Exhibit
99.3

EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Third Party Due Diligence Review
Overview
Consolidated Analytics, Inc (“Consolidated
Analytics”), a third-party due diligence provider, performed the review described below on newly originated mortgage loans acquired
by Loan Funding Structure III LLC through a bulk purchase. The review included a total of 514 newly originated residential mortgage loans,
in connection with the securitization identified as BRAVO 2026-NQM5 (the “Securitization”). Credit, Property Valuation, and
Data Integrity reviews were performed on a population of 514 loans. Compliance review was performed on a population of 479 loans. The
Review was conducted from January 2022 through May 2026 on mortgage loans originated between November 2021 and April 2026.
Scope of Review
Credit Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Credit
Review” to verify compliance with guidelines in effect at the time of loan origination, or other guidelines provided by Client prior
to review, and ensure the characteristics used by the underwriter are supported by the file documentation; and determine whether any loans
outside of those guidelines contain legitimate and approved exceptions with compensating factors.
The Credit Review attempted to confirm the
following:
| a. | QM
or ATR Validation / Review of 8 Key Underwriting Factors |
| ● | Validate borrower(s) monthly gross income |
| ● | Validate funds required to close, required reserves |
| ● | Review file documentation for required level of income and asset verifications |
| ● | Review file documentation for required level of employment |
| iii. | Monthly Mortgage Payment |
| ● | Confirm program, qualifying rate, terms |
| ● | Validate all concurrent loans are included in the DTI to properly assess
the ability to repay |
| v. | Mortgage Related Obligations: PITI, HOA, PMI, etc. |
| ● | Validate subject loan monthly payment (PITI) and associated obligations |
| ● | Validate monthly recurring liabilities |
| vii. | DTI and/or Residual Income |
| ● | Validate debt-to-income ratio (DTI) based upon income and debt documentation
provided in the file |
| ● | Documentation meets Appendix Q requirements for QM Loans |
| ● | Review credit report for credit history and required credit depth including
any / all inquiries |
| ● | Determine representative credit score from credit report |
| b. | Validate
loan-to-value (LTV) and combined loan-to-value |
| c. | Review
borrower's occupancy |
| d. | Validation
through third party resource of the subject properties most recent twelve (12) month sales history |
| e. | Confirm
sufficient evidence in loan file, by reviewing the underwriter’s decision to approve the loan based upon the borrows income, debt,
and credit history, to support borrower's willingness and ability to repay the debt |
| f. | Confirm
that Final 1003 is sufficiently completed |
| g. | Provide
Audit 1008 with accurate data based on file documentation |
| h. | Confirm
Loan Approval conditions were met |
| i. | Review
condominium questionnaire to verify all information is complete, prepared by an authorized representative, and address any red flags
that may deem condominium project ineligible |
| j. | General
QM for any loans originated under the GQM Rule |
| a. | Pricing
for First Lien Loans: |
| i. | | 2.25% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable
dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | | 3.5% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable
dollar amount threshold; and |
| iii. | | 6.5% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than the applicable dollar amount
threshold. |
| b. | Pricing
for Subordinate Lien Loans: |
| i. | | 3.5% for a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable
dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | | 6.5% for a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than the applicable dollar amount
threshold. |
| c. | Pricing
for Manufactured Homes: |
| i. | | 2.25% for a first-lien covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount equal to
or greater than the applicable dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | | 6.5% for a covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount less than applicable
dollar amount threshold. |
| ii. | Consider Income and Assets: |
| o | Consumer’s current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the dwelling
that secures the loan; |
| o | The consumer’s debt obligations, alimony, child support; and |
| o | The monthly DTI or residual income. |
| iii. | Verification of Income and Assets: |
