Exhibit 99.01
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Third Party Due Diligence Review
Overview
Consolidated Analytics, Inc (“Consolidated Analytics”), a third-party due diligence provider, performed the review described below on residential mortgage loans acquired by Onslow Bay Financial LLC through a bulk purchase. Credit, Compliance, Property Valuation, Data Integrity, and Pay History reviews were performed on a population of 101 loans. The review included a total of 101 residential mortgage loans acquired through a bulk purchase in connection with the securitization identified as OBX 2026-HYB1 (the “Securitization”). The Review was conducted from June 2023 through February 2026 on mortgage loans originated between December 2016 and December 2024.
Scope of Review
Credit Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Credit Review” to verify compliance with guidelines in effect at the time of loan origination, or other guidelines provided by Client prior to review, and ensure the characteristics used by the underwriter are supported by the file documentation; and determine whether any loans outside of those guidelines contain legitimate and approved exceptions with compensating factors.
The Credit Review attempted to confirm the following:
| a. | QM or ATR Validation / Review of 8 Key Underwriting Factors |
| i. | Income / Assets |
| · | Validate borrower(s) monthly gross income |
| · | Validate funds required to close, required reserves |
| · | Review file documentation for required level of income and asset verifications |
| ii. | Employment Status |
| · | Review file documentation for required level of employment |
| iii. | Monthly Mortgage Payment |
| · | Confirm program, qualifying rate, terms |
| iv. | Simultaneous Loans |
| · | Validate all concurrent loans are included in the DTI to properly assess the ability to repay |
| v. | Mortgage Related Obligations: PITI, HOA, PMI, etc. |
| · | Validate subject loan monthly payment (PITI) and associated obligations |
| vi. | Debts / Obligations |
| · | Validate monthly recurring liabilities |
| vii. | DTI and/or Residual Income |
| · | Validate debt-to-income ratio (DTI) based upon income and debt documentation provided in the file |
| · | Documentation meets Appendix Q requirements for QM Loans |
| viii. | Credit History |
| · | Review credit report for credit history and required credit depth including any / all inquiries |
| · | Determine representative credit score from credit report |
| b. | Validate loan-to-value (LTV) and combined loan-to-value |
| c. | Review borrower's occupancy |
| d. | Validation through third party resource of the subject properties most recent twelve (12) month sales history |
| e. | Confirm sufficient evidence in loan file, by reviewing the underwriter’s decision to approve the loan based upon the borrows income, debt, and credit history, to support borrower's willingness and ability to repay the debt |
| f. | Confirm that Final 1003 is sufficiently completed |
| g. | Provide Audit 1008 with accurate data based on file documentation |
| h. | Confirm Loan Approval conditions were met |
| i. | Review condominium questionnaire to verify all information is complete, prepared by an authorized representative, and address any red flags that may deem condominium project ineligible |
| j. | General QM for any loans originated under the GQM Rule |
| i. | Pricing Thresholds: |
| a. | Pricing for First Lien Loans: |
| i. | 2.25% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | 3.5% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable dollar amount threshold; and |
| iii. | 6.5% for a first-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than the applicable dollar amount threshold. |
| b. | Pricing for Subordinate Lien Loans: |
| i. | 3.5% for a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount greater than or equal to the applicable dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | 6.5% for a subordinate-lien covered transaction with a loan amount less than the applicable dollar amount threshold. |
| c. | Pricing for Manufactured Homes: |
| i. | 2.25% for a first-lien covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount equal to or greater than the applicable dollar amount threshold; and |
| ii. | 6.5% for a covered transaction secured by a manufactured home with a loan amount less than applicable dollar amount threshold. |
| ii. | Consider Income and Assets: |
| o | Consumer’s current or reasonably expected income or assets (other than the value of the dwelling that secures the loan; |
| o | The consumer’s debt obligations, alimony, child support; and |
| o | The monthly DTI or residual income. |
| iii. | Verification of Income and Assets: |
