SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company, and the majority of its subsidiaries, maintain their accounting records in U.S. Dollars. The Company’s operating subsidiary, SEO Butler, is located in the United Kingdom and maintains its accounting records in British Pounds, which is its functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates at the balance sheet date, equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rate and revenues and expenses are translated by using the average exchange rates for the period. Translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Foreign currency denominated transactions are translated at exchange rates approximating those in effect at the transaction dates.

Variable interest entities (“VIEs”) are consolidated when the investor is the primary beneficiary. A primary beneficiary is the variable interest holder in a VIE with both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Management concluded that the joint ventures do not qualify as variable interest entities under the requirements of ASC 810, as the joint ventures 1) have sufficient equity to finance its activities; 2) have equity owners that as a group have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest in the business, through the ability to vote on a majority basis to change the managing member of the respective joint ventures, and 3) are structured with substantive voting rights. The Company accounts for its investments in the joint ventures under either the cost or equity method based on the equity ownership in each entity.

The Company, through its subsidiary Onfolio Management LLC, is the manager of Onfolio Agency SPV, LLC (“OA SPV”), and Onfolio Agency SPV 2, LLC (“OA SPV 2”), collectively referred to as “OA SPVs”. The Company does not hold any equity interest in OA SPVs, but will receive 10% of any cash distributions paid by OA SPV, and 20% of any cash distributions paid by OA SPV 2, to its members, when declared, as the management fee. The Company can be removed as manager of OA SPVs through a unanimous vote of the members. The Company determined that the fees it may receive for its role as manager do not constitute a variable interest in OA SPVs and will be accounted for as a revenue contract under ASC 606.

The Company, through its subsidiary RevenueZen, LLC, is the manager of CliAcquire, LLC (“CliAcquire”). The Company holds a 5% members interest in CliAcquire and will receive profit distributions based on its membership interest. The Company can be removed as manager of CliAcquire through a supermajority vote of the members. The Company determined that the investment in CliAcquire will be accounted for as a cost method investment.

Cash and Cash Equivalent

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with banks and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company accounts for goodwill in a purchase business combination as the excess of the cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired. Business combinations can also result in the recognition of other intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets, if applicable, occurs over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill, which is not amortized, is tested for impairment on an annual basis (or an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value). When testing goodwill for impairment, the Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company elects to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that an impairment is more likely than not, then performance of the quantitative impairment test is required. The quantitative assessment is performed to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. To determine the reasonableness of the estimated fair values, the Company reviews the assumptions to determine that neither the income approach nor the market approach provides significantly different valuations. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further work is required and no impairment loss is recognized. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, a non-cash impairment loss is recognized in the amount of that excess.

When performing the quantitative assessment, key assumptions used in the income approach are updated when the analysis is performed for each reporting unit. The assumptions that have the most significant effect on the fair value calculations are the projected revenue growth rates, future operating margins, discount rates, and terminal values. While the Company uses reasonable and timely information to prepare its discounted cash flow analysis, actual future cash flows or market conditions could differ significantly and could result in future impairment charges related to recorded goodwill balances.

Recently acquired reporting units generally represent a higher inherent risk of impairment, which typically decreases as the businesses are integrated into the enterprise. Negative industry or economic trends, disruptions to its business, actual results significantly below expected results, unexpected significant changes or planned changes in the use of the assets, divestitures, and market capitalization declines may have a negative effect on the fair value of the Company's reporting units.

Indefinite lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are separately tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year or on an interim basis if an event occurs that indicates the fair value is more likely than not below the carrying value. The Company first qualitatively assesses whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of an indefinite-lived trade name is less than its carrying amount. If necessary, the Company conducts a quantitative assessment using the relief-from-royalty method. This methodology assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these assets. To the extent the Company determines a fair value, the inputs used represent a Level 3 fair value measurement in the FASB fair value hierarchy given that the inputs are unobservable. The assumptions that have the most significant effect on the fair value calculations are the royalty rates, projected revenue growth rates, discount rates, and terminal values. The royalty rate is determined based on the profitability of the trade name to which it relates and observed market royalty rates. Revenue growth rates are determined after considering current and future economic conditions, recent sales trends, or other variables.

The assessment of fair value for impairment purposes requires significant judgments to be made by management. Although forecasts are based on assumptions that are considered reasonable by management and consistent with the plans and estimates management uses to operate the underlying businesses, there is significant judgment in estimating future operating results. Changes in estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.

The Company evaluates whether there has been an impairment of identifiable intangible assets with definite useful economic lives, or of the remaining life of such assets, when certain indicators of impairment are present. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the cost or remaining period of amortization of any asset may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability would be performed. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future gross, undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset would be compared to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a write-down to fair value or a revision in the remaining amortization period is required.

