Investment Risks - REX-Osprey(TM) XRP ETF	Jun. 30, 2026
XRP Investing Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	XRP Investing Risk. Cryptocurrencies, such as XRP, operate without central authority or banks and are not backed by any government. Cryptocurrencies are often referred to as a “virtual asset” or “digital asset,” and operate as a decentralized, peer-to-peer financial trading platform and value storage that is used like money. A cryptocurrency is also not a legal tender. Investments linked to XRP can be highly volatile compared to investments in traditional securities and the Fund may experience sudden and large losses. The markets for XRP and XRP-related investments may become illiquid. These markets may fluctuate widely based on a variety of factors including changes in overall market movements, political and economic events, wars, acts of terrorism, natural disasters (including disease, epidemics and pandemics) and changes in interest rates or inflation rates. An investor should be prepared to lose the full principal value of their investment suddenly and without warning. A number of factors affect the price and market for XRP: •New Technology. XRP is a relatively new technological innovation with a limited operating history. XRP has a relatively limited history of existence and operations. There is a limited established performance record for the price of XRP and, in turn, a limited basis for evaluating an investment in XRP. •Supply and Demand of XRP. Unlike other digital assets such as bitcoin or ether, XRP is not and was not mined gradually over time. Instead, all 100 billion XRP tokens were created at the time of the XRP Ledger’s launch in 2012. This means that every XRP token that exists today, or will ever exist, was generated from the outset of the XRP Ledger. As a result, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be adjusted in response to economic conditions. For instance, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be increased to meet rising demand, which could lead to price volatility. In addition, unlike blockchains that utilize “proof-of-work” or “proof-of-stake” where miners or stakers are rewarded with newly minted coins or tokens, XRP validators are not incentivized by block rewards since there is no new issuance of XRP. Additionally, the fixed supply of XRP, combined with the burning of XRP (permanently destroyed) as transaction fees, could create deflationary pressure over time. A small amount of XRP is burned with every transaction to prevent spam on the network. While the amount of XRP burned per transaction is minuscule, over time, the total supply of XRP will slowly decrease. This could lead to a deflationary environment where the decreasing supply drives up the price of XRP, making it less practical as a medium of exchange. Additionally, as the total supply of XRP slowly shrinks due to burning, liquidity could become an issue in the distant future, potentially making it harder for businesses and users to access sufficient XRP for their transactions. The fixed supply of XRP could also contribute to price volatility, especially if demand fluctuates significantly. Since the supply of XRP is fixed, any significant surge in demand can result in large price spikes. This volatility could make XRP less predictable for businesses that rely on it for payments. The fixed supply of XRP may also not scale well with rapidly expanding use cases. To the extent more businesses, financial institutions, and payment providers adopt XRP for cross-border transactions and other use cases, there is a risk that the fixed supply may not meet such growing demand, leading to supply shortages and further price volatility. Ripple Labs holds a large portion (approximately 38-40 billion XRP as of February 2026) of the XRP supply, which has led to concerns about centralization. Despite escrow mechanisms that gradually release XRP into the market, Ripple Labs still retains control over a significant portion of XRP, which can impact market dynamics (e.g., supply and demand and volatility) if large amounts are sold. The concentration of XRP in the hands of Ripple Labs and early stakeholders could affect the market’s confidence in XRP as a decentralized asset. •Adoption and Use of XRP. The continued adoption of XRP will require growth in its usage as a means of exchange and payment. Even if growth in XRP adoption continues in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that XRP usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in the use of XRP may result in a lack of liquidity, increased volatility in and a reduction to the price of XRP. •Largely Unregulated Marketplace. Digital asset markets, including spot markets for XRP, are growing rapidly. The spot markets through which XRP and other digital assets trade are new and, in some cases, may be subject to but not comply with their relevant jurisdiction’s regulations. These markets are local, national and international and include a broadening range of digital assets and participants. Significant trading may occur on systems and platforms with minimum predictability. Spot markets may impose daily, weekly, monthly or customer-specific transaction or withdrawal limits or suspend withdrawals entirely, rendering the exchange of XRP for fiat currency difficult or impossible. Digital asset exchanges do not appear to be subject to, or may not comply with, regulation in a similar manner as other regulated trading platforms, such as national securities exchanges or designated contract markets. Many digital asset exchanges are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions. As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset exchanges is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. Furthermore, many spot markets lack certain safeguards put in place by more traditional exchanges to enhance the stability of trading on the exchange and prevent flash crashes, such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of digital assets such as XRP on digital asset exchanges may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities (such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading) may not be available to or employed by digital asset exchanges or may not exist at all. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, these venues. The closure or temporary shutdown of XRP exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the XRP Ledger and can slow down the mass adoption of XRP. Further, spot market failures or that of any other major component of the overall XRP ecosystem can have an adverse effect on XRP markets and the price of XRP and could therefore have a negative impact on the performance of the Fund. Furthermore, the closure or temporary shutdown of an XRP spot market may impact the Fund’s ability to determine the value of its XRP holdings or for the Fund’s Authorized Participants to effectively arbitrage the Shares. •Cybersecurity. As a digital asset, XRP is subject to the risk that malicious actors will exploit flaws in its code or structure that will allow them to, among other things, steal XRP held by others, control the blockchain, or steal personally identifying information. The occurrence of any of these events is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the price and liquidity of XRP and any XRP-related investments and therefore the value of an investment in the Fund. •Forks. XRP, along with many other digital assets, are open source projects. The infrastructure and ecosystem that powers the XRP Ledger are developed by different parties, including affiliated and non-affiliated engineers, developers, validators, platform developers, evangelists, marketers, exchange operators and other companies based around a service regarding XRP, each of whom may have different motivations, drivers, philosophies and incentives. Forks may have a detrimental effect on the value of XRP. Forks can also introduce new security risks.
XRP Investing Risk, New Technology Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	New Technology. XRP is a relatively new technological innovation with a limited operating history. XRP has a relatively limited history of existence and operations. There is a limited established performance record for the price of XRP and, in turn, a limited basis for evaluating an investment in XRP.
XRP Investing Risk, Supply And Demand Of XRP Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Supply and Demand of XRP. Unlike other digital assets such as bitcoin or ether, XRP is not and was not mined gradually over time. Instead, all 100 billion XRP tokens were created at the time of the XRP Ledger’s launch in 2012. This means that every XRP token that exists today, or will ever exist, was generated from the outset of the XRP Ledger. As a result, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be adjusted in response to economic conditions. For instance, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be increased to meet rising demand, which could lead to price volatility. In addition, unlike blockchains that utilize “proof-of-work” or “proof-of-stake” where miners or stakers are rewarded with newly minted coins or tokens, XRP validators are not incentivized by block rewards since there is no new issuance of XRP. Additionally, the fixed supply of XRP, combined with the burning of XRP (permanently destroyed) as transaction fees, could create deflationary pressure over time. A small amount of XRP is burned with every transaction to prevent spam on the network. While the amount of XRP burned per transaction is minuscule, over time, the total supply of XRP will slowly decrease. This could lead to a deflationary environment where the decreasing supply drives up the price of XRP, making it less practical as a medium of exchange. Additionally, as the total supply of XRP slowly shrinks due to burning, liquidity could become an issue in the distant future, potentially making it harder for businesses and users to access sufficient XRP for their transactions. The fixed supply of XRP could also contribute to price volatility, especially if demand fluctuates significantly. Since the supply of XRP is fixed, any significant surge in demand can result in large price spikes. This volatility could make XRP less predictable for businesses that rely on it for payments. The fixed supply of XRP may also not scale well with rapidly expanding use cases. To the extent more businesses, financial institutions, and payment providers adopt XRP for cross-border transactions and other use cases, there is a risk that the fixed supply may not meet such growing demand, leading to supply shortages and further price volatility. Ripple Labs holds a large portion (approximately 38-40 billion XRP as of February 2026) of the XRP supply, which has led to concerns about centralization. Despite escrow mechanisms that gradually release XRP into the market, Ripple Labs still retains control over a significant portion of XRP, which can impact market dynamics (e.g., supply and demand and volatility) if large amounts are sold. The concentration of XRP in the hands of Ripple Labs and early stakeholders could affect the market’s confidence in XRP as a decentralized asset.
XRP Investing Risk, Adoption And Use Of XRP Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Adoption and Use of XRP. The continued adoption of XRP will require growth in its usage as a means of exchange and payment. Even if growth in XRP adoption continues in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that XRP usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in the use of XRP may result in a lack of liquidity, increased volatility in and a reduction to the price of XRP.
XRP Investing Risk, Largely Unregulated Marketplace Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Largely Unregulated Marketplace. Digital asset markets, including spot markets for XRP, are growing rapidly. The spot markets through which XRP and other digital assets trade are new and, in some cases, may be subject to but not comply with their relevant jurisdiction’s regulations. These markets are local, national and international and include a broadening range of digital assets and participants. Significant trading may occur on systems and platforms with minimum predictability. Spot markets may impose daily, weekly, monthly or customer-specific transaction or withdrawal limits or suspend withdrawals entirely, rendering the exchange of XRP for fiat currency difficult or impossible. Digital asset exchanges do not appear to be subject to, or may not comply with, regulation in a similar manner as other regulated trading platforms, such as national securities exchanges or designated contract markets. Many digital asset exchanges are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions. As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset exchanges is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. Furthermore, many spot markets lack certain safeguards put in place by more traditional exchanges to enhance the stability of trading on the exchange and prevent flash crashes, such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of digital assets such as XRP on digital asset exchanges may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities (such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading) may not be available to or employed by digital asset exchanges or may not exist at all. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, these venues. The closure or temporary shutdown of XRP exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the XRP Ledger and can slow down the mass adoption of XRP. Further, spot market failures or that of any other major component of the overall XRP ecosystem can have an adverse effect on XRP markets and the price of XRP and could therefore have a negative impact on the performance of the Fund. Furthermore, the closure or temporary shutdown of an XRP spot market may impact the Fund’s ability to determine the value of its XRP holdings or for the Fund’s Authorized Participants to effectively arbitrage the Shares.
