1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company

Talphera, Inc., or the Company, or Talphera, was incorporated in Delaware on July 13, 2005, as SuRx, Inc. The Company subsequently changed its name to AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and, on January 9, 2024, to Talphera, Inc. The Company’s operations are based in San Mateo, California.

Talphera is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies for use in medically supervised settings. The Company’s product development portfolio features Niyad (a regional anticoagulant for the dialysis circuit). All resources are currently focused on developing Niyad. LTX-608 is a nafamostat formulation for direct IV infusion that the Company may develop for one or more of the following indications: disseminated intravascular coagulation, or DIC, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS, acute pancreatitis, or as an anti-viral treatment. There are two ready-to-use pre-filled syringe product candidates that have been explored but are being evaluated for discontinuation.

On January 7, 2022, the Company acquired Lowell Therapeutics, Inc., or Lowell, a privately held company (see Note 4, “Asset Acquisition”) and, as a result acquired the Niyad developmental product, a regional anticoagulant for the dialysis circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients in the hospital, that the Company is studying under an investigational device exemption, or IDE, and for which it has received Breakthrough Device Designation status from the FDA. While not approved for commercial use in the United States, the active drug component of Niyad, nafamostat, has been approved in Japan and South Korea as a regional anticoagulant for the dialysis circuit, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and acute pancreatitis. Niyad is a lyophilized formulation of nafamostat, a broad-spectrum, synthetic serine protease inhibitor, with anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and potential anti-viral activities. The second intended indication for Niyad is as a regional anticoagulant for the dialysis circuit for chronic kidney disease patients undergoing intermittent hemodialysis in dialysis centers. In addition, the Company acquired LTX-608, a nafamostat formulation for direct IV infusion.

On July 14, 2021, the Company entered into a License and Commercialization Agreement, or the PFS Agreement, with Laboratoire Aguettant, or Aguettant, pursuant to which the Company obtained the exclusive right to develop and, subject to FDA approval, commercialize in the United States (i) an ephedrine pre-filled syringe for injection (Fedsyra), and (ii) a phenylephrine PFS for injection. Aguettant will supply the Company with the products for use in commercialization, if they are approved in the U.S. This agreement is currently being evaluated for potential termination given the competitive environment for these product candidates.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, were prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operating activities since inception and expects to continue to incur operating losses and negative cash flows in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Considering the Company’s current cash resources and its current and expected levels of operating expenses for the next twelve months, management expects to need additional capital to fund its planned operations prior to the 12-month anniversary of the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.

Management may seek to raise such additional capital through public or private equity offerings, debt securities, a new debt facility, monetizing or securitizing certain assets, entering into product development, license or distribution agreements with third parties, or divesting any of the Company’s remaining product candidates. While management believes its plans to raise additional funds will alleviate the conditions that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, these plans are not entirely within the Company’s control and cannot be assessed as being probable of occurring.

Additional funds may not be available when the Company needs them on terms that are acceptable to the Company, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to further reduce its workforce, delay the ongoing clinical trial for Niyad, or delay the development of its regulatory filing plans for its product candidates in advance of the date on which the Company’s cash resources are exhausted to ensure that the Company has sufficient capital to meet its obligations and continue on a path designed to preserve stockholder value. In addition, if additional funds are raised through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, the Company may have to relinquish rights to its technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates, or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to the Company.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management believes its most significant accounting estimates relate to fair value of warrants, liability related to the sale of future payments, accrued clinical trial liabilities and management’s assessment of going concern. Management evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis including critical accounting policies. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other market-specific and other relevant assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity (at date of purchase) of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with banks.

Short-Term Investments

All marketable securities are classified as available for sale and consist of commercial paper and U.S. government sponsored enterprise debt securities. These securities are carried at estimated fair value, which is based on quoted market prices or observable market inputs of almost identical assets, with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The amortized cost of securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion is included in interest income or expense. The cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. When the fair value of an available-for-sale security falls below the amortized cost basis, it is evaluated to determine if any of the decline in value is attributable to credit loss. Decreases in fair value attributable to credit loss are recorded directly to the consolidated statement of operations with a corresponding allowance for credit losses, limited to the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. If the credit quality subsequently improves, the allowance is reversed up to a maximum of the previously recorded credit losses. When the Company intends to sell an impaired available-for-sale security, or if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovering the amortized cost basis, the entire fair value adjustment will immediately be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations with no corresponding allowance for credit losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures and reports its cash equivalents, investments and financial liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy defines a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as follows:

Level I—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level II—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable, unadjusted quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities; and

Level III—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity for the related assets or liabilities.

The categorization of a financial instrument within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Concentration of Risk

The Company invests cash that is currently not being used for operational purposes in accordance with its investment policy in debt securities of U.S. government sponsored agencies, commercial paper and overnight deposits. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the institutions holding the cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities to the extent recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has significant cash balances at financial institutions which throughout the year regularly exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000. Any loss incurred or a lack of access to such funds could have a significant adverse impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company relies on a single contract development and manufacturing organization, or CDMO, for the active ingredient (nafamostat) for Niyad and a second single contract manufacturer for the finished Niyad product.

