Exhibit (e)(1)

Excerpts from Destination XL Group, Inc.’s Form 10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2026

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation philosophy, the guiding principles used by the Compensation Committee in making compensation decisions, and the compensation programs in place for fiscal 2025. It also discusses the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) for fiscal 2025.

Our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025 were:

Fiscal 2025 Financial and Executive Compensation Highlights

Fiscal 2025 was a challenging year within the big + tall retail sector. Customer traffic was soft, consumer sentiment was cautious, and customers shopped less frequently often prioritizing essentials and lower price points which contributed to an 8.4% decline in comparable sales. Tariff‑related cost pressures, particularly in the second half of the year, further impacted merchandise margins. While management proactively reduced expenses, controlled inventory, and diversified sourcing, these actions were unable to fully offset the sector challenges. As a result, the Company reported a net loss of $(0.66) per diluted share, which included a $20.4 million non-cash charge to establish a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets, $4.2 million of transaction-related costs associated with the pending merger and impairment charges of $0.2 million. On an adjusted basis, excluding these items, the adjusted net loss (a non-GAAP measure) was $(0.21) per diluted share.

Despite these growth headwinds, the Company maintained a strong liquidity position, ended fiscal 2025 with $28.8 million in cash and investments, and continued to operate with no borrowings and full availability under its credit facility. At January 31, 2026, inventory levels were 2.6% lower than the prior year and availability under the credit facility was $55.1 million. The strength of the balance sheet gives us flexibility and resilience as management continues to navigate a challenging big + tall retail sector.

The Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation for fiscal 2025 appropriately reflected Company performance. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, the results reflected a decrease in performance-based compensation. As a result, both total compensation and realized pay for each NEO declined meaningfully from fiscal 2024 levels. The following table shows total compensation earned and total realized pay for each of the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2025 as compared to fiscal 2024:

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, implementing and monitoring adherence to the Board’s compensation philosophy, which is to ensure that executive compensation is fair, reasonable, competitive and aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

The Compensation Committee believes that an effective executive compensation program will:

When reviewing compensation, the Compensation Committee emphasizes direct compensation, which consists of total cash compensation (base salary and annual performance-based cash incentive awards) plus long-term incentive awards. Every year, the Compensation Committee assesses the effectiveness of our compensation plans with the goal of strengthening our overall compensation program as appropriate, including by setting performance metrics to ensure that compensation is aligned with performance that drives stockholder value. We also compare our performance metrics to those used by our peers and take into consideration the recommendations of proxy advisory services.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

We believe that the Company’s executive compensation program includes key features that align the compensation for our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

Use of Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain any compensation consultant, legal counsel and/or other adviser to assist in carrying out its duties, including the review of compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee may accept, reject or modify any recommendations by compensation consultants or other outside advisors.

The Compensation Committee periodically consults with the Segal Group ("Segal"), an independent firm that specializes in benefits and compensation, with respect to the structure and competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program compared to its proxy peer group. The Compensation Committee has assessed Segal’s independence and has concluded that no conflict of interest exists with respect to the services that it performs.

The Compensation Committee most recently engaged Segal to review Mr. Kanter’s compensation in August 2023 in connection with the extension of his “initial term” under his employment agreement from April 1, 2025 to August 11, 2026. At that time, Segal reviewed Mr. Kanter’s base salary and total direct compensation as well as provided guidance on the terms, conditions and value of a performance award that served as a retention award to extend his employment to August 2026. Based on market insights from Segal, including information derived from published surveys on chief executive officer compensation in retail companies with annual revenues of $500 million to $1.0 billion and trends in chief executive officer compensation, there were no other changes to Mr. Kanter’s compensation.

Fiscal 2025 Target Compensation

Chief Executive Officer Compensation. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the target compensation of our Chief Executive Officer . As discussed above, the Compensation Committee, working with Segal, most recently reviewed Mr. Kanter’s compensation in August 2023. With respect to setting 2025 target compensation, the Compensation Committee compared each element of the Chief Executive Officer’s direct compensation to published survey data and data from the Company’s peer group and concluded that no changes needed to be made to Mr. Kanter’s compensation. The Compensation Committee’s objective was that total target compensation should approximate the median target compensation of the Company’s peer group.