| a. | Verification in compliance with one of the “safe harbor” guidelines will meet the QM verification
requirement. A creditor is allowed to “mix and match” provisions of the different guidelines rather than only apply one guideline
per loan. |
The specific guidelines that the CFPB is designating for the safe
harbor are: The GQM Rule provides that if the creditor verifies the consumer’s income or assets, debt obligations, alimony, child
support, and monthly DTI or residual income by meeting the standards of certain specified third-party underwriting manuals, then a creditor
is presumed to have complied with the verification requirement. These specified manuals are:
| i. | | Chapters B3-3 through B3-6 of the Fannie Mae Single Family Selling Guide, published June 3, 2020; |
| ii. | | Sections 5102 through 5500 of the Freddie Mac Single-Family Seller/Servicer Guide, published June 10,
2020; |
| iii. | | Sections II.A.1 and II.A.4-5 of the Federal Housing Administration’s Single Family Housing Policy
Handbook, issued October 24, 2019; |
| iv. | | Chapter 4 of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Lenders Handbook, revised February 22, 2019;
|
| v. | | Chapter 4 of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Field Office Handbook for the Direct Single
Family Housing Program, revised March 15, 2019; and |
| vi. | | Chapters 9 through 11 of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Handbook for the Single Family Guaranteed
Loan Program, revised March 19, 2020. |
Compliance Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Compliance
Review” to determine, as applicable, to the extent possible and subject to the caveats below, whether the loan complies with applicable
regulatory requirements as noted below, each as amended, restated and/or replaced from time to time. In relation to cash out refinances
of investment property loans, documentation provided in the loan file will be reviewed only to validate the use of cash out proceeds for
business purposes at the origination/consummation of the loan. In the event use of proceeds cannot be validated, or are deemed to be utilized
for consumer purposes, the loan would then be subject to a “Compliance Review” of applicable regulatory requirements as noted
below, each as amended, restated and/or replaced from time to time. The Compliance Review included the following:
| a. | Test Loan Estimate(s) for accuracy and completeness as well as timing requirements as required by TRID
Regulations |
| b. | Test Closing Disclosure(s) for accuracy and completeness as well as timing requirements as required by
TRID Regulations |
| i. | Compare Loan Estimate and Closing Disclosures |
| ii. | Identify Tolerance Violations and applicable cost to cure |
| d. | Comprehensive review of Closing Disclosure to determine transaction accuracy |
| e. | Recalculation of APR and Finance Charge |
| i. | Federal High Cost Mortgage provisions |
| ii. | Federal Higher Priced Mortgage Loans provisions |
| iii. | Local and/or State Anti-predatory and High Cost provisions |
| g. | Determine whether specified federal disclosures were provided timely based upon comparison of the application
date to the dates on such disclosures |
| ii. | Home Ownership Counselling Disclosure |
| h. | Compliance with QM as it relates to: |
| iii. | Prepayment Penalty Test |
| iv. | Product Eligibility Testing |
| i. | Notice of Right to Cancel (Rescission)
Review |
| i. | Confirm transaction date, expiration date, and disbursement date |
| ii. | Confirm document is properly executed by all required
parties to the transaction |
| iii. | Confirm the correct Right of Rescission document was executed for the transaction
type |
| j. | Confirm through NMLS the loan originator and originating
firm's license status was active and properly disclosed on appropriate loan documents |
| k. | Check the Loan participants against the exclusionary list provided by Client or by the purchaser of the
Loan(s) |
| l. | Review closing documents to ensure that the Mortgage Loan information is complete, accurate, and consistent
with other documents; Confirm collateral documents have been recorded or sent for recording |
The Compliance Review did not include any federal,
state or local laws, constitutional provisions, regulations or ordinances that are not expressly enumerated above. Furthermore, the findings
reached by Consolidated Analytics are dependent upon its receiving complete and accurate data regarding the loans from loan originators
and other third parties upon which Consolidated Analytics is relying in reaching such findings.