XRP Investing Risk, Cybersecurity Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Cybersecurity. As a digital asset, XRP is subject to the risk that malicious actors will exploit flaws in its code or structure that will allow them to, among other things, steal XRP held by others, control the blockchain, or steal personally identifying information. The occurrence of any of these events is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the price and liquidity of XRP and any XRP-related investments and therefore the value of an investment in the Fund.
XRP Investing Risk, Forks Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Forks. XRP, along with many other digital assets, are open source projects. The infrastructure and ecosystem that powers the XRP Ledger are developed by different parties, including affiliated and non-affiliated engineers, developers, validators, platform developers, evangelists, marketers, exchange operators and other companies based around a service regarding XRP, each of whom may have different motivations, drivers, philosophies and incentives. Forks may have a detrimental effect on the value of XRP. Forks can also introduce new security risks.
Risks Related To The Regulation Of XRP Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Risks Related to the Regulation of XRP. Any final determination by a court that XRP or any other digital asset is a “security” or “commodity” may adversely affect the value of XRP and the value of the Fund’s shares, and, if XRP is not, or cannot, be registered as a security, result in a potential termination of the Fund. Depending on its characteristics, a digital asset may be considered a “security” under the federal securities laws. The test for determining whether a particular digital asset is a “security” is complex and difficult to apply, and the outcome is difficult to predict. Public, though non-binding, statements by senior officials at the SEC have indicated that the SEC did not consider Bitcoin or ETH to be securities, and does not currently consider Bitcoin to be a security. The SEC staff has also provided informal assurances via no-action letter to a handful of promoters that their digital assets are not securities. The SEC staff’s guidance regarding whether a digital asset is or is not a security is not determinative or binding and a court may come to a different conclusion. On the other hand, the SEC has brought enforcement actions against the issuers and promoters of several digital assets on the basis that the digital assets in question are securities. More recently, the SEC has also brought enforcement actions against various digital asset trading platforms for allegedly operating unregistered securities exchanges on the basis that certain of the digital assets traded on their platforms are securities. For example, in June 2023, the SEC brought a complaint against Coinbase (the “Coinbase Complaint”) alleging violations of a variety of securities laws. In its complaints, the SEC asserted that XRP is a security under the federal securities laws. In February 2025, the SEC withdrew the Coinbase Complaint. Whether a digital asset is a security under the federal securities laws depends on whether it is included in the lists of instruments making up the definition of “security” in the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 1940 Act. Digital assets as such do not appear in any of these lists, although each list includes the terms “investment contract,” “note,” and “transferable shares” and the SEC has typically analyzed whether a particular digital asset is a security by reference to whether it meets the tests developed by the federal courts interpreting these terms, known as the Howey and Reves tests, respectively. For many digital assets, whether or not the Howey or Reves tests are met is difficult to resolve definitively, and substantial legal arguments can often be made both in favor of and against a particular digital asset qualifying as a security under one or both tests. Adding to the complexity, the courts, the SEC and the SEC staff have indicated that the security status of a particular instrument, such as a digital asset, can change over time as the relevant facts evolve. As part of determining whether XRP is a security for purposes of the federal securities laws, the Fund takes into account a number of factors, including the various definitions of “security” under the federal securities laws and federal court decisions interpreting elements of these definitions, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in the Howey and Reves cases, as well as reports, orders, press releases, public statements and speeches by the SEC, its commissioners and its staff providing guidance on when a digital asset may be a security for purposes of the federal securities laws. Through this process, and the recent listing of CFTC regulated futures contracts, a reasonable argument exists that XRP is not a security for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in light of the uncertainties inherent in the Howey and Reves tests. If an appropriate court determines that XRP is a security, the Adviser would not intend to permit the Fund to continue holding its investments in a way that would violate the federal securities laws (and therefore, if necessary, would either dissolve the Fund or potentially seek to operate the Fund in a manner that complies with the federal securities laws).