Other Named Executive Officers. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations regarding the compensation paid to our other Named Executive Officers to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval. Our Named Executive Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are provided with a competitive base salary and an opportunity to earn performance awards each year, which are driven by our overall financial targets, and an opportunity to participate in our equity incentive plans.

In 2022, Korn Ferry, an independent global organizational consulting firm, completed a comprehensive job evaluation of the Company’s corporate positions, from entry level through the Chief Executive Officer, and developed a career framework using its structured job leveling methodology based on the scope, complexity and responsibilities of each role. The Company uses this framework, together with market compensation data available through Korn Ferry Pay, as one input in evaluating the competitiveness and internal alignment of its compensation programs, including the annual compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee has assessed Korn Ferry’s independence and determined that no conflicts of interest exist with respect to the services provided.

Our Peer Group

When determining peer companies for use in reviewing and establishing compensation for our Named Executive Officers, we focus primarily on public companies within the specialty retail apparel business with similar revenue and/or market capitalization. The Compensation Committee most recently engaged Korn Ferry to review the Company's peer group in fiscal 2024. The companies in the fiscal 2025 peer group were:

In order to develop an appropriate peer group, we considered domestic, publicly-traded companies with a range of revenues and market capitalizations that may differ from those included by independent analysts, such as Institutional Shareholder Services. We do so because we believe that companies doing business in specialty retail markets with omni-channel distribution models provide a better benchmark for total shareholder return. An independent analyst may include a company that falls within the same Standard & Poor’s Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) code with similar revenue and market capitalization, but with a different business model, business risks, geographic locations, customer base and industry traffic trends which, consequently, may have nothing in common with our Company. For example, a company that owns automotive dealerships is within the same GICS code as our Company but clearly has a distinctly different business model and is not affected by the same trends that affect specialty apparel retail. At the time that the fiscal 2025 peers were approved, we fell just below the median for revenues and slightly above the median for market capitalization.

Say-on-Pay

At our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders voted on a non-binding advisory proposal as to the frequency with which we should conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation (a “say-on-pay” proposal). At that meeting, and in accordance with the recommendation of our Board, 97.2% of votes cast voted for the “one-year” frequency for advisory votes on executive compensation. Therefore, we intend to hold an advisory “say-on-pay” vote every year until the next “say-on-pay” frequency vote by our stockholders, which will be at our 2029 annual meeting of stockholders.

At our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders, stockholders voted on a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation as disclosed in the 2025 Proxy Statement. Of the votes cast at the 2025 Annual Meeting on the “say-on-pay” proposal, 87.7% voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2025 advisory vote and believes that it affirms our stockholders' support for our approach to executive compensation, namely, to align short-term and long-term incentives with the Company’s financial performance. We will continue to consider the outcome of subsequent say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers.

Risk Assessment

We believe that our compensation programs do not provide incentives for unnecessary risk-taking by our employees. Our emphasis on performance-based annual and long-term incentive awards is designed to align executives with preserving and enhancing stockholder value. In addition, we use multiple objectives for our annual incentive plan (“AIP”), which limits the potential benefit from any single event of excessive risk-taking, and a cap on total payouts, as well as management processes for establishing key performance targets and monitoring our metrics. In addition, we have clawback policies in place relating to recoupment of compensation in the event of accounting restatements and misconduct of our executives, as described below under “Clawback Policies.” Based on these considerations, among others, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices create risks that are likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

Compensation Components and Fiscal 2025 Compensation Decisions

We believe that our executive compensation policies and practices appropriately align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders and emphasize the shared responsibility of our executive officers for the Company’s financial performance. Accordingly, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers is heavily weighted toward “at-risk” performance-based compensation.

The primary components of compensation for our Named Executive Officers in 2025 included base salary (“fixed compensation”), annual performance-based cash incentives under our AIP and long-term cash and/or equity incentives under our Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). The annual weight of each component leads to the following allocation of potential compensation that each executive can earn:

The components of executive compensation are as follows:

Base salary represents the fixed component of an executive’s annual compensation. In order to attract and retain top executive talent, we believe that it is important that our base salary be competitive, generally at or near the median of our industry peers.

