EXHIBIT 99.9
CONSOLIDATED ANALYTICS POOL 1 DATA COMPARE REPORT
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
112 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Per the DSCR calculation. | ||||||
|
72 |
Property Type | Two to Four Unit | PUD | XXX is XXX-unit per appraisal | ||||||
|
70 |
Property Type | PUD | Two to Four Unit | True data is correct, per appraisal and pud rider in file | ||||||
|
70 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Slight difference due to lender using XXX for XXX of the units instead of XXX as shown on the lease. | ||||||
|
93 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The verified DSCR score is XXX $XXX(lease rent)/XXX (PITIA) | ||||||
|
94 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The qualifying DSCR score is XXX | ||||||
|
95 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX is XXX | ||||||
|
119 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX score is XXX | ||||||
|
117 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the CD and rent | ||||||
|
120 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per XXX | ||||||
|
118 |
Note Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | True data is correct, per Note | ||||||
|
113 |
Maturity Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | Updated XXX per Note. | ||||||
|
113 |
First Payment Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | Updated XXX per Note. | ||||||
|
113 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated PITI payment and market rent. | ||||||
|
126 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The lender/Audited DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/XXX=XXX, XXX score $XXX(Market)/XXX=XXX. The discrepancy is LM is using the market rent and the lender/auditor are using the lease rent | ||||||
|
128 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is correct upon adding in appropriate rental income. | ||||||
|
127 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated with PITIA and market rent. | ||||||
|
129 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Unable to determine reason for variance due to missing lenders calculation | ||||||
|
179 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit XXX $XXX(market rent)/$XXX(PITIA)= XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
182 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Discrepancy due to lender using a market rent of XXX Audit review used a more recent value of XXX | ||||||
|
175 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the CD and XXX | ||||||
|
166 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated DSCR ratio using PITI payment and market rent. | ||||||
|
172 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX score is $XXX market rent)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX | ||||||
|
115 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The system is correct | ||||||
|
116 |
Note Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | XXX is XX/XX/XXXX per the Note in file (Page XXX) | ||||||
|
116 |
Qualifying CLTV | 45.45 | 45.46 | The LTV/CLTV of 45.45% is based on the appraisal value of XXX | ||||||
|
116 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Origination and Audit DSCR Ratio was calculated at XXX. | ||||||
|
114 |
Maturity Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | The loan is amortized over XXX years | ||||||
|
114 |
First Payment Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | Per the note the XXX is XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
114 |
Qualifying CLTV | 65.45 | 65.44 | The Qualifying CLTV is 65.445% | ||||||
|
114 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The Audited DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/XXX(PITI)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender used the amount of XXX for the PITI which does not include HOA monthly amount of $XXX. |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
188 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and PITI | ||||||
|
256 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audits DSCR score is XXX Lender’s DSCR score is XXX. The discrepancy is the lender used XXX/$XXX=XXX for the PITIA and audit used $XXX/$XXX=XXX for PITIA | ||||||
|
189 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The Correct DSCR Score XX/XX/XXXX based on form 1007 with market rents of XXX | ||||||
|
266 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Information in system is correct | ||||||
|
265 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated the loan program according to the loan approval | ||||||
|
271 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR score: Audit’s calculation $XXX(XXX)/$XXX(PITIA)= XXX. Lender’s calculation of is $XXX/ $XXX=XXX. The discrepancy is the monthly PITIA amount of XXX the lender used $XXX. | ||||||
|
270 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX score is $XXX market)/$XXX=XXX | ||||||
|
273 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX score is $XXX(market rent)/$XXX=XXX | ||||||
|
269 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated DSCR ratio with the PITI payment and market rents. | ||||||
|
294 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The Audited DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender used the amount of XXX for the monthly property tax amount. | ||||||
|
296 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Review DSCR is correct and matches XXX Tape figure is truncated. | ||||||
|
295 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is accurate based on AVM and rental income. | ||||||
|
293 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the piti and rent | ||||||
|
297 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per XXX | ||||||
|
303 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and pitia | ||||||
|
306 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated DSCR ratio with market rent and PITI payment. | ||||||
|
