Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company” or “Elite”) was incorporated on October 1, 1997 under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Elite Laboratories, Inc. (“Elite Labs”) was incorporated on August 23, 1990 under the laws of the State of Delaware. On January 5, 2012, Elite Pharmaceuticals was reincorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. Elite Labs engages primarily in researching, developing, licensing, manufacturing, and sales of generic, oral dose pharmaceuticals. The Company is equipped to manufacture controlled-release products on a contract basis for third parties and itself, if and when the product candidates are approved. These products include drugs that cover therapeutic areas for allergy, bariatric, attention deficit and infection. Research and development activities are performed with an objective of developing product candidates that will secure marketing approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and thereafter, commercially exploiting such products.

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The audited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Elite Labs. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions affecting amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such management estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, chargeback liabilities related to revenue recognition, valuation of intangible assets, the useful life of property and equipment and identifiable intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense, and income taxes. The Company continuously evaluates its estimates, which are based on the information that is currently available to the Company and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 280 (“ASC 280”), Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews the financial performance and the results of operations of the segments prepared in accordance with GAAP when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company.

The Company previously determined that its reportable segments were products whose marketing approvals were secured via an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) and products whose marketing approvals were secured via a New Drug Application (“NDA”). ANDA products are referred to as generic pharmaceuticals and NDA products are referred to as branded pharmaceuticals. The Company identifies its reporting segments based on the marketing authorization relating to each and the financial information used by its chief operating decision maker to make decisions regarding the allocation of resources to and the financial performance of the reporting segments. The Company has paused further development of NDAs and has not engaged in business activities for several years, and does not intend to engage in business activities related to the development of NDAs for the foreseeable future. Therefore, as of March 31, 2026, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating and reportable segment.

Asset information by operating segment is not presented below since the chief operating decision maker does not review this information by segment. The ANDA segment follows the same accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 14 for further details.

The Company generates revenue from manufacturing and licensing fees and direct sales to pharmaceutical distributors for pharmacies and institutions. Manufacturing fees include the development of pain management products, manufacturing of a line of generic pharmaceutical products with approved ANDA, through the manufacture of formulations and the development of new products. Licensing fees include the commercialization of products either by license and the collection of royalties, or the expansion of licensing agreements with other pharmaceutical companies, including co-development projects, joint ventures and other collaborations.

Under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), the Company recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company recognizes revenues following the five-step model prescribed under ASC 606: (i) identify contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligation(s) in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation(s) in the contract; and (v) recognize revenues when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue.

The following is a description of the Company’s goods and services from which the Company generates revenue, as well as the nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations, and significant payment terms for each, as applicable:

The Company is equipped to manufacture controlled-release products on a contract basis for third parties, if, and when, the products are approved. These products include products using controlled-release drug technology. The Company also develops and markets (either on its own or by license to other companies) generic and proprietary controlled-release pharmaceutical products.

The Company recognizes manufacturing fees related to revenue generated from wholesale customers and from direct sale customers. Wholesalers represent customers that purchase the Company’s products and sell them to end customers such as hospitals, group purchasing organizations, institutions, and pharmacies. Direct sales customers purchase products directly from the Company.

The Company provides for chargebacks to wholesalers for sales to various end-customers to include, but not limited to, hospitals, group purchasing organizations, and pharmacies. Chargebacks represent the difference between the price the wholesaler pays and the price that the end-customer pays for a product. The Company’s estimate for chargebacks is developed based upon management’s assumption of anticipated claims as well as historical information. Chargebacks represent variable consideration within the Company’s contracts and therefore as such, revenue recognized is limited to the amount for which a significant reversal of revenue related to this variable consideration is not probable.

The Company recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product based on the contractual shipping terms of the contract, at which time the performance obligation is deemed to be completed. The Company is primarily responsible for ensuring that the product is produced in accordance with the related supply agreement, and fulfilling the promise to deliver the product and bearing the risk of loss while the inventory is in-transit to the purchaser or commercial partner. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive from the sale of its products, including Elite-labeled pharmaceutical products, and is recorded at net realizable value which consists of gross amounts invoiced reduced by contractual reductions, including, without limitation, chargebacks, discounts and program rebates, as applicable.

The Company enters into licensing and development agreements, which may include multiple revenue generating activities, including milestones payments, licensing fees, product sales and services. The Company analyzes each element of its licensing and development agreements in accordance with ASC 606 to determine appropriate revenue recognition. The terms of the license agreement may include payment to the Company of licensing fees, non-refundable upfront license fees, milestone payments if specified objectives are achieved, and/or royalties on product sales.

If the contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations.

The Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable upfront payments at a point in time, typically upon fulfilling the delivery of the associated intellectual property to the customer. For those milestone payments which are contingent on the occurrence of particular future events (for example, payments due upon a product receiving FDA approval), the Company determined that these need to be considered for inclusion in the calculation of total consideration from the contract as a component of variable consideration using the most-likely amount method. As such, the Company assesses each milestone to determine the probability and substance behind achieving each milestone. Given the inherent uncertainty of the occurrence of future events, the Company will recognize revenue from the milestone when there is not a high probability of a reversal of revenue, which typically occurs near or upon achievement of the event.

Judgment is required to determine the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to complete its performance obligations under the arrangement. If the Company cannot reasonably estimate when its performance obligations either are completed or become inconsequential, then revenue recognition is deferred until the Company can reasonably make such estimates. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance using the cumulative catch-up method.

When determining the transaction price of a contract, an adjustment is made if payment from a customer occurs either significantly before or significantly after performance, resulting in a significant financing component. Applying the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-32-18, the Company does not assess whether a significant financing component exists if the period between when the Company performs its obligations under the contract and when the customer pays is one year or less. None of the Company’s contracts contained a significant financing component as of March 31, 2026.

In accordance with ASC 606-10-55-65, royalties are recognized when the subsequent sale of the customer’s products occurs.

In the following table, revenue is disaggregated by type of revenue generated by the Company. The Company recognizes revenue at a point in time for all performance obligations. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company has paused further development of NDAs and has not engaged in business activities in that segment. Accordingly during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company has only engaged in business activities in a single operating segment.

Selected information on reportable segments and the reconciliation of operating income by segment to income from operation and to income (loss) before income taxes are disclosed within Note 14.

The Company disaggregates manufacturing fees revenue by sales channel, consisting of revenues from direct and indirect wholesalers, which have different cash flows and contract economics as margins generated differ between direct and indirect revenues. Additionally, although the underlying arrangements are substantially similar, pricing to direct wholesalers yields higher margins than pricing to indirect wholesalers, while the timing and uncertainty of cash flows do not differ materially. The following table summarizes manufacturing fees by sales channel for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

The Company’s revenue-generating products consist of two categories: (i) products containing an active ingredient listed by the United States Drug Enforcement Agency as a scheduled substance under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (“Scheduled Products”) and (ii) products not containing such a scheduled active ingredient (“Unscheduled Products”). The following table summarizes the breakdown of revenues by product category for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

	2026		2025
	For the Years Ended March 31,
	2026		2025
Scheduled Products – Manufacturing Fees	$	141,465,975	$	74,756,506
Scheduled Products – Licensing Fees		465,511		248,789
Unscheduled Products – Manufacturing Fees		6,344,147		7,229,573
Unscheduled Products – Licensing Fees		594,486		1,809,061
Total Revenue	$	148,870,119	$	84,043,929

Cash consists of cash on deposit with banks and money market instruments. The Company places its cash with high-quality, U.S. financial institutions and, to date has not experienced losses on any of its balances.

As of March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company had $471,520 and $453,776, of restricted cash, respectively, related to debt service reserve in regard to the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (“NJEDA”) bonds (see Note 6).

Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers, net of estimated allowances for expected credit losses, and other contractual deductions, including, without limitation, chargebacks, discounts and program rebates. In determining collectability, historical trends are evaluated, and specific customer issues are reviewed on a periodic basis to arrive at appropriate allowances.

The allowance for expected credit losses is based on the probability of future collection under the current expected credited loss (“CECL”) impairment model under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Assets. Under the CECL impairment model, the Company determines its allowance by applying a loss-rate method based on an aging schedule using the Company’s historical loss rate. The Company also considers reasonable and supportable current information in determining its estimated loss rates, such as external forecasts, macroeconomic trends or other factors including customers’ credit risk and historical loss experience. The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated on a regular basis. Account balances are written off after all means of collection are exhausted and the balance is deemed uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance. Changes in the allowance are recorded as adjustments to credit losses in the period incurred.

The Company’s quantitative allowance for credit loss estimates under CECL was determined using the loss rate method, which is impacted by certain forecasted economic factors. In addition to the Company’s quantitative allowance for credit losses, the Company also incorporates qualitative adjustments that may relate to unique risks, changes in current economic conditions that may not be reflected in quantitatively derived results, or other relevant factors to further inform the Company’s estimate of the allowance for credit losses.

Additionally, due to the expansion of the time horizon over which the Company is required to estimate future credit losses, the Company may experience increased volatility in its future provisions for credit losses. Factors that could contribute to such volatility include, but are not limited to, changes in the composition and credit quality of customer base, economic conditions and forecasts, the allowance for credit loss models that are used, the data that is included in the models, the associated qualitative allowance framework, and the Company’s estimation techniques.

During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company incurred bad debt expenses of $1,053,990 and $151,258, respectively. As of March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $1,441,523 and $387,533, respectively.

Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value on specific identification by lot number basis.

The Company periodically evaluates the fair value of long-lived assets, which include property and equipment and intangibles, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the respective assets which range from three to forty years. Major repairs or improvements are capitalized. Minor replacements and maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend asset lives are expensed currently.

