Exhibit 1.01

Sangoma Technologies Corporation

Conflict Minerals Report

For the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2025

This conflict minerals report (this “Conflict Minerals Report”) for Sangoma Technologies Corporation (collectively, the “Company”, “Sangoma”, “we”, “our” or “us”) is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Rule 13p-1 (the “Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Form SD for the reporting period from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025. The Rule was adopted by the SEC to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to Conflict Minerals (as defined below) as directed by Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants whose manufactured products contain conflict minerals which are necessary to the functionality or production of their products. “Conflict Minerals” are defined as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives (collectively, “Conflict Minerals”), which are limited to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold (“3TG”) for purposes of this Conflict Minerals Report. For products which contain Conflict Minerals, registrants must conduct in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry (an “RCOI”) designed to determine whether any of the Conflict Minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (which encompasses Angola, Burundi, The Central African Republic, The Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia) (collectively, the “Covered Countries”). Numerous terms in this Conflict Minerals Report are defined in the Rule and SEC Release No. 34-67716 issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012, and the reader of this Conflict Minerals Report is referred to these materials for such definitions. This Conflict Minerals Report is not audited as provided by the April 2014 public statement made by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance.

Conflict Minerals Disclosure

1. Company Overview

The Company is a trusted leader in delivering value-based Communications as a Service (CaaS) solutions for businesses of all sizes. The Company simplifies communications by providing businesses with the industry’s most comprehensive suite of cloud-native communications solutions, which work together seamlessly to streamline business processes. The Company provides businesses with a complete solution, including cloud software, endpoints, and connectivity – all delivered and supported by the Company’s expert team.

2. Overview of Products

In addition to the CaaS solutions, the Company also offers network interconnection products, such as session border controller (SBCs), gateways and PSTN interface and media processing boards. The Company contracts to manufacture certain of its network interconnection products that contain Conflict Minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of such products (together, the “Covered Products”). For a further discussion of the Company’s products, including the Covered Products, please refer to the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2025 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended June 30, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on September 17, 2025 (the “Annual Report”)).

3. Supply Chain Overview and Due Diligence

The Company does not engage in the actual mining of Conflict Minerals nor does it make purchases of raw ore or unrefined Conflict Minerals, and makes no purchases in the Covered Countries. Rather, the Company’s manufacturing process is significantly removed from the mining, smelting and/or refining of 3TG minerals, and there are numerous third parties in the supply chain between the original sources of 3TG minerals and the ultimate manufacture of our products. Therefore, tracing these minerals to their sources is a challenge that requires the Company to rely on its direct and indirect suppliers in its efforts to achieve supply chain transparency, including obtaining information regarding the origin of the 3TG minerals. More specifically, the Company continues to rely upon its direct and indirect suppliers to provide information on the origin of Conflict Minerals contained in the Covered Products, including the sources of Conflict Minerals that are supplied to those manufacturers.

The Company has taken certain measures to identify the source of Conflict Minerals used in its products, including:

4. Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry Results and Conclusion

As required by the Rule, the Company undertook an analysis and determined that the Covered Products contain one or more Conflict Minerals, which are necessary to the Covered Products’ functionality or production. Accordingly, as required by the Rule, the Company conducted in good faith an RCOI regarding those Conflict Minerals, which was designed to determine whether any of those Conflict Minerals originated from a Covered Country or are from recycled or scrap sources, as each defined in the Rule. To this end, the Company sent communications to each third-party manufacturer of the Covered Products explaining the requirements of the Rule and its applicability to the Company and seeking the certification from each third-party manufacturer that the Conflict Minerals in the applicable Covered Product did not originate in a Covered Country and/or to provide answers to the CMRT reflecting the Company’s position on the supply chain.

The Company received back responses from a majority of the third-party suppliers surveyed. A list of smelters and refiners that sourced 3TG for our products contracted to be manufactured during the reporting period covered by this Conflict Minerals Report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Each CMRT received from third-party suppliers identified lists of smelters or refiners, and their countries of origin, which may supply Conflict Minerals utilized in the Covered Products. The Company exercised due diligence to determine the source and chain of custody of the 3TG necessary to the functionality or production of the Covered Products as required by the Rule. Certain responses to the Company’s RCOI regarding the origin or source of the 3TG contained in the components sold to the Company by its third-party suppliers did not provide the Company with sufficient information to conclusively determine whether the 3TG originated from a Covered Country, or whether such 3TG came from recycled or scrap sources. However, based on the information that has been obtained from the Company’s third-party suppliers as of the date hereof, the Company has reason to believe that a portion of the Conflict Minerals used in the Covered Products may have originated in the Covered Countries set forth on Exhibit B and may not be exclusively from scrap or recycled sources. Furthermore, the necessary 3TG in our products, which may have originated from outside the Covered Countries, came from one or more of the countries listed in the attached Exhibit C.

