Contingencies |
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
May 28, 2026 | |
| Loss Contingency [Abstract] | |
| Contingencies | Contingencies We are currently a party to legal actions other than those described below arising from the normal course of business, none of which are expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Patent Matters As is typical in the semiconductor and other high-tech industries, from time to time, others have asserted, and may in the future assert, that our products or manufacturing processes infringe upon their intellectual property rights. A description of certain claims is below. On April 28, 2021, Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) filed two patent infringement actions against Micron, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. (“MSP”), and Micron Technology Texas, LLC (“MTEC”) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (“W.D. Tex.”). The first complaint alleges that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our non-volatile dual in-line memory modules. The second complaint alleges that three U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our load-reduced dual in-line memory modules (“LRDIMMs”). Each complaint seeks injunctive relief, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On March 31, 2022, Netlist filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and Micron Semiconductor (Deutschland) GmbH (“MSG”) in Düsseldorf Regional Court alleging that two German patents are infringed by certain of our LRDIMMs. The complaint seeks damages, costs, and injunctive relief. In rulings issued on March 7, 2024 and November 7, 2024, the Federal Patent Court in Germany declared both patents invalid. Netlist appealed those rulings. On May 21, 2026, the appeals court affirmed the ruling of invalidity of the first patent. The appeal regarding the second patent has not yet been decided. On June 10, 2022, Netlist filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“E.D. Tex.”) alleging that six U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our memory modules and HBM products. On August 1, 2022, Netlist filed a second patent infringement complaint against the same defendants in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our LRDIMMs. On August 15, 2022, Netlist amended the second complaint to assert that two additional U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our LRDIMMs. The complaints in E.D. Tex. seek injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys’ fees. On May 23, 2024, following a four-day trial regarding the second complaint filed by Netlist in the E.D. Tex., a jury rendered a verdict that Micron’s memory modules infringe two asserted patents—U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912 (“the ‘912 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 11,093,417 (“the ‘417 patent”)—and found that Micron should pay $425 million for infringement of the ‘912 patent and $20 million for infringement of the ‘417 patent. On July 9, 2025, Micron filed a notice that it will appeal the judgment. On April 17, 2024, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a final written decision (“FWD”) finding unpatentable the sole asserted claim of the ‘912 patent. On September 10, 2024, Netlist filed a notice that it will appeal the ruling that the ‘912 patent is unpatentable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”). On July 30, 2024, the USPTO issued a FWD finding unpatentable all asserted claims of the ‘417 patent. On December 10, 2024, Netlist filed a notice that it will appeal the ruling that the ‘417 patent is unpatentable to the Federal Circuit. In the case of each of the ‘912 and ‘417 patents, if the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirms the FWD, then the affirmed FWD will preclude any pending actions asserting infringement of such patent (including enforcement of the infringement verdict). On May 19, 2025, Netlist filed a complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by our HBM products. On July 8, 2025, Netlist amended the complaint to allege that one additional U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our DIMMs. On March 6, 2026, the E.D. Tex. transferred the case to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (“D. Del.”) pursuant to a motion by Micron to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. On July 28, 2025, Netlist filed an additional complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our DIMMs. On April 1, 2026, the E.D. Tex. transferred the additional case to D. Del. These complaints seek damages, attorneys’ fees, and other equitable relief. On January 23, 2023, BeSang Inc. filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron in E.D. Tex. The complaint alleges that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and SSD products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On September 17, 2025, the District Court issued a judgment that the accused products do not infringe the asserted patent. On October 17, 2025, BeSang filed a notice of appeal of the District Court’s judgment. On November 9, 2023, Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. (“YMTC”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and one of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (“N.D. Cal.”). The complaint alleges that eight U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On January 22, 2024, Micron Semiconductor (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“MSS”) was served with three patent infringement complaints filed by YMTC in Beijing Intellectual Property Court and on February 27, 2024, Micron was served with the same complaints. The complaints assert that Micron and MSS infringed three Chinese patents owned by YMTC by importing, selling, offering for sale, and assisting others to sell certain 3D NAND products and SSDs in China. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On July 12, 2024, YMTC filed a second complaint against Micron and its subsidiary in N.D. Cal. The second complaint alleges that eleven U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and DDR5 DRAM products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On September 11, 2024, MSS was served with five patent infringement complaints filed by YMTC in Shanghai Intellectual Property Court. The complaints assert that Micron and MSS infringed five Chinese patents owned by YMTC by importing, selling, offering for sale, and assisting others to sell certain 3D NAND products and SSDs in China. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On October 6, 2025, YMTC filed several patent infringement complaints against Micron and certain of its subsidiaries alleging that the Company’s manufacture, importation, sale, offering for sale, and/or assisting others to sell certain NAND and DRAM products infringe certain patents owned by YMTC. Specifically, YMTC filed the following complaints: A patent infringement complaint against Micron, MSP, and MTEC in E.D. Tex. alleging that seven patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products and one patent is infringed by certain of our LPDRAM products; a patent infringement complaint in the London Chancery Division of the English High Court against Micron and Micron Europe Limited (“MEL”) alleging that three patents are infringed by certain of our NAND and DRAM products; three complaints against Micron and various combinations of subsidiaries, including MEL, MSP, MSG, and Micron Semiconductor France SAS in the Unified Patent Court in Dusseldorf, Germany, alleging that three patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND and LPDRAM products; and five complaints against Micron, MEL, and MSG in Munich Regional Court in Munich, Germany, alleging that five patents are infringed by certain of our 3D NAND products. Each of the complaints filed against us by YMTC on October 6, 2025, seeks an injunction, attorneys’ fees, damages, and costs. On June 30, 2025, Advanced Memory Technologies, LLC (“AMT”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron in W.D. Tex. alleging that four U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DRAM and NAND products. On November 4, 2025, AMT amended the complaint to allege that a fifth patent is infringed by certain of our DRAM products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On March 6, 2026, Nextech Semiconductor, LLC (“Nextech”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Micron and MSP in W.D. Tex. alleging that six U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our DRAM, NAND, and SSD products. The complaint seeks an injunction, damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The above lawsuits pertain to substantially all of our DRAM, NAND, and other memory and storage products we manufacture, which account for substantially all of our revenue. Securities Class Action Matters On January 9, 2025, a putative class action complaint was filed against Micron and certain officers in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On April 3, 2025, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (“D. Idaho”), and on May 23, 2025, an amended complaint was filed in D. Idaho. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made materially false or misleading statements regarding industry supply and demand dynamics and the demand for Micron's products. On February 3, 2026, the court dismissed the amended complaint but granted plaintiffs leave to file a further amended complaint. On April 3, 2026, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the case. Shareholder Derivative Matters On February 20 and 21, 2025, two shareholder derivative complaints were filed against certain directors and officers of Micron, allegedly on behalf of and for the benefit of Micron, in D. Idaho. The complaints alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, insider trading, abuse of control, and waste of corporate assets and were based on substantially the same statements asserted in the securities class action. On April 28, 2025, the complaints were consolidated and on May 14, 2025, the consolidated action was stayed. Following the dismissal of the securities class action, the consolidated action was dismissed. On September 8, 2025, a substantially similar shareholder derivative complaint was filed in D. Del. On April 24, 2026, the action was dismissed. Other Matters On June 7, 2025, YMTC filed a complaint against Micron and DCI Group AZ, LLC in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in false advertising, product disparagement, and unfair competition regarding YMTC’s 3D NAND flash products in violation of the Lanham Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief, damages, disgorgement of profits, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On January 16, 2026, Neighbors for a Better Micron and Jobs to Move America filed a petition in the Supreme Court of New York against Micron, one of our subsidiaries, Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency (“OCIDA”), and certain other state and local government entities. The petition challenges certain aspects of OCIDA’s environmental review of the Company’s planned construction of up to four fabs in Clay, New York, and seeks a judgment to annul, vacate, and void all permits, approvals, and findings issued by the named government entities related to the project. The petition further seeks costs and attorneys’ fees. In the normal course of business, we are a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which we may be obligated to indemnify another party. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these types of agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, our payments under these types of agreements have not had a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Contingency Assessment We are unable to predict the outcome of any of the matters noted above and cannot make a reasonable estimate of the potential loss or range of possible losses. A determination that our products or manufacturing processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others or entering into a license agreement covering such intellectual property could result in significant liability and/or require us to make material changes to our products and/or manufacturing processes. Any of the foregoing, as well as the resolution of any other legal matter noted above, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
|