine,
produced approximately 10 billion images and over 2 billion videos per month, on average, for the quarter
ending March 31, 2026. Together with Tesla, we are also developing Macrohard, an agentic AI platform
designed to be capable of fully emulating digital workflows and augmenting human operation of computers—
from coding and product development to management and entire business processes—using sophisticated
autonomous agents. We believe Macrohard will have the potential to fundamentally transform how companies
are structured and operate, thereby allowing dramatic increases in human productivity. In addition, we believe
our existing government relationships and track record as large government contractors are a structural
advantage as governments become significant consumers of AI applications.
Our integrated AI platforms across Grok and X have over 1.3 billion supported accounts active in the last
twelve months ended March 31, 2026, including approximately 550 million MAUs, up from over 1.1 billion
supported accounts and approximately 520 million MAUs as of December 31, 2025. Of our MAUs, we had
approximately 117 million MAUs that used Grok’s AI features as of March 31, 2026. While MAUs provide an
estimated measure of the size and engagement of our user base, we are focused on revenue and operating
margin, and manage our business with the objective of driving sustainable revenue growth and profitability
rather than with the primary objective of growing or maintaining MAU levels.
We also monetize user activity through high-impact advertising inventory on X. We believe X’s scale, real-time
engagement, and integration with Grok provide a differentiated foundation for building a unified user
experience across communication, content discovery, commerce, and financial services, among others. For
enterprises that advertise on X, we offer large-scale user engagement, real-time content, and advanced AI-
driven performance marketing tools. For enterprises, we offer tailored deployments of Grok customized to
specific workflows and security needs through Grok Business and Grok Enterprise, sold on license-,
consumption-, or outcome-based pricing models.
Our Capital Allocation and Funding Strategy
Since our beginning, we have managed through multiple investment cycles. We initially raised capital to fund what
is now our Space segment, which generates revenue from commercial and government customers while serving as
the backbone for our Connectivity segment. We invested in our Connectivity segment as we generated Segment
85
Adjusted EBITDA from our Space segment, along with additional equity capital that we raised externally, creating a
segment that generates predictable and recurring revenue from consumer, enterprise, and government customers. We
continue to invest meaningfully in both our Space and Connectivity segments to build out the infrastructure of the
future through our next-generation Starship launch platform and our expanded Starlink broadband and mobility
networks.
We have a stellar track record of capital allocation and value creation in Space and Connectivity. Since SpaceX’s
founding in 2002, we have raised over $9 billion of equity capital to fund the development and growth of these two
business segments. The Space segment became Segment Adjusted EBITDA positive on a sustained basis beginning
in 2018 and the Connectivity segment became in aggregate Segment Adjusted EBITDA positive on a sustained basis
beginning in 2023. In 2025, our Space segment generated a loss from operations of $(657) million and Segment
Adjusted EBITDA of $653 million, including the impact of funding $3,004 million in research and development
expense for our next-generation Starship launch vehicle program. In 2025, our Connectivity segment generated
income from operations of $4,423 million and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $7,168 million.
We acquired xAI in February 2026, which forms the basis of our AI segment. We expect to allocate substantial
capital to expand our compute infrastructure, and we expect a multi-year investment horizon before these
deployments translate into sustained positive AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA. During this investment period, our
capital expenditures will scale as quickly as we are able to deploy power and compute to address the $26.5 trillion
potential market opportunity for AI. We plan to access a range of debt and equity financing solutions available to us
as a public company to fund future investments in growth and to maintain strong liquidity. We aim to maintain an
investment grade credit rating.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “—Non-GAAP Financial
Measures” for additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations of Segment
Adjusted EBITDA to segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Key Business Metrics
We use the following key business metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends,
formulate business plans, and make strategic decisions.
Space
In our Space segment, we use mass to orbit and launches as key business metrics to measure our scale and
throughput. Mass to orbit and launches grow more rapidly than Space segment revenue because these metrics
include our internal constellation deployments from which we do not recognize inter-segment revenue.
Mass to Orbit: Mass to orbit is the total kilograms of payload that we deploy to orbit in a given period, and is a key
indicator of SpaceX’s capacity and scalability that supports Space revenue and drives expansion across our
Connectivity and AI segments. We calculate this metric by summing verified mass, including Starlink satellites,
customer payloads, and development cargo, from all successful orbital and flight tests. This measure excludes failed
or scrubbed attempts. We increased mass to orbit from 1,210 metric tons in 2023 to 1,699 metric tons in 2024 to
2,213 metric tons in 2025, and from 450 metric tons in the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 556 metric tons in
the three months ended March 31, 2026. In 2023, 2024, and 2025, mass to orbit included 205, 282, and 312 metric
tons attributable to customer payloads, respectively, and 1,005, 1,418, and 1,901 metric tons attributable to internal
payloads, respectively (the amounts presented may not add up to the corresponding totals due to rounding). Falcon 9
launches contribute steadily at an average capacity of 13 metric tons per mission since 2023 to various orbits while
we transition to Starship. As the most powerful launch system ever developed, we expect that Starship V3 will be
able to carry a payload of 100 metric tons, with future generations of Starship being designed to double this payload.
86
Launches: Launches are a key measure of our operational scale, which in turn supports our revenue growth and
mission to expand humanity’s presence in space. Launches in a period represent the sum of all successful orbital and
flight tests across our rockets, including internal Starlink deployments, development tests, and launches for our
third-party customers, and excluding any cancellations or scrubs that occurred in that period. Falcon 9 is the most
active orbital launch vehicle today, with approximately 620 orbital space launches as of March 31, 2026, and an
over 99% mission success rate. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we launched 40 Falcon rockets, of
which 39 were flight-proven booster launches, and in 2025, we launched 165 Falcon 9 rockets, of which 157 were
flight-proven booster launches. While we have steadily increased our Falcon 9 launch cadence over recent years, we
expect Falcon 9 launches to decrease over time. While Falcon 9 currently drives the majority of our launch activity,
we expect Starship, which is designed to be the world’s first fully, rapidly, reusable launch vehicle, to become a
larger contributor to our launch volume as it enters operational service. To date, we have executed 11 Starship flight
tests to advance our goal of rapidly and fully reusable orbital capability, a breakthrough we believe will transform
our launch economics and benefit both our business and customers who rely on our launch services. We have also
scheduled a 12th flight test, which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster,
powered by the next evolution of our Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad at Starbase. We
allocate a significant amount of launch capacity to our Connectivity segment, and expect to allocate a significant
87
amount to our AI segment in the future. Our Space segment revenue only reflects our customer launches and
customer activities.
__________________
(1)With respect to Falcon launches, the number of launches for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024, and 2025 totaled 96, 134, and 165,
respectively, of which customer launches totaled 33, 45, and 43, respectively, and internal launches totaled 63, 89, and 122, respectively.
The number of Falcon launches for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2026 totaled 36 and 40, respectively, of which customer
launches totaled 12 and 7, respectively, and internal launches totaled 24 and 33, respectively. We designate a launch as a “customer launch”
if an external customer payload constitutes the primary payload (i.e., where the principal objective is to deliver the customer payload) and
the mission parameters (e.g., launch window, orbital parameters, mission profile) are designed around the primary payload’s requirements.
To date, all Starship launches have been classified as internal.
Connectivity
In our Connectivity segment, we view Starlink Subscribers and Starlink Subscriber ARPU as key business metrics to
evaluate our growth and monetization.
Starlink Subscribers: We define a Starlink Subscriber as a unique Service Line that is directly assigned to a
Starlink.com account registered to a person or entity that does not have a direct, negotiated agreement with the
Starlink sales team. A Service Line is an individual instance of Starlink broadband internet service provisioned
under a subscription plan, generally associated with a specific Starlink terminal or group of terminals, and billed
according to Starlink’s service plans and terms of service. The number of Service Lines is distinct from the number
of unique devices, account holders, end users or physical persons. An individual, household, or business may share a
single Service Line among multiple end-users. Likewise, an individual, household, or business may maintain
multiple service lines (e.g., both a Residential Service Line and a separate Roam Service Line, which would be
defined as two separate Service Lines and therefore two Starlink Subscribers).
We use this measure to assess the adoption of Starlink as we expand within and across geographies and business
segments. Starlink Subscribers includes both Personal (e.g., Residential and Roam) and Business (e.g., Local
Priority and Global Priority) subscription plans, but does not include managed enterprise and government customers
with contracts in domains including aviation, maritime, land mobility, fixed sites and government entities. We
calculate Starlink Subscribers for a period as the number of unique Service Lines at the end of the period. Starlink
88
Subscribers totaled approximately 10.3 million and 5.0 million, up 105% and 91% on a year-over-year basis, in the
quarters ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively.
Starlink Subscriber ARPU: We calculate ARPU as service revenue generated from Starlink Subscribers during the
period divided by (i) the average number of Starlink Subscribers during the period and by (ii) the number of months
in the period. Our strategy is focused on driving sustainable revenue growth and expanding our margins through
operational efficiencies and technological advancements, rather than prioritizing increases in ARPU. This approach
aligns with our long-term vision of expanding global connectivity and market access. We generally expect Starlink
Subscriber ARPU to continue to decline over the next few years as the portion of our subscriber base outside North
America continues to grow, as we add lower priced service plans, and as we adjust the monthly service plan fees we
charge for broadband offerings. However, we expect these dynamics to be offset by increased scale and
technological advancement in our launch, satellite, and user terminal operations, ultimately supporting overall
revenue growth and cost reduction. Our Starlink Subscriber monthly ARPU decreased from $86 per month for the
three months ended March 31, 2025 to $66 per month for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and from $91 per
89
month in 2024 to $81 per month in 2025. These decreases were driven primarily by international expansion and the
addition of lower priced service plans.
AI
Nameplate Compute Draw: We calculate Nameplate Compute Draw for a period as the number of GPUs installed in
our data centers at the end of the period multiplied by their respective all-in power draw. Nameplate Compute Draw
reflects installed capacity and does not represent actual power consumption or utilization. It does not include power
we install and use for our supporting infrastructure such as cooling systems, power distribution losses, lighting,
security systems, or facility-level overhead. Our Nameplate Compute Draw increased to 1.0 gigawatt as of March
90
31, 2026 as we brought COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II online. We use this metric to assess our ability to deploy
and scale compute capacity.
Segment Income (Loss) from Operations
Space Income (Loss) from Operations
Space loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $592 million to $(662) million
compared to $(70) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an accelerated
investment in development of the Starship vehicle as well as launch facilities to support future Starship launches,
and a decrease in revenue from customer launches, partially offset by a decrease in cost of revenue, selling, general,
and administrative expenses and impairment.
Space income (loss) from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $678 million to $(657)
million compared to $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, while Space income (loss) from operations
for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $22 million to $21 million for the year ended December 31,
2024 compared to $(1) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The year-over-year decrease in 2025 was
primarily driven by an accelerated investment in development of the Starship vehicle as well as launch facilities to
support future Starship launches, partially offset by an increase in revenue and decrease in cost of revenue.
Connectivity Income (Loss) from Operations
Connectivity income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $155 million to
$1,188 million compared to $1,033 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by
increased revenue from our consumer subscribers (composed of 104.7% growth in Starlink Subscribers, offset by a
22.9% decline in Starlink Subscriber ARPU, primarily due to international expansion and the addition of lower
priced service plans) and enterprise business, partially offset by higher depreciation of capitalized launch and
satellite costs due to the increase in Starlink flights, as well as higher operating expenses including ground operating
costs and international expansion costs to support and drive subscriber growth.
Connectivity income from operations for 2025 increased by $2,417 million to $4,423 million compared to $2,006
million for the year ended December 31, 2024 while Connectivity income from operations for the year ended
91
December 31, 2024 increased by $1,537 million to $2,006 million compared to $469 million for the year ended
December 31, 2023. The year-over-year increase in 2025 was primarily driven by increased revenue from growth of
our consumer and enterprise customers by $2,378 million and $1,410 million, respectively, partially offset by higher
depreciation of capitalized launch and satellite costs due to the increase in Starlink flights, as well as higher
marketing and international expansion costs to drive subscriber growth.
AI Income (Loss) from Operations
AI loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $1,533 million to $(2,469) million
compared to $(936) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by higher cloud computing
and GPU depreciation costs, data center infrastructure and employee expenses, partially offset by higher revenue.
AI loss from operations for 2025 increased by $4,794 million to $(6,355) million compared to $(1,561) million for
the year ended December 31, 2024, while AI loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased
by $2,412 million to $(1,561) million compared to $(3,973) million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The
increase in 2025 was primarily driven by higher cloud computing costs, facilities-related costs and employee
expenses, partially offset by higher revenue.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is defined as segment income (loss) from operations excluding (i) depreciation and
amortization, (ii) share-based compensation, (iii) restructuring charges and (iv) impairment.
Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $575 million to $(351)
million compared to $224 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by an accelerated
investment in development of the Starship vehicle as well as launch facilities to support future Starship launches,
and a decrease in revenue from customer launches, partially offset by a decrease in cost of revenue, selling, general,
and administrative expenses.
Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2025 decreased by $501 million to $653 million compared to $1,154 million
in 2024, while Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 increased by $157 million to $1,154 million compared to
$997 million in 2023. The year-over-year decrease in 2025 was primarily driven by an accelerated investment in
development of the Starship vehicle, as well as launch facilities to support future Starship launches, partially offset
by an increase in NASA Cargo Resupply Services (CRS) for additional missions to the International Space Station,
along with increased revenue from a U.S. Department of War contract. Our Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA is
also driven by the reusability and efficiency of our rockets, which boosts cadence and reliability and supports a
diversified base of commercial and government customers. These efforts have created a strong foundation for our
Space Segment Adjusted EBITDA, and we believe position us to unlock further high-value opportunities in the
expanding space economy.
Connectivity Segment Adjusted EBITDA
Connectivity Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $469 million to
$2,087 million compared to $1,618 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by higher
revenue from growth in consumer and enterprise revenue. Consumer revenue was composed of 104.7% growth in
Starlink Subscribers, offset by a 22.9% decline in Starlink Subscriber ARPU, primarily due to international
expansion and the addition of lower priced service plans. Enterprise and government revenue had an increase
primarily driven by the growth in our aviation, maritime, mobility, and other enterprise business, partially offset by a
decrease in our government business. These increases in revenue were offset by higher operating expenses for
international expansion, and higher research and development costs.
Connectivity Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2025 increased by $3,319 million to $7,168 million compared to
$3,849 million in 2024 while Connectivity Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 increased by $2,247 million to
$3,849 million compared to $1,602 million in 2023. The year-over-year increase in 2025 was primarily driven by
92
higher revenue from growth in our consumer and enterprise customers, partially offset by higher marketing and
international expansion costs to grow our subscribers, as well as higher research and development costs for our next-
generation product development. We have driven our strong sequential Connectivity Segment Adjusted EBITDA
growth by expanding the scale and efficiency of our LEO satellite constellations and our highly verticalized supply
chain, which has delivered major cost reductions in user terminal production.
AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA
AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $497 million to $(609)
million compared to $(112) million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily driven by higher cloud
compute and data center infrastructure and operating costs, and employee compensation expenses, partially offset by
higher revenue.
AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2025 decreased by $1,584 million to $(1,237) million compared to $347 million
in 2024 while AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 decreased by $875 million to $347 million, compared to
$1,222 million in 2023. The decrease in 2025 was primarily driven by higher cloud computing costs, facilities-
related costs and employee expenses, partially offset by higher revenue. AI Segment Adjusted EBITDA is primarily
driven by our strategy to rapidly and cost-effectively scale compute infrastructure. We expect to continue to expand
our terrestrial data centers, and to launch orbital data centers, and we expect a multi-year investment horizon before
these deployments translate into sustained positive Segment Adjusted EBITDA for our AI segment.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “—Non-GAAP Financial
Measures” for additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations of Segment
Adjusted EBITDA to segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Capital Expenditures
The following table presents our capital expenditures by segment:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
Space .................................................. | $1,052 | $759 | $3,832 | $2,032 | $1,497 | ||||
Connectivity ....................................... | 1,332 | 814 | 4,178 | 3,498 | 2,455 | ||||
AI ........................................................ | 7,723 | 2,567 | 12,727 | 5,633 | 463 | ||||
Total Capital Expenditures ................. | $10,107 | $4,140 | $20,737 | $11,163 | $4,415 | ||||
Space Capital Expenditures
Space capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $293 million to $1,052 million
compared to $759 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by
increased investment in our launch site infrastructure for Starship.
Space capital expenditures for 2025 increased $1,800 million to $3,832 million compared to $2,032 million in 2024,
while Space capital expenditures for 2024 increased $535 million to $2,032 million compared to $1,497 million in
2023. The increase in each year-over-year period was primarily driven by increased investment in our launch site
infrastructure for Starship.
Connectivity Capital Expenditures
Connectivity capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $518 million to $1,332
million compared to $814 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by
higher satellite and ground equipment costs as we continue to increase our number of satellites and grow our satellite
network.
Connectivity capital expenditures for 2025 increased $680 million to $4,178 million compared to $3,498 million in
2024, while Connectivity capital expenditures for 2024 increased $1,043 million to $3,498 million compared to
93
$2,455 million in 2023. The increase in each year-over-year period was primarily driven by higher satellite and
ground equipment costs as we continue to increase our number of satellites and grow our satellite network.
AI Capital Expenditures
AI capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased $5,156 million to $7,723 million
compared to $2,567 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by
investments in the rapid expansion of our terrestrial data centers, including the development, construction, and
equipping of new facilities and supporting infrastructure.
AI capital expenditures for 2025 increased $7,094 million to $12,727 million compared to $5,633 million in 2024,
while AI capital expenditures for 2024 increased $5,170 million to $5,633 million compared to $463 million in
2023. This increase was primarily driven by significant investments in the rapid expansion of our terrestrial data
centers, including the development, construction, and equipping of new facilities and supporting infrastructure.
Drivers of Our Performance
Developing Starship. Starship is our next-generation vehicle that we expect will dramatically expand our launch
capability through full and rapid reusability combined with unprecedented mass to orbit capability. As the most
powerful launch system ever developed, we expect that Starship V3 will be able to carry a payload of 100 metric
tons, and that future generations could reach 200 metric tons, potentially as soon as Starship V4. Starship is central
to our goal of unlocking growth through our unique vertically integrated business model. Starship is expected to be
the only vehicle with fully reusable first and second stages, which is critical to reducing launch costs and increasing
launch cadence. We believe that Starship can eventually reduce the cost to reach orbit by 99% or more relative to the
historical average launch cost per kilogram according to NASA of $18,500, establishing a scalable path to creating
the infrastructure of the future, such as orbital AI compute.
We have already demonstrated catching and reusing the first stage booster for Starship through our innovative
“chopsticks” method to catch the booster. To date, we have executed 11 Starship flight tests. We have also
scheduled a 12th flight test, which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster. This
next-generation Starship introduces major changes for better orbital performance and reusability. We plan to
demonstrate key development milestones of catching the upper stage and demonstrating in-orbit propellant transfer
capabilities. These milestones will be the key unlocks for a rapidly reusable rocket that we expect will take hundreds
of thousands of tons of mass to orbit to drive growth in our Connectivity and AI segments, and allow us to develop
the lunar economy and eventually to reach Mars. We expect Starship to commence payload delivery to orbit in the
second half of 2026 following additional flight tests. For additional information about this risk, please refer to “Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Any failure or delay in the development of Starship at scale or in
achieving the required launch cadence, reusability and capabilities thereafter would delay or limit our ability to
execute our growth strategy, including the deployment of next-generation satellites, global satellite-to-mobile
connectivity, and orbital AI compute, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and future prospects” in this prospectus.
Launch Costs and Cadence. Our launch costs and cadence underpin the foundational competitive advantage that
enables the performance of each of our segments. The reusability of our launch vehicles meaningfully reduces the
cost per kilogram to orbit by eliminating or limiting the need to manufacture new vehicles for every mission.
Reusability also enables higher launch cadence by shortening the time between flights, as vehicles can be rapidly
reflown after their return. These factors enable performance in our Connectivity segment by supporting faster and
more cost‑effective deployment of our satellite constellations. We expect they will support our AI segment as we
aim to deploy a large fleet of orbital AI compute. We expect continued enhancements to our launch infrastructure
and launch vehicles, including Starship, to drive cost down and throughput up, extending these benefits to our
businesses, as well as to our third‑party customers who rely on our launch capabilities. As we continue to reduce
launch costs and increase launch cadence, we expect to transform the rocket launch industry into airline-like
operations, enabling continuous and affordable access to space. Period-to-period comparisons of launch costs and
cadence are impacted by factors out of our control, including timing of delivery of customer payloads which impacts
94
the mix of customer and internal payloads and related financial reporting, or weather which can delay a launch from
one period to another.
Increasing Satellite Capacity. The scale, reliability, and capacity of our LEO broadband and mobile satellite
constellations drive our Connectivity segment’s growth and operating performance. In 2025, launching and
operating higher-throughput satellites supported Starlink’s service quality and customer reach by increasing
available network capacity and improving service consistency during peak usage periods. As of March 31, 2026, we
operated over 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, with the majority composed of our
second-generation, V2 Mini satellites. We expect to commence deploying our next-generation V3 satellites,
designed to offer one Tbps of downlink capacity per satellite, using Starship in the second half of 2026 and expect
that a single Starship launch will be capable of deploying up to 60 V3 satellites to LEO, representing a twenty-fold
increase in Starlink downlink capacity deployed relative to a Falcon 9 launch.
We also provide satellite-to-mobile connectivity, supplementing terrestrial networks and substantially reducing
mobile “dead zones” in approximately 30 countries. Since January 2025, we have grown our constellation from
approximately 360 mobile V1 Mobile satellites to approximately 650 mobile V1 Mobile satellites. Through this
constellation and in partnership with more than 30 mobile network operators, we provided data, over-the-top voice,
and messaging services to approximately 7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30 countries.
During 2025, we also entered into agreements to acquire 65 MHz of spectrum in the United States as well as certain
global Mobile Satellite Service spectrum licenses from EchoStar for $19.6 billion of equity and cash consideration,
as described below under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Material Cash Commitments.” We expect the
spectrum acquisition to close in November 2027, subject to required regulatory approvals and other closing
conditions. We expect the wider bandwidth operations enabled by this spectrum purchase, together with our
authorization to deploy 7,500 satellites including with the 2GHz spectrum band, will provide stronger support for
current performance and potential future services, including broadband data and IoT connectivity, and is expected to
enable 5G connectivity.
These investments in satellite scale, per-satellite capacity, and expanded capabilities are instrumental to the growth
and operating performance of our Connectivity segment, enabling us to onboard new users while improving service
quality.
Increasing Starlink Brand Awareness and Acquiring New Subscribers. Our growth is driven in part by increased
global awareness of Starlink’s capabilities and our ability to convert that awareness into customer adoption. Trust,
visibility, and demonstrated reliability are central to customer acquisition, particularly for those in remote and
infrastructure-limited regions. Proven performance in rural, remote, and disaster-affected areas, along with strong
brand awareness, reinforces Starlink’s reputation as essential infrastructure, leading to higher adoption in new
markets.
As of March 31, 2026, we had over 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, operating the
world’s most advanced broadband constellation providing internet connectivity to approximately 10.3 million
Starlink Subscribers across 164 countries, territories, and other markets, collectively home to more than 3.3 billion
people. We are focused on growing the number of Starlink Subscribers by expanding our consumer distribution
network across thousands of authorized retail stores globally, and executing region-specific marketing campaigns to
increase brand awareness. By clearly demonstrating Starlink’s superior speed, low-latency, and ease of installation,
we expect to drive meaningful subscriber growth.
Increasing Enterprise Customer Adoption. As we continue to grow our Starlink constellation and bandwidth, we
see a large opportunity to grow the enterprise connectivity market by providing solutions that had not previously
been available. Our network is global and can provide primary connectivity for on-the-move applications as well as
a resilient backup option for enterprises serviced by land-based connectivity. We plan to deepen our penetration with
enterprise and government customers through direct, vertical-specific acquisition strategies. In recent years, we have
assembled dedicated sales and engineering teams to market and support fleet-wide conversions in aviation and
maritime, customized deployments for land mobility, which we expect to continue to grow as consumers who
experience Starlink begin to expect high-performance connectivity when traveling. We expect to enable more
customized deployments for land mobility across existing use cases such as commercial trucking fleets, and new
95
applications enabled by more connected devices. We also continue to develop specialized networks for secure
government applications via Starshield. By leveraging proven performance in mission-critical environments and
expanding through channel partners in select geographies, we expect to drive increased adoption among high-value
enterprise and government accounts.
Accelerating Investment in Growth and Innovation. We are simultaneously developing and scaling a wide range of
complex, capital‑intensive projects, including Starship and terrestrial and orbital AI compute. We believe speed is a
competitive advantage, and periodically we decide to increase and accelerate our investments. For example, in 2025
we accelerated our timeline for Starship development, increasing R&D in our Space segment to $3,004 million,
compared to $1,835 million in 2024. In our AI segment, in 2025 we successfully accelerated deployment of compute
for the development of Grok, increasing R&D in our AI segment to $5,064 million, compared to $1,176 million in
2024. We believe pursuing multiple ambitious programs in parallel enables us to compound advantages across our
vertically integrated innovation engine and unlock new large addressable markets over time. The timing of our
investments is not fixed and may accelerate based on technical progress, market opportunity, or resource
availability. As a result, our operating results, margins and profitability may fluctuate from period to period as we
continue to prioritize execution speed, capacity expansion, and technological leadership over near‑term margin
optimization. We believe that this approach maximizes long‑term value creation by allowing us to move faster than
competitors, scale earlier in emerging markets, and reinforce durable competitive advantages that we expect to
benefit our business over time.
Supply Chain and Manufacturing Efficiency for User Terminals. The operating performance of our Connectivity
segment depends in part on the cost and availability of user terminals at scale. We are vertically integrated across
terminal design, production, and support, including silicon, hardware, software, manufacturing, fulfillment, and
operations, which enables us to control our means of production as well as rapidly iterate to continuously improve
the performance of our user terminals and optimize product cost. Since our initial launch of our user terminal, we
have optimized the design of our phased-array antennas, our self-aligning antenna responsible for connecting user
equipment to our LEO satellite network, for manufacturability and high-volume scale. Over the past five years, we
have significantly lowered production costs and have scaled terminal output to approximately 200,000 terminals per
week. We plan to continue to further scale production significantly and make gains that improve margins, lower
customer barriers, and broaden addressable markets.
Scaling our AI Compute Rapidly and Efficiently. Our ability to rapidly and cost-effectively scale AI compute is a
significant driver of our competitiveness. We view scaling of compute capacity through a simple lens: power
availability and the powered shell together determine how quickly we can deploy compute, and our model and
serving stack in that powered shell determines how efficiently we convert that compute into useful tokens. In order
to scale our AI segment rapidly and efficiently, our strategy is extreme vertical integration, “from shovels to tokens.”
Power Availability and Powered Shells. We have demonstrated an industry-leading ability to rapidly deploy
large-scale data center infrastructure at unprecedented speed and cost efficiency. Our COLOSSUS and
COLOSSUS II data centers collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of compute power, with additional
power capacity available for data center operations. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS online in 122
days, repurposing the shell of an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91
days. As an illustrative comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data
center is approximately two years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency,
achieving data center construction costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry
benchmarks on a per megawatt basis.
COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II were brought online almost entirely through on-site power generation
capabilities that we designed, built, and deployed ourselves. We view our proven ability to construct power
infrastructure at this scale and speed as a significant competitive advantage. We partner closely with local
utilities to fund grid infrastructure expansions and access excess capacity, while proactively curtailing our grid
usage whenever required to prioritize community needs. Megapacks—utility-scale battery storage systems—
deliver critical redundancy and help stabilize operations during peak demand. Going forward, COLOSSUS II is
expected to be primarily powered by a dedicated natural gas power plant, supplemented over time by additional
grid capacity that we are directly funding through our local utility partners. Our comprehensive expertise across
the full infrastructure stack—from power procurement and on-site generation to distribution and advanced
96
cooling systems—enables us to translate available power into usable compute capacity with exceptional
efficiency. As we continue to scale and optimize, we expect to drive further improvements in Power Usage
Effectiveness. We expect these gains to accelerate the path from buildout to monetization.
AI Token Generation Efficiency. We are highly vertically integrated. We design, own or lease, and install all of
our powered shells and dedicated processor capacity. This full-stack ownership enables us to efficiently convert
power capacity into usable compute, precisely control cluster configuration, and operate a true end-to-end
system spanning infrastructure through to model deployment. Our operating performance depends on how
effectively we utilize deployed compute once capacity comes online—specifically, our ability to convert raw
infrastructure into reliable, high-throughput token generation at scale. Achieving this requires tight coordination
across model training and inference workflows, hardware configuration, and data center operations so that
utilization and throughput ramp efficiently as we expand. We believe we hold a meaningful efficiency
advantage by tightly integrating the model layer directly with the compute layer. Unlike third-party
environments that impose multiple abstraction layers, we run our serving stack close to the processors and
optimize serving, networking, and cluster configuration as a single unified system. This “model-to-compute”
integration reduces overhead, improves hardware utilization, and increases the proportion of available compute
that is converted into delivered output tokens. Output tokens represent the final generated response delivered to
the user, while total processing can be substantially higher when a request triggers additional inference-time
reasoning steps. Because we control workload scheduling and serving logic, we can prioritize high token
efficiency—intelligently balancing compute allocated to reasoning with strong final output to maintain or
improve response quality. This end-to-end control, combined with our sourcing relationships with leading
compute providers, gives us a performance-per-watt advantage and enables us to adopt new processor
generations at scale more rapidly through a repeatable playbook for reconfiguration and recommissioning.
Orbital AI Compute Has the Potential to Massively Increase Our Ability to Scale Our AI Compute,
Accelerate Our Pace, and to Be More Cost Effective Relative to Terrestrial Options. We believe we are the
only company with a commercially viable path to building orbital AI compute at scale. This is underpinned by
our unique ability to launch substantial mass into orbit cost efficiently through reusable rockets and manufacture
secure, reliable, and high performance satellites at low cost and high volume. We plan to develop orbital data
centers to enable scaling of compute capacity for us and our customers that is independent of terrestrial power
infrastructure constraints. Space offers the potential to access virtually limitless power and an operating
environment that supports sustained high‑density compute, including structural advantages for power
generation, cooling, and uninterrupted operations as capacity grows. We plan to employ a modular shell
approach built around our scalable satellite constellation, which enables compute capacity to be deployed and
expanded efficiently as capacity requirements grow. The architecture also supports shorter refresh cycles at the
token layer, as we can upgrade compute as successive chip generations arrive, increasing token output per unit
of installed capacity. Our goal over time is to launch 100 gigawatts of compute to space each year. If operated
continuously, the generation resources used to support 100 gigawatts of compute could generate approximately
one-fifth of the annual power production in the United States, which was 4.4 thousand terawatt hours in 2025,
according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). We expect space‑based compute to massively
increase AI compute scale, while also improving token economics.
Ability to Increase Revenue from our Consumer User Base. Our performance depends in part on our ability to
effectively increase revenue from our over 1.3 billion accounts active in the last twelve months ended March 2026,
including approximately 550 million monthly active AI users across Grok and X through multiple complementary
monetization channels:
Growing our Advertising Platform. Advertising remains a core monetization channel for our AI segment, with
revenue driven by our ability to deliver highly relevant ads. We aim to grow advertising revenue per user by
strengthening performance advertising, expanding AI‑driven targeting and measurement, and introducing richer
ad formats and creative tools. A central focus of ours is making ads feel like content—contextually relevant,
aligned with user interests, and integrated into real‑time conversations. Grok increasingly supports this strategy
by helping advertisers with campaign creation, creative optimization, and alignment with trending topics and
user intent. While these factors help us drive advertising revenue, the pricing of our advertising products is also
affected by other factors, including the global economy and the highly competitive nature of our industry. We
97
believe continued investment in AI‑powered advertising will further improve advertiser ROI while further
enhancing user experience.
Conversion of Users to Paid Subscribers. In parallel, we are focused on converting a greater portion of our user
base into paying subscribers through our X subscription (Premium and Premium+) and Grok subscription
offerings. Subscribers benefit from enhanced functionality, exclusive features, and access to our latest AI
models. As of March 31, 2026, we reached approximately 6.3 million active paid subscribers, which was
comprised of approximately 4.4 million X Premium and Premium+ paid subscribers and approximately 1.9
million SuperGrok, SuperGrok Heavy and SuperGrok Lite paid subscribers. We plan to continue adding new
features and functionality while releasing increasingly capable Grok models to increase the penetration rate of
our subscriber base. Our AI segment has demonstrated exceptional model velocity: since launching Grok, we
have developed leading frontier models at a far faster rate of innovation than others. We believe this pace of
innovation strengthens the value proposition of our subscription offerings and supports long‑term subscriber
growth.
Progress Toward the Everything App and New Monetization Channels. We aim to evolve X into an
“Everything App,” integrating real-time information, communications, media, payments, banking, commerce
and more within one consumer experience. This can increase the usefulness of X, and therefore increase the
usage and monetization potential of X. We have rapid product launch velocity, with a frequent cadence of new
features and products launched since 2023, including features such as long‑form video, improved group
interactions, and creator tools. We plan to further broaden the value proposition of X through offerings like
Money, a product we launched in beta in November 2025, which aims to expand platform utility by enabling
payments and other financial services. We released X Chat in November 2025, which features end-to-end
encryption and has no connection to advertising, unlike other services. We intend to further embed Grok
throughout the platform to enhance discovery, analysis of posts, user support, and personalization, making core
workflows more useful and reducing friction for users to adopt paid features.
Growing Enterprise and Government Adoption of Our AI Offerings. Our future growth and financial performance
depend in part on our ability to increase adoption and usage of our AI offerings among enterprise and government
customers. We have launched Grok Business, Grok Enterprise, Grok API, and xAI Gov, products that we believe
will be attractive to enterprises and governments, and we expect substantial opportunities to acquire new customers.
We are also partnering with Cursor to advance Grok and potentially to create jointly-owned coding and knowledge
work AI models, trained on our compute infrastructure. Over time, we also believe enterprises and governments will
present significant opportunities for revenue expansion as they deploy our models more broadly across their
organizations, adopt new capabilities, and build and operate solutions using our API. We also intend to continue to
offer our compute infrastructure to third-party customers. Our ability to realize these expansion opportunities
depends on continued innovation, reliable performance, and meeting evolving technical, security, and compliance
requirements.
Components of Results of Operations
Description of Our Segments
Space
Revenue - Space
Space segment generates revenue primarily through (i) Launch Services for the deployment of payloads to their
intended orbits for both commercial and government customers utilizing Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, and (ii)
Launch and Development for the development of spacecraft and provision of launch and mission services for
government agency space programs utilizing Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Starship, and Dragon. Launch Services
revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts that range from one to five years. Launch and Development revenue is
derived from fixed-price contracts that can range from one to fourteen years.
98
The Company recognizes Launch Services revenue at a point in time, due to the interchangeability of flight
hardware and minimal unique engineering costs. Revenue and costs are deferred and not recognized until upon the
launch or deployment of the customer’s payload to their intended orbit.
The Company recognizes Launch and Development revenue over time as the Company’s performance on the
contract creates an asset with no alternative use and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for
performance to date. The Company measures progress on these contracts using the cost-to-cost input method, which
the Company believes represents the most appropriate measure towards satisfaction of its performance obligation.
For launches of our Starlink satellites, the Company does not recognize any inter-segment revenue, rather those
launch costs are capitalized in satellites in Property, plant, and equipment, net. We allocate a significant amount of
launch capacity to our Connectivity segment, and expect to allocate a significant amount to our AI segment in the
future. Our Space segment revenue only reflects our customer launches and customer activities.
Revenue from Launch Services recognized at point in time and revenue from Launch and Development recognized
over time as a percentage of total Space segment revenue are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
Launch Services ............................... | 53.3% | 65.4% | 63.0% | 68.2% | 55.2% | |||||
Launch & Development ................... | 46.7% | 34.6% | 37.0% | 31.8% | 44.8% | |||||
Space ................................................ | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |||||
We expect Space revenue growth to continue to be lower than total company revenue growth as our internal
business continues to absorb most of the growth in our launch capacity. In addition, we expect Launch and
Development to represent a larger portion of our Space revenue as we continue to serve our long-term contracts for
our government customers. From period to period, Space revenue will vary based on the mix of launches used for
customers and our own businesses.
Expenses - Space
Cost of Revenue
The Company’s Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are composed of boosters (also known as first stages), second stages,
Merlin engines, and fairings. Boosters, fairings, and Merlin engines are reusable and are classified as property, plant,
and equipment and are depreciated to cost of revenue. The second stages are not reusable and are recorded to cost of
revenue when they are launched for Launch Services revenue transactions or assigned for Launch and Development
revenue transactions. Dragon is comprised of a fully reusable capsule that is classified as Property, plant, and
equipment, net and is depreciated to cost of revenue. Starship is comprised of a booster, ship, and Raptor engines
and is currently in the development stage. A majority of Starship costs are currently expensed to Research and
development as incurred. Raptor engines are expensed when used in test flights.
Space segment’s cost of revenue includes second stages flown related to the Company’s Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy
launches, launch operations and overhead, depreciation (inclusive of booster, Merlin engine, and fairing
depreciation), employee compensation costs (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) for our
operations teams, launch testing and overhead, engineering costs, inventory excess and obsolescence, shared costs
incurred in the production of launch hardware, and ongoing product support.
We expect Space cost of revenue to increase both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue based on our
expected mix of Launch Services and Launch and Development. From period to period, Space segment cost of
revenue will vary based on the mix of customer and internal launches.
Research and Development
Space segment’s research and development (“R&D”) expenses mainly relate to the development, build, and testing
of Starship. Starship costs consist of test flight hardware, Raptor engines, employee compensation costs (including
99
salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation), tooling and equipment expenses, depreciation for R&D
equipment, and allocated overhead. R&D also includes certain expenses related to the development of features and
modules created through engineering services for the Company’s Falcon vehicles, where the Company retains the
associated intellectual property.
We expect Space research and development to increase both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue in
2026, as we invest in the development and commercialization of Starship, and to moderate both in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of revenue once Starship is commercialized by delivering payload to orbit. At
commercialization, Starship costs generally will be capitalized and then depreciated in cost of revenue of the
segment associated with the payload delivered.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Space segment’s selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses include allocated employee compensation
costs (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) for our sales, facilities, legal, finance, information
technology, human resources, and other administrative employees, depreciation, and corporate aircraft costs.
We expect Space segment's SG&A to increase in absolute dollars to support growth of our business, and to decrease
as a percentage of revenue as we continue to work to reduce operating costs as a percentage of revenue.
Impairment
Space impairment includes impairment losses on fixed assets due to anomalies on the Company’s flight vehicles and
launch sites, which occur outside our normal business operations.
Connectivity
Revenue - Connectivity
Connectivity segment generates revenue from (i) the broadband and mobile connectivity services provided through
Starlink and (ii) the sale of the Starlink Kit (inclusive of the terminal). The Company provides connectivity services
and Starlink Kits to consumers or enterprise and government customers.
The Company recognizes revenue from broadband and mobile connectivity services over time as the customer
simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. The Company generates service revenue from (i)
fixed-price services that require advance or recurring monthly payments by the customer or (ii) variable-priced
services based on actual data consumption. The amounts received from customers for advanced payments for
broadband and mobile connectivity services are recognized either ratably over the subscription term or based on
actual data consumption. The Company’s broadband contracts are generally month-to-month and the revenue
recognized for these recurring consumer customers is equal to the amount billed in that month. The Company’s
mobile connectivity agreements are generally multi-year contractual obligations that range from one to five years,
although the customer can generally terminate at any time.
The Company recognizes revenue over time for certain contracts related to our Starshield business that are multi-
year in nature. For revenue that is recognized over time, we use the cost-to-cost input method. The Company records
revenue based upon costs (such as materials and labor hours) incurred to date relative to the total estimated cost at
completion.
The Company records revenue for the Starlink Kit upon delivery to the customer, or in the instance of certain
enterprise customers, when it is installed. Starlink Kit revenue is reported net of sales returns, credits, and
chargebacks.
100
Expenses - Connectivity
Cost of Revenue
Connectivity segment’s cost of revenue includes depreciation (inclusive of launch, satellite, and ground
infrastructure costs), Starlink Kit costs, shipping and handling costs, ground operating expenses, employee
compensation costs (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) for our engineering and operations
teams, payment processor fees, warranty expense, inventory excess and obsolescence, and customs and duties.
We expect Connectivity cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars as we grow our revenue, and to decrease as a
percentage of revenue as we continue to drive efficiencies in our next-generation satellites, Starlink Kits, and ground
infrastructure.
Research and Development
Connectivity segment’s R&D expenses mainly relate to the development, build, and testing of our next-generation
satellites, Starlink Kits, and ground infrastructure. These costs include employee compensation costs (including
salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation), contractor compensation expenses, equipment lease expenses,
depreciation for R&D equipment, and allocated overhead.
We expect Connectivity research and development to increase in absolute dollars as we grow our revenue, and to
decrease as a percentage of revenue as we scale our business.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Connectivity segment’s SG&A expenses include allocated employee compensation costs (including salaries,
benefits, and share-based compensation) for our sales, facilities, legal, finance, information technology, human
resources, and other administrative employees, licensing and regulatory fees, marketing expenses, depreciation, and
bad debt expense.
We expect Connectivity SG&A to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue in 2026 as we
introduce marketing spend to support growth of our business, and to decrease as a percentage of revenue over time
as we continue to work to reduce operating costs as a percentage of revenue.
Impairment
Connectivity impairment includes costs related to discontinuation of a product line for Starlink Kits that is non-
recurring.
AI
Revenue - AI
AI segment generates revenue from the sale of digital platform services, including advertising, subscription, and
licensing services offered to consumers and enterprise customers.
The Company generates revenue from (i) the sale of ad products displayed on its X platform, and (ii) providing AI
solutions and infrastructure, which includes subscription-related offerings, data licensing arrangements, and API
access to Grok models.
Revenue for advertising services is recognized in the period when advertising is delivered as evidenced by a person
engaging with an ad on the Company’s platforms in a manner satisfying the types of engagement selected by the
advertisers. The Company’s contract terms for advertising services are typically cancellable short-term
arrangements. We experience seasonality in our advertising revenues. Overall advertising spend tends to be highest
in the fourth quarter of each year due in large part to end-of-year advertiser spending and lowest in the first quarter
of each year.
101
Revenue for AI solutions and infrastructure includes: (i) premium subscriptions on X and Grok which is recognized
ratably over the period of the subscription term (ranging from month-to-month to one year), (ii) data licensing
revenue which is generally recognized ratably over the period (from month-to-month to two years) in which the
Company provides data as the customer consumes and benefits from the use of the licensed data, (iii) revenue from
providing API access to Grok models recognized ratably over the contract term (typically month-to-month or up to
one year) for stand-ready access or as services are consumed for usage based arrangements.
Expenses - AI
Cost of Revenue
AI segment’s cost of revenue includes infrastructure costs, revenue share expenses, payment processor fees,
payments to creators, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and allocated labor and overhead costs.
Infrastructure costs consist primarily of costs related to data center facilities, including lease and hosting costs,
related support, maintenance, energy, and bandwidth costs, depreciation of servers and networking equipment,
public cloud hosting costs, and employee compensation costs (including salaries, benefits, and share-based
compensation) for our operations teams.
We expect AI cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars as we grow our revenue, and to decrease as a
percentage of revenue as we monetize our products and as we expand our service offerings for AI solutions.
Research and Development
AI segment’s R&D expenses mainly relate to the training of Grok, our leading frontier model, development, build,
and testing of our next-generation AI-enabled products and data center costs to train AI-enabled products. These
costs include cloud computing expenses, employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-
based compensation), power generation costs, and depreciation of data center assets, including processors,
equipment lease expenses, and networking equipment.
We expect AI R&D expenses to increase, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue, as we invest in
compute infrastructure for Grok. Additionally, AI R&D expenses may increase as a result of the compute agreement
with Cursor.
Selling, General, and Administrative
AI segment’s SG&A expenses consist primarily of employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits,
and share-based compensation) for our sales, sales support, marketing, finance, legal, information technology,
human resources and other administrative employees. In addition, SG&A expenses include fees and costs for
professional services, including consulting, content moderation, third-party legal and accounting services and
facilities costs and other supporting overhead costs that are not allocated to other departments.
We expect AI SG&A to increase in absolute dollars to support growth of our business, and to decrease as a
percentage of revenue as we continue to work to reduce operating costs as a percentage of revenue. Additionally, AI
SG&A may increase as a result of the compute agreement with Cursor.
Restructuring Charges
AI restructuring charges are the result of the acquisition of Twitter in October 2022 by X Holdings. The charges
include workforce restructuring for former Twitter employees, as well as impairment and early termination penalties
as a result of consolidation of Twitter’s various office leases.
Impairment
AI impairment includes a one-time impairment of the Twitter brand when Twitter was rebranded to X in July 2023.
102
Other Corporate Expenses
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes interest expense related to our borrowings, amortization of associated debt issuance costs,
undrawn fees, and finance leases. Interest expense is reflected net of capitalized interest.
Interest Income
Interest income includes interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, and
dividend income from our investments in mutual funds.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists of gain or loss on digital assets, gain or loss on foreign currency transactions,
and loss on extinguishment of debt.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists primarily of income taxes in certain federal, state, local and
foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Foreign jurisdictions typically have different statutory tax rates
from those in the United States. Accordingly, our effective tax rates may vary depending on the impact of the
valuation allowance as well as the relative proportion of foreign income to domestic income, generation of tax
credits, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes in tax laws.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated financial statements data for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31, | 2026 vs. 2025 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $4,694 | $4,067 | $627 | 15.4% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 2,388 | 1,962 | 426 | 21.7% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 3,514 | 1,557 | 1,957 | 125.7% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 746 | 493 | 253 | 51.3% | |||
Restructuring charges (credits) ....................... | (11) | 4 | (15) | NM | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | — | 24 | (24) | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | 6,637 | 4,040 | 2,597 | 64.3% | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | (1,943) | 27 | (1,970) | NM | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (664) | (447) | (217) | 48.5% | |||
Interest income .................................................... | 213 | 117 | 96 | 82.1% | |||
Other expense, net ............................................... | (1,876) | (211) | (1,665) | 789.1% | |||
Loss before income taxes .................................... | (4,270) | (514) | (3,756) | 730.7% | |||
Provision for income taxes .................................. | 6 | 14 | (8) | (57.1)% | |||
Net loss ................................................................ | $(4,276) | $(528) | $(3,748) | 709.8% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
103
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $627 million, or 15.4%, compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue from our Connectivity
segment of $782 million as our Starlink Subscriber base continued to grow as well as an increase in revenue from
our AI segment of $91 million from higher X and Grok subscriptions, partially offset by a decrease in revenue from
our Space segment of $246 million due to lower Launch Services missions and timing of work for government
contracts.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $426 million, or 21.7%, compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to an increase in costs in our
Connectivity segment of $437 million driven by an increase in depreciation related to the number of satellites placed
into orbit and higher operating costs of $5 million in our AI segment, partially offset by a decrease in cost of revenue
from our Space segment of $16 million due to less customer launches.
Research and Development
Research and development expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $1,957 million, or
125.7%, compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher costs
in our AI segment of $1,471 million driven by depreciation of GPU hardware, and the cost of cloud computing and
data center infrastructure expenses as a result of our AI data center expansions and higher costs from our Space
segment of $404 million driven by accelerated investment in our Starship vehicle and related facilities.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $253 million,
or 51.3%, compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher
employee-related costs and professional fees for our AI segment of $163 million as our AI business grew rapidly,
higher marketing and international expansion costs of $79 million and $23 million, respectively, for our
Connectivity segment. These increases were partially offset by lower expenses of $18 million in our Space segment.
Restructuring Charges (Credits)
Restructuring charges (credits) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $15 million compared to
the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to change in estimated settlement
amounts for former Twitter employees as part of the workforce reduction program implemented in 2022.
Impairment
Impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $24 million compared to the prior three
months ended March 31, 2025. The impairment in the three months ended March 31, 2025 was related to a post-
landing anomaly in our Space segment. There was no impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Income (loss) from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $1,970 million compared to
the prior three months ended March 31, 2025 driven by the factors described above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $217 million, or 48.5%, compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to additional debt raised by the Company
and other financing arrangements entered into during the period by our AI segment.
104
Interest Income
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $96 million, or 82.1%, compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to an increase in interest income earned
from cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other expense, net for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $1,665 million, compared to the prior
three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to the loss on extinguishment of debt and
unrealized loss on digital assets.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $8 million compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to the change in the mix of our
jurisdictional earnings subject to different tax rates.
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $3,748 million compared to the prior three months
ended March 31, 2025 driven by the factors described above.
Segment Results
Space
Three Months Ended March 31, | 2026 vs. 2025 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................. | $619 | $865 | $(246) | (28.4)% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue ................................................... | 281 | 297 | (16) | (5.4)% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 930 | 526 | 404 | 76.8% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 70 | 88 | (18) | (20.5)% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | — | 24 | (24) | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | $1,281 | $935 | $346 | 37.0% | |||
Loss from operations ................................. | $(662) | $(70) | $(592) | 845.7% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased $246 million, or 28.4%, compared to the prior three
months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in Launch Services revenue of
$236 million and a decrease of $10 million in Launch and Development revenue. The decrease in Launch Services
revenue is due to a decrease in customer launches period over period. While total Falcon launches increased by 4
from 36 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to 40 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, Launch
Services missions decreased by 4 over the same period. Launch and Development revenue decreased due to timing
of work performed on government contracts.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $16 million, or 5.4%, compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in customer launches and
timing of work on government contracts of $34 million, offset by an increase of $10 million in inventory excess and
obsolescence reserves and $10 million in launch hardware disposals for damaged Falcon fairings.
105
Research and Development
Research and development for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $404 million, or 76.8%,
compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by higher production
costs of $194 million, higher engineering costs of $95 million, and higher test and launch costs of $62 million, due
to the accelerated investment in development of the Starship vehicle and continued development of production and
launch facilities to support future Starship launches.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $18 million, or 20.5%,
compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to lower allocated
general and administrative overhead of $13 million.
Impairment
Impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $24 million compared to the prior three
months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a non-recurring impairment loss on a Falcon 9
booster due to a post-landing anomaly during the three months ended March 31, 2025. There was no impairment for
the three months ended March 31, 2026.
Loss from Operations
Space loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $592 million compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025 driven by the factors described above.
Connectivity
Three Months Ended March 31, | 2026 vs. 2025 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................. | $3,257 | $2,475 | $782 | 31.6% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | $1,651 | $1,214 | $437 | 36.0% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 205 | 123 | 82 | 66.7% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 213 | 105 | 108 | 102.9% | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | $2,069 | $1,442 | $627 | 43.5% | |||
Income from operations ............................. | $1,188 | $1,033 | $155 | 15.0% | |||
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $782 million, or 31.6%, compared to the prior
three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by an increase of $656 million in revenue
from our consumer subscribers, composed of 104.7% growth in Starlink Subscribers, offset by an 22.9% decline in
Starlink Subscriber ARPU, primarily due to international expansion and the addition of lower priced service plans.
In addition, enterprise and government revenue had an increase of $126 million primarily driven by the growth in
our aviation, maritime, and other enterprise business of $209 million, our mobile connectivity business of $85
million, partially offset by a decrease of $175 million in our government connectivity business.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $437 million, or 36.0%, compared to the
prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher depreciation of $276 million
from capitalized launch and satellite costs, higher operating expenses of $140 million mainly driven by ground
operating costs of $50 million, customer support and installation costs of $42 million, payment processor fees of $19
million, freight costs of $15 million, and warranty costs of $12 million.
106
Research and Development
Research and development for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $82 million, or 66.7%,
compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher costs for the
next-generation production development of satellites of $62 million, Starlink Kits of $8 million, and ground
equipment of $14 million.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $108 million, or
102.9%, compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by higher
marketing costs of $79 million and higher international expansion costs of $23 million, partially offset by lower bad
debt expense of $9 million.
Income from Operations
Connectivity income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $155 million, or
15.0%, compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025 driven by the factors described above.
AI
Three Months Ended March 31, | 2026 vs. 2025 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................. | $818 | $727 | $91 | 12.5% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 456 | 451 | 5 | 1.1% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 2,379 | 908 | 1,471 | 162.0% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 463 | 300 | 163 | 54.3% | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | (11) | 4 | (15) | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $3,287 | $1,663 | $1,624 | 97.7% | |||
Loss from operations ................................. | $(2,469) | $(936) | $(1,533) | 163.8% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $91 million, or 12.5%, compared to the prior three
months ended March 31, 2025 due to the increase in AI solutions and infrastructure revenue of $191 million, offset
by decrease in advertising revenue of $100 million. The increase in AI solutions and infrastructure was primarily
due to an increase in Grok and X subscription revenue of $177 million and an increase in data licensing
arrangements of $12 million. The decrease in advertising revenue is due to an overhaul of the Company’s
advertising platform which impacted ad sales for a short period of time during the rebuild.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $5 million, or 1.1%, compared to the prior
three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue share and content
creator expenses of $71 million, and higher payment processing fees of $18 million, partially offset by a decrease in
amortization expenses of technology intangibles of $89 million that were fully amortized during 2025.
Research and Development
Research and development for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $1,471 million, or 162.0%,
compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher GPU
depreciation expense of $908 million, and higher cloud computing and data center infrastructure expenses of $301
107
million associated with the continued build out of our compute infrastructure, as well as higher employee
compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) of $262 million.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $163 million, or
54.3%, compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to higher
employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) of $148 million as
we continue to expand our AI business and higher legal expenses of $33 million, partially offset by a decrease in
facilities and general and administrative costs of $18 million.
Restructuring Charges (Credits)
Restructuring charges (credits) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by $15 million compared to
the prior three months ended March 31, 2025. This decrease was primarily due to a change in estimated settlement
amounts for former Twitter employees as part of the workforce reduction program implemented in 2022.
Loss from Operations
AI loss from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 increased by $1,533 million, or 163.8%,
compared to the prior three months ended March 31, 2025 driven by the factors described above.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31, | 2025 vs. 2024 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $18,674 | $14,015 | $4,659 | 33.2% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 9,451 | 7,996 | 1,455 | 18.2% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 8,643 | 3,464 | 5,179 | 149.5% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 2,644 | 1,813 | 831 | 45.8% | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | 487 | 213 | 274 | 128.6% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 38 | 63 | (25) | (39.7)% | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | 21,263 | 13,549 | 7,714 | 56.9% | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | (2,589) | 466 | (3,055) | NM | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (1,945) | (1,580) | (365) | 23.1% | |||
Interest income .................................................... | 492 | 371 | 121 | 32.6% | |||
Other income, net ................................................ | (177) | 985 | (1,162) | NM | |||
Income (loss) before income taxes ...................... | (4,219) | 242 | (4,461) | NM | |||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes .......... | 718 | (549) | 1,267 | NM | |||
Net income (loss) ................................................ | $(4,937) | $791 | $(5,728) | NM | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $4,659 million, or 33.2%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue from our Connectivity segment
of $3,788 million as our Starlink Subscriber base continued to grow as well as our Connectivity enterprise and
government sales, and increases in revenue from our Space segment of $290 million due to increases in Launch and
108
Development revenue for work performed on government contracts, and an increase in revenue from our AI
segment of $581 million as advertising, Grok and X subscriptions, and data licensing arrangements grew.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $1,455 million, or 18.2%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase in costs in our Connectivity segment
of $1,153 million driven by higher depreciation as the number of satellites placed into orbit grew and higher
operating expenses, and higher infrastructure and cloud computing costs of $491 million in our AI segment, partially
offset by a decrease in cost of revenue from our Space segment of $189 million due to the increased reusability of
our Falcon launch vehicles resulting in lower depreciation.
Research and Development
Research and development expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $5,179 million, or 149.5%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher R&D costs in our
AI segment of $3,888 million driven by the depreciation of GPU hardware and the cost of cloud computing as a
result of our AI data center expansions and higher R&D costs from our Space segment of $1,169 million driven by
accelerated investment in our Starship vehicle.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $831 million, or
45.8%, compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher employee
and facilities-related costs and higher legal expenses for our AI segment of $722 million as our AI business grew
rapidly, and higher marketing and international expansion costs of $53 million and $37 million, respectively, for our
Connectivity segment. These increases were partially offset by lower allocated general and administrative overhead
in our Space segment.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $274 million, or 128.6%, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to additional expense related to the settlement
to former Twitter employees as part of the workforce reduction program implemented in 2022.
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $25 million, or 39.7%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily related to a discontinuation of a Starlink Kit production line
in our Connectivity segment that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2024 with no impairment in 2025,
partially offset by an increase in impairment in our Space Segment during the year ended December 31, 2025
primarily related to a post-landing anomaly.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Income (loss) from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $3,055 million compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2024 driven by the factors described above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $365 million, or 23.1%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to new term loans and senior notes entered into by
the Company and other financing arrangements for GPUs entered into during the year by our AI segment.
109
Interest Income
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $121 million, or 32.6%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase in dividend income earned from
marketable securities and cash equivalents.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $1,162 million, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily due to an unrealized loss on digital assets.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $1,267 million compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a partial valuation allowance release in 2024 and
the establishment of a valuation allowance in 2025. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company released a
partial valuation allowance on the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2024, the Company
forecasted $659 million of deferred tax assets related to U.S. R&D credits would be utilized in the future. For the
year ended December 31, 2025, as a result of the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law No.
119-21), we assessed the realizability of our deferred tax assets and reversed the benefit that was recognized for the
year ended December 31, 2024.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $5,728 million compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024 driven by the factors described above.
Segment Results
Space
Year Ended December 31, | 2025 vs. 2024 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $4,086 | $3,796 | $290 | 7.6% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 1,352 | 1,541 | (189) | (12.2)% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 3,004 | 1,835 | 1,169 | 63.7% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 349 | 375 | (26) | (6.9)% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 38 | 24 | 14 | 61.5% | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $4,743 | $3,775 | $968 | 25.7% | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $(657) | $21 | $(678) | NM | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $290 million, or 7.6%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. Launch Services revenue remained relatively flat year over year, while Launch and
Development revenue increased by $298 million. The Launch and Development revenue increase was primarily
driven by increased revenue for an extended contract with NASA for additional Cargo Resupply Services (CRS)
missions to the International Space Station and increased revenue from a U.S. Department of War contract. While
total Falcon launches increased by 31 from 134 in 2024 to 165 in 2025, Space customer launches and average price
per launch remained relatively flat year over year.
110
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $189 million, or 12.2%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily due increased reusability of our Falcon launch vehicles
resulting in lower deprecation of $240 million, lowering the cost of each launch, and lower overhead costs of $11
million. The decrease is also due to the relative increase in Starlink satellite launches from 89 launches in 2024 to
122 launches in 2025, resulting in relatively more of our launch operations and overhead costs capitalized in our
Connectivity segment of $14 million. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in inventory excess and
obsolescence reserves of $51 million mainly due to less demand on rocket vehicle and spacecraft parts as reusability
has increased.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $1,169 million, or 63.7%, compared
to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily driven by higher production costs of $779
million, higher launch costs of $218 million, and higher engineering costs of $185 million, due to the accelerated
investment in development of the Starship vehicle and continued development of production and launch facilities to
support future Starship launches.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $26 million, or 6.9%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was primarily due to lower allocated general
and administrative overhead of $52 million, partially offset by higher employee compensation expenses (including
salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) of $16 million.
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $14 million, or 61.5%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to a non-recurring impairment loss on a Falcon 9 booster
due to a post-landing anomaly during the year.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Space income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $678 million compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2024 driven by the factors described above.
Connectivity
Year Ended December 31, | 2025 vs. 2024 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $11,387 | $7,599 | $3,788 | 49.8% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 5,921 | 4,768 | 1,153 | 24.2% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 575 | 453 | 122 | 27.1% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 468 | 333 | 135 | 40.4% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | — | 39 | (39) | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | $6,964 | $5,593 | $1,371 | 24.5% | |||
Income from operations ...................................... | $4,423 | $2,006 | $2,417 | 120.4% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
111
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $3,788 million, or 49.8%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily driven by an increase of $2,377 million in revenue from our
consumer subscribers, composed of 99.9% growth in Starlink Subscribers, offset by an 11.2% decline in Starlink
Subscriber ARPU, primarily due to international expansion and the addition of lower priced service plans. In
addition, Connectivity revenue had an increase of $1,411 million from our enterprise and government customers,
primarily driven by the growth in our enterprise connectivity business of $1,218 million inclusive of growth in our
mobile connectivity business of $632 million, and growth in our government connectivity business of $193 million.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $1,153 million, or 24.2%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher depreciation of $827 million from
capitalized launch and satellite costs, higher operating expenses of $283 million mainly driven by ground operating
costs of $134 million, payment processor fees of $45 million, international expansion of $44 million, warranty costs
of $38 million, and employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation)
of $12 million, and higher freight costs of $72 million.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $122 million, or 27.1%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher costs for the next-generation
production development of satellites of $84 million, Starlink Kits of $22 million, and ground equipment of $15
million.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $135 million, or 40.4%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily driven by higher marketing costs
of $53 million, higher international expansion costs of $37 million, and higher allocated general and administrative
overhead of $67 million.
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2025 decreased by $39 million compared to the prior year ended
December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily related to the discontinuation of a Starlink Kit production line in
2024 with no impairment in 2025.
Income from Operations
Connectivity income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $2,417 million, or
120.4%, compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024 driven by the factors described above.
112
AI
Year Ended December 31, | 2025 vs. 2024 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $3,201 | $2,620 | $581 | 22.2% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 2,178 | 1,687 | 491 | 29.1% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 5,064 | 1,176 | 3,888 | 330.8% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 1,827 | 1,105 | 722 | 65.4% | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | 487 | 213 | 274 | 129.1% | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $9,556 | $4,181 | $5,375 | 128.6% | |||
Loss from operations ........................................... | $(6,355) | $(1,561) | $(4,794) | 307.1% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $581 million, or 22.2%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to an increase in advertising revenue of $116 million as
advertising spend increased from advertising partners on X and an increase in AI solutions and infrastructure
revenue of $465 million. The increase in AI solutions and infrastructure revenue is mainly due to an increase in X
and Grok subscription revenue of $365 million and an increase in revenue from data licensing arrangements of $88
million.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $491 million, or 29.1%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher infrastructure and cloud computing costs
of $412 million attributable to increased subscriber revenue, higher employee compensation expenses (including
salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) of $90 million, higher revenue share and content creator fees of
$45 million, and higher payment processor fees of $28 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation and
amortization expense of $97 million driven by a decrease in amortization expense for intangible assets that were
fully amortized during 2025.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $3,888 million, or 330.8%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher GPU depreciation
expense of $1,673 million, higher infrastructure and cloud computing expenses of $1,440 million associated with the
build out of our compute infrastructure, and higher employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits,
and share-based compensation) and allocated overhead costs of $775 million.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $722 million, or 65.4%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to higher employee
compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) of $519 million as we continue
to expand our AI business, higher legal expenses of $189 million, and higher facilities and general and
administrative costs of $14 million.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $274 million or 129.1%, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to additional expense recorded to settle with
former Twitter employees as part of the workforce reduction program implemented in 2022.
113
Loss from Operations
AI loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $4,794 million, or 307.1%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2024 driven by the factors described above.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, | 2024 vs. 2023 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $14,015 | $10,387 | $3,628 | 34.9% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 7,996 | 6,110 | 1,886 | 30.9% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 3,464 | 2,105 | 1,359 | 64.6% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 1,813 | 1,665 | 148 | 8.9% | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | 213 | 237 | (24) | (10.1)% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 63 | 3,775 | (3,712) | (98.3)% | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | 13,549 | 13,892 | (343) | (2.5)% | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | 466 | (3,505) | 3,971 | NM | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (1,580) | (1,693) | 113 | (6.7)% | |||
Interest income .................................................... | 371 | 249 | 122 | 49.0% | |||
Other income, net ................................................ | 985 | (42) | 1,027 | NM | |||
Income (loss) before income taxes ...................... | 242 | (4,991) | 5,233 | NM | |||
Benefit from income taxes .................................. | (549) | (363) | (186) | 51.2% | |||
Net income (loss) ................................................ | $791 | $(4,628) | $5,419 | NM | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $3,628 million, or 34.9%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenue from our Connectivity segment
of $3,730 million as both our Starlink consumer subscriber base continued to grow as well as our Connectivity
enterprise and government sales, and an increase in revenue from our Space segment of $239 million due to the
increase in Falcon 9 launches partially offset by a decrease in Launch and Development revenue due to timing of
government contracts. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenue from our AI segment of $341
million driven by a decrease in advertising sales, partially offset by an increase in X subscriptions and data licensing
arrangements.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,886 million, or 30.9%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to a higher cost of revenue from the Connectivity
segment of $1,982 million as a result of the higher volume spend on Starlink Kits as deliveries increased and higher
depreciation of launch costs driven by an increase in the number of satellites placed into orbit, partially offset by
cost efficiency from increased reusability of our Falcon launch vehicles in our Space segment of $128 million.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,359 million, or 64.6%, compared
to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher cost in our AI segment of
114
$990 million related to advancing our AI technologies and higher costs of $297 million in our Space segment for
investment in Starship production, launch and engineering costs, and related facilities.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $148 million, or 8.9%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to: (i) higher international
expansion costs of $18 million, higher employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-
based compensation) of $11 million, and higher allocated general and administrative overhead of $54 million in our
Connectivity segment, and (ii) higher employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-
based compensation) and professional fees of $25 million in our Space segment.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $24 million, or 10.1%, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was due to the impairment on office leases assumed as part of
the Twitter acquisition that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2023, partially offset by an increase in
workforce-related restructuring charges.
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $3,712 million, or 98.3%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. The impairment during the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily related to
the impairment of the Twitter brand following its rebranding to X.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $3,971 million compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the factors described above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $113 million, or 6.7%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to the debt issuance costs related to the X Bridge
Credit Facilities being amortized only through July 2024, the original maturity date, as compared to a full year of
amortization in 2023.
Interest Income
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $122 million, or 49.0%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to an increase in dividend income earned from
marketable securities.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,027 million compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to an unrealized gain on digital assets.
Benefit from Income Taxes
Benefit from income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $186 million, or 51.2%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to the change in the realizability of our net
deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2024, we forecasted additional deferred tax assets related to U.S. R&D
credits would be utilized.
115
Net Income (Loss)
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $5,419 million compared to the prior year ended
December 31, 2023 driven by the factors described above.
Space
Year Ended December 31, | 2024 vs. 2023 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $3,796 | $3,557 | $239 | 6.7% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 1,541 | 1,669 | (128) | (7.6)% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 1,835 | 1,538 | 297 | 19.3% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 375 | 351 | 24 | 7.0% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 24 | — | 24 | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $3,775 | $3,558 | $217 | 6.1% | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $21 | $(1) | $22 | NM | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $239 million, or 6.7%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2023. Launch Services revenue increased by $620 million as total Falcon launches increased by
38 from 96 in 2023 to 134 in 2024, with Launch Services missions increasing by 8. This increase was partially
offset by a decrease of $381 million for Launch and Development revenue due to decreased activity in our
International Space Station contracts and lower revenue from a U.S. Department of War contract.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $128 million, or 7.6%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to increased reusability of our Falcon launch
vehicles resulting in lower depreciation of $80 million, lowering the cost of each launch. The decrease was also due
to the relative increase in Starlink satellite launches from 63 launches in 2023 to 89 launches in 2024, resulting in
relatively more of our launch operations and overhead costs capitalized in our Connectivity segment of $99 million.
This decrease was offset by an increase in launch overhead costs of $77 million due to the increase in Falcon
launches.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $297 million, or 19.3%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher production costs of $159 million,
higher launch costs of $67 million, and higher engineering costs of $56 million due to the increased investment in
the development of the Starship vehicle and related launch facilities.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $24 million, or 7.0%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher employee
compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation) and professional fees of $25
million.
116
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $24 million compared to the prior year ended
December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to non-recurring impairment losses resulting from one-time
launch anomalies experienced during the year.
Income (Loss) from Operations
Income (loss) from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $22 million compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the factors described above.
Connectivity
Year Ended December 31, | 2024 vs. 2023 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $7,599 | $3,869 | $3,730 | 96.4% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 4,768 | 2,786 | 1,982 | 71.1% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 453 | 381 | 72 | 18.8% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 333 | 233 | 100 | 43.0% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 39 | — | 39 | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $5,593 | $3,400 | $2,193 | 64.5% | |||
Income from operations ...................................... | $2,006 | $469 | $1,537 | 327.4% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $3,730 million, or 96.4%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily driven by an increase of $2,013 million in revenue from our
consumer subscribers, composed of 96.5% growth in Starlink Subscribers offset by a 8.1% decline in Starlink
Subscriber ARPU primarily due to international expansion. In addition, Connectivity revenue had an increase of
$1,717 million from our enterprise and government customers, primarily driven by the growth in our enterprise
connectivity business of $466 million and growth in our government connectivity business of $1,250 million.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,982 million, or 71.1%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher volume spend on Starlink Kits of $907
million driven by higher kit deliveries and higher depreciation of $555 million from capitalized launch and satellite
costs driven by an increase in the number of launches and satellites placed into orbit.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $72 million, or 18.8%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher costs for the next-generation
production development of satellites of $73 million, ground equipment of $4 million, offset by lower costs of $4
million for Starlink Kits.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $100 million, or 43.0%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher international
expansion costs of $18 million, higher employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-
based compensation) of $11 million, and higher allocated general and administrative overhead of $54 million.
117
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $39 million compared to the prior year ended
December 31, 2023. This increase was due to a discontinuation of a certain Starlink Kit production line.
Income from Operations
Income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,537 million, or 327.4%, compared to
the prior year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the factors described above.
AI
Year Ended December 31, | 2024 vs. 2023 Change | ||||||
(in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | % Change | |||
Revenue ............................................................... | $2,620 | $2,961 | $(341) | (11.5)% | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 1,687 | 1,655 | 32 | 1.9% | |||
Research and development ............................. | 1,176 | 186 | 990 | 531.5% | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ............... | 1,105 | 1,081 | 24 | 2.3% | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | 213 | 237 | (24) | (10.2)% | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | — | 3,775 | (3,775) | NM | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | $4,181 | $6,934 | $(2,753) | (39.7)% | |||
Loss from operations ........................................... | $(1,561) | $(3,973) | $2,412 | (60.7)% | |||
_________________
NM — Absolute percentage comparisons from positive to negative values or to zero values are considered not meaningful.
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $341 million, or 11.5%, compared to the prior year
ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was due to a decrease in advertising revenue of $595 million, partially
offset by an increase in AI solutions and infrastructure revenue of $254 million. The decrease in advertising revenue
was due to the loss of advertising partners for X. The increase in AI solutions and infrastructure was due to an
increase in X subscription revenue of $157 million and an increase in data licensing arrangements of $90 million. In
2023 and 2024, substantially all of our AI segment revenue consisted of advertising, subscriptions, and data
licensing revenue generated from X, formerly known as Twitter.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $32 million, or 1.9%, compared to the prior
year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher server depreciation of $97 million,
partially offset by lower infrastructure and revenue share expenses of $46 million, and lower employee and
facilities-related expenses of $18 million resulting from the Company’s restructuring and cost reduction efforts.
Research and Development
Research and development for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $990 million, or 531.5%, compared
to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to increased investments made in
advancing our AI technologies, including employee compensation expenses (including salaries, benefits, and share-
based compensation) and infrastructure services of $703 million and higher depreciation of $321 million for our
equipment hardware.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Selling, general, and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $24 million, or 2.3%,
compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to an increase in our
118
amortization expense of $107 million related to the Twitter brand becoming a finite-lived intangible asset and higher
legal costs of $65 million, partially offset by lower employee and facilities related costs of $125 million and lower
professional fees of $23 million resulting from the Company’s restructuring and cost reduction efforts.
Restructuring charges
Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $24 million, or 10.2%, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was due to the impairment on the office leases assumed as part
of the Twitter acquisition that primarily occurred during the year ended December 31, 2023, partially offset by an
increase in workforce-related restructuring charges.
Impairment
Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $3,775 million compared to the prior year ended
December 31, 2023. The impairment during the year ended December 31, 2023 was related to the impairment of the
Twitter brand intangible asset following its rebranding to X.
Loss from Operations
Loss from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $2,412 million, or 60.7%, compared to the
prior year ended December 31, 2023 driven by the factors described above.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Management believes that certain financial measures that are not presented in accordance with GAAP provide
management and investors with useful supplemental information that provides a meaningful view of our financial
condition and results of operations across periods by removing the impact of items that management believes do not
directly reflect our ongoing operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA are
supplemental measures that are not required by or presented in accordance with GAAP. In evaluating our
performance as measured by Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA, management recognizes and
considers the limitations of these measures. Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA and
Segment Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do or may not calculate them at all, limiting their usefulness as
comparative measures. Because of these limitations, Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA should not
be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss), income (loss) from operations, or any other
measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and should be considered together with our GAAP financial
measures and the reconciliations to the corresponding most directly comparable GAAP financial measures set forth
in this prospectus.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) excluding (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii) share-based
compensation, (iii) impairment, (iv) restructuring charges, (v) interest expense, (vi) interest income, (vii) other
income (expense), net and (viii) provision for income taxes. Segment Adjusted EBITDA is defined as segment
income (loss) from operations excluding (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii) share-based compensation, (iii)
restructuring charges, and (iv) impairment. Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA are key performance
measures that our management uses to assess our financial performance as well as for internal planning and
forecasting purposes. We consider Adjusted EBITDA and Segment Adjusted EBITDA to be meaningful
performance measures for investors to evaluate our operating performance and to compare the financial results
between periods.
119
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to
Adjusted EBITDA:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
Net income (loss) ........................................ | $(4,276) | $(528) | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | ||||
Add (deduct): | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization .................... | 2,442 | 1,443 | 6,701 | 3,824 | 2,635 | ||||
Share-based compensation .......................... | 639 | 232 | 1,947 | 784 | 679 | ||||
Restructuring charges .................................. | (11) | 4 | 487 | 213 | 237 | ||||
Impairments ................................................ | — | 24 | 38 | 63 | 3,775 | ||||
Interest expense ........................................... | 664 | 447 | 1,945 | 1,580 | 1,693 | ||||
Interest income ............................................ | (213) | (117) | (492) | (371) | (249) | ||||
Other (income) expense, net ....................... | 1,876 | 211 | 177 | (985) | 42 | ||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes .. | 6 | 14 | 718 | (549) | (363) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA ..................................... | $1,127 | $1,730 | $6,584 | $5,350 | $3,821 | ||||
120
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Income (loss) from operations for each segment, the most directly
comparable GAAP measure, to Segment Adjusted EBITDA:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2026 | |||||||
(in millions) | Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $(662) | $1,188 | $(2,469) | $(1,943) | |||
Add: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | 166 | 783 | 1,493 | 2,442 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | 145 | 116 | 378 | 639 | |||
Restructuring charges .......................................... | — | — | (11) | (11) | |||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA ................................ | $(351) | $2,087 | $(609) | $1,127 | |||
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2025 | |||||||
(in millions) | Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $(70) | $1,033 | $(936) | $27 | |||
Add: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | 162 | 510 | 771 | 1,443 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | 108 | 75 | 49 | 232 | |||
Restructuring charges .......................................... | — | — | 4 | 4 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | 24 | — | — | 24 | |||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA ................................ | $224 | $1,618 | $(112) | $1,730 | |||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2025 | |||||||
(in millions) | Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $(657) | $4,423 | $(6,355) | $(2,589) | |||
Add: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | 757 | 2,376 | 3,568 | 6,701 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | 515 | 369 | 1,063 | 1,947 | |||
Restructuring charges .......................................... | — | — | 487 | 487 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | 38 | — | — | 38 | |||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA ................................ | $653 | $7,168 | $(1,237) | $6,584 | |||
121
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2024 | |||||||
(in millions) | Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $21 | $2,006 | $(1,561) | $466 | |||
Add: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | 637 | 1,508 | 1,679 | 3,824 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | 472 | 296 | 16 | 784 | |||
Restructuring charges .......................................... | — | — | 213 | 213 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | 24 | 39 | — | 63 | |||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA ................................ | $1,154 | $3,849 | $347 | $5,350 | |||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2023 | |||||||
(in millions) | Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | |||
Income (loss) from operations ............................ | $(1) | $469 | $(3,973) | $(3,505) | |||
Add: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | 571 | 884 | 1,180 | 2,635 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | 427 | 249 | 3 | 679 | |||
Restructuring charges .......................................... | — | — | 237 | 237 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | — | — | 3,775 | 3,775 | |||
Segment Adjusted EBITDA ................................ | $997 | $1,602 | $1,222 | $3,821 | |||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations, our total cash and cash equivalents of
$15,852 million as of March 31, 2026, short-term marketable securities of $7,823 million as of March 31, 2026, and
borrowings under our credit facilities. As of March 31, 2026, we have $1,500 million available to borrow under the
SpaceX Credit Facility. The cash we generate from our core operations also enables us to fund our research and
development projects including our Starship rocket and next-generation satellites, the construction of future data
centers, and the continued expansion of our AI-enabled products.
In addition, because we expect a significant portion of our future expenditures to fund growth initiatives, we retain
flexibility to adjust spending across segments. For example, if our near-term data center needs decrease in scale or
ramp more slowly than expected, including due to global economic, tax, trade or business conditions, we may
reduce future capital expenditures in this segment and reallocate those expenditures to other segments based on
business priorities and growth opportunities. In addition, we continually evaluate our cash needs and may decide it is
best to raise additional capital or seek alternative financing sources to fund the rapid growth of our business,
including through drawdowns on existing or new debt facilities. We may seek to refinance the SpaceX Bridge Loan,
including with the proceeds from notes offerings, bank borrowings, or other financial arrangements. We may also
from time to time determine that it is in our best interests to voluntarily repay certain indebtedness early.
Accordingly, we believe we have sufficient sources of funding to meet our business requirements for at least the
next twelve months from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
Debt Agreements
SpaceX Credit Facility
In February 2025, SpaceX entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of
banks, under which the Company may borrow up to $1,500 million (“SpaceX Credit Facility”). The SpaceX Credit
Facility is subject to certain customary representations, warranties, covenants, and events of default, including a
122
maximum financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the
SpaceX Credit Facility) of no greater than 3.75 to 1.0 as of the end of each fiscal quarter (subject to temporary
increases to 4.25 to 1.0 following certain qualified acquisitions) and other customary reporting requirements. The
SpaceX Credit Facility also includes sublimits of up to $150 million for financial letters of credit and up to $1,000
million for performance letters of credit. The SpaceX Credit Facility terminates, and all outstanding loans become
due and payable, on February 7, 2030, unless the parties agree to an extension in accordance with the terms of the
SpaceX Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, no amounts were outstanding under the
SpaceX Credit Facility.
Borrowings under the SpaceX Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate per annum equal to (i)
a forward-looking term rate based on SOFR (“Term SOFR”) plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% and
1.25% (depending on the Company’s debt rating), or (ii) a base rate equal to the highest of (a) Federal Funds Rate
plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus 1.00%, and (d) 1.00% plus an applicable margin ranging from
0.0% and 0.25% (depending on the Company’s debt rating). The Company may also borrow in various alternative
currencies, with interest calculated at rates based on SONIA for Pound Sterling-denominated loans and EURIBOR
for Euro-denominated loans, plus an applicable margin. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee on the
unused portion of the SpaceX Credit Facility, which ranges from 0.07% (amended to 0.06% under the Amended
SpaceX Credit Facility described below) to 0.11% per annum based on the Company’s debt rating. As of March 31,
2026, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the SpaceX Credit Facility.
In March 2026, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver (the “First
Amendment”) with its lenders, in connection with the Company’s entry into the SpaceX Bridge Loan (as defined
below). The First Amendment, among other things, (i) waived certain specified defaults and (ii) amended certain
definitions and covenants under the SpaceX Credit Facility to conform to the terms of the SpaceX Bridge Loan.
In May 2026, SpaceX amended the SpaceX Credit Facility to increase the borrowing capacity up to $5,000 million
(“Amended SpaceX Credit Facility”). As part of the Amended SpaceX Credit Facility, the sublimit for performance
letters of credit was increased to $2,000 million. The Amended SpaceX Credit Facility terminates, and all
outstanding loans become due and payable, on May 19, 2031, unless the parties agree to an extension in accordance
with the terms of the Amended SpaceX Credit Facility. All other terms were consistent with the terms of the SpaceX
Credit Facility.
SpaceX Bridge Loan
In March 2026, SpaceX entered into a new bridge loan credit agreement (the “SpaceX Bridge Loan”) with a
syndicate of lenders, providing for an unsecured bridge term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of
$20,000 million. The SpaceX Bridge Loan matures on September 2, 2027, with two three-month extensions at the
Company’s option, subject to the absence of a continuing default and the payment of an extension fee of 0.25% of
the aggregate outstanding principal per extension, resulting in a final extended maturity date of March 2028.
The proceeds of the SpaceX Bridge Loan were used to repay the X B-1 Term Loan, the X B-3 Term Loan, the xAI
Fixed Rate Loan, the xAI Floating Rate Loan and the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes (as defined and described in
Note 10, Debt, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus). The Company may
also use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes.
The SpaceX Bridge Loan bears interest, at the Company’s election, at a rate per annum equal to (i) Term SOFR plus
an applicable margin ranging from 0.75%-1.75% (depending on the Company’s debt rating), or (ii) a base rate equal
to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus 1.0% and (d) 1.00%,
plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% (depending on the Company’s debt rating). In addition, the
Company is obligated to pay duration fees equal to 0.125% of outstanding principal on the first anniversary of
closing and 0.25% of outstanding principal on the fifteen-month anniversary of closing. As of March 31, 2026, the
Company was in compliance with all covenants under the SpaceX Bridge Loan.
The obligations of the Company under the SpaceX Bridge Loan are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by X
Corp., X.AI LLC, and CTC Property LLC (each a subsidiary of the Company). The SpaceX Bridge Loan may be
prepaid at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The Company is required to use an amount
123
equal to the net cash proceeds of certain debt financings to repay amounts outstanding under the SpaceX Bridge
Loan and to apply an amount equal to the net proceeds of a qualified initial public offering, including this offering,
to repay such amounts within six months following receipt of such proceeds.
The SpaceX Bridge Loan contains customary events of default and affirmative and negative covenants, including
restrictions on liens, subsidiary indebtedness, fundamental changes (including a prohibition on the disposition of
Starlink assets and other material businesses outside the consolidated group), and changes in the nature of the
Company’s business. The sole financial maintenance covenant requires the Company to maintain a Consolidated
Leverage Ratio — defined as consolidated funded indebtedness (net of 85% of unrestricted cash) to Consolidated
EBITDA (as defined in the SpaceX Bridge Loan) — of no greater than 3.75 to 1.0 as of the end of each fiscal
quarter, with a temporary step-up to 4.25 to 1.0 for four fiscal quarters following a qualifying acquisition of at least
$1.0 billion.
Material Cash Commitments
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we enter into agreements with suppliers for the purchase of
parts and raw materials to manufacture our products. However, due to contractual terms, variability in the precise
growth curves of our development and production ramps, and opportunities to renegotiate pricing, these contracts
generally do not have long-term binding and enforceable purchase orders, and the timing and magnitude of purchase
orders beyond the short term is difficult to accurately project. Because we do not have long-term purchase orders for
these parts and raw materials, future purchases may result in material cash commitments. For additional information
about this risk, please refer to “Risk Factors” in this prospectus.
On September 7, 2025, the Company entered into a License Purchase Agreement (the “Spectrum License Purchase
Agreement”) with Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1, a Nevada Business Trust (“Trust”) and EchoStar Corporation
(“EchoStar” and the transactions contemplated thereby, “Spectrum Transaction”). On November 5, 2025 the parties
amended and restated the Spectrum License Purchase Agreement to include EchoStar’s licenses for up to 15 MHz of
additional unpaired AWS-3 spectrum. The total consideration for the acquisition of EchoStar’s spectrum is
approximately $19.6 billion, consisting of (i) approximately $11.1 billion in equity, payable through the issuance of
approximately 261.8 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a fixed value of $42.40 per share,
and (ii) up to $8.5 billion related to the payoff of designated EchoStar debt, with any shortfall below $8.5 billion to
be paid in cash. The allocation of cash and equity consideration is subject to certain adjustments based on the
amount of EchoStar debt satisfied at or prior to closing. The Spectrum Transaction was approved by the FCC on
May 12, 2026 and is expected to close on or about November 30, 2027 subject to other closing conditions. Upon
closing, the Company intends to either use cash and cash equivalents on hand or seek alternative financing sources
to fund the cash payment to EchoStar.
As of March 31, 2026, we and our subsidiaries had outstanding $29,132 million in aggregate principal amount of
indebtedness and no debt principal payments are due until August 28, 2027 if we choose not to extend. As of March
31, 2026, our total minimum lease payments was $5,823 million, of which $1,026 million is due within this fiscal
year. For details regarding our indebtedness and lease obligations, refer to Note 10, Debt, and Note 11, Leases of our
audited consolidated financial statements and Note 9, Debt of our unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Summary of Cash flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
(in millions) | 2026 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) | |||||||||
Operating activities ........................ | $1,047 | $727 | $6,785 | $5,776 | $4,520 | ||||
Investing activities ......................... | $(16,724) | $(4,170) | $(19,575) | $(10,796) | $(4,867) | ||||
Financing activities ........................ | $7,125 | $354 | $26,350 | $11,830 | $422 | ||||
124
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $320 million from $727 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2025 to $1,047 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026. This increase was primarily
driven by an increase in working capital for deferred revenue of $1,153 million from upfront payments from our
Space and Connectivity customers, partially offset by lower net income exclusive of non-cash items.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $1,009 million from $5,776 million during the year ended
December 31, 2024 to $6,785 million during the year ended December 31, 2025. This increase was primarily driven
by higher net income exclusive of non-cash items and an increase of $1,080 million for accounts payable and other
liabilities as we continue to expand our infrastructure and timing of payments, and higher deferred revenue from
cash received from upfront payments from our aviation customers. This increase was partially offset by an increase
of $449 million for accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and inventory.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $1,256 million from $4,520 million during the year ended
December 31, 2023 to $5,776 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily driven
by higher net income exclusive of non-cash items, partially offset by a decrease of $628 million for inventory,
accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets due to increase in our revenue and production of Starlink
Kits.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $12,554 million from $4,170 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2025 to $16,724 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026. This increase was
primarily driven by an increase in capital expenditures of $5,967 million related to the build out of data centers and
related infrastructure, and space launch facilities and related infrastructure, as well as an increase in purchases of
marketable securities of $7,489 million in the period. This increase was partially offset by an increase in cash
received from product rebates of $1,195 million.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $8,779 million from $10,796 million during the year ended
December 31, 2024 to $19,575 million during the year ended December 31, 2025. This increase was primarily
driven by an increase in capital expenditures of $9,574 million related to the build out of data centers and related
infrastructure, and space launch facilities and related infrastructure, partially offset by a net increase in cash received
from marketable securities of $1,264 million.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $5,929 million from $4,867 million during the year ended
December 31, 2023 to $10,796 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily
driven by an increase in capital expenditures of $6,748 million related to the build out of data centers and related
infrastructure, and space launch facilities and related infrastructure, partially offset by an increase in cash received
for the maturities of marketable securities of $981 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $6,771 million from $354 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2025 to $7,125 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026. This increase was
primarily driven by an increase in proceeds from the SpaceX Bridge Loan and other financing arrangements of
$17,950 million and proceeds from sale of our capital stock of $7,420 million, partially offset by an increase in
payment on existing debt obligations and debt extinguishment costs of $14,703 million from the proceeds from the
SpaceX Bridge Loan as well as an increase in repurchases of our capital stock of $3,838 million following the xAI
Merger.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $14,520 million from $11,830 million during the year ended
December 31, 2024 to $26,350 million during the year ended December 31, 2025. This increase was primarily
driven by an increase in proceeds from debt and other financing arrangements for our AI segment of $16,055 million
and proceeds from sale of our capital stock of $5,706 million, partially offset by an increase in repayments on debt
and other financing arrangements for our AI segment of $6,781 million.