All revenue relates to the Company’s services for fees earned on the sales of DSUVIA to the DoD by Alora.

Acquisitions

The Company evaluates acquisitions of assets and other similar transactions to assess whether or not the transaction should be accounted for as a business combination or asset acquisition by first applying a screen test to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. If so, the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition. If not, further determination is required as to whether or not the Company has acquired inputs and processes that have the ability to create outputs which would meet the definition of a business. Significant judgment is required in the application of the screen test to determine whether an acquisition is a business combination or an acquisition of assets.

Acquisitions meeting the definition of business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that the purchase price be allocated to the net assets acquired at their respective fair values. In a business combination, any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

For asset acquisitions, a cost accumulation model is used to determine the cost of an asset acquisition. Direct transaction costs are recognized as part of the cost of an asset acquisition. The Company also evaluates which elements of a transaction should be accounted for as a part of an asset acquisition and which should be accounted for separately. The cost of an asset acquisition, including transaction costs, is allocated to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on a relative fair value basis. Goodwill is not recognized in an asset acquisition. Any difference between the cost of an asset acquisition and the fair value of the net assets acquired is allocated to the non-monetary identifiable assets based on their relative fair values. When a transaction accounted for as an asset acquisition includes an in-process research and development, or IPR&D, asset, the IPR&D asset is only capitalized if it has an alternative future use other than in a particular research and development project. For an IPR&D asset to have an alternative future use (a) the Company must reasonably expect that it will use the asset acquired in the alternative manner and anticipate economic benefit from that alternative use, and (b) the Company’s use of the asset acquired is not contingent on further development of the asset subsequent to the acquisition date (that is, the asset can be used in the alternative manner in the condition in which it existed at the acquisition date). Otherwise, amounts allocated to IPR&D that have no alternative use are expensed. Asset acquisitions may include contingent consideration arrangements that encompass obligations to make future payments to sellers contingent upon the achievement of future financial targets. Contingent consideration is not recognized until all contingencies are resolved and the consideration is paid or probable of payment, at which point the consideration is allocated to the assets acquired on a relative fair value basis.

In-Process Research and Development

In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the acquired IPR&D has initially been accounted for as an indefinite-lived intangible asset and, therefore, not amortized. If the IPR&D asset achieves regulatory approval and the asset life is determined to be finite, the asset’s useful life will be estimated, and the asset will be amortized over its remaining useful life.

The IPR&D asset is reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. These events and changes can include significant current period operating losses or negative cash flows associated with the use of the IPR&D asset, such as the result of unfavorable data from any ongoing or future clinical trial, changes in assumptions that negatively impact projected cash flows, or because of any other information regarding the prospects of successfully developing or commercializing the Company’s programs. When impairment indicators are present, the Company compares undiscounted future cash flows to the asset’s carrying value to determine if the asset is recoverable. If the carrying values are in excess of undiscounted expected future cash flows, the Company measures any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying value.

No impairment losses were recorded on the IPR&D asset during the years ended December 31, 2025 or 2024.

Discontinued Operations

In accordance with ASC 205-20 Presentation of Financial Statements: Discontinued Operations, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported as discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. In the period in which the component meets held-for-sale or discontinued operations criteria the major current assets, non-current assets, current liabilities, and non-current liabilities shall be reported as components of total assets and liabilities separate from those balances of the continuing operations. At the same time, the results of all discontinued operations, less applicable income taxes, shall be reported as components of net loss separate from the net income (loss) of continuing operations.

The Company’s DSUVIA business met the definition of a discontinued operation as of March 31, 2023. Accordingly, the Company has classified the results of the DSUVIA business as discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. All assets and liabilities associated with the DSUVIA business were classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets for the periods presented. All amounts included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements relate to continuing operations unless otherwise noted. (See Note 3, “Discontinued Operations”).

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. Research and development expenses include salaries, employee benefits, including stock-based compensation, consultant fees, laboratory supplies, costs associated with clinical trials and manufacturing, including contract research organization fees, other professional services and allocations of corporate costs. The Company reviews and accrues clinical trial expenses based on work performed, which relies on estimates of total costs incurred based on patient enrollment, completion of patient studies and other events.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and restricted stock units related to the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2020 EIP, the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, or 2011 EIP, and employee share purchases related to the Amended and Restated 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, is based on estimated fair values at grant date. The Company determines the grant date fair value of the awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and generally recognizes the fair value as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the respective awards. The Company applies the graded-vesting attribution method to awards with market conditions that include graded-vesting features. Additionally, the Company uses the Monte Carlo Simulation model to evaluate the derived service period and fair value of awards with market conditions, including assumptions of historical volatility and risk-free interest rate commensurate with the vesting term.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires inputs such as expected term, expected volatility and risk-free interest rate. These inputs are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. The expected term, which represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is derived by analyzing the historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock‑based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. Expected volatilities are estimated using the historical stock price performance over the expected term of the option, which are adjusted as necessary for any other factors which may reasonably affect the volatility of the Company’s stock in the future. The risk‑free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant for the expected term of the award. The Company recognizes forfeitures when they occur and does not anticipate paying dividends in the near future.

