v3.26.1
Reinsurance
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Reinsurance [Abstract]  
Reinsurance

5.       Reinsurance

 

External Reinsurance

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect the effects of assumed and ceded reinsurance transactions. Assumed reinsurance refers to the acceptance of certain insurance risks that other insurance companies have underwritten. Ceded reinsurance involves transferring certain insurance risks (along with the related written and earned premiums) the Company has underwritten to other insurance companies who agree to share these risks. The Company reinsures a portion of the risks it underwrites, through these ceded reinsurance agreements, in order to control its exposure to losses. Our ceded reinsurance is placed either on an automatic basis under general reinsurance contracts known as treaties or through facultative contracts placed on substantial individual risks. These contracts do not relieve the Company from its obligations to policyholders. Treaty reinsurance contracts are typically effective from January 1 through December 31 each year.

 

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, the Company maintained property catastrophe reinsurance protection covering $123,000 in excess of a $20,000 retention. Our per risk excess of loss treaty provides coverage of $3,900 in excess of $1,100 for property risks and $11,000 in excess of $1,000 for casualty risks. Additionally, a property per-risk facultative contract is in place to provide coverage up to $35,000 in excess of $5,000 per property. Aggregate stop loss reinsurance agreements are also in place for both crop hail and multi-peril crop coverage. The crop hail aggregate attaches at a 100% net loss ratio providing 50 points of cover. The multi-peril crop aggregate attaches at a 105% net loss ratio providing 45 points of cover. In addition to the aggregate covers, underlying multi-peril crop reinsurance is provided through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (“FCIC”).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company maintained property catastrophe reinsurance protection covering $117,000 in excess of a $20,000 retention. Our per risk excess of loss treaty provides coverage of $4,000 in excess of $1,000 for property risks and $11,000 in excess of $1,000 for casualty risks. Additionally, a property per-risk facultative contract is in place to provide coverage up to $20,000 in excess of $5,000 per property. Aggregate stop loss reinsurance agreements are also in place for both crop hail and multi-peril crop coverage. The crop hail aggregate attaches at a 100% net loss ratio providing 50 points of cover. The multi-peril crop aggregate attaches at a 105% net loss ratio providing 45 points of cover. In addition to the aggregate covers, underlying multi-peril crop reinsurance is provided through the FCIC.

 

The Company actively monitors and evaluates the financial condition of the reinsurers and develops estimates of the uncollectible amounts due from reinsurers, which would be recognized as credit losses through an allowance account developed using the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) model. Credit loss estimates are made based on periodic evaluation of balances due from reinsurers, changes in reinsurer credit standing, judgments regarding reinsurers’ solvency, known disputes, reporting characteristics of the underlying reinsured business, historical experience, current economic conditions, the state of reinsurer relations in general, and other relevant factors. Collection risk is mitigated by entering into reinsurance arrangements only with reinsurers that have strong credit ratings and statutory surplus above certain levels. At June 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, management has concluded that it is not necessary to record an allowance for expected credit losses related to reinsurance recoverables. All of our significant reinsurance partners are rated “A-” (Excellent) or better by AM Best or “A+” or better by Standard & Poor’s, and there is no history of write-offs.

 

A reconciliation of direct to net premiums on both a written and an earned basis is as follows:

 

    Three Months Ended June 30, 2026     Three Months Ended June 30, 2025  
    Premiums Written     Premiums Earned     Premiums Written     Premiums Earned  
Direct premium   $ 103,013     $ 71,104     $ 109,519     $ 82,542  
Assumed premium     4,178       2,619       2,309       696  
Ceded premium     (13,386 )     (8,706 )     (18,518 )     (10,233 )
Net premiums   $ 93,805     $ 65,017     $ 93,310     $ 73,005  

 

    Six Months Ended June 30, 2026     Six Months Ended June 30, 2025  
    Premiums Written     Premiums Earned     Premiums Written     Premiums Earned  
Direct premium   $ 158,542     $ 129,495     $ 177,247     $ 154,704  
Assumed premium     6,161       4,602       2,347       735  
Ceded premium     (18,647 )     (13,967 )     (23,222 )     (14,937 )
Net premiums   $ 146,056     $ 120,130     $ 156,372     $ 140,502  

 

A reconciliation of direct to net losses and loss adjustment expenses is as follows:

 

    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2026     2025     2026     2025  
Direct losses and loss adjustment expenses   $ 49,836     $ 109,382     $ 73,905     $ 149,761  
Assumed losses and loss adjustment expenses     2,388       284       2,509       51  
Ceded losses and loss adjustment expenses     (3,807 )     (43,059 )     (4,641 )     (44,680 )
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses   $ 48,417     $ 66,607     $ 71,773     $ 105,132  

 

Intercompany Reinsurance Pooling Arrangement

 

Effective January 1, 2020, all of our insurance subsidiary and affiliate companies entered into an intercompany reinsurance pooling agreement. Nodak Insurance is the lead company of the pool, and assumes the net premiums, net losses, and underwriting expenses from each of the other five companies. Nodak Insurance then retrocedes balances back to each company, while retaining its own share of the pool’s net underwriting results, based on individual pool percentages established in the respective pooling agreement. This arrangement allows each insurance company to rely upon the capacity of the pool’s total statutory capital and surplus. As a result, they are evaluated by AM Best on a group basis and hold a single combined financial strength rating, long-term issuer credit rating, and financial size category. Pooling percentages for the insurance subsidiaries are updated periodically based on their respective surplus as a percentage of the pool’s surplus.