Aharon Zaetz
Executive Director
Resolution Minerals Ltd
M: +61 424 743 098
ari@resolutionminerals.com

●     Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

●     Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

●     Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

●     In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

●    This announcement provides an update of the Company’s 2026 drill program recently completed at its Horse Heaven Project in Idaho, USA, and contains exploration results of three drill holes with the ID reference HH-GG26-031C and HH-GG26-032C.

●     Reported exploration results (data) includes: drill hole type, drill hole location (UTM metric) and drill hole parameters (dip, azimuth, altitude and end of hole data); sample data; assay data; and geological data. Supporting data includes drill collar locations in UTM metric data, together with dip, azimuth, altitude and end of hole data.

●     Reported assay data is for gold.

●     Please note that the primary data of the core samples (start, finish, interval) were converted from imperial feet measurements to metric metres in this announcement. Note that the operating jurisdiction uses imperial measurement system.

●     The assay data is derived independent professional laboratory services company of submitted core samples from HH-GG26-031C, HH-GG26-032C and HH-GG26-039C.

●    HH-GG26-031C HH-GG26-032C and HH-GG26-039C are diamond core holes. Sample intervals are contiguous and range in length individually from 2.2ft to 5.2ft (averaging 4.5ft). The samples are half-cut core prepared by industry standard core cutting saw by qualified personnel.

●    Samples were taken for the majority of the hole depth except where rock voids were encountered.

●    Geological data is derived from detailed geological and geotechnical logging by qualified personnel.

●    Drill core sample assay results of the above-mentioned holes are included in this announcement.

●     References to mineralised intersects are included in this announcement.

●    The Drilled Holes are diamond core drill holes that were drilled by Evolve Exploration Ltd using two Multipower MP1500 modular core rigs providing HQ diamond drill core.

●    The drill core is oriented. The core orientation method is conducted using the ACTxCore Orientation System.

●    Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

●    Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

●     Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

●    Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

●    Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

●     The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

●    Drill core was logged for lithology, alteration, mineralisation, structure (geotechnical) using oriented core to a level which has enabled preliminary interpretations relating to style of mineralisation, host and thickness. At this stage no Mineral Resource Estimates, mining studies or metallurgical studies are appropriate.

●    Drill core is also logged for RQD and Core recovery.

●    Drill core is then digitally photographed wet while whole after logging.

●    The logging, as described above is both quality and quantitative.

●    100% of the relevant intersections were logged as per above.

●     If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

●     If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

●     For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

●     Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

●    Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

●    Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

●    The HQ core was halved using a diamond core saw and sampled on geological intervals approximating 0.2m to 1.5m in length. The smallest intervals selected to specifically target mineralised veins have used down to 0.2m intervals. The 1.5 metre interval is most commonly applied across the core.

●    Drill core was halved using an electric powered core saw by RML contract staff who maintain possession of the core at its Antimony Camp facility.

●    Half-cut core samples were bagged and tagged using bar-coded sample tags and were securely stored prior to shipment at the Antimony Camp facility.

●    Half cut core samples were transported by RML contractors under lock and key to ALS prep’ lab’ facility in Twin Falls, ID. No third-party shippers were involved in the shipping process; chain of custody forms were exchanged at ALS Minerals in Twin Falls and a copy kept on file. The remaining boxed cut core are kept at a secure locked facility at Antimony Camp, ID.

●    ALS Minerals Twin Falls prep’ lab’ logs in the samples using the sample tag bar codes provided. Samples were then crushed to 70% less than 2mm, rotary split off 250g, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns.

●    All samples were then shipped to ALS Minerals analytical laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia.

●     The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

●    For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

●     Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

●    Gold was assayed by analytical method Au-AA23: Au by fire assay and AAS 30g nominal sample weight.

●    Silver (Ag) analysis was by analytical method ME-ICP61. Multielement analysis was by analytical method ME-ICP61: 34 elements by HF-HNO3-HClO4 acid digestion, HCl leach and ICP-AES. Quantitatively dissolves nearly all elements for the majority of geological materials. Only the most resistive minerals, such as Zircons, are only partially dissolved.

●    No geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc.. were used in the generation of the assay data.

●    Certified reference materials (CRM) from an ISO certified supplier were inserted randomly into the sample stream at a ratio of 2%. CRMs were obtained for Meg LLC of Reno, Nevada; two separate CRMs were used for gold: a low grade and high-grade standard.

●     Blank material was inserted randomly in the sample stream at a ratio of 2%. Blank material is commercially available pea-gravel that has been previously tested for gold concentrations.t.

●    Duplicates samples were collected by quarter cutting the core at randomly selected intervals. Two quarter-cut portions of core were sent for analysis; the remaining half is kept at a secure facility. Core intervals of poor recovery were not used for duplicate samples. Duplicate core samples were inserted into the sample stream at a ratio of 2%.

●     The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

●     The use of twinned holes.

