Pay vs Performance Disclosure
|
3 Months Ended |
9 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
Apr. 02, 2023 |
Dec. 31, 2023 |
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
|
|
Pay Versus Performance As required by SEC rules, we are providing the following information regarding executive pay and performance. Both Summary Compensation Table Total compensation and Compensation Actually Paid are calculated in accordance with SEC rules and may differ substantially from the manner in which the T&C Committee makes decisions regarding executive pay. For a discussion of the T&C Committee’s decisions regarding the pay of our named executive officers, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2025 | | | $1,149,308 | | | $5,330,820 | | | $— | | | $— | | | $7,399,288 | | | $7,194,235 | | | $41.29 | | | $100.41 | | | $(442,903) | | | (3.4)% | | | 2024 | | | $915,000 | | | $54,326,168 | | | $— | | | $— | | | $6,228,008 | | | $10,817,690 | | | $38.62 | | | $91.17 | | | $26,121 | | | 0.6% | | | 2023 | | | $44,538,114 | | | $66,452,986 | | | $854,000 | | | $860,490 | | | $3,784,404 | | | $8,899,974 | | | $26.29 | | | $123.98 | | | $(270,594) | | | (4.0)% | | | 2022 | | | $— | | | $— | | | $652,405 | | | $(1,019,097) | | | $1,090,898 | | | $(1,696,174) | | | $7.07 | | | $135.71 | | | $(609,552) | | | (14.9)% | | | 2021 | | | $— | | | $— | | | $60,814,546 | | | $(8,865,630) | | | $10,885,903 | | | $(4,147,460) | | | $22.56 | | | $127.88 | | | $(571,426) | | | (29.6)% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)
| For 2025, 2024, and 2023 Mr. Bertolini served as current CEO. For 2023, Mr. Schlosser served as former CEO and for 2022 and 2021, Mr. Schlosser served as current CEO. The Non-CEO NEOs were Mr. Schlosser (2025, 2024), Mr. Blackley (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Ms. Liang (2025), Mr. McAnaney (2025), Ranmali Bopitiya (2024, 2023, 2022), Alessandrea Quane (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Mr. Sankaran (2023, 2022, 2021), Dennis Weaver (2022), Meghan Joyce (2021) and Mr. Kushner (2021). |
(2)
| Amounts reflect Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO and Non-CEO NEOs for each corresponding year. In 2021, these amounts include the grant date fair value of the Founders Awards granted to Mr. Schlosser and Mr. Kushner in connection with our initial public offering. As previously disclosed, these awards were voluntarily canceled and terminated on March 28, 2023. |
(3)
| See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”). |
(4)
| The amounts reflect the cumulative TSR of our common stock and of the 2025 rTSR Peer Group. The cumulative TSR against the 2024 rTSR peer group would be $104.25 (2025), $100.48 (2024), $129.93 (2023), $141.76 (2022) and $131.10 (2021). For more information on the companies in these peer groups, see “rTSR Modifier” above. The TSR value listed in each year reflects what the cumulative value of $100 would be if invested on March 3, 2021 (the date of our initial public offering). TSR is calculated on a cumulative basis by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment (if any), and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. |
(5)
| The dollar amounts reported represent the net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year. |
(6)
| While we use numerous financial and non-financial performance measures to evaluate performance under our compensation programs, Operating Margin is the financial performance measure that, in our assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used to link compensation actually paid to NEOs to Company performance, for the most recently completed fiscal year. The amount shown in the table is equal to our Operating Margin as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the applicable year, which is defined as Earnings (loss) from operations divided by Total revenue. |
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CEO | | | $1,149,308 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $4,019,067 | | | $0 | | | $162,445 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $5,330,820 | | | Non-CEO NEOs | | | $7,399,288 | | | $5,560,344 | | | $4,440,090 | | | $176,541 | | | $565,979 | | | $172,681 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $7,194,235 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)
| The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
(2)
| The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Company Selected Measure Name |
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
|
| Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
|
|
(1)
| For 2025, 2024, and 2023 Mr. Bertolini served as current CEO. For 2023, Mr. Schlosser served as former CEO and for 2022 and 2021, Mr. Schlosser served as current CEO. The Non-CEO NEOs were Mr. Schlosser (2025, 2024), Mr. Blackley (2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Ms. Liang (2025), Mr. McAnaney (2025), Ranmali Bopitiya (2024, 2023, 2022), Alessandrea Quane (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021), Mr. Sankaran (2023, 2022, 2021), Dennis Weaver (2022), Meghan Joyce (2021) and Mr. Kushner (2021). |
|
|
|
|
|
| Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
|
|
(4)
| The amounts reflect the cumulative TSR of our common stock and of the 2025 rTSR Peer Group. The cumulative TSR against the 2024 rTSR peer group would be $104.25 (2025), $100.48 (2024), $129.93 (2023), $141.76 (2022) and $131.10 (2021). For more information on the companies in these peer groups, see “rTSR Modifier” above. The TSR value listed in each year reflects what the cumulative value of $100 would be if invested on March 3, 2021 (the date of our initial public offering). TSR is calculated on a cumulative basis by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment (if any), and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
|
|
(3)
| See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”). |
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CEO | | | $1,149,308 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $4,019,067 | | | $0 | | | $162,445 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $5,330,820 | | | Non-CEO NEOs | | | $7,399,288 | | | $5,560,344 | | | $4,440,090 | | | $176,541 | | | $565,979 | | | $172,681 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $7,194,235 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)
