COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
6 Months Ended |
|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2026 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | NOTE 17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company did not have any significant capital and other commitments.
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the Company does not currently believe that any pending legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, litigation is inherently uncertain and adverse outcomes could occur.
Although we cannot predict the outcome of legal or other proceedings with certainty, where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may be incurred, GAAP requires us to disclose an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of loss or make a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. We follow a process in which we seek to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss, and only if we are unable to make such an estimate do we conclude and disclose that an estimate cannot be made. Accordingly, unless otherwise indicated below in our discussion of legal proceedings, a reasonably possible loss or range of loss associated with any individual legal proceeding cannot be estimated.
Carl Austin Rosen v. Off The Hook yacht Sales NC LLC
Carl Austin Rosen v. Off The Hook Yacht Sales NC, LLC et al (Case No. 2024-004493-CA-01), pending in Miami-Dade’s Complex Business Litigation Division, Plaintiff Carl Rosen alleges he was fraudulently induced into purchasing a $2.6 million Yellowfin 54 yacht that had sustained damage during a manufacturer-authorized seatrial prior to delivery. The defendants—Yellowfin Yachts, Off The Hook Yacht Sales, broker Corey Simon, and Warbird Marine Holdings—deny all wrongdoing, maintaining that the grounding was a routine, low-speed “soft grounding” during testing, that any cosmetic damage was promptly repaired, and that the vessel was delivered in seaworthy condition following multiple post-repair inspections and sea trials. The parties plan to actively defend themselves against this claim.
Reistad et al v. Off The Hook YS, Inc.
In March 2026, three former employees filed a civil action against the Company in the Southern District of Florida. The complaint asserts a breach of employment agreements and the Stock Purchase Agreement. The plaintiffs seek lost compensation, severance benefits, totaling $0.6 million and the issuance of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company recognized an obligation to issue shares of common stock pursuant to the April 2025 Stock Purchase Agreement, and that obligation is reflected in the Company’s financial statements.
Regarding the remaining claims, the Company believes it terminated the plaintiffs for cause in accordance with the applicable employment agreements and therefore, no severance or additional compensation is owed. The Company has filed its answer in the matter and has asserted counterclaims. The Company intends to defend the matter fully.
OneWater Marine Inc. v. Off The Hook YS Inc. et al
The Company and two of its subsidiaries are named as defendants in OneWater Marine Inc. v. Off The Hook YS Inc. a civil case pending in the State of Florida in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County wherein claims have been made against the Company and such subsidiaries for tortious interference with contract and related claim. The Company has filed its answer and intends to fully defend the matter.
|