Exhibit 99.5
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Third Party Due Diligence Review
Overview
Digital Risk, LLC (“Digital
Risk”), a third party due diligence provider, performed the review described below on behalf of
its client, SLC BINOM Sponsor LLC. The review included a total of 31 newly originated residential mortgage
loans, in connection with certain BINOM 2026-NQM2 (each, a “Securitization”). The
review began on December 18, 2025, and concluded on August 10, 2026.
Scope of Review
Credit Review
Digital Risk performed a “Credit Review”
to verify compliance with guidelines in effect at the time of loan origination, or other guidelines provided by Client prior to review,
and ensure the characteristics used by the underwriter are supported by the file documentation; and determine whether any loans outside
of those guidelines contain legitimate and approved exceptions with compensating factors.
The Credit Review attempted to confirm the
following:
| a. | Review Initial & Final Application |
| a. | Check application for completeness. Determine whether the information in the preliminary Loan application,
final application, and all credit documents is consistent. |
| b. | Validate Social Security/Taxpayer Identification number is valid |
| c. | Compare data on final form 1003 with the data from verifications |
| d. | Form is Complete, Signed, Dated, on or before loan consummation date, |
| b. | Review Approval Conditions |
| a. | Underwriting decision is supported (manual underwrite credit conditions
have been satisfied prior to closing the approved Loan package) |
| b. | Validation of assets/funds to close |
| c. | Validation of DSCR or qualification method and LTV calculations |
| c. | Review Occupancy/Red Flags |
| b. | Occupancy Red Flags adequately addressed |
| d. | Verification of Borrower Original and Audit Credit Report |
| a. | Validate names, social security number(s), and addresses |
| b. | AKA’s investigated and cleared |
| c. | Acceptable credit history and credit score requirements in conformance with Visio’s guidelines. |
| e. | Verification of Borrower Asset Information |
| i. | | lease agreement or market survey for rental income |
| i. | | Confirm adequate funds to cover required down payment and closing costs and reserves |
| ii. | | Check dates for document expiration |
| b. | Earnest Money Deposit verified |
| d. | Seller contributions are within guidelines |
| g. | Hazard and Flood (if applicable) |
| a. | Verify sufficient coverage |
| b. | Verify coverage is for subject |
| c. | Validate all premiums are included in DSCR and any required upfront premium is paid |
| h. | Review Title Commitment/Policy |
| d. | Validate no encumbrances |
| i. | Review Closing Documents. |
| a. | Review security documents to ensure the Loan was closed in accordance with approval and with all required
signatures |
| b. | Correct and complete instruments |
| c. | Review Settlement Statement |
| d. | Right to Cancel (if applicable) |
Compliance Review
Digital Risk performed a “Compliance Review”
to determine, as applicable, to the extent possible and subject to the caveats below, whether the loan complies with applicable regulatory
requirements as noted below, each as amended, restated and/or replaced from time to time. The Compliance Review included the following:
| a. | Federal Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), as implemented by Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. Part 1026,
as set forth below (for applicable Owner Occupied Properties): |
| a. | Failure to provide the right of rescission notice; |
| b. | failure to provide the right of rescission notice in a timely manner and to the correct consumer(s); |
| c. | errors in the right of rescission notice; |
| d. | failure to provide the correct form of right of rescission notice; |
| e. | failure to provide the three (3) business day rescission period; and |
| f. | any material disclosure violation on a rescindable loan that gives rise to the right of rescission under
TILA, which means the required disclosures of the annual percentage rate, the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of payments,
the payment schedule, the HOEPA disclosures; |
| b. | TILA (for applicable Owner Occupied Properties) |
| a. | Higher-priced Mortgage Loan (§1026.35): |
| i. | | APR threshold test; and |
| ii. | | Compliance with the escrow account and appraisal requirements. |
| c. | Business Purpose Loan Compliance Review |
| a. | Non-Owner Occupied Declaration Disclosure |
| i. | | Verify reflects correct address |
| ii. | | Verify application address is different from subject property |
| iii. | | Verify executed by all borrowers |
| b. | Review Note accuracy and properly executed |
| c. | Review Mortgage and applicable riders for accuracy and properly executed |
| d. | Occupancy Affidavit (must state that borrower(s) or if borrower is a business entity, the member(s) and/or
officer(s) of that business entity, including immediate family members of the same, will not reside in the property or claimed as primary
or secondary residence) |
| e. | HMDA section (Information for Government Monitoring Purposes) of the application (initial and/or final) |
| f. | If property is in a flood zone, Flood Notice must be provided prior to closing |
| g. | Right to Receive Copy of Appraisal or Appraisal Waiver Disclosure |
| h. | Letter of Explanation detailing the use of proceeds |
| i. | Borrower's statement of purpose for the loan |
| j. | State License requirements when applicable |
| k. | State Predatory lending and high cost when applicable |
| d. | Exclusions. Digital Risk reviews do not test for: |
| a. | Technical formatting of disclosures. |
| b. | Other Post-consummation disclosures, including Escrow Closing Notice; and Mortgage servicing transfer
and partial payment notices. |
| c. | For Loans made by an FDIC-supervised institution or servicer, extended or renewed on or after January
1, 2016, whether prohibited fees were collected prior to the initial LE being issued |
| d. | Whether any fee is a “bona fide” fee for third-party services |
| e. | Whether the loans comply with all federal, state or local laws, constitutional provisions, regulations
or ordinances that are not expressly enumerated above. |
The Compliance Review did not include any federal,
state or local laws, constitutional provisions, regulations or ordinances that are not expressly enumerated above. Furthermore, the findings
reached by Digital Risk are dependent upon its receiving complete and accurate data regarding the loans from loan originators and other
third parties upon which Digital Risk is relying in reaching such findings.