Valuation Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Valuation
Review,” which included the following:
| a. | Review original appraisal, determination that property is in "average" condition or better,
or property requires cosmetic improvements (as defined by the appraiser) that do not affect habitability. Should an area of concern be
identified with the condition of the property, Consolidated Analytics will alert Client. |
| b. | Review appraisal, determination that property is completely constructed and appraisal is on an “as
is basis,” or property is identified as not completely constructed by originating appraiser. |
| c. | Review and determine if the appraisal report was performed on appropriate GSE forms and if the appraiser
indicated in the body of the subject appraisal that the appraisal conforms to USPAP standards. |
| d. | Review and determine the relevance of the comparable properties and ensure that a rational and reliable
value was provided and supported as of the effective date of the Origination Appraisal. |
| e. | Review adjustments (line item, net and gross adjustments) to ensure they are reasonable. |
| f. | Ensure that the appraisal conforms to the guidelines provided from the Client. |
| g. | Review appraisal to ensure all required documents were included. |
| h. | Review location map provided within the appraisal for external obsolescence. |
| i. | Ensure highest and best use and zoning complies with guidelines. |
| j. | Confirm there are no marketability issues that affect the subject property. |
| k. | Ensure subject property does not suffer any functional obsolescence. |
| l. | Where applicable, determine if the file did not contain the appraisal or other valuation method and a
review could not be performed. |
| m. | Additional valuation products were not required when the CU score provided was 2.5 or below or the appraisal
LCA risk score was eligible for Collateral Rep and Warranty relief. In the event the CU score was greater than 2.5 or the LCA score was
not eligible for R&W relief, an additional valuation product was obtained to confirm value was supported within 10% tolerance. In
some instances, based on guidance from the seller, CDA’s were ordered on loans that had an acceptable CU score or R&W eligibility. |
Consolidated Analytics applied a cascade methodology
to determine if the original appraised value was reasonably supported when compared to an independent third-party valuation product.
For loans reviewed in a post-close valuation review scenario (514
loans in total):
Three hundred twenty-eight (328) loans had CU scores of 2.5 or less
or were eligible for Collateral Rep and Warranty relief.
Twenty-nine (29) loans had an AVM, nineteen (19) loans had a Secondary
Appraisal, three-hundred eight (308) loans had a Desk Review, one (1) loan had a Second Desk Review, three (3) loans had a Broker Price
Opinion (BPO), and six (6) loans had a Field Review. Consolidated Analytics has independent access to the Desk Reviews ordered by the
Aggregator.
Product totals may not sum due to multiple products for each
loan
TAPE INTEGRITY REVIEW RESULTS SUMMARY
Of the five-hundred fourteen (514) mortgage loans reviewed, three
hundred thirty-nine (339) unique mortgage loans (65.70% by loan count) had a total of nine hundred fifty-four (954) discrepancies across
forty-nine (49) data fields. A blank or zero value on the data tape when an actual value was captured by Consolidated Analytics was not
treated as a data variance.
| Fields
Reviewed |
Discrepancy
Count |
Percentage
|
| Qualifying
Total Reserves Number of Months |
167 |
17.51% |
| Total
Qualified Assets Available |
129 |
13.52% |
| Borrower
Appraisal Receipt Date |
