UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-24159
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
One Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Marc A. De Oliveira
Franklin Templeton
100 First Stamford Place
Stamford, CT 06902
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-888-777-0102
Date of fiscal year end: March 31
Date of reporting period:
| ITEM 1. | REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS |
(a) The Report to Shareholders is filed herewith

|
1
| |
|
3
| |
|
4
| |
|
5
| |
|
6
| |
|
7
| |
|
8
| |
|
9
| |
|
10
| |
|
22
| |
|
23
| |
|
28
| |
|
34
| |
|
35
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Peter
Blue
|
Andrew
Buck |
Andrew
Knox |
|
Head
of Private Market
Solutions
|
Portfolio
Manager |
Managing
Director and
Portfolio
Manager |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Sam
Roach |
Jane
Trust, CFA |
|
|
Portfolio
Manager |
President
and
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
Date
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
Investments—100.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Investments
— 100.1%(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
America — 100.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
DB
AI Infrastructure U-B, LP |
|
1/23/26
|
|
$29,722,695
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Money
Market Funds — 0.0%††,(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreyfus
Government Cash Management |
3.536%
|
|
5,387
|
5,387
(c)
|
|
Total
Short-Term Investments |
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Total
Investments — 100.1% |
|
|
29,728,082
| |
|
Liabilities
in Excess of Other Assets — (0.1)% |
|
|
(32,331
) | |
|
Total
Net Assets — 100.0% |
|
|
$29,695,751
| |
|
††
|
Represents
less than 0.1%. |
|
(a)
|
Investments
have no redemption provisions, are issued in private placement transactions and are restricted to
resale.
Each investment may have been purchased on various dates and for different amounts. The date of the first
purchase
is reflected under acquisition date as shown in the Consolidated Schedule of Investments. Total fair value
of
restricted investments as of March 31, 2026, was $29,722,695, or 100.1% of net assets. As of March 31, 2026,
the
aggregate cost of each investment restricted to resale was $27,303,991. |
|
(b)
|
The
total cost of Investments in Money Market Funds as of March 31, 2026 was $5,387. |
|
(c)
|
Rate
shown is one-day yield as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
Investments,
at value (Cost — $27,309,378) |
$29,728,082
|
|
Deferred
offering costs
|
647,889
|
|
Receivable
from investment manager |
504,914
|
|
Interest
receivable |
16
|
|
Total
Assets |
30,880,901
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Payable
for offering costs |
647,889
|
|
Payable
for organization costs |
427,075
|
|
Legal
fees payable |
67,123
|
|
Audit
and tax fees payable |
39,500
|
|
Trustees’
fees payable |
1,818
|
|
Due
to custodian |
246
|
|
Accrued
expenses |
1,499
|
|
Total
Liabilities |
1,185,150
|
|
Total
Net Assets |
$29,695,751
|
|
Net
Assets: |
|
|
Paid-in
capital in excess of par value |
$27,301,099
|
|
Total
distributable earnings (loss)
|
2,394,652
|
|
Total
Net Assets |
$29,695,751
|
|
Net
Assets: |
|
|
Class
I |
$29,695,751
|
|
Shares
Outstanding: |
|
|
Class
I |
2,730,399
|
|
Net
Asset Value: |
|
|
Class
I
|
$10.88
|
|
Investment
Income: |
|
|
Interest
|
$8,049
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Organization
costs (Note
1) |
427,075
|
|
Legal
fees |
67,123
|
|
Investment
management fee (Note
2) |
61,733
|
|
Audit
and tax fees |
39,500
|
|
Trustees’
fees |
1,818
|
|
Shareholder
reports |
1,100
|
|
Custody
fees |
399
|
|
Total
Expenses |
598,748
|
|
Less:
Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements (Note
2) |
(566,647
) |
|
Net
Expenses |
32,101
|
|
Net
Investment Loss |
(24,052
) |
|
Realized
and Unrealized Gain on Investments (Notes
1, 3 and 6): | |
|
Change
in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) From Investments
|
2,418,704
|
|
Net
Gain on Investments
|
2,418,704
|
|
Increase
in Net Assets From Operations |
$2,394,652
|
|
For
the Period Ended March 31, 2026†
|
2026
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
Net
investment loss
|
$(24,052
) |
|
Change
in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
2,418,704
|
|
Increase
in Net Assets From Operations |
2,394,652
|
|
Fund
Share Transactions (Note
5): |
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of shares
|
42,006,142
|
|
Shares redeemed in-kind (Note
6) |
(14,705,043
) |
|
Increase
in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions |
27,301,099
|
|
Increase
in Net Assets |
29,695,751
|
|
Net
Assets: |
|
|
Beginning
of period |
—
|
|
End
of period |
$29,695,751
|
|
†
|
For
the period January 21, 2026 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2026. |
|
Increase
(Decrease) in Cash: |
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
Net
increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$2,394,652
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash
provided
(used) by operating activities: |
|
|
Purchases
of portfolio investments |
(42,009,034
) |
|
Net
purchases, sales and maturities of short-term investments |
(5,387
) |
|
Increase
in interest receivable |
(16
) |
|
Increase
in receivable from investment manager |
(504,914
) |
|
Increase
in deferred offering costs |
(647,889
) |
|
Increase
in payable for offering costs |
647,889
|
|
Increase
in payable for organization costs |
427,075
|
|
Increase
in Trustees’ fees payable |
1,818
|
|
Increase
in audit and tax fees payable |
39,500
|
|
Increase
in legal fees payable |
67,123
|
|
Increase
in accrued expenses |
1,499
|
|
Change
in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments |
(2,418,704
) |
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities |
(42,006,388
) |
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
Increase
in due to custodian |
246
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of shares |
42,006,142
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
42,006,388
|
|
Cash
and restricted cash at beginning of period |
—
|
|
Cash
and restricted cash at end of period |
—
|
|
Non-Cash
Financing Activities: |
|
|
Payment
for shares redeemed in-kind |
$(14,705,043
) |
|
For
a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended March 31,
unless
otherwise noted: | |
|
Class
I Shares |
20261,2
|
|
Net
asset value, beginning of period |
$10.00
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations: | |
|
Net
investment loss |
(0.01
) |
|
Net
realized and unrealized gain |
0.89
|
|
Total
income from operations |
0.88
|
|
Net
asset value, end of period |
$10.88
|
|
Total
return3
|
8.80
% |
|
Net
assets, end of period (000s) |
$29,696
|
|
Ratios
to average net assets: | |
|
Gross
expenses4
|
5.12
% |
|
Net
expenses5,6,7
|
0.65
|
|
Net
investment loss4
|
(0.49
) |
|
Portfolio
turnover rate |
0
% |
|
1
|
For
the period January 21, 2026 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2026. |
|
2
|
Per
share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
|
3
|
Performance
figures may reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of fee waivers and/or
expense
reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future
results.
Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.
|
|
4
|
Annualized,
except for organization costs (Note 2). |
|
5
|
Annualized.
|
|
6
|
Pursuant
to the Expense Limitation Agreement with the Fund, the Manager has agreed to waive fees and/or
assume
expenses of the Fund, if required, to ensure certain annual operating expenses do not exceed 0.65% per
annum
of the average monthly net assets. The Manager is permitted to recapture amounts forgone or reimbursed
within
thirty-six months after the month the Manager earned the fee or incurred the expense. The expense
limitation
agreement has a term ending one-year from the date the Fund commenced operations, and the Manager
may
extend the term for a period of one year on an annual basis. The Manager may not terminate the Expense
Limitation
Agreement during its initial one-year term. Refer to Note 2 for additional information. |
|
7
|
Reflects
fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. |
|
ASSETS
| |||||
|
Description
|
Quoted
Prices
(Level
1) |
Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2) |
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3) |
Investments
valued
at
NAV
|
Total
|
|
Long-Term
Investments†: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Investments
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
$29,722,695
|
$29,722,695
|
|
Total
Long-Term Investments |
—
|
—
|
—
|
29,722,695
|
29,722,695
|
|
Short-Term
Investments†: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market Funds |
$5,387
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,387
|
|
Total
Short-Term Investments |
5,387
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,387
|
|
Total
Investments |
$5,387
|
—
|
—
|
$29,722,695
|
$29,728,082
|
|
†
|
See Consolidated
Schedule of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
|
Investment
Category
|
Fair Value
|
Unfunded
Commitments
|
Estimated
Remaining Life
|
Redemption
Frequency*
|
Notice
Period
(In Days)
|
Redemption
Restriction
Terms**
|
|
Co-Investments
|
$29,722,695
|
$6,902,895
|
4-8
years |
None
|
N/A
|
Liquidity
in
the
form of
distributions
from
Private Asset
investments
|
|
*
|
The
information summarized in the table above represents the general terms for the specified investment type.
Individual
Private Asset investments may have terms that are more or less restrictive than those terms indicated
for
the investment type as a whole. In addition, most Private Asset investments have the flexibility, as provided
for
in their constituent documents, to modify and waive such terms. |
|
**
|
Distributions
from Private Asset investments occur at irregular intervals, and the exact timing of distributions
from
Private Asset investments cannot be determined. It is estimated that distributions will generally occur over
the
life of Private Asset investments. |
|
|
Class
I |
|
3/31/2027
|
—
|
|
3/31/2028
|
—
|
|
3/31/2029
|
$504,914
|
|
Total
fee waivers/expense reimbursements subject to recapture |
$504,914
|
|
Purchases
|
$42,009,034
|
|
Sales
|
—
* |
|
*
|
Excludes
value of securities delivered as a result of redemptions in-kind totaling $14,705,043 (Note
6). |
|
|
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
Gross
Unrealized
Depreciation
|
Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
|
Securities
|
$27,309,378
|
$2,418,704
|
—
|
$2,418,704
|
|
|
Period
Ended
March 31,
20261 | |
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|
Class
I |
|
|
|
Shares
issued |
4,200,614
|
$42,006,142
|
|
Shares
redeemed in-kind |
(1,470,215
) |
(14,705,043
) |
|
Net
increase |
2,730,399
|
$27,301,099
|
|
1
|
For
the period January 21, 2026 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2026. |
|
Independent
Trustees†
| |
|
Robert
D. Agdern | |
|
Year
of birth |
1950
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Nominating, Audit, Compensation
and
Pricing and Valuation Committees, and Compliance
Liaison
|
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Member
of the Advisory Committee of the Dispute
Resolution
Research Center at the Kellogg Graduate School
of
Business, Northwestern University (2002 to 2016);
formerly,
Deputy General Counsel responsible for western
hemisphere
matters for BP PLC (1999 to 2001); Associate
General
Counsel at Amoco Corporation responsible for
corporate,
chemical, and refining and marketing matters and
special
assignments (1993 to 1998) (Amoco merged with
British
Petroleum in 1998 forming BP PLC) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
None
|
|
Carol
L. Colman | |
|
Year
of birth |
1946
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Nominating, Audit and
Compensation
Committees, and Chair of Pricing and
Valuation
Committee |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
President,
Colman Consulting Company (consulting) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
None
|
|
Independent
Trustees† (cont’d)
| |
|
Anthony
Grillo | |
|
Year
of birth
|
1955
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Nominating, Audit, Compensation
and
Pricing and Valuation Committees |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years
|
Retired;
Founder, Managing Director and Partner of
American
Securities Opportunity Funds (private equity and
credit
firm) (2006 to 2018); formerly, Senior Managing
Director
of Evercore Partners Inc. (investment banking)
(2001
to 2004); Senior Managing Director of Joseph
Littlejohn
& Levy, Inc. (private equity firm) (1999 to 2001);
Senior
Managing Director of The Blackstone Group L.P.
(private
equity and credit firm) (1991 to 1999)
|
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
Director
of Littelfuse, Inc. (electronics manufacturing) (since
1991);
formerly, Director of Oaktree Acquisition Corp. II
(2020
to 2022); Director of Oaktree Acquisition Corp. (2019
to
2021)
|
|
Eileen
A. Kamerick | |
|
Year
of birth |
1958
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Chair
(since November 15, 2024) and Member of
Nominating,
Compensation, Pricing and Valuation and Audit
Committees
|
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Chief
Executive Officer, The Governance Partners, LLC
(consulting
firm) (since 2015); National Association of
Corporate
Directors Board Leadership Fellow (since 2016,
with
Directorship Certification since 2019) and NACD 2022
Directorship
100 honoree; Adjunct Professor, Georgetown
University
Law Center (since 2021); Adjunct Professor, The
University
of Chicago Law School (since 2018); Adjunct
Professor,
University of Iowa College of Law (since 2007);
formerly,
Chief Financial Officer, Press Ganey Associates
(health
care informatics company) (2012 to 2014);
Managing
Director and Chief Financial Officer, Houlihan
Lokey
(international investment bank) and President,
Houlihan
Lokey Foundation (2010 to 2012) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
Director,
VALIC Company I (since October 2022); Director of
ACV
Auctions Inc. (since 2021); Director of Associated
Banc-Corp
(financial services company) (since 2007);
formerly,
Director of Hochschild Mining plc (precious metals
company)
(2016 to 2023); formerly Trustee of AIG Funds
and
Anchor Series Trust (2018 to 2021) |
|
Independent
Trustees† (cont’d)
| |
|
Nisha
Kumar | |
|
Year
of birth |
1970
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Nominating, Compensation and
Pricing
and Valuation Committees, and Chair of Audit
Committee
|
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Formerly,
Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer
and
Chief Compliance Officer of Greenbriar Equity Group,
LP
(2011 to 2021); formerly, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief
Administrative Officer of Rent the Runway, Inc.