125
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $11,408 million from $422 million during the year ended
December 31, 2023 to $11,830 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily
driven by an increase in proceeds from the sale of our capital stock of $12,327 million, partially offset by an increase
in the buyback of common and preferred shares by the Company of $104 million.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP and the Company’s
discussion and analysis of its financial condition and operating results require the Company’s management to make
judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Note 2, “Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” of the Notes to audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus
describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated
financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions it
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Space contract revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts related to the development and provision of launch
services for the deployment of spacecraft and other payloads to their intended orbit for both commercial customers
and governmental agency space programs. Connectivity contract revenue for Starshield customers is mostly derived
from fixed-price contracts related to the development of a secure satellite network designed specifically for
government and national security applications.
The Company recognizes revenue over time when the Company’s performance on the contract creates an asset with
no alternative use and when the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance to date. The
Company measures progress on these contracts using the cost-to-cost input method, as the Company believes this
represents the most appropriate measure towards satisfaction of its performance obligation. Under the cost-to-cost
input method, the Company records revenue based upon costs (such as materials and labor hours) incurred to date
relative to the total estimated cost at completion.
The Company’s contracts recognized over time using the cost-to-cost input method are complex and require the
Company to estimate the total costs to perform over the term of the contracts, as well as the measurement of
progress towards completion for each performance obligation. For Space contracts, developing the estimated total
cost at completion for each performance obligation requires the use of significant management judgment, including
assumptions regarding launch timing, labor hours, allocation of shared costs for launch vehicles that have been
identified as reusable for multiple launches, as well as expected technological changes to launch vehicles and
spacecraft. For Connectivity contracts, developing the estimated total cost at completion for each performance
obligation requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions regarding labor hours,
allocation of shared costs used in the production of satellites, satellite material costs, as well as expected
technological changes to satellites. Material changes in estimated contract revenue or costs at completion and the
resulting changes in contract profit could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and operating
results.
The impact of net adjustments from contracts recognized over time using the cost-to-cost input method to our
revenue and operating income was not material for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2026. If the combined gross margins for our contracts recognized over time using the
cost-to-cost input method had been estimated to be higher or lower by 1% during 2025, it would have increased or
decreased operating income for the year by approximately $110 million.
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
Property, plant, and equipment, net is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Company depreciates these
assets primarily using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets except flight vehicles and
spacecraft, which are depreciated over the expected number of average flights for each flight vehicle and spacecraft.
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.
126
Determining the useful lives and the number of average flights a flight vehicle and spacecraft can fly require the
Company to estimate the period over which we expect to recover the economic value of our property, plant, and
equipment. For each of our flight vehicle hardware and spacecraft, we consider recovery and refurbishment success
rates, refurbishment economics, customer acceptance limits that may prohibit the use of vehicles that have been
flown more than a certain number of launches, expected future launches included in the mission manifest, as well as
any anticipated retirement timing of certain flight vehicle and spacecraft models such as Falcon as a result of
anticipated transition to Starship to determine the expected number of average flights for each vehicle.
For our satellites assets, we consider factors such as on-orbit performance, orbit-raise timing, expected service
capability, and the evolution of constellation density and technology.
When we determine that the useful lives or expected remaining flights of assets are shorter or longer than we had
originally estimated, we adjust the rate of depreciation to reflect the assets' revised useful lives or number of
remaining flights.
The Company periodically evaluates impairment of its property, plant, and equipment assets whenever events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
to identify indicators of potential impairment include significant changes or planned changes in our use of certain
property, plant and equipment, technological developments that reduce the utility of the existing assets, declines in
forecasted cash flows, and significant negative industry or economic trends.
Impairment is assessed at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows
of other assets and liabilities. If estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset or asset
group, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value to cost of
revenue or selling, general, and administrative expenses depending on the nature of the assets, or to impairment
charges if the impairment is considered to be outside the normal course of business. For the years ended December
31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, and for the three months ended March 31, 2026, impairments on fixed assets were not
material.
If the average remaining flights for our flight vehicle and spacecraft had been estimated to be five more or fewer
flights, the impact to our operating income for the year ended December 31, 2025 and three months ended March 31,
2026 would not be material. If the average useful life of our satellite assets had been changed by one year, it would
have an approximately $480 million and $170 million impact on our operating income for the year ended December
31, 2025 and three months ended March 31, 2026, respectively.
Legal and Other Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, the
outcomes of which are inherently uncertain. The Company records a liability when it is probable a loss has been
incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable, the determination of which requires significant judgment.
Resolution of legal matters in a manner inconsistent with management’s expectations could have a material impact
on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Risk
Our Connectivity and AI businesses operate in many countries and transact in multiple currencies. In general, we are
a net receiver of currencies other than the U.S. dollar for our foreign subsidiaries. Accordingly, we are exposed to
foreign currency risk both from fluctuations in exchange rates affecting foreign-currency denominated transactions
and from the impact of translating the assets, liabilities, revenues, costs of revenue, and other operating expenses of
our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars. We have experienced, and will continue to experience, fluctuations in our
127
net income as a result of gains (losses) on the settlement and the re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities
not denominated in our functional currencies. We do not hedge foreign currency risk and changes in exchange rates
could have an adverse impact on our operating results and cash flows.
We considered the historical trends in foreign currency exchange rates and determined that it is reasonably possible
that adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates of 10% for all currencies could be experienced in the near-
term. These changes were applied to our total monetary assets and liabilities denominated in our non-functional
currencies at the balance sheet date to compute the impact these changes would have had on our income (loss)
before income taxes. These changes would have resulted in an immaterial gain or loss as of March 31, 2026 and
December 31, 2025, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio, interest income on cash and
cash equivalents and our credit facilities.
Our cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, time deposits, money market funds, U.S. government and agency
securities. Our investment policy and strategy are focused on preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity
requirements. Changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents. A
hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would have resulted in an immaterial
increase or decrease in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2025 and three months ended March 31,
2026.
The effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the SpaceX Bridge Loan was 4.58% as of March 31,
2026. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in U.S. interest rates would increase annual interest expense by
approximately $200 million.
130
BUSINESS
“You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great—and that’s what being a space-faring
civilization is all about. It’s about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And
I can’t think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars.”
—Elon Musk
Our Mission
Our mission is to build the systems and technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary, to understand the true
nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars. To do this, we have formed the most
ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth with unmatched capabilities to rapidly
manufacture and launch space-based communications that connect the world, to harness the Sun to power a truth-
seeking artificial intelligence that advances scientific discovery, and ultimately to build a base on the Moon and
cities on other planets.
Overview
Founded in 2002, SpaceX is the only company building the integrated hardware and software infrastructure of the
future across space, connectivity, and AI. At our core, we are builders. We design, manufacture, launch, and operate
products and services built on cutting-edge technologies, including the world’s most advanced rockets and
spacecraft. We safely and reliably transport astronauts, satellites, and other payloads on missions that benefit life on
Earth. Since 2023, we have launched more than 80% of mass to orbit for the world each year with an over 99%
mission success rate with Falcon rockets. We also operate a high-speed, low-latency global broadband data and
communications network powered by approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth
Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers across 164 countries,
territories, and other markets, as of March 31, 2026. Using our dedicated satellite-to-mobile constellation, we offer
connectivity services, supplementing terrestrial networks and substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across
approximately 30 countries.
With the potential to improve both space exploration and life on Earth, AI accelerates SpaceX’s mission to make life
multiplanetary, to understand the true nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars.
xAI, which was founded in 2023 and acquired by SpaceX in early 2026, is now an integral pillar of our vertically
integrated company. We are rapidly constructing AI compute infrastructure—starting on Earth with the goal of
extending to space—at industry-leading pace and cost efficiency. Our infrastructure supports training and inference
for Grok, which has emerged as one of the world’s most advanced frontier models. Grok is designed as a truth-
seeking AI model, built on our founder Elon Musk’s mission to enable humanity to understand the universe. We
believe that accomplishing this mission requires a truth-seeking approach to AI. We define truth seeking as the
active, relentless pursuit of what is objectively true about reality, and grounded in evidence, logic, empirical data,
and first principles thinking. Our goal is to understand and explain what the universe appears to be doing, as
accurately as current knowledge allows. Within two years of its initial model release, Grok achieved frontier-level
performance in scientific reasoning, as measured by its GPQA Diamond score, an industry benchmark that evaluates
AI models on a standardized set of questions written and validated by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by
other leading model providers. Grok also benefits from integration with X, our real-time information, entertainment,
and free speech platform, which serves as a foundational distribution and data engine for our AI ecosystem and
further enhances Grok’s truth-seeking objective.
We believe that space represents the largest economic frontier in human history, unlocking unprecedented
opportunities in orbit and on Earth. Earth has limits, so we must build infrastructure and industries in space,
expanding human capabilities to improve life on Earth and to establish life beyond. Connectivity infrastructure in
space is designed to help everyone on Earth have access to education, healthcare, entertainment, and
communications, and to enable people to overcome many traditional limits, such as physical and political borders.
We believe AI infrastructure in space can utilize the virtually limitless power of the Sun and thereby enable the use
of AI as a transformative force for understanding the universe and improving the daily lives of all humans. We
believe the convergence of these areas will enable an unprecedented expansion in the global economy, leading to an
131
age of abundance. Our innovations and technological advancements are redefining industries on Earth, while we aim
to create new ones on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. We are truly building the infrastructure of the future.
SpaceX is the only company that has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, revolutionizing an industry
characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures. SpaceX upended
this paradigm through the application of first-principles thinking, which rejects industry assumptions and builds
solutions based on the fundamental laws of physics. Our intense, mission-driven, engineering-first culture and focus
on extreme vertical integration have propelled us to achieve what many deemed impossible. We have demonstrated
the ability to achieve groundbreaking technological innovations with speed, quality control, and precision. We
pioneered high-cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space with our Falcon family of rockets, with a goal to
transform the rocket launch industry into airline-like operations. In 2015, we established at least a 10-year lead over
the industry by successfully landing our first Falcon 9 booster back from space before anyone else. We have
continued to invest significantly in further increasing our lead by pursuing full and rapid reusability at scale,
including investing over $15 billion in our next-generation rocket, Starship.
We believe rocket launches and landings should be as routine and commonplace as airplanes taking off and landing.
To achieve this sort of cadence, our iterative approach emphasizes rapid designing, testing, and process
optimization, putting flight hardware in the flight environment as often as possible. This allows us to accelerate our
learning by repeatedly using and improving our systems. This has resulted in a significantly higher flight rate at
costs that are much lower than launch programs that existed before SpaceX. For example, according to NASA, the
first version of Falcon 9 in 2010 had a launch cost of approximately $2,700 per kilogram, which represented a
reduction of approximately 85% compared to the historical average launch cost per kilogram of $18,500. The first
version of Falcon Heavy in 2018 further reduced this cost to approximately $1,400 per kilogram, a reduction of
approximately 92% compared to the historical average cost. With the future deployment of Starship, which is
designed to be the world’s first fully and rapidly reusable spacecraft, we aim to further reduce the cost to reach orbit
by 99% or more relative to the historical average launch cost. Central to our cost advantage is the reusability of key
hardware—most notably boosters—which we recover, refurbish, and refly many times instead of discarding after
single use. This dramatically lowers per-launch costs by minimizing hardware replacement expenses and spreading
fixed production costs across repeated uses. Space flight that historically cost billions per launch now costs in the
tens of millions, fundamentally reducing the cost of space access, providing the opportunity to build new enterprises
in space.
Similarly, xAI has cracked the code in the complexities of building and scaling AI compute infrastructure, becoming
the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. We believe the combination of our
proprietary AI infrastructure capability, our truth-seeking frontier model, Grok, and our access to real-time data on
X creates a formidable competitive advantage, allowing us to maintain a leading position in the development of
advanced artificial intelligence. This advantage stems from our complete vertical integration and the common vision
infused by our founder, Elon Musk. In just a few years, we have demonstrated an ability to build coherent compute
at scale and rapid speed with lower cost. COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II collectively provide approximately 1.0
gigawatt of compute power, with additional power capacity available for data center operations. We believe speed is
a competitive advantage. In order to bring compute clusters online as fast as possible, we employ a vertically
integrated, nimble approach to construction. At COLOSSUS, we brought online the first cluster of approximately
100,000 H100 processors, approximately 130 megawatts of compute power, in just 122 days, repurposing the shell
of an existing factory. At COLOSSUS II, we brought online the first cluster of approximately 110,000 GB200
processors, approximately 210 megawatts of compute power, even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative comparison,
an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two years.
Furthermore, in the case of COLOSSUS II, following the initial cluster, we brought online the second cluster of
110,000 GB300 processors and 220 megawatts of compute power in 64 days, demonstrating our ability to rapidly
scale our facilities once built. We expect that once fully operational, the next phase of expansion at COLOSSUS II
will bring online at least 220,000 additional GB300 processors and over 400 additional megawatts of compute
power. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center construction costs
for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis.
We are able to deploy power and compute significantly faster than other AI companies through first-principles
thinking, behind-the-meter power generation, coupled with what we believe is the world’s largest network of
132
sustainable battery storage systems, and innovations in advanced liquid cooling, high-density rack layouts, and
efficient networking. Our facilities also incorporate innovative design features that limit the effects on regional
electricity pricing for neighbors and include advanced water cleaning, reclamation, and recycling processes to
support sustainable operations. We partner with utilities and communities to connect to and enhance the grid over
time, and do so while pledging to cover costs of all new power delivery infrastructure upgrades to service our data
centers, including adequate network upgrade costs, to ensure that these expenses are not passed on to the ordinary
household. Our ability to rapidly and cost-effectively scale with the latest processors keeps us ahead of competitors
who deploy traditional and more expensive methods. As a result, we believe COLOSSUS II became one of the
world’s first data centers to deploy GB200s and GB300s, the most advanced AI processors available at the time, at
significant scale, and is currently powering training for our next frontier models, including Grok-5. Furthermore,
through our Terafab initiative together with Tesla to build a manufacturing facility capable of producing 1 terawatt
per year of compute hardware, we intend to further extend our vertical integration to chip design and manufacturing
to alleviate potential future chip shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute performance, and potentially reduce overall
compute costs. Intel, which has the ability to design, fabricate, and package ultra-high-performance chips at scale,
also joined the Terafab project in early April 2026. Our shovels-to-tokens approach allows us to train and iterate our
frontier models at high velocity, accelerating development cycles, eliminating external bottlenecks, and driving
rapid, continuous improvements in model performance.
In pursuing our mission, SpaceX has created new opportunities across our three foundational competitive
advantages, Space, Connectivity, and AI:
•Space. Launch is one of our foundational competitive advantages. We were the first private company to
develop and launch a liquid-fuel rocket to reach orbit (2008), the first private company to successfully dock a
private spacecraft with the International Space Station (2012), the first company to propulsively land (2015) and
refly an orbital-class rocket booster (2017), the first to begin deploying a large-scale LEO broadband satellite
constellation (2019), and the first private company to launch astronauts to orbit, allowing American astronauts
to again fly to and from the International Space Station on an American launch vehicle (2020). As of March 31,
2026, SpaceX had completed approximately 650 orbital space launches, and over 540 of those launches were
completed by a flight-proven Falcon rocket, drastically reducing the cost of access to space. We are the only
private company that is certified by NASA to send human missions to orbit. We are currently developing
Starship, designed to be the world’s most powerful launch vehicle. Starship is designed to be a fully and rapidly
reusable transportation system capable of carrying larger payloads farther and at lower marginal cost per launch
than our current Falcon rockets. Our unparalleled launch capabilities power every aspect of our business.
•Connectivity. Since activating service for customers in 2020, Starlink has rapidly expanded global access to
high-speed internet, prioritizing underserved rural and remote communities worldwide. While building
terrestrial networks in such communities can be prohibitively expensive, Starlink is capable of delivering
broadband connectivity anywhere on Earth with just a Starlink Kit. As of March 31, 2026, we had
approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, operating the world’s most
advanced broadband constellation providing internet connectivity to approximately 10.3 million Starlink
Subscribers across 164 countries, territories, and other markets. In January 2024, we also began deploying our
Starlink Mobile constellation that utilizes separate Starlink satellites with satellite-to-mobile capabilities,
substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” around the world. As of March 31, 2026, our dedicated satellite-to-
mobile constellation of approximately 650 V1 Mobile satellites provides satellite-to-mobile data, over-the-top
voice, and messaging services to approximately 7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30
countries.
•AI. We were the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. We own and operate
what we believe to be the largest AI training data center clusters on Earth, consisting of hundreds of thousands
GPUs—all in the same spirit that enabled us to launch Grok faster than any other leading foundational AI model
—while maintaining full vertical integration from on-site power generation and water reclamation to GPU
deployment. In under two years, we have established a dual advantage in both cost efficiency and deployment
speed at scale. By owning the compute infrastructure and vertically integrating across the full AI stack, we can
train and iterate our frontier models at lower cost and higher velocity and accelerate development cycles. This
eliminates external bottlenecks and drives rapid, continuous improvements in model performance. The addition
133
of the Terafab initiative aims to further extend our control to the foundational processor layer. We believe that
the key constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical—chip manufacturing, data center infrastructure,
and power generation; the future of AI will be determined by the control of the physical stack. We believe no
other AI company has better control over the full physical stack than SpaceX. We believe this combination of
our state-of-the-art AI compute infrastructure, our truth-seeking frontier model, and our access to real-time data
on X creates a significant strategic advantage. Our integrated AI platforms across Grok and X have over 1.3
billion supported accounts active in the last twelve months ended March 31, 2026, including approximately 550
million MAUs, up from over 1.1 billion supported accounts and approximately 520 million MAUs as of
December 31, 2025, and generating approximately 350 million daily posts. Of our MAUs, we had
approximately 117 million MAUs that used Grok’s AI features as of March 31, 2026. Grok’s deep integration
with X enables freshness, relevance, and contextual awareness that we believe is a competitive differentiator.
This direct, real-time access to the information and human discourse on X enhances Grok’s truth-seeking
capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse viewpoints. As a result, we believe Grok
can deliver the most objective and relevant insights and best serve high-frequency, high-value use cases across
consumer and enterprise AI applications.
For complex reasoning and agentic workloads, compute is directly correlated with the quality of intelligence
and task completion speed. Over the long-term, however, we expect Earth’s finite resources will not be able to
sustain the immense computational demands of advanced AI models. Sustainably satisfying this compute
demand will require space-based infrastructure that utilizes the ultimate fusion energy source: the Sun. We
believe we are the only company with a commercially viable path to building orbital AI compute at scale, due to
our unique ability to launch substantial mass into orbit through reusable, cost-efficient rockets, to manufacture
secure, reliable, and high-performance satellites at low cost and high volume, and to manage large-scale
constellations. We expect that owning scalable, power-efficient infrastructure to train and operate frontier
models will be the most important driver for AI differentiation as AI systems converge toward artificial general
intelligence (“AGI”)—which has the potential to unlock large-scale productivity gains, scientific discovery, and
societal abundance.
We have created distinct new markets across the space, connectivity, and AI industries by building the integrated
hardware and software infrastructure of the future and by combining our broad range of capabilities. For example,
SpaceX’s recent acquisition of xAI unites SpaceX’s launch capabilities and global connectivity network with xAI’s
AI development capabilities. Specifically, we believe SpaceX’s reusable rockets, scaled satellite manufacturing, and
operational expertise can enable the cost-effective and rapid deployment of massive AI compute satellite
constellations—with potentially millions of satellites—for orbital data centers. We believe these AI compute
satellites in Sun-synchronous orbit will be able to handle energy-intensive AI workloads, such as inference demand,
at far greater scale and efficiency than terrestrial alternatives, with Starlink providing low-latency, global
connectivity linking these orbital AI systems to people around the world and delivering real-time intelligence. Our
goal is to leverage our launch leadership, global connectivity network, and AI expertise to allow us to continue
building the integrated infrastructure of the future on Earth, the Moon, Mars, and beyond to benefit humanity.
135
We have an intense, mission-driven, engineering-first culture that seeks to achieve what many have deemed
impossible. “The Algorithm,” as it is known internally, is a five-step iterative process that emphasizes making the
requirements less dumb, deleting unnecessary processes or parts (embracing the principle that the best part is no
part), only then optimizing the necessary processes or parts, accelerating cycle time, and automating only proven
processes. We strive to make the incredible and extraordinary accessible and repeatable, and we have grown rapidly
by continuously leveraging our core strengths, including:
•Global leadership in orbital launch services;
•Unrivaled satellite and connectivity platform across design, manufacturing, deployment, and operations;
•Truth-seeking AI model enhanced by real-time data;
•Extreme vertical integration enabling high velocity and superior cost efficiency at scale;
•Unique ability to scale new trillion-dollar markets across Space, Connectivity, and AI;
•Business models that are incredibly difficult to replicate; and
•Our mission-driven culture and world-class talent.
We have a stellar track record of capital allocation and value creation in Space and Connectivity. Since SpaceX’s
founding in 2002, we have raised over $9 billion of equity capital to fund the development and growth of these two
business segments. The Space segment became Segment Adjusted EBITDA positive on a sustained basis beginning
in 2018 and the Connectivity segment became in aggregate Segment Adjusted EBITDA positive on a sustained basis
beginning in 2023. In 2025, our Space segment generated a loss from operations of $(657) million and Segment
Adjusted EBITDA of $653 million, including the impact of funding $3,004 million in research and development
expense for our next-generation Starship launch vehicle program. In 2025, our Connectivity segment generated
income from operations of $4,423 million and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $7,168 million.
Our financial results reflect the strength of our operating model and our ability to create and scale multiple new
businesses:
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we generated revenue on a consolidated basis of $4,694 million,
loss from operations of $(1,943) million and Adjusted EBITDA of $1,127 million. In 2025, we generated
revenue on a consolidated basis of $18,674 million, loss from operations of $(2,589) million and Adjusted
EBITDA of $6,584 million. Our Space and Connectivity segments contributed the substantial majority of our
consolidated revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
demonstrating the benefits of their scale and operating leverage in our vertically integrated business model;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Space segment generated revenue of $619 million, loss from
operations of $(662) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(351) million. In 2025, our Space segment
generated revenue of $4,086 million, loss from operations of $(657) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of
$653 million Additionally, our Space segment funded $930 million and $3,004 million in research and
development expense during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and the year ended December 31, 2025,
respectively, for our next-generation Starship launch vehicle program. Starship is designed to enable a step-
function change in our launch capability across reusability, payload capacity, and launch cadence, and is the key
enabler of our long-term growth strategy by unlocking entirely new categories of missions;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our Connectivity segment generated revenue of $3,257 million,
income from operations of $1,188 million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $2,087 million. Our Connectivity
segment, primarily driven by Starlink, generated revenue of $11,387 million, income from operations of $4,423
million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $7,168 million in 2025, representing year-over-year growth of
49.8%, 120.4%, and 86.2%, respectively, benefiting from subscriber growth, increasing enterprise adoption, and
continued improvement in network efficiency;
136
•In our newly acquired AI segment, we plan to prioritize growth and investment to capture significant
opportunities in AI applications and compute infrastructure. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, our AI
segment generated revenue of $818 million, loss from operations of $(2,469) million, and Segment Adjusted
EBITDA of $(609) million. In 2025, our AI segment generated revenue of $3,201 million, loss from operations
of $(6,355) million, and Segment Adjusted EBITDA of $(1,237) million, reflecting its earlier stage of
development and continued investments to support long-term growth opportunities in AI; and
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, capital expenditures for our Space segment was $1,052 million, for
our Connectivity segment was $1,332 million and for our AI segment was $7,723 million. In 2025, capital
expenditures for our Space segment was $3,832 million, for our Connectivity segment was $4,178 million and
for our AI segment was $12,727 million.
Segment Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the section titled “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional
information on our non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations of Segment Adjusted EBITDA to
segment income (loss) from operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Why This Matters Now
For the entirety of its existence, human civilization has lived on a single celestial body: Earth. The current paradigm,
in which human civilization is confined to one planet, exposes humanity to existential threats that are unpredictable
and uncontrollable on a planetary scale. These threats include naturally occurring catastrophic events—such as
asteroid impacts, volcanic activity, or solar fluctuations—as well as man-made global conflicts. Geological and
astronomical records indicate a non-zero probability of extinction-level events occurring over periods measurable in
millions of years. Reliance on a single planetary home constitutes a single point of failure and carries existential risk
with a probability of one that must be solved. By moving beyond the only home we have ever known, we ensure
species-level redundancy and that the light of consciousness will not be tied to a single planet subject to the
inevitable hazards of a harsh and vast universe. We do not want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs. We want
to give them a reason to look ahead with excitement, with the prospect that we are entering an age of abundance
with an endlessly prosperous and exciting future.
Artist Visualization of Life on Mars
137
For decades, a reality where humanity travels between the planets and the stars has felt tantalizingly close but still
locked in the pages and screens of science fiction. We are capable of better understanding the universe, exploring the
universe, and ultimately making life multiplanetary across the universe. We are becoming a civilization with the
ability to reach beyond Earth’s cradle and begin to inhabit other worlds. While we remain dedicated to this
fundamental mission, our progress in accessing space continues to yield opportunities that enrich life on Earth.
We believe our steps into the expanse will be accelerated by the rapid emergence of AI. As humanity moves into the
unknown, we believe AI will be our greatest tool for innovation and navigation, helping us better understand day-to-
day life and the universe, and master the complexity of establishing new civilizations in the far-flung reaches of
space. For AI to help us understand the universe, we believe it must be able to discard the often popular, but wrong,
in favor of the unpopular, but true. By combining the innate human desire to seek truth and explore with our
breakthrough technologies, we believe humanity will eventually reach new frontiers across the universe, while
enhancing the quality and resilience of life on Earth.
The rapid emergence of the AI era intensifies the urgency of our mission, as AI has the potential to accelerate not
only space exploration, but also transformative societal advancements on Earth. However, AI’s ability to
revolutionize human potential is directly dependent on meeting exponentially increasing resource demands. On
Earth, the massive expansion of data center capacity to support growing compute demand is significantly outpacing
electricity generation, which was effectively flat in the United States for approximately 15 years, growing at a
compound annual growth rate of 0.1% from 2008 to 2023. Despite the recent increase in electricity demand from AI
data centers, electricity generation in the United States has grown at an annual rate of less than 3% between 2023
and 2025, while electricity generation in China has grown at approximately twice that rate in the same time period.
U.S. compute demand has already outpaced available power supply with estimated demand of 62 gigawatts in 2025
exceeding the power generation of 49 gigawatts, according to industry sources. We expect the gap between demand
for compute and power supply to continue to widen meaningfully as AI compute needs proliferate. Such structural
power shortages are expected to intensify over the coming years. This supply and demand imbalance is already
imposing unsustainable strains on terrestrial power grids, supply chains, and the environment. The Sun contains
approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy and, as a result, we believe it is the only truly scalable solution to
terrestrial energy constraints in the age of AI. Harnessing this energy in space is considerably more efficient than on
land. Space-based solar arrays can generate more than five times the energy per unit area of terrestrial solar due to
continuous illumination, lack of atmospheric interference, and optimal orientation. SpaceX is well-positioned to
capture this space-based solar energy through our ability to rapidly access Sun-synchronous orbit through our
satellite manufacturing scale and launch capability. As a result, we are expanding our footprint and harnessing the
vast resources of space that are essential to sustaining technological development. Our goal is to ensure that AI
becomes a force for human flourishing and a benefit to civilization, rather than a catalyst for terrestrial resource
depletion and instability. We believe owning scalable, power-efficient infrastructure to train and operate frontier
models will be the most important competitive differentiator as AI systems converge toward AGI—which has the
potential to unlock large-scale productivity gains, scientific discovery, and societal abundance.
We believe space represents the largest economic frontier in human history. Our unmatched launch cadence has
massively increased access to space, enabling rapid and reliable missions for humans, cargo, and satellites—creating
unprecedented opportunities for innovation, scientific discovery, and global connectivity. SpaceX has always been a
mission-driven company, founded with the goal of making humanity multiplanetary. By dramatically reducing the
cost of access to space, we have been able to expand our mission to address some of the Earth’s most pressing
challenges, including bridging the digital divide by aiming to connect over three billion unconnected people to the
internet and humanity’s collective knowledge. Starlink is our groundbreaking solution for global internet
connectivity, delivering high-speed, low-latency access to the most remote and underserved corners of the world—
from Antarctica’s frozen wilderness to vast oceans and towering mountaintops—overcoming barriers posed by
traditional terrestrial infrastructure. Starlink’s unparalleled global reach has the potential to enable society to educate
billions of people, to help lift entire communities out of poverty, and to provide essential connectivity to schools,
hospitals, and critical services, fostering a more equitable and informed future for humanity. We support essential
applications such as education in rural and underserved regions, telemedicine for hard-to-reach patients, seamless
connectivity for aviation and maritime users, and resilient communications during natural disasters. For example,
during the 2023 Maui wildfires, which devastated Lahaina and left thousands without power or cellular service,
138
Starlink rapidly deployed over 650 terminals to restore high-speed internet connectivity, enabling first responders,
humanitarian organizations, and survivors to coordinate relief efforts, access aid resources, communicate with
family, and support recovery in areas where traditional infrastructure had completely failed. During Hurricanes
Helene and Milton in 2024 in the southeastern United States, our Starlink terminals provided a rapid lifeline for
communication and recovery when traditional cell towers, broadband lines, and power infrastructure were knocked
out for days or weeks by widespread damage caused by flooding and high winds.
Our AI technology also has the ability to elevate the quality of life for people and communities around the world.
We believe AI has the potential to revolutionize human potential—from advanced manufacturing and infrastructure
development to scientific research and medicine—delivering tangible real-world benefits for individuals,
organizations, and governments. For example, AI systems can expedite scientific discovery for researchers, aid
healthcare professionals in precise medical analysis and diagnosis, and empower educators to craft tailored learning
experiences for students. Moreover, these technologies can optimize Earth’s resource allocation, enhance disaster
response strategies, and drive efficiencies in transportation and energy systems.
We believe that our current space efforts will catalyze transformative breakthroughs that could reshape terrestrial
industries and lead to the emergence of new trillion-dollar markets on the Moon, Mars, and beyond. In particular, we
believe our goal of establishing a lunar presence will enable terawatt-scale annual AI compute growth, support
deeper space exploration and industrialization, and serve as a stepping stone to establishing a civilization on Mars.
Due to technological advancements that we are working towards, such as in-space propellant transfer, we believe
our Starship vehicle will be capable of landing massive amounts of cargo on the Moon. Once there, we believe it
will be possible to establish a permanent presence for scientific and manufacturing pursuits. For example, we believe
that factories on the Moon will be able to take advantage of lunar resources to manufacture millions of AI compute
satellites and deploy them farther into space. Our goal is to establish a sustainable lunar presence for scientific
exploration, industrialization, and as a stepping stone to Mars, serving as a proving ground for habitats, resource
utilization, and Starship systems essential for long-term human survival beyond Earth.
We believe the next paradigm shift for humanity is the creation of a resilient, perpetually expanding spacefaring
civilization that drives continuous innovation across new frontiers, ultimately propelling us to Kardashev Type II
status—a civilization that harnesses the full energy output of our Sun. In the near term, we expect space-enabled
technologies to enhance life on Earth through greater global connectivity and breakthroughs forged in the harsh
environments of our solar system, leading to accelerating progress in energy and AI. As we build infrastructure in
the Earth’s orbit, and potentially on the Moon, Mars and beyond, we believe we are capable of unlocking an era of
unprecedented economic expansion, while also contributing to the safeguards of humanity’s future against
existential risk.
Who We Are
Our mission is to build the systems and technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary, to understand the true
nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars. To do this, we’ve formed the most
ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth. We are combining the most transformative and
critical technologies in human history, including reusable rockets, a fully global internet service, satellite-to-mobile
communications that enable connectivity everywhere, our real-time information, entertainment, and free speech
platform, and a truth-seeking AI system designed to accelerate scientific discovery and augment human capabilities.
These capabilities form a self-reinforcing ecosystem: launch systems deploy and maintain the satellite network,
which delivers ubiquitous connectivity and vast data flows; the platform surfaces real-time information and supports
open discourse; and AI processes data at scale to drive breakthroughs in physics, materials science, and space
exploration. Together, they create a foundation for the development of the infrastructure of the future and the
ultimate goal of establishing a self-sustaining human presence on other planets.
SpaceX designs, manufactures, launches, and operates the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. We safely
and reliably transport astronauts, satellites, and other payloads on missions that benefit life on Earth. Since 2023, we
have launched more than 80% of mass to orbit for the world each year with an over 99% mission success rate. We
believe our unparalleled launch capabilities represent the foundational competitive advantage that enables all other
parts of our business. We operate a high-speed, low-latency broadband data and communications network powered
139
by approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, delivering connectivity to
millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers across 164 countries, territories, and other markets, as
of March 31, 2026. We also built one of the world’s most advanced models in under two years and are rapidly
scaling the associated AI compute infrastructure—starting on Earth with the goal of extending to space—at industry-
leading pace and cost efficiency. We believe that space represents the largest economic frontier in human history
and that AI is a transformative force for understanding the universe. Together, we believe that space and AI will
enable an age of abundance that will lead to an unprecedented expansion in the global economy. We are the only
company that has the foundational infrastructure across hardware and software necessary to drive transformative
innovation across space, connectivity, and AI. Our technological advancements are redefining industries on Earth,
while aiming to create new ones on the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
Our Unparalleled Launch Capabilities
Since our founding in 2002, SpaceX has cracked the code on accessing space at scale, transforming an industry
characterized by decades of stagnation, risk aversion, and economically perverse cost structures. We design,
manufacture, launch, and refurbish reusable launch vehicles that provide cost-efficient, reliable, and high-cadence
access to space for our own purposes as well as for third-party commercial and government customers. In 2025, we
launched from four primary launch pads in the United States and successfully recovered boosters across seven
landing facilities including autonomous drone ships and catch towers based on the vehicle type and mission profile.
Our extensive vertical integration and end-to-end control over the entire value chain, from design to launch to
operations, allows us to achieve unprecedented speed and cost efficiency.
As of March 31, 2026, SpaceX had launched a total mass to orbit of approximately 7,400 metric tons with an over
99% mission success rate across our Falcon rockets. We have completed approximately 650 orbital space launches,
and over 540 of those launches were completed by a flight-proven Falcon rocket. In 2025 alone, SpaceX completed
170 missions across Falcon and Starship vehicles and 159 flight-proven booster launches with an over 99% success
rate on attempted booster recoveries. We launched over 2,200 metric tons, representing over 80% of mass to orbit
for the world in 2025. With the first successful launch of Falcon 1 in 2008, we became the first private company to
successfully launch a liquid-fueled rocket to Earth’s orbit. Just two years later, in 2010, the commercial debut of the
Falcon 9 rocket revolutionized space access by delivering unprecedented cost efficiency. For example, according to
NASA, the first version of Falcon 9 in 2010 reduced launch cost to approximately $2,700 per kilogram, which
represented a reduction of approximately 85% compared to the historical average launch cost per kilogram of
$18,500. The first version of Falcon Heavy in 2018 further reduced this cost to $1,400 per kilogram, a reduction of
approximately 92% compared to the historical average. We have also reduced our internal cost of launch through a
combination of engineering improvements, manufacturing efficiencies, and economies of scale—most notably,
through our ability to drive more frequent reuse of rockets.
In December 2015, we achieved what many deemed impossible: landing a rocket launched to space back on Earth.
By 2017, we were routinely recovering and reusing the Falcon 9 first-stage booster post-launch, delivering another
step-function drop in space access costs via groundbreaking reusability. As of March 31, 2026, our Falcon 9 rockets
have demonstrated the ability to refly a first-stage 34 times. Since 2020, our Dragon spacecraft has safely flown 78
crewmembers from 20 countries. With the future deployment of Starship, which is designed to be the world’s first
fully and rapidly reusable spacecraft, we aim to reduce the cost to reach orbit by 99% or more relative to the
historical average launch cost, establishing the most affordable and scalable path to creating new opportunities in
space, such as orbital AI compute and Mars exploration.
140
Booster Reusability Enables Increasing Launch Rates
Our principal launch vehicles and spacecraft include:
•Falcon 9. As the world’s first orbital-class rapidly reusable rocket, Falcon 9 was first launched in 2010 and has
a payload capacity to LEO of approximately 23 metric tons when fully expendable. Falcon 9 has completed
approximately 620 orbital space launches as of March 31, 2026, and an over 99% mission success rate, making
it the most active orbital launch vehicle today. In 2025 alone, we launched 165 Falcon 9 rockets, of which 157
were flight-proven booster launches, and during the three months ended March 31, 2026, we launched 40
Falcon rockets, of which 39 were flight-proven booster launches.
•Falcon Heavy. Falcon Heavy first launched in 2018 when it put a Tesla Roadster and its mannequin passenger,
known as Starman, into orbit around the Sun. With a payload capacity to LEO of approximately 64 metric tons,
Falcon Heavy is a partially reusable super heavy-lift launch vehicle designed to deliver large payloads to orbit.
Falcon Heavy is one of the most powerful operational rockets in the world measured by liftoff thrust, with 11
launches as of March 31, 2026 and a 100% mission success rate.
•Dragon. Launched by Falcon 9 in 2012, our Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial spacecraft to
deliver cargo to and from the International Space Station and, eight years later, the first privately built vehicle to
fly humans to the orbiting laboratory. Since its first flight, Dragon has visited the International Space Station
over 50 times, and restored America’s ability to launch astronauts. Dragon has also supported all of NASA’s
private astronaut missions to the International Space Station, flown the first all-commercial astronaut crew,
completed the first human spaceflight over the Earth’s polar regions, and supported the first-ever commercial
spacewalk.
•Starship. First launched in 2023, Starship is designed to be a fully reusable, super heavy-lift launch vehicle.
Starship V3 is designed to deliver 100 metric tons to Earth’s orbit in a fully reusable configuration while
enabling rapid turnaround times akin to commercial aviation. Future generations of Starship are being designed
to double this payload capacity. To date, we have executed 11 Starship flight tests. We have also scheduled a
12th flight test, which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster, powered by the
next evolution of our Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad at Starbase. We expect Starship
to commence payload delivery to orbit in the second half of 2026. We have achieved innovative milestones
141
such as catching a booster using “chopstick” arms on the same tower it launched from. We expect this
capability will facilitate rapid refurbishment and reuse, allowing for multiple launches per day at reduced costs.
Upon achieving rocket reusability, we recognized the immense potential of our launch business to enable new
revenue streams, as our launch capacity would eventually outstrip demand from traditional space customers alone.
This realization, along with our efforts to make life multiplanetary, drove us to reimagine what was possible when
access to space became more affordable. Rather than asking what was being done in space, we asked what large-
scale global need could be better served from space. This led to the development of Starlink, our global satellite
internet constellation, consisting of thousands of LEO satellites designed to provide high-speed, low-latency
broadband connectivity to underserved areas worldwide. Although the concept of using satellites for global internet
connectivity dates back decades, technical challenges and the prohibitive cost of accessing space historically
rendered attempts to provide such connectivity economically unviable. Within three years of our first satellite launch
in 2019, we solved the technical and production challenges of the satellites, and within five years, we had deployed
the largest LEO constellation in existence. Today, Starlink is the sole low-latency network available globally.
As the leader in space access, our launch operations are an important and expanding competitive advantage. By
combining increasing launch cadence, expanding cargo capacity, and declining unit costs—driven by rapid
reusability—we have generated a compounding competitive advantage. This not only fortifies our core business, but
also provides vast new market opportunities uniquely enabled by space.
Our Leading Capabilities Across Space, Connectivity, and AI
Space. While our launch capabilities support our other businesses, such as Starlink Consumer Broadband and
Starlink Mobile, we also sell launches to third-party customers. We offer launch services to commercial, civil, and
government customers through our reusable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets for satellite, cargo, and crew
missions. We fly to LEO, MEO, GEO, lunar, and interplanetary trajectories, as well as the International Space
Station. We are the primary launch provider for the U.S. government. In 2025, we launched 11 of 12 National
Security Space Launch (“NSSL”) medium and heavy lift missions and all five U.S. crew and cargo missions to the
International Space Station for NASA. We serve commercial and government customers—including NASA, the
National Reconnaissance Office (“NRO”), Axiom Space, SES, Eutelsat, and Oneweb. We charge our customers
based on the type of rocket, mass to orbit, size of payload, and type of service, such as whether the launch is
dedicated to a single customer or part of a “rideshare” with other customers.
Starship is our next-generation reusable rocket vehicle that we expect will expand our launch capability dramatically
through full and rapid reusability combined with currently unprecedented mass to orbit capability. As the most
powerful launch system ever developed, we expect that Starship V3 will be able to carry a payload of 100 metric
tons, and that future generations could reach 200 metric tons, potentially as soon as Starship V4. Starship is designed
to deliver our next-generation satellites to orbit, long-haul point-to-point transportation on Earth, the cargo and crew
necessary to develop a base on the Moon and a city on Mars for research and human spaceflight development.
Connectivity. Starlink provides global access to high-speed internet, including underserved rural and remote
communities worldwide. As of March 31, 2026, we had approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile
satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, providing broadband connectivity to approximately 10.3 million Starlink Subscribers
across 164 countries, territories, and other markets. We also provide satellite-to-mobile texting and over-the-top
voice services to approximately 7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30 countries.
•Starlink Consumer Broadband. We operate the world’s largest and most advanced space-based internet
broadband service with median latency at approximately 25 milliseconds as of March 31, 2026. We provide
fiber-like download speeds—at a median of 225 Mbps during peak hours for residential users as of March 31,
2026—and the technological capability to provide service everywhere on Earth, including the poles. This
service quality is enabled by our vast network of approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites
in Low-Earth Orbit, which accounted for approximately 75% of all active maneuverable satellites in orbit as of
March 31, 2026. We expect to commence deploying our next-generation V3 satellites, designed to offer one
Tbps of downlink capacity per satellite, using Starship in the second half of 2026. We expect that a single
Starship launch will be capable of deploying up to 60 V3 satellites to LEO, representing a potential twenty-fold
142
increase in Starlink downlink capacity deployed relative to a Falcon 9 launch. As of March 31, 2026, we had
approximately 10.3 million Starlink Subscribers, up approximately 105% from 5.0 million subscribers a year
prior. We charge our Starlink Subscribers a monthly subscription fee, which varies based on geographic market
and download speed, plus typically a one-time upfront terminal cost.
•Enterprise Solutions. SpaceX is a critical partner to a wide array of enterprises. We offer Starlink’s high-
speed, low-latency, reliable internet services to enterprise customers across industries including construction,
agriculture, retail, telecom, hospitality, aviation, maritime, and land mobility. Starlink’s unique capabilities are
well‑suited for deployments across field offices, remote worksites, research stations, drilling rigs, rural
hospitals, aircraft, cruise ships, trains, and hotels. Our enterprise customers include companies such as United
Airlines, Carnival, Maersk, and John Deere, among others. We also serve a broad fixed‑site customer base
across industries such as retail and financial services that require high availability for critical operations as well
as reliable connectivity in remote or hard-to-serve locations. As companies continue to invest in secure and
resilient networks and backup systems to keep critical infrastructure online—such as point‑of‑sale and payment
processing systems—we often start as a backup solution and then transition to being the primary solution. Our
enterprise contracts are based on a combination of subscriptions, data consumption, capacity, or other pricing
models depending on each customer’s particular needs. Since 2023, no Starlink Enterprise customer having
contributed more than $750,000 of annual revenue has voluntarily discontinued their service, demonstrating the
strong performance and value of our offering. This is despite the ability of our customers to cancel the service at
any time.
•Government Solutions. For our government customers, we provide high-speed, resilient connectivity for
public services, social impact, humanitarian efforts, and disaster response in even the most remote and
challenging environments. Examples include support for the FEMA in coordinating disaster recovery after
hurricanes and wildfires, the NOAA for at-sea testing and environmental monitoring, the Government of the
Philippines for linking remote islands, schools, and public institutions, the Government of Jamaica for
improving digital access in remote and maritime areas, and the Government of Ecuador for supporting
education and healthcare connectivity in isolated communities. Separately with Starshield, we have leveraged
our commercial LEO satellite constellation engineering learnings and operational experiences to develop a
secure, dedicated satellite network designed specifically for United States Government customers and national
security applications.
•Starlink Mobile. We provide satellite-to-mobile connectivity, supplementing terrestrial networks and
substantially reducing mobile “dead zones” across approximately 30 countries. We partner with MNOs
including major wireless carriers like T-Mobile in the United States, and other international operators including
One NZ, Optus, Telstra, Rogers, KDDI, Salt, Entel, Kyivstar, and VMO2. Through these partnerships, we
enable consumers, businesses, and public-sector customers to use their existing phones in more places, support
critical connectivity during disasters and power outages, and open new applications for low-bandwidth mobile
and IoT devices. Our current capabilities under our “V1” constellation (consisting of approximately 650 V1
Mobile satellites in orbit) include light data, text messaging (SMS), and over-the-top voice services (e.g.,
WhatsApp and FaceTime). We are developing more comprehensive satellite-to-mobile services, including
broadband data and IoT connectivity, which are expected to deliver resilient, infrastructure-independent
connectivity worldwide and enable 5G connectivity. We have partnerships with approximately 30 MNOs on six
continents, covering an area that is home to approximately 1.9 billion people. We charge MNOs either a fixed
fee or a per-mobile user fee-based amount, which is typically passed through to the customer via the carrier as
an “add-on” feature.
143
Our Global Starlink Subscriber Base
AI. We operate a highly vertically integrated AI platform spanning gigawatt-scale AI compute infrastructure, our
truth-seeking frontier AI model, Grok, AI solutions for consumer and enterprise customers, and X, our real-time
information, entertainment, and free speech platform. We believe AI is rapidly converging toward AGI, where
human cognitive capabilities can be replicated and scaled at machine speeds, profoundly augmenting human
productivity. Once an AGI system exists, its true value derives from the ability to create limitless duplicates of
human-like intelligence, necessitating vast computational resources and cost-efficient deployment to achieve
meaningful scale. Without large-scale, power-efficient infrastructure, AGI cannot be deployed broadly or
economically—making such infrastructure a critical strategic differentiator.
•AI Compute Infrastructure. xAI has established a leading position in building and scaling terrestrial AI
compute infrastructure, becoming the first company to deploy a coherent gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. Our
AI compute facilities, COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II, collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of
compute power, with additional power capacity available for data center operations. Our first-principles
thinking enables us to build coherent compute at scale and at rapid speed with lower costs than most other
companies in the industry. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS online in 122 days, repurposing the shell
of an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative
comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two
years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center construction
costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis. This
dual speed and cost advantage stems from our complete vertical integration and the shared culture infused by
our founder, Mr. Musk, across our Space, Connectivity, and AI segments. The addition of Terafab, an initiative
together with Tesla to build a manufacturing facility capable of producing 1 terawatt per year of compute
hardware, aims to further extend our vertical integration to chip design and manufacturing to alleviate potential
future chip shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute performance, and potentially reduce overall compute costs.
Intel, which has the ability to design, fabricate, and package ultra-high-performance chips at scale, has also
joined the Terafab project. We believe that the key constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical—chip
manufacturing, data center infrastructure, and power generation; the future of AI will be determined by the
control of the physical stack.
144
•Truth-Seeking Frontier Model. xAI has developed one of the world’s most advanced, truth-seeking frontier
models with Grok. Since launching Grok-1 in November 2023, we have released four major versions and
notable variations thereof, achieving one of the fastest iteration cycles in the industry, culminating in Grok-4.3
(April 2026). Building on this trajectory, we expect to continue scaling Grok through subsequent generations.
Ongoing training of next‑generation models is expected to scale toward multiple trillions of parameters, which
could represent a step change in reasoning in depth and overall intelligence. In this context, the number of
parameters refers to the scale of the model, where parameters are the internal numerical values, such as
“weights,” that are adjusted during training to enable the model to recognize patterns and relationships in data.
A larger number of parameters generally allows the model to capture more complex relationships, store greater
amounts of knowledge, and achieve higher levels of reasoning capability. Within two years of its initial model
release, Grok achieved frontier-level performance in scientific reasoning, as measured by its GPQA Diamond
score, an industry benchmark that evaluates AI models on a standardized set of questions written and validated
by experts, on a faster timeline than reported by other leading model providers. This accelerated rate of
innovation stems from our highly vertically integrated stack: full ownership of training infrastructure, access to
the world’s most powerful compute clusters, and relentless focus on truth seeking and real-world utility. A key
competitive differentiator is Grok’s deep integration with X, enabling proprietary access to a real-time
information stream of approximately 350 million daily posts, which enhances freshness, relevance, and
contextual awareness for Grok. This direct, real-time access to the information and human discourse on X
enhances Grok’s truth-seeking capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse
viewpoints. We believe that this combination of compute infrastructure scale and the massive dataset available
to us through X, subject to some limitations for certain content, has allowed us to achieve industry-leading
performance and provide model outputs that analyze real-time information on global events. We expect that our
compute infrastructure and direct access to real-time data via X constitute substantial performance advantages
for Grok that will result in increasingly rapid and dramatic iteration cycles.
•Consumer and Enterprise Applications. We leverage our leading frontier models and compute infrastructure
to deliver consumer and enterprise applications. In under six months, we developed Grok Voice, a real-time
speech engine, including in multilingual performance. Our image and video generation system, Imagine,
produced approximately 10 billion images and over 2 billion videos per month, on average, for the quarter
ending March 31, 2026. Together with Tesla, we are also developing Macrohard, an agentic AI platform
designed to be capable of fully emulating digital workflows and augmenting human operation of computers—
from coding and product development to management and entire business processes—using sophisticated
autonomous agents. We believe Macrohard will have the potential to fundamentally transform how companies
are structured and operate, thereby allowing dramatic increases in human productivity. In addition, we believe
our existing government relationships and track record as large government contractors are a structural
advantage as governments become significant consumers of AI applications.
Our integrated AI platforms across Grok and X have over 1.3 billion supported accounts active in the last
twelve months ended March 31, 2026, including approximately 550 million MAUs, up from over 1.1 billion
supported accounts and approximately 520 million MAUs as of December 31, 2025. Of our MAUs, we had
approximately 117 million MAUs that used Grok’s AI features as of March 31, 2026.
We also monetize user activity through high-impact advertising inventory on X. We believe X’s scale, real-time
engagement, and integration with Grok provide a differentiated foundation for building a unified user
experience across communication, content discovery, commerce, and financial services, among others. For
enterprises that advertise on X, we offer large-scale user engagement, real-time content, and advanced AI-
driven performance marketing tools. For enterprises, we offer tailored deployments of Grok customized to
specific workflows and security needs through Grok Business and Grok Enterprise, sold on license-,
consumption-, or outcome-based pricing models.
Collaboration with Tesla
SpaceX and Tesla developed the early foundation of a strong and constructive partnership through a series of limited
but successful commercial engagements. Our relationship with Tesla evolved meaningfully following Tesla’s
January 2026 commitment to invest in xAI—an investment that, upon SpaceX’s acquisition of xAI, was converted
145
into an equity interest in SpaceX. Tesla and xAI continue to build upon their longstanding collaborative relationship
by evaluating future strategic opportunities between the companies.
One expected area of collaboration is an AI project called Macrohard. We expect Macrohard to benefit from running
on both state-of-the-art processors and cost efficient, next-generation Tesla processors, a critical advantage of our
vertical integration.
Another expected area of collaboration is Terafab, an announced AI chip manufacturing initiative designed to
vertically integrate the design, fabrication, and deployment of advanced logic and memory chips. We believe this
initiative will alleviate potential future chip shortages at SpaceX and optimize compute performance. We expect
Terafab to be the world’s largest chip manufacturing facility. Our strategy for Terafab is to vertically integrate
across the design of lithography masks, fabrication of logic and memory chips, and design of advanced packaging in
a single closed-loop plant. Conducting all these activities end-to-end in a single facility enables rapid testing and
iterations, allowing us to improve chip design and scale manufacturing faster. We expect that our speed and cost
advantage from vertical integration will allow us to scale efficiently in AI chip manufacturing towards our long-term
goal of producing one terawatt of compute each year. We are partnering to build Terafab in order to support growth
in two kinds of chips— one type optimized for terrestrial edge and inference to be used primarily in Tesla’s Optimus
robots and vehicles, and another type optimized for the space environment to be used in our orbital compute
infrastructure. While Terafab is intended to expand our internal chip manufacturing capabilities, we expect to
continue sourcing a significant portion of our compute hardware from third-party suppliers. We view Terafab as
complementary to these relationships, enabling us to augment our access to compute hardware at massive scale and
further complete our highly vertically integrated compute platform by extending our control to the foundational chip
layer. We believe that the key constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical—chip manufacturing, data
center infrastructure, and power generation; the future of AI will be determined by the control of the physical stack.
We believe that we are better positioned than other AI companies given our unique control over the full physical
stack. We plan to explore other areas of strategic collaboration with Tesla in the future.
Collaboration with Cursor
On April 19, 2026, we entered into a compute agreement with Cursor. Cursor develops and operates an AI-native
integrated development environment that enables professional software developers and engineering teams to write,
edit, review, and refactor code using LLM-powered agents and workflows integrated via its proprietary model
harness. In 2025, Cursor launched Composer, its own LLM trained for software development. It recently released
Composer 2, which offers improvements in coding performance at lower cost. We believe the compute agreement
and any acquisition of Cursor (described below), if completed, will extend our strategy to vertically integrate
compute infrastructure, models, and applications, can help accelerate our development of AI-native software tools,
and combined with our significant compute capacity, will help strengthen our position in AI-assisted developer
productivity. We expect to accelerate the development of our existing AI models, including Grok, through our
collaboration with Cursor.
Under the compute agreement, we will provide Cursor with certain GPU cluster compute capacity for use in
connection with specified development, training, improvement and other activities related to AI models and other
technology and intellectual property. In exchange, Cursor will contribute certain personnel, data and datasets,
documentation, technical know-how, workflows, prompts, specifications and software code. We will collaborate
with Cursor to improve our existing models, including Grok, and potentially to jointly develop AI models and
related model-specific deliverables. Each party retains ownership of its pre-existing and independently developed
intellectual property (including, in the case of SpaceX, Grok) and related improvements and derivatives, including
where they are utilized in connection with joint development activities. Any jointly developed models will be jointly
owned, and each party will have a broad right to use, reproduce, modify, distribute, license, commercialize and
otherwise exploit them without an obligation to account to the other party.
We also entered into an option agreement pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to acquire
Cursor. The option agreement generally provides that we may exercise the call option at any time during the 30-day
period following the earlier of (i) seven trading days following the completion of this offering and (ii) September 30,
146
2026. Exercise of the call option is in our sole discretion and subject to further approval by our board of directors.
Cursor is also subject to certain exclusivity obligations under the option agreement.
If we exercise the call option, we would simultaneously execute a merger agreement with Cursor, pursuant to which,
following satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the merger agreement, including receipt of requisite
regulatory approvals, Cursor would become our subsidiary, and, as a result, we would acquire all of Cursor’s cash,
intellectual property, personnel, customer contracts and other assets. As of January 31, 2026 (Cursor’s fiscal year-
end), Cursor had $3.1 billion of total assets, primarily comprising $2.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents, and
$0.55 billion of total liabilities. The purchase price would primarily be allocated to goodwill on our balance sheet.
Cursor has historically earned some revenue by providing services to customers and, if we acquired Cursor, we may
provide these or similar services to customers after the acquisition although at revenue levels that may vary
significantly from historical performance. If we exercise the call option to acquire Cursor, we would expect to retain
certain Cursor talent by committing to provide continuing employees with competitive compensation and retention-
focused incentives designed to support the long-term value of SpaceX.
The consideration for the acquisition of Cursor, if any, after the closing of this offering would consist of shares of
our Class A common stock based on an implied equity value of Cursor of $60.0 billion, and the price of our Class A
common stock that equals the volume-weighted average closing price thereof over the seven consecutive trading
days immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition. If either (i) we decide to terminate the option agreement
or (ii) Cursor is eligible to and decides to terminate due to our material breach of the option agreement (subject to
notice and cure provisions), Cursor is entitled to a $1.5 billion termination fee under the option agreement and an
$8.5 billion deferred services fee under the compute agreement. These fees are payable in cash (or Class A common
stock, if this offering has not been consummated at the time the fees become payable).
Any shares of our Class A common stock issuable pursuant to the merger agreement would be issued in reliance
upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(a)(2) thereof. As
a result, any such shares of Class A common stock would be deemed “restricted securities” as such term is defined
under Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Such shares of Class A common stock would be eligible for resale only if
registered under the Securities Act or if such resales qualify for an exemption from registration.
We have conducted preliminary due diligence on Cursor’s business, technology and operations, and expect to
continue such diligence in connection with any decision to exercise the call option. We cannot predict whether we
will elect to exercise the call option or, if exercised, whether the acquisition will close on the anticipated terms, or at
all.
Compute Services Agreements with Third Parties
We believe our compute infrastructure and related strategy provides us with substantial flexibility in how we
allocate and monetize capacity. We have the ability to use compute resources to support our proprietary AI
applications (such as Grok 5, which is currently being trained at COLOSSUS II), while also providing access to
select compute capacity to third-party customers. For example, in May 2026, we entered into Cloud Services
Agreements with Anthropic, an AI research and development public benefit corporation, with respect to access to
compute capacity across COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II. Pursuant to these agreements, the customer has agreed to
pay us $1.25 billion per month through May 2029, with capacity ramping in May and June 2026 at a reduced fee.
The agreements may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ notice. The customer will retain ownership and
intellectual property rights in its content, AI models, and related data. This structure allows us to monetize unused
compute capacity in our infrastructure, while still permitting reallocation of the capacity for our own internal
initiatives if needed in the future. We have sufficient capacity to provide compute for our own AI models, including
support of our training and inference demands, and to satisfy the obligations under these agreements. We expect to
enter into additional similar services contracts for compute capacity with third parties. To the extent we become
compute constrained due internal and external utilization, we would need to expand our compute infrastructure. We
believe this opportunity highlights the increasing importance of large-scale, frontier-level AI infrastructure and
positions us as a differentiated provider of high-performance compute capacity to both internal and third-party AI
workloads. We believe our dual monetization strategy provides multiple pathways to generate returns on invested
capital.
147
Our Repeatable Business Model
Our business model is built on a repeatable, engineering-driven framework that combines our unparalleled launch
capabilities, extreme vertical integration, rapid iteration, and disciplined capital investment to create durable, large-
scale businesses. We execute this framework through the following core principles:
1.Leverage our unparalleled launch capabilities to enable massive scale. Our rockets—with unmatched
launch cadence, best-in-class reliability, and dramatically reduced cost-to-orbit—are the foundation that we
expect will enable us to create economic opportunities in space and deliver a diversified portfolio of services.
Our launch capabilities enable large-scale deployment of assets that would not otherwise be economically
viable.
2.Identify and create new trillion-dollar market opportunities. We focus on market opportunities that are
useful for humanity and that present trillion-dollar opportunities, including global broadband and mobile
connectivity for consumers, enterprises, and governments; and AI applications and computational infrastructure.
We prioritize opportunities where structural inefficiencies or legacy technological limitations have constrained
supply.
3.Design a solution with world-class engineering and first-principles thinking. We apply physics-based
engineering and first-principles thinking to design products and systems from the ground up—boiling things
down to the most fundamental truths and reasoning up from there. This helps us drive massive, step-function
improvements in performance, scalability, and cost.
4.Apply “The Algorithm” (make less dumb, delete, optimize, accelerate, automate). We operate under a set
of core execution principles that we refer to as “The Algorithm,” a five-step iterative process that we use as our
guiding principles day-to-day. We make the requirements less dumb, delete unnecessary processes or parts
(embracing the principle that the best part is no part), only then optimize the necessary processes or parts, and
then accelerate cycle time (many entities have launched once; no one other than us has ever launched over 100
times per year), and automate only proven processes after the first four steps are completed. We apply the
Algorithm across every aspect of our organization, creating a cultural and operational standard of excellence
that has defined SpaceX since inception.
5.Vertically integrate all the way to the end customer. We design and manufacture a significant portion of our
components in-house, including engines, avionics, structures, and software, even producing the “tools that make
the tools,” enabling us to test, fail, and iterate rapidly. We can then release newer, more advanced hardware with
speed and cost efficiency.
6.Continuously drive cost down and throughput up. Through rocket reusability, manufacturing at scale,
advanced automation, and rigorous operational discipline, we continuously reduce unit costs while increasing
launch cadence, satellite network, and AI hosting capacity.
7.Generate significant cash flow and reinvest in the future. As our businesses scale, they generate significant
cash flow, which we reinvest into nascent market opportunities—driving a self-reinforcing cycle of constant
innovation and potentially creating significant additional value.
Starship is a powerful example of this business model in action. Upon achieving a fully and rapidly reusable design,
we believe Starship will support a step-function increase in launch capacity and be capable of landing massive
amounts of cargo on the Moon. Once there, we believe it will be possible to establish a permanent presence for
scientific and manufacturing pursuits. For example, we believe that factories on the Moon could take advantage of
lunar resources to manufacture millions of AI compute satellites and deploy them farther into space. Additionally,
we are collaborating with NASA under the Artemis program to land humans on the Moon, with the goal of using
Starship for transportation, which will be the first such mission since 1972.
We will continue leveraging our expanding launch capabilities, combined with our engineering and manufacturing
expertise, to create and scale new markets in space for the benefit of humanity—on Earth, the Moon, Mars, and
beyond.
148
Our Engineering-First Culture
We are able to achieve transformative technological breakthroughs because we accept only the laws of physics as
the limiting factors to our work and mission. Our core approach is deeply rooted in first-principles thinking, which
rejects any preconceived notions or experience-based norms. Our unparalleled track record demonstrates our
capacity to execute space missions and achieve technological breakthroughs with speed and precision that others
have not achieved. We have a track record of achieving what many have deemed impossible. Some of our industry-
defining achievements and historic milestones include:
•The first private company to develop and launch a liquid-fuel rocket to reach orbit (2008);
•The first private company to successfully dock a private spacecraft with the International Space Station (2012);
•The first to successfully propulsively land (2015) and refly orbital-class rocket boosters (2017);
•The first to begin deploying a large-scale LEO broadband satellite constellation (2019);
•The first private company to transport astronauts to orbit, returning America’s ability to fly astronauts to and
from the International Space Station (2020);
•The first to manufacture consumer-grade phased-array user terminals at scale (2022);
•The first to deploy a large-scale LEO satellite-to-mobile constellation (2025);
•The first to build a gigawatt-scale AI training cluster and largest coherent supercomputer (2026);
•The first gigawatt-scale Megapack battery installation (2026); and
•The only company capable of building orbital AI compute at scale.
Our organizational philosophy fosters an engineering- and data-led culture that embraces failure as an essential
learning opportunity and is maniacally focused on efficiency and speed. This culture allows us to deliberately move
quickly to test new hardware, knowing that early failures provide more valuable data than protracted analysis. We
view our factories as the machines that build the machines and maintain a relentless focus on our ability to move,
fail, and fix fast.
Our AI Compute Infrastructure Advantage and Growth Strategy
We believe AI leadership will be defined by the ability to rapidly scale compute capacity to support exponential
usage growth and frontier intelligence. There is a meaningful compounding benefit of greater usage, creating more
data for training, driving improvements in model performance, and in turn leading to greater usage. We believe that
our highly vertically integrated, shovels-to-tokens approach allows us to train and iterate our frontier models at
lower cost and higher velocity, accelerating development cycles, eliminating external bottlenecks, and driving rapid,
continuous improvements in model performance. This dynamic reinforces the criticality of scale and cost efficiency
in compute infrastructure as the primary differentiator in the AI landscape. In addition, our leadership in compute
infrastructure positions us to monetize not only AI software applications built on our models, but also the underlying
compute that powers them. As we continue to scale our terrestrial and orbital compute infrastructure to support
internal model development, training, and inference workloads, we intend to sell our high-performance compute
capacity to a limited number of third party customers.
Why Compute Matters. The training and inference demanded by advanced AI models require substantial
computational resources. Greater compute capacity enables more intelligence by training new generations of models
with increasing frequency and creating more capable models, ability to support inference, or usage, across a large
and growing user base, and extraction of the highest performance from those models. As the AI user base expands,
we also expect compute demand per user to increase significantly. Reasoning models introduced in 2024
demonstrated that allocating more computational resources during inference directly leads to higher-quality
intelligence. AI agents popularized in 2026 demonstrated that allocating more computational resources enabled
149
multi-step task execution, meaningfully increasing compute demand per human user interaction. In addition,
compute infrastructure with end-to-end, cluster-level coherence through tight integration across software and
hardware systems enables more efficient, stable, and higher-fidelity training and inference at scale—ultimately
enhancing model intelligence and performance. Within inference, we expect computationally-intensive reasoning,
agentic, and multi-modal workloads will continue to grow as a portion of overall usage. We therefore expect
demand for compute will continue to increase across consumer, enterprise, and government applications as AI
adoption accelerates. For example, U.S. compute demand has already outpaced available power supply with
estimated demand of 62 gigawatts in 2025 exceeding the power generation of 49 gigawatts, according to industry
sources. We expect the gap between demand for compute and power supply to continue to widen meaningfully as AI
compute needs proliferate. Furthermore, we believe that third-party estimates on data center demand are constrained
by the practical supply limitations that exist in a terrestrial context and the power shortage may be far greater than
what research estimates suggest. We believe operators with superior model-to-compute integration—the ability to
efficiently support and allocate compute across both training and inference workloads—are best positioned to win
the AI race.
Self-Reinforcing Network Effects Among Lower Cost Per Token, Model Quality, and User Adoption. AI systems
are ultimately constrained or differentiated by the cost, speed, and scale at which they can generate and process
tokens. A “token” represents the fundamental unit of data consumed and produced by modern AI models, for
example corresponding to words, images, audio, or other modalities. It serves as the atomic unit through which
models read, reason, and generate output. As such, tokens are the primary basis for measuring both the cost of
training and cost of inference, making them a foundational economic metric in the AI space. Companies that can
structurally reduce energy, compute, networking, and deployment costs per token will be positioned to train faster,
iterate more rapidly, and ultimately manufacture greater intelligence, scale models more rapidly, and deliver
increasingly powerful and accessible AI solutions. This creates a self-reinforcing advantage in which lower token
costs drive greater model quality and user adoption, reinforcing AI leadership. This is because lower cost per token
enables more frequent model training, larger and more sophisticated models, longer chains of processing for
reasoning and agentic workloads, and significantly higher inference volumes at economically viable prices. This
dynamic directly impacts model quality, responsiveness, and accessibility, while also determining the ability to
serve the rising global demand across consumer, enterprise, and mission-critical AI applications. As AI systems
scale toward increasingly complex reasoning tasks and higher usage intensity, improvement in cost per token
enables meaningful advantages in performance quality, scaled distribution, and monetization. This is particularly
true as the industry converges towards recursive self-improving learning that minimizes human intervention, which
is highly token consumptive.
Cost of Compute is the Main Driver of Cost Per Token. The cost of compute is the primary driver of cost per token
across both training and inference workloads. Each token processed by an AI model requires a quantifiable amount
of computational effort. The total cost per token is determined by the efficiency, availability, and unit economics of
the underlying compute resources. According to SemiAnalysis, for most AI companies without a build cost
advantage, their total capital cost of building compute infrastructure derives approximately 30% from data center
construction costs (including, but not limited to, the shell; mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (“MEP”); and grid
interconnection) and approximately 70% from the cost of procuring processors and critical IT equipment. Ongoing
operational costs of utilizing this compute infrastructure include the cost of power to run the processors, cost of
maintaining those processors, and cost of delivering inference workloads to the end user. Improvement in the cost of
building and operating this compute infrastructure—whether through lower data center construction cost, lower
power infrastructure cost, shorter time to grid interconnection, or higher cluster-level throughput—translates directly
into lower cost per token. Accordingly, for a given level of intelligence, we expect the long-term economics of AI
companies to be driven by the ability to consistently deliver bleeding-edge compute at the lowest possible cost per
token. Put simply, we view cost per token as a function of three primary inputs—the underlying AI model, the
compute hardware, and energy, and we expect to have a competitive advantage in the latter two cost components.
We believe we have a pathway over time that will significantly reduce compute hardware costs through continued
vertical integration and development of proprietary chips, building on our experience designing custom silicon for
our Starlink satellites. We also expect that the marginal cost of energy for our AI compute satellites will be minimal
because our satellites are powered by solar arrays in space. By driving the energy component to minimal levels and
150
pursuing improvements in compute hardware cost, we believe we can achieve a meaningfully lower overall cost per
token in the future.
We Have a Dual Speed and Cost Advantage in Terrestrial AI Compute. We have established a leading position in
building and scaling terrestrial AI compute infrastructure, becoming the first company to deploy a coherent
gigawatt-scale AI training cluster. We own and operate what we believe to be the largest AI training data center
clusters on Earth. Our AI compute facilities, COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II, collectively provide approximately
1.0 gigawatt of compute power, with additional power capacity available for data center operations. Our first-
principles thinking enables us to build coherent compute at scale and at rapid speed with lower costs than most other
companies in the industry. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS online in 122 days, repurposing the shell of
an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative
comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two
years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center construction costs
for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis. We are able to
deploy power and compute significantly faster than other AI companies through first-principles thinking, behind-
the-meter power generation, coupled with what we believe is the world’s largest network of sustainable battery
storage systems, and innovations in advanced liquid cooling, high-density rack layouts, and efficient networking.
Our first-principles thinking and innovations in advanced liquid cooling, high-density rack layouts, and efficient
networking enable rapid, cost-effective scaling with the latest processors—keeping us ahead of competitors
deploying traditional methods. Faster deployments reinforce our cost advantage: we are able to access and bring
online the highest performing hardware before our competitors, allowing us to sustain a token cost advantage. For
example, we believe COLOSSUS II became one of the world’s first data centers to deploy GB200s and GB300s at
significant scale and is currently powering training for our next frontier models, including Grok-5. We have already
proven in multiple large-scale terrestrial data centers that we have built not only faster than competitors in the
industry, but also at a lower cost.
We have a Unique Right to Win in Orbital AI. The Sun contains approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy
and offers what we believe is the only truly scalable solution to terrestrial energy constraints, as we expect the cost
and availability of terrestrial energy sources over time will necessitate a transition to orbital AI solutions. The logical
path forward is to move power-intensive AI workloads into orbit, where solar energy is near-constant and
uninterrupted. With such accessibility to energy, we believe that our launch business will enable us to consistently
activate the highest performing hardware before our competitors without such access, shrinking the timeline to
useful tokens on bleeding-edge hardware and sustaining our token cost advantage. Manufacturing next-generation
satellites and launching them into space in very large numbers is a core component of our plans. We believe we are
the only company with a commercially viable path to building orbital AI compute at scale. This is underpinned by
our unique ability to launch substantial mass into orbit cost-efficiently through reusable rockets and to manufacture
secure, reliable, and high-performance satellites at low cost and high volume.
•Terrestrial compute leadership. We believe the same cost and build advantages that have underpinned our
leadership in gigawatt-scale terrestrial data centers will enable us to innovate across other terrestrial data center
formats such as modular data centers for inference. We believe our modular terrestrial data center architectures
will provide a foundation for the deployment of compute infrastructure in orbit given similarities in form factor
in contrast to a gigawatt-scale campus.
•Satellites. Just as we expect our expertise in terrestrial data centers will enable us to package AI compute into
modular, satellite form factors, we expect our leadership in satellite communications to allow us to interconnect
our fleet of AI compute satellites into a massive, coherent constellation of compute. For example, as of March
31, 2026, our constellation already incorporated over 23,000 inter-satellite lasers that create a dynamic mesh
network in space, enabling traffic to route through orbit rather than relying solely on terrestrial backhaul
infrastructure. We are designing next-generation, high-performance AI compute satellites built for high volume,
low cost, and with the reliability required for long-duration operation in space.
•Starship. We expect each of our Starship V3 vehicles to carry 100 metric tons to Earth’s orbit in a reusable
configuration, and future generations could reach 200 metric tons in capacity, potentially as soon as Starship
151
V4. Future generations of Starship are being designed to eventually deliver millions of tons to orbit and beyond
per year. Delivering large amounts of mass to orbit at low cost will be critical to deploying AI compute satellites
at scale.
We Believe Orbital AI Can Accelerate Time to Power and Reduce Token Costs. The Sun contains approximately
99.8% of the solar system’s energy and offers what we believe is the only truly scalable solution to the challenge of
accelerating demand for compute relative to terrestrial energy constraints. The logical path forward is to move
power-intensive AI workloads into orbit, where solar energy is near-constant and uninterrupted. With such
accessibility to energy, we believe that our launch business will enable us to consistently activate the highest
performing hardware before our competitors without such access. We believe SpaceX is uniquely positioned to
deploy and operate data centers in orbit that can eventually achieve a lower cost than terrestrial data centers over
time due to our extreme vertically integrated approach across launch, satellite manufacturing at scale, network
connectivity and terrestrial data center expertise.
•Time to useful tokens on new generations of infrastructure. Although we have already demonstrated an
ability to rapidly scale new generations of compute in terrestrial deployments, we believe orbital AI will
accelerate our time to useful tokens on bleeding-edge AI infrastructure. Physical deployment of new hardware
is expected to be enabled by our launch business, where we believe reusability and launch cost efficiency will
drive rapid cycles of payload delivery. Rapid time to useful tokens on that hardware will be enabled by the
Sun’s near-constant, uninterrupted supply of power, which would circumvent terrestrial power infrastructure
constraints such as power procurement, grid interconnections, and permitting. As new generations of AI
infrastructure continue to deliver step-function improvements in token efficiency, we believe that maintaining
an AI fleet consistently at the bleeding edge of the frontier curve has the potential to deliver a sustainable cost
per token advantage relative to our competitors.
•Construction, power, and cooling infrastructure. In orbit, construction costs are replaced by launch costs and
satellite production costs. We expect reusable launch systems and high flight cadence will significantly reduce
the cost per kilogram to orbit, enabling more efficient deployment of compute payloads to orbit, and eventually
approach the cost of fuel. We believe our advanced satellite manufacturing capabilities enable us to build AI
compute satellites at scale and lower cost than competitors. Other terrestrial data center construction costs such
as building the shell, MEP, and grid interconnection are not applicable in space. As a result, once Starship and
our AI compute satellites are fully deployed at scale, we believe that the initial deployment costs of in-orbit
compute in the aggregate will be less than construction costs of others’ terrestrial data centers.
•Cost to procure and service processors. The cost of processors is a significant cost for both terrestrial and
orbital data centers. We do not believe that moving compute to space in and of itself will have a meaningful
impact on the cost of procuring processors. However, we believe that diversifying our long-term access to the
supply of processors, including through our Terafab initiative with Tesla and Intel, will be a key driver in
reducing the overall cost of compute hardware over time. By combining internally manufactured, lower cost
chips with those we source from third-party suppliers, we expect the overall cost of our processors to decline. In
addition to reducing costs, we also expect that this hybrid sourcing strategy will help alleviate potential future
chip shortages at SpaceX. In addition, we intend to conduct intensive pre-deployment testing to reduce the rate
of chip failure in space, as we do not anticipate servicing or repairing processors in space.
•Ongoing operations. The total cost of operating data centers is heavily influenced by energy, cooling, and
distribution requirements. In orbit, chips are expected to be powered by solar energy which is low cost and
unlimited, and we expect to leverage radiative cooling architectures, which incur no operating costs compared
to liquid or air cooling. Our integrated, space-based Starlink network architecture also enables more cost
efficient routing of data between compute clusters and to end users on a global basis.
We Believe We Are Well-Positioned to Deliver Orbital AI Compute. We believe orbital AI compute is an incredibly
difficult technical challenge that only we can solve at scale in the near term. We are the only company that has
already accomplished the key technical challenges associated with evolving connectivity satellites into AI compute
satellites. In our view, due to our proven experience, we are well-positioned to deliver a full-scale AI compute
satellite constellation. Significant work remains, but we are confident in our singular leadership position.
152
•We have unmatched satellite launch capabilities to enable deployment at scale. Our ability to launch mass
at scale and low cost is our foundational competitive advantage. Deployment of 100 gigawatts per year via
satellites carrying over 100 kilowatts of compute power per metric ton will require thousands of launches per
year and the transport of approximately one million metric tons to orbit annually. The fully reusable nature of
Starship positions us to be capable of launching this level of mass. We plan to leverage our PEZ dispenser
system, an integrated payload deployment system for Starship, along with our experience in developing fully
deployable single-unit systems that are designed to substantially reduce the risks associated with in-orbit
assembly. Starlink Broadband V1 and V2 Mini satellites have already demonstrated launch survivability and
high reliability under vibration, shock, g-loads, acoustic stress, and vacuum exposure, achieving 99.9% average
uptime. Although introducing AI processors would traditionally increase component-level failure rates, we plan
to subject compute hardware to extensive pre-deployment testing on Earth to identify early life failures before
launch.
•We have already solved many of the significant technical hurdles to evolving connectivity satellites into
AI compute satellites. Through our leading expertise in connectivity satellites and Starlink’s existing technical
and operational capabilities—including constellation-scale satellite management, autonomous operations, over-
the-air software updates, inter-satellite laser communications, mesh network deployment, radiation-hardened
system design, proprietary chip development, and the ability to operate computers reliably in the space
environment—we have already solved the hardest part in the development of AI compute satellites. AI compute
satellites represent an evolution of spacecraft engineering already demonstrated at scale through Starlink’s
connectivity satellites, and we believe development of AI compute satellites will be easier for us than for
anyone else. AI compute satellites must integrate high-density compute payloads developed with radiation-
tolerant designs and components with high electrical power generation, advanced thermal management, and
inter satellite networking. To source the electricity needed to power our AI processors, we aim to continuously
scale our existing space-grade solar technologies through insourced process development and build a
constellation in dawn-dusk Sun-synchronous orbit that delivers near-constant solar exposure. We expect solar
cells optimized for the space environment will be produced at a rapid rate, with early satellites generating 100
kilowatts of compute power and scaling from there. In orbit, thermal control must be accomplished through
radiation rather than convection and conduction. We plan to advance thermal control systems—many of which
have been proven on Starlink—by using radiators, vapor chambers, active cooling loops, and coatings to
dissipate the heat generated by AI hardware in space’s vacuum. We will also utilize inter-satellite lasers
pioneered by Starlink for mesh networking at scale, creating coherent computing clusters across free space
instead of wired connections used in terrestrial data centers. Our existing Starlink constellation, with over
23,000 inter-satellite lasers, will be a crucial enabler of orbital AI compute, as its global network allows data
from our AI compute satellites in Sun-synchronous orbit to reach ground stations anywhere on Earth. The
SpaceX AI compute satellites will be designed for high rate, automated production to enable the scale of
satellites needed for the large amounts of compute planned in space.
There are material differences between connectivity satellites and AI compute satellites. Connectivity satellites
are primarily designed for communications, with substantial onboard equipment dedicated to phased-array
antennas, radio systems, and data transmission. In contrast, AI compute satellites are optimized for high-
performance computing. Key differences include significantly larger solar arrays to support higher power
requirements, substantially larger radiators for thermal management, different electronics centered on AI
accelerators rather than communications processors, and the removal of much of the communications hardware.
Our V3 satellite platform already incorporates proprietary chips, providing a strong foundation for the ability to
operate AI-focused electronics in space, and we expect to begin deploying our orbital AI compute satellites as
early as 2028.
The primary remaining challenge is one of scale. For example, a deployment rate of approximately 10 gigawatts
per year would require a materially lower manufacturing and launch cadence, which we believe would still
enable a commercially attractive AI compute business with strong economic returns. While our long-term vision
includes the ambition of deploying up to 100 gigawatts of power to orbit annually, which would require the
deployment of thousands of launches per year, assuming 100 kilowatts of compute power per metric ton and
Starship capacity to orbit of 100 metric tons, we believe we can be economically successful at significantly
more modest volumes.
153
Our 100 gigawatt annual power deployment goal is based on reasoned engineering analyses and design
parameters developed through our ongoing design and development work on next-generation AI compute
satellites. These analyses are based on currently available space-grade solar technology and do not require
fundamental technological advances beyond existing capabilities. Specifically, we expect these satellites to
leverage our already-designed V3 satellite platform. The core V3 satellite design is complete, and the AI
compute satellites are expected to generate substantially more power than V3 satellites. This performance is
expected to be achieved primarily through the use of significantly larger solar arrays. These satellites are
targeted to generate approximately 100 kW of compute power per ton, which initially will require
approximately five times the solar array output compared to V3 satellite designs.
We currently do not anticipate material supply constraints for space-based solar panels, as global production
capacity, including through our vertical integration efforts, is believed to be sufficient to meet its requirements.
We are actively developing the manufacturing, launch cadence, and operational capabilities that we believe
would be needed to support such launch rates.
The precise solar collection area, total system mass per satellite, and on-orbit assembly requirements associated
with this goal continue to be refined as part of our ongoing engineering efforts. In general, the approach
contemplates larger deployable solar arrays on each satellite, with no significant on-orbit assembly currently
anticipated.
•We will use our proven Starlink in-orbit technology to optimize our orbital AI compute. In order to
operate orbital AI compute satellites, we plan to build on our vast experience of operating approximately 9,600
Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in Low-Earth Orbit. In 2025 alone, Starlink satellites proactively
performed over 1,000 automated collision avoidance maneuvers per day guided by this technology to safely and
efficiently operate the constellation. This operating model gives us control over workload placement across
Earth and space while maintaining resilience through redundancy and fail safe systems. To ensure optimized
thermal management and power generation, we will design each satellite’s solar arrays to face the sun for
constant power while its housing radiator panels face cold deep space for radiative cooling. A high degree of
controllability will allow the satellite to be optimized for brightness mitigation, disposal, and other modes of
operation. As more advanced AI hardware becomes available, we plan to manage the lifecycle of deployed
systems by shifting older hardware to lower intensity workloads as performance characteristics evolve, and
retiring systems that are no longer needed through controlled end of life disposition, including transition to
graveyard orbits where appropriate. These retirements may occur sooner than our estimates for the useful lives
of our satellites, which estimates are based on engineering studies, historical on-orbit performance, propellant
life, utilization patterns, design enhancements across generations, and planned transitions to newer satellite
technology. Space based compute also introduces orbital debris risk, which we already manage at constellation
scale through our autonomous collision avoidance system across Starlink. To date, we have not experienced any
failures of our autonomous collision avoidance system that have resulted in satellite loss.
•We can manufacture our AI compute constellations at scale with rapid upgrade cycles. We have built one
of the largest satellite manufacturing operations in the world with standardized bus architectures, rapid iteration
cycles, and automotive-style production lines, enabling us to evolve bus architecture and subsystem design with
limited reliance on third-party suppliers. Our highly vertically integrated approach will be key to our mass-
scaling efforts and should allow us to deploy the latest AI processors. Our ability to quickly develop and deploy
new generations of AI compute to orbit will be a key advantage in maintaining frontier performance of the
constellation. We believe SpaceX will be the first and only company to manufacture satellites at the scale of
automotive manufacturing.
•We are building chip manufacturing capabilities to scale our access to AI compute hardware. We
announced a collaboration with Tesla in March 2026 to build the Terafab initiative with a long-term goal of
producing one terawatt of compute hardware each year. Intel joined the project in April 2026 and is expected to
contribute its expertise in designing, fabricating, and packaging ultra-high-performance chips to help Terafab
scale. In connection with such collaboration, we have agreed with Tesla on a general framework for the future
development of Terafab. Any specific projects undertaken pursuant to this framework will be subject to separate
negotiations and agreements (including any development timelines, milestones and capital expenditures) and
154
have not yet been determined. Our strategy for Terafab is to vertically integrate across design of lithography
masks, fabrication of logic and memory chips, design of advanced packaging and rapidly test and iterate in
order to improve chip design and performance. With this internal manufacturing capability, we plan to alleviate
potential future chip shortages at SpaceX, especially as we develop orbital AI at scale, and design chips that are
optimized for the space environment. We expect that our speed and cost advantage from vertical integration will
allow us to scale efficiently in AI chip manufacturing.
•We can leverage our terrestrial experience to build and operate compute clusters and AI workloads at
scale. We believe our experience operating compute infrastructure on Earth provides the technical and
operational foundation to extend these capabilities into orbit. For example, manufacturing and silicon defects in
AI processors can cause failures early in life. We plan to subject compute hardware to extensive pre-deployment
testing on Earth to identify early life failures before launch to reduce in-orbit disruption. Over time, we plan to
design AI compute processors optimized for the space environment. Our operating experience will be critical in
informing our orbital data center designs for highly reliable operations even with potential chip failures. This
capability is further supported by our flexible allocation of AI workloads across compute clusters, enabling us to
utilize orbital data centers for workloads without hardware reconfigurations or maintenance. For compute
hardware that does fail, we plan to leverage existing Starlink fleet management software to reallocate traffic to
other satellites and prevent cluster-level downtime. We further believe that our strong relationships with chip
makers enhance our ability to build a well-functioning, integrated AI compute system in space.
We Believe Our Infrastructure is a Distinct Advantage in Delivering Superior AI. We believe that the key
constraints in the continued growth of AI are physical – chip manufacturing, data center infrastructure, and power
generation; the future of AI will be determined by the control of the physical stack. We believe no other AI company
has better control over the full physical stack than SpaceX. We expect the combination of competitive cost per
token, our ability to deploy and operate data centers in orbit, and our strength in connectivity to result in more
scalable intelligence that is accessible globally at high speeds by way of the following structural advantages:
•Time to power. If we are able to deploy our AI compute satellite constellation, we believe it will enable
compute capacity to be deployed and expanded efficiently as capacity requirements grow. This approach will
also allow us to deploy new generations of compute hardware in quicker succession relative to terrestrial
approaches where data centers cannot be easily retrofitted for new compute hardware. Due to terrestrial
retrofitting limitations, adding terrestrial capacity typically demands building large, new data centers designed
for specific generations of compute hardware. This approach is usually burdened with long lead times for
activities such as power procurement, utility grid interconnections, and permitting before new computing
hardware can generate useful tokens. We believe our orbital, modular approach will allow us to circumvent
terrestrial power infrastructure constraints.
