LITIGATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Gain (Loss) from Litigation Settlement [Abstract]
LITIGATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	LITIGATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ARBITRATIONS AND COURT PROCEEDINGS Amazon In June 2026, the Company reached an agreement with Amazon.com, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (“Amazon”) to suspend or withdraw all pending litigation and enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a patent license agreement. Brazil Proceedings In September 2025, Amazon filed a claim in the Second Business Court of Sao Paulo (“Sao Paulo Court”) against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. The claims alleged the non-infringement and non-essentiality of certain patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Amazon was seeking a declaration that the challenged Brazilian patents were not infringed, and a declaration preventing enforcement by the Company of any video coding patents anywhere in Brazil. In November 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Amazon. The claim alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the parties stayed all Brazil proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration described above. Eastern District of Virginia Proceedings In December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia against Amazon. The claim alleged infringement of four of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the court stayed the case in view of the arbitration agreement described above. Germany Proceedings In November and December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in three separate proceedings in the Munich and Mannheim Regional Courts against Amazon. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Company withdrew its Germany proceedings following entry into the arbitration agreement described above. International Trade Commission and Companion District Court Proceedings In November 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against Amazon in the Federal District Court of the District of Delaware. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case has been stayed pending resolution of the arbitration. In December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the United States International Trade Commission ("ITC") alleging that Amazon was engaged in unfair trade practices, and that certain of Amazon's video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, streaming devices, tablets and smart display devices, and components thereof, infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company was seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against Amazon barring from entry into the United States all of Amazon’s products that infringe the asserted patents and cease and desist orders prohibiting Amazon from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. In July 2026, the ITC terminated the investigation following entry into the arbitration agreement. United Kingdom Proceedings In August 2025, Amazon.com filed a claim in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. The claims alleged the non-infringement and invalidity of certain patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Amazon was seeking, among other relief, a rate-setting and order that InterDigital offer Amazon a RAND license as declared by the Court, or a declaration that InterDigital is in breach of its RAND commitment and an unwilling licensor and damages arising from such breach, and a declaration that the challenged patents are invalid and non-essential and not infringed. All deadlines in the UK proceedings were suspended following entry into the arbitration agreement described above. UPC Proceedings In November and December of 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in three separate proceedings in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court and Dusseldorf Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Amazon. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The UPC proceedings were stayed in July 2026 following entry into the arbitration agreement described above. Western District of Texas Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint with the District Court for the Western District of Texas. The claim alleged infringement of six of the Company’s patents covering certain networking technologies relating to the delivery of video content. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the court stayed the case in view of the arbitration agreement described above. Disney Brazil Proceedings In February 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Disney. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In March 2025, Disney filed an answer and asserted a rate-setting counterclaim. In May 2025, the Company requested an anti-interference injunction to prevent Disney from continuing with its anti-suit injunction in California. In September 2025, the Court granted the Company’s preliminary injunction request. The Appellate Court initially granted Disney’s request to stay the preliminary injunction pending hearing of an appeal, but that stay was lifted. In May 2026, the Court affirmed the lower court’s preliminary injunction decision. In October 2025, the Company filed another claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Disney. The claim alleges infringement of one of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patent. Central District of California Proceedings In February 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Federal District Court of the Central District of California against The Walt Disney Co. and certain of its subsidiaries (“Disney”). The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In March 2025, Disney filed an answer and asserted multiple counterclaims against the Company. In April 2025, Disney filed a motion for an anti-suit injunction to prevent enforcement of any potential injunctive relief in Brazil, which the court denied. In March 2026, the court issued a claim construction decision holding that certain claims of a subset of the asserted patents were invalid for lack of sufficient definiteness; the balance of the decision was favorable. The Company is seeking reconsideration as to one of the claims held to be indefinite, and further intends to appeal such conclusions. The case was stayed in June 2026 pending resolution of ex parte reexamination proceedings and the declaratory judgment action filed by Dolby referenced below. Delaware Proceedings In August 2025, a subsidiary of Disney filed an antitrust complaint against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and Technicolor in the Federal District Court of the District of Delaware. The claims allege the Company has engaged in monopolistic conduct in the licensing of its patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Disney is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to halt the licensing practices it views as unlawful, and damages. In September 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Disney’s complaint, or in the alternative, stay the case pending resolution of the Company’s cases against Disney in California, Europe, and Brazil. In October 2025, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the Delaware case. Germany Proceedings In February and April 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in four separate proceedings in the Munich Regional Court against Disney. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In October 2025, the Court held a hearing and issued an order finding validity of and infringement by Disney of one of the Company’s patents. The order enjoined Disney from further infringement. Disney is currently appealing the Court’s determinations. In January 2026, the Court imposed fines of €550,000 for Disney’s violations of the injunction following a request for coercive measures from the Company. Disney appealed, and the fine was adjusted on appeal to €50,000. Enforcement of the patent was stayed in May 2026 pending final decision from the Federal Patent Court on validity. In November 2025, the Court held another hearing and issued another order finding infringement by Disney of another of the Company’s patents. The order also enjoined Disney from further infringement. In July 2026, the Court imposed fines of €150,000 for Disney’s violations of the injunction following a request for coercive measures from the Company. In February 2026, the Court held another hearing and issued another order finding infringement by Disney of another of the Company’s patents. The order also enjoined Disney from further infringement. A hearing on the remaining asserted patent has not yet been scheduled. In July 2026, the Company filed an additional suit asserting infringement of a patent relating to video streaming technologies. UPC Proceedings In February and April of 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in four separate proceedings, two in each court, in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court and Dusseldorf Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Disney. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Mannheim Court held a hearing for one of the two asserted patents in May 2026, found infringement and issued an injunction in June 2026. The Dusseldorf Court held a hearing on one of the asserted patents in June 2026, also found infringement and issued an injunction in July 2026. Each of these injunctions spans 11 EU countries. The Dusseldorf Court held an additional hearing on the second asserted patent in July 2026, with a decision expected in September 2026. In July 2026, the Company filed an additional suit asserting infringement of a patent relating to video streaming technologies in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court. Dolby In March 2026, Dolby Laboratories filed two complaints in the Central District of California seeking declaratory judgment relief with respect to six of the Company’s patents. The first complaint seeks declarations of invalidity and noninfringement with respect to one of the Company’s video technology patents that is also currently being asserted against Disney. The second complaint seeks declarations of noninfringement with respect to five of the Company’s video technology patents that have been asserted against Amazon, Hisense and TCL. In April 2026, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the first complaint; that motion was denied. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the second complaint, which was granted in July 2026. Hisense Brazil Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Hisense. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In April 2026, Hisense filed an antitrust action against the Company in the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, alleging that the Company has acted as an unwilling licensor. The Company submitted its answer to the complaint in May 2026. Germany Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Regional Court against Hisense. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027. India Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against Hisense. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that Hisense is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims. International Trade Commission and Companion District Court Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against Hisense in the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Georgia. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC case described below. In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the ITC alleging that Hisense (and TCL, as further described below) is engaged in unfair trade practices by selling for importation, importing, and selling after importation products that infringe six of the Company's patents. The products include certain video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, monitor display devices, and components thereof that infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company is seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against Hisense barring from entry into the United States all of Hisense’s products that infringe the asserted patents and cease and desist orders prohibiting Hisense from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. The ITC has instituted the investigation. A hearing is scheduled for second quarter 2027, with a final determination currently expected by the end of 2027. UPC Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Hisense Group Co., Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries (“Hisense”). The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. Lenovo In fourth quarter 2024, the Company reached an agreement with Lenovo Group Limited and certain of its subsidiaries (“Lenovo”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a new patent license agreement, which will be effective from January 1, 2024. In November 2024, the Company filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce. In March 2025, the International Chamber of Commerce confirmed the full tribunal for the arbitration. The arbitration hearing is scheduled for fourth quarter 2026. Samsung The Company reached an agreement with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Samsung”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a renewed patent license agreement to certain of the Company’s patents, to be effective from January 1, 2023. In July 2025, a panel of International Chamber of Commerce arbitrators determined the royalties of the patent license between the Company and Samsung covering Samsung’s products other than digital televisions and computer display monitors, which have been licensed under a separate agreement. The panel set the total royalties at $1.05 billion for the eight-year patent license. In December 2025, Samsung filed a request to the International Chamber of Commerce seeking to challenge the previously determined royalties. In July 2026, the Company filed jurisdictional objections. TCL Brazil Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against TCL. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. A hearing has been scheduled for third quarter 2026. China Proceedings In July 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries were served with two complaints filed by TCL in the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court. The first suit seeks, among other things, a declaration that the Company’s proposed licensing terms for its HEVC portfolio does not comply with FRAND principles, and for the court to determine global FRAND licensing terms for the Company’s HEVC portfolio applicable to TCL’s television products. The second suit seeks, among other things, a declaration that the Company has abused a dominant market position in licensing its Chinese SEPs, and compensation for alleged economic losses caused by this abuse of dominant market position. Germany Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Regional Court against TCL. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027. India Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against TCL. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that TCL is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims. International Trade Commission and Companion District Court Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against TCL in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Texas. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC case described below. In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the ITC, referenced above with respect to Hisense, alleging that TCL is engaged in unfair trade practices by selling for importation, importing, and selling after importation products that infringe six of the Company's patents. The products include certain video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, monitor display devices, and components thereof that infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company is seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against TCL barring from entry into the United States all of TCL’s products that infringe the asserted patent and cease and desist orders prohibiting TCL from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. The ITC has instituted the investigation. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for second quarter 2027, with a final determination currently expected by the end of 2027. UPC Proceedings In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Local Divisional Court of the UPC against TCL Technology Group Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (“TCL”). The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. Tesla In December 2023, Tesla, Inc. ("Tesla") and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the UK High Court against the Company and Avanci. The claim alleges invalidity of three of the Company’s patents relating to 5G standards: European Patent (UK) Nos. 3,718,369, 3,566,413, and 3,455,985. Tesla sought, among other relief, a declaration that the patents at issue are invalid, not essential, and not infringed, revocation of the patents at issue, a declaration that the terms of the Avanci 5G Connected Vehicle platform license are not FRAND, and a determination of FRAND terms for a license between Tesla and Avanci covering Avanci’s 5G Connected Vehicle platform. In March 2024, the Company filed a jurisdiction challenge; the jurisdiction challenge was heard during May and June 2024, and in July 2024 the UK High Court issued a judgment dismissing Tesla’s FRAND claims against the Company and Avanci, and maintaining Tesla’s patent claims against the Company. The patent claims against the Company were further stayed by the UK High Court. An appeal hearing was held in December 2024, and the UK Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's decision and refused Tesla’s request for permission to appeal. Tesla filed an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. In July 2025, the Supreme Court granted Tesla’s request for permission to appeal the issues of whether pool licenses are arguably required to be FRAND, whether all members of the Avanci 5G Platform must be joined to the case, and whether Tesla’s claim advances the possibility of a bilateral license from the Company. In September 2025, the Company filed an application for permission to cross-appeal. The Supreme Court heard the appeal in April 2026. In July 2026, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the lower courts finding that there was an issue to be tried regarding Tesla’s FRAND claims against the Company and Avanci, and that the UK High Court has jurisdiction to hear those claims. Transsion Brazil Proceedings In September 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Transsion and distributors. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In March 2026, the Court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining Transsion from selling 5G-compliant devices in Brazil. Transsion has appealed this decision, and the appeal is pending. India Proceedings In September and October 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against Transsion. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies and video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that Transsion is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims. UPC Proceedings In September 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Transsion Holdings Pvt Ltd and certain of its subsidiaries (“Transsion”) and distributors. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies and video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027. OTHER We are party to certain other disputes and legal actions in the ordinary course of business, including arbitrations and legal proceedings with licensees regarding the terms of their agreements and the negotiation thereof. We do not currently believe that these matters, even if adversely adjudicated or settled, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. None of the preceding matters have met the requirements for accrual or disclosure of a potential range as of June 30, 2026, except as noted above.

