Commitments, Contingencies and Debt (Notes)	3 Months Ended
Mar. 28, 2026
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments, Contingencies and Debt	Commitments, Contingencies, and Debt Legal Proceedings We are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and governmental inquiries, inspections, or investigations (“Legal Matters”) arising in the ordinary course of our business. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of Legal Matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve the Legal Matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Stockholder Derivative Action: Certain of The Kraft Heinz Company’s current and former officers and directors and 3G Capital, Inc. and several of its subsidiaries and affiliates (the “3G Entities”) have been named as defendants in a consolidated stockholder derivative action, In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation, which was originally filed in 2019 in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The consolidated amended complaint, which was filed on April 27, 2020, alleged state law claims, contending that the 3G Entities were controlling stockholders who owed fiduciary duties to the Company, and that they breached those duties by allegedly engaging in insider trading and misappropriating the Company’s material, non-public information. The complaint further alleged that certain of The Kraft Heinz Company’s current and former officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by purportedly making materially misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company’s financial performance and the impairment of its goodwill and intangible assets, and by supposedly approving or allowing the 3G Entities’ alleged insider trading. The complaint sought relief against the defendants in the form of damages, disgorgement of all profits obtained from the alleged insider trading, contribution and indemnification, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint, which motion the Delaware Chancery Court granted in an order dated December 15, 2021. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on January 13, 2022, and the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of the consolidated amended complaint in an order dated August 1, 2022. One of the plaintiffs from the In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation subsequently filed a new complaint, Erste Asset Management GmbH v. Hees, et al., against certain current and former officers and directors of The Kraft Heinz Company on November 28, 2023 in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking to reinstate the plaintiff’s previously-dismissed claims and recover attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the dismissed litigation on the basis of alleged newly discovered evidence. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges the 3G Entities caused the Company to make false and misleading public disclosures regarding the independence of two directors of The Kraft Heinz Company, one of whose independence plaintiff contends formed a basis for the court’s prior dismissal of the In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation consolidated amended complaint. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which the Delaware Chancery Court granted in an order dated August 8, 2024, dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on September 5, 2024. The Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion and order on June 9, 2025, reversing the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint and remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Following remand, the trial court entered a stipulation on December 1, 2025, consolidating the previously dismissed In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation with the Erste Asset Management GmbH v. Hees, et al. suit under Case No. 2019-0587-LWW. The stipulation also appointed the General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, the Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, and Erste Asset Management GmbH as co-lead plaintiffs and their counsel as co-lead counsel. On December 2, 2025, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a verified consolidated second amended complaint, which motion the court granted with limitations on April 2, 2026. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit; however, we cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, due to the early stage of the proceedings. Environmental Actions: Since March 2024, the Company has been engaged in ongoing discussions with the U.S. Department of Justice, joined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, concerning alleged violations of the Clean Water Act related to a Company facility in Kendallville, Indiana. Previously, the Company entered into an Administrative Order on Consent with the U.S. EPA that requires the Company to implement a compliance plan to address related alleged violations of the Clean Water Act related to the facility in Kendallville, Indiana. While we cannot predict with certainty the resolution of these discussions, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve this matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Since September 2021, the Company has been involved in an administrative proceeding with the environmental authority from the State of Goiás (“SEMAD”) regarding alleged pollution in the Capivara stream related to a Company facility in Brazil. In March 2025, SEMAD issued a first instance administrative decision maintaining the initial infraction notice, and in September 2025, SEMAD issued a second instance administrative decision again maintaining the initial infraction notice. In a separate civil action brought against the Company by the local Public Prosecutor in September 2025 relating to the same alleged pollution, the court of first instance imposed a penalty against the Company in November 2025. In March 2026, the Public Prosecutor filed a criminal complaint against the Company and two former plant-level employees in connection with the same stream pollution contentions. Given that there are several available levels of appeal from both SEMAD’s administrative decision and the decision of the court in the Public Prosecutor’s civil action, and given the preliminary nature of the criminal action, we cannot predict with certainty how these matters will resolve; however, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve either matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Debt We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through redemptions, tender offers, cash purchases, prepayments, refinancing, exchange offers, open market or privately negotiated transactions, Rule 10b5-1 plans, or otherwise. Borrowing Arrangements: See Note 17, Debt, to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2025 for additional information on our borrowing arrangements. Our long-term debt contains customary representations, covenants, and events of default. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of March 28, 2026. Debt Issuances: 2025 Debt Issuance In the first quarter of 2025, KHFC, our 100% owned operating subsidiary, issued 600 million euro aggregate principal amount of 3.250% senior notes due March 2033, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.200% senior notes due March 2032, and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.400% senior notes due March 2035 (collectively, the “2025 Notes”). The 2025 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by The Kraft Heinz Company as to payment of principal, premium, and interest on a senior unsecured basis. Debt Issuance Costs: Debt issuance costs related to the 2025 Notes were insignificant. Fair Value of Debt: At March 28, 2026, the aggregate fair value of our total debt was $19.6 billion as compared with a carrying value of $21.1 billion. At December 27, 2025, the aggregate fair value of our total debt was $20.4 billion as compared with a carrying value of $21.2 billion. Our short-term debt had a carrying value that approximated its fair value at March 28, 2026 and December 27, 2025. We determined the fair value of our long-term debt using Level 2 inputs. Fair values are generally estimated based on quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments. Synthetic Lease Arrangements In June 2023, we entered into a non-cancellable synthetic lease for a distribution facility, for which we are the construction agent, for which we now anticipate the estimated construction cost to be approximately $625 million. The lease will commence upon completion of construction of the facility which is now expected to be in the later part of 2027. The term of the lease is five years after commencement. At the end of the lease term, we will be required to either purchase the facility or, in the event that option is not elected, to remarket the facility. Upon lease commencement, the lease classification, right-of-use asset, and lease liability will be determined and recorded. The lease arrangement contains a residual value guarantee of 100% of the total construction cost. The construction agreement and lease contain covenants that are consistent with our Senior Credit Facility.

