Exhibit 1.01

Conflict Minerals Report

For 2025, we have completed our analysis of the suppliers for Amazon electronic devices, fashion and apparel, and other consumer products that fall within the scope of the applicable rules (collectively, in-scope products). A majority of these suppliers certified that they: did not use gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum in parts or components for our in-scope products; did not source these minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, referred to as the DRC region; or sourced these minerals from a smelter or refiner that complies with a responsible mineral sourcing validation program such as the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process. Remaining suppliers are still completing investigations of their supply chains. As discussed in the Conclusion, for 2025, we identified no suppliers that were sourcing minerals through a supply chain that benefitted armed groups in the DRC region.

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s conflict minerals rules, we designed our due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum in our in-scope products in accordance with the OECD’s Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas Third Edition, and the related Supplements on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and on Gold. We undertook the steps described below as part of our due diligence process:

Establish strong company management systems

We are committed to avoiding the use of minerals that have fueled conflict, and we expect our suppliers to support our efforts to identify the origin of gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum used in products that we manufacture or contract to manufacture. Our policy is reflected in our Supply Chain Standards, available at https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/social-responsibility#section-nav-id-0, which we communicate to our suppliers through our supplier screening process, contracts with suppliers, or by sending our suppliers a copy of the Supplier Code.

In 2012, we established a conflict minerals group, which includes representatives from supply chain management, sustainability, and legal. The group implemented a process to identify within Amazon’s businesses the products that we manufacture or contract to manufacture potentially containing gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum. Based on that process, we concluded that the conflict minerals rules applied to our in-scope products, and the group identified, engaged with, and made inquiries of, our suppliers that, based on our reasonable country of origin inquiry, we believed sourced gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum from the DRC region in 2025.

Identify and assess risk in the supply chain

Our conflict minerals due diligence is based on a survey process in which we request information from our in-scope product suppliers through the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template prepared by the Responsible Minerals Initiative. In addition, we communicated with each of our suppliers to confirm the accuracy of the information provided in their most recent template.

The completed templates were reviewed by our conflict minerals group, and the findings were reported to senior management.

Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks; engagement with certain suppliers

If we became aware that a supplier was sourcing gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum from the DRC region, we then reviewed the smelters or refiners identified by the supplier against lists of facilities that comply with a responsible mineral sourcing validation program in order to determine whether the smelter or refiner that processed those minerals had been audited by an independent third party. We actively reviewed and discussed our policy regarding gold, tin, tungsten, and tantalum with each supplier unable to determine the origin of gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum and we will continue evaluating the results of their efforts.

Report on supply chain due diligence

This report is publicly filed with the SEC and is available at www.amazon.com/ir.

Conclusion

While, for 2025, we identified no suppliers that were sourcing minerals through a supply chain that benefitted armed groups in the DRC region, some of the suppliers for our in-scope products are still working to determine country of origin and facility information or are still investigating whether the facilities they identified were used to process the gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum in our in-scope products. For suppliers that were unable to determine the sources of such minerals, we:

Annex A below includes a list of known smelters and refiners that may have processed gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum in the in-scope products, based on our review of data from several sources, including information reported to us by suppliers for our in-scope products that provided facility information and information obtained through engagement with processing facilities. Because many of the suppliers for our in-scope products that provided country of origin and facility information provided this information to us for their entire supply chain, without specifying which facilities contributed gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum used in components of the in-scope products, we are unable to validate the accuracy of the list in Annex A, including which of these facilities in fact processed the gold, tin, tungsten, or tantalum used in the in-scope products.

Annex A

Countries of origin from which these facilities may source conflict minerals include:

Albania

Andorra

Angola

Argentina

Armenia

Australia

Austria

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Belgium

Benin

Bermuda

Bolivia

Botswana

Brazil

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cambodia

Canada

Central African Republic

Chile

China

Colombia

Cyprus

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Djibouti

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

Egypt

El Salvador

Eritrea

Estonia

Ethiopia

Fiji 

Finland

France

Georgia

Germany

Ghana

Guatemala

Guinea

Guyana

Honduras

Hungary

India

Indonesia

Ireland

Israel

Italy

Japan

Jersey

Kazakhstan

Kenya

Kyrgyzstan

Liberia

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Madagascar

Malaysia

Mali

Mauritania

Mexico

Mongolia

Morocco

Mozambique

Myanmar

Namibia

Netherlands

New Zealand

Nicaragua

Niger

Nigeria

Norway

Oman

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Republic of the Congo

Republic of Korea

Russian Federation

Rwanda

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Serbia

Sierra Leone

Singapore

Slovakia

Solomon Islands

South Africa

South Sudan

Spain

Sudan

Suriname

Sweden

Switzerland

Taiwan

Tajikistan

Tanzania

Thailand

Turkey

Uganda

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

Uruguay

Uzbekistan

Vietnam

Zambia

Zimbabwe