Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. As a result of this ruling, we may be eligible for a refund of tariffs previously paid on imported materials. As the recoverability and timing of any such refund remains uncertain, we have not recognized a receivable and corresponding offset to expense or asset as of March 31, 2026, and will not until such amounts are realized or realizable. We continue to monitor these developments and their potential impact on our results of operations. Legal Proceedings Class Action Complaints On March 6, 2026, a class action lawsuit (the “Yung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey by plaintiff Shui Shing Yung against the Company and two individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Yung Defendants”). The Yung Complaint alleges that the Yung Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter. On March 13, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Berger Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Paul Berger against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s current Directors (the “Berger Defendants”). The Berger Complaint alleges that the Berger Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter. On March 25, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Skaff Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Ronald F. Skaff against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s current Directors (the “Skaff Defendants”). The Skaff Complaint alleges that the Skaff Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.

In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. As a result of this ruling, we may be eligible for a refund of tariffs previously paid on imported materials. As the recoverability and timing of any such refund remains uncertain, we have not recognized a receivable and corresponding offset to expense or asset as of March 31, 2026, and will not until such amounts are realized or realizable. We continue to monitor these developments and their potential impact on our results of operations.

On March 6, 2026, a class action lawsuit (the “Yung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey by plaintiff Shui Shing Yung against the Company and two individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Yung Defendants”). The Yung Complaint alleges that the Yung Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.

On March 13, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Berger Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Paul Berger against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s current Directors (the “Berger Defendants”). The Berger Complaint alleges that the Berger Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.

On March 25, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Skaff Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court of the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Ronald F. Skaff against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s current Directors (the “Skaff Defendants”). The Skaff Complaint alleges that the Skaff Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.