| 20 | Financial instruments
– risk management |
The Group is exposed through its operations to the following financial
risks:
This note describes the Group’s policies and processes for managing
those risks. The policy for managing these risks is reviewed and agreed with the Board, however it has delegated the authority for designing
and operating processes that ensure the effective management of the risks to the Group’s management.
Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Group, from which financial
instrument risk arises, are as follows:
| · | Trade and other receivables |
| · | Cash and cash equivalents |
| · | Trade and other payables |
| · | Derivative financial liability |
A summary of the financial instruments held by category is provided
below:
Financial assets – amortised cost
| Schedule of consolidated derivative financial instruments | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
2025 £’000 | | |
2024 £’000 | | |
2023 £’000 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | |
| 8,534 | | |
| 1,669 | | |
| 5,971 | |
| Trade receivables | |
| 35 | | |
| 11 | | |
| – | |
| Other receivables | |
| 64 | | |
| 131 | | |
| 282 | |
| Total financial assets | |
| 8,633 | | |
| 1,811 | | |
| 6,253 | |
Financial liabilities – amortised cost
| | |
2025 £’000 | | |
2024 £’000 | | |
2023 £’000 | |
| Trade payables | |
| 97 | | |
| 707 | | |
| 314 | |
| Other payables | |
| 17 | | |
| 6 | | |
| 7 | |
| Accruals | |
| 1,860 | | |
| 1,273 | | |
| 857 | |
| Deferred consideration | |
| 1,208 | | |
| 1,844 | | |
| – | |
| Borrowings | |
| 61 | | |
| 727 | | |
| 464 | |
| Total financial liabilities – amortised cost | |
| 3,243 | | |
| 4,557 | | |
| 1,642 | |
Financial liabilities – fair value through profit and loss
– current
| | |
2025 £’000 | | |
2024 £’000 | | |
2023 £’000 | |
| Equity settled derivative financial liability | |
| 2,915 | | |
| 383 | | |
| 4,160 | |
Fair value hierarchy
The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing
the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:
| · | Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
| · | Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly
or indirectly; and |
| · | Level 3: techniques which use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable market
data. |
The fair value of the Group’s derivative financial liability
is measured on a recurring basis. The following table gives information about how the fair value of this financial liability is determined,
additional disclosure is given in note 19:
| Schedule of consolidated financial assets and liabilities at fair value |
|
|
|
| |
|
Financial liabilities |
Fair value as at 31/12/2025 |
Fair value hierarchy |
Valuation technique(s) and key input(s) |
Significant unobservable input(s) | |
Relationship of unobservable inputs to fair value |
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series L warrants |
£2,914,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 110.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 4.97 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.73% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series J warrants |
£1,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 115.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 3.56 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.60% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series G warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 115.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 3.39 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.59% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series E warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 115.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 2.98 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.55% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series D warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 120.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 2.47 years determined using the remaining life of the share options. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.51% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Total |
£2,915,000 |
|
|
| |
|
Financial liabilities |
Fair value as at 31/12/2024 |
Fair value hierarchy |
Valuation technique(s) and key input(s) |
Significant unobservable input(s) | |
Relationship of unobservable inputs to fair value |
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series K warrants |
£ – |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 75.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 0.51 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.24% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series J warrants |
£231,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 100.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 4.56 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.36% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series H warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 75.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 0.39 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.29% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series G warrants |
£102,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 105.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 4.39 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.35% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series E warrants |
£47,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 105.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 3.98 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.32% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series D warrants |
£2,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 110.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 3.47 years determined using the remaining life of the share options. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.30% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – May 2020 warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 100.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 0.89 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.18% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – October 2019 warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 80.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 0.48 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.24% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Total |
£383,000 |
|
|
| |
|
Financial liabilities |
Fair value as at 31/12/2023 |
Fair value hierarchy |
Valuation technique(s) and key input(s) |
Significant unobservable input(s) | |
Relationship of unobservable inputs to fair value |
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series E warrants |
£2,592,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 90.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 0.98 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.79% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series F warrants |
£1,444,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 95.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 4.98 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.84% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – Series D warrants |
£124,000 |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 95.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 4.40 years determined using the remaining life of the share options. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 3.93% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – May 2020 warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 100.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 1.88 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.23% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Equity settled financial derivative liability – October 2019 warrants |
£– |
Level 3 |
Black-Scholes Model
|
Volatility rate of 100.0% determined using historical volatility of comparable companies. | |
The higher the volatility the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected life between a range of 0.1 and 1.50 years determined using the remaining life of the warrant. | |
The shorter the expected life the lower the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Risk-free rate of 4.51% determined using the expected life assumptions. | |
The higher the risk-free rate the higher the fair value. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Total |
£4,160,000 |
|
|
| |
|
Changing the unobservable risk-free rate input to the valuation model
by 10% higher while all other variables were held constant, would not impact the carrying amount of warrants (2024: nil; 2023: nil).