Digital Assets/Cryptocurrency Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Digital Assets/Cryptocurrency Risk. The performance of the Reference Asset, and consequently the Fund’s performance, is subject to the risks of the digital assets/cryptocurrency industry. The trading prices of many digital assets, including the Reference Asset, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of the Reference Asset, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the Fund’s shares (“Shares”) and the Shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. The value of the Shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the fundamental investment characteristics of the Reference Asset as a digital asset, including the fact that digital assets are bearer instruments and loss, theft, destruction, or compromise of the associated private keys could result in permanent loss of the asset, and the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies. Digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry, and the value of the Shares depends on the acceptance of the Reference Asset. Changes in the governance of a digital asset network may not receive sufficient support from users and validators, which may negatively affect that digital asset network’s ability to grow and respond to challenges. Cryptocurrencies, such as the Reference Asset, are a subset of digital assets designed to act as a medium of exchange. Despite being referred to as “currencies,” crypto assets are not widely accepted as a means of payment, are not backed by any government or central bank, and are not legal tender. The value of digital assets is determined by supply and demand in the global markets, which consist primarily of transactions of the respective digital assets on electronic trading platforms or trading venues. Unlike the exchanges for more traditional assets, the regulation of digital asset trading platforms is highly fragmented. Due to the fragmentation and lack of oversight of these trading venues, there is a heightened potential for fraud and manipulation. Regulation in the U.S. is still developing.
Reference Asset ETF Investing Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Reference Asset ETF Investing Risk. Issuer-specific attributes related to ETFs in which the Fund may invest may cause an investment held by the Fund to be more volatile than the market generally. The value of an individual security or asset or particular type of security or asset may be more volatile than the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. When the Fund invests in ETFs it will incur costs associated with such funds, including management fees and fees and expenses borne by shareholders of such ETFs. The value of shares in an ETF may not replicate the performance of the Reference Asset and the Fund’s investments in the ETFs will not perform exactly the same as the Fund’s direct investments in the Reference Asset. However, the Adviser will still seek to invest as much of the Fund’s portfolio assets into the Reference Asset directly rather than through a Reference ETF provided that the Fund will always have at least 40% of its assets in securities. The following is a summary of risk factors related to the ETFs that invest in the Reference Assets as identified by the ETFs in their registration statements – this is not purported to be a complete list of risks (references to “shares” in this section are to shares of an ETF).
Risk Factors Related To Digital Assets Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Risk Factors Related to Digital Assets •The Reference Asset and investments linked to the Reference Asset are relatively new investments, they present unique and substantial risks, and investing in Reference Asset has been subject to significant price volatility. The trading prices of many digital assets, including the Reference Asset, have experienced extreme volatility in recent periods and may continue to do so. Extreme volatility in the future, including further declines in the trading prices of Reference Asset, could have a material adverse effect on the value of the shares and the shares could lose all or substantially all of their value. •The value of the Reference Asset has been and may continue to be deeply speculative such that trading and investing in the Reference Asset intraday may not be based on fundamental analysis. Individuals and organizations holding large amounts of the Reference Asset known as “whales” may have the ability to manipulate the price of the Reference Asset. The value of the shares is subject to a number of factors relating to the fundamental investment characteristics of the Reference Asset as a digital asset, including the fact that digital assets are bearer instruments and loss, theft, destruction, or compromise of the associated private keys could result in permanent loss of the asset, and the capabilities and development of blockchain technologies. For example, a blockchain may be subject to attack by a group of miners or validators that possess more than 50% of the blockchain’s hashing power. The value of the Fund’s investments in the Reference Asset may be adversely affected by such an attack. •Digital assets represent a new and rapidly evolving industry, and the value of the shares depends on the acceptance of the Reference Asset. •Changes in the governance of a digital asset network may not receive sufficient support from users and miners, which may negatively affect that digital asset network’s ability to grow and respond to challenges.
Risk Factors Related To The Digital Asset Platforms Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Risk Factors Related to the Digital Asset Platforms •The value of the Shares relates directly to the value of the Reference Asset, the value of which may be highly volatile and subject to fluctuations due to a number of factors. •Proposed changes to the Reference Asset blockchain protocol may not be adopted by a sufficient number of validators or miners, which may result in competing blockchains with different native crypto assets and sets of participants (known as a “fork”). The value of an investment in the Fund may be negatively impacted by a temporary or permanent “fork”. •The Reference Asset blockchain protocol may contain flaws that can be exploited by attackers and which may adversely affect the value of Reference Asset and the Fund’s investments. Flaws in the source code for digital assets have been exploited including flaws that disabled some functionality for users, exposed users’ personal information and/or resulted in the theft of users’ digital assets. The cryptography underlying the Reference Asset could prove to be flawed or ineffective, or developments in mathematics and/or technology, including advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, could result in such cryptography becoming ineffective. In any of these circumstances, a malicious actor may be able to compromise the security of the Reference Asset’s network or take the Trust’s Reference Asset, which would adversely affect the value of the Fund. Exposure of the Reference Asset to instability in other speculative parts of the blockchain and crypto industry, such as through an event that is not necessarily related to the security or utility of Reference Asset blockchain can nonetheless precipitate a significant decline in the price of the Reference Asset and an investment in the Fund. •As of February 28, 2026, there are over 18,000 alternative digital assets with a total market capitalization of approximately $2.53 trillion. Many consortiums and financial institutions are also researching and investing resources into private or permissioned smart contract platforms. Competition from the emergence or growth of alternative digital assets and smart contracts platforms could have a negative impact on the demand for, and price of, the Reference Asset and thereby adversely affect the value of the Fund. •Use of the Reference Asset by consumers and institutions as a medium of exchange in commerce may be limited. Banks and other established financial institutions may refuse to process funds for Reference Asset transactions; process wire transfers to or from digital asset platforms, Reference Asset-related companies or service providers; or maintain accounts for persons or entities transacting in the Reference Asset. Processing of transactions in the Reference Asset may be slow, transaction fees may be subject to significant variability. As a result, the price of the Reference Asset may be influenced to a significant extent by speculators and miners, thus contributing to price volatility that makes retailers less likely to accept it as a form of payment in the future.