Warrants Issued in Connection with Financings

The Company accounts for issued warrants as either liability or equity in accordance with ASC 480-10, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, or ASC 815-40, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock. Under ASC 480-10, warrants are considered liability if they are mandatorily redeemable and they require settlement in cash or other assets, or a variable number of shares. If warrants do not meet liability classification under ASC 480-10, the Company considers the requirements of ASC 815-40 to determine whether the warrants should be classified as liability or equity. Under ASC 815-40, contracts that may require settlement for cash are liabilities, regardless of the probability of the occurrence of the triggering event. Liability classified warrants are measured at fair value on the issuance date and at the end of each reporting period. Any change in the fair value of the warrants after the issuance date is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. If warrants do not require liability classification under ASC 815-40, in order to conclude warrants should be classified as equity, the Company assesses whether the warrants are indexed to its common stock and whether the warrants are classified as equity under ASC 815-40 or other applicable GAAP. Equity classified warrants are accounted for at fair value on the issuance date with no changes in fair value recognized after the issuance date.

Sale of Future Payments

On January 12, 2024, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with XOMA to monetize a portion of its future payments for commercial sales of DSUVIA and services performed by the Company to support sales of DSUVIA to the Department of Defense, or DoD, by Alora under the Marketing Agreement, and sales milestones under the DSUVIA Agreement. Refer to Note 6, “Sale of Future Payments” for further details on the Purchase Agreement.

The Company recorded approximately $6.1 million, net of $0.5 million in issuance costs, of the $8.0 million proceeds as a liability, as this portion of the proceeds represents a sale of future revenues under ASC 470 for which the Company has continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows. The Company recorded approximately $1.2 million, net of $0.2 million in issuance costs, of the $8.0 million proceeds as other income, as this portion of proceeds represents the sale of all of the Company’s interest in future payments related to commercial sales of DSUVIA for which the Company is no longer entitled to receive such payments and has no further continuing involvement. The Company utilized internal estimates to develop a cash flow model based on business assumptions to determine the allocation of the proceeds.

The liability related to the sale of future payments is recorded as debt and will be amortized under the effective interest rate method over the estimated life of the Purchase Agreement. The Company estimates the effective interest rate based on its estimate of total payments to be received by XOMA under the Purchase Agreement. The Company reassesses these estimates at each reporting date and adjusts the effective interest rate and amortization of the liability on a prospective basis, as necessary. The Company records the payments to XOMA as a reduction of the liability when paid. As such payments are made to XOMA, the balance of the liability will be effectively repaid over the life of the Purchase Agreement.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance for the full amount of deferred assets, which would otherwise be recorded for tax benefits relating to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, as realization of such deferred tax assets cannot be determined to be more likely than not.

Net Loss per Share of Common Stock

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share, or EPS, are calculated in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 260, Earnings per Share.

The Company applies the two-class method to compute basic and, if more dilutive than other methods, diluted net income or loss per share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats participating securities as having rights to earnings that would otherwise have been available to common stockholders (including pre-funded warrants). Shares of common stock into which the pre-funded warrants may be exercised are considered outstanding for the purposes of computing net loss per share because the shares may be issued for little or no consideration and are exercisable after the original issuance date. In addition, the Company is required to calculate diluted net income or loss per share under the two-class method if the effect is more dilutive than the application of another dilutive method of calculating diluted EPS (i.e., the treasury stock, if-converted, or contingently issuable share method). In periods where there is a net loss, no allocation of undistributed net loss to participating securities is performed if the holders of these securities are not contractually obligated to participate in the Company’s losses. The Company’s participating securities include the November 2021 Financing Warrants, December 2022 Common Stock Warrants, the July 2023 Series A and Series B common stock warrants, and the placement agent July 2023 Series A and Series B common stock warrants (see Note 8, “Stockholders’ Equity” and Note 9, “Warrants”).

For additional information regarding the net loss per share, see Note 11, “Net Loss per Share of Common Stock”.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires companies to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, ASU 2023-09 requires companies to disclose additional information about income taxes paid. The Company has adopted ASU 2023-09 for its period beginning January 1, 2025 on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements (see Note 14, “Income Taxes”).

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, or ASU 2024-03, which is intended to enhance transparency into the nature and function of expenses, primarily through additional disclosures on certain cost and expenses. Additionally, in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03. This authoritative guidance is effective for the Company beginning with its annual disclosures for 2027 and interim periods beginning in 2028. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments may be applied prospectively to reporting periods after the effective date or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its disclosures.

The Company does not believe other recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.