v3.26.3
Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2025
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP. In the opinion of Management, the unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the balances and results for the periods presented. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected through December 31, 2025, or any future period.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2025, which contains the audited financial statements and notes thereto. The financial information as of December 31, 2024, is derived from the audited financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the SEC on April 15, 2025.

Emerging Growth Company

Emerging Growth Company

 

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

 

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company that is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of condensed financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Making estimates requires Management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which Management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. On November 2, 2022 and December 14, 2023, Slam received formal letters from each of Goldman and BTIG, respectively, that each bank has agreed to waive its right to the deferred underwriting commission provided, however, BTIG’s waiver is conditioned upon the consummation of the Business Combination and its receipt of a capital markets advisory fee from Lynk. Goldman and BTIG did not receive any payment from Slam in connection with the fee waiver; provided, however, BTIG’s waiver is conditioned upon the consummation of the Business Combination and its receipt of the aforementioned capital markets advisory fee from Lynk.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash accounts in a financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage limit of $250,000. Any loss incurred or a lack of access to such funds could have a significant adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Cash Held in the Trust Account

Cash Held in the Trust Account

 

On February 17, 2023, the Company liquidated the U.S. government treasury obligations and money market funds held in the Trust Account. The funds in the Trust Account will be maintained in cash in an interest-bearing demand deposit account at a bank until the earlier of consummation of the Company’s initial business combination or liquidation. Prior to February 17, 2023, the Company’s portfolio of investments held in the Trust Account were comprised of U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act, with a maturity of 185 days or less, or investments in money market funds that invest in U.S. government securities and generally have a readily determinable fair value or a combination thereof. When the Company’s investments were held in the Trust Account comprised of U.S. government securities, the investments were classified as trading securities. When the Company’s investments held in the Trust Account were comprised of money market funds, the investments were recognized at fair value. Trading securities and investments in money market funds are presented on the balance sheets at fair value at the end of each reporting period. Gains and losses resulting from the change in fair value of these securities are included in income from cash held in the Trust Account in the accompanying statements of operations. The estimated fair values of investments held in the Trust Account are determined using available market information.

Due to Continental

Due to Continental

 

On October 28, 2024, Continental erroneously deposited $172,500 into the Trust Account. This erroneous deposit plus interest earned, total of approximately $174,540, was subsequently reimbursed to Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company on March 4, 2025.

Trust Account Receivable

Trust Account Receivable

  

On October 28, 2024, Continental erroneously deposited a total of approximately $174,540. As a result of this error, the Trust Account contained $174,540 more funds than it otherwise would have at the time of the Third Extension Meeting. In connection with the Third Extension Meeting, Continental paid shareholders of Slam who properly redeemed their shares $135,122 more than they would have received if the erroneous deposit had not occurred. As such, Continental returned $135,122 to the Company’s Trust Account on April 14, 2025.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under the FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheets, except for the derivative warrant liabilities (see Note 9).

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for sale of an asset or paid for transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). These tiers consist of:

 

  ● Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets;
     
  ● Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
     
  ● Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

 

In some circumstances, the inputs used to measure fair value might be categorized within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Derivative Warrant Liabilities

Derivative Warrant Liabilities

 

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.

 

 

The Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815. Accordingly, the Company recognizes the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The liabilities are subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company’s statements of operations. The determination of the fair value of the warrant liability may be subject to change as more current information becomes available, and accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly. The estimated fair value of the Public Warrants, at issuance, was measured at fair value using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and is subsequently valued using the observable listed prices for such warrants. As the transfer of Private Placement Warrants to anyone who is not a permitted transferee would result in the Private Placement Warrants having substantially the same terms as the Public Warrants, the Company determined that the fair value of each Private Placement Warrant is equivalent to that of each Public Warrant. The fair value of the Warrants as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, is based on observable listed prices for such warrants.

Backstop Agreement

Backstop Agreement

 

The Company evaluated the backstop agreement under FASB ASC 815 in which it was concluded that the settlement terms listed within the Backstop Agreement are not considered an input into a fixed-for-fixed contract as required under step 2 of FASB ASC 815-40-15 because they are neither specifically mentioned in FASB ASC 815-40-15 nor is it an input into a fixed-for-fixed contract. As a result, the Backstop Agreement is required to be classified as a liability and measured at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Accordingly, the Company recognized the Backstop Agreement as a liability at its fair value and will adjust the instrument to its fair value at each reporting period. The liability will be subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised. The fair value of the Backstop Agreement assumes Antara Capital Master Fund LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (“Antara”) will fund the maximum number of shares and considers the probability of the backstop commitment consisting only of an amount equal to the difference between (x) the Minimum Cash Condition and (y) the sum of the Private Placement Net Financing Amount (as defined in the Backstop Agreement) and the Trust Amount (as defined in the Backstop Agreement), in no event will the backstop commitment exceed $25,000,000, and Antara will not be obligated to make the backstop commitment if the Minimum Cash Condition is satisfied (see Note 5).