Digital Assets

The Company’s digital assets include Bitcoin, the native cryptocurrency on the Bitcoin blockchain (“BTC”), Ether, the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain (“ETH”), and Solana, the native cryptocurrency of the Solana blockchain (“SOL”), collectively the “Digital Assets”.

Cryptocurrency assets within the scope of ASC 350-60 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets(“ASC 350-60):

Our Digital Asset tokens have been determined to fall within the scope of ASC 350-60. The Company reflects cryptocurrency assets held at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets within the Digital Assets line item. Changes in the fair value of cryptocurrency assets are recognized in income, reflected in the Change in fair value of digital assets category within the consolidated statement of operations.

In determining the fair value of digital assets in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). The Company utilizes BitGo as the principal market and for pricing in determining the fair value of its Digital Asset holdings. The Company uses a first-in, first-out methodology to assign costs to digital assets. The fair value of digital assets are considered a level 1 fair value measurement.

Custodian Risk

The Company’s Digital Assets are held with a single third-party custodian, BitGo, which we selected based on various factors, including their financial strength and industry reputation. Custodian risk refers to the potential loss, theft, or misappropriation of our Bitcoin assets due to operational failures, cybersecurity breaches, or financial difficulties experienced by these third parties. Although we periodically monitor the financial health, insurance coverage, and security measures of our custodians, reliance on such third parties inherently exposes us to risks that we cannot fully mitigate.

Native Staking

The Company utilized one third-party asset manager to manage and stake ETH and SOL on its behalf for the periods ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Under these arrangements, the Company’s ETH and SOL is held by a qualified custodian and staked in the Ethereum and Solana protocol through a third-party validator operator (e.g., BitGo). The validator operator manages the staking process and delegates the Company’s ETH and SOL to network validators. When selected by the networks, these validators earn staking rewards and transaction fees proportional to the amount of stake delegated.

ETH and SOL used in native staking is retained on the Company’s balance sheet as a crypto asset measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 350-60. The Company does not derecognize ETH and SOL when participating in native staking because it retains the ability to direct the use of the asset and obtain substantially all benefits.

The validator operator (e.g., BitGo) is not considered a customer under ASC606 as the service provided to BitGo does not represent an output as part of the entity’s ordinary operating strategy. As such the earnings are recorded as other income in the statement of operations.

Earnings from native staking is recognized at the end of each daily period, when the Company’s right to staking rewards becomes determinable (i.e., when the constraint is lifted). The amount recognized as earnings is measured at the fair value of rewards at contract inception for that day, net of validator commissions, in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) and ASC 820. Rewards represent noncash consideration and are measured using quoted prices in the principal market at contract inception. Subsequent changes in the fair value of ETH and SOL after initial recognition are recorded as unrealized gains or losses.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of product revenue consists primarily of costs associated with the acquisition and shipment of products being sold through the Company’s online marketplaces.

Cost of Service revenue which includes website content creation costs including contract labor, domain and hosting costs and certain software costs related to website operations.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, which requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes and allows recognition and measurement of deferred tax assets based upon the likelihood of realization of tax benefits in future years. Under the asset and liability approach, deferred taxes are provided for the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefits, or that future deductibility is uncertain.

Tax benefits of uncertain tax positions are recorded only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained based on their technical merits. The amount recognized is the amount that represents the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being ultimately realized. A liability is recognized for any benefit claimed or expected to be claimed, in a tax return in excess of the benefit recorded in the financial statements, along with any interest and penalty (if applicable) in such excess. The Company has no uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2026.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of short-term instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and notes payable approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurements, defined as follows:

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities that are required to be measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the Company’s estimated level within the fair value hierarchy of those assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value at March 31, 2026
Assets:
Cryptocurrency holdings	$	1,612,739	$	-	$	-	$	1,612,739
Total assets	$	1,612,739	$	-	$	-	$	1,612,739
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	3,777,864	$	3,777,864
Total liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	3,777,864	$	3,777,864

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value at December 31, 2025
Assets:
Cryptocurrency holdings	$	2,263,471	$	-	$	-	$	2,263,471
Total assets	$	2,263,471	$	-	$	-	$	2,263,471
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	3,463,727	$	3,463,727
Total liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	3,463,727	$	3,463,727

Segment Reporting

The Company manages its operations under two segments for the purpose of assessing performance and making operating decisions – Business to Business (“B2B”) and Business to Consumer (“B2C)”. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) is its executive management committee. The CODM allocates resources and evaluates the performance of the Company using information about combined net income from operations. All significant operating decisions are based upon an analysis of the Company as two operating segments, which are the same as its reporting segments.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to our prior year’s consolidated financial statements to conform to our current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on our previously reported results of operations or accumulated deficit.