Sale of Energy Producing Assets	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Discontinued Operations and Disposal Groups [Abstract]
Sale of Energy Producing Assets	Sale of Energy Producing AssetsDuring the first quarter of 2019, we recognized two individual sales of energy producing assets for a total of eight power purchase agreements, including the associated energy production contracts, for total consideration of $7 million. In connection with the asset sales, we entered into agreements with the purchaser to maintain and operate the assets over the remaining periods of the associated energy production contracts (through August 2033 and January 2034, respectively) in exchange for monthly fees for both maintenance and operation. These agreements contain provisions whereby we have guaranteed to the purchaser a minimum level or threshold of cash flows from the associated energy production contracts. As of June 30, 2026 the remaining minimum guaranteed cash flows aggregated to $3,733,220 over the remaining periods of the associated energy production contracts (through August 2033 and January 2034, respectively). Based upon an analysis of these energy producing assets expected future performance, as of June 30, 2026, we do not expect to make any material payments under the guarantee. Actual results are compared to the minimum threshold bi-annually and we reimburse any shortfall to the purchaser. To the extent actual results are in excess of the minimum threshold, we are entitled to fifty percent of such excess under the agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a threshold shortfall of $84,854. Payment of our obligation under the energy production contracts for the bi-annual period ended June 30, 2025, in the amount of $42,089, representing 100% of the cash flows shortfall below the minimum threshold for this measurement period was made in the third quarter of 2025. At June 30, 2026, our obligation under the energy production contracts was $91,912, representing 100% of the cash flows shortfall below the minimum threshold for the bi-annual period ended June 30, 2026. The shortfall was due to unexpected repair costs at two sites, which have been remediated and are not expected to be reoccuring. The shortfall payment will be remitted in the third quarter of 2026. The foregoing agreements also contain provisions whereby we have agreed to make whole the purchaser in the event the counterparty to the energy production contract(s) defaults on or otherwise terminates before the stated expiration of the energy production contract. Should we be required to make whole the purchaser under such provisions, we would be entitled to seek recovery from the counterparty to the energy production contract(s) under a similar provision contained in those contracts in respect of early termination. We are also responsible under the agreements for site decommissioning costs, if any, in excess of certain threshold amounts by site. Decommissioning of site assets is performed when, if and as requested by the counterparty to the energy production contract upon termination of the energy production contract. We review and assess the likelihood and potential liability for decommissioning when sites cease operating. To date, our decommissioning liability exposure has not been material since most customers assume the decommissioning costs in connection with their facility upgrade.

In connection with the asset sales, we entered into agreements with the purchaser to maintain and operate the assets over the remaining periods of the associated energy production contracts (through August 2033 and January 2034, respectively) in exchange for monthly fees for both maintenance and operation. These agreements contain provisions whereby we have guaranteed to the purchaser a minimum level or threshold of cash flows from the associated energy production contracts. As of June 30, 2026 the remaining minimum guaranteed cash flows aggregated to $3,733,220 over the remaining periods of the associated energy production contracts (through August 2033 and January 2034, respectively). Based upon an analysis of these energy producing assets expected future performance, as of June 30, 2026, we do not expect to make any material payments under the guarantee. Actual results are compared to the minimum threshold bi-annually and we reimburse any shortfall to the purchaser. To the extent actual results are in excess of the minimum threshold, we are entitled to fifty percent of such excess under the agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a threshold shortfall of $84,854. Payment of our obligation under the energy production contracts for the bi-annual period ended June 30, 2025, in the amount of $42,089, representing 100% of the cash flows shortfall below the minimum threshold for this measurement period was made in the third quarter of 2025.

At June 30, 2026, our obligation under the energy production contracts was $91,912, representing 100% of the cash flows shortfall below the minimum threshold for the bi-annual period ended June 30, 2026. The shortfall was due to unexpected repair costs at two sites, which have been remediated and are not expected to be reoccuring. The shortfall payment will be remitted in the third quarter of 2026.

The foregoing agreements also contain provisions whereby we have agreed to make whole the purchaser in the event the counterparty to the energy production contract(s) defaults on or otherwise terminates before the stated expiration of the energy production contract. Should we be required to make whole the purchaser under such provisions, we would be entitled to seek recovery from the counterparty to the energy production contract(s) under a similar provision contained in those contracts in respect of early termination.

We are also responsible under the agreements for site decommissioning costs, if any, in excess of certain threshold amounts by site. Decommissioning of site assets is performed when, if and as requested by the counterparty to the energy production contract upon termination of the energy production contract. We review and assess the likelihood and potential liability for decommissioning when sites cease operating. To date, our decommissioning liability exposure has not been material since most customers assume the decommissioning costs in connection with their facility upgrade.