Risk Factors Related To The Regulation Of The Reference Asset Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Risk Factors Related to the Regulation of the Reference Asset •There are risks regarding new or changing laws and regulations that may affect the use of blockchain technology and/or investments in crypto assets. Digital asset platforms in the U.S. exist in a state of regulatory uncertainty, and adverse legislative or regulatory developments could significantly harm the value of the Reference Asset, such as by banning, restricting or imposing onerous conditions or prohibitions on the use of the Reference Asset, mining activity, digital wallets, the provision of services related to trading and custodying the Reference Asset, the operation of the Reference Asset network, or the digital asset platforms generally. Accordingly, future regulatory changes may have a material adverse impact on the Fund’s investments and its ability to implement its investment strategy. •If regulators subject the Reference Asset to regulation, this could result in extraordinary expenses that could potentially be borne by the Fund. •The treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal, state and local income tax purposes is uncertain.
Exchange-Traded Products Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Exchange-Traded Products Risk. The Fund invests in other ETFs and ETPs, including those based outside the United States. These investments carry the same risks as the securities they hold and may trade at prices above or below the value of their holdings. Non-U.S. ETPs are not registered investment companies and are subject to different regulations than U.S. ETFs. They may also be taxed differently for U.S. investors, which could increase the Fund’s taxable income or cause the Fund to sell investments at unfavorable times to meet tax requirements.
Subsidiary Investment Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Subsidiary Investment Risk. Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which the Fund and the XRP Subsidiary are organized, respectively, could result in the inability of the Fund to operate as intended and could negatively affect the Fund and its shareholders. The XRP Subsidiary is not registered under the 1940 Act and is not subject to all the investor protections of the 1940 Act. Thus, the Fund, as an investor in the XRP Subsidiary, will not have all the protections offered to investors in registered investment companies.
Reverse Repurchase Agreement Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Reverse Repurchase Agreement Risk. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale by the Fund of a security to a party for a specified price, with the simultaneous agreement by the Fund to repurchase that security from that party on a future date at a higher price. Similar to borrowing, reverse repurchase agreements provide the Fund with cash for investment purposes, which creates leverage and subjects the Fund to the risks of leverage. Reverse repurchase agreements also involve the risk that the other party may fail to return the securities in a timely manner or at all. The Fund could lose money if it is unable to recover the securities and/or if the value of collateral held by the Fund, including the value of the investments made with cash collateral, is less than the value of securities.
Concentration Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Concentration Risk. The Fund’s assets will be concentrated in the sector or sectors or industry or group of industries that are assigned to the Reference Asset, which will subject the Fund to the risk that economic, political or other conditions that have a negative effect on those sectors and/or industries may negatively impact the Fund to a greater extent than if the Fund’s assets were invested in a wider variety of sectors or industries.
Cyber Security Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Cyber Security Risk. The Fund and its service providers, such as the custodian, are susceptible to operational risks through breaches in cyber security. A breach in cyber security refers to both intentional and unintentional events that may cause the Fund and its service providers to lose proprietary information, suffer data corruption or lose operational capacity. Such events could cause the Fund to incur regulatory penalties, reputational damage, additional compliance costs associated with corrective measures and/or financial loss, including loss of the Reference Asset. Cyber security breaches may involve unauthorized access to the Fund’s digital information systems through hacking or malicious software coding but may also result from outside attacks such as denial-of-service attacks through efforts to make network services unavailable to intended users. In addition, cyber security breaches of the issuers of securities in which the Fund invests or the Fund’s third-party service providers, such as its administrator, transfer agent, custodian, or sub- advisor, as applicable, can also subject the Fund to many of the same risks associated with direct cyber security breaches. Although the Fund has established risk management systems designed to reduce the risks associated with cyber security, there is no guarantee that such efforts will succeed, especially because the Fund does not directly control the cyber security systems of issuers or third-party service providers.
Custodian Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Custodian Risk. The Reference Asset and other assets held by the Fund that operate on distributed ledger/blockchain technology can only be transferred by the person holding both the public and private keys to the digital wallet in which the asset is held. The Fund’s Crypto Custodian that custodies the Fund’s digital assets is in control of the private keys for the Fund’s digital wallets. In the event such custodian loses sole control of the private keys (e.g., through a data breach or hack), the Fund’s digital assets held by such custodian could be lost. The Fund’s custodian uses hardware security modules (HSMs) as part of their security architecture. An HSM is a specialized device that can generate and hold private keys securely and can use those keys to sign and approve transactions. The HSMs’ custom logic verifies that all sensitive requests (withdrawals, policy changes, new user additions, etc.) are approved by a valid quorum of client users and also approved by the custodian, and they provide on-demand private key accessibility.