| a. | Verification in compliance with one of the “safe harbor” guidelines will meet the QM verification requirement. A creditor is allowed to “mix and match” provisions of the different guidelines rather than only apply one guideline per loan. |
The specific guidelines that the CFPB is designating for the safe harbor are: The GQM Rule provides that if the creditor verifies the consumer’s income or assets, debt obligations, alimony, child support, and monthly DTI or residual income by meeting the standards of certain specified third-party underwriting manuals, then a creditor is presumed to have complied with the verification requirement. These specified manuals are:
| i. | Chapters B3-3 through B3-6 of the Fannie Mae Single Family Selling Guide, published June 3, 2020; |
| ii. | Sections 5102 through 5500 of the Freddie Mac Single-Family Seller/Servicer Guide, published June 10, 2020; |
| iii. | Sections II.A.1 and II.A.4-5 of the Federal Housing Administration’s Single Family Housing Policy Handbook, issued October 24, 2019; |
| iv. | Chapter 4 of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs’ Lenders Handbook, revised February 22, 2019; |
| v. | Chapter 4 of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Field Office Handbook for the Direct Single Family Housing Program, revised March 15, 2019; and |
| vi. | Chapters 9 through 11 of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Handbook for the Single Family Guaranteed Loan Program, revised March 19, 2020. |
Compliance Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Compliance Review” to determine, as applicable, to the extent possible and subject to the caveats below, whether the loan complies with applicable regulatory requirements as noted below, each as amended, restated and/or replaced from time to time. In relation to cash out refinances of investment property loans, documentation provided in the loan file will be reviewed only to validate the use of cash out proceeds for business purposes at the origination/consummation of the loan. In the event use of proceeds cannot be validated, or are deemed to be utilized for consumer purposes, the loan would then be subject to a “Compliance Review” of applicable regulatory requirements as noted below, each as amended, restated and/or replaced from time to time. The Compliance Review included the following:
| a. | Test Loan Estimate(s) for accuracy and completeness as well as timing requirements as required by TRID Regulations |
| b. | Test Closing Disclosure(s) for accuracy and completeness as well as timing requirements as required by TRID Regulations |
| c. | Tolerance Testing |
| i. | Compare Loan Estimate and Closing Disclosures |
| ii. | Identify Tolerance Violations and applicable cost to cure |
| d. | Comprehensive review of Closing Disclosure to determine transaction accuracy |
| e. | Recalculation of APR and Finance Charge |
| f. | Testing of: |
| i. | Federal High Cost Mortgage provisions |
| ii. | Federal Higher Priced Mortgage Loans provisions |
| iii. | Local and/or State Anti-predatory and High Cost provisions |
| iv. | HOEPA Points and Fees |
| g. | Determine whether specified federal disclosures were provided timely based upon comparison of the application date to the dates on such disclosures |
| i. | Service Provider List |
| ii. | Home Ownership Counselling Disclosure |
| iii. | ARM Disclosure |
| h. | Compliance with QM as it relates to: |
| i. | APR Test |
| ii. | Points & Fees Test |
| iii. | Prepayment Penalty Test |
| iv. | Product Eligibility Testing |
| i. | Notice of Right to Cancel (Rescission) Review |
| i. | Confirm transaction date, expiration date, and disbursement date |
| ii. | Confirm document is properly executed by all required parties to the transaction |
| iii. | Confirm the correct Right of Rescission document was executed for the transaction type |
| iv. | Confirm a full three (3) day rescission period was provided to the borrower |
| j. | Confirm through NMLS the loan originator and originating firm's license status was active and properly disclosed on appropriate loan documents |
| k. | Check the Loan participants against the exclusionary list provided by Client or by the purchaser of the Loan(s) |
| l. | Review closing documents to ensure that the Mortgage Loan information is complete, accurate, and consistent with other documents; Confirm collateral documents have been recorded or sent for recording |
The Compliance Review did not include any federal, state or local laws, constitutional provisions, regulations or ordinances that are not expressly enumerated above. Furthermore, the findings reached by Consolidated Analytics are dependent upon its receiving complete and accurate data regarding the loans from loan originators and other third parties upon which Consolidated Analytics is relying in reaching such findings.