(2011);
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of
AOL LLC, a subsidiary of Time Warner Inc. (2007
to
2009); Member of the Council on Foreign Relations |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
Director
of Stonepeak-Plus Infrastructure Fund LP
(since
2025); Director of Birkenstock Holding plc
(since
2023); Director of The India Fund, Inc. (since 2016);
formerly,
Director of Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies
Fund
(2017 to 2018); and Director of The Asia Tigers Fund,
Inc.
(2016 to 2018) |
|
Peter
Mason | |
|
Year
of birth
|
1959
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Audit, Nominating and Pricing and
Valuation
Committees, and Chair of Compensation
Committee
|
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years
|
Arbitrator
and Mediator (self-employed) (since 2021);
formerly,
Global General Counsel of UNICEF
(intergovernmental
organization) (1998 to 2021) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
Chairman
of University of Sydney USA Foundation
(since
2020); formerly, Director of the Radio Workshop US,
Inc.
(2023-2026)
|
|
Independent
Trustees† (cont’d)
| |
|
Hillary
A. Sale | |
|
Year
of birth
|
1961
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee
and Member of Audit, Compensation and Pricing
and
Valuation Committees, and Chair of Nominating
Committee
|
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years
|
Agnes
Williams Sesquicentennial Professor of Leadership
and
Corporate Governance, Georgetown Law; and
Professor
of Management, McDonough School of Business
(since
2018); formerly, Associate Dean for Strategy,
Georgetown
Law (2020 to 2023); National Association of
Corporate
Directors Board Faculty Member (since 2021);
formerly,
a Member of the Board of Governors of FINRA
(2016
to 2022) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
22
|
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years |
Director
of CBOE U.S. Securities Exchanges, CBOE
Futures
Exchange, and CBOE SEF, Director (since 2022);
Advisory
Board Member of Foundation Press (academic
book
publisher) (since 2019); Chair of DirectWomen Board
Institute
(since 2019); formerly, Member of DirectWomen
Board
(nonprofit) (2007 to 2022) |
|
Interested
Trustee and Officer
| |
|
Jane
Trust, CFA3
| |
|
Year
of birth |
1962
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Trustee,
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Senior
Vice President, Fund Board Management, Franklin
Templeton
(since 2020); Officer and/or Trustee/Director of
119
funds associated with Franklin Templeton Fund Adviser,
LLC
(“FTFA”) or
its affiliates (since 2015); Trustee of Putnam
Family
of Funds consisting of 105 portfolios; President and
Chief
Executive Officer of FTFA (since 2015); President and
Chief
Executive Officer of Franklin Templeton Private
Markets
Adviser, LLC (“FTPMA”)(since 2025); formerly,
Senior
Managing Director (2018 to 2020) and Managing
Director
(2016 to 2018) of Legg Mason & Co., LLC (“Legg
Mason
& Co.”); and Senior Vice President of FTFA (2015) |
|
Number
of portfolios in fund complex2
overseen by Trustee
(including
the Fund) |
Trustee/Director
of Franklin Templeton funds consisting of
119
portfolios; Trustee of Putnam Family of Funds
consisting
of 105 portfolios |
|
Other
board memberships held by Trustee during the past
five
years
|
None
|
|
Additional
Officers
| |
|
Fred
Jensen |
|
|
Franklin
Templeton
One
Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10010 |
|
|
Year
of birth |
1963
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Chief
Compliance Officer |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Director
- Global Compliance of Franklin Templeton
(since
2020); Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co.
(2006
to 2020); Director of Compliance, Legg Mason Office
of
the Chief Compliance Officer (2006 to 2020); formerly,
Chief
Compliance Officer of Legg Mason Global Asset
Allocation
(prior to 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of Legg
Mason
Private Portfolio Group (prior to 2013); formerly,
Chief
Compliance Officer of The Reserve Funds
(investment
adviser, funds and broker-dealer) (2004) and
Ambac
Financial Group (investment adviser, funds and
broker-dealer)
(2000 to 2003) |
|
Marc
A. De Oliveira |
|
|
Franklin
Templeton
100
First Stamford Place, 6th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902 |
|
|
Year
of birth |
1971
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Secretary
and Chief Legal Officer |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Associate
General Counsel of Franklin Templeton
(since
2020); Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
(since
2020) and Assistant Secretary of certain funds in the
Franklin
Templeton fund complex (since 2006); formerly,
Managing
Director (2016 to 2020) and Associate General
Counsel
of Legg Mason & Co. (2005 to 2020) |
|
Thomas
C. Mandia |
|
|
Franklin
Templeton
100
First Stamford Place, 6th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902 |
|
|
Year
of birth |
1962
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Senior
Vice President |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Senior
Associate General Counsel to Franklin Templeton
(since
2020); Senior Vice President (since 2020) and
Assistant
Secretary of certain funds in the Franklin
Templeton
fund complex (since 2006); Secretary of FTPMA
(since
2025); Secretary of FTFA (since 2006); Secretary of
LMAS
(since 2002) and LMFAM (formerly registered
investment
advisers) (since 2013); formerly, Managing
Director
and Deputy General Counsel of Legg Mason & Co.
(2005
to 2020) |
|
Additional
Officers (cont’d)
| |
|
Christopher
Berarducci |
|
|
Franklin
Templeton
One
Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10010 |
|
|
Year
of birth |
1974
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Treasurer
and Principal Financial Officer |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
Vice
President, Fund Administration and Reporting, Franklin
Templeton
(since 2020); Treasurer (since 2010) and
Principal
Financial Officer (since 2019) of certain funds
associated
with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates; formerly,
Managing
Director (2020), Director (2015 to 2020), and Vice
President
(2011 to 2015) of Legg Mason & Co. |
|
Jeanne
M. Kelly |
|
|
Franklin
Templeton
One
Madison Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10010 |
|
|
Year
of birth |
1951
|
|
Position(s)
held with Fund1
|
Senior
Vice President |
|
Term
of office1
and year service began |
Since
2026 |
|
Principal
occupation(s) during the past five years |
U.S.
Fund Board Team Manager, Franklin Templeton
(since
2020); Senior Vice President of certain funds
associated
with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates
(since
2007); Senior Vice President of FTFA (since 2006);
Senior
Vice President of FTPMA (since 2025); President
and
Chief Executive Officer of LMAS and LMFAM
(since
2015); formerly, Managing Director of Legg Mason &
Co.
