On September 24, 2025, KBR, Inc. (“KBR” or “we”) announced its strategic intention to spin off its Mission Technology Solutions segment to create a separate, publicly traded company, Trinzic, Inc. (“Trinzic”). We believe that, upon completion, this spin-off will unlock meaningful value creation through the formation of two independent, pure-play companies: KBR and Trinzic. Both will operate with greater strategic focus, operational independence, financial flexibility, and clear growth opportunities with sharpened go-to-market approaches and distinct, compelling investment profiles.

As Mission Technology Solutions does today, Trinzic will continue to serve as a highly trusted provider of advanced science, technology, digital, engineering, and logistics solutions to the U.S. federal government, allied nations, and commercial customers across missions of high-consequence in global national security and space markets. Combining a history of organic growth through progressive customer engagement with successful and accretive acquisitions, Trinzic has continually expanded its capabilities and broadened its customer base to grow its addressable market and global offerings. We believe Trinzic is well positioned to deliver profitable growth by leveraging its key competitive strengths: critical mission expertise, modern technology solutions, a trusted business model, and vast global reach. Trinzic is expected to continue to benefit from its low capital intensity, diversified, and highly renewable long-duration contracts portfolio with predictable cash flow, robust backlog, and strong marketplace positions driven by customer intimacy, commercial agility, and deep domain expertise.

KBR, comprising the Sustainable Technology Solutions segment, will continue to deliver proprietary IP-protected process technologies, high-end design and engineering, advisory and consulting services, program management, and digitalization solutions for customers in the energy, critical infrastructure, and industrial sectors. KBR’s solutions and delivery approach improve safety, reduce emissions, and increase efficiency across the asset life cycle, with increasing participation in longer cycle operations and maintenance. KBR is well positioned to continue to be one of the global leaders in energy transition solutions and serve as a partner of choice for commercial and government customers in the delivery of mega-scale critical infrastructure to bolster energy security worldwide. KBR will continue to build on its strong track record of commercializing new, and in select cases, world-first technologies. As ever, the solutions and deep domain expertise KBR delivers will be aligned with our customers’ evolving demands and future needs, helping them to capture meaningful market potential, gain strategic advantage, and enable their success.

The spin-off will provide current KBR stockholders with ownership interests in both KBR and Trinzic and will be in the form of a pro rata distribution of at least 80.1% of the outstanding shares of Trinzic common stock to holders of KBR common stock. Each KBR stockholder will receive [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock for every [•] share[s] of KBR common stock held at the close of business on [•], 2026, the record date for the distribution. You do not need to take any action to receive shares of Trinzic common stock to which you are entitled as a KBR stockholder. You do not need to pay any consideration or surrender or exchange your shares of KBR common stock to participate in the spin-off.

The distribution is intended to be tax-free to KBR and its stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash received by stockholders in lieu of fractional shares. You should consult your tax advisor as to the particular consequences of the distribution to you, including the applicability and effect of any U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. tax laws.

I encourage you to read the attached information statement, which is being made available to all KBR stockholders as of the record date for the distribution. The information statement describes the separation in detail and contains important business and financial information about Trinzic.

We believe that the spin-off better positions both KBR and Trinzic for sustained growth and value and is in the best interests of KBR and its stockholders. We remain committed to working on your behalf to continue to build long-term stockholder value.

I am pleased to welcome you as future stockholders of Trinzic, Inc. (“Trinzic”), which will be a newly independent, pure-play global national security and space company. Our separation from KBR, Inc. will mark a defining moment — the launch of a focused, at-scale enterprise built to advance the missions that matter most to our nation and allies.

We are an established business, with approximately $5.3 billion in total annual revenue for fiscal year 2025, 18,000 employees, and operations across over 60 locations in North America, Europe, and Australia/Pacific. We will enter the public markets with approximately $17.5 billion of total backlog and award options, as of July 3, 2026, a diversified base of long-term contracts with high renewal rates, and strong, predictable cash flows supported by a capital-light business model. We believe these are hallmarks of a company well positioned for enduring performance.

What we believe sets Trinzic apart is its combination of trusted mission expertise, a technology-forward approach, and global presence with sovereign delivery capabilities — all underpinned by the dedication of its world-class workforce. Our people are deeply embedded in the highest-priority missions of our customers, from integrated air and missile defense and space exploration to digital modernization and health and human performance. We serve as a trusted, vendor-agnostic integrator, with the goal of adapting and deploying the best available technologies to deliver mission impact with speed, agility, and rigor.

The markets we serve are large, growing, and shaped by powerful tailwinds: an increasingly complex global threat environment, the emergence of space as a critical operational domain, rapid digital technology modernization, and a generational transformation of U.S. and allied defense industries. We expect these trends will drive sustained investment from our customers, and we believe Trinzic is exceptionally well positioned to capture this opportunity.

As an independent, publicly traded company, our strategy is clear: address the most critical national security and space priorities across our global markets, advance transformative technology solutions that deliver mission superiority, maintain rigorous operational discipline to drive strong cash flow and enhance profitability, and deploy capital with discipline to deliver long-term value to you, our future stockholders — whether through strategic acquisitions, debt reduction, or capital returns.

I want to express my gratitude to the talented team at Trinzic, whose expertise, dedication, and purpose-driven culture are the foundation of everything we do. I also want to thank you, our future stockholders, for your confidence in our company and our future.

I encourage you to learn more about Trinzic by reading the attached information statement. We look forward to this next chapter with energy and conviction and believe Trinzic is mission-ready.

This information statement is being furnished in connection with the distribution by KBR, Inc. (“KBR”) to its stockholders of at least 80.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Trinzic, Inc. (“Trinzic”), a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR, that will hold, directly or indirectly, substantially all of the assets and liabilities associated with KBR’s existing Mission Technology Solutions segment. To implement the distribution, KBR will distribute at least 80.1% of the shares of Trinzic common stock on a pro rata basis to KBR stockholders.

For every [•] share[s] of KBR common stock held of record by you as of the close of business on [•], 2026, the record date for the distribution, you will receive [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock. You will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Trinzic common stock that you would have received after application of the above ratio. As discussed under the section entitled “The Separation and Distribution—Trading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date,” if you sell your shares of KBR common stock “regular-way” after the record date and before the distribution, you also will be selling your right to receive shares of Trinzic common stock in connection with the separation. Trinzic expects the shares of Trinzic common stock to be distributed by KBR on [•], 2027. We refer to the date of the distribution of the shares of Trinzic common stock as the “distribution date.”

The distribution is expected to be tax-free to KBR and its stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares.

No vote of KBR stockholders is required for the distribution. Therefore, you are not being asked for a proxy, and you are requested not to send KBR a proxy, in connection with the distribution. You do not need to pay any consideration, exchange or surrender your existing shares of KBR common stock, or take any other action to receive your shares of Trinzic common stock.

There is no current trading market for Trinzic common stock, although Trinzic expects that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop on or shortly before the record date for the distribution, and Trinzic expects “regular-way” trading of Trinzic common stock to begin on the first trading day following the distribution. Trinzic intends to apply to have its common stock authorized for listing on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TZIC.” Following the distribution, KBR will continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “KBR.”

In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 18.

Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

A notice of Internet Availability of Information Statement Materials containing instructions describing how to access this information statement was first mailed to KBR stockholders on or about [•], 2026. This information statement will be mailed to KBR’s stockholders who previously elected to receive a paper copy of KBR’s materials.

Unless the context otherwise requires, (i) references in this information statement to “Trinzic,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Trinzic, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the separation, (ii) references in this information statement to the “Mission Technology Solutions segment” or “MTS” refer to the business and operations of KBR’s Mission Technology Solutions segment that will be transferred to Trinzic in connection with the separation and distribution, and (iii) references in this information statement to “KBR” and “Parent” refer to KBR, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

In connection with the separation and distribution, we will enter into a series of transactions with KBR pursuant to which KBR will receive the Internal Cash Distribution (as defined herein) and will transfer substantially all of the assets and liabilities of its Mission Technology Solutions segment to us in exchange for shares of our common stock. As used herein, (i) the “separation” refers to the separation of the Mission Technology Solutions segment from KBR and the creation of a separate company holding the Mission Technology Solutions segment, (ii) the “distribution” refers to the distribution of at least 80.1% of the shares of Trinzic common stock owned by KBR to KBR stockholders as of the record date, and (iii) the “spin-off” refers to the separation and distribution, together. Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, the information included in this information statement about Trinzic assumes the completion of all of the transactions referred to in this information statement in connection with the separation and distribution.

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this information statement concerning Trinzic’s industry and the markets in which Trinzic operates, including its general expectations and market position, market opportunity and market share, is based on information from third-party sources and management estimates. Trinzic’s management estimates are derived from publicly available information, Trinzic’s knowledge of its industry and assumptions based on such information and knowledge, which Trinzic believes to be reasonable. Trinzic’s management estimates have not been verified by any independent source. In addition, assumptions and estimates of Trinzic and its industry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause future performance to differ materially from Trinzic’s assumptions and estimates. For additional information, see the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.”

The trademarks, trade names and service marks of Trinzic appearing in this information statement are Trinzic’s property or, as applicable, licensed to Trinzic, or, as applicable, are the property of KBR. The name and mark, KBR, and other trademarks, trade names and service marks of KBR appearing in this information statement are the property of KBR. This information statement also contains additional trade names, trademarks and service marks belonging to other companies. Trinzic does not intend its use or display of other parties’ trademarks, trade names, or service marks to imply, and such use or display should not be construed to imply, a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of Trinzic by, these other parties.

All financial information presented in this information statement is derived from the combined financial statements of Trinzic included elsewhere in this information statement. All financial information presented in this information statement has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), except for the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin.

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide management and investors with useful information in assessing trends in Trinzic’s ongoing operating performance and may provide greater visibility in understanding the long-term financial performance of Trinzic. While we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are useful for management and investors in evaluating our financial information, they should be considered supplemental in nature and not as a substitute for financial information prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Measures” for an explanation on why we use these non-GAAP financial measures, their definitions, and their limitations, and reconciliations to their nearest U.S. GAAP financial measures.

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this information statement. We have identified the risks and uncertainties described below as material, but they are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, such as market conditions, economic conditions, geopolitical events, changes in laws, regulations, or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest rates, terrorism, wars or conflicts, major health concerns, natural disasters, or other disruptions of expected business conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business and financial statements, including our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, and our stock price.

A significant portion of our revenue is generated under contracts with certain significant customers. Revenue from the U.S. government represented 84% of our total consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2025. Budget uncertainty, the potential for U.S. government shutdowns, the use of continuing resolutions, and the federal debt ceiling can adversely affect our industry and the funding for our contracts. In addition, government acquisition reform and spending cut initiatives, including executive orders, may impact our business. For example, on January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order creating an advisory commission, the “Department of Government Efficiency,” (“DOGE”) to reform federal government processes and reduce expenditures. Although DOGE was disbanded in November 2025, we cannot rule out the possibility of similar initiatives occurring in the future. Further, on April 15, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14275, “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement,” directing major revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) to make the government’s procurement process more efficient, and on November 7, 2025, DoW Secretary Pete Hegseth released a memorandum and strategy on defense acquisition reform titled “Transforming the Warfighting Acquisition System” that aims to overhaul the procurement landscape and prioritizes speed to capability delivery. If appropriations are delayed, a government shutdown were to occur and continue for an extended period of time, or changes in budgetary priorities or U.S. government spending levels were to occur, we could be at risk of contract cancellations, contract options not being exercised, funding shortages, nonpayment, increased uncertainty in the conversion of our book to bill to revenue and other disruptions and nonrepayment. When the U.S. government operates under a continuing resolution, new contract starts are restricted and funding for our programs may be unavailable, reduced, or delayed. Shifting funding priorities or federal budget compromises also could result in reductions in overall defense spending on an absolute or inflation-adjusted basis, which could negatively affect our business, financial performance, and condition. In addition, if we are unable to effectively respond to proposed acquisition reform in the U.S., our ability to secure and perform government contracts could be adversely affected, which may negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If we are deemed to be underperforming on our contracts, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may likewise be adversely impacted.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from contracts with agencies and departments of the U.S., the UK, and Australia governments, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to other companies performing prime contracts for these governments. We expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue from work performed under or relating to U.S. and foreign government contracts. Our relationship with the U.S. and foreign governments is key to maintaining these contracts, winning new work, and growing our revenue. Negative press reports or publicity, regardless of accuracy, could harm our reputation and jeopardize our business with our customers, potentially adversely affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our revenue are directly and indirectly derived from contract awards. Reductions in the number and amounts of new awards, delays in the timing of anticipated awards or potential cancellations of such prospects as a result of economic conditions, funding priorities, material and equipment pricing and availability, or other factors could

adversely impact our long-term projected results. It is particularly difficult to predict whether or when we will receive large-scale contracts as these contracts usually involve a lengthy and complex bidding and selection process. This process can be affected by a number of factors, including market conditions and governmental approvals, and our results of operations and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending on the timing of our contract awards and the commencement or progress of work under awarded contracts. The uncertainty of our contract award timing can also present difficulties in matching workforce size with contract needs. In some cases, we maintain and bear the cost of a ready workforce that is larger than necessary under existing contracts in expectation of future workforce needs for anticipated contract awards. If an anticipated contract award is delayed or not received, we may incur additional costs resulting from reductions in staff or redundancy of facilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Following contract award, we may also encounter significant expense, delay, contract modifications, or even contract loss or termination. For example, HomeSafe Alliance (“HomeSafe”), a joint venture with Tier One Relocation, informed KBR on June 18, 2025, that U.S. Transportation Command unexpectedly terminated HomeSafe’s role in the Global Household Goods Contract. KBR owns a 72% interest in HomeSafe. As of January 2, 2026, all of HomeSafe’s operations, including run-off operations, have ceased.