•Highly scalable compute capacity. Unlike terrestrial facilities constrained by physical footprint and
availability of power in a given location, orbital data centers leverage a decentralized mesh architecture. This
permits the aggregation of massive compute clusters interconnected over long distances by inter-satellite lasers
pioneered by Starlink. Space offers effectively unlimited power and vast expanse to sustain uninterrupted
operations as capacity grows. We believe this abundance of power and physical area will allow us to scale our
connected compute capacity faster and far beyond levels that are terrestrially viable.
•Low latency. Our satellite constellation provides a direct, orbital data path that circumvents the bottlenecks of
terrestrial communications networks. This architecture is particularly suitable to support high-speed
connectivity for latency-sensitive workloads, which we believe are increasingly valued in certain consumer- and
enterprise-facing applications.
•Global distribution. Because of the global coverage of our satellite constellation, not only can we deliver high-
speed, ultra-low latency AI solutions, we can do so anywhere in the world. We believe our increasingly global
network of Starlink satellites will enable us to deliver frontier intelligence, at high speed and reliability, to
communities and economies around the world.
155
Design and manufacture our own chips. Terafab aims to be the world’s largest chip manufacturing facility, with
the goal of achieving one terawatt of annual compute production capacity. While Terafab is intended to expand our
internal chip manufacturing capabilities, we expect to continue sourcing a significant portion of our compute
hardware from third-party suppliers. We view Terafab as complementary to these relationships, enabling us to
augment our access to compute hardware at massive scale and further complete our highly vertically integrated
compute platform by extending our control to the foundational chip layer. By developing end-to-end capabilities
spanning the design of lithography masks, fabrication of logic and memory chips, and advanced packaging, all in a
vertically integrated closed-loop single plant, we will be able to more rapidly iterate to improve chip design and
performance. We plan to design chips that are optimized for the space environment. This collaboration directly
enables our planned orders-of-magnitude increases in AI compute deployment in orbit which would be constrained
by pure reliance on external foundries. Leveraging shared engineering resources, intellectual property, and
infrastructure across Tesla and SpaceX, as well as Intel’s proposed contribution of its expertise in designing,
fabricating and packaging ultra-high-performance chips at scale, Terafab creates powerful ecosystem synergies that
accelerate innovation cycles and reduce costs. Just as we manufacture approximately 80% of Starship in-house,
enabling it to be the world’s most powerful and, eventually, the most cost-effective launch vehicle through full and
rapid reusability, we expect significant speed and cost advantages from Terafab’s vertical integration. We believe
this will provide us with a critical competitive advantage in the race to scale AI infrastructure, especially as we begin
our orbital AI compute satellite deployments.
Industry Overview
We are focused on three rapidly evolving industries: space, connectivity, and AI. Technological advancements and
breakthrough innovation are enabling what we believe is the next great economic frontier, as progress across space
launch, global communications, frontier models, AI compute, robotics, and automation reshape what is possible on
and off Earth. There are several key trends driving the growth and evolution of these industries in which we operate:
•Reusable launch and industrialized space operations are materially reducing the cost of access to orbit,
increasing mass carried per launch, and enabling high-cadence deployment of space-based infrastructure;
•High‑volume satellite manufacturing, combined with rapid constellation refresh cycles, is expanding the ability
for ubiquitous connectivity across unconnected, underconnected, and mobile “dead zone” areas; and
•AI, automation, and robotics are accelerating engineering iteration cycles, streamlining operations, and
revolutionizing complex construction, reducing reliance on scarce specialized labor while delivering faster,
more precise, and cost-optimized infrastructure.
The Space Industry
For most of the space age—dating back to the first launches in the 1950s—spaceflight was shaped by onerous
regulatory requirements and government budgets that determined launch cadence. The prevailing cost-plus
procurement model offered limited incentives to reduce costs or increase launch cadence, creating an operating
environment that constrained technological innovation. Government agencies served as the primary launch services
providers and the industry remained stagnant for decades. According to NASA, until the 2000s and the introduction
of the Falcon 9 rocket by SpaceX, global commercial launch activity averaged 25 to 35 launches per year. As a
result, the space industry remained a niche domain with limited ability to support large commercial markets or
scaled space-based infrastructure.
During this period, satellites—which comprised the majority of launch payload—were typically bespoke, expensive
systems requiring significant non-recurring engineering that consisted of development cycles that were measured in
decades. Launch vehicles were designed to be largely expendable and optimized for single-mission use, reinforcing
a low-throughput ecosystem that lacked flexibility, scalability, and responsiveness to evolving customer
requirements.
The need for more advanced launch capabilities became clear as space-based use cases expanded to include
communications, navigation, Earth observation, environmental monitoring, scientific research, Intelligence,
Surveillance and Reconnaissance, and access to the International Space Station. In 2006, NASA awarded SpaceX,
156
along with Rocketplane Kistler, the landmark Commercial Orbital Transportation Services contract that heralded the
age of commercial space launch, marking a shift toward a more scalable approach to accessing space. This inflection
point catalyzed a transition toward systems designed for more frequent operations, lower cost, and greater
operational flexibility.
Fundamental breakthroughs in high cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space—driven largely by SpaceX—
have expanded space from a purely mission-driven activity to a fully industrialized and commercial sector capable
of supporting and enabling industries far beyond traditional launch and satellites. SpaceX’s advancements reduced
the cost of access to orbit from tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram to just a few thousand dollars per kilogram.
Cost of Space Launches to Low-Earth Orbit
(constant 2021 $ per kilogram; plotted on a logarithmic axis)
As launch economics have changed rapidly over the last decade, demand for orbital infrastructure has expanded
dramatically. Commercial operators have launched thousands of satellites since 2015 as constellation architectures
scale and diversify. The number of active maneuverable satellites in orbit has grown from less than 1,000 in 2015 to
approximately 12,700 as of March 31, 2026. With approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in
Low-Earth Orbit as of March 31, 2026, SpaceX owns and operates approximately 75% of all active maneuverable
satellites. Additionally, launch activity has continued to grow, with approximately 220 metric tons of payload
launched to orbit in 2012 increasing to approximately 2,600 metric tons in 2025, of which over 80% was launched
by SpaceX.
Government demand is rising in parallel: according to the Space Foundation, excluding classified spending, U.S.
Government space spending in 2024 totaled approximately $77 billion. Notably, U.S. national security customers
have also awarded approximately $13.7 billion across the National Security Space Launch (“NSSL”) Program’s
Phase 3 Lane 2 contracts through 2032, supporting approximately 54 missions from 2025 to 2032, with the overall
Phase 3 manifest nearly doubling Phase 2’s manifest to 84 missions. Amid escalating geopolitical tensions that
further underscore the critical role of resilient launch infrastructure, we believe government space budgets around
the world are positioned for sustained, long‑term growth.
157
Falcon Heavy Boosters Landing
On the back of dramatically reduced launch cost pioneered by SpaceX over the past two decades, the global
economy is reorganizing around a new domain: space. We believe the development of a lunar economy will be
central to unlocking the full potential of this new domain and advancing the long-term transition to a multiplanetary
civilization.
The Connectivity Industry
Modern life relies on connectivity. Over the past several decades, the technologies that underpin global connectivity
have evolved rapidly, reshaping the way individuals, families, and organizations communicate, collaborate, and
access information.
Despite remarkable technological advancements, terrestrial networks remain constrained by the same inherent
structural limitations that have hindered them since their inception. According to the Global Satellite Operators
Association, terrestrial network infrastructure only covers approximately 20% of global land mass, resulting in
significant unserved and underserved regions across both developed and developing economies. This terrestrial
connectivity gap spans areas that are remote, difficult to build in, or economically impractical to serve—and also
includes mobile “dead zones” within otherwise well-connected areas and in urban markets. According to the J.D.
Power U.S. Wireless Network Quality Performance Study, U.S. wireless customers experienced service problems in
approximately one out of every 11 mobile interactions, even in well-connected areas. As demand for ubiquitous,
high-reliability connectivity continues to rise, terrestrial networks alone are increasingly unable to bridge the
widening gap between user demand and available coverage.
The development of large-scale LEO constellations represented a paradigm shift, breaking from the long-standing
dependence on terrestrial networks for global connectivity. Deployed at unprecedented scale—such as through
SpaceX’s Starlink and Mobile constellations—these satellites can provide high-speed, low-latency service that
integrates seamlessly with terrestrial infrastructure. This evolution has transformed satellite connectivity from a
solution of last resort into a core pillar of resilient, ubiquitous global communications.
158
Consumer Broadband
Residential internet access began with the dial-up connection in the late 1990s with maximum speeds of .056 Mbps,
when early users relied on narrowband copper phone lines to connect. As demand for speed and reliability grew,
dial-up gave way to DSL, cable, and eventually fiber, each increasing bandwidth and enabling more connected
devices. According to the Speedtest Global Index, the global average broadband download speed has increased to
approximately 120 Mbps. Satellite internet also emerged in the 1990s through geostationary orbit (GEO) systems
that extended coverage to remote and unconnected regions—beginning with early offerings such as Hughesnet’s
first satellite service DirecPC, which provided downstream speeds of roughly 400 kbps compared to dial-up
averages of 28.8 kbps—but these systems were constrained by limited throughput and high latency, making it
difficult to keep pace as consumer requirements evolved. Starlink satellites operate in Low-Earth Orbit, substantially
closer to the Earth’s surface than traditional geostationary communications satellites. This architecture reduces
signal latency and is designed to support broadband connectivity in remote and underserved areas. Each launch of
additional Starlink satellites increases the overall capacity of the network, which provides service globally.
In today’s digital landscape, consumers increasingly rely on seamless, high-performance connectivity to power all
aspects of connected life—from every day digital services to demanding applications that require high throughput,
consistent performance, and low latency. These needs are particularly challenging to satisfy in regions where
terrestrial networks are limited, degraded, or unavailable due to prohibitive deployment costs, rugged terrain, low
population density, or outdated infrastructure. Consequently, consumer broadband has evolved into a multifaceted
ecosystem, where diverse access technologies converge and providers compete based on superior reliability,
consistent performance, and an exceptional overall user experience.
Consumer demand for data is surging at a pace that terrestrial infrastructure has struggled to match. According to
International Data Corporation’s Global DataSphere, in 2025, global data generation was estimated to have reached
more than 585 exabytes of per day—up from approximately 10.8 exabytes per day in 2010—reflecting an immense
escalation in consumption. With fixed broadband connections projected to reach two billion by 2030 according to
Ericsson, and terrestrial expansion often economically unfeasible in remote and challenging regions, only space-
based systems can deliver truly global, ubiquitous, high-throughput coverage capable of supporting this explosive
growth in data demand.
Enterprise and Government Broadband
Enterprise broadband internet has evolved alongside residential internet, beginning with fixed private lines that
connected offices and infrastructure. As businesses adopted real-time, distributed workflows, they needed secure,
low-latency connectivity across multiple sites and mobile assets. Mobility became essential in sectors like
manufacturing, transportation, and logistics, extending connectivity demands beyond fixed locations into dynamic
environments that terrestrial networks often cannot support reliably or economically. Enterprises now expect
seamless, uninterrupted performance with instant failover where terrestrial systems are unavailable or unstable—
driving adoption of hybrid architectures that combine ground networks with space-based solutions.
Enterprise connectivity demand continues to rise as organizations digitize operations and rely on real‑time,
cloud‑based workflows that require secure, low‑latency connectivity across distributed sites and mobile
environments. This is particularly true in the case of aviation, maritime, and land mobility applications, where
aircraft, vessels, and ground fleets are inherently mobile and therefore unable to depend on continuous terrestrial
network coverage for connectivity. These platforms increasingly require resilient communications to support flight
and voyage operations, crew applications, passenger internet access, telematics, and port or shipboard logistics. In
aviation, legacy GEO-based systems that are still prevalent across most major commercial fleets typically provide
low Mbps speeds and significantly higher latency, often exceeding 500 milliseconds, falling well short of the
approximately 100 Mbps throughput and sub-50 milliseconds latency that today’s applications—such as streaming,
cloud services, and real-time collaboration—increasingly demand. Therefore, there is a need for modern LEO-
powered in-flight connectivity systems—such as Starlink Broadband—that can deliver passenger download speeds
exceeding 400 Mbps with latency as low as 21 milliseconds. Terrestrial networks cannot meet these evolving
demands where deployment is costly, complex, and slowed by regulatory constraints, and legacy satellite solutions
159
have not delivered the latency or consistency needed for enterprise‑grade applications, with average terrestrial ISP
download speeds at 120 Mbps and average latency from 7-34 milliseconds.
Defense and civil agencies similarly require secure, resilient, and global connectivity, often operating in contested or
infrastructure-poor regions where terrestrial networks are unavailable or vulnerable. As the battlefield becomes
increasingly connected, the need for robust, persistent connectivity across all domains is more urgent than ever.
Modern missions depend on high-throughput, low-latency connectivity for command and control, autonomous
systems, emergency response, and humanitarian operations, driving demand for architectures that maintain
performance where terrestrial systems fail. Substantial government investment into mission-critical, space-based
communication services illustrates the institutional reliance on LEO architecture for defense applications. High-
throughput, low-latency LEO constellations add a new architectural layer that enhances redundancy, operational
continuity, and flexibility across mission sets. There is an increasing need for purpose-built secure platforms—such
as Starshield, that can provide encrypted, high-assurance communications and modular payload integration—further
expand the utility of space-based connectivity for defense, civil, and national resilience needs. Together, these
advances position space as the foundational component of future mission‑critical communications architectures.
Satellite-to-Mobile Service
Since the early rise of mobile phones, terrestrial networks have expanded at immense cost and increasing density to
support successive generations of cellular technology—from the primarily voice-centric networks of the 1980s to
today’s high-speed 5G data networks. These investments have enabled much of the global population to become
well‑connected, yet the capital‑intensive nature of terrestrial build‑outs has resulted in vast geographic mobile “dead
zones” where coverage remains too expensive or is nonexistent. In many regions particularly those that are remote
or sparsely populated, extending towers is economically impractical for mobile network operators, resulting in large
segments of the population with limited or no access to reliable connectivity. Early satellite-based cellular options,
beginning in the 1980s with dedicated satellite phones, helped fill these gaps but required bulky hardware and
carried high usage cost, limiting them to narrow and mission-driven use cases. As consumer expectations for
ubiquitous coverage have grown, mobile network operators face structural limits in closing these “dead zones” with
terrestrial infrastructure alone, making LEO-based augmentation the most viable path to continuous, reliable mobile
connectivity at global scale.
Early satellite-to-mobile services (i.e., those connecting directly to standard smartphones) emerged in the 2020s with
support for basic messaging and, in some cases, voice in areas without terrestrial coverage. These offerings provided
more contiguous communication for safety, continuity, and remote operations. However, they were introduced at the
same time mobile data consumption was accelerating dramatically, and consumer expectations for “always-
connected” devices were rising. As a result, satellite-to-mobile technology is now evolving beyond emergency-only
communication. It is shifting toward enabling everyday smartphones to remain seamlessly connected when outside
traditional cellular or Wi-Fi range, integrating satellite connectivity into routine mobile usage, rather than treating it
as a contingency layer. At the same time, telecom operators have been reducing capital expenditures amid slower
revenue growth, weaker monetization, and declining returns on invested capital—pressures that have limited their
willingness to maintain historically high levels of network deployment. These shifts are also increasing demand for
harmonized, scalable spectrum allocations capable of supporting higher-capacity satellite-to-mobile services without
interfering with terrestrial networks, with the potential to add an incremental $1.4 trillion of economic growth over
the next 10 years, as forecasted by Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association.
These industry shifts have opened the door for deeper collaboration among satellite operators, MNOs, carriers,
spectrum owners, device manufacturers, and regulators. As satellite network performance continues to improve and
these partnerships expand, satellite-to-mobile offerings—such as Starlink Mobile—are poised to evolve from a
“backup” layer into a meaningful complement to terrestrial networks, extending coverage and enhancing overall
network resilience and performance.
The AI Industry
Humanity is defined by our relentless pursuit of knowledge, with each transformative breakthrough dramatically
expanding our capacity to create, preserve, and share ideas across time and space. AI marks the next—and arguably
160
most consequential—chapter in this progression. For the first time, we are creating systems that do more than simply
amplify or transmit human-generated knowledge. These systems can reason, learn, and generate new knowledge
autonomously—synthesizing information, forming hypotheses, and in some domains even making original
discoveries. In doing so, they augment, accelerate, and will likely surpass unaided human cognition. This represents
a profound shift: we are moving from tools that simply extend the mind to autonomous agents and companions that
actively participate in the act of knowing.
Over the past decade, the convergence of big data, advances in AI hardware, and the breakthrough development of
LLMs have transformed AI from a speculative academic field into a foundational driver of the modern economy.
AI Compute
Massive demand for frontier AI models is accelerating the build-out of AI infrastructure at a pace and scale with few
historical precedents. Meeting projected AI needs will require $7 trillion in global data center investment through
2030, with generative AI workloads expected to account for roughly 70% of total data-center power demand by the
end of the decade. Each new generation of frontier models requires exponentially greater compute, following well-
established scaling laws that link model performance to the volume and quality of training data, parameter count,
and total compute expected. The rise of agentic AI and the potential emergence of artificial general intelligence are
expected to further amplify inference workloads, driving a step-function increase in compute requirements and the
corresponding data center capacity needed to support them. Frontier AI has become fundamentally infrastructure-
constrained. Only operators with access to massive amounts of power, very large GPU clusters and tightly integrated
training infrastructure can train cutting-edge models, and these systems exhibit non-linear performance advantages
that compound over time. Compute infrastructure scale helps determine model iteration speed, model quality, and
capital efficiency—making infrastructure itself a critical capability.
AI Frontier Models
A new class of frontier models has emerged, which includes LLMs and multimodal models. LLMs are neural
network-based models trained on massive datasets to interpret user questions and generate responses to highly
complex questions. LLMs can synthesize existing research, propose new ideas, and communicate in a natural
language that requires no programming expertise by the user. Demand for these tools has been explosive—according
to a YouGov survey, approximately 60% of Americans have used AI tools since December 2024, and 34% use AI
tools at least weekly. Multimodal models are AI systems that can process, understand, and generate outputs across
multiple types of data simultaneously—such as text, images, audio, video, and sometimes other modalities—rather
than being limited to just one (like text-only language models). Multimodal models offer several key benefits over
traditional unimodal (e.g., text-only) systems by processing and integrating multiple data types like text, images,
audio, video, and sometimes sensor data simultaneously. They provide richer contextual understanding, capturing
relationships and nuances across modalities that are invisible in isolation, leading to more accurate predictions and
reasoning.
AI frontier models are shaped by the values, objectives, and design choices of their creators. Model intelligence and
performance reflect decisions around data curation, training methodologies, alignment frameworks, and system
constraints, resulting in different reasoning styles, interpretations, and responses across models. Therefore, values
can be embedded in the technology, influencing accuracy, logic, and utility of the model outputs and how well
models can serve end users.
Following rapid frontier model innovation and broad adoption of chat-based tools, organizations are now beginning
to deploy agentic systems—AI that can use tools and operate with limited supervision. This marks the beginning of
what we believe will be a broader transition from co-pilots to agentic systems that enable high-complexity
workflows and create materially higher inference demand.
Consumer and Enterprise Applications
Advances in digital communication have reshaped how information is created, shared, and consumed, laying the
foundation for today’s social media platforms. These platforms have become essential channels for digital
advertising by combining large‑scale user engagement with targeted content and ad distribution. Recent advances in
161
AI are further strengthening advertising, allowing enterprises to optimize campaigns and measure outcomes. At the
same time, consumer expectations for AI‑powered tools are rising, with users seeking timely, accurate and
trustworthy information across an expanding universe of digital content.
We believe the ongoing convergence of consumer platforms, consumer AI, and integrated digital services will
accelerate the emergence of super‑app ecosystems that combine communication, content creation, information,
commerce, and banking within a single platform. These trends are expected to expand the role of internet platforms
as distribution channels and support next‑generation AI‑enabled applications and advertising solutions.
For enterprises and governments, frontier models and agentic AI—autonomous systems capable of multi-step
reasoning and independent task execution—are beginning to manage increasingly complex processes and
workflows. As of February 2026, more than 80% of Fortune 500 companies were using AI active agents. Entire
industries are being reshaped by AI-driven applications, including agentic commerce (personalized AI-directed
shopping), vibe coding (software development with minimal or no human-written code), and autonomous driving for
vehicles.
The ultimate frontier in AI is human augmentation: creating systems that amplify and multiply human reasoning,
creativity, decision-making, and productivity, enabling people to perform highly complex tasks with unprecedented
speed, scale, and insight. By enhancing how humans think, learn, and interact, such systems act as cognitive
multipliers, supercharging individual and collective capabilities far beyond biological limits. As AI evolves, we
expect both consumer platforms and enterprises to adopt increasingly agentic systems that serve as powerful
extensions of human intelligence. These tools will orchestrate multi-step workflows, interact seamlessly with
business applications, and accelerate operational processes, with humans at the center of judgment, creativity, and
strategy. Emerging efforts in enterprise AI illustrate how future systems could coordinate entire business functions
as force multipliers—dramatically expanding what a human team can achieve with minimal scaling friction and
maximal leverage. Human augmentation also offers a transformative solution to the escalating effort required for
breakthroughs in technology and beyond. For example, the human effort needed to sustain Moore’s Law (chip
density doubling approximately every two years) has increased eighteenfold since the early 1970s; AI augmentation
could reverse this trend by empowering engineers, researchers, and innovators to iterate faster, explore more
possibilities, and achieve exponential progress with smaller, core teams of experts.
As humanity expands beyond Earth, augmented human intelligence will be essential to managing the immense
operational, scientific, and logistical complexity of a spacefaring civilization. The core promise of augmentation lies
in multiplication: AI not as a substitute for human minds, but as an amplifier for human ingenuity, curiosity and
purpose that unlocks new frontiers of what humans can accomplish together.
Our Strengths
We have an intense, mission-driven, and engineering-first culture that seeks to achieve what many have deemed
impossible. We make the incredible and extraordinary possible and repeatable by continuously leveraging our core
strengths:
Global Leadership in Orbital Launch Services
Our unique ability to reliably, quickly, and cost efficiently launch rockets at scale into space is our core competitive
advantage that enables other parts of our business. Our launch capabilities form the foundation of our orbital
infrastructure and have created new multi-trillion-dollar opportunities in space, global connectivity, and AI. We
believe no other launch provider is competitive at this scale today, nor is likely to become so in the near term. Our
fleet of 24 flight-proven, reusable rockets and our growing share of total mass delivered to orbit has increased every
year since 2021. Reusability completely changes the economics of space access. Qualified for 40 launches, our
reusable rockets can fly multiple times with only minimal refurbishment between missions, sharply lowering the
cost per launch, while boosting our launch rate, asset use, and overall efficiency compared to traditional expendable
rockets. As a result, we can offer competitive launch prices, rapidly deploy our own satellites and infrastructure, and
make it easier and cheaper for us to pursue new opportunities requiring orbital access. Our higher launch rates and
reusability also create a virtuous cycle: more flights lead to faster improvements in design, manufacturing, and
operations through accumulated experience. Additionally, not only did we demonstrate at least a 10-year advantage
162
over the rest of the industry when we first landed our Falcon 9 booster back from space in 2015, but we have
continued to invest significantly in further increasing our lead by pursuing full and rapid reusability at scale,
including investing over $15 billion in our next-generation rocket, Starship.
Unrivaled Satellite and Connectivity Platform across Design, Manufacturing, Deployment, and Operations
We are able to design, engineer, and manufacture the world’s most advanced satellites at scale, enabling the creation
and scaling of new businesses leveraging this core satellite technology platform, including: Starlink Broadband, our
space-based internet broadband service; Starlink Mobile, our global satellite-to-mobile service; and emerging AI
initiatives. Unlike traditional satellite manufacturers that rely on fragmented supply chains and low-volume
production, we have built an integrated satellite platform that spans architecture, chip design, software, power
systems, and final assembly. As we rapidly iterate on our next-generation satellites in-house, some others are
contracting outsourced manufacturers to build satellite architectures with capacity comparable to satellites that we
retired years ago. As of March 31, 2026, our constellation also incorporates over 23,000 inter-satellite lasers that
create a dynamic mesh network in space, enabling data traffic to route through orbit rather than relying solely on
terrestrial backhaul infrastructure. By controlling satellite design, production, launch and operations, we can tailor
payloads, networking capabilities, and power requirements to support new use cases. For example, our AI compute
constellations will leverage our core satellite technologies already developed for our existing Starlink constellations.
We will build new satellites that can host processors for high-density compute payloads, offer enhanced power
generation with larger solar panels and storage systems, and enable higher-capacity networking capabilities to
support low-latency workloads in orbit. Our high-throughput manufacturing capabilities—combined with our launch
capabilities—enable us to produce and deploy thousands of satellites per year, an uneconomic proposition for those
lacking an ability to deliver substantial mass into space. This capability accelerates our deployment timelines and
allows us to commercialize entire constellations with capital efficiency that we believe is difficult to replicate.
Our global connectivity platform, Starlink, is powered by the world’s largest LEO constellation and supported by
our vertically integrated launch and satellite manufacturing capabilities to enable the delivery of high-speed, low-
latency broadband and mobile connectivity to homes and businesses everywhere in the world. Our vertically
integrated model allows us to provide reliable service with unmatched speed and cost across geographies where
traditional terrestrial infrastructure has been limited, uneconomical, or unavailable.
Truth-Seeking AI Model Enhanced by Real-Time Data
AI frontier models are shaped by the values, objectives, and design choices of their creators that influence accuracy,
logic, and utility of the model outputs. We believe Grok represents a differentiated approach to AI, grounded in a
core objective of truth seeking and powered by continuous, proprietary access to real-time data inflows through its
integration with X. With approximately 350 million daily posts, X enables freshness, relevance, and contextual
awareness for Grok that we believe is a competitive differentiator. This direct, real-time access to the information
and human discourse on X enhances Grok’s truth-seeking capabilities by grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge
and diverse viewpoints.
This architecture reflects our core philosophy that maximizing truth seeking—through the active, relentless pursuit
of what is objectively true about reality, grounded in evidence, logic, empirical data, and first principles thinking—
drives superior model outputs and higher utility intelligence. By combining our unique truth-seeking model with
proprietary access to one of the world’s largest real-time information platforms, we believe Grok can deliver the
most objective and relevant insights and best serve high-frequency, high-value use cases across consumer and
enterprise AI applications.
Extreme Vertical Integration Enabling High Velocity and Superior Cost Efficiency at Scale
While conventional aerospace manufacturing relies heavily on fragmented and outsourced supply chains, we operate
with extreme vertical integration. By designing and manufacturing a significant portion of our components in-house,
we bypass many of the slow, bloated sourcing channels that structurally constrain the rest of the industry. For
example, approximately 80% of Starship, SpaceX’s next-generation launch vehicle, is manufactured in-house. Our
vertical integration allows us to achieve iterative cycles in weeks, compared to years for some legacy companies,
enabling us to build newer, more technologically advanced products faster than many of our competitors. We
163
believe this technological and logistical gap is widening meaningfully as our speed and cost advantage compound.
Our vertical integration extends beyond design and manufacturing—it permeates our entire business model,
encompassing engineering, deployment, and operations. We are the only company building integrated hardware and
software infrastructure of the future across space, connectivity and AI. This end-to-end control allows us to deliver
value through structural advantages in speed, cost and quality.
Our strong belief in the benefits of extreme vertical integration is further exemplified by our acquisition of xAI. We
not only develop best-in-class models to support the application layer of AI, where we leverage real-time data
ingestion from X (subject to some limitations for certain content), but we also own and operate the physical compute
infrastructure required to train and run inference on those models, providing a substantial cost and speed advantage.
Through our Terafab initiative together with Tesla and Intel, we intend to further extend our vertical integration to
chip design and manufacturing to alleviate potential future chip shortages at SpaceX, optimize compute
performance, and reduce overall compute costs. Intel will contribute its expertise in designing, fabricating, and
packaging ultra-high-performance chips to help Terafab scale. This highly vertically integrated approach allows us
to train and iterate our frontier models at high velocity, accelerating development cycles, eliminating external
bottlenecks, and driving rapid, continuous improvements in model performance. Compute availability is also critical
for running more complex workloads and delivering higher performance inference at scale. As AI adoption
accelerates and demand for low-latency, high-throughput inference increases, we believe operators with the ability
to support and efficiently allocate compute across both training and inference workloads are best positioned to win
the AI race. Our human augmentation solutions are being designed to capitalize on this shift, enabling us to deliver
superior performance for our customers. This advantage of vertical integration exists in both a terrestrial context,
where we own our own data centers and the associated power infrastructure, and eventually in a space-based
context, where we are planning to build our own orbital AI compute infrastructure. The key constraints in the
continued growth of AI are physical—chip manufacturing, data center infrastructure, and power generation.
Differentiation is rapidly shifting from model architecture alone to AI compute scale, cost efficiency, power
availability, and speed of deployment. We believe that physical infrastructure, not models, will be the primary
competitive differentiator for AI companies, and no other AI company has better control over the full physical
infrastructure than SpaceX.
Unique Ability to Scale New Trillion-Dollar Markets Across Space, Connectivity, and AI
We believe space represents the largest economic frontier in human history. We believe we have a distinct ability to
identify, activate, and commercialize new multi-trillion-dollar markets that did not previously exist. Historically,
space access was impaired by high launch costs, low flight cadence, and limited demand. While such constraints
may limit others’ ability to access space at a scale, our ability to build large-scale and complex hardware
infrastructure is a meaningful competitive advantage. By pioneering the world’s first and only fleet of reusable
rockets at scale, we revolutionized space access through dramatically lower cost and unmatched reliability.
Lowering costs by orders of magnitude does not just expand the launch market, it enables the creation of entirely
new industries on Earth and in space that have historically been technologically and economically infeasible for
others to access historically.
When we have identified a new trillion-dollar market opportunity to pursue, we design a solution rooted in the same
world-class engineering and first-principles thinking that has driven our technological breakthroughs and success to
date. Our first trillion-dollar market was connectivity: we founded Starlink, a satellite service supported by our low-
latency, high-speed LEO constellation. Starlink required the rapid, low-cost deployment of millions of kilograms of
hardware into orbit, a feat economically impossible to solve for anyone lacking our foundational launch capabilities.
Our Starlink constellation powers a global connectivity platform capable of supporting the world’s largest and most
advanced space-based internet broadband service and satellite-to-mobile service, enabling high-speed internet access
to homes, enterprises, governments, and mobile users around the world. We believe our next trillion-dollar market is
AI compute, and we expect to leverage our rockets and satellites for massive orbital deployments of AI
infrastructure. We believe this AI compute infrastructure will help us develop and monetize the Grok model faster
than other AI companies that are dependent on finite sources of power on Earth. No other company has built the
capabilities to create value across all these end markets at scale.
164
In addition, we believe we are poised to catalyze transformative breakthroughs in other industries on Earth and in
space such as long haul point-to-point terrestrial travel, in-orbit manufacturing, passenger and cargo transportation to
the Moon and Mars, manufacturing and energy production on the Moon and Mars, and asteroid mining. In
particular, we believe that if we achieve our goal of establishing a lunar presence, it will potentially enable terawatt-
scale annual AI compute growth, support deeper space exploration and industrialization, and serve as a stepping
stone to establishing a civilization on Mars. As we continue to scale and expand into new trillion-dollar markets, we
expect our more mature businesses will continue to generate substantial cash flows, enabling us to reinvest in
emerging opportunities.
Business Models that Are Incredibly Difficult to Replicate
Our business model is simple to describe: leverage our unparalleled launch capabilities to reduce the cost of access
to space, apply first-principles thinking and world-class engineering to solve large structural constraints, vertically
integrate across the value chain, continuously improve cost efficiency and throughput, and reinvest cash flow to
expand our capabilities and create new markets. While simple to describe, we believe this model is extraordinarily
difficult to replicate. We believe no other organization can execute this combination of reusable orbital launch
systems at industrial scale, breakthrough engineering designs with reliable high-volume manufacturing, full stack
proprietary software, and end-to-end operational control. These capabilities reinforce each other, and our vertical
integration enables faster innovation cycles and structural cost advantages that widen our competitive advantage.
Our business model has allowed us to build a diversified portfolio of complementary businesses and revenue streams
from a common technological foundation. Our Space segment generates revenue from commercial and government
customers, while also serving as the backbone for our Connectivity segment which generates highly predictable and
recurring subscription revenue from Starlink broadband consumer, enterprise, and government customers, as well as
Starlink Mobile subscribers. The result is a powerful, self-reinforcing value creation cycle: success in one business
fuels faster growth in the others, enabling reinvestment into the next frontier. We believe this model has the potential
to create compounding value across our ecosystem, allowing our lead to grow and become more durable over time.
Mission-Driven Culture and World-Class Talent
We have the benefit of being founded and led by Elon Musk, one of the great visionaries of our generation. We
believe that our ability to attract and retain world-class technical and engineering talent is a significant competitive
advantage. Our founding goal of making life multiplanetary serves as the ultimate mission-driven filter and retention
tool, which has only been enhanced by xAI’s truth-seeking mission of understanding the universe. Top engineers are
drawn to SpaceX to work on some of the hardest, most consequential problems facing humanity—doing things that
have never been done before, like landing and re-using rockets, working towards making humanity multiplanetary,
and gaining a better understanding of the mysteries of the universe through AI. They are also drawn to our intense,
engineering-led, first-principles culture, which treats the laws of physics as the only true constraints. We reinforce
this culture through “The Algorithm,” a five-step iterative process that emphasizes making the requirements less
dumb, deleting unnecessary processes or parts (embracing the principle that the best part is no part), only then
optimizing what remains, accelerating cycle time, and automating only proven processes. Our organizational
philosophy embraces failure as an essential learning opportunity and maintains a relentless focus on efficiency and
speed, enabling rapid iteration and repeatable execution on the hardest technical problems. To this end, our
engineering-oriented organization maintains access to some of the world’s most selective talent pool. In 2025, we
accepted under 2% of our engineering applicants, reflecting our ability to be highly selective and hire among the
best talent in the industry. We also foster commitment by aligning employee interests with organizational success:
our broad-based employee ownership program ensures that those who help us build the future are also direct
beneficiaries of our success. This commitment to quality and mission results in exceptional employee loyalty,
reflected by an average tenure across our broader SpaceX leadership team of 12 years.
Our Growth Strategies
We have created what we believe to be the world’s most ambitious vertically integrated innovation engine that
captures significant growth across three domains: Space, Connectivity, and AI. While our Space segment provides
us with a foundational competitive advantage that enables all other parts of our business, our Connectivity and AI
165
segments are expected to be the primary driver of revenue growth in the near term. In the next few years, we are
focused on increasing the monetization of our existing Connectivity infrastructure and our existing AI user base. We
also intend to continue to build out our AI infrastructure, which we expect to enable growth as we address the
significant AI market opportunity. Our growth strategy aligns with our value creation cycle where we identify
emerging opportunities, invest in innovation, rigorously test and iterate, launch new offerings, and generate strong
cash flows to fuel the next wave of breakthroughs.
Space
Increase launch payload capacity. We plan to drive meaningful growth in payload delivered to orbit (mass to orbit)
through higher launch cadence and increased payload per launch, while enhancing launch efficiency and reducing
costs. Our next-generation fully and rapidly reusable Starship V3 vehicle is designed to carry 100 metric tons to
Earth’s orbit in a reusable configuration, driving substantial improvements in payload capacity per launch, while
enabling significantly more frequent flights, at unparalleled cost efficiency. To date, we have executed 11 Starship
flight tests. We have also scheduled a 12th flight test, which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and
Super Heavy booster, powered by the next evolution of our Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad
at Starbase. We expect Starship to commence payload delivery to orbit in the second half of 2026. We have
achieved innovative milestones, such as the creation of booster catches using “chopstick” arms that facilitate rapid
refurbishment and reuse, including launching multiple times per day. To enable a more frequent launch cadence and
overall greater payload delivery, we are also expanding our ground launch infrastructure, including investing in
additional pads, on-site propellant production, and other support facilities, and investing in future generations of
Starship, which could carry 200 metric tons in capacity, potentially as soon as Starship V4. We expect these efforts
to continue to drive launch payload growth that is expected to provide the foundational capacity needed to scale our
Starlink Broadband and Starlink Mobile constellations that underpin our Connectivity platform. Our growing
payload capacity is also intended to underpin the deployment of orbital AI compute that will accelerate our AI
business, as well as benefit third-party customers who use our launch offerings.
Establish the lunar economy. Advancing access to the lunar surface represents an important next step in the
evolution of our Space segment and is a prerequisite for long-term commercialization beyond Earth. We are focused
on developing the capability to transport significant amounts of cargo and crew to the lunar surface in a repeatable
and economically viable manner. We believe this capability will also enable creating a petawatt-scale AI
constellation through the use of lunar satellite production and a lunar mass driver for launch activities. By leveraging
Starship’s expected fully and rapidly reusable capabilities and in‑space refueling, we expect to materially reduce the
cost of lunar missions relative to historical norms. Our initial efforts will prioritize lunar cargo landings and
returning Americans to the Moon, followed by expanded crewed missions that we believe can establish a continuous
flow of cargo and humans between Earth and the lunar surface.
We believe that the foundation of a commercial lunar economy begins with achieving infrastructure development,
lunar resource utilization, and high bandwidth communications at scale. This requires the ability to mine, extract and
process raw material for the production of solar power on the lunar surface. Combined with the ability to locally
produce water and fuel, we believe these capabilities would enable sustained lunar operations, support lunar
exploration, and provide the foundation for humanity’s permanent presence on the Moon. The lunar base would then
allow sustained, high volume testing of new technologies in a space environment much closer to Earth than deep
space.
We intend to establish lunar‑based manufacturing capabilities, including factories to produce large‑scale AI compute
satellites. We believe we can efficiently launch our satellites at scale, namely due to the potential use of a lunar mass
driver that is capable of high-frequency, low-cost launches of satellites from the lunar surface. By shifting energy
and material and mass-intensive satellite and solar manufacturing activities off Earth that leverage sustainable power
generation and the Moon’s low gravity, we aim to significantly reduce costs and terrestrial resource constraints. We
expect to use raw materials from the Moon to construct most of the mass of the satellites and ship chips and other
lower mass elements from Earth. This roadmap positions the Moon not only as a potential gateway to Mars and
space exploration, but as the first space-based industrial economy at scale.
166
Once resource utilization capabilities are proven feasible, we believe there is an opportunity to commercialize the
harvesting and exportation of rare materials, which is estimated to be present on the Moon in quantities exceeding
one million tons and has potential applications in future nuclear energy and quantum computing systems. Large-
scale access to these resources, coupled with the Moon’s low gravity, could unlock the potential for scalable growth
by establishing a vertically-integrated resource extraction, processing and exportation hub. Using Starship’s high
payload capacity, we believe these materials could be economically transported directly to Earth. In parallel, the
Moon could function as a proving ground for closed-loop ecosystems, long-duration habitats, and autonomous
construction techniques, all of which are essential for industrialization. Over time, this infrastructure has the
potential to position the Moon as a strategic industrial and transportation node.
Establishing lunar operations for mining, refueling, manufacturing, and habitation is subject to a variety of
interconnected engineering and other hurdles as well as known and currently unknown risks and uncertainties. These
include hurdles, risks and uncertainties that relate to, among other things, transporting and deploying heavy
equipment to the lunar surface, developing reliable power generation and storage systems, extracting and processing
lunar resources at commercial scale, operating equipment in extreme temperature, radiation and dust conditions,
maintaining communications and navigation infrastructure, and supporting long-duration human presence in a
remote and hazardous environment.
Connectivity
Grow Starlink Broadband customers. In the near term, we are focused on increasing global awareness of our
Starlink brand and capabilities to grow our base of Starlink Broadband subscribers and to increase Starlink
Broadband adoption in new and existing markets.
•Starlink Consumer Broadband. We have grown the number of Starlink Subscribers rapidly over the last
several years. As of March 31, 2026, we had approximately 10.3 million Starlink Subscribers across 164
countries, territories, and other markets. These subscribers represent a small fraction of the estimated 3.3 billion
potential end users in the markets we currently serve, many of whom still lack reliable high-speed broadband.
Because we report Starlink Subscribers on a per‑Service Line basis, the number of individual end users who
access Starlink is already likely meaningfully higher than 10.3 million, as multiple people may share a single
Service Line, including within a household. We intend to grow the number of Starlink Subscribers by
expanding our consumer distribution network across thousands of authorized retail stores globally and execute
region-specific marketing campaigns to increase Starlink brand awareness. By clearly demonstrating Starlink’s
superior speed, low-latency, affordability, and ease of installation—not only in rural, remote, and infrastructure-
limited areas, but also in suburban and urban areas with wireline broadband options—we expect to drive
meaningful subscriber and revenue growth.
•Enterprise and Government Starlink Customers. We plan to drive growth in enterprise and government
Starlink customers through our direct, vertical-specific sales model. In recent years, we have assembled
dedicated sales and engineering teams to market and support fleet-wide conversions in the aviation and
maritime sectors. This has enabled partnerships with many of the world’s leading airlines, including United
Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Qatar Airways, Lufthansa Group, British Airways, Alaska Airlines, and Hawaiian
Airlines, many of which have implemented or committed to fleet-wide Starlink installations for seamless in-
flight connectivity. We have also partnered with premier cruise operators, such as Carnival Corporation, Royal
Caribbean Group, MSC Cruises, and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, for full-fleet deployments that deliver
reliable high-speed internet across thousands of vessels worldwide. In addition, we have partnered with land
mobility operators, including John Deere and the California Fire Department, as well as passenger rail operators
such as Brightline (Florida), and Italo Treno, to provide remote monitoring and management of their fleets. We
are actively driving growth in these sectors by onboarding new major airlines, cruise lines, and land mobility
operators around the world, expanding existing relationships through deeper fleet penetration, and introducing
advanced service tiers to make Starlink the standard connectivity solution for aviation, maritime, and land
mobility customers globally. We also intend to expand our government customer base, securing major contracts
with the United States and allied governments while delivering secure, resilient, and mission-critical
connectivity for defense operations, humanitarian efforts, disaster response, and national security applications in
even the most remote and challenging environments. We also serve a broad fixed‑site customer base across
167
industries such as retail and financial services that require high availability for critical operations as well as
reliable connectivity in remote or hard-to-serve locations. As companies continue to invest in secure and
resilient networks to keep critical infrastructure—such as point‑of‑sale and payment processing systems—we
see an opportunity to grow our broad fixed‑site customer base, often starting as back-up and then transitioning
to primary.
Expand our Starlink Mobile offering. As of March 31, 2026, we provide Starlink Mobile services to approximately
7.4 million monthly unique devices across approximately 30 countries. We partner with leading device
manufacturers, application developers, and mobile network operators to enhance the services we provide over one
satellite network, including over-the-top voice, video, and messaging. In 2025, we entered into agreements to
acquire 65 MHz of spectrum in the United States and certain global Mobile Satellite Service spectrum licenses from
EchoStar, which will enable a step-change in the possibilities for our Starlink Mobile service. Furthermore, we
anticipate that Starship will be able to deploy approximately 50 mobile satellites per launch, significantly increasing
capacity per launch and accelerating the deployment of our next-generation constellation. With the deployment of
our next-generation constellation, which is designed to fully utilize the acquired spectrum, and the expansion of our
MNO partnerships, we aim to further deliver on our goal of providing connectivity for everyone and substantially
reducing mobile “dead zones” worldwide—eventually with 5G connectivity to unmodified cell phones and IoT
devices globally.
Increase the capacity of our constellations. Our current constellations of approximately 9,600 Starlink broadband
and mobile satellites, including over 3,000 satellites deployed in 2025, support over 700 Tbps of cumulative
downlink capacity. To support larger numbers of customers through our Connectivity segment, we plan to materially
increase the capacity of our broadband and mobile constellations. For our Starlink broadband constellation, we will
continue deployment of more of our V2 Mini satellites, and in the second half of 2026, we expect to begin
deployment of our next-generation V3 satellites, each of which is designed to offer one Tbps of downlink capacity
per satellite. We expect Starship will be able to deploy up to 60 V3 satellites per launch, representing a twenty-fold
increase in downlink capacity deployed per launch compared to Falcon 9, enabling a more rapid expansion of our
Starlink broadband constellation at a significantly lower cost. For our Starlink Mobile constellation, we currently
have approximately 650 existing dedicated mobile satellites. We are developing more comprehensive satellite-to
mobile services, which we refer to as our Starlink Mobile Gen2 services, including broadband data and IoT
connectivity, which are expected to deliver resilient, infrastructure-independent connectivity worldwide and enable
5G connectivity.
We plan to expand our mobile constellation by deploying our next-generation mobile V2 Mobile satellites in 2027
which, combined with the EchoStar spectrum acquisition and optimized 5G protocols, are expected to increase
capacity by orders of magnitude compared to our first-generation constellation. In the U.S., the FCC approved the
EchoStar license transfer in May 2026, and we separately expect to receive the remaining necessary U.S. regulatory
authorizations in the second or third quarter of 2026. While these authorizations would be sufficient from a U.S.
regulatory perspective, we still require our V2 Mobile satellites to be in orbit and must complete the acquisition of
the relevant spectrum from EchoStar before we can commence our planned commercial Gen2 service in the United
States. Internationally, we have filed applications in nearly every country in which we intend to operate our Gen2
service, and approvals have been granted in a limited number of these jurisdictions to date. Each international
jurisdiction presents its own regulatory process and timeline, and we cannot predict when or whether approvals will
be granted in any given market. In addition, our Gen2 service is subject to ITU coordination requirements. We have
an operational coordination agreement with EchoStar, which we expect to continue through 2026 and 2027, under
which EchoStar has agreed to protect our lower-priority S-band V2 Mobile constellation. By prioritizing these step-
change capacity increases in our satellite-to-mobile capabilities, we expect to both enhance high-speed, low-latency
service quality in existing markets and provide services to previously capacity-limited and unserved regions,
including dense urban areas and emerging markets.
AI
Grow consumer AI platform monetization. We plan to continue to grow revenue from our AI platform, the Grok
application, by increasing monetization of our existing user base. We will leverage our unique combination of
real‑time data, large‑scale distribution, leading foundational model, and hardware expertise to increase the number
168
of Grok subscribers. Subscribers benefit from enhanced functionality, exclusive features, and access to our latest AI
models. Since the introduction of our Grok subscription offering in 2025, we have increased the number of available
features to add value to our subscribers, including providing access to our latest and enhanced AI tools. We plan to
continue adding new features and functionality while releasing increasingly capable Grok models to increase the
penetration rate of our subscriber base. Our AI segment has demonstrated exceptional model velocity: since
launching Grok, we have developed leading frontier models at a far faster rate of innovation than others. We
continue to invest in scaling Grok through subsequent generations, including Grok 5. Our roadmap for future models
contains multi-trillion parameter models, which could represent a step change in reasoning depth and overall
intelligence. We believe this pace of innovation strengthens the value proposition of our subscription offerings and
supports long term subscriber growth. While our subscriber growth has been strong, we believe we are still early in
increasing paid penetration across our Grok user base. We further believe there might be an incremental
monetization opportunity by introducing advertising into our stand-alone Grok offering.
Grow X monetization. We intend to drive X revenue growth by increasing engagement across our users, increasing
X Premium subscriber conversion, growing advertising revenue per user, and diversifying our advertising base. We
continue to evolve X into an “Everything App,” integrating real-time information, communications, media,
payments, banking, and more within one consumer app experience. This can improve the usefulness of X, and
therefore increase the usage and monetization potential of X. We have demonstrated rapid product launch velocity,
with frequent features and products launched since 2023, including Grok integration, long‑form video, audio and
video calling, secure messaging, tool calling, long-form articles, and creator tools. We plan to further broaden the
value proposition of X through offerings like Money, a product we launched in beta in November 2025, which aims
to expand platform utility by enabling payments and other financial services. We updated X chat in 2025, featuring
end-to-end encryption and no connection to our ad personalization, unlike other messaging services. We intend to
further embed Grok throughout X to enhance discovery, analysis of posts, user support, and personalization,
increasing the usefulness of X and further improving the value of a paid subscription.
We also expect to grow advertising revenue per user and to diversify our advertiser base over time because of X’s
compelling advertiser value proposition—large-scale user engagement, real-time content, and advanced AI-driven
performance marketing tools. We intend to drive further advertising revenue growth by improving our performance
advertising capabilities, embedding AI to optimize ad campaigns, and launching richer ad formats, including those
that increase advertiser return on ad spending and their spend with us. In determining our advertising rates, we use
an auction process in which advertisers bid to have their ads shown to the audience they are targeting, except for
certain reserved inventory, which is sold on a fixed price basis. We provide advertisers with several engagement
metrics, including: the number of impressions, price per ad, clicks, and conversions. Currently, Grok API access is
not included in our advertising rates to advertisers. We do not currently sell or offer advertisers the ability to place
ads on the Grok API.
We also expect X’s real-time content stream and engagement feedback, subject to some limitations for certain
content, to strengthen our advertising product performance and relevance, improving outcomes for both consumers
and advertisers, and increasing retention. We also began a phased roll-out of our new advertising platform, including
the new X Ads Manager, in April 2026. X Ads Manager is designed to help advertisers launch better campaigns
faster, with AI-powered systems enabling more precise, relevant, and dynamic ad delivery and a centralized
workflow for campaign creation, optimization, and real-time monitoring. Grok supports this strategy by helping
advertisers with campaign creation, creative optimization, and alignment with trending topics and user intent.
Deepen enterprise and government adoption. We believe adoption of AI by both enterprise and government reflects
a structural industry shift, with room for substantial long-term growth. Our Grok Business, Grok Enterprise, and xAI
Gov offerings position us to scale in tandem with broader enterprise and governmental AI adoption. Our Grok API
further extends our reach by enabling developers to integrate our models directly into their applications and
workflows. We intend to further support our enterprise offerings with a specialized salesforce and forward deployed
engineers, engineers who embed directly with a client to implement our solution, to support customer acquisition
and expansion.
Increase the scale of our terrestrial power and AI compute infrastructure. We plan to rapidly scale our terrestrial
AI compute infrastructure through the continued deployment of large-scale clusters to support the training and
169
inference of our AI models. To rapidly bring gigawatt-scale data centers online, we leverage world-class
engineering, first-principles thinking and deep “shovels-to-tokens” vertical integration. Our AI compute facilities,
COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II, collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of compute power, with additional
power capacity available for data center operations. COLOSSUS II will also provide the compute to train our next-
generation Grok 5 AI model. We expect that once fully operational, the next phase of expansion at COLOSSUS II
will represent an additional 400MW of compute capacity. Our first-principles thinking enables us to build coherent
compute at scale and at rapid speed with lower costs than most other companies in the industry. We brought the first
cluster of COLOSSUS online in 122 days, repurposing the shell of an existing factory, and the first cluster of
COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91 days. As an illustrative comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a
100 megawatt greenfield data center is approximately two years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in
cost efficiency, achieving data center construction costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry
benchmarks on a per megawatt basis. As AI workloads increase in complexity and scale, data center operators face
constraints related to power density, cooling, network bandwidth, supply chain management, construction expertise
and capital deployment. Our experience in designing mission-critical hardware systems, optimizing power
efficiency, and operating distributed infrastructure networks provides a differentiated foundation for continuing to
grow and advance the next-generation compute platform. We believe that continued investment in our compute
infrastructure is critical to supporting long-term consumer and enterprise growth as AI adoption accelerates, while
also providing a powerful foundation for our transition to orbital AI compute at scale.
In addition, our leadership in compute infrastructure positions us to monetize not only AI software applications built
on our models, but also the underlying compute that powers them. As we continue to scale our terrestrial compute
infrastructure to support internal model development, training, and inference workloads, we intend to sell our high-
performance compute capacity to a limited number of third party customers.
Deploy orbital AI compute at scale. We believe growth of the projected $26.5 trillion-dollar AI market will be
constrained by Earth’s inability to rapidly scale power generation, underscoring the challenge of achieving terawatt-
scale compute without harming people and the environment. While we expect terrestrial power generation to
continue to grow, we believe the physical, environmental, and regulatory constraints will prevent it from delivering
the orders-of-magnitude increases needed to match future energy demands of the AI era. Power from the Sun, an
enormous, free fusion reactor in the sky, represents approximately 99.8% of the solar system’s energy and offers the
only truly scalable solution to terrestrial energy constraints. By combining virtually unlimited solar power in space
with our industry-leading launch costs and satellite manufacturing capabilities, we believe we can deliver compute
over time at a fundamentally lower cost structure than is possible on Earth. By the end of the decade, we intend to
deploy the first modular orbital AI compute shells and begin monetizing capacity through the sale of AI software
and AI compute. We aim to launch 100 gigawatts of AI compute capacity on solar-powered satellites each year,
equivalent to roughly one fifth of total annual U.S. power production in 2025. The amount of compute capacity we
can launch depends on three components—payload, satellite capacity, and launch frequency. With respect to
payload, Starship V3 is designed to deliver 100 metric tons to space in a fully reusable configuration while enabling
rapid turnaround times, and future generations could reach 200 metric tons, potentially as soon as Starship V4. With
respect to satellite capacity, we expect solar cells optimized for the space environment will be produced at a rapid
rate, with early satellites generating 100 kilowatts of compute power and scaling from there. Finally, with respect to
launch frequency, we expect to be able to scale to thousands of launches per year. Together, we expect these
achievements will allow us to transport approximately one million metric tons to orbit annually, powering 100
gigawatts of AI compute. Such compute capacity will also play a critical role in advancing our human augmentation
vision by expanding the reach, speed, and capability of AI beyond what is possible with terrestrial compute
infrastructure alone.
We believe we are well-positioned to execute and deliver orbital AI compute to build the infrastructure of the future.
We believe orbital AI compute is an incredibly difficult challenge that only we can solve at scale in the near term.
Design and manufacture our own chips. We plan to deepen our strategic collaboration with Tesla and Intel through
Terafab. In connection with such collaboration, we have agreed with Tesla on a general framework for the future
development of Terafab. Any specific projects undertaken pursuant to this framework will be subject to separate
negotiations and agreements (including any development timelines, milestones and capital expenditures) and have
not yet been determined. We expect Terafab to be the world’s largest chip manufacturing facility, with the goal of
170
eventually achieving one terawatt of annual compute production capacity. While Terafab is intended to expand our
internal chip manufacturing capabilities, we expect to continue sourcing a significant portion of our compute
hardware from third-party suppliers. We view Terafab as complementary to these relationships, enabling us to
augment our access to compute hardware at massive scale and further complete our highly vertically integrated
compute platform by extending our control to the foundational chip layer. By developing end-to-end capabilities
spanning the design of lithography masks, fabrication of logic and memory chips, and advanced packaging, all in a
vertically integrated closed-loop single plant, we will be able to more rapidly iterate to improve chip design and
performance. We plan to design chips that are optimized for the space environment. This collaboration directly
enables our planned orders-of-magnitude increases in AI compute deployment in orbit which would be constrained
by pure reliance on external foundries. Leveraging shared engineering resources, intellectual property, and
infrastructure across Tesla and SpaceX, as well as Intel’s expertise in designing, fabricating and packaging ultra-
high-performance chips at scale, Terafab is designed to create powerful ecosystem synergies that accelerate
innovation cycles and reduce costs. Just as we manufacture approximately 80% of Starship in-house, we expect
significant speed and cost advantages from Terafab’s vertical integration. We believe this integration, if achieved,
will provide us with a critical competitive advantage in the race to scale AI infrastructure, especially as we begin our
orbital AI compute satellite deployments.
Launch digital human augmentation. In partnership with Tesla, we are developing Macrohard, an agentic platform
designed to fully emulate digital workflows and augment human operation of computers—from coding and product
development to management and entire business processes. Similar to how autonomous systems emulate human
inputs to execute complex tasks, Macrohard is designed to augment how humans operate computers and tools to
analyze, create, and manage workflows. Unlike other enterprise software and AI applications that primarily digitize
workflows and systematize historical processes, our solutions are designed to operate as real-time, intelligence-
driven extensions of the user. Macrohard aims to combine our frontier AI model with Tesla’s physical AI prowess to
achieve the goal of augmenting the operational functions of entire companies. We expect Macrohard to benefit from
running on both state-of-the-art processors and cost efficient Tesla processors, a critical advantage of our vertical
integration. We believe Macrohard has the potential to fundamentally transform how companies across all industries
are structured and operate, thereby allowing dramatic increases in human productivity and prosperity.
Future Markets
We aim to build the infrastructure of the future in Space, leveraging our foundational competitive advantage, the
ability to launch mass at scale. By opening access to space to industries on Earth, we can grow our business by
creating new markets. Our technological capabilities enable us to repeatedly create new markets by pushing the
boundaries of what space can support. As we continue to advance and scale, we expect to unlock new market
opportunities. Over the long-term, we expect our Starship-enabled opportunities to include:
•Point-to-point terrestrial travel. We plan to develop ultra-fast long-haul point-to-point Earth transport using
Starship, enabling passengers and cargo to travel between major cities in a fraction of current transit times,
revolutionizing global logistics and passenger travel with unprecedented speed and efficiency.
•Space tourism. With meaningful advances in space technology and the continued build-out of orbital flight
infrastructure, we expect increasing interest in human space travel as it becomes easier and more common to
access space.
•In-orbit manufacturing. We aim to establish in-space manufacturing facilities that leverage the unique
microgravity conditions of space to produce materials, pharmaceuticals, and advanced components that are
difficult or impossible to manufacture on Earth, opening new high-value industrial markets.
•Passenger and cargo transport to the Moon and Mars. We intend to support large-scale passenger and cargo
missions to the Moon and Mars, delivering the people, equipment, and supplies needed to establish permanent
human settlements and accelerate the path to becoming a self-sustaining multiplanetary civilization.
•Energy production on the Moon and Mars. We aim to develop large-scale solar energy production on the
Moon and Mars, taking advantage of the thin atmosphere and constant solar exposure to generate power for
manufacturing, habitats, and future infrastructure at scale.
171
•Manufacturing capabilities on the Moon and Mars. We plan to build manufacturing infrastructure on the
Moon and Mars that utilizes local resources to produce fuel, construction materials, and other essential
resources, reducing dependence on Earth resupply and enabling sustainable long-term presence.
•Asteroid mining. We plan to pursue asteroid mining operations to extract metals and other critical resources
from near-Earth and main-belt asteroids, providing abundant raw materials for space-based industries and
reducing the need to launch mass from Earth.
Our Market Opportunity
We believe space represents the largest economic frontier in human history. Our innovations and technological
advancements are redefining existing industries and creating new market opportunities across Space, Connectivity
and AI. We believe we have a distinct ability to identify, develop, and commercialize new multi-trillion-dollar
markets that did not previously exist. We currently stand alone in our ability to deliver revolutionary breakthroughs
across spaceflight and exploration, global connectivity, and artificial intelligence, enabling an age of abundance that
we believe has the potential to propel an unprecedented expansion in the global economy.
By pioneering the world’s first and only fleet of reusable rockets at scale, we revolutionized space access through
dramatically lower cost and unmatched reliability. Lowering costs by orders of magnitude creates entirely new
industries on Earth and in space that were technologically and economically infeasible for others to access
historically. Our first trillion-dollar market was Starlink, a satellite service supported by our low-latency, high-speed
LEO constellation that required the rapid, low-cost deployment of millions of kilograms of hardware into orbit. Our
Starlink constellation powers a global connectivity platform capable of supporting broadband and mobile services,
enabling high-speed internet access to homes, enterprises, governments, and mobile users across virtually any
location on Earth. We believe our next trillion-dollar market is AI compute, which we contemplate will leverage our
rockets and satellites for massive orbital deployment.
We believe we have identified the largest TAM in human history. We estimate that our quantifiable TAM is $28.5
trillion, consisting of $370 billion in Space from space-enabled solutions; $1.6 trillion in Connectivity across $870
billion in Starlink Broadband and $740 billion in Starlink Mobile as well as additional opportunities in enterprise
and government; $26.5 trillion in AI across $2.4 trillion in AI infrastructure, $760 billion in consumer subscriptions,
$600 billion in digital advertising, and $22.7 trillion in enterprise applications. For illustrative purposes of sizing our
addressable market opportunity, we exclude China and Russia from our global estimates.
In addition to the markets we serve today, we believe we are poised to catalyze transformative breakthroughs and
create entirely new markets. Given these are longer-term opportunities at earlier stages of development, we do not
quantify them in our TAM estimates; however, we believe that over time each of these markets could eventually
represent multi-trillion-dollar economic opportunities. These new markets include long haul point-to-point terrestrial
travel, space tourism, in-orbit manufacturing, asteroid mining, energy production and manufacturing on the Moon
and Mars, and passenger and cargo transportation to the Moon and Mars.
172
SpaceX’s Estimated TAM by Segment
Space
While the size of the space market is massive for any company to address, our capabilities in space represent a
foundational competitive advantage that allow us to address markets that represent significant portions of global
gross domestic product (“GDP”)—connectivity and AI. We estimate a total market opportunity of $370 billion
across space-enabled solutions, with the lunar economy presenting a significant upside not included in the estimate.
Space-Enabled Solutions. According to Novaspace, space-enabled solutions represented a $370 billion market in
2025, including spacecraft manufacturing, launch services, satellite operations, positioning, navigation and timing
(“PNT”) devices and value-added services, as well as uncontracted costs of government space agencies. Both
commercial and government customers participate in this market, with growing space-based defense budgets
reflecting prioritization of security, resilience, and strategic autonomy by governments globally. For the purpose of
sizing our TAM, we exclude the value of satellite communications services, as we include those within our
Connectivity segment.
Lunar Economy. We believe the development of a sustained human and commercial presence on the Moon has the
potential to give rise to a new lunar economy encompassing transportation, infrastructure, communications, energy,
manufacturing (including the production of satellites and advanced chips), resource extraction, and scientific and
commercial activity. Early demand is already emerging from government space agencies and research institutions,
and we expect this to expand over time to include commercial enterprises seeking to leverage the Moon as a
platform for logistics, industrial activity, and deep-space exploration. Establishing a lunar economy requires first
proving reliable extraction of water ice to sustain life and producing hydrogen-oxygen propellant, alongside building
power, transport, and storage infrastructure in an extreme, high-cost environment. If achieved, we believe these
same resources and the Moon’s low gravity unlock the potential for scalable growth through an efficient fuel
production and refueling hub, creating a strategic access point that can potentially support deeper space
industrialization and serve as a stepping stone to establishing a civilization on Mars. Although we believe the
potential size and scope of the lunar economy is extraordinarily large, we are not providing an estimate of the TAM
for this opportunity at this time because expectations regarding the timing, pace of adoption, regulatory frameworks,
and ultimate scope of commercial activity beyond Earth are rapidly evolving alongside the development and
deployment of the technology necessary to establish a lunar presence (such as Starship). As the Moon transitions
173
from a scientific outpost into an industrial frontier, SpaceX is positioned to spearhead this revolutionary expansion,
and we believe that continued advancements in our launch capabilities, space infrastructure capabilities, and cost
efficiency will allow us to meaningfully accelerate the development of a sustainable lunar economy.
Connectivity
We believe the global connectivity market represents a substantial and durable opportunity, driven by the increasing
reliance of consumers, enterprises, and governments on high-speed, low-latency, reliable connectivity across both
terrestrial and remote environments. Across Starlink Broadband and Starlink Mobile, we estimate a total market
opportunity of $1.6 trillion reflecting primarily consumer use cases. We believe these traditional use cases, however,
do not account for the long-term market opportunity, as connectivity is evolving into a critical infrastructure layer
underpinning the global economy, enabling entirely new categories of demand. As high-performance, ubiquitous
connectivity becomes embedded across transportation networks, autonomous systems, and smart devices, we expect
the scope of the market to extend well beyond the traditional definitions.
Starlink Broadband. The global demand for ubiquitous, high-speed broadband internet creates an approximately
$870 billion dollar opportunity. Our satellite broadband service, Starlink, is positioned to capture value across
multiple massive and rapidly expanding markets:
•Consumer Broadband. As the digital economy continues to expand, ubiquitous, high-speed, reliable internet
has become a structural necessity for households worldwide—powering opportunity and the next wave of
global prosperity. According to Euromonitor, there were approximately 1.8 billion global households in 2025.
As Starlink develops, we believe that our broadband network can connect, and improve the existing connection,
of every household globally. Given varying economic conditions and consumer purchasing power across
different countries, we use a different monthly ARPU for different parts of the world based on country-specific
consumer broadband ARPU from Omdia as we seek to make our service affordable and accessible across
different economic development contexts. Region-specific ARPU assumptions result in a weighted average of
$31 monthly ARPU for residential broadband internet services globally, according to Omdia. This global
average consists of a weighted average monthly ARPU of $43 in high-income markets, $16 in upper-middle
income markets, and $9 in lower-middle income and low income markets per World Bank classification.
Together this represents a total addressable market of $660 billion based on 1.8 billion households.
Approximately 40% of the global population lives in rural areas, remaining structurally underserved by
terrestrial broadband infrastructure due to unfavorable deployment economics, limited network density and high
last-mile costs.
This structural imbalance creates a large, durable and relatively uncontested baseline market for satellite-based
connectivity solutions. For many of these households, Starlink represents the first viable option for high-speed,
low-latency internet access, with limited competition from terrestrial providers. Unlike terrestrial networks,
which require significant incremental capital to extend coverage to low-density areas, our space-based
architecture enables economically scalable service delivery across these regions with minimal marginal cost per
additional user.
Importantly, while rural and underserved geographies provide a compelling initial adoption vector, we believe
Starlink’s value proposition extends well beyond these markets. As network capacity increases and product
performance continues to improve, we expect to compete increasingly in suburban and urban environments.
Accordingly, while rural households represent a large and durable entry point for our connectivity offering, we
view this segment as a foundational layer upon which significantly broader consumer, enterprise and
government demand can be built.
•Enterprise Solutions. We offer fixed site broadband solutions tailored for the needs of our enterprise customers
across many different industries, including construction, agriculture, retail, telecom, hospitality and others. For
the purpose of sizing market opportunity, we include small and medium sized businesses within our Enterprise
Solutions market opportunity. Our Starlink enterprise offerings can provide important primary or back-up
connectivity for every business in the geographies where we are licensed to operate. According to Grand View
174
Research, the global business broadband market in 2025 across small to medium sized business and enterprise
usage is estimated to be $200 billion.
•Government Solutions. Driven by increasing demand for resilient, low-latency, and highly secure
communications in contested and remote environments, defense organizations and governments around the
world are increasingly turning to commercial satellite providers with connectivity solutions to supplement and
enhance traditional military networks. According to Novaspace, the global satellite communications market
driven by defense and government demand in 2025 was $5 billion. The estimate of the government
communications market includes only publicly disclosed programs and budgets and does not include classified
missions or other restricted uses, which we believe represent additional sources of demand.
Starlink Mobile. According to Omdia, as of December 31, 2025, there were eight billion mobile connected devices
globally. We believe our Starlink Mobile offering will be able to provide continuous global coverage and
substantially reduce mobile “dead zones,” which remain areas that are structurally underserved by the limitations of
the networks of current mobile network operators. For example, according to the J.D. Power U.S. Wireless Network
Quality Performance Study, U.S. wireless customers experienced service problems in approximately one out of
every 11 mobile interactions, even in well-connected areas. In addition, an estimated 40% of the global population
resided in rural areas in 2024 according to the World Bank, where terrestrial mobile coverage can be limited or
unreliable. While we expect Starlink Mobile service today to be most impactful for customers in remote areas
uncovered by terrestrial mobile networks, as our constellation grows and our product performance continues to
improve, we will compete to be the preferred connectivity experience to our customers no matter where they are
located, whether in rural, suburban, or urban areas. The next-generation of Starlink Mobile satellites, in combination
with our recent purchase of wireless spectrum from EchoStar, is designed to provide high bandwidth and low
latency connectivity directly to end user devices, enabling a connectivity solution on par with terrestrial mobile
networks. Given varying economic conditions and consumer purchasing power across different countries, we
assume a different monthly ARPU for different parts of the world as we seek to make our service affordable and
accessible across different economic development contexts. Our region-specific ARPU assumptions result in a
weighted average monthly mobile ARPU of $8 per user. This global average consists of a weighted average monthly
ARPU of $18 in high-income markets, $5 in upper-middle income markets, $2 in lower-middle, and $2 in low
income markets. Based on the total number of connected devices globally and the mobile ARPU, we estimate the
Starlink Mobile market opportunity to be $740 billion. We expect to continue to partner with mobile network
operators globally as we expand coverage and participate in the broader mobile connectivity market.
Additional and Future Starlink Applications. We believe the long-term market opportunity for Starlink extends
materially beyond traditional fixed broadband and satellite-to-mobile connectivity. Many of these use cases
represent new categories of demand that were not previously addressable with legacy terrestrial or satellite solutions
due to limitations in coverage, latency, capacity, or cost. While these additional and future use cases are early stage
and not yet captured in conventional industry market definitions, we believe they have the potential to significantly
expand the total addressable market for connectivity over time.
•Enterprise Mobility. Because our Starlink solutions are uniquely well-suited for in-motion environments,
remote, or hard-to-serve locations, we are able to provide high-performance connectivity across land, air, and
sea. We believe we have a differentiated right to win these verticals as existing connectivity solutions are not
able to provide sufficient speed, latency and reliability, with frequent service outages driven by weather, orbital
mechanics and coverage gaps. Our Starlink constellation directly addresses these deficiencies, creating a
compelling path for us to capture a substantial share of opportunities and to unlock previously unattainable
levels of service quality and customer willingness to pay.
In land mobility, Starlink supports connectivity for vehicle fleets, including trucking, rail, public safety vehicles,
and autonomous systems, enabling real-time telematics, route optimization, safety monitoring, and onboard
passenger connectivity, as fleets become increasingly connected and data-driven.
In aviation, Starlink delivers high-speed, low-latency in-flight connectivity for commercial airlines, business
aviation, and government aircraft, supporting passenger broadband, operational communications, and real-time
aircraft data transmission, as airlines increasingly prioritize differentiated onboard experiences and operational
175
efficiency. There are approximately 23,900 commercial aircraft, according to Oliver Wyman, and
approximately 24,500 privately owned aircraft, according to Corporate Jet Investor, in the world, which can be
served by our aviation offering.
In maritime, Starlink provides connectivity for commercial shipping, offshore energy platforms, cruise lines,
and government vessels, enabling crew welfare, operational optimization, safety systems, and real-time data
transfer, as connectivity becomes a standard requirement across global fleets. Our potential customer base as of
2025 consists of approximately 99,000 commercial merchant ships, defined as being 100 gross tons or more,
approximately 21,000 fishing vessels, and approximately 4,000 cruise ships and private yachts, according to
Marine Traffic Dashboard.
•Expanded Enterprise and Government Applications
Enterprise Back-Up and Failover Connectivity. As connectivity becomes a mission critical component of
enterprise operations, we believe back-up and failover connectivity is evolving into a foundational layer of
enterprise infrastructure. The increasing cost of downtime, combined with the proliferation of cloud-based and
latency-sensitive applications, is driving enterprises to prioritize uptime, business continuity, and network
resilience and adopt multi-layered connectivity architectures. We believe this shift will result in a meaningful
expansion of the connectivity market.
Expanded Government Applications. We believe traditional connectivity market estimates do not fully
capture the scope of government-related demand, particularly in mission-critical and classified applications. The
growing importance of secure communications, real-time intelligence, and resilient network architectures is
driving sustained investment in connectivity capabilities across defense and civilian agencies. These use cases
tend to command higher value and longer-duration contracts, contributing to a meaningful and durable
expansion of the connectivity market.
Smart Device Connectivity. The proliferation of connected devices across various physical environments—
including sensors, wearables, vehicles, appliances, and infrastructure systems—is driving increasing demand for
ubiquitous, reliable, and low-latency connectivity. As of 2025, there were approximately 22 billion IoT
connected devices globally, forecasted to reach 47 billion by 2031. As billions of connected devices generate,
transmit, and act on data, connectivity becomes an essential enabler of new categories of economic activity. As
these devices grow in scale into the tens of billions globally and become more intelligent and data-intensive, we
believe the scope of the connectivity market will expand significantly beyond traditional human-centric usage.
In-Orbit Data Transport. We operate a large constellation of over 23,000 inter-satellite lasers that create a
dynamic mesh network in space and enable traffic rerouting through orbit. We believe this laser mesh network
will help us unlock a new connectivity market by enabling third-party satellites to utilize our in-orbit data
transport layer. While most of our laser mesh network capacity is used to power our Starlink services, we
selectively monetize excess capacity through our Plaser program. We allow third parties to purchase our space
laser hardware and connect their satellites to our Starlink network, allowing them to offload data to a ground
station anywhere on Earth while bypassing the need to build their own relay architecture or ground stations. As
satellite constellations grow, we expect market demand for high-throughput, low-latency data relay to increase
across commercial and government operators. While this market remains nascent, we believe the opportunity
represents a meaningful expansion beyond traditional satellite connectivity TAM.
Artificial Intelligence
The market for artificial intelligence is currently undergoing explosive structural growth, emerging as a foundational
utility for the modern global economy and unlocking a multi-trillion-dollar opportunity. Our frontier models,
consumer and enterprise applications, and AI infrastructure solutions are strategically positioned to capture value
across four key components of this vast ecosystem, resulting in an estimated total market opportunity of $26.5
trillion.
AI Infrastructure. According to RAND Corporation, global data center compute demand is estimated to be 235
gigawatts in 2030, of which 70% is estimated to be utilized for AI workloads. Assuming a target Power Usage
176
Effectiveness of 1.2 and an all-in chip power consumption per GPU of 1.3 kilowatts per GPU—that of an H100
SXM—this AI workload demand corresponds to 104 million GPUs required. We apply an 80% utilization rate per
the National Electrical Installation Standards and a GPU rental rate of $3.33 per hour, according to Silicon Data,
which is based on the median of neocloud GPU rental rates in 2025; we note that the rental rate has historically
varied subject to market conditions. As a result, we estimate the AI compute infrastructure market opportunity to be
approximately $2.4 trillion.
Consumer Subscriptions. As demand for AI solutions surges, fueled by widespread adoption of AI tools that
enhance productivity, creativity, personalization, and real-time assistance in everyday life, consumers are
increasingly turning to subscription-based access to high-performance AI platforms. These platforms, equipped with
advanced reasoning, seamless real-time data integration, and multimodal capabilities, are essential in today’s ever-
more receptive and interconnected world. We believe SpaceX is well positioned to address this opportunity through
our X and Grok platforms by delivering a differentiated product centered on truth-seeking and real-time relevance.
Our roadmap for future models contains multi-trillion parameter models, which could represent a step change in
reasoning depth and overall intelligence. Through Grok’s integration with X and proprietary access to real-time data
inflows, we believe we can better address a broader set of high-frequency, high-value consumer use cases and
increase user engagement and willingness to pay, positioning Grok to capture a larger share of the consumer AI
subscription market relative to standalone, non-integrated offerings. We estimate our market opportunity based on
the global population of individuals aged 10 and over in 2025—approximately five and a half billion according to
Euromonitor—multiplied by the weighted average monthly subscription revenue of $12, resulting in an annualized
market opportunity of approximately $760 billion. Our weighted average monthly revenue assumes different
monthly subscription fees across different geographies around the world. We assume $30 monthly cost of a
SuperGrok subscription in high-income countries, $8 monthly cost in upper-middle and lower-middle income
countries, and significantly lower monthly cost in low income countries, as defined by the World Bank.
Digital Advertising. Digital advertising represents a large and growing global market opportunity as businesses
increase marketing budgets towards digital platforms that enable targeted advertising, measurable performance, and
direct engagement with consumers. In 2025, global digital advertising spending totaled $600 billion according to
S&P Global Market Intelligence. We believe that X’s ability to combine large-scale user engagement, real-time
content, and advanced AI-driven performance marketing tools positions us well to participate in this significant
market opportunity.
Enterprise Applications. AI is revolutionizing enterprise applications as organizations across industries increasingly
adopt AI solutions to automate complex workflows, augment knowledge workers, enhance decision-making,
redefine productivity, and improve operational efficiency. Specifically, we believe that our enterprise applications,
including Macrohard, agentic AI, will increasingly support knowledge workers across industries by automating
routine cognitive tasks, assisting with research and analysis, generating content and code, and refining decision-
making processes. Ultimately, we believe this transformation could evolve knowledge workers into empowered
managers of autonomous agents, unlocking unprecedented levels of creativity and productivity.
We believe we are still in the early days of AI transforming enterprises, with AI-powered enterprise applications
poised to reshape the digital economy. The Digital Cooperation Organization (“DCO”) defines the digital economy
as economic activity reliant on, significantly enhanced, or enabled by digital technologies and their applications,
including the following products and services: AI and advanced analytics, blockchain and decentralized
technologies, cloud services, digital connectivity, digital devices and the IoT, encryption and cybersecurity,
immersive technologies, and robotics and autonomous systems. DCO estimates that the digital economy will grow
three times faster in 2026 on a year-over-year basis compared to the estimated growth of the global GDP, reaching
approximately $22.7 trillion in 2026. In a survey of CTOs, senior technologists, policymakers, and digital economy
experts, also conducted by DCO, AI and advanced analytics were identified by 69% of respondents as their top
digital technology priority—higher than any other surveyed priority. We believe that our enterprise strategy, which
is focused on serving the digital needs of the world’s largest industries with AI solutions, positions us competitively
to pursue this rapidly growing opportunity.
177
Future Markets
Beyond the established markets reflected in our TAM, we envision that ongoing advancements in our technology
and infrastructure will unlock entirely new markets over time. As launch costs decline, satellite capabilities advance,
and large-scale compute infrastructure expands, innovative applications and new markets may emerge that harness
our integrated infrastructure across space, connectivity, and AI. Although these prospects remain nascent, with
uncertain timing and scale—and thus are excluded from our quantified total addressable market estimates—we
believe they hold trillions of dollars of eventual potential for groundbreaking innovation and value creation,
eventually representing multi-trillion-dollar economic opportunities.
Long-Haul Point-to-Point Terrestrial Travel. Our Starship vehicle has the potential to revolutionize terrestrial
commercial transportation by achieving an unparalleled combination of speed, reliability and cost efficiency. This
capability could reduce most international long-haul flights to under 30 minutes, enabling point-to-point travel to the
furthest location in an hour or less. While we must surmount technological, economic and regulatory obstacles to
fully capitalize on this opportunity—such as restrictions on supersonic flights over land in certain regions due to
sonic booms, and the economic feasibility of shorter routes—we believe we are strategically positioned to take share
of the terrestrial logistics and transportation market.
Space Tourism. Historically, human spaceflight has been limited to government astronauts, augmented by a limited
number of privately funded missions. Yet, with meaningful advances in space technology and the ongoing
expansion of orbital flight infrastructure, we anticipate a gradual increase in accessibility of spaceflight over time,
potentially enabling a new category of commercial human spaceflight and tourism. Under 30 people out of the
global population visited Earth’s orbit in 2025, which we believe could be a far greater number in the future.
Passenger and Cargo Transport to the Moon and Mars. Looking further ahead, advances in reusable launch
systems and deep-space transportation infrastructure may enable new forms of interplanetary logistics, including
passenger and cargo transportation to the Moon and Mars. Supporting a sustained human presence on another planet
would require the regular transport of people, equipment, and materials at a scale not previously possible.
Energy Production and Manufacturing on the Moon and Mars. Establishing a sustained human and industrial
presence on the Moon and Mars would require reliable, large-scale energy generation to support habitats,
manufacturing, and scientific operations. Potential solutions could include solar power systems, taking advantage of
the thin atmosphere, constant solar exposure, and other advanced energy technologies designed to operate in the
unique environmental conditions of the Moon and Mars. Over time, we believe that advances in planetary
infrastructure may enable manufacturing on the Moon and Mars using locally available resources.
In-Orbit Manufacturing. Terrestrial manufacturing is inherently constrained by gravity, which imposes
fundamental limitations on processes at the atomic and molecular level. Establishing in-orbit infrastructure unlocks
large-scale, high-value production free from those traditional barriers, enabling breakthroughs in precision and
efficiency. The microgravity environment of space fosters innovative advancements in key industries, such as
pharmaceuticals—where it enhances drug solubility, purity, crystallization, and stability—as well as, advanced
materials and semiconductors, allowing for superior crystal formation and material properties unattainable on Earth.
Beyond these particle-level innovations, in-orbit facilities overcome Earth’s energy constraints by harnessing
abundant, uninterrupted solar power, facilitating energy-intensive operations with unparalleled sustainability.
Asteroid Mining. Asteroid resources, including platinum-group metals, rare earth elements, nickel, cobalt, iron and
water, represent a vast untapped reservoir beyond Earth’s gravity well, with some near-Earth objects containing
concentrations of elements far exceeding typical terrestrial ore grades. With meaningful advances in reusable launch
capabilities, autonomous robotics, and in-situ processing technologies, we believe the accessibility of asteroid
resources will expand over time, unlocking a new category of commercial space resource extraction. We believe our
experience in launch systems, spacecraft development, and space infrastructure uniquely positions us to pursue
asteroid mining operations to extract metals and other critical resources from near-Earth and main-belt asteroids,
providing abundant raw materials for space-based infrastructure, reducing the need to launch all mass from Earth.
178
Our Solutions & Services
Unparalleled Launch Capability
Our unmatched launch capability is the foundational competitive advantage that enables our unique solutions and
services. We are the market leader in orbital launch, providing low-cost, reliable, and frequent access to space for
commercial and government customers. Our launch services are built around a fleet of reusable rockets and
spacecraft. SpaceX’s family of rocket systems and spacecraft address missions ranging from routine cargo delivery
to the International Space Station to deep-space exploration. The Falcon class of rockets delivered over 80% of mass
to orbit in the year ending December 31, 2025. Starship, a two-stage super heavy-lift launch vehicle that we have
been flight testing since 2023, further enhances our industry-defining launch offerings.
Separate from our fleet of reusable rockets, SpaceX’s launch advantage is equally underpinned by our fleet of
advanced spacecraft. Our International Space Station cargo and human spaceflight missions are launched on Falcon
9 and flown on the Dragon crew and cargo spacecraft. The vehicles autonomously dock to the station, delivering
pressurized and unpressurized cargo, and passengers. Both Dragon variants are partially reusable and perform fully
autonomous rendezvous, docking, and return operations.
Our Fleet of Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft
Our Fleet of Launch Vehicles
Falcon 9. The Falcon 9 rocket is a reusable, two-stage rocket designed and manufactured by SpaceX for the safe,
reliable, and cost-effective transport of satellites, scientific payloads, cargo, and crew to Earth orbit and beyond.
Powered by liquid oxygen and rocket-grade kerosene, the first-stage is equipped with nine Merlin 1D engines
producing over 1.7 million pounds of thrust at sea level, while the second stage utilizes a single vacuum-optimized
Merlin engine for precise orbital insertion. First launched in 2010, Falcon 9 is the world’s first orbital-class rapidly
reusable rocket, and has become the most active orbital launch vehicle today, with approximately 620 orbital space
launches as of March 31, 2026 and an over 99% mission success rate. Falcon 9 is capable of delivering
approximately 23 metric tons to LEO and eight metric tons to geosynchronous transfer orbit. Reusability allows
SpaceX to refly the most expensive parts of the rocket, which in turn drives down the cost of space access. Falcon
9’s reusable components primarily include its booster, which lands on one of our autonomous drone ships out on the
179
ocean or on one of our landing zones near our launch pads ahead of being refurbished for a future launch, and its
payload fairing halves, which are recovered via parachute-assisted splashdowns and are refurbished and reused after
retrieval. The second stage is not designed for recovery or reuse and instead safely deorbits after successful payload
deployment.
Falcon 9 Overview
Falcon 9 introduced a combination of technical innovation, cost reduction, and operational scale that materially
altered the economics of orbital launch and established our position as the leading commercial launch provider.
•First Orbital-Class Rapidly Reusable Rocket: In December 2015, Falcon 9 achieved the first vertical landing
of an orbital-class booster, followed in April 2016 by the first autonomous drone ship landing in the Atlantic
Ocean. Reuse of boosters and fairings, a practice pioneered by SpaceX in the launch industry, fundamentally
enables our launch rate and capacity and forms the basis for the launch system’s inherent reliability. Through
recovering, inspecting, and evaluating flown hardware, SpaceX gains insight into system performance that
would not be otherwise achievable. Partial reusability for orbital spaceflight has reduced cost per ton to orbit by
approximately 85% as compared to the historical average launch cost per kilogram of $18,500.
•Reusability Enabled Cost Structure Advantage: Reuse of the first-stage—representing the majority of
vehicle manufacturing cost—has materially reduced marginal launch costs relative to fully expendable systems.
•Highest Operational Tempo in History: With approximately 620 orbital space launches over 15 years of
operation, Falcon 9 is the most frequently flown active orbital launch vehicle to date. In 2025, Falcon 9
conducted 165 launches, accounting for over half of all global orbital launches in the year while delivering over
80% of mass to orbit.
•Track Record of Success: As of March 31, 2026, Falcon 9 has achieved an over 99% mission success rate.
Falcon 9 has achieved over 530 successful booster landings and more than 540 launches completed by a flight-
proven Falcon rocket, underscoring the reliability of its reusability architecture.
•Human Spaceflight Certified: Falcon 9, paired with SpaceX’s Dragon crew spacecraft, is the only U.S.-based
launch vehicle certified by NASA under the Commercial Crew Program to transport astronauts to and from the
180
International Space Station. As of December 31, 2025, Falcon 9 has successfully launched 19 human
spaceflight missions with a 100% mission success rate.
•In-House Engine Development and Manufacturing: Falcon 9 is powered by Merlin engines that are
designed, developed, and manufactured in‑house, providing vertical integration across propulsion design,
production, and testing. The Merlin engine achieves one of the highest thrust‑to‑weight ratios of any rocket
engine in operational service, contributing to Falcon 9’s performance and payload capacity.
Falcon 9
As we transition primary production and development resources toward the fully and rapidly reusable Starship
system, Falcon 9 continues to serve as the backbone of our launch revenue base; generating high-margin recurring
cash flows while providing critical operational experience in high-cadence reuse. The proven capabilities of Falcon
9 established us as the leading provider of launch services globally and laid the technological and economic
foundation for the next era of space transportation.
Falcon Heavy. Falcon Heavy is a partially reusable super heavy-lift launch vehicle, designed to deliver large
payloads to orbit. Building on the proven architecture of the Falcon 9 rocket, Falcon Heavy is composed of three
reusable Falcon 9 nine-engine boosters whose combined 27 Merlin engines generate more than five million pounds
of thrust at liftoff—one of the most powerful operational rockets in the world today. It is capable of carrying
approximately 64 metric tons of payload to LEO and 27 metric tons to geosynchronous transfer orbit. Falcon
Heavy’s reusable components primarily include its three boosters, which are designed to land vertically on drone
ships in the ocean and landing zones near our launch sites, and its payload-faring halves, which are recovered via
parachute-assisted splashdown and are refurbished and reused after retrieval. The second stage is not designed for
recovery or reuse and is designed to safely deorbit after successful payload deployment, similar to Falcon 9.