Valuation Review
Digital Risk performed a “Valuation Review,”
which included the following:
| b. | Digital Risk’s review will include a review of the valuation materials utilized during the origination
of the loan and in confirming the value of the underlying property. Digital Risk’s review will include verifying the appraisal report: |
| c. | On the appropriate appraisal form: |
| a. | All elements of appraisal are present |
| b. | Ensure all applicable Loan documents match appraisal information |
| c. | Property is acceptable collateral for Loan program |
| d. | Completed by an appraiser that was actively licensed to perform the valuation |
| e. | Completed such that the named client on the appraisal report is the lender or a related entity that is
permitted to engage the lender per Title XI of FIRREA, or if the appraisal was performed for another lender, the file contains evidence
that Client approved use of that appraisal |
| f. | The original appraisal report is made and signed prior to the final approval of the closing of the loan.
Any revisions, if made known to Digital Risk, to the original report are documented and dated completed and dated within the guideline’s
restrictions, |
| g. | The original appraisal is ‘As is' or Inspection received including all inspections, licenses, and
certificates (including certificates of occupancy) to be made or issued with respect to all occupied portions of the mortgaged property
and with respect to the use and occupancy of the same, have been made or obtained from the appropriate authorities. |
| h. | Determine whether the appraised value is supported at or within 90% based on a third-party valuation product.
If a third-party valuation product is in file, but notes less than 90% of the appraised value or an inconclusive value, Digital Risk will
review other third-party product(s) in the file to ensure the correct value was applied per Client Guidelines. |
| i. | With regard to the use of comparable properties, Digital Risk will (a) review the relative comparable
data (gross and net adjustments, sale dates and distance from subject property) and ensure that such comparable properties are within
standard appraisal guidelines, (b) confirm the property value and square footage of the subject property was bracketed by comparable properties,
(c) verify that comparable properties used are similar in size, style, and location to the subject, and (d) check for the reasonableness
of adjustments when reconciling value between the subject property and comparable properties. |
| j. | Other aspects of Digital Risk’s review include (i) verifying that the address matched the mortgage
note, ((ii) if requested, noting whether the property zip code was declared a FEMA disaster area after the valuation date and notifying
the Client of same, (iii) confirming the appraisal report does not include any apparent environmental problems, (iv) confirming the appraisal
notes the current use of the property is legal or legal non-conforming (grandfathered), (v) reviewing pictures to ensure (a) that the
property is in average or better condition and any repairs are noted where required and (b) that the subject property is the one for which
the valuation was ordered and that if there are negative external factors, there is support in the loan file of the Client’s approval
to waive the factor; and (vi) confirming that the value product that was used as part of the origination decision conforms with rating
agency requirements. |
| d. | If more than one valuation was provided, Digital Risk will confirm consistency among the valuation products
and if there are discrepancies that could not be resolved, Digital Risk will create an exception and work with the client on the next
steps which may include ordering of additional valuation products such as collateral desktop analyses, broker’s price opinions,
and full appraisals. If the property valuation products included in Digital Risk’s review result in a variance of more than 10%
then the client will be notified of such variance. |
| e. | Digital Risk will confirm to the extent possible, that the appraiser and the appraisal made by such appraiser
both satisfied the requirements of Title XI of FIRREA. Specifically, Digital Risk will review the appraisal for conformity to industry
standards, including ensuring the appraisal was complete, that the comparable properties and adjustments were documented and that pictures
were provided and were accurate. |
| f. | In addition, Digital Risk will access the ASC database to verify that the appraiser, and if applicable
the appraiser’s supervisor, were licensed and in good standing at the time the appraisal was completed. |
Data Discrepancy Report
As part of the Credit and Compliance Reviews,
Digital Risk captured data from the source documents and compared it to a data tape provided by Client. Digital Risk provided Client a
Data Discrepancy Report which shows the differences between the tape data and the data captured by Digital Risk during the diligence process.