Additionally, certain contract awards (including the performance of such awards) have been and may in the future be contested and/or otherwise involved in ongoing bid protests, legal proceedings, inquiries, or other similar developments outside of our control, which may result in significant delays in the contract timeline or the wholesale cancellation or termination of a contract. Any contract delays, cancellations, or contract modifications following the award of a contract could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, backlog, revenue recognition timing and cash flows.

Political, economic and other conditions in foreign countries and regions, including geopolitical risks, such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, political instability in Venezuela and political and economic instability and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, including the recent military conflict in Iran, may adversely affect our business and operations as a portion of our revenue is derived from foreign operations. Additionally, the full scope, duration and broader implications of international conflicts, which may include additional international sanctions, embargoes, regional instability and geopolitical shifts; increased tensions between the United States and countries in which we operate; and the extent of a conflict’s effects on our business and results of operations as well as the global economy, cannot be predicted. Any alleged or actual failure to comply with any sanctions and trade control measures implemented in response to international conflicts may subject us to government scrutiny, civil and/or criminal proceedings, sanctions and other liabilities, which may have an adverse effect on our international operations, financial condition, and results of operations.

To the extent current conflicts or other geopolitical conflicts adversely affect our business, they may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks identified in this information statement, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

Our business and results of operations could be adversely impacted by trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. and other governments globally, as well as by changes in these governments’ approaches to tariffs and other trade policies. New or increased tariffs or trade bans could have an adverse effect on both our U.S. and international operations due to increased costs of materials, disruptions or delays in deliveries, and greater difficulty in planning and operating our business. While our business in the U.S. primarily provides labor services to our customers, some of our U.S. work involves procuring goods, equipment, or materials that may be subject to tariffs. Our non-U.S. work could also be impacted by greater costs for goods sourced from the U.S. due to increased tariffs imposed by other countries. Although we plan to continue to monitor trade policy developments closely and to mitigate the adverse impacts of any changes where possible, we may not be able to fully mitigate such impacts in all situations.

We utilize a variety of proprietary and third party technologies in providing services to our customers. We may not be able to successfully preserve our proprietary intellectual property rights in the future, and these rights could be invalidated, circumvented, challenged, or infringed upon. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which our services may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. We also license technologies from third parties, and there is a risk that our relationships with licensors may terminate, expire or be interrupted or harmed. If we are unable to protect and maintain our intellectual property rights, or if there are any successful intellectual property challenges or infringement proceedings against us, our ability to effectively deliver services could diminish and our business and financial performance could be materially and adversely affected.

We operate in global markets with customers who demand innovation, technical and domain expertise, and digitally-enabled, technology-led solutions. Robust information technology systems, platforms and products are integral in our efforts to differentiate our service offerings and maintain our competitive advantages. Disruptive technologies, including in areas of artificial intelligence and machine learning, are rapidly changing the environment in which we, our customers, and our competitors operate and could affect the nature of how we generate revenue. We will need to continue to respond to and anticipate these changes by enhancing our product and service offerings to maintain our competitive position. If we are not successful in staying ahead of developing artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and strategically incorporating them into our business, our business and financial performance could be materially and adversely affected.

It is strategically important that we lead the digital transformation occurring in our industry. However, we may not be successful in structuring our technology or developing, acquiring or implementing technology systems in ways that are competitive and responsive to the needs of our customers. We may lack sufficient resources to continue to make the significant technology investments needed to effectively compete with our competitors. Certain technology initiatives that management considers important to our long-term success will require capital investment, have significant risks associated with their execution and could take several years to implement. If we are unable to develop and implement these initiatives in a cost-effective, timely manner or at all, it could damage our relationships with our customers and negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. Others may acquire similar or superior technologies sooner than we do, and we may not acquire technologies on an exclusive basis or at a significant price advantage. If we do not accurately predict, prepare, and respond to new technology innovations, market developments, and changing customer needs, our revenue, profitability, and long-term competitiveness could be materially adversely affected.

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, data science, and similar technologies (collectively, “AI Technology”), including third-party AI Technology tools, may be enabled by, or integrated into some of our business and solutions. As with many developing technologies, AI Technology presents risks and challenges that could affect its further development, adoption, and use, and therefore our business. AI Technology algorithms may be flawed or biased or produce incorrect information. Datasets used to train or develop AI Technology systems may be insufficient, of inferior

quality, or contain biased information. Additionally, the laws and regulations concerning the use of AI Technology continue to evolve. If the use or integration of AI Technology systems, or the outputs generated by such systems, were determined to be non-compliant (e.g., in relation to intellectual property or data privacy rights), this may result in liability or adversely affect our business, reputation, brand, financial condition, and results of operations. It is possible that emerging regulations may limit or block the use of AI Technology in our business and solutions or otherwise impose other restrictions that may affect or impair the usability or efficiency of our business or services for an extended period of time or indefinitely. Our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI Technology into their product development, product offerings, technology, and infrastructure products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our strategy requires talent with dynamic and elite skills as we move upmarket. Our rate of growth and the success of our business depend upon our ability to attract, develop, retain, and replace key qualified technical and management professionals, either through direct hires, subcontracts, or acquisition of other firms, who possess the elite skills to successfully deliver the solutions strategy. The market for these professionals is competitive in the sectors in which we compete, and we rely heavily upon the expertise and leadership of our professionals to perform, execute, and complete contracts as required by our customers.

We currently hold U.S. government-issued facility security clearances and many of our employees have qualified for and hold U.S., UK, and Australian government-issued personal security clearances necessary to perform certain U.S., UK, and Australian government contracts. Obtaining and maintaining security clearances for employees involves lengthy processes, and it is difficult to identify, recruit, and retain employees who already hold security clearances. If our employees are unable to obtain or retain security clearances or if our employees who hold security clearances terminate employment with us, and we are unable to find replacements with equivalent security clearances, we may be unable to perform our obligations to customers whose work requires cleared employees, or such customers could terminate their contracts or decide not to renew them upon their expiration. Our facility security clearances could be marked as “invalid” for several reasons, including unapproved foreign ownership, control or influence, mishandling of classified materials, or failure to properly report required activities. An inability to obtain or retain our facility security clearances or engage employees with the required security clearances for a particular contract could disqualify us from bidding for and winning new contracts with security requirements or result in negative consequences for current contracts, including termination for default if security concerns are not remedied.

If we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of elite skilled professionals with appropriate government qualifications, our ability to pursue and execute contracts may be adversely affected, our operating income may decline, and our reputation may be damaged. Our future success depends on the continued services of our executive officers as well as our ability to effectively transition to their successors. If we are unable to attract, develop, and retain qualified employees that can succeed our executive officers, or if our succession plans and/or succession planning processes do not yield the results we intend or expect, there could be a material adverse effect on our operating income and reputation.

We engage in activities where failures can result in substantial injury or damage to employees or other third parties or service delivery impacts, exposing us to legal proceedings, investigations, and disputes. The nature of our business results in customers, subcontractors, and vendors occasionally presenting claims against us for recovery of costs they incurred in excess of what they expected to incur or for which they believe they are not contractually liable. If it is determined that we have liability, we may not be covered by insurance or, if covered, the dollar amount of these liabilities may exceed our policy limits. Our professional liability coverage is on a “claims-made” basis covering only claims actually made during the policy period currently in effect. In addition, even where insurance is maintained for such exposures, the policies have deductibles, which result in our assumption of exposure for a layer of coverage with respect to any such claims. We also manage and maintain a portion of our retained risk through our wholly owned captive insurance company, which insures certain claims up to the applicable deductible amount of our third-party insurance programs. Additionally, our captive insurance company is a registered and licensed insurance company with the Texas Department of Insurance and is therefore subject to various rules and regulations including meeting certain

capital requirements, which can result in additional use of our resources such as securing the captive insurance company’s retained risks with issuing letters of credit. Any liability not covered by our insurance, in excess of our insurance limits or if covered by insurance but subject to a high deductible, could result in a significant loss for us, which may reduce our profits and cash available for operations. Furthermore, there is risk of mass casualty or environmentally damaging events that may involve our and third-party personnel and property, which could lead to future claims and litigation, impact our reputation and investor confidence, and ultimately result in reduced share price.

We occasionally bring claims against customers for additional costs exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. These types of claims occur due to matters such as customer-caused delays, changes from the initial contract scope, or other economic changes not stipulated under the contract that may result in additional direct and indirect costs. Often these claims can be the subject of lengthy negotiations, arbitration, or litigation proceedings, and it is difficult to accurately predict when these claims will be fully resolved. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in contracts to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to recover on these types of claims fully or promptly could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial results.

We rely on third-party subcontractors, suppliers, and equipment manufacturers in order to complete many of our contracts. Certain subcontractors and suppliers, such as those used on our U.S. government contracts, are subject to the same rigorous government requirements that we are and if they are unable to comply with these requirements, in many cases, there are limited alternative subcontractors and suppliers available in the market, particularly those with the requisite security clearances. Our subcontractors may be subject to various regulations to engage in motor carrier service, including regulations from the Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and various state agencies. The failure of our subcontractors to comply with these regulations could adversely affect our financial performance on certain contracts.

We sometimes have disputes with our contracting parties, including disputes regarding the cost, quality, and timeliness of work performed or customer concerns about the other party’s performance. We also have been and in the future could be adversely affected by actions or issues experienced by our contracting parties that are outside of our control, such as misconduct and reputational issues involving our contracting parties, which has and could in the future subject us to liability and reputational harm or adversely affect our ability to compete for contract awards. In addition, if any subcontractor or a manufacturer is unable to deliver its services, equipment, or materials according to the negotiated terms for any reason including, but not limited to, the deterioration of its financial condition, we may be required to purchase the services, equipment or materials from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the profit we expect to realize or result in a loss on a contract for which the services, equipment, or materials were needed. Furthermore, if the amount we are required to pay for these goods and services exceeds the amount we have estimated in bidding for fixed-price contracts, we could experience losses in the performance of these contracts.

We are subject to the risk of misconduct, fraud, non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or other improper activities by our employees, agents, or partners, which could have a significant negative impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct includes the failure to comply with government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified information, regulations prohibiting bribery and other corrupt practices, regulations regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts, regulations on lobbying or similar activities, regulations pertaining to the internal controls over financial reporting, regulations pertaining to export control, environmental laws, employee wages, pay and benefits, and any other applicable laws or regulations. For example, we routinely provide services that may be highly sensitive or that relate to critical national security matters and, if a security breach were to occur, our ability to receive future government contracts could be severely limited. The precautions we take to prevent and detect these activities may not be effective and we could face unknown risks or losses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or acts of misconduct subject us to the risk of civil or criminal fines and penalties, cancellation of contracts, loss of security clearance, and suspension or debarment from contracting, any of which could damage our reputation, weaken our ability to win contracts and result in reduced revenue and profits and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on teaming relationships with other prime contractors and subcontractors to bid on large procurements and other opportunities when we believe the combination of services, products, and solutions we can offer with teammates will help us win and perform the contract. Our future revenue and growth could be adversely affected if our partners reduce or end their contract relationships with us, or if the U.S. government terminates or reduces programs of prime contractors to which we subcontract, does not award them new contracts, or refuses to pay under a contract. We may contract with subcontractors that do not have experience on U.S. government contracts or with our customers, providing them with the experience, relationships, and past performance to compete with us on future contracts and potential result in contract losses. If subcontractors fail to timely meet their contractual obligations or have regulatory compliance or other problems, our ability to fulfill our obligations as a prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor may be jeopardized.

A significant portion of our revenue and profits are measured and recognized over time using the cost-to-cost method of revenue recognition. Our use of this accounting method results in recognition of revenue and profits over the life of a contract, based on the proportion of costs incurred to date to total costs expected to be incurred for the entire contract. The effects of revisions to estimated revenue and costs are recorded when the amounts are known or can be reasonably estimated. In addition, we record unapproved change orders and claims against customers as well as estimated recoveries of claims against suppliers and subcontractors that have been included in the estimated profit at completion for certain contracts. Revisions to these estimates could occur in any period and their effects could be material. The uncertainties inherent in estimating the progress towards completion or the recoverability of claims of long-term contracts make it possible for actual revenue and costs to vary materially from our estimates, including reductions or reversals of previously recorded revenue and profits.

We conduct a portion of our operations through contract-specific joint ventures where control may be shared with unaffiliated third parties or control may be held by the unaffiliated third parties. As with any joint venture arrangement, differences in views among the joint venture partners may result in delayed decisions or in failures to agree on major issues. We also cannot control the actions of our joint venture partners, including failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, nonperformance and default or bankruptcy of our joint venture partners. If our partners do not meet their contractual obligations, the joint venture may be unable to adequately perform and deliver its contracted services, which could ultimately result in litigation. Failure to perform may result in reduced profits, significant losses on the contract, and a negative impact to our cash flows. Additionally, these factors could have a material adverse effect on the business operations of the joint venture and, in turn, our business operations and reputation.