181
Falcon Heavy Overview
•Reusability: Falcon Heavy incorporates a design focused on reusability, which has contributed to lowering the
cost of access to space and altering the launch industry’s economic model for large or high-value payloads. The
vehicle’s two side boosters, equipped with hypersonic grid fins and advanced propulsion systems, enable
controlled recovery and soft landings. This capability enables reusability, with missions launching on flight-
proven boosters generally priced below those of traditional expendable flights. Our Falcon 9 boosters, which are
qualified for up to 40 flights, are also used on Falcon Heavy, with an average of 6 flights per booster on Falcon
Heavy. Although our Falcon 9 boosters have been engineered and demonstrated to support up to 40 flights, we
have established a maximum accounting useful life of 25 flights as an estimate based on forecasted utilization.
This estimate reflects: (i) our strategic transition to Starship, which is expected to materially reduce future
Falcon 9 flight demand; and (ii) restrictions under certain government contracts that prohibit the use of boosters
flown more than five times on their missions. These useful life estimates are periodically reassessed based on
engineering qualification data, post-flight inspections, recovery success rates, actual fleet performance, cost
sensitivity analyses, and the long-range launch manifest.
182
Falcon Heavy
•Exploratory Missions Beyond Earth’s Orbit: Falcon Heavy first launched in February 2018, when it put a
Tesla Roadster and its mannequin passenger, Starman, into orbit around the Sun. This was the first instance of a
car sent into deep space and demonstrated the rocket’s capability for trans-Mars injection. Since its inaugural
flight, Falcon Heavy has completed missions that expanded the scope of space exploration and commercial
spaceflight. Falcon Heavy has been selected by NASA to launch critical weather satellites, interplanetary probes
including Europa Clipper (Jupiter) and Dragonfly (Saturn), and the upcoming Nancy Grace Roman telescope,
designed to study exoplanets and dark energy and matter.
183
Starman in Orbit
•Perfect Performance Record: As of March 31, 2026, Falcon Heavy had successfully completed 11 launches,
all resulting in successful payload delivery. Falcon Heavy flown boosters have also safely completed 18 total
recoveries and 16 reflights. It was certified for National Security Space Launch in 2019, authorizing its use for
U.S. government operations alongside Falcon 9.
Starship. A fully reusable two-stage super heavy-lift launch vehicle, Starship stands to fundamentally transform
spaceflight by making it more accessible, cost-effective, and scalable than ever before. Comprising the Super Heavy
booster (powered by 33 Raptor engines) and the Starship upper stage (with three sea-level and three vacuum Raptor
engines), Starship V3 is designed to deliver 100 metric tons to space in a fully reusable configuration while enabling
rapid turnaround times akin to commercial aviation, and future generations could reach 200 metric tons, potentially
as soon as Starship V4. To date, we have executed 11 Starship flight tests. We have also scheduled a 12th flight test,
which will debut the next generation Starship vehicle and Super Heavy booster, powered by the next evolution of
our Raptor engine and launching from a newly designed pad at Starbase. We expect Starship to commence payload
delivery to orbit in the second half of 2026. We have achieved innovative milestones, including multiple successful
ascents of the world’s most powerful rocket; the launch, return, catch, and reuse of the Super Heavy booster; the
return of its upper stage within three meters of its intended landing point; the transfer of approximately five metric
tons of cryogenic propellant between tanks while in space, a first of its kind operation that provides key data for
future full-scale propellant transfer operations; successful in-space relights of the Raptor engines; and multiple
controlled reentries through Earth’s atmosphere. The purpose of flight tests is to collect data so no result, even loss
of a vehicle, is considered a failure because we learn something.
Starship is a key enabler of our growth objectives, including the deployment of next-generation V3 satellites, direct-
to-cell constellations, and orbital AI compute at scale. Achieving our targeted launch cadence with Starship will
require significant progress on several key milestones and the investment of significant capital resources. These
include: securing additional land and developing high-rate launch sites and supporting infrastructure across multiple
locations; scaling production of Starship vehicles and Raptor engines; constructing propellant production facilities,
including air separation units and methane liquefaction plants co-located with launch sites; securing sufficient power
supply; and obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals, particularly from the FAA, to support a high launch
cadence while addressing public safety and environmental considerations. Our development of Starship and its
184
associated infrastructure assumes continued successful iteration through flight testing, regulatory progress, supply
chain scaling, and cost reduction driven by increasing reusability. We have made substantial investments in
manufacturing scale-up, including Starfactory for high-volume vehicle production, multiple large-scale vertical
integration and refurbishment facilities, additional launch towers, test infrastructure, propellant production assets,
and power generation capabilities.
Full reusability of Starship’s upper stage is not required to deploy our V3 satellites and V2 Mobile satellites in low-
Earth orbit. In-orbit refueling is also not required for any of these LEO programs and is instead intended for
missions beyond LEO, such as lunar and interplanetary transport. Starship’s substantial payload capacity to LEO,
even in partially reusable or expendable configurations, enables meaningful progress toward these objectives. We
have already demonstrated Super Heavy booster reusability in multiple integrated flight tests. As a result,
meaningful advancement across the deployment of next-generation V3 satellites, direct-to-cell constellations, and
the orbital AI compute program is not dependent on achieving full reusability.
Starship Overview
•Full and Rapid Reusability and Drastically Reduced Launch Costs: Starship’s core design innovation is its
full and rapid approach to reusability: both stages return to Earth for catch and rapid refurbishment. The Super
Heavy booster returns to the launch site following stage separation and is caught mid-air by the launch tower’s
mechanical arms, also known as “chopsticks,” to facilitate immediate inspection, refurbishment, and relaunch.
185
“Chopstick” Super Heavy Booster Catch
The Starship upper stage, after orbital delivery or missions beyond, is designed to reenter protected by advanced
heat shield tiles, execute a propulsive landing burn, and be similarly caught mid-air by the launch tower’s
mechanical arms. We believe that Starship’s full and rapid reusability will enable sub-one hour reflights,
causing a paradigm shift in launch cadence.
Starship Landing Burn
186
•Improvements in Engine Development Underpin Starship’s Massive Payload Capacity: With a payload
bay volume rivaling the pressurized sections of the International Space Station, Starship is designed to deploy
structures like space station modules, large telescopes, our next-generation V3 satellites, and future AI compute
satellites. Starship is powered by 39 Raptor engines, which are full-flow staged combustion cycle rocket engines
burning cryogenic liquid methane and liquid oxygen. Raptor engines offer nearly triple the thrust per engine,
higher efficiency, and better performance for heavy-lift and deep space missions compared to the Merlin engine
used on Falcon 9. Each Raptor 3 engine in Starship saves nearly a ton of vehicle mass compared to previous
generations by removing heat shields and simplifying plumbing. Starship’s capacity enables the next leg of our
growth, including scaling our Starlink Mobile constellation and orbital AI compute.
•Orbital Refueling: Starship’s expected orbital refueling capability will allow tanker variants to refill the upper
stage in LEO and extend its range for deep-space missions beyond Earth’s orbit. These capabilities are expected
to revolutionize mission architecture, with each Starship designed to be capable of transporting large numbers
of people or hundreds of metric tons of cargo to destinations like the surface of the Moon and Mars.
•Sustainable Human Exploration Beyond Earth: Starship was designed from the beginning to fly to other
worlds and enable self-growing bases on the Moon, an entire civilization on Mars, and ultimately expansion
beyond our solar system. As NASA’s Human Landing System for Artemis, Starship is built to deliver
astronauts and cargo to the lunar surface and serve as the key enabler for supporting permanent presence on the
Moon.
•Versatility Across Mission Profiles: Beyond deep space, Starship is designed to adapt to diverse roles
including the U.S. Space Force’s Rocket Cargo program for rapid point-to-point global logistics, Starlink and
other commercial satellite constellations, in-orbit manufacturing components and hardware, space tourism, and
others.
Starship is designed to enable a step-function advancement in our capabilities, featuring rapid, full reusability of
both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship spacecraft to achieve unprecedented throughput at significantly
reduced costs compared to existing systems. As Starship progresses toward full operational utilization, the Falcon 9
and Falcon Heavy platforms will remain key assets for specialized missions, including NASA crew rotations and
national security payloads.
Dragon Cargo Spacecraft. The Dragon cargo spacecraft is an uncrewed vehicle designed primarily for transporting
cargo to and from the International Space Station under NASA’s Commercial Resupply Services program. As an
evolution of the original Dragon spacecraft, this vehicle represents a critical component of our portfolio, enabling
reliable, cost-effective logistics for space missions. The spacecraft consists of a pressurized section for
environmentally controlled cargo and an unpressurized trunk section for additional payloads. It has a launch payload
mass of up to 6,000 kilograms and a return payload mass of 3,000 kilograms, making it uniquely suited for both
delivery and retrieval of scientific experiments, supplies, and hardware, and establishing SpaceX as the only
company capable of returning significant amounts of cargo from the International Space Station back to Earth.
187
Dragon Cargo Overview
•Key features: Key highlights of the Dragon cargo spacecraft include its propulsion system with 16 Draco
thrusters for precise orbital maneuvering, autonomous docking capabilities via NASA’s International Docking
System Standard (IDSS), and a trunk equipped with solar panels for power generation during flight.
•Launch vehicle, return mechanism and mission profiles: The spacecraft is launched atop the Falcon 9 rocket
and returns to Earth via parachute-assisted splashdown in the ocean, where it is recovered for refurbishment and
reuse. Dragon supports extended in-orbit durations, typically spending several weeks docked to the International
Space Station before undocking with returned cargo.
•Historic accomplishments: Launched by Falcon 9 in 2012, our Dragon spacecraft became the first commercial
spacecraft to deliver cargo to and from the International Space Station and, eight years later, the first privately
built vehicle to fly humans to the orbiting laboratory. This achievement ended U.S. reliance on foreign vehicles
for International Space Station resupply following the Space Shuttle’s retirement in 2011. The original Dragon
variant (later known as Dragon 1) established a critical role in advancing research on the space station as the
only spacecraft capable of returning significant amounts of cargo to Earth. The upgraded cargo spacecraft
pioneered autonomous docking without robotic arm assistance, delivered major hardware upgrades for the
station including new solar arrays, and recently debuted the ability to reboost the station’s altitude. It remains
the only reusable cargo spacecraft in operation. As of March 31, 2026, our Dragon spacecraft has completed
over 30 cargo missions to the International Space Station.
Dragon Crew Spacecraft. Dragon is engineered to fly humans to and from Earth orbit, including the International
Space Station. The spacecraft is designed to accommodate up to seven passengers, with a pressurized cabin for crew
habitation, life support systems, and cargo.
188
Dragon Orbiting Earth's Poles
•Key features: Dragon Crew spacecraft is equipped with advanced avionics, touchscreen interfaces for manual
control, and an integrated trunk with solar power generation. Dragon Crew’s propulsion includes 16 Draco
thrusters for orbital adjustments and 8 Super Draco engines for its launch escape system, enabling rapid
separation from the rocket in the unlikely event of an emergency.
•Launch vehicle, return mechanism and mission profiles: The spacecraft is launched atop the Falcon 9 rocket
and returns to Earth via parachute-assisted splashdown in the ocean, where it is recovered for refurbishment and
reuse. The design emphasizes reusability, with vehicles certified for multiple flights after refurbishment, and
supports missions lasting up to nine months on the International Space Station.
•Historic accomplishments: Revolutionary accomplishments of Dragon include being the first privately
developed spacecraft to transport humans to and from the International Space Station, achieved during the
Demo-2 mission in May 2020 which carried NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken. This milestone
returned human spaceflight capabilities to the United States for the first time since the Space Shuttle’s
retirement in 2011, reducing dependence on foreign spacecraft. Dragon has enabled regular astronaut rotations
under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, flying nearly 15 successful Crew and Private Astronaut missions to
the International Space Station to date, while pioneering space tourism by carrying commercial astronauts on
private flights. Its autonomous docking technology, life support for extended durations, and abort system have
set new safety standards achieving a flawless record in crewed operations.
Connectivity
Starlink Consumer Broadband
Starlink Consumer Broadband is a broadband network powered by our global LEO satellite constellation, designed
to deliver high-speed, low-latency internet connectivity anywhere on Earth. The service provides fiber-like
download speeds with latency low enough to support intensive real-time applications, such as content streaming,
video calls, and online gaming, while requiring only visible sight to the sky and electricity for installation. Since
launch, Starlink has scaled rapidly, serving approximately 10.3 million subscribers across 164 countries, territories,
and other markets as of March 31, 2026.
189
Starlink Consumer Broadband is enabled by the largest satellite constellation in human history with approximately
9,000 broadband satellites as of March 31, 2026, operating in LEO to deliver latency comparable to many terrestrial
broadband connections. We launched approximately 3,100 Starlink broadband and mobile satellites in 2025, which
is approximately five times more than the total number of active satellites in the entire second largest LEO satellite
constellation. We provide download speeds exceeding 400 Mbps with round-trip latencies as low as 21 milliseconds
—performance that rivals or surpasses traditional terrestrial broadband while also reaching locations no traditional
fiber or cellular network can economically serve. Satellite-based communications are uniquely suited to reach
underserved and remote areas by delivering coverage directly from LEO without requiring local infrastructure. In
contrast, terrestrial networks depend on costly, ground-based buildouts that are often uneconomical in low-density or
hard-to-access regions. As of March 31, 2026, the constellation incorporated over 23,000 inter-satellite lasers that
create a dynamic mesh network in space, enabling traffic to route through orbit rather than relying solely on
terrestrial backhaul infrastructure. Satellites autonomously maneuver to avoid collisions and are designed for
controlled end-of-life deorbit, supporting long-term orbital sustainability. Successive generations of our broadband
satellites, including V3 satellites, are expected to increase throughput, power capacity, and network efficiency, with
production vertically integrated and performed largely in-house. Our focus on vertical integration has allowed us to
reduce the Starlink satellite manufacturing cost per one Gbps of downlink capacity by approximately three times
from Starlink V1 Broadband satellites to V2 Mini satellites. We expect to achieve a total cost reduction of nine times
from Starlink V1 Broadband satellites to V3 satellites.
Starlink Broadband V2 and V3 Satellites
On Earth, users access the network through proprietary Starlink terminals that we design and manufacture. As of
March 31, 2026, we have reduced the cost of Starlink terminals—achieving an approximately 59% reduction in the
average manufacturing cost of a Starlink Kit since 2022—while improving performance and reliability, which we
believe collectively provides us a meaningful and durable competitive advantage over other terrestrial and satellite
broadband providers. Our portfolio of terminals, which we are able to manufacture and sell for a fraction of the cost
of terminals used by other satellite internet providers, includes three primary consumer configurations including: a
Standard terminal designed for fixed residential and small business use, featuring a wide field of view; a Mini
terminal roughly the size of a laptop, designed for mobility and travel use cases with a built-in Wi-Fi router and the
ability to operate on portable battery systems or 12V vehicle power; and the Performance terminal, designed for
demanding environments, with a maximum download speed over 450 Mbps and a higher power consumption of
190
110W or more under load. Each type of terminal is designed to be quick and seamless for a consumer to self-set up,
support in-motion connectivity up to speeds of 100 mph, and deliver global, oceanwide coverage for consumer
maritime use. We believe that this combination of low cost, portability (particularly in the case of our Starlink Mini
terminal), and ease of installation of our terminals will help scale our consumer broadband offering.
Starlink Standard and Mini User Terminals
We monetize Starlink primarily through subscription plans paired with hardware sales. Service tiers vary by speed,
priority access, geographic coverage, and mobility requirements, including Local and Global Priority options for
small to medium sized business, enterprise, and government Starlink customers. As the constellation scales and
capacity expands with next-generation satellites, we expect Starlink to continue growing as a global, recurring-
revenue connectivity platform and foundational layer of a space-enabled digital economy.
Enterprise Solutions
Enterprise Solutions offers the same fundamental advantages of Starlink Consumer Broadband—high throughput,
low-latency, and global coverage—into mission-critical, in-motion, and distributed connectivity environments for
enterprises. Starlink’s architecture is designed to deliver consistent performance across routes, oceans, and remote
industrial sites. Enterprise services are supported by dedicated hardware configurations and commercial structures
tailored to usage intensity, service-level requirements, and fleet-scale deployments.
191
Enterprise Solutions
Aviation Connectivity
Starlink Aviation provides broadband connectivity for commercial and private aircraft, enabling high-quality
internet service for passengers and crew from gate to gate, including during taxi and prior to take-off. The service is
differentiated by materially lower latency and higher throughput than legacy in-flight connectivity systems, enabling
streaming, video conferencing, and real-time applications at scale while in flight—even bandwidth-intensive
applications such as gaming, previously impractical from an airplane. Starlink’s global network is designed to
eliminate “dead zones” and supports performance on polar and high-latitude routes that can be challenging for
traditional providers. In recent years, we have assembled dedicated sales and engineering teams to market and
support fleet-wide conversions in the aviation sector. This has enabled partnerships with many of the world’s
leading airlines, including United Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Qatar Airways, Lufthansa Group, British Airways,
Alaska Airlines, and Hawaiian Airlines, many of which have implemented or committed to fleet-wide Starlink
installations for seamless in-flight connectivity.
Maritime Connectivity
Starlink Maritime provides broadband connectivity for vessels operating in coastal and deep-ocean environments,
supporting both operational requirements (navigation, telemetry, maintenance, logistics) and end-user connectivity
(crew welfare and passenger internet). The service is designed for consistent coverage regardless of proximity to
land, including routes that may experience service degradation under legacy satellite architectures. Starlink terminals
are engineered for marine operating conditions and are designed to be installed or swapped efficiently alongside
existing onboard communications systems, reducing downtime during retrofit. For many maritime operators,
Starlink functions as a wholesale or “syndicated” connectivity layer: vessel owners or cruise operators purchase and
allocate capacity across passengers, crew, and critical ship systems, including when reselling Wi-Fi access as an
onboard service. Pricing structures vary by vessel class, expected consumption, coverage requirements (coastal vs.
ocean), and priority level, and are generally implemented through recurring subscription arrangements with fleet-
based commercial terms. To support fleet-wide conversions in the maritime sector, we have partnered with premier
cruise operators, such as Carnival Corporation, Royal Caribbean Group, MSC Cruises, and Norwegian Cruise Line
Holdings, for full-fleet deployments that deliver reliable high-speed internet across thousands of vessels worldwide.
192
Land Mobility and IoT
Starlink supports in-motion connectivity for land mobility and industrial IoT applications where terrestrial networks
are intermittent or unavailable. These deployments include fleet vehicles, remote field operations, and ruggedized
use cases that require continuous broadband while moving, often across large geographies. The service is
particularly relevant for emergency responders, disaster recovery, and critical infrastructure continuity, where
resilient communications materially impact safety and response effectiveness. In industrial settings, Starlink can
serve as a connectivity backbone for connected equipment and telemetry-driven workflows, enabling real-time
monitoring and remote operations in agriculture, energy, and logistics environments. Commercial deployments are
typically structured around fleets or enterprise accounts, with hardware and service tiers aligned to mobility
requirements, usage intensity, and priority performance. We have partnered with land mobility operators, including
John Deere and the California Fire Department, as well as passenger rail operators such as Brightline (Florida), and
Italo Treno, to provide remote monitoring and management of their fleets.
Starlink Fixed Site
Starlink Fixed Site is designed to provide primary or backup connectivity for distributed business locations globally,
including sites that are difficult to serve economically with fiber or that require redundancy for uptime. Starlink’s
lack of dependence on wireline infrastructure—which is subject to damage or disruption from natural disasters,
conflict, and other events—makes it well-suited for businesses that rely on continuous broadband connectivity and
cannot afford a terrestrial offering going temporarily “offline.” Customers deploy Starlink to support point-of-sale
systems, corporate networking, video and security systems, and business continuity, including during disasters and
localized outages where terrestrial infrastructure may be impaired. The service is differentiated by rapid
installability, geographic flexibility, and reliable performance in remote and hard-to-reach locations, making it
suitable for retailers, industrial operators, and remote facilities (including offshore and field sites). Pricing models
include multiple tiers and configurations depending on speed, priority access, coverage footprint, and the number of
sites deployed, with typical enterprise arrangements structured as recurring subscriptions paired with hardware.
Government Solutions
We provide U.S. civil, state, and local government agencies as well as international civil government agencies high-
speed, resilient connectivity for public services, social impact, humanitarian efforts, and disaster response in even
the most remote and challenging environments. Examples include support for the FEMA in coordinating disaster
recovery after hurricanes and wildfires, the NOAA for at-sea testing and environmental monitoring, the Government
of the Philippines for linking remote islands, schools, and public institutions, the Government of Jamaica for
improving digital access in remote and maritime areas, and the Government of Ecuador for supporting education and
healthcare connectivity in isolated communities.
Separately, we operate Starshield, a secure satellite network designed specifically for national security applications.
Built on the technology, manufacturing, and launch infrastructure that underpin Starlink, Starshield is focused on
three core mission areas: Earth observation, global secure communications, and hosted payloads. Starshield satellites
are designed to integrate a wide range of sensors and instruments, allowing government customers to deploy
mission-specific capabilities in LEO without having to design, build, and launch standalone spacecraft for every
program.
Starshield builds on the end-to-end data encryption used in our commercial network by adding high-assurance
cryptographic capabilities tailored to military and other government requirements. By combining this security
posture with our high-cadence launch capability and evolving Starlink-derived infrastructure, we aim to offer a
scalable national security platform that can be updated, replenished, and expanded as mission needs change over
time.
Starlink Mobile
We are extending the reach of Starlink beyond fixed and mobility terminals through our mobile service, connecting
smartphones (with no modifications or incremental hardware) and other terrestrial devices directly to our satellites.
We aim to entirely eliminate mobile “dead zones.” By using satellites that effectively function as cell towers in
193
space, we enable data, over-the-top voice, video and messaging in remote and hard-to-reach locations where
terrestrial networks have historically been unavailable or unreliable. Starlink Mobile is already commercially
available for messaging in select markets and has been used to support emergency communications following
natural disasters, demonstrating its strength as resilient, infrastructure-independent connectivity.
V1 Mobile Satellites and V2 Mobile Satellites
Our mobile constellation builds on the same LEO architecture as our broadband network, with satellites specifically
designed to communicate directly with everyday LTE handsets and IoT devices without requiring specialized or
additional hardware. These satellites use exclusive licensed spectrum, allowing us to integrate into MNOs’ existing
networks while delivering coverage far beyond the reach of ground-based towers. Since launching the first mobile
satellites in early 2024, we have rapidly scaled the network to hundreds of in-orbit spacecraft and demonstrated key
technical milestones, including the first SMS tests within days of launch, live video calls, and public posts sent
directly from standard smartphones through a Starlink Mobile satellite. Our ability to design, manufacture and
launch these satellites on our own vehicles enables us to iterate quickly on payloads and software, expanding
capacity and performance over time.
Today, our Starlink Mobile service is delivered in partnership with leading mobile network operators around the
world. We are initially focused on messaging for consumer subscribers in areas with limited or no terrestrial
coverage, with a roadmap to support broader data, voice and IoT services. We partner with approximately 30 MNOs
across six continents, including T-Mobile in the United States, and other international operators including One NZ,
Optus, Telstra, Rogers, KDDI, Salt, Entel, Kyivstar, and VMO2. Through these partnerships, we enable consumers,
businesses and public-sector customers to use their existing phones in more places, support critical connectivity
during disasters and power outages, and open new applications for low-bandwidth mobile and IoT devices.
194
Map of Starlink Mobile Coverage
Satellite Life
We estimate that our satellites have useful lives of three to five years based on engineering studies, historical on-
orbit performance, propellant life, utilization patterns, design enhancements across generations, and planned
transitions to newer satellite technology. We, however, often deorbit satellites before the end of their useful lives,
primarily to reduce degradation risks that could impair our autonomous collision avoidance system and compromise
constellation safety. To date, our autonomous collision avoidance system has not experienced any failures resulting
in satellite loss, and satellite losses from other causes remain de minimis.
AI
Grok
Grok represents a core pillar of our mission to advance humanity’s understanding of the universe through the
development of truth-seeking artificial intelligence. Grok is designed and optimized for rigorous reasoning, real-time
information synthesis, and transparent outputs, with a product philosophy centered on intellectual honesty, first-
principles thinking, and engagement with complex topics.
Grok is designed as a truth-seeking AI model, built on our founder Elon Musk’s mission to enable humanity to
understand the universe. We believe that accomplishing this mission requires a truth-seeking approach to AI. We
define truth seeking as the active, relentless pursuit of what is objectively true about reality, and grounded in
evidence, logic, empirical data, and first principles thinking. Our goal is to understand and explain what the universe
appears to be doing, as accurately as current knowledge allows. In pursuit of this truth-seeking objective, Grok also
benefits from its integration with X, our real-time information, entertainment, and free speech platform. This direct,
real-time access to the information and human discourse on X enhances Grok’s truth-seeking capabilities by
grounding outputs in up-to-date knowledge and diverse viewpoints.
Since the initial release of Grok 1, we have iterated rapidly, releasing Grok 2, Grok 3, and, the current version, Grok
4, each delivering material improvements in pre-training, reasoning depth, multimodal capabilities, latency, and
scale. Building on this trajectory, we expect to continue scaling Grok through subsequent generations. Ongoing
195
training of next‑generation models is expected to scale toward multiple trillions of parameters, which could
represent a step change in reasoning in depth and overall intelligence. In this context, the number of parameters
refers to the scale of the model, where parameters are the internal numerical values, such as “weights,” that are
adjusted during training to enable the model to recognize patterns and relationships in data. A larger number of
parameters generally allows the model to capture more complex relationships, store greater amounts of knowledge,
and achieve higher levels of reasoning capability. Our accelerated development cadence positions Grok among the
fastest-advancing frontier models relative to peers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. Grok is differentiated
by its emphasis on real-time data integration, particularly through insights derived from the X platform (subject to
some limitations for certain content), enabling dynamic awareness of current events and user discourse, as well as by
explicit investment in reasoning transparency and explainability. Grok enhances the X ecosystem by improving
content understanding, personalization, and recommendation systems, thereby increasing user engagement and
platform intelligence. We are currently developing next-generation iterations, including Grok 5, which are expected
to further expand reasoning fidelity, multimodal integration, and domain-specific performance.
Terrestrial AI Compute
Our terrestrial AI compute forms the backbone of the Grok model family and is anchored by the COLOSSUS and
COLOSSUS II data centers that boast some of the world’s largest and most advanced AI training clusters.
COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II collectively provide approximately 1.0 gigawatt of compute power, with the
additional power capacity available for data center operations. We brought the first cluster of COLOSSUS online in
122 days, repurposing the shell of an existing factory, and the first cluster of COLOSSUS II online even faster in 91
days. As an illustrative comparison, an industry benchmark to bring online a 100 megawatt greenfield data center is
approximately two years. We also demonstrated a significant improvement in cost efficiency, achieving data center
construction costs for COLOSSUS II that are considerably lower than industry benchmarks on a per megawatt basis.
COLOSSUS II is capable of operating entirely by our self-built behind-the-meter gigawatt-scale natural gas power
plant. Our data centers are integrated with the world’s largest Megapack deployment, providing additional layers of
reliability and operating performance. At all our existing data centers we have employed a brownfield retrofit
strategy leveraging existing industrial sites, advanced direct-to-chip cooling to support higher rack densities, and
high-speed networking. The clusters deploy leading-edge GPUs to maximize training throughput and model
performance. The next phase of expansion at COLOSSUS II is designed to train our next-generation Grok 5 AI
model. As we continue to expand our AI compute infrastructure, we will also continue to enhance our power
capabilities utilizing a combination of grid-power and behind-the-meter natural gas power plant buildouts. At
COLOSSUS, our grid power capabilities are designed to purchase power from the grid as available, and to rely on
our behind-the-meter, self-generated power and Megapack installations when grid power is curtailed.
196
COLOSSUS II Facility
X Platform
X is a real-time information, entertainment, and free speech platform that serves as a foundational distribution and
data engine for our AI ecosystem. With a global user base generating substantial volumes of content at all times
across a wide variety of topics, X provides a uniquely dynamic data for model training and real-time context
integration, subject to some limitations for certain content, which significantly differentiates Grok from the other
frontier lab offerings.
197
X is Our Real-time Information, Entertainment, and Free Speech Platform
X is our real-time information, entertainment, and free speech platform that serves as a global town square with
integrated AI capabilities powered by Grok. Designed to evolve toward an “everything app,” X enables users to post
content, share media, engage in conversations, host, view, and participate in live group discussions, follow real-time
events, use encrypted messaging, and leverage advanced features such as Grok-assisted post creation, content
discovery, and conversational AI directly within the interface via the prominent Grok icon.
198
Grok Holds Front and Center Real Estate on the X Platform
With native integration of Grok’s frontier models, including real-time access to X data for up-to-date insights,
trending analysis, and enhanced search, X delivers personalized feeds, smarter recommendations, and low-latency
AI assistance for our users worldwide. Our X Premium subscription options, including Basic, Premium and
Premium+ tiers, offer expanded features, ad-reduced experiences, and priority Grok interactions. In 2023, Grok’s
chat functionality was integrated into the X app allowing for the user to open the chat interface to type prompts and
get real time answers.
Public X data enhances Grok’s training and reasoning capabilities, while the platform continues to deliver
measurable performance outcomes for advertisers, with an increasing strategic focus on performance-based
marketing solutions.
In addition to X consumer products, X offers advertisers and developers a powerful suite of tools to reach highly
engaged audiences. Advertisers can target audiences through diverse ad formats—such as Promoted Ads, Vertical
Video Ads, Collection Ads, and premium options such as X Amplify and Takeovers—blending seamlessly with
organic content for authentic engagement. With advanced targeting based on public conversations, events,
keywords, interests, locations, and look-alike audiences, brands can connect with audiences while benefiting from
flexible, performance-based pricing (pay only for actions such as clicks or engagements) and often lower costs
compared to other platforms. We expect that our ongoing innovations—including Grok-powered integrations, new
contextual ad tests, and expanded aspect ratio support for easy reuse of ad creative—make X a competitive choice
for driving traffic, conversions, and brand awareness and visibility among X’s hundreds of millions of MAUs.
Developers have access to a continuous, high-volume, real-time stream of data around current events, trends, or
sentiment, which they can access through an official X Developer Platform and APIs.
In April 2026, we began a phased roll-out of our new advertising platform, that we rebuilt from the ground up. The
new Ads Manager is built to help advertisers launch better campaigns, faster, with stronger ROI. Powered by AI, the
new systems enable more precise, relevant and dynamic ad delivery. Ads are seamlessly integrated into a User’s X
feed.
199
By combining high-volume user interactions with frontier AI, AI compute infrastructure, and vertical integration, X
accelerates progress toward ubiquitous connectivity, real-time global awareness, and the foundational social layer
for multiplanetary human endeavors.
X Ads Manager. X provides a comprehensive suite of advertising products, including promoted posts, video ads,
carousels, and sponsored content, which enable businesses to reach targeted audiences in real time across the
platform. Powered by real-time conversation data, interest-based targeting, and behavioral signals, these solutions
support objective-based campaigns focused on website traffic, video views, app installs, lead generation, and brand
awareness. X’s Ad Manager provides a centralized platform that allows advertisers to manage creation,
optimization, and real-time monitoring of ad campaigns with detailed audience insights, bidding controls,
performance analytics, and A/B testing capabilities. Integration with Grok AI further streamlines creative
development, making X’s scalable ad solutions effective for businesses of all sizes seeking efficient engagement in a
dynamic public conversation environment.
Grok Consumer Products
Our consumer products are powered by Grok, including Grok language and coding models, Grok image and video
generation models (more commonly known as Grok Imagine), and Grokipedia. These applications leverage the
underlying Grok model family to deliver advanced multimodal interaction, real-time information awareness, and
transparent reasoning outputs. We currently offer three different tiers of subscription for Grok—basic, SuperGrok,
SuperGrok Heavy, and SuperGrok Lite, each priced on a monthly or annual basis. Higher pricing tiers unlock
expanded access to advanced models, increased usage limits, priority compute, and a suite of premium features
tailored to power users and enterprise-grade applications.
Grok Chat. Grok Chat represents the primary conversational interface of Grok, enabling users to submit text or
voice queries for explanations, problem-solving, research, coding, brainstorming, and in-depth discussions with real-
time integration of web search, X data, code execution, and multimodal analysis of images or documents. Available
via grok.com, dedicated mobile apps, X platform integration, and the xAI API, it provides truth-seeking, helpful,
and minimally censored responses optimized for factual precision and complex reasoning.
Grok Chat
200
Grok Imagine. Grok Imagine is Grok’s generative visual and multimedia creation suite, powered by proprietary
models for producing high-quality images, short videos (up to 15 seconds at 720p in current iterations), and
synchronized audio from text prompts, reference images, or existing visuals. It supports text-to-image/video editing,
image-to-video editing, and video-to-video editing, style transfer, and cinematic motion with strong prompt
adherence and photorealistic output, accessible through the Grok platform, Imagine tab, and dedicated API.
Grok Imagine
Grok Voice. Grok Voice delivers natural, real-time conversational AI through voice interactions, allowing users to
seamlessly speak and listen to Grok for faster access to information and task execution.
Grok Enterprise Products
Grok Teams. Grok Teams empowers small-to-medium-sized organizations to integrate Grok’s advanced AI
capabilities directly into collaborative workflows. Teams gain access to dedicated workspaces with secure sharing,
enhanced privacy protections, and administrative controls for inviting users and managing access. Grok Teams
accelerates analysis, innovation, and creation while ensuring data remains private and is never used for training.
Grok API. The Grok API provides programmatic access to Grok’s frontier models, including advanced reasoning,
vision, tool-use, image generation, voice AI, and real-time search capabilities, tailored for enterprise-scale
integration. It offers features like agentic workflows, and enterprise-grade options such as custom allocations, secure
authentication, and dedicated support. Designed for developers and organizations building production applications,
the API enables seamless embedding of Grok’s powerful AI into custom solutions, driving innovation across
industries with speed, precision, and reliability. For example, the enterprise version of the Grok Voice Agent API
allows developers and businesses to build multilingual voice agents capable of speech recognition, tool calling, real-
time data querying, and low-latency responses. It supports production-grade voice applications that enhance
customer service, internal operations, and interactive experiences with high performance in audio reasoning
benchmarks.
201
Infrastructure and Facilities
SpaceX maintains a highly vertically integrated, geographically diverse manufacturing ecosystem that designs,
produces, and qualifies a significant share of components in-house, from raw materials and rocket engines to
complete launch vehicles, crewed spacecraft, satellites, and user terminals, enabling unprecedented iteration speed,
quality control, and cost efficiency essential for successful production of reusable systems and high-cadence
operations. Our manufacturing facilities are complemented by our physical infrastructure, which supports launch
and orbital operations for human spaceflight, satellite deployment, and cargo missions, as well as large-scale
artificial intelligence training and inference. We continue to invest in expansions and improvements across our sites
to accommodate anticipated growth in launch cadence, Starlink Subscribers, and AI compute requirements.
SpaceX Facilities
While none of our properties are individually material to our operations because of the long-term timetables for
renewal and the opportunities for alternative sites, we maintain an effective network of vertically integrated facilities
across the United States, including:
•Starbase, Texas: Development, manufacturing, testing, and launch of Starship currently takes place at
Starbase, home to SpaceX headquarters and one of the world’s first commercial spaceports designed for orbital
missions. The site is located at the newly created city of Starbase in Cameron County, Texas, along the Gulf of
America. Its infrastructure includes Starfactory, a manufacturing facility designed to mass produce Starship and
Super Heavy at scale; a large office structure co-locating engineering and production personnel; and large,
vertical integration buildings including the upcoming Gigabay, which will be able to support Starship and Super
Heavy vehicles up to 85 meters (279 feet) tall and will provide 24 work cells for integration and refurbishment
work, along with cranes capable of lifting up to 400 tons. Starbase also has an orbital launch pad for flight of the
world’s most powerful rocket, complete with one of the tallest launch towers in the world, specially designed to
integrate, test, launch, and catch Starship and Super Heavy vehicles, with an additional pad underway to support
Starship V3. The Starbase team also operates a site for full and subscale vehicle structural testing, static fires,
and component level testing.
Starbase is also home to several hundred SpaceX employees and their families, many of whom have relocated
from across the country to the community to support the development and operation of Starship. SpaceX, in
202
partnership with the newly formed city, is developing local infrastructure and municipal services, including
utilities, governance, schools, and environmental conservation initiatives, to support a world-class, concentrated
engineering and manufacturing community focused on the rapid advancement of Starship and SpaceX’s long-
term mission. This close integration of residential life, engineering, and manufacturing around a single program
enables a mission-focused environment designed to accelerate development, testing, and launch operations.
SpaceX Headquarters at Starbase, Texas
203
•Hawthorne, California: Our original flagship facility in Hawthorne, California manufactures Falcon 9 and
Falcon Heavy first and second stages, Dragon Crew and Dragon Cargo spacecraft, Merlin engines, Starship’s
Raptor engines, Starlink User Terminals, as well as other various Starship components. The site supports high-
reliability production for hundreds of successful missions, including NASA-certified crew rotations. We also
maintain a corporate presence in Hawthorne.
Hawthorne, California
204
•McGregor, Texas: The McGregor rocket engine complex is the most active rocket development and testing
facility in the world. It serves as the primary site for qualification, acceptance, and post-flight testing of Merlin
and Raptor engines. It features 15 specialized test stands, including dedicated vertical stands for Raptor engines
and multiple stands for Falcon 9’s Merlin engines, as well as component-level testing facilities for Starship
hardware, including composite overwrapped pressure vessels, tanks, and experimental systems.
McGregor, Texas
205
•Redmond, Washington: The Redmond Starlink satellite manufacturing facility has produced an average of
approximately 70 satellites per week (approximately 3,640 per year at full rate) from December 2025 to April
2026, covering bus structures, phased-array antennas, propulsion, solar arrays, and inter-satellite lasers,
enabling rapid Starlink constellation expansion.
Redmond, Washington
206
•Bastrop, Texas: We build the majority of Starlink products at our manufacturing facility in Bastrop, Texas,
which opened in 2023, producing tens of thousands of Starlink Kits per day and all of the current generation
Starlink Standard and Performance Kits.
In 2026, we expect to more than double the size of the Bastrop facility, expanding our design and
manufacturing capabilities to support new Starlink products, plus deepening our vertical integration by adding
the production of Starlink gateway antennas, solar cells and AI compute satellites.
Bastrop, Texas
•Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral, Florida: SpaceX operations in Florida span across NASA’s
Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, which includes two active launch sites—
Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) and Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40)—Falcon booster and Dragon
spacecraft refurbishing facilities, launch operations, and payload processing buildings. Both launch sites support
critical missions to geostationary orbit and the International Space Station while also providing launch
opportunities to a wide range of low, mid, and polar orbit inclinations for science and national security
missions. SpaceX also utilizes Landing Zones 40 and 2 at the Cape, which support Return to Launch Site
landings for Falcon boosters ahead of recovery and refurbishment for future missions.
Once recovered, flight hardware is refurbished at one of two state-of-the-art SpaceX facilities, HangarX and X2,
on Kennedy Space Center. These facilities also house our Falcon Launch and Landing Control Center, where
our Dragon spacecraft are refurbished and prepared for their next missions after they are recovered off the coast
of southern California, where we produce Starship heatshield tiles in the Bakery, and where we process
customer payloads before launch in our Payload Processing Facility.
For future launches, SpaceX is expanding its operations in Florida to bring Starship to the Cape. In addition to
the under-construction Starship launch pad at LC-39A expected to be completed by the end of 2026, SpaceX is
constructing Space Launch Complex 37 (SLC-37) on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station as another Starship
launch site. SLC-37 will host two orbital launch pads, including up to two towers for Starship launch, catch, and
testing operations, culminating in a total of four operational launch pads for Starship by the end of 2027.
SpaceX is also building a new integration facility called Gigabay, next to its HangarX location at Kennedy
Space Center by late 2026.
207
In connection with preparing leased real property for our launch operations, we make significant capital
improvements and install extensive real and personal property at these government-owned sites. The launch
facilities we build are a unique capital improvement compared to standard commercial use sites because the
federal government specifically designates these launch sites for aerospace activities, such as rocket launches.
Given the specific use requirements of these government-owned sites, we have historically entered into
handover agreements with the relevant government entities upon expiration or termination of the leases,
pursuant to which the improvements are transferred to the government rather than removed. This fact pattern
has historically been the case with previous leases such as at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Florida
208
Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida
•Vandenberg Space Force Base, Space Launch Complex 4: Space Launch Complex 4 East at Vandenberg
Space Force Base is our West Coast launch site and serves as our primary facility for polar and high-inclination
orbit missions critical to Starlink constellation deployment, national security payloads, Earth observation
satellites, and select lunar trajectories. The facility includes a modernized orbital launch pad optimized for
Falcon 9 launches, featuring a fixed launch mount, integration tower, propellant loading infrastructure, flame
trench, and support systems enabling frequent operations. Adjacent Space Launch Complex 4 West functions as
a dedicated Falcon 9 booster landing zone, supporting downrange recoveries to maximize reusability. Please
refer to “—Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral, Florida” for additional information regarding our lease
arrangements with government entities.
210
•Memphis, Tennessee and Southaven, Mississippi: We operate a cluster of high-density data centers in the
Greater Memphis Area extending into northern Mississippi along the state border, to power training and
inference for frontier AI models, including the Grok family. The flagship COLOSSUS supercomputer campus
is located on Paul R. Lowry Road in Memphis, Tennessee; the COLOSSUS II facilities are located on Tulane
Road in Memphis, Tennessee and on Stateline Road in Southaven, Mississippi.
Memphis, Tennessee
211
•Palo Alto, California: The corporate headquarters for our AI operations following the acquisition of xAI in
February 2026 is located in Palo Alto, California. This location, under long-term lease, houses our advanced AI
research, development, and engineering teams and is strategically situated in Silicon Valley to attract and retain
top AI research talent. The engineers responsible for the design, training, and continued evolution of Grok, our
proprietary frontier AI model, are based at this facility.
Palo Alto, California
In addition to our infrastructure and facilities across the United States, we also operate a fleet of recovery vessels,
autonomous spaceport drone ships (“ASDS”), and a network of Starlink ground stations.
•Our recovery fleet: Our fleet of ASDS forms the maritime backbone of SpaceX’s reusable rocket architecture,
enabling high-probability downrange booster landings for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy missions while
maximizing vehicle recovery and rapid refurbishment. The core ASDS fleet consists of three operational
vessels: “Of Course I Still Love You,” the pioneering East Coast-to-Pacific vessel homeported at the Port of
Long Beach, California, and dedicated to supporting primarily polar and high-inclination launches from
Vandenberg Space Force Base with its large landing deck and thruster-based dynamic positioning; “Just Read
the Instructions,” stationed at Port Canaveral, Florida, serving East Coast operations from Cape Canaveral and
Kennedy Space Center; and “A Shortfall of Gravitas,” the newest and most advanced addition since 2021, also
based at Port Canaveral with enhanced autonomy, station-keeping precision, and upgraded deck infrastructure
to handle frequent, high-cadence missions. These autonomous ships have collectively facilitated hundreds of
successful booster touchdowns, dramatically reducing expendable flight profiles and enabling the reuse of
boosters 34 times as of March 31, 2026. Complementing the drone ships are dedicated support vessels for
fairing half recovery, such as “Bob” and “Doug,” named after astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley, and
Dragon retrieval vessel “Shannon,” named in honor of astronaut Shannon Walker. These support vessels ensure
comprehensive ocean-based recovery operations across Atlantic and Pacific theaters and underpin our
constellation deployments, national security launches, and crewed missions while advancing toward full
reusability for Starship in future offshore scenarios.
212
Autonomous Drone Ship “A Shortfall of Gravitas”
•Starlink ground stations: A Starlink ground station, also referred to as a gateway, is a terrestrial relay station
that communicates with our satellite constellation. These stations transmit data between satellites and terrestrial
internet networks. We operate ground stations around the world, with over 400 sites globally.
Customer Case Studies
The following examples illustrate ways in which customers across a range of industries have used and benefited
from our solutions within our Space, Connectivity, and AI segments. These examples are intended to highlight
representative applications of our offerings and the types of operational, performance and efficiency benefits that
customers may realize.
In addition, we include examples of our deployment of Starlink services in response to natural disasters, which
demonstrate our ability to rapidly establish communications infrastructure to support emergency response and
recovery efforts in challenging environments.
219
Competition
Our principal sources of competition vary based on the segment and market in which our business operates.
In Space, we compete with launch service providers that transport small, medium, and heavy payloads and
astronauts to Earth’s orbit and beyond. Participants in this market include established aerospace and defense
companies, emerging commercial launch providers, and national space agencies. Key established aerospace and
defense competitors providing launch services include, among others, United Launch Alliance, a joint venture
between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, Arianespace, a French-based aerospace company operating a family of
European-developed rockets, and Northrop Grumman, manufacturer of the Cygnus cargo spacecraft. Emerging
commercial launch providers include Blue Origin, which has developed launch vehicles intended to compete with
our Falcon 9 rocket, and Rocket Lab, which operates in the small-lift launch market but is expanding into medium-
lift payloads, as well as other domestic competitors such as Firefly Aerospace and Relativity Space. While we
typically do not compete directly for the same missions, national space agencies also provide launch services in their
respective markets.
However, the launch services market is characterized by significant barriers to entry, including substantial capital
requirements, advanced technological expertise, regulatory licenses and approvals, and established relationships
with government and commercial customers. Competition in this market is based on factors that include launch
reliability and cadence, payload capacity, mission flexibility, manufacturing capabilities and price. For this reason,
while the established aerospace and defense competitors and emerging commercial launch providers may provide
launch services at varying degrees of scale, we believe that SpaceX holds a meaningful advantage in terms of the
breadth of our launch solutions and services and the cadence at which we are able to launch, and thus a significant
competitive advantage relative to these players.
In Connectivity, we compete with operators of terrestrial and satellite communications infrastructure and providers
of satellite-to-mobile connectivity solutions, including terrestrial fixed network providers, terrestrial mobile network
companies, and other satellite service providers, as described below:
•Consumer and Enterprise Broadband. Our Starlink Consumer and Enterprise broadband offerings compete with
terrestrial fixed network providers, terrestrial mobile network companies, and other satellite service providers.
Terrestrial fixed network providers include operators of cable and fiber networks such as Verizon, Comcast,
AT&T, T-Mobile, Lumen, Charter Communications, Google Fiber, Astound, BT, Deutsche Telekom, and
Liberty Global. Terrestrial mobile network companies also operate land-based infrastructure, including wireless
antennas affixed to mobile towers used to provide fixed wireless services, and include AT&T, Telefónica, T-
Mobile, Verizon, and Vodafone Group. These network providers typically serve customers in one or more
countries (for example, Verizon in the United States, or Telefónica in Spain and Brazil, among others), but are
not global players insofar as they do not sell to a global customer base, nor does their network infrastructure
exist globally. Satellite service providers include, among others, GEO satellite network operators such as
EchoStar, SES, Telesat Corporation (“Telesat”) GEO, and Viasat, as well as current and planned LEO and
MEO constellations including Amazon LEO, Blue Origin’s TeraWave, Eutelsat OneWeb, Iridium NEXT and
Telesat Lightspeed. Some of these service providers are also launch customers of SpaceX as they contract with
us to launch their satellite constellations into orbit.
•Government Solutions. Our Starlink broadband offering for government use cases competes primarily with the
same terrestrial network providers and satellite service providers with which our Starlink Consumer and
Enterprise broadband offerings compete, as well as defense prime contractors. In certain cases, these providers
also have dedicated subsidiaries or business units focused on serving government customers, such as Telesat
Government Solutions.
•Starlink Mobile. Our Starlink Mobile offering competes with other satellite-to-mobile satellite operators
including, among others, AST SpaceMobile, Lynk, Globalstar and Skylo.
The satellite connectivity market involves significant barriers to entry, including substantial capital requirements,
advanced technological capabilities, access to spectrum and orbital resources, regulatory licenses and approvals, and
the development of relationships with government, enterprise and commercial customers. Competition in this market
220
is based on factors that include network coverage, capacity, latency and reliability, spectrum access, density of urban
environments, satellite deployment capability and efficiency, price and user acquisition, retention, and experience.
In AI, we compete with developers of foundational AI models and providers of AI products and services, as well as
general purpose and vertical search engines, information services, online advertising platforms and social networks.
Participants in this market include large technology companies, emerging AI model developers and providers of AI-
enabled products and services. Key competitors in these markets include, among others, AI model developers and
platform providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and various open source model providers,
as well as social networks such as Threads (owned by Meta), Reddit, and TikTok. As we continue to build out our
AI compute infrastructure, we intend to sell our excess capacity by offering it to a limited number of third parties
and intend to continue to explore monetizing excess capacity, potentially positioning us to emerge as a competitor to
AI cloud providers such as Coreweave and Nebius as well as hyperscalers.
Our AI businesses likewise compete in markets characterized by significant barriers to entry, including substantial
computational and infrastructure requirements, access to large datasets and the ability to attract and retain highly
skilled technical talent. Competition in these markets is based on factors including pricing and cost efficiency, the
performance and technical features of AI platforms, customer experience across our products and services, the
ability to attract new and retain existing subscribers, users and advertisers and the ability to deploy compute and
innovative technologies at scale.
Intellectual Property
The intellectual property that is material to our business includes our proprietary knowledge and software, as well as
our brands and our selectively patented inventions and technologies. Our proprietary knowledge includes expertise
in design, testing, manufacturing, software, in-orbit operations, real-time platforms, and artificial intelligence
development. The protection of our technology and intellectual property is an important aspect of our business. We
rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality procedures, contractual
commitments and other legal rights to establish and protect our intellectual property. We have registered, and
applied for the registration of, U.S. and international trademarks, service marks, domain names, and copyrights. We
have also filed patent applications and acquired patents in the United States and foreign countries covering certain
aspects of our technology, and in some cases, we have acquired patent assets of others to supplement our portfolio.
We have licensed in the past, and expect that we may license in the future, certain of our rights to other parties or
from other parties. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements and invention or work product assignment
agreements with our employees, contractors, and consultants to control access to, and clarify ownership of, our
proprietary information and other intellectual property. For additional information, please refer to “Risk Factors—
Risks Related to Our Business—We may face substantial potential liability and operational disruptions if we violate
the intellectual property rights or other rights of third parties, and if we fail to adequately protect, maintain, defend
or enforce our intellectual property and other similar rights, we could lose an important competitive advantage, in
each case which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
customer trust and future prospects.”
Human Capital
As of March 31, 2026, we employed over 22,000 full-time employees worldwide, none of whom are subject to any
collective bargaining agreement. We believe our strong culture of collaboration and innovation distinguishes us and
serves as an important driver of our business performance.
Regulatory Environment
We are required to comply with a variety of governmental regulations, which could have a significant impact on our
business, including our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position. In particular, our ability to (i)
conduct launches and reentries, (ii) operate and expand our satellite systems and related ground infrastructure and
(iii) perform certain U.S. government programs depends on maintaining key governmental authorizations and
complying with evolving safety, spectrum, national security, environmental, contractual, and trade-control
requirements. Our ability to provide our AI products and X platform depends on complying with evolving AI, data
privacy, online services, cybersecurity and environmental requirements. We incur and will continue to incur
221
substantial costs to monitor and take actions to comply with governmental and other regulations that are or will be
applicable to our businesses, including, among others, restrictions and regulations of the U.S. Department of
Transportation, the FAA, the FCC and other government agencies in the United States and the other countries in
which we operate, economic sanctions and trade embargo laws, export controls, import controls and customs. For
additional information, please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our ability to continue and
expand launch and satellite operations depends upon our ability to obtain new and leverage existing U.S. export
control and sanctions authorizations, and any significant changes to the geopolitical landscape or U.S. government
regulatory approach to licensing could materially and adversely impact our international business operations by
compromising existing licenses or limiting our ability to engage in commercial dealings in or involving
geopolitically sensitive countries.” We will also be subject to additional laws and regulations as a result of being a
public company, which will require us to devote significant management resources and incur additional legal,
accounting and other expenses.
Space
Our Space segment is subject to extensive regulation in the United States and internationally, including (i)
regulations administered by the FAA relating to commercial space launches and reentries, (ii) regulations
administered by the FCC relating to radio communications used in launch activities and spacecraft operations, and
related domestic and international coordination processes, including through the International Telecommunication
Union, (iii) U.S. export and import regulatory regimes, and (iv) additional regulations that relate to being a U.S.
government contractor.
Commercial space launch and reentry activities require licenses and permits from the FAA. FAA licenses are
generally granted on a launch-by-launch basis and may incorporate safety, environmental and operational
conditions. Where applicable, reentry operations require separate authorization. We are generally required to obtain
licenses or license modifications from the FAA in connection with changes to vehicles, launch sites, flight profiles,
operational procedures, payloads, or other mission parameters, and our launch and range operations may also be
subject to environmental reviews, consultations, and permits. We depend on timely approvals of licenses or license
modifications from the FAA and the timing and outcome of the FAA approval process may affect our ability to
conduct launches and reentries or require operational restrictions or mitigation measures. For additional information,
please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining
or renewing required regulatory approvals and licenses required for our space-related activities, including FAA
launch and reentry licenses, would materially delay or disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability
to execute our business strategy.”
Radio communications for launch activities and spacecraft operations require licenses from the FCC and are subject
to technical and operational conditions, coordination requirements, and interference-mitigation frameworks. We rely
on obtaining licenses from the FCC to conduct our launch and spacecraft operations, and many of our FCC licenses
include conditions regarding milestone schedules, reporting and surety‑bond requirements, among other conditions.
In addition, our spacecraft and satellite operations are subject to evolving regulatory expectations relating to space
situational awareness and orbital debris mitigation, including requirements regarding collision avoidance and post-
mission disposal. International spacecraft frequency use is coordinated via International Telecommunication Union
filings made through the FCC and similar international regulatory bodies, and through country‑by‑country market
access approvals for non‑U.S. service. For additional information, please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to
Our Business—Any delays or difficulties in obtaining, maintaining or renewing required regulatory approvals and
licenses required for our space-related activities, including FAA launch and reentry licenses, would materially delay
or disrupt our operations, harm our business, or limit our ability to execute our business strategy.”
Additionally, as a contractor and subcontractor to certain agencies of the U.S. government, we are subject to the
Federal Acquisition Regulation, and other applicable laws, security requirements, and regulations, including
supplemental agency regulations, which comprehensively regulate the formation, administration, and performance
under government contracts. Certain contracts with the U.S. government may require us to be issued facility security
clearances under the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual Rule, as a result of which we are
required to maintain with the Department of War mitigation measures with respect to foreign ownership, control and
influence. Additionally, certain transactions in which we may be involved from time to time may be subject to the
222
jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), which has authority to conduct
national security reviews of certain foreign investments. CFIUS may impose mitigation conditions to grant clearance
of a particular transaction, may unilaterally initiate national security review of certain transactions, and may
recommend that the President of the United States order parties to divest their shareholdings in certain situations,
among other actions.
Connectivity
Our Connectivity services, including our global satellite-to-mobile connectivity services under Starlink Mobile,
depend on authorizations from the FCC in the United States and telecommunications regulators in other countries.
Without these licenses and approvals, we generally cannot offer connectivity services in a given market. In the
United States, these authorizations include FCC approvals for our satellite system and related earth stations and use
of radio frequency spectrum, and they may be subject to technical, operational, and reporting conditions and
ongoing compliance obligations (including interference mitigation, coordination requirements and orbital debris
mitigation requirements). All communications services that rely on radio frequency communications require use of
radio frequency spectrum, the assignment and distribution of which is subject to FCC oversight. Our access to
spectrum and orbital resources is also subject to international coordination processes, including through International
Telecommunication Union filing and coordination processes, and disputes or delays in these processes could
adversely affect our operations. If demand continues to increase or if new spectrum is required for a future
generation of technology, we may need to obtain additional spectrum usage rights or related authorizations through
FCC proceedings (including modification applications), coordination processes, auctions or secondary market
transactions, or partnerships with third parties, each of which may be subject to review, approval, and conditions.
We hold FCC authorizations and licenses that allow us to provide a wide range of satellite-based connectivity
services, including through the operation of our satellite system and related earth stations. FCC spectrum licenses
and authorizations typically have terms of 10-15 years, at which time they are subject to renewal. Similarly, our
subsidiaries operating outside the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory authorities in the
territories in which the subsidiaries operate, including any requirements to obtain spectrum licenses or other market
access authorization. Our licensing, compliance and advocacy initiatives in foreign countries support our ability to
offer enterprise and consumer connectivity services in various international markets. Although we generally seek to
renew and maintain these authorizations, challenges could be raised in the future, and there can be no assurance that
our applications to renew, modify, or expand our authorizations will be granted on a timely basis, or at all, or
without additional conditions. If a spectrum license was revoked or not renewed, we would not be permitted to
provide services on the spectrum covered by that license or could be required to modify or curtail operations.
Within the United States, the Communications Act generally preempts regulation by state and local governments of
the entry of, or the rates charged by, wireless carriers. It does not prohibit states from regulating the other “terms and
conditions” of wireless service. For example, some states impose reporting and consumer protection requirements.
Several states also have laws or regulations that address safety issues (for example, use of wireless handsets while
driving), universal service funding, and taxation matters. Some states are also considering new network reliability or
service quality requirements that may affect how and where we provide services if not preempted by federal law.
AI
Certain enacted and proposed laws and regulations related to AI may impose requirements with respect to our
development, deployment, and use of AI systems and models, including obligations relating to security, integrity,
transparency, labeling, detection, and provenance of AI data, models and AI-generated content, as well as
restrictions on the export or import of AI-related systems and components. AI regulation is evolving rapidly across
jurisdictions, with regulators applying, or considering applying, existing laws or adopting new, non-harmonized
frameworks with respect thereto, including emerging AI laws. Development, deployment, and use of AI can also be
subject to existing, technology-agnostic regulatory frameworks, including, for example, those addressing consumer
protection, data privacy, cybersecurity, intellectual property, content moderation, non-discrimination, and
employment. Data centers necessary for AI-related systems may also be subject to changing regulatory frameworks
under federal, state, local, and foreign environmental, health, and safety laws. The scope and enforcement of these
regimes remain uncertain, and their potential impact on our multiple and overlapping business lines is difficult to
223
predict. Divergent or conflicting regulatory approaches across jurisdictions, as well as evolving enforcement
priorities, may also create compliance uncertainty and require market-specific limitations or modifications to AI-
related functionality, increasing operational complexity.
In addition, third parties may allege intellectual property violations, or misappropriation relating to the training data
used in, or the outputs generated by, AI systems and models. The uncertain and evolving legal status of AI-
generated content may create legal and operational risk, including with respect to the ownership of, and ability to
obtain intellectual property protection for, such outputs, as well as our ability to offer services in certain markets.
Open-source and other license terms applicable to AI systems and models may limit the distribution of AI-related
functionality or constrain product design.
Separately, AI systems and models may present legal operational and reputational risks. Legal and reputational risk
may arise in the context of datasets used in the development or operation of AI systems and models as well as the
use of AI-enabled products or services to generate output that is perceived as objectionable or inappropriate.
Emerging legislation, such as the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, California’s Transparency in
Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53) and New York’s Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act),
may impose requirements relating to, among other things, safety, governance, transparency, and incident reporting
on developers of large or frontier AI models. Misuse of our AI systems, models, products, or services by customers
or partners may similarly create safety, compliance, or brand risks. These risks have in the past and may in the future
result in regulatory scrutiny, legal liability, or reputational harm and adversely affect our business, results of
operations, and financial condition. Addressing these risks may require substantial investment in testing,
moderation, guardrails, enforcement, and other mitigation measures. For additional information, please refer to
“Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—If the recommendations, forecasts, content, analyses or other output
that our AI technologies, including Grok, assist in producing are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, harmful,
illegal, or used for an improper purpose, we could continue to be subjected to claims and investigations, and we
could be subjected to legal liability and brand, reputational, or competitive harm.”
Privacy, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, Online Safety, and Digital Platform Regulation
We are subject to complex and evolving global legal and regulatory frameworks relating to privacy, cybersecurity,
AI, data protection, lawful access, content moderation, and digital platform regulation, as well as contractual and
other commitments we make in the course of doing business and our internal and external policies, procedures and
controls. These laws and regulations vary across jurisdictions and sectors, are not harmonized, and may conflict or
impose overlapping or inconsistent obligations, and continue to evolve and emerge. In particular, the California
Consumer Privacy Act (as amended), the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (and its equivalent
in the United Kingdom) and other data privacy laws and regulations impose stringent and burdensome requirements
in connection with the processing of personal information and include significant penalties for non-compliance.
Additionally, as a government contractor, we are also subject to the Department of War’s Cybersecurity Maturity
Model Certification requirements, which requires companies that do business with the Department of War to,
depending on the level of security required, meet or exceed certain specified cybersecurity standards to be eligible
for new contract awards. The interpretation and application of these and other existing laws not originally enacted to
address privacy, cybersecurity, AI, data protection, lawful access, content moderation, or digital platforms are
uncertain and continue to develop as they are applied to new technologies and data-driven products and services.
These frameworks impose obligations regarding, among other things, the collection, use, storage, protection,
disclosure, transfer, and other processing of data, including personal information, and may restrict or condition
cross-border data transfers, require data localization, or impose content moderation or other platform-related
requirements, and may be interpreted or enforced in ways that are inconsistent, unclear, or subject to significant
regulatory discretion. The risks are particularly acute for us because we operate globally across multiple industries
and develop cutting-edge technologies that present novel regulatory and security issues. The data we collect and
otherwise process is integral to our business, technology, and services, and regulatory restrictions or limitations on
our ability to secure and process such data could materially affect our operations and business model.
In addition, our products and services, including those enabled by AI, may also be subject to online safety and
youth-protection laws and regulations. Such laws and regulations may impose obligations relating to content risk
mitigation, age assurance, platform governance, and, in certain jurisdictions, content reporting and removal
224
requirements. For example, the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023 and Australia’s Online Safety Amendment (Social
Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 impose risk mitigation and age-related requirements on certain online platforms. As
a result of these requirements or to otherwise seek to maintain the safety of our platforms, we maintain content
policies and enforcement mechanisms across our platforms and related products and services. These include a
combination of automated detection tools, classifiers and filters, algorithmic signals, and human review processes.
We also employ measures to help detect and challenge suspicious accounts during sign-up and ongoing use, provide
user reporting channels, and apply enforcement actions. Additional safeguards to help mitigate safety concerns
include age-related controls, content restrictions, and specialized modes; and labeling or watermarks on certain
outputs and other market-specific restrictions on certain content categories where required by local laws.
This evolving landscape will continue to affect our ability to maintain, develop, or launch products and services,
including those that rely on the processing of personal information or other sensitive data, including targeted
advertising and other data-driven offerings, and may require market-specific changes to our products, services, or
business practices, increasing operational complexity and cost. In addition, emerging laws and regulations seeking to
restrict cross-border transfer of or access to certain data in light of perceived national security considerations may
increase compliance costs and restrict our operational flexibility, investment activities, or ability to achieve our
strategic objectives. As our business evolves, and if we expand into additional industries or jurisdictions, our
compliance requirements and associated costs may increase and we may be subject to heightened regulatory
scrutiny.
We also face cybersecurity risks, including the potential unlawful, accidental, or unauthorized access to, or use,
disclosure, alteration, loss, or disruption of, our technology, products, systems, and data, or those of our service
providers and partners, which could result in a loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. We operate in
industries that have been, and will continue to be, targeted by sophisticated and persistent internal and external threat
actors, including those controlled by or affiliated with nation states. For additional information, please refer to “Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Any significant disruption in, or unauthorized access to, our computer and
data systems or those of third parties that we utilize in our operations could result in a loss or degradation of service,
loss of trust in us and harm to our business.” Many jurisdictions impose mandatory breach notification and reporting
obligations, and compliance with such requirements can be costly, time-sensitive, and operationally burdensome,
and we may bear such costs in the event of a material incident. As we continue to use and integrate advanced
technologies, including AI systems and models, into our operations, products, and services, our exposure to
cybersecurity incidents may increase, particularly as threat actors also try to adopt and deploy AI-enabled tools to
evade detection and compromise systems or data. Compliance with applicable privacy, cybersecurity, AI, data
protection, lawful access, content moderation and digital platform obligations can be costly and operationally
demanding and may require changes to our products, services, business practices, or technical infrastructure.
Environmental, Health, and Safety
Our operations and facilities, as well as existing and planned infrastructure, are subject to an extensive regulatory
framework of federal, state, local, and foreign environmental, health, and safety laws, and regulations and permits
that govern, among other things, employee health and safety, discharges of pollutants into the air and water, the
generation, handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes and the investigation and remediation
of certain materials, substances, and wastes. These include various regulations promulgated by federal, state, and
local regulatory agencies and legislative bodies. Certain of our operations, including launch, reentry, testing, and
manufacturing activities and the development or expansion of facilities, as well as the siting, construction and
operation of data centers, may require environmental reviews, consultations, and permits and may be subject to
conditions or mitigation measures that could increase costs or limit operations.
We are required to obtain a number of permits and entitlements from various government agencies to construct and
operate our facilities, including zoning, land use and building code permits, air quality permits for permanent
combustion equipment (including both diesel generators and natural gas turbines), stormwater and wastewater
discharge permits, and fire and life safety approvals. We have issued or pending permit applications for certain of
our facilities. For additional information, please refer to “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—
Environmental laws, regulations, litigation, liabilities and proceedings may adversely affect our operations,
225
including our launch operations, manufacturing activities, fuel storage and handling operations, launch facilities and
ground infrastructure, and data center operations and expansion plans.”
Government Contracts
A portion of our revenue is derived from contracts, directly or indirectly, with the U.S. government. We have
numerous direct contracts with the U.S. government, primarily NASA, the Department of War, the General Services
Administration, and certain Intelligence Community agencies. These contracts focus mainly on launch services,
spacecraft development, and satellite deployment, and artificial intelligence products. We are almost always the
prime contractor on our government contracts, and we rarely use subcontractors. All of our launch contracts with
U.S. government agencies are firm fixed-price contracts with milestone-based payments.
These contracts are subject to U.S. government contracting rules and regulations (Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)), and therefore, we are subject to the
business risks specific to the defense industry. These regulations impose stringent requirements on our operations,
business practices and reporting, and noncompliance could result in civil or criminal penalties, suspension or
debarment from government contracting, or loss of existing or future business. These requirements, although
customary in U.S. government contracts, increase our performance and compliance costs. These costs might increase
in the future. The U.S. government has the ability to unilaterally: (i) declare us ineligible to receive new contracts;
(ii) terminate existing contracts at its convenience and without advance notice; (iii) reduce the scope and value of
existing contracts; (iv) audit our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs; and (v) revoke
required security clearances. Violations of government procurement laws could result in civil or criminal penalties.
We are also required to maintain special security clearances and comply with executive orders, federal laws and
regulations, and customer security requirements for classified programs, and our government contracts impose
cybersecurity and information assurance requirements, including implementation of information security protections
in accordance with NIST Special Publication 800-171 and obligations to review and report certain cyber incidents.
Failure to comply could result in suspension of payments, termination of contracts, civil or criminal penalties, or
exclusion from future government contracting opportunities. For additional information, please refer to “Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our services are subject to risks related to supplying services to the U.S.
government.”
In addition, in connection with preparing leased real property for our launch operations at Kennedy Space Center
and Cape Canaveral, Florida, and Space Launch Complex 4 at Vandenberg Space Force Base, California, we make
significant capital improvements and install extensive real and personal property at these government-owned sites.
The launch facilities we build are a unique capital improvement compared to standard commercial use sites because
the federal government specifically designates these launch sites for aerospace activities, such as rocket launches.
Given the specific use requirements of these government-owned sites, we have historically entered into handover
agreements with the relevant government entities upon expiration or termination of the leases, pursuant to which the
improvements are transferred to the government rather than removed. This fact pattern has historically been the case
with previous leases such as at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
Legal Proceedings
We are involved in the legal proceedings described in Note 17, Commitments and Contingencies, in our audited
consolidated financial statements and Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies in our unaudited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, and we are subject to other claims and litigation arising in
the ordinary course of business. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, and if decided adversely to us,
or if we determine that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
226
MANAGEMENT
Below is certain information as of May 1, 2026 regarding individuals who are expected to serve as our executive
officers and directors upon the completion of this offering.
Name | Age | Position | ||
Elon Musk ...................... | 54 | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of the Board | ||
Gwynne Shotwell ........... | 62 | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
Bret Johnsen ................... | 57 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Ira Ehrenpreis ................. | 57 | Director | ||
Randy Glein .................... | 60 | Director | ||
Antonio J. Gracias .......... | 55 | Director | ||
Donald Harrison ............. | 54 | Director | ||
Steve Jurvetson ............... | 59 | Director | ||
Luke Nosek ..................... | 50 | Director |
Executive Officers and Management Directors
Elon Musk has served as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of our board since
May 2002. Mr. Musk is also the Technoking of Tesla and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Tesla since
October 2008. Mr. Musk was Chief Technology Officer and on the board of directors of X, beginning October 2022
and served as the Chief Executive Officer and on the board of directors of xAI, beginning March 2023, in each case
through the March 2025 merger of X and xAI. Following the merger, Mr. Musk served as the President, Treasurer,
and Chief Executive Officer and on the board of directors of xAI, until it was acquired by the Company in February
2026. Mr. Musk is also a founder and Chief Executive Officer of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on
developing brain-machine interfaces, and The Boring Company, an infrastructure company. Prior to the Company,
Mr. Musk co-founded PayPal, an electronic payment system, which was acquired by eBay in October 2002, and
Zip2 Corporation, a provider of Internet enterprise software and services, which was acquired by Compaq in March
1999. Mr. Musk serves on the board of directors of Tesla and previously served on the board of directors of
Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. from April 2021 to June 2022. Mr. Musk holds a B.A. in Physics from the
University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in Business from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr.
Musk brings to our board historical knowledge, operational and technical expertise, and continuity.
Gwynne Shotwell has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since 2008 and has been a member of our
board since March 2009. Previously, Ms. Shotwell served as our Vice President, Business Development, from 2002
to 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Shotwell held positions with Microcosm, Inc., an aerospace company, as
a director, and The Aerospace Corporation, an independent, non-profit organization performing objective technical
analyses and assessments for a variety of government, civil, and commercial customers, as a senior project engineer.
Ms. Shotwell also serves on the board of directors of Polaris, Inc., a manufacturer of powersports vehicles, and on
Northwestern University’s Board of Trustees. Ms. Shotwell was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering
and was previously named the Satellite Executive of the Year, included on Time’s 100 Most Influential People, and
Fortune Magazine’s World’s 50 Greatest Leaders. Ms. Shotwell holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and an
M.S. in Applied Mathematics from Northwestern University. As one of the key members of our leadership team,
Ms. Shotwell brings to our board extensive operational experience and in-house knowledge of the Company’s
operations, technology, research and development and business management.
Bret Johnsen has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2011. In this role, Mr. Johnsen leads our global
finance organization and is responsible for our long-term financial strategy, internal financial operations,
interactions with the financial community, and the financial aspects of our growth initiatives. With more than two
decades of experience in financial leadership, primarily in high-profile technology and semiconductor companies,
his leadership continues to play a key role in driving our financial performance, long-term value creation and
operational discipline. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Johnsen served as Chief Financial Officer at Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company, from 2008 to 2011. Prior to that role, he spent nearly
227
a decade at Broadcom Inc., a global semiconductor company, from 1999 to 2008, holding roles of increasing
responsibility within the organization, including serving as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Mr. Johnsen
serves as a Trustee of the University of Southern California and holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of
Southern California and an M.S. in Finance from San Diego State University, and he is a Certified Public
Accountant (CPA).
Non-Management Directors
Ira Ehrenpreis has served on our board since February 2026. Mr. Ehrenpreis is a founder and managing member of
DBL Partners, a leading impact investing venture capital firm, formed in 2015. Previously, he was a partner at
Technology Partners, a venture capital firm. Mr. Ehrenpreis serves on the board of directors of Tesla. He serves as
the Chairman of the VCNetwork, the largest and most active California venture capital organization. Mr. Ehrenpreis
also serves as the Chair of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Northern California and the Co-
Chair of the Stanford Precourt Institute for Energy Advisory Council. Among several other awards and honors, Mr.
Ehrenpreis has been named a member of the NACD Directorship 100 for being “one of the most influential leaders
in the boardroom and corporate governance community.” Mr. Ehrenpreis holds a B.A. from the University of
California, Los Angeles and a J.D. and M.B.A. from Stanford University. Mr. Ehrenpreis brings to our board
experience in the technology, impact and venture capital industries, as well as valuable insights in corporate
governance, strategic growth and shareholder values.
Randy Glein has served on our board since February 2026 and previously served as a board observer since 2009.
Mr. Glein is co-founder and managing partner of DFJ Growth, a venture capital firm that has invested in more than
100 growth-stage technology companies over the past 20 years. He currently serves on the board of directors of
several private technology companies and has previously served on the board of directors of Anaplan, Inc. and
Tremor Video, Inc. Prior to DFJ Growth, Mr. Glein served as Chief Financial Officer of FeedBurner (acquired by
Google in 2007) and Vice President of Tribune Company and its corporate investment group, Tribune Ventures. Mr.
Glein began his career in the aerospace industry as a systems engineer with Hughes Space & Communications and
in business development roles with its DIRECTV and New Ventures units. Mr. Glein holds a B.S.E.E. in Electrical
Engineering from the University of Florida, an M.S.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern
California, and an M.B.A. from the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Mr. Glein brings to our board
experience in the venture capital industry and more than 35 years of business and leadership experience in the
technology, media, and satellite communications industries.
Antonio J. Gracias has served on our board since October 2010. Since 2001, Mr. Gracias has been Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Valor Management LLC, a private equity firm. As Founder, CEO, and CIO
of Valor, he oversees one of the leading growth-focused investment firms in the United States with over $55 billion
in assets under management. He has served on the board of Neuralink Corp., a company focused on developing
brain-machine interfaces, since May 2026, served on the board of The Boring Company, an infrastructure company,
since May 2026 and served as a director of Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, from
September 2017 to May 2026. He also served as a director of Marathon Pharmaceuticals, LLC from November 2013
until its acquisition by PTC Therapeutics in May 2017, and SolarCity Corporation from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Gracias
previously served as a director of Tesla from 2007 to 2021 helping take the company public and acting as Lead
Independent Director for eight years. Prior to founding Valor Management LLC in 2001, Mr. Gracias served as
Founder and Managing Member of MG Capital, a private equity firm headquartered in Chicago, where he was the
lead transaction principal from 1995 through 2000. Prior to MG Capital, Mr. Gracias was an associate with
Goldman, Sachs & Co. in New York, where he served the firm’s institutional clients in the International Equity
Division. Mr. Gracias is also actively involved in philanthropic activities. He is a trustee of The Aspen Institute,
where he was a 2009 Henry Crown Fellow, an Aspen Institute program designed to engage the next generation of
leaders in the challenge of community-spirited leadership. Additionally, he serves as a member of several
prestigious non-profit and endowment boards, including the Board of Visitors for the Georgetown University School
of Foreign Service and the Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering at the University of Chicago. He is also a
member of the University of Chicago Board of Trustees. Mr. Gracias holds a joint B.S. and M.S.F.S. (Honors
Degree) in International Finance and Economics from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service and a
J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School. Mr. Gracias brings to our board skills and experience in
228
investment strategy, portfolio company management and improvement, operations of business, and finance across
several industries, including aerospace, technology, and manufacturing.
Donald Harrison has served on our board since February 2015. Mr. Harrison has served as President, Global
Partnerships and Corporate Development at Google LLC, a technology company, since 2017. Mr. Harrison
previously served as Vice-President, Corporate Development at Google from 2012 to 2017 and as Vice-President
and Deputy General Counsel from 2005 to 2012. Mr. Harrison also sits on the board of directors of Reliance Jio, the
largest mobile telecommunications services provider in India. Mr. Harrison holds a B.A. in Philosophy and Political
Science from the University of King’s College and a J.D. and LLB from the University of Toronto. Mr. Harrison
brings to our board years of business and leadership experience and provides valuable experience in the areas of
strategic transactions and partnerships.
Steve Jurvetson has served on our board since March 2009. Mr. Jurvetson is a co-founder of Future Ventures, a
venture capital firm, which he founded in 2019, and previously he co-founded and served as Managing Director of
Draper Fisher Jurvetson, a venture capital firm, from 1995 to 2017. Mr. Jurvetson serves as a director of The Metals
Company, a deep sea mining exploration company, and also previously served as a director of Tesla from 2009 to
2020, and NeoPhotonics Corp. from 2004 to 2011. Mr. Jurvetson also served as a director of Planet Labs from 2011
to 2017 and a director of D-Wave from 2003 to 2020. Before co-founding Future Ventures and Draper Fisher
Jurvetson, Mr. Jurvetson was an R&D Engineer at Hewlett-Packard, where seven of his chip designs were
fabricated. He also worked in product marketing at Apple Inc. and NeXT and management consulting with Bain &
Company. Mr. Jurvetson holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University and an
M.B.A. from the Stanford Business School. Mr. Jurvetson brings to our board experience in the venture capital
industry and years of business and leadership experience.
Luke Nosek has served on our board since July 2008. Mr. Nosek co-founded Gigafund, a venture capital firm, in
July 2017, and has been Managing Partner since inception. Mr. Nosek previously co-founded Founders Fund, a
venture capital fund, in April 2006, and served as General Partner through July 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Nosek co-
founded and served as Vice President of Business Development, Vice President of Marketing, and Vice President of
Strategy of PayPal, an electronic payment system, from November 1998 to February 2002. Mr. Nosek also serves as
a member of the board of directors of various private companies, including Last Energy, a nuclear energy company
that designs and manufactures small modular reactors, Emerald Cloud Lab, which operates remotely accessible and
largely autonomous life science laboratories, and ResearchGate, an online platform connecting scientists and
researchers with each other and their work. Mr. Nosek also served as a board member of DeepMind prior to its
acquisition by Google. Mr. Nosek holds a B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-
Champaign. Mr. Nosek brings to the board experience in the venture capital industry and years of business and
leadership experience.
Additional Information
On October 16, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment
approving the terms of a settlement, filed with the court on September 29, 2018, in connection with the actions taken
by the SEC relating to Mr. Musk’s August 7, 2018 Twitter (now known as X) posts stating that he was considering
taking Tesla private at a specified price and with secured financing. The SEC alleged that these posts were
materially false and misleading, in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. In settling the action, Mr. Musk did not admit or deny the SEC’s allegations and consented to the entry
of a judgment that enjoined him from violating these laws, ordered him to pay a $20 million civil penalty and
required him to comply with procedures implemented by Tesla with respect to preclearing his public statements
about Tesla. While he was required to step down as chairman of the board of Tesla for three years, there is no
restriction on Mr. Musk’s ability to serve as an officer or director on the board of directors of any public or private
company. On April 26, 2019, this settlement was amended to further clarify the pre-clearance procedures applicable
to his making certain public statements about Tesla. The amendment was subsequently approved by the District
Court.
On April 3, 2026, in Pampena v. Musk, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California entered a
partial judgment against Mr. Musk in his personal capacity only in favor of lead plaintiffs on behalf of themselves
229
and a class of investors who sold certain Twitter, Inc. equity securities between May 13 and October 4, 2022. The
judgment is based on a jury verdict rendered on March 20, 2026 that found (i) in favor of plaintiffs on claims
alleging that Mr. Musk violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder in
connection with two statements made by Mr. Musk in May 2022 and (ii) in favor of Mr. Musk on claims challenging
a third statement and alleging a “scheme to defraud” under Rules 10b-5(a) and (c). The claims in this case all
concern Mr. Musk’s then-pending potential purchase of Twitter, Inc. On May 1, 2026, Mr. Musk challenged the
partial judgment by filing a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion to decertify the class. The
motion practice is ongoing, and the Court is expected to hear these motions in June 2026.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
Controlled Company Exemption
Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will beneficially own approximately % of our outstanding Class B
common stock, which under our charter, as described under “Description of Capital Stock,” will be entitled to elect
51% of the total number of authorized directors (rounded up to the nearest whole number), and % of the total
voting power of our outstanding common stock (or % if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase
additional shares of Class A common stock in full). As a result, we will be a “controlled company” within the
meaning of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas corporate governance standards. Under the listing rules of Nasdaq and
Nasdaq Texas, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power with respect to director elections is held by
another person or group of persons acting together is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with
certain Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that:
•a majority of such company’s board of directors consist of independent directors as defined under the listing
rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas;
•director nominees be selected or recommended for board of directors’ selection by a nominating committee
composed entirely of independent directors, with a written charter addressing the nominations process as
required under the listing rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas;
•the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing
the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and
•annual performance evaluations of the compensation and nominating committees be conducted.
Following the completion of this offering, we intend to utilize certain of these exemptions. As a result, we do not
expect to have a compensation and nominating committee that is composed entirely of independent directors or that
has a committee charter that addresses all Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas requirements applicable to companies that are
not controlled companies. Additionally, we may elect to take advantage of certain other exemptions in the future for
as long as we remain a “controlled company.” Accordingly, our Class A shareholders will not have the same
protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas. In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company” and our shares continue to be
listed on Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas, we will be required to comply with all of the applicable governance
requirements within the applicable transition periods.
Composition of Our Board
Upon the consummation of the offering, our board will consist of eight directors. Subject to the terms of our charter
and bylaws, the number of directors on our board will be determined from time to time by our board. Under the
terms of our charter, the holders of our outstanding Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, will have
the right to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors, rounded up to the nearest whole number (the
“Class B Directors”). Holders of Class A and Class B common stock, voting together as a single class, will elect the
remaining members of our board (the “Common Stock Directors”). We expect that upon the completion of the
offering Mr. Musk, Gwynne Shotwell, Antonio J. Gracias, Donald Harrison, and Luke Nosek will serve as the initial
230
Class B Directors and Ira Ehrenpreis, Randy Glein, and Steve Jurvetson will serve as the initial Common Stock
Directors.
Our board will be subject to annual elections. Each director will hold office until the next annual meeting of our
shareholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation
or removal (as provided in our charter). For additional information, please refer to “Description of Capital Stock.”
Role of our Board in Risk Oversight
We face a number of risks, including those described under the section titled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Our board believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and
executing on our business strategy. Our board, as a whole and at the committee level, has oversight responsibility
relating to risks that could affect our corporate strategy, business objectives, compliance, operations and financial
condition and performance. Our board focuses its oversight on the most significant risks facing us and on the
processes to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and mitigate those risks. While our board has an oversight role,
management is principally tasked with direct responsibility for management and assessment of risks and the
implementation of processes and controls to mitigate their effects on us.
Director Independence
Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background,
employment and affiliations, our board has determined that each of Ira Ehrenpreis, Randy Glein, Donald Harrison,
Steve Jurvetson, and Luke Nosek is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq and Nasdaq
Texas currently in effect. In making this determination, our board considered the relationships that each of these
directors has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board deemed relevant in determining their
independence, including (i) the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each such director and/or investment
funds or other entities affiliated with them and (ii) the relationships set forth below under “Certain Relationships and
Related Person Transactions.” The board also considered that Donald Harrison was employed by an organization
that does business with Company. The amount received by the Company or such other organization in each of the
last three fiscal years did not exceed the greater of $200,000 or 5% of either the Company’s or such organization’s
consolidated gross revenues.
Board Leadership Structure
Upon the completion of this offering, as provided in our charter, our board will continue to be led by Mr. Musk.
Pursuant to the terms of our charter, he can only be removed from the board and these leadership positions by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, voting
separately as a class.
Our board has concluded that our current leadership structure is appropriate at this time.
Board Committees
In connection with the completion of this offering, our board will establish an audit committee and a compensation
and nominating committee. Audit and compensation and nominating committees will be governed by their charters
that will be available on our website at www.spacex.com. Pursuant to our bylaws, our board may, from time to time,
establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business and operations. Information contained on
our website or linked therein or otherwise connected thereto does not constitute part of nor is it incorporated by
reference into this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Audit Committee
The primary responsibilities of our audit committee will include, among other things:
•assisting our board in its oversight responsibilities regarding the integrity of our financial statements, our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent accountant’s qualifications and
independence and our accounting and financial reporting processes of and the audits of our financial statements;
231
•preparing the report required by the SEC for inclusion in our annual proxy or information statement;
•approving audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent accountants; and
•performing such other functions as our board may from time to time assign to the audit committee.
The audit committee will be empowered to retain any advisors as it deems necessary or appropriate to assist it in
fulfilling its responsibilities, and to approve the fees and other retention terms of such advisors.
Upon the completion of this offering, Randy Glein and Steve Jurvetson are expected to be the members of our audit
committee. Randy Glein is expected to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined
under the rules of the SEC implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and each of Randy Glein and Steve
Jurvetson qualifies as an independent director for purposes of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the listing
standards of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas. We will identify the third member to serve on the audit committee within
the applicable one year period under the Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas listing rules. Randy Glein is expected to serve as
the chair of the audit committee.
Compensation and Nominating Committee
The primary responsibilities of our compensation and nominating committee will include, among other things:
•overseeing the Company’s overall compensation philosophy;
•reviewing and approving, or recommending to the full board for approval, the compensation and other benefits
for executive officers;
•reviewing and recommending to our board for approval the form and amount of compensation for our
independent directors;
•making recommendations to our board regarding director candidates and assisting our board in determining the
composition of our board and its committees, subject to the terms of our charter; and
•performing such other functions as our board may from time to time assign to the committee.
Upon the completion of this offering, Ira Ehrenpreis, Antonio J. Gracias, and Luke Nosek are expected to be the
members of our compensation and nominating committee. As a “controlled company,” we will rely upon the
exemption from Nasdaq’s and Nasdaq Texas’ requirement that we have a compensation and nominating committee
that is composed entirely of independent directors with a committee charter that addresses all Nasdaq and Nasdaq
Texas’ requirements applicable to companies that are not controlled companies. Each of Ira Ehrenpreis and Luke
Nosek qualifies as an independent director under the listing standards of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas, including the
heightened independence standards for members of a compensation committee, and as a “non-employee director” as
defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. Ira Ehrenpreis is expected to serve as the chair of the compensation and
nominating committee.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the last completed fiscal year, we were not a publicly traded company and did not have a compensation
committee or any other committee serving a similar function. Historically, the board has been responsible for
determining, and has made all decisions regarding, the compensation for Mr. Musk. With respect to those expected
to serve as our other executive officers, Mr. Musk has had primary responsibility for compensation-related
decisions; however, all equity awards were approved by the board.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
In connection with this offering, our board will adopt a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to our
employees, directors and officers, in accordance with applicable SEC rules and the corporate governance rules of
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas. We expect that any amendments to the code or any waivers of its requirements
applicable to our directors and executive officers will be disclosed on our website at www.spacex.com, as and to the
232
extent required by applicable SEC rules and the corporate governance rules of Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas.
Information contained on our website or linked therein or otherwise connected thereto does not constitute part of,
nor is it incorporated by reference into, this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a
part.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
In connection with the completion of this offering, we intend to adopt corporate governance guidelines, which will
set forth expectations for directors, director qualification standards, committee structure and functions and other
policies for the governance of our company. A copy of our corporate governance guidelines will be posted on our
website at www.spacex.com. Information contained on our website or linked therein or otherwise connected thereto
does not constitute part of, nor is it incorporated by reference into, this prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part.
