During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we determined that a triggering event had occurred as a result of a decline in our stock price, necessitating an interim goodwill impairment evaluation. We performed a quantitative assessment as of April 4, 2026, and concluded that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeded its estimated fair value. Accordingly, we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $158.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026. No goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.

For the quantitative impairment assessment, we used a combination of an income approach and a market approach, which were equally weighted, to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. For the income approach, a discounted cash flow model was used that required forecasts of cash flows, assumptions such as revenue growth rates and gross profit margins, among others, and an estimate of weighted-average cost of capital that we believe approximates the assumptions from a market participant’s perspective. For the market approach, a guideline public company model was used, which required judgment in estimating key assumptions including the selection of guideline companies and multiples of sales revenue and EBITDA. These estimates incorporated many uncertain factors which could be impacted by changes in market conditions, interest rates, growth rates, tax rates, costs, customer behavior, regulatory environment and other macroeconomic changes. In addition, we considered the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied enterprise value control premium based on our market capitalization. We determined that the implied control premium was reasonable which corroborates our fair value estimates. We categorized the fair value determination as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to our use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.

Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.