Foreign Securities Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Foreign Securities Risk. To the extent the Fund invests in securities of foreign ETFs, such investments may be subject to additional risks not typically associated with investments in domestic securities. These risks may include, among others, currency risk, country risks (political, diplomatic, regional conflicts, terrorism, war, social and economic instability, currency devaluations and policies that have the effect of limiting or restricting foreign investment or the movement of assets), different trading practices, less government supervision, less publicly available information, limited trading markets and greater volatility.
ETF Risks Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	ETF Risks. The Fund is an exchange-traded fund, and, as a result of an ETF’s structure, it is exposed to the following risks: •Authorized Participants, Market Makers, and Liquidity Providers Limitation Risk. The Fund has a limited number of financial institutions that may act as Authorized Participants (“APs”). In addition, there may be a limited number of market makers and/or liquidity providers in the marketplace. To the extent either of the following events occur, shares of the Fund (“Shares”) may trade at a material discount to NAV and possibly face delisting: (i) APs exit the business or otherwise become unable to process creation and/or redemption orders and no other APs step forward to perform these services, or (ii) market makers and/or liquidity providers exit the business or significantly reduce their business activities and no other entities step forward to perform their functions. •Cash Redemption Risk. The Fund intends to redeem Shares for cash or to otherwise include cash as part of its redemption proceeds. The Fund may be required to sell or unwind portfolio investments to obtain the cash needed to distribute redemption proceeds. This may cause the Fund to recognize a capital gain that it might not have recognized if it had made a redemption in-kind. As a result, the Fund may pay out higher annual capital gain distributions than if the in-kind redemption process was used. •Costs of Buying or Selling Shares. Due to the costs of buying or selling Shares, including brokerage commissions imposed by brokers and bid/ask spreads, frequent trading of Shares may significantly reduce investment results and an investment in Shares may not be advisable for investors who anticipate regularly making small investments. •Shares May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, Shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of Shares will approximate the Fund’s NAV, there may be times when the market price of Shares is more than the NAV intra-day (premium) or less than the NAV intra-day (discount) due to supply and demand of Shares or during periods of market volatility. This risk is heightened in times of market volatility and volatility in the Fund’s portfolio holdings, periods of steep market declines, and periods when there is limited trading activity for Shares in the secondary market, in which case such premiums or discounts may be significant. If an investor purchases Shares at a time when the market price is at a premium to the NAV of the Shares or sells at a time when the market price is at a discount to the NAV of the Shares, then the investor may sustain losses that are in addition to any losses caused by a decrease in NAV. •Trading. Although Shares are listed for trading on a national securities exchange, and may be traded on other U.S. exchanges, there can be no assurance that Shares will trade with any volume, or at all, on any stock exchange. In stressed market conditions, the liquidity of Shares may begin to mirror the liquidity of the Fund’s underlying portfolio holdings, which can be significantly less liquid than Fund Shares.
ETF Risks, Authorized Participants, Market Makers, And Liquidity Providers Limitation Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Authorized Participants, Market Makers, and Liquidity Providers Limitation Risk. The Fund has a limited number of financial institutions that may act as Authorized Participants (“APs”). In addition, there may be a limited number of market makers and/or liquidity providers in the marketplace. To the extent either of the following events occur, shares of the Fund (“Shares”) may trade at a material discount to NAV and possibly face delisting: (i) APs exit the business or otherwise become unable to process creation and/or redemption orders and no other APs step forward to perform these services, or (ii) market makers and/or liquidity providers exit the business or significantly reduce their business activities and no other entities step forward to perform their functions.
ETF Risks, Cash Redemption Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Cash Redemption Risk. The Fund intends to redeem Shares for cash or to otherwise include cash as part of its redemption proceeds. The Fund may be required to sell or unwind portfolio investments to obtain the cash needed to distribute redemption proceeds. This may cause the Fund to recognize a capital gain that it might not have recognized if it had made a redemption in-kind. As a result, the Fund may pay out higher annual capital gain distributions than if the in-kind redemption process was used.
ETF Risks, Costs Of Buying Or Selling Shares Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Costs of Buying or Selling Shares. Due to the costs of buying or selling Shares, including brokerage commissions imposed by brokers and bid/ask spreads, frequent trading of Shares may significantly reduce investment results and an investment in Shares may not be advisable for investors who anticipate regularly making small investments.
ETF Risks, Shares May Trade At Prices Other Than NAV Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Shares May Trade at Prices Other Than NAV. As with all ETFs, Shares may be bought and sold in the secondary market at market prices. Although it is expected that the market price of Shares will approximate the Fund’s NAV, there may be times when the market price of Shares is more than the NAV intra-day (premium) or less than the NAV intra-day (discount) due to supply and demand of Shares or during periods of market volatility. This risk is heightened in times of market volatility and volatility in the Fund’s portfolio holdings, periods of steep market declines, and periods when there is limited trading activity for Shares in the secondary market, in which case such premiums or discounts may be significant. If an investor purchases Shares at a time when the market price is at a premium to the NAV of the Shares or sells at a time when the market price is at a discount to the NAV of the Shares, then the investor may sustain losses that are in addition to any losses caused by a decrease in NAV.
