v3.26.1
Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative)
 6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 16, 2024
USD ($)
Oct. 01, 2024
USD ($)
ft²
Aug. 01, 2023
USD ($)
ft²
Jan. 01, 2022
USD ($)
ft²
Jun. 30, 2026
USD ($)
Jun. 30, 2025
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Area of Land | ft²       5,778      
Lessee, operating lease, term of contract       39 months      
Total monthly lease payment       $ 21,773      
Payment for rent       14,743      
Lease right of use asset       $ 735,197      
Aggregate sale of common stock         $ 7,917,443   $ 3,941,280
Depreciation         623,814    
Interest expenses         268,678    
Finance lease, liability current         1,030,525  
Finance lease, liability noncurrent         2,091,419   3,577,478
Repayments of notes payable $ 5,000,000       7,565,592 $ 17,992,795 23,754,992
Viable Power Purchase Agreement [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Payments to acquire development rights         $ 4,100,000    
Other commitments description         The transaction was premised on the understanding that the project would support a viable power purchase agreement with JEA, the community-owned electric utility serving Jacksonville, Florida (“JEA”), at a rate of approximately $49/MW, and that the project could connect to JEA’s infrastructure through existing easements for a “gen-tie” line. The Next Plaintiffs allege that defendants made and repeated these representations in the parties’ Letter of Intent (“LOI”) and Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”), while contractually restricting the Next Plaintiffs from contacting JEA directly and agreeing to keep the Next Plaintiffs updated regarding communications with JEA. The Next Plaintiffs further allege that defendants failed to disclose that, prior to closing, JEA had informed defendants that the proposed $49/MW pricing would not be acceptable, that JEA would not permit the project to utilize its easements for the proposed gen-tie line, and that new resource planning was underway, all of which allegedly undermined the feasibility and value of the project.    
Loss contingency damages paid value         $ 4,100,000    
Loss contingency damages sought value         4,100,000    
Note Payables [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Finance lease, liability         3,121,944    
Finance lease, liability current         1,030,525    
Finance lease, liability noncurrent         2,091,419    
Minimum [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Payment for rent             25,515
Maximum [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Payment for rent             35,685
Avishai Vaknin [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Area of Land | ft²     1,200        
Lease right of use asset     $ 316,557        
Total monthly lease payment     $ 6,955        
Related Party [Member]              
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]              
Area of Land | ft²   3,500          
Lessee, operating lease, term of contract   36 months          
Total monthly lease payment   $ 10,300          
Lease right of use asset   $ 340,368     151,744   $ 208,354
Lessee, Operating Lease, Discount Rate   3.00%          
Repayments of notes payable         $ 915,507