305 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Ratios are based on appraisal in file as a XXX. | ||||||
|
304 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the piti and rent | ||||||
|
315 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Unable to determine the variance due to missing lenders calculation | ||||||
|
313 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Updated per Deed of Trust. | ||||||
|
313 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated with PITI and market rent. | ||||||
|
311 |
Property Value | XXX | XXX | XXX reflecting is per appraisal value. LTV calculated off XXX price. | ||||||
|
317 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the piti and rent | ||||||
|
310 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, however the lender used XX/XX/XXXX per the XXX(pg XXX). There is no discrepancy other than the lender using a totally different DSCR score | ||||||
|
316 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Variance due to lender using a rental amount of XXX vs XXX calculated using leases in file | ||||||
|
314 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy both audit and lender’s DSCR calculations are $XXX(Market)/XXX (PITIA)=XXX | ||||||
|
318 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Discrepancy due to lender using a lower amount for market rent (XXX). Audit review used the most current amount as of XX/XX/XXXX in the amount of XXX | ||||||
|
322 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy, both True Data and Tape Data are the same | ||||||
|
319 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy, $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX | ||||||
|
321 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and piti | ||||||
|
330 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy. True Data and Tape Date are the same. $XXX(market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
338 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(XXX rent)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender’s use of the XXX for HOA. | ||||||
|
335 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Actually DSCR Score | ||||||
|
341 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy with the DSCR score. Both the True data and True Data are the same | ||||||
|
368 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and piti | ||||||
|
365 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Ratios were corrected to match XXX given in file. | ||||||
|
370 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Tape data figure is actually XXX which is the same as the true data figure XXX. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
377 |
Qualifying LTV | 48.21 | 48.20 | LTV XXX is Slightly mismatches with XXX | ||||||
|
377 |
Qualifying CLTV | 48.21 | 48.20 | CLTV XXX is Slightly mismatches with XXX | ||||||
|
377 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR Ratio XXX per audit review. Variance due to lender not including addition XXX per month added to each unit for water expenses | ||||||
|
373 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy. The True data and Tape data are the same | ||||||
|
371 |
Qualifying CLTV | 70.75 | 70.76 | CLTV XXX matches the lender calculation | ||||||
|
371 |
Qualifying LTV | 70.75 | 70.76 | LTV XXX % matches the lender calculation. | ||||||
|
371 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR of XXX ($XXX ÷ $XXX) matches the lender calculation. | ||||||
|
380 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX DSCR to XXX decimal places | ||||||
|
378 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Variance due to lender using a slightly higher amount of XXX for rental income vs XXX | ||||||
|
389 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX Premium updated as per source doc page XXX $XXX/XXX=$XXX, but lender used XXX hence slight changes in DSCR ratio | ||||||
|
392 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX ratio matching with XXX | ||||||
|
383 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio calculated using actual Rent/PITIA, lender used lower hazard insurance. | ||||||
|
386 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX (gross rent) / XXX (PITIA) | ||||||
|
391 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Our XXX ratio XXX is consistent with the lender-XXX ratio. | ||||||
|
384 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There is no discrepancy. The true data and the Tape data match | ||||||
|
398 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR calculation supports lenders. | ||||||
|
402 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
399 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
400 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX Audit’s DSCR score XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender’s use of the XXX for the monthly property tax amount. It is unclear why the lender used this amount | ||||||
|
406 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
412 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Confirmed. XXX (gross rent) / XXX per month (PITIA) | ||||||
|
414 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The true data and tape data are the same. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
408 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR Ratio calculated (Gross Rental Income / PITIA) |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
429 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review | ||||||
|
427 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The true data and tape data are the same. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
423 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
424 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The true data and tape data are the same. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
420 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per XXX | ||||||
|
418 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review. Lenders DSCR calculation worksheet shows XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