118 |
12.37% |
| Total
Liquid Assets Available For Close |
86 |
9.01% |
| Monthly
Total Escrow Payment |
53 |
5.56% |
| Qualifying
All Borrower Residual Income |
46 |
4.82% |
| Borrower
1 Last Name |
37 |
3.88% |
| Application
Date |
31 |
3.25% |
| Qualifying
CLTV |
27 |
2.83% |
| Qualifying
LTV |
27 |
2.83% |
| Calculated
DSCR |
24 |
2.52% |
| Property
Type |
23 |
2.41% |
| Property
Value |
21 |
2.20% |
| MIN
No |
19 |
1.99% |
| Qualifying
FICO |
17 |
1.78% |
| Borrower
1 Citizen |
16 |
1.68% |
| Cash
Disbursement Date |
13 |
1.36% |
| ULI |
13 |
1.36% |
| T
& I Payment |
11 |
1.15% |
| Borrower
1 FTHB |
10 |
1.05% |
| DSCR |
8 |
0.84% |
| Note
Date |
7 |
0.73% |
| Reviewed
Appraised Property Value |
5 |
0.52% |
| Mo Pymt (P&I) |
5 |
0.52% |
| Property County |
4 |
0.42% |
| Number of Units |
4 |
0.42% |
| First Payment Date |
3 |
0.31% |
| Maturity Date |
3 |
0.31% |
| Verified Doc Type |
3 |
0.31% |
| Qualifying Monthly P&I Amount |
2 |
0.21% |
| NON QM Months Reserves |
2 |
0.21% |
| Property Address |
2 |
0.21% |
| Original_Collateral_Value_Date |
2 |
0.21% |
| Index |
1 |
0.10% |
| Property City |
1 |
0.10% |
| Sales Price |
1 |
0.10% |
| Property_Type |
1 |
0.10% |
| Property No Units |
1 |
0.10% |
| Interest Rate |
1 |
0.10% |
| Prepayment Penalty |
1 |
0.10% |
| Loan Purpose |
1 |
0.10% |
| As-Is Value |
1 |
0.10% |
| Margin |
1 |
0.10% |
| Citizen Types |
1 |
0.10% |
| Closing_Date |
1 |
0.10% |
| UW_FICO_Utilized |
1 |
0.10% |
| Original_PITI_Payment |
1 |
0.10% |
| Mortgage Origination Channel |
1 |
0.10% |
| Originator DSCR |
1 |
0.10% |
| Grand Total |
954 |
100.00% |
Summary of Results
OVERALL RESULTS SUMMARY
Final Loan Grades
| |
Overall Loan Results: |
|
|
| |
Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Original
Principal Balance |
Percent
of Sample |
|
| |
Event
Grade A |
469 |
$249,915,803.00 |
91.25% |
|
| |
Event
Grade B |
45 |
$29,772,850.00 |
8.75% |
|
| |
Event
Grade C |
0 |
$0.00 |
0% |
|
| |
Event
Grade D |
0 |
$0.00 |
0% |
|
| |
Total
Sample |
514 |
$279,688,653.00 |
100.00% |
|
| |
Credit Results: |
|
|
| |
Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Percent
of Sample |
|
| |
Event
Grade A |
480 |
93.39% |
|
| |
Event
Grade B |
34 |
6.61% |
|
| |
Event
Grade C |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Event
Grade D |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Total
Sample |
514 |
100.00% |
|
| |
Compliance Results: As applicable, 35 loans within population did not receive a Compliance Review |
|
| |
Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Percent
of Sample |
|
| |
Event
Grade A |
473 |
98.75% |
|
| |
Event
Grade B |
6 |
1.25% |
|
| |
Event
Grade C |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Event
Grade D |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Total
Sample |
479 |
100.00% |
|
| |
Valuation Results: |
|
|
| |
Event
Grade |
Loan
Count |
Percent
of Sample |
|
| |
Event
Grade A |
508 |
98.83% |
|
| |
Event
Grade B |
6 |
1.17% |
|
| |
Event
Grade C |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Event
Grade D |
0 |
0% |
|
| |
Total
Sample |
514 |
100.00% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Exception Category Summary
The table below summarizes the individual exceptions which carried an associated
“A”, “B”, “C”, or “D” level exception grade. One loan may have carried more than one exception.
In such cases, the exception with the lowest grade would drive the loan grade for that particular area of the review. The overall loan
grade is the lowest grade for any one particular review scope (ex. a loan with a Compliance Grade of “B”, a Credit Grade of
“A”, and a Property Grade of “A” would receive an overall Loan Grade of “B”).
