Exhibit 1.01

Peraso Inc.

Conflict Minerals Report

For the year ended December 31, 2025

This Conflict Minerals Report of Peraso Inc. (“Peraso” or the “Company”) for the reporting period January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 is provided in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Rule 13p-1”). Rule 13p-1 was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to Conflict Minerals, as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Conflict Minerals are defined as columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold and wolframite, including their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten (collectively, “3TG”), that originate in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (collectively, the “Covered Countries”).

The Company is a fabless semiconductor company specializing in the development of millimeter wave, which is generally described as the frequency band from 24 Gigahertz (“GHz”) to 300 GHz, wireless technology. Prior to April 2024, the Company also manufactured and sold high-performance memory semiconductor devices and received royalties from licensees of its memory technology. The Company derives revenue from selling its semiconductor devices and antenna modules, performance of non-recurring engineering services and licensing of its technologies. As a fabless semiconductor company, Peraso does not purchase directly from smelters or refineries and must rely upon its manufacturing subcontractors to: (i) identify whether 3TG minerals are used in the manufacture of Peraso’s products, (ii) identify the sources of 3TG used in the manufacture of Peraso products, and (iii) declare whether any of the 3TG minerals used is a Conflict Mineral. Peraso has determined that at least one or more of the 3TG is necessary to produce one or more Peraso integrated circuit products. In particular, the Company believes some material used by its foundries to produce the silicon wafers for one or more of the Company’s products contains at least one of the 3TG.

The Company has conducted a good faith reasonable country of origin inquiry regarding the 3TG contained in its products, which inquiry was designed to determine (a) whether any of the 3TG contained in its products originated in the Covered Countries and (b) whether any of the 3TG are from recycled or scrap sources. The Company also exercised due diligence on the chain of custody and source of the 3TG.

Peraso’s due diligence measures were designed to conform, in all material respects, with the framework in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (the “OECD Framework”). The objectives of the Company’s diligence initiative were to determine, to the best of its ability, the source and chain of custody of the 3TG necessary for the functionality and/or production of its products; whether any such 3TG originated in the Covered Countries or are from recycled or scrap sources; and where such 3TG were determined to have originated in Covered Countries and whether armed groups directly or indirectly benefited from such 3TG.

As Peraso is downstream in the semiconductor supply chain, the Company is many steps removed from the mining of conflict minerals. The components and materials contained in its products are supplied by a large number of suppliers, through multiple tiers of distribution. Once minerals are in the supply chain, determining the smelter or the origin of minerals is a challenging process, and Peraso recognizes the limitations inherent as to what is able to identify and control. 

Consistent with these limitations, the OECD Guidance acknowledges that the requirements for compliance should reflect a company's position in the supply chain. In particular, the OECD Guidance states that the implementation of due diligence should be tailored to a company's activities and relationships and that the nature and extent of due diligence may vary based on a company's size, products, relationships with suppliers and other factors. Due to practical difficulties associated with supply chain complexities, the OECD Guidance advises that downstream companies exercise due diligence primarily by establishing controls over their immediate suppliers. The Responsible Minerals Initiative (“RMI”) guidance on implementing the OECD Guidance further recommends that, in conducting due diligence, downstream companies identify relevant or highest priority "tier-1" ( direct) suppliers and focus their due diligence efforts on those priority suppliers first. 

Because some of the information provided by Peraso suppliers is incomplete and not all smelters have been identified under the CFS program as conflict-free, Peraso is unable to determine if its products are entirely conflict-free; however, the Company does not have any information indicating that any of the 3TG used by Peraso’s manufacturing suppliers originate from the Covered Countries.

Based on the information provided by the Company’s suppliers and obtained through the due diligence process, set forth below is a list of CFS program-certified conflict-free facilities identified by the Company’s supply chain:

The Company has communicated its expectations, as reflected in its Conflict Minerals Policy, to its manufacturing suppliers. The Company continues to engage with its suppliers to update their information on the source and chain of custody of conflict minerals in Peraso’s supply chain and to request that all smelters utilized by its suppliers agree to participate in the RMI or equivalent program.