422 |
Qualifying LTV | 48.78 | 43.48 | XXX matches Lender’s information | ||||||
|
422 |
Qualifying CLTV | 48.78 | 43.48 | XXX matches Lender’s information | ||||||
|
440 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per audit review | ||||||
|
439 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct, per DSCR calculation | ||||||
|
444 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX matches with lenders calculation. | ||||||
|
461 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR calculation s matches final XXX p. XXX | ||||||
|
468 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and the tape data match. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
469 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR matches XXX p. XXX | ||||||
|
474 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True date and Tape data are the same. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
475 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The DSCR ratio has gone up based on market rents showing more than original calculation | ||||||
|
489 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
499 |
Property Value | XXX | XXX | Appraisal in file shows higher value that is being used for qualifying. | ||||||
|
499 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | There are no notes in the file on the XXX to confirm DSCR ratio calculation. Our ratio is higher at XXX rents of $XXX/$XXX. | ||||||
|
494 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Rental income is XXX and PITIA is XXX resulting in a rental coverage ratio of XXX ($XXX ÷ XXX = XXX). | ||||||
|
495 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Calculated using per PITIA at XXX | ||||||
|
496 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR per XXX/XXX est rents XXX divided by PITi $XXX=XXX | ||||||
|
501 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. Both figures are the same. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
506 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified the XXX Ratio as XX/XX/XXXX as per Rental income/PITIA. | ||||||
|
503 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified and updated as per the Lender provided Documents | ||||||
|
505 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio discrepancy is due to the decimal point only. | ||||||
|
508 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and CD | ||||||
|
516 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX | ||||||
|
510 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is higher than Originator calculation. | ||||||
|
515 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR - Rental income/PITIA = $XXX/$XXX = XXX matchhes XXX p. XXX |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
511 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. This matches the lender’s XXX There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
512 |
Qualifying LTV | 45.39 | 45.40 | Auditor calc loan amount $XXX/appraised value XXX = XXX | ||||||
|
512 |
Qualifying CLTV | 45.39 | 45.40 | Auditor calc loan amount $XXX/appraised value XXX = XXX | ||||||
|
512 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX based on market rent XXX / PITIA XXX = XXX | ||||||
|
507 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX Ratio is XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
514 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit confirms ratios were calculated using the form 1007 rental income applied to the subject property PITIA. | ||||||
|
517 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is accurate | ||||||
|
518 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratios match lenders calculation. | ||||||
|
519 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratios match lender calculation. | ||||||
|
523 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and Tape data are the same. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
520 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the monthly property tax amount of XXX the lender used the $XXX. | ||||||
|
525 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated as per Document | ||||||
|
527 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX does not show the calculated ratio from lender | ||||||
|
533 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit confirms verified source document and updated accordingly. | ||||||
|
537 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | $XXX/ XXX = XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
531 |
Qualifying LTV | 45.89 | 45.90 | The Qualifying LTV is 45.895%, this matches the Tape data and XXX No discrepancy | ||||||
|
531 |
Qualifying CLTV | 45.89 | 45.90 | The Qualifying CLTV is 45.895%, this matches the Tape data and XXX No discrepancy | ||||||
|
531 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and Tape data are the same. No discrepacy | ||||||
|
535 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender used XXX for market rent. | ||||||
|
48 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True source reflects DSCR of XXX while tape data shows XXX. Variance identified between source documentation and tape | ||||||
|
46 |
Qualifying FICO | XXX | XXX | Per guides: Selecting the representative score from the borrower with the highest percentage ownership. - B1 is XXX% owner and B2 is XXX% owner. | ||||||
|
46 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR calculation: Rent = XXX / XXX = XXX DSCR Used lower of current rent in place and form XXX-unit property only XXX units are currently rented | ||||||
|
44 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated as per Document | ||||||
|
49 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR is exactly matching with lender calculation no discrepancy | ||||||
|
45 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified the DSCR ratio as XX/XX/XXXX as per documentation. | ||||||
|