Operating through joint ventures in which we have a minority interest could result in us having limited control over many decisions made with respect to contracts and internal controls relating to contracts. These joint ventures may not be subject to the same requirements regarding internal controls that are applicable to us. As a result, internal control issues may arise, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We conduct our business under various types of contracts where costs must be estimated in advance of our performance. A portion of the value of our current backlog is attributable to fixed-price contracts where we bear a significant portion of the risk of cost overruns. These types of contracts are priced, in part, on cost and scheduling estimates that are based on assumptions, including pricing and availability of experienced labor, equipment, and materials as well as productivity, performance, and future economic conditions. If these estimates prove inaccurate, if there are errors or ambiguities as to contract terms or specifications, or if circumstances change due to, among other things, increases in interest rates, continued inflation, supply-chain disruptions, tariffs, unanticipated technical problems, poor contract execution, difficulties in obtaining permits or approvals, changes in local laws or labor conditions, weather delays, increased costs of equipment and materials from inflation, or other factors or our suppliers’

or subcontractors’ inability to perform, then cost overruns may occur. Our approach to include annual price escalations in our bids for multi-year work may be insufficient to counter inflationary cost pressures, which may result in significant cost overruns on our contracts. This could result in reduced profits on a contract, losses on a contract and negative impacts to our cash flows, and our longer-term multi-year contracts could become less favorable to us over time.

We may not be able to obtain compensation for additional work performed or expenses incurred. Additionally, we have in the past and may in the future be required to pay liquidated damages upon our failure to meet schedule or performance requirements of our contracts. Our failure to accurately estimate the resources and time required for fixed-price contracts or our failure to complete our contractual obligations within a specified time frame or cost estimate could result in reduced profits or, in certain cases, a loss for that contract. If the contract is significant, or we encounter issues that impact multiple contracts, cost overruns or schedule delays could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As of July 3, 2026, the future revenue we expect to realize as a result of our backlog was approximately $17.5 billion. Of this amount, we currently estimate that 96% will be recognized in revenue on our consolidated statement of operations and 4% will be recorded by our unconsolidated joint ventures. We cannot guarantee that the revenue projected in our backlog will be realized or that the contracts will be profitable. Many of our contracts are subject to cancellation, termination, or suspension at the discretion of the customer. From time to time, changes in contract scope may occur with respect to contracts reflected in our backlog and could reduce the dollar amount of our backlog or the timing of the revenue and profits that we ultimately earn. Contracts may remain in our backlog for an extended period of time because of the nature of the contract and the timing of the particular services or equipment required by the contract. Delays, suspensions, cancellations, payment defaults, scope changes, and poor contract execution could materially reduce or eliminate profits that we actually realize from contracts in our backlog. We cannot predict the impact that future economic conditions may have on our backlog, which could include a diminished ability to replace backlog once contracts are completed or could result in the termination, modification, or suspension of contracts currently in our backlog. Such developments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may seek business acquisitions as a means of broadening our offerings and capturing additional market opportunities by our business segments. However, there is no guarantee that we will be successful in identifying target companies that meet our criteria for acquisition. We may also face competition from other potential acquirers who have greater financial resources or who are in a position to offer more favorable terms to the target company. This competition may limit our ability to pursue acquisition opportunities, which could negatively affect our growth strategies. Additionally, future acquisitions may require us to obtain equity or debt financing, which may not be available on attractive terms, if at all.

The success of any future business combinations also depends on our ability to integrate the operations of the acquired businesses efficiently and effectively with our existing operations and realize the anticipated benefits from them. The potential risks associated with successful integration and realization of benefits include, but are not limited to the following:

A portion of our revenue is derived from foreign operations, which exposes us to risks inherent in doing business in each of the countries where we transact business. The occurrence of any of the risks described below could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial performance. With respect to any particular country, these risks may include, but not be limited to:

Due to the unsettled political conditions in countries where we provide governmental logistical support, our financial performance is subject to the adverse consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest, strikes, currency controls, and governmental actions. In addition, despite safety precautions, military action or unrest could disrupt our operations in such locations and elsewhere and increase our costs related to security worldwide.

As a U.S. government contractor and a provider of services operating in multiple regulated industries and geographies, we and our business partners (including our service providers, joint venture partners, suppliers and subcontractors) handle a variety of sensitive information concerning our business, employees, and customers, including personally identifiable information, personnel information, protected health information, classified and controlled unclassified information, and financial information. We and our business partners are continuously exposed to cyber and other security threats, including cyberattacks such as malware/computer viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks, insider threats related to malicious and non-malicious activities from authorized and unauthorized employees or third parties, catastrophic events, power outages, natural disasters, computer system or network failures, third party provider service interruptions, or physical break-ins. We also utilize third-party software in the performance of certain critical accounting, contract management, and financial reporting systems. Technological developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning, particularly those that provide actors with the capability to use more sophisticated means to attack our systems, may exacerbate cybersecurity and data privacy risks. Any unauthorized electronic or physical intrusion or other security threat may jeopardize the protection of sensitive or other information stored or transmitted through our information technology systems and networks and those of our business partners and third-party software providers. This could lead to disruptions in our business and result in decreased performance, significant remediation costs, reputational damage, transaction errors, loss of data (including personally identifiable information), data leakage of confidential information, processing inefficiencies, downtime, litigation, and the loss of suppliers or customers. Under certain contracts with the U.S. government subject to the FAR and Cost Accounting Standards for U.S. government contracts (“CAS”), the adequacy of our business processes and related systems could be called into question. Any significant disruptions or failures could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, financial performance, financial condition, and reputation.

Additionally, we work with the defense industrial base industry and the U.S., UK, and Australian governments to gather and share threat intelligence and promote increased awareness and enhanced protections against cybersecurity threats. However, because of the evolving nature of these security threats, our policies, procedures, and other controls might not detect or prevent them, and we cannot predict their full impact. We may experience similar security threats to the information technology systems that we develop, install, or maintain under customer contracts, including customer contracts under which we may have access to or management responsibility for customer databases or networks that contain sensitive information relating to our customers, their employees, or related third parties. Although we work cooperatively with our customers to seek to minimize the impacts of cyber and other security threats, we must usually rely on the safeguards used or required by those customers. In the event of unauthorized access to sensitive information for which we are responsible under customer contracts, our customers, their employees, or third parties may seek to hold us liable for any costs or other damages associated with the unauthorized access. In addition, government agencies may bring legal actions against us for violation of or noncompliance with regulatory requirements relating to any unauthorized access to sensitive information. Any remediation costs, damages, or other liabilities related to unauthorized access of sensitive information of ours or our customers caused by cyber or other security threats may not be fully insured or indemnified by other means or our insurers. Occurrence of any unauthorized access caused by these security threats could adversely affect our reputation, business operations, and financial results.

While we have security measures and technology in place designed to protect our and our customers’ proprietary or classified information, our efforts might not prevent all threats to our computer systems. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently, become more sophisticated and generally are not identified until they are launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. As a result, we may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of system disruptions and security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these disruptions and breaches. Any of these events could damage our reputation, cause us to incur significant liability and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We continuously evaluate the need to upgrade and/or replace our systems and network infrastructure to protect our digital environment, to stay current on vendor supported products and to improve the efficiency of our systems and for other business reasons. The implementation of new systems and information technology could adversely impact our operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time, and risks of delays or

difficulties in transitioning to new systems. In addition, our systems implementations may not result in productivity improvements at the levels anticipated. Systems implementation disruption and any other information technology disruption, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of personal data, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, the UK Data Protection Act, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the California Privacy Rights Act, and other emerging U.S. state and global privacy laws pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate costs and may require changes to our business practices resulting from the variation of regulatory requirements and increased enforcement frequency. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, including related regulatory enforcement and/or private litigation resulting from a potential privacy breach, could result in governmental investigations, significant fines and penalties, damages from private causes of action, or reputational harm. Additionally, we are subject to laws, rules and regulations regarding cross-border transfers of personal data, including laws relating to transfer of personal data outside the European Economic Area. If we cannot rely on existing mechanisms for transferring personal data, we may be unable to transfer personal data of employees and customers in those regions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

As of July 3, 2026, we had $2,089 million of goodwill and $583 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of net assets acquired in business combinations. We perform an annual analysis of our goodwill to determine if it has become impaired. In addition, we perform interim analyses to determine if events have occurred or circumstances have changed that would indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of our goodwill or intangible assets have fallen below their respective carrying values. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, including a significant sustained decline in a reporting unit’s market value, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of our business, potential government actions toward our facilities, and various other factors. If the fair value of a reporting unit is estimated to be less than its carrying value or if the fair value of an intangible asset falls below its carrying value, we could be required to record an impairment charge. An impairment of all or a part of our goodwill or intangible assets could have a material adverse effect on our net earnings and net worth.

Pandemics, epidemics, outbreaks of infectious diseases, or public health crises across the globe have in the past disrupted and may in the future disrupt our business, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and/or future expectations. Our business, operations and financial performance have also been, and may in the future be affected by macroeconomic impacts resulting from pandemics, infectious disease outbreaks, and public health crises. The extent to which our business may in the future be affected by pandemics, infectious disease outbreaks, and other public health crises depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including but not limited to the extent and duration of labor disruptions, business operations disruptions from quarantines, travel restrictions and other requirements imposed by regulators and health authorities, delays, modifications and terminations of contracts, supply chain disruptions, increased cybersecurity and data protection risks, restricted access to or increased costs of raising capital, and other macroeconomic disruptions.

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses for the periods covered and certain amounts disclosed in the accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements and actual results could differ from those estimates, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We execute different contracts in remote locations around the world and procure equipment and materials on a global basis. Depending on the type of contract, location, nature of the work, and the sourcing of equipment and

materials, we may charter seagoing vessels under time and bareboat charter arrangements and assume certain risks typical of those agreements. Such risks may include damage to the ship, liability for cargo, and liability that charterers and vessel operators have to third parties “at law.” In addition, we ship a significant amount of cargo and are subject to hazards of the shipping and transportation industry.

Governments conduct a rigorous competitive process for awarding most contracts. In the services arena, the U.S. government uses multiple contracting approaches. Historically, omnibus contract vehicles have been used for work that is done on a contingency or as-needed basis. In more predictable “sustainment” environments, contracts may include fixed-price, cost-reimbursable, and time-and-materials elements. The U.S. government also favors multiple award task order contracts in which several contractors are selected as eligible bidders for future work. Such processes require successful contractors to continually anticipate customer requirements and develop rapid-response bid and proposal teams as well as maintain supplier relationships and delivery systems to react to emerging needs. Globally, our efforts to win business are subject to the particular bidding and review processes of the jurisdictions in which we operate or may seek to operate in the future. In addition, government procurement practices sometimes emphasize price over qualitative factors, such as technical capability and past performance. As a result of these competitive pricing pressures, our profit margins on future government contracts may be reduced and may require us to make sustained efforts to reduce costs to remain competitive.

We face rigorous competition and pricing pressures for any additional contract awards from the U.S. government and other governments. Many of our existing contracts must be recompeted when their original period of performance ends, representing opportunities for competitors to take market share away from us or for our customers to obtain more favorable terms. We may be required to qualify or continue to qualify under the various multiple award task order contract criteria. Therefore, it may be more difficult for us to win future awards from the U.S. government or other governments, and we may have other contractors sharing in U.S. government or other government awards that we win. Once a contract is awarded, it may be subject to a lengthy protest process. Bid protests can result in significant expenses to us, contract modifications, or even loss of the contract award and the resolution can extend the time until contract activity can begin and delay the recognition of sales and defer underlying cash flows and adversely affect our operating results. Our efforts to protest or challenge any bids for contracts that were not awarded to us also may be unsuccessful.

Our profitability and cash flow may vary materially depending on the types of government contracts undertaken, the nature of services performed under those contracts, the costs incurred in performing the work, the achievement of other performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees is determined, particularly under award and incentive-fee contracts. Failure to perform to customer expectations and contract requirements may result in reduced fees or losses and may adversely affect our financial performance.

We primarily perform work in the U.S. under cost-reimbursable contracts with the DoW and other U.S. governmental agencies. If the U.S. government concludes costs charged to a contract are not reimbursable under the terms of the contract or applicable procurement regulations, these costs are disallowed or, if already reimbursed, we may be required to refund the reimbursed amounts to the customer. Such conditions may also include interest and other financial penalties.

Contract types primarily include fixed-price and cost-reimbursable contracts. Cost-reimbursable contracts provide for the payment of allowable costs incurred during performance of the contract plus a fee up to a ceiling based on the amount that has been funded. Cost, schedule, or technical performance issues with respect to cost-reimbursable contracts could result in reduced fees, lower profit rates, or program cancellation.

Under fixed price contracts, we receive a fixed price irrespective of the actual costs we incur and therefore we carry the burden of any cost overruns. Due to the fixed-price nature of the contracts, if our actual costs exceed our estimates, our margins and profits are reduced and we could incur a loss on the respective contract which could adversely affect our financial results.

Under both fixed-price and cost-reimbursable contracts, if we are unable to control costs, our operating results could be adversely affected. Costs to complete a contract may increase for many reasons, including technical and

manufacturing challenges, schedule delays, workforce-related issues, the timeliness and availability of materials from suppliers, internal and subcontractor performance or product quality issues, inability to meet cost reduction initiatives or achieve efficiencies from digital transformation, changing laws or regulations, inflation, and natural disasters. Certain contracts may impose other risks, such as forfeiting fees, paying penalties, or providing replacement systems in the event of performance failure. Many of our contracts include multiple option years exercisable at the customer’s discretion, which carries risk. The customer may decline to exercise an option, or the customer may exercise an option on a contract for which we expect to incur a loss or perform at a low margin, either of which could adversely affect our financial results.

