Contingent Liabilities |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2026 | |
| Contingent Liabilities | |
| Contingent Liabilities | 17.Contingent Liabilities On January 23, 2023, investors in the 2021 private placement from the Business Combination filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Commercial Division of New York Supreme Court, New York County, captioned Atalaya Special Purpose Investment Fund II LP et al. v. Sustainable Opportunities Acquisition Corp. n/k/a TMC The Metals Company Inc., Index No. 650449/2023 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). The Company filed a motion to dismiss on March 31, 2023, after which the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on June 5, 2023. The amended complaint alleges that the Company breached the representations and warranties in the plaintiffs’ private placement Subscription Agreements and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Plaintiffs are seeking to recover compensable damages caused by the alleged wrongdoings. The Company denies any allegations of wrongdoing and filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on July 28, 2023. On December 7, 2023, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and denied the Company’s motion to dismiss the breach of the Subscription Agreement claim. The Company filed a notice of appeal regarding the Court’s denial of the Company’s motion to dismiss the breach of the Subscription Agreement claim. The appeal was heard on November 8, 2024. The NY Appellate Division upheld the lower court’s ruling in December 2024, moving the case into the discovery phase. Discovery closed following the plaintiffs’ filing of a note of issue on April 27, 2026. On June 26, 2026, the Company and the plaintiffs cross-moved for summary judgment, and that briefing is ongoing, with the parties’ opposition briefs due July 31, 2026 and reply briefs due August 25, 2026. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in its defense of this lawsuit or that insurance will be available or adequate to fund any settlement or judgment or the litigation costs of this action. Such losses or range of possible losses cannot be reliably estimated. On January 16, 2026, American Metal Inc. and American Metal Resources LLC filed a civil claim against TMC The Metals Company Inc. and The Metals Company USA LLC in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Vancouver Registry, captioned American Metal Inc. and American Metal Resources LLC v. TMC The Metals Company Inc. and The Metals Company USA LLC, No. S260335. The complaint alleged, among other things, breach of contract, breach of confidence and related claims arising from discussions between the parties regarding potential collaboration and the submission of applications for deep seabed mineral exploration licenses to NOAA. On March 3, 2026, the Company filed a response denying the material allegations and asserting a counterclaim against Robert Heydon and the plaintiffs alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of confidence and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the alleged misuse of the Company’s confidential information. In June 2026, without any admission of liability by any party, the Company entered into a settlement deed with American Metal Inc., American Metal Resources LLC, Robert Heydon and certain of his affiliated parties resolving this action, pursuant to which the parties agreed to the consent dismissal, without costs to any party, of the civil claim and our counterclaim, together with mutual releases of related claims. This matter is now concluded. On May 18, 2026, NORI and TOML each issued a Notice of Dispute to the International Seabed Authority (the “ISA”) concerning the ISA’s inquiries into their possible non-compliance with their Exploration Contracts, dated July 22, 2011 and January 11, 2012, respectively. By Applications filed with the Registry on June 5, 2026, NORI and TOML each instituted proceedings, together with a request for provisional measures, before the Seabed Disputes Chamber (the “Chamber”) of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (“ITLOS”), captioned Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. v. International Seabed Authority, Case No. 34, and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd. v. International Seabed Authority, Case No. 35. The Applications allege that the ISA failed to afford due process, transparency and fairness in its Council-mandated inquiries and, in NORI’s case, in the ISA’s separate consideration of NORI’s application to extend its Exploration Contract. Following a hearing on July 2–3, 2026, the Chamber issued parallel orders on July 18, 2026 prescribing provisional measures requiring the ISA to act in accordance with the relevant legal framework, including rules of due process, in the pending inquiries (and, for NORI, in the Exploration Contract extension procedure), to provide NORI and TOML the information they need to respond meaningfully, and to cooperate with NORI and TOML and refrain from aggravating the dispute. The Chamber did not order the suspension of the inquiries that NORI and TOML had requested, and each party bears its own costs of that phase. NORI, TOML and the ISA are each required to submit an initial compliance report to the Chamber by August 31, 2026. The orders do not prejudge the Chamber’s jurisdiction over the merits, which remain to be briefed and heard. The ISA requested an extension of the deadline to file its defense on the merits until March 30, 2027, which was granted by the Chamber. The relief sought by NORI and TOML is declaratory and injunctive rather than monetary, and no damages have been claimed or awarded in either proceeding. On July 20, 2026, the Council of the ISA approved a five-year extension of NORI’s Exploration Contract, effective July 22, 2026 and expiring July 21, 2031, without prejudice to any findings or recommendations arising from the inquiry. On July 10, 2026, TOML applied to the ISA for a five-year extension of its Exploration Contract, which is due to expire on January 11, 2027. The application is scheduled to be considered in February and March 2027, and TOML expects its Exploration Contract to continue in force in the interim under the ISA’s extension procedures. Neither NORI nor TOML had received the information contemplated by the orders as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. No amounts have been recognized in these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements in respect of these proceedings, and related legal costs are expensed as incurred. |