Exhibit 99.5

Clayton Contact Information

Client Service Management:

		Michael Santarsiere	Client Service Director
			Phone: (813) 371-0280/E-mail: msantarsiere@clayton.com

		Joe Ozment	Vice President – Client Services & Securitization
			Phone: (813) 261-0733/E-mail: jozment@clayton.com

Overview

On behalf of HomeXpress Mortgage Corp., Clayton conducted an independent third-party pre-securitization due diligence review of 16 residential loans.

On behalf of Hometown Equity Mortgage, LLC dba “theLender”, Clayton Services LLC (“Clayton”) conducted an independent third-party pre-securitization due diligence review of 195 residential loans.

Santander Bank, N.A subsequently purchased these loans via reliance letter and selected these loans for the SAN 2026-NQM8 transaction.

The loans referenced in this narrative report were reviewed on a flow loan basis from December 2025 to July 2026. This narrative report provides information about the scope of work performed by Clayton, and the results of Clayton’s review.

Originators

Origination channels for the loans in this review:

Clayton’s Third Party Review (“TPR”) Scope of Work

The scope of work for this transaction consisted of a credit review, property valuation review, regulatory compliance review, and data integrity check.

Loan Grading

Each loan received an “initial” and a “final” grade. The “initial” grade was assigned during the initial loan review. The “final” grade takes into account additional information and supporting documentation that may have been provided by the originators to clear outstanding conditions. Clayton’s loan grading is solely based on Clayton’s independent assessment of all guideline exceptions and compensating factors for each of the component reviews. Clayton is providing a comprehensive loan-level analysis as part of this pre-securitization reporting package that includes initial grades, final grades and detailed commentary on the rationale for any changes in grades and sets forth compensating factors and waivers.

Clayton’s loan grading complied with rating agency grading definitions published by Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, Fitch, Morningstar, Kroll and DBRS.

TPR Component Review Scope

Clayton examined the selected loan files with respect to the presence or absence of relevant documents, enforceability of mortgage loan documents, and accuracy and completeness of data fields. Clayton relied on the accuracy of information contained in the loan documentation provided to Clayton.

Credit Review

Clayton’s Credit scope of review conducted on 211 loans on this transaction included the following elements (for more detail, please refer to Appendix A):

Property Valuation Review

Clayton’s Property Valuation scope of review conducted included the following elements:

Clayton applied a cascade methodology to determine if the original appraised value was supported when compared to an independent third party valuation product. Loans were held to a -10% tolerance utilizing the following waterfall;

For further detail please refer to the SAN 2026-NQM8 Valuations Summary Report

Regulatory Compliance Review

Clayton’s regulatory compliance scope of review conducted on 96 loans on this transaction included the elements summarized below. (For more detail, please refer to Appendix C.)

Clayton utilized its proprietary eCLAS engine for regulatory compliance testing.

The scope of the compliance review performed is summarized below:

OF NOTE: As of October 3, 2015 (“TRID Effective Date”), Clayton commenced testing applicable loans subject to the TRID Effective date against a TRID scope of review that was based on outside counsel’s interpretations of the published regulations as of the TRID Effective Date. Clayton’s scope was commercially reasonable as it relates to a Third Party Review (“TPR”) firm’s role as TPR conducting an independent third-party pre-securitization due diligence review (“Initial TRID Scope”). The Initial TRID Scope was created with guidance from outside counsel.

On, June 15th, 2016 SFIG published its RMBS 3.0 TRID Compliance Review Scope © documentation, developed under the leadership of members from Third Party Review (“TPR”) firms across the industry and SFIG’s RMBS 3.0 Due Diligence, Data and Disclosure Working Group. The RMBS 3.0 TRID Compliance Review Scope was created with an aim to facilitate a uniform testing and risk identification standard as it would apply to an assignee, as a result of a consistent Truth-In-Lending Act liability interpretation according to the understanding of prevailing legal precedent and informal written guidance and webinars offered by the CFPB, as it applies to the Know Before You Owe / Truth In Lending Act (“TILA) – Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) Integrated Disclosure (“TRID”) Rule (78 FR 79730, as amended). RMBS 3.0 TRID Compliance Review Scope may be formally amended by the SFIG RMBS 3.0 Due Diligence, Data and Disclosure Working Group as clarifying regulations may be promulgated on a go forward basis, as well as any binding judicial interpretations of the underlying law.

