Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Cash Collateral Agreements The Company maintains cash collateral agreements in lieu of letters of credit for certain leases and customer contracts. As of July 31, 2026 and January 31, 2026, approximately $8.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively, is outstanding under these cash collateral agreements, which is classified as restricted cash and reported within prepaid expenses and other current assets ($1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively) and other non-current assets ($7.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively) on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Legal Matters From time to time, the Company, various subsidiaries, and certain current and former officers and directors may be named as defendants in various lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings arising from the normal course of business. The Company also may become involved with contract issues and disputes with customers. With respect to litigation in general, based on the Company’s experience, management believes that the amount of damages claimed in a case are not a meaningful indicator of the potential liability. Claims, suits, investigations, and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of cases. The Company makes a provision for a liability relating to legal matters when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. In management’s opinion, resolution of all current matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, if an unfavorable ruling were to occur in any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations for that period. At July 31, 2026, the Company had no provision for liability related to the litigation discussed below. On March 18, 2025, a stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Coffey v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02242 (the “Coffey Action”). On March 26, 2025, a second stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Figurella v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02513 (the “Figurella Action”), asserting claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Coffey Action. On April 29, 2025, the Coffey Action was voluntarily dismissed. On April 30, 2025, a third stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Newman v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-03591 (the “Newman Action”), asserting claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Coffey Action and Figurella Action. On May 2, 2025, the Court consolidated the Figurella Action and Newman Action under the caption In re Sprinklr, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 1:25-cv-02513, appointed co-lead counsel for plaintiffs, and ordered the parties to submit a proposal regarding further proceedings by July 1, 2025. On June 20, 2025, the Court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation to stay the derivative action pending either (i) the dismissal of the Securities Action, (ii) the filing of defendants’ answer in the Securities Action, or (iii) in the event the parties no longer consent to the stay. On May 6, 2026, the Court entered an order granting the plaintiffs’ stipulation to dismiss the actions without prejudice. The derivative complaints named the Company as a nominal defendant and purported to bring claims on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers for alleged violations of the federal securities laws and breaches of their fiduciary duties, among other claims, in relation to substantially the same factual allegations as those made in the Securities Action. The derivative complaints primarily sought to recover for the Company compensatory damages, restitution, and equitable relief in the form of certain corporate governance reforms. Other Contractual Commitments Other contractual commitments consist primarily of non-cancelable minimum guaranteed purchase commitments for various data, hosting, and software services, which the Company may renew as part of the normal course of business. The Company also has agreements in place related to its operating leases that impact its cash requirements. See Note 7, Leases, for additional information. There were no significant changes in the Company’s material cash requirements as compared to the material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations described in the 2026 10-K.

The Company maintains cash collateral agreements in lieu of letters of credit for certain leases and customer contracts. As of July 31, 2026 and January 31, 2026, approximately $8.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively, is outstanding under these cash collateral agreements, which is classified as restricted cash and reported within prepaid expenses and other current assets ($1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively) and other non-current assets ($7.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively) on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

From time to time, the Company, various subsidiaries, and certain current and former officers and directors may be named as defendants in various lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings arising from the normal course of business. The Company also may become involved with contract issues and disputes with customers. With respect to litigation in general, based on the Company’s experience, management believes that the amount of damages claimed in a case are not a meaningful indicator of the potential liability. Claims, suits, investigations, and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of cases.

The Company makes a provision for a liability relating to legal matters when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. In management’s opinion, resolution of all current matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, if an unfavorable ruling were to occur in any specific period, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the results of operations for that period. At July 31, 2026, the Company had no provision for liability related to the litigation discussed below.

On March 18, 2025, a stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Coffey v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02242 (the “Coffey Action”). On March 26, 2025, a second stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Figurella v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02513 (the “Figurella Action”), asserting claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Coffey Action. On April 29, 2025, the Coffey Action was voluntarily dismissed. On April 30, 2025, a third stockholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Newman v. Thomas, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-03591 (the “Newman Action”), asserting claims substantially similar to those alleged in the Coffey Action and Figurella Action. On May 2, 2025, the Court consolidated the Figurella Action and Newman Action under the caption In re Sprinklr, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. 1:25-cv-02513, appointed co-lead counsel for plaintiffs, and ordered the parties to submit a proposal regarding further proceedings by July 1, 2025. On June 20, 2025, the Court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation to stay the derivative action pending either (i) the dismissal of the Securities Action, (ii) the filing of defendants’ answer in the Securities Action, or (iii) in the event the parties no longer consent to the stay. On May 6, 2026, the Court entered an order granting the plaintiffs’ stipulation to dismiss the actions without prejudice. The derivative complaints named the Company as a nominal defendant and purported to bring claims on behalf of the Company against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers for alleged violations of the federal securities laws and breaches of their fiduciary duties, among other claims, in relation to substantially the same factual allegations as those made in the Securities Action. The derivative complaints primarily sought to recover for the Company compensatory damages, restitution, and equitable relief in the form of certain corporate governance reforms.

Other contractual commitments consist primarily of non-cancelable minimum guaranteed purchase commitments for various data, hosting, and software services, which the Company may renew as part of the normal course of business. The Company also has agreements in place related to its operating leases that impact its cash requirements. See Note 7, Leases, for additional information. There were no significant changes in the Company’s material cash requirements as compared to the material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations described in the 2026 10-K.