Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jul. 03, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Indemnification Agreements - In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company or intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company entered into indemnification agreements with directors and certain officers and employees that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise because of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any claims under indemnification arrangements will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Legal Proceedings - On February 20, 2024, a complaint alleging violations of federal securities laws and seeking certification as a class action was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta. On August 16, 2024, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that purported to seek damages on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between May 6, 2021 and November 2, 2023. The amended complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act and alleged that the Company and certain current and former officers made material misstatements and omissions to investors regarding demand for the Company’s products and its inventory levels. The amended complaint generally sought money damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. On October 15, 2024, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which plaintiff opposed. On March 13, 2025, the court dismissed the amended complaint but granted plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. On April 14, 2025, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint asserting essentially the same claims and relief. On February 10, 2026, the court issued its opinion and order dismissing with prejudice the second amended complaint for failing to state a claim. Judgment was entered on February 12, 2026, and plaintiff did not file an appeal, concluding the case. On October 9, 2024, and October 29, 2024, two stockholder derivative complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against certain of the Company’s officers and its directors, with the Company named as a nominal defendant. The cases are assigned to the same judge presiding over the securities fraud class action. The complaints are premised on substantially the same factual allegations as the securities fraud class action, but in these complaints, the plaintiff claims that the Company’s officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties or otherwise engaged in wrongdoing by allowing the underlying securities fraud to occur. Following the dismissal of the securities fraud litigation in February 2026, plaintiff agreed to voluntarily dismiss these cases without prejudice. On March 30, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice, and on May 1, 2026, the court granted the motion. Bailment Pool Arrangements - The Company has relationships with several OEM partners, including General Motors (“GM”), Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and Stellantis to obtain truck chassis. For Stellantis chassis, the Company pays a cash deposit upon transfer of the chassis to the Company’s premises and records the chassis within prepaids and other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets until the chassis are transferred to the dealer customer’s floor plan, at which time the cash deposit is returned to the Company. For GM and Ford, the Company entered into floor plan financing agreements with the OEM. The Company receives an allocation of chassis and pays interest expense on the allocated value of chassis based on the duration of time they are on the Company’s premises. Bailment, which is the non-ownership transfer of the chassis from GM and Ford to the Company, ends when the vehicle is sold to an authorized dealer, or upon authorized return of the vehicle to the manufacturer. The Company does not pay a cash deposit to obtain GM and Ford chassis and accordingly it does not recognize an asset or a liability related to these chassis. Interest payments made to manufacturer-affiliated finance companies are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. At July 3, 2026 and January 2, 2026, the Company utilized $19,522 and $9,566, out of a maximum of $30,500 and $38,300 of Ford allocation of chassis, respectively, and $28,840 and $11,152, out of a maximum of $49,500 and $49,500 of GM allocation of chassis, respectively. The Company incurred interest expenses related to bailment of $453 and $677 during the three months July 3, 2026 and January 2, 2026, respectively and $935 and $1,898 during the six months ended July 3, 2026 and January 2, 2026, respectively.

Indemnification Agreements - In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners, and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company or intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company entered into indemnification agreements with directors and certain officers and employees that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise because of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any claims under indemnification arrangements will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

Legal Proceedings - On February 20, 2024, a complaint alleging violations of federal securities laws and seeking certification as a class action was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta. On August 16, 2024, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that purported to seek damages on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between May 6, 2021 and November 2, 2023. The amended complaint asserted claims under Sections 10(b) and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act and alleged that the Company and certain current and former officers made material misstatements and omissions to investors regarding demand for the Company’s products and its inventory levels. The amended complaint generally sought money damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, and other costs. On October 15, 2024, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which plaintiff opposed. On March 13, 2025, the court dismissed the amended complaint but granted plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. On April 14, 2025, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint asserting essentially the same claims and relief. On February 10, 2026, the court issued its opinion and order dismissing with prejudice the second amended complaint for failing to state a claim. Judgment was entered on February 12, 2026, and plaintiff did not file an appeal, concluding the case.

On October 9, 2024, and October 29, 2024, two stockholder derivative complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against certain of the Company’s officers and its directors, with the Company named as a nominal defendant. The cases are assigned to the same judge presiding over the securities fraud class action. The complaints are premised on substantially the same factual allegations as the securities fraud class action, but in these complaints, the plaintiff claims that the Company’s officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties or otherwise engaged in wrongdoing by allowing the underlying securities fraud to occur. Following the dismissal of the securities fraud litigation in February 2026, plaintiff agreed to voluntarily dismiss these cases without prejudice. On March 30, 2026, the parties filed a joint motion to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice, and on May 1, 2026, the court granted the motion.

Bailment Pool Arrangements - The Company has relationships with several OEM partners, including General Motors (“GM”), Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), and Stellantis to obtain truck chassis. For Stellantis chassis, the Company pays a cash deposit upon transfer of the chassis to the Company’s premises and records the chassis within prepaids and other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets until the chassis are transferred to the dealer customer’s floor plan, at which time the cash deposit is returned to the Company. For GM and Ford, the Company entered into floor plan financing agreements with the OEM. The Company receives an allocation of chassis and pays interest expense on the allocated value of chassis based on the duration of time they are on the Company’s premises. Bailment, which is the non-ownership transfer of the chassis from GM and Ford to the Company, ends when the vehicle is sold to an authorized dealer, or upon authorized return of the vehicle to the manufacturer. The Company does not pay a cash deposit to obtain GM and Ford chassis and accordingly it does not recognize an asset or a liability related to these chassis. Interest payments made to manufacturer-affiliated finance companies are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.