v3.26.1
Fair Value Measurements - Investments (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule of Fair Value Measurements of Investments, by Major Class
The following tables present fair value measurements of investments, by major class, according to the fair value hierarchy:

June 30, 2026
InvestmentsLevel ILevel IILevel III
Investments Measured at Net Asset Value(1)
Fair Value
Portfolio companies$22,538 $10,198 $10,444,090 $5,411 $10,482,237 
Unrealized appreciation on foreign currency forward contracts— 31,711 — — 31,711 
Unrealized depreciation on foreign currency forward contracts— (4,579)— — (4,579)
Investments in Money Market Funds1,875,256 — — — 1,875,256 
Total$1,897,794 $37,330 $10,444,090 $5,411 $12,384,625 

(1) Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value practical expedient under ASC 820 have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company transferred $4,525 out of Level III category of measurement into Level II due to changes in the observability of the inputs used in the fair value measurements at period end.

December 31, 2025
InvestmentsLevel ILevel IILevel III
Investments Measured at Net Asset Value(1)
Fair Value
Portfolio companies$23,278 $— $8,980,760 $5,411 $9,009,449 
Unrealized appreciation on foreign currency forward contracts— 27,607 — — 27,607 
Unrealized depreciation on foreign currency forward contracts— (5,177)— — (5,177)
Investments in Money Market Funds963,528 — — — 963,528 
Total$986,806 $22,430 $8,980,760 $5,411 $9,995,407 

(1) Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value practical expedient under ASC 820 have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Schedule of Reconciliation of Infrastructure Assets, Level III Inputs
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level III inputs for the six months ended June 30, 2026:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026
Investments
Balance as of December 31, 2025
PurchasesSales and Proceeds from InvestmentsTransfers out of Level IIIChange in Gain (Loss) included in Net AssetsNet change in unrealized appreciation on investmentsNet change in unrealized appreciation on foreign currency translation
Balance as of June 30, 2026
Portfolio companies$8,980,760 $829,513 $(2,704)$(4,525)$(134)$725,643 $(84,463)$10,444,090 
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level III inputs for the six months ended June 30, 2025:

Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Investments
Balance as of December 31, 2024
PurchasesSales and Proceeds from InvestmentsRealized gain on investmentsNet change in unrealized appreciation on investmentsNet change in unrealized appreciation on foreign currency translation
Balance as of June 30, 2025
Portfolio companies$3,918,519 $1,092,644 $(64,366)$32,761 $445,940 $167,788 $5,593,286 
Schedule of Fair Value Measurement Inputs and Valuation Techniques
The following tables present the quantitative information about Level III fair value measurements of the Company’s portfolio companies as of June 30, 2026:

Level III Assets
Fair Value
June 30, 2026
Valuation Methodology and Inputs
Unobservable Input(s)(1)
Weighted Average (2)
Range
Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Input (3)
Portfolio companies$10,444,090Inputs to market comparables, discounted cash flow and transaction price/otherWeight Ascribed to Market Comparables44.7%
0.0% - 100.0%
(4)
Weight Ascribed to Discounted Cash Flow45.0%
0.0% - 75.0%
(5)
Weight Ascribed to Transaction Price/Other10.3%
 0.0% - 100.0%
(6)
Market ComparablesEnterprise Value / Forward EBITDA Multiple
14.1x
5.5x - 25.5x
Increase
Enterprise Value / Forward Revenues Multiple
8.2x
2.3x - 11.9x
Increase
Discounted Cash FlowWeighted Average Cost of Capital14.1%
6.8% - 23.5%
Decrease
Enterprise Value / EBITDA Exit Multiple
14.6x
8.0x - 23.3x
Increase

(1) In determining the inputs, management evaluates a variety of factors including economic conditions, industry and market developments, market valuations of comparable companies, and company-specific developments including exit strategies and realization opportunities. The Manager has determined that market participants would take these inputs into account when valuing the investments.
(2) Inputs are weighted based on fair value of the investments included in the range.
(3) Unless otherwise noted, this column represents the directional change in the fair value of the Level III investments that would result from an increase to the corresponding unobservable input. A decrease to the unobservable input would have the opposite effect. Significant increases and decreases in these inputs in isolation could result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements.
(4) The directional change from an increase in the weight ascribed to the market comparables approach would increase the fair value of the Level III investments if the market comparables approach results in a higher valuation than the discounted cash flow approach and transaction price approach. The opposite would be true if the market comparables approach results in a lower valuation than the discounted cash flow approach and transaction price approach.
(5) The directional change from an increase in the weight ascribed to the discounted cash flow approach would increase the fair value of the Level III investments if the discounted cash flow approach results in a higher valuation than the market comparables approach and transaction price approach. The opposite would be true if the discounted cash flow approach results in a lower valuation than the market comparables approach and transaction price approach.
(6) The directional change from an increase in the weight ascribed to the transaction price approach would increase the fair value of the Level III investments if the transaction price approach results in a higher valuation than the market comparables approach and discounted cash flow approach. The opposite would be true if the transaction price approach results in a lower valuation than the market comparables approach and discounted cash flow approach.