v3.26.1
ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS  
ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

Nature of Business

 

Shefford Small Business, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of North Carolina on November 13, 2025 and has been inactive since inception, other than activities related to its formation and registration of its common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company was formed to serve as a vehicle to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more operating businesses (each, a “Target Business”).

 

The Company does not currently have any operations or generate any revenues and is considered a “shell company” as defined in Rule 12b‑2 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Company has not entered into a definitive agreement with any Target Business and there can be no assurance that it will be successful in identifying or completing a business combination on favorable terms, or at all.

 

The Company will not limit its search for a Target Business to any particular industry, sector or geographic region and may pursue a business combination opportunity in any line of business or location that management believes offers attractive risk‑adjusted returns for the Company’s stockholders. The Company expects that, until it completes a business combination, its activities will be limited to organizational matters, SEC reporting compliance, and evaluating potential Target Businesses.

 

The Company has not established any source of revenues sufficient to fund its operating activities and is dependent upon the financial support of its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who has funded formation and professional costs and has committed to continue funding operating expenses until the completion of a business combination without any obligation of repayment. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, as further discussed in Note 3.