Commitments, Contingencies and Debt (Notes)

We are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and governmental inquiries, inspections, or investigations (“Legal Matters”) arising in the ordinary course of our business. While we cannot predict with certainty the results of Legal Matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve the Legal Matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Stockholder Derivative Action:

Certain of The Kraft Heinz Company’s current and former officers and directors and 3G Capital, Inc. and several of its subsidiaries and affiliates (the “3G Entities”) have been named as defendants in a consolidated stockholder derivative action, In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation, which was originally filed in 2019 in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The consolidated amended complaint, which was filed on April 27, 2020, alleged state law claims, contending that the 3G Entities were controlling stockholders who owed fiduciary duties to the Company, and that they breached those duties by allegedly engaging in insider trading and misappropriating the Company’s material, non-public information. The complaint further alleged that certain of The Kraft Heinz Company’s current and former officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by purportedly making materially misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company’s financial performance and the impairment of its goodwill and intangible assets, and by supposedly approving or allowing the 3G Entities’ alleged insider trading. The complaint sought relief against the defendants in the form of damages, disgorgement of all profits obtained from the alleged insider trading, contribution and indemnification, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint, which motion the Delaware Chancery Court granted in an order dated December 15, 2021. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on January 13, 2022, and the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of the consolidated amended complaint in an order dated August 1, 2022. One of the plaintiffs from the In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation subsequently filed a new complaint, Erste Asset Management GmbH v. Hees, et al., against certain current and former officers and directors of The Kraft Heinz Company on November 28, 2023 in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking to reinstate the plaintiff’s previously-dismissed claims and recover attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the dismissed litigation on the basis of alleged newly discovered evidence. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges the 3G Entities caused the Company to make false and misleading public disclosures regarding the independence of two directors of The Kraft Heinz Company, one of whose independence plaintiff contends formed a basis for the court’s prior dismissal of the In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation consolidated amended complaint. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which the Delaware Chancery Court granted in an order dated August 8, 2024, dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on September 5, 2024. The Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion and order on June 9, 2025, reversing the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint and remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Following remand, the trial court entered a stipulation on December 1, 2025, consolidating the previously dismissed In re Kraft Heinz Company Derivative Litigation with the Erste Asset Management GmbH v. Hees, et al. suit under Case No. 2019-0587-LWW. The stipulation also appointed the General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, the Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, and Erste Asset Management GmbH as co-lead plaintiffs and their counsel as co-lead counsel. On December 2, 2025, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a verified consolidated second amended complaint, which motion the court granted with limitations on April 2, 2026. We intend to vigorously defend against this lawsuit; however, we cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any, due to the early stage of the proceedings.