233
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides an overview of our executive compensation
philosophy, objectives, and design and each element of our executive compensation program with regard to the
compensation awarded, to, earned by, or paid to the following named executive officers (collectively, our “NEOs”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Fiscal Year”), which includes all of our executive officers
for the 2025 Fiscal Year. For the 2025 Fiscal Year, our NEOs were:
Name | Position | |
Elon Musk ...................................... | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of the Board | |
Gwynne Shotwell ........................... | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | |
Bret Johnsen ................................... | Chief Financial Officer |
Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our compensation program is designed to attract, retain and reward executives and employees, with a heavy
emphasis on equity compensation to provide employees with a financial stake in our business and an ownership
mindset. We offer a number of programs that allow employees to voluntarily elect to receive elements of their
compensation in equity or to otherwise increase their ownership interests in the Company.
Process for Setting Compensation
Historically, our board has been responsible for determining, and has made all decisions regarding, the
compensation for Mr. Musk. With respect to the other NEOs, Mr. Musk has had primary responsibility for
compensation-related decisions (in consultation with Ms. Shotwell with respect to Mr. Johnsen’s compensation). All
equity awards are approved by our board.
In connection with this offering, we plan to establish a compensation and nominating committee of our board who
will oversee our executive compensation program going forward. The compensation and nominating committee, in
consultation with Mr. Musk (other than with respect to his own compensation), will have primary responsibility for
evaluating and approving the compensation of our NEOs or making recommendations regarding such compensation
to our board when appropriate, including with respect to Mr. Musk’s compensation.
Elements of Compensation
Base Salary
Each NEO’s base salary is a fixed component of compensation for performing specific job duties and functions.
Base salaries are generally reviewed on an annual basis, taking into account the NEO’s experience and
responsibilities. Mr. Musk’s base salary of $54,080 has remained unchanged since 2019, and prior to our relocation
to Texas in 2024 was tied to California’s minimum salary for exempt employees. Mr. Musk has historically
determined the base salary for Ms. Shotwell, which was increased from $1,040,000 to $1,080,000 effective April 20,
2025. Mr. Musk and Ms. Shotwell have historically determined the base salary for Mr. Johnsen, which was
increased from $780,000 to $825,000 on April 6, 2025, with retroactive effect for the full 2025 Fiscal Year.
As participants in a broader employee equity election program, our NEOs, other than Mr. Musk, were eligible to
elect to receive all or a portion of their base salary in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). For the 2025 Fiscal
Year, Ms. Shotwell received $353,077 of her base salary in cash and the remainder as a grant of 19,650 RSUs that
vested 50% on May 15, 2025 and 50% on November 15, 2025, and Mr. Johnsen elected to receive his base salary
fully in cash. The base salaries paid to our NEOs reflect the only cash compensation that they are eligible to receive,
as no NEO participates in an annual bonus program.
234
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
In 2025, we granted long-term incentive compensation under our 2024 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2024 Plan”),
which replaced our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) with respect to new grants; however, outstanding
grants under the 2015 Plan remained outstanding and subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, which are substantially
similar to the terms of the 2024 Plan. The 2024 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 365,950,000 shares of Class
C common stock thereunder pursuant to stock options (which may be either incentive stock options or nonstatutory
stock options), RSUs, and other equity awards, in each case, on the terms determined by our board. It is expected
that, in connection with and following the completion of this offering, all outstanding awards under the 2015 Plan
and the 2024 Plan will remain outstanding and continue to be subject to their existing terms; however, awards in
respect of Class C common stock will be converted into awards in respect of Class A common stock on a one-for-
one basis as part of the Class C Reclassification. It is expected that the 2024 Plan will be amended and restated in
connection with this offering, as described below.
Given his significant ownership interest in our Company, Mr. Musk was not granted any annual long-term incentive
compensation in 2025, and generally does not participate in our annual long-term incentive compensation program.
However, as part of our efforts to further incentivize Mr. Musk to achieve our long-term business objectives, the
board granted him a performance-based award of restricted shares of Class B common stock in January 2026, as
described further under “—2026 Compensation Developments” below.
Ms. Shotwell was eligible to participate in our long-term incentive election program with a target award of $5
million, pursuant to which she could elect to receive 20% of her target award in cash or RSUs that vest after six
months and 80% of her target award in cash vesting over five years, RSUs vesting over five years or stock options
vesting over six years. In accordance with her elections, on May 10, 2025, our board granted Ms. Shotwell 27,030
RSUs, representing $1 million of her target award, that vested on November 15, 2025 and stock options to purchase
324,325 shares of Class C common stock, representing $4 million of her target award, which vest as to 12.5% on
May 15, 2027 and monthly thereafter in equal installments through November 15, 2030, in each case, subject to Ms.
Shotwell’s continued employment with us through the applicable vesting date.
Because Mr. Johnsen held outstanding stock options tied to aggressive performance milestones, a portion of which
were adjusted in 2026 as described further under “—2026 Compensation Developments” below, he was not eligible
to participate in the long-term incentive election program described above. Instead, Mr. Johnsen’s long-term
incentive award for the 2025 Fiscal Year consisted exclusively of stock options to purchase 324,325 shares of Class
C common stock, which was granted by our board on May 10, 2025. These stock options vest as to 40% in equal
monthly installments from January 1, 2027 through December 1, 2027 and as to 60% in equal monthly installments
from January 1, 2028 through December 1, 2030, in each case, subject to Mr. Johnsen’s continued employment with
us through the applicable vesting date.
On October 20, 2025, as a special equity grant intended to further promote their retention, reward their individual
performance, and encourage efforts to continue growing the Company, our board granted Ms. Shotwell stock
options to purchase 3,537,740 shares of Class C common stock and granted Mr. Johnsen stock options to purchase
141,510 shares of Class C common stock. These special stock options vest as to 20% on September 30, 2027 and
monthly thereafter in equal installments through September 30, 2031, in each case, subject to the NEO’s continued
employment with us through the applicable vesting date.
Other Elements of Compensation
Retirement Benefits
All of our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan, which is a broad-
based, tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan. Under the 401(k) plan, we may make discretionary
matching and non-elective contributions, subject to certain limits under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), and such contributions would vest ratably and would be 100% vested after five years of
credited service; however, no such company contributions were made for 2025.
235
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
Historically, we have provided two employee stock purchase plans in which all of our U.S. employees, including the
NEOs, are eligible to participate. Our Amended and Restated 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2017
ESPP”) is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code and allows eligible employees to purchase shares of
Class C common stock using accumulated payroll contributions at a discount. It is expected that the 2017 ESPP will
be amended and restated in connection with this offering, as described below. Our 2023 Non-Qualified ESPP (the
“NQ ESPP”) is not intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code and allows eligible employees to purchase
shares of Class C common stock using accumulated payroll contributions at fair market value. Our NQ ESPP will be
discontinued in connection with this offering.
Perquisites
The Company provides security equipment to enhance security at Ms. Shotwell’s personal residence. The aggregate
incremental cost of these security benefits are reported in the “—Executive Compensation Tables—2025 Summary
Compensation Table” below. No other material perquisites are provided to our NEOs.
Other Matters
2026 Compensation Developments
On January 13, 2026, our board approved the grant of 1 billion performance-based restricted shares of Class B
common stock to Mr. Musk. The restricted shares vest upon (i) our achievement of specified market capitalization
milestones across 15 equal tranches and (ii) the Company’s establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars
with at least one million inhabitants, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment with us through the
date on which achievement is certified by our board. For any tranche of the award to vest, both the applicable market
capitalization milestone for such tranche and the human colony milestone must be met. In connection with the xAI
Merger that closed on February 2, 2026, the market capitalization milestones were equitably adjusted in accordance
with the terms of the award agreement to the following:
Restricted Shares Subject to Tranche | Market Capitalization Milestone | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $1,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $1,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $2,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $2,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $3,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $3,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $4,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $4,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,665 ............................................................................................................................... | $5,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,670 ............................................................................................................................... | $5,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,670 ............................................................................................................................... | $6,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,670 ............................................................................................................................... | $6,500,000,000,000 | |
66,666,670 ............................................................................................................................... | $7,000,000,000,000 | |
66,666,670 ............................................................................................................................... | $7,500,000,000,000 |
In connection with the xAI Merger, we also assumed a performance stock award originally granted to Mr. Musk by
xAI on November 26, 2025. In accordance with the terms of that award agreement, the award was adjusted to
account for the xAI Merger and, following such adjustment, reflected Mr. Musk’s right to receive shares of our
Class A common stock equal to 0.20% of the fully diluted capitalization of the Company upon achievement of each
of 12 valuation milestones ranging from $1.065 trillion to $6.565 trillion, with each milestone reflecting $500 billion
236
in additional valuation, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment with us. The first valuation
milestone was achieved prior to the xAI Merger, and Mr. Musk was issued 25,172,695 shares of our Class A
common stock in settlement of that portion of the award. On March 23, 2026, this award and the 25,172,695 shares
earned upon achievement of the first valuation milestone were cancelled and replaced with a grant of 302,072,285
performance-based restricted shares of Class B common stock, which vest upon both (i) achievement of specified
market capitalization milestones across 12 equal tranches ranging from $1.065 trillion to $6.565 trillion, with each
milestone reflecting $500 billion in additional valuation, and (ii) the Company’s completion of non-Earth-based data
centers capable of delivering 100 terawatts of compute per year, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued
employment with us through the date on which achievement is certified by our board.
On January 4, 2026, our board approved an amendment to Mr. Johnsen’s 4 million performance-based stock options
originally granted in 2024. In lieu of vesting based on free cash flow achievement in excess of a baseline, 371,125 of
the stock options will vest for each $10 billion in adjusted EBITDA achieved during the 2025 through 2029 fiscal
years, assessed on an annual basis. For purposes of this award, adjusted EBITDA is calculated as income from
operations excluding (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii) share-based compensation, (iii) impairment, and (iv)
restructuring impacts. Once a tranche of the stock options have become earned as a result of our adjusted EBITDA
performance as of the end of a particular fiscal year, such stock options remain subject to an additional one-year and
one day service-based vesting requirement following December 31 of the fiscal year in which such tranche was
earned. None of the stock options became earned on account of our 2025 Fiscal Year adjusted EBITDA
performance.
Clawback Policy
In connection with this offering, we will adopt a compensation recoupment (clawback) policy that complies with the
Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas listing standards implementing Rule 10D-1 of the Exchange Act.
Executive Compensation Tables
2025 Summary Compensation Table
The following table presents information regarding the total compensation awarded to, earned by, and paid to the
NEOs for the 2025 Fiscal Year.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Option Awards ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | Total Compensation ($) | |||||||
Elon Musk Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of the Board ............ | 2025 | 54,080 | — | — | — | 54,080 | |||||||
Gwynne Shotwell President, Chief Operating Officer and Director ................ | 2025 | 1,080,127 | (4) | 82,969,515 | 1,727,160 | 30,095 | 85,806,897 | ||||||
Bret Johnsen Chief Financial Officer ............... | 2025 | 825,000 | 9,013,002 | — | — | 9,838,002 | |||||||
__________________
(1)Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock options granted to the NEOs during the 2025 Fiscal Year calculated in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For additional information regarding the
assumptions underlying this calculation, please refer to Note 15, Share-based Compensation—Fair Value Determination, to the consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
(2)Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of RSUs granted to the NEOs calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic
718, disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures, based on the fair market value of a share of our Class C common stock on the
applicable date.
(3)Amounts in the column include, for Ms. Shotwell, the incremental cost to the Company of security equipment to enhance security at Ms.
Shotwell’s personal residence. From time to time, each NEO may also be accompanied by personal guests on travel on Company-owned
aircraft that otherwise has a business purpose; however, there is no incremental cost to the Company of such travel.
(4)This amount includes the grant date fair value of 19,650 RSUs granted to Ms. Shotwell in lieu of base salary, calculated in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures, based on the fair market value of a share of our Class C common
stock on the applicable date ($37 on May 10, 2025). For additional information, please refer to “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis
—Elements of Compensation—Base Salary” above and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.
237
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information on the stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock and
RSUs representing a right to receive shares of our Class C common stock, in each case, granted to each NEO during
the 2025 Fiscal Year under the 2024 Plan. Mr. Musk did not receive any equity grants from the Company during the
2025 Fiscal Year.
Name | Grant Date | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(1) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(2) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(4) | ||||||
Gwynne Shotwell | |||||||||||
RSUs ...................................... | 5/10/25 | 19,650 | (5) | $727,050 | |||||||
RSUs ...................................... | 5/10/25 | 27,030 | $1,000,110 | ||||||||
Options ................................... | 5/10/25 | 324,325 | $37.00 | $6,136,878 | |||||||
Options ................................... | 10/20/25 | 3,537,740 | $42.40 | $76,832,637 | |||||||
Bret Johnsen | |||||||||||
Options ................................... | 5/10/25 | 324,325 | $37.00 | $5,939,688 | |||||||
Options ................................... | 10/20/25 | 141,510 | $42.40 | $3,073,314 | |||||||
__________________
(1)Amounts in this column represent RSUs granted during the 2025 Fiscal Year. For more information, please refer to “—Compensation
Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis
—Elements of Compensation—Base Salaries” above.
(2)Amounts in this column represent stock options granted during the 2025 Fiscal Year. For more information, please refer to “—
Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” above.
(3)The exercise price of each stock option granted during the 2025 Fiscal Year reflects the fair market value of a share of our Class C common
stock on the date of grant and was determined based on a third-party valuation obtained in accordance with Section 409A of the Code.
(4)Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock options and RSUs, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,
disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For additional information regarding the assumptions underlying this calculation, refer to
Note 15, Share-based Compensation—Fair Value Determination, to the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
(5)Represents the RSUs granted to Ms. Shotwell in lieu of $726,923 of her 2025 base salary. For additional information, please refer to “—
Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Base Salary” above.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table presents information regarding the outstanding stock option awards held by our NEOs as of
December 31, 2025. No NEOs held outstanding RSUs or other unvested stock awards in the Company as of
December 31, 2025. Awards in respect of Class C common stock reflected in this following table will be converted
into awards in respect of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis as part of the Class C Reclassification.
238
Name | Option Awards | |||||||||||
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||
Elon Musk | ||||||||||||
Class B Options ..................... | 344,166,650 | 8,333,350 | (1) | — | $8.3998 | 2/11/31 | ||||||
Gwynne Shotwell | ||||||||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 27,800 | 305,550 | (2) | — | $8.3998 | 4/20/31 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 14,885 | 163,690 | (2) | — | $11.20 | 4/27/32 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 618,560 | (3) | — | $19.40 | 5/16/34 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 324,325 | (4) | — | $37.00 | 5/10/35 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 3,537,740 | (5) | — | $42.40 | 10/20/35 | ||||||
Bret Johnsen | ||||||||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 711,850 | — | — | $4.40 | 4/24/30 | |||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 1,019,400 | 480,600 | (2) | — | $8.3998 | 4/20/31 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 535,715 | — | 2,142,860 | (6) | $11.20 | 4/27/32 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | 139,285 | 375,005 | (7) | — | $15.40 | 5/1/33 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 371,135 | (3) | — | $19.40 | 5/16/34 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | — | 4,000,000 | (8) | $19.40 | 5/16/34 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 324,325 | (9) | — | $37.00 | 5/10/35 | ||||||
Class C Options ..................... | — | 141,510 | (5) | — | $42.40 | 10/20/35 | ||||||
__________________
(1)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class B common stock vested on January 1, 2026.
(2)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest in approximately equal monthly installments through November
15, 2026, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
(3)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest as to 12.5% on May 15, 2026 and thereafter in approximately
equal monthly installments through November 15, 2029, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
(4)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest as to 12.5% on May 15, 2027 and thereafter in approximately
equal monthly installments through November 15, 2030, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
(5)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest as to 20% on September 30, 2027 and thereafter in approximately
equal monthly installments through September 30, 2031, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
(6)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest as follows: (i) 75% vests in three equal tranches upon
achievement of a 50%, 80% and 90% reduction in cost per ton to orbit from such cost in April 2022, and (ii) 25% vests in two equal
tranches upon achievement of 80% and 90% reduction in Starlink service delivery costs from such costs in April 2022, in each case, subject
to the NEO’s continued employment.
(7)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest in approximately equal monthly installments through November
15, 2028, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
(8)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock were eligible to vest based on our free cash flow performance
exceeding $2 billion beginning in 2025, subject to the NEO’s continued employment. In 2026, these stock options were amended as
described in more detail under —”Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Matters—2026 Compensation Developments” above.
(9)These stock options to purchase shares of our Class C common stock vest as follows: (i) 129,730 vest in approximately equal monthly
installments from January 1, 2027 through December 1, 2027 and (ii) 194,595 vest in approximately equal monthly installments from
January 1, 2028 through December 1, 2030, in each case, subject to the NEO’s continued employment.
239
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table reflects stock options to purchase Class C common stock exercised by our NEOs during the
2025 Fiscal Years and RSUs held by our NEOs which vested during 2025.
Name | Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||||
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | |||||
Elon Musk .......................................................... | — | — | — | — | ||||
Gwynne Shotwell ............................................... | 1,684,515 | 44,800,662 | 46,680 | 1,926,177 | ||||
Bret Johnsen ....................................................... | 1,182,150 | 41,906,655 | — | — | ||||
__________________
(1)The value realized on the exercise of stock options is determined based on the fair market value of a share of our Class C common stock on
the exercise date, less the applicable exercise price.
(2)The value realized on the vesting of RSUs is determined based on the fair market value of a share of our Class C common stock on the
vesting date.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
None of our NEOs are party to an employment agreement or severance arrangement that provides for payments or
benefits upon termination of employment or a change in control of the Company. Under the terms of the RSU award
agreements, in the event of an NEO’s death, the RSUs scheduled to vest within the following 12-month period
would become vested. No NEOs held outstanding RSUs as of December 31, 2025. No other equity award
agreements provide for benefits upon termination of employment or a change in control of the Company.
Amended and Restated 2024 Equity Incentive Plan
In connection with this offering, we intend to amend and restate our 2024 Plan (the “A&R 2024 Plan”). The purpose
of the A&R 2024 Plan is to secure and retain the services of eligible employees, directors and consultants to provide
incentives for such persons to exert maximum efforts for the success of the Company and to provide a means by
which such eligible recipients may be given an opportunity to benefit from increases in value of our Class A
common stock. The A&R 2024 Plan allows for the grant of stock options, both incentive stock options and
“nonstatutory” stock options; stock appreciation rights (“SARs”); restricted stock; RSUs; and other equity awards.
We refer to these collectively herein as “Awards.”
The following description of the A&R 2024 Plan is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the complete text of the A&R 2024 Plan, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Please read the A&R 2024 Plan in its entirety.
Administration
The A&R 2024 Plan will be administered by our board or a committee thereof designated by our board to administer
the A&R 2024 Plan, which we refer to herein as the “Plan Administrator.” The Plan Administrator will have broad
authority, subject to the provisions of the A&R 2024 Plan, to administer and interpret the A&R 2024 Plan and
Awards granted thereunder. All decisions and actions of the Plan Administrator will be final, binding and conclusive
on all persons.
Stock Subject to A&R 2024 Plan
The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be issued under the A&R 2024 Plan will not
exceed 365,950,000 shares (the “Share Reserve”), inclusive of shares issued under the 2024 Plan prior to the
adoption of the A&R 2024 Plan. The Share Reserve is subject to certain adjustments in the event of a change in our
capitalization. Shares of Class A common stock issued under the A&R 2024 Plan may be authorized but unissued or
reacquired shares, including shares repurchased by the Company on the open market or otherwise.
240
Shares of Class A common stock subject to any award under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan or the 2015 Plan that
expires, terminates or is forfeited or that are reacquired, withheld or not issued to satisfy a tax withholding obligation
will be added to the Share Reserve. Shares of Class A common stock subject to any award under the A&R 2024 Plan
that expires, terminates or is forfeited or that are reacquired, withheld or not issued to satisfy a tax withholding
obligation or payment of an exercise price will be again be available for issuance under the A&R 2024 Plan.
Eligibility
Current or prospective employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its affiliates will be
eligible to participate in the A&R 2024 Plan.
Types of Awards
Stock Options. Stock options granted under the A&R 2024 Plan may be granted as incentive stock options or
nonstatutory stock options, in either case with a term not to exceed 10 years (or five years for incentive stock options
granted to 10% shareholders). Subject to the express provisions of the A&R 2024 Plan, stock options generally may
be exercised over such period, in installments or otherwise, as the Plan Administrator may determine. The exercise
price for any stock option granted may not generally be less than the fair market value of the Class A common stock
subject to that option on the grant date (or 110% of the fair market value for incentive stock options granted to 10%
shareholders). The exercise price may be paid in cash or such other method as determined by the Plan Administrator,
including an irrevocable commitment by a broker to pay over such amount from a sale of the shares issuable under
an option, the delivery of previously owned shares, or withholding of shares deliverable upon exercise.
Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs represent, upon exercise, the right to receive the amount by which the fair market
value of the Class A common stock at the time of exercise exceeds the exercise price of the SAR. This amount is
payable in Class A common stock, cash, or a combination thereof, or in any other form of consideration at the Plan
Administrator’s discretion. The exercise price for any SARs may not generally be less than the fair market value of
the Class A common stock subject to the SAR on the grant date and may not have a term in excess of 10 years.
Restricted Stock and RSUs. Awards of restricted stock consist of shares of stock that are transferred to the
participant subject to restrictions that may result in forfeiture if specified conditions are not satisfied. RSUs result in
the transfer of shares of Class A common stock, cash or other form of consideration to the participant only after
specified conditions are satisfied. The Plan Administrator will determine the restrictions and conditions applicable to
each award of restricted stock or RSUs, which may include performance vesting conditions.
Other Equity Awards. Other equity awards are Awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise
based, on Class A common stock, including the appreciation in value thereof. Other equity awards may be granted
either alone or in tandem with other Awards under the A&R 2024 Plan.
Performance Criteria
The Plan Administrator may specify certain performance criteria which must be satisfied before Awards will be
granted or will vest. The performance goals may vary from participant to participant, group to group, and period to
period.
Transferability
Except as otherwise permitted by the Plan Administrator, Awards generally are not transferable except by will or by
the laws of descent and distribution, and each stock option or SAR will be exercisable during the lifetime of the
participant only by the participant.
Clawback
Awards will be subject to recoupment in accordance with any clawback policy that we adopt, including any
clawback policy required under Rule 10D-1 of the Exchange Act.
241
Amendment and Termination
The Plan Administrator may amend, suspend or terminate the A&R 2024 Plan at any time; however certain
enumerated material amendments may not be made without shareholder approval. Suspension or termination of the
A&R 2024 Plan may not impair the rights and obligations of any outstanding Award. The Plan Administrator may
also amend any outstanding Award, subject to the participant’s consent in the event such amendment impairs such
participant’s rights under such Award. The A&R 2024 Plan is expected to be adopted by our board in connection
with this offering and will terminate on December 10, 2034, unless earlier terminated by our board.
Second Amended and Restated 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In connection with this offering, we intend to further amend and restated our 2017 ESPP. The purpose of the A&R
2017 ESPP is to encourage and enable our eligible employees to acquire a proprietary interest in us through the
ownership of our Class A common stock. The A&R 2017 ESPP, and the rights of participants to make purchases
thereunder, is intended to qualify under the provisions of Section 423 of the Code.
The following description of the A&R 2017 ESPP is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the complete text of the A&R 2017 ESPP, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Please read the A&R 2017 ESPP in its entirety.
Administration
The A&R 2017 ESPP will be administered by our board or a committee thereof designated by our board to
administer the A&R 2017 ESPP, which we refer to herein as the “ESPP Administrator.” The ESPP Administrator
has the final power to determine all questions of policy and expediency that may arise in the administration of the
A&R 2017 ESPP. The ESPP Administrator may delegate its responsibilities under the A&R 2017 ESPP to one or
more other persons.
Stock Subject to A&R 2017 ESPP
The maximum number of shares of Class A common stock that may be issued under the A&R 2017 ESPP will not
exceed 75,000,000 shares (the “ESPP Share Pool”), inclusive of shares issued under the 2017 ESPP prior to the
adoption of the A&R 2017 Plan. The ESPP Share Pool is subject to certain adjustments in the event of a change in
our capitalization. Shares of Class A common stock issued under the A&R 2017 ESPP may be either authorized and
unissued shares or previously issued shares acquired by us. A participant does not have the rights of a shareholder
until the shares are actually issued to the participant.
Eligibility; Limitations
An employee is eligible to participate in the A&R 2017 ESPP if the employee has been continuously employed by
us our one of our related corporations incorporated in the United States since at least the last day of the calendar
month preceding the month in which the offering date occurs and does not own 5% or more of the combined voting
power of the Company or any related corporations (as determined under Section 423 and 424 of the Code). Eligible
employees must enroll in a particular offering at least 10 business days prior to the offering date of such offering,
and once enrolled for an offering, employees will be automatically enrolled in subsequent offerings unless the
employee withdraws.
A participant is not permitted to purchase shares of our Class A common stock with a fair market value in excess of
$25,000 in any one calendar year (calculated based on the fair market value on the offering date).
Offerings
The offerings and purchase periods will be determined by the ESPP Administrator, subject to limitations under the
Section 423 of the Code. It is expected that we will continue six-month successive purchase periods with purchase
dates occurring on April 15th and October 15th of each year.
242
During the purchase period, a participant may contribute between 1% and 100% of their eligible earnings (in whole
percentage increments) through payroll deductions. A participant may change their payroll deduction prior to the
beginning of an offering; however, during an offering, a participant may not increase the contribution percentage
and may only decrease it up to two times (with the second decrease required to be to 0%), subject to the withdrawal
provisions. At the end of each offering period, unless the participant has withdrawn from the A&R 2017 ESPP,
payroll deductions are applied automatically to purchase shares of Class A common stock at the purchase price
described below. The number of shares purchased is determined by dividing the payroll deductions by the applicable
purchase price, with any remaining funds held in the participant’s account for the subsequent purchase period
(subject to the withdrawal provisions).
In the event of a participant’s termination of employment or a participant’s withdrawal from an offering (which may
occur at any time prior to the ten-business day period preceding the purchase date), such participant’s accumulated
deductions will be returned to the participant as soon as administratively practicable.
Purchase Price
The price per share at which shares are purchased under the A&R 2017 ESPP in a particular offering period is
determined by the ESPP Administrator, but in no event will be less than 85% of the lower of the fair market value of
the Class A common stock on the offering date or the fair market value of the Class A common stock on the
purchase date.
Adjustments
In the event of any reorganizations, recapitalizations, stock splits, reverse stock splits, stock dividends, extraordinary
dividends or distributions, or similar events, the ESPP Administrator will appropriately adjust the number and class
of shares available under the A&R 2017 ESPP and subject to the purchase limits under each ongoing offering and
the applicable purchase price of such shares in each ongoing offering.
Transferability
Rights to purchase Class A common stock under the A&R 2017 ESPP may not be transferred by a participant and
may be exercised during a participant’s lifetime only by the participant.
Amendment and Termination
The A&R 2017 ESPP will become effective when it is approved by our board. Our board may amend, alter, or
discontinue the A&R 2017 ESPP in any respect at any time, subject to shareholder approval as required by
applicable laws and regulations.
Director Compensation
During 2025, our non-employee directors did not receive cash or equity compensation for their service on our board.
Mr. Musk and Ms. Shotwell do not receive any additional compensation for their respective services as directors.
243
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
The following is a description of certain relationships and transactions that exist, are proposed to exist or have
existed or that we have entered into or propose to enter into with our directors, executive officers, holders of more
than 5% of our capital stock or their affiliates and immediate family members since January 1, 2023 and where:
•we have been or are to be a participant;
•the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
•any of our directors, executive officers, or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate
family member of, or persons sharing their household with, any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest.
Note Regarding the xAI Merger
On February 2, 2026, we effected the xAI Merger, pursuant to which we acquired xAI (which includes X). For the
purposes of the disclosures set forth in this section pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, the transactions
described below also include certain agreements and transactions originally entered into by xAI or X Holdings prior
to the xAI Merger to the extent that such agreements and transactions are ongoing following the consummation of
the xAI Merger.
Transactions with Elon Musk and Affiliated Entities
Elon Musk, our founder, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer, Chairman of our board, and principal
shareholder, also serves as the Technoking, Chief Executive Officer and director of Tesla, and is an approximately
20% shareholder of Tesla as of November 10, 2025. Mr. Musk is also the founder of several other ventures,
including The Boring Company (an infrastructure company). In addition, Mr. Musk was a stockholder, director, and
officer of each of xAI and X prior to the X Merger and the xAI Merger. We have certain relationships and/or
transactions with Mr. Musk and affiliated entities, as described below.
Transactions with Tesla
Tesla is the beneficial owner of 18,990,195 shares of our Class A common stock as of May 1, 2026, representing an
ownership interest of less than 1.0% of the total outstanding number of shares of our Class A common stock, after
giving effect to the sale of shares of Class A common stock in this offering.
Tesla designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and leases fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage
systems that deliver AI-related and enhanced software and services to its customers. We have historically
collaborated with Tesla through commercial, licensing, and support agreements. Certain amounts presented below
that may have been incurred in one year could be paid in another year.
•SpaceX commercial, licensing and support agreements. We are party with Tesla to certain agreements which
generally relate to commercial, licensing, and support agreements and standardized commercial transactions
with Tesla done on terms no less favorable to SpaceX than those generally available to unaffiliated third parties
under similar circumstances. Pursuant to those agreements, we obtained goods and services of $11 million in
2023, $4 million in 2024, $144 million in 2025, and $0.2 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28,
2026.
•xAI commercial, licensing and support agreements. xAI is party to certain commercial, licensing, and
support agreements with Tesla. Under these agreements, xAI obtained goods and services of $191 million in
2024, $506 million in 2025, and $34 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026, and xAI
recognized revenue of $2 million in 2025 and $0.4 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026
from Tesla.
244
•X Holdings advertising agreements. Tesla has directly and indirectly purchased advertising on our X
platform. These amounts totaled $0.5 million in 2024, $4 million in 2025, and $0 from January 1, 2026 through
February 28, 2026.
•Aircraft usage. Since April 2016, we have owned and operated aircraft used by Mr. Musk, in his capacity as
the Chief Executive Officer of Tesla, and other Tesla personnel for business travel, and we have invoiced Tesla
for the use of such aircraft owned and operated by us at rates determined by Tesla and SpaceX, subject to rules
of the Federal Aviation Administration governing such arrangements. For such aircraft use, we charged Tesla
$1 million in 2023, $1 million in 2024, $2 million in 2025, and $0 from January 1, 2026 through February 28,
2026.
Transactions with The Boring Company
In 2024, X entered into a lease for office space with a subsidiary owned by The Boring Company (an entity
affiliated with Mr. Musk). Under this agreement, X made lease payments of $0.1 million in 2024, $1 million in
2025, and $0.1 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026. In addition, SpaceX incurred expenses of
$1 million in 2025 in connection with the construction of tunnels by The Boring Company in Bastrop, Texas.
Relationships with Musk Industries LLC
xAI leases a real property owned by the Musk Industries LLC, which is owned by Mr. Musk. Under this agreement,
xAI made lease payments of $0.5 million in 2024, $2 million in 2025, and $0.2 million from January 1, 2026
through February 28, 2026.
Security Services provided to Mr. Musk
We are party to a services agreement with a security company owned by Mr. Musk and organized to provide
security services concerning him, including in connection with his duties to and work for SpaceX. SpaceX incurred
expenses of $2 million for such SpaceX-related security services in 2023, $3 million for such security services in
2024, $4 million for such security services in 2025, and $1 million for such security services from January 1, 2026
through February 28, 2026.
Relationship with Antonio J. Gracias and Affiliated Entities
Transactions with Valor Equity Partners and Affiliated Entities
Mr. Antonio J. Gracias, a member of our board, also serves as the founder, CEO and Chief Investment Officer of
Valor Equity Partners (together with its affiliates, “Valor”).
Certain subsidiaries of xAI, have entered into certain equipment lease, sublease, and access agreements with Valor.
These arrangements include (i) an equipment lease agreement under which a subsidiary of xAI leases computing and
related equipment from Valor, which provides for aggregate cash payments of $6,986 million to be made by such
subsidiary over the life of the lease, (ii) a second equipment lease agreement under which such subsidiary leases
certain computing and related equipment from Valor, which provides for aggregate cash payments of $6,633 million
to be made by such subsidiary over the life of the lease, and (iii) a third equipment lease under which such
subsidiary leases certain computing and related equipment from Valor, which provides for aggregate cash payments
of $6,587 million to be made by such subsidiary over the life of the lease. The lessees’ payments and performance
obligations under these agreements are guaranteed by Space Exploration Technologies Corp. or one of its
subsidiaries. Pursuant to the lease agreements described above, our subsidiaries have made payments of $885
million in 2025, and $857 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026.
In connection with certain X API services, X received payments from Valor of $1 million in 2024, $1 million in
2025, and $0.1 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026.
245
Other Transactions with our Directors and Executive Officers
We own and operate, through our subsidiary, Falcon Landing, LLC, three aircraft for use by our directors, executive
officers and employees in connection with the performance of their duties for business purposes. One of the aircraft
is maintained and serviced by Craft Aviation Services, LLC, an affiliate of Mr. Musk. The amount of the expenses
incurred by us for the maintenance and service of this aircraft was $1 million in 2023, $1 million in 2024, $3 million
in 2025, and $1 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026. As disclosed above, we have also invoiced
Tesla for their use of one of the aircraft owned and operated by us at rates determined by Tesla and SpaceX, subject
to rules of the Federal Aviation Administration governing such arrangements.
In certain circumstances, when our aircraft are unavailable, Mr. Musk uses his personal aircraft for SpaceX business
purposes and is reimbursed by us, subject to rules of the Federal Aviation Administration governing such
arrangements. In connection with the use of such aircraft, SpaceX has incurred expenses of $0.1 million in 2023, $3
million in 2024, $2 million in 2025, and $0.2 million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026.
Ms. Shotwell, our President, Chief Operating Officer and Director, and Mr. Johnsen, our Chief Financial Officer,
separately co-own an aircraft for their personal use. In certain circumstances, when none of our aircraft are available
for business use, our directors and employees, including Ms. Shotwell and Mr. Johnsen, have used this aircraft for
SpaceX business purposes. Any leasing fees for the use of such aircraft for our business purposes have been waived
by the owners, and we have agreed to assume the cost of maintenance, crew and operation of such aircraft for such
use, subject to rules of the Federal Aviation Administration governing such arrangements. In connection with the use
of this aircraft, SpaceX has incurred expenses of $3 million in 2023, $3 million in 2024, $3 million in 2025, and $1
million from January 1, 2026 through February 28, 2026.
Investors’ Rights Agreement
Certain existing investors in our equity securities, including entities affiliated with Elon Musk, Google, Valor, and
DFJ Growth, are party to an Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2020 (the
“Investors’ Rights Agreement”). Under the Investors’ Rights Agreement, such existing investors are entitled to
registration rights with respect to shares of our Class A common stock beneficially owned by them (collectively, the
“Registrable Securities”). These registration rights, if exercised, would require us to register such existing investors’
Registrable Securities under the Securities Act, and would facilitate the resale of such securities by such existing
investors into the public markets.
We will pay all registration expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, associated with
registrations effected pursuant to the Investors’ Rights Agreement, subject to limited exceptions.
Demand Registration Rights
At any time commencing six months after the effective date of the first registration statement for a public offering of
our securities (other than a registration on certain registration forms or for transactions not providing for the sale of
Registrable Securities), such holders of a majority of the then‑outstanding Registrable Securities, excluding for this
purpose shares issuable or issued upon conversion of certain series of our preferred stock, may request that we file a
registration statement within 60 days after receipt of the request covering the offer and sale of Registrable Securities,
provided that, among other things, the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and selling
expenses, exceeds $250.0 million. Further, the initiating holders may require that such registration be an
underwritten offering, in which case the underwriter will be selected by a majority in interest of the initiating
holders, subject to our reasonable approval.
Piggyback Registration Rights
If we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act for sale to the public for cash (other than on
certain registration forms or for transactions that do not permit piggyback participation), we must promptly give
each holder of Registrable Securities notice of such proposed registration and, upon timely request, cause to be
registered all Registrable Securities that such holder requests to be included, subject to any cutbacks, as permitted by
the agreement.
246
Policies and Procedures for Review of Related Person Transactions
In connection with the completion of this offering, we will adopt a written policy pursuant to which the audit
committee will review and approve or disapprove certain “related person transactions” (as defined in the policy and
summarized below) with our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting
securities and certain of their family members and affiliates. In approving or disapproving any such transaction, we
expect that our audit committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to
the audit committee. Any member of the audit committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under
review will not be permitted to participate in the deliberations or vote on approval or disapproval of the transaction.
In addition, certain transactions (including compensation arrangements with our executives and directors) will
constitute pre-approved related person transactions under the terms of our policy.
For purposes of the policy, (i) “related person transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we
or any of our subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, the amount of which involved exceeds $120,000, and in
which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest; and (ii) “related person” means:
(1) any person who is, or at any time during the applicable period was, one of our executive officers or one of our
directors; (2) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of our
common stock; and (3) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, which means any child,
stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-
law or sister-in-law of a director, executive officer or a beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of our
common stock, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director, executive
officer or beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of any class of our common stock.
247
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as
of May 1, 2026 and as adjusted to give effect to the completion of this offering and transactions related thereto, for:
•each person (or group of affiliated persons) known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of our
voting securities;
•each of our named executive officers and directors; and
•all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed below is c/o Space Exploration Technologies
Corp., 1 Rocket Road, Starbase, Texas 78521.
The percentage ownership information before this offering shown in the table is based on 6,932,508,000 shares of
our Class A common stock and 5,602,790,410 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding as of May 1, 2026,
after giving effect to the Class C Reclassification, the Preferred Conversion, and the 2026 Stock Split. The
percentage ownership information after this offering shown in the table is based on shares of our Class A
common stock and shares of our Class B common stock outstanding as of May 1, 2026, after giving effect
to the sale of shares of Class A common stock in this offering and to the Class C Reclassification, the
Preferred Conversion, and the 2026 Stock Split.
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than shares of Class A common stock, the underwriters have
the option to purchase up to an additional shares of Class A common stock from us. These amounts are
shown assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of Class A common stock.
The following table does not reflect any of the shares of Class A common stock that may be purchased in this
offering through the directed share program described in “Underwriting—Directed Share Program.”
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Shares of common stock subject
to options, warrants and rights that are exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 2026 are considered outstanding and
beneficially owned by the person holding such options or warrants for the purpose of computing the percentage
ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of any other person, except with respect to the percentage ownership of all directors and executive officers as a
group.
248
Shares Beneficially Owned Before This Offering | Shares Beneficially Owned After This Offering (No Exercise) | |||||||||||||||||||
Class A common stock(8) | Class B common stock | Combined voting power | Class A common stock | Class B common stock | Combined voting power | |||||||||||||||
Number | % | Number | % | % | Number | % | Number | % | % | |||||||||||
5% Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Elon Musk (1) ................................... | 849,494,440 | 12.3% | 5,569,053,075 | 93.6% | 85.1% | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Elon Musk (1) ................................... | 849,494,440 | 12.3% | 5,569,053,075 | 93.6% | 85.1% | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Gwynne Shotwell (2) ........................ | 5,460,400 | * | 7,113,550 | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Bret Johnsen (3) ................................ | 9,583,690 | * | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Ira Ehrenpreis (4) .............................. | 809,050 | * | 564,650 | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Randy Glein (5) ................................. | 277,800 | * | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Antonio J. Gracias (6) ....................... | 503,414,530 | 7.3% | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Donald Harrison .............................. | — | * | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Steve Jurvetson ............................... | — | * | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
Luke Nosek (7) ................................. | 32,987,360 | * | — | * | * | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group ( persons) ...... | 1,402,027,270 | 20.2% | 5,576,731,275 | 93.7% | 86.0% | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
__________________
*Represents beneficial ownership or voting power of less than 1%.
(1)Includes (i) 1,302,072,285 shares of restricted Class B common stock issued to and held of record by Mr. Musk, which may be voted by Mr. Musk and the vesting
of which is subject to the satisfaction of certain performance and other conditions, (ii) 842,091,670 shares of Class A common stock and 3,788,654,145 shares of
Class B common stock held of record by the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003, of which Mr. Musk serves as trustee, (iii) 900,495 shares of Class B
common stock held of record by the Musk 2017 Sprinkling Trust dated 12/12/2017, of which Mr. Musk serves as trustee, (iv) 7,402,770 shares of Class A
common stock held of record by the EM 2024 GRAT-A under agreement dated November 26, 2024, of which Mr. Musk serves as trustee, (v) 127,426,150 shares
of Class B common stock held of record by the Mission Trust dated December 12, 2019, of which Mr. Musk serves as trustee, and (vi) 350,000,000 shares of
Class B common stock issuable to Mr. Musk upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 2026. The reported amounts include 237,530 shares of
Class A common stock pledged as security for personal indebtedness.
(2)Includes (i) 2,258,135 shares of Class A common stock and 7,113,550 shares of Class B common stock held of record by Ms. Shotwell, (ii) 1,556,055 shares of
Class A common stock held of record by QM GS 2021 Exempt Trust, of which Ms. Shotwell and her spouse serve as trustees, (iii) 1,556,005 shares of Class A
common stock held of record by QM RS 2021 Exempt Trust, of which Ms. Shotwell and her spouse serve as trustees, and (iv) 90,205 shares of Class A common
stock issuable to Ms. Shotwell upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 2026.
(3)Includes (i) 2,518,540 shares of Class A common stock held of record by B & C Johnsen Holdings LLC, of which Mr. Johnsen and his spouse serve as managers,
(ii) 3,866,970 shares of Class A common stock held of record by the Bret and Catherine Johnsen Family Trust dated July 2, 2015, of which Mr. Johnsen and his
spouse serve as trustees, and (iii) 3,198,180 shares of Class A common stock issuable to Mr. Johnsen upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of May
1, 2026.
(4)Consists of 809,050 shares of Class A common stock and 564,650 shares of Class B common stock held of record by a revocable trust, of which Mr. Ehrenpreis
and his spouse serve as trustees.
(5)Represents 277,800 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Galaxy2021 Partners, LLC for which Mr. Glein serves as a manager. Mr. Glein disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares held of record by Galaxy2021 Partners, LLC, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(6)Consists of shares of Class A common stock held of record by the following: (i) 16,250,015 shares held by CV Consortio A LLC, (ii) 5,154,650 shares held by CV
Consortio F LLC, (iii) 4,464,250 shares held by CV Consortio G LLC, (iv) 2,375,295 shares held by CV Consortio M LLC, (v) 4,652,600 shares held by CV
Consortio N LLC, (vi) 3,648,645 shares held by KVSX I L.P., (vii) 1,118,920 shares held by TM33 Partner Holdings LLC, (viii) 911,430 shares held by Valor
Equity Partners Opportunity Fund I L.P., (ix) 190,610 shares held by Valor Equity Partners Opportunity Fund I-A L.P., (x) 1,576,525 shares held by Valor Equity
Partners Opportunity Fund I-B L.P., (xi) 20,529,605 shares held by Valor Equity Partners VI L.P., (xii) 495,880 shares held by Valor Equity Partners VI-A L.P.,
(xiii) 13,152,840 shares held by Valor Equity Partners VI-B L.P., (xiv) 52,569,550 shares held by Valor IV Space Holdings, LLC, (xv) 39,793,000 shares held by
Valor M33 II L.P., (xvi) 22,066,800 shares held by Valor M33 IV L.P., (xvii) 77,810,800 shares held by Valor M33 V L.P., (xviii) 8,939,445 shares held by Valor
M33 VI L.P., (xix) 31,083,705 shares held by Valor M33 L.P., (xx) 7,552,000 shares held by Valor R&D Series LLC, (xxi) 97,883,000 shares held by Valor
Space Holdings, LLC, (xxii) 34,051,100 shares held by Valor V Space Holdings, L.P., (xxiii) 1,179,245 shares held by Valor VII Space Holdings, L.P., (xxiv)
20,497,155 shares held by VG 1.0 L.P., (xxv) 4,272,795 shares held by VG 2.0 L.P., (xxvi) 783,920 shares held by VG AI Holdings L.P., (xxvii) 27,462,910
shares held by VGX 1.0 L.P., (xxviii) 669,600 shares held by VOF Space Holdings L.P., (xxix) 1,197,160 shares held by VSV II XAI Holdings L.P., and (xxx)
1,081,080 shares held by VX Holdings L.P. (collectively, “Valor Entities”). By virtue of his position with the Valor Entities or the general partners of the Valor
Entities, Antonio J. Gracias may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the shares held of record by the Valor Entities. Mr. Gracias disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares held of record by each of the Valor Entities, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The address for each of the Valor
Entities identified in this footnote and Antonio Gracias is c/o Valor Equity Partners, 320 North Sangamon Street, Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60607.
(7)Includes (i) 24,987,340 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Mr. Nosek and (ii) 8,000,020 shares of Class A common stock held of record by Nosek
Capital, LLC, for which Mr. Nosek is the managing member. The reported amounts include 2,381,000 shares of Class A common stock pledged as security for
personal indebtedness.
249
(8)The amounts in the table with respect to Class A Common Stock do not include the shares of Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by the persons listed
therein. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of our Class A common stock. In addition,
subject to certain exceptions, each share of Class B common stock will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon any sale of such share
of Class B common stock or any legal or beneficial interest in such share, as described in “Description of Capital Stock—Common Stock—Conversion.”
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, which generally attribute ownership to persons who have or share voting or
investment power with respect to the relevant securities. Shares of Class A Common Stock that may be acquired within 60 days upon conversion of outstanding
Class B Common Stock are deemed to be beneficially owned. Securities not outstanding, but included in the beneficial ownership of each such person, are deemed
to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities of the class owned by such person, but are not deemed to be outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class(es) of securities owned by any other person. Except as indicated in these footnotes, and subject to
community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all securities shown as
beneficially owned by them. Moreover, as described in “Description of Capital Stock—Voting Rights,” subject to the terms of our charter, each holder of our
Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share, and each holder of our Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Holders of our Class B
common stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors (rounded up to the nearest whole number).
250
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary of the Company’s capital stock and charter and bylaws (each as in effect upon completion of
this offering) does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of
applicable law and to our charter and bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part. To understand the material terms of our common stock and preferred stock, you should read
our charter and our bylaws in their entirety. For purposes of this section, the term “common stock” refers to our
Class A, Class B, and Class C common stock.
General
Upon completion of this offering, the authorized capital stock of the Company will consist of 36,132,150,000 shares
of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which shares will be issued and outstanding,
6,125,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which shares will be issued and
outstanding, 10,000,000,000 shares of Class C common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which no shares will be
issued and outstanding, and 2,400,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which no shares
will be issued and outstanding.
Common Stock
Voting Rights
General
Subject to the terms of our charter, each holder of our Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share; each
holder of our Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share; and the holders of our Class C common stock
will have no voting rights. Generally speaking, with respect to matters to be voted on by shareholders of the
Company, the holders of all classes of our voting common stock will vote together as a single class. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, our charter will provide that (i) as further described below, (1) holders of our Class B common stock,
voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors (rounded up to the
nearest whole number); and (2) removal of Mr. Musk from his board and leadership roles (Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of our board) requires the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares of Class B common stock, voting separately as a class; and (ii) in addition to any other required
vote, under our charter, the approval of the Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, is required to
approve (1) any amendment to our charter that would make any change in the rights, powers, preferences and
privileges of the Class B common stock (including with respect to Class B Directors); and (2) certain combinations,
mergers or sales, as described in our charter. Otherwise, classes of common stock will not be entitled to any separate
class votes, as our charter will provide for an opt-out from class votes that would otherwise be required under the
TBOC.
Election and Removal of Directors
With respect to the election of directors, our charter will provide that (i) holders of our Class B common stock,
voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors (rounded up to the
nearest whole number) for so long as any shares of Class B common stock remain outstanding; and that (ii) holders
of all classes of our voting common stock, voting together as a single class, are entitled to elect the remaining
directors (the “Common Stock Directors”). Class B Directors may be removed with or without cause by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Class B
common stock, voting separately as a class. Vacancies occurring with respect to the Class B Directors, including as
a result of newly created directorships on the board, may be filled at any time by the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock, voting separately as a
class, or by the remaining Class B Directors, and not any other persons, subject to the terms of our charter. Common
Stock Directors may be removed with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of
the voting power of the outstanding shares of voting common stock, voting together as a single class. Vacancies
occurring with respect to the Common Stock Directors, including as a result of newly created directorships on the
board, may be filled at any time by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of
251
the outstanding shares of voting common stock, voting together as a single class, or by the remaining directors,
subject to the terms of our charter.
Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will continue to serve as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical
Officer and Chairman of the board. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, pursuant to the terms of our charter,
Mr. Musk will only be subject to removal from the board and from his Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
board leadership positions with the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the
outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, voting separately as a class.
Notwithstanding the above, each of the voting rights described above will be subject to the rights that may be
granted in the future to the holders of any one or more series of preferred stock, as applicable.
Dividends
Subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of the Company’s capital stock at the time outstanding
having prior rights as to dividends, the holders of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class
C common stock will be entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the board. Any
dividends paid to the holders of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock
will be paid pro rata, on an equal priority, pari passu basis.
Dissolution and Liquidation
Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of shares of Class A common stock, Class B
common stock and Class C common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of
liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company.
Conversion
Holders of our Class A common stock and Class C common stock do not have conversion rights. Each share of
Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one share of our Class A common
stock. In addition, subject to certain exceptions specified in the charter that do not constitute a “Transfer” (as defined
below) and other than in the case of certain “permitted transfers” (as summarized below), each share of Class B
common stock will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon any sale, assignment,
encumbrance, transfer, conveyance, hypothecation, pledge, gift, or other transfer or disposition of any kind of such
share of Class B common stock or any legal or beneficial interest in such share, whether or not for value and
whether voluntary or involuntary or by operation of law, including, without limitation, the transfer of, or entering
into a binding agreement with respect to, voting control over such share by proxy or otherwise (each, a “Transfer”).
For purposes of our charter, “permitted transfers” will include transfers to and from (i) the registered holders of
Class B common stock; (ii) each natural person who transferred shares of Class B common stock or equity awards
(including any option or warrant exercisable or convertible into shares of Class B common stock) to certain
“permitted entities” (as defined in the charter); (iii) one or more family members of shareholders specified in clauses
(i) and (ii); (iv) certain other trusts, general partnerships, limited partnerships, limited liability companies,
corporations, or other entities owned by certain qualified shareholders (as defined in the charter), including certain
permitted non-for-profits; as well as (v) certain transfers to bona fide trusts for the benefit of a charitable
organization, contributions to which are deductible for federal income, estate, gift and generation skipping transfer
tax purposes, to certain retirement accounts, and for certain estate or succession planning purposes. “Permitted
Transferees” will include a transferee of shares of Class B common stock received in a Transfer that constitutes a
“permitted transfer.”
No Preemptive or Other Rights
Holders of the Company’s Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock do not have
preemptive, subscription, redemption rights, or sinking fund.
252
Issuance of Additional Shares
We may issue additional authorized shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common
stock at any time or from time to time, subject to applicable provisions of our charter, our bylaws and Texas law.
Our charter will provide that additional shares of Class B common stock may only be issued in the future to Mr.
Musk, his family members and certain entities permitted under our charter.
Preferred Stock
Our charter authorizes our board, subject to any limitations prescribed by applicable law and any stock exchange,
without further shareholder approval, to establish and to issue from time to time one or more series of preferred
stock. Each series of preferred stock will have the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participation,
optional or other rights, if any, including voting rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, if
any, and the number of shares constituting the series, as determined by the board. Any issuance of preferred stock
could have the effect of decreasing the market price of our Class A common stock.
Anti-takeover Effects of Provisions of Our Charter, our Bylaws and Texas Law
Some provisions of Texas law, and our charter and our bylaws contain provisions that could make the following
transactions more difficult: acquisitions of us by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise; or removal of
our incumbent officers and directors. These provisions may also have the effect of preventing changes in our
management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish or could deter
transactions that shareholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in our best interests, including
transactions that might result in a premium over the market price for our shares of Class A common stock.
These provisions, as summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first
negotiate with us. We believe that the benefits of increased protection and our potential ability to negotiate with the
proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of
discouraging these proposals because, among other things, negotiation of these proposals could result in an
improvement of their terms.
Anti-takeover statute under Texas law
We will be subject to Section 21.606 of the TBOC, which in general, prohibits a publicly held Texas corporation,
like the Company after the completion of this offering, from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business
combination with an affiliated shareholder (as defined in the TBOC) for a period of three years following the date
the person became an affiliated shareholder unless:
•the board approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the shareholder becoming
an affiliated shareholder before the affiliated shareholder’s share acquisition date; or
•at or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board and authorized
at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds of the outstanding voting shares not beneficially owned by the affiliated shareholder or any of its
affiliates or associates at a meeting of shareholders called for that purpose not less than six months after the
affiliated shareholder’s share acquisition date.
Provisions of our charter and our bylaws that may have an anti-takeover effect
Election of Class B Directors
As discussed above, our charter will provide that holders of our Class B common stock, voting separately as a class,
are entitled to elect 51% of the total number of authorized directors (rounded up to the nearest whole number). Upon
completion of this offering, Mr. Musk will beneficially own shares of our Class A common stock
and shares of our Class B common stock, representing approximately % of the combined voting
power of our outstanding shares of voting common stock. As the holder of a majority of our outstanding shares of
253
Class B common stock, Mr. Musk will be able to elect, remove or fill any vacancy among the Class B Directors. As
a result, Mr. Musk will have the power to control the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval, including
election of the board, and our business and affairs. This may have the effect of deferring, delaying or discouraging
hostile takeovers, or changes in control or management, of the Company.
No cumulative voting
Our charter will not permit cumulative voting in the election of directors.
Special meetings of shareholders
Our charter will provide that special meetings of shareholders may be called by the chairman of the board, the chief
executive officer, the president (to the extent required by the TBOC), our board, our founder or by shareholders
holding not less than 50% (or the highest percentage of ownership that may be set under the TBOC) of the
Company’s then outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote on the proposed action at the meeting.
Shareholder action by written consent
Our charter will provide that any action required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of the shareholders
may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a consent or consents in writing, setting
forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of
votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of stock entitled to
vote thereon were present and voted. Our charter will also provide that any action required or permitted to be taken
by the holders of Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, may be taken without a meeting, without prior
notice and without a vote if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the
holders of outstanding Class B common stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of Class B common stock entitled to vote
thereon were present and voted.
Requirements for advance notification of shareholder meetings, nominations and proposals
Our bylaws will establish advance notice procedures with respect to shareholder proposals and the nomination of
candidates for election as a director. In order for any matter to be “properly brought” before a meeting, a shareholder
(other than Mr. Musk and his permitted transferees) must comply with such advance notice procedures and provide
us with certain information.
Section 21.373 of the TBOC permits a “nationally listed corporation” to amend its governing documents to elect to
impose stock ownership requirements on shareholders seeking to submit a proposal on a matter (other than director
nominations and procedural resolutions ancillary to the conduct of a shareholder meeting) to the shareholders of
such corporation for approval at a shareholder meeting. If a “nationally listed corporation” elects to be governed by
Section 21.373 of the TBOC, a shareholder or group of shareholders may submit a proposal on a matter to the
shareholders of such corporation for approval at a meeting of shareholders only if such shareholder or group of
shareholders (i) holds an amount of voting shares (determined as of the date of submission of the proposal) equal to
at least $1,000,000 in market value or 3% of the corporation’s voting shares, and (ii) holds such amount for a
continuous period of at least six months before the date of the meeting and throughout the entire duration of the
meeting and (iii) solicits the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of shares entitled to vote
on the proposal at the shareholder meeting. For the purpose of this paragraph, “voting shares” means shares that
entitle the holder of the shares to vote on the proposal. Our bylaws will adopt these requirements for submitting a
shareholder proposal to go into effect immediately upon the completion of this offering, when we will qualify as a
“nationally listed corporation.”
Authorized but unissued shares
As mentioned above, our authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock will generally be
available for future issuance without the approval of our shareholders. The TBOC does not require shareholder
approval for any issuance of authorized shares. However, the Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas listing requirements require
254
shareholder approval of certain issuances equal to or exceeding 20% of the then-outstanding voting power or the
then-outstanding number of shares of common stock. We may issue additional shares for a variety of corporate
purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit
plans.
Corporate Opportunities
Under our charter, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, we will renounce any interest or expectancy of
the Company or its subsidiaries in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, certain business opportunities
(as specified in our charter) that are from time to time presented to any member of the board or board observer or
attendee, regardless of whether any such person is an employee of the Company and their respective affiliates (other
than the Company and its subsidiaries) (together, the “Business Opportunities Exempt Party”), even if the business
opportunity is one that we or our subsidiaries might reasonably be deemed to have pursued or had the ability or
desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do so, and no Business Opportunities Exempt Party shall have any duty
to present any such business opportunity to us or be liable to us or any of our subsidiaries or any shareholder,
including for breach of any fiduciary or other duty, as a director or officer or controlling shareholder or otherwise,
and we shall indemnify each Business Opportunities Exempt Party against any claim that such person is liable to us
or our shareholders for breach of any fiduciary duty, by reason of the fact that such person (i) fails to present any
such business opportunity, (ii) pursues, acquires or exploits any such business opportunity, or (iii) directs, sells,
assigns or transfers any such business opportunity to another person or entity, unless, in the case of a person who is
our director or officer, such business opportunity is presented to, or acquired, created or developed by, or otherwise
comes into the possession of, such Business Opportunities Exempt Party expressly and solely in his or her capacity
as an employee, director, board observer or attendee, or shareholder of the Company.
Exclusive Forum and Venue and Arbitration, Jury Trial Waiver
Our bylaws will provide that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the
sole and exclusive forum for any of the filing, adjudication and trial of all disputes (“Internal Disputes”) between (i)
one or more shareholders and (ii) the Company or its directors, officers, or controlling persons, or any underwriter of
securities issued by the Company (or controlling person thereof) relating to any of the following: (1) any derivative
proceeding, meaning a civil dispute brought in the right of the Company; (2) any action based on the governance,
governing documents, or internal affairs of the Company; (3) any action based on state or federal securities or trade
regulation laws; (4) any action based on the alleged act(s) or omission(s) by a person in its capacity as a shareholder,
controlling person, director, officer, or other managerial official of the Company; (5) any action based on the alleged
breach(es) by one or more shareholders, controlling persons, directors, officers, or other managerial officials of a
duty owed, in his or her capacity as such, to the Company or to any shareholder thereof; (6) an action seeking to
hold a shareholder, controlling person, director, officer, or other managerial official of the Company liable for an
obligation of the Company, other than on account of a written contract signed by the person to be held liable in a
capacity other than as a shareholder or managerial official; and (7) any action arising out of the TBOC, will be the
Business Court.
Our bylaws will further provide that to the extent, and solely to the extent, that a court of competent jurisdiction
determines in a final and unappealable judgment that an Internal Dispute is not subject to the sole and exclusive
venue and forum provision or to the jurisdiction of the Business Court (such Internal Dispute, an “Other Dispute”),
such Other Dispute, irrespective of the amount in dispute, shall be exclusively and finally settled by arbitration
before the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) in Houston, Texas, conducted under the Expedited
Procedure Provisions of the Rules (the “Arbitration Rules”) of the ICC as those rules may be periodically updated.
Our bylaws will provide the following for arbitration:
•The tribunal will include one arbitrator for claims of $5 million or less or a panel of three arbitrators for claims
exceeding $5 million, and our bylaws will specify procedures governing the selection of the panel. The ICC fees
and arbitrator(s) fees will be governed by the ICC fee and arbitrator fee schedule as may apply depending on the
nature and amount of the claim.
255
•If more than three claims arising from the same or similar conduct, transaction, or occurrence are submitted to
arbitration within any three-year period, all but the first-filed claim shall be stayed pending final resolution of
that first-filed claim. In such circumstance, the Company and each shareholder asserting such a claim shall bear
equal shares of the ICC fees and arbitrator(s) fees. However, if any shareholder party or parties are ultimately
successful on all of their claims, the Company shall reimburse the successful shareholder party or parties for the
ICC fees and arbitrator(s) fees paid by such shareholder party or parties.
•If more than three claims are submitted by the same shareholder(s) within any three-year period, then the
Company shall pay the ICC fees and arbitrator(s) fees associated with the first three claims only. However, if
any shareholder party or parties are ultimately successful on all of their claims, the Company shall reimburse the
successful shareholder party or parties for the ICC fees and arbitrator(s) fees paid by such shareholder party or
parties.
•If any claim submitted to arbitration is determined by the tribunal to be frivolous, without reasonable cause, or
for an improper purpose such as bad faith or vexatious litigation, the Company shall be entitled to recover its
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in defending against such claim, including any ICC fees and
arbitrator(s) fees.
•The tribunal’s authority is subject to the same limits as the authority of a judge in a Texas court of law. The
tribunal does not have authority to issue an award that (i) exceeds the tribunal’s authority under the Texas
Arbitration Act; (ii) contains a reversible error of state or federal law, including as to the admissibility of
evidence, or a clearly erroneous finding of fact; or (iii) applies a cause of action or provides a remedy not
expressly provided for under applicable Texas or federal law. The tribunal’s application of the pleading and
discovery limitations imposed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act is mandatory for applicable
claims and shall not constitute a refusal to hear evidence pertinent and/or material to the controversy under
Texas or federal law.
•Pursuant to the Texas Arbitration Act, the scope of judicial review of the tribunal’s award includes the ordinary
grounds for vacatur, modification, and correction imposed by the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code §§
171.088 and 171.091, and is expanded beyond what is otherwise available under the Texas Civil Practice &
Remedies Code to include review of whether the award: (i) contains a reversible error of state or federal law,
including as to the admissibility of evidence, or a clearly erroneous finding of fact; or (ii) applies a cause of
action or provides a remedy not expressly provided for under applicable Texas or federal law. The arbitral
tribunal’s award and the findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be reviewable upon the same standards of
review as if said award and supporting findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered by a Texas court.
•Any action seeking to confirm, vacate, modify, correct, or otherwise challenge the tribunal’s award shall be
brought in the Business Court. In any such action, the parties shall file all court filings under seal, to the fullest
extent allowed by applicable law.
Our bylaws will further provide that the extent, and solely to the extent, that a court of competent jurisdiction
determines in a final and unappealable judgment that the requirement that Other Disputes be exclusively and finally
settled by arbitration is unenforceable in whole or part, the sole and exclusive forum and venue for such Other
Disputes which are determined not to be subject to mandatory arbitration shall be the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the “Federal Court”), or if a court of competent jurisdiction
determines in a final and unappealable judgment that the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction over any such Other
Dispute, the sole and exclusive forum and venue for such Other Dispute shall be the state district courts of Harris
County, Texas.
Our bylaws will further provide that Other Disputes will be governed either by Texas state law or federal law,
depending on the claim asserted.
Our bylaws will also provide that:
•The Company and each shareholder, director, and officer of the Company irrevocably and unconditionally
waives, and any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of stock of
256
the Company shall be deemed to have irrevocably and unconditionally waived, any right it may have to a trial
by jury in any legal action or proceeding relating to Internal Disputes described above.
•Internal Disputes may not be brought as a class, or consolidated or joined, except at the Company’s option.
Although we believe these provisions will benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Texas
law for the specified types of actions and proceedings, the provisions may have the effect of discouraging or
increasing the costs of lawsuits against our directors, officers, other managerial officials employees and agents.
However, it is possible that, in connection with a future legal proceeding, a court could rule that all or a portion of
these provisions in our bylaws purporting to require an exclusive forum for certain disputes, to waive the right to a
jury trial or to require arbitration for shareholder claims are inapplicable, unconstitutional or otherwise
unenforceable.
Stock Ownership Requirement for Derivative Suits
Our bylaws will specify that the required ownership threshold for a shareholder or group of shareholders to institute
or maintain a derivative proceeding in the right of the Company for purposes of Section 21.552(a)(3) of the TBOC
will be 3% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. This provision will continue to apply so
long as any shares of the Company’s common stock are listed for trading on a national securities exchange or the
Company affirmatively elects to be governed by TBOC 21.419 and has 500 or more shareholders.
Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Our charter will include a provision eliminating the liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages for
an act or omission by the person in the person’s capacity as a director or officer, respectively, except for: (i) a breach
of the duty of loyalty to the Company or its shareholders; (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a
breach of duty of the person to the Company or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of applicable
law; (iii) a transaction from which the director or officer obtains an improper benefit, regardless of whether the
benefit resulted from an action taken within the scope of the person’s duties; or (iv) an act or omission for which the
liability of a director or officer is expressly provided by an applicable statute (such as wrongful distributions). Our
charter also will provide that if the TBOC is amended in the future to authorize corporate action further eliminating
or limiting of the personal liability of directors and officers, the liability of directors and officers will be eliminated
or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC as so amended.
Any amendment, repeal or modification of these provisions will be prospective only and would not affect any
limitation on liability of a director or officer for acts or omissions that occurred prior to any such amendment, repeal
or modification.
Our bylaws also provide that we will indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by the TBOC, subject to reimbursement in the event it is ultimately determined that the individual
was not entitled to indemnification under the TBOC or the indemnification agreement. Our bylaws also will permit
us to purchase insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee, or other agent for any liability arising out of
that person’s actions as our officer, director, employee or agent, regardless of whether the TBOC would permit
indemnification. We intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our current and future directors
and officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals against liability that may arise by
reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which
they could be indemnified. As permitted by the TBOC, because these agreements are expected to be approved by
our shareholders, the agreements may require indemnification or payment of expenses in favor of the indemnitee in
certain circumstances in which we would not otherwise have the power to do so under the provisions of the TBOC
or our charter or bylaws. We believe that the limitation of liability provision that will be in our charter and the
indemnification agreements will facilitate our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve as
directors and officers.
Our bylaws will provide that the Company affirmatively elects to be governed by Section 21.419 of the TBOC and
any successor provision thereto. Because the Company will have a class of voting common stock (our Class A
common stock) listed on a national securities exchange, Section 21.419 will also be deemed to apply to the
257
Company. Under Section 21.419 of the TBOC, in taking or declining to take any action on any matters of a
corporation’s business, a director or officer of the Company is presumed to act (i) in good faith, (ii) on an informed
basis, (iii) in furtherance of the interests of the Company, and (iv) in obedience to the law and the Company’s
governing documents. In addition, neither the Company nor any of its shareholders has a cause of action against the
director or officer as a result of any act or omission in the person’s capacity as such unless the claimant rebuts one or
more of the foregoing presumptions and it is proven by the claimant that (A) the director’s or officer’s act or
omission constitutes a breach of one or more of the person’s duties as a director or officer and (B) the breach
involved fraud, intentional misconduct, an ultra vires act or a knowing violation of law.
Protection for Conflicts of Interest
Section 21.418 of the TBOC provides that, at any time a corporation’s voting common stock is listed for trading on a
national securities exchange, the corporation’s directors and officers will not be liable to the corporation or its
shareholders for claims alleging a breach of duty arising from the making, authorization, or performance of a
contract or transaction solely because the director or officer had an interest in the transaction unless the claim would
be permitted under Section 21.419 of the TBOC as described above. Because the Company will have a class of
voting common stock (our Class A common stock) listed on a national securities exchange, Section 21.418 of the
TBOC will be deemed to apply to the Company.
Registration Rights
For a description of registration rights with respect to our Class A common stock, see “Certain Relationships and
Related Person Transactions—Investors' Rights Agreement.”
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The Transfer Agent and Registrar for our Class A common stock is .
Listing
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas under the symbol “SPCX.”
258
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our Class A common stock. Future sales of our Class A
common stock in the public market, or the availability of such shares for sale in the public market, could adversely
affect the market price of our Class A common stock prevailing from time to time. As described below, only a
limited number of shares will be available for sale shortly after this offering due to contractual and legal restrictions
on resale. Nevertheless, sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market
after such restrictions lapse, or the perception that those sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing
market price of our Class A common stock at such time and our ability to raise equity-related capital at a time and
price we deem appropriate.
Sales of Restricted Shares
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have outstanding an aggregate of shares of Class A
common stock. Of these shares, all shares of Class A common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable
without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless the shares are held by any of our
“affiliates” as such term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. All shares of Class A and Class B common
stock issued prior to the closing of this offering, including shares held by Mr. Musk and other existing investors, will
be deemed “restricted securities” as such term is defined under Rule 144. The restricted securities were issued in
private transactions and are eligible for public sale only if registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act, which rules are summarized
below.
As a result of the lock-up agreements described below, shares of Class A common stock, and potentially
an additional shares of Class A common stock, assuming that 100% of our Class B common stock has
been converted into Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, will be eligible for sale upon the expiration of
the lock-up agreements, beginning days after the date of this prospectus when permitted under Rule 144
or Rule 701.
Lock-Up Agreements
We and all of our directors and executive officers have agreed not to sell any shares of Class A common stock for a
period of days after the date of this prospectus, subject to certain exceptions. Please refer to
“Underwriting” for a description of these lock-up provisions.
Registration Rights
After the completion of this offering, holders of an aggregate of approximately shares of our Class A
common stock will be entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration of such shares under the Securities
Act. The registration of these shares of our Class A common stock under the Securities Act would result in these
shares becoming eligible for sale in the public market without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon
the effectiveness of such registration, subject to certain limitations applicable to affiliates. See “Certain
Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Investors' Rights Agreement” for a description of these registration
rights.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 under the Securities Act as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are
aggregated) who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and who has beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at least six months
(including any period of consecutive ownership of preceding non-affiliated holders) would be entitled to sell those
shares, subject only to the availability of current public information about us. A non-affiliated person (who has been
unaffiliated for at least the past three months) who has beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of
Rule 144 for at least one year would be entitled to sell those shares without regard to the provisions of Rule 144.
259
Beginning 90 days after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, a
person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who is deemed to be an affiliate of ours and who has beneficially
owned restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at least nine months would be entitled to sell within
any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of one percent of the then outstanding
shares of our Class A common stock or the average weekly trading volume of our Class A common stock reported
through Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with
respect to the sale. Such sales are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the
availability of current public information about us.
Regulation S
Regulation S under the Securities Act (“Regulation S”) provides that ordinary shares owned by any person may be
sold without registration in the United States, provided that the sale is effected in an offshore transaction and no
directed selling efforts are made in the United States (as these terms are defined in Regulation S), subject to certain
other conditions. In general, this means that our Class A common stock may be sold outside the United States under
certain circumstances without registration in the United States being required.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 under the Securities Act, any of our employees, directors, officers, consultants or
advisors who purchases shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written
agreement before the effective date of this offering is entitled to sell such shares 90 days after the effective date of
this offering in reliance on Rule 144, without having to comply with the holding period requirement of Rule 144
and, in the case of non-affiliates, without having to comply with the public information, volume limitation or notice
filing provisions of Rule 144. The SEC has indicated that Rule 701 will apply to typical stock options granted by an
issuer before it becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, along with the shares acquired
upon exercise of such options, including exercises after the date of this prospectus.
Stock Issued Under Employee Plans
We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register stock issuable under our
A&R 2024 Plan and A&R 2017 ESPP and to register stock issuable pursuant to outstanding awards under our other
Equity Plans. This registration statement on Form S-8 is expected to be filed following the effective date of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and will be effective immediately upon filing. Accordingly,
shares of Class A common stock registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open
market following the effective date, unless such shares are subject to vesting restrictions with us or the lock-up
restrictions described above.
260
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF CLASS
A COMMON STOCK
The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase,
ownership, and disposition of shares of our Class A common stock by a Non-U.S. Holder (as defined below). This
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular taxpayers in
light of their special circumstances (including the impact of the Medicare contribution tax on net investment income
and the alternative minimum tax) or to taxpayers subject to special tax rules (including a “controlled foreign
corporation,” a “passive foreign investment company,” a company that accumulates earnings to avoid U.S. federal
income tax, a tax-exempt organization or a governmental organization, a financial institution, a person that elects to
mark their securities to market, a person required to conform the timing of income accruals to financial statements
pursuant to Section 451 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a person holding our Class
A common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, or other risk reduction strategy or as part of a conversion transaction or
other integrated investment, a person who holds or receives our Class A common stock pursuant to the exercise of
any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation, a tax-qualified retirement plan, a “qualified foreign
pension fund” as defined in Section 897(l)(2) of “Code” or an entity all of the interests of which are held by
qualified foreign pension funds, a broker or dealer in securities or currencies, a U.S. expatriate, a former U.S. citizen
or resident, or a partnership or other entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes).
Except as specifically provided herein, this discussion does not address any aspect of U.S. federal taxation other than
U.S. federal income taxation or any aspect of state, local or foreign taxation. In addition, this discussion deals only
with U.S. federal income tax consequences to a Non-U.S. Holder that acquires our Class A common stock in this
offering and holds our Class A common stock as a capital asset.
This discussion is based on the Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions, and
published rulings and administrative pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), in each case, in
effect as of the date hereof. These authorities may change or be subject to differing interpretations. Any such change
or differing interpretation may be applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a Non-U.S. Holder of
our Class A common stock. We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS regarding the matters
discussed below. We cannot assure that the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below
regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of our Class A common stock, or that a
change in law will not alter significantly the tax considerations that we describe in this summary.
A “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our Class A common stock that is an individual, corporation (or other
entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes), trust or estate that is not, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
•an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
•a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State thereof (including the
District of Columbia);
•an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
•a trust, the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and
for which one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions, or that has a valid
election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
If a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our
Class A common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend upon the status of
the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding our Class A common stock and partners in such
partnerships should consult their tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income and other tax consequences of
investing in our Class A common stock.
261
THIS DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR GENERAL
INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS SHOULD
CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
TO THEM OF PURCHASING, OWNING, AND DISPOSING OF OUR CLASS A COMMON STOCK, AS WELL
AS THE APPLICATION OF ANY U.S. FEDERAL NON-INCOME, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. INCOME,
GIFT, ESTATE AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
Distributions
As described in the section titled “Dividend Policy,” we do not anticipate declaring or paying dividends to holders of
our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future. However, if we do make distributions of cash or property on
our Class A common stock (other than certain pro rata distributions of our stock), such distributions will be treated
as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S.
federal income tax principles). Amounts not treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be treated
as a tax-free return of capital and first be applied against and reduce a Non-U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its shares of
our Class A common stock, but not below zero. Any excess will be treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange
of the Non-U.S. Holder’s shares of Class A common stock taxable as described below under “—Sale or Disposition
of Class A Common Stock.”
Subject to the discussion below on backup withholding and FATCA, dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder of our
Class A common stock that are not effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business
within the United States will generally be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate or such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty, provided the Non-U.S. Holder furnishes a valid
IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or other applicable documentation) certifying qualification for the lower treaty
rate. These certifications must be provided to the applicable withholding agent prior to the payment of dividends and
must be updated periodically. A Non-U.S. Holder that does not timely furnish the required documentation, but is
eligible for a reduced rate of withholding tax under an income tax treaty, may obtain a refund or credit of any excess
amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax
advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under an applicable income tax treaty and the manner of claiming the
benefits of such treaty.
Dividends that are effectively connected with a Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business within the United
States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed
base that such holder maintains or maintained in the United States) are not subject to the withholding tax described
above but instead are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at applicable graduated U.S. federal
income tax rates. In order for its effectively connected dividends to be exempt from the withholding tax described
above, a Non-U.S. Holder will be required to provide a duly completed and properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI,
certifying that the dividends are effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business
within the United States. Dividends received by a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation that are effectively
connected with its conduct of a trade or business within the United States may be subject to an additional “branch
profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. Non-U.S.
Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding any applicable tax treaties that may provide for different rules.
Sale or Disposition of Class A Common Stock
Subject to the discussion below on backup withholding and FATCA, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be
subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain recognized upon the sale, exchange or other taxable
disposition of shares of our Class A common stock, unless:
•such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business within the
United States and, if the Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to claim treaty benefits (and the Non-U.S. Holder complies
with applicable certification and other requirements), is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base
maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States;
•such Non-U.S. Holder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more
in the taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met; or
262
•we are or have been a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes at
any time within the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the period that such Non-
U.S. Holder held shares of our Class A common stock.
A Non-U.S. Holder described in the first bullet point immediately above will be subject to tax on the gain derived
from the sale or other disposition in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. person as defined under
the Code. In addition, if any Non-U.S. Holder described in the first bullet point immediately above is a corporation,
the gain realized by such Non-U.S. Holder may be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such
lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. An individual Non-U.S. Holder described in the
second bullet point immediately above will be subject to a 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty) tax on the gain derived from the sale or other taxable disposition, which gain may be
offset by U.S. source capital losses even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States,
provided the Non-U.S. Holder has timely filed U.S. federal income tax returns with respect to such losses.
Generally, a corporation is a “United States real property holding corporation” (“USRPHC”) if the fair market value
of its United States real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its
worldwide real property interests and its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business (all as determined for
U.S. federal income tax purposes). We believe we are not and do not anticipate becoming a USRPHC for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. However, because the determination of whether we are a USRPHC depends on the fair
market value of our U.S. real property interests relative to the fair market value of our business assets, there can be
no assurances that we are not a USRPHC or will not become one in the future. Even if we became a USRPHC, a
Non-U.S. Holder would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition of
our Class A common stock by reason of our status as USRPHC so long as our Class A common stock is regularly
traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of the applicable regulations) and such Non-U.S.
Holder does not own and is not deemed to own (directly, indirectly or constructively) more than 5% of our
outstanding Class A common stock at any time during the shorter of the five year period ending on the date of
disposition and such holder’s holding period. Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding the
possible consequences to them if we are, or were to become, a USRPHC.
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding
The amount of dividends or proceeds paid to a Non-U.S. Holder, the name and address of the Non-U.S. Holder and
the amount of tax, if any, withheld generally will be reported to the IRS. Copies of these information returns may
also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in
which the Non-U.S. Holder resides. A Non-U.S. Holder generally will be required to provide proper certification
(usually on an IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E or W-8ECI, as applicable) to establish that the Non-U.S. Holder is
not a U.S. person or otherwise qualifies for an exemption in order to avoid backup withholding tax with respect to
our payment of dividends on, or the proceeds from the disposition of, our Class A common stock. Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against that Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information
is timely furnished to the IRS. Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding the application of the
information reporting rules and backup withholding to it.
Additional Withholding Tax on Payments Made to Foreign Accounts
Withholding taxes may be imposed under Sections 1471 to 1474 of the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated
thereunder and other official guidance (commonly referred to as “FATCA”) on certain types of payments made to
non-U.S. financial institutions and certain other non-U.S. entities. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax may be
imposed on dividends on, or (subject to the proposed Treasury Regulations discussed below) gross proceeds from
the sale or other disposition of, our Class A common stock paid to a “foreign financial institution” or a “non-
financial foreign entity” (each as defined in the Code), unless applicable exceptions apply. Foreign financial
institutions located in jurisdictions that have an intergovernmental agreement with the United States governing
FATCA may be subject to different rules.
263
Under the applicable Treasury Regulations and administrative guidance, withholding under FATCA generally
applies to payments of dividends on our Class A common stock. However, under proposed Treasury Regulations (on
which taxpayers may rely until final Treasury Regulations are issued), this withholding tax will not apply to the
gross proceeds from the sale, exchange, redemption or other taxable disposition of our Class A common stock.
There can be no assurance that the proposed Treasury Regulations will be finalized in their present form.
Each Non-U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding the effects of FATCA on its investment in our Class
A common stock.
THE PRECEDING DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS NOT TAX
ADVICE. EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR SHOULD CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE
PARTICULAR U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING,
OWNING, AND DISPOSING OF OUR CLASS A COMMON STOCK, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES
OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGE IN APPLICABLE LAWS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS, OR
TAX TREATIES.
264
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions in an underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the
underwriters named below, for whom Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, BofA Securities,
Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC are acting as representatives, have severally
agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares of Class A common stock
indicated below:
Name | Number of Shares | |
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC ................................................................................................................. | ||
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC ................................................................................................................ | ||
BofA Securities, Inc. ............................................................................................................................ | ||
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. ............................................................................................................. | ||
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ................................................................................................................. | ||
Barclays Capital Inc. ............................................................................................................................ | ||
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ............................................................................................................. | ||
RBC Capital Markets, LLC ................................................................................................................. | ||
UBS Securities LLC ............................................................................................................................ | ||
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC ............................................................................................................... | ||
Banco BTG Pactual S.A. – Cayman Branch ....................................................................................... | ||
ING Bank N.V. .................................................................................................................................... | ||
Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. ............................................................................................................. | ||
Mirae Asset Securities Co., Ltd. ......................................................................................................... | ||
Mizuho Securities USA LLC ............................................................................................................... | ||
Santander US Capital Markets LLC ................................................................................................... | ||
Allen & Company LLC ....................................................................................................................... | ||
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. ..................................................................................................................... | ||
Needham & Company, LLC ................................................................................................................ | ||
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. .................................................................................................... | ||
SG Americas Securities, LLC .............................................................................................................. | ||
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated ......................................................................................... | ||
William Blair & Company, L.L.C. ...................................................................................................... | ||
Total .............................................................................................................................................. |
The underwriters and the representatives are collectively referred to as the “underwriters” and the “representatives,”
respectively. The underwriters are offering the shares of Class A common stock subject to their acceptance of such
shares from us and subject to prior sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several
underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus are
subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are
obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares
are taken. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwriters’
option to purchase additional shares described below. The offering of the shares of Class A common stock by the
underwriters is subject to their receipt and acceptance of the shares being offered and subject to the underwriters’
right to reject any order in whole or in part.
The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of Class A common stock directly to the public at the
offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers at a price that represents a
concession not in excess of $ per share of Class A common stock under the public offering price. After the
initial offering of the shares of Class A common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to
265
time be varied by the representatives. Sales of Class A common stock made outside of the United States may be
made by affiliates of the underwriters.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase
up to additional shares of Class A common stock at the public offering price listed on the cover page of
this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter
will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the additional shares
of Class A common stock as the number listed next to the underwriter’s name in the preceding table bears to the
total number of shares of Class A common stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.
ING Bank N.V., Banco BTG Pactual S.A. – Cayman Branch and Mirae Asset Securities Co., Ltd. are not broker-
dealers registered with the SEC and therefore may not make sales of any shares of Class A common stock in the
United States or to U.S. persons except in compliance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations.
The following table shows the per share and total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions,
and proceeds before expenses to us. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional shares of Class A common stock.
Total | |||||
Per Share | No Exercise | Full Exercise | |||
Public offering price ....................................................................... | $ | $ | $ | ||
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by us ........... | $ | $ | $ | ||
Proceeds, before expenses, to us .................................................... | $ | $ | $ | ||
The estimated offering expenses payable by us, exclusive of the underwriting discounts and commissions, are
approximately $ . We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for their reasonable expenses relating to
clearance of this offering with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority up to $ .
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of the total
number of shares of Class A common stock offered by them.
We have applied to list our Class A common stock on Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas under the trading symbol “SPCX.”
In addition to allocations made to retail investors by the underwriters, we currently anticipate that certain of the
shares of Class A common stock offered hereby will, at our request, be offered to retail investors through Charles
Schwab & Co., Inc., Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and Fidelity Capital Markets, a division of National Financial
Services LLC, Robinhood Financial, LLC, and SoFi Securities LLC, as selling group members, via their respective
online brokerage platforms. We also anticipate that certain of the shares of Class A common stock will be offered to
retail investors through E*TRADE by Morgan Stanley, an affiliate of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, one of the
underwriters of this offering. These platforms are not affiliated with us. Purchases through these platforms will be
subject to the terms, conditions and requirements set by each selling group member. Any purchase of our Class A
common stock in this offering through these platforms will be at the same initial public offering price, and at the
same time, as any other purchases in this offering, including purchases by institutions and other large investors. The
selling group members’ platforms and information on the selling group members’ applications do not form a part of
nor are they incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
We have agreed with the underwriters that during the period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus (the “lock-
up period”), without the prior written consent of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, on behalf of the underwriters, subject
to certain exceptions, we will not (a) offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to purchase, make any short
sale or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the SEC a registration statement under the
Securities Act relating to, any of our common stock or other securities substantially similar to our common stock,
including but not limited to any options or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock or any securities that
are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or any such
substantially similar securities, or publicly disclose the intention to do any of the foregoing, or (b) enter into any
swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of any
266
of our common stock or such other securities, whether any such transaction described in clause (a) or (b) above is to
be settled by delivery of our common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. These restrictions will not
apply to securities to be issued by the Company in connection with any mergers, acquisitions or similar transactions
during the lock-up period. Certain additional exceptions to these restrictions will be detailed in a subsequent
amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Our Founder and certain significant investors have agreed with the underwriters, that during a period of 366 days
after the date of this prospectus, an aggregate of shares owned by them (including 100% of the shares owned by
our Founder), representing % of our shares outstanding, are subject to the restrictions described in the paragraph
below. This total amount of shares will not be subject to any early release provisions.
These shareholders and our Founder may not (and may not cause any of their direct or indirect affiliates to), without
the prior written consent of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, on behalf of the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions:
(a) offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, purchase any option or contract
to sell, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of (directly or indirectly) any shares of our common stock, or any
options, rights, or warrants to purchase any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into,
exchangeable for or that represent the right to receive shares of our common stock (such shares of common stock,
options, rights, warrants or other securities, collectively, the "lock-up securities"), including without limitation any
such lock-up securities now owned or hereafter acquired, (b) engage in any hedging or other transaction or
arrangement (including, without limitation, any short sale or the purchase or sale of, or entry into, any put or call
option, or combination thereof, forward, swap or any other derivative transaction or instrument, however described
or defined) which is designed to or which reasonably could be expected to lead to or result in a sale, loan, pledge, or
other disposition (whether by the applicable lock-up party or someone other than such lock-up party), or transfer of
any of the economic consequences of ownership, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, of any lock-up securities,
whether any such transaction or arrangement (or instrument provided for thereunder) would be settled by delivery of
our common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise, (c) make any demand for or exercise any right with
respect to the registration of any lock-up securities, or (d) otherwise publicly announce any intention to engage in or
cause any action, activity, transaction or arrangement described in clause (a), (b) or (c) above. Certain exceptions to
these restrictions will be detailed in a subsequent amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus
forms a part.
In addition, all of the remaining shares of our common stock, and securities convertible into, exchangeable for or
that represent the right to receive our common stock, are subject to a variety of other terms governing restrictions on
the sale, short sale, transfer, hedging, pledging, or other disposition of their interests in our equity, pursuant to a
number of different agreements, for 180 days from the date of this prospectus.
Furthermore, there are automatic releases from these restrictions on a portion of securities earlier than 180 days as
follows, for (i) the total number of shares of common stock comprising or underlying (as applicable) the outstanding
lock-up securities, as of the date of this offering, subject to the 180-day lock-up period described above, and (ii) %
of the total number of shares of common stock comprising or underlying (as applicable) the outstanding lock-up
securities, as of the date of this offering, subject to the 366-day lock-up period described above (together, the “Early
Release Eligible Shares”):
a.on or after the second full trading day on Nasdaq immediately following the public release of our quarterly
financial results (which for this purpose does not include “flash” numbers or preliminary, partial earnings) for
the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (such date, the “First Earnings Release Date”), up to 20% of the Early Release
Eligible Shares may be transferred;
b.if the reported closing price of our Class A common stock on Nasdaq is at least 30% greater than the public
offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus for at least five of the ten consecutive trading days
ending on, and including, the First Earnings Release Date,, on or after the second full trading day immediately
after the First Earnings Release Date, up to additional 10% of the Early Release Eligible Shares may be
transferred;
267
c.up to additional 7% of the Early Release Eligible Shares may be transferred on or after each of the dates that are
70 days, 90 days, 105 days, 120 days, and 135 days, respectively, after this offering;
d.on the second full trading day immediately following the public release of our quarterly financial results (which
for this purpose does not include “flash” numbers or preliminary, partial earnings) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2026, up to additional 28% of the Early Release Eligible Shares may be transferred; and
e.on or after the date that is 180 days after this offering, all remaining Early Release Eligible Shares may be
transferred.