We face rigorous competition and pricing pressures for any additional contract awards from the U.S. government and other governments. Our industry has experienced, and we expect it will continue to experience, significant changes to business practices as a result of an increased focus on affordability, efficiencies, and recovery of costs, among other items. From time to time, new laws, executive orders, and regulations are enacted, and government agencies adopt new interpretations and enforcement priorities relative to laws and regulations already in effect, including recent U.S. government initiatives such as the FAR overhaul under Executive Order 14275, DOGE and defense acquisition reform. In addition, government agencies have and may continue to face restrictions or pressure regarding the type and amount of services that they may obtain from private contractors. Legislation, regulations, and initiatives dealing with procurement reform as well as any resulting shifts in the buying practices of government agencies, such as increased usage of fixed-price contracts, multiple-award contracts, and small business set-aside contracts, could have adverse effects on government contractors, including us. In addition, government procurement practices sometimes emphasize price over qualitative factors, such as technical capability and past performance. As a result of these competitive pricing pressures, our profit margins on future government contracts may be reduced and may require us to make sustained efforts to reduce costs to remain competitive.

Our programs for the U.S. government often operate for periods of time under Undefinitized Contract Actions, which means that we begin performing our obligations before the terms, specifications, or price are finally agreed to between the parties. The U.S. government has (and has exercised in the past) the ability to unilaterally definitize contracts, which, absent a successful appeal, obligates us to perform under terms and conditions imposed by the U.S. government. This can affect our ability to negotiate mutually agreeable contract terms and, if a contract is unilaterally imposed upon us, it may negatively affect our expected profit and cash flows on a program or impose burdensome terms.

In the U.S., federal legislation, regulations, executive orders, and other initiatives dealing with, among other things, procurement reform, the mitigation of potential organizational conflicts of interest (“OCIs”), the deterrence of fraud, the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion, and changes in corporate environmental obligations, could affect our business. Additionally, we are subject to the laws and regulations of the states in which we operate, which, at times, may conflict with federal laws and regulations, introducing ambiguity.

The ongoing FAR overhaul and other reforms to the U.S. government acquisition process, including changes to procurement rules and regulations, could transform how contracts are awarded, negotiated, and managed, which could lead to delays in contract awards and/or modifications to the scope or terms of contracts we hold. As a result of these changes, or changes in the procurement laws, rules, and regulations adopted in other jurisdictions in which we operate, we could face increased competition, greater scrutiny, a more complex regulatory environment, heightened compliance requirements, and additional administrative burdens, all of which have the potential to affect our profitability.

We serve markets that are global and highly competitive. We compete with larger companies that have greater name recognition, financial resources, and a larger technical staff. We also compete with smaller, more specialized companies that are able to concentrate their resources on particular areas. Additionally, we compete with the U.S. government’s own capabilities.

The markets in which we operate are characterized by rapidly changing technology and the needs of our customers change and evolve regularly. Therefore, our success depends on our ability to invest in and develop our people and technology to enable us to deliver services and products that address these changing needs. To remain competitive, we must consistently provide superior service, technology, and performance on a cost-effective basis to our customers

while understanding customer priorities and maintaining customer relationships. Our competitors may be able to provide our customers with differentiated or superior capabilities or technologies or more attractive contract terms than we can provide, including technical qualifications, past contract experience, geographic presence, price, and the availability of qualified professional personnel. Some of our competitors have made or could make acquisitions of businesses, or establish teaming or other agreements among themselves or third parties, that allow them to offer more competitive, and comprehensive solutions. As a result of such acquisitions or arrangements, our current or potential competitors may be able to accelerate the adoption of new technologies that better address customer needs, devote greater resources to bring these products and services to market, initiate or withstand substantial price competition, or develop and expand their product and service offerings at a more accelerated rate. These competitive pressures in our market or our failure to compete effectively may result in fewer orders, reduced revenue and margins and loss of market share.

U.S. government contracts are subject to specific regulations such as the FAR, the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Statute, CAS, the Service Contract Act, and DoW security regulations. Failure to comply with any of these regulations, requirements, or statutes may result in contract price adjustments, financial penalties, or contract termination. Our U.S. government contracts are subject to audits, cost reviews and investigations by U.S. government contracting oversight agencies such as the Defense Contract Audit Agency (the “DCAA”) or relevant agency inspectors general. The DCAA reviews the adequacy of, and our compliance with, our internal control systems and policies, including our labor, billing, accounting, purchasing, property, estimating, compensation, and management information systems. The DCAA has the authority to conduct audits and reviews to determine if we are complying with the requirements under the FAR and CAS, pertaining to the allocation, period assignment, and allowability of costs assigned to U.S. government contracts. The DCAA presents its report findings to the Defense Contract Management Agency (the “DCMA”). Should the DCMA determine that we have not complied with the terms of our contract or applicable statutes and regulations, payments to us may be disallowed, which could result in adjustments to previously reported revenue and refunding of previously collected cash proceeds. Additionally, we previously have been, and may in the future be subject to, additional qui tam litigation brought by private individuals on behalf of the U.S. government under the Federal False Claims Act, which could include claims for treble damages. These suits may remain under seal (and hence, be unknown to us) for some time while the U.S. government decides whether to intervene on behalf of the qui tam plaintiff. For more information, see Note 15 “U.S. Government Matters” to our audited combined financial statements and Note 11 “U.S. Government Matters” to our unaudited condensed combined financial statements included in this information statement.

Given the demands of working for the U.S. government, we may have disagreements or experience performance issues. When performance issues arise under any of our U.S. government contracts, the U.S. government retains the right to pursue remedies, which could include termination under any affected contract. If any contract were so terminated, our ability to secure future contracts could be adversely affected. Other remedies that could be sought by our U.S. government customers for any improper activities or performance issues include sanctions such as withholding of payments, liquidated damages, and suspensions or debarment from doing business with the U.S. government. Further, the negative publicity that could arise from disagreements with our customers or sanctions as a result thereof could have an adverse effect on our reputation in the industry, reduce our ability to compete for new contracts, and may also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

A significant portion of our revenue is from contracts with the U.S. government that are classified or subject to security restrictions that preclude the disclosure of certain information. Additionally, a large number of our employees have security clearances which prohibit them from providing information to investors and other Trinzic employees without security clearances regarding certain customers and the related services we provide to them. As we are limited in our ability to provide information about these contracts and services, such as the scope of work, associated risks, and any disputes or claims, our investors may have limited insight into a substantial portion of our business which may hinder their ability to fully evaluate the risks related to that portion of our business.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from contracts with agencies and departments of the U.S., the UK, and Australia governments, which is directly affected by changes in government spending priorities and availability of adequate funding. Additionally, government regulations generally include the right for government agencies to modify, delay, curtail, renegotiate, or terminate contracts at their convenience any time prior to their completion. As we are a significant government contractor, our financial performance is affected by the allocation and prioritization of government spending. Factors that could affect current and future government spending include:

We face uncertainty with respect to our government contracts due to the political, fiscal, economic, and budgetary challenges facing our customers. Potential contract delays, modifications, or terminations may arise from resolution of these issues and could cause our revenue, profits, and cash flows to be lower than our current projections. The loss of work we perform for governments or decreases in governmental spending and outsourcing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and cash flows.

We finance our business using cash provided by operations but also depend on the availability of and access to credit markets, including bank credit lines, letters of credit, and surety bonds. Our ability to obtain capital or financing on satisfactory terms will depend in part on prevailing market conditions as well as our operating results. The lack of adequate credit or funding or the unavailability of funding on terms satisfactory to us, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. Rising or high inflation and/or interest rates could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and we may not be able to fully offset such higher rates.

Our government customers may face budget deficits that prohibit them from funding proposed and existing contracts or that cause them to exercise their right to terminate our contracts with little or no prior notice. Furthermore, any financial difficulties suffered by our subcontractors or suppliers could increase our costs or adversely impact contract schedules. These disruptions could materially impact our backlog and financial performance.

We also routinely enter into contracts with counterparties, including vendors, suppliers, and subcontractors that may be negatively affected by events in the capital markets. If those counterparties are unable to perform their obligations to us or our customers, we may be required to provide additional services or make alternate arrangements on less favorable terms with other parties to ensure adequate performance and delivery of service to our customers. These circumstances could also lead to disputes and litigation with our partners or customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Furthermore, our cash balances and short-term investments are maintained in accounts held at major banks and financial institutions located primarily in North America, the UK, and Australia. Deposits are in amounts that exceed available insurance. Although none of the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and investments have gone into bankruptcy, been forced into receivership or have been seized by their governments, there is a risk that this may occur in the future. If this were to occur, we would be at risk of not being able to access our cash and investments, which may result in a temporary decrease in liquidity that could impede our ability to fund operations or execute acquisitions.

Customers may require us to provide credit enhancements, including letters of credit, bank guarantees, or surety bonds. We are often required to provide performance guarantees to customers to indemnify the customer should we fail to perform our obligations under the contract. Failure to provide the required credit enhancements on terms required by a customer may result in an inability to bid, win, or comply with the contract. Due to events that affect the banking and insurance markets, letters of credit or surety bonds may be difficult to obtain or may only be available at significant cost. Moreover, many contracts are very large and complex, which often necessitates the use of a joint venture, often with a market competitor, to bid on and perform the contract. Entering into joint ventures or partnerships exposes us to the credit and performance risk of third parties, many of whom may not be financially as strong or may encounter financial difficulties. If our joint ventures or partners fail to perform, we may be required to complete the contract activities. In addition, future contracts may require us to obtain letters of credit. Any inability to bid for or win new contracts due to the failure of obtaining adequate letters of credit, surety bonds, or other customary credit enhancements could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects and future revenue.

We have frozen defined benefit pension plans for employees in the U.S. and UK. At July 3, 2026, our defined benefit pension plan in the UK had an aggregate funding surplus (calculated as the excess of the fair value of plan assets over the projected benefit obligations) of approximately $107 million. In the future, our pension surpluses and deficits may increase or decrease depending on changes in the levels of interest rates, pension plan asset performance, and other factors that may require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans and recognize further increases in our net pension cost to satisfy our funding requirements. If we are required or elect to make up all or a significant portion of the deficit for any underfunded benefit plans, our financial position could be materially and adversely affected.

While our UK pension plan has been frozen to new participants and to ongoing benefit accrual for a number of years, we can still have an aggregate funding deficit due to a number of assumptions and factors, as noted below. For our frozen defined benefit pension plan in the UK, the annual minimum funding requirements are based on an agreement with the plan trustees that is negotiated on a triennial basis, and in addition there are other contingent assurances and commitments regarding the business and assets that support the UK pension plan. It is possible that, following future valuations of our UK pension plan assets and liabilities or following future discussions with the trustees, the annual funding obligation will change. The future valuations under our UK pension plan can be affected by a number of assumptions and factors, including legislative changes, assumptions regarding interest rates, inflation, mortality and retirement rates, the investment strategy, and performance of the plan assets and (in certain circumstance) actions by the UK pensions regulator. Adverse changes in the equity markets, interest rates or actuarial assumptions, and legislative or other regulatory actions could increase the risk that the funding requirements increase following the next triennial negotiation. A significant increase in our funding requirements for our UK pension plan could result in a material adverse effect on our cash flows and financial position.

Additionally, the UK pension plan is sponsored by a UK Trinzic entity, and so following the separation, the plan will be retained by Trinzic. Some of the contingent assurances and commitments in place from the UK pension plan are given by KBR entities, and so prior to the separation, KBR will need to agree with the plan trustees that these should be released, which may require new contingent assurances or commitments from Trinzic to replace existing support from KBR.

We generally attempt to denominate our contracts in U.S. dollars or in the currencies of our costs. However, we enter into contracts that subject us to currency risk exposure, primarily when our contract revenue are denominated in a currency different from the contract costs. A portion of our consolidated revenue and consolidated operating expenses are in foreign currencies. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency risks, including risks resulting from changes in currency exchange rates and limitations on our ability to reinvest earnings from operations in one country to fund the financing requirements of our operations in other countries.

The governments of certain countries have or may in the future impose restrictive exchange controls on local currencies and it may not be possible for us to engage in effective hedging transactions to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations of a particular currency. We are often required to pay all or a portion of our costs associated with a contract in the local currency. As a result, we generally attempt to negotiate contract terms with our customer, who is often affiliated with the local government, or has a significant local presence, to provide that we are only paid in the local currency for amounts that match our local expenses. If we are unable to match our local currency costs with revenue in the local currency, we would be exposed to the risk of adverse changes in currency exchange rates.

To the extent that we export products, technical data, and services outside of the U.S., we are subject to laws and regulations governing trade, exports, and sanctions including, but not limited to, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, and trade sanctions against embargoed countries, entities, and individuals, including sanctions and export restrictions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which are administered by the Office of Foreign Asset Control within the Department of the Treasury. In addition, in 2025, the U.S. Government announced significant trade policy changes and reciprocal tariffs imposed pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the “IEEPA”). In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the IEEPA does not authorize the U.S. Government to impose tariffs, invalidating the reciprocal tariffs and certain country-specific tariffs previously imposed by executive orders. Following this decision, the U.S. Government immediately imposed new global tariffs pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows for tariffs of up to 15% for a period of up to 150 days. These tariffs expired in July 2026. A failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal penalties or sanctions, including the imposition of fines as well as the denial of export privileges and debarment from participation in U.S. government contracts. U.S. government contract violations could result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties or sanctions, contract termination, forfeiture of profit or suspension of payment, any of which could result in losing our status as an eligible U.S. government contractor and cause us to suffer serious reputational harm, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act and similar anti-bribery laws (collectively, “Anti-bribery Laws”) in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with Anti-bribery Laws may conflict with local customs and practices. We train our staff concerning Anti-bribery Laws and we also inform our partners, subcontractors, agents, and other third parties who work for us or on our behalf that they must comply with the requirements of these Anti-bribery Laws. We also have procedures and controls in place to monitor internal and external compliance. Our internal controls and procedures might not always protect us from the reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or third parties working on our behalf. If we are found to be liable for violations of these laws (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Certain work sites often expose our employees and others to large pieces of mechanized equipment and moving vehicles. Additionally, our employees and others at certain project sites may be exposed to severe weather events, austere or remote environments, or high security risks. Failure to implement effective safety procedures may result in injury, disability, or loss of life to these parties. In addition, the contracts may be delayed and we may be exposed to litigation or investigations.

Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental, worker health and safety laws, and regulations governing the generation, management, and use of regulated materials, the discharge of materials into the environment, the remediation of environmental contamination associated with the release of hazardous substances, and human health and safety. Violations of these laws and regulations can cause significant delays and additional costs to a project. We may be subject to claims alleging personal injury, property damage, or natural resource damages by employees, customers, and third parties as a result of alleged exposure to or contamination by hazardous substances. In addition, we may be subject to fines, penalties, or other liabilities arising under environmental and employee safety laws. A claim, if not covered by insurance at all or only partially, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. In addition, more stringent regulation of our customers’ operations with respect to the protection of the environment could also adversely affect their operations and reduce demand for our services.

Various U.S. federal, state, and local as well as foreign environmental laws and regulations may impose liability for property damage and costs of investigation and cleanup of hazardous or toxic substances on property currently or previously owned by us or arising out of our waste management or environmental remediation activities. These laws may impose responsibility and liability without regard to knowledge or causation of the presence of contaminants. The liability under these laws may be joint and several. The ongoing costs of complying with existing environmental laws and regulations could be substantial and have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Changes in the environmental laws and regulations, remediation obligations, enforcement actions, stricter interpretations of existing requirements, future discovery of contamination or claims for damages to persons, property, natural resources, or the environment could result in material costs and liabilities that we currently do not anticipate.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining certain components of our worldwide provision for income taxes and a change in tax laws, treaties, or regulations, or their interpretation, in any country in which we operate could result in higher taxes on our earnings, which could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations. In the ordinary course of our business, there are certain transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are audited by various U.S. and foreign tax authorities in the ordinary course of business, and our tax estimates and tax positions could be materially affected by many factors including the final outcome of tax audits and related litigation, the introduction of new tax accounting standards, legislation, regulations and related interpretations, our global mix of earnings, the realizability of deferred tax assets, and changes in uncertain tax positions. In particular, international operations could adversely be affected by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s proposed international taxation reform and introduction of a global minimum tax. A significant increase in tax rates could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and liquidity.

We are subject to numerous state, federal, and international laws and directives and regulations in the U.S. and abroad that involve matters central to our business, including but not limited to, data privacy and security, employment and labor relations, immigration, taxation, anti-corruption, anti-bribery, import-export controls, trade restrictions, internal and disclosure control obligations, securities regulation, and anti-competition restrictions. Compliance with legal requirements is costly, time-consuming and requires significant resources. Violations of one or more of these legal requirements in the conduct of our business could result in significant fines and other damages, criminal sanctions against us or our officers, prohibitions on doing business, and damage to our reputation. Violations of these regulations

or contractual obligations related to regulatory compliance in connection with the performance of customer contracts could also result in liability for significant monetary damages, fines and criminal prosecution, unfavorable publicity and other reputational damage, restrictions on our ability to compete for certain work, and allegations by our customers that we have not performed our contractual obligations.

Many of our U.S. government contracts contain OCI clauses that may limit our ability to compete for or perform certain other contracts or other types of services for particular customers. OCI arises when we engage in activities that may make us unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the U.S. government, impair our objectivity in performing contract work, or provide us with an unfair competitive advantage. Existing OCI, and any OCI that may develop, could, if not mitigated to the satisfaction of the customer, preclude our competition for or performance on a significant project or contract, which could limit our opportunities. Further, we occasionally hire former government employees who may be subject to certain representation or non-disclosure obligations. These representation restrictions may, if not honored, result in disqualification from competition or loss of contract, and the violation of such obligations could result in criminal liability for the former government employee. These former government employees may also have had access to competitively sensitive or commercially usable information that, if not properly firewalled, could result in allegations of unfair competition and, if such findings are made, loss of contract award.

We are subject to and may become a party to various other litigation, claims, investigations, audits, enforcement actions, arbitrations, or other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. Adverse judgments or settlements in some or all of these legal disputes may result in significant monetary damages, penalties, or injunctive relief against us. Any claims or litigation could be costly to defend, and even if we are successful or fully indemnified or insured, they could damage our reputation and make it more difficult to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future, and responding to any action may result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources. Litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future. For more information, see Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our audited combined financial statements and Note 10 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our unaudited condensed combined financial statements included in this information statement.

Continued attention to issues concerning climate risks or other environmental matters may result in the imposition of additional environmental regulations, rules, standards, and policies that seek to restrict, or otherwise impose limitations or costs upon our operations and the emission of greenhouse gases.

Furthermore, investor and societal expectations with respect to corporate responsibility matters have been rapidly evolving and increasing. We risk damage to our reputation if we do not act responsibly in the following key areas: anti-discrimination, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, and corporate governance and transparency. A failure to adequately meet stakeholders’ expectations may result in loss of business, diluted market valuation, an inability to attract and retain customers and talented personnel, increased negative investor sentiment toward us and/or our customers, and the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and costs of capital. In some cases, certain of our key stakeholders may have oppositional or conflicting views and expectations with respect to various matters (e.g., some may be pro-environmental stewardship and others may be anti-sustainability initiatives). In such cases, it may be difficult or impossible for us to meet all stakeholders’ expectations, and the decisions we make may not yield the results that we expect or intend.

In addition, standards for tracking and reporting corporate responsibility matters continue to evolve. New laws, regulations, policies, and international accords relating to such matters, including sustainability, climate-related risks, human capital, and anti-discrimination, are being developed and formalized in Europe, the United States, Asia, and

elsewhere, which may entail specific, target-driven frameworks and/or disclosure requirements. Our selection of voluntary disclosure frameworks and standards, and the interpretation or application of those frameworks and standards, may change from time to time or differ from those of others, and may not be in line with any new and forthcoming related disclosure rules in the United States and abroad. In addition, methodologies for reporting data in these areas (e.g., sustainability and climate-related impacts, or human capital data) may be updated and previously reported data may be adjusted to reflect improvement in availability and quality of internal and third-party data, changing assumptions, changes in the nature and scope of our operations, and other changes in circumstances. Our processes and controls for reporting such matters across our operations and supply chain are evolving along with multiple disparate standards for identifying, measuring and reporting metrics, including related disclosures that may be required by the SEC, European and other regulators, and such standards may change over time, which could result in significant revisions to our current goals, reported progress in achieving such goals, or ability to achieve such goals in the future. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply fully with developing interpretations of such laws and regulations could harm our business, reputation, financial condition, and operating results and require significant time and resources to make the necessary adjustments. If our corporate responsibility practices do not meet evolving investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, then our reputation or our attractiveness as an investment, business partner, acquirer, service provider, or employer could be negatively impacted.

Climate-related events, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, wildfires, droughts, hurricanes, freezing conditions, and other natural disasters, may have a long-term impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Although we are proactively seeking measures to mitigate our business risks associated with climate-related events, we recognize that there are innate climate-related risks regardless of where and how we conduct our businesses. As such, a potential disruption to our and our customer’s businesses from a natural disaster may cause us to experience work stoppages, project delays, financial losses, and additional costs to resume operations such as increased insurance costs or loss of coverage, legal liability, and reputational damage.

Certain of our customers in non-U.S. jurisdictions impose sustainability requirements, reporting obligations, or evaluation criteria as conditions of contract eligibility or as weighted factors in competitive procurement processes. These requirements may include greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets, environmental management standards, supply chain sustainability disclosures, and climate-related reporting aligned with local or regional regulatory frameworks. Our ability to satisfy these requirements is subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, including:

We may also face challenges adapting to divergent or conflicting sustainability standards across the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate. If we are unable to meet the sustainability requirements or expectations embedded in customer procurement processes — or if we fail to maintain adequate sustainability reporting and performance levels — we may be excluded from bidding on certain contracts, lose existing customers, or be placed at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors who have achieved higher sustainability credentials. Any such outcome could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, particularly with respect to our international operations.

The historical information about Trinzic in this information statement refers to Trinzic’s business as operated by and integrated with KBR. Trinzic’s historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement is derived from the audited combined financial statements and accounting records of KBR. Accordingly, the historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement does not necessarily reflect the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows that Trinzic would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company during the periods presented or those that Trinzic will achieve in the future primarily as a result of the factors described below:

Other significant changes may occur in Trinzic’s cost structure, management, financing and business operations as a result of operating as a company separate from KBR. See the sections entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited combined financial statements, unaudited condensed combined financial statements, and accompanying notes included in this information statement.

The separation will result in each of Trinzic and KBR being smaller, less diversified companies with more limited businesses concentrated in their respective industries. As a result, our company may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, the diversification of our revenue, costs, and cash flows will diminish as a standalone company, such that our results of operations, cash flows, working capital, and financing requirements may be subject to increased volatility and our ability to fund capital expenditures and investments, pay dividends, and service debt may be diminished. Following the separation, we may also lose capital allocation efficiency and flexibility, as we will no longer be able to use cash flow from KBR to fund our investments into our business.

There is a risk that, by separating from KBR, Trinzic may become more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than it would have been if it were still a part of the current KBR organizational structure. As part of KBR, Trinzic has been able to enjoy certain benefits from KBR’s operating diversity, purchasing power, and opportunities to pursue integrated strategies with KBR’s other businesses. As a separate, publicly traded company, Trinzic will not have similar diversity or integration opportunities and may not have similar purchasing power or access to capital markets.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this information statement are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what Trinzic’s actual financial condition or results of operations would have been had the separation been completed on the date indicated. The assumptions used in preparing the pro forma financial information may not prove to be accurate and other factors may affect Trinzic’s financial condition or results of operations. Accordingly, Trinzic’s financial condition and results of operations in the future may not be evident from or consistent with such pro forma financial information.

Immediately following the distribution, it is expected that KBR will own [•]% of the economic interest and voting power of Trinzic outstanding common stock. Subject to the restrictions described below, future sales of these shares in the public market will be subject to the volume and other restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for so long as KBR is deemed to be our affiliate, unless the shares to be sold are registered with SEC pursuant to the stockholder and registration rights agreement to be entered into between Trinzic and KBR in connection with the separation or otherwise. We are unable to predict with certainty whether or when KBR will sell a substantial number of shares of our common stock following the distribution. Sales or distributions by KBR or others of a substantial number of shares after the distribution, or a perception that such sales or distributions could occur, could significantly reduce the market price of Trinzic common stock. Upon completion of the distribution, except as otherwise described herein, all shares of Trinzic common stock that are being distributed hereby will be freely tradable without restriction, assuming they are not held by Trinzic’s affiliates.

Immediately following the distribution, Trinzic intends to file a registration statement on Form S-8 registering under the Securities Act the shares of Trinzic common stock reserved for issuance under Trinzic’s employee benefits plans. If equity securities granted under Trinzic’s employee benefits plans are sold or it is perceived that they will be sold in the public market, the trading price of Trinzic common stock could decline substantially. These sales also could impede Trinzic’s ability to raise future capital.

Some of Trinzic’s customers, prospective customers, suppliers, or other companies with whom we conduct business may conclude that Trinzic’s financial stability as a separate, publicly traded company is insufficient to satisfy their requirements for doing or continuing to do business with them, or may require Trinzic to provide additional credit support, such as letters of credit or other financial guarantees. Any failure of parties to be satisfied with Trinzic’s financial stability could have a material adverse effect on Trinzic’s business and financial statements.

The separation agreement, among other things, provides for indemnification obligations (for uncapped amounts) designed to make Trinzic financially responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to its business activities, whether incurred prior to or after the separation, as well as any other liabilities it agrees to assume pursuant to the separation agreement. If Trinzic is required to indemnify KBR under the circumstances set forth in the separation agreement, Trinzic may be subject to substantial liabilities. See the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—The Separation Agreement—Release of Claims and Indemnification.”

Pursuant to the separation agreement and certain other agreements with KBR, KBR will agree to indemnify Trinzic for certain liabilities as discussed in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” However, third parties could also seek to hold Trinzic responsible for any of the liabilities that KBR has agreed to retain, and the indemnity from KBR may be insufficient to protect Trinzic against the full amount of such liabilities, or KBR may be unable to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. In addition, KBR’s insurance will not necessarily be available to Trinzic for liabilities associated with occurrences of indemnified liabilities prior to the separation, and in any event KBR’s insurers may deny coverage to Trinzic for liabilities associated with certain occurrences of indemnified liabilities prior to the separation. Moreover, even if Trinzic ultimately succeeds in recovering from KBR or such insurance providers any amounts for which Trinzic is held liable, Trinzic may be temporarily required to bear these losses. Each of these risks could negatively affect Trinzic’s business and financial statements.

