Exhibit 1.01

Conflict Minerals Report

This Conflict Minerals Report (this “Report”) of Digi International Inc. (“Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) has been prepared pursuant to Rule 13p-1 and Form SD (the “Rule”) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the reporting period from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.

The Rule requires disclosure of certain information when a company manufactures or contracts to manufacture products that contain the minerals specified in the Rule, which are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. The specified minerals, which we refer to in this report as the “conflict minerals,” are gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite and wolframite, or their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten. The “covered countries” for the purposes of the Rule and this Report are the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the “DRC”), the Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and Angola.

We are a leading provider of machine-to-machine networking hardware and solutions that enable the connection, monitoring and control of local or remote physical assets by electronic means. These networking products and solutions can connect communication hardware to a physical asset, convey information about the asset’s status and performance to a computer system and then use that information to improve or automate one or more processes. As described in this Report, certain of the products we manufacture or contract to manufacture contain components that include conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. In this Report, we refer to such products which were manufactured during calendar year 2025 as the “covered products.” The covered products are hardware products that generally include: embedded modules, gateways, adapter cards and device and terminal servers. Neither the software nor the services we sold to customers during calendar year 2025 are considered covered products as these products contain no conflict minerals.

Covered products contain components we purchased from third parties that use tin, tantalum, tungsten and/or gold. We do not source these conflict minerals directly. Due to the depth of our supply chain, we are far removed from the sources from which these conflict minerals are produced and the smelters or refiners that process them. Our efforts undertaken to identify the countries of origin of those conflict minerals reflect our circumstances and position in the supply chain. The amount of information available globally on the traceability and sourcing of the conflict minerals is extremely limited at this time. We have taken steps to identify the applicable smelters or refiners of such conflict minerals in our supply chain; however, we believe that the smelters and refiners of the conflict minerals contained in the covered products are best situated to identify the sources of the conflict minerals.

We have conducted a country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) regarding the conflict minerals that may be contained in our products. This inquiry was reasonably designed and conducted in good faith to determine whether any of the conflict minerals originated in the covered countries and whether any of the conflict minerals may have been from recycled or scrap sources.

We group components and materials included in our products based on whether they might contain a conflict mineral. In this manner, we determined the scope of our covered products. We asked direct suppliers who provide us with materials and components for our covered products that might contain a conflict mineral to make a reasonable determination if raw materials, consumables or purchased components they provide to us contain conflict minerals. Where appropriate, we also asked direct suppliers to make similar inquiries among their direct suppliers to further inform their responses to our request. We asked these suppliers to complete a supply chain compliance questionnaire based on the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”) reflecting our position on the supply chain.

We received statements or responses from 67% of the direct suppliers who supply us with materials or components that we believe may contain conflict minerals, which represents greater than 90% of our supply chain spend during the applicable calendar year. We reviewed the statements and responses we received for completeness and consistency of answers and, as appropriate, asked certain suppliers to provide corrections and clarifications.

Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform in all material respects to the five-step framework in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chain of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (the “OECD Guidance”).

To address the first step of the OECD Guidance, we have established strong company management systems by adopting a policy relating to conflict minerals that incorporates the OECD Guidance. The policy is found on our website at the following url: https://www.digi.com/company/environment/conflict-minerals. This policy has also been communicated directly to our direct suppliers.

We have advanced the second step of the OECD Guidance related to identifying risks in our supply chain by analyzing the responses from our suppliers. Certain responses from our direct suppliers pursuant to the RCOI process described above contained names of smelters and refiners who processed conflict minerals contained in our products. We reviewed the locations of these smelters and refiners in light of the covered countries and compared them against the conflict-free compliant smelters and refiners list of the RMI.

The results of our due diligence were reviewed with members of our senior management team and summarized for our Board of Directors to enable us to design a strategy to robustly respond to risks in our supply chain.

This Report is also publicly available on our website at the address identified above to meet the final step of the OECD Guidance to report annually on our supply chain due diligence.

Many of our hardware products contain materials or components that include one or more of the conflict minerals. Notwithstanding our efforts described above, we have been unable to determine, after exercising due diligence, whether all of the conflict minerals in our hardware products are DRC conflict-free. We are therefore not able to determine whether these products originated in the covered countries and whether all of the conflict minerals in our hardware products may have been from recycled or scrap sources. We received no information from our direct suppliers indicating that the tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold in our products originated in the covered countries, and we have also been unable to confirm the sourcing status of these minerals for each of the smelters and refiners listed below in Schedule A.

Our suppliers also provided us with the names of approximately 523 smelters and refiners, along with the smelter or refiner facility location, that our direct suppliers have identified as processing the necessary conflict minerals in our hardware products. These smelters and refiners are listed on Schedule A. Of these smelters and refiners, 219 were identified as “compliant conformant” and 9 were reported to be “active” in the process of conforming to the assessment protocols of the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (“RMAP”) as of May 26, 2026. The remaining smelters or refiners were not defined as either conformant or active by the RMI as of the same date. While our suppliers identified smelters or refiners they have utilized in the production of components on company-wide basis, in many cases they were unable to confirm whether any particular smelter or refiner was actually used in the production of components provided to us.  

We will continue to communicate our expectations and information requirements to our direct suppliers. We will also continue to monitor changes in circumstances that may impact the facts or our determination. Over time, we anticipate that the amount of information globally on the traceability and sourcing of conflict minerals will likely increase and improve our knowledge. We will continue to make inquiries to our direct suppliers and undertake additional fact and risk assessments where potentially relevant changes in facts or circumstances are identified. Accordingly, we will continue to encourage our direct suppliers to improve their own due diligence programs as well as encourage smelters and refiners in the supply chain to engage with or conform to the assessment protocols of the RMAP or another independent, third-party audit program. If we become aware of a supplier whose due diligence needs improvement, we intend to continue the trade relationship while that supplier improves its performance. We expect our direct suppliers to take similar measures with their suppliers to ensure alignment throughout the supply chain.

An independent private sector audit is not required for calendar year 2025.