| Exception
Type |
Exception
Level Grade |
Exception
Category |
Total |
| Credit |
A |
No
Credit Findings |
347 |
| Third
Party Fraud Report not Provided |
14 |
| Property
Title Issue |
12 |
| Asset
Qualification Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
11 |
| Housing
History Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
8 |
| All
Interested Parties Not Checked with Exclusionary Lists |
8 |
| Verification
of Rent (VOR)/Verification of Mortgage (VOM) Document is incomplete |
8 |
| Income
and Employment Do Not Meet Guidelines |
7 |
| Borrower
1 3rd Party VOE Prior to Close Missing |
7 |
| Missing
Personal Guaranty |
7 |
| Missing
verification of taxes, insurance, and/or HOA fees for non-subject property |
7 |
| Title
Coverage is Less than Subject Lien |
6 |
| Approval/Underwriting
Summary Not Provided |
6 |
| Assets
do not meet guideline requirements |
5 |
| Audited
Reserves are less than Guideline Required Reserves (Dollar Amount) |
5 |
| Audited
Reserves are less than Guideline Required Reserves (Number of Months) |
5 |
| Missing
evidence of self employment |
5 |
| OFAC
Check Not Completed and/or Cleared |
4 |
| Hazard
Insurance Effective Date is after the Disbursement Date |
4 |
| Purchase
Contract is Incomplete |
4 |
| Fraud
Report Shows Uncleared Alerts |
4 |
| The
Total Hazard Coverage is LESS than the Required Coverage Amount |
4 |
| Asset
1 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
3 |
| DSCR
is less than guideline minimum |
3 |
| |
|
Borrower
residency documentation not provided or issue with documentation |
3 |
| Borrower
Contributions Do Not Met Guideline Minimum |
3 |
| The
Deed of Trust is Missing |
3 |
| Borrower
Non-US Citizen Identification Document Missing |
3 |
| Missing
Letter of Explanation (Credit) |
3 |
| Title
Document is Partially Present |
3 |
| The
Final 1003 is Incomplete |
2 |
| Third
Party Fraud Report Partially Provided |
2 |
| Asset
General |
2 |
| Audited
FICO is less than Guideline FICO |
2 |
| Approval/Underwriting
Summary Partially Provided |
2 |
| Title
Insurance Missing or Defective |
2 |
| The
Note is Missing |
2 |
| Missing
income documentation |
2 |
| Asset
2 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
2 |
| Missing
Lender Income Calculation Worksheet |
2 |
| Loan
does not conform to program guidelines |
2 |
| The
Deed of Trust is Incomplete |
2 |
| Audited
DTI Exceeds Guideline DTI |
2 |
| Missing
Trust Agreement |
2 |
| Asset
3 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
2 |
| Satisfactory
Chain of Title not Provided |
1 |
| ATR
Risk |
1 |
| Flood
Certificate Missing |
1 |
| 1-4
Family Rider is Missing |
1 |
| Audited
CLTV Exceeds Guideline CLTV |
1 |
| Audited
LTV Exceeds Guideline LTV |
1 |
| The
Final 1003 is Missing |
1 |
| Tradelines
do not meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Title
Insurance Coverage - Inadequate Coverage |
1 |
| Income
2 Months Income Verified is Missing |
1 |
| Borrower
information on 1003 is incomplete |
1 |
| Asset
3 Missing |
1 |
| Asset
7 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Ineligible
Property |
1 |
| Cash
Out Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Insufficient
Assets to Close |
1 |
| Asset
Documentation Missing or Defective |
1 |
| |
|
Loan
Agreement Missing |
1 |
| Audited
HCLTV Exceeds Guideline HCLTV |
1 |
| Asset
4 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Verification
of Borrower Liabilities Missing or Incomplete |
1 |
| Missing
Business Entity Formation Document |
1 |
| Missing
VOM or VOR |
1 |
| Asset
5 Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| No
Findings |
1 |
| Missing
final HUD-1 from sale of non-subject property |
1 |
| Asset
1 Missing |
1 |
| Missing
Income - Bank Statements |
1 |
| Purchase
is not considered to be an Arm's Length Transaction |
1 |
| Borrower
1 Business Bank Statements Missing |
1 |
| Business
Purpose Affidavit/Disclosure Missing |
1 |
| Borrower
1 Lease Agreements Missing |
1 |
| Closing
Documentation Missing or Defective |
1 |
| Missing
Letter of Explanation (Assets) |
1 |
| The
Initial 1003 is Missing |
1 |
| Borrower
1 Photo Identification not provided |
1 |
| Evidence
of Primary Residence and Rent-Free Scenario Missing or Defective |
1 |
| Missing
Letter of Explanation (Income) |
1 |
| Flood
Insurance Expiration Date is before the Disbursement Date |
1 |
| Borrower
2 Photo Identification not provided |
1 |
| Audited
Interested Party Contribution Exceeds Guideline Program Maximum |
1 |
| Missing
rent comparable schedule form 1007 |
1 |
| Hazard
Insurance Policy is Missing |
1 |
| Borrower