There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 in the period.
The financial liability measured at fair value at 31 December 2025
on Level 3 fair value measurement represents consideration relating to warrants issued in December 2025, July 2024, May 2024, December
2023 and May 2023 as part of Registered Direct offerings and private placement.
Credit risk
The Group is exposed to credit risk from amounts due from collaborative
partners and from cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and financial institutions. The risk from collaborative partners is
deemed to be low. For banks and financial institutions, only independently rated parties with high credit status are accepted. The Group
does not enter into derivatives to manage credit risk. The gross carrying amount of a financial asset is written off (either partially
or in full) to the extent that there is no realistic prospect of recovery.
The total exposure to credit risk of the Group is equal to the total
value of the financial assets held at each year end as noted above.
Foreign exchange risk
The group operates internationally although its operations are based
in the United Kingdom. The group incorporated subsidiaries in the United Sate of America and the Republic of Ireland during the year,
there were minimal transactions in these entities during 2025.
The group assets and liabilities are predominately denominated in Pounds
Sterling and US Dollar. The Group retains cash balances in US Dollars as a hedge against these liabilities. The assets and liabilities
associated with the Joint Arrangement with Emtora, as disclosed in note 1, are held in US dollars as the majority of operations under
the arrangement are undertaken in the US.
The group is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from exposure
to various currencies primarily the US Dollar and Euro.
The table below shows analysis of the Pounds Sterling equivalent of
year-end cash and cash equivalent balances by currency:
| Schedule of foreign exchange risk | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
2025 £’000 | | |
2024 £’000 | | |
2023 £’000 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Pounds Sterling | |
| 97 | | |
| 212 | | |
| 2,244 | |
| US Dollar | |
| 8,436 | | |
| 1,457 | | |
| 3,727 | |
| Other | |
| 1 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Total | |
| 8,534 | | |
| 1,669 | | |
| 5,971 | |
Foreign exchange risk also arises when individual Group entities enter
into transactions denominated in a currency other than their functional currency, the Group’s transactions outside the UK to the
US and Europe drive foreign exchange movements where suppliers invoice in currency other than sterling. The Group does retain some cash
balances in US Dollars from its US Dollar denominated equity raises to reduce the foreign exchange exposure on US$ denominated suppliers
related to its NASDAQ listing and US based clinical trial. All other assets and/or consumables that are purchased in foreign currencies,
such currency is purchased immediately upon invoice. These transactions are not hedged because the cost of doing so is disproportionate
to the risk.
Foreign currency sensitivity analysis
The most significant currencies in which the Group transacts, other
than Pounds Sterling, are the US Dollar and the Euro. The Group also trades in other currencies in small amounts as necessary.
The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 10%
change in year-end exchange rates, which the Group feels is the maximum likely change in rate based upon recent currency movements, in
the key foreign currency exchange rates against Pounds Sterling:
| Schedule of foreign currency exchange rates | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| Year ended 31 December 2025 | |
US Dollar £’000 | | |
Euro £’000 | | |
Other £’000 | |
| Loss before tax | |
| 1,068 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Total equity | |
| 1,068 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Year ended 31 December 2024 | |
US Dollar £’000 | | |
Euro £’000 | | |
Other £’000 | |
| Loss before tax | |
| 146 | | |
| – | | |
| (1 | ) |
| Total equity | |
| 146 | | |
| – | | |
| (1 | ) |
| Year ended 31 December 2023 | |
US Dollar £’000 | | |
Euro £’000 | | |
Other £’000 | |
| Loss before tax | |
| 373 | | |
| 2 | | |
| – | |
| Total equity | |
| 373 | | |
| 2 | | |
| – | |
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Group’s management of working
capital. It is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they fall due. It is the Group’s
aim to settle balances as they become due.
During 2025 the Company utilised its Equity Line of Credit (“ELOC”)
to raise gross proceeds of $8.92 million before expenses. In May 2025, the Company completed a Warrant Inducement which raised £47,000.
In December 2025, the Company completed a Registered Offering in the US which raised $10 million before expenses.
In December 2024 the Company issued a Promissory Note as detailed in
Note 17 for the principle amount of $600,000. The Company received $540,000 on 24 December 2024 as the note was issued at a 10% discount.
The Promissory Note was repaid in full during 2025.
In May 2024, the Company completed a Warrant Inducement which raised
£4.8 million before expenses. In July 2024, the Company completed a Registered Direct Offering in the US which raised £3.9
million before expenses. During the year warrants previously issued were exercised resulting in the Company receiving £0.4 million.
