v3.26.3
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and disclosures made in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. We use estimates that affect the reported amounts (including assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses) and related disclosures. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the valuation of derivatives liabilities associated with our Covered Call Options (as defined below), valuation of share-based awards including warrants issued for services, clinical trial accruals, potential loss contingencies, deferred income taxes and related valuation allowances, and the assessment of our ability to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and other market-specific or other relevant assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates are assessed each reporting period and updated to reflect current information. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results may materially differ from those estimates or assumptions.

Market, Custody and Operational Risks of Digital Assets

We are subject to various risks including market risk, liquidity risk, and other risks related to our concentration in a single asset, LTC. Investing in LTC is highly speculative and volatile.

Because the fair value of our digital assets is calculated by reference to the principal market price in accordance with U.S. GAAP, fluctuations in the price of LTC could materially and adversely affect an investment in us. LTC prices have been volatile

and subject to influence by many factors, including LTC's levels of liquidity, which have historically been limited. If digital asset markets continue to experience significant price fluctuations, we may experience losses. During LTC's limited history, it has been subject to various factors affecting the price of LTC, including, but not limited to, global LTC supply and demand, compliance and internal control failures leading to the theft of LTC from global trading platforms or vaults, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies market and competition from other forms of digital currency or payment services, and global or regional political, economic or financial conditions.

There is a risk that some or all our LTC could be lost or stolen. There can be no assurance that the custodian will maintain adequate insurance or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to our LTC. Further, transactions in LTC are irrevocable. Stolen or incorrectly transferred LTC may be irretrievable. Further, any LTC we hold with our custodians and transact with our trade execution partners does not enjoy the same protections as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. As a result, any incorrectly executed LTC transactions could adversely affect an investment in us.

We rely on third-party service providers to perform certain functions essential to our operations. Any disruptions to our service providers’ business operations resulting from business failures, financial instability, security failures, government mandated regulation or operational problems could have an adverse impact on our ability to access critical services and be disruptive to our operations.

LTC is subject to a developing regulatory landscape. On March 17, 2026, the SEC issued an interpretation addressing how the federal securities laws apply to certain types of crypto assets and transactions involving crypto assets (the Digital Asset Interpretation). While not a binding regulation, the Digital Asset Interpretation represents a shift in the SEC’s regulatory posture toward the crypto asset industry, moving from reliance primarily on enforcement actions to affirmative guidance establishing a classification framework and clarifying when crypto-related activities do or do not implicate the federal securities laws.

In the Digital Asset Interpretation, the SEC classified crypto assets into five categories based on their characteristics, uses, and functions. “Digital commodities,” “digital collectibles” including “meme coins,” and “digital tools” are not themselves securities according to the SEC. A “digital commodity” is a crypto asset intrinsically linked to, and deriving its value from, the programmatic operation of a “functional” crypto system and supply and demand dynamics, rather than from the expectation of profits based on the essential managerial efforts of others. A digital commodity is not a security. The Digital Asset Interpretation identifies a number of specific crypto assets as digital commodities, including LTC.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC) joined the Digital Asset Interpretation to provide guidance that the CFTC and its staff will administer the Commodities Exchange Act of 1936, as amended (the CEA) consistent with the SEC’s interpretation. Accordingly, by following the Digital Asset Interpretation, the CFTC will continue to regulate LTC as a digital commodity. Under the CEA, the CFTC has broad enforcement authority to police market manipulation and fraud in spot digital asset markets in which we may transact. Beyond instances of fraud or manipulation, the CFTC generally does not oversee cash or spot market exchanges or transactions involving digital asset commodities that do not utilize margin, leverage or financing. In addition, CFTC regulations and CFTC oversight and enforcement authority apply with respect to futures, swaps, other derivative products and certain retail leveraged commodity transactions involving digital asset commodities, including the markets on which these products trade and the Digital Asset Interpretation does not include in its taxonomy digital derivatives or digital swaps or address regulation regarding these products.