Following the June 15^th formal publication of the RMBS 3.0 TRID Compliance Review Scope ©, Clayton reviewed prior testing results dating back to the TRID Effective Date, and applied the enhanced RMBS 3.0 TRID Compliance Review Scope to such loans upon the affirmative election by Santander Bank, N.A.

Compliance Review (Business Purpose, Non-Owner Occupied)

Non-Owner Occupied Scope: Most consumer protection laws are designed to afford protection to borrowers who are entering into a loan that will be secured by their residence.  For most high cost and higher-priced laws, as well as rescission, the only loans covered by the law are loans secured by the borrower’s (or in the case of rescission a title holder’s) principal residence.   Most other consumer protection laws extend to a borrower’s secondary residence, which under TILA and RESPA is a residence that they occupy at least 2 weeks during the year.  Further, if the loan is for a business purpose it is often excluded from consumer protection laws regardless of occupancy, including TILA (whereas if it is secured by non-owner occupied but for a personal, family or household purpose it is more likely to be covered). 

Therefore, the list of laws that Clayton tests that apply to a loan secured by non-owner occupied property for a business purpose is limited. Regulatory Compliance testing of Business Purpose Loans consists of the following:

State and Federal High Cost and Higher-Priced:

Clayton currently tests the Chicago and Cook County ordinances due to vague language around loans for a business purpose not related to the property.  While the state of Illinois has similar language, Clayton’s audit law firm determined that only principal residences should be tested for IL high cost. 

Anti-predatory lending laws

Prepayment Penalties and Late Charges in certain states

National Flood Insurance Program for 1-4 unit residential properties (Transaction Date on or after 1/1/2016 for regulated lenders)

Data Integrity

     Clayton utilized its proprietary eCLAS tool to determine tape-to-file accuracy of 211 reviewed loans, by completing the following steps:

Data Capture

Clayton collected data fields required to create American Securitization Forum (“ASF”) data tape. The file format was provided as part of the pre-securitization reporting package. Additionally, Clayton captured rating agency required data points relating to ATR/QM determination, which is provided in the reporting package.

data Compare Results

Clayton provided Santander Bank, N.A, with a copy of the Loan Level Tape Compare Upload which shows the differences between the data received from the sellers versus the data captured by Clayton during the loan review in relation to the 211 loans reviewed.

Clayton Due Diligence Results

Below are the initial and final overall loan grades for this review, as well as the credit, property valuation, and regulatory compliance component review grades.

Initial and Final Overall Loan Grade Results (S&P)

The overall grade summary reflects the combination of the credit, property valuation and regulatory compliance component reviews into one overall grade. The overall grade assigned is the most severe grade from each of the component reviews.

Initial and Final Credit Component Grade Results (S&P)

Initial and Final Property Valuation Grade Results (S&P)

Initial and Final Regulatory Compliance Grade Results (S&P)

*Compliance results may not tie to total loan count based on business entity loans not being subject to a regulatory compliance review (115 loans in pool)

Clayton Third Party Reports Delivered

Clayton furnished the following reports on this transaction:

Appendix A: Credit Review Scope

For each mortgage loan, Clayton performed a guideline review utilizing specific guidelines furnished at the time of the review.

-    Citizenship status

-    Non- occupant co-borrower

-    Maximum loan amount

-    Loan purpose

-    Occupancy

Appendix B: Origination Appraisal Assessment

For each Mortgage Loan, Clayton performed the following origination appraisal analysis:

Appendix C: Regulatory Compliance Review Scope

This appendix provides an overview of Clayton’s proprietary compliance system for 1-4 family residential mortgage loans in the due diligence process to determine, to the extent possible and subject to the caveats below, whether the loans comply with federal, state and local laws. The Disclaimer section explains limitations that you should be aware of. Additional details on the items listed below as well as Clayton’s state, county and municipal testing can be provided upon request. The compliance engine is fully integrated into Clayton’s proprietary due diligence platform, eCLAS.