In September 2025, Amazon filed a claim in the Second Business Court of Sao Paulo (“Sao Paulo Court”) against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. The claims alleged the non-infringement and non-essentiality of certain patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Amazon was seeking a declaration that the challenged Brazilian patents were not infringed, and a declaration preventing enforcement by the Company of any video coding patents anywhere in Brazil.

In November 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Amazon. The claim alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the parties stayed all Brazil proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration described above.

In December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia against Amazon. The claim alleged infringement of four of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the court stayed the case in view of the arbitration agreement described above.

In November and December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in three separate proceedings in the Munich and Mannheim Regional Courts against Amazon. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Company withdrew its Germany proceedings following entry into the arbitration agreement described above.

In November 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against Amazon in the Federal District Court of the District of Delaware. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case has been stayed pending resolution of the arbitration.

In December 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the United States International Trade Commission ("ITC") alleging that Amazon was engaged in unfair trade practices, and that certain of Amazon's video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, streaming devices, tablets and smart display devices, and components thereof, infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company was seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against Amazon barring from entry into the United States all of Amazon’s products that infringe the asserted patents and cease and desist orders prohibiting Amazon from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. In July 2026, the ITC terminated the investigation following entry into the arbitration agreement.

In August 2025, Amazon.com filed a claim in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. The claims alleged the non-infringement and invalidity of certain patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Amazon was seeking, among other relief, a rate-setting and order that InterDigital offer Amazon a RAND license as declared by the Court, or a declaration that InterDigital is in breach of its RAND commitment and an unwilling licensor and damages arising from such breach, and a declaration that the challenged patents are invalid and non-essential and not infringed.

In November and December of 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in three separate proceedings in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court and Dusseldorf Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Amazon. The claims alleged infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company was seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The UPC proceedings were stayed in July 2026 following entry into the arbitration agreement described above.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint with the District Court for the Western District of Texas. The claim alleged infringement of six of the Company’s patents covering certain networking technologies relating to the delivery of video content. The Company was seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In July 2026, the court stayed the case in view of the arbitration agreement described above.

In February 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Federal District Court of the Central District of California against The Walt Disney Co. and certain of its subsidiaries (“Disney”). The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents.

In March 2025, Disney filed an answer and asserted multiple counterclaims against the Company. In April 2025, Disney filed a motion for an anti-suit injunction to prevent enforcement of any potential injunctive relief in Brazil, which the court denied. In March 2026, the court issued a claim construction decision holding that certain claims of a subset of the asserted patents were invalid for lack of sufficient definiteness; the balance of the decision was favorable. The Company is seeking reconsideration as to one of the claims held to be indefinite, and further intends to appeal such conclusions.

In August 2025, a subsidiary of Disney filed an antitrust complaint against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and Technicolor in the Federal District Court of the District of Delaware. The claims allege the Company has engaged in monopolistic conduct in the licensing of its patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. Disney is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to halt the licensing practices it views as unlawful, and damages.

In February and April 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in four separate proceedings in the Munich Regional Court against Disney. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents.

In October 2025, the Court held a hearing and issued an order finding validity of and infringement by Disney of one of the Company’s patents. The order enjoined Disney from further infringement. Disney is currently appealing the Court’s determinations. In January 2026, the Court imposed fines of €550,000 for Disney’s violations of the injunction following a request for coercive measures from the Company. Disney appealed, and the fine was adjusted on appeal to €50,000. Enforcement of the patent was stayed in May 2026 pending final decision from the Federal Patent Court on validity.

In February and April of 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in four separate proceedings, two in each court, in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court and Dusseldorf Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Disney. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding and video streaming technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents.

The Mannheim Court held a hearing for one of the two asserted patents in May 2026, found infringement and issued an injunction in June 2026. The Dusseldorf Court held a hearing on one of the asserted patents in June 2026, also found infringement and issued an injunction in July 2026. Each of these injunctions spans 11 EU countries. The Dusseldorf Court held an additional hearing on the second asserted patent in July 2026, with a decision expected in September 2026.

In March 2026, Dolby Laboratories filed two complaints in the Central District of California seeking declaratory judgment relief with respect to six of the Company’s patents. The first complaint seeks declarations of invalidity and noninfringement with respect to one of the Company’s video technology patents that is also currently being asserted against Disney. The second complaint seeks declarations of noninfringement with respect to five of the Company’s video technology patents that have been asserted against Amazon, Hisense and TCL.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Regional Court against Hisense. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against Hisense. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that Hisense is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against Hisense in the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Georgia. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC case described below.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the ITC alleging that Hisense (and TCL, as further described below) is engaged in unfair trade practices by selling for importation, importing, and selling after importation products that infringe six of the Company's patents. The products include certain video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, monitor display devices, and components thereof that infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company is seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against Hisense barring from entry into the United States all of Hisense’s products that infringe the asserted patents and cease and desist orders prohibiting Hisense from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. The ITC has instituted the investigation. A hearing is scheduled for second quarter 2027, with a final determination currently expected by the end of 2027.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Mannheim Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Hisense Group Co., Ltd. and certain of its subsidiaries (“Hisense”). The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents.

In fourth quarter 2024, the Company reached an agreement with Lenovo Group Limited and certain of its subsidiaries (“Lenovo”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a new patent license agreement, which will be effective from January 1, 2024. In November 2024, the Company filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce. In March 2025, the International Chamber of Commerce confirmed the full tribunal for the arbitration. The arbitration hearing is scheduled for fourth quarter 2026.