Base salaries are reviewed annually, and adjustments are influenced by the Company’s performance in the previous fiscal year and the executive’s contribution to that performance. The executive’s performance is measured by various factors, including, but not limited to, achievement of specific individual and department goals. Additionally, adjustments may be considered with respect to an individual’s promotion that may occur during the fiscal year and any modifications in the individual’s level of responsibility.

The Compensation Committee expects the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary to be at or near the peer group median and to approximate 25%-33% of his target direct compensation. The base salary of our other Named Executive Officers is recommended by our Chief Executive Officer to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval and targets the median of the peer group and published industry compensation surveys.

In April 2025, the Company and Mr. Stratton entered into a temporary addendum to his employment agreement in connection with his assumption of additional responsibilities overseeing the Company’s information and technology function following the departure of the Chief Information Officer. As compensation for these additional duties, Mr. Stratton is receiving a temporary bi‑weekly salary increase of $2,500. The addendum will remain in effect until a new chief information officer is appointed or the Company terminates the addendum.

The Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation should tie directly to our Company’s financial performance. The Company’s AIP is an annual performance-based incentive plan that provides a cash award to participants based on achievement of specified corporate, departmental and individual targets.

2025 AIP Awards

On March 28, 2025, the Compensation Committee established the financial, operating and performance metrics for the 2025 AIP. Traditionally, the metrics for the AIP have been focused on the financial and operating performance of the Company in relation to our Board-approved budget. However, given the ongoing economic headwinds that have negatively impacted consumer discretionary spending, particularly in the big + tall sector and in an effort to keep employees engaged and motivated to achieve our strategic objectives should the macroeconomic situation not begin to improve in 2025, the Compensation Committee once again added a second tier to the 2025 AIP program that was a relative measure, comparing the Company’s financial performance in fiscal 2025 against the financial performance of its 2025 peer group, as listed above under “Our Peer Group.”

Under this two-tier structure, the payout related to corporate or departmental targets accounted for 80% of the potential award and was determined based on the higher achievement of either TIER I (based on the Company’s approved financial plan) or TIER II (based on the relative financial performance of the Company to its 2025 peers).

TIER I Company performance metrics consisted of corporate targets for Sales and Adjusted EBITDA and departmental targets, if applicable, for Store Operations, Marketing & Digital, and Merchandise/Planning and Allocation. Under TIER I, the Company’s financial performance metrics accounted for 80% of the potential award for Messrs. Kanter, Stratton and Molloy and 40% of the potential award for Mr. Gaeta and Ms. Surette. Mr. Gaeta’s performance metrics included specific store operation targets, and Ms. Surette's performance metrics included specific merchandising, planning and allocation targets, which accounted for 40% of their respective potential awards. The performance metrics were derived from the Company’s annual operating plan for fiscal 2025. The Compensation Committee believed that sales and adjusted EBITDA continued to be the two most significant financial metrics for the 2025 AIP.

TIER II Company performance metrics consisted of corporate targets for Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, each accounting for 40% of the potential award for each participant. Our Comparable Sales and Adjusted EBITDA Margin results for fiscal 2025 were compared to our 2025 peer group on a quartile ranking. For each metric, if the Company ranked in (i) the top quartile, the payout would be 100%; (ii) the second quartile, the payout would be 75%; and (iii) the third quartile, the payout would be 50%. No payout would be earned if the Company finished in the fourth quartile.

Individual performance metrics consisted of discretionary personal goals that accounted for the remaining 20% of the potential award for each of the Named Executive Officers under either TIER I or TIER II. See footnote 6 to the table below for a discussion of these individual targets.

For fiscal 2025, Mr. Kanter’s target participation in the AIP was at 100% of his earned salary with the potential to earn up to 200% of the TIER I corporate targets and 100% of the TIER II corporate targets, Mr. Stratton’s target participation was 60% of his earned salary with the potential to earn up to 150% of the TIER I corporate targets and 100% of the TIER II corporate targets, and the target participation for Messrs. Gaeta and Molloy and Ms. Surette was 50% of their respective earned salaries with the potential to earn up to 150% of the TIER I corporate and departmental targets and 100% of the TIER II corporate targets.

