Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). On March 4, 2026 the U.S. Court of International Trade directed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) to refund amounts previously collected, including applicable interest. CBP developed and implemented a process to facilitate refunds through its Automated Commercial Environment system, which went live on April 20, 2026. The Company has submitted its refund claim, has received approval for certain tariff refunds and started to receive proceeds during the month of June 2026. As a result, the Company recognized the portion of tariff approved by the CBP that were probable and reasonably estimable. The refund claims that are still under review, and have not yet been approved by the CBP, the Company has not recognized refunds related to such claims in its Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will evaluate recognition of these amounts upon receipt of approval or when recovery becomes probable and reasonably estimable. Legal Proceedings Securities Class Action On March 6, 2026, a class action lawsuit (the “Yung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Shui Shing Yung (“Plaintiff”) against the Company and two individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its then acting Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Yung Defendants”). The Yung Complaint alleges that the Yung Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Yung Complaint seeks compensatory damages for Plaintiff and the other members of the putative class, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees. Several alleged stockholders have filed motions seeking appointment by the Court as lead plaintiff; those motions are pending. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter. Shareholder Derivative Action On March 13, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Berger Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Paul Berger against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s then current Directors (the “Berger Defendants”). The Berger Complaint alleges that the Berger Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Berger Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees. On March 25, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Skaff Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Ronald F. Skaff against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s then current Directors (the “Skaff Defendants”). The Skaff Complaint alleges that the Skaff Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Skaff Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages including interest thereon and attorney’s fees. On May 13, 2026, the Berger Complaint and the Skaff Complaint were consolidated into a single action (the “Consolidated Derivative Action”). The Consolidated Derivative Action was then stayed pending resolution of the Yung Complaint, including appeals therefrom. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.

In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). On March 4, 2026 the U.S. Court of International Trade directed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) to refund amounts previously collected, including applicable interest. CBP developed and implemented a process to facilitate refunds through its Automated Commercial Environment system, which went live on April 20, 2026.

The Company has submitted its refund claim, has received approval for certain tariff refunds and started to receive proceeds during the month of June 2026. As a result, the Company recognized the portion of tariff approved by the CBP that were probable and reasonably estimable.

The refund claims that are still under review, and have not yet been approved by the CBP, the Company has not recognized refunds related to such claims in its Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will evaluate recognition of these amounts upon receipt of approval or when recovery becomes probable and reasonably estimable.

On March 6, 2026, a class action lawsuit (the “Yung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Shui Shing Yung (“Plaintiff”) against the Company and two individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its then acting Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Yung Defendants”). The Yung Complaint alleges that the Yung Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Yung Complaint seeks compensatory damages for Plaintiff and the other members of the putative class, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees. Several alleged stockholders have filed motions seeking appointment by the Court as lead plaintiff; those motions are pending. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.

On March 13, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Berger Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Paul Berger against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s then current Directors (the “Berger Defendants”). The Berger Complaint alleges that the Berger Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Berger Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees.

On March 25, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Skaff Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Ronald F. Skaff against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s then current Directors (the “Skaff Defendants”). The Skaff Complaint alleges that the Skaff Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Skaff Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages including interest thereon and attorney’s fees.

On May 13, 2026, the Berger Complaint and the Skaff Complaint were consolidated into a single action (the “Consolidated Derivative Action”). The Consolidated Derivative Action was then stayed pending resolution of the Yung Complaint, including appeals therefrom. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.