v3.26.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
3 Months Ended 9 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Apr. 02, 2023
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table    
Pay Versus Performance
As required by SEC rules, we are providing the following information regarding executive pay and performance. Both Summary Compensation Table Total compensation and Compensation Actually Paid are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and may differ substantially from the manner in which the T&C Committee makes decisions regarding executive pay. For a discussion of the T&C Committee’s decisions regarding the pay of our named executive officers, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
 
 
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Current
CEO(1)(2)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Current
CEO(1)(3)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Former
CEO(1)(2)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to Former
CEO(1)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-CEO
NEOs(1)(2)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-CEO
NEOs(1)(3)
TSR(4)
Peer Group
TSR(4)
Net Income
(Loss)
(thousands)(5)
Operating
Margin(6)
2025
$1,149,308
$5,330,820
$—
$—
$7,399,288
$7,194,235
$41.29
$100.41
$(442,903)
(3.4)%
2024
$915,000
$54,326,168
$—
$—
$6,228,008
$10,817,690
$38.62
$91.17
$26,121
0.6%
2023
$44,538,114
$66,452,986
$854,000
$860,490
$3,784,404
$8,899,974
$26.29
$123.98
$(270,594)
(4.0)%
2022
$—
$—
$652,405
$(1,019,097)
$1,090,898
$(1,696,174)
$7.07
$135.71
$(609,552)
(14.9)%
2021
$—
$—
$60,814,546
$(8,865,630)
$10,885,903
$(4,147,460)
$22.56
$127.88
$(571,426)
(29.6)%
(1)
For 2025, 2024, and 2023 Mr. Bertolini served as current CEO. For 2023, Mr. Schlosser served as former CEO and for 2022 and 2021, Mr. Schlosser served as current CEO. The Non-CEO NEOs were Mr. Schlosser (2025, 2024), Mr. Blackley (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Ms. Liang (2025), Mr. McAnaney (2025), Ranmali Bopitiya (2024, 2023, 2022), Alessandrea Quane (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Mr. Sankaran (2023, 2022, 2021), Dennis Weaver (2022), Meghan Joyce (2021) and Mr. Kushner (2021).
(2)
Amounts reflect Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO and Non-CEO NEOs for each corresponding year. In 2021, these amounts include the grant date fair value of the Founders Awards granted to Mr. Schlosser and Mr. Kushner in connection with our initial public offering. As previously disclosed, these awards were voluntarily canceled and terminated on March 28, 2023.
(3)
See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”).
(4)
The amounts reflect the cumulative TSR of our common stock and of the 2025 rTSR Peer Group. The cumulative TSR against the 2024 rTSR peer group would be $104.25 (2025), $100.48 (2024), $129.93 (2023), $141.76 (2022) and $131.10 (2021). For more information on the companies in these peer groups, see “rTSR Modifier” above. The TSR value listed in each year reflects what the cumulative value of $100 would be if invested on March 3, 2021 (the date of our initial public offering). TSR is calculated on a cumulative basis by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment (if any), and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
(5)
The dollar amounts reported represent the net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
(6)
While we use numerous financial and non-financial performance measures to evaluate performance under our compensation programs, Operating Margin is the financial performance measure that, in our assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used to link compensation actually paid to NEOs to Company performance, for the most recently completed fiscal year. The amount shown in the table is equal to our Operating Margin as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year, which is defined as Earnings (loss) from operations divided by Total revenue.
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year.
Year and
Individuals
Total
Compensation
as reported in
the Summary
Compensation
Table (“SCT”)
Less: Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards as
reported in
SCT(1)
Add: Year-
End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
the Year(2)
Add: Change
in Fair Value
of Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards(2)
Add: Fair
Value as
of Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted
and
Vested in
the Year(2)
Add:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years that
Vested in
the Fiscal
Year(2)
Add: Fair
Value at the
End of the
Prior Year
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet
Vesting
Conditions
in the Year
Add: Value of
Dividends or
Other
Earnings Paid
on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Total
Compensation
Compensation
Actually Paid
CEO
$1,149,308
$0
$0
$4,019,067
$0
$162,445
$0
$0
$5,330,820
Non-CEO NEOs
$7,399,288
$5,560,344
$4,440,090
$176,541
$565,979
$172,681
$0
$0
$7,194,235
(1)
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(2)
The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant.
       
