Litigation Risk

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate liability, if any, from these actions will not have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Right Value Litigation

On January 30, 2024, a lawsuit was filed in the 162nd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (the “District Court of Dallas County”) against the Company by Right Value Drug Stores, LLC d/b/a Carie Boyd’s Prescription Shop n/k/a Carie Boyd Pharmaceuticals (“Right Value”). The lawsuit generally alleges breach of contract, fraud, and declaratory judgment (“Right Value Litigation”). The Company has brought counterclaims against Right Value generally for fraud, breach of contract, and quantum meruit.

On February 26, 2025, BioTE Medical entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Right Value. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, BioTE Medical agreed to pay Right Value an aggregate amount of $5.0 million, of which $3.5 million was paid in February 2025. The remaining due under the Settlement Agreement was paid in February 2026. In addition to the monetary settlement, the parties identified therein have agreed to, among other things, a customary mutual release of all claims arising out of or relating to the Right Value Litigation, except as expressly provided in the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement also contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by the parties in addition to the terms described above.

Yosaki and Mioko Trusts

On July 12, 2024, a lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Haymaker Sponsor III, LLC, the Company's outside legal counsel, and certain Company executive officers and directors (collectively, “Defendants”) by two trusts (“Plaintiffs”) that allegedly owned shares representing approximately 4.2% of the Company's outstanding stock immediately following the May 26, 2022 transaction with Haymaker Acquisition Corp III. The lawsuit alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting those alleged breaches, and unjust enrichment. This case was closed on January 7, 2026.

Cindy Latch

On November 15, 2024, Cindy Latch, an actress / model who formerly appeared in one BioTE marketing video, filed suit against BioTE alleging misappropriation of her name, image and likeness by both BioTE and various of its approved practitioners and sought a temporary restraining order and temporary injunction. On April 14, 2026, the Company entered into a settlement agreement and release, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay Ms. Latch an aggregate amount of $0.08 million and is included in accrued liabilities on the Company’s March 31, 2026 unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition to the monetary settlement, the parties identified in the suit have agreed to dismiss the suit with prejudice. The settlement agreement contains, among other things, a customary mutual release of all claims, demands, causes of actions and liabilities that were asserted in the suit. The Company paid the amount due under the settlement agreement and release on May 11, 2026.

Inventory Purchase Commitments

Purchase obligations, which include legally binding contracts such as firm minimum commitments for inventory purchases are defined

as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had satisfied its 2025 inventory purchase commitments. As of March 31, 2026, the Company had inventory purchase commitments of $2.3 million, which are expected to be paid by December 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2025, the Company did not have any inventory purchase commitments. See Note 21 for additional information on the Company’s inventory purchase commitments.

The Company issues inventory purchase orders in the ordinary course of business, which represent authorizations to purchase inventory from a vendor rather than a binding agreement. Accordingly, purchase orders for inventory are excluded from the obligation above. The Company’s purchase orders are based on its current inventory needs and are filled by the Company’s suppliers within a short period of time.

Tax Distributions

To the extent the Company has funds legally available, the board of directors will approve distributions to each stockholder on a quarterly basis, in an amount per share that, when added to all other distributions made to such stockholder with respect to the previous calendar year, equals the estimated federal and state income tax liabilities applicable to such stockholder as the result of its, his or her ownership of the units and the associated net taxable income allocated with respect to such units for the previous calendar year.