Valuation Review
Consolidated Analytics performed a “Valuation Review,” which included the following:
| a. | Review original appraisal, determination that property is in "average" condition or better, or property requires cosmetic improvements (as defined by the appraiser) that do not affect habitability. Should an area of concern be identified with the condition of the property, Consolidated Analytics will alert Client. |
| b. | Review appraisal, determination that property is completely constructed and appraisal is on an “as is basis,” or property is identified as not completely constructed by originating appraiser. |
| c. | Review and determine if the appraisal report was performed on appropriate GSE forms and if the appraiser indicated in the body of the subject appraisal that the appraisal conforms to USPAP standards. |
| d. | Review and determine the relevance of the comparable properties and ensure that a rational and reliable value was provided and supported as of the effective date of the Origination Appraisal. |
| e. | Review adjustments (line item, net and gross adjustments) to ensure they are reasonable. |
| f. | Ensure that the appraisal conforms to the guidelines provided from the Client. |
| g. | Review appraisal to ensure all required documents were included. |
| h. | Review location map provided within the appraisal for external obsolescence. |
| i. | Ensure highest and best use and zoning complies with guidelines. |
| j. | Confirm there are no marketability issues that affect the subject property. |
| k. | Ensure subject property does not suffer any functional obsolescence. |
| l. | Where applicable, determine if the file did not contain the appraisal or other valuation method and a review could not be performed. |
| m. | Additional valuation products were not required when the CU score provided was 2.5 or below or the appraisal LCA risk score was eligible for Collateral Rep and Warranty relief. In the event the CU score was greater than 2.5 or the LCA score was not eligible for R&W relief, an additional valuation product was obtained to confirm value was supported within 10% tolerance. In some instances, based on guidance from the seller, CDA’s were ordered on loans that had an acceptable CU score or R&W eligibility. |
Consolidated Analytics applied a cascade methodology to determine if the original appraised value was reasonably supported when compared to an independent third party valuation product.
For loans reviewed in a post-close valuation review scenario (101 loans in total):
Thirty-nine (39) loans had CU scores of 2.5 or less or were eligible for Collateral Rep and Warranty relief.
Zero (0) loans had a Secondary Appraisal, zero (0) loans had an AVM, one (1) loan had a Field Review, and forty-one (41) loans had Desktop Reviews. Consolidated Analytics has independent access to the Desktop Reviews ordered by the Aggregator.
If a loan with an AVM or Desktop Review fell outside of a -10% tolerance, was inconclusive, or a PIW was present, then an additional valuation product was completed. There were zero (0) occurrences of this.
Product totals may not sum due to multiple products for each loan.
TAPE INTEGRITY REVIEW RESULTS SUMMARY
Of the one hundred and one (101) mortgage loans reviewed, sixty-six (66) unique mortgage loans (65.35% by loan count) had a total of one hundred seventy (170) discrepancies across fifteen (15) data fields. A blank or zero value on the data tape when an actual value was captured by Consolidated Analytics was not treated as a data variance.
| Fields Reviewed | Discrepancy Count | Percentage |
| Total Qualified Assets Post-Close | 58 | 34.12% |
| Qualifying CLTV | 38 | 22.35% |
| Qualifying LTV | 37 | 21.76% |
| Property Address | 11 | 6.47% |
| Total Closing Costs | 9 | 5.29% |
| Borrower 1 Self-Employment Flag | 4 | 2.35% |
| Borrower 1 FTHB | 3 | 1.76% |
| Borrower 1 Last Name | 3 | 1.76% |
| Property City | 1 | 0.59% |
| Borrower 1 First Name | 1 | 0.59% |
| Amortization Term | 1 | 0.59% |
| Borrower 2 Self-Employment Flag | 1 | 0.59% |
| Loan Purpose | 1 | 0.59% |
| First Payment Date | 1 | 0.59% |
| Interest Only Flag | 1 | 0.59% |
| Grand Total | 170 | 100.00% |
PAY HISTORY REVIEW RESULTS SUMMARY
For loans reviewed post-close, one hundred and one (101) loans in total, zero (0) loans were found to have a discrepancy between the servicer provided string and the string calculated by Consolidated Analytics.