Company Selected Measure Name     Operating Margin        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote    
(1)
For 2025, 2024, and 2023 Mr. Bertolini served as current CEO. For 2023, Mr. Schlosser served as former CEO and for 2022 and 2021, Mr. Schlosser served as current CEO. The Non-CEO NEOs were Mr. Schlosser (2025, 2024), Mr. Blackley (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Ms. Liang (2025), Mr. McAnaney (2025), Ranmali Bopitiya (2024, 2023, 2022), Alessandrea Quane (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Mr. Sankaran (2023, 2022, 2021), Dennis Weaver (2022), Meghan Joyce (2021) and Mr. Kushner (2021).
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote    
(4)
The amounts reflect the cumulative TSR of our common stock and of the 2025 rTSR Peer Group. The cumulative TSR against the 2024 rTSR peer group would be $104.25 (2025), $100.48 (2024), $129.93 (2023), $141.76 (2022) and $131.10 (2021). For more information on the companies in these peer groups, see “rTSR Modifier” above. The TSR value listed in each year reflects what the cumulative value of $100 would be if invested on March 3, 2021 (the date of our initial public offering). TSR is calculated on a cumulative basis by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment (if any), and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
       
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote    
(3)
See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”).
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year.
Year and
Individuals
Total
Compensation
as reported in
the Summary
Compensation
Table (“SCT”)
Less: Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards as
reported in
SCT(1)
Add: Year-
End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
the Year(2)
Add: Change
in Fair Value
of Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards(2)
Add: Fair
Value as
of Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted
and
Vested in
the Year(2)
Add:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years that
Vested in
the Fiscal
Year(2)
Add: Fair
Value at the
End of the
Prior Year
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet
Vesting
Conditions
in the Year
Add: Value of
Dividends or
Other
Earnings Paid
on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Total
Compensation
Compensation
Actually Paid
CEO
$1,149,308
$0
$0
$4,019,067
$0
$162,445
$0
$0
$5,330,820
Non-CEO NEOs
$7,399,288
$5,560,344
$4,440,090
$176,541
$565,979
$172,681
$0
$0
$7,194,235
(1)
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(2)
The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant.
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount     $ 7,399,288 $ 6,228,008 $ 3,784,404 $ 1,090,898 $ 10,885,903
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount     $ 7,194,235 10,817,690 8,899,974 (1,696,174) (4,147,460)
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote    
(3)
See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”).
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year.
Year and
Individuals
Total
Compensation
as reported in
the Summary
Compensation
Table (“SCT”)
Less: Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards as
reported in
SCT(1)
Add: Year-
End Fair
Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
the Year(2)
Add: Change
in Fair Value
of Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity
Awards(2)
Add: Fair
Value as
of Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted
and
Vested in
the Year(2)
Add:
Change in
Fair Value
as of the
Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Fiscal
Years that
Vested in
the Fiscal
Year(2)
Add: Fair
Value at the
End of the
Prior Year
of Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet
Vesting
Conditions
in the Year
Add: Value of
Dividends or
Other
Earnings Paid
on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Total
Compensation
Compensation
Actually Paid
CEO
$1,149,308
$0
$0
$4,019,067
$0
$162,445
$0
$0
$5,330,820
Non-CEO NEOs
$7,399,288
$5,560,344
$4,440,090
$176,541
$565,979
$172,681
$0
$0
$7,194,235
(1)
The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(2)
The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant.
       
Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote    
(2)
The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return            
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income            
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure            
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group            
Tabular List, Table    
Tabular List of Financial Performance Metrics
We believe the following performance measures represent the most important financial performance measures used by us to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025:
Operating Margin
Adjusted EBIT(1)
Direct & Assumed Premiums(1)
Relative TSR
Direct SG&A Ratio(1)
Stock Price Performance
(1)
Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable.
For additional details regarding our most important financial performance measures, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement.
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 41.29 38.62 26.29 7.07 22.56
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 100.41 $ 91.17 $ 123.98 $ 135.71 $ 127.88
Company Selected Measure Amount     (0.034) 0.006 (0.04) (0.149) (0.296)
PEO Name Mr. Schlosser Mr. Bertolini Mr. Bertolini Mr. Bertolini   Mr. Schlosser Mr. Schlosser
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest     $ (442,903,000) $ 26,121,000 $ (270,594,000) $ (609,552,000) $ (571,426,000)
Previous Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount     $ 104.25 100.48 129.93 141.76 131.1
Measure:: 1              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Operating Margin        
Measure:: 2              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Adjusted EBIT        
Non-GAAP Measure Description    
(1)
Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable.
       
Measure:: 3              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Direct & Assumed Premiums        
Non-GAAP Measure Description    
(1)
Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable.
       
Measure:: 4              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Relative TSR        
Measure:: 5              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Direct SG&A Ratio        
Non-GAAP Measure Description    
(1)
Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable.
       
Measure:: 6              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Name     Stock Price Performance        
Mr. Bertolini [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     $ 1,149,308 915,000 44,538,114 0 0
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     5,330,820 54,326,168 66,452,986 0 0
Mr. Schlosser [Member]              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
PEO Total Compensation Amount     0 0 854,000 652,405 60,814,546
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount     0 $ 0 $ 860,490 $ (1,019,097) $ (8,865,630)
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     4,019,067        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     162,445        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     (5,560,344)        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     4,440,090        
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     176,541        
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     565,979        
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     172,681        
Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     0        
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year              
Pay vs Performance Disclosure              
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount     $ 0