2 Verbal Verification of Employment does not meet GSE guideline timing requirement |
1 |
| Missing
Verification of Subject Property Taxes, Insurance, HOA or Other Payments |
1 |
| Housing
history does not meet guidelines |
1 |
| Hazard
Insurance Policy is Partial |
1 |
| HO6
Insurance Policy Effective Date is after the Note Date |
1 |
| Total
Credit Grade (A) Exceptions: |
590 |
| B |
Audited
HCLTV Exceeds Guideline HCLTV |
10 |
| Audited
LTV Exceeds Guideline LTV |
10 |
| Audited
CLTV Exceeds Guideline CLTV |
10 |
| |
|
Audited
Reserves are less than Guideline Required Reserves (Dollar Amount) |
5 |
| Audited
Reserves are less than Guideline Required Reserves (Number of Months) |
5 |
| Housing
History Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
3 |
| Loan
does not conform to program guidelines |
2 |
| Verification
of Rent (VOR)/Verification of Mortgage (VOM) Document is incomplete |
2 |
| Borrower
has less than 2 FICO scores and does not meet minimum required to be scored. |
2 |
| Maximum
Borrower Exposure Exceeded |
2 |
| Cash
Out Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
2 |
| DSCR
is less than guideline minimum |
2 |
| Title
Coverage is Less than Subject Lien |
1 |
| Missing
verification of taxes, insurance, and/or HOA fees for non-subject property |
1 |
| Missing
Letter of Explanation (Assets) |
1 |
| Audited
Loan Amount is less than Guideline Minimum Loan Amount |
1 |
| Product
Type does not meet eligibility requirement(s) |
1 |
| Asset
Qualification Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Maximum
Loan Amount Exceeded |
1 |
| Audited
Interested Party Contribution Exceeds Guideline Program Maximum |
1 |
| Missing
Letter of Explanation (Credit) |
1 |
| Income
documentation does not meet guidelines |
1 |
| Missing
VOM or VOR |
1 |
| Interest
rate per executed note does not meet program requirements |
1 |
| Purchase
Contract does not Match Final CD |
1 |
| Business
Purpose Affidavit/Disclosure Missing |
1 |
| Delinquent
Credit History Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements |
1 |
| Audited
Loan Amount is greater than Guideline Maximum Loan Amount |
1 |
| Hazard
Insurance Effective Date is after the Disbursement Date |
1 |
| Total
Credit Grade (B) Exceptions: |
72 |
| Compliance |
A |
No Compliance Findings |
344 |
| Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Test |
41 |
| Charges That Cannot Increase Test |
17 |
| eSigned Documents Consent is Missing |
14 |
| |
|
CA AB 260 Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Test |
7 |
| Missing Required Affiliated Business Disclosure |
7 |
| Initial Loan Estimate Delivery Date Test (from application) |
6 |
| Charges That In Total Cannot Increase More Than 10% Test |
6 |
| Initial Closing Disclosure Delivery Date Test |
5 |
| RESPA Homeownership Counseling Organizations Disclosure Date Test |
4 |
| TRID: Missing Closing Disclosure |
3 |
| Homeownership Counseling Disclosure Is Missing |
2 |
| TILA Right of Rescission Test |
2 |
| Evidence of Appraisal Delivery to Borrower not Provided or Late (12 CFR 1002.14(a)(1)) |
1 |
| Regulation § 1026.43(c)(2)(vi) failure - The consumer's current debt obligations, alimony, and child support or other debt obligations were not confirmed and included in the DTI or excluded per lender guidelines. |
1 |
| Missing Initial Escrow Disclosure |
1 |
| CT Nonprime Home Loan Test |
1 |
| Reimbursement Amount Test |
1 |
| NC Rate Spread Home Loan Test |
1 |
| Revised Loan Estimate Delivery Date Test (prior to consummation) |
1 |
| The Note is Not Executed |
1 |
| NY Subprime Home Loan Test |
1 |
| Consummation or Reimbursement Date Validation Test |
1 |
| Lender Credits That Cannot Decrease Test |
1 |
| MD COMAR Higher-Priced Mortgage Loan Test |
1 |
| Total Compliance Grade (A) Exceptions: |
470 |
| B |
Charges That In Total Cannot Increase More Than 10% Test |
2 |
| Incorrect rescission model used - RTC form model H-9 used for refinance not with Original Lender or Lender Affiliate |
1 |
| TILA Finance Charge Test |
1 |
| Intent to Proceed is Missing |
1 |
| Missing Required Affiliated Business Disclosure |
1 |
| Closing Disclosure is Not Executed |
1 |
| Charges That Cannot Increase Test |
1 |
| Homeownership Counseling Disclosure Is Missing |
1 |
| Total Compliance Grade (B) Exceptions: |
9 |
| Property |
A |
No Property Findings |
451 |
| Property/Appraisal General |
8 |
| |
|
HOA Questionnaire is Missing |
4 |
| Third Party Valuation Product Not Provided within 10% Tolerance |
3 |
| FEMA Post Disaster Inspection Report not Provided |
3 |
| FEMA Declared Disaster Dated Prior to the Note Date, After Appraisal Date |