Summary of Results
OVERALL RESULTS SUMMARY
Final Loan Grades
| Overall Loan Results: | |||
| Event Grade | Loan Count | Original Principal Balance | Percent of Sample |
| Event Grade A | 90 | $81,459,133.00 | 89.11% |
| Event Grade B | 11 | $11,029,322.00 | 10.89% |
| Event Grade C | 0 | $0.00 | 0% |
| Event Grade D | 0 | $0.00 | 0% |
| Total Sample | 101 | $92,488,455.00 | 100.00% |
| Credit Results: | ||
| Event Grade | Loan Count | Percent of Sample |
| Event Grade A | 92 | 91.09% |
| Event Grade B | 9 | 8.91% |
| Event Grade C | 0 | 0% |
| Event Grade D | 0 | 0% |
| Total Sample | 101 | 100.00% |
| Compliance Results: | ||
| Event Grade | Loan Count | Percent of Sample |
| Event Grade A | 98 | 97.03% |
| Event Grade B | 3 | 2.97% |
| Event Grade C | 0 | 0% |
| Event Grade D | 0 | 0% |
| Total Sample | 101 | 100.00% |
| Valuation Results: | ||
| Event Grade | Loan Count | Percent of Sample |
| Event Grade A | 101 | 100.00% |
| Event Grade B | 0 | 0% |
| Event Grade C | 0 | 0% |
| Event Grade D | 0 | 0% |
| Total Sample | 101 | 100.00% |
Exception Category Summary
The table below summarizes the individual exceptions which carried an associated “A”, “B”, “C”, or “D” level exception grade. One loan may have carried more than one exception. In such cases, the exception with the lowest grade would drive the loan grade for that particular area of the review. The overall loan grade is the lowest grade for any one particular review scope (ex. a loan with a Compliance Grade of “B”, a Credit Grade of “A”, and a Property Grade of “A” would receive an overall Loan Grade of “B”).
| Exception Type | Exception Level Grade | Exception Category | Total |
| Credit | A | HMDA Data Tape Not Provided | 101 |
| HMDA Discrepancy(s) Noted | 13 | ||
| Borrower 1 Credit Report is Incomplete | 6 | ||
| Hazard insurance dwelling coverage is not sufficient | 3 | ||
| Missing verification of taxes, insurance, and/or HOA fees for non-subject property | 3 | ||
| AUS Partially Provided | 3 | ||
| Borrower 2 3rd Party VOE Prior to Close Missing | 3 | ||
| Missing income documentation | 2 | ||
| Audited LTV Exceeds AUS LTV | 2 | ||
| The Final 1003 is Incomplete | 2 | ||
| Hazard Insurance Effective Date is after the Disbursement Date | 2 | ||
| Audited DTI Exceeds AUS DTI | 2 | ||
| The Total Hazard Coverage is LESS than the Required Coverage Amount | 2 | ||
| Borrower 1 Business Tax Returns Missing | 1 | ||
| Missing rent comparable schedule form 1007 | 1 | ||
| Missing Income - Bank Statements | 1 | ||
| Hazard Insurance Policy is Missing | 1 | ||
| Missing VOM or VOR | 1 | ||
| The Note is Incomplete | 1 | ||
| Missing final HUD-1 from sale of non-subject property | 1 | ||
| Third Party Fraud Report not Provided | 1 | ||
| Borrower is a BofA insider | 1 | ||
| Borrower 1 3rd Party VOE Prior to Close Missing | 1 | ||
| Fraud Report Shows Uncleared Alerts | 1 | ||
| Income 1 Income Trend is Decreasing | 1 | ||
| Property Title Issue | 1 | ||
| Income 1 Months Income Verified is Missing | 1 | ||
| Audited HCLTV Exceeds Guideline HCLTV | 1 |
| Missing Divorce Decree | 1 | ||
| Approval/Underwriting Summary Partially Provided | 1 | ||
| Title Coverage is Less than Subject Lien | 1 | ||
| Approval/Underwriting Summary Not Provided | 1 | ||
| HO6 Insurance Policy Effective Date is after the Note Date | 1 | ||
| Total Credit Grade (A) Exceptions: | 164 | ||
| B | Audited LTV Exceeds Guideline LTV | 2 | |
| Hazard insurance dwelling coverage is not sufficient | 1 | ||
| The Total Hazard Coverage is LESS than the Required Coverage Amount | 1 | ||
| Income 1 Income Trend is Decreasing | 1 | ||
| Income and Employment Do Not Meet Guidelines | 1 | ||
| Borrower has less than 2 FICO scores and does not meet minimum required to be scored. | 1 | ||
| Audited CLTV Exceeds AUS CLTV | 1 | ||
| Cash Out Does Not Meet Guideline Requirements | 1 | ||
| Total Credit Grade (B) Exceptions: | 9 | ||
| Compliance | A | Missing Required Affiliated Business Disclosure | 68 |
| Evidence of Appraisal Delivery to Borrower not Provided or Late (12 CFR 1002.14(a)(1)) | 44 | ||
| eSigned Documents Consent is Missing | 36 | ||
| ARM Disclosure Not Provided Within 3 Days of Application Date | 4 | ||
| Right of Rescission is Missing | 3 | ||
| TILA Right of Rescission Test | 3 | ||
| Revised Loan Estimate Delivery Date Test (prior to consummation) | 1 | ||
| Settlement Cost Booklet has not been entered | 1 | ||
| CHARM Booklet is Missing | 1 | ||
| ARM Disclosure is Missing | 1 | ||
| Initial Closing Disclosure Delivery Date Test | 1 | ||
