Commitments and Contingencies |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2026 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal matters
From time-to-time suits and claims against Camber arise in the ordinary course of Camber’s business, including contract disputes and title disputes. Camber records reserves for contingencies when information available indicates that a loss is probable, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Gastal Litigation
On June 15, 2022, a Petition for Damages (Danny Paul Gastal and Ignatius Hoffpauir v. Petrodome Operating, LLC, et. al.) was filed in The 15th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Acadia in the State of Louisiana against Petrodome Operating, LLC (“Petrodome”) and two other parties (collectively, the “Defendants”) related to a flowline leak on a salt-water disposal well owned by a third party and operated by Petrodome. The owner of the property where the leak occurred and his tenant farmer (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) alleged environmental damage as a result of the leak and sought damages for the cost of remediation, loss of use and loss of income. Subsequently, the suit was amended to name the insurers of both Petrodome and the well owner.
Petrodome and the well owner made a “limited admission” of liability for environmental damage under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1563 and La. R.S. 30:29 and presented a “most feasible plan” to remediate the property to the Louisiana Department of Conservation & Energy (“LDCE”) at a January 6, 2026 public hearing. The LDCE approved the plan which was expected to cost approximately $286,000 to implement.
On or about April 24, 2026, the parties reached a settlement agreement pursuant to which the Defendants agreed to pay the Plaintiffs approximately $10.3 million for damages and to fund and implement the LDCE-approved remediation plan and to diligently perform whatever remediation, restoration, clean-ups, investigation(s), evaluation(s), testing, and/or other work, if any, that the LDCE deems necessary in order to obtain the required no further action letter for the limited admission area. The settlement amount for damages and the LDCE-approved remediation plan was fully paid by the Company’s insurers in June 2026.
Drew Estate Litigation
Petrodome is one of several defendants in litigation filed on December 16, 2025 in the 14th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana, styled H.C. Drew Estate v. Mayne & Mertz, Inc., et al. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that historical oil and gas operations on certain property resulted in environmental damage and seeks various forms of relief, including alleged remediation costs and other damages.
The Company believes the claims asserted against Petrodome are without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously. The Company’s insurers have agreed to provide a defense to Petrodome, subject to a reservation of rights under the applicable insurance policies, and have approved the appointment of defense counsel to represent Petrodome in the litigation. The Company presently expects that substantially all of Petrodome’s defense costs will continue to be funded by the applicable insurers, subject to the insurers’ reservation of rights. As is customary in insurance coverage matters, the insurers have reserved the right to deny or limit coverage based on the terms and conditions of the applicable insurance policies.
At this stage of the proceedings, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate outcome of the litigation or the amount of any potential loss, if any. Accordingly, no liability has been recorded with respect to this matter. The Company will continue to evaluate the matter as additional information becomes available. |