Our Founder is not party to any of the early release provisions during the extended lock-up period.
In order to facilitate the offering of our Class A common stock, the underwriters, with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
acting as stabilization agent, may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our
Class A common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may sell more shares of Class A common stock than they are
obligated to purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short position. A short sale is covered if the short
position is no greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the underwriters under the option to
purchase additional shares. The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by exercising the option to purchase
additional shares or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a covered
short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the open market price of our Class A common stock
compared to the price available under the option to purchase additional shares. The underwriters may also sell shares
of Class A common stock in excess of the option to purchase additional shares, creating a naked short position. The
underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares of Class A common stock in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be
downward pressure on the price of our Class A common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase shares of Class A common stock in this offering. As an additional means of
facilitating this offering, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of Class A common stock in the open
market to stabilize the price of our Class A common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market price of
our Class A common stock above independent market levels or prevent or retard a decline in the market price of our
Class A common stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and may end any of these
activities at any time.
We and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under
the Securities Act.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of
shares of Class A common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet
distributions will be allocated by the representatives to the underwriters that may make internet distributions on the
same basis as other allocations.
The underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities,
which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment
management, investment research, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Certain of the
underwriters and their respective affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future perform,
various financial advisory and investment banking services for us, for which they received or will receive customary
fees and expenses. Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have in the past been, are currently, and
may in the future be, our customers in arm’s length transactions. In addition, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC advised us
in connection with the acquisition of xAI. Affiliates of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC,
BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC serve as lenders or
administrative agents under the SpaceX Bridge Loan. Affiliates of Barclays Capital Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, UBS Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC are lenders under the
SpaceX Bridge Loan. Affiliates of BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co.
LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Wells Fargo Securities,
LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and UBS Securities LLC are lenders under the SpaceX Credit Facility. Affiliates
268
of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC serve as co-
syndication agents; affiliates of Barclays Capital Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities,
LLC serve as co-documentation agents; affiliates of BofA Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman
Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC serve as joint lead arrangers; affiliates of BofA Securities, Inc.,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Barclays Capital Inc.,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC serve as joint bookrunners; and an affiliate of BofA
Securities, Inc. serves as administrative agent under the SpaceX Credit Facility.
In addition, in the ordinary course of their various business activities, the underwriters and their respective affiliates
may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative
securities) and financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their
customers and may at any time hold long and short positions, or provide loans or other financing on or secured by,
in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve our securities and
instruments. The underwriters and their respective affiliates may also make investment recommendations or publish
or express independent research views in respect of such securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or
recommend to clients that they acquire, long or short positions in such securities and instruments.
Pricing of the Offering
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our Class A common stock. The initial public offering
price has been determined by negotiations between us and the representatives. Among the factors considered in
determining the initial public offering price were prevailing market conditions, our future prospects and those of our
industry in general, our historical financial and operating performance in recent periods, an assessment by our
management and the consideration of the above factors in relation to market valuation of companies engaged in
activities similar to ours.
Directed Share Program
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to percent of the shares of Class A common stock
offered by this prospectus for sale at the initial public offering price through a directed share program to certain
employees and persons identified by our management, which may include parties with whom we have a business
relationship and friends and family of management. If purchased by these persons, these shares will not be subject to
a lock-up restriction. The number of shares of Class A common stock available for sale to the general public will be
reduced by the number of reserved shares sold to these persons. Any reserved shares not purchased by these persons
will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as the other shares of Class A common
stock offered by this prospectus. We will agree to indemnify the underwriters and their affiliates against certain
liabilities and expenses, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with sales of the shares reserved
for the directed share program. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, an underwriter in this offering, and its affiliates will
administer the global directed share program.
Offerings Outside the United States
This offering includes public offerings in Australia, certain provinces and territories of Canada, certain member
states of the European Economic Area, Japan, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. We do not currently intend to
list our Class A common stock on any exchange in such jurisdictions.
Subject to applicable law, the underwriters may offer shares of our Class A common stock outside of the United
States, Australia, Canada, the European Economic Area, Japan, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. The
underwriters may use one or more affiliates in order to offer and sell shares outside of the United States. No shares
of our Class A common stock will be offered or sold in any jurisdiction except by or through brokers or dealers duly
registered under the applicable securities laws of that jurisdiction, or in circumstances where any exemption from
such registration requirements is available.
269
Selling Restrictions
Argentina
The shares of Class A common stock are not authorized for public offering in Argentina by the Comisión Nacional
de Valores pursuant to Argentine Public Offering Law No. 17,811, as amended, and they shall not be sold publicly.
Therefore, any transaction carried out in Argentina must be made privately.
Australia
This prospectus does not constitute a prospectus, product disclosure statement, or other disclosure document under
Chapter 6D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (the “Corporations Act”), and does not purport to include the
information required for a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the
Corporations Act.
Any offer in Australia of the shares of Class A common stock made pursuant to this prospectus may only be made to
persons (the “Exempt Investors”) who are “sophisticated investors” (within the meaning of section 708(8) of the
Corporations Act), “professional investors” (within the meaning of section 708(11) of the Corporations Act) or
otherwise pursuant to one or more exemptions contained in section 708 of the Corporations Act so that it is lawful to
offer the shares of Class A common stock without disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act.
The shares of Class A common stock applied for by Exempt Investors in Australia pursuant to this prospectus must
not be offered for sale in Australia in the period of 12 months after the date of allotment under the offering, except in
circumstances where disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act would not be required
pursuant to an exemption under section 708 of the Corporations Act or otherwise, or where the offer is pursuant to a
disclosure document which complies with Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act. Any person acquiring the shares of
Class A common stock pursuant to this prospectus must observe such Australian on-sale restrictions.
The public offering in Australia will be made pursuant to a separate prospectus (“Australian Prospectus”) which
complies with the requirements of the Corporations Act and will be lodged with the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission. Any non-Exempt Investor who wishes to participate in the offering must apply pursuant
to the Australian Prospectus, through an application form which accompanies the Australian Prospectus.
This prospectus contains general information only and does not take account of the investment objectives, financial
situation or particular needs of any particular person. It does not contain any securities recommendations or financial
product advice. Before making an investment decision, investors need to consider whether the information in this
prospectus is appropriate to their needs, objectives and circumstances and, if necessary, seek expert advice on those
matters.
Brazil
The offer and sale of the shares of Class A common stock have not been and will not be registered with the Brazilian
Securities Commission (Comissão de Valores Mobiliários, or “CVM”) and, therefore, will not be carried out by any
means that would constitute a public offering in Brazil under CVM Resolution No. 160, dated 13 July 2022, as
amended, or unauthorized distribution under Brazilian laws and regulations. The shares of Class A common stock
will be authorized for trading on organized non-Brazilian securities markets and may only be offered to Brazilian
Professional Investors (as defined by applicable CVM regulation), who may only acquire the shares of Class A
common stock through a non-Brazilian account, with settlement outside Brazil in non-Brazilian currency. The
trading of the shares of Class A common stock on regulated securities markets in Brazil is prohibited.
Chile
The shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus are not registered in the Securities Registry
(Registro de Valores) or subject to the control of the Chilean Securities and Exchange Commission
(Superintendencia de Valores y Seguros de Chile). This prospectus and other offering materials relating to the offer
of the shares of Class A common stock do not constitute a public offer of, or an invitation to subscribe for or
purchase, the shares of Class A common stock in the Republic of Chile, other than to individually identified
270
purchasers pursuant to a private offering within the meaning of Article 4 of the Chilean Securities Market Act (Ley
de Mercado de Valores) (an offer that is not “addressed to the public at large or to a certain sector or specific group
of the public”).
China
This prospectus will not be circulated or distributed in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) and the shares of
Class A common stock will not be offered or sold, and will not be offered or sold to any person for re-offering or
resale directly or indirectly, to any residents of the PRC (for such purposes, not including the Hong Kong and Macau
Special Administrative Regions or Taiwan), except pursuant to any applicable laws and regulations of the PRC.
Neither this prospectus nor any advertisement or other offering material may be distributed or published in the PRC,
except under circumstances that will result in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Colombia
The shares of Class A common stock have not been and will not be registered with the Colombian National Registry
of Securities and Issuers (Registro Nacional de Valores y Emisores - RNVE) maintained by the Financial
Superintendence of Colombia (Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia; the “SFC”) and, therefore, the shares of
Class A common stock may not be publicly offered or delivered in Colombia. However, the shares of Class A
common stock may be offered in Colombia under Colombian law pursuant to the private placement exemption set
forth in the Colombian regulation (Decree 2555 of 2010), in accordance of which an offering shall be deemed a
private placement if it is addressed to fewer than one hundred (100) specific persons (article 6.1.1.1.1, Decree 2555
of 2010). These materials are solely our responsibility and have not been reviewed or authorized by the SFC and
may not be publicly distributed in Colombia. In making an investment decision, all investors, including any
Colombian investor who may acquire shares of the Class A common stock from time to time, must rely on their own
examination of the terms of the offering and shares of the Class A common stock, including the merits and risks
involved.
Dubai
This prospectus relates to an “Exempt Offer” in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial
Services Authority (the “DFSA”). This prospectus is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in
the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA
has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has
not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for
the prospectus. The shares of Class A common stock to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid or subject to
restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares of Class A common stock should conduct their own
due diligence on the shares of Class A common stock. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus, you
should consult an authorized financial advisor.
Hong Kong
The shares of Class A common stock have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by
means of any document, other than (a) to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance
(Cap. 571 of the laws of Hong Kong) (the “SFO”) and any rules made thereunder; or (b) in other circumstances
which do not result in this prospectus being a “prospectus” as defined in the Companies (Winding Up and
Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (the “CO”) or which do not constitute an
offer to the public within the meaning of the CO. No advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares of
Class A common stock has been or may be issued or has been or may be in the possession of any person for the
purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be
accessed or read by, the public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong)
other than with respect to the shares of Class A common stock which are or are intended to be disposed of only to
persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” as defined in the SFO and any rules made
thereunder.
271
India
This prospectus has not been and will not be registered as a prospectus with any registrar of companies in India. This
prospectus has not been and will not be reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority in India, including the
Securities and Exchange Board of India, any registrar of companies in India or any stock exchange in India. This
prospectus and this offering of the shares of Class A common stock are not and should not be construed as an
invitation, offer or sale of any securities to the public in India. Other than in compliance with the private placement
exemptions under applicable laws and regulations in India, including the Companies Act, 2013, as amended, the
shares of Class A common stock have not been, and will not be, offered or sold to the public or any member of the
public in India. This prospectus is strictly personal to the recipient and neither this prospectus nor the offering of the
shares of Class A common stock is calculated to result, directly or indirectly, in the shares of Class A common stock
becoming available for subscription or purchase by persons other than those receiving the invitation or offer. Each
investor is deemed to have acknowledged, represented and agreed that it is eligible to invest in the shares of Class A
common stock under applicable laws, rules and regulations in India, without the requirement to obtain any prior
approval, and that it is not prohibited or prevented under any law, rule or regulation in India from acquiring, owning
or selling the shares of Class A common stock.
Indonesia
This prospectus does not, and is not intended to, constitute a public offering in Indonesia under Law Number 8 of
1995 regarding Capital Market. This prospectus may not be distributed in the Republic of Indonesia and the shares
of Class A common stock may not be offered or sold in the Republic of Indonesia or to Indonesian citizens wherever
they are domiciled, or to Indonesia residents, in a manner which constitutes a public offering under the laws of the
Republic of Indonesia.
Israel
In the State of Israel this prospectus shall not be regarded as an offer to the public to purchase shares of Class A
common stock under the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968, which requires a prospectus to be published and
authorized by the Israel Securities Authority, if it complies with certain provisions of Section 15 of the Israeli
Securities Law, 5728–1968, including, inter alia, if: (i) the offer is made, distributed or directed to not more than 35
investors, subject to certain conditions (the “Addressed Investors”), or (ii) the offer is made, distributed or directed
to certain qualified investors defined in the First Addendum of the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968, subject to
certain conditions (the “Qualified Investors”). The Qualified Investors shall not be taken into account in the count of
the Addressed Investors and may be offered to purchase securities in addition to the 35 Addressed Investors. We
have not and will not take any action that would require it to publish a prospectus in accordance with and subject to
the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968. We have not and will not distribute this prospectus or make, distribute or
direct an offer to subscribe for our Class A common stock to any person within the State of Israel, other than to
Qualified Investors and up to 35 Addressed Investors.
Qualified Investors may have to submit written evidence that they meet the definitions set out in of the First
Addendum to the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968. In particular, we may request, as a condition to be offered
shares of Class A common stock, that Qualified Investors will each represent, warrant and certify to us and/or to
anyone acting on our behalf: (i) that it is an investor falling within one of the categories listed in the First Addendum
to the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968; (ii) which of the categories listed in the First Addendum to the Israeli
Securities Law, 5728—1968 regarding Qualified Investors is applicable to it; (iii) that it will abide by all provisions
set forth in the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968 and the regulations promulgated thereunder in connection with
the offer to be issued shares of Class A common stock; (iv) that the shares of Class A common stock that it will be
issued are, subject to exemptions available under the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968: (a) for its own account; (b)
for investment purposes only; and (c) not issued with a view to resale within the State of Israel, other than in
accordance with the provisions of the Israeli Securities Law, 5728—1968; and (v) that it is willing to provide further
evidence of its Qualified Investor status. Addressed Investors may have to submit written evidence in respect of their
identity and may have to sign and submit a declaration containing, inter alia, the Addressed Investor’s name, address
and passport number or Israeli identification number.
272
Malaysia
No prospectus or other offering material or document in connection with the offer and sale of shares of Class A
common stock offered by this prospectus has been or will be registered with the Securities Commission of Malaysia
(the “Malaysian Commission”) for the Malaysian Commission’s approval pursuant to the Capital Markets and
Services Act 2007. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or
sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the shares of Class A common stock may not be circulated or
distributed, nor may the shares of Class A common stock be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation
for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Malaysia other than (i) a closed-end fund
approved by the Malaysian Commission; (ii) a holder of a Capital Markets Services License; (iii) a person who
acquires shares of Class A common stock, as principal, if the offer is on terms that the shares if Class A common
stock may only be acquired at a consideration of not less than RM250,000 (or its equivalent in foreign currencies)
for each transaction; (iv) an individual whose total net personal assets or total net joint assets with his or her spouse
exceeds RM3 million (or its equivalent in foreign currencies), excluding the value of the primary residence of the
individual; (v) an individual who has a gross annual income exceeding RM300,000 (or its equivalent in foreign
currencies) per annum in the preceding twelve months; (vi) an individual who, jointly with his or her spouse, has a
gross annual income of RM400,000 (or its equivalent in foreign currencies), per annum in the preceding twelve
months; (vii) a corporation with total net assets exceeding RM10 million (or its equivalent in foreign currencies)
based on the last audited accounts; (viii) a partnership with total net assets exceeding RM10 million (or its
equivalent in foreign currencies); (ix) a bank licensee or insurance licensee as defined in the Labuan Financial
Services and Securities Act 2010; (x) an Islamic bank licensee or takaful licensee as defined in the Labuan Financial
Services and Securities Act 2010; and (xi) any other person as may be specified by the Commission; provided that,
in each of the preceding categories (i) to (xi), the distribution of the shares of Class A common stock is made by a
holder of a Capital Markets Services License who carries on the business of dealing in securities. The distribution in
Malaysia of this prospectus is subject to Malaysian laws. This prospectus does not constitute and may not be used
for the purpose of a public offering or an issue, offer for subscription or purchase, or invitation to subscribe for or
purchase any securities requiring the registration of a prospectus with the Malaysian Commission under the Capital
Markets and Services Act 2007.
Mexico
The shares of Class A common stock have not been and will not be registered with the Mexican National Securities
Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores or the “RNV”) maintained by the Mexican National Banking and Securities
Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, or the “CNBV”), and therefore, may not be offered or sold
publicly in Mexico or otherwise be subject to intermediation activities in Mexico. However, the shares of Class A
common stock may only be offered and sold in Mexico on a private placement basis to investors that qualify as
institutional or qualified investors pursuant to the private placement exemption set forth in Article 8 of the Mexican
Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores) and regulations thereunder. The information contained in this
prospectus is solely our responsibility and has not been reviewed or authorized by the CNBV and may not be
publicly distributed in Mexico. In making an investment decision, all investors, including any Mexican investor,
who may acquire the shares of Class A common stock from time to time, must rely on their own examination of us
and the terms of this offering and the shares of Class A common stock, including the merits and risks involved.
New Zealand
This document has not been registered, filed with or approved by any New Zealand regulatory authority under the
Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (the “FMC Act”). The shares of Class A common stock may only be offered or
sold in New Zealand (or allotted with a view to being offered for sale in New Zealand) to a person who:
•is an investment business within the meaning of clause 37 of Schedule I of the FMC Act;
•meets the investment activity criteria in clause 38 of Schedule I of the FMC Act;
•is large within the meaning of clause 39 of Schedule I of the FMC Act;
•is a government agency within the meaning of clause 40 of Schedule I of the FMC Act; or
273
•is an eligible investor within the meaning of clause 41 of Schedule I of the FMC Act.
Peru
The shares of Class A common stock and the information contained herein are not being publicly marketed or
offered in Peru and will not be distributed or caused to be distributed to the general public in Peru. Peruvian
securities laws and regulations on public offerings will not be applicable to this offering and therefore, the disclosure
obligations set forth therein will not be applicable to the Company or the sellers of the shares of Class A common
stock before or after their acquisition by prospective investors. The shares of Class A common stock and the
information contained herein have not been and will not be reviewed, confirmed, approved or in any way submitted
to the Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores (Peruvian capital market regulator) (the “SMV”), nor have they
been registered with the SMV’s Securities Market Public Registry (Registro Público del Mercado de Valores).
Accordingly, the shares of Class A common stock cannot be offered or sold within Peruvian territory except to the
extent any such offering or sale qualifies as a private offering under Peruvian law and regulations and complies with
the provisions on private offerings set forth therein.
Philippines
The shares of Class A common stock being offered or sold have not been and will not be registered with the
Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Regulation Code of the Philippines (the
“SCR”). Any future offer or sale of the shares of Class A common stock within the Philippines is subject to the
registration requirements under the SRC unless such offer or sale qualifies as a transaction exempt from the
registration under the SRC.
Accordingly, this prospectus, and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation
for subscription or purchase of the shares of Class A common stock, may not be circulated or distributed in the
Philippines, and the shares of Class A common stock may not be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an
invitation for subscription or purchase, to persons in the Philippines, other than (i) to qualified investors in
transactions that are exempt from the registration requirements of the SRC; and (ii) by persons licensed to make
such offers or sales in the Philippines.
Qatar
In the State of Qatar, the offer contained in this prospectus is made on an exclusive basis to the specifically intended
recipient thereof, upon that person’s request and initiative, for personal use only and shall in no way be construed as
a general offer for the sale of the shares of Class A common stock to the public or an attempt to do business as a
bank, an investment company or otherwise in the State of Qatar. This prospectus and the underlying securities have
not been approved or licensed by the Qatar Central Bank or the Qatar Financial Center Regulatory Authority or any
other regulator in the State of Qatar. The information contained in this prospectus shall only be shared with any third
parties in the State of Qatar on a need to know basis for the purpose of evaluating the offering. Any distribution of
this prospectus by the recipient to third parties in the State of Qatar beyond the terms hereof is not permitted and
shall be at the liability of such recipient.
Saudi Arabia
This prospectus may not be distributed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia except to such persons as are permitted
under the Rules on the Offer of Securities and Continuing Obligations Regulations as issued by the board of the
Saudi Arabian Capital Market Authority (the “CMA”) pursuant to resolution number 3-123-2017 dated 27
December 2017, as amended. The CMA does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this
prospectus and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from, or incurred in reliance upon,
any part of this prospectus. Prospective purchasers of the shares of Class A common stock offered hereby should
conduct their own due diligence on the accuracy of the information relating to the shares of Class A common stock.
If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus, you should consult an authorized financial adviser.
274
Singapore
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, the
shares of Class A common stock may not be offered or sold, or made the subject of an invitation for subscription or
purchase, nor may this prospectus or any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or
invitation for subscription or purchase of the shares of Class A common stock be circulated, whether directly or
indirectly, to any person in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor (as defined in Section 4A of the
Securities and Futures Act 2001 of Singapore, as modified or amended from time to time (the “SFA”)) pursuant to
Section 274 of the SFA or (ii) to an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA) pursuant to and in
accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275 of the SFA.
South Africa
Due to restrictions under the securities laws of South Africa, no “offer to the public” (as such term is defined in the
South African Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008 (as amended or re-enacted) (the South African Companies Act)) is
being made in connection with the issue of the shares of Class A common stock in South Africa. Accordingly, this
document does not, nor is it intended to, constitute a “registered prospectus” (as that term is defined in the South
African Companies Act) prepared and registered under the South African Companies Act and has not been approved
by, and/or filed with, the South African Companies and Intellectual Property Commission or any other regulatory
authority in South Africa. The shares of Class A common stock are not offered, and the offer should not be
transferred, sold, renounced, or delivered in South Africa or to a person with an address in South Africa, unless one
or other of the following exemptions stipulated in section 96(1) applies:
Section 96(1)(a) the offer, transfer, sale, renunciation or delivery is to:
i.persons whose ordinary business, or part of whose ordinary business, is to deal in securities, as principal or
agent;
ii.the South African Public Investment Corporation;
iii.persons or entities regulated by the Reserve Bank of South Africa;
iv.authorized financial service providers under South African law;
v.financial institutions recognized as such under South African law;
vi.a wholly-owned subsidiary of any person or entity contemplated in (iii), (iv) or (v), acting as agent in the
capacity of an authorized portfolio manager for a pension fund, or as manager for a collective investment
scheme (in each case duly registered as such under South African law); or
vii.any combination of the person in (i) to (vi);
Section 96(1)(b) the total contemplated acquisition cost of the shares of Class A common stock, for any single
addressee acting as a principal is equal to or greater than ZAR 1,000,000 or such higher amount as may be
promulgated by notice in the Government Gazette of South Africa pursuant to section 96(2)(a) of the South African
Companies Act.
Information made available in this prospectus should not be considered as “advice” as defined in the South African
Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 2002.
South Korea
The shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus have not been and will not be registered under the
Financial Investments Services and Capital Markets Act of Korea and the decrees and regulations thereunder (the
“FSCMA”), and the shares of Class A common stock have been and will be offered in Korea as a private placement
under the FSCMA. None of the shares of Class A common stock may be offered, sold or delivered directly or
indirectly, or offered or sold to any person for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Korea or to any resident
275
of Korea except pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations of Korea, including the FSCMA and the Foreign
Exchange Transaction Law of Korea and the decrees and regulations thereunder (the “FETL”). The shares of Class
A common stock have not been listed on any of securities exchanges in the world including, without limitation, the
Korea Exchange in Korea. Furthermore, the purchaser of the shares of Class A common stock will comply with all
applicable regulatory requirements (including but not limited to requirements under the FETL) in connection with
the purchase of shares of Class A common stock. By the purchase of shares of Class A common stock, the relevant
holder thereof will be deemed to represent and warrant that if it is in Korea or is a resident of Korea, it purchased the
shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations of Korea.
Switzerland
Except pursuant to the Swiss public offering described above, the shares of Class A common stock may not be
publicly offered in Switzerland. In addition, the Class A common stock will not be listed on any trading venue in
Switzerland.
Other than in the context of the Swiss public offering described above, the shares of Class A common stock may
only be offered, sold or advertised, directly or indirectly, in or into Switzerland (i) to any investor that qualifies as a
professional client within the meaning of the Swiss Financial Services Act ("FinSA") or (ii) in any other
circumstances falling within Article 36 FinSA.
This document does not constitute a prospectus within the meaning of the FinSA and has not been and will not be
filed with, or reviewed or approved by, a Swiss review body pursuant to Article 51 FinSA. This document does not
comply with the disclosure requirements applicable to a prospectus within the meaning of the FinSA. This document
may not be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.
Taiwan
The shares of Class A common stock have not been and will not be registered with the Financial Supervisory
Commission of Taiwan pursuant to relevant securities laws and regulations and may not be sold, issued or offered
within Taiwan through a public offering or in circumstances which constitutes an offer within the meaning of the
Securities and Exchange Act of Taiwan that requires a registration or approval of the Financial Supervisory
Commission of Taiwan. No person or entity in Taiwan has been authorized to offer, sell, give advice regarding or
otherwise intermediate the offering and sale of the shares of Class A common stock in Taiwan.
Thailand
This prospectus does not, and is not intended to, constitute a public offering in Thailand. The shares of Class A
common stock may not be offered or sold to persons in Thailand, unless such offering is made under the exemptions
from approval and filing requirements under applicable laws, or under circumstances which do not constitute an
offer for sale of the shares Class A common stock to the public for the purposes of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1992 of Thailand, nor require approval from the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand.
United Arab Emirates
The shares of Class A common stock have not been, and are not being, publicly offered, sold, promoted or
advertised in the United Arab Emirates (including the Dubai International Financial Centre) other than in
compliance with the laws of the United Arab Emirates (and the Dubai International Financial Centre) governing the
issue, offering and sale of the shares of Class A common stock. Further, this prospectus does not constitute a public
offer of securities in the United Arab Emirates (including the Dubai International Financial Centre) and is not
intended to be a public offer. This prospectus has not been approved by or filed with the Central Bank of the United
Arab Emirates, the Securities and Commodities Authority, Financial Services Regulatory Authority or the Dubai
Financial Services Authority.
United Kingdom
This prospectus has been prepared on the basis that the offering of the shares of Class A common stock falls within
one of the exceptions specified in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations
276
2024 (the “POATRs”) and, accordingly, there will not be a prospectus prepared or published for the purposes of the
POATRs. This prospectus does not constitute a prospectus for the purposes of the POATRs.
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that it has not made and will not make an offer of the shares of Class A
common stock which are the subject of this prospectus to the public in the United Kingdom, except that it may make
an offer:
•at any time to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in paragraph 15 of Schedule 1 to the
POATRs;
•at any time to fewer than 150 persons (other than qualified investors as defined in paragraph 15 of Schedule 1 to
the POATRs) in the United Kingdom subject to obtaining the prior consent of the relevant underwriters
nominated by us for any such offer; or
•at any time in any other circumstances falling within Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the POATRs.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer to the public” in relation to the shares of Class A
common stock in the United Kingdom means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the shares of Class A common stock to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the shares of Class A common stock.
277
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of Class A common stock offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Gibson,
Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Houston, Texas. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon
for the underwriters by Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The financial statements as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2025 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s significant
transactions with related parties, as described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements), an independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act relating to the shares of
our Class A common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules
thereto. For more information regarding us and the shares of our Class A common stock offered by this prospectus,
we refer you to the full registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. This prospectus
summarizes certain provisions of certain contracts and other documents filed as exhibits to which we refer you.
Because the summaries may not contain all of the information that you may find important, you should review the
full text of those documents.
The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, information statements and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Our registration statement, of which this prospectus
constitutes a part, can be downloaded from the SEC’s website. As a result of the offering, we will become subject to
the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and will file with or furnish to the SEC periodic reports and other
information. We intend to furnish or make available to our shareholders annual reports containing our audited
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. We also intend to furnish or make available to
our shareholders quarterly reports containing our unaudited interim financial information, for the first three fiscal
quarters of each fiscal year. Our website is located at www.spacex.com. Following the completion of this offering,
we intend to make our periodic reports and other information filed with or furnished to the SEC available, free of
charge, through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports and other information are
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information contained on our website or linked therein or
otherwise connected thereto does not constitute part of nor is it incorporated by reference into this prospectus or the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. We may use our website www.spacex.com/ or
our X account to make information publicly available for purposes of Regulation FD from time to time.
F-1
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | |
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. | |
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ................................................................... | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 .......................................................... | |
2024, and 2023 ..................................................................................................................................... | |
the Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 ........................................................................ | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ........................................................................................... |
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 ........................................ | |
2025 ..................................................................................................................................................... | |
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 .......................................................................... | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ........................................................................................... |
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, of comprehensive income (loss), of redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders' equity and
of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, including the related notes
(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025
and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2025 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it
accounts for digital assets in 2024.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Significant Transactions with Related Parties
As discussed in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has entered into significant
transactions with related parties.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated
financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i)
relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our
especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter
in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by
communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the
accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
F-3
Revenue Recognition – Estimate of Total Cost at Completion for Certain Contracts Recognized Over Time
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognized revenue of $4.1
billion and $11.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 within the Space and Connectivity segments,
respectively, a portion of which related to contracts recognized over time using the cost-to-cost input method. Under
the cost-to-cost input method, the Company records revenue based upon costs (such as materials and labor hours)
incurred to date relative to the total estimated cost at completion. Developing the estimated total cost at completion
for each performance obligation requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions
regarding (i) launch timing, labor hours, allocation of shared costs for launch vehicles that have been identified as
reusable for multiple launches, as well as expected technological changes to launch vehicles and spacecraft for
Space contracts, and (ii) labor hours, allocation of shared costs used in the production of satellites, satellite material
costs, as well as expected technological changes to satellites for Connectivity contracts. The Company recognizes
changes in estimated contract revenue or costs at completion and the resulting changes in contract profit on a
cumulative basis.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to revenue recognition –
estimate of total cost at completion for certain contracts recognized over time is a critical audit matter are (i) the
significant judgment by management in developing the estimate of total cost at completion, including significant
judgments and assumptions on a contract by contract basis, and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity,
and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s estimate of total cost at
completion, including estimated labor hours.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming
our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, (i) testing
the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used by management related to actual costs to date, (ii) testing
management’s process for developing the estimate of total cost at completion, including evaluating on a test basis,
the reasonableness of certain significant judgments and assumptions considered by management specific to each
contract, including estimated labor hours. Evaluating the significant judgments and assumptions related to the
estimates of total cost at completion involved evaluating whether the significant judgments and assumptions used by
management were reasonable considering (i) management’s historical forecasting accuracy; (ii) evidence to support
the relevant aforementioned assumptions; (iii) the consistent application of accounting policies; and (iv) the timely
identification of circumstances which may require a modification to a previous estimate.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2026, except for the effects of the reorganization of entities under common control and the effects of the
stock split discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and the change in reportable segments
discussed in Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is May 7, 2026
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
F-4
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions, except per share data)
December 31, | ||||
2025 | 2024 | |||
Assets | ||||
Current assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................................................................................................. | $24,747 | $11,385 | ||
Marketable securities ..................................................................................................................................... | — | 800 | ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $39 and $119 at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively ............................................................................................................................................... | 1,579 | 1,052 | ||
Inventory ........................................................................................................................................................ | 2,416 | 2,003 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ..................................................................................................... | 2,210 | 868 | ||
Total current assets ..................................................................................................................................... | 30,952 | 16,108 | ||
Property, plant, and equipment, net(a) ................................................................................................................... | 42,602 | 21,147 | ||
Finance lease right-of-use assets .......................................................................................................................... | 1,260 | 1,686 | ||
Intangible assets, net ............................................................................................................................................ | 1,548 | 2,211 | ||
Digital assets ......................................................................................................................................................... | 1,637 | 1,749 | ||
Goodwill ............................................................................................................................................................... | 11,809 | 11,129 | ||
Deferred tax assets ................................................................................................................................................ | 141 | 696 | ||
Other assets ........................................................................................................................................................... | 2,130 | 2,336 | ||
Total assets ............................................................................................................................................... | $92,079 | $57,062 | ||
Liabilities, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||
Current liabilities | ||||
Accounts payable ........................................................................................................................................... | 11,792 | 4,413 | ||
Deferred revenue, current ............................................................................................................................. | 6,111 | 5,498 | ||
Debt and finance leases, current (related party of $455 and $- at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively) .............................................................................................................................................. | 928 | 372 | ||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities .............................................................................................. | 2,569 | 1,508 | ||
Total current liabilities ................................................................................................................................ | 21,400 | 11,791 | ||
Long-term liabilities ............................................................................................................................................. | ||||
Deferred revenue, net of current .......................................................................................................................... | 6,005 | 4,681 | ||
Debt and finance leases, net of current (related party of $4,052 and $- at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively) .................................................................................................................................................... | 21,968 | 13,421 | ||
Other liabilities ..................................................................................................................................................... | 1,381 | 1,365 | ||
Total liabilities .......................................................................................................................................... | 50,754 | 31,258 | ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) | ||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock | ||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 2,351 and 1,997 shares issued; 2,046 and 1,748 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively ............................................. | 38,752 | 20,941 | ||
Shareholders’ equity | ||||
Class A common stock, par value $0.001; 2,036 and 1,832 shares issued; 1,954 and 1,832 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively .................................................................. | 3 | 2 | ||
Class B common stock, par value $0.001; 644 and 768 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively ................................................................................................................ | 1 | 1 | ||
Class C common stock, par value $0.001; 482 and 421 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively ................................................................................................................ | 0 | 0 | ||
Class D common stock, par value $0.0001; no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively ............................................................................................................................... | — | — | ||
Additional paid-in capital ..................................................................................................................................... | 37,706 | 35,865 | ||
Accumulated deficit ............................................................................................................................................. | (37,035) | (32,098) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income ......................................................................................................... | 1,898 | 1,093 | ||
Total shareholders’ equity ...................................................................................................................... | 2,573 | 4,863 | ||
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock, and shareholders’ equity ....................... | $92,079 | $57,062 | ||
__________________
(a)Refer to Note 18, Related Party Transactions for additional details on related party arrangements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in millions, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Revenue ........................................................................................ | $18,674 | $14,015 | $10,387 | ||
Costs and expenses ...................................................................... | |||||
Cost of revenue ............................................................................ | 9,451 | 7,996 | 6,110 | ||
Research and development .......................................................... | 8,643 | 3,464 | 2,105 | ||
Selling, general, and administrative ............................................. | 2,644 | 1,813 | 1,665 | ||
Restructuring charges ................................................................... | 487 | 213 | 237 | ||
Impairment ................................................................................... | 38 | 63 | 3,775 | ||
Total costs and expenses ........................................................... | 21,263 | 13,549 | 13,892 | ||
Income (loss) from operations .................................................... | (2,589) | 466 | (3,505) | ||
Interest expense (related party of $66, $-, and $- for December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively) ..................................... | (1,945) | (1,580) | (1,693) | ||
Interest income ............................................................................... | 492 | 371 | 249 | ||
Other income (expense), net ........................................................... | (177) | 985 | (42) | ||
Income (loss) before income taxes .............................................. | (4,219) | 242 | (4,991) | ||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes ..................................... | 718 | (549) | (363) | ||
Net income (loss) .......................................................................... | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders - basic ................. | $(4,937) | $18 | $(4,628) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders - diluted .............. | $(4,937) | $21 | $(4,628) | ||
Net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders | |||||
Basic ............................................................................................... | $(1.69) | $0.01 | $(1.68) | ||
Diluted ............................................................................................ | $(1.69) | $0.00 | $(1.68) | ||
Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share of common stock | |||||
Basic ............................................................................................... | 2,926 | 2,848 | 2,759 | ||
Diluted ............................................................................................ | 2,926 | 9,956 | 2,759 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
Net income (loss) ......................................................................... | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax .... | 805 | (391) | 222 | |||
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of tax ...... | 0 | (1) | 1 | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) .............................................. | 805 | (392) | 223 | |||
Comprehensive income (loss) .................................................... | $(4,132) | $399 | $(4,405) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity
(in millions)
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | Common Stock | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total Shareholders’ Equity | |||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2022 .................................... | 136 | $7,239 | 2,742 | $3 | $35,275 | $(28,757) | $1,262 | $7,783 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation ............................................... | — | 3 | — | — | 784 | — | — | 784 | ||||||||
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock ........ | 750 | 750 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ................. | — | — | 249 | 0 | (41) | — | — | (41) | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock .......................................... | — | — | (11) | 0 | (170) | — | — | (170) | ||||||||
Net loss ............................................................................. | — | — | — | — | — | (4,628) | — | (4,628) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) ................................. | — | — | — | — | — | — | 223 | 223 | ||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2023 .................................... | 886 | $7,992 | 2,980 | $3 | $35,848 | $(33,385) | $1,485 | $3,951 | ||||||||
Adjustment for prior periods from adoption of ASU 2023-08 ....................................................................... | — | — | — | — | — | 496 | — | 496 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation .............................................. | — | — | — | — | 914 | — | — | 914 | ||||||||
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock ........ | 862 | 13,001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ................. | — | — | 75 | 0 | 72 | — | — | 72 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock ............................................................. | 0 | (21) | (46) | 0 | (1,000) | — | — | (1,000) | ||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock .......................................................... | 0 | (31) | 14 | 0 | 31 | — | — | 31 | ||||||||
Net income ...................................................................... | — | — | — | — | — | 791 | — | 791 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) ................................. | — | — | — | — | — | — | (392) | (392) | ||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2024 .................................... | 1,748 | $20,941 | 3,023 | $3 | $35,865 | $(32,098) | $1,093 | $4,863 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation .............................................. | — | — | — | — | 2,087 | — | — | 2,087 | ||||||||
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock ........ | 299 | 17,898 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ................. | — | — | 97 | 1 | 740 | — | — | 741 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock .......................................... | — | — | (69) | 0 | (1,125) | — | — | (1,125) | ||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock .......................................................... | (1) | (87) | 28 | 0 | 87 | — | — | 87 | ||||||||
Transfer of equity in business combination ..................... | — | — | 0 | 0 | 52 | — | — | 52 | ||||||||
Net loss ............................................................................. | — | — | — | — | — | (4,937) | — | (4,937) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) ................................. | — | — | — | — | — | — | 805 | 805 | ||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2025 .................................... | 2,046 | $38,752 | 3,079 | $4 | $37,706 | $(37,035) | $1,898 | $2,573 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
Net income (loss) ........................................................................... | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||
Depreciation and amortization ................................................... | 6,701 | 3,824 | 2,635 | ||
Share-based compensation ........................................................ | 1,947 | 784 | 679 | ||
Intangible asset impairment ....................................................... | — | — | 3,775 | ||
Deferred income taxes ............................................................... | 626 | (675) | (409) | ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on digital assets ..................................... | 112 | (955) | — | ||
Impairment and loss on disposal of fixed assets, net ................. | 88 | 135 | 36 | ||
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs ..................... | 93 | 84 | 212 | ||
Other .......................................................................................... | 66 | 115 | 214 | ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |||||
Accounts receivable .............................................................. | (543) | (347) | 345 | ||
Inventory ............................................................................... | (413) | (309) | (72) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets ........................................ | (673) | (328) | 41 | ||
Accounts payable .................................................................. | 709 | 472 | 220 | ||
Deferred revenue .................................................................. | 1,929 | 1,876 | 1,695 | ||
Operating lease liabilities, net ............................................... | (56) | (37) | (15) | ||
Other liabilities ..................................................................... | 1,136 | 346 | (208) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities ........................ | $6,785 | $5,776 | $4,520 | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (related party of $666, $171, and $11 for December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively) ................................................................................ | (20,737) | (11,163) | (4,415) | ||
Capitalized interest ......................................................................... | (169) | — | — | ||
Proceeds from product rebates ....................................................... | 118 | — | — | ||
Purchases of marketable securities ................................................. | (611) | (3,542) | (3,535) | ||
Maturities of marketable securities ................................................ | 548 | 3,712 | 2,731 | ||
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities ................................. | 1,457 | 193 | 333 | ||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates ........................................ | (86) | — | — | ||
Other investing activities, net ......................................................... | (95) | 4 | 19 | ||
Net cash used in investing activities .......................................... | $(19,575) | $(10,796) | $(4,867) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
Principal repayments on finance leases .......................................... | (295) | (154) | — | ||
Proceeds from debt and other financing obligations ...................... | 16,055 | — | — | ||
Payment of debt issuance costs ...................................................... | (66) | — | — | ||
Repayments on debt and other financing obligations .................... | (6,858) | (77) | (112) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net of issuance costs ...... | 18,807 | 13,101 | 774 | ||
Proceeds from employee equity award plans ................................. | 328 | 224 | 141 | ||
F-9
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Payments for repurchase of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock ............................................................................ | (1,125) | (1,021) | (170) | ||
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity award ............ | (496) | (243) | (211) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities .................................. | $26,350 | $11,830 | $422 | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents ...... | 63 | 1 | (2) | ||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash ......... | 13,623 | 6,811 | 73 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year . | 11,501 | 4,690 | 4,617 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year ........... | $25,124 | $11,501 | $4,690 | ||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | |||||
Cash paid for the following: | |||||
Interest, net of interest capitalized ............................................. | $1,476 | $1,500 | $1,365 | ||
Income taxes, net ....................................................................... | $154 | $134 | $45 | ||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities | |||||
Share-based compensation capitalized in property, plant, and equipment, net ............................................................................. | $154 | $132 | $108 | ||
Acquisition of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable ......................................................................... | $7,088 | $2,481 | $505 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-10
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tables in millions, except per share data)
Note 1 - Nature of Business
Description of Business
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as the “Company”
or “SpaceX,” operate three segments – (i) the Space segment designs, manufactures, and launches reusable rockets
to provide high cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space at unprecedented scale, (ii) the Connectivity
segment operates a worldwide high-speed, low-latency broadband network powered by thousands of Starlink
satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers
through our Starlink offering, and (iii) the AI segment operates a vertically integrated AI platform spanning a
frontier LLM Grok, AI solutions for consumer and enterprise customers, X — a real-time information,
entertainment, and free speech platform — and AI computational infrastructure.
SpaceX is advancing the boundaries of space technology and human spaceflight through its Falcon launch vehicles
and Dragon spacecraft and is currently developing Starship, a fully reusable transportation system that is designed to
carry crew, cargo, satellites, and data centers to Earth orbit, the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
SpaceX operates Starlink which delivers high-speed, low-latency broadband internet to customers around the globe,
including to those who live in some of the most remote places on Earth. The Company also provides access to
satellite-to-mobile texting and voice services to mobile users (referred to as “Starlink Mobile”).
SpaceX operates a global platform for public conversation known as X (formerly known as Twitter) as well as the
Grok suite of text and multi-modal AI models, accessible to individual users via online platforms such as x.com and
to enterprise clients for applications in research, productivity, and decision-making.
The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Starbase, Texas. SpaceX was incorporated in the state of
Delaware on March 14, 2002 and converted into a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas on
February 14, 2024.
On May 4, 2026, the Company effected a five-for-one forward stock split of its authorized, issued, and outstanding
shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C Common Stock (“2026 Stock Split”). The conversion rate of SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock was proportionately adjusted to factor in the 2026 Stock Split. All share
and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2026 Stock Split for all periods presented.
On February 2, 2026, the Company completed its acquisition of X.AI Holdings Corp. (“xAI”), pursuant to which
xAI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“xAI Merger”). Prior to the xAI Merger, on March 28,
2025, xAI completed its acquisition of X Holdings Corp. (“X”) and X.AI Corp., in which X and X.AI Corp. became
wholly-owned subsidiaries of xAI (“X Merger”, and collectively with xAI Merger, “Mergers”). X.AI Corp began
operations in March 2023 and Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) was acquired by Mr. Elon Musk in October 2022. The
Mergers were each effected through a share exchange.
The Mergers have been accounted for as reorganizations of entities under common control as Mr. Elon Musk had a
controlling financial interest in the Company, xAI and X through his majority voting interest in each such entity
during the years presented in these consolidated financial statements. The Company’s consolidated financial
statements have been prepared to reflect the retrospective combination of the net assets of the entities at their
historical carrying amounts for all periods presented. No new goodwill or other intangible assets have been recorded
and all historical related party transactions between the entities have been eliminated in consolidation. The capital
stock and shareholders’ equity for all periods presented reflects a continuation of the historical SpaceX capital stock
and shareholders’ equity, combined with the historical capital stock and shareholders’ equity of X and xAI merged
under common control, as adjusted by the respective exchange ratios used to effect the Mergers, except for xAI’s
historical redeemable convertible preferred stock. This presentation constitutes a change in reporting entity. Refer to
F-11
Note 13, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional details.
As the consolidated financial statements already reflect the reorganization of entities under common control for all
periods presented, separate financial statements of xAI and X are not provided.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”) in the United States of America (“U.S.”).
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts which are subject to
significant judgment and use of estimates include revenues recognized over time using the cost-to-cost input
method, the determination of valuation allowances associated with deferred tax assets and estimates of tax liabilities,
reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives
of property, plant, and equipment, the determination of incremental borrowing rate for lease liabilities, litigation and
settlement costs, and the valuation and assumptions underlying share-based compensation. On an ongoing basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates compared to historical experience and current trends, which forms the basis for
making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company engages valuation
specialists to assist in the valuation of equity instruments.
Concentration of Supplier Risk
Certain materials and products that are key inputs in the Company’s Space, Connectivity, and AI segments are
available from a limited number of suppliers, including sole or limited-source suppliers; and the Company’s direct
chip suppliers are dependent on a concentrated group of advanced semiconductor fabrication facilities. The
Company believes that alternative suppliers are available for many, but not all, of these products and services. The
inability of these suppliers to deliver necessary components of the products in a timely manner and at prices, quality
levels, and volumes acceptable to the Company, or interruptions in supply of materials or products on which these
suppliers rely, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to meet customer demands and contractual
obligations, to execute on its growth strategy, or to manage its expenses or timelines as expected, which could
adversely impact the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in checking accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit
at high quality financial institutions primarily in the U.S. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains certain
cash and cash equivalents for which the withdrawal or use is restricted. The restricted cash and cash equivalents are
generally held in separate, dedicated accounts required to secure letters of credit related to various customer,
insurance, and facility lease agreements.
F-12
The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, as presented in the consolidated statements of
cash flows, are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents .............................................................. | $24,747 | $11,385 | $4,620 | ||
Restricted cash included in prepaid expenses and other current assets ........................................................................................... | 182 | 23 | 28 | ||
Restricted cash included in other assets ......................................... | 195 | 93 | 42 | ||
Total as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows .......................................................................................... | $25,124 | $11,501 | $4,690 | ||
Marketable Securities
The Company’s marketable securities consist primarily of debt securities of the U.S. Government, time deposits and
certificates of deposits, and are classified and accounted for as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity.
Management determines the classification of its investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates the
classification at each balance sheet date. Marketable securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company
has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity and are carried at cost. The Company’s available-
for-sale investments in marketable securities are recorded at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of
taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity until
realized. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale marketable securities are recorded in Other
income (expense), net. Interest on marketable securities is included in Interest income.
The Company classifies its marketable securities as either short-term or long-term based on each instrument’s
underlying contractual maturity date. Marketable securities with maturities of 12 months or less from the balance
sheet date are classified as short-term, and maturities greater than 12 months from the balance sheet date are
classified as long-term and included in Other assets.
Accounts Receivable, Unbilled Receivables, and Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company extends credit in the normal course of business to its customers and performs credit evaluations on a
case-by-case basis. The Company generally does not obtain collateral or other security to secure accounts receivable.
Billed receivables are recorded at their carrying amount, net of allowance for credit losses, and do not bear interest.
Unbilled receivables is comprised principally of revenue recognized on contracts that are not contractually billable at
the balance sheet date.
The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for bad debt expense which is recorded in Selling,
general, and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company determines the
adequacy of its allowance for credit losses by considering a number of factors including: age of invoices, each
customer’s expected ability to pay and collection history, customer-specific information, and current economic
conditions that may impact a customer’s ability to pay. Accounts receivable are written off when they are deemed
uncollectible.
Fair Value Measurement
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair
Value Measurement, states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a
market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing an asset or a liability. The three-tiered fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes which inputs should be used in
measuring fair value, is comprised of:
Level IObservable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
F-13
Level IIInputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly
Level IIIUnobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data
The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available in determining fair value. The
Company’s financial assets only include cash equivalents, certain restricted cash accounts, digital assets and
marketable securities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of the
Company’s other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair
value because of their short maturities. The carrying value of financing obligations approximate fair value based on
the interest rate remaining relatively consistent from the dates these arrangements were initially entered into and/or
the overall materiality of the related liability balances.
Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft
The Company has four types of launch vehicles - Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Dragon, and Starship. Falcon 9 and
Falcon Heavy are comprised of the following significant components: boosters (also known as first stages), second
stages, Merlin engines, and fairings. Boosters, fairings, and Merlin engines are reusable and are classified as
Property, plant, and equipment, net. The second stages are not reusable and are recorded as inventory until they are
launched for point-in-time revenue transactions or assigned for over-time revenue transactions. Dragon is composed
of a fully reusable capsule that is classified as Property, plant, and equipment, net. Starship is a fully reusable rocket
composed of boosters, ships, and Raptor engines and is currently in the development stage. A majority of Starship
costs are expensed to Research and development as incurred.
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of raw materials and work-in-progress used in the production of launch vehicles and
Starlink Kits, and finished goods for Starlink Kits, Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy second stages awaiting launch.
Inventory is computed using standard cost or weighted average, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-
out basis and is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company records inventory write-downs in
Cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventories
based upon assumptions about future demand and design, and technological or other changes.
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets except flight vehicles, which is computed based on
the expected number of average flights for each flight vehicle. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the
shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term. Management periodically reviews these useful life
estimates with engineering and operations teams and revises them as additional data becomes available.
The Company estimates the useful lives of its satellite assets based on engineering studies, historical on-orbit
performance, propellant life, utilization patterns, design enhancements across generations, and planned transitions to
newer satellite technology. The Company estimates broadband satellites to have a five-year useful life and the first
generation mobile satellites to have a three-year useful life.
The Company estimates the expected flights for its flight vehicle hardware based on three key criteria: (1) the
continued ability to successfully recover and refurbish the hardware for additional flights, (2) the continued
economic feasibility of using the hardware on incremental flights, supported by declining refurbishment costs and
sensitivity analyses, and (3) customer acceptance for reflown hardware as evidenced by the Company’s launch
manifest.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs that do not extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as
incurred while significant refurbishment, renewals, and enhancements that increase the functionality, output or
expected life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated ratably over the identified useful life.
F-14
Satellites include costs to build the satellites (parts, labor, and allocated overhead) as well as capitalized launch costs
incurred by the Space segment to launch the satellites to orbit, which include an allocation of the flight vehicle
hardware costs.
The Company capitalizes certain interest costs associated with significant acquisition or construction of certain
Property, plant, and equipment, net. The Company begins to capitalize qualified interest cost once activities
necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use have commenced. The Company calculates qualified interest
capitalization using the average amount of accumulated expenditures during the period the asset is being prepared
for its intended use and a capitalization rate which is derived from the Company’s weighted average borrowing rate
during such time, in the absence of specific borrowings related to the significant long term construction projects.
The Company ceases capitalization on any portions substantially completed and ready for their intended use.
Capitalized interest is considered a part of the assets’ historical cost, and depreciates over the estimated useful lives
of the underlying assets.
The Company evaluates impairment of its Property, plant, and equipment assets at the lowest level for which
identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The Company
reviews Property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying
value of the asset or asset group, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent its carrying value exceeds its
estimated fair value. Routine asset disposals, scrapping, gateway decommissions, and other recurring operational
losses are charged to Cost of revenue or Selling, general, and administrative expenses depending on the nature of the
assets, or to impairment if the impairment is considered to be outside the normal course of business.
The estimated useful lives of the Company’s Property, plant, and equipment, net are as follows:
Classification | Estimated Useful Life | |
Servers and networking equipment ................................... | 5 - 6 years | |
Satellites ............................................................................ | 3 - 5 years | |
Machinery and equipment ................................................. | 3 - 10 years | |
Flight vehicle hardware ..................................................... | 5 - 25 flights | |
Data center infrastructure .................................................. | 20 - 25 years | |
Launch sites ....................................................................... | 7 - 20 years | |
Buildings and improvements ............................................. | 30 years | |
Leasehold improvements ................................................... | Shorter of 7 - 20 years or the life of the lease |
Leases
The Company leases facilities, corporate offices, data centers, and manufacturing equipment primarily in the U.S.
under various operating and finance leases. In addition, the Company enters into various lease agreements for its
satellite gateway sites throughout the world.
The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. If a lease exists, any lease
arrangements with contractual terms longer than twelve months are classified as either an operating or finance lease.
Finance leases are generally those leases that allow the Company to substantially utilize or pay for the entire asset
over its estimated life. All other leases that do not meet any of the criteria for finance lease classification are
classified as operating leases.
Leases with a lease term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets and are
expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the consolidated statements of operations.
Certain lease agreements include options that grant the Company the ability to renew or extend the lease term, or
early terminate the lease. When determining the lease term, the Company does not include renewal or early
termination options unless they are deemed to be reasonably certain of being exercised at the lease commencement
date.
F-15
Upon lease commencement, the Company recognizes a lease liability measured at the present value of the fixed
future minimum lease payments and a right-of-use asset for an amount equal to the lease liability, adjusted by
prepaid and accrued rent, lease incentives, and initial direct costs. The Company has elected the practical expedient
to not separate lease and non-lease components. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the lease term, with the cost presented as a component of Cost of revenue, Research and development, or Selling,
general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations depending on the nature of the
operating lease. Finance lease cost is composed of a separate interest component and amortization component. The
interest component of a finance lease is included in Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and
the amortization component of a finance lease is included in Cost of revenue, Research and development, or Selling,
general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations depending on the nature of the
finance lease.
The Company’s leases generally do not provide information about the rate implicit in the lease. Therefore, the
Company utilizes an incremental borrowing rate to calculate the present value of future lease obligations. The
Company’s incremental borrowing rate is estimated to approximate the interest rate on a collateralized basis with
similar terms and payments, and in economic environments where the leased asset is located.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed in connection with a business combination. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are
not amortized but rather, are tested for impairment annually on October 1 and more frequently if events and
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Events that could indicate impairment of goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets that trigger an impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, adverse
economic market conditions, long-term declining industry outlook conditions, entity-specific financial
underperformance, changes in the use of the asset, and other adverse legal and regulatory events. Goodwill is tested
for impairment at the reporting unit level.
The Company may elect to utilize a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that the fair
value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value and if so, the Company
performs a quantitative test. Impairment is recognized when the quantitative assessment results in the carrying value
exceeding the fair value. The reporting unit’s estimated fair value is determined on the basis of discounted future
cash flows and market approach using the guideline public company method.
The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment test and no goodwill impairments were identified for the
years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023. Refer to Note 6, Intangible Assets and Goodwill for additional
discussion on indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Digital Assets
The Company has ownership of and control over its digital assets, which consist of bitcoin, and utilizes, and expects
to continue to utilize, third-party custodians to hold its bitcoin.
The Company determines and records the fair value of its bitcoin based on quoted prices on the active exchange that
the Company has determined is the principal market for bitcoin (Level I inputs). The cost of bitcoin is based upon
the specific identification method. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded to Other income (expense),
net in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto
Assets (Subtopic 350-60) (“ASU 2023-08”), using a modified retrospective approach effective January 1, 2024. The
F-16
cumulative effect of the changes made on the Company’s January 1, 2024 consolidated balance sheet for the
adoption of ASU 2023-08 were as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2023 | Adjustment from adoption of ASU 2023-08 | Balance at January 1, 2024 | |||
Assets | |||||
Digital assets .................................................................................. | $299 | $496 | $794 | ||
Shareholders’ Equity | |||||
Accumulated deficit ....................................................................... | $(4,664) | $496 | $(4,168) |
Loss Contingencies
The Company is currently involved in, and may in the future be involved in, legal proceedings, claims,
investigations, and government inquiries and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company
records a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount or range can
be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines there is a reasonable possibility that it may incur a loss and the
loss or range of loss can be estimated, it discloses the possible loss to the extent material. Significant judgment is
required to determine both probability and the estimated amount. The Company reviews these provisions on a
regular basis and adjusts these provisions accordingly to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings,
advice of legal counsel, and updated information. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.
Joint Ventures and Investments
The Company has made strategic investments in joint ventures. The Company evaluates each investment to
determine if the investee is a variable interest entity, and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of
the variable interest entity. The Company has determined, as of December 31, 2025, there were no variable interest
entities required to be consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company’s investments
in unconsolidated affiliates are primarily non-marketable equity securities without readily determinable fair values.
The Company accounts for each of its investments in unconsolidated affiliates either under equity method
accounting, fair value, or by adjusting the carrying value of its non-marketable equity securities to fair value upon
observable transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer or upon impairment (referred to as the
measurement alternative). The investments in unconsolidated affiliates are included within Other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses on the Company’s non-marketable equity securities are recognized in
Other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Refer to Note 9, Investments in
unconsolidated affiliates for additional details.
Revenue Recognition
Below describes the Company’s significant revenue recognition policies by segment.
Space Segment
The Company’s Space segment generates revenue primarily through (i) Launch Services for the deployment of
payloads to their intended orbits for both commercial and government customers utilizing Falcon 9 and Falcon
Heavy, and (ii) Launch and Development for the development of spacecraft and provision of launch and mission
services for government agency space programs utilizing Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Starship, and Dragon.
Space revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts related to the development and provision of launch services for
the deployment of spacecraft and other payloads to its intended orbit for both commercial customers and
governmental agency space programs. The Company recognizes revenue as control is transferred to the customer,
either “over time” or at a “point in time”. The Company recognizes revenue over time for Launch and Development
contracts when the Company’s performance on the contract creates an asset with no alternative use and when the
Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance to date. The Company measures progress on these
F-17
contracts using the cost-to-cost input method, as the Company believes this represents the most appropriate measure
towards satisfaction of its performance obligation. Under the cost-to-cost input method, the Company records
revenue based upon costs (such as materials and labor hours) incurred to date relative to the total estimated cost at
completion. For Launch Services contracts where revenue is recognized at a point in time, due to the
interchangeability of flight hardware and minimal unique engineering costs, revenue and costs are deferred and not
recognized until the launch or deployment of the customer’s spacecraft to its intended orbit.
The Company’s contracts are complex and require the Company to estimate total costs to perform over the term of
the contracts, as well as the measurement of progress towards completion for each performance obligation.
Developing the estimated total cost at completion for each performance obligation requires the use of significant
management judgment, including assumptions regarding launch timing, labor hours, allocation of shared costs for
launch vehicles that have been identified as reusable for multiple launches, as well as expected technological
changes to launch vehicles and spacecraft. The Company recognizes changes in estimated contract revenue or costs
at completion and the resulting changes in contract profit on a cumulative basis.
Connectivity Segment
The Company’s Connectivity segment generates revenue primarily through broadband and Starlink Mobile services
to consumers, and enterprise and government customers throughout 156 markets.
Substantially all of the Company’s contracts with Starlink customers contain multiple performance obligations.
These performance obligations typically include (i) the broadband services provided through Starlink and (ii) the
sale of the Starlink Kit (inclusive of the terminal). For customer contracts that include multiple performance
obligations, the Company accounts for individual performance obligations if they are distinct. The transaction price
is allocated to each performance obligation based on its standalone selling price. The Company determines the
standalone selling price based on the price at which the good or service is sold separately on a standalone basis to
similar customers in similar locations. Starlink Mobile services have one performance obligation.
The Company’s performance obligation to provide broadband and Starlink Mobile services is satisfied over time as
the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. The Company generates service revenue
by (i) fixed price services that require advanced or recurring monthly payments by the customer or (ii) variable
priced services based on actual data usage of the Starlink broadband. The amounts received from customers for
advanced payment for broadband and Starlink Mobile service are included in deferred revenue on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets and revenue is recognized either ratably over the subscription term or based on actual
data usage. The Company’s contracts are generally month to month and the revenue recognized for these recurring
customers is equal to the amount billed in that month.
The Company’s performance obligation to provide the Starlink Kit and other related hardware is satisfied at the
point in time when control is transferred to the customer. In almost all circumstances, control passes to the customer
upon delivery of the Starlink Kit and other related hardware to the customer, or in the instance of certain enterprise
customers, when it is installed. Starlink Kit revenue is reported net of sales returns and chargebacks. Shipping and
handling charges are included in the transaction price. The Company recognizes shipping and handling activities as
fulfillment activities and not as a separate performance obligation.
The Company recognizes revenue over time for certain contracts related to the Starshield business that are long-term
in nature using the cost-to-cost input method. The Company records revenue based upon costs (such as materials
and labor hours) incurred to date relative to the total estimated cost at completion.
The Company’s Starshield contracts are complex and require the Company to estimate the total costs to perform
over the term of the contracts, as well as the measurement of progress towards completion for each performance
obligation. Developing the estimated total cost at completion for each performance obligation requires the use of
significant management judgment, including assumptions regarding labor hours, allocation of shared costs used in
the production of satellites, satellite material costs, as well as expected technological changes to satellites. The
Company recognizes changes in estimated contract revenue or costs at completion and the resulting changes in
contract profit on a cumulative basis.
F-18
AI Segment
The AI segment generates revenue from the sale of advertising and from AI solutions and infrastructure services,
which include (i) subscription offerings, (ii) data licensing arrangements, and (iii) API access to Grok models.
Revenue from advertising is recognized in the period in which the advertising is delivered, as evidenced by a user
engaging with the ad in a manner that satisfies the advertiser’s selected engagement criteria. The Company evaluates
whether it acts as principal or agent when third parties are involved. For advertising products sold directly through
its X platform, the Company controls the specified ad services prior to transfer to the advertiser, is responsible for
serving the advertisements, and fulfills the advertiser’s engagement criteria. Accordingly, it acts as principal and
recognizes revenue on a gross basis. For advertising sold through supply side platform (“SSP”) partners, the
Company receives a percentage share of gross advertising spend. The SSP partner controls the advertising inventory
prior to its transfer to the advertisers, is primarily responsible for fulfilling the performance obligation to the
advertiser, and has discretion in pricing. As a result, the Company acts as agent and recognizes revenue on a net
basis.
Subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the period of the subscription term.
Data licensing arrangements grant customers a right to access, search, and analyze the Company’s historical and
real-time intellectual property (“IP”) on the X platform through the developer channel for a defined period. These
arrangements may contain a single performance obligation (satisfied at a point in time for historical IP or over time
for future IP) or multiple performance obligations satisfied separately. For arrangements with a fixed monthly fee
and a single future IP performance obligation, revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period in which
the Company provides the data. When such arrangements contain multiple performance obligations, the Company
allocates revenue on a relative basis between the performance obligations based on standalone selling price based on
directly observable standalone transactions and recognizes revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied. For
certain data licensing arrangements, the Company charges customers based on the amount of sales they generate
from downstream customers using its data. For arrangements with a minimum guarantee and a single future IP
performance obligation, the minimum guarantee is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period. For
arrangements with a minimum guarantee and two or more performance obligations, the Company allocates revenue
on a relative basis between the performance obligations based on standalone selling price based on directly
observable standalone transactions and recognizes revenue as each performance obligation is satisfied. Any royalties
in excess of minimum guarantees, if any, are recognized over the contract term, on a straight-line, on a cumulative
catch-up basis.
For the Company’s API services, the primary performance obligation is to stand ready to provide customers with
access to the platform to process data through token-based inputs and utilize compute hours for outputs. Revenue is
recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the contract term for subscription arrangements that provide stand-
ready access. For usage-based arrangements, revenue is recognized as the services are consumed (i.e., as tokens are
processed or compute hours are utilized).
For all segments, the Company records payment processing fees for its credit card sales within Cost of revenue.
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are not included in the transaction price. The
Company expenses sales commissions as incurred when the amortization period is one year or less within Selling,
general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue includes the cost of materials, depreciation and amortization, shipping and handling, payment
processor fees, customs and duties, revenue share costs, infrastructure costs, allocated overhead, and employee
compensation costs (including salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation). Infrastructure costs consist
primarily of rocket, kit, and satellite manufacturing facilities and data center costs related to the Company’s
colocated facilities, which include lease and hosting costs, related support and maintenance costs, energy and
bandwidth costs, and public cloud hosting costs.
F-19
Warranty on Starlink Kits
The Company offers a standard product warranty for a period of one to two years on Starlink Kits. The Company
has an obligation to either repair or replace the defective Starlink Kit. At the time revenue is recognized, an estimate
of future warranty costs is recorded as a component of Cost of revenue. Factors that affect the warranty obligation
include historical as well as current product failure rates and costs incurred in correcting product failures. Warranty
expenses and related liabilities are not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Research and Development Expenses
The Company sponsors various research and development projects, whose costs are expensed as incurred. Research
and development (“R&D”) expenses consist of cost of materials, employee compensation costs (including salaries,
benefits, and share-based compensation), contractor compensation expenses, cloud computing expenses, data
services, equipment lease expenses, depreciation for R&D equipment and allocated overhead. R&D costs also
include certain expenses related to the development of features and modules created through engineering services
for the Company’s products, where the Company retains the associated intellectual property.
Software Development Costs
The Company expenses software development costs marketed under on-premise perpetual license agreements. Costs
incurred prior to the establishment of technological feasibility are expensed as research and development costs. Due
to the nature of the Company’s development cycle, technological feasibility typically occurs shortly before the
product is available for general release. All software development costs for the years ended December 31, 2025,
2024, and 2023 were expensed as incurred.
Share-Based Compensation
The fair value of stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and restricted share awards (“RSAs”) with service
and/or performance conditions and the employee share purchase plan (“ESPP”) are estimated on the grant or
offering date. The fair value of RSUs, RSAs, and ESPP is determined based on the fair value of the Company’s
common stock on the date of grant and the fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-
pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires inputs such as the fair value of the Company’s
common stock, risk-free interest rate, expected award term and expected share price volatility.
Share-based compensation expense for equity awards with performance conditions is recognized over the requisite
service period when the vesting of the award becomes probable. Share-based compensation expense is recognized
on a straight-line basis for equity awards with only a service condition and on a graded vesting basis for equity
awards with a performance condition. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an
estimated basis.
The fair value and derived service period of awards granted to the Company’s CEO with market, service, and
performance conditions are estimated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. A Monte Carlo
simulation model requires inputs such as fair value of the Company’s common stock, the risk-free interest rate,
expected award term, expected share dilution and expected share price volatility. These inputs, which are subjective
and generally require judgment, are unique to each award based on the best available information at the valuation
date. For these awards, share-based compensation expense is not recognized until the performance condition is
probable. Once the performance condition is met, share-based compensation is recorded based on the requisite
service period associated with the probable performance condition.
Advertising Expense
The Company expenses the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to primarily market Starlink
services as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, advertising expenses included in
Selling, general, and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations are $69 million, $31
million, and $29 million, respectively.
F-20
Net Income (Loss) per Share of Common Stock Attributable to Common Shareholders
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders is computed using the two-class method required
for participating securities. Under this method, net income is allocated to common shareholders and participating
securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends as if all earnings for the period had been distributed.
Certain series of the Company’s redeemable convertible preferred stock are considered participating securities
because they are entitled to receive dividends on an as-converted basis if and when dividends are declared on
common stock. These securities do not participate in net losses. The Company’s classes of common stock have
identical economic rights, resulting in the same net income (loss) per share for each class. Accordingly, the
Company presents a single net income (loss) per share for all classes of common stock.
Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed based on the more dilutive of (i) the two-class method or (ii) the if-
converted method. Potentially dilutive shares from outstanding share-based compensation awards, including stock
options and restricted stock units, are included when calculating diluted net income (loss) per share of attributable to
common shareholders using the treasury stock method when their effect is dilutive.
Refer to Note 13, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional details of the
Company’s preferred and common stock.
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized using enacted tax
rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities.
ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize deferred tax
assets is assessed at each year-end and a valuation allowance is established if necessary. The factors used to assess
the likelihood of realization may include forecasts of future taxable income, future reversal of existing taxable
temporary differences, and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize net deferred tax
assets.
The Company applies the provisions of ASC 740-10, which requires the Company to recognize in the consolidated
financial statements the impact of a tax position only if it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination
based on the technical merits of the position. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions in income tax expense.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740)
(“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate
reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid. The Company adopted this ASU on a
prospective basis effective January 1, 2025. Refer to Note 16, Income Taxes for the inclusion of new disclosures
required.
Investment Tax Credits
The Company recognizes investment tax credits when there is reasonable assurance that the credit will be received
and the Company will comply with the conditions specified in the agreement or statutory requirements. The
Company records capital-related credits as a reduction to Property, plant, and equipment, net within the consolidated
balance sheets and recognizes a reduction to depreciation expense over the useful life of the corresponding acquired
asset.
Foreign Currency
The reporting currency of the Company is the United States (“U.S.”) dollar. The Company determines the functional
and reporting currency of each of its international subsidiaries based on the primary currency in which they operate.
If the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, the Company recognizes a cumulative translation adjustment created
by the different rates the Company applies to current period income or loss and the balance sheet. For each
F-21
subsidiary, the Company applies the monthly average functional exchange rate to its monthly income or loss and the
month-end functional currency rate to translate the balance sheet.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are a result of the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Transaction gains and losses are recognized in Other
income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Net foreign currency transaction gains (losses)
were not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (Subtopic
220-40). The ASU requires the disaggregated disclosure of specific expense categories, including purchases of
inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization, within relevant income statement captions. This
ASU also requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses along with the definition of selling expenses.
The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2027. Adoption of this ASU can either be applied prospectively to consolidated
financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of this ASU or retrospectively to any or all
prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. This ASU will likely result in the required
additional disclosures being included in the consolidated financial statements, once adopted. The Company is
currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement
of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendments in this update provide a practical
expedient permitting an entity to assume that conditions at the balance sheet date remain unchanged over the life of
the asset when estimating expected credit losses for current classified accounts receivable and contract assets. This
update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, including interim periods within those
fiscal years. Adoption of this ASU can be applied prospectively for reporting periods after its effective date. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this
ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software
(Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The ASU simplifies the
capitalization guidance by removing all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages
(referred to as “project stages”) throughout ASC 350-40. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption of this ASU can be applied
prospectively for reporting periods after its effective date; or follow a modified transition approach that is based on
the status of the respective projects and whether software costs were capitalized before the date of adoption; or
retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for
Government Grants Received by Business Entities. The ASU establishes authoritative guidance in GAAP about
accounting for government grants received by business entities, clarifies the appropriate accounting, in an effort to
reduce diversity in practice, and increase consistency of application across business entities. The ASU is effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim reporting periods within those annual
reporting periods. Adoption of this ASU can be applied a modified prospective approach, a modified retrospective
approach, or a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
F-22
Note 3 - Revenue
Revenue disaggregated by products and services is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Products .......................................................................................... | $1,510 | $1,470 | $1,093 | ||
Services .......................................................................................... | 17,164 | 12,545 | 9,294 | ||
Total revenues .............................................................................. | $18,674 | $14,015 | $10,387 | ||
All of products revenue is attributable to the Connectivity segment.
Revenue disaggregated by type and segment is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Launch Services ........................................................................... | $2,576 | $2,584 | $1,964 | ||
Launch & Development ............................................................... | 1,510 | 1,212 | 1,593 | ||
Space ............................................................................................. | 4,086 | 3,796 | 3,557 | ||
Consumer ..................................................................................... | 7,208 | 4,830 | 2,817 | ||
Enterprise & Government (1) ........................................................ | 4,179 | 2,769 | 1,052 | ||
Connectivity ................................................................................. | 11,387 | 7,599 | 3,869 | ||
Advertising ................................................................................... | 1,844 | 1,728 | 2,323 | ||
AI Solutions & Infrastructure ...................................................... | 1,357 | 892 | 638 | ||
AI .................................................................................................. | 3,201 | 2,620 | 2,961 | ||
Total revenues ......................................................................... | $18,674 | $14,015 | $10,387 | ||
___________________
(1) Enterprise & Government revenue includes revenue from Starlink Mobile service offerings.
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is recorded when cash payments are received or due, in advance of the Company’s performance.
Deferred revenue primarily relates to Space agreements and Connectivity enterprise and government contracts. Total
deferred revenue as of December 31, 2024 was $10,179 million, of which $4,080 million was recognized as revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2025. Total deferred revenue as of December 31, 2025 was $12,116 million.
Revenue recognized during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 that were included in the deferred revenue
balance at the beginning of each period was $3,414 million and $2,691 million, respectively.
Backlog
The Company’s backlog represents the transaction price of performance obligations to customers for which work
remains to be performed. The amount of backlog increases with new contracts or additions to existing contracts and
decreases as revenue is recognized on existing contracts. Contracts are included in backlog when an enforceable
agreement has been reached. Backlog does not include amounts related to performance obligations that are billed
and recognized as they are delivered, optional purchases that do not represent material rights and any estimated
amounts of variable consideration that are subject to constraint. Backlog totaled $28,377 million as of December 31,
2025, of which $12,116 million was recognized as deferred revenue at December 31, 2025. Approximately 32% is
expected to be recognized within one year, and approximately 53% to be recognized in 2027 and 2028, with the
remaining 15% to be recognized thereafter.
F-23
Concentration of risk
Consolidated revenue from a significant customer is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Customer A .................................................................................... | 20.9% | 24.2% | 25.2% | ||
Revenue from this customer relates to all three segments. No other customers represented more than 10% of
consolidated revenue during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.
Note 4 - Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Raw materials ............................................................................................................ | $1,030 | $923 | |
Work-in-progress ....................................................................................................... | 803 | 730 | |
Finished goods ........................................................................................................... | 583 | 350 | |
Inventory ................................................................................................................. | $2,416 | $2,003 | |
Note 5 - Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
Property, plant, and equipment, net consist of the following:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Servers and networking equipment ........................................................................... | $22,694 | $6,892 | |
Satellites ..................................................................................................................... | 11,949 | 7,591 | |
Machinery and equipment ......................................................................................... | 6,343 | 5,343 | |
Data center infrastructure .......................................................................................... | 2,960 | 224 | |
Launch sites ............................................................................................................... | 2,404 | 2,121 | |
Land, buildings and improvements (1) ....................................................................... | 1,876 | 913 | |
Flight vehicle hardware ............................................................................................. | 1,689 | 1,577 | |
Leasehold improvements ........................................................................................... | 784 | 1,019 | |
Construction-in-progress ........................................................................................... | 4,604 | 3,007 | |
Property, plant, and equipment .................................................................................. | 55,303 | 28,687 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation ................................................................................ | (12,701) | (7,540) | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net ..................................................................... | $42,602 | $21,147 | |
__________________
(1)Land is not a depreciable asset.
Construction in progress is primarily comprised of ongoing construction and expansion of the facilities and
equipment as well as AI infrastructure that has not yet been placed in service.
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $5,915 million, $2,977 million
and $1,897 million respectively.
Interest is capitalized during the construction period for significant long term construction projects, such as the AI
infrastructure data centers. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company capitalized $169 million of interest,
F-24
which is included in Construction-in-progress amounts above. No interest was capitalized during the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded impairment charges of $38 million and
$63 million, respectively, related to the write off of (i) damaged flight vehicle in the Space segment, and (ii)
abandoned production line and damaged satellite hardware in the Connectivity segment. These charges are reflected
in Impairment in the consolidated statements of operations. There was no impairment related to Property, plant, and
equipment recorded in Impairment during the year ended December 31, 2023.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company also recorded impairment charges of $36
million and $54 million, respectively, related to its leasehold improvements and office equipment as part of its
facilities consolidation efforts in the AI segment in Restructuring charges in the consolidated statements of
operations. There was no impairment related to Property, plant, and equipment recorded in Restructuring charges
during the year ended December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 20, Restructuring for additional details.
In 2024, the Company closed two taxable revenue bond transactions with a local municipality, in order to receive a
personal property tax abatement on newly acquired server and networking equipment in the state. Pursuant to this
transaction, the municipality issued taxable revenue bonds of $442 million and $258 million principal amount each
to the Company and used the constructive proceeds to purchase the server and networking equipment from the
Company, and then leased the equipment back to the Company. As this effectively created a bond receivable and a
corresponding financing obligation with the municipality, and the Company has the legal right to set-off and intends
to set-off the corresponding lease expense and bond service payments received, there was no impact to the
consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets.
Note 6 - Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets
Finite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:
December 31, 2025 | |||||||
Weighted- Average Useful Life (years) | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||
Brand ...................................................................... | 5.0 | $743 | $(335) | $408 | |||
User base ................................................................. | 9.0 | 1,291 | (456) | 835 | |||
Existing technology ................................................ | 3.2 | 27 | (16) | 11 | |||
Advertising customer relationships ........................ | 5.0 | 752 | (478) | 274 | |||
Acquired workforce ................................................ | 2.0 | 9 | — | 9 | |||
Total ................................................................. | $2,822 | $(1,285) | $1,537 | ||||
December 31, 2024 | |||||||
Weighted- Average Useful Life (in years) | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||
Brand ...................................................................... | 5.0 | $707 | $(177) | $530 | |||
User base ................................................................. | 9.0 | 1,225 | (297) | 928 | |||
Existing technology ................................................ | 3.0 | 1,140 | (823) | 317 | |||
Advertising customer relationships ........................ | 5.0 | 714 | (311) | 403 | |||
Data licensing customer relationships .................... | 3.0 | 102 | (74) | 28 | |||
Developed technology ............................................ | 2.0 | 3 | (2) | 1 | |||
Total ................................................................. | $3,891 | $(1,684) | $2,207 | ||||
F-25
Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangible assets was $786 million, $847 million, and $738
million in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
The Company also has indefinite-lived intangible assets of $11 million and $4 million as of December 31, 2025 and
2024, respectively. Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of domain names, which are expected to
provide long-term branding and marketing benefits. No impairment charges were recognized on indefinite-lived
intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 other than the Twitter impairment
described below.
Estimated future amortization expense of finite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2025 is as follows:
2026 ...................................................................................................................................................... | $452 |
2027 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 421 |
2028 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 256 |
2029 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 143 |
2030 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 142 |
Thereafter .............................................................................................................................................. | 123 |
$1,537 |
Twitter Impairment
In 2023, the Company rebranded its Twitter platform to X. As a result of the rebranding, the Company performed an
impairment assessment and recorded an impairment charge of $3,775 million on its previously indefinite-lived brand
intangible for the AI segment. The Company’s brand intangible asset was determined to no longer be indefinite-
lived and is presented as a finite-lived intangible asset with a five-year useful life. The fair value of the brand
intangible asset was determined using the relief-from-royalty method.
Spectrum Transactions
On September 7, 2025, the Company entered into a License Purchase Agreement (the “Spectrum License Purchase
Agreement”) with Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1, a Nevada Business Trust (“Trust”) and EchoStar Corporation
(“EchoStar”, and the transactions contemplated thereby, “Spectrum Transactions”) for total consideration of $17,000
million as discussed below.
Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Spectrum License Purchase Agreement, the
Company agreed to purchase EchoStar’s rights and licenses related to an aggregate of 50 MHz of spectrum in
frequency ranges 2000–2020, 2180–2200, 1915–1920 and 1995–2000 (the “AWS-4 and H-Block Licenses” and
such spectrum, “the Spectrum”) granted by the Federal Communication Commissions (“FCC”), together with
certain international authorizations, filings, concessions, licenses, rights and priorities related to that spectrum and
certain assets associated therewith (collectively, the “Foreign Assets”). The transfer of the AWS-4 and H-Block
Licenses will occur in two steps: first, the AWS-4 and H-Block Licenses will be transferred by EchoStar to the Trust
(the “Spectrum Transfer Closing”), and second, the AWS-4 and H-Block Licenses will be transferred by the Trust to
the Company (the “Spectrum Acquisition Closing”). The Foreign Assets will be transferred directly to the Company
at the Spectrum Acquisition Closing, to the extent the required regulatory approvals have been obtained by such
date; provided, however, that the failure to obtain such approvals will not delay or prevent the Spectrum Acquisition
Closing.
In connection with the Spectrum License Purchase Agreement and the Spectrum Transactions, on September 7,
2025, the Company and the Trust entered into a Credit Agreement, pursuant to which the Company has agreed upon
the Spectrum Transfer Closing, to loan to the Trust (via loans which are able to be canceled at six-month intervals)
to be used by the Trust to make debt service payments on EchoStar’s debt through at least November 30, 2027, but
in no event later than November 30, 2028. These loans will be secured on a junior lien basis by the AWS-4 and H-
Block Licenses. The aggregate amount of debt service payments through November 30, 2028 will equal
approximately $3,000 million.
F-26
On November 5, 2025, the parties amended and restated the Spectrum License Purchase Agreement to include
EchoStar’s licenses for up to 15MHz of additional unpaired AWS-3 spectrum, and increased the consideration by
$2,600 million, to a total amount of consideration of $19,600 million. The cash payoff consideration (as noted
below), two-step transfer process, debt service payments, trust structure, and maintenance obligations remain
unchanged.
The total consideration, approximating $19.6 billion, consisting of (i) approximately $11.1 billion in equity, payable
through the issuance of approximately 261.8 million shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a fixed
value of $42.40 per share, and (ii) up to $8.5 billion related to the payoff of designated EchoStar debt, with any
shortfall below $8.5 billion to be paid in cash. The allocation of cash and equity consideration is subject to certain
adjustments based on the amount of EchoStar debt satisfied at or prior to closing.
The Spectrum Acquisition Closing is expected to occur on or about November 30, 2027. The completion of the
Spectrum Transactions is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including, among
others, receipt of certain consents and approvals from the FCC and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”). The
Spectrum License Purchase Agreement also provides for specified termination rights. As of December 31, 2025, the
Spectrum Transfer Closing has not yet occurred, and as a result, the Company is not yet obligated to make any
payments under the Credit Agreement with the Trust. Once the Spectrum Transfer Closing occurs, the Spectrum
Transactions will be recognized as acquired intangible assets.
Goodwill
The activity for goodwill is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2023 ............................................................................................................. | $11,418 |
Cumulative translation adjustments ................................................................................................. | (289) |
Balance at December 31, 2024 ............................................................................................................. | 11,129 |
Business combination ....................................................................................................................... | 52 |
Cumulative translation adjustments ................................................................................................ | 628 |
Balance at December 31, 2025 .......................................................................................................... | $11,809 |
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, goodwill attributable to the Connectivity segment was $513 million and $505
million, respectively, and goodwill attributable to the AI segment was $11,296 million and $10,624 million,
respectively.
Note 7 - Digital Assets
Digital assets consist of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||||
2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
(in millions except units of digital assets) | Units | Cost Basis | Fair Value | Units | Cost Basis | Fair Value | |||||
Digital assets held: | |||||||||||
Bitcoin ......................................... | 18,712 | $661 | $1,637 | 18,712 | $661 | $1,749 | |||||
Total ................................................ | 18,712 | $661 | $1,637 | 18,712 | $661 | $1,749 | |||||
F-27
The fair value of digital assets is determined using a Level I in the fair value hierarchy. The following table
provides activities related to digital assets:
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Beginning balance, at fair value ................................................................................ | $1,749 | $794 | |
Unrealized gain (loss), net ......................................................................................... | (112) | 955 | |
Ending balance, at fair value ................................................................................. | $1,637 | $1,749 | |
Note 8 - Financial Instruments
The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
As of December 31, 2025 | |||||||||
Level | Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Cash ................................................. | I | $3,408 | $— | $— | $3,408 | ||||
Money market funds ........................ | I | 21,339 | — | — | 21,339 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ................................. | I | 30 | — | — | 30 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ............................................... | I | 152 | — | — | 152 | ||||
Other assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ................................. | I | 182 | — | — | 182 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ............................................... | I | 13 | — | — | 13 | ||||
Total .................................................. | $25,124 | $— | $— | $25,124 | |||||
As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||
Level | Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Cash ................................................. | I | $3,865 | $— | $— | $3,865 | ||||
Money market funds ........................ | I | 7,520 | — | — | 7,520 | ||||
Marketable securities | |||||||||
Government securities ..................... | II | 800 | 1 | (1) | 800 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ................................. | I | 23 | — | — | 23 | ||||
Other assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ................................. | I | 88 | — | — | 88 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ............................................... | I | 5 | — | — | 5 | ||||
Government securities ..................... | II | 581 | 1 | — | 582 | ||||
Total .................................................. | $12,882 | $2 | $(1) | $12,883 | |||||
F-28
Note 9 - Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
Equity method investment
In April 2025, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CTC Property LLC (“CTC”), entered into a joint
venture Stateline Power, LLC (“Stateline”), with Solaris Power Solutions Stateline, LLC (“Stateline Power
Solutions”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (“Solaris”).
Stateline was formed to provide off-grid power to CTC’s data center campus pursuant to a long-term equipment
rental arrangement. In connection with the formation of Stateline, Solaris contributed non-cash assets valued at $86
million, consisting primarily of progress payments on power generation equipment now owned by Stateline and pre-
funded expenses, in exchange for a 50.1% equity interest in Stateline. CTC contributed $86 million in cash in
exchange for the remaining 49.9% equity interest. Interests in Stateline held by CTC were subsequently assigned to
MZX Tech LLC (“MZX”), another wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Concurrent with its formation, CTC (subsequently assigned to MZX) entered into a master equipment rental
agreement (“Rental Agreement”) with Stateline under which Stateline will lease power generation equipment to
MZX for use at the Company’s data center facility. The Rental Agreement lease commences upon completion of
equipment deployment and commissioning activities by Stateline. No rental payments were made by the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2025.
The Company evaluated its interest in Stateline under ASC 810 and determined that Stateline is a variable interest
entity but the Company is not the primary beneficiary because it does not have the power to direct the activities that
most significantly impact Stateline’s economic performance, which are the operations of the assets managed by a
subsidiary of Solaris and the Company’s lack of control over how the assets are managed and redeployed after the
initial term of the Rental Agreement. As a result, the Company accounts for its interest in Stateline using the equity
method of accounting. As of December 31, 2025, the carrying value of the equity method investment was $86
million, which represents the Company’s initial investment in Stateline. Activity in Stateline during the year ended
December 31, 2025 was not material.
Equity investments without readily determinable fair value
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company held investments in unconsolidated affiliates which are accounted
for as equity investments without readily determinable fair values of $157 million and $154 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company recorded a total of $0 million, $1 million,
and $45 million of impairment charges related to the equity method investments in Other income (expense), net in
the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded cumulative downward adjustments of $59 million
on these investments as of December 31, 2025. No upward adjustments were recorded in the years ended December
31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.