(2005 to 2020); and Senior Vice President of LMFAM
(2013
to 2015) |
(b) Not applicable
| ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
(a) The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer.
(c) N/A
(d) N/A
(f) Pursuant to Item 19(a) (1), the Registrant is attaching as an exhibit a copy of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer.
| ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
The Board of Directors of the Registrant has determined that Eileen A. Kamerick and Nisha Kumar, possesses the technical attributes identified in Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as an “audit committee financial experts,” and has designated Eileen A. Kamerick and Nisha Kumar, as the Audit Committee’s financial experts. Eileen A. Kamerick and Nisha Kumar are an “independent” Trustee pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR.
Under applicable securities laws, a person determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for any purpose, including without limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being designated or identified as an audit committee financial expert. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations, or liabilities greater than the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. The designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not affect the duties, obligations, or liability of any other member of the audit committee or board of directors.
| ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026 (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant (the “Auditor”) for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Period, were $29,500 in March 31, 2026.
b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the Registrant’s financial statements were $0 in March 31, 2026.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Period for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (“Tax Services”) were $0 in March 31, 2026. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held.
There were no fees billed for tax services by the Auditors to the Registrant’s investment manager and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment manager that provides ongoing services to the Registrant (“Service Affiliates”) during the Reporting Periods that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Period for products and services provided by the Auditor to the Registrant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this item, were $0 in March 31, 2026.
There were no other non-audit services rendered by the Auditor to the Service Affiliates requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee in the Reporting Periods.
(e) Audit Committee’s pre–approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(1) The Charter for the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of each registered investment company (the “Fund”) advised by the Registrant’s investment manager or one of their affiliates (each, an “Adviser”) requires that the Committee shall approve (a) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Fund and (b) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Adviser and any service providers controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Covered Service Providers”) if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Committee may implement policies and procedures by which such services are approved other than by the full Committee.
The Committee shall not approve non-audit services that the Committee believes may impair the independence of the auditors. As of the date of the approval of this Audit Committee Charter, permissible non-audit services include any professional services (including tax services), that are not prohibited services as described below, provided to the Fund by the independent auditors, other than those provided to the Fund in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Fund. Permissible non-audit services may not include: (i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Fund; (ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.
Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Fund, the Adviser and the Covered Service Providers constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to the independent auditors during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit services are provided to (a) the Fund, (b) the Adviser and (c) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be approved by the Committee; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee (or its delegate(s)) prior to the completion of the audit.
(2) None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item were performed in reliance on paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) Non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant and the Service Affiliates during the reporting period $538,089 in March 31, 2026.
(h) Yes. The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Auditor’s independence. All services provided by the Auditor to the Registrant or to the Service Affiliates, which were required to be pre-approved, were pre-approved as required.
(i) Not applicable.
(j) Not applicable.
| ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
a) Registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)58(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of the following Board members:
Robert D. Agdern
Carol L. Colman
Anthony Grillo
Eileen A. Kamerick
Nisha Kumar
Peter Mason
Hillary A. Sale
b) Not applicable
| ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. |
| (a) | Please see schedule of investments contained in the Financial Statements and Financial Highlights included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR. | |
| (b) | Not applicable. |
| ITEM 7. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL HIGLIGHTS FOR OPEN-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 8. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS FOR OPEN-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 9. | PROXY DISCLOSURES FOR OPEN-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 10. | REMUNERATION PAID TO DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND OTHERS OF OPEN-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 11. | STATEMENT REGARDING BASIS FOR APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACT. |
The information is disclosed as part of the Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR, as applicable.
| ITEM 12. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
PROXY VOTING – FRANKLIN ADVISORS, INC. (and affiliates)
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC. (“FAV”)

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS TO VOTE PROXIES
Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions, a separate investment group within Franklin Templeton, comprised of investment personnel from the SEC-registered investment advisers listed on Appendix A (hereinafter individually an “Investment Manager” and collectively the “Investment Managers”) have delegated the administrative duties with respect to voting proxies for securities to the Franklin Templeton Proxy Group. Proxy duties consist of disseminating proxy materials and analyses of issuers whose stock is owned by any client (including both investment companies and any separate accounts managed by the Investment Managers) that has either delegated proxy voting administrative responsibility to the Investment Managers or has asked for information and/or recommendations on the issues to be voted. The Investment Managers will inform advisory clients that have not delegated the voting responsibility but that have requested voting advice about the Investment Managers’ views on such proxy votes. The Proxy Group also provides these services to other advisory affiliates of the Investment Managers.
The Proxy Group will process proxy votes on behalf of, and the Investment Managers vote proxies solely in the best interests of, separate account clients, the Investment Managers’-managed investment company shareholders, or shareholders of funds that have appointed Franklin Templeton International Services S.à.r.l. (“FTIS S.à.r.l.”) as the Management Company, provided such funds or clients have properly delegated such responsibility in writing, or, where employee benefit plan assets subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, are involved (“ERISA accounts”), in the best interests of the plan participants and beneficiaries (collectively, “Advisory Clients”), unless (i) the power to vote has been specifically retained by the named fiduciary in the documents in which the named fiduciary appointed the Investment Managers or (ii) the documents otherwise expressly prohibit the Investment Managers from voting proxies. The Investment Managers recognize that the exercise of voting rights on securities held by ERISA plans for which the Investment Managers have voting responsibility is a fiduciary duty that must be exercised with care, skill, prudence and diligence.
In certain circumstances, Advisory Clients are permitted to direct their votes in a solicitation pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement. An Advisory Client that wishes to direct its vote shall give reasonable prior written notice to the Investment Managers indicating such intention and provide written instructions directing the Investment Managers or the Proxy Group to vote regarding the solicitation. Where such prior written notice is received, the Proxy Group will vote proxies in accordance with such written notification received from the Advisory Client.
* Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”) and Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) (together the “Compliance Rule”) require registered investment companies and registered investment advisers to, among other things, adopt and implement written olicies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the federal securities laws (“Compliance Rule Policies and Procedures”).
The Investment Managers have adopted and implemented Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Policies”) that they believe are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of Advisory Clients in accordance with their fiduciary duties and rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. To the extent that the Investment Managers have a subadvisory agreement with an affiliated investment manager (the “Affiliated Subadviser”) with respect to a particular Advisory Client, the Investment Managers may delegate proxy voting responsibility to the Affiliated Subadviser. The Investment Managers may also delegate proxy voting responsibility to a subadviser that is not an Affiliated Subadviser in certain limited situations as disclosed to fund shareholders (e.g., where an Investment Manager to a pooled investment vehicle has engaged a subadviser that is not an Affiliated Subadviser to manage all or a portion of the assets).
