v3.26.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
5 Months Ended 7 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 10, 2024
Dec. 31, 2024
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table    
Pay-Versus-Performance
The following section has been prepared in accordance with the SEC’s pay versus performance disclosure rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under these rules, the SEC has developed a new way to calculate executive pay, referred to as “compensation actually paid,” or CAP, which amounts are then compared to certain performance measures defined by the SEC.
The CAP does not reflect the value received or realized by our NEOs or how the compensation committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of company performance.
Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 36 for a discussion of our executive compensation program objectives and the ways in which we design our program to align executive compensation with company performance.
The CAP values are derived from the total compensation amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table, but adjusts those amounts to replace the grant date fair values of equity awards granted during the year with the fair value of equity awards granted during the year as of the end of the year, plus changes in fair value of any outstanding unvested awards granted in prior years. Thus, unlike the Summary Compensation Table that only factors in current year equity awards, the CAP reflects year-over-year changes in value of all outstanding unvested equity awards and equity awards vesting during the year. The CAP values also replace the change in pension value reported with the pension plan service cost or prior service cost for the year.
 
Year
 
 
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
Ms. Quirk
(1)
 
   
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Ms. Quirk
(2)
 
   
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
Mr. Adkerson
(1)
 
   
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
Mr. Adkerson
(2)
 
   
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for
Non-PEO

NEOs
(3)
 
   
Average 
Compensation 
Actually Paid 
to
Non-PEO 

NEOs
(4)
 
   
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
 
   
Net Income
($ in MM)
(6)
 
   
Return on
Investment
(7)
 
 
 
Total
Stockholder
Return
 
   
 
Peer Group
Total
Stockholder
Return
(5)
 
 
 2025 
 
$
14,808,126
 
 
$
24,358,128
 
 
$
 
 
$
 
 
$
7,310,132
 
 
 
$10,297,566
 
 
 
$208.56
 
 
 
$330.58
 
 
 
$2,204
 
 
 
15.21%
 
 2024 
 
 
13,286,084
 
 
 
10,935,875
 
 
 
23,744,421
 
 
 
16,451,198
 
 
 
3,646,350
 
 
 
3,185,580
 
 
 
154.02
 
 
 
179.48
 
 
 
1,889
 
 
 
17.95%
 
 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24,017,321
 
 
 
25,276,163
 
 
 
5,123,031
 
 
 
5,798,178
 
 
 
170.03
 
 
 
187.42
 
 
 
1,848
 
 
 
17.77%
 
 2022 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
 
 
5,191,453
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 
 
149.56
 
 
 
153.72
 
 
 
3,468
 
 
 
26.79%
 
 2021 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
 
 
4,086,801
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 
 
161.41
 
 
 
135.48
 
 
 
4,306
 
 
 
38.50%
 
 
(1)
For fiscal year 2025, and from June 11, 2024, through December 31, 2024, Kathleen L. Quirk served as our principal executive officer (PEO). For fiscal years 2021 through 2023 and from January 1, 2024, through June 10, 2024, Richard C. Adkerson served as our PEO. Since June 11, 2024, Mr. Adkerson has continued in his role as an executive officer and chairman of the board.
 
(2)
The amounts reported in this column represent the CAP for each PEO, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or delivered to each PEO during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the tables below were made to each PEO’s total compensation for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) to determine the CAP values. For Mr. Adkerson, he has reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for him during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO — Quirk (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add 
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2025 
 
 
$14,808,126
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$(11,631,590)
 
 
 
$15,669,610
 
 
 
$2,677,515
 
 
 
$2,461,467
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$373,000
 
 
 
$24,358,128
 
 2024 
 
 
13,286,084
 
 
 
   —
 
 
 
(9,528,290)
 
 
 
8,606,435
 
 
 
(731,685
 
 
(1,111,390
 
 
 —
 
 
 
414,721
 
 
 
10,935,875
 
 
 
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO — Adkerson (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add 
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
 
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
 
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2024 
 
 
$23,744,421
 
 
 
$(4,385,577)
 
 
 
$(12,542,380)
 
 
 
$11,730,530
 
 
 
$(1,157,955)
 
 
 
$(1,762,113)
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$824,272
 
 
 
$16,451,198
 
 2023 
 
 
24,017,321
 
 
 
(3,904,609
 
 
(12,518,840
 
 
12,051,685
 
 
 
134,268
 
 
 
5,037,937
 
 
 
 
 
 
458,401
 
 
 
25,276,163
 
 2022 
 
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
(3,505,075
 
 
(11,036,050
 
 
10,018,375
 
 
 
(5,674,233
 
 
(4,664,116
 
 
 
 
 
1,503,807
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
 2021 
 
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
(3,163,533
 
 
(9,818,515
 
 
24,933,600
 
 
 
25,690,784
 
 
 
18,530,775
 
 
 
 
 
 
401,757
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2025 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
 
(3)
Our NEOs other than our PEOs for each fiscal year included in the table were as follows: 2025 — Richard C. Adkerson, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; 2024 — Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; 2023 and 2022 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; and 2021 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II. The amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported for each NEO (excluding our PEOs) in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year.
 