Under the Digital Asset Interpretation, even if a crypto asset is deemed to be a non-security crypto asset (such as a digital commodity), the interpretation takes the view that the non-security crypto asset may still be subject to an investment contract, even in the secondary market, and thus secondary market transactions, even in such non-security crypto assets, might be subject to the federal securities laws. While the Digital Asset Interpretation conveys the SEC’s views on how the definition of “security” applies to crypto assets, it does not have the binding force of a regulation adopted through notice-and-comment rulemaking. Accordingly, courts are not bound by it and may reach different conclusions, and the SEC could revise or withdraw it in the future.

If LTC is determined to be a “security” under federal or state securities laws by the SEC or any other agency, or in a proceeding in a court of law or otherwise, it may have material adverse consequences for LTC. For example, it may become more difficult for LTC to be traded, cleared and custodied as compared to other digital assets that are not considered to be securities, which could, in turn, negatively affect the liquidity and general acceptance of LTC and cause users to migrate to other digital assets. As such, any determination that LTC is a security under federal or state securities laws may adversely affect the value of LTC and, as a result, an investment in us.

In addition, if LTC is in fact a security, we could be considered an unregistered “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which could necessitate our liquidation or delisting from the exchange on which our stock is traded. In such case, we may be deemed to have participated in an illegal offering of investment company securities and there is no guarantee that we will be able to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940 at such time, or take such other actions as may be necessary to ensure our activities comply with applicable law, which could force us to liquidate our LTC holdings.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. We maintain cash and cash equivalent balances at financial institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). At times, deposits held may exceed the amount of insurance provided by the FDIC. We have not experienced any losses in our cash and cash equivalents and management believes we are not exposed to significant credit risk with respect to such accounts. Our cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5. Fair Value Measurements for further information on the fair value hierarchy.

Digital Assets

In accordance with our Litecoin Treasury Strategy, we intend to hold our LTC for long-term investment purposes. We seek to generate returns on our LTC holdings, as LTC appreciates and actively pursue risk-adjusted return opportunities to generate cash flows that support our operating expenses. As a result, our LTC digital assets are included in long-term assets in the consolidated balances sheets, due to our intent to retain and hold our LTC. Pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350-60 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Crypto Assets (ASC 350-60) in-scope crypto assets are required to be measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, with gains and losses from changes in the fair value of such crypto assets recognized in net loss each reporting period. Proceeds from the sale of digital assets are included within investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

ASC 350-60 does not address the initial measurement, recognition, and derecognition of crypto assets. As such, our digital assets were initially recorded at cost plus fees in accordance with ASC 350-30 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill. Our digital assets are recorded at fair value at each reporting period with changes in fair value of digital assets included as a component of operating activities in the consolidated statements of operations, as our LTC tokens could, if needed, be sold for use in our operations. Digital assets intended for use in operations and/or for the repurchase of our Common Stock are classified as current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Our first purchase of LTC was on July 30, 2025. In accordance with ASC 350-60, our required adoption date was July 1, 2025 (beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period of adoption). LTC tokens are measured using Level 1 inputs under ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820), based on quoted prices from a principal market, Coinbase, as Coinbase has the highest trading volume of LTC tokens (LTC Tokens), the native cryptocurrency of LTC, and is the market in which we transact in LTC Tokens. We track the cost basis of our digital assets based upon a first-in-first-out methodology. See Note 4. Digital Assets for further information. Except for digital assets pledged as collateral for our Covered Call Options (as defined below), our digital asset holdings are not subject to any contractual sale restrictions. Digital assets pledged as collateral are reported as digital assets receivable, net, and classified as long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets, consistent with our intent to primarily retain LTC under our Litecoin Treasury Strategy.

Digital Assets Receivable, Net

We enter into contracts with GSR Markets Ltd (GSR Markets), an affiliate of GSR Strategies LLC (GSR or Asset Manager), in which we write covered call options on certain of our LTC holdings (Covered Call Options). In connection with these arrangements, we transfer LTC as collateral to GSR Markets, on a title-transfer basis. Upon transfer, we no longer have control of the specific LTC transferred; however, we retain a contractual right to receive the same quantity of LTC if the Covered Call Options expire unexercised.

As a result of the title transfer, the amount of LTC collateralized is reclassified from digital assets to digital assets receivable, net, in the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we recognize the difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and the initial purchase price of the LTC as a realized gain or loss within change in fair value of digital assets, a component of operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The digital assets receivable, net, is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date in accordance with ASC 350-60.