We believe our RCOI process was reasonably designed and performed in good faith, but there are inherent limitations in the information provided to us by third parties, including the possibility of information being inaccurate, incomplete or falsified despite our efforts to validate and confirm the information. Because of the relatively small amount of the Company’s components that contain Conflict Minerals and the fact that the Company’s third-party suppliers are several steps removed from the applicable smelters and refiners, the Company has assessed, and will continue to assess, if any additional actions can or should be implemented that would improve the information gathered from its due diligence to ensure compliance with its reporting requirements under the Rule.

5. Non-Conformant or Sanctioned Smelters

Our version 6.5 CMRT (the “v6.5 CMRT”) consists of a compilation of 3TG Smelters or Refiners (“SORs”) received from our suppliers for the 2025 reporting period. The CMRT is regularly updated, and we required use of version 6.5 for reporting. We are aware that as of the current date, some of these SORs are no longer considered RMAP eligible and may no longer have an audit status of conformant. Some of these SORs on the v6.5 CMRT were either active or conformant for at least part of the 2025 reporting period and were reported by our suppliers as used in their supply chains; therefore, we must continue to report them on our CMRT. Sangoma has no direct affiliation or business with the SORs and instead relies on information from a multi-level upstream supply base. Based on these factors and the size of our supply chain, we are unable to provide a specific removal date at this time as we have no direct influence over (i) the supply base purchasing sources and (ii) related budgetary constraints.

We are committed to responsible sourcing and conformance with global standards. As part of our due diligence procedures, we conduct a review of the supply chain and seek to promote supplier direct/indirect contact with the smelters to encourage RMAP conformance and/or participation. In the case of smelters which are unable (or unwilling) to conform to RMAP audit standards, we will thereafter work collaboratively with our supply chain to disengage from these smelters and/or find alternative sourcing locations should they remain non-conformant. We reviewed the smelters of concern and have provided comments below regarding the RMAP “non-conformant” and/or “high risk” smelters. Each of the sanctioned SORs identified in our due diligence process are listed on Exhibit D attached hereto.

6. Continued Steps to Mitigate Risk

We intend to continue improving our RCOI process and to further mitigate risk that any Conflict Minerals in our products could benefit armed groups in a Covered Country contributing to human rights violations through the following measures:

Moreover, we continually look to improve on our due diligence processes. As the SEC and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development provide more guidance on this process, we will implement necessary measures to report on our Conflict Minerals status. We will work with our direct suppliers to get more relevant and complete data on the source and chain of custody of the Conflict Minerals used in our products and will continue to refine the list of relevant suppliers.

7. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Conflict Minerals Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Please see “Forward Looking Information” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2025 filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause the actual results and performance of the Company to vary and deviate from those forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that such risks, uncertainties and assumptions are not exhaustive, and the Company does not undertake any obligation to update, modify or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, newly obtained information or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable laws. Moreover, given that forward-looking statements involve significant and inherent risks, uncertainties and assumptions, readers of this Conflict Minerals Report are strongly advised not to place any undue reliance on any such information.

Exhibit A

Smelters and Refiners Reported in the Company’s Supply Chain as of April 8, 2026

EXHIBIT B

Covered Countries from Which the Company’s Necessary 3TG

May Have Originated as of April 8, 2026

EXHIBIT C

Countries, Outside of the Covered Countries, from Which the Company’s Necessary 3TG May Have Originated as of April 8, 2026

Andorra

Australia

Austria

Belgium

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Brazil

Canada

Chile

China

Colombia

Czechia

Estonia

France

Germany

Ghana

India

Indonesia

Italy

Japan

Kazakhstan

Republic of Korea

Kyrgyzstan

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Lithuania

Malaysia

Mexico

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Russian Federation

Singapore

South Africa

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan, Province of China

Thailand

Turkey

United Arab Emirates

United States of America

Uzbekistan

Viet Nam

Zimbabwe

EXHIBIT D

Non-Conformant or Sanctioned SORs as of April 8, 2026