The distribution, along with certain related transactions, is conditioned upon the receipt by KBR of (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS (the “Ruling”) and (ii) opinions of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and Baker & McKenzie LLP, tax counsel to KBR. The Ruling and opinions of tax counsel, taken together, will support the intended U.S. federal income tax treatment of the distribution, along with certain related transactions, as tax-free under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. KBR has submitted a request for the Ruling from the IRS. The Ruling and the opinions of tax counsel will rely on certain facts, assumptions, representations, and undertakings from KBR and Trinzic regarding the past and future conduct of the companies’ respective businesses and other matters. If any of these facts, assumptions, representations, or undertakings are incorrect or not otherwise satisfied, KBR and its stockholders may not be able to rely on the Ruling or the opinions of tax counsel and could be subject to significant tax liabilities. Notwithstanding the Ruling or opinions of tax counsel, the IRS could determine on audit that the distribution or any of the certain related transactions is taxable if it determines that any of these facts, assumptions, representations, or undertakings from KBR or Trinzic are not correct or have been violated or if it disagrees with the conclusions in the opinions that are not covered by the Ruling, or for other reasons, including as a result of certain significant changes in the stock ownership of KBR or Trinzic after the distribution. If the distribution or any of the relevant related transactions is determined to be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes, KBR and/or its stockholders could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities, and Trinzic could also incur significant liabilities. For a discussion of the tax consequences of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, see the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

In addition, under the tax matters agreement between KBR and Trinzic, Trinzic will generally be required to indemnify KBR against taxes and related liabilities incurred by KBR that result from a breach of any representation made by Trinzic, or as a result of Trinzic taking or failing to take, as the case may be, certain actions, including in each case those provided in connection with the Ruling and opinions of tax counsel, that result in the distribution, together with certain related transactions, failing to meet the requirements of a tax-free distribution under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. For a discussion of the tax matters agreement, please see the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Tax Matters Agreement.”

To preserve the intended tax-free treatment of the distribution and certain related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under the tax matters agreement that Trinzic will enter into with KBR, Trinzic will generally be restricted from taking any action that could jeopardize or impede such intended U.S. federal income tax treatment. Under the tax matters agreement, for the two-year period following the distribution, as described in the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Tax Matters Agreement,” Trinzic will be subject to specific restrictions on its ability to enter into certain acquisition, merger, liquidation, sale, and stock redemption transactions. These restrictions may limit Trinzic’s ability to pursue certain strategic transactions or other transactions that it may

believe to be in the best interests of its stockholders or that might increase the value of its business. These restrictions generally will not limit the acquisition of other businesses by Trinzic for cash consideration. In addition, under the tax matters agreement, Trinzic may be required to indemnify KBR against any such tax liabilities as a result of an acquisition of Trinzic’s stock or assets, even if Trinzic does not participate in or otherwise facilitate the acquisition. Furthermore, Trinzic will be subject to specific restrictions on discontinuing the active conduct of its trade or business, issuing or selling its stock or other securities (including securities convertible into Trinzic stock but excluding certain compensatory arrangements), and selling its assets outside the ordinary course of business. Such restrictions may reduce Trinzic’s strategic and operating flexibility. For more information, see the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Tax Matters Agreement.”

Because of their current or former positions with KBR, certain of Trinzic’s expected executive officers and directors own equity interests in KBR. Continuing ownership of shares of KBR common stock and equity awards could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest if Trinzic and KBR face decisions that could have implications for both KBR and Trinzic after the separation. In addition, if one or more of KBR’s current directors joins the Trinzic board of directors, this could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when Trinzic and KBR encounter opportunities or face decisions that could have implications for both companies following the separation or in connection with the allocation of such director’s time between KBR and Trinzic.

Potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between KBR and Trinzic regarding the terms of the agreements governing the separation and distribution and Trinzic’s relationship with KBR following the separation and distribution. See the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” for information about these agreements. Potential conflicts of interest may also arise out of any commercial arrangements that Trinzic or KBR may enter into in the future. A dispute regarding a potential or actual conflict of interest involving Trinzic and KBR could negatively impact Trinzic’s businesses, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. In addition, public perception of such an actual or apparent conflict of interest could pose reputational risks and expose Trinzic to increased scrutiny from investors and regulators.

Trinzic may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits expected to result from the separation, or such benefits may be delayed or not occur at all. The separation is expected to provide the following benefits, among others:

Trinzic may not achieve these and other anticipated benefits for a variety of reasons, including, among others:

If Trinzic fails to achieve some or all of the benefits expected to result from the separation, or if such benefits are delayed, the business, operating results and financial condition of Trinzic could be adversely affected.

The agreements Trinzic will enter into with KBR in connection with the separation, including the separation agreement, transition services agreement, employee matters agreement, tax matters agreement, master services

agreements, a sublease agreement, and stockholder and registration rights agreement were prepared in the context of Trinzic’s separation from KBR while Trinzic was still a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR. Accordingly, during the period in which the terms of those agreements were prepared, Trinzic did not have a separate or independent board of directors or a management team that was separate from or independent of KBR. As a result, the terms of those agreements may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations between unaffiliated third parties. Arm’s-length negotiations between KBR and an unaffiliated third party in another form of transaction, such as a buyer in a sale of a business transaction, may have resulted in more favorable terms to the unaffiliated third party. For more information, see the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.”

The separation agreement and other agreements to be entered into in connection with the separation will determine the allocation of assets and liabilities between the companies following the separation for those respective areas and will include any necessary indemnifications related to liabilities and obligations. The transition services agreement will provide for the performance of certain services by each company for the benefit of the other for a period of time after the separation. Trinzic will rely on KBR after the separation to satisfy its performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If KBR is unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, Trinzic could incur operational difficulties or losses. If Trinzic does not have in place its own systems and services, or if Trinzic does not have agreements with other providers of these services once certain transition services terminate, Trinzic may not be able to operate its business effectively and its profitability may decline. Trinzic is in the process of creating its own, or engaging third parties to provide, systems and services to replace many of the systems and services that KBR currently provides to Trinzic. However, Trinzic may not be successful in implementing these systems and services or in transitioning data from KBR’s systems to Trinzic’s.

In addition, Trinzic expects this process to be complex, time-consuming, and costly. Trinzic is also establishing or expanding its own tax, treasury, internal audit, investor relations, corporate governance and listed company compliance, and other corporate functions. Trinzic expects to incur one-time costs to replicate, or outsource from other providers, these corporate functions to replace the corporate services that KBR historically provided Trinzic prior to the separation. Any failure or significant downtime in Trinzic’s own financial, administrative, or other support systems or in the KBR financial, administrative, or other support systems during the transitional period during which KBR provides Trinzic with support could negatively impact Trinzic’s business and financial statements or prevent Trinzic from paying its suppliers and employees, executing business combinations and foreign currency transactions, or performing administrative or other services on a timely basis, which could negatively affect Trinzic’s business and financial statements.

In particular, Trinzic’s day-to-day business operations rely on information technology systems. A significant portion of the communications among Trinzic’s personnel, customers and suppliers take place on information technology platforms. Trinzic expects the transfer of information technology systems from KBR to Trinzic to be complex, time consuming and costly. There is also a risk of data loss in the process of transferring information technology. As a result of Trinzic’s reliance on information technology systems, the cost of such information technology integration and transfer and any such loss of key data could have an adverse effect on Trinzic’s business and financial statements.

Trinzic expects to complete one or more financing transactions before the distribution is completed, including through one or more subsidiaries that will be contributed to Trinzic prior to the distribution. Approximately $[•] of the proceeds of such financings are expected to be used to distribute cash to KBR. As a result of such transactions, prior to the closing of the separation, Trinzic anticipates having approximately $[•] of outstanding indebtedness and the ability to incur up to an additional $[•] of indebtedness under a revolving credit facility. Trinzic’s capital structure remains under review and will be finalized prior to the distribution. Trinzic may also add incremental term loan facilities, increase commitments under the revolving credit facility or otherwise incur additional indebtedness in the future.

This significant amount of debt could potentially have important consequences to Trinzic and its debt and equity investors, including:

The revolving credit facility will not be available for borrowings until the date on which certain conditions are satisfied, which Trinzic expects will be satisfied prior to or concurrently with the completion of the distribution. The instruments governing Trinzic’s indebtedness will contain restrictive covenants that will limit Trinzic’s ability to engage in activities that may be in Trinzic’s long-term interest. If Trinzic breaches any of the restrictive covenants and cannot obtain a waiver from the lenders on favorable terms, subject to applicable cure periods, the outstanding indebtedness (and any other indebtedness with cross-default provisions) could be declared immediately due and payable, which would adversely affect Trinzic’s liquidity and financial statements. In addition, any failure to obtain and maintain credit ratings from independent rating agencies could adversely affect Trinzic’s cost of funds and could adversely affect Trinzic’s liquidity and access to the capital markets.

Additionally, Trinzic has historically relied upon KBR to provide credit support or fund its working capital requirements and other cash requirements. After the separation and distribution, Trinzic will not be able to rely on the earnings, assets, or cash flow of KBR, and KBR will not provide credit support or funds to finance Trinzic’s working capital or other cash requirements. As a result, after the separation and distribution, Trinzic will be responsible for servicing its own debt and obtaining and maintaining sufficient working capital and other funds to satisfy its cash requirements. After the separation and distribution, Trinzic’s access to and cost of debt financing will be different from the historical access to and cost of debt financing under KBR. Differences in access to and cost of debt financing may result in differences in the interest rate charged to Trinzic on financings, as well as the amount of indebtedness, types of financing structures and debt markets that may be available to Trinzic.

To the extent that Trinzic incurs additional indebtedness, the risks described above could increase. In addition, Trinzic’s actual cash requirements in the future may be greater than expected. Trinzic’s cash flow from operations may not be sufficient to repay all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due, and Trinzic may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms, or at all, to refinance its debt.

Trinzic’s ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance its debt obligations depends on its financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory, and other factors beyond Trinzic’s control. Trinzic may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit it to pay the principal and interest on its indebtedness.

If Trinzic’s cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, Trinzic could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure, or refinance its indebtedness. Trinzic may not be able to effect any such alternative measures on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, those alternative actions may not allow Trinzic to meet its scheduled debt service obligations. The instruments that will govern Trinzic’s indebtedness may restrict its ability to dispose of assets and may restrict the use of proceeds from those dispositions. Trinzic may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations when due.

In addition, Trinzic conducts operations through its subsidiaries. Accordingly, repayment of Trinzic’s indebtedness will depend on the generation of cash flow by Trinzic’s subsidiaries, including certain international subsidiaries, and their ability to make such cash available to Trinzic, by dividend, debt repayment, or otherwise. Trinzic’s subsidiaries may not have any obligation to pay amounts due on Trinzic’s indebtedness or to make funds available for that purpose. Trinzic’s subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make adequate distributions to enable Trinzic to make payments in respect of Trinzic’s indebtedness. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal, tax, and contractual restrictions may limit Trinzic’s ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries. If Trinzic does not receive distributions from its subsidiaries, Trinzic may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on its indebtedness.

Trinzic’s inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, may materially adversely affect its business and financial statements and its ability to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness or pay dividends on its common stock.

Certain entities and assets that are part of Trinzic’s separation from KBR may not be transferred prior to the distribution or at all because the entities or assets, as applicable, are subject to foreign government or third-party approvals that Trinzic may not receive prior to the distribution or at all. Such approvals may include, but are not limited to, approvals to merge or demerge, to form new legal entities (including obtaining required registrations and/or licenses or permits) and to transfer assets and/or liabilities. It is currently anticipated that all material transfers will occur without delays that extend beyond the separation, but such transfers may be delayed beyond the separation or ultimately may not occur at all. To the extent such transfers do not occur prior to the distribution, under the separation agreement, the economic benefits and burdens of owning such assets and/or entities will, to the extent reasonably possible and permitted by applicable law, be provided to the Company.

In the event such transfers do not occur or are significantly delayed because Trinzic does not receive the required approvals, Trinzic may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of Trinzic’s separation from KBR and Trinzic may be dependent on KBR for transition services for a longer period of time than would otherwise be the case. For additional information, see the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business.”

The separation agreement will provide that certain contracts, permits, and other assets and rights are to be transferred from KBR or its subsidiaries to Trinzic or its subsidiaries in connection with the separation. The transfer of certain of these contracts, permits, and other assets and rights may require consents or approvals of third parties or governmental authorities or provide other rights to third parties. In addition, in some circumstances, we and KBR are joint beneficiaries of contracts, and we and KBR may need the consents of third parties in order to split or separate the existing contracts or the relevant portion of the existing contracts to us or KBR.

Some parties may use consent requirements or other rights to seek to terminate contracts or obtain more favorable contractual terms from us, which, for example, could take the form of adverse price changes, require us to expend additional resources in order to obtain the services or assets previously provided under the contract or require us to seek arrangements with new third parties or obtain letters of credit or other forms of credit support. If we are unable to obtain required consents or approvals, we may be unable to obtain the benefits, permits, assets, and contractual commitments that are intended to be allocated to us as part of our separation from KBR, and we may be required to seek alternative

arrangements to obtain services and assets which may be more costly and/or of lower quality. The termination or modification of these contracts or permits or the failure to timely complete the transfer or separation of these contracts or permits could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Until the distribution occurs, Trinzic will be a wholly owned subsidiary of KBR. Accordingly, the KBR board of directors will have the sole and absolute discretion to determine and change the terms of the separation, including the establishment of the record date for the distribution and the distribution date. These changes could be unfavorable to us. In addition, the KBR board of directors, at its sole and absolute discretion, may decide not to proceed with the distribution at any time prior to the distribution date.

No vote of KBR stockholders is required in connection with the distribution. Accordingly, if you do not want to receive our common stock in the distribution, your only recourse will be to divest yourself of your KBR common stock prior to the record date for the distribution.

Prior to the completion of the distribution, there has been no public market for Trinzic common stock. Trinzic cannot guarantee that an active trading market will develop or be sustained for its common stock after the distribution. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling your shares of Trinzic common stock at an attractive price, or at all.