Offering Costs Associated with the Initial Public Offering

Offering Costs Associated with the Initial Public Offering

 

Offering costs consisted of legal, accounting, underwriting fees and other costs incurred through the Initial Public Offering that were directly related to the Initial Public Offering. Offering costs were allocated to the separable financial instruments issued in the Initial Public Offering based on a relative fair value basis, compared to total proceeds received. Offering costs associated with derivative warrant liabilities were expensed as incurred and presented as non-operating expenses in the statements of operations. Offering costs associated with the Class A ordinary shares issued were charged against the carrying value of the Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption upon the completion of the Initial Public Offering. The Company classifies deferred underwriting commissions as non-current liabilities as their liquidation is not reasonably expected to require the use of current assets or require the creation of current liabilities.

Class A Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Redemption

Class A Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Redemption

 

The Company accounts for its Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Class A ordinary shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable Class A ordinary shares (including Class A ordinary shares that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, Class A ordinary shares are classified as shareholders’ equity (deficit). The Company’s Class A ordinary shares feature certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, 114,053 and 2,000,000 Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption, respectively, are presented at redemption value as temporary equity, outside of the shareholders’ deficit section of the Company’s balance sheets.

 

At the June 2025 Special Meeting, stockholders redeemed 1,885,947 shares of the Company’s common stock for $22,485,938. As of June 30, 2025 the redeeming stockholders were not paid for the redeeming shares. The Company reports this amount as due to redeeming shareholders, a non-current liability on the condensed balance sheet, as the settlement of this liability does not require the use of current assets to settle the liability.

 

The Company recognizes changes in redemption value immediately as they occur and adjusts the carrying value of the Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period. This method would view the end of the reporting period as if it were also the redemption date for the security. Effective with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company recognized the accretion from initial book value to redemption amount, which resulted in charges against additional paid-in capital (to the extent available) and accumulated deficit.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

 

The Company complies with the accounting and reporting requirements of FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” FASB ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Management determined that the Cayman Islands is the Company’s only major tax jurisdiction. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position.

 

There is currently no taxation imposed on income by the government of the Cayman Islands. In accordance with Cayman Islands federal income tax regulations, income taxes are not levied on the Company. Consequently, income taxes are not reflected in the Company’s financial statements. Management does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will materially change over the next twelve months.

Net Loss per Ordinary Share

Net Loss per Ordinary Share

 

The Company complies with accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” The Company has two classes of shares, which are referred to as Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. Income and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. This presentation assumes an initial business combination as the most likely outcome. Net loss per ordinary share is calculated by dividing the net income by the weighted average shares of ordinary shares outstanding for the respective period.

 

The calculation of diluted net loss does not consider the effect of the warrants underlying the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering (including the consummation of the over-allotment) and the Private Placement Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 25,708,333 Class A ordinary shares in the calculation of diluted loss per share, because their exercise is contingent upon future events and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. As a result, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. Accretion associated with the redeemable Class A ordinary shares is excluded from earnings per share as the redemption value approximates fair value.

 

The following tables present a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share for each class of ordinary shares:

 

    For the Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2025     2024  
    Class A
Redeemable
    Class A and
Class B Non-
Redeemable
    Class A     Class B  
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share:                        
Numerator:                        
Allocation of net loss, basic and diluted   $ 309,069     $ 2,567,269     $ (606,201 )   $ (959,923 )
Denominator:                                
Basic and diluted weighted average ordinary shares outstanding     1,730,579       14,375,000       9,077,959       14,375,000  
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share   $ 0.18     $ 0.18     $ (0.07 )   $ (0.07 )

 

    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2025     2024  
    Class A
Redeemable
    Class A and
Class B Non-
Redeemable
    Class A     Class B  
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share:                        
Numerator:                        
Allocation of net loss, basic and diluted   $ 250,770     $ 1,933,348     $ (972,613 )   $ (1,540,138 )
Denominator:                                
Basic and diluted weighted average ordinary shares outstanding     1,864,545       14,375,000       9,077,959       14,375,000  
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share   $ 0.13     $ 0.13     $ (0.11 )   $ (0.11 )
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company’s Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards updates, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying condensed financial statements.