COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2026
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Litigation Governmental Investigations and Litigation Department of Justice Complaint In May 2024, the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, together with the attorneys general of twenty-nine states plus the District of Columbia, filed a civil antitrust complaint (the “Complaint”) against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of various federal and state laws pertaining to antitrust, competition, unlawful or unfair business practices, restraint of trade, and other causes of action. The United States filed an Amended Complaint in August 2024, adding ten additional states as plaintiffs. The Complaint requested various forms of relief for the alleged violations, including without limitation the divestiture of Ticketmaster by the Company, cancellation of certain ticketing contracts, enjoining the Company from engaging in anticompetitive practices, and other forms of relief. Twenty-five states also seek damages for their citizens allegedly caused by anticompetitive ticketing practices. In the fall of 2025, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment. In February 2026, the court granted the motion in part and denied the motion in part. In March 2026, the remaining claims proceeded to trial. Early in the trial, the Company entered into a binding term sheet with the United States settling the lawsuit (“the Settlement”). The terms of the Settlement, which were made public on March 9, 2026, provide for injunctive and structural relief addressing all of the United States’ claims, and provide for a $280 million settlement fund to address damages and civil penalty claims by plaintiff states. Under the Tunney Act, the district court judge presiding over the matter must approve the settlement before it takes final effect, following a process prescribed by statute. In the ensuing weeks, six additional states (“the Settling States”) also settled their claims for the same injunctive relief and their shares of the settlement fund totaling approximately $18.6 million. The remaining states and District of Columbia (“the Litigating States”) proceeded to trial. On April 15, 2026, the jury returned a verdict for the Litigating States on all claims that remained, including an award of damages measured on a per-ticket-sold basis, but without calculating the number of tickets to which the damages would be applied. After the verdict, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to propose a schedule for subsequent phases of the litigation, including post-trial motions and a “remedies” phase in which the plaintiff States will propose and the Court will assess equitable remedies the plaintiffs have sought, including among others those enumerated above, as well as civil penalties under certain state laws. The Company believes the jury verdict and damages award are legally infirm in a number of respects, many of which it has already raised in a pre-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Company intends to raise those issues and others in post-trial motions at the district court and, as needed and in due course, by filing an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. As a result, we have recognized $450 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, within selling, general and administrative expenses which represents our best estimate of the ultimate loss associated with the Settling States and the jury’s damages award. There can be no assurance that the Court will approve the Settlement with the United States and the Settling States or that the Company will be successful in challenging the verdict reached by the jury on the remaining claims brought by the Litigating States or otherwise settling those remaining claims. Accordingly, the continued defense and ultimate resolution of this matter could involve significant monetary costs or penalties and involve potential remedies or compliance requirements imposed by the Court which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate our business or have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s financial results. Federal Trade Commission Complaint In September 2025, the United States Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), joined by the attorneys general of seven states, filed a lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C. in the Central District of California. The plaintiffs allege that Live Nation and Ticketmaster advertised ticket prices to consumers that were deceptively lower than prices displayed at checkout, deceived consumers about the enforcement of advertised event ticket purchase limits and facilitated the sale of tickets unlawfully acquired by ticket brokers. The plaintiffs also allege that the Company violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as well as various state consumer protection statutes. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, statutory penalties and restitution for consumers. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in January 2026. Based on information presently known to management, we do not believe that a loss is probable of occurring at this time, and considerable uncertainty exists regarding the monetary penalties or other relief that the FTC could obtain in litigation. The Company will vigorously defend itself. Antitrust Litigation The Company is a defendant in three putative antitrust consumer class actions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws, among other causes of action. In Heckman, et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment, et al., filed in the Central District of California in January 2022, the District Court denied defendants’ motion to compel arbitration in August 2023. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling in October 2024. In January 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was granted in part and denied in part in April 2025. In December 2025, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims alleged in the lawsuit and will continue to vigorously defend itself. Two other putative class actions were filed in the Southern District of New York in August and September 2024: In Re Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C. Antitrust Litigation, and Jacobson v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al. While these lawsuits are at their initial stages, the Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims alleged therein and will vigorously defend itself. Other Litigation From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, including proceedings and claims based upon purported violations of antitrust laws, intellectual property rights and tortious interference, which could cause us to incur significant expenses. We have also been the subject of personal injury and wrongful death claims relating to accidents at certain venues in connection with our operations. As required, we have accrued our estimate of the probable settlement or other losses for the resolution of any outstanding claims. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results, including, in some cases, estimated redemption rates for the settlement offered, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.

