Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) |
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2026 | |
| Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
| Accounting Estimates | Accounting Estimates In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. The most significant estimate impacting the Company's consolidated financial statements is the ACL.
|
| Reclassifications | Reclassifications Certain amounts presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presented.
|
| New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2025 and Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted | Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted ASU No. 2024-03—Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. This ASU requires additional disclosure in interim and annual periods about specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements. This ASU is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows but may lead to additional disclosures about expenses in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU No. 2025-06—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The ASU eliminates the prior stage-based model for capitalization of internal-use software costs and replaces it with a principles-based approach that requires capitalization once management has approved and committed funding for a project and it is probable the project will be completed and the software will function as intended. The ASU is effective for the Company for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating early adoption of the ASU effective January 1, 2027, using the prospective transition method, and is currently evaluating the impact of adoption on its Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU 2025‑08 – Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans. The ASU amends the accounting for certain acquired loans by expanding the CECL gross‑up approach—previously applicable only to PCD loans—to a newly defined class of purchased seasoned loans ("PSL"). PSLs generally include non‑PCD loans acquired in a business combination or those meeting defined seasoning criteria. Under the amended guidance, the Company will recognize the initial allowance for credit losses on PSLs as an adjustment to the loan's amortized cost basis rather than recording a Day 1 provision expense. The ASU is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be applied prospectively; early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements. ASU 2025‑12 – Codification Improvements. The ASU includes amendments to ASC 505 that clarify the permissible methods for accounting for share retirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating early adoption of the ASC 505 amendments and the related impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| Investment Securities | The Company monitors its investment securities available for sale for credit loss impairment on an individual security basis.The Company performed an analysis comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to the amortized cost basis of impaired securities. This analysis was based on a scenario that we believe to be generally more conservative than our reasonable and supportable economic forecast at September 30, 2026, and incorporated assumptions about voluntary prepayment rates, collateral defaults, delinquencies, severity and other relevant factors as described further below. Our analysis also considered the structural characteristics of each security and the level of credit enhancement provided by that structure.Our analysis of potential credit loss impairment for these securities incorporates a comprehensive analysis and quantitative score of the underlying obligor's credit worthiness provided by a third-party vendor as well as other relevant qualitative considerations. |
| Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses | The ACL was determined utilizing a 2-year reasonable and supportable forecast period. The quantitative portion of the ACL was determined by weighting three third-party provided economic scenarios. Internal risk ratings are considered the most meaningful indicator of credit quality for commercial loans. Internal risk ratings are one indicator of the likelihood that a borrower will default, are a key factor influencing the level and nature of ongoing monitoring of loans and may impact the estimation of the ACL. Internal risk ratings are updated on a continuous basis.Management considers delinquency status to be the most meaningful indicator of the credit quality of residential loans, other than government insured residential loans. Delinquency status is updated at least monthly. LTV and FICO scores are also important indicators of credit quality for 1-4 single family residential loans other than government insured loans. FICO scores are generally updated semi-annually and were most recently updated in the first quarter of 2026. LTVs are typically at origination.
|
| Derivative Financial Instruments | Derivatives designated as hedging instruments The Company has entered into interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges with the objective of limiting the variability of interest payment cash flows. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company also enters into interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedges with the objective of managing exposure to changes in the fair value of certain fixed-rate financial liabilities attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges and changes in the fair value of the hedged liabilities attributable to the designated hedged risk are recognized currently in earnings in the same income statement line item as the earnings effect of the hedged liabilities. These derivative contracts are not designated as hedging instruments; therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized in earnings.The Company does not offset assets and liabilities under master netting agreements for financial reporting purposes.
|
| Fair Value Measurements | Investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities—Fair value measurements are based on quoted prices in active markets when available; these measurements are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities typically include U.S. Treasury securities and certain preferred stocks. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, quoted prices of identical securities in less active markets, discounted cash flow techniques, or matrix pricing models. These securities are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and typically include all categories of investment securities not classified within level 1 of the hierarchy. Pricing of these securities is generally primarily spread driven. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these securities include benchmark yield curves, credit spreads, reported trades, dealer quotes, bids, issuer spreads, current rating, historical constant prepayment rates, historical voluntary prepayment rates, structural and waterfall features of individual securities, published collateral data, and for certain securities, historical constant default rates and default severities. The Company uses third-party pricing services in determining fair value measurements for investment securities. To obtain an understanding of the methodologies and assumptions used, management reviews written documentation provided by the pricing services, conducts interviews with valuation desk personnel and reviews model results and detailed assumptions used to value selected securities as considered necessary. Management has established a robust price challenge process that includes a review by the treasury front office of all prices provided on a quarterly basis. Any price evidencing significant unexpected quarter-over-quarter fluctuations or deviations from expectations is challenged. The Company has also established a quarterly process whereby prices provided by its primary pricing service are validated by obtaining a price from a second external source for most securities in the portfolio. If considered necessary to resolve any discrepancies, a price will be obtained from an additional independent valuation source. The Company does not typically adjust the prices provided, other than through this established challenge process. The results of price challenges are subject to review by executive management. Any price discrepancies are resolved based on careful consideration of the assumptions and inputs employed by each of the pricing sources. Derivative financial instruments—Fair values of interest rate derivatives are determined using widely accepted discounted cash flow modeling techniques. These discounted cash flow models use projections of future cash payments and receipts that are discounted at mid-market rates. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these instruments include benchmark swap rates and benchmark forward yield curves. These fair value measurements are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Collateral dependent loans and OREO—The carrying amount of collateral dependent loans is typically based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which may be real estate, enterprise value or other business assets, less estimated costs to sell when repayment is expected to come from the sale of the collateral. The carrying value of OREO is initially measured based on the fair value of the real estate acquired in foreclosure and subsequently adjusted to the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. Fair values of real estate collateral and OREO are typically based on third-party real estate appraisals which utilize market and income approaches to valuation incorporating both observable and unobservable inputs. Fair value measurements related to collateral dependent loans and OREO are generally classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
|