Federal Law

STATE, COUNTY and MUNICIPAL LAW

Clayton test whether a loan meets the thresholds for a higher-priced, rate spread, subprime or nonprime mortgage loan, and whether such loan meets regulatory requirements, in the following states:

Clayton test whether a loan meets the thresholds for a high cost or covered loan in the following states, counties and municipalities, and also tests for compliance with provisions in such laws that apply to all loans subject to high cost testing:

Several states have laws that do not create a separate class of high cost or higher-priced mortgage loans, but set APR or finance charge ceilings and may also set forth similar anti-predatory lending restrictions as found in high cost laws. Clayton tests for compliance with such laws in the following states:

Clayton uses a module that reports to the client the factors that the client can weigh to determine whether or not the loan is in the borrower’s interest, and also makes a mathematical determination as to whether or not there is at least one benefit. This module is only used in the following states, where the laws or releases by the regulators provide an indication of some standards that can be applied.

Several states have laws that neither create a separate class of high cost or higher-priced mortgage loan, nor impose a ceiling on the overall fees or APR, but nonetheless contain requirements and restrictions on mortgage loans that may impact the assignee or the lien. Clayton tests for compliance with such laws, including late charge and prepayment penalty provisions, in the following states and municipalities:

See attached Exhibit A - Consumer Protection Laws for additional details on the specific components of the aforementioned Consumer Protection laws that are evaluated as part of the Clayton Compliance Review Scope:

In addition to identifying whether Texas refinances are cash out transactions subject to the Texas Constitution Article 16 Section 50(a)(6) requirements, Clayton reviews the title report to confirm prior loans being refinanced are continuous purchase money and not (a)(6) loans. In the event a loan is determined to be a Texas Home Equity loan, the underwriter reviews the loan images to confirm the loan meets the Texas requirements including maximum LTV/CLTV, 3% fee cap, product restrictions and the required disclosures were provided to the borrower in accordance with required timelines.

GSE Testing

Clayton can review loans to determine whether they comply with Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s Points and Fees threshold tests. These fee limitations of 5% for all loans with application dates prior to 1/10/2014 were reduced to 3% on Primary and Second Homes for applications on or after 1/10/2014. If requested, loans can be reviewed to determine whether the loan is a residential mortgage transaction ineligible for delivery due to its APR or fees exceeding the HOEPA thresholds. Clayton offers Lender Letter and non-traditional mortgage testing for Fannie Mae. (Note: Fannie Mae requires a non-disclosure agreement between the client and Fannie Mae for Clayton to report these results.)

Disclaimer

Please be advised that Clayton has not determined whether the Loans comply with federal, state or local laws, constitutional provisions, regulations or ordinances, including, but not limited to, licensing and general usury laws that set rate and/or fee limitations, unless listed above. Clayton’s review is focused on issues that raise concerns for secondary market investors and other assignees, based on potential for assignee liability, an adverse impact on the lien, and regulatory, litigation and headline risk. Clayton’s review is not designed to fully test a lender’s compliance with all applicable disclosure and licensing requirements. Furthermore, the findings reached by Clayton are dependent upon its receiving complete and accurate data regarding the Loans from loan originators and other third parties. Please be further advised that Clayton and its employees do not engage in the practice of law, and the findings set forth in the reports prepared by Clayton do not constitute legal advice or opinions.

© 2026 Clayton Services LLC. All rights reserved.

This material is confidential and may not be copied, used, or distributed without the written permission of Clayton Services LLC

 ©2026 Clayton Services LLC. All rights reserved. Ownership and use of this report is governed by the legal agreement between Clayton and the party for which it was prepared. Any use not expressly authorized by such agreement, including reliance on this report by anyone other than such party, is prohibited.