Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 28, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Contingencies The Company assesses its exposure related to legal matters, including those pertaining to product liability, safety and health matters and other items that arise in the regular course of its business. If the Company determines that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. There are no pending or threatened legal matters for which a reasonably estimated range of losses can be determined except as described below, and accordingly, the Company has not identified any such legal matters that could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated condensed results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Legal Proceedings During the quarter, the Company settled all claims pending against it in the previously reported lawsuit styled Moss Land Company, LLC, et al. v City of Calhoun, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, case No. 24CV74289, including all claims and counter-claims asserted against the Company in that case by the City of Calhoun, Georgia. Those claims have been dismissed with prejudice or will be dismissed with prejudice imminently. Additionally, the claims asserted against the Company in the previously reported lawsuit styled the City of Chatsworth, Georgia and Chatsworth Water Works Commission v. 3M Company, et al. in the Superior Court of Murray County, Georgia, Case No. 25-CI-0245, have been dismissed without prejudice. The Company has reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims against it in the previously reported lawsuits styled William Hartwell Brooks, et al. v City of Calhoun Georgia, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, Case No. 25CV74289, and James Haley Stephens and Pamela J. Stephens v 3M Company, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, case No. 25CV75072. Accordingly, the Company expects a prompt dismissal of those claims with prejudice. Environmental Remediation The Company accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and estimable. Remediation obligations are accrued based on the latest available information and are recorded at undiscounted amounts. The Company regularly monitors the progress of environmental remediation. If studies indicate that the cost of remediation has changed from the previous estimate, an adjustment to the liability would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made (see Note 20).

The Company assesses its exposure related to legal matters, including those pertaining to product liability, safety and health matters and other items that arise in the regular course of its business. If the Company determines that it is probable a loss has been incurred, the amount of the loss, or an amount within the range of loss, that can be reasonably estimated will be recorded. There are no pending or threatened legal matters for which a reasonably estimated range of losses can be determined except as described below, and accordingly, the Company has not identified any such legal matters that could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated condensed results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

During the quarter, the Company settled all claims pending against it in the previously reported lawsuit styled Moss Land Company, LLC, et al. v City of Calhoun, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, case No. 24CV74289, including all claims and counter-claims asserted against the Company in that case by the City of Calhoun, Georgia. Those claims have been dismissed with prejudice or will be dismissed with prejudice imminently.

Additionally, the claims asserted against the Company in the previously reported lawsuit styled the City of Chatsworth, Georgia and Chatsworth Water Works Commission v. 3M Company, et al. in the Superior Court of Murray County, Georgia, Case No. 25-CI-0245, have been dismissed without prejudice.

The Company has reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims against it in the previously reported lawsuits styled William Hartwell Brooks, et al. v City of Calhoun Georgia, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, Case No. 25CV74289, and James Haley Stephens and Pamela J. Stephens v 3M Company, et al., in the Superior Court of Gordon County Georgia, case No. 25CV75072. Accordingly, the Company expects a prompt dismissal of those claims with prejudice.

The Company accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and estimable. Remediation obligations are accrued based on the latest available information and are recorded at undiscounted amounts. The Company regularly monitors the progress of environmental remediation. If studies indicate that the cost of remediation has changed from the previous estimate, an adjustment to the liability would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made (see Note 20).