Environmental Actions:

Since March 2024, the Company has been engaged in ongoing discussions with the U.S. Department of Justice, joined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, concerning alleged violations of the Clean Water Act related to a Company facility in Kendallville, Indiana. Previously, the Company entered into an Administrative Order on Consent with the U.S. EPA that requires the Company to implement a compliance plan to address related alleged violations of the Clean Water Act related to the facility in Kendallville, Indiana. While we cannot predict with certainty the resolution of these discussions, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve this matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Since September 2021, the Company has been involved in an administrative proceeding with the environmental authority from the State of Goiás (“SEMAD”) regarding alleged pollution in the Capivara stream related to a Company facility in Brazil. In March 2025, SEMAD issued a first instance administrative decision maintaining the initial infraction notice, and in September 2025, SEMAD issued a second instance administrative decision again maintaining the initial infraction notice. In a separate civil action brought against the Company by the local Public Prosecutor in September 2025 relating to the same alleged pollution, the court of first instance imposed a penalty against the Company in November 2025. In March 2026, the Public Prosecutor filed a criminal complaint against the Company and two former plant-level employees in connection with the same stream pollution contentions. Given that there are several available levels of appeal from both SEMAD’s administrative decision and the decision of the court in the Public Prosecutor’s civil action, and given the preliminary nature of the criminal action, we cannot predict with certainty how these matters will resolve; however, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve either matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through redemptions, tender offers, cash purchases, prepayments, refinancing, exchange offers, open market or privately negotiated transactions, Rule 10b5-1 plans, or otherwise.

Borrowing Arrangements:

See Note 17, Debt, to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2025 for additional information on our borrowing arrangements.

Our long-term debt contains customary representations, covenants, and events of default. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of March 28, 2026.

In the first quarter of 2025, KHFC, our 100% owned operating subsidiary, issued 600 million euro aggregate principal amount of 3.250% senior notes due March 2033, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.200% senior notes due March 2032, and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.400% senior notes due March 2035 (collectively, the “2025 Notes”). The 2025 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by The Kraft Heinz Company as to payment of principal, premium, and interest on a senior unsecured basis.

Debt Issuance Costs:

Debt issuance costs related to the 2025 Notes were insignificant.

At March 28, 2026, the aggregate fair value of our total debt was $19.6 billion as compared with a carrying value of $21.1 billion. At December 27, 2025, the aggregate fair value of our total debt was $20.4 billion as compared with a carrying value of $21.2 billion. Our short-term debt had a carrying value that approximated its fair value at March 28, 2026 and December 27, 2025. We determined the fair value of our long-term debt using Level 2 inputs. Fair values are generally estimated based on quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments.

Synthetic Lease Arrangements

In June 2023, we entered into a non-cancellable synthetic lease for a distribution facility, for which we are the construction agent, for which we now anticipate the estimated construction cost to be approximately $625 million. The lease will commence upon completion of construction of the facility which is now expected to be in the later part of 2027. The term of the lease is five years after commencement. At the end of the lease term, we will be required to either purchase the facility or, in the event that option is not elected, to remarket the facility. Upon lease commencement, the lease classification, right-of-use asset, and lease liability will be determined and recorded. The lease arrangement contains a residual value guarantee of 100% of the total construction cost. The construction agreement and lease contain covenants that are consistent with our Senior Credit Facility.