Even if a trading market develops, the market price of Trinzic common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Trinzic cannot predict the prices at which shares of Trinzic common stock may trade after the distribution. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market, or political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of Trinzic common stock regardless of Trinzic’s operating performance. In addition, Trinzic’s operating results could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors due to a number of potential factors, including variations in Trinzic’s quarterly operating results or dividends, if any, to stockholders, additions or departures of key management personnel, failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting Trinzic’s business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness Trinzic may incur or securities Trinzic may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or investment community, announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments, adverse publicity about the industries Trinzic participates in, or individual scandals, and in response the market price of shares of Trinzic common stock could decrease significantly.

In the past few years, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Such litigation, if instituted against Trinzic and/or its directors and officers, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Any sales of substantial amounts of Trinzic common stock in the public market or the perception that such sales might occur, in connection with the distribution or otherwise, may cause the market price of Trinzic common stock to decline. Upon completion of the distribution, Trinzic expects that it will have an aggregate of approximately [•] shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Shares distributed to KBR stockholders in the separation will generally be freely tradeable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except for shares owned by Trinzic’s

“affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act. Trinzic cannot predict whether large amounts of Trinzic common stock will be sold in the open market following the distribution. Trinzic is also unable to predict whether a sufficient number of buyers of Trinzic common stock to meet the demand to sell shares of Trinzic common stock at attractive prices would exist at that time.

In addition, immediately after the completion of the distribution, KBR will hold up to 19.9% of Trinzic’s outstanding common stock. KBR currently intends to dispose of all of Trinzic common stock that it retains after the distribution, including through (i) one or more subsequent exchanges of Trinzic common stock for KBR debt held by one or more investment banks, (ii) distributions of Trinzic common stock to KBR stockholders as dividends or in exchange for outstanding shares of KBR common stock and/or (iii) one or more public offerings or private sales, in each case, subject to market conditions and the relevant requirements of the private letter ruling that KBR has requested from the IRS. With respect to potential dispositions of Trinzic common stock described in clauses (i) and (ii) of the preceding sentence, KBR intends to undertake such dispositions during the [•]-month period following the distribution. To the extent KBR holds any Trinzic common stock at the end of such [•]-month period, KBR will dispose of such stock in one or more public offerings or private sales (including potentially through secondary transactions) as soon as practical, taking into account market conditions and sound business judgment, but in no event later than five years after the distribution. Trinzic will agree that, upon the request of KBR and pursuant to the terms of the stockholder and registration rights agreement, it will use its reasonable best efforts to effect a registration under applicable federal and state securities laws of any shares of Trinzic common stock retained by KBR to the extent that KBR wishes to sell the shares of our common stock it retains in a registered offering. In addition, these shares will be restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act and will also be eligible for resale by KBR in the public market without registration subject to volume, manner of sale and holding period limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Any sales of substantial amounts of Trinzic common stock in the public market by KBR or the perception that such sales might occur, in connection with the distribution or otherwise, may cause the market price of Trinzic common stock to decline.

As a public company, Trinzic will be required to maintain internal controls over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. In addition, Trinzic will be required to furnish a report by management on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). Trinzic’s independent registered public accounting firm may also be required to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Trinzic’s independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which Trinzic’s internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed, or operating.

The process of designing, implementing, and testing the internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation is time consuming, costly, and complicated. If Trinzic identifies material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, if Trinzic is unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner or to assert that its internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if Trinzic’s independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of Trinzic’s financial reports and the market price of Trinzic common stock could be negatively affected, and Trinzic could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which its securities are listed, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

Currently, Trinzic is not directly subject to the reporting and other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this information statement forms a part, Trinzic will be directly subject to such reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE. As a separate public company, Trinzic will be required to, among other things:

These reporting and other obligations will place significant demands on Trinzic’s management and Trinzic’s administrative and operational resources, and Trinzic expects to face increased legal, accounting, administrative, and other costs and expenses relating to these demands that it had not incurred as a part of KBR. Certain of these functions will be provided on a transitional basis by KBR pursuant to a transition services agreement. See the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” Trinzic’s investment in compliance with existing and evolving regulatory requirements will result in increased administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from sales-generating activities to compliance activities, which could have an adverse effect on its business and financial statements.

Trinzic has not yet determined whether or the extent to which it will pay any dividends on its common stock. The payment of any dividends in the future, and the timing and amount thereof, to Trinzic stockholders will fall within the discretion of the Trinzic board of directors. The Trinzic board of directors’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends will depend on many factors, such as Trinzic’s financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, restrictive covenants in Trinzic’s then existing debt arrangements, industry practice, legal requirements, and other factors that the Trinzic board of directors deems relevant. For more information, see the section entitled “Dividend Policy.” Trinzic’s ability to pay dividends will depend on its ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and on its access to the capital markets. Trinzic cannot guarantee that it will pay a dividend in the future or continue to pay any dividends if Trinzic commences paying dividends. Pursuant to a January 7, 2026 Executive Order, the Secretary of War could seek to limit our ability to pay cash dividends or make stock repurchases if the Secretary of War determines that we have underperformed or lacked sufficient prioritization of, investment in or production speed in carrying out or performing under our U.S. government contracts.

In the future, an investor’s percentage ownership in Trinzic may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions, or otherwise, including equity awards that Trinzic will grant to its directors, officers, and employees. In addition, following the distribution, Trinzic’s employees will have rights to purchase or receive shares of Trinzic common stock as a result of the conversion of their KBR equity awards into Trinzic equity awards. The conversion of these KBR awards into Trinzic awards is described in further detail in the section entitled “The Separation and Distribution—Treatment of Equity Awards.” As of the date of this information statement, the exact number of shares of Trinzic common stock that will be subject to the converted Trinzic equity awards is not determinable, and, therefore, it is not possible to determine the extent to which your percentage ownership in Trinzic could be diluted as a result of the conversion. It is anticipated that the Trinzic compensation committee will grant additional equity awards to Trinzic’s employees and directors after the distribution, from time to time, under Trinzic’s employee benefits plans. These additional awards will have a dilutive effect on Trinzic’s earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of Trinzic common stock.

In addition, Trinzic’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize Trinzic to issue, without the approval of Trinzic’s stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designation, powers, preferences, and relative, participating, optional, and other special rights, including preferences over Trinzic common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as the Trinzic board of directors generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of Trinzic common stock. For example, Trinzic could grant the holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of Trinzic’s directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the

repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences that Trinzic could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock. See the section entitled “Description of Trinzic’s Capital Stock.”

Trinzic’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will contain, and Delaware law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with the Trinzic board of directors rather than to attempt an unsolicited takeover not approved by the Board. These provisions include, among others:

In addition, because Trinzic has not chosen to be exempt from Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), this provision could also delay or prevent a change of control that you may favor. Section 203 provides that an interested stockholder may not engage in business combinations with the corporation for a period of three years after the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, with the following exceptions: (i) before such date, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction began, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder) those shares owned (a) by persons who are directors and also officers and (b) employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or (iii) on or after such date, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of the stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder. KBR and its affiliates have been approved as an interested stockholder of ours and therefore are not subject to Section 203 of the DGCL.

Trinzic believes these provisions will help protect its stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with the Trinzic board of directors and by providing the Trinzic board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make Trinzic immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that the Trinzic board of directors determines is not in the best interests of Trinzic and Trinzic’s stockholders. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

Trinzic’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that, unless Trinzic consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware does not have jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the following types of proceedings:

These choice of forum provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. There is, however, uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce the exclusive forum provisions, and investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any claims arising under the Securities Act. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provisions. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, and the provisions may not be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions.

These exclusive forum provisions may limit the ability of our stockholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such stockholders find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and employees. If a court were to find either exclusive forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur further significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.

This information statement and other materials that KBR and Trinzic have filed or will file with the SEC contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements other than historical information or statements about our current condition are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “goal,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “predict,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements we make are based on reasonable assumptions, these expectations may not be attained and it is possible that actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

The separation, distribution, or any other transaction described in this information statement may not in fact be consummated in the manner described or at all. The above list of factors is not exhaustive or necessarily in order of importance. For additional information on identifying factors that may cause actual results to vary materially from those stated in forward-looking statements, see the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and each of KBR and Trinzic assumes no obligation to update or revise such statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

On September 24, 2025, KBR announced its intention to spin off its Mission Technology Solutions segment, officially rebranded as Trinzic on July 30, 2026, in preparation for the expected separation in January 2027.

It is expected that the KBR board of directors will approve the distribution of at least 80.1% of Trinzic’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the basis of [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock for every [•] share[s] of KBR common stock held as of the close of business on the record date for the distribution of [•], 2026.

At [•], Eastern time, on [•], 2027, the distribution date, each KBR stockholder will receive [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock for every [•] share[s] of KBR common stock held at the close of business on the record date for the distribution, as described below. KBR stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Trinzic common stock that they would have received after application of this ratio. You will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your KBR common stock, or take any other action to receive your shares of Trinzic common stock in the distribution. The distribution of Trinzic common stock as described in this information statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. For a more detailed description of these conditions, see the section entitled “–Conditions to the Distribution” below.

In deciding to pursue the spin-off of Trinzic, KBR considered the transformation of its business over the last 10 years into leading MTS and STS businesses, each with significant scale, and the ability at this time to effect a spin-off to create two independent, pure-play companies to better position each of them for continued future growth.

As part of its evaluation, the KBR board of directors considered a number of factors, including: the benefits that could be realized through a spin-off by providing each of the MTS business and the STS business with enhanced strategic and operational focus to prioritize each business’s independent goals and improve organizational agility; the ability to customize the capital structures and capital allocation priorities of each business to better fit their respective needs; the ability to better position each business to be able to capitalize on merger, acquisition, and other strategic transaction opportunities; the ability to better focus on delivering for customers in the distinctive end markets of each business; the ability for each business to have a board of directors and management team with domain expertise better aligned with their respective businesses; and the ability to otherwise make the respective companies more attractive to customers, management and talent, and to investors, including through distinguished and distinct corporate identities. KBR also considered a range of potential alternatives to the spin-off, including maintaining the status quo of KBR’s existing business and structure and potential sale and other separation transactions with respect to each of the MTS and STS businesses and the risks associated with each transaction structure. KBR additionally assessed that the spin-off transaction would be intended to be tax-free to KBR and its stockholders. Ultimately, KBR determined that a spin-off transaction would have the best potential to unlock value for KBR and its stockholders at this time. KBR believed that changes in government policy were adversely affecting its valuation as a combined business and that a separation could allow for investors to weigh the benefits and risks of each of MTS and STS individually, with a focus on the recent historical growth rate and perceived prospects of STS. KBR also believed that current valuations would make a taxable sale of MTS less favorable than a non-taxable transaction, such as a spin-off.

For these reasons, KBR believed the separation of the MTS and STS businesses into two independent, pure-play companies via a tax-free spin-off would provide the best opportunity to achieve greater value for each of the MTS and STS businesses.

Given the significant transformation of KBR’s business over the last 10 years and the current scale and needs of each of the MTS and STS businesses and after considering other alternatives, the KBR board of directors believes that separating KBR’s MTS segment at this time is in the best interests of KBR and its stockholders.

The KBR board of directors considered the following potential benefits of the separation:

The KBR board of directors also considered the following potentially negative factors in evaluating the separation, including:

In determining to pursue the separation, the KBR board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of the separation outweighed these negative factors.

In considering the appropriate structure for the separation and distribution, KBR determined that it would be beneficial for KBR to retain up to 19.9% of the outstanding shares of Trinzic common stock upon completion of the spin-off. More specifically, KBR determined that, subject to the relevant requirements of the private letter ruling that KBR has requested from the IRS, its retention of Trinzic common stock has the potential to provide KBR with financial flexibility and support optimal capital structures for each of KBR and Trinzic. KBR intends to dispose of such shares after the distribution and following completion of the spin-off in a manner consistent with the business reasons for its retention of those shares. Such dispositions are generally expected to be effected through (i) one or more subsequent exchanges of Trinzic common stock for KBR debt held by one or more investment banks, (ii) distributions of Trinzic common stock to KBR stockholders as dividends or in exchange for outstanding shares of KBR common stock and/or (iii) one or more public offerings or private sales, in each case, subject to market conditions and the relevant requirements of the private letter ruling that KBR has requested from the IRS. With respect to potential dispositions of Trinzic common stock described in clauses (i) and (ii) of the preceding sentence, KBR intends to undertake such dispositions during the [•]-month period following the distribution. To the extent KBR holds any Trinzic common stock at the end of such [•]-month period, KBR will dispose of such stock in one or more public offerings or private sales (including potentially through secondary transactions) as soon as practical and consistent with the business reasons for the retention of those shares, taking into account market conditions and sound business judgment, but in no event later than five years after the distribution.

Any sales of substantial amounts of Trinzic common stock in the public market by KBR or the perception that such sales might occur, in connection with a distribution, sale, or otherwise, may cause the market price of Trinzic common stock to decline. See the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Trinzic’s Common Stock—A significant number of shares of Trinzic common stock may be sold by KBR or others following the distribution, which may cause Trinzic’s stock price to decline” for additional details.

Trinzic was incorporated in Delaware on November 17, 2025 under the name “Solar SpinCo Inc.” for the purpose of holding KBR’s MTS segment. As part of the plan to separate the MTS segment from the remainder of KBR’s businesses, in connection with the internal reorganization, KBR plans to transfer the equity interests of certain entities that operate the MTS segment and the assets and liabilities of the MTS segment to Trinzic, as set forth in the separation agreement.

With the assistance of Equiniti, KBR expects to distribute Trinzic common stock at [•], Eastern time, on [•], 2027, the distribution date, to all holders of outstanding shares of KBR common stock as of the close of business on [•], 2026, the record date for the distribution. Equiniti, which currently serves as the transfer agent and registrar for shares of KBR common stock, will serve as the settlement and distribution agent in connection with the distribution and the transfer agent and registrar for shares of Trinzic common stock.