HOW THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS VOTE PROXIES
Proxy Services
All proxies received by the Proxy Group will be voted based upon the Investment Managers’ instructions and/or policies. To assist it in analyzing proxies of equity securities, the Investment Managers subscribe to Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”), an unaffiliated third-party corporate governance research service that provides in-depth analyses of shareholder meeting agendas and vote recommendations. In addition, the Investment Managers subscribe to ISS’s Proxy Voting Service and Vote Disclosure Service. These services include receipt of proxy ballots, custodian bank relations, account maintenance, vote execution, ballot reconciliation, vote record maintenance, comprehensive reporting capabilities, and vote disclosure services. Also, the Investment Managers subscribe to Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC (“Glass Lewis”), an unaffiliated third-party analytical research firm, to receive analyses and vote recommendations on the shareholder meetings of publicly held U.S. companies, as well as a limited subscription to its international research.
Although analyses provided by ISS, Glass Lewis, and/or another independent third-party proxy service provider (each a “Proxy Service”) are thoroughly reviewed and considered in making a final voting decision, the Investment Managers do not consider recommendations from a Proxy Service or any third-party to be determinative of the Investment Managers’ ultimate decision. Rather, the Investment Managers exercise their independent judgment in making voting decisions. As a matter of policy, the officers, directors and employees of the Investment Managers and the Proxy Group will not be influenced by outside sources whose interests conflict with the interests of Advisory Clients.
For ease of reference, the Proxy Policies often refer to all Advisory Clients. However, our processes and practices seek to ensure that proxy voting decisions are suitable for individual Advisory Clients. In some cases, the Investment Managers’ evaluation may result in an individual Advisory Client or Investment Manager voting differently, depending upon the nature and objective of the fund or account, the composition of its portfolio, whether the Investment Manager has adopted a specialty or custom voting policy, and other factors.
Conflicts of Interest
All conflicts of interest will be resolved in the best interests of the Advisory Clients. The Investment Managers are affiliates of a large, diverse financial services firm with many affiliates and make their best efforts to mitigate conflicts of interest. However, as a general matter, the Investment Managers take the position that relationships between certain affiliates that do not use the “Franklin Templeton” name (“Independent Affiliates”) and an issuer (e.g., an investment management relationship between an issuer and an Independent Affiliate) do not present a conflict of interest for an Investment Manager in voting proxies with respect to such issuer because: (i) the Investment Managers operate as an independent business unit from the Independent Affiliate business units, and (ii) informational barriers exist between the Investment Managers and the Independent Affiliate business units.
Material conflicts of interest could arise in a variety of situations, including as a result of the Investment Managers’ or an affiliate’s (other than an Independent Affiliate as described above): (i) material business relationship with an issuer or proponent, (ii) direct or indirect pecuniary interest in an issuer or proponent; or (iii) significant personal or family relationship with an issuer or proponent.
Material conflicts of interest are identified by the Proxy Group based upon analyses of client, distributor, broker dealer, and vendor lists, information periodically gathered from directors and officers, and information derived from other sources, including public filings. The Proxy Group gathers and analyzes this information on a best-efforts basis, as much of this information is provided directly by individuals and groups other than the Proxy Group, and the Proxy Group relies on the accuracy of the information it receives from such parties.
Nonetheless, even though a potential conflict of interest between the Investment Managers or an affiliate (other than an Independent Affiliate as described above) and an issuer may exist: (1) the Investment Managers may vote in opposition to the recommendations of an issuer’s management even if contrary to the recommendations of a third-party proxy voting research provider; (2) if management has made no recommendations, the Proxy Group may defer to the voting instructions of the Investment Managers; and (3) with respect to shares held by Franklin Resources, Inc. or its affiliates for their own corporate accounts, such shares may be voted without regard to these conflict procedures.
Otherwise, in situations where a material conflict of interest is identified between the Investment Managers or one of its affiliates (other than Independent Affiliates) and an issuer, the Proxy Group may vote consistent with the voting recommendation of a Proxy Service or send the proxy directly to the relevant Advisory Clients with the Investment Managers’ recommendation regarding the vote for approval. To address certain affiliate conflict situations, the Investment Managers will employ pass-through voting or mirror voting when required pursuant to a fund’s governing documents or applicable law.
Where the Proxy Group refers a matter to an Advisory Client, it may rely upon the instructions of a representative of the Advisory Client, such as the board of directors or trustees, a committee of the board, or an appointed delegate in the case of a U.S. registered investment company, a conducting officer in the case of a fund that has appointed FTIS S.à.r.l as its Management Company, the Independent Review Committee for Canadian investment funds, or a plan administrator in the case of an employee benefit plan. A quorum of the board of directors or trustees or of a committee of the board can be reached by a majority of members, or a majority of non-recused members. The Proxy Group may determine to vote all shares held by Advisory Clients of the Investment Managers and affiliated Investment Managers (other than Independent Affiliates) in accordance with the instructions of one or more of the Advisory Clients.
The Investment Managers may also decide whether to vote proxies for securities deemed to present conflicts of interest that are sold following a record date, but before a shareholder meeting date. The Investment Managers may consider various factors in deciding whether to vote such proxies, including the Investment Managers’ long-term view of the issuer’s securities for investment, or it may defer the decision to vote to the applicable Advisory Client. The Investment Managers also may be unable to vote, or choose not to vote, a proxy for securities deemed to present a conflict of interest for any of the reasons outlined in the first paragraph of the section of these policies entitled “Proxy Procedures.”
Weight Given Management Recommendations
One of the primary factors the Investment Managers consider when determining the desirability of investing in a particular company is the quality and depth of that company’s management. Accordingly, the recommendation of management on any issue is a factor that the Investment Managers consider in determining how proxies should be voted. However, the Investment Managers do not consider recommendations from management to be determinative of the Investment Managers’ ultimate decision. Each issue is considered on its own merits, and the Investment Managers will not support the position of a company’s management in any situation where it determines that the ratification of management’s position would adversely affect the investment merits of owning that company’s shares.
Engagement with Issuers
The Investment Managers believe that engagement with issuers is important to good corporate governance and to assist in making proxy voting decisions. The Investment Managers may engage with issuers to discuss specific ballot items to be voted on in advance of an annual or special meeting to obtain further information or clarification on the proposals. The Investment Managers may also engage with management on a range of issues throughout the year.