| The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
(2)
| The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
|
|
$ 7,399,288
|
$ 6,228,008
|
$ 3,784,404
|
$ 1,090,898
|
$ 10,885,903
|
| Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
|
|
$ 7,194,235
|
10,817,690
|
8,899,974
|
(1,696,174)
|
(4,147,460)
|
| Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
|
|
(3)
| See table immediately following for adjustments to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”). |
The following table details the adjustment to the Summary Compensation Table Total compensation for our CEO, as well as the average for our Non-CEO NEOs, to determine CAP, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during the applicable year. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CEO | | | $1,149,308 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $4,019,067 | | | $0 | | | $162,445 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $5,330,820 | | | Non-CEO NEOs | | | $7,399,288 | | | $5,560,344 | | | $4,440,090 | | | $176,541 | | | $565,979 | | | $172,681 | | | $0 | | | $0 | | | $7,194,235 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)
| The amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. |
(2)
| The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote |
|
|
(2)
| The fair values of unvested and outstanding equity awards to our NEOs were re-measured as of the end of each fiscal year, and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table above. Fair values as of each measurement date were determined using valuation assumptions and methodologies (including volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rates) that are generally consistent with those used to estimate fair value at grant in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For stock options, the grant date fair values were estimated using Black-Scholes. Subsequent valuations at the end of each fiscal year and as of each vest date are performed using a lattice model, as the latter provides a better estimate of options that are no longer at-the-money. For market-based performance restricted stock units, fair values were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, using inputs that are consistent with those used at grant. For other performance-based awards, the fair values reflect the probable outcome of the performance vesting conditions as of each measurement date. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, where we explain assumptions made in valuing equity awards at grant. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tabular List, Table |
|
|
Tabular List of Financial Performance Metrics We believe the following performance measures represent the most important financial performance measures used by us to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025: • | Direct & Assumed Premiums(1) |
(1)
| Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable. |
For additional details regarding our most important financial performance measures, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Shareholder Return Amount |
|
|
$ 41.29
|
38.62
|
26.29
|
7.07
|
22.56
|
| Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
|
|
$ 100.41
|
$ 91.17
|
$ 123.98
|
$ 135.71
|
$ 127.88
|
| Company Selected Measure Amount |
|
|
(0.034)
|
0.006
|
(0.04)
|
(0.149)
|
(0.296)
|
| PEO Name |
Mr. Schlosser
|
Mr. Bertolini
|
Mr. Bertolini
|
Mr. Bertolini
|
|
Mr. Schlosser
|
Mr. Schlosser
|
| Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest |
|
|
$ (442,903,000)
|
$ 26,121,000
|
$ (270,594,000)
|
$ (609,552,000)
|
$ (571,426,000)
|
| Previous Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
|
|
$ 104.25
|
100.48
|
129.93
|
141.76
|
131.1
|
| Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
|
|
| Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Adjusted EBIT
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-GAAP Measure Description |
|
|
(1)
| Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Direct & Assumed Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-GAAP Measure Description |
|
|
(1)
| Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Measure:: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Relative TSR
|
|
|
|
|
| Measure:: 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Direct SG&A Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-GAAP Measure Description |
|
|
(1)
| Direct & Assumed Premiums, Direct SG&A Ratio and Adjusted EBIT are financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Appendix A to this Proxy Statement defines these and other non-GAAP financial measures and reconciles them to the most directly comparable historical GAAP financial measures, where applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Measure:: 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name |
|
|
Stock Price Performance
|
|
|
|
|
| Mr. Bertolini [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO Total Compensation Amount |
|
|
$ 1,149,308
|
915,000
|
44,538,114
|
0
|
0
|
| PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
|
|
5,330,820
|
54,326,168
|
66,452,986
|
0
|
0
|
| Mr. Schlosser [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO Total Compensation Amount |
|
|
0
|
0
|
854,000
|
652,405
|
60,814,546
|
| PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
|
|
0
|
$ 0
|
$ 860,490
|
$ (1,019,097)
|
$ (8,865,630)
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
4,019,067
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
162,445
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| PEO | Mr. Bertolini [Member] | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
(5,560,344)
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
4,440,090
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
176,541
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
565,979
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
172,681
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Prior Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Any Prior Year that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Total Compensation for Covered Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
|