| Total Compliance Grade (A) Exceptions: | 163 | ||
| B | Charges That In Total Cannot Increase More Than 10% Test | 2 | |
| CHARM Booklet is Missing | 1 | ||
| ARM Disclosure is Missing | 1 | ||
| Total Compliance Grade (B) Exceptions: | 4 | ||
| Property | A | Third Party Valuation Product Not Provided within 10% Tolerance | 70 |
| FEMA Declared Disaster Dated Prior to the Note Date, After Appraisal Date | 21 | ||
| The appraiser was not licensed (Primary Value) | 1 | ||
| Condo Approval Missing | 1 | ||
| Missing Appraisal photos | 1 | ||
| Total Property Grade (A) Exceptions: | 94 |
Event Grade Definitions
|
Final Loan Grade | |
| A | Loan meets Credit, Compliance, and Valuation Guidelines |
| B | The loan substantially meets published Client/Seller guidelines and/or eligibility in the validation of income, assets, or credit, is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and the value and valuation methodology is supported and substantially meets published guidelines. |
| C | The loan does not meet the published guidelines and/or violates one material law or regulation, and/or the value and valuation methodology is not supported or did not meet published guidelines. |
| D | Loan is missing documentation to perform a sufficient review. |
| Credit Event Grades | |
| A | The loan meets the published guidelines without any exceptions. The employment, income, assets and occupancy are supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan is documented and reasonable. |
| B | The loan substantially meets the published guidelines but reasonable compensating factors were considered and documented for exceeding published guidelines. The employment, income, assets and occupancy are supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan is documented and reasonable. |
| C | The loan does not substantially meet the published guidelines. There are not sufficient compensating factors that justify exceeding the published guidelines. The employment, income, assets or occupancy are not supported and justifiable. The borrower’s willingness and ability to repay the loan were not documented or are unreasonable. |
| D | There was not sufficient documentation to perform a review or the credit file was not furnished. |
| Compliance Event Grades | |
| A | The loan is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The legal documents accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms and are executed by all applicable parties. |
| B | The loan is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The legal documents accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms and are executed by all applicable parties. Client review required. |
| C | The loan violates one material law or regulation. The material disclosures are absent or the legal documents do not accurately reflect the agreed upon loan terms or all required applicants did not execute the documents. |
| D | There was not sufficient documentation to perform a review or the required legal documents were not furnished. |
| Valuation Event Grades | |
| A | The value is supported within 10% of the original appraisal by the AVM or there are other supporting documents in the originators loan file package (CDA, Field Review or Second Appraisal). The appraisal was performed on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable at origination. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE approved forms. |
| B | The value is not supported within 10% of the original appraisal by the AVM and there are no other valuation support documents in the loan file provided by the Seller. The valuation methodology substantially meets the published guidelines but reasonable compensating factors were considered and documented for exceeding guidelines. The appraisal was performed on an "as-is" basis and the property is complete and habitable. The appraiser was appropriately licensed and used GSE approved forms. |
| C | The value is not supported within 10% of the original appraisal. The valuation methodology did not meet the published guidelines and there were not sufficient compensating factors for exceeding published guidelines. The property is in below “average” condition or the property is not complete or requires significant repairs. The appraisal was not performed on an “as is” basis. The appraiser was not appropriately licensed or did not use GSE approved forms. |
| D | The file was missing the appraisal or there was not sufficient valuation documentation to perform a review. |