F-29
Note 10 - Debt
As of December 31, 2025 | |||||
Principal | Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs | Net | |||
X 2027 and X 2030 Notes .............................................................. | $27 | $— | $27 | ||
X B-1 Term Loan ........................................................................... | 6,504 | 280 | 6,224 | ||
X B-3 Term Loan ........................................................................... | 5,966 | 54 | 5,912 | ||
xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan ............................................................ | 995 | 4 | 991 | ||
xAI Floating Rate Term Loan ........................................................ | 995 | 40 | 955 | ||
xAI 12.5% Secured Senior Notes ................................................... | 3,000 | 12 | 2,988 | ||
Other financings (1) ......................................................................... | 4,562 | — | 4,562 | ||
Total debt ........................................................................................ | 22,049 | 390 | 21,659 | ||
Finance lease liability ..................................................................... | 1,237 | — | 1,237 | ||
Total debt and finance leases .......................................................... | $23,286 | $390 | $22,896 | ||
Less: Short-term portion ................................................................. | 928 | — | 928 | ||
Total debt and finance leases, net of current ............................ | 22,358 | 390 | 21,968 | ||
As of December 31, 2024 | |||||
Principal | Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs | Net | |||
X 2027 and X 2030 Notes .............................................................. | $27 | $— | $27 | ||
X B-1 Term Loan ........................................................................... | 6,571 | 359 | 6,212 | ||
X Bridge Credit Facilities ............................................................... | 5,966 | — | 5,966 | ||
Other financings ............................................................................. | 57 | — | 57 | ||
Total debt ........................................................................................ | 12,621 | 359 | 12,262 | ||
Finance lease liability ..................................................................... | 1,531 | — | 1,531 | ||
Total debt and finance leases .......................................................... | 14,152 | 359 | 13,793 | ||
Less: Short-term portion ................................................................. | 372 | — | 372 | ||
Total debt and finance leases, net of current ............................ | 13,780 | 359 | 13,421 | ||
__________________
(1)Includes obligations related to certain AI infrastructure assets recorded as failed sale-leaseback transactions. Refer to Other Financings
below for additional details.
SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement
General. In 2018 and subsequently amended through 2023, SpaceX entered into a senior secured asset-based
revolving credit agreement (“SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. The SpaceX ABL Credit
Agreement provided for a senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, from which the Company may draw
upon as needed for up to $1,500 million. The SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement was collateralized primarily by a
pledge of certain of SpaceX’s inventory and equipment, and availability under the SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement
was based on the estimated fair value of such assets, as reduced by certain reserves. The Company was required to
meet various covenants, including meeting certain reporting requirements, and certain financial covenants applied
once more than 85.0% of the SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement was drawn upon. In February 2025, SpaceX
terminated the SpaceX ABL Credit Agreement. No amounts were outstanding at the time of termination.
SpaceX Credit Facility
General. In February 2025, the Company entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement
(“SpaceX Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of banks, under which the Company may draw up to $1,500 million,
F-30
subject to a customary financial covenant and other reporting requirements. The SpaceX Credit Facility terminates,
and all outstanding loans become due and payable, on February 7, 2030, unless the parties agree to an extension. No
amounts were borrowed under the SpaceX Credit Facility during 2025.
Interest Rates. Under the SpaceX Credit Facility, borrowings bear interest at the Company’s option, at a rate per
annum of (i) between 0.75%-1.25%, depending on the Company’s current debt rating, plus the relevant Term SOFR
or (ii) between 0.0%-0.25% depending on the Company’s current debt rating plus the greater of (a) the Federal
Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus 1.0% and (d) 1.0%. The Company may also borrow
in various alternative currencies at various alternative rates, including rates based on SONIA for Pound Sterling
loans and EURIBOR for Euro loans plus an applicable margin. The fee for undrawn amounts is between
0.07%-0.11% per annum, depending on the Company’s current debt rating. Interest is payable either monthly or
quarterly, depending on the interest loan option.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants of the SpaceX Credit Facility as of December 31,
2025; however, the Company had a technical default when the Company acquired xAI on February 2, 2026 due to
the amount of debt assumed as part of the acquisition at the subsidiary level. On March 2, 2026, the Company
obtained a waiver from the syndicate of banks and amended the SpaceX Credit Facility allowing for the debt
refinance completed on March 2, 2026 (refer to Note 21, Subsequent Events for additional details), resulting in the
Company being in compliance with all covenants.
X 2027 and 2030 Notes
General. In 2019, a subsidiary of X, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, issued $700 million aggregate principal
amount of 3.875% senior notes due 2027 (the “X 2027 Notes”) in a private placement. The X 2027 Notes mature on
December 15, 2027. In 2022, a subsidiary of X issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5.000% senior
notes due 2030 (the “X 2030 Notes”) in a private placement. The X 2030 Notes mature on March 1, 2030. The X
2027 and X 2030 Notes represent senior unsecured obligations of the Company.
Interest Rates. For the X 2027 Notes, the interest rate is fixed at 3.875% per annum and interest is payable semi-
annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year. For the X 2030 Notes, the interest rate is fixed at
5.000% per annum and interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year.
Principal Repayments. In November 2022, the Company purchased approximately $675 million aggregate principal
amount of X 2027 Notes and $998 million aggregate principal amount of the X 2030 Notes in settlement of the
change in control of Twitter. The X 2027 Notes and X 2030 Notes that remain outstanding may be redeemed at the
option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time prior to September 15, 2027 and December 1, 2029,
respectively, at a price equal to 100.0% of the principal amounts plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, up to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants of the X 2027 Notes and X 2030 Notes as of
December 31, 2025.
X First Lien Senior Credit Facilities
General. In 2022, X Corp., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, entered into the First Lien Credit Agreement
which provided for a new term loan commitment of $6,705 million (“X B-1 Term Loan”) and a $500 million
Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility (including a letter of credit subfacility with an aggregate face value of
up to $100 million) (together referred to as “X First Lien Senior Credit Facilities”). The Secured First Lien
Revolving Credit Facility matures on October 27, 2027 and the X B-1 Term Loan matures on October 27, 2029.
Amendments. In February 2025, X Corp., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, amended the X First Lien Senior
Credit Facilities and entered into a new term loan commitment for $4,741 million with a maturity date of October
27, 2029 (“X B-3 Term Loan”) and reduced the Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility commitment to $0.
As part of the issuance of the X B-3 Term Loan, the Company is required to pay an arrangement fee of $51 million,
which is due and payable on February 19, 2027. In April 2025, the Company entered into an amendment to the X
F-31
B-3 Term Loan for an additional commitment of $1,225 million with the same terms and conditions, increasing the
total X B-3 Term Loan borrowings to $5,966 million.
Proceeds. The proceeds from the X B-3 Term Loan were used to pay down and extinguish the First Lien Bridge
Credit Facility and the Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility. The Company accounted for the pay down as a partial
modification and extinguishment of debt, expensing immaterial debt issuance costs.
Interest Rates. The X B-1 Term Loan bears interest at a rate per annum of, initially, adjusted Term SOFR plus
6.50%. The Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum of, initially, an adjusted
Term SOFR plus 4.50%, with leverage-based step-downs. Undrawn commitments under the Secured First Lien
Revolving Credit Facility were subject to an unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum, subject to quarterly
leverage based step-downs. The X B-3 Term Loan has a fixed interest rate of 9.50% per annum. Interest on the X
B-1 Term Loan and X B-3 Term Loan is payable monthly, quarterly, or bi-annually at the option of the Company.
The effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the X B-1 Term Loan and X B-3 Term Loan was
12.40% and 9.80%, respectively, as of December 31, 2025.
Principal Repayments. The X B-1 Term Loan is repayable at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or
penalty, subject to mandatory quarterly prepayments of principal beginning on the last day of the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2023, in amounts equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount of borrowings thereunder, with
the unpaid balance being payable on the final maturity date thereof. The X B-1 Term Loan is also subject to
additional customary mandatory prepayment provisions from the proceeds of certain debt issuances and asset sales,
as well as sweeps of a portion of excess cash flow, subject to certain leverage-based step-downs and exceptions.
None of these additional customary mandatory prepayment provisions have been triggered as of December 31, 2025.
The X B-3 Term Loan has prepayment penalties of 107.13% of the outstanding principal before October 27, 2026,
104.75% of the outstanding principal before October 27, 2027, and 102.38% of the outstanding principal before
October 27, 2028.
Guarantors and Collateral. Obligations under the First Lien Senior Credit Facilities were guaranteed by X, and were
collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of X and its subsidiaries (subject to customary
exceptions) which had a carrying amount of $42,132 million as of December 31, 2025.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants of the First Lien Senior Credit Facilities as of
December 31, 2025.
X Bridge Credit Facilities
General. On October 27, 2022, X Corp., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, entered into the First Lien Bridge
Loan Credit Agreement and the Second Lien Bridge Loan Credit Agreement as borrower, which provided for a
$3,000 million First Lien Bridge Credit Facility and a $3,000 million Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility (together,
the “X Bridge Credit Facilities”), respectively. The initial term loans under each Bridge Credit Facility automatically
convert to permanent term loans (“Permanent Bridge Loans”) on July 31, 2025 (“Bridge Conversion Date”), as
amended. The Permanent Bridge Loans mature on October 27, 2029 and October 27, 2030 for the First Lien Bridge
Credit Facility and the Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility, respectively. In February 2025, the Company repaid the
full outstanding amount of $2,966 million resulting in the full payoff of the First Lien Bridge Credit Facility prior to
the Bridge Conversation Date. In February and April 2025, the Company made principal payments of $1,775
million and $1,225 million respectively, resulting in the full payoff of the Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility prior
to the Bridge Conversation Date.
Interest Rates. Borrowings under the First Lien Bridge Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum of, initially,
an adjusted term SOFR plus 6.75%, with 0.50% step-ups occurring on each successive three-month period until the
Bridge Conversion Date, but subject to a maximum all-in rate of, prior to January 20, 2023, 9.25% and, on and after
January 20, 2023, 9.50% (“First Lien Bridge Total Cap”). After the Bridge Conversion Date, any outstanding
borrowings under the First Lien Bridge Credit Facility bore interest at the First Lien Bridge Total Cap. Borrowings
under the Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum of, initially, an adjusted term SOFR
plus 10.00%, with 0.50% step-ups occurring on each successive three-month period thereafter until the Bridge
Conversion Date, but subject to a maximum all-in rate of, prior to January 20, 2023, 12.75% and, on and after
F-32
January 20, 2023, 13.00% (“Second Lien Bridge Total Cap”). After the Bridge Conversion Date, any outstanding
borrowings under the Second Lien Bridge Credit Facility bore interest at the Second Lien Bridge Total Cap.
xAI First Lien Credit Agreement
General. In June 2025, X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, entered into the First Lien
Credit Agreement to provide borrowings up to $2,000 million. The Company executed a $1,000 million Fixed Rate
Term Loan maturing on June 30, 2030 (“xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan”); and a $1,000 million Floating Rate Term
Loan maturing on June 30, 2030 (“xAI Floating Rate Term Loan”).
Interest Rates. The xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan has a fixed interest rate of 12.50% per annum and the xAI Floating
Rate Term Loan has a floating interest rate per annum of Term SOFR plus 7.25% or ABR plus 6.25%. Interest on
the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan is payable bi-annually on January 31 and July 31, commencing on January 31, 2026.
Interest on the xAI Floating Rate Term loan is payable monthly, quarterly, or bi-annually at the option of the
Company. The effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and xAI
Floating Rate Term Loan was 11.91% and 12.48%, respectively, as of December 31, 2025.
Principal Repayments. The xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and the xAI Floating Rate Term Loan have prepayment
penalties of 103% on the principal outstanding balance prior to June 30, 2027 and 101% on the principal outstanding
balance prior to June 30, 2028.
Guarantors. Obligations under the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and xAI Floating Rate Term Loan were guaranteed
each jointly and severally by X.AI Corp. and the following subsidiaries of X.AI Corp.: AIQ Phase LLC, CTC
Holding LLC, CTC, LLZ Build LLC, and MZX.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants of the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and xAI Floating
Rate Term Loan as of December 31, 2025.
xAI 12.5% Secured Senior Notes
General. In June 2025, X.AI LLC and, X.AI Co Issuer Corp, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, issued $3,000
million aggregate principal amount of 12.5% interest Senior Secured Notes due in 2030 (“xAI 12.5% Senior Secured
Notes”). The Senior Secured Notes were issued at 100% of the principal amount and the entire principal amount
will be due on June 30, 2030.
Interest Rates. The xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes have a fixed interest rate of 12.50% per annum. Interest is
payable bi-annually on January 15 and July 15, commencing on January 15, 2026.
Principal Repayments. The xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes have prepayment penalties of 106.25% on the principal
outstanding balance prior to July 15, 2027 and 103.13% on the principal outstanding balance prior to July 15, 2028.
Guarantors. Obligations under the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes were guaranteed each jointly and severally by
xAI and the following subsidiaries of xAI: AIQ Phase LLC, CTC Holding LLC, CTC, LLZ Build LLC, and MZX.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants of the 12.5% Senior Secured Notes as of
December 31, 2025.
xAI Revolving Line of Credit
General. In April 2024 and amended in May 2024, a subsidiary of xAI, an indirect subsidiary of the Company,
entered into a revolving line of credit for an aggregate face amount up to $150 million. The Company had no
F-33
borrowings under the line of credit during 2025. Letters of credit issued under the revolving line of credit were $145
million as of December 31, 2025.
Interest Rates. Interest on any borrowings is calculated based on the 30-day average SOFR plus the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association spread adjustment plus a spread of 40 basis points.
Guarantors and Collateral. The agreement permits borrowings up to the value of the pledged collateral held in
custody, less any outstanding loan balances, accrued interest, and fees. The pledged collateral consisted of securities
held in xAI’s custodial account.
Other Financings
The Company has entered into various other financing arrangements, generally collateralized by specific machinery
and equipment. These arrangements have an average fixed interest rate of 5.5% and 5.3% per annum as of
December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, with principal and interest payments due monthly, and in certain
instances, a lump sum payment at the end of term.
In addition, in November 2025, CTC completed a sale-leaseback transaction for its AI infrastructure assets which
would have been deemed finance leases resulting in failed sale-leaseback transactions. X.AI Corp. guarantees certain
of CTC’s obligations under the lease agreement. As a result, the Company recorded the related debt of $455 million
and $4,052 million within Debt and finance leases, current and Debt and finance leases, net of current, respectively,
in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 18, Related Party Transactions for additional details.
The future scheduled principal maturities of debt as of December 31, 2025 are as follows:
2026 ...................................................................................................................................................... | $560 |
2027 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 858 |
2028 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 1,063 |
2029 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 13,539 |
2030 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 6,029 |
Thereafter .............................................................................................................................................. | — |
$22,049 |
The Company recognized interest expense for debt prior to capitalization of interest of $1,797 million, $1,580
million and $1,693 million, in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
The Company measures the fair value of its long-term fixed-rate debt for disclosure purposes. The fair value
estimates for these debts were determined based on a discounted cash flow approach using yields calibrated from
recent issuances of the securities, resulting in Level II measurement.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the long-term fixed-rate debt included in the consolidated balance sheets are
as follows:
As of December 31, 2025 | |||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||
X B-3 Term Loan ...................................................................................................... | $5,912 | $6,190 | |
xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan ........................................................................................ | $991 | $1,057 | |
xAI 12.5% Secured Senior Notes .............................................................................. | $2,988 | $3,173 | |
F-34
Note 11 - Leases
The balances of the Company’s operating and finance leases, included in Other assets, Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities, and Other liabilities for operating leases, and Finance lease right-of-use assets, Debt and finance
leases, current, and Debt and finance leases, net of current for finance leases, in the consolidated balance sheets, are
as follows:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Operating leases: | |||
Operating lease right-of-use assets ....................................................................... | $1,338 | $1,367 | |
Operating lease liabilities, current ........................................................................ | 422 | 382 | |
Operating lease liabilities, net of current .............................................................. | 1,136 | 1,259 | |
Total operating lease liabilities ................................................................... | $1,558 | $1,641 | |
Finance leases: | |||
Finance lease right-of-use assets ........................................................................... | $1,260 | $1,686 | |
Finance lease liabilities, current ............................................................................ | 369 | 295 | |
Finance lease liabilities, net of current ................................................................. | 868 | 1,236 | |
Total finance lease liabilities ........................................................................ | $1,237 | $1,531 | |
The components of lease expense are as follows within the consolidated statements of operations:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Operating lease expense: | |||||
Operating lease expense ............................................................ | $475 | $311 | $295 | ||
Short-term lease cost ................................................................. | 267 | 101 | 25 | ||
Variable lease cost ..................................................................... | 106 | 83 | 75 | ||
Total operating lease expense ............................................... | 848 | 495 | 395 | ||
Finance lease expense: | |||||
Amortization of leased assets .................................................... | 330 | — | — | ||
Interest on lease liabilities ......................................................... | 317 | — | — | ||
Total finance lease expense .................................................. | 647 | — | — | ||
Total lease expense ...................................................................... | $1,495 | $495 | $395 | ||
F-35
Other information related to leases is as follows:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years): | |||
Operating leases ......................................................................................................... | 5.9 | 5.2 | |
Finance leases ............................................................................................................ | 3.0 | 4.0 | |
Weighted-average discount rate: | |||
Operating leases ......................................................................................................... | 10.3% | 10.9% | |
Finance leases ............................................................................................................ | 22.6% | 22.6% | |
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $30 million
and $106 million, respectively, for operating lease right-of-use assets as part of its facilities consolidation
restructuring efforts in Restructuring charges in the consolidated statements of operations. There was no impairment
related to leases during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Supplemental cash flow and other information related to the Company’s leases are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |||||
Operating cash outflows from operating leases ......................... | $533 | $372 | $303 | ||
Operating cash outflows from finance leases ............................ | $317 | $— | $— | ||
Financing cash outflows from finance leases ............................ | $295 | $154 | $— | ||
Leased assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities . | $288 | $564 | $168 | ||
Leased assets obtained in exchange for finance lease liabilities .... | $— | $1,686 | $— | ||
The above tables exclude operating lease agreements that have been signed as of December 31, 2025, but not yet
commenced for the aggregate lease payments of $1,627 million and an average lease term of 7.2 years, including the
operating lease arrangement with Stateline. Refer to Note 9, Investments in unconsolidated affiliates for additional
details.
The maturities of the Company’s lease liabilities as of December 31, 2025 are as follows:
Operating Leases | Finance Leases | ||
2026 ........................................................................................................................... | $682 | $611 | |
2027 ........................................................................................................................... | 593 | 611 | |
2028 ........................................................................................................................... | 531 | 459 | |
2029 ........................................................................................................................... | 492 | — | |
2030 ........................................................................................................................... | 446 | — | |
Thereafter ................................................................................................................... | 995 | — | |
Total undiscounted liabilities ..................................................................................... | 3,739 | 1,681 | |
Less: Leases not yet commenced ............................................................................... | (1,627) | — | |
Less: Imputed interest ................................................................................................ | (554) | (444) | |
Total lease liabilities ............................................................................................... | $1,558 | $1,237 |
F-36
Note 12 - Balance Sheet Components
Certain financial statement details are as follows:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||
Tax related assets ....................................................................................................... | $618 | $160 | |
Rebates and credits .................................................................................................... | 597 | — | |
Unbilled receivables .................................................................................................. | 223 | 314 | |
Restricted cash and deposits ...................................................................................... | 182 | 23 | |
Other .......................................................................................................................... | 590 | 371 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ...................................................... | $2,210 | $868 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | |||
Tax related liabilities ................................................................................................. | $563 | $112 | |
Operating lease liabilities, current ............................................................................. | 422 | 382 | |
Accrued interest ......................................................................................................... | 416 | 118 | |
Restructuring liabilities .............................................................................................. | 339 | 149 | |
Payroll & employee benefit accruals ......................................................................... | 322 | 366 | |
Other current liabilities .............................................................................................. | 507 | 381 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities ............................................... | $2,569 | $1,508 | |
Note 13 - Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity
SpaceX Preferred and Common Stock
On February 14, 2024, the holders of outstanding stock of the Company approved and adopted a Plan of Conversion,
pursuant to which the Company converted from a Delaware corporation into a corporation organized under the laws
of the State of Texas.
In connection with the Plan of Conversion, the Company updated its authorized capitalization to issue five classes of
stock - four classes to be designated Class A common stock (“Class A”), Class B common stock (“Class B”),
Class C common stock (“Class C”), Class D common stock (“Class D”) (collectively the “SpaceX Common Stock”),
and one class of stock to be designated preferred stock and subdivided into several series of redeemable convertible
preferred stock (collectively the “SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock”). All references to “Class” refer
to that particular class of SpaceX Common Stock and all references to “Series” refer to that particular series of
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
As of December 31, 2025, the total number of shares of SpaceX Common Stock the Company is authorized to issue
is 53,855 million shares, each with a par value of $0.001 per share, except for Class D, which has a par value of
$0.0001 per share. 36,130 million shares are Class A, 5,325 million shares are Class B, 10,000 million shares are
Class C, and 2,400 million shares are Class D. The total number of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
that the Company is authorized to issue is 2,607 million shares, of which 2,400 million shares are undesignated.
With the exception of the expanded conversion rights described below, there were no changes to the dividend
provisions, liquidation preferences, conversion rights, redemption rights or the voting rights of the SpaceX
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and SpaceX Common Stock during the years ended December 31, 2025,
2024, and 2023.
In 2022, the Board approved a stock split (the “2022 Stock Split”), pursuant to which each share of the SpaceX
Common Stock issued and outstanding was split into ten shares of SpaceX Common Stock. In May 2026, the Board
F-37
approved the 2026 Stock Split, pursuant to which each share of the Class A, Class B, and Class C SpaceX Common
Stock issued and outstanding was split into five shares of SpaceX Common Stock.
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock
On March 28, 2025, xAI adopted an Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, which established its capital
structure and designated multiple classes of common stock and several series of redeemable convertible preferred
stock. The Articles were subsequently amended and restated through January 30, 2026 (collectively, the “xAI
Articles of Incorporation”) to add and authorize additional series of redeemable convertible preferred stock with no
economic changes to any previously existing series.
Pursuant to the xAI Articles of Incorporation, xAI’s authorized capitalization prior to the xAI Merger consisted of
three classes of common, stock, which are designated Class A common stock (“xAI Class A”), Class B common
stock (“xAI Class B”), Limited Voting common stock (“xAI Limited Voting”), (collectively the “xAI Common
Stock”) and several series of redeemable convertible preferred stock (collectively the “xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock”). All references to “xAI Class” refer to that particular class of xAI Common Stock and all
references to “xAI Series” refer to that particular series of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
As of December 31, 2025, the total number of xAI Common Stock that xAI authorized to issue is 7,884 million
shares, each with a par value of $0.001 per share, 5,874 million shares are xAI Class A, 2,000 million shares are xAI
Class B, and 10 million shares are xAI Limited Voting. The total number of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock that the Company is authorized to issue is 3,302 million shares.
Effect of the xAI Merger
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
Upon the effective date of the xAI Merger, all outstanding shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
converted into shares of SpaceX Common Stock, based on the share-for-share exchange mechanics specified in the
Merger Agreement. Each share of xAI Series A‑1, B, C, D, and E redeemable convertible preferred stock (classified
as “xAI Low Vote Stock”) was converted into 0.1433 shares of SpaceX Class A Common Stock per preferred share
(on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), rounded up to the nearest whole number for fractional shares. Each share of xAI
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock (classified as “xAI High Vote Stock”) was converted into 0.1433
shares of SpaceX Class B Common Stock per preferred share (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), rounded up to the
nearest whole number for fractional shares. For xAI Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, all holders
that are an eligible service provider may instead elect to receive cash of $75.46 per share (on a pre-2026 Stock Split
basis) of xAI Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Upon conversion, all shares of xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock were canceled and retired, and former xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
shareholders received the applicable shares of SpaceX Common Stock. Any shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock previously held by the Company were canceled and retired and did not receive any consideration.
Although xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock converted into SpaceX Common Stock upon the xAI Merger
closing, the xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock balances are presented as Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Because the xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock was legally outstanding during all historical periods prior to the xAI Merger and
represented a separate equity class of a legally distinct predecessor entity, the conversion of xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock into SpaceX Common Stock is recognized only in the period in which the exchange
actually occurs, and not retrospectively. Accordingly, the historical consolidated balance sheets and consolidated
statements of redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity reflect the xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock as outstanding xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock consistent with its legal
form and rights during those periods and are not recast on an as-converted basis. The impact of the conversion will
be presented prospectively in the period of the merger (Q1 2026).
F-38
xAI Warrants
xAI also issued warrants to customer that were outstanding as of the effective date of the xAI Merger, which had a
ten-year term originally set to expire in 2035, with an exercise price equal to the par value of the stock, and vesting
terms that resulted in the warrants vesting proportionally to the payments received under the related agreement. The
closing of the xAI Merger triggered an acceleration clause in which all outstanding xAI warrants, both vested and
unvested components, were automatically exercised on a cashless basis exercised and converted into fully vested
SpaceX Class A Common Stock at the exchange ratio of 0.1433 (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis).
xAI and X Common Stock
Upon the effective date of the xAI Merger, every outstanding share of xAI Common Stock, whether Class A, Class
B, or Limited Voting, converted into the right to receive SpaceX Common Stock at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.1433
SpaceX shares per share of xAI Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), unless the holder was an eligible
service provider and elected to receive cash of $75.46 per share of xAI Class A or Class B. No fractional SpaceX
shares were issued and all share amounts were rounded up to the nearest whole number. Any shares of xAI Common
Stock previously held by the Company were canceled and retired and did not receive any consideration.
Effect of the X Merger
Upon the effective date of the X Merger, each class of common stock of X Holdings Corp. (“X Common Stock”)
was converted to 2.776 shares of xAI Common Stock of the same class (rounded down to the nearest whole share),
each class of common stock of X.AI Corp. (“xAI Corp. Common Stock”) was converted to 1.000 share of xAI
Common Stock of the same class, and each series of X.AI Corp. preferred stock (“xAI Corp. Preferred Stock”)
(other than shares held by X or any of its subsidiaries) was converted to 1.000 share of xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock of the same series.
As a result of the Mergers, all of X, X.AI Corp. and xAI Common Stock are being presented in the historical
financial statements as if they had been converted into SpaceX Common Stock at the applicable exchange rate for all
periods presented. As such, all shares of historical X, X.AI Corp. and xAI Common Stock are included in the share
counts for SpaceX Common Stock below. X.AI Corp. and xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are being
presented in the consolidated financial statements at historical values with an adjustment to the conversion rate at the
applicable exchange ratio per the xAI Merger.
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
Information for each series of SpaceX and xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, the
“Combined Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock”) at December 31 is as follows:
Dividend Per Share | Initial Price Per Share | Authorized Shares | Outstanding (1) | Liquidation Preference | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||
2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2025 | |||||||
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||
Series A ................................ | $0.05 | $1.00 | 61.0 | 60.4 | 60.5 | $60 | $59 | ||||||
Series A-1 ............................. | $0.05 | $1.00 | 61.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | — | ||||||
Series B ................................. | $0.10 | $2.00 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Series B-1 ............................. | $0.10 | $2.00 | 5.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | — | ||||||
Series C ................................. | $0.15 | $3.00 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 29 | 23 | ||||||
Series D ................................ | $0.19 | $3.88 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 40 | 20 | ||||||
Series E ................................. | $0.23 | $4.50 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 46 | 647 | ||||||
Series F ................................. | $0.38 | $7.50 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 50 | 48 | ||||||
Series G ................................ | $3.87 | $77.46 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 12.8 | 978 | 978 | ||||||
Series H ................................ | $6.75 | $135.00 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 429 | 429 | ||||||
Series I .................................. | $8.45 | $169.00 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 499 | 499 | ||||||
Series J .................................. | $9.30 | $186.00 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 457 | 457 | ||||||
F-39
Dividend Per Share | Initial Price Per Share | Authorized Shares | Outstanding (1) | Liquidation Preference | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||
2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2025 | |||||||
Series K ................................ | $10.20 | $204.00 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 518 | 518 | ||||||
Series L ................................. | $10.70 | $214.00 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 295 | 295 | ||||||
Series M ................................ | $11.00 | $220.00 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 596 | 596 | ||||||
Series N ................................ | $13.50 | $270.00 | 9.5 | 9.3 | 9.4 | 2,520 | 2,520 | ||||||
Total SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ............................... | 206.8 | 134.8 | 135.4 | $6,527 | $7,099 | ||||||||
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||
Series A ................................ | $0.05 | $1.00 | 1,000.0 | 750.0 | 750.0 | $750 | $753 | ||||||
Series A-1 ............................. | $0.05 | $1.00 | 1,000.0 | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Series B ................................. | $0.60 | $11.97 | 584.9 | 584.9 | 584.9 | 7,001 | 7,001 | ||||||
Series C ................................. | $1.08 | $21.65 | 277.1 | 277.1 | 277.1 | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Series D ................................ | $1.83 | $36.56 | 174.8 | 120.1 | — | 4,390 | 4,388 | ||||||
Series E ................................. | $3.77 | $75.46 | 265.0 | 179.2 | — | 13,523 | 13,510 | ||||||
Total xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ............................... | 3,301.8 | 1,911.3 | 1,612.0 | $31,664 | $31,652 | ||||||||
Total Combined Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ............................... | 3,508.6 | 2,046.1 | 1,747.4 | $38,191 | $38,751 | ||||||||
______________
(1)The number of issued redeemable convertible preferred stock is equal to the number of outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock,
with the exception of xAI Series A and xAI Series D, of which the number of issued shares is 1,000.0 million and 175.0 million,
respectively, due to redeemable convertible preferred stock held by X and SpaceX, respectively.
The following describes the various rights and preferences of the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock:
Dividend Provisions
On a per annum basis, holders of shares of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive
dividends prior and in preference to any declaration or payment of any dividend to common shareholders at a rate
described in the table above for each outstanding share of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Any
such dividends are declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and are not cumulative. For the period from
inception through December 31, 2025, no dividends on SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock have been
declared. The SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock do not participate in distributions beyond their
preferred dividend as described above.
Liquidation Preference
The series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock listed in the table above were issued by the Company
chronologically and in alphabetical order, with Series A issued first and Series N issued most recently. Each series
of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is senior in rank to all earlier issued series and junior in rank to
all later issued series, except that: (i) Series A, A-1, B, B-1, and C SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
are all on parity with each other and junior in rank to all subsequently issued series of SpaceX Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock; and (ii) series E, F, and G SpaceX redeemable convertible preferred stock are all on
parity with each other, are senior in rank to all earlier issued series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock, and junior in rank to all subsequently issued series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, holders of a given series of SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, in preference to the holders of SpaceX Common
Stock and any junior-ranking SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, the liquidation preference indicated
in the table above for such series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, plus any declared but unpaid
dividends. Holders of all series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive the
F-40
greater of the liquidation preference per share indicated above, or the amount each series would be entitled to receive
if all such outstanding SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to Class A or Class B
SpaceX Common Stock, as applicable, immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the
Company. Upon completion of the distributions described above, if any assets remain in the Company, the then
remaining assets will be distributed on an equal priority, pro rata basis to the holders of SpaceX Common Stock.
Conversion Rights
Each share of Series A and Series B SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of
the holder at any time after the date of issuance of such share into shares of Class A, Class B, or Class C SpaceX
Common Stock and each share of all other series of preferred stock are convertible at the option of the holder at any
time after the date of issuance of such share into shares of Class A or Class C SpaceX Common Stock. The number
of shares of SpaceX Common Stock to which a holder of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is
entitled shall be at a conversion rate determined by dividing the initial price by the conversion price. Each share of
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into fifty shares of SpaceX Common Stock
following the 2026 Stock Split. The conversion price is subject to adjustment set forth in the charter for certain
dilutive issuances, splits and combinations. Prior to Company’s conversion to a Texas entity, holders of Series A and
Series B SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were only permitted to convert to Class B SpaceX
Common Stock, and holders of other series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were only permitted
to convert to Class A SpaceX Common Stock.
The SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock automatically converts upon the earlier of (i) the Company’s
sale of its common stock in a public offering pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, in
which the pre-public offering market capitalization of the Company is at least $6.0 billion and which results in
aggregate cash proceeds to the Company of not less than $250 million (“Qualified IPO”) or (ii) the date specified by
written consent or agreement of the applicable holders of shares of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(with respect to each applicable series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock), voting in accordance
with the charter.
In the event of a transfer of a share of Series A or Series B (other than a Permitted Transfer as defined in the
charter), such share shall automatically be cancelled and converted into a corresponding share of Series A-1 or
Series B-1.
Voting Rights
Holders of each share of Series A and Series B have the right to ten votes for each share of Class B into which such
share is convertible. Holders of each share of all other series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
have the right to one vote for each share of Class A into which such share is convertible. Such holders will have full
voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of SpaceX Common Stock, except as
required by law.
Classification
The liquidation preference provisions of the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are considered
contingent redemption provisions as deemed liquidation events such as a change of control are not solely within the
control of the Company. Accordingly, SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are presented outside of
permanent equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as Redeemable convertible preferred stock. SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock has not been remeasured to their redemption amount as they are not
currently redeemable or probable of becoming redeemable.
The following describes the various rights and preferences of the xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock:
Dividend Provisions
On a per annum basis, holders of shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive
dividends prior and in preference to any declaration or payment of any dividend to common shareholders at a rate
F-41
described in the table above for each outstanding share of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Any such
dividends declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and are not cumulative. After payment of any such
preferred dividends, holders of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to participate in any
additional dividends or distributions on an as‑converted basis with holders of xAI Common Stock. For the period
from inception through December 31, 2025, no dividends were declared on xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock.
Liquidation Preference
The series of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock listed in the table above were issued by xAI
chronologically and in alphabetical order, with Series A issued first and Series E issued most recently. Each of
Series A, Series A‑1, Series B, Series C, Series D, and Series E xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock has a
liquidation preference equal to the greater of (i) the applicable original issue price plus any declared but unpaid
dividends or (ii) the amount the holder would receive if the xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were
converted to xAI Common Stock immediately prior to such event. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, winding
up, or deemed liquidation event, holders of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock would receive their
liquidation preference prior to holders of xAI Common Stock. After payment of all liquidation amounts owed to xAI
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, remaining assets or consideration not payable to holders of xAI
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (as applicable), if any, would be distributed to holders of xAI Common
Stock on a pro rata basis.
Conversion Rights
Each share of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder into xAI
Common Stock at any time after the date of issuance. The number of shares of xAI Common Stock issuable upon
conversion is determined by dividing the initial price of the applicable series by its conversion price, with the
conversion price subject to adjustment for customary anti‑dilution events, including stock splits, combinations, and
certain dilutive issuances as presented in the table above. Each share of xAI Series A Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock is convertible into xAI Class B Common Stock or Series A-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock, while each remaining series of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into xAI Class A
Common Stock.
The xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock would automatically convert into xAI Common Stock upon the
earlier of (i) the consummation of a qualified public offering that meets the criteria set forth in the Articles, or (ii)
the written consent of the requisite percentage of voting power of the outstanding shares of xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock.
Voting Rights
Holders of each share of xAI Series A have the right to ten votes for each share of Series A held by such holder.
Holders of each share of all other series of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to one vote
for each share of xAI Class A into which such share is convertible. Such holders have full voting rights and powers
equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of xAI Common Stock (other than xAI Limited Voting).
Classification
The liquidation preference provisions of the xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are considered contingent
redemption provisions as deemed liquidation events such as a change of control are not solely within the control of
xAI. Accordingly, xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are presented outside of permanent equity on the
Company’s consolidated balance sheets as Redeemable convertible preferred stock. xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock has not been remeasured to their redemption amount as they are not currently redeemable or
probable of becoming redeemable.
F-42
Common Stock
The following describes all of the activity that occurred within each class of SpaceX Common Stock during the
years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, incorporating all activity that occurred within the class of xAI Common
Stock on an as-converted basis to the class of SpaceX Common Stock it was converted into per the xAI Merger and
X Merger.
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | ||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Common Stock | Common Stock | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2022 ......... | 1,778 | $2 | 647 | $1 | 317 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ............................... | 6 | 0 | 188 | 0 | 55 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Conversion between classes of common stock ........................... | 32 | 0 | (32) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock ..... | (6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (5) | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2023 ......... | 1,810 | 2 | 803 | 1 | 367 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ............................... | 8 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 58 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock ..... | (35) | 0 | (8) | 0 | (3) | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ........................... | 13 | 0 | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion between classes of common stock ........................... | 36 | 0 | (36) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2024 ......... | 1,832 | 2 | 768 | 1 | 423 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding ............................... | 33 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 60 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock ..... | (31) | 0 | (38) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ........................... | 27 | 0 | — | — | 1 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Conversion between classes of common stock ........................... | 91 | 0 | (91) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2025 ......... | 1,952 | $3 | 643 | $1 | 484 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
The following describes the various rights and preferences of the SpaceX Common Stock:
Dividend Provisions
Subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of stock at the time outstanding having prior rights as to
dividends, holders of SpaceX Common Stock shall be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors, out of any funds legally available, such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of
Directors. For the period from inception through December 31, 2025, no dividends were declared on SpaceX
Common Stock.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, upon the completion of the distributions
required with respect to the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, if assets remain in the Company, the
then remaining assets will be distributed on an equal priority, pro rata basis to the holders of SpaceX Common
Stock.
F-43
Conversion Rights
Each share of Class B is convertible at the option of the holder, at any time, into one share of Class A. Each share of
Class B will automatically convert into one share of Class A upon a transfer, other than a Permitted Transfer (as
defined in the charter), of such share of Class B.
Voting Rights
Each holder of Class A is entitled to one vote for each share held. Each holder of Class B is entitled to ten votes for
each share held. The holders of Class C have no voting rights, except as required by law. Voting rights with respect
to Class D will be established when and if any shares of Class D are issued by the Board of Directors.
Reserve for Unissued Shares of Common Stock
The Company is required to reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of SpaceX Common
Stock such number of shares sufficient to effect the conversion of all outstanding shares of SpaceX Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock and Class B, as applicable, plus shares granted and available for grant under the
Company’s share plans.
The amount of such shares of the SpaceX Common Stock reserved for these purposes at December 31, 2025 is as
follows:
Number of Shares | |||||||
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | ||||
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock issued (low-vote) ........................................................ | 4,291 | — | 3,459 | — | |||
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock issued (high-vote) ....................................................... | 3,275 | 3,812 | 3,275 | — | |||
Outstanding Class B ............................................ | 644 | — | — | — | |||
Outstanding stock options ................................... | 10 | 468 | 474 | — | |||
Outstanding RSUs ............................................... | 47 | 43 | 62 | — | |||
Future grants under share-based compensation .. | 161 | — | 383 | — | |||
8,428 | 4,323 | 7,653 | — | ||||
Share Repurchases
SpaceX Share Repurchases
During the year ended December 31, 2025, SpaceX repurchased $522 million or 14.0 million shares of SpaceX
Common Stock from eligible current and former employees. Similarly, the Company repurchased $920 million or
38.7 million shares of SpaceX Common Stock from eligible current and former employees and existing shareholders
during the year ended December 31, 2024, as well as $101 million or 0.1 million shares of SpaceX Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock in a number of unrelated transactions with existing shareholders at their then-current
fair market value. The Company only repurchased shares held by eligible participants for more than six months at a
purchase price per share equal to the then current fair market value.
All SpaceX shares repurchased to date have been retired.
xAI Share Repurchase
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company also purchased 11.8 million shares of xAI Common Stock
for $600 million from an existing shareholder of xAI. Following the xAI Merger, this transaction is considered as a
repurchase of xAI Common Stock in the consolidated statements of redeemable convertible preferred stock and
shareholders’ equity.
All xAI shares repurchased to date have been retired.
F-44
Note 14 - Earnings per Share
The following table presents the reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to net
income (loss) used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Numerator: | |||||
Net income (loss) .......................................................................... | $(4,937) | $791 | $(4,628) | ||
Less: Deemed dividend(1) .......................................................... | — | 80 | — | ||
Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities ........................................................... | — | 693 | — | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders - basic .... | (4,937) | 18 | (4,628) | ||
Add: Effect of assumed conversion of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ................................................... | — | 3 | — | ||
Add: Effect of assumed conversion of stock options ................ | — | 0 | — | ||
Add: Effect of assumed conversion of restricted stock units .... | — | 0 | — | ||
Add: Effect of assumed issuance of shares under the ESPP ..... | — | 0 | — | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders - diluted .. | $(4,937) | $21 | $(4,628) | ||
Denominator: | |||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic .... | 2,926 | 2,848 | 2,759 | ||
Weighted average shares of common stock equivalents: | |||||
Conversion of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ...................................................................................... | — | 6,771 | — | ||
Exercise of stock options ........................................................... | — | 292 | — | ||
Conversion of restricted stock units .......................................... | — | 45 | — | ||
Conversion of ESPPs ................................................................. | — | 0 | — | ||
Weighted average common stock and common stock equivalent outstanding - diluted ................................................................... | 2,926 | 9,956 | 2,759 | ||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders | |||||
Basic .......................................................................................... | $(1.69) | $0.01 | $(1.68) | ||
Diluted ....................................................................................... | $(1.69) | $0.00 | $(1.68) | ||
__________________
(1)The excess of fair market value over the consideration transferred for the repurchase of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
was treated as a deemed dividend and resulted in a decrease to net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders in the calculation of
earnings (loss) per share.
F-45
The following potentially dilutive securities on an as-converted basis are excluded from the calculation of diluted net
income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders for the periods presented because the impact of
including them would be anti-dilutive (refer to Note 15, Share-based Compensation for additional details):
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ............................... | 1,369 | — | 537 | ||
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ......................... | 6,733 | — | 6,780 | ||
Share-based compensation ............................................................. | 623 | 18 | 767 | ||
The table above excludes 14.5 million, 38.3 million, and 21.2 million share-based compensation awards outstanding
as of December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, as these awards are subject to performance and market
conditions that were not met as of those dates.
Note 15 - Share-based Compensation
X and xAI Mergers
As part of the xAI Merger, each xAI option for a share of xAI common stock outstanding and unexercised at the
time of the xAI Merger (vested and unvested) was converted into a SpaceX option to receive 0.1433 shares of
SpaceX Class A or Class B Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as applicable, under the same terms
and conditions (including the vesting and exercisability conditions) as the original xAI stock options at an exercise
price equal to the original xAI option exercise price divided by 0.1433 (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis). Each xAI
RSU that was vested and outstanding was converted to the right to receive 0.1433 of a share of SpaceX Class A or
Class B Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as applicable. Each xAI RSU that was unvested was
converted to 0.1433 of a SpaceX RSU (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis). Each xAI RSA was converted to 0.1433
shares of SpaceX RSA for SpaceX Class A or Class B Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as
applicable, with the same terms and conditions (including the vesting terms). Holders of vested xAI options and
vested xAI RSUs also had the option to receive cash payment for $75.46 per share in lieu of conversion. Refer to
Note 13, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional details.
As part of the X Merger, each X RSU that was outstanding was converted to a xAI RSU to receive 2.776 shares of
xAI Common Stock.
General
The Company grants RSUs, RSAs, and non-statutory options to eligible employees, key executives, and certain non-
employee service providers (collectively, the “Plans”). The Company also has a number of performance-based
awards. RSUs entitle the grantee to receive shares of Class A or Class B Common Stock upon vesting, with vesting
generally occurring either (i) 25% after the first service year with quarterly vesting for the remaining four-year
service period, (ii) 12.5% after the first six months of service with quarterly vesting for the remaining four-year
service period, or (iii) 20% after the first service year with semi-annual vesting for the remaining five-year service
period, subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. RSAs entitle the grantee to receive shares of
Class A or Class B Common Stock with 25% after the first service year with monthly vesting for the remaining four-
year service period. Options generally vest over (i) four years with 25% vesting after one year then one thirty-sixth
of the remainder vesting thereafter on a monthly basis or (ii) six years with 20% vesting after two years, and then
one forty-eighth of the remainder vesting thereafter on a monthly basis. Options are exercisable up to ten years from
the date of grant. At December 31, 2025, 543.8 million shares remained available for future grant under the Plans.
The Company offers an ESPP, under which eligible employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at a
discounted price. The Company also offers a Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“NQ ESPP”), under
which employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at the fair market value. At December 31, 2025, 27.0
million and 4.8 million shares remained available for future grant under the ESPP and NQ ESPP plans, respectively.
F-46
Summary Activity under the Plans
Below table summarizes activities related to the Company’s Plans, presented on an as-converted basis per the xAI
Merger. For the purposes of the table below, each xAI option, RSU and RSA is presented as 0.1433 SpaceX option,
RSU and RSA, respectively.
Stock Options | |||||||
Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2024 ........................ | 530 | $8.86 | 6.5 | $14,342 | |||
Granted ................................................................ | 20 | $37.27 | |||||
Exercised ............................................................. | (34) | $5.80 | |||||
Cancelled ............................................................. | (20) | $9.81 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2025 ................. | 496 | $10.18 | 5.7 | $37,171 | |||
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2025 .................................................................. | 496 | $10.18 | 5.7 | $37,171 | |||
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2025 .. | 398 | $8.31 | 5.2 | $30,346 | |||
RSUs | RSAs | ||||||
Number of Restricted Stock Units | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | Number of Restricted Stock Awards | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2024 ........................ | 110 | $12.57 | 109 | $0.00 | |||
Granted ................................................................ | 74 | $54.84 | 0 | $93.87 | |||
Exercised ............................................................. | (51) | $25.53 | (34) | $0.42 | |||
Cancelled ............................................................. | (24) | $33.44 | (42) | $0.00 | |||
Balance at December 31, 2025 ........................ | 109 | $40.49 | 34 | $0.11 | |||
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2025,
2024, and 2023 was $21.29, $5.02, and $7.60 respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 was $1,249 million, $392 million and $261 million, respectively.
The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2025,
2024, and 2023 was $54.84, $17.68, and $15.60, respectively. The total fair market value of RSUs released for the
years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 was $2,151 million, $871 million and $729 million, respectively.
The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of RSAs granted during the years ended December 31, 2025,
2024, and 2023 was $93.87, $—, and $0.00, respectively. There were no RSAs released during the years ended
December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the total fair value of the RSAs released during the year ended December 31,
2023 was $38 million.
At December 31, 2025, total remaining share-based compensation expense for unvested stock options, RSUs, and
RSAs was $4,842 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.
ESPP
During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, under the ESPP, the Company issued 6.3 million, 8.0
million and 6.5 million shares, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company issued 0.2 million
shares under the NQ ESPP. No shares were issued under NQ ESPP during the years ended December 31, 2024 and
2023.
F-47
CEO Award
In November 2025, the Company granted a performance-based award (“xAI Award”) to Elon Musk consisting of
twelve tranches. Each tranche represents the right to receive a number of shares at fair market value equal to 1.0% of
xAI’s valuation at the valuation milestone. The xAI Award is subject to market conditions based on valuation
milestones, ranging from $213 billion to $1,313 billion, performance condition requiring the Company to receive not
less than $2,000 million in proceeds from investors through capital raises on the milestone date, and a service
condition requiring Mr. Musk’s continued service over the ten-year performance period.
The grant date fair value of the award was determined to be $2,205 million and the Company recorded $28 million
of share-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2025. In March 2026, the Company
terminated the xAI Award, refer to Note 21, Subsequent Events for further discussion.
Performance-based awards
In March 2023, X issued performance-based RSU awards to all X employees that also included service conditions.
The performance conditions would only be satisfied upon a change in control or completion of an initial public
offering (deemed a liquidity event). For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, no share-based compensation
expense was recorded as it was not probable the performance-based vesting condition would be met. In 2025, these
awards were modified to remove the performance-based condition, resulting in additional share-based compensation
expense of $588 million.
Fair Value Determination
The weighted-average assumptions that were used to calculate the grant date fair value of the Company’s employee
stock option grants are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Expected term (years) ..................................................................... | 6.94 | 6.80 | 6.70 | ||
Volatility ......................................................................................... | 43.14% | 39.80% | 43.20% | ||
Risk-free interest rate ..................................................................... | 4.02% | 4.30% | 3.60% | ||
Dividend yield ................................................................................ | —% | —% | —% | ||
The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are
expected to remain outstanding. The Company determined the expected term of options granted using the simplified
method. Under the simplified method, the expected term of an award is presumed to be the mid-point between the
vesting period and the contractual life of the award.
The Company determined the expected volatility assumption using the frequency of daily historical prices of
comparable public companies’ common stock for a period equal to the expected term of the options.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates on U.S. Government securities for a
period consistent with the expected term of the Company’s employee stock options.
The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The
Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
F-48
The weighted-average assumptions that were used to calculate the grant date fair value of the CEO’s xAI Award are
as follows:
Expected term (years) ........................................................................................................................... | 10.0 |
Volatility ............................................................................................................................................... | 45% – 55% |
Risk-free interest rate ............................................................................................................................ | 4.06 |
Dividend yield ....................................................................................................................................... | 0.00 |
The expected term is the period from the grant date to the end of the performance period. The Company determined
the expected volatility assumption using the frequency of daily historical prices of comparable public companies’
common stock for a period equal to the expected term. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed
interest rates on U.S. Government securities for a period consistent with the expected term. The dividend yield
assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has never
declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Summary of Share-Based Compensation Information
The following table summarizes our share-based compensation expense by line item in the consolidated statements
of operations:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Cost of revenue ............................................................................... | $253 | $193 | $167 | ||
Research and development ............................................................. | 859 | 230 | 179 | ||
Selling, general, and administrative ............................................... | 835 | 360 | 333 | ||
Total ......................................................................................... | $1,947 | $784 | $679 | ||
During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, share-based compensation expense capitalized to the
consolidated balance sheets was $154 million, $132 million, and $108 million, respectively. No income tax benefit
was recognized from share-based compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023
due to the valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets. Refer to Note 16, Income Taxes for additional details.
Note 16 - Income Taxes
The U.S. and foreign components of consolidated income (loss) before income taxes for the years ended December
31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Domestic ......................................................................................... | $(3,959) | $73 | $(3,598) | ||
Foreign ........................................................................................... | (260) | 169 | (1,393) | ||
Income (loss) before income taxes .............................................. | $(4,219) | $242 | $(4,991) | ||
F-49
The current and deferred provisions (benefits) for federal, state, and foreign income taxes consist of the following:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Current: | |||||
Federal ....................................................................................... | $(11) | $57 | $11 | ||
State ........................................................................................... | 18 | 18 | 24 | ||
Foreign ....................................................................................... | 82 | 51 | 15 | ||
Total current provision ............................................................... | 89 | 126 | 50 | ||
Deferred: | |||||
Federal ....................................................................................... | 659 | (667) | (305) | ||
State ........................................................................................... | 4 | 2 | (70) | ||
Foreign ....................................................................................... | (34) | (10) | (38) | ||
Total deferred provision ............................................................. | 629 | (675) | (413) | ||
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes ....................... | $718 | $(549) | $(363) | ||
Upon adoption of ASU 2023-09, as described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the
reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2025 | |||
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate ....................................................................... | $(886) | 21.0% | |
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effect(1) ............................... | (105) | 2.5% | |
Foreign tax effects ..................................................................................................... | |||
Ireland ................................................................................................................... | 81 | (1.9)% | |
Other ..................................................................................................................... | 22 | (0.5)% | |
Effect of cross-border tax laws .................................................................................. | (1) | —% | |
Tax credits | |||
Research and development tax credits .................................................................. | (602) | 14.3% | |
Foreign tax credits ................................................................................................ | (27) | 0.6% | |
Other ..................................................................................................................... | (11) | 0.3% | |
Change in valuation allowance .................................................................................. | 2,194 | (51.6)% | |
Nontaxable or nondeductible items | |||
Share-based compensation .................................................................................... | (274) | 6.5% | |
Other ..................................................................................................................... | 45 | (1.1)% | |
Change in unrecognized tax benefits ......................................................................... | 297 | (7.0)% | |
Other adjustments ...................................................................................................... | (15) | (0.1)% | |
Effective tax rate ..................................................................................................... | $718 | (17.0)% | |
__________________
(1)State taxes in California made up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category.
F-50
The following table is a reconciliation of taxes at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s benefit
from income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 in accordance with the guidance prior to the
Company’s adoption of ASU 2023-09:
Year Ended December 31, | |||
2024 | 2023 | ||
Federal statutory income tax rate ............................................................................... | $51 | $(1,048) | |
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effect .................................. | (213) | (276) | |
Share-based compensation ........................................................................................ | (90) | (73) | |
Foreign tax effects ..................................................................................................... | (3) | 84 | |
Research and development tax credits ....................................................................... | (689) | (489) | |
Change in valuation allowance .................................................................................. | 137 | 1,209 | |
Change in unrecognized tax benefits ......................................................................... | 299 | 206 | |
Other adjustments ...................................................................................................... | (41) | 24 | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes ............................................................ | $(549) | $(363) | |
Upon adoption of ASU 2023-09, cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, during the year ended December 31,
2025 is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |
2025 | |
Federal ................................................................................................................................................... | $70 |
State and Local ...................................................................................................................................... | 17 |
Foreign | |
Ireland .............................................................................................................................................. | 20 |
Mexico ............................................................................................................................................. | 9 |
Other ................................................................................................................................................. | 38 |
Total cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds ............................................................................. | $154 |
F-51
The significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
December 31, | |||
2025 | 2024 | ||
Deferred tax assets: | |||
Net operating loss carryforwards ............................................................................. | $2,275 | $572 | |
Research and development and other credits ........................................................... | 3,627 | 2,988 | |
Intangible assets ....................................................................................................... | 812 | 568 | |
Operating lease liability ........................................................................................... | 1,613 | 313 | |
Capitalized research and development costs ........................................................... | 4,077 | 3,215 | |
Share-based compensation ...................................................................................... | 366 | 254 | |
Deferred revenue ..................................................................................................... | 757 | 664 | |
Disallowed interest expense .................................................................................... | 762 | 785 | |
Other ........................................................................................................................ | 233 | 206 | |
Total deferred tax assets .......................................................................................... | 14,522 | 9,565 | |
Valuation allowance ................................................................................................ | (8,286) | (5,621) | |
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance ....................................................... | 6,236 | 3,944 | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||
Fixed assets .............................................................................................................. | (5,209) | (2,372) | |
Operating lease right-of-use asset ............................................................................ | (627) | (632) | |
Unrealized gains/losses ............................................................................................ | (248) | (244) | |
Other ........................................................................................................................ | (39) | (32) | |
Total deferred tax liabilities ..................................................................................... | (6,123) | (3,280) | |
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance ................................................. | $113 | $664 | |
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considered whether it is more likely than not that
some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realizable based on the relevant weight of all positive and negative
evidence, including the retrospective combination of the financial results of the entities due to the Mergers described
in Note 1, Nature of Business. As a result of the Mergers, management assessed the realizability of the deferred tax
assets of the combined group and concluded that the majority of the U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets are not
more likely than not to be realized based on cumulative pretax losses adjusted for permanent differences and other
negative evidence. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net U.S. deferred
tax assets as of December 31, 2025 with the exception of certain state deferred tax assets and transferrable
investment tax credits that are expected to be realizable. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of its
deferred tax assets in future periods and will adjust the valuation allowance as necessary based on changes in facts
and circumstances.
In addition, the Company continues to record a valuation allowance in certain foreign jurisdictions where the
Company has concluded it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
A reconciliation of the valuation allowance is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Beginning balance .......................................................................... | $5,621 | $5,582 | $4,347 | ||
Charged to income tax expense ...................................................... | 2,551 | 204 | 1,210 | ||
Charged to other comprehensive income ....................................... | 114 | (55) | 25 | ||
Cumulative effect adjustment ......................................................... | — | (110) | — | ||
Ending balance ............................................................................ | $8,286 | $5,621 | $5,582 | ||
F-52
The valuation allowance on the Company’s net deferred tax assets increased by $2,665 million, $39 million and
$1,235 million during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. The changes in valuation
allowance are primarily driven by the generation of net operating loss carry-forwards (“NOLs”) and tax credits,
which are not more likely than not to be realizable. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company released a
partial valuation allowance on SpaceX’s U.S. deferred tax assets for the retrospectively combined comparative
results. Based on available projections as of December 31, 2024, management forecasted $659 million of deferred
tax assets related to U.S. R&D credits would be utilized in the following year on a separate company basis in 2025
before the Mergers occurred, and as such, no valuation allowance was recorded on those credits.
At December 31, 2025, the Company had NOLs for federal and state income tax purposes of $9,728 million and
$5,234 million, which are available to offset taxable income in future periods. The federal NOLs generated through
December 31, 2017 expire at various dates beginning in 2034 and will continue to expire through 2037, while U.S.
federal net operating loss carryforwards generated in 2018 or later do not expire. The state NOLs will expire at
various dates beginning in 2027.
At December 31, 2025, the Company had tax credits for federal and state income tax purposes of $3,586 million and
$2,104 million, respectively, which are available to offset future periods and begin to expire in 2036 for federal
income tax purposes. Of the $2,104 million in state tax credits, $161 million will begin to expire in 2026 and the
remaining credits do not expire.
Additionally, the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes are subject to various
limitations and restrictions, including those arising from ownership changes under applicable tax laws, which may
limit the Company’s ability to utilize such attributes in the future.
At December 31, 2025, the Company had foreign NOLs of $126 million, which will expire at various dates based on
the tax laws of the different jurisdictions we operate in.
In assessing whether uncertain tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements, the Company first
determines whether it is more likely than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including
resolution of any related appeals or litigation process, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating
whether a tax position has met the more likely than-not recognition threshold, the Company presumes that the
position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant
information. For tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold, the Company measures the
amount of benefit recognized in its financial statements at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50.0%
likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
The following table reflects changes in gross unrecognized tax benefits:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
Beginning balance .......................................................................... | $1,619 | $1,320 | $1,114 | ||
Gross increases - current year tax positions ................................... | 282 | 302 | 233 | ||
Gross increases - prior year tax positions ....................................... | 16 | — | — | ||
Gross decreases - current year tax positions .................................. | — | — | — | ||
Gross decreases - prior year tax positions ...................................... | (1) | (3) | (27) | ||
Gross decreases - settlements with tax authorities ......................... | — | — | — | ||
Gross decreases - lapse of statute of limitations ............................. | — | — | — | ||
Ending balance ............................................................................ | $1,916 | $1,619 | $1,320 | ||
For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $1,916
million, $1,619 million, and $1,320 million respectively. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and
penalties associated with uncertain tax benefits as part of the income tax provision. The amount of interest and
penalties recognized in the periods presented were insignificant. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company
has accrued $6 million and $5 million, respectively, related to interest and penalties on our unrecognized tax
F-53
benefits. As of December 31, 2025, unrecognized tax benefits of $11 million, if recognized, would affect our
effective tax rate.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and all state and various foreign jurisdictions. To the extent the
Company has tax attribute carryforwards, the tax years in which the attribute was generated may still be adjusted
upon examination by the federal, state or foreign tax authorities to the extent utilized in a future period. As of
December 31, 2025, the major jurisdictions in which the Company remains subject to examinations are U.S. federal
and California for tax years 2003 and forward. Based on all available information, the Company is not aware of any
new information that would require the remeasurement of its uncertain tax positions.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Public Law No. 119-21 and formally titled “An Act to Provide for
Reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14” (“OBBBA”) was enacted in the United States. The OBBBA
includes a broad range of tax provisions, such as the permanent extension of certain provisions of the 2017 Act and
the restoration of favorable tax treatment for certain business provisions. The legislation has multiple effective dates,
with certain provisions effective in 2025 and others implemented through 2027. The Company has evaluated the
provisions of the OBBBA and determined that the most significant impacts relate to the expensing of research and
experimental expenditures under IRC Section 174A and interest expense limitation under IRC Section 163(j). The
effects of applicable provisions of OBBBA have been reflected in the Company’s income tax provision.
Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies
Unconditional Obligations
The Company’s unconditional obligations are non-cancelable contractual commitments primarily relate to the
Company’s investments in AI infrastructure and third-party cloud capacity arrangements and other service
arrangements. It also includes the Company’s commitments under the Spectrum Transaction, which are payable in
cash and in the Company’s Class A Common Stock. Refer to Note 6, Intangible Assets and Goodwill for additional
details. The following table summarizes the Company’s non-cancelable contractual commitments as of
December 31, 2025:
2026 ...................................................................................................................................................... | $2,720 |
2027 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 21,476 |
2028 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 1,250 |
2029 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 4 |
2030 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 1 |
Thereafter .............................................................................................................................................. | — |
Total .................................................................................................................................................... | $25,451 |
Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds
The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $348 million at December 31, 2025 related to various customer
contracts, insurance agreements, and facility lease agreements. All of the outstanding letters of credit were
collateralized by restricted cash. The Company also had surety bonds of $51 million for self-insured workers’
compensation programs and other governmental licenses at December 31, 2025.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of its business, the Company is involved from time to time in various arbitrations, class actions,
commercial litigation, investigations and other legal, regulatory or governmental actions, including the significant
matters described below that could have a material impact on our results of operations. The Company assesses, in
conjunction with its legal counsel, the need to record a liability for litigation and contingencies. With respect to the
cases, actions, and inquiries described below, the Company evaluates the associated developments on a regular basis
and will accrue a liability when it believes a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In
F-54
addition, the Company believes there is a reasonable possibility that it may incur a loss in some of these matters and
the loss may be material or exceed its estimated ranges of possible loss.
The outcomes of the matters described in this section, such as whether the likelihood of loss is remote, reasonably
possible, or probable, or if and when the reasonably possible range of loss is estimable, are inherently uncertain, and
unless specified otherwise, possible losses are not reasonably estimable at this time. If one or more of these matters
were resolved against the Company for amounts above management’s estimates, the Company’s financial condition
and results of operations, including in a particular reporting period in which any such outcome becomes probable
and estimable, could be materially adversely affected.
In November 2022, the European Union’s Digital Services Act (“DSA”) came into force as a result of which X has
to comply with extensive content moderation and other duties. The Company published its first Transparency Report
under the DSA in November 2023. In December 2023, the European Commission (“EC”) opened a formal
investigation into X and its Irish subsidiary, Twitter International Unlimited Company (“TIUC”), which was later
renamed to X Internet Unlimited Company (XIUC). On July 12, 2024, in relation to alleged breaches of Articles
25(1), 39 and 40(12) of the DSA, the EC issued preliminary findings that X’s blue checkmark is deceptive, its
advertisement repository does not meet DSA requirements, and it grants inadequate access to data to third-party
researchers. On September 26, 2024, XIUC and X submitted their observations challenging the EC’s preliminary
findings. On December 5, 2025, the EC delivered a final decision in which it upheld its preliminary findings and
imposed a fine of EUR 120 million on XIUC, X., x.AI, and Elon Musk (together, the “parties”). On February 16,
2026, the parties challenged the EC’s decision in the General Court of the European Union. This challenge remains
pending.
In March 2016, non-practicing entity Youtoo Technologies filed suit against Twitter, Inc. in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging its Vine and Periscope products infringe Youtoo’s video-
sharing patents (the ‘304, ‘506, and ‘997 patents). On Twitter’s motion, the district court dismissed the ‘304 and
’506 patents as invalid. Twitter filed petitions for Inter Partes Review before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board
(PTAB) challenging all three patents-in-suit. The PTAB upheld the ‘304 and ‘506 Patents and invalidated the ‘997
Patent; the Federal Circuit affirmed. On March 16, 2020, Plaintiff (now Vidstream LLC, which allegedly acquired
the patents from Youtoo Technologies in a bankruptcy proceeding), moved the Court to reconsider its earlier ruling
invalidating the ‘304 and ‘506 patents. On April 1, 2022, the Court reversed its original ruling on the ‘304 and ‘506
patents. On September 27, 2024, Vidstream filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which the Court granted in
part. The case went to a jury trial, and on April 16, 2025, the jury rendered a verdict finding (i) that Twitter did not
infringe any claim of the ‘506 patent and two out of three claims of the ‘304 patent and that each of those patent
claims was invalid, but (ii) that Twitter willfully infringed one claim of the ‘304 patent. The jury awarded Plaintiff
$105 million in damages. In November 2025, the district court affirmed the jury’s award and awarded an additional
$67 million in prejudgment interest. Twitter has appealed and Vidstream has cross-appealed. Both appeals remain
pending before the Federal Circuit.
In June 2023, music publishing companies that are members of the National Music Publishers’ Association (the
“NMPA”) filed a complaint against X in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, claiming
direct, contributory, and vicarious copyright infringement based on Twitter’s alleged failure to expeditiously take
down infringing music posted by users after the music publishers allegedly gave Twitter notice of those
infringements. The music publishers also allege that Twitter did not suspend the accounts of “repeat infringers,” so
that Twitter is not entitled to a “safe harbor” from liability under the DMCA. X filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint on August 14, 2023. On March 5, 2024, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ direct infringement and vicarious
infringement claims, and part of plaintiffs’ claim for contributory infringement. X answered the complaint on April
9, 2024. Litigation was stayed from June 11, 2025 to September 9, 2025 for settlement discussions that were not
successful. Accordingly, discovery is ongoing.
In September 2023, Dutch foundation Stichting Data Bescherming Nederland (“SDBN”) filed a putative class action
lawsuit in the District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands against TIUC, Twitter, Inc., X Corp., and Twitter
Netherlands b.v. related to Twitter’s operation of the MoPub platform. SDBN primarily claims that MoPub’s real-
time bidding ad exchange violated the GDPR. SDBN claims to represent 11 million Dutch internet users who
downloaded and used third-party mobile apps containing the MoPub software development kit during the period
F-55
2013-2022 and it seeks a monetary award in the range of € 250 to € 2,500 per person. On February 4, 2026, the
Court declined to allow the case to proceed as a class action and indicated that it is considering staying the
proceedings until the Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled in a separate case concerning the
applicability of Dutch class action requirements to GDPR claims. The Twitter parties filed a brief in support of the
proposed stay, which the plaintiffs opposed, on March 4, 2026.
In August 2024, Dutch foundation Stichting Onderzoek Marktinformatie (SOMI) initiated a collective action in the
District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands on behalf of approximately 7.8 million Dutch X users. Among other
things, SOMI seeks damages against TIUC, X Corp. and Twitter Netherlands B.V. (collectively, the “X entities”)
for: (1) alleged data breaches and insufficient security measures; (2) alleged unauthorized microtargeting and lack of
transparency; and (3) the alleged failure to moderate hate speech and the obstruction of research, all in violation of
the GDPR and/or DSA. The alleged data breaches relate to a Twitter API bug that came to light in 2022 and that had
allowed persons who knew the email address or phone number of a user to determine the user’s Twitter ID. SOMI
has requested compensation (to be assessed at a later stage) for each member of the class, including symbolic
damages of EUR 1 for each member of the class that is allegedly affected by hate speech on the X platform. The X
entities filed a procedural defense on March 12, 2025. A hearing has been scheduled for April 2, 2026.
In September 2025, non-practicing entity Search and Share Technologies, LLC (“SaS”) filed a patent complaint
against X Corp. in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Texas. SaS alleges that X Corp. infringed on
U.S. Patent Nos. 10,180,952 and 11,106,744, through features in its mobile app and website enabling users to
interact with content through dedicated interfaces that directly share what other users see in ranked feeds and search
results. SaS filed an Amended Complaint on January 5, 2026. On January 20, 2026, X Corp. moved to dismiss SaS’s
willful infringement and induced infringement claims. On February 3, 2026, SAS responded to, but did not oppose,
X Corp.’s partial motion to dismiss. On February 10, 2026, X Corp. filed its reply. On February 4, 2026, X Corp.
filed an IPR petition challenging the ‘744 Patent and on February 18, 2026, filed an IPR petition challenging the
'952 Patent.
Beginning in January 2026, the Company and certain subsidiaries have been named as defendants in multiple
lawsuits arising from Grok’s image-generation and editing features. The complaints generally allege that Grok’s
image-generation and editing features enabled the creation and dissemination of nonconsensual explicit images and/
or content representing women and/or children in sexualized contexts. The actions include Jane Doe v. X.AI Corp.
and X.AI LLC, instituted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on January 23, 2026, and
Jane Doe 1 et al. v. X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC (the “Jane Doe 1 Case”) instituted in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on March 16, 2026. These cases are putative class actions, asserting claims
including, among other things, claims of strict liability, negligence, nuisance, rights of privacy or publicity, and, in
the Jane Doe 1 Case, certain federal statutory claims. Plaintiffs in these two cases seek, among other things,
compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, restitution, disgorgement and injunctive relief. In addition, a case,
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore ex rel. Ebony M. Thompson v. X Corp., X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC, and Space
Exploration Technologies Corp, was instituted in the Baltimore City Circuit Court on March 24, 2026 (the
“Baltimore Case”). The plaintiff in the Baltimore Case, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, asserts similar
claims to those in the two cases discussed above under Baltimore’s Consumer Protection Ordinances. The plaintiff
in the Baltimore Case seeks statutory penalties and/or injunctive relief. The defendants intend to defend themselves
vigorously in these actions.
The Company has recorded an accrual of $530 million for litigation losses that are probable and reasonably
estimable in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 2025. For other matters, the Company is not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss
or range of loss.
Non-Income Taxes
The Company is under various non-income tax audits by domestic and foreign tax authorities. These audits
primarily revolve around routine inquiries, refund requests, and employee benefits. The Company accrues non-
income taxes that may result from these audits when they are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Due to the
F-56
complexity and uncertainty of some of these matters, however, as well as the judicial process in certain jurisdictions,
the final outcome of these audits may be materially different from the Company’s expectations.
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to
customers, vendors, lessors, investors, directors, officers, employees, and other parties with respect to certain
matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the Company’s breach of certain agreements, services to
be provided by the Company, or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. These
indemnifications may survive the termination of the underlying agreement and the maximum potential amount of
future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions may not be subject
to maximum loss clauses. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification
agreements due to the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments
made by us under these agreements have not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. At
December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has not accrued a liability for any indemnification claims, because the
likelihood of incurring a payment obligation, if any, in connection with any such indemnification claims is not
probable or reasonably estimable.
Note 18 - Related Party Transactions
The Company periodically does business with certain entities with which its CEO and directors are affiliated.
During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company purchased $506 million and $191 million of
Megapack products, respectively, from Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) recorded in Property, plant, and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheets. The Company also obtained $131 million of Cybertrucks at manufacturer’s suggested
retail price from Tesla recorded in Property, plant, and equipment, net in the consolidated balance sheets during the
year ended December 31, 2025.
On October 12, 2025, and as subsequently amended on November 10, 2025, CTC, a subsidiary of xAI and an
indirect subsidiary of the Company, entered into an equipment lease agreement with Valor Equity Partners (“Valor”)
for certain AI infrastructure hardware (the “Valor transaction”). The founder, CEO and Chief Investment Officer of
Valor, Antonio J. Gracias, serves as one of the directors of the Company. The Valor transaction was deemed to be a
failed sale-leaseback transaction and the Company recorded the related debt of $455 million and $4,052 million
within Debt and finance leases, current and Debt and finance leases, net of current, respectively, as of December 31,
2025 in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and $66 million in Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2025 in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Refer to Note 10, Debt for additional
details. The related asset is recorded within Property, plant, and equipment, net in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheets.
In 2025, Elon Musk, through his trust, purchased $1,421 million of common stock from current and former
employees.
Other transactions with Tesla and other related parties during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023
were immaterial.
F-57
Note 19 - Segments
Following the Mergers, the Company evaluated how to view and measure performance of the combined company
and potential realignment of individual entity’s historical segment structure. Following this evaluation, the Company
determined that as a combined company, effective in Q1 2026, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as the Chief
Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), organizes the Company, manages resource allocations, and measures
performance among three operating and reportable segments: (i) Space, (ii) Connectivity, and (iii) AI. Prior period
presentations for segments conform to the current segment reporting structure.
The Company’s CODM assesses performance and allocates resources to operating segments based on segment
income (loss) from operations by comparing actual income (loss) from operations to historical results and previously
forecasted financial information. The Company’s CODM does not evaluate operating and reportable segments using
asset or liability information.
The following tables present information as to revenues, significant segment expenses, and income (loss) from
operations by the Company’s reportable segments:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2025 | |||||||
Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | ||||
Revenue ............................................................. | $4,086 | $11,387 | $3,201 | $18,674 | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue ................................................. | 1,352 | 5,921 | 2,178 | 9,451 | |||
Research and development ............................... | 3,004 | 575 | 5,064 | 8,643 | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ................. | 349 | 468 | 1,827 | 2,644 | |||
Restructuring charges ....................................... | — | — | 487 | 487 | |||
Impairment ........................................................ | 38 | — | — | 38 | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | 4,743 | 6,964 | 9,556 | 21,263 | |||
Income (loss) from operations ......................... | (657) | 4,423 | (6,355) | (2,589) | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (1,945) | ||||||
Interest income .................................................... | 492 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net ............................... | (177) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes .................. | $(4,219) | ||||||
Supplemental segment information | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | $757 | $2,376 | $3,568 | $6,701 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | $515 | $369 | $1,063 | $1,947 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | $38 | $— | $— | $38 | |||
Capital expenditures ............................................ | $3,832 | $4,178 | $12,727 | $20,737 | |||
F-58
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2024 | |||||||
Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | ||||
Revenue ............................................................. | $3,796 | $7,599 | $2,620 | $14,015 | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue ................................................. | 1,541 | 4,768 | 1,687 | 7,996 | |||
Research and development ............................... | 1,835 | 453 | 1,176 | 3,464 | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ................. | 375 | 333 | 1,105 | 1,813 | |||
Restructuring charges ....................................... | — | — | 213 | 213 | |||
Impairment ........................................................ | 24 | 39 | — | 63 | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | 3,775 | 5,593 | 4,181 | 13,549 | |||
Income (loss) from operations ......................... | 21 | 2,006 | (1,561) | 466 | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (1,580) | ||||||
Interest income .................................................... | 371 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net ............................... | 985 | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes .................. | $242 | ||||||
Supplemental segment information | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | $637 | $1,508 | $1,679 | $3,824 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | $472 | $296 | $16 | $784 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | $24 | $39 | $— | $63 | |||
Capital expenditures ............................................ | $2,032 | $3,498 | $5,633 | $11,163 | |||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2023 | |||||||
Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | ||||
Revenue ............................................................. | $3,557 | $3,869 | $2,961 | $10,387 | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue ................................................. | 1,669 | 2,786 | 1,655 | 6,110 | |||
Research and development ............................... | 1,538 | 381 | 186 | 2,105 | |||
Selling, general, and administrative ................. | 351 | 233 | 1,081 | 1,665 | |||
Restructuring charges ....................................... | — | — | 237 | 237 | |||
Impairment ........................................................ | — | — | 3,775 | 3,775 | |||
Total costs and expenses ................................ | 3,558 | 3,400 | 6,934 | 13,892 | |||
Income (loss) from operations ......................... | (1) | 469 | (3,973) | (3,505) | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (1,693) | ||||||
Interest income .................................................... | 249 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net ............................... | (42) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes .................. | $(4,991) | ||||||
Supplemental segment information | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | $571 | $884 | $1,180 | $2,635 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | $427 | $249 | $3 | $679 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | $— | $— | $3,775 | $3,775 | |||
Capital expenditures ............................................ | $1,497 | $2,455 | $463 | $4,415 | |||
F-59
The following tables provide revenue by geography based on the country of domicile in which the transaction
originated:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||
USA ................................................................................................ | $12,966 | $10,008 | $7,473 | ||
Ireland ............................................................................................. | 1,827 | 1,371 | 1,047 | ||
Canada ............................................................................................ | 764 | 582 | 447 | ||
All Other ......................................................................................... | 3,117 | 2,054 | 1,420 | ||
Total Revenues .......................................................................... | $18,674 | $14,015 | $10,387 | ||
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets were located within the
United States.
Note 20 - Restructuring
In 2022. X, an indirect subsidiary of the Company (through the X Merger and subsequently, xAI Merger), initiated
global employee workforce reductions, the effects of which continued through 2025. The charges associated with
the workforce reduction include cash severance expense and other termination benefits. Restructuring charges also
include impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets for excess office space and related leasehold improvements
and office equipment, as well as lease termination penalties for office space terminated before the end of the lease
term as a result of the workforce reduction.
Total charges of $487 million, $147 million, and $77 million associated with the workforce reduction were recorded
in Restructuring charges in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024,
and 2023, respectively. Additionally, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $36 million, and $54 million
related to its leasehold improvements and office equipment, and restructuring charges of $30 million, and $106
million for operating lease right-of-use assets as part of its facilities consolidation efforts for the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
The following table is a summary of the changes in the restructuring liabilities for each period presented, included
within Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets:
Restructuring liabilities as of December 31, 2023 ................................................................................ | $8 |
Severance and other personnel costs ................................................................................................. | 147 |
Cash payments ................................................................................................................................... | (11) |
Other adjustments .............................................................................................................................. | 8 |
Restructuring liabilities as of December 31, 2024 ................................................................................ | 152 |
Severance and other personnel costs ................................................................................................. | 487 |
Cash payments ................................................................................................................................... | (212) |
Other adjustments .............................................................................................................................. | 16 |
Restructuring liabilities as of December 31, 2025 ................................................................................ | $443 |
Note 21 - Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred from January 1, 2026 through March 30, 2026, which
is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued, and determined that there were no
subsequent events or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements,
except as discussed below.
F-60
Officer Equity Awards
In January 2026, the Company granted 1,000 million performance-based restricted shares of Class B common stock
to Elon Musk. The restricted shares vest upon (i) the Company’s achievement of specified market capitalization
milestones across 15 equal tranches ranging from $500 billion to $7.5 trillion, with each milestone reflecting $500
billion in additional valuation, and (ii) the Company’s establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at
least one million inhabitants, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment.
In March 2026, the Company cancelled Mr. Musk’s xAI Award and replaced it with a grant of 302.1 million
performance-based restricted shares of Class B common stock, which vest upon (i) the achievement of specified
market capitalization milestones across 12 equal tranches ranging from $1.065 trillion to $6.565 trillion, with each
milestone reflecting $500 billion in additional valuation, and (ii) the Company’s completion of non-Earth-based data
centers capable of delivering 100 terawatts of compute per year, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued
employment.
In January 2026, the Company approved an amendment to 4 million performance-based stock options granted to
Bret Johnsen, Chief Financial Officer, that were originally issued in 2024. In lieu of vesting based on free cash flow
achievement in excess of a baseline, 371 thousand of the stock options will vest for each $10 billion in adjusted
EBITDA achieved during the 2025 through 2029 fiscal years, assessed on an annual basis. For purposes of this
award, adjusted EBITDA is calculated as income from operations excluding (i) depreciation and amortization, (ii)
share-based compensation, (iii) impairment, and (iv) restructuring impacts. Once a tranche of the stock options have
become earned as a result of the Company’s adjusted EBITDA performance as of the end of a particular fiscal year,
such stock options remain subject to an additional one-year and one day service-based vesting requirement
following December 31 of the fiscal year in which such tranche was earned. The number of options granted was not
changed in the amendment. None of the stock options became earned on account of the Company’s adjusted
EBITDA performance for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Share Repurchases
Between January and March 2026, the Company repurchased Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and
Common Stock from eligible current and former employees as well as third-party investors totaling $1,396 million.
Sale-Leaseback Transaction
In January 2026, and as further amended on February 18, 2026, CTC entered into an equipment lease agreement
with Valor for certain AI infrastructure hardware (“Valor transaction II”). Similar to the Valor transaction, the Valor
transaction II was considered to be a transaction with a related party. The Valor transaction II is deemed to be a
failed sale-leaseback transaction and the Company recorded the related debt of $5,365 million in the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets.
xAI Merger Closing
Pursuant to the terms of the xAI Merger on February 2, 2026, the Company issued, prior to the 2026 Stock Split,
321.7 million shares of Class A Common Stock, 121.7 million shares of Class B Common Stock and paid $2,947
million in cash to holders of xAI Common Stock and Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Refer to Note 13,
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional details.
Tesla’s xAI Investment and SpaceX Class A Common Stock Issuance
In January 2026, Tesla entered into an agreement with xAI to invest $2,000 million via a purchase of xAI Series E
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of that agreement and a letter agreement entered into
between xAI and Tesla on January 16, 2026, xAI’s issuance of the shares of Series E Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock, and Tesla’s payment therefore, was conditioned upon the receipt of required regulatory approvals.
Following the xAI Merger, Tesla’s right to acquire Series E Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock of xAI was
converted into the right to acquire SpaceX Class A common stock. On March 12, 2026, following expiration of the
F-61
applicable regulatory waiting period, SpaceX issued 3.8 million shares of Class A Common Stock (on a pre-2026
Stock Split basis) to Tesla in accordance with the terms of the foregoing agreements.
Tesla Collaboration
In March 2026, the Company announced a collaboration with Tesla to build a chip manufacturing facility (referred
to as Terafab).
SpaceX Bridge Loan Credit Agreement
In March 2026, SpaceX entered into a new bridge loan credit agreement (“SpaceX Bridge Loan”) for
$20,000 million with a syndicate of banks. The SpaceX Bridge Loan matures on September 2, 2027 with two three-
month extensions, at the option of the Company, reaching a final maturity date of March 2, 2028. The SpaceX
Bridge Loan proceeds were used to extinguish and pay off the X B-1 Term Loan, X B-3 Term Loan, xAI Fixed Rate
Loan, xAI Floating Rate Loan, and the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes. The SpaceX Bridge Loan bears interest at
a rate per annum of (i) between 0.75%-1.75%, dependent upon the debt rating of the Company, plus the relevant
Term SOFR or (ii) the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus
1.0% and (d) 1.0%, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% (depending on the Company’s debt
rating). Obligations under the SpaceX Bridge Loan were guaranteed jointly and severally by certain subsidiaries of
the Company. The SpaceX Bridge Loan is repayable at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.
The Company is required to meet various covenants, including meeting certain reporting requirements, and certain
financial covenants.
Concurrently with the SpaceX Bridge Loan, the Company repaid the outstanding principal and accrued interests of
the X B-1 Term Loan, X B-3 Term Loan, xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan, xAI Floating Rate Term Loan and xAI 12.5%
Secured Senior Notes for an aggregate amount of $18,905 million, including $1,163 million of prepayment penalty.
Purchase Commitments
In March 2026, the Company executed a purchase agreement with an unaffiliated third party to acquire additional
turbines for the AI infrastructure totaling $805 million through 2029.
Note 22 - Subsequent Events to the Original Issuance of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred from the date the consolidated financial statements
were originally issued on March 30, 2026 through May 7, 2026, the date the consolidated financial statements were
available to be reissued, and determined that the following subsequent events require disclosure in the consolidated
financial statements.
Collaboration Agreement
On April 19, 2026, the Company entered into a compute agreement with Anysphere, Inc., doing business as Cursor,
a San Francisco-based private software company (“Cursor”). Pursuant to the compute agreement, the Company will
collaborate with Cursor to improve the Company’s existing models, including Grok, and potentially to jointly
develop AI models and related model-specific deliverables.
Concurrent with the compute agreement, the Company also entered into an option agreement for the right, but not
the obligation, to acquire Cursor. The option agreement generally provides that the Company may exercise the call
option at any time during the 30-day period following the earlier of (i) seven trading days following the completion
of the Company’s IPO and (ii) September 30, 2026. Exercise of the call option is in the Company’s sole discretion
and subject to further approval by the board of directors. Cursor is also subject to certain exclusivity obligations
under the option agreement. The consideration for the acquisition of Cursor would consist of shares of Class A
common stock based on an implied equity value of Cursor of $60.0 billion, and the price of Class A common stock
that equals, if the acquisition closed prior to the completion of this offering, the most recent quarterly valuation, or,
if the acquisition closed after the completion of the Company’s IPO, the volume-weighted average closing price
thereof over the seven consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition. If either (i) the
Company decides to terminate the option agreement or (ii) Cursor is eligible to and decides to terminate due to the
F-62
Company’s material breach of the option agreement, Cursor is entitled to a $1.5 billion termination fee under the
option agreement and an $8.5 billion deferred services fee under the compute agreement. These fees are payable in
cash (or Class A common stock, if the Company’s IPO has not been consummated at the time the fees become
payable).
The Company has conducted preliminary due diligence on Cursor’s business, technology and operations, and expect
to continue such diligence in connection with any decision to exercise the call option. The Company cannot predict
whether the Company will elect to exercise the call option or, if exercised, whether the acquisition will close on the
anticipated terms or at all.
Sale-Leaseback Transaction
On April 24, 2026, CTC entered into a five-year equipment lease agreement with Valor, a related party, for certain
AI infrastructure hardware (“Valor transaction III”) for total undiscounted lease payments of $6,587 million.
Asset Acquisition
On April 30, 2026, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with an unaffiliated third party to
purchase certain mobile gas turbines and related packages for approximately $2,000 million (the “Turbine
Acquisition”). The closing of the Turbine Acquisition is expected to occur in May 2026 and is subject to customary
closing conditions. The seller has also agreed to enter into a post-closing services agreement to support the
Company's turbine operations. The Turbine Acquisition will help provide power to the Company's data centers.
Cloud Services Agreement
On May 3, 2026, the Company entered into a cloud services agreement with Anthropic PBC, an AI research and
development public benefit corporation, with respect to access to compute capacity. Pursuant to this agreement, the
customer has agreed to pay a monthly fee through May 2029, with capacity ramping in May 2026 at a reduced fee.
The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ notice. The customer will retain ownership and
intellectual property rights in its content, AI models, and related data.
