Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies |
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
May 03, 2026 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
| Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies | Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies Legal proceedings In addition to the legal proceedings described below, the Company is, from time to time, involved in routine legal matters, and audits and inspections by governmental agencies and other third parties which are incidental to the conduct of its business. This includes legal matters such as initiation and defense of proceedings to protect intellectual property rights, employment claims, product liability claims, personal injury claims, and similar matters. The Company believes the ultimate resolution of any such legal proceedings, audits, and inspections is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows; however, litigation and regulatory matters are inherently uncertain, and it is possible that an adverse outcome in one or more matters could have a material impact in a particular reporting period. The Company has recognized immaterial provisions related to the expected outcome of legal proceedings. On August 8, 2024, lululemon athletica inc. and certain officers of the Company were named as defendants in a purported securities class action (Patel v. Lululemon Athletica Inc., et al., No. 1:24-cv-06033) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 10, 2025, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based on allegedly false and misleading public statements and omissions by defendants during the period December 8, 2023 to July 24, 2024 relating to lululemon's business, product offerings, and inventory allocation that plaintiffs allege artificially inflated the Company’s stock price. The amended complaint currently seeks unspecified monetary damages. On May 19, 2025, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On March 31, 2026, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Company intends to defend the action vigorously. Since November 4, 2024, six stockholder derivative complaints have been filed in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York: Bhavsar v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08405; Muszynski v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08507; Holtz v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08572; Wong v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08752; Kanaly v. McDonald et al., No. 1:24-cv-08839; and Wasserman v. McDonald et al., No. 1:25-cv-02793 (collectively, the "Derivative Actions."). The complaints in the Derivative Actions are generally based on the same allegations alleged in the securities action complaint and assert claims against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers for, among other things, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Certain of the Derivative Actions also assert claims based on alleged false and misleading statements during the period October 28, 2020 to April 25, 2024 relating to the Company’s "IDEA" program. The complaints seek, among other things, monetary damages and equitable relief on behalf of the Company, as well as an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. On May 15, 2025, plaintiff in Bhavsar v. McDonald et al. voluntarily dismissed the complaint and that action has been terminated. On August 1, 2025, the Derivative Actions were consolidated for all purposes under the caption In re lululemon athletica inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Master File No. 1:24-cv-08507. Subject to the terms of the parties' stipulation, which the Court "so ordered" on May 18, 2026, the Derivative Actions are stayed pending resolution of the securities class action. Tariffs On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Power Act (the "IEEPA"). Immediately following this IEEPA decision, the U.S. Administration initiated new tariffs at different rates under alternative legislative powers. The U.S. Administration also confirmed that the IEEPA decision does not impact the removal of the de minimis exemption. The Company has commenced submitting refund claims for eligible IEEPA tariffs paid, including associated interest. The ultimate amounts that it may recover remain uncertain and as of May 3, 2026, it has not recognized an asset in relation to IEEPA refund claims. On March 27, 2026, lululemon usa inc. was named as a defendant in a purported consumer class action (Neuman v. Lululemon USA Inc., No. 2:26-cv-11029) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, asserting equitable claims relating to alleged tariff-related pricing actions and potential governmental tariff reimbursements. The complaint seeks unspecified damages or restitution for the alleged tariff-cost component of prices charged and other relief. The Company intends to defend the matter vigorously.
|