When Covered Call Options expire unexercised, GSR Markets may either return the LTC to us or retain the LTC to support future Covered Call Option contracts. If the LTC is retained by GSR Markets after expiration, the balance continues to be reported as digital assets receivable, net, and remeasured at fair value. If the LTC is returned to us, the receivable is derecognized by reclassifying the fair value of the LTC to digital assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

When Covered Call Options are exercised, the associated digital assets receivable, net, is derecognized as the underlying LTC is retained by GSR Markets and removed from our collateral balance held by GSR Markets. Gains or losses related to the exercise of Covered Call Options are recorded within gain on derivative liabilities, net, within other expense (income), net, in the consolidated statements of operations.

We evaluate our digital assets receivable for expected credit losses in accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. Our assessment considers, among other factors, the short-term nature of the Covered Call Options contractual term,

the creditworthiness and risk management practices of GSR, the amount of LTC collateralized, and historical loss experience. As of June 30, 2026, we concluded expected credit losses were immaterial and, therefore, recorded no allowance for credit losses related to our digital assets receivable, net.

Investment in Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE) and Token Warrants

Our investment in the SAFE provides us with the right to participate in future equity financings of a private company and token warrants provide us with the right to purchase two percent of the total network tokens developed (Token Warrants) (the SAFE and Token Warrants are herein referred to as the SAFE Investment). We accounted for the SAFE Investment under ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities (ASC 321). The SAFE Investment contains multiple settlement provisions which could require bifurcation under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). Rather than separately value each settlement provision, we elected the fair value option for the SAFE Investment under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, which requires financial instruments to be remeasured to fair value each reporting period, with changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value estimate includes significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.

Fair Value Measurements

Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and other current assets, digital assets, including Covered Call Options, digital assets receivable, net, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and Advisory Warrants (as defined below). The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of the relatively short-term nature of those instruments. For information regarding the fair value of our digital assets and our Covered Call Options, see Note 5. Fair Value Measurements and Note 8. Derivatives, respectively.

Derivatives – Covered Call Options

From time to time, to generate cash flows on a portion of our LTC, we sell Covered Call Options. These options do not qualify as accounting hedges under ASC 815; however, we consider them to be economic hedges. We classify our Covered Call Options as derivative liabilities, which are recorded within the accrued liabilities line item in the consolidated balance sheets, and accordingly recorded at fair value at inception and subsequently remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. Changes in fair value of our Covered Call Options and/or realized gains or losses on Covered Call Options which expire unexercised are recognized upon settlement (expiration) of the related Covered Call Option contract within gain on derivative liabilities, net, a component of other (expense) income, net, in the consolidated statements of operations.

The notional amount of Covered Call Options represents the quantity of digital assets underlying the option contracts multiplied by the spot entry price when the contract is written. Notional amounts are not recorded on the balance sheet and do not represent our maximum exposure to loss, which is limited to the opportunity cost of foregone appreciation in the underlying digital assets above the strike price. Premiums received from the sale of Covered Call Options are recorded as cash inflows within investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 8. Derivatives for additional information related to our Covered Call Options.

Master Loan Agreement

As discussed in Note 7. Master Loan Agreement, we entered into a master loan agreement (the MLA) with BitGo Prime (the Lender). The MLA provides a framework under which we may borrow digital assets or cash from the Lender, from time-to-time. Each loan is documented in a separate loan request agreed to by the parties setting forth the specific terms, including principal amount, fees, collateral requirements and the date on which the loan is to commence and mature (each a Loan). Each Loan may have a fixed term, or may include a call option or prepayment option, as specified in each loan request. In general, either party may terminate a Loan by providing notice within the time frame set forth in the respective Loan. Upon termination, the borrowed digital assets or cash must be returned, and the related collateral released.

Warrants

We account for the Pre-Funded Warrants issued in the PIPE as equity-classified instruments based on an assessment of the Pre-Funded Warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (ASC 480) and ASC 815. The assessment considers whether the Pre-Funded Warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and meet all the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including but not limited to, whether the Pre-Funded Warrants are indexed to our own Common Stock and whether the Pre-Funded Warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside our control. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of the Pre-Funded Warrant's issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the Pre-Funded Warrants are outstanding.