●     Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

●    Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

●    No verification of the “significant intersections” has been completed to date by either independent or alternative company personnel. The company acknowledges the material nature of the results and is planning a program of select verification assays. Such were the immediacy of the results, these verifications were not possible prior to the release of the initial results.

●    The Company is confident that its sample security processes are adequate for the interim period.

●    The announcement details drill holes HH-GG26-031C and HH-GG26-032C. that were drilled on the same platform but were drilled with different directions and dips (Figure 3). By this HH-GG26-031C and HH-GG26-032C, and HH-GG25-006C are fanned holes. No holes are twinned (same collar, same azimuth, same dip). HH-GG26-039C was drilled about 500m north of HH-GG26-031C & HH-GG26-032C.

●     Sample results, certificates and results were sent via email to RML site contractors in Antimony Camp where results are analysed and interpreted.

●     No assay adjustments have been carried out.

●     Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

●    Specification of the grid system used.

●   Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

●     Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

●    Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

●     Whether sample compositing has been applied.

●    The assay data spacing of HH-GG26-031C HH-GG26-032C and HH-GG26-039C, the length and frequency of each sample and the collective coverage of the drill holes are best practise in terms of hole sample representativeness.

●     In terms of geological data spacing associated with the Drilled Holes every metre of these holes was logged, with details of lithology, alteration, mineralisation recorded to sub-metre detail.

●    Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

●     If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

●    The Drilled Holes have a drill direction that is approaching perpendicular to the regional trend (lithologically and structurally) and also approaching perpendicular to the known mineralisation. The purpose of the Drilled Holes was to test the possible extension of known gold and tungsten mineralisation at surface at depth along strike from past drill holes and past surface sample results and to test the occurrence of gold in un-oxidised rocks at depth.

●   Cautionary Note: There is currently insufficient data pertaining to sampling orientation and the local-scale orientation of mineralisation to determine the true width of the gold intervals in these holes. Additional holes in all directions are required to determine whether the gold mineralisation is broadly pervasive or (to various degrees) spatially constrained. For example, if the gold mineralisation is broadly pervasive, then the gold intervals in this announcement are true widths. If the gold mineralisation is spatially constrained, then the gold intervals in this announcement are not true widths. Based in increasing data, the gold mineralisation is interpreted as being broadly pervasive in association with a structurally-controlled repeating host sequence of country-rock granites and fault breccias

●    Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, past sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

●    The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

●    This announcement refers to exploration results regarding drill core at Golden Gate, a project within the one larger project, Horse Heaven project in Idaho USA, comprising seven hundred and twenty-nine (729) U.S. Federal lode mining claims covering 14,580 acres and includes seven hundred and nineteen (719) mining claims and ten lode mining claims referred as the Oberbillig Group.

●    The competent person understands that the mining claims are all in good standing.

●    The project area is dominated by Cretaceous-aged granitic rocks relating to intrusive phases associated with the Atlanta Lobe of the Idaho Batholith. These largely granodiorite rocks have intruded Neoproterozoic-aged metasediments, comprising quartzites (which are dominant) calc-silicates, marble and black shale. The area and broader region is affected by broad regional folding and N-S, NNE-SSW, and NE-SW faults.

●    Gold, antimony, tungsten and silver mineralisation is associated with hydrothermally altered and fractured granodiorites.

●     A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drillholes:

o      easting and northing of the drillhole collar

o      elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drillhole collar

o      dip and azimuth of the hole

o      down hole length and interception depth

o    hole length.

●    If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

●    In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

●    Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

●    The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

●    In reporting downhole gold intersections results of HH-GG26-031C, HH-GG26-032C and HH-GG26-039C no maximum and minimum truncations or cut off grades were used.

●    In reporting downhole gold intersections/intervals, assay results of HH-GG26-031C and HH-GG26-032C and HH-GG26-039C weighted averages were required due to the fact that sample lengths were variant (between 2.2ft and 5.2ft). The sample interval length was multiplied by the sample assay data then divided by the total length of the interval.

●    No metal equivalents were used in this announcement.

●    These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

●    If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drillhole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

●    If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

●    With reference to the Drilled Holes, these holes were drilled close to perpendicular across the prospect-scale orientation of the known mineralisation.

●    There is insufficient data pertaining to the gold mineralisation identified the Drilled Holes to allow conclusive statements concerning the sampling orientation and the local-scale orientation of mineralisation. Therefore the true width nature of the reported widths of the mineralisation is not known.

●    A drill hole location plan and cross section are provided with geolocation information (coordinates, northing and scale bar) showing the locations of the Drilled Holes. Legends are included within each figure (where appropriate) and when additional explanation is required, this is given to the figure caption.

●    A drill hole location plan and cross section are provided in this announcement to provide a sense of location of the hole in relation: to i) other drill holes; and ii) intersected mineralisation. The cross sections include a geological interpretation

●    The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

●    Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

●    The Drilled Holes, subject of this announcement, are part of a large diamond core drill program of 42 holes for 12,236m (40,144 ft), which is now completed.

●    Drill hole results will be released on an ongoing basis.