Upon retirement or other disposition of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income.

The Company capitalizes certain costs to acquire intangible assets; if such assets are determined to have a finite useful life they are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life. Costs to acquire indefinite lived intangible assets, such as costs related to ANDAs are capitalized accordingly.

The Company tests its intangible assets for impairment at least annually (as of March 31st) and whenever events or circumstances change that indicate impairment may have occurred. Judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others and without limitation: a significant decline in the Company’s expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate of the Company’s segments; unanticipated competition; and slower growth rates.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where applicable, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce any deferred tax assets that it determines will not be realizable in the future.

The Company recognizes the benefit of an uncertain tax position that it has taken or expects to take on income tax returns it files if such tax position is more likely than not to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. These tax benefits are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.

The Company operates in multiple tax jurisdictions within the United States of America. The Company remains subject to examination in all tax jurisdiction until the applicable statutes of limitation expire. As of March 31, 2026, a summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the Company’s major tax jurisdictions are: United States – Federal, 2022 and forward, and State, 2021 and forward. The Company did not have any unrecognized tax positions for the years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.

The accounting treatment of warrants and preferred share series issued is determined pursuant to the guidance provided by ASC 470, Debt, ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, as applicable. Each feature of a freestanding financial instrument including, without limitation, any rights relating to subsequent dilutive issuances, dividend issuances, equity sales, rights offerings, forced conversions, optional redemptions, automatic monthly conversions, dividends and exercise is assessed with determinations made regarding the proper classification in the Company’s financial statements.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based on the terms of the awards. The cost of the stock-based payments to nonemployees that are fully vested and non-forfeitable as at the grant date is measured and recognized at that date, unless there is a contractual term for services in which case such compensation would be amortized over the contractual term. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.

The Company follows ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex capital structures and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. In the accompanying financial statements, basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share includes the assumed exercise of options and warrants if the effect is dilutive. The assumed exercise of the Series J Warrants was dilutive for the year ended March 31, 2026, and is therefore included in the diluted EPS calculation for that period.

As the Company was in a net loss position for the year ended March 31, 2025, the potential dilution from the Series J Warrants converting into 79,008,661 shares of Common Stock and the stock options being exercised for 15,640,000 shares of Common Stock for these periods have been excluded from the number of shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share as their inclusion would have been antidilutive.

The following is the computation of earnings per share applicable to common shareholders for the periods indicated:

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) provides a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).

The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described as follows:

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. Based upon current borrowing rates with similar maturities the carrying value of long-term debt, and related party loans payable approximates fair value.

Non-financial assets such as intangible assets and property and equipment are measured at fair value only when an impairment loss is recognized.

See Note 4 for additional information for the impairment loss recorded in relation to the Company’s intangible assets.

The Company records treasury stock at the cost to acquire it and includes treasury stock as a component of shareholders’ equity.

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”).

A lessee should recognize the lease liability to make lease payments and the right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For operating leases and finance leases, a right-of-use asset and a lease liability are initially measured at the present value of the lease payments by discount rates. The Company’s lease discount rates are generally based on its incremental borrowing rate, as the discount rates implicit in the Company’s leases is readily determinable. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property and equipment and lease liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Lease expense for operating expense payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Interest and amortization expenses are recognized for finance leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

For the leases with a term of twelve months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires public entities, on an annual basis, to provide disclosure of specific categories in the rate reconciliation, as well as disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended March 31, 2026, and applied the new disclosure requirements prospectively to the current annual period. Prior period disclosures have not been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. See Note 16 Income Taxes in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further detail.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), Clarifying the Effective Date (“ASU-2024-03”). ASU 2024-03 requires public companies to disclose, in interim and reporting periods, additional information about certain expenses in the financial statements. ASU 2024-03, as clarified by ASU 2025-01, is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted and is effective on either a prospective basis or retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the updated standard will have on the Company’s disclosures within the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-04, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Clarifications to Share-Based Consideration Payable to a Customer to reduce diversity in practice and improve the decision usefulness and operability of the guidance for share-based consideration payable to a customer in conjunction with selling goods or services. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 with updates to be applied on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact that this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The ASU introduces a practical expedient and an accounting policy election to simplify the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. The practical expedient allows entities to assume that conditions at the balance sheet date remain unchanged for the asset’s remaining life when preparing forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and is to be adopted on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270)—Narrow-Scope Improvements. The ASU clarifies the scope of interim reporting guidance, reorganizes disclosure requirements for ease of navigation, and introduces a principle requiring disclosure of material events occurring after the last annual reporting period but before interim financial statements are issued. The ASU does not create new disclosure requirements but improves clarity and consistency in presentation. The ASU is effective for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Management has evaluated recently issued accounting pronouncements outside of those mentioned above and does not believe that any of these pronouncements will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.