v3.26.1
Regulatory Matters
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Regulated Operations [Abstract]  
Public Utilities Disclosure [Text Block] Regulatory Matters
Montana Rate Review

In December 2025, the MPSC issued a final order approving our partial electric settlement agreement. The final order also suspended the 90/10 cost sharing mechanism of the Power Cost and Credit Adjustment Mechanism (PCCAM) on a temporary basis pending further review by the MPSC. Within this final order, the MPSC disallowed a portion of the capital costs related to the construction of Yellowstone County Generating Station (YCGS). As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2025 we recorded a $30.9 million non-cash charge for the regulatory disallowance. As of June 30, 2026, we have $3.6 million reserved within Regulatory liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for interim rates to be refunded to customers.

In January 2026, we filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Motion) as it relates to this final order. Among other things, our Motion requests that the MPSC reconsider their prudence conclusions regarding the capital costs associated with the construction of YCGS and clarification as to the effective date of the PCCAM sharing mechanism suspension, for which we have requested an effective date of July 1, 2025, to align with the PCCAM tracker year. Any subsequent modifications by the MPSC to their final order are expected to be reflected in our 2026 results.

Colstrip Acquisitions and Requests for Cost Recovery

In January 2023, and July 2024, we entered into definitive agreements with Avista Corporation (Avista) and Puget Sound Energy (Puget), respectively, to acquire their respective interests in Colstrip Units 3 and 4 for $0 and completed these acquisitions on January 1, 2026. Accordingly, we are responsible for the associated operating costs beginning on January 1, 2026, which we will not collect through utility base rates, until requested in a future Montana rate review. Puget and Avista will remain responsible for their respective pre-closing share of environmental, asset retirement obligations (AROs), and pension
liabilities attributed to events or conditions existing prior to the closing of the transaction and for any future decommissioning and demolition costs associated with the existing facilities that comprise their interests.

While Puget and Avista remain contractually obligated for the pre-closing share of AROs, we remain the primary obligor. As such, as of June 30, 2026, we have recorded $2.8 million and $34.2 million within Accrued expenses and other and Other noncurrent liabilities, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for these AROs, and we have recorded an indemnification asset of $2.8 million and $34.2 million with Prepaid expenses and other and Other noncurrent assets, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Avista Interests - The 222 megawatts of generation capacity from Colstrip Units 3 and 4 acquired from Avista (Avista Interests) on January 1, 2026, was identified as a key element in our strategy to achieve resource adequacy for customers, as outlined in our 2023 Montana Integrated Resource Plan. Noting the costs associated with operating this resource are not currently reflected in utility customer rates, in August 2025, we filed a temporary PCCAM tariff waiver request with the MPSC that could provide a near-term cost-recovery mechanism to offset a portion of the approximately $18 million in annual incremental operating and maintenance costs associated with the Avista Interests. This waiver requested that the MPSC allow us to keep 100 percent of the net revenue associated with certain designated power sales contracts up to the amount of the operating and maintenance expenses we incur associated with our Avista Interests. Furthermore, the waiver request indicated that any net revenues from the designated contracts exceeding the operating and maintenance expenses associated with our Avista Interests would continue to flow back to retail customers. In January 2026, the MPSC approved our PCCAM tariff waiver request on an interim basis with final approval or denial subject to the ongoing PCCAM docket process.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, power prices in the Pacific Northwest associated with these designated power sales contracts included within our PCCAM tariff waiver were insufficient to contribute to the recovery of the operating and maintenance expenses associated with the Avista Interests.

Puget Interests - The 370 megawatts of generation capacity from Colstrip Units 3 and 4 acquired from Puget (Puget Interests) on January 1, 2026, increases our ownership share of the facility to 55 percent and provides an increase in voting share in determining strategic direction and investment decisions at the facility. Unlike the Avista Interests, we do not currently need this capacity to serve existing customers in Montana. As such, the Puget Interests are held by our FERC regulated subsidiary to isolate the costs associated with this acquired interest from our Montana retail customers. While we expect our future opportunity to serve growing customer demand, including large-load customers, may be supported by this resource, in October 2025, we signed a contract to sell the dispatchable capacity and associated energy from the Puget Interests beginning January 1, 2026, through late 2027. Revenues from this agreement are expected to largely offset the estimated $30 million of annual incremental operating and maintenance costs associated with the Puget Interests. In addition, in October 2025, we submitted a request to the FERC for approval of cost-based rates for our subsidiary that will own the Puget Interests. In February 2026, the FERC approved both the cost based rates and the contract rates retroactive to January 1, 2026. In March 2026, two MPSC commissioners, in their individual capacity, filed a motion with the FERC requesting a rehearing that largely reiterated arguments previously rejected by the FERC. The FERC denied this motion by operation of law. In June 2026, the two MPSC commissioners appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit. We have intervened in the case.