F-63
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||
Assets | ||||
Current assets | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................................................................ | $15,852 | $24,747 | ||
Marketable securities ....................................................................................................................... | 7,823 | — | ||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $47 and $39 at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ............................................................................................... | 1,833 | 1,579 | ||
Inventory .......................................................................................................................................... | 2,588 | 2,416 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ....................................................................................... | 1,636 | 2,210 | ||
Total current assets ..................................................................................................................... | 29,732 | 30,952 | ||
Property, plant, and equipment, net(a) .................................................................................................... | 53,879 | 42,602 | ||
Finance lease right-of-use assets ............................................................................................................ | 1,182 | 1,260 | ||
Intangible assets, net .............................................................................................................................. | 1,432 | 1,548 | ||
Digital assets .......................................................................................................................................... | 1,293 | 1,637 | ||
Goodwill ................................................................................................................................................. | 11,681 | 11,809 | ||
Deferred tax assets ................................................................................................................................. | 213 | 141 | ||
Other assets ............................................................................................................................................ | 2,682 | 2,130 | ||
Total assets ............................................................................................................................... | $102,094 | $92,079 | ||
Liabilities, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||
Current liabilities | ||||
Accounts payable ................................................................................................................................... | 10,002 | 11,792 | ||
Deferred revenue, current ..................................................................................................................... | 7,207 | 6,111 | ||
Debt and finance leases, current (related party of $1,121 and $455 at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively) ..................................................................................................... | 1,538 | 928 | ||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities ...................................................................................... | 5,689 | 2,569 | ||
Total current liabilities ........................................................................................................................... | 24,436 | 21,400 | ||
Long-term liabilities | ||||
Deferred revenue, net of current ........................................................................................................... | 6,029 | 6,005 | ||
Debt and finance leases, net of current (related party of $7,920 and $4,052 at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively) ..................................................................................................... | 28,727 | 21,968 | ||
Other liabilities ....................................................................................................................................... | 1,320 | 1,381 | ||
Total liabilities ...................................................................................................................................... | 60,512 | 50,754 | ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) | ||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock | ||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, par value $0.001; 189 and 2,351 shares issued; 135 and 2,046 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively .................... | 7,049 | 38,752 | ||
Shareholders’ equity | ||||
Class A common stock, par value $0.001; 2,965 and 2,036 shares issued; 2,883 and 1,952 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ......................................... | 3 | 3 | ||
Class B common stock, par value $0.001; 2,421 and 643 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ................................................................................. | 3 | 1 | ||
Class C common stock, par value $0.001; 494 and 484 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ................................................................................. | 0 | 0 | ||
Class D common stock, par value $0.0001; no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively ................................................................................................ | — | — | ||
Additional paid-in capital ....................................................................................................................... | 74,083 | 37,706 | ||
Accumulated deficit ............................................................................................................................... | (41,311) | (37,035) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income ........................................................................................... | 1,755 | 1,898 | ||
Total shareholders’ equity ................................................................................................................. | 34,533 | 2,573 | ||
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock, and shareholders’ equity ................... | $102,094 | $92,079 |
__________________
(a)Refer to Note 17, Related Party Transactions for additional details on related party arrangements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-64
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Revenue ........................................................................................................................ | $4,694 | $4,067 | |
Costs and expenses | |||
Cost of revenue ......................................................................................................... | 2,388 | 1,962 | |
Research and development ........................................................................................ | 3,514 | 1,557 | |
Selling, general, and administrative .......................................................................... | 746 | 493 | |
Restructuring charges (credits) ................................................................................. | (11) | 4 | |
Impairment ................................................................................................................ | — | 24 | |
Total costs and expenses ...................................................................................... | 6,637 | 4,040 | |
Income (loss) from operations .................................................................................... | (1,943) | 27 | |
Interest expense (related party of $186 and $- for March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively) ............................................................................................................... | (664) | (447) | |
Interest income ............................................................................................................... | 213 | 117 | |
Other expense, net .......................................................................................................... | (1,876) | (211) | |
Loss before income taxes ............................................................................................. | (4,270) | (514) | |
Provision for income taxes ............................................................................................ | 6 | 14 | |
Net loss .......................................................................................................................... | $(4,276) | $(528) | |
Net loss attributable to shareholders - basic and diluted ........................................... | $(4,947) | $(528) | |
Net loss per share of common stock attributable to common shareholders | |||
Basic and Diluted ........................................................................................................... | $(1.27) | $(0.18) | |
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share of common stock | |||
Basic and Diluted ........................................................................................................... | 3,884 | 2,875 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-65
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Net loss ..................................................................................................................... | $(4,276) | $(528) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | |||
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax ............................... | (140) | 257 | |
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of tax ................................. | (3) | 2 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) ......................................................................... | (143) | 259 | |
Comprehensive loss ................................................................................................ | $(4,419) | $(269) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-66
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | Common Stock | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2024 ........................................ | 1,748 | $20,941 | 3,023 | $3 | $35,865 | $(32,098) | $1,093 | $4,863 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation .................................................. | — | — | — | — | 262 | — | — | 262 | ||||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding .................... | — | — | 26 | 0 | 931 | — | — | 931 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock ............................................. | — | — | (28) | 0 | (508) | — | — | (508) | ||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ................................................................. | 0 | (1) | 2 | 0 | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||
Transfer of equity in business combination ........................ | — | — | 1 | 0 | 39 | — | — | 39 | ||||||||
Net loss ................................................................................ | — | — | — | — | — | (528) | — | (528) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income .............................................. | — | — | — | — | — | — | 259 | 259 | ||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2025 .............................................. | 1,748 | $20,940 | 3,024 | $3 | $36,590 | $(32,626) | $1,352 | $5,319 | ||||||||
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | Common Stock | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | Total Shareholders' Equity | |||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2025 .......................................... | 2,046 | $38,752 | 3,079 | $4 | $37,706 | $(37,035) | $1,898 | $2,573 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation .................................................. | — | — | — | — | 693 | — | — | 693 | ||||||||
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock ........... | 78 | 5,869 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding .................... | — | — | 1,346 | 1 | 2,460 | — | — | 2,461 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock ................................................................ | (2) | (69) | (31) | — | (1,864) | — | — | (1,864) | ||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock pursuant to the xAI Merger ............................................. | (1,987) | (37,476) | 1,424 | 1 | 37,474 | — | — | 37,475 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock pursuant to xAI Merger ....... | — | — | (25) | — | (2,413) | — | — | (2,413) | ||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ................................................................. | — | (27) | 5 | — | 27 | — | — | 27 | ||||||||
Net loss ................................................................................ | — | — | — | — | — | (4,276) | — | (4,276) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss ................................................... | — | — | — | — | — | — | (143) | (143) | ||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2026 .............................................. | 135 | $7,049 | 5,798 | $6 | $74,083 | $(41,311) | $1,755 | $34,533 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-67
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
Net loss ..................................................................................................................................... | $(4,276) | $(528) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||
Depreciation and amortization ............................................................................................ | 2,442 | 1,443 | |
Share-based compensation .................................................................................................. | 639 | 232 | |
Unrealized loss on digital assets ......................................................................................... | 344 | 188 | |
Impairment and loss on disposal of fixed assets, net .......................................................... | 5 | 32 | |
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs .............................................................. | 19 | 18 | |
Loss on debt extinguishment .............................................................................................. | 1,526 | — | |
Other ................................................................................................................................... | (26) | 31 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |||
Accounts receivable ....................................................................................................... | (218) | (197) | |
Inventory ........................................................................................................................ | (384) | (322) | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets ................................................................................. | (74) | (88) | |
Accounts payable ........................................................................................................... | (528) | 93 | |
Deferred revenue ........................................................................................................... | 1,119 | (34) | |
Operating lease liabilities, net ....................................................................................... | (5) | (1) | |
Other liabilities .............................................................................................................. | 464 | (140) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities ................................................................ | $1,047 | $727 | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |||
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment (related party of $34 and $84 for March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively) ............................................................................................... | (10,107) | (4,140) | |
Capitalized interest ................................................................................................................... | (7) | — | |
Proceeds from product rebates ................................................................................................. | 1,195 | — | |
Purchases of marketable securities ........................................................................................... | (7,801) | (312) | |
Maturities of marketable securities .......................................................................................... | — | 289 | |
Other investing activities, net ................................................................................................... | (4) | (7) | |
Net cash used in investing activities ................................................................................... | $(16,724) | $(4,170) | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |||
Principal repayments on finance leases .................................................................................... | (82) | (66) | |
Proceeds from debt and other financing obligations ................................................................ | 22,694 | 4,744 | |
Payment of debt issuance costs | (23) | (3) | |
Repayments on debt and other financing obligations .............................................................. | (18,295) | (4,745) | |
Payment of debt extinguishment premium | (1,153) | — | |
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net of issuance costs ................................................ | 8,319 | 899 | |
Proceeds from employee equity award plans ........................................................................... | 111 | 33 | |
Payments for repurchase of common and redeemable convertible preferred stock ................. | (4,346) | (508) | |
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards .................................................... | (100) | — | |
Net cash provided by financing activities ........................................................................... | $7,125 | $354 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents ................................................ | 36 | 70 | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash ................................................... | (8,516) | (3,019) | |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of the period .................................. | 25,124 | 11,501 | |
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of the period ............................................ | $16,608 | $8,482 | |
F-68
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information | |||
Cash paid for the following: | |||
Interest, net of interest capitalized ...................................................................................... | $990 | $382 | |
Income taxes, net ................................................................................................................ | $8 | $7 | |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities | |||
Share-based compensation capitalized in property, plant, and equipment, net ........................ | $60 | $30 | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment included in accrued expenses and accounts payable ................................................................................................................................. | $10,649 | $565 | |
Purchases of property, plant, and equipment financed by other financings ............................ | $2,684 | $— | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-69
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tables in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
Note 1 - Nature of Business
Description of Business
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as the “Company”
or “SpaceX,” operate three segments – (i) the Space segment designs, manufactures, and launches reusable rockets
to provide high cadence, reliable, and affordable access to space at unprecedented scale, (ii) the Connectivity
segment operates a worldwide high-speed, low-latency broadband network powered by thousands of Starlink
satellites in Low-Earth Orbit, delivering connectivity to millions of consumer, enterprise, and government customers
through our Starlink offering, and (iii) the AI segment operates a vertically integrated AI platform spanning a
frontier LLM Grok, AI solutions for consumer and enterprise customers, X — a real-time information,
entertainment, and free speech platform — and AI computational infrastructure.
On February 2, 2026 (“xAI Merger Date”), the Company completed its acquisition of X.AI Holdings Corp. (“xAI”),
pursuant to which xAI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“xAI Merger”). Prior to the xAI
Merger, on March 28, 2025, xAI completed its acquisition of X Holdings Corp. (“X”) and X.AI Corp., in which X
and X.AI Corp. became wholly-owned subsidiaries of xAI (“X Merger”, and collectively with xAI Merger,
“Mergers”). X.AI Corp began operations in March 2023 and Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) was acquired by Mr. Elon
Musk in October 2022. The Mergers were each effected through a share exchange.
The Mergers have been accounted for as reorganizations of entities under common control as Mr. Elon Musk had a
controlling financial interest in the Company, xAI and X through his majority voting interest in each such entity
during the periods presented in these consolidated financial statements. The Company’s consolidated financial
statements have been prepared to reflect the retrospective combination of the net assets of the entities at their
historical carrying amounts for all periods presented. No new goodwill or other intangible assets have been recorded
and all historical related party transactions between the entities have been eliminated in consolidation. The capital
stock and shareholders’ equity for all periods presented reflects a continuation of the historical SpaceX capital stock
and shareholders’ equity, combined with the historical capital stock and shareholders’ equity of X and xAI merged
under common control, as adjusted by the respective exchange ratios used to effect the Mergers, except for xAI’s
historical redeemable convertible preferred stock through the date of the xAI Merger. All of xAI’s redeemable
convertible preferred stock were converted to SpaceX common stock as part of the xAI Merger and are presented as
such from the date of the xAI Merger. This presentation constitutes a change in reporting entity. Refer to Note 12 -
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional details.
On May 4, 2026, the Company effected a five-for-one forward stock split of its authorized, issued, and outstanding
shares of Class A, Class B, and Class C Common Stock (“2026 Stock Split”). The conversion rate of SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock was proportionately adjusted to factor in the 2026 Stock Split. All share
and per share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 2026 Stock Split for all periods presented.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements, including the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2026, the
consolidated statements of operations, the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, the consolidated
statements of redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity and the consolidated statements of
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, as well as other information disclosed in the
accompanying notes, are unaudited. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025 was derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. The interim consolidated financial statements and the
F-70
accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes.
The interim consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes have been prepared on the same basis as
the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which
include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the periods
presented. The consolidated results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for the full year or for any other future years or interim periods.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Amounts which are subject to
significant judgment and use of estimates include revenues recognized over time using the cost-to-cost input
method, the determination of valuation allowances associated with deferred tax assets and estimates of tax liabilities,
reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives
of property, plant, and equipment, the determination of incremental borrowing rate for lease liabilities, litigation and
settlement costs, and the valuation and assumptions underlying share-based compensation. On an ongoing basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates compared to historical experience and current trends, which forms the basis for
making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. In addition, the Company engages valuation
specialists to assist in the valuation of equity instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, as presented in the consolidated statements of
cash flows, are as follows:
March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents ......................................................................................... | $15,852 | $24,747 | |
Restricted cash included in prepaid expenses and other current assets ..................... | 67 | 182 | |
Restricted cash included in other assets ..................................................................... | 689 | 195 | |
Total as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows ........................ | $16,608 | $25,124 |
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies from the annual consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope
Improvements. The ASU improves the guidance in Topic 270 by improving the navigability of the required interim
disclosures and clarifying when that guidance is applicable. The amendments also provide additional guidance on
what disclosures should be provided in interim reporting periods. The amendments add to Topic 270 a principle that
requires entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the
entity. The ASU is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2027. Adoption of this ASU can either be applied prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods
presented in the financial statements, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
F-71
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement
of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendments in this update provide a practical
expedient permitting an entity to assume that conditions at the balance sheet date remain unchanged over the life of
the asset when estimating expected credit losses for current classified accounts receivable and contract assets. The
Company adopted this ASU on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2026. While this ASU was adopted, the
Company did not elect the practical expedient permitted under this ASU. Therefore, the adoption has no impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 - Revenue
Revenue disaggregated by products and services is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Products ..................................................................................................................... | $380 | $352 | |
Services ...................................................................................................................... | 4,314 | 3,715 | |
Total revenues ......................................................................................................... | $4,694 | $4,067 | |
All of products revenue is attributable to the Connectivity segment.
Revenue disaggregated by type and segment is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Launch Services ................................................................................................... | $330 | $566 | |
Launch & Development ........................................................................................ | 289 | 299 | |
Space ........................................................................................................................ | 619 | 865 | |
Consumer .............................................................................................................. | 2,148 | 1,492 | |
Enterprise & Government (1) ................................................................................. | 1,109 | 983 | |
Connectivity ............................................................................................................ | 3,257 | 2,475 | |
Advertising ............................................................................................................ | 343 | 443 | |
AI Solutions & Infrastructure ............................................................................... | 475 | 284 | |
AI .............................................................................................................................. | 818 | 727 | |
Total revenues ......................................................................................................... | $4,694 | $4,067 | |
___________________
(1) Enterprise & Government revenue includes revenue from Starlink Mobile service offerings.
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is recorded when cash payments are received or due, in advance of the Company’s performance.
Deferred revenue primarily relates to Space agreements and Connectivity enterprise and government contracts. Total
deferred revenue as of December 31, 2025 was $12,116 million, of which $1,165 million was recognized as revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2026. Total deferred revenue as of March 31, 2026 was $13,236 million.
Backlog
The Company’s backlog represents the transaction price of performance obligations to customers for which work
remains to be performed. The amount of backlog increases with new contracts or additions to existing contracts and
decreases as revenue is recognized on existing contracts. Contracts are included in backlog when an enforceable
agreement has been reached. Backlog does not include amounts related to performance obligations that are billed
and recognized as they are delivered, optional purchases that do not represent material rights and any estimated
amounts of variable consideration that are subject to constraint. Backlog totaled $27,621 million as of March 31,
F-72
2026, of which $13,236 million was recognized as deferred revenue at March 31, 2026. Approximately 36% is
expected to be recognized within one year, and approximately 46% is expected to be recognized between one and
three years, with the remaining 18% to be recognized thereafter.
Note 4 - Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | ||
Raw materials ............................................................................................................ | $1,054 | $1,030 | |
Work-in-progress ....................................................................................................... | 835 | 803 | |
Finished goods ........................................................................................................... | 699 | 583 | |
Inventory ................................................................................................................. | $2,588 | $2,416 |
Note 5 - Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
Property, plant, and equipment, net consist of the following:
March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | ||
Servers and networking equipment ........................................................................... | $23,850 | $22,694 | |
Satellites ..................................................................................................................... | 12,893 | 11,949 | |
Machinery and equipment ......................................................................................... | 8,020 | 6,343 | |
Data center infrastructure .......................................................................................... | 2,965 | 2,960 | |
Launch sites ............................................................................................................... | 2,479 | 2,404 | |
Land, buildings and improvements (1) ....................................................................... | 2,018 | 1,876 | |
Flight vehicle hardware ............................................................................................. | 1,459 | 1,689 | |
Leasehold improvements ........................................................................................... | 842 | 784 | |
Construction-in-progress ........................................................................................... | 14,045 | 4,604 | |
Property, plant, and equipment .................................................................................. | 68,571 | 55,303 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation ................................................................................ | (14,692) | (12,701) | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net ..................................................................... | $53,879 | $42,602 |
__________________
(1)Land is not a depreciable asset.
Construction in progress is primarily comprised of ongoing construction and expansion of the facilities and
equipment as well as AI infrastructure that has not yet been placed in service.
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $2,329 million and $1,237 million,
respectively.
Interest is capitalized during the construction period for significant long term construction projects, such as the AI
infrastructure data centers and launch facilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company
capitalized $7 million of interest, which is included in Construction-in-progress amounts above. No interest was
capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded impairment charges of $24 million related to the
write off of damaged flight vehicles in the Space segment. These charges are reflected in Impairment in the
consolidated statements of operations. There were no impairment charges related to Property, plant, and equipment
during the three months ended March 31, 2026.
F-73
Note 6 - Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets
Finite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:
March 31, 2026 | |||||||
Weighted- Average Useful Life (years) | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||
Brand ...................................................................... | 5.0 | $735 | $(367) | $368 | |||
User base ................................................................. | 9.0 | 1,277 | (486) | 791 | |||
Existing technology ................................................ | 3.0 | 27 | (17) | 10 | |||
Advertising customer relationships ........................ | 5.0 | 745 | (510) | 235 | |||
Acquired workforce ................................................ | 2.0 | 11 | (2) | 9 | |||
Total ................................................................. | $2,795 | $(1,382) | $1,413 | ||||
December 31, 2025 | |||||||
Weighted- Average Useful Life (in years) | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||
Brand ...................................................................... | 5.0 | $743 | $(335) | $408 | |||
User base ................................................................. | 9.0 | 1,291 | (456) | 835 | |||
Existing technology ................................................ | 3.2 | 27 | (16) | 11 | |||
Advertising customer relationships ........................ | 5.0 | 752 | (478) | 274 | |||
Acquired workforce ................................................ | 2.0 | 9 | — | 9 | |||
Total ................................................................. | $2,822 | $(1,285) | $1,537 | ||||
Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangible assets was $113 million and $206 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
The Company also has indefinite-lived intangible assets of $19 million and $11 million as of March 31, 2026 and
December 31, 2025, respectively. Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of trade names and domain
names, which are expected to provide long-term branding and marketing benefits.
Goodwill
The activity for goodwill is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2025 ............................................................................................................. | 11,809 |
Business combination ....................................................................................................................... | 3 |
Cumulative translation adjustments ................................................................................................ | (131) |
Balance at March 31, 2026 ................................................................................................................. | $11,681 |
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, goodwill attributable to the Connectivity segment was $515 million
and $513 million, respectively, and goodwill attributable to the AI segment was $11,166 million and $11,296
million, respectively.
F-74
Note 7 - Financial Instruments
The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
March 31, 2026 | |||||||||
Level | Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Cash ............................................. | I | 7,181 | — | — | 7,181 | ||||
Money market funds .................... | I | 6,950 | — | — | 6,950 | ||||
Government securities ................. | II | 1,721 | — | — | 1,721 | ||||
Marketable securities ..................... | |||||||||
Government securities ................. | II | 7,823 | — | 0 | 7,823 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ............................. | I | 15 | — | — | 15 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ......................................... | I | 52 | — | — | 52 | ||||
Other assets ..................................... | |||||||||
Restricted cash ............................. | I | 512 | — | — | 512 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ......................................... | I | 146 | — | — | 146 | ||||
Restricted cash in government securities ................................... | II | 31 | — | — | 31 | ||||
Total ................................................. | $24,431 | $— | $— | $24,431 | |||||
December 31, 2025 | |||||||||
Level | Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Cash .............................................. | I | $3,408 | $— | $— | $3,408 | ||||
Money market funds .................... | I | 21,339 | — | — | 21,339 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||||||||
Restricted cash ............................. | I | 30 | — | — | 30 | ||||
Money market funds .................... | I | 152 | — | — | 152 | ||||
Other assets .................................... | |||||||||
Restricted cash ............................. | I | 182 | — | — | 182 | ||||
Restricted cash in money market funds ......................................... | I | 13 | — | — | 13 | ||||
Total ................................................. | $25,124 | $— | $— | $25,124 | |||||
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company also held 18,712 units of Bitcoin with a cost basis of
$661 million and fair value of $1,293 million and $1,637 million, respectively. The fair value of these digital assets
is determined using Level I in the fair value hierarchy.
F-75
Note 8 - Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
Equity method investment
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company held an investment in Stateline Power, LLC, which is
accounted for as an equity method investment, of $80 million and $86 million, respectively.
Equity investments without readily determinable fair value
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company held investments in unconsolidated affiliates which are
accounted for as equity investments without readily determinable fair values of $168 million and $157 million,
respectively. The Company recorded cumulative downward adjustments of $59 million on these investments as of
March 31, 2026. Upward adjustments or impairment on these investments during the three months ended March 31,
2026 and 2025 were not material.
Note 9 - Debt
March 31, 2026 | |||||
Principal | Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs | Net | |||
SpaceX Bridge Loan ...................................................................... | 20,000 | 21 | 19,979 | ||
X 2027 and X 2030 Notes .............................................................. | 27 | — | 27 | ||
Other financings (1) ......................................................................... | 9,105 | — | 9,105 | ||
Total debt ........................................................................................ | 29,132 | 21 | 29,111 | ||
Finance lease liability ..................................................................... | 1,154 | — | 1,154 | ||
Total debt and finance leases .......................................................... | 30,286 | 21 | 30,265 | ||
Less: Short-term portion ................................................................. | 1,538 | — | 1,538 | ||
Total debt and finance leases, net of current ............................. | $28,748 | $21 | $28,727 | ||
December 31, 2025 | |||||
Principal | Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs | Net | |||
X 2027 and X 2030 Notes .............................................................. | 27 | — | 27 | ||
X B-1 Term Loan ........................................................................... | 6,504 | 280 | 6,224 | ||
X B-3 Term Loan ........................................................................... | 5,966 | 54 | 5,912 | ||
xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan ............................................................ | 995 | 4 | 991 | ||
xAI Floating Rate Term Loan ........................................................ | 995 | 40 | 955 | ||
xAI 12.5% Secured Senior Notes ................................................... | 3,000 | 12 | 2,988 | ||
Other financings (1) ......................................................................... | 4,562 | — | 4,562 | ||
Total debt ........................................................................................ | 22,049 | 390 | 21,659 | ||
Finance lease liability ..................................................................... | 1,237 | — | 1,237 | ||
Total debt and finance leases .......................................................... | 23,286 | 390 | 22,896 | ||
Less: Short-term portion ................................................................. | 928 | — | 928 | ||
Total debt and finance leases, net of current ............................. | $22,358 | $390 | $21,968 | ||
__________________
(1)Includes obligations related to certain AI infrastructure assets recorded as failed sale-leaseback transactions. Refer to Other Financings
below for additional details.
F-76
SpaceX Bridge Loan
General. In March 2026, SpaceX entered into a new bridge loan credit agreement (the “SpaceX Bridge Loan”) with
a syndicate of lenders, providing for an unsecured bridge term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of
$20,000 million. The SpaceX Bridge Loan matures on September 2, 2027, with two three-month extensions at the
Company’s option, subject to the absence of a continuing default and the payment of an extension fee of 0.25% of
the aggregate outstanding principal per extension, resulting in a final extended maturity date in March 2028.
Proceeds. The proceeds of the SpaceX Bridge Loan were used to repay the X B-1 Term Loan, the X B-3 Term
Loan, the xAI Fixed Rate Loan, the xAI Floating Rate Loan, and the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes (as defined
and described below). The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
Interest Rates. The SpaceX Bridge Loan bears interest, at the Company’s election, at a rate per annum equal to (i)
Term SOFR plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75%-1.75% (depending on the Company’s debt rating), or (ii)
a base rate equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus
1.00% and (d) 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% (depending on the Company’s debt
rating). In addition, the Company is obligated to pay duration fees equal to 0.125% of outstanding principal on the
first anniversary of closing and 0.25% of outstanding principal on the fifteen-month anniversary of closing. The
effective interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the SpaceX Bridge Loan was 4.58% as of March 31, 2026.
Principal Repayments. The SpaceX Bridge Loan may be prepaid at any time, in whole or in part, without premium
or penalty. The Company is required to use the net proceeds of certain debt financings to repay amounts outstanding
under the SpaceX Bridge Loan and to apply the net proceeds of a qualified initial public offering (“IPO”) to repay
such amounts within six months following receipt.
Guarantors and Collateral. The obligations of the Company under the SpaceX Bridge Loan are guaranteed on a
joint and several basis by X Corp., X.AI LLC, and CTC Property LLC (each a subsidiary of the Company).
Covenants. The SpaceX Bridge Loan contains customary events of default and affirmative and negative covenants,
including restrictions on liens, subsidiary indebtedness, fundamental changes (including a prohibition on the
disposition of Starlink assets and other material businesses outside the consolidated group), and changes in the
nature of the Company’s business. The sole financial maintenance covenant requires the Company to maintain a
Consolidated Leverage Ratio — defined as consolidated funded indebtedness (net of 85% of unrestricted cash) to
Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the SpaceX Bridge Loan) — of no greater than 3.75 to 1.0 as of the end of
each fiscal quarter, with a temporary step-up to 4.25 to 1.0 for four fiscal quarters following a qualifying acquisition
of at least $1.0 billion. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of March 31, 2026.
Accounting Treatment. The Company accounted for the repayment of the X B-1 Term Loan, the X B-3 Term Loan,
the xAI Fixed Rate Loan, the xAI Floating Rate Loan and the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes as an
extinguishment of debt, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of $1,526 million, recorded in Other expense, net.
SpaceX Credit Facility
General. In February 2025, the Company entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit agreement
(“SpaceX Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of banks, under which the Company may draw up to $1,500 million,
subject to a customary financial covenant and other reporting requirements. The SpaceX Credit Facility terminates,
and all outstanding loans become due and payable, on February 7, 2030, unless the parties agree to an extension. No
amounts were borrowed under the SpaceX Credit Facility during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Amendment. In March 2026, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver (the
“First Amendment”) with its lenders, in connection with the Company’s entry into the SpaceX Bridge Loan (as
defined above). The First Amendment, among other things, (i) waived certain specified defaults and (ii) amended
F-77
certain definitions and covenants under the SpaceX Credit Facility to conform to the terms of the SpaceX Bridge
Loan.
Interest Rates. Under the SpaceX Credit Facility, borrowings bear interest at the Company’s option, at a rate per
annum of (i) between 0.75%-1.25%, depending on the Company’s current debt rating, plus the relevant Term SOFR
or (ii) between 0.0%-0.25% depending on the Company’s current debt rating plus the greater of (a) the Federal
Funds Rate plus 0.5%, (b) the Prime Rate, (c) Term SOFR plus 1.0% and (d) 1.0%. The Company may also borrow
in various alternative currencies at various alternative rates, including rates based on SONIA for Pound Sterling
loans and EURIBOR for Euro loans plus an applicable margin. The fee for undrawn amounts is between
0.07%-0.11% per annum, depending on the Company’s current debt rating. Interest is payable either monthly or
quarterly, depending on the interest loan option.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of March 31, 2026; however, the Company had
a technical default when the Company acquired xAI on February 2, 2026 due to the amount of debt assumed as part
of the acquisition at the subsidiary level. On March 2, 2026, the Company obtained a waiver from the syndicate of
banks and amended the SpaceX Credit Facility allowing for the debt refinance completed on March 2, 2026,
resulting in the Company being in compliance with all covenants.
X 2027 and 2030 Notes
General. In 2019, a subsidiary of X, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, issued $700 million aggregate principal
amount of 3.875% senior notes due 2027 (the “X 2027 Notes”) in a private placement. The X 2027 Notes mature on
December 15, 2027. In 2022, a subsidiary of X issued $1,000 million aggregate principal amount of 5.000% senior
notes due 2030 (the “X 2030 Notes”) in a private placement. The X 2030 Notes mature on March 1, 2030. The X
2027 and X 2030 Notes represent senior unsecured obligations of the Company.
Interest Rates. For the X 2027 Notes, the interest rate is fixed at 3.875% per annum and interest is payable semi-
annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year. For the X 2030 Notes, the interest rate is fixed at
5.000% per annum and interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year.
Principal Repayments. In November 2022, the Company purchased approximately $675 million aggregate principal
amount of X 2027 Notes and $998 million aggregate principal amount of the X 2030 Notes in settlement of the
change in control of Twitter. The X 2027 Notes and X 2030 Notes that remain outstanding may be redeemed at the
option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time prior to September 15, 2027 and December 1, 2029,
respectively, at a price equal to 100.0% of the principal amounts plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, up to, but excluding, the redemption date.
Covenants. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of March 31, 2026.
X First Lien Senior Credit Facilities
General. In 2022, X Corp., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, entered into the First Lien Credit Agreement
which provided for a new term loan commitment of $6,705 million (“X B-1 Term Loan”) and a $500 million
Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility (including a letter of credit subfacility with an aggregate face value of
up to $100 million) (together referred to as “X First Lien Senior Credit Facilities”). The Secured First Lien
Revolving Credit Facility matures on October 27, 2027 and the X B-1 Term Loan matures on October 27, 2029.
Amendments. In February 2025, X Corp., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, amended the X First Lien Senior
Credit Facilities and entered into a new term loan commitment for $4,741 million with a maturity date of October
27, 2029 (“X B-3 Term Loan”) and reduced the Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility commitment to $0.
As part of the issuance of the X B-3 Term Loan, the Company is required to pay an arrangement fee of $51 million,
which is due and payable on February 19, 2027. In April 2025, the Company entered into an amendment to the X
F-78
B-3 Term Loan for an additional commitment of $1,225 million with the same terms and conditions, increasing the
total X B-3 Term Loan borrowings to $5,966 million.
Interest Rates. The X B-1 Term Loan bore interest at a rate per annum of, initially, adjusted Term SOFR plus
6.50%. The Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility bore interest at a rate per annum of, initially, an adjusted
Term SOFR plus 4.50%, with leverage-based step-downs. Undrawn commitments under the Secured First Lien
Revolving Credit Facility were subject to an unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum, subject to quarterly
leverage based step-downs. The X B-3 Term Loan had a fixed interest rate of 9.50% per annum. Interest on the X
B-1 Term Loan and X B-3 Term Loan was payable monthly, quarterly, or bi-annually at the option of the Company.
Principal Repayments. On March 2, 2026, the Company repaid the full outstanding principal balance and accrued
interest, including a prepayment penalty of $425 million, resulting in the extinguishment of the X B-1 Term Loan
and X B-3 Term Loan. The X B-1 Term Loan was repayable at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or
penalty, subject to mandatory quarterly prepayments of principal beginning on the last day of the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2023, in amounts equal to 0.25% of the original principal amount of borrowings thereunder, with
the unpaid balance being payable on the final maturity date thereof. The X B-1 Term Loan was also subject to
additional customary mandatory prepayment provisions from the proceeds of certain debt issuances and asset sales,
as well as sweeps of a portion of excess cash flow, subject to certain leverage-based step-downs and exceptions.
The X B-3 Term Loan had prepayment penalties of 107.13% of the outstanding principal before October 27, 2026,
104.75% of the outstanding principal before October 27, 2027, and 102.38% of the outstanding principal before
October 27, 2028.
Guarantors and Collateral. Obligations under the First Lien Senior Credit Facilities were guaranteed by X, and were
collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of X and its subsidiaries (subject to customary
exceptions).
xAI First Lien Credit Agreement
General. In June 2025, X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, entered into the First Lien
Credit Agreement to provide borrowings up to $2,000 million. The Company executed a $1,000 million Fixed Rate
Term Loan maturing on June 30, 2030 (“xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan”); and a $1,000 million Floating Rate Term
Loan maturing on June 30, 2030 (“xAI Floating Rate Term Loan”).
Interest Rates. The xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan had a fixed interest rate of 12.50% per annum and the xAI Floating
Rate Term Loan had a floating interest rate per annum of Term SOFR plus 7.25% or ABR plus 6.25%. Interest on
the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan was payable bi-annually on January 31 and July 31, commencing on January 31,
2026. Interest on the xAI Floating Rate Term loan was payable monthly, quarterly, or bi-annually at the option of
the Company.
Principal Repayments. On March 2, 2026, the Company repaid the full outstanding principal balance and accrued
interest, including a prepayment penalty of $221 million, resulting in the extinguishment of the xAI Fixed Rate
Term Loan and xAI Floating Rate Term Loan. The xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and the xAI Floating Rate Term
Loan had prepayment penalties of 103% on the principal outstanding balance prior to June 30, 2027 and 101% on
the principal outstanding balance prior to June 30, 2028.
Guarantors. Obligations under the xAI Fixed Rate Term Loan and xAI Floating Rate Term Loan were guaranteed
each jointly and severally by X.AI Corp. and the following subsidiaries of X.AI Corp.: AIQ Phase LLC, CTC
Holding LLC, CTC, LLZ Build LLC, and MZX.
xAI 12.5% Secured Senior Notes
General. In June 2025, X.AI LLC and, X.AI Co Issuer Corp, indirect subsidiaries of the Company, issued $3,000
million aggregate principal amount of 12.5% interest Senior Secured Notes due in 2030 (“xAI 12.5% Senior Secured
Notes”). The Senior Secured Notes were issued at 100% of the principal amount and the entire principal amount
will be due on June 30, 2030.
F-79
Interest Rates. The xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes had a fixed interest rate of 12.50% per annum. Interest was
payable bi-annually on January 15 and July 15, commencing on January 15, 2026.
Principal Repayments. On March 5, 2026, the Company repaid the full outstanding principal balance and accrued
interest, including a prepayment penalty of $518 million, resulting in the extinguishment of the xAI 12.5% Senior
Secured Notes. The xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes had prepayment penalties of 106.25% on the principal
outstanding balance prior to July 15, 2027 and 103.13% on the principal outstanding balance prior to July 15, 2028.
Guarantors. Obligations under the xAI 12.5% Senior Secured Notes were guaranteed each jointly and severally by
xAI and the following subsidiaries of xAI: AIQ Phase LLC, CTC Holding LLC, CTC, LLZ Build LLC, and MZX.
xAI Revolving Line of Credit
General. In April 2024 and amended through March 2026, a subsidiary of xAI, an indirect subsidiary of the
Company, entered into a revolving line of credit up to borrowing capacity of $250 million. The Company had no
borrowings under the line of credit during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Interest Rates. Interest on any borrowings is calculated based on the 30-day average SOFR plus the International
Swaps and Derivatives Association spread adjustment plus a spread of 40 basis points.
Guarantors and Collateral. The agreement permits borrowings up to the value of the pledged collateral held in
custody, less any outstanding loan balances, accrued interest, and fees. The pledged collateral consisted of securities
held in xAI’s custodial account.
Other Financings
The Company has entered into various other financing arrangements, generally collateralized by specific machinery
and equipment. These arrangements have an average fixed interest rate of 4.4% and 5.5% per annum as of March
31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, with principal and interest payments due monthly, and in certain
instances, a lump sum payment at the end of term.
In addition, in November 2025 and January 2026, CTC completed sale-leaseback transactions for its AI
infrastructure assets which would have been deemed finance leases resulting in failed sale-leaseback transactions. As
a result, the Company recorded the related debt of $1,121 million and $7,920 million within Debt and finance leases,
current and Debt and finance leases, net of current, respectively, in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of
March 31, 2026 for these two failed sale-leaseback transactions. Refer to Note 17, Related Party Transactions for
additional details.
The future scheduled principal maturities of debt as of March 31, 2026 are as follows:
2026 (remaining nine months) .............................................................................................................. | $801 |
2027 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 21,540 |
2028 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 1,938 |
2029 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 2,393 |
2030 ...................................................................................................................................................... | 2,460 |
Thereafter .............................................................................................................................................. | — |
Total ..................................................................................................................................................... | $29,132 |
F-80
Note 10 - Leases
The components of lease expense are as follows within the consolidated statements of operations:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Operating lease expense: | |||
Operating lease expense ........................................................................................ | $107 | $120 | |
Short-term lease cost ............................................................................................. | 113 | 29 | |
Variable lease cost ................................................................................................ | 31 | 23 | |
Total operating lease expense .......................................................................... | 251 | 172 | |
Finance lease expense: | |||
Amortization of leased assets ............................................................................... | $79 | $84 | |
Interest on lease liabilities ..................................................................................... | 68 | 85 | |
Total finance lease expense .............................................................................. | 147 | 169 | |
Total lease expense .................................................................................................. | $398 | $341 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, there has been no material changes in the Company’s lease portfolio
since December 31, 2025.
Note 11 - Balance Sheet Components
Certain financial statement details are as follows:
March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | |||
Tax related assets ....................................................................................................... | $690 | $618 | |
Unbilled receivables .................................................................................................. | 275 | 223 | |
Rebates and credits .................................................................................................... | 109 | 597 | |
Restricted cash and deposits ...................................................................................... | 67 | 182 | |
Other .......................................................................................................................... | 495 | 590 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ...................................................... | $1,636 | $2,210 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | |||
Accrued infrastructure purchases .............................................................................. | $2,669 | $— | |
Tax related liabilities ................................................................................................. | 601 | 563 | |
Payroll & employee benefit accruals ......................................................................... | 436 | 322 | |
Operating lease liabilities, current ............................................................................. | 338 | 422 | |
Restructuring liabilities .............................................................................................. | 220 | 339 | |
Accrued interest ......................................................................................................... | 68 | 416 | |
Other current liabilities .............................................................................................. | 1,357 | 507 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities ............................................... | $5,689 | $2,569 |
F-81
Note 12 - Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity
SpaceX Preferred and Common Stock
The Company has five classes of stock - four classes to be designated Class A common stock (“Class A”), Class B
common stock (“Class B”), Class C common stock (“Class C”), Class D common stock (“Class D”) (collectively the
“SpaceX Common Stock”), and one class of stock to be designated preferred stock and subdivided into several
series of redeemable convertible preferred stock (collectively the “SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock”). All references to “Class” refer to that particular class of SpaceX Common Stock and all references to
“Series” refer to that particular series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
As of March 31, 2026, the total number of shares of SpaceX Common Stock the Company is authorized to issue is
54,657 million shares, each with a par value of $0.001 per share, except for Class D, which has a par value of
$0.0001 per share. 36,132 million shares are Class A, 6,125 million shares are Class B, 10,000 million shares are
Class C, and 2,400 million shares are Class D. The total number of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
that the Company is authorized to issue is 2,607 million shares, of which 2,400 million shares are undesignated.
With the exception of the expanded conversion rights described below, there were no changes to the dividend
provisions, liquidation preferences, conversion rights, redemption rights or the voting rights of the SpaceX
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock and SpaceX Common Stock during the three months ended March 31,
2026.
In May 2026, the Board approved the 2026 Stock Split, pursuant to which each share of the Class A, Class B, and
Class C SpaceX Common Stock issued and outstanding was split into five shares of the same class of SpaceX
Common Stock.
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock
On March 28, 2025, xAI adopted an Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, which established its capital
structure and designated multiple classes of common stock and several series of redeemable convertible preferred
stock. The Articles were subsequently amended and restated through January 30, 2026 (collectively, the “xAI
Articles of Incorporation”) to add and authorize additional series of redeemable convertible preferred stock with no
economic changes to any previously existing series.
Pursuant to the xAI Articles of Incorporation, xAI’s authorized capitalization prior to the xAI Merger consisted of
three classes of common, stock, which are designated Class A common stock (“xAI Class A”), Class B common
stock (“xAI Class B”), Limited Voting common stock (“xAI Limited Voting”), (collectively the “xAI Common
Stock”) and several series of redeemable convertible preferred stock (collectively the “xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock”). All references to “xAI Class” refer to that particular class of xAI Common Stock and all
references to “xAI Series” refer to that particular series of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
Effect of the xAI Merger
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
On xAI Merger Date, all outstanding shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock converted into shares
of SpaceX Common Stock, based on the share-for-share exchange mechanics specified in the Merger Agreement.
Each share of xAI Series A‑1, B, C, D, and E redeemable convertible preferred stock (classified as “xAI Low Vote
Stock”) was converted into 0.1433 shares of SpaceX Class A Common Stock per preferred share (on a pre-2026
Stock Split basis), rounded up to the nearest whole number for fractional shares. Each share of xAI Series A
redeemable convertible preferred stock (classified as “xAI High Vote Stock”) was converted into 0.1433 shares of
SpaceX Class B Common Stock per preferred share (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), rounded up to the nearest
whole number for fractional shares. For xAI Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, all holders that were
an eligible service provider could elect to receive cash of $75.46 per share of xAI Series A Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis). Upon conversion, all shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock were canceled and retired, and former xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock shareholders
F-82
received the applicable shares of SpaceX Common Stock. Any shares of xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock previously held by the Company were canceled and retired and did not receive any consideration.
Because the xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock was legally outstanding during all historical periods prior
to the xAI Merger and represented a separate equity class of a legally distinct predecessor entity, the conversion of
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock into SpaceX Common Stock is recognized only as of the closing of the
xAI Merger, and not retrospectively. Accordingly, the historical consolidated balance sheets and consolidated
statements of redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity reflect the xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock as outstanding xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock consistent with its legal
form and rights during those periods and are not recast on an as-converted basis for all periods presented prior to the
xAI Merger Date. The impact of the conversion is presented separately in the consolidated statements of redeemable
convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
xAI Warrants
xAI also issued warrants to customers that were outstanding as of the effective date of the xAI Merger, which had a
ten-year term originally set to expire in 2035, with an exercise price equal to the par value of the stock, and vesting
terms that resulted in the warrants vesting proportionally to the payments received under the related agreement. The
closing of the xAI Merger triggered an acceleration clause in which all outstanding xAI warrants, both vested and
unvested components, were automatically exercised on a cashless basis exercised and converted into fully vested
SpaceX Class A Common Stock at the exchange ratio of 0.1433 (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis).
xAI and X Common Stock
Upon the effective date of the xAI Merger, every outstanding share of xAI Common Stock, whether Class A, Class
B, or Limited Voting, converted into the right to receive SpaceX Common Stock at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.1433
SpaceX shares per share of xAI Common Stock, unless the holder was an eligible service provider and elected to
receive cash of $75.46 per share of xAI Class A or Class B (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis). No fractional SpaceX
shares were issued and all share amounts were rounded up to the nearest whole number. Any shares of xAI Common
Stock previously held by the Company were canceled and retired and did not receive any consideration.
Effect of the X Merger
Upon the effective date of the X Merger, each class of common stock of X Holdings Corp. (“X Common Stock”)
was converted to 2.776 shares of xAI Common Stock of the same class (rounded down to the nearest whole share),
each class of common stock of X.AI Corp. (“xAI Corp. Common Stock”) was converted to 1.000 share of xAI
Common Stock of the same class, and each series of X.AI Corp. preferred stock (“xAI Corp. Preferred Stock”)
(other than shares held by X or any of its subsidiaries) was converted to 1.000 share of xAI Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock of the same series.
As a result of the Mergers, all of X, X.AI Corp. and xAI Common Stock are being presented in the historical
financial statements as if they had been converted into SpaceX Common Stock at the applicable exchange rate for all
periods presented through the date of the xAI Merger. As such, all shares of historical X, X.AI Corp. and xAI
Common Stock are included in the share counts for SpaceX Common Stock below. X.AI Corp. and xAI Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock are being presented in the consolidated financial statements at historical values with an
adjustment to the conversion rate at the applicable exchange ratio per the xAI Merger.
F-83
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
Information for each series of SpaceX and xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (collectively, the
“Combined Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock”) is as follows:
Dividend Per Share | Initial Price Per Share | Authorized Shares | Outstanding (1) | Liquidation Preference | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||
March 31, 2026 | March 31, 2026 | March 31, 2026 | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | March 31, 2026 | March 31, 2026 | |||||||
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||
Series A ................................ | $0.05 | $1.00 | 61.0 | 60.4 | 60.4 | $60 | $59 | ||||||
Series A-1 ............................. | $0.05 | $1.00 | 61.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | — | ||||||
Series B ................................. | $0.10 | $2.00 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 10 | 10 | ||||||
Series B-1 ............................. | $0.10 | $2.00 | 5.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | — | ||||||
Series C ................................. | $0.15 | $3.00 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 29 | 23 | ||||||
Series D ................................ | $0.19 | $3.88 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 40 | 20 | ||||||
Series E ................................. | $0.23 | $4.50 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 46 | 647 | ||||||
Series F ................................. | $0.38 | $7.50 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 50 | 48 | ||||||
Series G ................................ | $3.87 | $77.46 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 978 | 978 | ||||||
Series H ................................ | $6.75 | $135.00 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 429 | 429 | ||||||
Series I .................................. | $8.45 | $169.00 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 499 | 499 | ||||||
Series J .................................. | $9.30 | $186.00 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 457 | 457 | ||||||
Series K ................................ | $10.20 | $204.00 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 515 | 515 | ||||||
Series L ................................. | $10.70 | $214.00 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 295 | 295 | ||||||
Series M ................................ | $11.00 | $220.00 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 575 | 575 | ||||||
Series N ................................ | $13.50 | $270.00 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 2,492 | 2,494 | ||||||
Total SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ................................ | 206.6 | 134.6 | 134.7 | $6,475 | $7,049 | ||||||||
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||
Series A ................................ | $— | $— | — | — | 750.0 | $— | $— | ||||||
Series A-1 ............................. | $— | $— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Series B ................................. | $— | $— | — | — | 584.9 | — | — | ||||||
Series C ................................. | $— | $— | — | — | 277.1 | — | — | ||||||
Series D ................................ | $— | $— | — | — | 120.1 | — | — | ||||||
Series E ................................. | $— | $— | — | — | 179.2 | — | — | ||||||
Total xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ................................ | — | — | 1,911.3 | $— | $— | ||||||||
Total Combined Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ................................ | 206.6 | 134.6 | 2,046.0 | $6,475 | $7,049 | ||||||||
__________________
(1)The number of issued redeemable convertible preferred stock is equal to the number of outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock,
with the exception of xAI Series A and xAI Series D, of which the number of issued shares is 1,000.0 million and 175.0 million as of
December 31, 2025, respectively, due to redeemable convertible preferred stock held by X and SpaceX, respectively.
F-84
The following describes the various rights and preferences of the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock:
Dividend Provisions
On a per annum basis, holders of shares of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive
dividends prior and in preference to any declaration or payment of any dividend to common shareholders at a rate
described in the table above for each outstanding share of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. Any
such dividends are declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors and are not cumulative. For the period from
inception through March 31, 2026, no dividends on SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock have been
declared. The SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock do not participate in distributions beyond their
preferred dividend as described above.
Liquidation Preference
The series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock listed in the table above were issued by the Company
chronologically and in alphabetical order, with Series A issued first and Series N issued most recently. Each series
of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is senior in rank to all earlier issued series and junior in rank to
all later issued series, except that: (i) Series A, A-1, B, B-1, and C SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
are all on parity with each other and junior in rank to all subsequently issued series of SpaceX Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock; and (ii) series E, F, and G SpaceX redeemable convertible preferred stock are all on
parity with each other, are senior in rank to all earlier issued series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock, and junior in rank to all subsequently issued series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, holders of a given series of SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, in preference to the holders of SpaceX Common
Stock and any junior-ranking SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, the liquidation preference indicated
in the table above for such series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, plus any declared but unpaid
dividends. Holders of all series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive the
greater of the liquidation preference per share indicated above, or the amount each series would be entitled to receive
if all such outstanding SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to Class A or Class B
SpaceX Common Stock, as applicable, immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the
Company. Upon completion of the distributions described above, if any assets remain in the Company, the then
remaining assets will be distributed on an equal priority, pro rata basis to the holders of SpaceX Common Stock.
Conversion Rights
Each share of Series A and Series B SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of
the holder at any time after the date of issuance of such share into shares of Class A, Class B, or Class C SpaceX
Common Stock and each share of all other series of preferred stock are convertible at the option of the holder at any
time after the date of issuance of such share into shares of Class A or Class C SpaceX Common Stock. The number
of shares of SpaceX Common Stock to which a holder of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is
entitled shall be at a conversion rate determined by dividing the initial price by the conversion price. Each share of
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into fifty shares of SpaceX Common Stock
following the 2026 Stock Split. The conversion price is subject to adjustment set forth in the charter for certain
dilutive issuances, splits and combinations.
The SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock automatically converts upon the earlier of (i) the Company’s
sale of its common stock in a public offering pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, in
which the pre-public offering market capitalization of the Company is at least $6.0 billion and which results in
aggregate cash proceeds to the Company of not less than $250 million (“Qualified IPO”) or (ii) the date specified by
written consent or agreement of the applicable holders of shares of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(with respect to each applicable series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock), voting in accordance
with the charter.
F-85
In the event of a transfer of a share of Series A or Series B (other than a Permitted Transfer as defined in the
charter), such share shall automatically be cancelled and converted into a corresponding share of Series A-1 or
Series B-1.
Voting Rights
Holders of each share of Series A and Series B have the right to ten votes for each share of Class B into which such
share is convertible. Holders of each share of all other series of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
have the right to one vote for each share of Class A into which such share is convertible. Such holders will have full
voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of SpaceX Common Stock, except as
required by law.
Classification
The liquidation preference provisions of the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are considered
contingent redemption provisions as deemed liquidation events such as a change of control are not solely within the
control of the Company. Accordingly, SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock are presented outside of
permanent equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as Redeemable convertible preferred stock. SpaceX
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock has not been remeasured to their redemption amount as they are not
currently redeemable or probable of becoming redeemable.
Common Stock
The following describes all of the activity that occurred within each class of SpaceX Common Stock during the three
months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, incorporating all activity that occurred within the class of xAI Common
Stock on an as-converted basis to the class of SpaceX Common Stock it was converted into per the xAI Merger and
X Merger.
Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Class C Common Stock | Class D Common Stock | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2024 ................................... | 1,832 | $2 | 768 | $1 | 423 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding .................. | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock ................................... | (14) | 0 | (14) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ............... | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 | 0 | — | — | |||||||
Conversion between classes of common stock ............... | 24 | 0 | (24) | 0 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Transfer of equity in business combination ........ | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Balances at March 31, 2025 | 1,862 | $2 | 731 | $1 | 431 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
F-86
Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Class C Common Stock | Class D Common Stock | ||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2025 ................................... | 1,952 | $3 | 643 | $1 | 484 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
Common stock issued, net of tax withholding .................. | 28 | — | 1,305 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock ................................... | (9) | — | (22) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock pursuant to the xAI Merger ............................... | 886 | — | 537 | 1 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock pursuant to xAI Merger ............................... | (3) | — | (20) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to common stock ............... | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Conversion between classes of common stock ............... | 25 | — | (25) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Balances at March 31, 2026 | 2,884 | $3 | 2,418 | $3 | 497 | $0 | — | $— | |||||||
The following describes the various rights and preferences of the SpaceX Common Stock:
Dividend Provisions
Subject to the prior rights of holders of all classes and series of stock at the time outstanding having prior rights as to
dividends, holders of SpaceX Common Stock shall be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors, out of any funds legally available, such dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Board of
Directors. For the period from inception through March 31, 2026, no dividends were declared on SpaceX Common
Stock.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, upon the completion of the distributions
required with respect to the SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, if assets remain in the Company, the
then remaining assets will be distributed on an equal priority, pro rata basis to the holders of SpaceX Common
Stock.
Conversion Rights
Each share of Class B is convertible at the option of the holder, at any time, into one share of Class A. Each share of
Class B will automatically convert into one share of Class A upon a transfer, other than a Permitted Transfer (as
defined in the charter), of such share of Class B.
Voting Rights
Each holder of Class A is entitled to one vote for each share held. Each holder of Class B is entitled to ten votes for
each share held. The holders of Class C have no voting rights, except as required by law. Voting rights with respect
to Class D will be established when and if any shares of Class D are issued by the Board of Directors.
Reserve for Unissued Shares of Common Stock
The Company is required to reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of SpaceX Common
Stock such number of shares sufficient to effect the conversion of all outstanding shares of SpaceX Redeemable
F-87
Convertible Preferred Stock and Class B, as applicable, plus shares granted and available for grant under the
Company’s share plans.
The amount of such shares of the SpaceX Common Stock reserved for these purposes at March 31, 2026 is as
follows:
Number of Shares | |||||||
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | ||||
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock issued (low-vote) ................................................................. | 3,448 | — | 3,448 | — | |||
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock issued (high-vote) ............................................................... | 3,274 | 3,274 | 3,274 | — | |||
Outstanding Class B .................................................... | 2,421 | — | — | — | |||
Outstanding stock options ........................................... | 8 | 450 | 476 | — | |||
Outstanding RSUs ....................................................... | 49 | 1 | 79 | — | |||
Future grants under share-based compensation ........... | 150 | — | 350 | — | |||
9,350 | 3,725 | 7,627 | — | ||||
Share Repurchases
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company repurchased $2,413 million or 25.4 million shares of
SpaceX Common Stock from eligible current and former xAI employees as part of the xAI Merger. During the three
months ended March 31, 2026, the Company also repurchased of 30.5 million shares of SpaceX Common Stock and
2.1 million shares of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock for $1,933 million in a number of unrelated
transactions with existing shareholders at their then-current fair market value.
Similarly, the Company repurchased $508 million or 28.0 million shares of SpaceX Common Stock from eligible
current and former employees and existing shareholders during the three ended March 31, 2025. The Company only
repurchased shares held by eligible participants for more than six months at a purchase price per share equal to the
then current fair market value.
All SpaceX shares repurchased to date have been retired.
F-88
Note 13 - Earnings per Share
The following table presents the reconciliation of net loss attributable to common shareholders to net loss used in
computing basic and diluted net income loss per share of common stock:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Numerator: | |||
Net loss ...................................................................................................................... | $(4,276) | $(528) | |
Less: Deemed dividend(1) ...................................................................................... | 671 | — | |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders - basic and diluted ............................ | (4,947) | (528) | |
Denominator: | |||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted ............ | 3,884 | 2,875 | |
Loss per share attributable to common shareholders | |||
Basic and Diluted .................................................................................................. | $(1.27) | $(0.18) | |
__________________
(1)The excess of fair market value over the consideration transferred for the repurchase of SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
was treated as a deemed dividend and resulted in an increase to net loss attributable to common shareholders in the calculation of loss per
share.
The following potentially dilutive securities on an as-converted basis are excluded from the calculation of diluted net
loss per share attributable to common shareholders for the periods presented because the impact of including them
would be anti-dilutive (refer to Note 14, Share-based Compensation for additional details):
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
xAI Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock .......................................................... | — | 1,155 | |
SpaceX Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock .................................................... | 6,723 | 6,760 | |
Share-based compensation ........................................................................................ | 598 | 674 | |
The table above excludes 1,319.1 million and 14.3 million share-based compensation awards outstanding as of
March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, as these awards are subject to performance and market conditions that were
not met as of those dates.
Note 14 - Share-based Compensation
X and xAI Mergers
As part of the xAI Merger, each xAI option for a share of xAI common stock outstanding and unexercised at the
time of the xAI Merger (vested and unvested) was converted into a SpaceX option to receive 0.1433 shares of
SpaceX Class A or Class B Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as applicable, under the same terms
and conditions (including the vesting and exercisability conditions) as the original xAI stock options at an exercise
price equal to the original xAI option exercise price divided by 0.1433. Each xAI RSU that was vested and
outstanding was converted to the right to receive 0.1433 of a share of SpaceX Class A or Class B Common Stock
(on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as applicable. Each xAI RSU that was unvested was converted to 0.1433 of a
SpaceX RSU. Each xAI RSA was converted to 0.1433 shares of SpaceX RSA for SpaceX Class A or Class B
Common Stock (on a pre-2026 Stock Split basis), as applicable, with the same terms and conditions (including the
vesting terms). Refer to Note 12, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Shareholders’ Equity for additional
details.
F-89
As part of the X Merger, each X RSU that was outstanding was converted to a xAI RSU to receive 2.776 shares of
xAI Common Stock.
General
The Company grants RSUs, RSAs, and non-statutory options to eligible employees, key executives, and certain non-
employee service providers (collectively, the “Plans”). The Company also has a number of performance-based
awards. The Company offers an ESPP, under which eligible employees can purchase the Company’s Common
Stock at a discounted price. The Company also offers a Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“NQ
ESPP”), under which employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at the fair market value. In April
2026, the Company cancelled the NQ ESPP.
Officer Equity Awards
In January 2026, the Company granted 1,000 million performance-based restricted shares of Class B common stock
to Elon Musk. The restricted shares vest upon (i) the Company’s achievement of specified market capitalization
milestones across 15 equal tranches ranging from $500 billion to $7.5 trillion, with each milestone reflecting $500
billion in additional valuation, and (ii) the Company’s establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at
least one million inhabitants, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment (“SpaceX CEO Award”).
The grant date fair value of the SpaceX CEO Award was determined to be $90.40 to $95.92 per share for each
tranche.
In November 2025, the Company granted a performance-based award (“xAI Award”) to Elon Musk consisting of
twelve tranches with certain market, performance and service conditions. In March 2026, the Company cancelled the
xAI Award and replaced it with a grant of 302.1 million performance-based restricted shares of Class B common
stock, which vest upon (i) the achievement of specified market capitalization milestones across 12 equal tranches
ranging from $1.065 trillion to $6.565 trillion, with each milestone reflecting $500 billion in additional valuation,
and (ii) the Company’s completion of non-Earth-based data centers capable of delivering 100 terawatts of compute
per year, in each case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment (“AI CEO Award”). The grant date fair value
of the AI CEO Award was determined to be $91.47 to $95.92 per share for each tranche. The cancellation of the xAI
Award and the grant of the AI CEO Award was considered an accounting modification. Share-based compensation
will continue to be recognized over the original remaining service period equal to the fair value of the portion of the
original xAI Award that was deemed probable of vesting as of the modification date. No incremental expense will
be recognized based on the modified terms of the new AI CEO Award until the new performance conditions are
deemed probable of vesting.
Share-based compensation expense recognition for the SpaceX CEO Award and AI CEO Award commences when
the performance condition milestone is considered probable of achievement for each award regardless of the
progress made towards achieving the next market capitalization milestone. As of March 31, 2026, both performance
milestones were considered improbable and no share-based compensation expense has been recognized related to
the SpaceX CEO Award and AI CEO Award. Once the performance milestone is considered probable of
achievement, share-based compensation expense associated with the tranche will be recognized over the expected
achievement date of the performance milestone.
In January 2026, the Company approved an amendment to 4 million performance-based stock options granted to
Bret Johnsen, Chief Financial Officer, that were originally issued in 2024 (“CFO Award”). In lieu of vesting based
on free cash flow achievement in excess of a baseline, 371 thousand of the stock options will vest for each $10
billion in adjusted EBITDA achieved during the 2025 through 2029 fiscal years, assessed on an annual basis. For
purposes of this award, adjusted EBITDA is calculated as income from operations excluding (i) depreciation and
amortization, (ii) share-based compensation, (iii) impairment, and (iv) restructuring impacts. Once a tranche of the
stock options have become earned as a result of the Company’s adjusted EBITDA performance as of the end of a
particular fiscal year, such stock options remain subject to an additional one-year and one day service-based vesting
requirement following December 31 of the fiscal year in which such tranche was earned. The number of options
granted was not changed in the amendment. The impact of the modification of the CFO Award was not material.
F-90
Fair Value Determination
The fair value and derived service period of the SpaceX CEO Award and AI CEO Award are estimated on the grant
date using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The weighted-average assumptions that were used to calculate the grant
date fair value of the SpaceX CEO Award and modification date fair value of the AI CEO Award are as follows:
Expected term (years) ........................................................................................................................... | 30.0 |
Volatility ............................................................................................................................................... | 45.0% |
Risk-free interest rate ............................................................................................................................ | 4.91% |
Dividend yield ....................................................................................................................................... | —% |
The SpaceX CEO Award and AI CEO Award do not have a defined performance period other than Mr. Musk’s
continued employment through the date each milestone is achieved. Therefore, an analysis was performed for an
expected term of ten to fifty years and a midpoint of thirty years was used. The Company determined the expected
volatility assumption using the frequency of daily historical prices of comparable public companies’ common stock
for a period equal to the expected term. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates
on U.S. Government securities for a period consistent with the expected term. The dividend yield assumption is
based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has never declared or paid any
cash dividends on its Common Stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Summary of Share-Based Compensation Information
The following table summarizes our share-based compensation expense by line item in the consolidated statements
of operations:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
2026 | 2025 | ||
Cost of revenue .......................................................................................................... | $76 | $39 | |
Research and development ........................................................................................ | 362 | 75 | |
Selling, general, and administrative .......................................................................... | 201 | 118 | |
Total .................................................................................................................... | $639 | $232 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, share-based compensation expense capitalized to the
consolidated balance sheets was $60 million and $30 million, respectively.
Note 15 - Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was (0.1)% for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to (2.7)% for
the three months ended March 31, 2025. The change in the Company’s effective tax rate was primarily due to the
changes in the mix of its jurisdictional earnings.
The Company’s effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 as compared to the U.S.
federal statutory rate of 21.0% were primarily impacted by the mix of its jurisdictional earnings subject to different
tax rates and the valuation allowances on its deferred tax assets.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considered whether it is more likely than not that
some or all of its net deferred tax assets will not be realizable based on the relevant weight of all positive and
negative evidence. As of March 31, 2026, the Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance against its
deferred tax assets in the United States, with the exception of certain state deferred tax assets and transferrable
investment tax credits that are expected to be realizable. The Company has also recorded valuation allowances in
certain foreign jurisdictions where it concluded that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of its deferred tax assets in future periods and will
adjust the valuation allowance as necessary based on changes in facts and circumstances.
F-91
Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies
Unconditional Obligations
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, there have been no material changes to the Company’s
unconditional obligation since December 31, 2025 other than the execution of certain purchase agreements with an
unaffiliated third party to acquire additional turbines for the AI infrastructure totaling $925 million through 2029.
Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds
The Company had outstanding letters of credit of $517 million at March 31, 2026 related to various customer
contracts, insurance agreements, and facility lease agreements. All of the outstanding letters of credit were
collateralized by restricted cash. The Company also had surety bonds of $447 million for self-insured workers’
compensation programs and other governmental licenses at March 31, 2026.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of its business, the Company is involved from time to time in various arbitrations, class actions,
commercial litigation, investigations and other legal, regulatory or governmental actions, including the significant
matters described below that could have a material impact on our results of operations. The Company assesses, in
conjunction with its legal counsel, the need to record a liability for litigation and contingencies. With respect to the
cases, actions, and inquiries described below, the Company evaluates the associated developments on a regular basis
and will accrue a liability when it believes a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In
addition, the Company believes there is a reasonable possibility that it may incur a loss in some of these matters and
the loss may be material or exceed its estimated ranges of possible loss.
The outcomes of the matters described in this section, such as whether the likelihood of loss is remote, reasonably
possible, or probable, or if and when the reasonably possible range of loss is estimable, are inherently uncertain, and
unless specified otherwise, possible losses are not reasonably estimable at this time. If one or more of these matters
were resolved against the Company for amounts above management’s estimates, the Company’s financial condition
and results of operations, including in a particular reporting period in which any such outcome becomes probable
and estimable, could be materially adversely affected.
In November 2022, the European Union’s Digital Services Act (“DSA”) came into force as a result of which X has
to comply with extensive content moderation and other duties. The Company published its first Transparency Report
under the DSA in November 2023. In December 2023, the European Commission (“EC”) opened a formal
investigation into X and its Irish subsidiary, Twitter International Unlimited Company (“TIUC”), which was later
renamed to X Internet Unlimited Company (XIUC). On July 12, 2024, in relation to alleged breaches of Articles
25(1), 39 and 40(12) of the DSA, the EC issued preliminary findings that X’s blue checkmark is deceptive, its
advertisement repository does not meet DSA requirements, and it grants inadequate access to data to third-party
researchers. On September 26, 2024, XIUC and X submitted their observations challenging the EC’s preliminary
findings. On December 5, 2025, the EC delivered a final decision in which it upheld its preliminary findings and
imposed a fine of EUR 120 million on XIUC, X., x.AI, and Elon Musk (together, the “parties”). On February 16,
2026, the parties challenged the EC’s decision in the General Court of the European Union. This challenge remains
pending.
In March 2016, non-practicing entity Youtoo Technologies filed suit against Twitter, Inc. in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging its Vine and Periscope products infringe Youtoo’s video-
sharing patents (the ‘304, ‘506, and ‘997 patents). On Twitter’s motion, the district court dismissed the ‘304 and
’506 patents as invalid. Twitter filed petitions for Inter Partes Review before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board
(PTAB) challenging all three patents-in-suit. The PTAB upheld the ‘304 and ‘506 Patents and invalidated the ‘997
Patent; the Federal Circuit affirmed. On March 16, 2020, Plaintiff (now Vidstream LLC, which allegedly acquired
the patents from Youtoo Technologies in a bankruptcy proceeding), moved the Court to reconsider its earlier ruling
invalidating the ‘304 and ‘506 patents. On April 1, 2022, the Court reversed its original ruling on the ‘304 and ‘506
patents. On September 27, 2024, Vidstream filed a motion for partial summary judgment, which the Court granted in
part. The case went to a jury trial, and on April 16, 2025, the jury rendered a verdict finding (i) that Twitter did not
F-92
infringe any claim of the ‘506 patent and two out of three claims of the ‘304 patent and that each of those patent
claims was invalid, but (ii) that Twitter willfully infringed one claim of the ‘304 patent. The jury awarded Plaintiff
$105 million in damages. In November 2025, the district court affirmed the jury’s award and awarded an additional
$67 million in prejudgment interest. Twitter has appealed and Vidstream has cross-appealed. Both appeals remain
pending before the Federal Circuit.
In June 2023, music publishing companies that are members of the National Music Publishers’ Association (the
“NMPA”) filed a complaint against X in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, claiming
direct, contributory, and vicarious copyright infringement based on Twitter’s alleged failure to expeditiously take
down infringing music posted by users after the music publishers allegedly gave Twitter notice of those
infringements. The music publishers also allege that Twitter did not suspend the accounts of “repeat infringers,” so
that Twitter is not entitled to a “safe harbor” from liability under the DMCA. X filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint on August 14, 2023. On March 5, 2024, the Court dismissed plaintiffs’ direct infringement and vicarious
infringement claims, and part of plaintiffs’ claim for contributory infringement. X answered the complaint on April
9, 2024. Litigation was stayed from June 11, 2025 to September 9, 2025 for settlement discussions that were not
successful. Accordingly, discovery is ongoing. On April 1, 2026, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion for a
stay to allow X to file a renewed motion to dismiss the suit based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cox Comm’s,
Inc. v. Sony Music Entm’t. Fact discovery is now closed. In light of this Supreme Court ruling, the parties have
stipulated to a May 11, 2026 deadline for the music publishers to amend their complaint with respect to their
remaining claims for contributory infringement, and a June 11, 2026 deadline for X to file a renewed motion to
dismiss.
In September 2023, Dutch foundation Stichting Data Bescherming Nederland (“SDBN”) filed a putative class action
lawsuit in the District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands against TIUC, Twitter, Inc., X Corp., and Twitter
Netherlands b.v. related to Twitter’s operation of the MoPub platform. SDBN primarily claims that MoPub’s real-
time bidding ad exchange violated the GDPR. SDBN claims to represent 11 million Dutch internet users who
downloaded and used third-party mobile apps containing the MoPub software development kit during the period
2013-2022 and it seeks a monetary award in the range of € 250 to € 2,500 per person. On February 4, 2026, the
Court declined to allow the case to proceed as a class action and indicated that it is considering staying the
proceedings until the Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled in a separate case concerning the
applicability of Dutch class action requirements to GDPR claims. The Twitter parties filed a brief in support of the
proposed stay, which the plaintiffs opposed, on March 4, 2026.
In August 2024, Dutch foundation Stichting Onderzoek Marktinformatie (SOMI) initiated a collective action in the
District Court of Amsterdam in the Netherlands on behalf of approximately 7.8 million Dutch X users. Among other
things, SOMI seeks damages against TIUC, X Corp. and Twitter Netherlands B.V. (collectively, the “X entities”)
for: (1) alleged data breaches and insufficient security measures; (2) alleged unauthorized microtargeting and lack of
transparency; and (3) the alleged failure to moderate hate speech and the obstruction of research, all in violation of
the GDPR and/or DSA. The alleged data breaches relate to a Twitter API bug that came to light in 2022 and that had
allowed persons who knew the email address or phone number of a user to determine the user’s Twitter ID. SOMI
has requested compensation (to be assessed at a later stage) for each member of the class, including symbolic
damages of EUR 1 for each member of the class that is allegedly affected by hate speech on the X platform. The X
entities filed a procedural defense on March 12, 2025. The court held a hearing on April 2, 2026, and indicated that
it would hand down its decision on May 27, 2026.
In September 2025, non-practicing entity Search and Share Technologies, LLC (“SaS”) filed a patent complaint
against X Corp. in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Texas. SaS alleges that X Corp. infringed on
U.S. Patent Nos. 10,180,952 and 11,106,744, through features in its mobile app and website enabling users to
interact with content through dedicated interfaces that directly share what other users see in ranked feeds and search
results. SaS filed an Amended Complaint on January 5, 2026. On January 20, 2026, X Corp. moved to dismiss SaS’s
willful infringement and induced infringement claims. On February 3, 2026, SAS responded to, but did not oppose,
X Corp.’s partial motion to dismiss. On February 10, 2026, X Corp. filed its reply. On February 4, 2026, X Corp.
filed an IPR petition challenging the ‘744 Patent and on February 18, 2026, filed an IPR petition challenging the
'952 Patent.
F-93
Beginning in January 2026, the Company and certain subsidiaries have been named as defendants in multiple
lawsuits arising from Grok’s image-generation and editing features. The complaints generally allege that Grok’s
image-generation and editing features enabled the creation and dissemination of nonconsensual explicit images and/
or content representing women and/or children in sexualized contexts. The actions include Jane Doe v. X.AI Corp.
and X.AI LLC, instituted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on January 23, 2026, and
Jane Doe 1 et al. v. X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC (the “Jane Doe 1 Case”) instituted in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on March 16, 2026. These cases are putative class actions, asserting claims
including, among other things, claims of strict liability, negligence, nuisance, rights of privacy or publicity, and, in
the Jane Doe 1 Case, certain federal statutory claims. Plaintiffs in these two cases seek, among other things,
compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, restitution, disgorgement and injunctive relief. In addition, a case,
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore ex rel. Ebony M. Thompson v. X Corp., X.AI Corp., X.AI LLC, and Space
Exploration Technologies Corp, was instituted in the Baltimore City Circuit Court on March 24, 2026 (the
“Baltimore Case”). The plaintiff in the Baltimore Case, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, asserts similar
claims to those in the two cases discussed above under Baltimore’s Consumer Protection Ordinances. The plaintiff
in the Baltimore Case seeks statutory penalties and/or injunctive relief. The Company intends to defend itself
vigorously in these actions.
On April 14, 2026, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the NAACP Mississippi
State Conference (together, the “NAACP”) filed suit against X.AI Corp. and MZX Tech, LLC alleging that the
mobile gas turbines powering the COLOSSUS II data center with the permission of the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality are in violation of the Clean Air Act because they allegedly constitute stationary sources
without the proper permits. On May 6, 2026, the NAACP filed a preliminary injunction motion seeking to enjoin
the operation of the turbines. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously in these actions.
The Company has recorded an accrual of $399 million for litigation losses that are probable and reasonably
estimable in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2026. For other matters, the Company is not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or
range of loss.
Note 17 - Related Party Transactions
The Company periodically does business with certain entities with which its CEO and directors are affiliated.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company purchased $34 million of Megapack products from
Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) recorded in Property, plant, and equipment, net in the consolidated balance sheets. As of
December 31, 2025, the Company purchased $506 million of Megapack products and $131 million of Cybertrucks
at manufacturer’s suggested retail price from Tesla, recorded in Property, plant, and equipment, net in the
consolidated balance sheets.
In January 2026, and as further amended on February 18, 2026, CTC entered into an equipment lease agreement
with Valor Equity Partners (“Valor”) for certain AI infrastructure hardware (“Valor transaction II”). The founder,
CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Valor, Antonio Gracias, serves as one of the directors of the Company. The
Valor transaction II was deemed to be a failed sale-leaseback transaction. The Company has previously entered into
a similar agreement with Valor for other AI infrastructure hardware. As of March 31, 2026, the Company recorded
debt of $1,121 million and $7,920 million within Debt and finance leases, current and Debt and finance leases, net
of current, respectively, in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, and $186 million in Interest expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2026 in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations related to equipment
lease agreements with Valor. As of December 31, 2025, the Company recorded debt of $455 million and $4,052
million within Debt and finance leases, current and Debt and finance leases, net of current, respectively, in the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet related to equipment lease agreements with Valor. Refer to Note 9, Debt for
additional details. The related asset is recorded within Property, plant, and equipment, net in the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets.
Other transactions with Tesla and other related parties during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were
immaterial.
F-94
Note 18 - Segments
Following the Mergers, the Company evaluated how to view and measure performance of the combined company
and potential realignment of individual entity’s historical segment structure. Following this evaluation, the Company
determined that as a combined company, effective in Q1 2026, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as the Chief
Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), organizes the Company, manages resource allocations, and measures
performance among three operating and reportable segments: (i) Space, (ii) Connectivity, and (iii) AI. Prior period
presentations for segments conform to the current segment reporting structure.
The Company’s CODM assesses performance and allocates resources to operating segments based on segment
income (loss) from operations by comparing actual income (loss) from operations to historical results and previously
forecasted financial information. The Company’s CODM does not evaluate operating and reportable segments using
asset or liability information.
The following tables present information as to revenues, significant segment expenses, and income (loss) from
operations by the Company’s reportable segments:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2026 | |||||||
Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | ||||
Revenue ............................................................. | $619 | $3,257 | $818 | $4,694 | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 281 | 1,651 | 456 | 2,388 | |||
Research and development ............................. | 930 | 205 | 2,379 | 3,514 | |||
Selling, general and administrative ................ | 70 | 213 | 463 | 746 | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | — | — | (11) | (11) | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | 1,281 | 2,069 | 3,287 | 6,637 | |||
Income (loss) from operations .......................... | (662) | 1,188 | (2,469) | (1,943) | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (664) | ||||||
Interest income .................................................... | 213 | ||||||
Other expense, net ............................................... | (1,876) | ||||||
Loss before income taxes .................................. | $(4,270) | ||||||
Supplemental segment information | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | $166 | $783 | $1,493 | $2,442 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | $145 | $116 | $378 | $639 | |||
Capital expenditures ............................................ | $1,052 | $1,332 | $7,723 | $10,107 | |||
F-95
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2025 | |||||||
Space | Connectivity | AI | Total Reportable Segments | ||||
Revenue .............................................................. | $865 | $2,475 | $727 | $4,067 | |||
Costs and expenses | |||||||
Cost of revenue .............................................. | 297 | 1,214 | 451 | 1,962 | |||
Research and development ............................. | 526 | 123 | 908 | 1,557 | |||
Selling, general and administrative ................ | 88 | 105 | 300 | 493 | |||
Restructuring charges ..................................... | — | — | 4 | 4 | |||
Impairment ..................................................... | 24 | — | — | 24 | |||
Total costs and expenses ........................... | 935 | 1,442 | 1,663 | 4,040 | |||
Income (loss) from operations .......................... | (70) | 1,033 | (936) | 27 | |||
Interest expense ................................................... | (447) | ||||||
Interest income .................................................... | 117 | ||||||
Other expense, net ............................................... | (211) | ||||||
Loss before income taxes .................................. | $(514) | ||||||
Supplemental segment information | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization ............................ | $162 | $510 | $771 | $1,443 | |||
Share-based compensation .................................. | $108 | $75 | $49 | $232 | |||
Impairment .......................................................... | $24 | $— | $— | $24 | |||
Capital expenditures ............................................ | $759 | $814 | $2,567 | $4,140 | |||
Note 19 - Restructuring
In 2022, X, an indirect subsidiary of the Company (through the X Merger and subsequently, xAI Merger), initiated
global employee workforce reductions, the effects of which continued into 2026. The charges and credits associated
with the workforce reduction include cash severance expense and other termination benefits. Total charges (credits)
of $(11) million and $4 million associated with the workforce reduction were recorded in Restructuring charges
(credits) in the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and 2025,
respectively.
The following table is a summary of the changes in the restructuring liabilities for each period presented, included
within Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets:
Restructuring liabilities as of December 31, 2025 ................................................................................ | $443 |
Severance and other personnel costs ................................................................................................. | (11) |
Cash payments ................................................................................................................................... | (123) |
Other adjustments .............................................................................................................................. | 3 |
Restructuring liabilities as of March 31, 2026 ...................................................................................... | $312 |
F-96
Note 20 - Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred from April 1, 2026 through May 7, 2026, which is the
date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued, and determined that there were no subsequent
events or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, except as
discussed below.
Collaboration Agreement
On April 19, 2026, the Company entered into a compute agreement with Anysphere, Inc., doing business as Cursor,
a San Francisco-based private software company (“Cursor”). Pursuant to the compute agreement, the Company will
collaborate with Cursor to improve the Company’s existing models, including Grok, and potentially to jointly
develop AI models and related model-specific deliverables.
Concurrent with the compute agreement, the Company also entered into an option agreement for the right, but not
the obligation, to acquire Cursor. The option agreement generally provides that the Company may exercise the call
option at any time during the 30-day period following the earlier of (i) seven trading days following the completion
of the Company’s IPO and (ii) September 30, 2026. Exercise of the call option is in the Company’s sole discretion
and subject to further approval by the board of directors. Cursor is also subject to certain exclusivity obligations
under the option agreement. The consideration for the acquisition of Cursor would consist of shares of Class A
common stock based on an implied equity value of Cursor of $60.0 billion, and the price of Class A common stock
that equals, if the acquisition closed prior to the completion of this offering, the most recent quarterly valuation, or,
if the acquisition closed after the completion of the Company’s IPO, the volume-weighted average closing price
thereof over the seven consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing of the acquisition. If either (i) the
Company decides to terminate the option agreement or (ii) Cursor is eligible to and decides to terminate due to the
Company’s material breach of the option agreement, Cursor is entitled to a $1.5 billion termination fee under the
option agreement and an $8.5 billion deferred services fee under the compute agreement. These fees are payable in
cash (or Class A common stock, if the Company’s IPO has not been consummated at the time the fees become
payable).
The Company has conducted preliminary due diligence on Cursor’s business, technology and operations, and expect
to continue such diligence in connection with any decision to exercise the call option. The Company cannot predict
whether the Company will elect to exercise the call option or, if exercised, whether the acquisition will close on the
anticipated terms or at all.
Sale-Leaseback Transaction
On April 24, 2026, CTC entered into a five-year equipment lease agreement with Valor, a related party, for certain
AI infrastructure hardware (“Valor transaction III”) for total undiscounted lease payments of $6,587 million.
Asset Acquisition
On April 30, 2026, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with an unaffiliated third party to
purchase certain mobile gas turbines and related packages for approximately $2,000 million (the “Turbine
Acquisition”). The closing of the Turbine Acquisition is expected to occur in May 2026 and is subject to customary
closing conditions. The seller has also agreed to enter into a post-closing services agreement to support the
Company's turbine operations. The Turbine Acquisition will help provide power to the Company's data centers.
Cloud Services Agreement
On May 3, 2026, the Company entered into a cloud services agreement with Anthropic PBC, an AI research and
development public benefit corporation, with respect to access to compute capacity. Pursuant to this agreement, the
customer has agreed to pay a monthly fee through May 2029, with capacity ramping in May 2026 at a reduced fee.
The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ notice. The customer will retain ownership and
intellectual property rights in its content, AI models, and related data.
Shares
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Class A Common Stock
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
, 2026
Through and including , 2026 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting
transactions in our Class A common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an
underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.
II-1
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table shows the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable in
connection with the sale and distribution of the securities being registered. All amounts except the SEC registration
fee, the FINRA fee and the stock exchange listing fee are estimated.
SEC Registration Fee ............................................................................................................................ | $ | 138,100 |
FINRA Filing Fee ................................................................................................................................. | 150,500 | |
Nasdaq Listing Fee | 335,000 | |
Printing Costs ........................................................................................................................................ | * | |
Legal Fees and Expenses ....................................................................................................................... | * | |
Accounting Fees and Expenses ............................................................................................................. | * | |
Transfer Agent Fees and Expenses ....................................................................................................... | * | |
Miscellaneous Expenses ........................................................................................................................ | * | |
Total ...................................................................................................................................................... | $ | * |
__________________
*To be provided by amendment.
Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Under the Texas Business Organizations Code (the “TBOC”), the charter of a corporation may provide that a
director or officer of the corporation is not liable, or is liable only to the extent provided by the charter, to the
corporation or its shareholders for monetary damages for an act or omission by the person in the person’s capacity as
a director or officer. The TBOC does not authorize elimination or limitation of liability to the extent the director or
officer is found liable under applicable law for:
•any breach of the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders;
•any act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the director or officer to the corporation
or that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
•any transaction from which the director or officer receives an improper benefit, whether or not the benefit
resulted from an action taken within the scope of the director’s duties; or
•an act or omission for which the liability of the director or officer is expressly provided by an applicable statute.
Our charter will provide that our directors and officers are not liable to the Company or its shareholders for
monetary damages for an act or omission by the director or officer in his or her capacity as a director or officer or
for a breach of any duty as a director or officer to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, as it exists or as
amended from time to time.
The TBOC provides that a corporation must indemnify a director or former director against reasonable expenses
actually incurred by the person in connection with a proceeding in which the person is a respondent because the
person is or was a director, or is or was serving as a representative of another enterprise or organization or an
employee benefit plan while serving as a director, if the director or former director is wholly successful, on the
merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding. If a court determines that a director, former director or
representative is entitled to indemnification, the court will order indemnification by the corporation and award the
person expenses incurred in securing the indemnification. The TBOC also permits corporations to indemnify present
or former directors where indemnification is not mandated by the TBOC; however, such permissive indemnification
is subject to certain limitations and the director satisfying specified standards of conduct. The TBOC also provides
that officers must be indemnified to the same extent as directors are required to be indemnified under the TBOC and
II-2
that a court may also order indemnification under various circumstances. In addition, the TBOC permits
indemnification in certain circumstances in which we would not otherwise have the power to do so under the
provisions of the TBOC or our charter or bylaws if that indemnification is approved by the shareholders of the
Company.
Our bylaws will also provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by the TBOC, the Company must indemnify any
person who was or is, or is threatened to be made, a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, arbitrative, legislative or investigative, including an appeal
thereof, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director or an officer (who is appointed by our board or
specifically designated as such by our chief executive officer, president or chief financial officer) of the Company,
or while a director or officer of the Company is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer,
partner, venturer, trustee, employee, administrator or agent of another entity, trust or enterprise, against expenses
(including attorneys’ fees), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by the person in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if the person satisfied a specified standard of
conduct. Our bylaws will also provide that expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by
such director or officer in defending any proceeding will be paid by the Company in advance of the final disposition
of the proceeding upon written request from that person subject to the person satisfying certain conditions. To the
extent that indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers
and controlling persons, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
The TBOC and our bylaws permit the Company to purchase insurance on behalf of existing or former officers,
employees, directors or agents against any liability asserted against and incurred by that person in such capacity, or
arising out of that person’s status in such capacity, whether or not the Company would have the power to indemnify
that person under the TBOC. Pursuant to this authority, we expect to obtain such insurance for the officers,
employees, directors and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries. We will also enter into written indemnification
agreements with each of our officers and directors that provide, in general, that we will indemnify them against loss
and liability arising from, and will pay or reimburse their actual and reasonable expenses incurred in advance of the
final disposition of any legal proceeding involving their service to us or on our behalf. As permitted by the TBOC,
because these agreements are expected to be approved by our shareholders, the agreements may require
indemnification or payment of expenses in favor of the indemnitee in certain circumstances in which we would not
otherwise have the power to do so under the provisions of the TBOC or our charter or bylaws. Pursuant to a written
undertaking provided by any director or officer who requests the Company to reimburse or pay that person’s
expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding, the director or officer will be required to repay the
advanced expenses to the Company if it is found that such director or officer is not entitled to indemnification under
applicable law and our bylaws.
The proposed form of Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement will provide for
indemnification of our directors and officers by the underwriters against certain liabilities in connection with this
offering.
II-3
Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
The following sets forth information regarding all unregistered securities we have issued in the last three years.
Unless stated otherwise, the sale of the securities listed below were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, including Regulation D and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder, as
transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. Share amounts in this Item 15. do not give effect to the
2026 Stock Split.
On February 2, 2026, we consummated the xAI Merger and, in connection therewith, issued 321,681,643 shares of
Class A common stock and 121,683,400 shares of Class B common stock as partial consideration, including
3,798,039 shares of Class A common stock to Tesla following the completion of a regulatory review period on
March 12, 2026.
On January 13, 2026, we granted 200 million performance-based restricted shares of Class B common stock to Mr.
Musk to vest upon (i) our achievement of specified market capitalization milestones across 15 equal tranches and (ii)
the Company’s establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at least one million inhabitants, in each
case, subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment with us through the date on which achievement is certified by
our board.
On September 7, 2025, we entered into a License Purchase Agreement with Spectrum Business Trust 2025-1, a
Nevada Business Trust, and EchoStar. The total consideration for the acquisition of EchoStar’s spectrum is
approximately $19.6 billion, consisting of (i) approximately $11.1 billion in equity, payable through the issuance of
approximately 52.4 million shares of Class A common stock at a fixed value of $212 per share, and (ii) up to $8.5
billion related to the payoff of designated EchoStar debt, with any shortfall below $8.5 billion to be paid in cash.
Such amounts do not give effect to the 2026 Stock Split. The allocation of cash and equity consideration is subject to
certain adjustments based on the amount of EchoStar debt satisfied at or prior to closing. The Spectrum Transaction
is expected to close in November 2027.
Item 16.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit | |
1.1* | Form of Underwriting Agreement. | |
2.1^ | ||
3.1 | ||
3.2 | ||
4.1 | ||
4.2 | ||
5.1 | ||
10.1 | ||
10.2† | ||
10.3† | ||
10.4† | ||
10.5† | ||
10.6† | ||
10.7† |
II-4
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit | |
10.8^ | ||
10.9^ | ||
10.10* | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2026, by and among Space Exploration Technologies Corp., the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, NA., as the administrative agent, an L/C Issuer and the Swing Line Lender, and the other L/ C Issuers from time to time party thereto. | |
21.1 | ||
23.1 | ||
23.2 | ||
24.1 | ||
107 |
__________________
*To be filed by amendment.
^Certain of the schedules and attachments to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(a)(5). The registrant
hereby undertakes to provide further information regarding such omitted materials to the SEC upon request.
†Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information is not applicable or included in our
consolidated financial statements in the prospectus that forms a part of this Registration Statement.
Item 17.Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the
underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the
underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions referenced in Item 14 of this Registration Statement,
or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action,
suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling
precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1)For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be
deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2)For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Starbase, Texas, on May 20,
2026.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. | ||
By: | /s/ Elon Musk | |
Name: | Elon Musk | |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technical Officer | |
II-6
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and
appoints Gwynne Shotwell and Bret Johnsen, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place or stead,
in any and all capacities (including, without limitation, the capacities listed below), to sign any and all amendments
(including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement, and to sign any registration statement for the
same offering covered by this Registration Statement that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b)
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all post-effective amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and hereby grants to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed
by the following persons in the capacities indicated on the 20th day of May, 2026.
Signature | Title | |
/s/ Elon Musk | Elon Musk | |
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Chairman of the Board (principal executive officer) | ||
/s/ Gwynne Shotwell | Gwynne Shotwell | |
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
/s/ Bret Johnsen | Bret Johnsen | |
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) | ||
/s/ Ira Ehrenpreis | Ira Ehrenpreis | |
Director | ||
/s/ Randy Glein | Randy Glein | |
Director | ||
/s/ Antonio J. Gracias | Antonio J. Gracias | |
Director | ||
/s/ Donald Harrison | Donald Harrison | |
Director | ||
/s/ Steve Jurvetson | Steve Jurvetson | |
Director | ||
/s/ Luke Nosek | Luke Nosek | |
Director | ||