50 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and Tape data are the same. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
51 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio differs only in decimal points when compared to Tape data. | ||||||
|
52 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit confirms the true data is XX/XX/XXXX which is slightly higher than XXX. | ||||||
|
60 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Decimal mismatch | ||||||
|
64 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and Tapa date figures are the same. No discrepancy | ||||||
|
207 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the lender used XXX for the lease amount, it’s unclear why this amount was used |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
69 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Per final XXX pg XXX Lender has a XX/XX/XXXX DSCR ratio and the audit has a XXX ratio. The lender has XXX as their PITI, audit has PITI XXX | ||||||
|
63 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
67 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is based on $XXX/XXX= XXX. Lender shows XX/XX/XXXX per data tape. | ||||||
|
204 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is higher due to lender only utilizing rents from one unit and this is a XXX unit property. Utilizing all units gives a higher dscr ratio. | ||||||
|
208 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XX/XX/XXXX DSCR is more than Lender DSCR of 10due to differnce in property tax calculationS) | ||||||
|
193 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Per the lends XXX pg XXX they used XXX market rent with PITIA of $XXX. These are the same figures used in the Audit | ||||||
|
195 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Lender includes a monthly tax payment in their PITIA, Missing taxes to include in audit PITIA | ||||||
|
196 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
206 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Lender used XXX for rental income audit figure is XXX | ||||||
|
200 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio matches lender calculation shown on XXX | ||||||
|
211 |
Qualifying LTV | 70.25 | 75.00 | XXX shows ltv to be XXX% and LM matches. | ||||||
|
211 |
Qualifying CLTV | 70.25 | 75.00 | XXX shows cltv to be XXX% and LM matches. | ||||||
|
211 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio matches lender calculation. | ||||||
|
210 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the monthly PITIA amount of XXX the lender used the XXX | ||||||
|
209 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Per lenders final XXX pg XXX - Lender has a XXX P&I payment but the note on pg XXX reflects XXX P&I payment. Taxes and insurance match | ||||||
|
214 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
212 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
217 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITA)=XXX, lender’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. The discrepancy is the monthly PITIA amount of XXX the lender used the XXX | ||||||
|
215 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The True data and the Tape data figures are the same. No discrepancy. | ||||||
|
137 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX DSCR matches lender’s calculation. | ||||||
|
133 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | PITIA is less for audit based on documents provided than what the lender used to qualify. | ||||||
|
134 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | PITIA is different than the lenders PITIA. | ||||||
|
139 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
142 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX DSCR per Rent and PITIA | ||||||
|
149 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | True data is correct per the Lease agreement for unit XXX Unite XXX $XXX.=$XXX/ (PITI)$XXX=XXX. Verified with XXX | ||||||
|
145 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Manual calculation of DSCR Ratio: Estimated Market Rent $XXX/$XXX Subject Property PITIA = DSCR Ratio XXX and Tape Data show XXX | ||||||
|
146 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio variance is due to the market rents and Flood insurance premium. | ||||||
|
148 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Manual calculation of DSCR Ratio: Estimated Market Rent $XXX/$XXX Subject Property PITIA = DSCR Ratio XXX and Tape Data show XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
140 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Missing subject property HOI policy to include in PITIA | ||||||
|
164 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
161 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Based on the loan docs the dscr is XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
158 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Updated as per document | ||||||
|
159 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Calculate DSCR as XX/XX/XXXX which is align with XXX and Payments & income correctly updated as per document. | ||||||
|
168 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The XXX ratio is XX/XX/XXXX However, the Tape Data displays XX/XX/XXXX with only two decimal places | ||||||
|
144 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Min number XXX supported by the final deed of trust | ||||||
|
144 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Lender qualified the borrower using the following monthly rent $XXX/Auditor qualified the borrower using rental income provided by the operating income Statement XXX this caused a change in the XXX |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
218 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Market Rent $XXX/PITIA of Subject Property XXX = XXX% | ||||||
|
227 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Confirmed. Lender’s XXX of XXX is on pg XXX | ||||||
|
225 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audited PITIA is different than Lenders PITIA | ||||||
|
232 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
234 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audited PITIA matches lenders final PITIA | ||||||
|
233 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Confirmed DSCR and compared against lender’s XXX. | ||||||
|
241 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX DSCR matches Lender’s worksheet. | ||||||
|
236 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Originator DSCR calc XXX auditor calc based on rent amount XXX | ||||||
|
238 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR calculation is accurate also the lender used the same DSCR value | ||||||
|
247 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX of XXX is greater than Lender DSCR of XXX. The difference is due to the amount of rental income on Unit #XXX. The initial Lease agreement of XXX monthly rent (the amount used by the Lender) expired XX/XX/XXXX and converted to a month-to-month tenancy with an increase of XXX monthly. | ||||||
|
251 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR confirmed with Lender Asset Review Calculator. | ||||||
|
255 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
538 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
543 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX determined by lowest of two form 1007’s in file. | ||||||
|
547 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR Ratio Calculated With All Recent Documents | ||||||
|
546 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Taxes and Insurance are slightly variance from the lender’s, updated as per the document | ||||||
|
549 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX is XXX which is matching with the Tape Data and True data is also reflecting with decimal of XXX. | ||||||
|
548 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The difference in DSCR arises from the use of the updated lease agreement for the property at XXX. The updated lease reflects a monthly rental income of XXX whereas the lender used XXX based on an expired lease agreement. The higher rental income results in an increased DSCR. | ||||||
|
224 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Confirmed on the Deed of Trust Document | ||||||
|
253 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Min Number updated per Deed of Trust | ||||||
|
253 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR calculated with Market Rent/PITIA and aligns with Originator DSCR | ||||||
|
550 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Audit of deed confirms MIN # XXX The MIN # on the tape data corresponds to another investment property borrower XXX in July. | ||||||
|
550 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audited DSCR Ratio is changed from XXX to XXX% from Qualified Rent income $XXX/PITIA XXX. | ||||||
|
552 |
Interest Rate | XXX | XXX | Updated per Note | ||||||
|
552 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | $XXX/ XXX = XXX% | ||||||
|
223 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XX/XX/XXXX DSCR Calculated matches with lenders. | ||||||
|
555 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | The DSCR ratio = Rental Income XXX / Subject PITIA XXX = XXX. There is no dicrepancy | ||||||
|
3 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | per final rents and liabilities. meets minimum DSCR | ||||||
|
2 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Confirmed. XXX (gross rent) / XXX (PITIA). XXX had DSCR of XXX as well as DSCR calc in the file. | ||||||
|
5 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
9 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt |
| Loan ID | Seller Loan ID |
Field Name | Verified Value | Bid Tape Value | Comment | |||||
|
8 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | XXX based on active rent; difference due to slightly different PITI. | ||||||
|
7 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR score: Audit’s calculation $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)= XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
11 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
10 |
Maturity Date | XX/XX/XXXX | XX/XX/XXXX | Per the Note, transaction is a XXX year IO with XXX amortization | ||||||
|
10 |
Amortization Term | XXX | XXX | Per the Note, transaction is a XXX year IO with XXX amortization | ||||||
|
10 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX, There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
18 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | DSCR ratio is being match with XXX and lender calculation | ||||||
|
23 |
Property Value | XXX | XXX | XXX updated as per XXX appraisal report | ||||||
|
30 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Verified by the mortgage | ||||||
|
27 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Verified by the mortgage | ||||||
|
27 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
26 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Per the Deed, the MIN is XX/XX/XXXX | ||||||
|
26 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
29 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Per the Deed, the MIN XXX | ||||||
|
29 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
28 |
MIN No | XXX | XXX | Verified by the mortgage | ||||||
|
28 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the debt and rent | ||||||
|
38 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. Lender’s score XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
34 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Lease)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. Lender’s score XXX. There is no discrepancy | ||||||
|
42 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
40 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Verified by the rent and debt | ||||||
|
39 |
Calculated DSCR | XXX | XXX | Audit’s DSCR score $XXX(Market)/$XXX(PITIA)=XXX. Lender’s score XXX. The lender’s PITIA XXX is the same as audit’s, not sure how the XX/XX/XXXX score was calculated |