ETF Risks, Trading Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Trading. Although Shares are listed for trading on a national securities exchange, and may be traded on other U.S. exchanges, there can be no assurance that Shares will trade with any volume, or at all, on any stock exchange. In stressed market conditions, the liquidity of Shares may begin to mirror the liquidity of the Fund’s underlying portfolio holdings, which can be significantly less liquid than Fund Shares.
Inflation Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.
Indirect Investment Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Indirect Investment Risk. Neither the Reference Asset nor the XRP Ledger are affiliated with the Trust, the Fund, or the Adviser, or any affiliates thereof and are not involved with this offering in any way, and have no obligation to consider the Fund in taking any actions that might affect the value of the Fund. None of the Trust, the Fund, the Adviser, or any affiliate are responsible for the performance of the Reference Asset and make no representation as to the performance of the Reference Asset. Investing in the Fund is not equivalent to investing in the Reference Asset.
Non-Correlation Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Non-Correlation Risk. The performance of the fund will not, and is not intended to, correlate exactly to the performance of the Reference Asset and will vary somewhat due to factors such as fees and expenses of the Fund and the Reference ETFs, transaction costs, regulatory restrictions, and active management of the Fund’s portfolio.
New Fund Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	New Fund Risk. As of the date of this prospectus, the Fund has less than a year of operations and currently has fewer assets than larger funds. Like other new funds, large inflows and outflows may impact the Fund’s market exposure for limited periods of time. This impact may be positive or negative, depending on the direction of market movement during the period affected.
Operational Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Operational Risk. The Fund is subject to risks arising from various operational factors, including, but not limited to, human error, processing and communication errors, errors of the Fund’s service providers, counterparties or other third-parties, failed or inadequate processes and technology or systems failures. The Fund relies on third-parties for a range of services, including custody. Any delay or failure relating to engaging or maintaining such service providers may affect the Fund’s ability to meet its investment objective. Although the Fund and Adviser seek to reduce these operational risks through controls and procedures, there is no way to completely protect against such risks.
Economic And Market Events Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Economic and Market Events Risk. Events in the U.S. and global financial markets, including actions taken by the U.S. Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to stimulate or stabilize economic growth, may at times, and for varying periods of time, result in unusually high market volatility, which could negatively impact the Fund’s performance and cause the Fund to experience illiquidity, shareholder redemptions, or other potentially adverse effects. Reduced liquidity in credit and fixed-income markets could negatively affect issuers worldwide. Banks and financial services companies could suffer losses if interest rates rise or economic conditions deteriorate.
Tax Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Tax Risk. The Fund will qualify as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”) for tax purposes if, among other things, it satisfies a source-of-income test and an asset-diversification test. Investing in XRP (or any other digital asset) or derivatives based upon XRP (or any other digital assets) presents a risk for the Fund because income from such investments would not qualify as good income under the source-of-income test. The Fund will gain exposure to the Reference Asset through investments in the XRP Subsidiary, which is intended to provide the Fund with exposure to XRP returns while enabling the Fund to satisfy source-of-income requirements. There is some uncertainty about how the XRP Subsidiary will be treated for tax purposes and thus whether the Fund can maintain exposure to XRP returns without risking its status as a RIC for tax purposes. Failing to qualify as a RIC for tax purposes and not curing such failure could have adverse consequences for the Fund and its shareholders, including that both the income of the Fund and dividends paid to its shareholders would be subject to U.S. federal income tax and that such taxes applied at the Fund level would correspondingly reduce the NAV of the Fund. These issues are described in more detail in the section entitled “ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT RISK – Tax Risk” below, as well as in the Fund’s SAI.
U.S. Government Securities Risk Member
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	U.S. Government Securities Risk. U.S. government securities are subject to interest rate risk but generally do not involve the credit risks associated with investments in other types of debt securities. As a result, the yields available from U.S. government securities are generally lower than the yields available from other debt securities. U.S. government securities are guaranteed only as to the timely payment of interest and the payment of principal when held to maturity.
Risk Lose Money [Member]
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	As with all funds, a shareholder is subject to the risk that his or her investment could lose money.
Risk Not Insured Depository Institution [Member]
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) or any government agency.
Risk Nondiversified Status [Member]
Prospectus [Line Items]
Risk [Text Block]	Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is non-diversified, it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund. As a result, a decline in the value of an investment in a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers could cause the Fund’s overall value to decline to a greater degree than if the Fund held a more diversified portfolio.