(4)
The amounts reported in this column represent the average CAP for the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEOs), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or delivered to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to the average total compensation for the NEOs for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51 to determine the CAP values. Messrs. Adkerson and Higgins, the only NEOs who have pension benefits, reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and SRP, respectively, and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for them during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — Average of All Other NEOs (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add

Fair Value
at 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Awards
Vested
during Year
 
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2025 
 
 
$ 7,310,132
 
 
$
(1,294,491)
 
 
$
(3,733,371)
 
 
 
$5,031,230
 
 
 
$1,349,631
 
 
 
$1,473,360
 
 
$
   —
 
 
 
$161,075
 
 
 
$10,297,566
 
 2024 
 
 
3,646,350
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,917,153
 
 
1,799,912
 
 
 
(182,497
 
 
(223,898
 
 
 
 
 
62,867
 
 
 
3,185,580
 
 2023 
 
 
5,123,031
 
 
 
(311
 
 
(3,266,249
 
 
3,152,590
 
 
 
113,415
 
 
 
576,402
 
 
 
 
 
 
99,300
 
 
 
5,798,178
 
 2022 
 
 
5,191,453
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,358,315
 
 
2,970,644
 
 
 
(600,525
 
 
(459,070
 
 
 
 
 
187,462
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 2021 
 
 
 4,086,801
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,132,295
 
 
4,334,855
 
 
 
4,842,400
 
 
 
3,498,433
 
 
 
 
 
 
80,938
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2025 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
 
(5)
Represents the weighted peer group total stockholder return, or “TSR,” weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, which is the industry line peer group reported in our performance graph under Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our annual reports.
 
(6)
Net income represents net income attributable to common stock as reported in our consolidated financial statements that appear in our annual reports on Form
10-K.
 
(7)
While we use numerous financial and
non-financial
performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance under our AIP and LTIP, we believe that ROI represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) we use to link compensation actually paid to our executive officers to company performance. Per SEC guidance, the table reflects our annual ROI for each year; however, we use a three-year average ROI to measure performance for purposes of the PSUs granted under our LTIP.
       
Company Selected Measure Name     Return on Investment        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote     Our NEOs other than our PEOs for each fiscal year included in the table were as follows: 2025 — Richard C. Adkerson, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; 2024 — Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; 2023 and 2022 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II; and 2021 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Stephen T. Higgins and Douglas N. Currault II. The amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported for each NEO (excluding our PEOs) in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year.        
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote     Represents the weighted peer group total stockholder return, or “TSR,” weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, which is the industry line peer group reported in our performance graph under Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our annual reports.
       
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote    
(2)
The amounts reported in this column represent the CAP for each PEO, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or delivered to each PEO during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the tables below were made to each PEO’s total compensation for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) to determine the CAP values. For Mr. Adkerson, he has reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for him during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO — Quirk (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add 
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2025 
 
 
$14,808,126
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$(11,631,590)
 
 
 
$15,669,610
 
 
 
$2,677,515
 
 
 
$2,461,467
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$373,000
 
 
 
$24,358,128
 
 2024 
 
 
13,286,084
 
 
 
   —
 
 
 
(9,528,290)
 
 
 
8,606,435
 
 
 
(731,685
 
 
(1,111,390
 
 
 —
 
 
 
414,721
 
 
 
10,935,875
 
 
 
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO — Adkerson (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add 
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
 
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
 
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2024 
 
 
$23,744,421
 
 
 
$(4,385,577)
 
 
 
$(12,542,380)
 
 
 
$11,730,530
 
 
 
$(1,157,955)
 
 
 
$(1,762,113)
 
 
 
$   —
 
 
 
$824,272
 
 
 
$16,451,198
 
 2023 
 
 
24,017,321
 
 
 
(3,904,609
 
 
(12,518,840
 
 
12,051,685
 
 
 
134,268
 
 
 
5,037,937
 
 
 
 
 
 
458,401
 
 
 
25,276,163
 
 2022 
 
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
(3,505,075
 
 
(11,036,050
 
 
10,018,375
 
 
 
(5,674,233
 
 
(4,664,116
 
 
 
 
 
1,503,807
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
 2021 
 
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
(3,163,533
 
 
(9,818,515
 
 
24,933,600
 
 
 
