v3.26.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Tax Indemnification Obligation—Under our Advisory Agreement, Ashford Trust OP is obligated to indemnify Ashford LLC for any and all tax liabilities arising from asset dispositions, deemed distributions, or fair market value and tax basis adjustments occurring since January 1, 2024. The Company has engaged tax counsel to evaluate the scope and potential exposure of this indemnification obligation. As of March 31, 2026, the Company has accrued a liability of $9.7 million related to this obligation, which is included in “due to Ashford Inc., net” on our consolidated balance sheet. The ultimate liability is subject to change and is dependent upon future asset dispositions, future taxable events and the resolution of other related tax matters.
Restricted Cash—Under certain management and debt agreements for our hotel properties existing as of March 31, 2026, escrow payments are required for insurance, real estate taxes and debt service. In addition, for certain properties based on the terms of the underlying debt and management agreements, we escrow generally 4% to 5% of gross revenues for capital improvements. From time to time, the Company may work with its property managers and lenders in order to utilize lender and manager held reserves to fund operating shortfalls.
Franchise Fees—Under franchise agreements for our hotel properties existing as of March 31, 2026, we pay franchisor royalty fees between 4% and 6% of gross rooms revenue and, in some cases, 1% to 3% of food and beverage revenues. Additionally, we pay fees for marketing, reservations, and other related activities aggregating between 1% and 4% of gross rooms revenue and, in some cases, food and beverage revenues. These franchise agreements expire on varying dates between 2026 and 2049. When a franchise term expires, the franchisor has no obligation to renew the franchise. In addition, if we breach the franchise agreement and the franchisor terminates a franchise prior to its expiration date, we may be liable for up to three times the average annual fees incurred for that property.
The table below summarizes the franchise fees incurred (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31,
Line Item20262025
Other hotel expenses$12,285 $13,114 
Management Fees—Under hotel management agreements for our hotel properties existing as of March 31, 2026, we pay monthly hotel management fees equal to the greater of approximately $18,000 per hotel (increased annually based on consumer price index adjustments) or 3% of gross revenues, or in some cases 2% to 7% of gross revenues, as well as annual incentive management fees, if applicable. These hotel management agreements expire from 2026 through 2038, with renewal options. If we terminate a hotel management agreement prior to its expiration, we may be liable for estimated management fees through the remaining term and liquidated damages or, in certain circumstances, we may substitute a new management agreement. Our hotel management agreements also require that we fund property-level operating costs, including the hotel manager’s payroll and related costs.
Income Taxes—We and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the federal jurisdiction and various states. Tax years 2021 through 2025 remain subject to potential examination by certain federal and state taxing authorities.
Litigation—On December 20, 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against one of the Company’s hotel management companies in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Contra Costa alleging violations of certain California employment laws, which class action affects nine hotels owned by subsidiaries of the Company. The court has entered an order granting class certification with respect to: (i) a statewide class of non-exempt employees of our manager who were allegedly deprived of rest breaks as a result of our manager’s previous written policy requiring its employees to stay on premises during rest breaks; and (ii) a derivative class of non-exempt former employees of our manager who were not paid for allegedly missed breaks upon separation from employment. Notices to potential class members were sent out on February 2, 2021. Potential class members had until April 4, 2021, to opt out of the class; however, the total number of employees in the class has not been definitively determined and is the subject of continuing discovery. The opt-out period has been extended until such time that discovery has concluded. In May 2023, the trial court requested additional briefing from the parties to determine whether the case should be maintained, dismissed or the class de-certified. After submission of the briefs, the court requested that the parties submit stipulations for the court to rule upon. On February 13, 2024, the judge ordered the parties to submit additional briefing related to on-site breaks. A tentative settlement in the amount of $850,000 was reached on February 14, 2025. Final court approval was obtained on September 12, 2025. Ashford Trust’s portion of the settlement is 88.2%. The case is now in the settlement administration phase. As of March 31, 2026, the settlement liability amount was accrued.
On August 4, 2020, a lawsuit, Benjamin Zermeno v. Beverly Hills Marriott, was filed in Alameda County Superior Court as a PAGA representative action alleging various wage and hour violations of all Remington-managed California properties. The plaintiff’s individual claims were compelled to arbitration. On August 18, 2022, another lawsuit, Cristina Catalano v. Beverly Hills Marriott and Mr. C, was filed as a PAGA representative action alleging various wage and hour violations of all Remington-managed California properties. The co-defendant separately settled and the individual arbitration has also settled. A private mediation was held on December 27, 2024, to globally resolve the three outstanding matters. The court approved the settlement of all matters on January 16, 2026. The aggregate settlement is $2.5 million and Ashford Trust’s portion of the settlement is $1.8 million. As of March 31, 2026, the settlement liability amount was accrued.
On April 18, 2024, the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) served the Company’s manager with an investigative subpoena relative to concerns with the Palm Springs Renaissance Hotel’s COVID recall efforts. On August 27, 2025, the DIR issued a citation that the Company’s manager failed to properly recall certain employees. On September 17, 2025, the Company’s manager filed an appeal which is currently pending. The matter is in the early stages and the ultimate outcome of this matter is unknown at this time. We do not believe that any potential loss to the Company is reasonably estimable at this time. As of March 31, 2026, no amounts were accrued.
We are also engaged in other legal proceedings that have arisen but have not been fully adjudicated. To the extent the claims giving rise to these legal proceedings are not covered by insurance, they relate to the following general types of claims: employment matters; tax matters; and matters relating to compliance with applicable law (for example, the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws). The likelihood of loss from these legal proceedings is based on the definitions within contingency accounting literature. We recognize a loss when we believe the loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. Based on the information available to us relating to these legal proceedings and/or our experience in similar legal proceedings, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
Our assessment may change depending upon the development of any current or future legal proceedings, and the final results of such legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. If we ultimately do not prevail in one or more of these legal matters, and the associated realized losses exceed our current estimates of the range of potential losses, our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected in future periods.