THE PROXY GROUP
The Proxy Group’s ‘full-time staff members and support staff are devoted to proxy voting administration and oversight and providing support and assistance where needed. On a daily basis, the Proxy Group will review each proxy upon receipt as well as any agendas, materials and recommendations that they receive from a Proxy Service or other sources. The Proxy Group maintains a record of all shareholder meetings that are scheduled for companies whose securities are held by the Investment Managers’ managed funds and accounts. For each shareholder meeting, a member of the Proxy Group will consult with the research analyst that follows the security and provide the analyst with the agenda, analyses of one or more Proxy Services, recommendations and any other information provided to the Proxy Group. Except in situations identified as presenting material conflicts of interest, the Investment Managers’ research analyst and relevant portfolio manager(s) are responsible for making the final voting decision based on their review of the agenda, analyses of one or more Proxy Services, proxy statements, their knowledge of the company and any other information publicly available.
In situations where the Investment Managers have not responded with vote recommendations to the Proxy Group by the deadline date, the Proxy Group may vote consistent with the vote recommendations of a Proxy Service. Except in cases where the Proxy Group is voting consistent with the voting recommendation of a Proxy Service, the Proxy Group must obtain voting instructions from the Investment Managers’ research analysts, relevant portfolio manager(s), legal counsel and/or the Advisory Client prior to submitting the vote. In the event that an account holds a security that an Investment Manager did not purchase on its behalf, and the Investment Manager does not normally consider the security as a potential investment for other accounts, the Proxy Group may vote consistent with the voting recommendations of a Proxy Service or take no action on the meeting.
PROXY ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES
Situations Where Proxies Are Not Voted
The Proxy Group is fully cognizant of its responsibility to process proxies and maintain proxy records as may be required by relevant rules and regulations. In addition, the Investment Managers understand their fiduciary duty to vote proxies and that proxy voting decisions may affect the value of shareholdings. Therefore, the Investment Managers will generally attempt to process every proxy they receive for all domestic and foreign securities.
However, there may be situations in which the Investment Managers may be unable to successfully vote a proxy, or may choose not to vote a proxy, such as where: (i) a proxy ballot was not received from the custodian bank; (ii) a meeting notice was received too late; (iii) there are fees imposed upon the exercise of a vote and it is determined that such fees outweigh the benefit of voting; (iv) there are legal encumbrances to voting, including blocking restrictions in certain markets that preclude the ability to dispose of a security if an Investment Manager votes a proxy or where the Investment Manager is prohibited from voting by applicable law, economic or other sanctions, or other regulatory or market requirements, including but not limited to, effective Powers of Attorney;
(v) additional documentation or the disclosure of beneficial owner details is required; (vi) the Investment Managers held shares on the record date but has sold them prior to the meeting date; (vii) the Advisory Client held shares on the record date, but the Advisory Client closed the account prior to the meeting date; (viii) a proxy voting service is not offered by the custodian in the market; (ix) due to either system error or human error, the Investment Managers’ intended vote is not correctly submitted; (x) the Investment Managers believe it is not in the best interest of the Advisory Client to vote the proxy for any other reason not enumerated herein; or
(xi) a security is subject to a securities lending or similar program that has transferred legal title to the security to another person.
Rejected Votes
Even if the Investment Managers use reasonable efforts to vote a proxy on behalf of their Advisory Clients, such vote or proxy may be rejected because of (a) operational or procedural issues experienced by one or more third parties involved in voting proxies in such jurisdictions; (b) changes in the process or agenda for the meeting by the issuer for which the Investment Managers do not have sufficient notice; or (c) the exercise by the issuer of its discretion to reject the vote of the Investment Managers. In addition, despite the best efforts of the Proxy Group and its agents, there may be situations where the Investment Managers’ votes are not received, or properly tabulated, by an issuer or the issuer’s agent.
Securities on Loan
The Investment Managers or their affiliates may, on behalf of one or more of the proprietary registered investment companies advised by the Investment Managers or their affiliates, make efforts to recall any security on loan where the Investment Manager or its affiliates (a) learn of a vote on an event that may materially affect a security on loan and (b) determine that it is in the best interests of such proprietary registered investment companies to recall the security for voting purposes. The ability to timely recall shares is not entirely within the control of the Investment Managers. Under certain circumstances, the recall of shares in time for such shares to be voted may not be possible due to applicable proxy voting record dates or other administrative considerations.
Split Voting
There may be instances in certain non-U.S. markets where split voting is not allowed. Split voting occurs when a position held within an account is voted in accordance with two differing instructions. Some markets and/or issuers only allow voting on an entire position and do not accept split voting. In certain cases, when more than one Franklin Templeton investment manager has accounts holding shares of an issuer that are held in an omnibus structure, the Proxy Group will seek direction from an appropriate representative of the Advisory Client with multiple Investment Managers (such as a conducting officer of the Management Company in the case of a SICAV), or the Proxy Group will submit the vote based on the voting instructions provided by the Investment Manager with accounts holding the greatest number of shares of the security within the omnibus structure.
Bundled Items
If several issues are bundled together in a single voting item, the Investment Managers will assess the total benefit to shareholders and the extent that such issues should be subject to separate voting proposals.
PROCEDURES FOR MEETINGS INVOLVING FIXED INCOME SECURITIES & PRIVATELY HELD ISSUERS
From time to time, certain custodians may process events for fixed income securities through their proxy voting channels rather than corporate action channels for administrative convenience. In such cases, the Proxy Group will receive ballots for such events on the ISS voting platform. The Proxy Group will solicit voting instructions from the Investment Managers for each account or fund involved. If the Proxy Group does not receive voting instructions from the Investment Managers, the Proxy Group will take no action on the event. The Investment Managers may be unable to vote a proxy for a fixed income security, or may choose not to vote a proxy, for the reasons described under the section entitled “Proxy Procedures.”
In the rare instance where there is a vote for a privately held issuer, the decision will generally be made by the relevant portfolio managers or research analysts.
The Proxy Group will monitor such meetings involving fixed income securities or privately held issuers for conflicts of interest in accordance with these procedures. If a fixed income or privately held issuer is flagged as a potential conflict of interest, the Investment Managers may nonetheless vote as it deems in the best interests of its Advisory Clients. The Investment Managers will report such decisions on an annual basis to Advisory Clients as may be required.
Appendix A
These Proxy Policies apply to accounts managed by personnel within Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions, which includes the following Investment Managers:
Franklin Advisers, Inc. (FAV)
Franklin Advisory Services, LLC (FASL)
Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC (FMA)
Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. (FTIC)
Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML)
Templeton Asset Management Ltd. (TAML)
The following Proxy Policies apply to FAV, FMA, FTIC, FTIML, and TAML only:
HOW THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS VOTE PROXIES
Proxy Services
Certain of the Investment Managers’ separate accounts or funds (or a portion thereof) are included under Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions (“FTIS”), a separate investment group within Franklin Templeton, and employ a quantitative strategy.
For such accounts, FTIS’s proprietary methodologies rely on a combination of quantitative, qualitative, and behavioral analysis rather than fundamental security research and analyst coverage that an actively managed portfolio would ordinarily employ.
Accordingly, absent client direction, in light of the high number of positions held by such accounts and the considerable time and effort that would be required to review proxy statements and ISS or Glass Lewis recommendations, the Investment Manager may review ISS’s guidelines’’ or Glass Lewis’s US guidelines (the “ISS and Glass Lewis Proxy Voting Guidelines”) and determine, consistent with the best interest of its clients, to provide standing instructions to the Proxy Group to vote proxies according to the recommendations of ISS or Glass Lewis.
In addition, the Investment Managers may request in-house voting research from Franklin Templeton’s Stewardship Team (FT Stewardship). FT Stewardship provides customized research on specific corporate governance issues that is tailored to the investment manager and corporate engagement undertaken. This research may include opinions on voting decisions; however, there is no obligation or inference for the investment manager to formally vote in line with these opinions. This research supports the independent vote decision making process, and may reduce reliance on third-party advice for certain votes.
The Investment Manager, however, retains the ability to vote a proxy differently than ISS or Glass Lewis recommends if the Investment Manager determines that it would be in the best interests of Advisory Clients.
The following Proxy Policies apply to FASL only:
HOW THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS VOTE PROXIES
Proxy Services
Passively managed exchange traded funds (collectively, “ETFs”), seek to track a particular securities index. As a result, each ETF may hold the securities of hundreds of issuers. Because the primary criteria for determining whether a security should be included (or continued to be included) in an ETF’s investment portfolio is whether such security is a representative component of the securities index that the ETF is seeking to track, the ETFs do not require the fundamental security research and analyst coverage that an actively managed portfolio would require. Accordingly, in light of the high number of positions held by an ETF and the considerable time and effort that would be required to review proxy statements and ISS or Glass Lewis recommendations, the Investment Manager may review ISS’s guidelines’’ or Glass Lewis’s US guidelines (the “ISS and Glass Lewis Proxy Voting Guidelines”) and determine, consistent with the best interest of its clients, to provide standing instructions to the Proxy Group to vote. proxies according to the recommendations of ISS or Glass Lewis rather than analyze each individual proxy vote. Permitting the Investment Manager of the ETFs to defer its judgment for voting on a proxy to the recommendations of ISS or Glass Lewis may result in a proxy related to the securities of a particular issuer held by an ETF being voted differently from the same proxy that is voted on by other funds managed by the Investment Managers.
In addition, the investment managers may request in-house voting research from Franklin Templeton’s Stewardship Team (FT Stewardship). FT Stewardship provides customized research on specific corporate governance issues that is tailored to the investment manager and corporate engagement undertaken. This research may include opinions on voting decisions; however, there is no obligation or inference for the investment manager to formally vote in line with these opinions. This research supports the independent vote decision making process, and may reduce reliance on third-party advice for certain votes.
The following Proxy Policies apply to FTIC, FTIML, and TAML only:
HOW THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS VOTE PROXIES
Proxy Services
For accounts managed by the Templeton Global Equity Group (“TGEG”), in making voting decisions, the Investment Manager may consider Glass Lewis’s Proxy Voting Guidelines, ISS’s Policies’ and TGEG’s custom sustainability guidelines, where appropriate.
The following Proxy Policies apply to FTIC only:
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS TO VOTE PROXIES
To the extent that the Investment Manager has a subadvisory agreement with an affiliated investment manager (the “Affiliated Subadviser”) with respect to a particular Advisory Client or the Investment Manager chooses securities for an Advisory Client’s portfolios that are recommended by an Affiliated Subadviser, the Investment Manager may delegate proxy voting responsibility to the Affiliated Subadviser or vote proxies in accordance with the Affiliated Subadviser’s recommendations.
| ITEM 13. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
(a)(1): As of the date of filing this report:
| NAME AND | LENGTH OF | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING | ||
| ADDRESS | TIME SERVED | PAST 5 YEARS | ||
|
Andrew Buck, CFA Franklin Advisers, Inc. One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 |
Since 2026 | Responsible for the day-to-day management with other members of the Fund’s portfolio management team; A Portfolio Manager for Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions (FTIS). He is responsible for managing FTIS’ private markets portfolios, encompassing asset allocation, manager selection, and portfolio construction. He was previously a member of the FTIS Manager Research team, where he led sourcing and due diligence of funds and managers across private equity, private credit, and real assets; and has been employed for more than 5 years with Franklin Advisers, Inc. | ||
|
Peter Blue, CFA Franklin Advisers, Inc. One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 |
Since 2026 |
Responsible for the day-to-day management with other members of the Fund’s portfolio management team; Head of Alternatives Solutions for Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions; Mr. Blue is responsible for the development and implementation of multi-asset alternatives capabilities for the Franklin Templeton Investment Solutions team; and has been employed for more than 5 years with Franklin Advisers, Inc.
| ||
|
Andrew Knox, CFA, CAIA Franklin Advisers, Inc. One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 |
Since 2026 |
Responsible for the day-to-day management with other members of the Fund’s portfolio management team; Managing Director, Portfolio Manager for Franklin Real Asset Advisors (FRAA). With over 28 years of experience in the investment industry, Mr. Knox has held positions in portfolio management, research, and client service within both the institutional and high net worth markets. Mr. Knox joined Franklin Templeton in 2006. From 2011 until 2017, Mr. Knox was the co-lead manager of the Franklin Templeton Institutional Balanced Trust. In 2018, Mr. Knox joined Franklin Real Asset Advisors and was appointed to the FRAA Global Investment Committee in 2019 and assumed Portfolio Management responsibilities for the Franklin Global Real Assets Strategies in 2021 | ||
|
Sam Roach, CFA Franklin Advisers, Inc. One Franklin Parkway San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 |
Since 2026 |
Responsible for the day-to-day management with other members of the Fund’s portfolio management team; A Portfolio Manager for Franklin Real Asset Advisors and portfolio manager of the Franklin Global Real Assets Fund. He is responsible for underwriting and due diligence and shares responsibility for investment strategy, portfolio construction, asset allocation, and risk management. Prior to joining Franklin Templeton in 2023, he accumulated 13 years of experience in institutional investment research and portfolio management.
|
(a)(2): DATA TO BE PROVIDED BY FINANCIAL CONTROL
The following tables set forth certain additional information with respect to the fund’s investment professionals for the fund. Unless noted otherwise, all information is provided as of March 31, 2026.
Other Accounts Managed by Investment Professionals
The table below identifies the number of accounts (other than the fund) for which the fund’s investment professionals have day-to-day management responsibilities and the total assets in such accounts, within each of the following categories: registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles, and other accounts. For each category, the number of accounts and total assets in the accounts where fees are based on performance is also indicated.
| Portfolio Manager | Type of Account | Number
of Accounts Managed |
Total Assets Managed ($ millions) |
Number
of Accounts Managed for which an Advisory Fee is Charged |
Assets
Managed for which Advisory Fee is Performance- Based ($ millions) | |||||
| Andrew Buck, CFA | Other Registered Investment Companies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Other Pooled Vehicles | 1 | $0.05 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Other Accounts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Peter Blue, CFA | Other Registered Investment Companies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Other Pooled Vehicles | 1 | $0.05 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Other Accounts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Andrew Knox, CFA, CAIA | Other Registered Investment Companies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Other Pooled Vehicles | 4 | $482.3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Other Accounts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sam Roach, CFA | Other Registered Investment Companies | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Other Pooled Vehicles | 4 | $482.3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Other Accounts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(a)(3): Portfolio Manager Compensation (As of March 31, 2026):
Conflicts
The management of multiple funds, including the Fund, and accounts may also give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and other accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The investment manager seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment strategies that are used in connection with the management of the Fund. Accordingly, portfolio holdings, position sizes, and industry and sector exposures tend to be similar across similar portfolios, which may minimize the potential for conflicts of interest. As noted above, the separate management of the trade execution and valuation functions from the portfolio management process also helps to reduce potential conflicts of interest. However, securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Moreover, if a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or other account, the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of that opportunity across all eligible funds and other accounts. The investment manager seeks to manage such potential conflicts by using procedures intended to provide a fair allocation of buy and sell opportunities among funds and other accounts.
The structure of a portfolio manager’s compensation may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. A portfolio manager’s base pay and bonus tend to increase with additional and more complex responsibilities that include increased assets under management. As such, there may be a relationship between a portfolio manager’s marketing or sales efforts and his or her bonus.
Finally, the management of personal accounts by a portfolio manager may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. While the funds and the investment manager have adopted a code of ethics which they believe contains provisions designed to prevent a wide range of prohibited activities by portfolio managers and others with respect to their personal trading activities, there can be no assurance that the code of ethics addresses all individual conduct that could result in conflicts of interest.
The investment manager and the Fund have adopted certain compliance procedures that are designed to address these, and other, types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation where a conflict arises.
Portfolio Manager Compensation FAV
Investment personnel compensation consists of the following three elements:
• Base salary: All investment personnel are paid a base salary.
• Annual bonus: Annual bonuses are structured to align the interests of the investment personnel with those of our clients. Investment personnel are eligible to receive an annual bonus. Bonuses generally are split between cash, restricted shares of Franklin Resources, Inc. stock, and / or mutual fund units. The deferred equity-based compensation is structured to create a vested interest of the investment personnel in the financial performance of both Franklin Resources, Inc. and the mutual funds they advise, if applicable. The bonus plan seeks to provide a competitive level of annual bonus compensation, commensurate with the investment personnel’s consistently strong investment performance. In accordance with Franklin Templeton guidelines, the Chief Investment Officer and/or other officers of the investment personnel who also bear responsibility for the account, have discretion in the granting of annual bonuses. The following factors are generally considered when determining bonuses:
o Investment performance. Primary consideration is given to historical investment performance over the one, three, and five preceding years of all accounts managed by the investment personnel, if applicable. The pre-tax performance of each fund managed is measured relative to a relevant peer group and/or applicable benchmark, as appropriate.
o Non-investment performance. The more qualitative contributions of an investment professional to the company’s business and the investment management team, including professional knowledge, productivity, responsiveness to client needs, and communication, are evaluated in determining the amount of any bonus award.
o Responsibilities. The characteristics and complexity of accounts managed by the investment personnel are factored in the manager’s appraisal.
o Research. Where the portfolio management team also has research responsibilities, each is evaluated on productivity and quality of recommendations over time.
• Additional long-term, equity-based compensation: Investment personnel may also be awarded restricted shares or units of Franklin Resources stock or restricted shares or units of one or more mutual funds. Vesting of such deferred equity-based compensation awards is time-based over three years.
Additionally, in some instances as applicable to specific fund types and asset classes, we offer investment professionals (employees that can affect investment performance) the opportunity to share in the carried interest/ performance fee revenues earned by the firm in the form of carried interest or performance fee sharing plans/agreements.
Investment personnel also participate in benefit plans and programs available generally to all employees of the investment manager.
(a)(4): Portfolio Manager Securities Ownership
The table below identifies the dollar range of securities beneficially owned by each investment professional as of March 31, 2026.
| Portfolio Manager(s) | Dollar
Range of Portfolio Securities Beneficially Owned | |
| Andrew Buck, CFA | A | |
| Peter Blue, CFA | A | |
| Andrew Knox, CFA, CAIA | A | |
| Sam Roach, CFA | A |
Dollar Range ownership is as follows:
A: none
B: $1 - $10,000
C: 10,001 - $50,000
D: $50,001 - $100,000
E: $100,001 - $500,000
F: $500,001 - $1 million
G: over $1 million
| ITEM 14. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
| Not applicable. |
| ITEM 15. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There have been no changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s Board of Trustees that would require disclosure herein.
| ITEM 16. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
| (a) | The Registrants acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In future filings on Form N-CSR, the certifications required by Rule 30a-2 and Item 19(a)(3) will include the designations “principal executive officer” and “principal financial officer” in the signature blocks, reflecting the capacity in which each signatory executes the certification, in conformity with the language of the Rule and Form N-CSR. The Registrants may also include each signatory’s actual title with respect to the Funds alongside the required designation. | |
| (b) | There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are likely to materially affect the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| ITEM 17. | DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITIES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
| Not applicable. | |
| ITEM 18. | RECOVERY OF ERRONEOUSLY AWARDED COMPENSATION. |
| (a) | Not applicable. | |
| (b) | Not applicable. |
| ITEM 19. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) (1) Code of Ethics attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CODE ETH
(a) (3) Certifications pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CERT
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.906CERT
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
Franklin Infrastructure Solutions Fund
| By: | /s/ Jane Trust | |
| Jane Trust | ||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Date: | June 03, 2026 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | /s/ Jane Trust | |
| Jane Trust | ||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Date: | June 03, 2026 | |
| By: | /s/ Christopher Berarducci | |
| Christopher Berarducci | ||
| Principal Financial Officer | ||
| Date: | June 03, 2026 |