Tape values that are blank indicate that the data was not provided on the provided data tape but Digital Risk captured it during the review.
The percentages are based on a population of 31 properties (31 loans) where data validation was completed. The table below reflects the
discrepancies inclusive of the blank data fields:
| Fields
Reviewed |
Count |
Percentage
|
| Total
Cash Reserves |
1 |
3.23% |
Summary of Results
| Overall
Loan Results: |
| Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Original
Principal Balance |
Percent
of Sample |
| Event Grade
A |
30 |
$9,103,887.00 |
96.77% |
| Event Grade
B |
1 |
$134,500.00 |
3.23% |
| Event Grade
C |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
D |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Total
Sample |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
| Credit
Results: |
| Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Original
Principal Balance |
Percent
of Sample |
| Event Grade
A |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
| Event Grade
B |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
C |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
D |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Total
Sample |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
| Compliance
Results: |
| Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Original
Principal Balance |
Percent
of Sample |
| Event Grade
A |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
| Event Grade
B |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
C |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
D |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Total
Sample |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
| Valuation
Results: |
| Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Original
Principal Balance |
Percent
of Sample |
| Event Grade
A |
30 |
$9,103,887.00 |
96.77% |
| Event Grade
B |
1 |
$134,500.00 |
3.23% |
| Event Grade
C |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event Grade
D |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Event
Grade N/A |
0 |
$0.00 |
0.00% |
| Total
Sample |
31 |
$9,238,387.00 |
100.00% |
Event Grade Definitions
| Final
Loan Grade |
| A |
Loan
meets Credit, Compliance, and Valuation Guidelines |
| B |
The
loan substantially meets published Client/Seller
guidelines and/or eligibility in the validation of income, assets, or credit, is in material
compliance
with all
applicable laws
and regulations,
and the value and valuation methodology is supported and substantially meets published guidelines. |
| C |
The
loan does not meet the
published guidelines and/or violates one material law or regulation, and/or the value
and valuation methodology is not supported or did not meet published guidelines. |
| D |
Loan
is missing documentation to perform a sufficient review. |
| Credit
Event Grades |
| A |
The
loan meets the
published guidelines without any exceptions. The employment,
income, assets and occupancy are supported
and justifiable. The borrower’s
willingness and ability to repay the loan is documented and reasonable. |
| B |
The
loan substantially meets the
published guidelines but reasonable compensating
factors were considered and documented
for exceeding published guidelines. The employment,
income, assets and occupancy are supported and justifiable. The borrower’s
willingness and ability to repay the loan
is documented and reasonable. |
| C |
The
loan does not substantially meet the
published guidelines. There are
not sufficient compensating factors that
justify exceeding the published guidelines. The
employment, income,
assets or occupancy are not supported and justifiable. The borrower’s
willingness and ability to repay the loan
were not documented or are unreasonable. |
| D |
There
was not sufficient documentation to perform a review or the
credit file was not furnished. |
| Compliance
Event Grades |
| A |
The
loan complies with
all applicable laws
and regulations.
The legal documents
accurately
reflect
the agreed upon
loan terms
and are executed
by all applicable
parties. |
| B |
The
loan complies with
all material applicable
laws and
regulations.
The
legal documents
accurately
reflect
the agreed
upon loan
terms and
are executed
by all applicable
parties. Client review required. |
| C |
The
loan violates one
material law
or regulation. The
material disclosures
are absent or
the legal documents
do not accurately
reflect the agreed
upon loan terms
or all required
applicants did not
execute the documents. |
| D |
There
was not
sufficient
documentation
to perform
a review
or the required
legal documents
were not
furnished. |
| Valuation Event Grades |
| A |
The valuation methodology complies with applicable underwriting guidelines and the value is supported within 90% of the original appraisal by the first third party valuation product. The appraisal was performed on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable at origination. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE approved forms. |
| B |
The valuation methodology does not meet applicable published
guidelines for the program.
The value is not supported within 90% of the original
appraisal by the first third party valuation product but a second third party valuation product is provided and does support original
appraised value within 90%.
The value is not supported within 90% of the original
appraisal by the first third party valuation product; a second third party valuation product is provided and does not support the original
appraised value within 90%; a third party value reconciliation product is then provided which reconciles the appraisal, first, and second
valuation products, and supports within 90% of the appraisal. When a reconciliation supports the appraisal, first and second valuation
products the lower of the appraised value and reconciliation will be used to establish lending value.
The appraisal was performed
on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE
approved forms. |
| C |
The valuation methodology does not meet every applicable published guideline for the program. The value is not supported within 90% of the original appraisal by any of the third-party valuation products or the reconciliation. |
| D |
The file was missing the appraisal or there was not sufficient valuation documentation to perform a review. |