The Company reached an agreement with Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Samsung”) to enter into binding arbitration to determine the final terms of a renewed patent license agreement to certain of the Company’s patents, to be effective from January 1, 2023. In July 2025, a panel of International Chamber of Commerce arbitrators determined the royalties of the patent license between the Company and Samsung covering Samsung’s products other than digital televisions and computer display monitors, which have been licensed under a separate agreement. The panel set the total royalties at $1.05 billion for the eight-year patent license.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against TCL. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. A hearing has been scheduled for third quarter 2026.

In July 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries were served with two complaints filed by TCL in the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court. The first suit seeks, among other things, a declaration that the Company’s proposed licensing terms for its HEVC portfolio does not comply with FRAND principles, and for the court to determine global FRAND licensing terms for the Company’s HEVC portfolio applicable to TCL’s television products. The second suit seeks, among other things, a declaration that the Company has abused a dominant market position in licensing its Chinese SEPs, and compensation for alleged economic losses caused by this abuse of dominant market position.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Regional Court against TCL. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against TCL. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that TCL is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a companion patent infringement complaint against TCL in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Texas. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The case is currently stayed pending resolution of the ITC case described below.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a complaint in the ITC, referenced above with respect to Hisense, alleging that TCL is engaged in unfair trade practices by selling for importation, importing, and selling after importation products that infringe six of the Company's patents. The products include certain video-capable electronic devices like smart TVs, monitor display devices, and components thereof that infringe certain claims of the asserted patents. As relief, the Company is seeking, among other relief, a limited exclusion order against TCL barring from entry into the United States all of TCL’s products that infringe the asserted patent and cease and desist orders prohibiting TCL from importing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, advertising, and distributing, infringing products. The ITC has instituted the investigation. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled for second quarter 2027, with a final determination currently expected by the end of 2027.

In February 2026, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Local Divisional Court of the UPC against TCL Technology Group Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (“TCL”). The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents.

In December 2023, Tesla, Inc. ("Tesla") and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the UK High Court against the Company and Avanci. The claim alleges invalidity of three of the Company’s patents relating to 5G standards: European Patent (UK) Nos. 3,718,369, 3,566,413, and 3,455,985. Tesla sought, among other relief, a declaration that the patents at issue are invalid, not essential, and not infringed, revocation of the patents at issue, a declaration that the terms of the Avanci 5G Connected Vehicle platform license are not FRAND, and a determination of FRAND terms for a license between Tesla and Avanci covering Avanci’s 5G Connected Vehicle platform. In March 2024, the Company filed a jurisdiction challenge; the jurisdiction challenge was heard during May and June 2024, and in July 2024 the UK High Court issued a judgment dismissing Tesla’s FRAND claims against the Company and Avanci, and maintaining Tesla’s patent claims against the Company. The patent claims against the Company were further stayed by the UK High Court. An appeal hearing was held in December 2024, and the UK Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's decision and refused Tesla’s request for permission to appeal. Tesla filed an application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. In July 2025, the Supreme Court granted Tesla’s request for permission to appeal the issues of whether pool licenses are arguably required to be FRAND, whether all members of the Avanci 5G Platform must be joined to the case, and whether Tesla’s claim advances the possibility of a bilateral license from the Company. In September 2025, the Company filed an application for permission to cross-appeal. The Supreme Court heard the appeal in April 2026. In July 2026, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the lower courts finding that there was an issue to be tried regarding Tesla’s FRAND claims against the Company and Avanci, and that the UK High Court has jurisdiction to hear those claims.

In September 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed a claim in the Regional Business Court of Rio de Janeiro against Transsion and distributors. The claim alleges infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, damages and injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. In March 2026, the Court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining Transsion from selling 5G-compliant devices in Brazil. Transsion has appealed this decision, and the appeal is pending.

In September and October 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Delhi High Court against Transsion. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies and video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents, damages, and a declaration that the Company is FRAND compliant and that Transsion is an unwilling licensee with respect to the FRAND claims.

In September 2025, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed patent infringement claims in the Munich Local Divisional Court of the UPC against Transsion Holdings Pvt Ltd and certain of its subsidiaries (“Transsion”) and distributors. The claims allege infringement of certain of the Company’s patents relating to cellular SEP technologies and video coding technologies. The Company is seeking, among other relief, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement of the asserted patents. The Munich Court has scheduled a hearing for first quarter 2027.

We are party to certain other disputes and legal actions in the ordinary course of business, including arbitrations and legal proceedings with licensees regarding the terms of their agreements and the negotiation thereof. We do not currently believe that these matters, even if adversely adjudicated or settled, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. None of the preceding matters have met the requirements for accrual or disclosure of a potential range as of June 30, 2026, except as noted above.