If you own shares of KBR common stock as of the close of business on the record date for the distribution, Trinzic common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution will be issued electronically, as of the distribution date, to you in direct registration form or to your bank or brokerage firm on your behalf. If you are a registered holder, Equiniti will then mail you a direct registration account statement that reflects your shares of Trinzic common stock. If you hold your shares through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares. Direct registration form refers to a method of recording share ownership when no physical share certificates are issued to stockholders, as is the case in this distribution. If you sell shares of KBR common stock in the “regular-way” market up to and including the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of Trinzic common stock in the distribution.

Commencing on or shortly after the distribution date, if you hold physical share certificates that represent your shares of KBR common stock and you are the registered holder of the shares represented by those certificates, the distribution agent will mail to you an account statement that indicates the number of shares of Trinzic common stock that have been registered in book-entry form in your name.

Most KBR stockholders hold their common shares through a bank or brokerage firm. In such cases, the bank or brokerage firm would be said to hold the shares in “street name” and ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage firm’s books. If you hold your shares of KBR common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for Trinzic common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares held in “street name,” please contact your bank or brokerage firm.

Shares of Trinzic common stock distributed to holders in connection with the distribution will be transferable without registration under the Securities Act, except for shares received by persons who may be deemed to be Trinzic’s affiliates. Persons who may be deemed to be Trinzic’s affiliates after the distribution generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with Trinzic, which may include certain Trinzic executive officers, directors, or principal stockholders. Securities held by Trinzic’s affiliates will be subject to resale restrictions under the Securities Act. Trinzic’s affiliates will be permitted to sell shares of Trinzic common stock only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, such as the exemption afforded by Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

For every [•] share[s] of KBR common stock that you own at the close of business on [•], 2026, the record date for the distribution, you will receive [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock on the distribution date.

KBR will not distribute any fractional shares of Trinzic common stock to its stockholders. Instead, if you are a registered holder, Equiniti will aggregate fractional shares into whole shares, sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices and distribute the aggregate cash proceeds (net of discounts and commissions) of the sales pro rata (based on the fractional share such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive) to each holder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. The transfer agent, in its sole discretion, without any influence by KBR or Trinzic, will determine when, how, through which broker-dealer and at what price to sell the whole shares. Any broker-dealer used by the transfer agent will not be an affiliate of either KBR or Trinzic. Neither KBR nor Trinzic will be able to guarantee any minimum sale price in connection with the sale of these shares. Recipients of cash in lieu of fractional shares will not be entitled to any interest on the amounts of payment made in lieu of fractional shares.

Trinzic estimates that it will take approximately [•] from the distribution date for the distribution agent to complete the distributions of the aggregate net cash proceeds. If you hold physical certificates for shares of KBR common stock and are the registered holder, you will receive a check from the distribution agent in an amount equal to your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales. If you hold your shares of Trinzic common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will receive, on your behalf, your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales and will electronically credit your account for your share of such proceeds.

The net cash proceeds of these sales of fractional shares will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” for an explanation of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations with respect to the distribution.

All KBR equity awards held by Trinzic employees will be converted into Trinzic equity awards, as further described below. Each outstanding award of KBR restricted stock units and performance stock units held by Trinzic employees will be converted into awards of Trinzic restricted stock units based on an adjustment ratio intended to preserve the value of those awards. KBR’s compensation committee will determine the extent to which performance of KBR outstanding performance awards is achieved prior to the distribution date. Following such determination, the performance awards, to the extent of achievement, will then be converted into Trinzic restricted stock units, to the extent the KBR performance award was settleable in shares of KBR common stock, or Trinzic restricted units settleable in cash, to the extent the KBR performance award was settleable in cash, in each case, that time-vest over the original vesting schedule of the KBR performance award to which it relates and based on an adjustment ratio intended to preserve the value of those awards.

After its separation from KBR, Trinzic will be a separate, publicly traded company. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined at the close of business on [•], 2026, the record date for the distribution. The distribution will not affect the number of outstanding shares of KBR common stock or any rights of KBR stockholders. KBR will not distribute any fractional shares of Trinzic common stock.

Trinzic will enter into a separation agreement and other related agreements with KBR to effect the separation and provide a framework for Trinzic’s relationship with KBR after the separation. These agreements provide for the allocation between KBR and Trinzic of KBR’s assets, liabilities, and obligations (including its investments, property, employee benefits, and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after Trinzic’s separation from KBR and will govern certain relationships between KBR and Trinzic after the separation. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.”

There is currently no public trading market for Trinzic common stock. Trinzic intends to apply to list its common stock on the NYSE under the symbol “TZIC.” Trinzic has not and will not set the initial price of its common stock. The initial price will be established by the public markets.

Trinzic cannot predict the price at which its common stock will trade after the distribution. In fact, the combined trading prices of one share of KBR common stock and [•] share[s] of Trinzic common stock after the distribution (representing the number of shares of Trinzic common stock to be received per one share of KBR common stock in the distribution) may not equal the “regular-way” trading price of a share of KBR common stock immediately prior to the distribution. The price at which Trinzic common stock trades may fluctuate significantly, particularly until an orderly public market develops. Trading prices for Trinzic common stock will be determined in the public markets and may be influenced by many factors. See the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Trinzic’s Common Stock.”

Beginning on or shortly before the record date for the distribution and continuing up to the distribution date, KBR expects that there will be two markets in shares of KBR common stock: a “regular-way” market and an “ex-distribution” market. Shares of KBR common stock that trade on the “regular-way” market will trade with an entitlement to Trinzic common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Shares of KBR common stock that trade on the “ex-distribution” market will trade without an entitlement to Trinzic common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Therefore, if you sell shares of KBR common stock in the “regular-way” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive Trinzic common stock in the distribution. If you own shares of KBR common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the “ex-distribution” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will receive the shares of Trinzic common stock that you are entitled to receive pursuant to your ownership as of the record date of the shares of KBR common stock.

Furthermore, beginning on or shortly before the record date for the distribution and continuing up to the distribution date, Trinzic expects that there will be a “when-issued” market in its common stock. “When-issued” trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. The “when-issued” trading market will be a market for Trinzic common stock that will be distributed to holders of shares

of KBR common stock on the distribution date. If you owned shares of KBR common stock at the close of business on the record date for the distribution, you would be entitled to Trinzic common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. You may trade this entitlement to shares of Trinzic common stock, without the shares of KBR common stock you own, on the “when-issued” market. On the first trading day following the distribution date, “when-issued” trading with respect to Trinzic common stock will end, and “regular-way” trading will begin. “Ex-distribution” and “when-issued” trades are generally settled shortly after the distribution date, but if KBR determines not to proceed with the distribution following the initiation of the “ex-distribution” and “when-issued” trading markets, trades in the “ex-distribution” and “when-issued” trading markets will be cancelled and, therefore, will not be settled.

The distribution will be effective at [•], Eastern time, on [•], 2027, the distribution date; provided that the following conditions will have been satisfied (or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waived by KBR in its sole discretion):

KBR and Trinzic cannot assure you that any or all of these conditions will be met, or that the distribution will be consummated even if all of these conditions are met. The satisfaction of these conditions does not create any obligations

on KBR’s part to effect the distribution, and KBR’s board of directors has reserved the right, in its sole discretion, to abandon, modify or change the terms of the distribution, including by accelerating or delaying the timing of the consummation of all or part of the distribution, at any time prior to the distribution date. To the extent that the KBR board of directors determines that any modifications by KBR materially change the material terms of the distribution, KBR will notify KBR stockholders in a manner reasonably calculated to inform them about the modification as may be required by law.

In addition, each of these conditions may be waived by KBR (to the extent permitted by applicable law). If the distribution is completed and the KBR board of directors waived any such condition, such waiver could have a material adverse effect on Trinzic’s business and financial statements, the trading price of Trinzic common stock, or the ability of Trinzic stockholders to sell their shares after the distribution, including, without limitation, as a result of illiquid trading due to the failure of Trinzic common stock to be accepted for listing. If KBR elects to proceed with the distribution notwithstanding that one or more of the conditions to the distribution has not been met, KBR will evaluate the applicable facts and circumstances at that time and make such additional disclosure and take such other actions as KBR determines to be necessary and appropriate in accordance with applicable law.

We are furnishing this information statement solely to provide information to KBR stockholders who will receive shares of Trinzic common stock in the distribution. You should not construe this information statement as an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold, or sell any of Trinzic’s or KBR’s securities. No KBR stockholder approval is required for the distribution, and you are not being asked for a proxy. We believe that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and neither Trinzic nor KBR undertakes any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of Trinzic’s and KBR’s public disclosure obligations and practices.

We have not yet determined the extent to which we will pay any dividends on Trinzic common stock. The payment of any dividends in the future, and the timing and amount thereof, is within the discretion of the Trinzic board of directors. The Trinzic board of directors’ decisions regarding the payment of dividends will depend on many factors, such as Trinzic’s financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, debt service obligations, restrictive covenants in its then existing debt agreements, industry practice, legal requirements and other factors that the Trinzic board of directors deems relevant. Trinzic’s ability to pay dividends will depend on its ongoing ability to generate cash from operations and on its access to the capital markets. We cannot guarantee that we will pay a dividend in the future or continue to pay any dividends if we commence paying dividends.

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of July 3, 2026:

The information below is not necessarily indicative of what our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization would have been had the separation, distribution, and related transactions been completed as of July 3, 2026. In addition, it is not indicative of our future cash and equivalents and capitalization. This table should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited combined financial statements, unaudited condensed financial statements, and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this information statement (amounts in millions, except per share data).

In connection with the planned spin-off of Trinzic, KBR will distribute at least 80.1% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Trinzic to its stockholders. To implement the distribution, KBR stockholders will receive at least 80.1% of Trinzic’s common stock on a pro rata basis, with KBR retaining the remaining shares of Trinzic common stock. The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements give effect to the spin-off.

The applicable accounting guidance states that a presumption shall exist that a spin-off transaction will be accounted for based on its legal form, and therefore the legal spinnor will also be considered the accounting spinnor. Based on our evaluation of several qualitative and quantitative indicators in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, including the relative sizes and profitability of the legal spinnor and legal spinnee (KBR and Trinzic, respectively), their estimated relative fair values, and the expected post-separation organizational structure and business operations, we have determined that KBR, the legal spinnor, is also the spinnor for accounting purposes, and Trinzic, the legal spinnee, is also the spinnee for accounting purposes, as this presentation provides the most accurate depiction of the transaction to stockholders and other users of the financial statements.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements consist of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of July 3, 2026, and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the six months ended July 3, 2026 and the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements reflect adjustments to our historical unaudited condensed combined balance sheet as of July 3, 2026, our unaudited historical unaudited condensed combined statement of operations for the six months ended July 3, 2026 and our audited historical audited combined statement of operations for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet gives effect to the separation and related transactions, described below, as if they occurred as of July 3, 2026, our latest reported balance sheet date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations give effect to the separation and related transactions as if they had occurred on January 4, 2025, which was the first day of fiscal 2025.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared to reflect transaction accounting and autonomous entity adjustments to present the financial condition and results of operations as if we were a separate standalone entity. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to the following (collectively, the “Pro Forma Transactions”):

In connection with the spin-off, Trinzic will enter into a transition services agreement (“TSA”) with KBR pursuant to which KBR will continue to provide us with support services at a fair and reasonable cost to us, including, but not limited to, information technology, procurement, customer service, quality and regulatory affairs, accounting, human resources, and distribution and logistics services. In addition, Trinzic and KBR will enter into master services agreements (“MSAs”) to govern certain business relationships between KBR and Trinzic that will continue following termination or expiration of the TSA, including with respect to business operations and contracts that cannot be transferred during the term of the transition services TSA. Discussions regarding the TSA and MSAs are ongoing and

will be completed prior to the spin-off. The adjustments for the TSA and MSAs are not expected to have a material impact on pro forma net income for the six months ended July 3, 2026 and the fiscal year ended January 2, 2026, as the unaudited historical condensed combined statements of operations and audited historical combined statements of operations already reflects allocations of costs for these services that are not expected to be materially different under the TSA and MSAs and, accordingly, the pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not reflect any adjustments to reflect the TSA and MSAs. Our expectation is that these adjustments will not have a material impact based upon the expected terms of the services to be provided under the TSA and MSAs as of the date of this information statement and are subject to change.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are subject to the assumptions and adjustments described in the accompanying notes. These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are subject to change as KBR and Trinzic finalize the terms of the separation agreement and other agreements and transactions related to the separation.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what our financial position and results of operations actually would have been had the Pro Forma Transactions occurred on the dates indicated, or to project our financial performance for any future period. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are based on information and assumptions, which are described in the accompanying notes.

Our unaudited historical condensed combined financial statements and audited historical combined financial statements, which were the basis for the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, were prepared on a carve-out basis, as we did not operate as a standalone entity for the periods presented. Accordingly, such financial information reflects an allocation of general corporate costs, such as information technology, finance and accounting, human resources, legal, and other expenses. The allocations have been determined based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, the amounts are not necessarily representative of the amounts that would have been reflected in the financial statements had we been an entity that operated independently of KBR during the periods or at the dates presented.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared to include transaction accounting (including the impact of changes to our legal entity structure in anticipation of the separation) and autonomous entity adjustments. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information reported below should be read in conjunction with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our unaudited condensed combined financial statements and our audited combined financial statements included elsewhere in this information statement.