Investment Risks - REX-Osprey(TM) XRP ETF

Jun. 30, 2026

XRP Investing Risk. Cryptocurrencies, such as XRP, operate without central authority or banks and are not backed by any government. Cryptocurrencies are often referred to as a “virtual asset” or “digital asset,” and operate as a decentralized, peer-to-peer financial trading platform and value storage that is used like money. A cryptocurrency is also not a legal tender. Investments linked to XRP can be highly volatile compared to investments in traditional securities and the Fund may experience sudden and large losses. The markets for XRP and XRP-related investments may become illiquid. These markets may fluctuate widely based on a variety of factors including changes in overall market movements, political and economic events, wars, acts of terrorism, natural disasters (including disease, epidemics and pandemics) and changes in interest rates or inflation rates. An investor should be prepared to lose the full principal value of their investment suddenly and without warning. A number of factors affect the price and market for XRP:

•New Technology. XRP is a relatively new technological innovation with a limited operating history. XRP has a relatively limited history of existence and operations. There is a limited established performance record for the price of XRP and, in turn, a limited basis for evaluating an investment in XRP.

•Supply and Demand of XRP. Unlike other digital assets such as bitcoin or ether, XRP is not and was not mined gradually over time. Instead, all 100 billion XRP tokens were created at the time of the XRP Ledger’s launch in 2012. This means that every XRP token that exists today, or will ever exist, was generated from the outset of the XRP Ledger. As a result, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be adjusted in response to economic conditions. For instance, there is no ability for the supply of XRP to be increased to meet rising demand, which

could lead to price volatility. In addition, unlike blockchains that utilize “proof-of-work” or “proof-of-stake” where miners or stakers are rewarded with newly minted coins or tokens, XRP validators are not incentivized by block rewards since there is no new issuance of XRP.

Additionally, the fixed supply of XRP, combined with the burning of XRP (permanently destroyed) as transaction fees, could create deflationary pressure over time. A small amount of XRP is burned with every transaction to prevent spam on the network. While the amount of XRP burned per transaction is minuscule, over time, the total supply of XRP will slowly decrease. This could lead to a deflationary environment where the decreasing supply drives up the price of XRP, making it less practical as a medium of exchange. Additionally, as the total supply of XRP slowly shrinks due to burning, liquidity could become an issue in the distant future, potentially making it harder for businesses and users to access sufficient XRP for their transactions.

The fixed supply of XRP could also contribute to price volatility, especially if demand fluctuates significantly. Since the supply of XRP is fixed, any significant surge in demand can result in large price spikes. This volatility could make XRP less predictable for businesses that rely on it for payments. The fixed supply of XRP may also not scale well with rapidly expanding use cases. To the extent more businesses, financial institutions, and payment providers adopt XRP for cross-border transactions and other use cases, there is a risk that the fixed supply may not meet such growing demand, leading to supply shortages and further price volatility.

Ripple Labs holds a large portion (approximately 38-40 billion XRP as of February 2026) of the XRP supply, which has led to concerns about centralization. Despite escrow mechanisms that gradually release XRP into the market, Ripple Labs still retains control over a significant portion of XRP, which can impact market dynamics (e.g., supply and demand and volatility) if large amounts are sold. The concentration of XRP in the hands of Ripple Labs and early stakeholders could affect the market’s confidence in XRP as a decentralized asset.

•Adoption and Use of XRP. The continued adoption of XRP will require growth in its usage as a means of exchange and payment. Even if growth in XRP adoption continues in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that XRP usage will continue to grow over the long-term. A contraction in the use of XRP may result in a lack of liquidity, increased volatility in and a reduction to the price of XRP.

•Largely Unregulated Marketplace. Digital asset markets, including spot markets for XRP, are growing rapidly. The spot markets through which XRP and other digital assets trade are new and, in some cases, may be subject to but not comply with their relevant jurisdiction’s regulations. These markets are local, national and international and include a broadening range of digital assets and participants. Significant trading may occur on systems and platforms with minimum predictability. Spot markets may impose daily, weekly, monthly or customer-specific transaction or withdrawal limits or suspend withdrawals entirely, rendering the exchange of XRP for fiat currency difficult or impossible.

Digital asset exchanges do not appear to be subject to, or may not comply with, regulation in a similar manner as other regulated trading platforms, such as national securities exchanges or designated contract markets. Many digital asset exchanges are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without extensive supervision by governmental authorities, and do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management team, corporate practices, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance. In particular, those located outside the United States may be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions.

As a result, trading activity on or reported by these digital asset exchanges is generally significantly less regulated than trading in regulated U.S. securities and commodities markets, and may reflect behavior that would be prohibited in regulated U.S. trading venues. Furthermore, many spot markets lack certain safeguards put in place by more traditional exchanges to enhance the stability of trading on the exchange and prevent flash crashes, such as limit-down circuit breakers. As a result, the prices of digital assets such as XRP on digital asset exchanges may be subject to larger and/or more frequent sudden declines than assets traded on more traditional exchanges. Tools to detect and deter fraudulent or manipulative trading activities (such as market manipulation, front-running of trades, and wash-trading) may not be available to or employed by digital asset

exchanges or may not exist at all. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, these venues.

The closure or temporary shutdown of XRP exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in the XRP Ledger and can slow down the mass adoption of XRP. Further, spot market failures or that of any other major component of the overall XRP ecosystem can have an adverse effect on XRP markets and the price of XRP and could therefore have a negative impact on the performance of the Fund. Furthermore, the closure or temporary shutdown of an XRP spot market may impact the Fund’s ability to determine the value of its XRP holdings or for the Fund’s Authorized Participants to effectively arbitrage the Shares.

•Cybersecurity. As a digital asset, XRP is subject to the risk that malicious actors will exploit flaws in its code or structure that will allow them to, among other things, steal XRP held by others, control the blockchain, or steal personally identifying information. The occurrence of any of these events is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the price and liquidity of XRP and any XRP-related investments and therefore the value of an investment in the Fund.

•Forks. XRP, along with many other digital assets, are open source projects. The infrastructure and ecosystem that powers the XRP Ledger are developed by different parties, including affiliated and non-affiliated engineers, developers, validators, platform developers, evangelists, marketers, exchange operators and other companies based around a service regarding XRP, each of whom may have different motivations, drivers, philosophies and incentives.

Forks may have a detrimental effect on the value of XRP. Forks can also introduce new security risks.