Contingencies |
12 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Sep. 03, 2026 | |
| Loss Contingency [Abstract] | |
| Contingencies | Contingencies We are currently a party to legal actions other than those described below arising from the normal course of business, none of which are expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Patent Matters As is typical in the semiconductor and other high-tech industries, from time to time, others have asserted, and may in the future assert, that our products or manufacturing processes infringe upon their intellectual property rights. A description of certain claims is below. On April 28, 2021, Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) filed two patent infringement actions against Micron, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. (“MSP”), and Micron Technology Texas, LLC (“MTEC”) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (“W.D. Tex.”). On March 31, 2022, Netlist filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and Micron Semiconductor (Deutschland) GmbH (“MSG”) in Düsseldorf Regional Court alleging that two German patents are infringed by certain of our load-reduced dual in-line memory modules (“LRDIMMs”). The complaint seeks damages, costs, and injunctive relief. On June 10, 2022, Netlist filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“E.D. Tex.”) alleging that six U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our memory modules and HBM products. On August 1, 2022, Netlist filed a second patent infringement complaint against the same defendants in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our LRDIMMs. Additional patents were added by subsequent amendments to the complaint. The complaints in E.D. Tex. seek injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys’ fees. On May 19, 2025, Netlist filed a complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by our HBM products. On March 6, 2026, the E.D. Tex. transferred the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (“D. Del.”) pursuant to a motion by Micron to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. On July 28, 2025, Netlist filed an additional complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our DIMMs. On June 23, 2026, Netlist filed a counterclaim against Micron and MSP in D. Del. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by our HBM products. The counterclaim seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, and other equitable relief. On August 10, 2026, Netlist filed a complaint against Micron and MSP in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (“C.D. Cal.:) alleging that two U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DIMMs. On August 10, 2026, Netlist filed a complaint to the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) requesting the ITC to institute an investigation under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for patent infringement. The ITC instituted an investigation on September 23, 2026. Netlist’s complaint alleges that four U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DRAM products and seeks an exclusion order barring importation of such products. On October 5, 2026, Netlist and Micron agreed to dismiss all litigation claims against one another pursuant to settlement and license agreements. On January 23, 2023, BeSang Inc. filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron in E.D. Tex. The complaint alleges that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and SSD products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On September 17, 2025, the District Court issued a judgment that the accused products do not infringe the asserted patent. On October 17, 2025, BeSang filed a notice of appeal of the District Court’s judgment. On November 9, 2023, Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. (“YMTC”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and one of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“N.D. Cal.”). The complaint alleges that eight U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On January 22, 2024, Micron Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“MSS”) was served with three patent infringement complaints filed by YMTC in Beijing Intellectual Property Court and on February 27, 2024, Micron was served with the same complaints. The complaints assert that Micron and MSS infringed three Chinese patents owned by YMTC by importing, selling, offering for sale, and assisting others to sell certain 3D NAND products and SSDs in China. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On July 12, 2024, YMTC filed a second complaint against Micron and its subsidiary in N.D. Cal. The second complaint alleges that eleven U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and DDR5 DRAM products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On September 11, 2024, MSS was served with five patent infringement complaints filed by YMTC in Shanghai Intellectual Property Court. The complaints assert that Micron and MSS infringed five Chinese patents owned by YMTC by importing, selling, offering for sale, and assisting others to sell certain 3D NAND products and SSDs in China. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On October 6, 2025, YMTC filed several patent infringement complaints against Micron and certain of its subsidiaries alleging that the Company’s manufacture, importation, sale, offering for sale, and/or assisting others to sell certain NAND and DRAM products infringe certain patents owned by YMTC. Specifically, YMTC filed the following complaints: A patent infringement complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that seven patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products and one patent is infringed by certain of our LPDRAM products; a patent infringement complaint in the London Chancery Division of the English High Court against Micron and Micron Europe Limited (“MEL”) alleging that three patents are infringed by certain of our NAND and DRAM products; three complaints against Micron and various combinations of subsidiaries, including MEL, MSP, MSG, and Micron Semiconductor France SAS in the Unified Patent Court in Dusseldorf, Germany, alleging that three patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and LPDRAM products; and five complaints against Micron, MEL, and MSG in Munich Regional Court in Munich, Germany, alleging that four utility models and one patent are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products. Each of the complaints filed against us by YMTC on October 6, 2025, seeks an injunction, attorneys’ fees, damages, and costs. On September 17 and 18, 2026, the Munich Regional Court held a hearing regarding infringement of the asserted utility models and patent. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court indicated that it would find that certain of Micron’s 3D NAND products infringe two of the asserted utility models. On October 6, 2026, the court issued written rulings requiring Micron to cease and desist offering, marketing, importing, or possessing the accused 3D NAND products in Germany and to stop deliveries of products abroad to customers where Micron knows or has clear indications the customer will supply the products into Germany; to provide an accounting regarding alleged infringing acts; and to surrender accused products located in Germany unless already incorporated into third parties’ end devices. The court further indicated that additional proceedings will be held in June and September 2027 regarding the other two asserted utility models and the asserted patent. Micron has appealed the infringement ruling regarding the two utility models. On June 30, 2025, Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC (“AMT”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron in W.D. Tex. alleging that four U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DRAM and NAND products. On November 4, 2025, AMT amended the complaint to allege that a fifth patent is infringed by certain of our DRAM products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On July 6, 2026, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho (“D. Idaho”). On March 6, 2026, Nextech Semiconductor, LLC (“Nextech”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and MSP in W.D. Tex. alleging that six U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DRAM, NAND, and SSD products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The above lawsuits pertain to substantially all of our DRAM, NAND, and other memory and storage products we manufacture, which account for substantially all of our revenue. Antitrust Matters On June 25, 2026, certain individuals and businesses filed a putative class action complaint in N.D. Cal. against Micron, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and one of its subsidiaries, and SK hynix Inc. and one of its subsidiaries, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of DRAM products, alleging that the defendants conspired to restrict the supply of, and fix prices for, DRAM products in violation of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust and consumer protection laws, for a period beginning October 26, 2022. The complaint seeks damages, treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On July 17, 2026, an individual filed a complaint containing similar allegations of conspiracy against the same defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. Other Matters On June 7, 2025, YMTC filed a complaint against Micron and DCI Group AZ, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in false advertising, product disparagement, and unfair competition regarding YMTC’s 3D NAND flash products in violation of the Lanham Act. The complaint sought injunctive relief, damages, disgorgement of profits, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On August 13, 2026, the District Court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss YMTC’s complaint. On August 24, 2026, YMTC filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. On January 16, 2026, Neighbors for a Better Micron and Jobs to Move America filed a petition in the Supreme Court of New York against Micron, one of our subsidiaries, Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (“OCIDA”), and certain other state and local government entities. The petition challenges certain aspects of OCIDA’s environmental review of the Company’s planned construction of up to four fabs in Clay, New York, and seeks a judgment to annul, vacate, and void all permits, approvals, and findings issued by the named government entities related to the project. The petition further seeks costs and attorneys’ fees. On July 31, 2026, the same plaintiffs filed a petition in the Supreme Court of New York against the same defendants challenging certain permits issued for Micron’s construction related activities in Clay, New York. The petition seeks a judgment to annul, vacate and void such permits and an award to the petitioners of costs and attorneys’ fees. In the normal course of business, we are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated to indemnify another party. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these types of agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, our payments under these types of agreements have not had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Contingency Assessment Except for the patent license charges recognized in the fourth quarter of 2026, we are unable to predict the outcome of any of the matters noted above and cannot make a reasonable estimate of the potential loss or range of possible losses. See Note 17. Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net. A determination that our products or manufacturing processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others or entering into a license agreement covering such intellectual property could result in significant liability and/or require us to make material changes to our products and/or manufacturing processes. Any of the foregoing, as well as the resolution of any other legal matter noted above, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
|