In May 2024, the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, together with the attorneys general of twenty-nine states plus the District of Columbia, filed a civil antitrust complaint (the “Complaint”) against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of various federal and state laws pertaining to antitrust, competition, unlawful or unfair business practices, restraint of trade, and other causes of action. The United States filed an Amended Complaint in August 2024, adding ten additional states as plaintiffs. The Complaint requested various forms of relief for the alleged violations, including without limitation the divestiture of Ticketmaster by the Company, cancellation of certain ticketing contracts, enjoining the Company from engaging in anticompetitive practices, and other forms of relief. Twenty-five states also seek damages for their citizens allegedly caused by anticompetitive ticketing practices.

In the fall of 2025, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment. In February 2026, the court granted the motion in part and denied the motion in part. In March 2026, the remaining claims proceeded to trial.

Early in the trial, the Company entered into a binding term sheet with the United States settling the lawsuit (“the Settlement”). The terms of the Settlement, which were made public on March 9, 2026, provide for injunctive and structural relief addressing all of the United States’ claims, and provide for a $280 million settlement fund to address damages and civil penalty claims by plaintiff states. Under the Tunney Act, the district court judge presiding over the matter must approve the settlement before it takes final effect, following a process prescribed by statute. In the ensuing weeks, six additional states (“the Settling States”) also settled their claims for the same injunctive relief and their shares of the settlement fund totaling approximately $18.6 million. The remaining states and District of Columbia (“the Litigating States”) proceeded to trial.

On April 15, 2026, the jury returned a verdict for the Litigating States on all claims that remained, including an award of damages measured on a per-ticket-sold basis, but without calculating the number of tickets to which the damages would be applied.

After the verdict, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to propose a schedule for subsequent phases of the litigation, including post-trial motions and a “remedies” phase in which the plaintiff States will propose and the Court will assess equitable remedies the plaintiffs have sought, including among others those enumerated above, as well as civil penalties under certain state laws. The Company believes the jury verdict and damages award are legally infirm in a number of respects, many of which it has already raised in a pre-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law. The Company intends to raise those issues and others in post-trial motions at the district court and, as needed and in due course, by filing an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

As a result, we have recognized $450 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, within selling, general and administrative expenses which represents our best estimate of the ultimate loss associated with the Settling States and the jury’s damages award. There can be no assurance that the Court will approve the Settlement with the United States and the Settling States or that the Company will be successful in challenging the verdict reached by the jury on the remaining claims brought by the Litigating States or otherwise settling those remaining claims. Accordingly, the continued defense and ultimate resolution of this matter could involve significant monetary costs or penalties and involve potential remedies or compliance requirements imposed by the Court which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate our business or have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s financial results.

In September 2025, the United States Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), joined by the attorneys general of seven states, filed a lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C. in the Central District of California. The plaintiffs allege that Live Nation and Ticketmaster advertised ticket prices to consumers that were deceptively lower than prices displayed at checkout, deceived consumers about the enforcement of advertised event ticket purchase limits and facilitated the sale of tickets unlawfully acquired by ticket brokers. The plaintiffs also allege that the Company violated the Better Online Ticket Sales Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act, as well as various state consumer protection statutes. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, statutory penalties and restitution for consumers. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in January 2026.

Based on information presently known to management, we do not believe that a loss is probable of occurring at this time, and considerable uncertainty exists regarding the monetary penalties or other relief that the FTC could obtain in litigation. The Company will vigorously defend itself.

The Company is a defendant in three putative antitrust consumer class actions alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws, among other causes of action. In Heckman, et al. v. Live Nation Entertainment, et al., filed in the Central District of California in January 2022, the District Court denied defendants’ motion to compel arbitration in August 2023. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling in October 2024. In January 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was granted in part and denied in part in April 2025. In December 2025, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims alleged in the lawsuit and will continue to vigorously defend itself.

Two other putative class actions were filed in the Southern District of New York in August and September 2024: In Re Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C. Antitrust Litigation, and Jacobson v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., et al. While these lawsuits are at their initial stages, the Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims alleged therein and will vigorously defend itself.

From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, including proceedings and claims based upon purported violations of antitrust laws, intellectual property rights and tortious interference, which could cause us to incur significant expenses. We have also been the subject of personal injury and wrongful death claims relating to accidents at certain venues in connection with our operations. As required, we have accrued our estimate of the probable settlement or other losses for the resolution of any outstanding claims. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an analysis of potential results, including, in some cases, estimated redemption rates for the settlement offered, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to these proceedings.