25,690,784
 
 
 
18,530,775
 
 
 
 
 
 
401,757
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2025 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount     $ 7,310,132 $ 3,646,350 $ 5,123,031 $ 5,191,453 $ 4,086,801
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount     $ 10,297,566 3,185,580 5,798,178 3,931,649 14,711,132
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote    
(4)
The amounts reported in this column represent the average CAP for the NEOs as a group (excluding our PEOs), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or delivered to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to the average total compensation for the NEOs for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51 to determine the CAP values. Messrs. Adkerson and Higgins, the only NEOs who have pension benefits, reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and SRP, respectively, and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for them during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — Average of All Other NEOs (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
 
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add

Fair Value
at 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add
 Change
in Fair Value
of Awards
Vested
during Year
 
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2025 
 
 
$ 7,310,132
 
 
$
(1,294,491)
 
 
$
(3,733,371)
 
 
 
$5,031,230
 
 
 
$1,349,631
 
 
 
$1,473,360
 
 
$
   —
 
 
 
$161,075
 
 
 
$10,297,566
 
 2024 
 
 
3,646,350
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,917,153
 
 
1,799,912
 
 
 
(182,497
 
 
(223,898
 
 
 
 
 
62,867
 
 
 
3,185,580
 
 2023 
 
 
5,123,031
 
 
 
(311
 
 
(3,266,249
 
 
3,152,590
 
 
 
113,415
 
 
 
576,402
 
 
 
 
 
 
99,300
 
 
 
5,798,178
 
 2022 
 
 
5,191,453
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3,358,315
 
 
2,970,644
 
 
 
(600,525
 
 
(459,070
 
 
 
 
 
187,462
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 2021 
 
 
 4,086,801
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,132,295
 
 
4,334,855
 
 
 
4,842,400
 
 
 
3,498,433
 
 
 
 
 
 
80,938
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2025 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return     LOGO        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income     LOGO        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure    
LOGO
       
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group    
 
LOGO
       
Tabular List, Table    
Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program reflects a
pay-for-performance
philosophy. The metrics that we use under our AIP and LTIP are selected with the objective of linking our NEO’s compensation to the key metrics driving our future growth and incentivizing our NEOs to focus on critical elements of our strategic priorities each year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the most important financial and
non-financial
performance measures used to link executive compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to our performance are as follows:
 
 
Most Important Performance Measures (Without Ranking)
§
Return on Investment
  
§
Relative TSR
§
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
  
§
Copper Sales
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 208.56 154.02 170.03 149.56 161.41
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount     330.58 179.48 187.42 153.72 135.48
Net Income (Loss)     $ 2,204,000,000 $ 1,889,000,000 $ 1,848,000,000 $ 3,468,000,000 $ 4,306,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount     0.1521 0.1795 0.1777 0.2679 0.385
Measure:: 1              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Return on Investment        
Measure:: 2              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Relative TSR        
Measure:: 3              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA        
Measure:: 4              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Copper Sales        
Richard C. Adkerson [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     $ 0 $ 23,744,421 $ 24,017,321 $ 20,521,929 $ 19,111,894
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     0 16,451,198 $ 25,276,163 $ 7,164,637 $ 75,686,762
PEO Name Richard C. Adkerson       Richard C. Adkerson Richard C. Adkerson Richard C. Adkerson
Kathleen L. Quirk [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     14,808,126 13,286,084 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     $ 24,358,128 10,935,875 0 0 0
PEO Name   Kathleen L. Quirk Kathleen L. Quirk        
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (4,385,577) (3,904,609) (3,505,075) (3,163,533)
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (12,542,380) (12,518,840) (11,036,050) (9,818,515)
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       11,730,530 12,051,685 10,018,375 24,933,600
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (1,157,955) 134,268 (5,674,233) 25,690,784
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       (1,762,113) 5,037,937 (4,664,116) 18,530,775
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       0 0 0 0
PEO | Richard C. Adkerson [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount       824,272 458,401 1,503,807 401,757
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     $ 0 0      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (11,631,590) (9,528,290)      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     15,669,610 8,606,435      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     2,677,515 (731,685)      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     2,461,467 (1,111,390)      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0      
PEO | Kathleen L. Quirk [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     373,000 414,721      
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (1,294,491) 0 (311) 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (3,733,371) (1,917,153) (3,266,249) (3,358,315) (2,132,295)
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     5,031,230 1,799,912 3,152,590 2,970,644 4,334,855
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     1,349,631 (182,497) 113,415 (600,525) 4,842,400
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     1,473,360 (223,898) 576,402 (459,070) 3,498,433
Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     $ 161,075 $ 62,867 $ 99,300 $ 187,462 $ 80,938