The 2025 AIP metrics were intended to be achievable, with an approximate 50% probability of achievement. The 2025 AIP performance metrics and actual results against these metrics were as follows:

As a result of achieving the performance metric for Adjusted EBITDA margin at threshold, together with each NEO's individual performance target, in March 2026, the Compensation Committee approved cash bonus payouts to our NEOs as follows:

2026 AIP

On March 16, 2026, the Compensation Committee established the financial, operating and performance metrics for the 2026 AIP. Over the past two years, our financial performance has been directly impacted by the continued uncertainty

surrounding the U.S. economy and reduced consumer discretionary spending, particularly within the big + tall sector. The financial plan and the established metrics for fiscal 2026 reflect the current environment. Unlike the 2025 AIP, the threshold, or 50% potential payout, is based on achievement of the 2026 financial plan. Accordingly, in order to achieve 100% payout at target or 150% payout (200% for Mr. Kanter) at maximum, actual performance must exceed the 2026 financial plan. The Compensation Committee also eliminated the Tier II metric which measured the Company’s performance against its peers.

The Company performance metrics are structured in the same manner as the Tier I of the 2025 AIP and consist of corporate targets for Sales and Adjusted EBITDA with departmental targets for Store Operations, Marketing & Digital, and Merchandise/Planning and Allocation. The Company’s financial performance metrics account for 80% of the potential award for Messrs. Kanter, Stratton and Molloy and 40% of the potential award for Mr. Gaeta and Ms. Surette. Mr. Gaeta’s performance metrics include specific store operations and FiTMAP targets, and Ms. Surette's performance metrics include specific merchandise, planning and allocation and account for 40% of their respective targets.

Individual performance targets consisting of discretionary personal goals account for the remaining 20% of the potential award for each of the Named Executive Officers. Mr. Kanter has the potential to earn up to 200% of his individual target, and Messrs. Stratton, Gaeta and Molloy and Ms. Surette have the potential to earn up to 150% of their individual targets.

The 2026 AIP performance metrics approved by the Compensation Committee are as follows:

The above targets were derived from the Company’s annual operating plan and budget for the 2026 fiscal year. If the 2026 operating plan and budget is achieved, the payout would be 50% of target. In order for a participant to receive 100% of target or more, the Company must exceed its financial plan for fiscal 2026. The metrics at threshold are intended to be achievable, with an approximate 50% probability of achievement. The likelihood of achieving a payout equal to or greater than 100% reflects the challenges given the continuing uncertainty with respect to the economy, higher costs, and consumer discretionary spending.

For fiscal 2026, Mr. Kanter will continue to participate at 100% of his salary, Mr. Stratton will continue to participate at 60% of his salary, and Messrs. Gaeta and Molloy and Ms. Surette will continue to participate at 50% of their respective salaries.

The Company’s LTIPs are designed to ensure that the interests of our executives are aligned with those of our stockholders to create sustainable shareholder value and to promote executive retention. Awards under each LTIP consist of a combination of time-based and performance-based awards for which payouts may consist of cash or equity or a combination of both. The performance-based portion of each LTIP is based on financial metric(s) measured over a three-year performance cycle. All equity awards granted under each LTIP are issued from the Company’s stockholder-approved 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the “2016 Plan”). Participants in the LTIPs are eligible to receive awards based on their “Target Cash Value,” which is defined as the participant’s annual base salary multiplied by his or her LTIP percentage. Under each LTIP, 50% of each participant’s Target Cash Value is subject to time-based vesting and 50% is subject to performance-based vesting.