For other warrants that meet all criteria for equity classification, such warrants are required to be recorded as additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheets at the time of issuance.

We issued the following warrants for services rendered in connection with the PIPE: (i) the Asset Manager GSR 1 Warrant (AMA GSR 1 Warrant), (ii) Asset Manager GSR 2 Warrant (AMA GSR 2 Warrant), (iii) Asset Manager GSR 3 Warrant (AMA GSR 3 Warrant), (iv) Asset Manager GSR 4 Warrant (AMA GSR 4 Warrant), (v) Placement Agent (PA) Warrant and (vi) Strategic Advisor (SA) Warrant (collectively, the Advisory Warrants), and we issued the Asset Manager's Pre-Funded Warrant (AMA Pre-Funded Warrants) after the Closing Date. The Advisory Warrants are accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation (ASC 718), which requires us to recognize the fair value of the Advisory Warrants at either (i) the fair value of the equity instruments issued or (ii) the liabilities settled. The fair value of the Advisory Warrants was determined based upon the Common Stock underlying the Advisory Warrants using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option pricing model (BSM Model) based on the applicable assumptions, which include the exercise price of the warrants, our stock price and historical volatility, the expected warrant term, the risk-free interest rate, the expected dividends, and if applicable, the vesting behavior. See Note 12. Warrants for a summary of the fair value assumptions used to value the Advisory Warrants upon the closing of the PIPE and a summary of the Warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2026.

The fair value of the AMA Pre-Funded Warrant issued in September 2025 as payment of the annual asset-based fee (Asset-based Fee) under the GSR Asset Management Agreement (as defined in Note 17. Related Party Transactions) and the GD Advisory Warrants issued in October 2025 in settlement of the Annual Advisory Fee with Green Dragon Investment LLC (Green Dragon) were determined by the settlement amount of the Asset-based Fee and the Annual Advisory Fee, respectively. The AMA Pre-Funded Warrants, the GD Advisory Warrants and the agreements under which they were issued are further discussed in Note 12. Warrants, and defined in Note 17. Related Party Transactions.

Share-based Compensation

For fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments granted at the date we and a nonemployee enter into an agreement for goods or services, we recognize the equity instruments when they are granted. The corresponding cost is recognized as an immediate expense or a prepaid asset depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the agreement with the nonemployee. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, 546,348 Pre-Funded Warrants were issued as fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments to a nonemployee. The agreement with the nonemployee does not include any provisions to claw back the share-based payments in the event of nonperformance by the nonemployee. Before July 21, 2026, GSR is expected to provide asset management services related to our LTC holdings under the GSR Asset Management Agreement (as defined in Note 17. Related Party Transactions) entered into by us and GSR. As of June 30, 2026, we recorded $0.1 million in current unamortized deferred prepaid assets associated with the AMA Pre-Funded Warrants.

We review options granted at or in close proximity to our release of material public information to determine if such options would be considered spring-loaded options in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 120 (SAB 120) and ASC 718. When we determine we were in possession of material non-public information (MNPI) at the time of grant, and the options granted therefore would meet the definition of spring-loaded options, we make appropriate adjustments to the closing price used in valuing such options for accounting purposes. Such adjustments may include use of the closing price on the release date rather than the grant date.

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense consists of current and deferred income tax expense or benefit. Current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to tax credits and loss carryforwards and to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of June 30, 2026 and 2025, we have established a valuation allowance to fully reserve our net deferred tax assets. Tax rate changes are reflected in income during the period such changes are enacted. Changes in our ownership may limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized in the future to offset taxable income.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Topic ASC 740 - Income Taxes (ASC 740) prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Disposition of Nonfinancial Assets

We account for infrequent dispositions of assets in its product pipeline in accordance with ASC 610-20, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, which requires dispositions of long-lived assets that are not a discontinued operation be accounted for on a net basis and included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in accordance with ASC 350, Intangible Assets - Goodwill and Other. Proceeds from sales designated as dispositions of nonfinancial assets are classified as cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Issued and outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock are included in the calculation of basic net loss per common share if the exercise price of the warrants represents de minimis consideration and is nonsubstantive in relation to the price paid for the warrant and if the warrants are immediately exercisable with no further vesting conditions or contingencies associated with them. The 546,348 shares of our Common Stock underlying Pre-Funded Warrants, as described in Note 12. Warrants, and 175,611 shares of our Common Stock underlying the vested portion of our GD Advisory Warrants are included in the calculation of our weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share, basic and diluted due to their nominal exercise price.

We consider our Pre-Funded Warrants, including the AMA Pre-Funded Warrants and our Advisory Warrants, including the GD Advisory Warrant (collectively, the Warrants) to be participating securities, because the holders of such instruments participate when a dividend is paid on common stock. The holders of the Warrants do not have a contractual obligation to share in our losses. Because such losses are attributable entirely to common stockholders, for periods in which we have reported a net loss, diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method.

For each of the periods presented, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same.

 

The following table presents potentially dilutive shares that have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per share because of their anti-dilutive effect (in thousands):

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2026

 

 

2025

 

Stock options

 

 

1,731

 

 

 

869

 

Warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory Warrants

 

 

3,070

 

 

 

—

 

GD Advisory Warrants

 

 

59

 

 

 

—

 

Other warrant

 

 

103

 

 

 

103

 

Total anti-dilutive shares

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

972

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

Recently Adopted

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (ASC 350-60). The amendments in ASC 350-60 are intended to improve the accounting for certain crypto assets by requiring an entity to measure those crypto assets at fair value each reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The amendments also improve the information provided to investors about an entity’s crypto asset holdings by requiring disclosure about significant holdings, contractual sale restrictions, and changes during the reporting period. The amendments were effective for us beginning July 1, 2025. ASC 350-60 requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity or net assets) as of the beginning of the annual reporting period in which an entity adopts the amendments. As we did not hold cryptocurrency prior to July 30, 2025, the adoption of ASC 350-60 did not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Digital Assets discussion within Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 4. Digital Assets and Note 5. Fair Value Measurements for related disclosures related to our LTC holdings.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which focuses on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. ASU No. 2023-09 requires a public business entity

(PBE) to disclose, on an annual basis, a tabular rate reconciliation using both percentages and currency amounts, broken out into specified categories with certain reconciling items further broken out by nature and jurisdiction to the extent those items exceed a specified threshold. In addition, all entities are required to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds received disaggregated by federal, state/local, and foreign and by jurisdiction if the amount is at least 5% of total income tax payments, net of refunds received. We adopted ASU 2023-09 prospectively for its annual period ended June 30, 2026. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and disclosures.

In July 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was enacted in the U.S. The OBBBA makes permanent key elements of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, including 100% bonus depreciation, domestic research cost expensing and the business interest expense limitation, among other tax changes. The legislation did not have a material impact on our statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2026.

Recently Issued

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies that are adopted as of the specified effective date. We believe the impact of recently issued standards and any issued but not yet effective standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendments in this update require disclosure, in the notes to the financial statements, of specific expense categories present within expense captions presented on the face of the statements of operations (income statement) within continuing operations of PBEs. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied either prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of this ASU or retrospectively to any and all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We are currently evaluating this ASU to determine its impact on our disclosures.

In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date. The amendment in this update clarifies the effective date of ASU 2024-03, which is that public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and in interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The impact of adoption of this ASU on our disclosures is currently being evaluated.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12, Codification Improvements (ASU 2025-12). The amendments in this update represent changes to the Codification that (1) clarify, (2) correct errors, or (3) make minor improvements. The amendments make the Codification easier to understand and apply. An entity should apply the amendments in this update (except for the amendments to Topic 206, Earnings Per Share, related to Issue 4) either prospectively to all transactions recognized on or after the date that the entity first applies the amendments or retrospectively to the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. Entities may elect the transition method on an issue-by-issue basis. The amendments in this update clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03, which is that public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and in interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted in both interim and annual reporting periods. The impact of adoption of this ASU on our disclosures is currently being evaluated.