2 |
| Title Issues Present |
2 |
| Appraisal incomplete (missing map, layout, pages, etc.) |
1 |
| Appraisal Review - Missing |
1 |
| Property Issue(s) are Present |
1 |
| Appraisal is Expired |
1 |
| Subject property appraisal is not on an as-is basis (Primary Value) |
1 |
| Condo Approval Missing |
1 |
| Desk Review Variance > 10% |
1 |
| Appraisal is Missing |
1 |
| Origination Appraisal is Partial |
1 |
| Total Property Grade (A) Exceptions: |
482 |
| B |
Third Party Valuation Product Not Provided within 10% Tolerance |
2 |
| Appraisal is Expired |
1 |
| Second Appraisal is Missing |
1 |
| Desk Review Variance > 10% |
1 |
| Property/Appraisal General |
1 |
| Total Property Grade (B) Exceptions: |
6 |
Event Grade Definitions
| Final
Loan Grade |
| A |
Loan
meets Credit, Compliance, and Valuation Guidelines |
| B |
The
loan substantially meets published Client/Seller
guidelines and/or eligibility in the validation of income, assets, or credit, is in material
compliance
with all
applicable laws
and regulations,
and the value and valuation methodology is supported and substantially meets published guidelines. |
| C |
The
loan does not meet the
published guidelines and/or violates one material law or regulation, and/or the value
and valuation methodology is not supported or did not meet published guidelines. |
| D |
Loan
is missing documentation to perform a sufficient review. |
| Credit Event Grades |
| A |
The loan meets the published guidelines without any exceptions. The employment, income, assets and occupancy are supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan is documented and reasonable. |
| B |
The loan substantially meets the published guidelines but reasonable compensating factors were considered and documented for exceeding published guidelines. The employment, income, assets and occupancy are supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan is documented and reasonable. |
| C |
The loan does not substantially meet the published guidelines. There are not sufficient compensating factors that justify exceeding the published guidelines. The employment, income, assets or occupancy are not supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan were not documented or are unreasonable. |
| D |
There was not sufficient documentation to perform a review or the credit file was not furnished. |
| Compliance Event Grades |
| A |
The loan is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The legal documents accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms and are executed by all applicable parties. |
| B |
The loan is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The legal documents accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms and are executed by all applicable parties. Client review required. |
| C |
The loan violates one material law or regulation. The material disclosures are absent or the legal documents do not accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms or all required applicants did not execute the documents. |
| D |
There was not sufficient documentation to perform a review or the required legal documents were not furnished. |
| Valuation Event Grades |
| A |
The value is supported within 10% of the original appraisal by the AVM or there are other supporting documents in the originators loan file package (CDA, Field Review or Second Appraisal). The appraisal was performed on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable at origination. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE approved forms. |
| B |
The value is not supported within 10% of the original appraisal by the AVM and there are no other valuation support documents in the loan file provided by the Seller. The valuation methodology substantially meets the published guidelines but reasonable compensating factors were considered and documented for exceeding guidelines. The appraisal was performed on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE approved forms. |
| Valuation Event Grades |
| C |
The value is not supported within 10% of the original appraisal. The valuation methodology did not meet the published guidelines and there were not sufficient compensating factors for exceeding published guidelines. The property is in below “average” condition or the property is not complete or requires significant repairs. The appraisal was not performed on an “as is” basis. The appraiser was not appropriately licensed or did not use GSE approved forms. |
| D |
The file was missing the appraisal or there was not sufficient valuation documentation to perform a review. |