COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Legal Matters On February 17, 2023, Touchstream Technologies, Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit, alleging infringement of certain patents directed to the use of a personal computing device, such as a mobile phone, to control playback of content on a separate display device, such as a TV. Touchstream’s allegation of infringement is based on a remote control and “Watch on TV” functionality previously available to customers through the Company’s Optimum and Optimum TV mobile applications for iPhone and Android devices. The suit, originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and later transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, is in discovery. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due. On September 10, 2024, United States Technologies Communication Corp. d/b/a Netceed filed suit in the New York Supreme Court, New York County. Plaintiff asserts claims for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing for alleged violations of the parties’ services and sales agreements, and seeks compensatory damages, as set forth in the complaint. We deny the claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. On November 21, 2024, we filed a motion to dismiss in part plaintiff’s complaint, and on May 15, 2025, the Court issued a decision and order on the Company’s motion to dismiss, and dismissed certain causes of action. On June 12, 2025, the Company filed its answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due. On June 9, 2026, Paul Berger as trustee for The Paul Berger Revocable Trust, directly on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated stockholders of Optimum Communications, Inc., filed a putative class action suit against Patrick Drahi, Dennis Mathew, Dexter Goei, Charles Stewart, Dennis Okhuijsen, Susan C. Schnabel, Raymond Svider, David Drahi, Mark Mullen, Marc Sirota, Michael Parker, Michael E. Olsen, Next Alt S.a.r.l., and Next Partner, L.P. and Optimum Communications, Inc. in connection with recently disclosed restructuring transactions, the Private Exchange Transaction, and the Tender Offer (as defined below). Plaintiff brings (1) a direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Director defendants and Marc Sirota, (2) a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the controller defendants (Next Alt S.a.r.l., Next Partner, L.P., and Patrick Drahi), and (3) a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the director and officer defendants (excluding two directors). Plaintiff also moved for expedited proceedings, though withdrew that motion following the Company’s filing of supplemental disclosures. Plaintiff has until September 8, 2026 to file an amended complaint. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due. We also receive notices from third parties, and in some cases we are named as a defendant in lawsuits, claiming infringement of various patents or copyrights relating to various aspects of our businesses. In certain of these cases other industry participants are also defendants, and in certain of these cases we expect that some or all potential liability would be the responsibility of our vendors pursuant to applicable contractual indemnification provisions. In the event that we are found to infringe on any patent or other intellectual property rights, we may be subject to substantial damages or an injunction that could require us or our vendors to modify certain products and services we offer to our subscribers, as well as enter into royalty or license agreements with respect to the patents at issue. We are also party to various other lawsuits, disputes and investigations arising in the ordinary course of our business, some of which may involve claims for substantial damages, fines or penalties. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution of these matters on our results of operations in a particular subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these matters, individually, will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due, but they could be material to our consolidated results of operations or cash flows for any one period.

On February 17, 2023, Touchstream Technologies, Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit, alleging infringement of certain patents directed to the use of a personal computing device, such as a mobile phone, to control playback of content on a separate display device, such as a TV. Touchstream’s allegation of infringement is based on a remote control and “Watch on TV” functionality previously available to customers through the Company’s Optimum and Optimum TV mobile applications for iPhone and Android devices. The suit, originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and later transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, is in discovery. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due.

On September 10, 2024, United States Technologies Communication Corp. d/b/a Netceed filed suit in the New York Supreme Court, New York County. Plaintiff asserts claims for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing for alleged violations of the parties’ services and sales agreements, and seeks compensatory damages, as set forth in the complaint. We deny the claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. On November 21, 2024, we filed a motion to dismiss in part plaintiff’s complaint, and on May 15, 2025, the Court issued a decision and order on the Company’s motion to dismiss, and dismissed certain causes of action. On June 12, 2025, the Company filed its answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due.

On June 9, 2026, Paul Berger as trustee for The Paul Berger Revocable Trust, directly on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated stockholders of Optimum Communications, Inc., filed a putative class action suit against Patrick Drahi, Dennis Mathew, Dexter Goei, Charles Stewart, Dennis Okhuijsen, Susan C. Schnabel, Raymond Svider, David Drahi, Mark Mullen, Marc Sirota, Michael Parker, Michael E. Olsen, Next Alt S.a.r.l., and Next Partner, L.P. and Optimum Communications, Inc. in connection with recently disclosed restructuring transactions, the Private Exchange Transaction, and the Tender Offer (as defined below). Plaintiff brings (1) a direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Director defendants and Marc Sirota, (2) a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the controller defendants (Next Alt S.a.r.l., Next Partner, L.P., and Patrick Drahi), and (3) a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the director and officer defendants (excluding two directors). Plaintiff also moved for expedited proceedings, though withdrew that motion following the Company’s filing of supplemental disclosures. Plaintiff has until September 8, 2026 to file an amended complaint. Although the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution on our results of operations in a subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due.

We also receive notices from third parties, and in some cases we are named as a defendant in lawsuits, claiming infringement of various patents or copyrights relating to various aspects of our businesses. In certain of these cases other industry participants are also defendants, and in certain of these cases we expect that some or all potential liability would be the responsibility of our vendors pursuant to applicable contractual indemnification provisions. In the event that we are found to infringe on any patent or other intellectual property rights, we may be subject to substantial damages or an injunction that could require us or our vendors to modify certain products and services we offer to our subscribers, as well as enter into royalty or license agreements with respect to the patents at issue. We are also party to various other lawsuits, disputes and investigations arising in the ordinary course of our business, some of which may involve claims for substantial damages, fines or penalties. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted and the impact of the final resolution of these matters on our results of operations in a particular subsequent reporting period is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these matters, individually, will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position or our ability to meet our financial obligations as they become due, but they could be material to our consolidated results of operations or cash flows for any one period.