In February 2023, the Company completed a Private Placement in the
US which raised £5.0 million before expenses. In May 2023, the Company completed a Registered Direct Offering in the US which raised
£2.7 million before expenses. In December 2023, the Company completed a Registered Offering in the US which raised £4.4 million
before expenses.
The Directors have prepared cash flow forecasts and considered the
cash flow requirement for the Group for the next three years including the period 12 months from the date of approval of the consolidated
financial statements. These forecasts show that further financing will be required before Q4 2025 assuming, inter alia, that certain development
programs and other operating activities continue as currently planned.
Pursuant to its $35 million Equity Line of Credit, or ELOC, as described
above, the Company may direct C/M to purchase ADSs (subject to certain limitations) and receive proceeds in accordance with a formula
price for up to 36 months from the Commencement Date. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to use the ELOC or raise from
other financing to the extent necessary to finance the Company’s operations. As at 31 December 2025 $26.08 million remains undrawn
from the ELOC.
In the Directors’ opinion, the environment for financing of small
and micro-cap biotech companies remains challenging. While this may present acquisition and/or merger opportunities with other companies
with limited or no access to financing, as noted above, any attendant financings by Biodexa are likely to be dilutive. The Directors continue
to evaluate financing options, including those connected to acquisitions and/or mergers, potentially available to the Group. Any alternatives
considered are contingent upon the agreement of counterparties and accordingly, there can be no assurance that any alternative courses
of action to finance the Company would be successful.
This requirement for additional financing in the short term represents
a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt upon the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Should it become evident in the future that there are no realistic financing options available to the Company which are actionable before
its cash resources run out then the Company will no longer be a going concern. In such circumstances, we would no longer be able to prepare
financial statements under paragraph 25 of IAS 1. Instead, the financial statements would be prepared on a liquidation basis and assets
would be stated at net realizable value and all liabilities would be accelerated to current liabilities.
The following table sets out the contractual maturities (representing
undiscounted contractual cash-flows) of financial liabilities:
| Schedule of contractual maturities of financial liabilities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| 2025 | |
Up to 3 months £’000 | | |
Between 3 and 12 months £’000 | | |
Between 1 and 2 years £’000 | | |
Between 2 and 5 years £’000 | | |
Over 5 years £’000 | |
| Trade and other payables | |
| 1,974 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Deferred considerations | |
| 166 | | |
| 497 | | |
| 662 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Promissory note | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Lease liabilities | |
| 48 | | |
| 16 | | |
| | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Total | |
| 2,188 | | |
| 513 | | |
| 662 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| 2024 | |
Up to 3 months £’000 | | |
Between 3 and 12 months £’000 | | |
Between 1 and 2 years £’000 | | |
Between 2 and 5 years £’000 | | |
Over 5 years £’000 | |
| Trade and other payables | |
| 1,986 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Deferred considerations | |
| 178 | | |
| 533 | | |
| 711 | | |
| 711 | | |
| – | |
| Promissory note | |
| – | | |
| 479 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Lease liabilities | |
| 47 | | |
| 142 | | |
| 111 | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Total | |
| 2,211 | | |
| 1,154 | | |
| 822 | | |
| 711 | | |
| – | |
| 2023 | |
Up to 3 months £’000 | | |
Between 3 and 12 months £’000 | | |
Between 1 and 2 years £’000 | | |
Between 2 and 5 years £’000 | | |
Over 5 years £’000 | |
| Trade and other payables | |
| 1,178 | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| Lease liabilities | |
| 47 | | |
| 141 | | |
| 189 | | |
| 112 | | |
| – | |
| Total | |
| 1,225 | | |
| 141 | | |
| 189 | | |
| 112 | | |
| – | |
More details with regard to the line items above are included in the
respective notes:
| · | Trade and other payables
– note 15 |
| · | Deferred consideration
– note 16 |
Capital risk management
The Group monitors capital which comprises all components of equity
(i.e. share capital, share premium, foreign exchange reserve and accumulated deficit).
The Group’s objectives when maintaining capital are:
| · | to safeguard the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern; and |
| · | to have sufficient resource to take development projects forward towards commercialisation. |
The Group continues to incur substantial operating expenses. Until
the Group generates positive net cash inflows from the commercialisation of its products it remains dependent upon additional funding
through the injection of equity capital and government funding. The Group may not be able to generate positive net cash inflows in the
future or to attract such additional required funding at all, or on suitable terms. In such circumstances the development programmes may
be delayed or cancelled, and business operations cut back.
The Group seeks to reduce this risk by keeping a tight control on expenditure,
avoiding long term supplier contracts (other than clinical trials), prioritising development spend on products closest to potential revenue
generation, obtaining government grants (where applicable), maintaining a focussed portfolio of products under development and keeping
shareholders informed of progress.
There have been no changes to the Group’s processes for managing
capital risk since the previous year.
|