Effective beginning with the 2022-2024 LTIP, the LTIPs include a “Structured Retirement” provision, which provides an opportunity for greater vesting upon retirement where the participant assists the Company in ensuring the succession of the participant’s position within the Company prior to the participant’s retirement. In order to be eligible to participate in a Structured Retirement, (i) the participant must terminate employment after meeting the age and service requirements set forth in the LTIP, (ii) the Compensation Committee must confirm through proper corporate action that the participant has met all of the succession planning objectives set by the Compensation Committee for the participant, (iii) the participant must continue to work until the date required by the Compensation Committee (which may not be more than 60 days after the Compensation Committee confirms that the objectives have been met), and (iv) the participant must execute a release of claims in favor of the Company. The final determination as to whether the requirements of a Structured Retirement have been met is in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

2023-2025 LTIP

The performance period for the Company’s 2023-2025 LTIP ended on January 31, 2026. The time-based awards under the 2023-2025 LTIP were granted in a combination of 50% Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") and 50% cash that vests over four years, with the last tranche vesting on April 1, 2027.

The performance target, which was established by the Compensation Committee on May 1, 2023, was a three-year relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to the Company’s 2023 peer group. Based on the Company’s 3-year relative TSR, as compared to the 3-year relative TSR of its 2023 peer group, the Company fell within the fourth quartile and, as a result, no performance award was earned for the 2023-2025 LTIP.

2023-2025 Performance-Based Component

(1) For the Company and each of its 2023 disclosed proxy peers, the three-year relative TSR was calculated as the percentage change in the 30-day trailing volume-weighted average closing stock price at January 27, 2023 and January 30, 2026, adjusted for any dividends paid.

2024-2026 LTIP and 2025-2027 LTIP

The following is a summary of the 2024-2026 LTIP and 2025-2027 LTIP in effect, but not completed, as of January 31, 2026:

At the time of establishing the performance targets, the Compensation Committee believed that the single performance metric of a Three-Year Relative Total Shareholder Return reflected the Company’s primary objective of earnings growth and driving shareholder return.

The following table illustrates the components of the LTIPs with the respective vesting dates, illustrating that the time-based portion of the LTIP acts as a retention tool:

2026-2028 LTIP

The Company has not yet established a long-term incentive plan for fiscal 2026. Pursuant to the terms of the plan, the Company has until November 2, 2026 to approve and establish a performance target or targets for the 2026-2028 performance period.

No discretionary cash or equity awards were granted to our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2025.

We offer our senior executives, including our Named Executive Officers, supplemental disability insurance and long-term care and pay a portion of the premiums, which we do not pay for our other employees.

Our Named Executive Officers also receive benefits under certain group health, long-term disability and life insurance plans that are generally available to all of our eligible employees.

After six months of service with us, all of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate in a 401(k) savings plan and, after one year of employment with us, are eligible for a Company match. Under the 401(k) savings plan, the Company offers a qualified automatic contribution arrangement (“QACA”), with the Company matching 100% of the first 1% of deferred compensation and 50% of the next 5% (with a maximum contribution of 3.5% of eligible compensation).

We have employment agreements with our Chief Executive Officer and all of our other Named Executive Officers. Upon termination of employment, each executive is entitled to receive severance payments under his or her employment agreement and under the Company’s incentive programs in the event of a termination without justifiable cause. These employment agreements and incentive programs, as they relate to terminations, are discussed in detail below in the section “Employment Agreements” following the “Summary Compensation Table.” Our employment agreements do not contain any tax gross-ups pursuant to Section 280(g) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Summary Compensation Table. The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth certain information regarding compensation paid or accrued by us with respect to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2025.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The fair value associated with the performance-based component of the equity awards under the 2025-2027 LTIP was determined based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the service-inception date. Because the achievement of the performance targets under the 2025-2027 LTIP was not deemed probable as of the service-inception date, no value was attributed to the performance-based portion of these awards. In addition, performance-based compensation is a liability-based award until earned, at which time it can be settled in a combination of cash and/or equity. The following table reflects the fair value of the performance-based equity portion of the 2025-2027 LTIP assuming that 50% of the award is settled in equity and that the payout achieved is the highest level of performance for each of the Named Executive Officers:

2025 Non-Equity (Cash) Incentive Plan Compensation. The following table provides a breakdown of the amounts for fiscal 2025 in the “2025 Non-Equity (Cash) Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above:

All Other Compensation. The following table provides a breakdown of the amounts for fiscal 2025 in the “All Other Compensation” of the Summary Compensation Table above:

Grants of Plan-Based Awards. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2025.

2025 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS