Table of Contents

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

​

(Mark One)

​

​

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

​

Or

​

​

For the transition period from                                    to                                    

​

Commission file number 001-37990

CYPHERPUNK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

​

​

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (617) 714-0360

​

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

​

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

​

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes  ☐  No  ☒

​

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Yes  ☐  No  ☒

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes  ☒  No  ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).Yes  ☒  No  ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

​

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

​

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes  ☐   No  ☒

​

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed based on the closing price for such stock as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market on June 30, 2025, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was approximately: $12.1 million.

​

As of March 11, 2026, there were 89,979,619 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, which is the only outstanding class of common stock of the registrant.

​

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

1

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, our operations and financial performance. Such statements are based upon our current plans, estimates and expectations that are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. The inclusion of forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation that such plans, estimates and expectations will be achieved. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “continue,” “target,” “contemplate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “predict,” “possible,” “potential,” “pursue,” “likely,” and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future plans, actions or events identify forward-looking statements.

All statements, other than historical facts, including statements regarding estimations of projected cash runway; our future product development plans; the potential, safety, efficacy, and regulatory and clinical progress of our product candidates, including the anticipated timing for initiation of clinical trials and release of clinical trial data and the expectations surrounding potential regulatory submissions, approvals and timing thereof; and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements address various matters including statements relating to the assets held or to be held by the Company, the expected future market, price and liquidity of the digital assets the Company owns or acquires, the macro, regulatory, and political conditions surrounding digital assets, the Company’s plan for value creation and strategic advantages, market size and growth opportunities, competitive position and the interest of other public or private business entities engaged in similar strategies, technological and market trends, and future financial condition and performance.

With respect to our biotechnology operations, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our plans, estimates or expectations could include, but are not limited to: (i) our ability and plan to develop and commercialize sirexatamab (DKN-01) and our other programs; (ii) status, timing and results of our preclinical studies and clinical trials; (iii) the potential benefits of sirexatamab and our other programs; (iv) the timing of our development programs and seeking regulatory approval of sirexatamab and our other programs; (v) our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval; (vi) our estimates of expenses and future revenues and profitability; (vii) our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing; (viii) our estimates of the size of the potential markets for sirexatamab and our other programs; (ix) the benefits to be derived from any collaborations, license agreements, or other acquisition efforts; (x) sources of revenues and anticipated revenues, including contributions from any collaborations or license agreements for the development and commercialization of products; (xi) the rate and degree of market acceptance of sirexatamab or our other products; (xii) the success of other competing therapies that may become available; (xiii) the manufacturing capacity for our products; (xiv) our intellectual property position; and (xv) our ability to maintain and protect our intellectual property rights.

Additional risks and uncertainties include, among others, the risk that the Company fails to realize the anticipated benefits of the digital asset treasury strategy; changes in business, market, financial, political and regulatory conditions; risks relating to the Company’s operations and business, including the highly volatile nature of the price of digital assets; the risk that the price of the Company’s Common Stock may be highly correlated to the price of the digital assets that it holds, which may be highly volatile; risks related to increased competition in the industries in which the Company operates or may operate in the future, including competition from the emergence or growth of digital assets other than those which we include as part of our digital asset treasury strategy; risks relating to significant legal, commercial, regulatory and technical uncertainty regarding digital assets generally; and risks relating to the treatment of crypto assets for U.S. and foreign tax purposes.

Our business is further subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including our ability to comply with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”); our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and growth strategies; geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, including but not limited to our ability to access the capital markets, the effects of inflation and interest rate factors, as well as fluctuations in the market price of our traded securities and the cryptocurrency markets.

2

Table of Contents

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events, competitive dynamics and industry change, and depend on economic circumstances that may or may not occur in the future or may occur on longer or shorter timelines than anticipated. Although we believe that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in this Annual Report, we caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and events in the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods. You should carefully and completely read this Annual Report and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this Annual Report.

You should refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified timeframe, or at all. Any forward-looking statement that we make in this Annual Report speaks only as of the date of such statement, and, except to the extent required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Annual Report. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

Sirexatamab (DKN-01) is an investigational drug undergoing clinical development and has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), nor has it been submitted to the FDA for approval. Sirexatamab has not been, and may never be, approved by any regulatory agency or marketed anywhere in the world. Statements contained in this Annual Report should not be deemed to be promotional.

We obtained the industry, market and competitive position data in this Annual Report from our own internal estimates and research as well as from industry and general publications and research surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Such industry publications and surveys generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. We believe this data is accurate in all material respects as of the date of this Annual Report.

INTRODUCTORY COMMENT

References to Cypherpunk and Leap

On November 12, 2025, we filed a Charter Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware changing the Company’s name from “Leap Therapeutics, Inc.” to “Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.”. In connection with the name change, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, named “Leap Therapeutics, Inc.”, which conducts the biotechnology operations of the Company.

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the “Company,” “Cypherpunk”, “Cypherpunk Technologies”, “we,” “us,” and “our,” except where the context requires otherwise, refer to Cypherpunk Technologies Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, and, except where the context requires otherwise, “Board of Directors” refers to the board of directors of Cypherpunk Technologies Inc. References to “Leap” and “Leap Therapeutics” refer to Leap Therapeutics, Inc., and may include drug development activities that took place prior to Leap’s incorporation on November 12, 2025. For purposes of clarity and differentiation between the two business strategies, we may refer to “Cypherpunk” when discussing the privacy technology and digital asset treasury business and to “Leap” when discussing the cancer drug development business.

​

3

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.BUSINESS

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the state of Delaware on January 3, 2011. Our wholly owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2025 include HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd. (“HCP Australia”), Leap Securities Corp., Flame Biosciences LLC, and Leap Therapeutics, Inc. (“Leap”).

Prior to October 2025, we devoted substantially all of our resources to development efforts related to biomarker-targeted antibody therapies designed to treat patients with cancer. Our clinical stage program is sirexatamab (DKN-01), a monoclonal antibody that inhibits Dickkopf-related protein 1, or DKK1, for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients. We also have a preclinical antibody program, FL-501, that is designed to treat cachexia-related indications.

In October 2025, we announced a $58.88 million private placement, led by Winklevoss Capital, and the intent to initiate a digital asset treasury strategy. Immediately following the financing, we initiated a strategy to deploy a portion of our capital raised that is not required to provide working capital for our ongoing operations to accumulate digital assets, focused on Zcash. Zcash is a protocol and blockchain network of connected devices all over the world, working together to validate transactions and maintain the Zcash ledger. ZEC is the monetary unit, or coin, of Zcash. Zcash allows for transactional privacy, providing users with options for fully shielded transactions in which the sender, recipient, and amount are encrypted.

On November 12, 2025, we changed our name from “Leap Therapeutics, Inc.” to “Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.” and changed our trading symbol from “LPTX” to “CYPH”. We were renamed to Cypherpunk to reflect the strategic focus on acquiring ZEC, participating in the development of Zcash, and the values of privacy and liberty. Our ongoing biotechnology research and development operations are conducted under a wholly-owned subsidiary named “Leap Therapeutics, Inc.”.

We are a privacy technology company implementing a digital asset treasury strategy anchored by Zcash and, through our subsidiary Leap, are developing novel therapies for patients with cancer.

Overview of Cypherpunk

Cypherpunk is a privacy technology company. Our mission is to advance technologies that guarantee privacy for all humans on the internet. Our vision is a future where technology defends self-sovereignty and secures human freedom.

We are not a typical digital asset treasury company. While we hold digital assets as part of our strategy, our core business is identifying, developing, investing in, and, where appropriate, acquiring or building privacy-enhancing technologies. Our initial and primary focus is the Zcash ecosystem, which we believe represents the most mature implementation of private digital money. Over time, we intend to assemble a portfolio of complementary privacy technologies that, together, are designed to secure privacy for individuals across the digital economy.

We believe that privacy is a precondition for the meaningful exercise of individual freedoms, including freedom of speech, thought, and association. As digital systems expand and personal data generation accelerates, we believe demand for privacy-preserving infrastructure will grow and that the companies and protocols best positioned to provide it will capture significant long-term value.

There are public companies focused on delivery, social networking, search, payments, and entertainment, among other sectors. To our knowledge, there is no publicly traded company whose core mission is the advancement of privacy technology. We intend to fill that gap. Our strategy is to combine disciplined capital allocation with active investment in privacy infrastructure, positioning the Company to benefit from what we believe is a structural increase in global demand for privacy-preserving technologies as digital surveillance capabilities expand and the volume of personal data generated continues to grow.

4

Table of Contents

Privacy Strategy

We are focused on identifying, developing, and investing in privacy-enhancing technologies that address the growing global demand for data protection, digital autonomy, and secure communications. We believe that privacy is an increasingly vital component of the digital economy and that technologies enabling responsible data protection, user control, and cryptographic security will play a critical role in future digital infrastructure. We intend to execute a broad corporate strategy designed to make Cypherpunk a globally recognized leader in the privacy field.

We believe that demand for privacy-enhancing technologies will increase as digital systems expand and data generation accelerates. Our objective is to position Cypherpunk as a disciplined capital allocator and strategic partner in this sector, supporting innovation while maintaining a focus on sustainable value creation and risk management.

Zcash Overview

Zcash is a cryptographic digital asset that operates on a decentralized, open-source blockchain network known as the Zcash Network. The network consists of a distributed group of independent computers that collectively maintain and validate a shared transaction ledger. No central authority owns, controls, or operates the Zcash Network; instead, its infrastructure and rules are maintained through consensus among network participants.

Transactions on the Zcash Network are recorded on a publicly accessible blockchain. ZEC functions as the native unit of value on the network and may be used to transfer value between users, pay transaction fees, or facilitate exchange for fiat currencies or other digital assets through trading platforms or private transactions.

Zcash was launched in 2016 using a modified version of the Bitcoin codebase, with a fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins. Its distinguishing technical feature is the use of zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs), which allow transactions to be validated by the network without revealing the sender, receiver, or transaction amount. This cryptographic approach has been adopted or referenced by other blockchain projects, including Ethereum and Solana. The Zcash protocol has undergone several upgrades since launch, including the introduction of Halo 2, a recursive proof system that eliminates the need for trusted setup ceremonies. Since inception, Zcash has processed tens of millions of transactions and has generally ranked among the larger privacy-focused digital assets by market capitalization.

Privacy-Preserving Transaction Features

Zcash was developed to advance blockchain technology. A core feature of the Zcash Network is optional privacy: the protocol supports both transparent transfers, which disclose transaction data in a manner similar to many other blockchains like Bitcoin, and privacy-preserving transfers that allow users to selectively disclose information associated with a transaction.

Privacy on Zcash is enabled through zero-knowledge cryptography which can conceal transaction amounts and counterparties while still permitting network validation. Transactions using these privacy features are commonly referred to as “shielded” transactions. As of December 31, 2025 approximately 31% of all ZEC was shielded. Since the launch of the Zcash Network in 2016, the amount of shielded ZEC has been consistently growing suggestive of utility and adoption of Zcash’s advantage to other blockchain networks without enhanced privacy, such as Bitcoin.

Zcash History, Network Development, and Governance

Zcash was launched on October 28, 2016 by scientists, advisers, and engineers affiliated with Electric Coin Company (“ECC”) (formerly the Zcash Company) as a new blockchain network based on the Bitcoin codebase but designed with enhanced privacy functionality. Rather than created through a true network fork, Zcash was independently launched using a modified version of Bitcoin’s underlying software architecture. As a result, ownership of bitcoin did not confer ownership of ZEC at the time of launch.

From its launch through early 2026, ECC played a significant role in supporting protocol research and development, including advancing scalability and usability improvements and contributing to upgrades that became part of the primary Zcash client implementation. This development model was broadly comparable to the role played by core developer communities in other open-source blockchain ecosystems, although ultimate adoption of changes depended on the decentralized network.

5

Table of Contents

Ongoing development of the Zcash protocol is supported by a combination of open-source contributors and organizations that propose, review, and implement software updates. Changes to the protocol are adopted only if accepted by the broader network, and participants may choose whether to implement proposed upgrades. The protocol has been upgraded over time to improve the usability, efficiency, and security of shielded transactions.

In January 2026, all employees of ECC resigned from their positions following a governance dispute with the board of Bootstrap, the nonprofit organization that had overseen ECC. The former ECC team, led by former CEO Josh Swihart, subsequently announced the formation of a new company, Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL) to continue Zcash protocol development. In connection with this transition, the Bootstrap board authorized the transfer of the Zashi wallet technology and related intellectual property to the new entity, and announced an orderly wind-down of ECC. Certain digital assets, including the Z.cash domain and the official Zcash social media accounts, were transferred to the Zcash Foundation.

In February 2026, ZODL released an update to the Zashi wallet and renamed the wallet Zodl. ZODL aims to make Zcash easier to use, with continued development of the wallet as well as supporting Zcash at the protocol level. We believe that Zodl represents critical privacy infrastructure and will support the adoption of Zcash and demand for ZEC.

On March 9, 2026, ZODL announced a financing of over $25 million with investments from a16z, Winklevoss Capital, Coinbase, Paradigm, Chapter One, David Friedberg, Balaji Srinivasan, and others. We invested $5 million in ZODL as part of our commitment to the Zcash ecosystem and the team with the leading Zcash wallet and development expertise.

Zcash Decentralization and Mining

Zcash functions on a distributed network architecture that allows participants to transact directly without reliance on centralized authorization, clearing entities, or custodial intermediaries. The issuance of ZEC and the validation of transactions are governed by protocol-defined rules embedded in the network software rather than by discretionary actions of any organization. No single entity controls or operates the Zcash Network. Prices for ZEC are not fixed or managed by any party and instead emerge from trading activity across digital asset marketplaces and from negotiated transactions between counterparties.

Transaction integrity on the Zcash Network is maintained through a computational consensus process in which independent participants, known as miners, compete to confirm transfers and record them in sequential data structures, known as blocks. These blocks collectively form the Zcash blockchain, which serves as a continuously updated record of confirmed network activity.

To generate a block, miners compete by performing computational work defined by the protocol, selecting unconfirmed transactions and proposing a valid block for network acceptance. Transaction data is propagated across the network, evaluated under consensus rules, and permanently recorded once accepted. Only one miner succeeds in adding each block, and the protocol dynamically adjusts mining difficulty to maintain consistent block timing as total network hash power fluctuates. Miners are economically incentivized through protocol-defined rewards, consisting of newly issued ZEC and transaction fees associated with the transactions included in a block. New blocks are produced at an average interval of approximately 1.25 minutes, with block rewards allocated probabilistically based on the relative computing power contributed by individual miners or mining pools.

Once validated by network nodes, the block is appended to the blockchain, and the associated reward is issued to the successful miner. This process governs transaction finality and represents the sole mechanism through which new ZEC is introduced into circulation.

ZEC Transactions

The Zcash Network accommodates both standard transactions that disclose details on the blockchain and privacy-focused transactions that limit public visibility of transaction information. Users who interact directly with the network typically do so through a “wallet”, which generates cryptographic credentials and enables the sending and receipt of ZEC. Each wallet is controlled by private keys, and possession of the relevant private key is required to authorize transfers; loss or compromise of those keys may result in permanent loss of access to the associated ZEC.

6

Table of Contents

Privacy-enabled Zcash transfers employ zero-knowledge cryptographic methods which allow transactions to be validated without revealing transaction amounts or counterparties. These mechanisms enable the network to confirm authorization and prevent double spending while preserving confidentiality. In addition to on-chain transfers, some ZEC ownership changes occur off-chain, such as internal ledger movements within exchanges or custodial platforms. Because these off-chain activities are not recorded on the blockchain, they are not protected by the protocol’s consensus mechanisms and may expose participants to additional counterparty and operational risks.

Maximum Supply and Halving Schedule

The Zcash protocol establishes a fixed maximum supply of 21 million ZEC, which are introduced into circulation over time through block rewards. New ZEC is issued as part of the mining process at regular intervals. The block subsidy is reduced by 50% at predetermined intervals, commonly referred to as “halvings,” which occur based on block height rather than calendar date and are designed to slow the rate of new issuance over time.

Since its launch, Zcash has undergone multiple halving events. The first occurred in November 2020, reducing the block reward from 6.25 ZEC to 3.125 ZEC. The second halving occurred in November 2024, further reducing the block reward to 1.5625 ZEC. Future halvings are expected to occur at approximately four-year intervals thereafter based on the current network hash rate, with each event continuing to reduce the rate of new ZEC issuance until the maximum supply is reached.

Trading ZEC

The market price of ZEC is determined by supply and demand for ZEC among buyers and sellers and the overall utility of the Zcash Network, and is typically quoted in fiat currencies or relative to other digital assets on trading platforms. Centralized exchanges generally publish real-time pricing and volume data that serve as common market reference points. ZEC may also be traded through over-the-counter arrangements or private transactions, which are typically less transparent than exchange-based trading.

As of December 31, 2025, the following exchanges have been registered as money services businesses with FinCEN, and have state money transmitter licensing: Coinbase, Kraken, Binance.US, and Gemini Space Station, which is an affiliate of our largest stockholder, Winklevoss Capital. However, there are several additional exchanges that trade ZEC including: KuCoin, Binance (Global), OKX, Bitget and Gate.io.

Our ZEC Digital Asset Treasury Holdings

Our investment thesis for ZEC rests on two premises. First, Zcash is built on the same sound monetary principles as Bitcoin: a fixed supply of 21 million coins, open-source development, and decentralized consensus, but adds privacy-preserving transaction capabilities through zero-knowledge cryptography. We view Bitcoin as a store of value and Zcash as private digital money: one protects value across time, the other protects privacy in daily transactions. Second, we believe that the market has not yet priced in the growing structural demand for financial privacy. Transaction data reveals patterns of life: location, associations, habits, and financial capacity. As data collection and surveillance capabilities expand, we expect demand for privacy-preserving financial infrastructure to increase. Zcash, as the most technically mature privacy-preserving blockchain with a fixed monetary supply, is, in our view, well-positioned to capture a meaningful share of that demand.

As of March 11, 2026, we held a total of 294,743.10 ZEC, at an average purchase price of $335.89, representing approximately 1.76% of the total circulating supply of the Zcash Network. Our stated objective is to accumulate holdings representing at least 5% of the total circulating supply over time. This objective is subject to change, and we may suspend, reduce, or modify acquisition activity at any time based on our assessment of market conditions, capital availability, and strategic priorities.

7

Table of Contents

Competition Related to our Cypherpunk Business

The privacy technology, cryptocurrency, and digital asset treasury industries are characterized by continuing technological advancement and significant competition. Our digital asset treasury strategy involves, from time to time and subject to market conditions, acquiring ZEC using proceeds from offerings of equity securities or other capital raising transactions. While we believe that our focus on privacy technologies and the Zcash Network provides us with competitive advantages, we compete for capital with, among others: Exchange Traded Products, such as Grayscale Zcash Trust; other digital assets with a larger market value than ZEC, such as bitcoin; digital asset treasury companies focused on other digital assets, such as Strategy Inc.; miners; digital asset exchanges that sell ZEC directly to investors; traditional financial firms that have entered into the digital assets market; and other entities that pursue strategies to accumulate or gain exposure to digital assets. In addition, numerous venture capital firms have established investment strategies around privacy technologies and digital assets, including a16z crypto. Many of the entities against which we may compete for capital or for investment in or development of privacy technologies have significantly greater financial resources and expertise than we do. This competition could adversely affect the availability and cost of capital for our ZEC purchases and our privacy technology strategy, and thereby could affect the market price of our securities.

Government Regulation Related to our Cypherpunk Business

The U.S. Congress and a number of U.S. federal and state agencies (including FinCEN, the Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), SEC, CFTC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “IRS”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve and state financial institution and securities regulators) have been examining, among other issues: digital asset market structure and regulation, and a bill known as the Digital Assset Market Clarity Act of 2025 is currently under consideration in Congress; and the operations of digital asset networks and digital asset users, with particular focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, evade sanctions or fund criminal or terrorist enterprises and the safety and soundness of trading platforms and other service providers that hold or custody digital assets for users.

Various foreign jurisdictions have, and may continue to, in the near future, adopt laws, regulations or directives that affect the Zcash Network and its users. For example, beginning on July 1, 2027, regulations in the European Union will prohibit transactions involving anonymous wallets and privacy-focused digital assets such as ZEC. There remains significant uncertainty regarding foreign governments’ future actions with respect to the regulation of digital assets, particularly digital assets with privacy features such as Zcash. Such laws, regulations or directives may conflict with those of the United States and may negatively impact the acceptance of ZEC by users, merchants, and service providers outside the United States and may therefore impede the growth or sustainability of the Zcash ecosystem in the United States and globally, or otherwise negatively affect the value of the ZEC that we hold in our treasury.

Drug Development Through Our Leap Therapeutics Subsidiary

Our subsidiary, Leap, is a biopharmaceutical company developing novel biomarker-targeted antibody therapies designed to treat patients with cancer and other diseases with high unmet medical need. Our lead program is sirexatamab (DKN-01), a monoclonal antibody that inhibits Dickkopf-related protein 1 (“DKK1”). We recently completed a Phase 2 study of sirexatamab in patients with colorectal cancer. We also have a preclinical program to develop a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the GDF-15 protein, known as FL-501. FL-501 has potential to treat patients with a broad variety of difficult-to-treat diseases such as: cancer cachexia, hyperemesis gravidarum and pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting, and many others associated with aging and frailty.

8

Table of Contents

Market Opportunity

Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (“CRC”), is the third most frequent cancer globally and the second leading cause of death. According to the World Health Organization (“WHO”), there will be over 2.3 million new cases of CRC in 2030, with nearly 1.1 million deaths. CRC includes colon cancer (64%), rectal cancers (29.4%), and anal cancer (6.6%). According to the American Cancer Society (“ACS”), in the United States, there will be 158,850 newly diagnosed cases of CRC and 55,230 estimated deaths from CRC.

When the symptoms of CRC appear, such as rectal bleeding, anemia, or abdominal pain, most patients are already in the advanced stage where cancers are aggressive, malignant, and metastatic. Mutations in the pathways modulated by DKK1, such as APC, and activation of the Wnt pathway are highly prevalent in CRC patients. For patients who have microsatellite stable (“MSS”) colorectal cancer, and who do not have a specific mutation that can be targeted with approved therapies, outcomes are extremely poor for patients who have progressed on first-line therapy. A clinical trial of the antibody bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy generated a response rate of approximately 5% and PFS of 5.7 months in second-line patients.

Our Product and Clinical Studies

Sirexatamab (DKN-01)

DKK1 is a cell secreted protein that research has found plays a crucial role in embryonic development. DKK1 binds to specific cell surface receptors and affects the signaling of key cellular pathways, known as the canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. DKK1 serves as one of the inhibitors of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and modulates the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. DKK1 is also a modulator of CKAP4/PI3K/AKT signaling. Changes in these pathways can lead to the expression of several cancer causing genes and factors associated with cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. DKK1 also has a role in suppressing the immune system from effectively targeting and clearing the cancer.

Published data, including from The Cancer Genome Atlas (“TCGA”) and real world evidence from our collaboration with Tempus, indicate that DKK1 levels are significantly higher or have an important high DKK1 population in many cancers, including esophagogastric cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, endometrial cancer, CRC, and pancreatic cancer. In addition, elevated DKK1 is associated with worse overall survival or time to treatment discontinuation for patients with CRC and several other cancers. Researchers have shown that when the DKK1 protein is added in certain animal models, the cancer grows larger.

Sirexatamab is a high affinity, neutralizing monoclonal antibody targeting DKK1. We have shown that sirexatamab reduces free DKK1 levels and has demonstrated an anti-tumor effect in preclinical models.

The FDA granted orphan drug designation to sirexatamab for the treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. In addition, on September 24, 2020, the FDA granted Fast Track designation to sirexatamab in combination with tislelizumab for the treatment of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors express high DKK1, following disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum- containing chemotherapy and if appropriate, human epidermal receptor growth factor (HER2)/neu-targeted therapy.

We are currently developing sirexatamab in patients with CRC and have also conducted clinical trials in patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and with endometrial cancer.

9

Table of Contents

Colorectal Cancer

Mechanism of Action and Preclinical Data

We have evaluated sirexatamab in multiple preclinical CRC models. Sirexatamab showed additive activity with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, which is commonly used in CRC patients, and in two CRC models that were resistant to 5-FU therapy. Treatment with sirexatamab can result in tumor regressions as a monotherapy and can overcome 5-FU-resistance to have further activity in combination with 5-FU chemotherapy. We believe that these 5-FU-resistant models are reflective of the second-line CRC population. We believe that sirexatamab also work through an anti-angiogenic mechanism of action, preclinical models have also shown fewer and smaller blood vessels in response to sirexatamab treatment, and an additive effect of sirexatamab in combination with bevacizumab at reducing xenograft tumor size.

DeFianCe Study –Second-Line Patients in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy

The DeFianCe study is a Phase 2, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of sirexatmab (DKN-01) in combination with standard of care bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with advanced microsatellite stable (“MSS”) CRC who have received one prior systemic therapy. Part A of the study enrolled 33 patients as a single arm trial. Based on the results of these first 33 patients, the study expanded into Part B, a 188-patient randomized controlled trial against bevacizumab and standard of care chemotherapy.

Part A – Single Arm

In January 2025, we presented ORR and PFS data from Part A of DeFianCe. In the 27 response-evaluable patients, the ORR was 33% and the disease control rate (“DCR”) was 93%. Of these responding patients, the median DoR experienced was 9.92 months. In the 15 patients who had never received prior bevacizumab, the ORR was 53%, the DCR was 93%, and their median PFS was 8.05 months.

Part B – Randomized Controlled Trial

In October 2025, we presented final clinical data from Part B at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2025.

In patients with high circulating DKK1 plasma levels (upper quartile as measured by the SomaLogic SomaScan platform, n=44), the sirexatamab experimental arm has improved ORR, by both investigator-assessment (“IA”) and blinded independent central review (“BICR”), PFS, and OS compared to the control arm:

​

​

​

10

Table of Contents

​

Figure 2: PFS K-M curve in DKK1-high upper quartile patients

​

Figure 3: OS K-M curve in DKK1-high upper quartile patients

​

11

Table of Contents

​

​

​

DKK1 levels correlated with increasing clinical benefit in those patients receiving sirexatamab compared to patients in the control arm who had poorer outcomes and shorter survival as DKK1 levels increased.

​

FL-501

FL-501 is a potential best in class monoclonal antibody in preclinical development that targets growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), which is a cytokine that is produced at elevated levels in response to various stresses, including chronic inflammation, obesity, cancers, and chemotherapy treatment. High GDF15 expression is associated with cachexia including loss of appetite, nausea and weight loss, and is also a validated target with a successful randomized clinical trial from Pfizer. FL-501 was engineered for higher target affinity and a longer plasma half-life compared to competing therapies. In preclinical cachexia models, FL-501 increased body weight and restored muscle mass. FL-501 is being developed through a collaboration agreement with Adimab.

Intellectual Property

We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are commercially important to our business, including seeking, maintaining and defending patent rights. We also rely on confidential know-how that may be important to the development of our business. We protect our confidential know-how as trade secrets and through confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and others. We additionally expect to rely on regulatory protection afforded through data exclusivity as well as patent term extensions, where available.

Our commercial success may depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business; to defend and enforce our patents; to preserve the confidentiality of our know-how and trade secrets; and to operate without infringing on the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties.

12

Table of Contents

Our ability to prevent third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell or importing competing products to ours, including a competitor to sirexatamab depends on the validity, enforceability and/or scope of our patents. We have several patents and patent applications relating to sirexatamab and its therapeutic uses, and possess substantial know-how relating to the development and commercialization of sirexatamab. We are the licensee of patents and patent applications relating to sirexatamab. We cannot be sure that any of our pending patent applications or future patent filings will lead to the issuance of new patents, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents that may be granted to us in the future will be adequate to protect our market.

We plan on pursuing in-licensing opportunities to develop, strengthen and maintain our proprietary position in our field. We expect to use trademark protection for our products as they are marketed.

Patents

We exclusively license from Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), rights under 26 issued patents and 1 pending patent application, all of which belong to the same patent family. The patents and applications in this patent family are directed to the composition of matter and use of sirexatamab, and include (i) one issued U.S. Patent, (ii) issued patents in the following jurisdictions: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Eurasia, Europe, Gulf Cooperation Council, India, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Macao, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Ukraine, Hong Kong, Thailand and South Korea and (iii) a pending application in Venezuela. The base 20-year term for patents in this family would expire in 2030. The U.S. patent will expire 87 days after the base term due to patent term adjustment. Patent term extensions for delays in marketing approval may also extend the terms of patents in this family.

We own two issued U.S. Patents, granted patents in Australia, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Israel and pending applications directed to the use of a biomarker in patients receiving DKN-01 therapy in the following jurisdictions: Brazil, Canada, Europe and Hong Kong,. The issued U.S. Patents will expire in 2037, absent any terminal disclaimer, patent term adjustment due to administrative delays by the United States Patent and Trade Office (“USPTO”) or patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Act or Hatch-Waxman Amendment, and provided that all required maintenance fee payments are timely paid. The non-USPatents and any other patents that may issue in foreign jurisdictions will likewise expire in 2037, provided that all required annuities are timely paid.

We also own two additional patent families both directed to the treatment of cancer using DKN-01 in specific subpopulations of patients. In the first patent family, the patient subpopulation is defined by its DKK-1 expression level. A patent has granted in South Korea and applications are pending in the following jurisdictions: the United States of America, China, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Mexico, Brazil, Israel and Europe. In the second patent family, the patient subpopulation is defined as harboring a specific genetic mutation. Applications are pending in the following jurisdictions: the United States of America, South Korea, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Mexico, Brazil, Israel and Europe.

Any patents that may issue in the United States based on the applications in these two patent families will expire in 2040, absent any terminal disclaimers, patent term adjustment due to administrative delays at the USPTO or patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, and provided that all required maintenance fee payments are timely paid. The Korean Patent and any other patents that may issue in foreign jurisdictions will likewise expire in 2040, provided that all required annuities are timely paid.

We also own another patent family directed to the treatment of colorectal cancer using combination therapy comprising sirexatamab and additional therapeutic agents. Applications are pending in the following jurisdictions: the United States of America, China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Hong Kong, Israel and Europe. Any patent that may issue in the United States based on the pending U.S. application will expire no earlier than 2043 absent any terminal disclaimer. Any patents issued in foreign jurisdictions will likewise expire in 2043.

We also own one pending international patent application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) directed to the treatment of colorectal cancer using combination therapy comprising sirexatamab and additional therapeutic agents in specific subpopulations of patients. The PCT is an international patent law treaty that provides a unified procedure for filing a single initial patent application to seek patent protection for an invention simultaneously in each of the member states. Although a PCT Application is not itself examined and cannot issue as a patent, it allows the applicant to seek protection in any of the member states through national phase applications. Any patents that may issue in the United States based on the PCT application will expire no earlier than 2045 absent any terminal disclaimer. Any patents issued in foreign jurisdictions will likewise expire in 2045.

13

Table of Contents

We also own a pending U.S. Provisional application directed to, among other things, FL-501 (a monoclonal antibody that inhibits GDF-15). If non-Provisional patent applications (e.g., a regular U.S. application, a PCT Application or direct foreign applications) claiming the benefit of the U.S. Provisional application are filed in 2026, any patents that may issue in the United States will expire no earlier than 2046 absent any terminal disclaimer. Any patents issued in foreign jurisdictions will likewise expire in 2046.

Patent Term

The base term of a U.S. patent is 20 years from the filing date of the earliest-filed non-provisional patent application to which the patent is entitled to priority. The term of a U.S. patent can be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates the owner of the patent for administrative delays at the USPTO. In some cases, the term of a U.S. patent is shortened by a terminal disclaimer that reduces its term to that of an earlier-expiring U.S. patent.

The term of a U.S. patent may be eligible for patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, to account for at least some of the time a product is under development and regulatory review after the patent is granted. With regard to a product for which FDA approval is the first permitted marketing of the active ingredient, the Hatch-Waxman Act allows for extension of protection of one U.S. patent that includes at least one claim covering the composition of matter of an FDA-approved product, an FDA-approved method of treatment using the product, and/or a method of manufacturing the FDA-approved product. The extended protection cannot exceed the shorter of five years beyond the non-extended expiration of the patent or fourteen years from the date of the FDA approval of the product. Some foreign jurisdictions, including Europe, have patent extension provisions (e.g., supplementary protection certificates), which allow for extension of the protection of a patent that covers a drug approved by the applicable foreign regulatory agency. In the future, if and when sirexatamab or any of our other products receives FDA approval, we expect to apply for patent term extension to extend the protection of one of our U.S. patents covering the product, its use, or a method of manufacturing this product. We also may pursue extensions in foreign jurisdictions where applicable.

Lilly License Agreement

On January 3, 2011, we entered into a license agreement with Lilly (the “Lilly Agreement”), pursuant to which Lilly granted us an exclusive license for certain intellectual property rights relating to pharmaceutically active compounds that may be useful in the treatment of bone healing, cancer and, potentially, other medical conditions. The license includes a right to sublicense, under certain Lilly intellectual property rights to further develop and commercialize, on a worldwide basis, pharmaceutical products containing such licensed compounds.

Pursuant to the Lilly Agreement, we granted to Lilly 65,761 shares of common stock and agreed to pay Lilly a royalty in the low single digits of net sales of a particular product in the territory during the applicable royalty term, with certain adjustments to be made to the royalty rate in connection with third person intellectual property, sales of competing products, and sales of biosimilar or generic products. We have not yet paid any royalties to Lilly pursuant to this agreement.

The royalty term, with respect to each country in which a product is sold, on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, begins on first commercial sale of the product in the country and the later of (i) the tenth anniversary of the first date of commercial sale of the product in the country, (ii) expiration of the last-to-expire issued patent included within the patents licensed under the Lilly Agreement having a valid claim covering the sale of the product, and (iii) the expiration of any data exclusivity period for the product in the country.

The term of the Lilly Agreement began on January 3, 2011 and, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the termination provisions described below, will continue on a country-by-country basis until we have no remaining royalty or other payment obligations in a specific country. Upon expiration in a given country, the licenses granted with respect to such country shall become fully paid up, perpetual and irrevocable.

Either party may terminate the Lilly Agreement with immediate effect if the other party enters into bankruptcy or takes similar action. We may terminate the Lilly Agreement (i) at any time without cause upon ninety (90) days written notice to Lilly or (ii) upon material breach of the Lilly Agreement by Lilly upon ninety (90) days written notice to Lilly, unless Lilly cures such breach or violation during such ninety (90) day period. Lilly may terminate the agreement (i) upon our material breach of the Lilly Agreement upon ninety (90) days written notice to us, unless we cure such breach or violation during such ninety day period or (ii) if we challenge, or materially assist any third person to challenge, the validity or enforceability of the licensed intellectual property that is the subject of the Lilly Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to us, unless we cure such breach or violation during such thirty (30) day period.

14

Table of Contents

If Lilly terminates the Lilly Agreement or if we terminate the Lilly Agreement without cause, (i) all rights under the licensed intellectual property rights will terminate and immediately and automatically revert to Lilly, (ii) any sublicense will be assigned by us to Lilly so that such sublicense becomes a direct license between Lilly and such sublicensee, (iii) subject to certain limitations, we will be required to grant to Lilly an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, fully paid up license under all patent rights developed or acquired by us during the term of the Lilly Agreement that relate to the Lilly licensed intellectual property, (iv) subject to certain limitations, we will be required to grant to Lilly an irrevocable, non-exclusive, perpetual, fully paid up license to the results of data from all preclinical and clinical studies of any compound or product covered by the Lilly Agreement, (v) subject to certain limitations, we will be required to take all steps necessary to permit Lilly to commence marketing product covered by the Lilly Agreement, and (vi) we will be required to assign or re-assign to Lilly all Lilly patents covered by the Lilly Agreement and that were assigned by Lilly to us. If we terminate the Lilly Agreement for material breach by Lilly or Lilly’s bankruptcy, the licenses will remain in full force and effect and we will remain liable for the payment of all royalty obligations under the Lilly Agreement. However, in this case, we may offset against such royalties any damages that we are entitled to for breach of the Lilly Agreement by Lilly.

The Lilly Agreement also contains certain standard representations and warranties and certain standard confidentiality and indemnification provisions.

Adimab Collaboration Agreement

On August 10, 2020, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Adimab, LLC (the “Adimab Agreement”), pursuant to which Adimab will conduct research programs to develop monoclonal antibodies to certain targets identified by us and provide us with an option to acquire exclusive rights to such antibodies. Upon payment of an option fee, on a product-by-product basis, Adimab will grant us a world-wide, exclusive license for, or assign ownership to us of, certain intellectual property rights and grant us a non-exclusive license with respect to the Adimab platform technology. Each such license includes a right to sublicense. Pursuant to the Adimab Agreement, after exercising an option and making the option payment, we agreed to pay Adimab milestones upon the completion of clinical development and regulatory milestones, along with a royalty in the low-single digits of net sales of each product during the applicable royalty term, with certain adjustments to be made to the royalty rate in connection with third person intellectual property or a challenge to the royalty term. FL-501 was discovered under the Adimab Agreement and is in the evaluation phase. We have not yet paid any option payments or royalties to Adimab pursuant to this agreement.

The royalty term, with respect to each country in which a product is sold, on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, begins on the first commercial sale of the product in the country and the later of (i) the expiration of the last-to-expire issued patent included within the patents licensed under the Adimab Agreement having a valid claim covering the sale of the product, and (ii) the twelfth anniversary of the first date of commercial sale of the product in the country.

The term of the Adimab Agreement began on August 10, 2020, and, shall, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the termination provisions described below, expire (a) in the event that no option payment is made by us on any program under the Adimab Agreement, the conclusion of the last-to-expire evaluation term or (b) in the event that an option is exercised, on a country-by-country basis until we have no remaining royalty payment obligations in a specific country. Upon expiration in a given country, the licenses granted with respect to such country shall become fully paid up, perpetual and irrevocable.

Either we or Adimab may terminate the Adimab Agreement for the material breach of this Agreement by the other Party, if such breach remains uncured ninety (90) days following notice. If the Adimab Agreement expires or terminates (other than following an option exercise after all applicable royalties have been paid), we shall not research, develop or commercialize any Adimab-related product except as if it were part of the Adimab Agreement, and we shall not grant any right or options to any third party regarding any Adimab-related product. If we have entered into any sublicense and the Adimab Agreement is terminated, then such sublicenses will survive the termination of the Adimab Agreement and become direct licenses with Adimab.

If Adimab terminates the Adimab Agreement for our uncured material breach, then we shall assign to Adimab all right, title and interest in and to the intellectual property and all data with respect to Adimab-related products, transfer cell lines and manufacturing information to Adimab, transfer all filings with regulatory authorities, and Adimab shall pay us a royalty in low single digits.

The Adimab Agreement also contains certain standard representations and warranties and certain standard confidentiality and indemnification provisions.

15

Table of Contents

Competition Related to our Leap Therapeutics Business

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by continuing technological advancement and significant competition. While we believe that our product candidates, technology, knowledge, experience and scientific resources provide us with competitive advantages, we face competition from major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions, among others. Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future. Key product features that would affect our ability to effectively compete with other therapeutics include the efficacy, safety and convenience of our products and the ease of use and effectiveness of any companion diagnostics. The level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors will also significantly affect the pricing and competitiveness of our products. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market.

Many of the companies against which we may compete have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. For example, Novartis, Merck, Amgen, Pfizer, Junshi Biosciences, and Twist Biosciences are all currently developing or have previously been developing anti-DKK1 monoclonal antibodies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Manufacturing and Distribution

We do not have, and we do not currently plan to acquire or develop, the facilities or capabilities to manufacture clinical trial material for use in human clinical trials or finished drug product for commercialization. We depend on third-party contract manufacturers (“CMOs”), for the production of clinical trial material for our studies. Our sirexatamab bulk drug substance (“DS”), is produced at our CMO, ThermoFisher Scientific, which is required to comply with the FDA’s Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) regulations. Our finished drug product is produced at a contract fill/finisher provider, which is also required to comply with cGMP regulations. We have personnel with significant technical, manufacturing, analytical, quality and project management experience to oversee our third-party CMOs and to manage manufacturing and quality data and information for regulatory compliance purposes.

We must manufacture drug product for clinical trial use in compliance with cGMP regulations. The cGMP regulations include requirements relating to organization of personnel, buildings and facilities, equipment, control of components and drug product containers and closures, production and process controls, packaging and labeling controls, holding and distribution, laboratory controls, records and reports, and returned or salvaged products. Our third-party CMOs are also subject to periodic inspections of facilities by the FDA and other authorities, including procedures and operations used in the testing and manufacture of our products to assess our compliance with applicable regulations. Failure to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements subjects a manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, including warning letters, the seizure or recall of products, injunctions, consent decrees placing significant restrictions on or suspending manufacturing operations and civil and criminal penalties. These actions could have a material impact on the availability of our products. CMOs often encounter difficulties involving production yields, quality control and quality assurance, as well as shortages of qualified personnel.

We have not yet established a sales, marketing or product distribution infrastructure because our lead candidates are still in clinical development. We eventually may, however, choose to build (or obtain through strategic acquisition) our own sales and marketing team to commercialize some or all of our products if they receive FDA approval and if it is in our long -term interests. We may choose to enter into distribution agreements with strategic partners with their own robust distribution channels for the United States, Europe, Japan, and other territories.

16

Table of Contents

Government Regulation and Product Approval

Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state, and local level, and in other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, approval, manufacture, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting, marketing, import, and export of biopharmaceutical products such as those we are developing. In addition, manufacturers of biopharmaceutical products participating in Medicaid and Medicare are required to comply with mandatory price reporting, discount, and rebate requirements. The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. The following is a summary of the primary government regulations applicable to our business.

FDA Regulation

In the United States, the FDA regulates biologics under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), the Public Health Services Act (“PHSA”), and their implementing regulations. Any product we may develop must be cleared by the FDA before it is marketed in the United States. The process required by the FDA before product candidates may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

Preclinical Studies and IND Submission

The testing and approval process of product candidates requires substantial time, effort, and financial resources. Satisfaction of FDA pre-market approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity, and novelty of the product or disease. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of chemistry, pharmacology, toxicity, and product formulation, as well as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. Such studies must generally be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s GLPs. Prior to commencing the first clinical trial with a product candidate, an IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests and preclinical literature, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature, and proposed clinical study protocols among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND.

17

Table of Contents

An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the 30-day time period, notifies the applicant of safety concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the trial on a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. Clinical holds also may be imposed by the FDA at any time before or during trials due to safety concerns or non-compliance. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in FDA authorization to commence a clinical trial. A separate submission to an existing IND must also be made for each successive clinical trial conducted during product development.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with federal regulations and GCP requirements, which include the requirements that all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing for their participation in any clinical trial, as well as review and approval of the study by an IRB. Investigators must also provide certain information to the clinical trial sponsors to allow the sponsors to make certain financial disclosures to the FDA. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the trial, the trial procedures, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated, and a statistical analysis plan. A protocol for each clinical trial, and any subsequent protocol amendments, must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition, an IRB at each study site participating in the clinical trial or a central IRB must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial, informed consent forms, and communications to study subjects before a study commences at that site. An IRB considers, among other things, whether the risks to individuals participating in the trials are minimized and are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits and whether the planned human subject protections are adequate. The IRB must continue to oversee the clinical trial while it is being conducted. Once an IND is in effect, each new clinical protocol and any amendments to the protocol must be submitted to the IND for FDA review, and to the IRB for approval. Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must also be submitted at least annually to the FDA and the IRB and more frequently if serious adverse events or other significant safety information is found.

The FDA may order the temporary, or permanent, discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time, or impose other sanctions, if it believes that the clinical trial either is not being conducted in accordance with FDA requirements or presents an unacceptable risk to the clinical trial patients. An IRB may also require the clinical trial at the site to be halted, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to comply with the IRB’s requirements or if the trial poses an unexpected serious harm to subjects, or may impose other conditions. We may also discontinue clinical trials as a result of risks to subjects, a lack of favorable results, or changing business priorities.

Information about certain clinical trials, including a description of the study and study results, must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on their clinicaltrials.gov website.

Additionally, some clinical trials are overseen by an independent group of qualified experts organized by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or committee. This group regularly reviews accumulated data and advises the study sponsor regarding the continuing safety of trial subjects, potential trial subjects, and the continuing validity and scientific merit of the clinical trial. The data safety monitoring board receives special access to unblinded data during the clinical trial and may advise the sponsor to halt the clinical trial if it determines there is an unacceptable safety risk for subjects or on other grounds, such as no demonstration of efficacy.

The manufacture of investigational biologics for the conduct of human clinical trials is subject to cGMP requirements. Investigational biologics and active ingredients imported into the United States are also subject to regulation by the FDA relating to their labeling and distribution. Further, the export of investigational products outside of the United States is subject to regulatory requirements of the receiving country as well as U.S. export requirements under the FDCA.

In general, for purposes of BLA approval, human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined.

18

Table of Contents

The FDA may also require, or companies may conduct, additional clinical trials for the same indication after a product is approved. These so-called Phase 4 studies may be made a condition to be satisfied after approval. The results of Phase 4 studies can confirm the effectiveness of a product candidate and can provide important safety information.

Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. Regulatory authorities, an IRB, or the sponsor may suspend or discontinue a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk, the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the FDA’s or the IRB’s requirements, the product has been associated with unexpected serious harm to the subjects, or based on evolving business objectives or competitive climate.

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product candidate as well as finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality, potency, and purity of the final product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

During the development of a new therapeutic, a sponsor may be able to request a Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”), the purpose of which is to reach agreement with the FDA on the Phase 3 clinical trial protocol design and analysis that will form the primary basis of product approval and an efficacy claim as well as preclinical carcinogenicity trials and stability studies. An SPA may only be modified with the agreement of the FDA and the trial sponsor, or if the director of the FDA reviewing division determines that a substantial scientific issue essential to determining the safety or efficacy of the product was identified after the testing began. An SPA is intended to provide assurance that, in the case of clinical trials, if the agreed upon clinical trial protocol is followed, the clinical trial endpoints are achieved, and there is a favorable risk-benefit profile, the data may serve as the primary basis for an efficacy claim in support of a BLA. However, SPA agreements are not a guarantee of an approval of a product candidate or any permissible claims about the product candidate. In particular, SPAs are not binding on the FDA if, among other reasons, previously unrecognized public health concerns arise during the performance of the clinical trial, other new scientific concerns regarding the product candidate’s safety or efficacy arise, or if the sponsoring company fails to comply with the agreed upon clinical trial protocol.

BLA Submission, Review by the FDA, and Marketing Approval

Assuming successful completion of the required clinical and preclinical testing, the results of product development, including chemistry, manufacture, and controls, non-clinical studies, and clinical trial results, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive findings, are all submitted to the FDA, along with the proposed labeling, as part of a BLA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. In most cases, the submission of a BLA is subject to a substantial application user fee. These user fees must be paid at the time of the first submission of the application, even if the application is being submitted on a rolling basis. Fee waivers or reductions are available in certain circumstances. One basis for a waiver of the application user fee is if the applicant employs fewer than 500 employees, including employees of affiliates, the applicant does not have an approved marketing application for a product that has been introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce, and the applicant, including its affiliates, is submitting its first marketing application. Product candidates that are designated as orphan drugs, which are further described below, are also not subject to application user fees unless the application includes an indication other than the orphan indication.

19

Table of Contents

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”), a BLA or supplement to a BLA for a new active ingredient, indication, dosage form, dosage regimen, or route of administration, must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements.

The FDA also may require submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS, to ensure that the benefits of the biologic outweigh the risks. The REMS plan could include medication guides, physician communication plans, and elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk minimization tools. An assessment of the REMS must also be conducted at set intervals. Following product approval, a REMS may also be required by the FDA if new safety information is discovered and the FDA determines that a REMS is necessary to ensure that the benefits of the biologic outweigh the risks.

Once the FDA receives an application, it has 60 days to review the BLA to determine if it is substantially complete to permit a substantive review, before it accepts the application for filing. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept a BLA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review.

Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), the FDA has set the review goal of completing its review of 90% of all applications within ten months from the 60-day filing date for its initial review of an initial BLA. Such deadlines are referred to as the PDUFA date. The PDUFA date is only a goal, thus, the FDA does not always meet its PDUFA dates. The review process and the PDUFA date may also be extended if the FDA requests or the sponsor otherwise provides substantial additional information or clarification regarding the submission.

The FDA may also refer certain applications to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, which reviews, evaluates, and makes a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

The FDA reviews applications to determine, among other things, whether a product is safe, pure and potent and whether the manufacturing methods and controls are adequate to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, safety, potency, and purity. Before approving a BLA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured, referred to as a Pre-Approval Inspection. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities, including contract manufacturers and subcontractors, are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving a BLA, the FDA will inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs.

The approval process is lengthy and difficult, and the FDA may refuse to approve a BLA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical data or other data and information. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the BLA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive and the FDA may interpret data differently than an applicant interprets the same data.

After evaluating the BLA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter, or, in some cases, a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”). If a CRL is issued, the applicant may either: resubmit the BLA, addressing all of the deficiencies identified in the letter; withdraw the application; or request an opportunity for a hearing. A CRL indicates that the review cycle of the application is complete, and the application is not ready for approval and describes all of the specific deficiencies that the FDA identified in the BLA. A CRL generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the BLA and may require additional clinical or preclinical testing in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. The deficiencies identified may be minor, for example, requiring labeling changes; or major, for example, requiring additional clinical trials. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA may issue an approval letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the product with specific prescribing information for specific indications.

20

Table of Contents

Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings, or precautions be included in the product labeling, including a boxed warning, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a product’s safety and efficacy after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may also not approve label statements that are necessary for successful commercialization and marketing.

After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes, and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval. The FDA may also withdraw the product approval if compliance with the pre- and post-marketing regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the marketplace. Further, should new safety information arise, additional testing, product labeling, or FDA notification may be required.

Biosimilars, Orphan Drugs, and Exclusivity

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”), creates an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products shown to be highly similar to or interchangeable with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Biosimilarity sufficient to reference a prior FDA-approved product requires a high similarity to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product in terms of safety, purity, and potency. Biosimilarity must be shown through analytical studies, animal studies, and at least one clinical trial, absent a waiver by the FDA. There must be no difference between the reference product and a biosimilar product in conditions of use, route of administration, dosage form, and strength. A biosimilar product may be deemed interchangeable with a prior approved product if it meets the higher hurdle of demonstrating that it can be expected to produce the same clinical results as the reference product and, for products administered multiple times, the biologic and the reference biologic may be switched after one has been previously administered without increasing safety risks or risks of diminished efficacy relative to exclusive use of the reference biologic. Complexities associated with the larger, and often more complex, structures of biological products, as well as the process by which such products are manufactured, pose significant hurdles to implementation which are still being evaluated by the FDA.

A reference biologic is granted 12 years of exclusivity from the time of first licensure of the reference product, and no application for a biosimilar can be submitted for four years from the date of licensure of the reference product. However, certain changes and supplements to an approved BLA, and subsequent applications filed by the same sponsor, manufacturer, licensor, predecessor in interest, or other related entity do not qualify for the twelve-year exclusivity period.

The Orphan Drug Act provides incentives for the development of products intended to treat rare diseases or conditions, which generally are diseases or conditions affecting less than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or affecting more than 200,000 in the United States and for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making the product available in the United States will be recovered from United States sales. Additionally, sponsors must present a plausible hypothesis for clinical superiority to obtain orphan designation if there is a product already approved by the FDA that is intended for the same indication and that is considered by the FDA to be the same as the already approved product. This hypothesis must be demonstrated to obtain orphan exclusivity. If granted, prior to product approval, Orphan Designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical study costs, tax advantages, and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product receives FDA approval for the indication for which it has orphan designation, the product is generally entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same product for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity.

Special FDA Expedited Review and Approval Programs

The FDA has various programs, including Fast Track designation, priority review, and breakthrough designation, that are intended to expedite or simplify the process for the development and FDA review of certain products that are intended for the treatment of serious or life threatening diseases or conditions, and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs or present a significant improvement over existing therapy. The purpose of these programs is to provide important new therapeutics to patients earlier than under standard FDA review procedures.

21

Table of Contents

To be eligible for a Fast Track designation, the FDA must determine, based on the request of a sponsor, that a product is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need. The FDA will determine that a product will fill an unmet medical need if the product will provide a therapy where none exists or provide a therapy that may be potentially superior to existing therapies based on efficacy, safety, or public health factors. If Fast Track designation is obtained, sponsors may be eligible for more frequent development meetings and correspondence with the FDA. In addition, the FDA may initiate reviews of certain sections of an application before the application is complete. This “rolling review” is available if the applicant provides and the FDA approves a schedule for the remaining information. In some cases, a Fast Track product may be eligible for accelerated approval or priority review. On September 24, 2020, the FDA granted Fast Track designation to DKN-01 for the treatment of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose tumors express high DKK1, following disease progression on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- and platinum- containing chemotherapy and if appropriate, human epidermal receptor growth factor (HER2)/neu targeted therapy.

The FDA may give a priority review designation to products that are intended to treat serious conditions and, if approved, would provide significant improvements in the safety or effectiveness of the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions. A priority review means that the goal for the FDA is to review an application within six months, rather than the standard review of ten months under current PDUFA guidelines, of the 60-day filing date.

Drug or biological products studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments may receive accelerated approval, which means the FDA may approve the product based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments. A drug or biologic candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, will allow the FDA to withdraw the drug or biologic from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for drug or biologic candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.

Moreover, under the provisions of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (“FDASIA”), enacted in 2012, a sponsor can request designation of a product candidate as a “breakthrough therapy”. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a product that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other products, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. Products designated as breakthrough therapies are eligible for the Fast Track designation features as described above, intensive guidance on an efficient development program beginning as early as Phase 1 trials, and a commitment from the FDA to involve senior managers and experienced review staff in a proactive collaborative, cross-disciplinary review.

Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.

Post-approval Requirements

Any products manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements related to manufacturing, recordkeeping, and reporting, including adverse experience reporting, shortage reporting, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising, marketing, promotion, certain electronic records and signatures, and post-approval obligations imposed as a condition of approval, such as Phase 4 clinical trials, REMS, and surveillance to assess safety and effectiveness after commercialization.

22

Table of Contents

After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are subject to prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing annual user fee requirements for any marketed products and the establishments at which such products are manufactured, as well as new application fees for supplemental applications with clinical data. In addition, manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved therapeutics are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, list their products, and are subject to periodic announced and unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other requirements, which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon a company and its third-party manufacturers. Manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the areas of production and quality -control to maintain compliance with cGMPs. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product approvals or request product recalls if a company fails to comply with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following initial marketing, or if previously unrecognized problems are subsequently discovered.

Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval or notification before being implemented. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and specifications, and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.

Moreover, the enacted Drug Quality and Security Act (“DQSA”) imposes obligations on manufacturers of biopharmaceutical products related to product tracking and tracing. Among the requirements of this legislation, manufacturers are required to provide certain information regarding the products to individuals and entities to which product ownership is transferred, will be required to label products with a product identifier, and are required to keep certain records regarding the product. The transfer of information to subsequent product owners by manufacturers will eventually be required to be done electronically. Manufacturers must also verify that purchasers of the manufacturers’ products are appropriately licensed. Further, under this legislation, manufacturers will have product investigation, quarantine, disposition, and notification responsibilities related to counterfeit, diverted, stolen, and intentionally adulterated products that would result in serious adverse health consequences or death to humans, as well as products that are the subject of fraudulent transactions or which are otherwise unfit for distribution such that they would be reasonably likely to result in serious health consequences or death. Similar requirements additionally are and will be imposed through this legislation on other companies within the biopharmaceutical product supply chain, such as distributors and dispensers.

Adverse event reporting and the submission of periodic reports, including annual reports and deviation reports, are required following FDA approval of a BLA. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in significant regulatory actions. Such actions may include refusal to approve pending applications, license suspension or revocation, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold or termination of clinical trials, warning letters, untitled letters, cyber letters, modification of promotional materials or labeling, provision of corrective information, imposition of post-market requirements including the need for additional testing, imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS, product recalls, product seizures or detentions, refusal to allow imports or exports, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, FDA debarment, injunctions, fines, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, debarment from receiving government contracts, new orders under existing contracts, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, restitution, disgorgement, or civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, and result in adverse publicity, among other adverse consequences.

Other Regulation Related to our Leap Therapeutics Business

In addition to any FDA restrictions on marketing and promotion of drugs and devices, other federal and state laws restrict our business practice including, without limitation, anti-kickback and false claims laws, data privacy and security laws, as well as transparency laws regarding payment or other items of value provided to healthcare providers. Future legislative proposals to reform healthcare may also impact us.

We are also governed by other federal, state and local laws of general applicability, such as laws regulating working conditions, employment practices, as well as environmental protection.

23

Table of Contents

Research and Development Expenses Related to Our Leap Therapeutics Business

Our total research and development expenses were $25.7 million and $57.2 million, during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. See Part II — Item 7 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional details regarding our research and development activities.

Employees

As of December 31, 2025, we had 6 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced a work stoppage and consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Web Availability

We make available free of charge through our website, www.leaptx.com, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments to the reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as well as certain of our corporate governance policies, including the charters for the audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees of our board of directors and our code of ethics and corporate governance guidelines. We make these reports available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through our website is not a part of or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We will also provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of any of the foregoing materials. Any such request must be made in writing to us at: Cypherpunk Technologies Inc. c/o Investor Relations, 47 Thorndike Street, Suite B1, Cambridge, MA 02141.

​

24

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. Please see the “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry Data” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of some of the forward-looking statements that are qualified by these risk factors. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Risk Factors Summary

The following is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky, all of which are more fully described below. This summary should be read in conjunction with the full description of “Risk Factors” in this section and should not be relied upon as an exhaustive summary of the material risks facing our business. In addition to the following summary and the information in this section, you should consider the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before investing in our securities.

Risks Related to the Company’s Strategy and Industry

25

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Leap

26

Table of Contents

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Risks Related to the Company’s Strategy and Industry

We have recently shifted a significant portion of our business strategy towards a focus on our digital asset treasury strategy, and we may be unable to successfully execute this new strategy.

In October 2025, we shifted a significant portion of our business strategy towards the implementation of our digital asset treasury strategy, including material investments in ZEC. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully execute this new strategy or operate ZEC-related activities at the scale or profitability currently anticipated. This strategic shift requires specialized skillsets and operational, technical and compliance infrastructure to support our accumulation of ZEC and related activities. This also requires that we implement different security protocols and treasury management practices. Although we have engaged consultants and added additional board members with experience in these areas, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively execute on this strategy within our expected timeframe, or at all. Further, there is ongoing scrutiny and limited formal guidance from regulatory agencies, including Nasdaq and the SEC, with respect to the treatment of public company digital asset treasury strategies. Errors by key management or our third party service providers could result in significant loss of funds and value, which could in turn result in a significant decrease in the value of our common stock. As a result, our shift towards our digital asset treasury strategy could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

ZEC is a highly volatile digital asset, and fluctuations in the price of ZEC may adversely influence our financial results and the market price of our listed securities.

We have used a significant portion of capital in our treasury to purchase ZEC, a digital asset, and plan to continue to do so in the future. The price of ZEC has been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and is highly volatile. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, ZEC has traded between approximately $26.14 and $736.51.

27

Table of Contents

Any increase or decrease in the fair value of ZEC will require us to recognize unrealized gains or losses, which could be material to our financial results for the applicable reporting period, which may create significant volatility in our reported earnings. Any decrease in reported earnings or increased volatility of such earnings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities. In addition, the application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States with respect to digital assets remains uncertain in some respects, and any future changes in the manner in which we account for our ZEC holdings could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the market price of our securities.

In addition, investors may view the value of our securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our ZEC holdings, and accordingly, the price of ZEC may significantly influence the market price of our securities. ZEC is a highly volatile asset. Our financial results and the market price of our listed securities would be adversely affected, and our business and financial condition would be negatively impacted, if the price of ZEC decreased substantially, including as a result of:

28

Table of Contents

In addition, the U.S. and international stock markets and the markets for both digital asset-influenced and technology companies have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies in those markets. In particular, future trading prices in our securities may reflect market dynamics that are not connected to valuation methods commonly associated with operating companies in similar industries or with companies engaged predominantly in passive investments in digital assets or other commodities, such as exchange-traded products (“ETPs”). Equity market capitalizations of other such companies are often in excess of stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and in excess of valuations that might traditionally be expected based on their operating performances, cash flows and net assets. Investors may therefore be unable to assess the value of our common stock or evaluate the risks of an investment in our company using traditional or commonly used enterprise valuation methods. We cannot predict how these dynamics may evolve over time, or whether or how long they may last. These market and industry factors may significantly harm the market price of our listed securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

The price of our listed securities has been and is likely to continue to be volatile, and with the recent adoption of our new digital asset treasury strategy, we expect to see additional volatility in our stock price. In addition, if investors view the value of our listed securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our ZEC holdings, the price of ZEC may significantly influence the market price of our listed securities. The price of ZEC has historically been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile.

We have limited experience in investing in and managing the ownership of digital assets, and we rely on an affiliate of Winklevoss Capital, Gemini Space Sciences LLC, for the trading execution and custody of our ZEC, and we will not have direct control over our digital assets held through such custodian.

We have limited experience in investing in and managing the ownership of digital assets, such as ZEC. We are reliant on an affiliate of Winklevoss Capital, Gemini Space Sciences LLC (“Gemini”), for the trading execution by which we acquire ZEC and to serve as the custodian for our ZEC on its regulated exchange and wallet storage system. As a result, our ZEC holdings are concentrated with a single custodian, and we rely solely on its proprietary storage system and wallet infrastructure, security infrastructure, financial reporting, and software systems for our ZEC holdings. In Gemini’s structure to support trading, customer digital assets are pooled together, and Gemini relies on an internal customer ledger to maintain the segregated customer digital asset ownership. Gemini’s Omnibus Wallet Structure is made up of a set of online (i.e., “Hot”) and offline (e.g., “Cold”) wallets (or “storage tiers”), with Gemini responsible for managing the movement of digital assets between the online and offline storage tiers. While we have agreements governing Gemini’s activities relating to our account, we have limited influence over its actual performance.

ZEC is controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key(s) relating to the local or online digital wallet in which ZEC is held. While the Zcash blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing ZEC held in such wallet. To the extent the private key(s) for a digital wallet are lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key(s) is accessible, neither we nor our custodians will be able to access ZEC held in the related digital wallet.

29

Table of Contents

Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that the digital wallets at Gemini will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack. ZEC and the Zcash blockchain ledger, as well as other digital assets and blockchain technologies, have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. The failure of Gemini to successfully carry out its contractual duties, trading instructions, safeguard our ZEC, or maintain its internal systems and processes could have a material adverse effect on our ZEC holdings, digital asset treasury strategy, financial condition, and business operations.

Moreover, our agreements with Gemini might terminate for a variety of reasons, and if we need to enter into alternative custody arrangements, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative custodians or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional custodians for digital assets involves additional cost, custody risk, and requires management time and focus. While we will conduct due diligence on our custodians and any exchanges or platforms we may use, there can be no assurance that such diligence will uncover all risks, including operational deficiencies, hidden vulnerabilities or legal noncompliance. In addition, there is risk during any transition period when a new custodian would commence services to safeguard our ownership of our digital assets. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges in the custody of our digital assets and that those challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects, and results of operations.

Additionally, our use of custodians, such as Gemini, exposes us to the risk that the ZEC that the custodian holds on our behalf could be subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar insolvency proceedings, and we could be treated as a general unsecured creditor of the custodian, inhibiting our ability to exercise ownership rights with respect to such ZEC. A series of recent high-profile bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions, criminal charges, and other events relating to companies operating in the digital asset industry, the closure or liquidation of certain financial institutions that provided lending and other services to the digital assets industry, and the filing and subsequent settlement of a civil fraud lawsuit have highlighted the counterparty risks applicable to owning and transacting in digital assets. These bankruptcies, closures, liquidations and other events have likely negatively impacted the adoption rate and use of digital assets. Additional bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions, criminal charges, or other events involving participants in the digital assets industry in the future may further negatively impact the adoption rate, price, and use of digital assets, limit the availability to us of financing collateralized by such assets, or create or expose additional counterparty risks. Any loss associated with such bankruptcy, receivership or similar insolvency proceedings is unlikely to be covered by any insurance coverage we may maintain related to our ZEC. Even if we are able to prevent our digital assets from being considered the property of a custodian’s bankruptcy estate as part of an insolvency proceeding, it is possible that we would still be delayed or may otherwise experience difficulty in accessing our digital assets held by the affected custodian during the pendency of the insolvency proceedings. Any such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the market price of our listed securities. The legal framework governing digital asset ownership and rights in custodial or insolvency contexts remains uncertain and continues to evolve, which could result in unexpected losses, protracted recovery processes or adverse treatment in insolvency proceedings.

Any insurance that may cover losses of our ZEC holdings may cover none or only a small fraction of the value of the entirety of our ZEC holdings, and there can be no guarantee that such insurance will be maintained as part of the custodial services we have or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to our ZEC.

In addition, we rely, for financial reporting requirements and our own internal controls, on the controls that are implemented, executed, and reported on by Gemini and other third party service providers. If those controls fail, are modified, or if assurance reports are unavailable or delayed, our ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial reports could be adversely affected. A failure of controls could have a material adverse effect on our digital asset treasury strategy, financial condition, and business operations.

Because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions, we may inadvertently and without knowledge, directly or indirectly, engage in transactions with or for the benefit of prohibited persons under U.S. or foreign sanctions laws.

We are subject to the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”), including prohibitions on conducting direct or indirect business with persons named on, or owned by persons named on, OFAC’s various sanctions lists, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list. We are also prohibited from direct or indirect dealings with persons located in, organized in, or nationals of, jurisdictions subject to U.S. embargos, and may be prohibited from dealing with persons in other jurisdictions subject to targeted U.S. sanctions. U.S. sanctions compliance obligations apply to transactions in digital assets and U.S. sanctions authorities have in recent years directed significant attention to sanctions compliance in the digital asset industry. Because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions and decentralized applications, we may inadvertently and without knowledge, directly or indirectly, engage in transactions with or for the benefit of prohibited persons. Civil liability for OFAC sanctions violations

30

Table of Contents

is typically regarded as “strict liability” violations, meaning we may be held responsible for transacting with prohibited parties even if we have no knowledge that a particular counterparty is a prohibited person under the OFAC sanctions regulations. In addition, we may be subject to non-U.S. economic sanctions laws and regulations to the extent we conduct activity within the jurisdiction of other sanctions regimes, including those of the European Union and United Kingdom.

OFAC and other governmental authorities have significant discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of sanctions laws and regulations. Moreover, economic sanctions laws and regulations continue to evolve, often with little or no notice, which could raise operational or compliance challenges. If it is determined that we have transacted with prohibited persons, even inadvertently, this could result in substantial reputational harm, fines or penalties, and costs associated with governmental inquiries and investigations. Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operations or financial condition.

The cryptography used to enhance the privacy of transactions on the Zcash Network could ultimately fail or could be used to facilitate illicit activities, and businesses that facilitate transactions in ZEC may be at increased risk of criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having services cut off, which could negatively affect the price of ZEC and the value of our listed securities.

The Zcash network uses zk-SNARKs, which provide additional layers of confidentiality to transactions on the Zcash Network by protecting the amount and the recipient in ZEC transactions. This cryptography could ultimately fail, resulting in less privacy than believed or no privacy at all, and could adversely affect one’s ability to complete transactions on any such digital asset network or otherwise adversely interfere with the integrity of the relevant blockchain. Because ZEC is a privacy-preserving digital asset, it is also subject to certain types of attacks that may go undetected. For example, on February 5, 2019, the team behind ZEC announced that it discovered a vulnerability in its zk-SNARK implementation on March 1, 2018 that was subsequently patched in connection with a network upgrade called “Sapling” in October 2018.

Digital asset networks have in the past been, and may continue to be, used to facilitate illicit activities, including money laundering, human and drug trafficking, arms dealing and other crimes. Moreover, law enforcement agencies and other market participants have often relied on the transparency of blockchains to facilitate investigations and comply with laws, such as anti-money laundering and economic sanctions laws. Because of the privacy-enhancing features of the Zcash Network, law enforcement agencies and other market participants may have less visibility into transaction-level data, which may encourage bad actors to misuse the Zcash Network for such illicit purposes. As a result, businesses that facilitate transactions in ZEC may be at increased risk of potential criminal charges or civil lawsuits, or of having banking or other services cut off if there is a concern that these features interfere with the performance of anti-money laundering duties and economic sanctions checks. Since 2019, ZEC, along with several other privacy tokens including Monero, Dash, and Horizen have been delisted from multiple exchanges. Although these digital asset trading platforms did not disclose the reasons for such delisting, and some digital asset trading platforms subsequently relisted ZEC, it is believed that they were the result of the privacy-enhancing features of the digital assets, and there is a risk that other digital asset trading platforms may remove ZEC from their platforms as a result of these concerns. Other service providers of such businesses may also cut off services if there is a concern that the Zcash Network is being used to facilitate crime. Any of the aforementioned occurrences could increase regulatory scrutiny of the Zcash Network and/or adversely affect the price of ZEC, the attractiveness of the Zcash Network and an investment in our listed securities.

If we, Gemini or our respective third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our ZEC, or if our access to our wallets holding ZEC is lost or destroyed, or other similar circumstances or events occur, we may lose some or all of our ZEC and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We expect that substantially all of the ZEC we acquire will be held in accounts at Gemini. Security breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to digital assets, including ZEC. ZEC and other blockchain-based digital assets and the entities that provide services to participants in the Zcash ecosystem have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. For example, in October 2021, it was reported that hackers exploited a flaw in the account recovery process and stole from the accounts of at least 6,000 customers of the Coinbase exchange, although the flaw was subsequently fixed and Coinbase reimbursed affected customers. Similarly, in November 2022, hackers exploited weaknesses in the security architecture of the FTX Trading digital asset exchange and reportedly stole over $400 million in digital assets from customers.

31

Table of Contents

A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in:

Further, any actual or perceived data security breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other companies with digital assets or companies that operate in the digital asset ecosystem, regardless of whether we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of confidence in the broader Zcash ecosystem or in the use of the Zcash Network to conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact us.

Attacks upon systems across a variety of industries, including industries related to digital assets such as ZEC, are increasing in frequency, persistence and sophistication and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded and organized groups and individuals, including state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to systems and information (including personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners, including Gemini. We may experience breaches of our security measures due to human error, malfeasance, insider threats, system errors or vulnerabilities or other irregularities. In particular, we expect that unauthorized parties will attempt to gain access to our systems and facilities, as well as those of our partners and third-party service providers, through various means, such as hacking, social engineering, phishing and fraud. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. Further, there has been an increase in such activities due to the increase in work-from-home arrangements. The risk of cyberattacks could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, as well as the conflicts in the Middle East and Latin America, or other future conflicts, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated to such conflicts. Any future breach of our operations or those of others in the Zcash ecosystem, including third-party services on which we rely, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We face significant risks relating to disruptions, forks, 51% attacks, hacks, network disruptions, or other adverse events or other compromises to blockchain networks, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Blockchain networks are maintained by decentralized networks of participants, and as such are susceptible and vulnerable to a variety of risks, including disruptions, security breaches, and fundamental technical issues. Blockchain networks are vulnerable to attacks by malicious actors who gain control of a significant portion of the network’s mining hash rate, a scenario commonly referred to as a 51% attack. In such an event, the attacker could double-spend transactions, reverse previously confirmed transactions, or otherwise disrupt the normal operations of the network. Successful 51% attacks have historically undermined trust in affected blockchain networks and could materially decrease the value of digital assets.

Additionally, forks, or splits in the underlying protocol may occur when participants fail to reach consensus on proposed upgrades or changes. Forks can lead to the creation of duplicate networks, confusion among market participants, dilution of the original network’s value and disruption of the network’s operations. Hard forks, in particular, can materially and adversely impact the perceived stability and value of digital assets, leading to reduced demand and price declines.

Further, hacks and other security breaches targeting the core infrastructure of blockchain networks or major participants, such as exchanges and custodians, including Gemini, could severely impact the reputation and market confidence in these networks. Exploits of protocol-level vulnerabilities could also compromise the integrity of blockchain networks, resulting in a substantial loss of value.

32

Table of Contents

The success and growth of digital assets depend significantly on their continued security, stability and scalability. Any technical failures, consensus breakdowns, governance disputes or regulatory interventions that diminish confidence in the networks or impair their functionality could lead to a material decline in their market price, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. A sustained or significant decrease in the price or liquidity of digital assets, whether due to 51% attacks, forks, hacks, network disruptions or other adverse events, could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, even the perception that any of these events could occur may lead to significant market volatility and price declines, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks relating to the potential compromise of the Zcash Network security by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and quantum computing, which may materially and adversely impact our operations and financial condition.

The security and integrity of the Zcash Network are fundamentally dependent on the robustness of its cryptographic algorithms. Blockchain protocols rely heavily on public key cryptography and hashing algorithms to secure transactions, safeguard private keys, and prevent double-spending. Advances in emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (“AI”) and quantum computing, may pose significant risks to the network’s security and operational stability.

Quantum computing, in particular, presents a long-term threat to the cryptographic assumptions underpinning the Zcash Network. Should quantum computing achieve sufficient maturity, it could undermine the effectiveness of the cryptographic algorithms used to secure the blockchain. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could potentially reverse-engineer private keys from public addresses or compromise the blockchain’s consensus mechanism, leading to the theft of digital assets, double-spending, and other forms of fraud. Although current quantum computing capabilities are not yet at this level, advancements in quantum technologies could materialize more rapidly than anticipated, creating significant systemic risks for the Zcash Network.

AI may also pose indirect security risks. AI-driven cyberattacks, including advanced phishing schemes, autonomous malware, and intelligent blockchain analysis tools, could increase the sophistication and success rate of attacks targeting Zcash users, exchanges, custodians, and node operators. The use of AI to exploit vulnerabilities in software, mining hardware, or network protocols could threaten the stability and reliability of the Zcash Network and other digital asset ecosystems.

There can be no assurance that Zcash’s current cryptographic safeguards will be sufficient to protect against future technological advances. While research and development efforts are ongoing to develop quantum-resistant cryptographic protocols, the Zcash network may face challenges in adopting such technologies at scale, particularly given its decentralized governance structure. Any successful attack or perceived vulnerability arising from AI or quantum computing could materially and adversely affect the price, liquidity, and adoption of ZEC and could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

ZEC and other digital assets are novel assets and are subject to significant legal, commercial, tax, technical and regulatory uncertainty, which could materially adversely affect our financial position, operations and prospects.

The first digital asset, Bitcoin, was launched in 2009. Zcash was launched in 2016. ZEC and other digital assets are relatively novel and are subject to significant uncertainty, which could adversely impact their price. The application of state and federal securities laws and other laws and regulations to digital assets is unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may interpret or apply existing laws and regulations in a manner that adversely affects the price of ZEC or the ability of individuals or institutions such as us to own or transfer ZEC. For example, beginning on July 1, 2027, regulations in the European Union will prohibit transactions involving anonymous wallets and privacy-focused digital assets such as ZEC.

In addition, our accounting for digital assets relies on complex judgment and emerging interpretations of U.S. GAAP. Digital assets are a relatively new asset class, and accordingly, accounting and tax guidance, regulations, and best practices are evolving and rapidly changing. Future changes in authoritative guidance, SEC views, or industry practice could require us to change our accounting or tax approach, which could materially affect our financial statements, reported earnings, comparability of financial results in future periods with prior periods, or comparability with other companies.

The U.S. federal government, states, regulatory agencies, and foreign countries may also enact new laws and regulations, or pursue regulatory, legislative, enforcement or judicial actions, that could materially impact the price of ZEC or the ability of individuals or institutions such as us to own or transfer ZEC.

33

Table of Contents

It is not possible to predict whether or when new laws and regulations will be enacted or adopted that change the legal framework governing digital assets or provide additional authorities to the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”), or other regulators, or whether or when any other federal, state or foreign legislative or regulatory bodies will take any similar actions. For example, legislation such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (the “CLARITY Act”), a comprehensive digital asset market structure and regulation bill, as proposed by the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2025 could, if it became law, grant the CFTC additional regulatory and supervisory powers with respect to spot digital assets as “digital commodities” and potentially result in the imposition of additional regulatory obligations and burdens to us, which could potentially include registration, disclosure, reporting, and business conduct requirements.

It is also not possible to predict the nature of any such additional laws or authorities, how additional legislation or regulatory oversight might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function, the willingness of financial and other institutions to continue to provide services to the digital assets industry, or how any new laws or regulations, or changes to existing laws or regulations, might impact the value of digital assets generally and ZEC specifically. The consequences of any new law or regulation relating to digital assets and digital asset activities could adversely affect the market price of ZEC, as well as our ability to hold or transact in ZEC, and in turn adversely affect the market price of our listed securities. Furthermore, other companies have begun to adopt strategies similar to ours with respect to digital assets, and this could result in new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, impacting our digital asset treasury strategy, particularly if the adoption of digital asset strategies by other companies continues or accelerates.

Moreover, the risks of engaging in a digital asset treasury strategy generally, and ZEC as the digital asset specifically, are relatively novel and have created, and could continue to create, complications due to the lack of experience that third parties have with companies engaging in such a strategy, such as increased costs of director and officer liability insurance or the potential inability to obtain such coverage on acceptable terms in the future.

The growth of the digital assets industry in general, and the use and acceptance of Zcash in particular, may also impact the price of ZEC and is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The pace of worldwide growth in the adoption and use of ZEC may depend, for instance, on public familiarity with digital assets, ease of buying, accessing or gaining exposure to ZEC, institutional demand for ZEC as an investment asset, the participation of traditional financial institutions in the digital assets industry, consumer demand for ZEC as a store of value or means of payment, and the availability and popularity of alternatives. Even if growth in ZEC adoption occurs in the near or medium term, there is no assurance that ZEC usage will continue to grow over the long term.

A variety of technical factors related to the Zcash blockchain could also impact the price of ZEC. For example, malicious attacks by miners, inadequate mining fees to incentivize validating of Zcash transactions, hard “forks” of the Zcash blockchain into multiple blockchains, and advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry, and quantum computing could undercut the integrity of the Zcash blockchain and protocol, and negatively affect the price of ZEC. The liquidity of ZEC may also be reduced and damage to the public perception of ZEC may occur, if financial institutions were to deny or limit banking services to businesses that hold ZEC, provide Zcash-related services or accept ZEC as payment, which could also decrease the price of ZEC. The liquidity of ZEC may also be impacted to the extent that changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements, such as those proposed by the European Union, negatively impact the ability of exchanges and trading venues to provide services for ZEC and other privacy-based digital assets.

ZEC does not pay interest or dividends and our ability to generate a return on investment from our purchases of ZEC is dependent on an appreciation in value of ZEC.

ZEC does not pay interest or dividends. The ability to generate a return on investment from the purchase of ZEC will depend on whether there is appreciation in the value of ZEC following our purchases. Future fluctuations in ZEC’s trading prices may result in our converting ZEC into US dollars, Euros, or other assets with a value substantially below the cost of such purchases.

34

Table of Contents

Digital asset holdings are less liquid than cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.

Our ZEC holdings are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents. Historically, the digital asset market has been characterized by significant volatility in price, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, concerns regarding pseudonymity of digital asset addresses, a developing regulatory landscape, potential susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, compliance and internal control failures at exchanges, and various other risks inherent in its entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our digital assets at favorable prices or at all. As a result, digital asset holdings may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents. Further, digital assets we hold with our custodians and transact with our trade execution partners do not enjoy the same protections or insurance as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Additionally, we may be unable to enter into term loans or other capital raising transactions collateralized by our unencumbered digital assets or otherwise generate funds using our digital asset holdings, including in particular during times of market instability or when the price of digital assets has declined significantly. If we are unable to sell our digital assets, enter into additional capital raising transactions, including capital raising transactions using ZEC as collateral, or otherwise generate funds using our ZEC holdings, or if we are forced to sell our digital assets at a significant loss, in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

The concentration of our ZEC holdings could enhance the risks inherent in our digital asset treasury strategy.

The concentration of our ZEC holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could achieve if we were to purchase a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our ZEC digital asset treasury strategy. Any future significant declines in the price of ZEC would have a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.

Historically, the digital asset markets have been characterized by significant volatility in price, limited liquidity and trading volumes compared to sovereign currencies markets, relative anonymity, a developing regulatory landscape, potential susceptibility to market abuse and manipulation, compliance and internal control failures at exchanges and various other risks inherent in its entirely electronic, virtual form and decentralized network. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our ZEC at favorable prices or at all. Further, any ZEC we hold with Gemini or other custodians and transact with our trade execution partners does not enjoy the same protections as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. If we are unable to sell our ZEC, enter into additional capital raising transactions, or otherwise generate funds using our ZEC holdings, or if we are forced to sell our ZEC at a significant loss, in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

The concentration of our expected digital asset holdings relative to non-digital assets enhances the risks inherent in our digital asset treasury strategy.

We expect ZEC to comprise a significant portion of our total assets. The concentration of our digital asset holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could take advantage of by purchasing a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our digital asset treasury strategy. If there is a significant decrease in the price of ZEC, we will experience a more pronounced impact on our financial condition than if we used our cash to purchase a more diverse portfolio of assets.

If we are unable to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, our ability to implement and sustain a digital asset treasury strategy may be compromised.

Our digital asset treasury strategy contemplates the discretionary purchase of ZEC. The capital required to acquire and actively manage ZEC may exceed our existing cash resources and any cash flows from operations. Market conditions, our share price performance, the volatility of digital assets, and regulatory uncertainties could impair our ability to access debt or equity capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Failure to obtain necessary financing could force us to curtail or abandon our digital asset strategy, which could materially harm our growth prospects and the value of our securities.

35

Table of Contents

Our ability to time the price of our purchases of ZEC pursuant to our digital asset treasury strategy will be limited.

In future periods, we intend to continue to acquire additional ZEC in accordance with our digital asset treasury strategy. ZEC is a highly volatile asset. Volatility may continue in the future and historical trends could reverse dramatically. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to purchase ZEC at favorable prices or avoid losses associated with declines in the value of ZEC. Our ability to time such purchases to coincide with favorable market conditions may be limited.

A significant decrease in the market value of our digital asset holdings could adversely affect our ability to satisfy financial obligations, including any debt financings.

As part of our digital asset treasury strategy, we may incur indebtedness and other fixed charges in the future in order to raise capital for our business strategies. If our businesses do not generate cash flow in future periods sufficient to satisfy our financial obligations, including our debt, if any, we intend to fund our obligations using cash flow generated by equity or debt financing. Our ability to obtain equity or debt financing may in turn depend on, among other factors, the value of our ZEC holdings, investor sentiment and the general public perception of ZEC, as well as our strategy and our value proposition. Accordingly, a significant decline in the market value of our ZEC holdings or a negative shift in these other factors may create liquidity and credit risks, as such a decline or such shifts may adversely impact our ability to secure sufficient equity or debt financing to satisfy our financial obligations. As ZEC will constitute a substantial part of our balance sheet, if we are unable to generate revenue or secure equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all, we may be required to sell ZEC to satisfy these obligations. Any such sale of ZEC may have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and future prospects, and could impair our ability to secure additional equity or debt financing in the future. Our inability to secure additional equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms or at all, or to sell our ZEC in amounts and at prices sufficient to satisfy our financial obligations, including our debt service obligations, could cause us to default under such obligations. Any default on our indebtedness may have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and future prospects.

Our common stock may trade at a substantial premium or discount to the value of ZEC we hold, and our stock price may be more volatile than the price of ZEC.

The market price of our common stock reflects many factors that do not affect the spot price of ZEC and may therefore diverge materially — positively or negatively — from the per-share value of our ZEC holdings (net of cash, other assets and liabilities). These factors include, among others: our corporate-level expenses; taxes; the timing, size and pricing of equity or debt financings (including at-the-market offerings, equity line financings or convertible securities), equity awards and other sources of dilution; expectations about our future purchases or sales of ZEC; our liquidity and public float; differences in trading hours and market microstructure between our common stock and spot markets for ZEC; changes in index inclusion, analyst coverage or investor sentiment toward us as an operating company; our corporate governance, financial reporting, and any actual or perceived operational, custody, technology or regulatory risks specific to us; and broader equity-market conditions independent of crypto-asset markets. As a result, our common stock may trade at a premium or discount to the value of our ZEC holdings for extended periods, and may be more volatile than the price of ZEC. Accordingly, investors could lose all or a substantial part of their investment even if the market price of ZEC does not decline, and may not benefit commensurately from increases in the market price of ZEC.

Our ZEC treasury strategy subjects us to enhanced regulatory oversight.

Several spot ETPs have received approval from the SEC to list their shares on a U.S. national securities exchange with continuous share creation and redemption at net asset value. Even though we are not, and do not function in the manner of, a spot ETP, it is possible that we nevertheless could face regulatory scrutiny from the SEC or other federal or state agencies due to our ZEC holdings.

In addition, there has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist activities, or circumvent sanctions regimes, including those sanctions imposed in response to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. While we have implemented and maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and take care to only acquire our ZEC through Gemini, which is subject to anti-money laundering regulation and related compliance rules in the United States, if we are found to have purchased any of our ZEC from bad actors that have used ZEC to launder money or persons subject to sanctions, we may be subject to regulatory proceedings and any further transactions or dealings in ZEC by us may be restricted or prohibited.

36

Table of Contents

Although our ZEC holdings do not currently serve as collateral securing any of our outstanding indebtedness as of the date hereof, we may incur indebtedness or enter into other financial instruments in the future that may be collateralized by our ZEC holdings. We may also consider pursuing strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our ZEC holdings. These types of ZEC-related transactions are the subject of enhanced regulatory oversight by international, federal, and state regulatory agencies. These and any other ZEC-related transactions we may enter into, beyond simply acquiring and holding ZEC, may subject us to additional regulatory compliance requirements and scrutiny, including under international, federal, and state money services regulations, money transmitter licensing requirements and various commodity and securities laws and regulations.

In addition, private actors that are wary of ZEC or the regulatory concerns associated with Zcash may in the future take actions that may have an adverse effect on our business or the market price of our listed securities. For example, it is possible that a financial institution could restrict customers from buying our securities if it were to determine that the value of our securities is closely tied to the performance of ZEC, signaling a reluctance to facilitate exposure to virtual currencies.

Absent federal regulations, there is a possibility that ZEC may be classified as a “security.” Any classification of ZEC as a “security” could lead to our falling under the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Act of 1940, as amended, and would subject us to additional regulation and could materially impact the operation of our business.

Neither the SEC nor any other U.S. federal or state regulator has publicly stated whether they believe that ZEC is a “security.” Despite the Executive Order titled “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology,” which includes as an objective, “protecting and promoting the ability of individual citizens and private sector entities alike to access and … to maintain self-custody of digital assets,” ZEC has not yet been classified with respect to U.S. federal securities laws. Because ZEC heavily resembles bitcoin, we believe that the analysis and statements from the SEC and CFTC that have stated that bitcoin is not a security apply to ZEC. Therefore, while we believe that ZEC is not a “security” within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, and registration of the Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), is therefore not required under the applicable securities laws, we acknowledge that a regulatory body or federal court may determine otherwise. Our belief, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on such a finding that ZEC is a “security” which would require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

ZEC and other digital assets, as well as new business models and transactions enabled by blockchain technologies, present novel interpretive questions under the Investment Company Act. There is a risk that assets or arrangements that we have concluded are not securities could be deemed to be securities by the SEC or another authority for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which would increase the percentage of securities held by us for Investment Company Act purposes.

Regulatory change reclassifying ZEC as a security could lead to our falling within the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act and could adversely affect the market price of ZEC and the market price of our common stock.

Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the Investment Company Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if (1) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (2) it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.

While the SEC has not stated a view as to whether ZEC is or is not a “security” for purposes of the federal securities laws, a determination by the SEC or a court of competent jurisdiction that ZEC is a security could lead to our meeting the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, if the portion of our assets that consists of investments in ZEC exceeds the 40% limit prescribed in the Investment Company Act, which would subject us to significant additional regulatory requirements that could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations and may also require us to change the manner in which we conduct our business.

37

Table of Contents

We intend to monitor our assets and income in order to conduct our business activities in a manner such that we do not fall within the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act or would qualify under one of the exemptions or exclusions provided by the Investment Company Act and corresponding SEC rules. If ZEC is determined to be a security for purposes of the federal securities laws, we would evaluate taking steps to reduce our holdings of ZEC as a percentage of our total assets. These steps may include, among others, selling ZEC that we might otherwise hold for the long term and deploying our cash in assets that are not considered to be investment securities under the Investment Company Act, in which case we may be forced to sell our ZEC at unattractive prices. We may also seek to acquire additional assets that are not considered to be investment securities under the Investment Company Act and we may need to incur debt, issue additional equity or enter into other financing arrangements that are not otherwise attractive to our business. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, we can make no assurance that we would successfully be able to take the necessary steps to avoid meeting the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act and becoming subject to its requirements. If ZEC is determined to constitute a security for purposes of the federal securities laws and if we are not able to come within an available exemption or exclusion under the Investment Company Act, then we would have to register as an investment company and require us to change the manner in which we conduct our business. In addition, such a determination could adversely affect the market price of ZEC and in turn adversely affect the market price of our common stock, or subject us to risk of enforcement proceedings and lawsuits, which could result in potential injunctions, cease-and-desist orders, fines and penalties. Such developments would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

We may be deemed to be a “commodity pool” under CEA and CFTC Rules as a result of our commodity interest trading, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The CEA and CFTC Rules define a “commodity pool” as any investment trust, syndicate, or similar form of enterprise operated for the purpose of trading in “commodity interests,” such as swaps, futures and options on an underlying commodity (including any digital asset that constitutes a commodity). The CFTC has previously interpreted “for the purpose of trading” as being triggered where only one swap is executed. The legal and regulatory landscape of CFTC commodity pool regulation is currently unclear as applied to digital asset treasury companies. Accordingly, (i) no person is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) or a commodity trading adviser (“CTA”) with respect to our company and (ii) our stockholders will not have the regulatory protections provided to investors in a commodity pool operated or advised by a registered CPO or CTA, as applicable.

If our company were determined to be a “commodity pool,” including as a result of any future change in legislation, regulation or interpretation, we may be subject to additional regulatory requirements which may be burdensome or costly or that could make it impractical or impossible for us to continue our business as currently contemplated. For example, a commodity pool must generally be operated as a separately cognizable entity from its CPO and any person acting as a CPO or CTA with respect to a commodity pool must be registered with the CFTC and as a member of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”). Absent an applicable exemption, a registered CPO or CTA must generally provide investors with a “disclosure document” in compliance with the CFTC Rules and the requirements of the NFA, and must comply with a range of ongoing reporting and recordkeeping requirements on registered and certain exempt commodity pool operators. Registration can be time-consuming, expensive and restrictive, and compliance with these additional regulatory requirements could result in substantial, non-recurring expenses, adversely affecting an investment in our securities. If we determine not to comply with such regulations, we may be forced to cease or modify certain of our operations, which could negatively impact our investors.

We are not subject to legal and regulatory obligations that apply to investment companies such as mutual funds and ETPs, or to obligations applicable to investment advisers.

Mutual funds, ETPs and their directors and management are subject to extensive regulation as “investment companies” and “investment advisers” under U.S. federal and state law; this regulation is intended for the benefit and protection of investors. We do not currently comply with and do not intend to voluntarily comply with these laws and regulations. Consequently, our stockholders do not have the regulatory protections provided to stockholders in registered and regulated investment companies, which, for example, require investment companies to have a certain percentage of disinterested directors and regulate the relationship between the investment company and certain of its affiliates.

38

Table of Contents

This means, among other things, that the execution of or changes to our ZEC treasury strategy, our use of leverage, the manner in which our ZEC is custodied, our ability to engage in transactions with affiliated parties and our operating and investment activities generally are not subject to the extensive legal and regulatory requirements and prohibitions that apply to investment companies and investment advisers. Consequently, our Board has broad discretion over the investment, leverage and cash management policies it authorizes, whether in respect of our ZEC holdings or other activities we may pursue and has the power to change our current policies, including our strategy of acquiring and holding ZEC.

Changes in regulatory interpretations could require us to register as a money services business or money transmitter, leading to increased compliance costs or operational shutdowns.

The regulatory regime for digital assets in the U.S. and elsewhere is uncertain. We may be unable to effectively react to proposed legislation and regulation of digital assets, which could adversely affect our business.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a division of the U.S. Treasury Department (“FinCEN”), regulates providers of certain services with respect to “convertible virtual currency,” including ZEC. Businesses engaged in the transfer of convertible virtual currencies are subject to registration and licensure requirements at the U.S. federal level and also under U.S. state laws.

If regulatory changes or interpretations require us to register as a money services business with FinCEN under the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, or as a money transmitter under state laws, we may be subject to extensive regulatory requirements, resulting in significant compliance costs and operational burdens. In such a case, we may incur extraordinary expenses to meet these requirements or, alternatively, may determine that continued operations are not viable. If we decide to cease certain operations in response to new regulatory obligations, such actions could occur at a time that is unfavorable to investors.

Multiple states have implemented or proposed regulatory frameworks for digital asset businesses. Compliance with such state-specific regulations may increase costs or impact our business operations. Further, if we or our service providers are unable to comply with evolving federal or state regulations, we may be forced to dissolve or liquidate certain operations, which could materially impact our investors.

The availability of spot ETPs for digital assets may adversely affect the demand for our common stock, which could result in a decrease in the market price of our listed securities.

Although Bitcoin and other digital assets such as ZEC have experienced a surge of investor attention since Bitcoin was invented in 2008, until recently investors in the United States had limited means to gain direct exposure to digital assets through traditional investment channels, and instead generally were only able to hold digital assets through “hosted” wallets provided by digital asset service providers or through “unhosted” wallets that expose the investor to risks associated with loss or hacking of their private keys. Given the relative novelty of digital assets, general lack of familiarity with the processes needed to hold digital assets directly, as well as the potential reluctance of financial planners and advisers to recommend direct digital asset holdings to their retail customers because of the manner in which such holdings are custodied, some investors have sought exposure to digital assets through investment vehicles that issue shares representing fractional undivided interests in their underlying digital asset holdings.

On January 10, 2024, the SEC approved the listing and trading of spot Bitcoin ETPs, the shares of which can be sold in public offerings and are traded on U.S. national securities exchanges. The SEC has also approved spot ETPs for Ethereum and other digital assets. The listing and trading of spot ETPs for digital assets offers investors another alternative to gain exposure to digital assets, which could result in a decline in the price of our listed securities relative to the value of our digital assets.

39

Table of Contents

Although we are an operating company, and we believe we offer a different value proposition than an investment vehicle such as a spot digital asset ETP, investors may nevertheless view our securities as an alternative to an investment in an ETP, and choose to purchase shares of an ETP instead of our securities. They may do so for a variety of reasons, including if they believe that ETPs offer a “pure play” exposure to digital assets that is generally not subject to federal income tax at the entity level as we are, or the other risk factors applicable to an operating business, such as ours. Additionally, unlike spot digital asset ETPs, we (i) do not seek for our common stock to track the value of the underlying digital assets we hold before payment of expenses and liabilities, (ii) may not benefit from various exemptions and relief under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Regulation M, and other securities laws, which enable ETPs to continuously align the value of their shares to the price of the underlying assets they hold through share creation and redemption, (iii) are a Delaware corporation rather than a statutory trust, and do not operate pursuant to a trust agreement that would require us to pursue one or more stated investment objectives, and (iv) are not required to provide daily transparency as to our digital asset holdings or our net asset value. Based on how we are viewed in the market relative to ETPs, and other vehicles which offer economic exposure to digital assets, such as futures ETPs, leveraged futures ETPs and similar vehicles offered on international exchanges, any premium or discount in our common stock relative to the value of our digital asset holdings may increase or decrease in different market conditions.

As a result of the foregoing factors, availability of spot ETPs for ZEC and other digital assets could decrease demand for our common stock, which could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our listed securities.

Although we currently are not considered to be a “controlled company” under Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we may in the future become a controlled company due to the concentration of voting power among Winklevoss Capital and their affiliates.

A “controlled company” pursuant to the Nasdaq corporate governance rules is a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group, or another company. Winklevoss Capital beneficially owns 19.9% of our outstanding shares of common stock, which excludes an additional 71,647,916 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Pre-Funded Warrants and 57,182,378 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Common Warrants. Although we currently are not considered to be a “controlled company” under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, we may in the future become a controlled company if such shares are issued. In the event that Winklevoss Capital acquires more than 50% of the voting power of the Company, we may in the future be able to rely on the “controlled company” exemptions under the Nasdaq corporate governance rules due to this concentration of voting power and the ability of Winklevoss Capital and its affiliates to act as a group. If we were a controlled company, we would be eligible, and could elect, not to comply with certain of the Nasdaq corporate governance standards. Such standards include the requirement that a majority of our directors are independent directors, subject to certain phase-in periods, and the requirement that our compensation, nominating and governance committee consist entirely of independent directors. In such a case, if the interests of our stockholders differ from Winklevoss Capital, including as a result of Winklevoss Capital’s affiliation with Gemini, our stockholders would not have the same protection afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance standards, and the ability of our independent directors to influence our business policies and corporate matters may be reduced.

Risks Related to Leap

We have a history of losses, have no source of product revenue, and may never become profitable.

Investment in the biotechnology research and development business conducted by Leap is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that our lead product candidate, sirexatamab, or any other products will fail to gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We do not currently have any products approved by regulatory authorities for marketing and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have incurred significant research, development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations.

We have not generated any product revenues, and we have no commercial products. Our ability to generate revenue from product sales and achieve profitability with respect to our biotechnology research and development operations conducted by Leap will depend upon our ability to successfully gain regulatory approval and commercialize sirexatamab, FL-501, or other product candidates that we may in-license or acquire in the future. Even if we are able to successfully achieve regulatory approval, we do not know when we will generate revenue from product sales, if at all. Our ability to generate revenue from product sales from any product candidates also depends on a number of additional factors, including but not limited to, our ability to:

40

Table of Contents

In addition, because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, including that our product candidates may not advance through development or achieve the endpoints of applicable clinical trials, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our company and could impair our ability to expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our product offerings, or even continue operations.

We will require additional capital to fund our operations which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain financing when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We will need to spend substantial amounts to advance the development of sirexatamab and FL-501 and launch and commercialize our product candidates, if we receive regulatory approval. We will require additional capital for further development and potential commercialization. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to reduce or eliminate our research and development programs.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our product candidates.

Until Leap can generate substantial revenue from product sales, if ever, Leap expects to seek additional capital through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, strategic collaborations and alliances, licensing arrangements, and mergers with other companies. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale or issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of existing stockholders will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of existing stockholders. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing when needed, we may be required to terminate our product development efforts, or to grant rights to develop and market our product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves, or to sell ourselves or engage in some other strategic transaction at an unfavorable price and on other unfavorable terms, or to discontinue our drug development business and operations entirely. If we raise additional funds through strategic collaborations and alliances, licensing arrangements, or mergers with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates in particular countries, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process.

The results of preclinical studies, preliminary study results, and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials or the ultimately completed trials. For instance, while we have early clinical trial results for our clinical studies of sirexatamab, additional clinical trials will be needed for the registration of sirexatamab. The ultimate study results of our future trials may be different than the ones we have seen to date.

41

Table of Contents

Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. Preclinical studies may also reveal unfavorable product candidate characteristics, including safety concerns. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, the impact of an active comparator arm, differences in the size and type of patient populations, changes in and adherence to clinical trial protocols, changes in medical prescribing practices, and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants.

Our future clinical trial results may not be successful. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Moreover, should there be a flaw in a clinical trial, it may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. Further, because we currently plan to develop our product candidates for use in combination with other oncology products, the design, implementation, and interpretation of the clinical trials necessary for marketing approval may be more complex than if we were developing our product candidates alone.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, especially for an early-stage company such as ours. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we may not be able to commercialize our product candidates as expected, and our ability to generate revenue could be materially impaired.

The time required to obtain approval for a new therapeutic from the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of such regulatory authorities.

In addition, approval policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. Any such change may require us to amend our clinical trial protocols, conduct additional studies that require regulatory or IRB approval, or otherwise cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. We have not obtained regulatory approval for any product candidate and it is possible that none of our existing product candidates or any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future will ever obtain regulatory approval. Both sirexatamab and FL-501 will require additional preclinical and clinical development, as well as additional manufacturing development before we will be able to submit a marketing application to the FDA. Moreover, should the FDA determine that a companion diagnostic device is required for use of our product candidates or should we decide to pursue the development of a companion diagnostic device for the use of our product candidates, further development work would be required for such a device, including, possibly the approval of an Investigational Device Exemption for the study of such a device from the FDA, compliance with the FDA’s device regulations, and either FDA clearance or approval of the device for commercial use. Such development would require additional time and expense and be subject to the risk of FDA non-approval or clearance of the diagnostic. Any delay in obtaining or failure to obtain required approvals could materially adversely affect our ability or the ability of any of our future collaborators to generate revenue from the particular product candidate, which could result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact our stock price.

Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, marketing, promotion, sale, and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), and similar regulatory authorities outside the United States and Europe. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate will prevent us from commercializing that product candidate. We have no experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain marketing approvals and expect to rely on CROs and consultants to assist us in this process. Securing marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety, purity, and potency for that indication. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites by, the relevant regulatory authorities.

Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. The number and types of preclinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for regulatory approval also varies depending on the product candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any particular product candidate.

42

Table of Contents

Approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions, which may cause delays or limitations in the approval of or the decision not to approve an application. It is possible that neither of our product candidates, sirexatamab and FL-501, nor any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future will ever obtain the appropriate regulatory approvals necessary for us or any future collaborators to commence product sales.

Finally, even if we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications or uses than we request, may require significant safety warnings, including black box warnings, contraindications, and precautions, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, surveillance, or other requirements, including risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (“REMS”), to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of these scenarios could compromise the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

If we experience delays in obtaining approval, if we fail to obtain approval of a product candidate or if the label for a product candidate does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate, the commercial prospects for such product candidate may be harmed and our ability to generate revenues from that product candidate could be materially impaired.

The therapeutic safety and efficacy of sirexatamab is unproven, and we may not be able to successfully develop and commercialize any of our products.

Our clinical stage product, sirexatamab is a novel monoclonal antibody and its potential benefit as a therapeutic cancer drug is unproven. Our ability to generate revenues from product sales, which we do not expect will occur in the short term, if ever, will depend on successful development and commercialization after approval, if achieved, which is subject to many potential risks. Sirexatamab may interact with human biological systems in unforeseen, ineffective or harmful ways. If our products are associated with undesirable side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may need to abandon development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in early stage testing for treating cancer have later been found to be ineffective in later stage studies or cause side effects that prevented further development of the compound. As a result of these and other risks described herein that are inherent in the development of novel therapeutic agents, we may never successfully develop, enter into or maintain third party licensing or collaboration transactions with respect to, or successfully commercialize sirexatamab, in which case we will not achieve profitability and the value of our stock may materially decline.

We face substantial competition from much larger competitors, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before, or more successfully than, we do.

The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive, especially in the oncology space in which we operate. We face competition with respect to sirexatamab and FL-501 and will likely face competition with respect to any other product candidates that we may seek to develop in the future, from major pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. There are several companies that are marketing drugs and testing product candidates in the same cancer indications as we are. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific mechanisms of action that are the same as or similar to our approaches for DKN-01 and FL-501. For example, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, and Amgen have previously been developing anti-DKK1 monoclonal antibodies. In addition, Pfizer, CatalYm, NGM Biosciences, among other companies, are all currently developing or have developed antibodies targeting GDF-15.

43

Table of Contents

More established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their greater size, cash flows, and institutional experience. Compared to us, many of our competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical, and human resources. Due to the significant resources required for the development of our product candidates, we must decide which product candidates to pursue and advance and the resources to allocate to each. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, collaboration, management, and financial resources toward particular product candidates may not lead to the development of any viable commercial product and may divert resources away from better opportunities. As a result of these factors, our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products before we are able to, which may limit our ability to develop or commercialize sirexatamab and FL-501. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are safer, more effective, more widely used, and/or cheaper than ours, and may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products. These advantages could render our product candidates non-competitive before we can recover the expenses of development and commercialization.

We may acquire other assets, form collaborations or make investments in other companies or technologies, that could harm our operating results, dilute our stockholders’ ownership, or cause us to incur significant expense.

As part of our business strategy for Leap, we intend to pursue acquisitions of assets, including preclinical or clinical stage product candidates, or enter into strategic alliances and collaborations to expand our existing programs and operations, such as we did with the merger with Flame Biosciences. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction, any of which could have a detrimental effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We may not be able to consistently find suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into our existing business. Any integration of an acquired company or assets may also disrupt our ongoing operations, expose us to additional liabilities, require the hiring of additional personnel and the implementation of additional internal systems and infrastructure, and require intensive management resources.

To finance any acquisitions or collaborations, we may choose to issue shares of our common stock as consideration. Any such issuance of shares would dilute the ownership of our stockholders. If the price of our common stock is low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other assets or companies or fund a transaction using our stock as consideration. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds for acquisitions through public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us, or at all.

We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not carry out their contractual duties or do not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials or failing to comply with regulatory requirements, our business could be substantially harmed.

We rely on CROs to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates. We expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions, and clinical investigators, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. While we have agreements governing their activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance and control only certain aspects of their activities. The failure of these third parties to successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines could substantially harm our business, because we may be delayed in completing or unable to complete the clinical trials required to support future approval of our product candidates, and we may not obtain marketing approval for or commercialize our product candidates in a timely manner or at all. Moreover, these agreements might terminate for a variety of reasons, including a failure to perform by such third parties. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, our product development activities could be delayed, which could adversely affect our business.

44

Table of Contents

Our reliance on these third parties for development activities reduces our control over these activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with applicable protocols, legal, regulatory, and scientific standards, and our reliance on CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and applicable protocols for that trial and for ensuring that our preclinical trials are conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice Standards (“GLPs”), as appropriate. Moreover, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with Good Clinical Practices, commonly referred to as GCPs, for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Regulatory authorities enforce these requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical investigators, and trial sites. If we or any of our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCPs or other regulatory requirements, we or our CROs may be subject to enforcement or other legal actions, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials.

If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional CROs involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could compromise our ability to meet our desired development timelines. Although we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects, and results of operations.

If the contract manufacturers upon whom we rely fail to produce our product candidates or components in the volumes that we require on a timely basis, or to comply with stringent regulations applicable to biopharmaceutical manufacturers, we may face delays in the development and commercialization of, or be unable to meet demand for, our product candidates and may lose potential revenues.

We do not manufacture any of our product candidates, and we do not currently plan to develop any capacity to do so. We utilize third-party contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), to manufacture the clinical trial material of sirexatamab and expect to do so for commercial products, if approved. We do not have any long-term commitments from our CMOs for clinical trial material or guaranteed prices for our product candidates. Any delays in obtaining adequate supplies with respect to our product candidates will delay the development or commercialization of our product candidates.

Our product candidates compete with other products and product candidates for access to contract manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of CMOs that operate under cGMP regulations and that are both capable of manufacturing for us and willing to do so. If our existing CMOs, or any new third party CMOs that we engage in the future to manufacture our product candidates for our clinical trials, should cease to continue to do so for any reason, we likely would experience delays in obtaining sufficient quantities of our product candidates for us to advance our clinical trials while we identify and qualify replacement suppliers. We may not succeed in our efforts to establish sufficient manufacturing relationships or other alternative arrangements to meet our needs for any of our existing or future product candidates. If for any reason we are unable to obtain adequate supplies of our product candidates, it will be more difficult for us to conduct clinical trials, develop our product candidates and operate our business.

Any problems or delays we experience in preparing for commercial-scale manufacturing of a product candidate or component may result in a delay in FDA approval of the product candidate or may impair our ability to manufacture commercial quantities or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could result in the delay, prevention, or impairment of clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates and could adversely affect our business.

The manufacture of pharmaceutical products requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of therapeutics often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling up initial production, including difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, (including stability of the product candidate and quality assurance testing), shortages of qualified personnel, and compliance with strictly enforced federal, state, and foreign regulations. Our CMOs may not perform as agreed or may have a failure of a manufacturing campaign. Any changes or deviations in a manufacturing process may result in the failure of the product to meet the necessary specifications. If our CMOs were to encounter any of these difficulties, our ability to provide product candidates to patients in our clinical trials and for commercial use, if approved, could be jeopardized. Reliance on third-party CMOs entails exposure to risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured the product candidate ourselves.

45

Table of Contents

In addition, all CMOs of our product candidates and therapeutic substances must comply with cGMP requirements enforced by the FDA that are applicable to both finished products and their active components used both for clinical and commercial supply, through its facilities inspection program. Our CMOs must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our marketing applications to the agency. Our CMOs will also be subject to continuing FDA and other regulatory authority inspections should we receive marketing approval. Further, we, in cooperation with our CMOs, must supply all necessary chemistry, manufacturing, and control documentation in support of a BLA on a timely basis. The cGMP requirements include quality control, quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of our product candidates and therapeutic substances may be unable to comply with our specifications, these cGMP requirements and with other FDA, state, and foreign regulatory requirements. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of adventitious agents or other contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of product candidates that may not be detectable in final product testing. If our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities, they may not be able to secure or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. Any such deviations may also require remedial measures that may be costly and/or time-consuming for us or a third party to implement and that may include the temporary or permanent suspension of a clinical trial or commercial sales or the temporary or permanent closure of a facility. Any such remedial measures imposed upon us or third parties with whom we contract could materially harm our business.

While we are ultimately responsible for the manufacture of our product candidates and therapeutic substances, other than through our contractual arrangements, we have little control over our CMOs’ compliance with these regulations and standards. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which could significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. A failure to comply with these requirements may also result in regulatory enforcement actions against our CMOs or us, including fines and civil and criminal penalties. If the safety of any quantities supplied is compromised due to our CMOs’ failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates.

Any failure or refusal to supply sufficient quantities of our product candidates could delay, prevent or impair our clinical development or commercialization efforts. Any change in our CMOs could be costly because the commercial terms of any new arrangements could be less favorable than our existing arrangements and because the expenses relating to the transfer of necessary technology and processes could be significant, as there are significant regulatory requirements which must be met prior to receiving FDA approval for the transfer of a manufacturing process for a therapeutic antibody product to a new manufacturing facility.

We also rely on third parties to store and distribute our product candidates for the clinical trials that we conduct. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay clinical development of our product candidates, which could produce additional losses.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights or if our intellectual property rights are inadequate to protect our technology and product candidates, our competitive position could be harmed.

Our commercial success will depend in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the U.S. and other countries with respect to our proprietary technology and products. We rely on patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws, and confidentiality, licensing and other agreements with employees and third parties, all of which offer only limited protection. We have sought and continue to seek to protect our proprietary position by filing and prosecuting patent applications in the U.S. and abroad related to our novel technologies and products that are important to our business.

46

Table of Contents

The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally are highly uncertain, involve complex legal and factual questions and have in recent years been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the scope, validity, enforceability, and commercial value of our patents, including those patent rights licensed to us by third parties, are highly uncertain. The steps we or our licensors have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be adequate to preclude misappropriation of our proprietary information or infringement of our intellectual property rights, both inside and outside the U.S. Further, the examination process may require us or our licensors to narrow the claims for our pending patent applications and those of our licensors, which may limit the scope of patent protection that may be obtained if these applications issue. The rights already granted under any of our currently issued patents or those licensed to us and those that may be granted under future issued patents may not provide us with the proprietary protection or competitive advantages we are seeking. If we or our licensors are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficient, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or superior to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be adversely affected. It is also possible that we or our licensors will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of our development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection for them.

With respect to patent rights, we do not know whether any of our pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents that protect our technology or products, or if any of our or our licensors’ issued patents will effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Patents in the field of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are frequently limited in scope based on the sequence of amino acids that form particular parts of the antibody. A portion of our intellectual property portfolio is limited by amino acid sequences found in our product candidates. Other competing companies may have therapeutic antibodies to the same target as our product candidates, but have a different amino acid sequence and, as a result, may not be determined to infringe our patents which are limited by amino acid sequence(s). Even for those patents which are defined by the target of a therapeutic antibody and not limited by an amino acid sequence, we cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully enforce those patents against our competitors with antibodies to these targets.

Our pending applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a patent issues from such applications. Because the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity, or enforceability, issued patents that we own or have licensed from third parties may be challenged in the courts, administrative agencies or patent offices in the U.S. and abroad. Such challenges may result in the loss of patent protection, the narrowing of claims in such patents or the invalidity or unenforceability of such patents, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection for our technology and products. Protecting against the unauthorized use of our or our licensors’ patented technology, trademarks and other intellectual property rights is expensive, difficult and may in some cases not be possible. In some cases, it may be difficult or impossible to detect third-party infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, even in relation to issued patent claims, and proving any such infringement may be even more difficult.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Our share price has been low and volatile. If our share price continues to be low and volatile, we could be subject to securities class action litigation and our stockholders could incur substantial losses.

The market price of shares of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to many risk factors listed in this section, and others beyond our control, including:

47

Table of Contents

These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, the stock market in general, and Nasdaq in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. In the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If in the future any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit against us, we could incur significant legal expenses, settlement costs or damage awards that are not covered by, or exceed the limits of, our available directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, which could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Such a lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management.

We are a “smaller reporting company,” and we take advantage of reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies, which could result in our common stock being less attractive to investors.

We qualify as a “smaller reporting company” which will allow us to take advantage of scaled disclosure requirements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock, our stock price may be more volatile and it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital as and when we need it. If we are unable to raise additional capital as and when we need it, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be adversely affected.

Each year we are required to evaluate our internal controls systems in order to allow management to report on our internal controls as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, we continue to incur additional expenses and expend our management’s time to comply with these regulations. We currently do not have an internal audit group, and we will need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. During the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, we identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting in connection with our accounting for certain complex and unusual transactions, as further described under Part II, Item 9A. of this Annual Report. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404, if we are not able to adequately remediate the previously identified material weakness, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identify additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our common stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market by our stockholders could cause our stock price to fall.

In October 2025, we completed the private placement of: (i) 15,212,311 shares of common stock, (ii) pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 80,768,504 shares of common stock and (iii) common warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 71,985,605 shares of common stock. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we sold an additional 27,151,211 shares of common stock pursuant to our ATM program (as described herein). Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our

48

Table of Contents

ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that future sales may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock. Substantial sales of common stock by our stockholders could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased them.

Our failure to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements could result in the delisting of our Common Stock.

Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that our closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share. On March 4, 2026, we received a letter from Nasdaq stating that the we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Closing Bid Price Rule”) because our common stock failed to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. This letter provides an initial 180 calendar day period, or until August 31, 2026, in which to regain compliance. If we do not regain compliance by August 31, 2026, we may be eligible for an additional 180-day grace period.

We will continue to monitor the closing bid price of our common stock and intend to continue to take definitive steps in an effort to evidence compliance with the Closing Bid Price Rule, including by implementing a reverse stock split, if necessary. Our stockholders previously adopted a Charter amendment that permits our Board, in its discretion, to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock in a ratio to be determined, within a range of 1 to 5 (1:5) up to 1 to 20 (1:20), in order to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s $1.00 closing bid price requirement. The Board may choose whether or not to effect a reverse stock split at any time prior to December 15, 2026, without further stockholder approval.

If we were to implement a reverse stock split to facilitate compliance with the Closing Bid Price Rule and maintenance of our Nasdaq listing, the announcement and implementation of the reverse stock split could negatively affect the price of our common stock. We cannot assure you that the prices for shares of the common stock after a reverse stock split would increase proportionately to prices for shares of our common stock immediately before a reverse stock split. Furthermore, even if the market price of our common stock did rise following a reverse stock split, we cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock immediately after a reverse stock split would be maintained for any period of time, or that we may not again be subject to delisting for failure to meet the $1.00 closing bid price requirement. There is also the possibility that liquidity may be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares which would be issued and outstanding when a reverse stock split is effected, particularly if the price per share of our common stock were to begin a declining trend after the reverse stock split is effected. Accordingly, our total market capitalization after a reverse stock split may be lower than the market capitalization before such reverse stock split.

If we do not regain compliance with the Closing Bid Price Rule or we fail to continue to meet all other applicable continued listing requirements for The Nasdaq Stock Market, our common stock may be delisted, which would adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock and our ability to obtain financing to fund our operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

​

Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

49

Table of Contents

​

Item 2.Properties.

We have leased our principal offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts covering approximately 7,667 square feet of space. In November 2018, we entered into a lease through April 30, 2022. On May 16, 2022, we entered into a Third Amendment to Lease and extended the lease through July 31, 2024. On January 3, 2024, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Lease and extended the lease through July 31, 2025. On July 1, 2025 we entered into a Fifth Amendment to Lease (“Fifth Amendment”), extending the 47 Thorndike Street Lease as a tenancy-at will. The term of the Lease expires on the last day of any month identified by notice by the Company or the landlord to the other, not less than sixty (60) days in advance.

​

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

From time to time we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this report, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.

​

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

​

50

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, has been publicly traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market since January 24, 2017. Prior to November 12, 2025, our common stock traded under the symbol “LPTX” and since November 12, 2025, our common stock has traded under the symbol “CYPH”, in connection with our corporate name change to Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.

Holders of Record

As of March 11, 2026, there were approximately 49 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include stockholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business, including our investments in Zcash. Payment of future dividends, if any, on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, anticipated cash needs, and plans for expansion.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Information regarding our equity compensation plans and our securities authorized for issuance thereunder is set forth herein under Part III, Item 12 below.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

All unregistered sales of equity securities made by us during the period covered by this report were previously disclosed in the the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 9, 2025.

Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not purchase any of our registered equity securities during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 6.Reserved.

​

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10 -K. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors. We discuss factors that we believe could cause or contribute to these differences below and elsewhere in this report, including those set forth under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report.

Overview

We are a privacy technology company implementing a digital asset treasury strategy anchored by Zcash and, through our subsidiary Leap, are developing novel therapies for patients with cancer.

51

Table of Contents

We have historically devoted substantially all of our resources to development efforts relating to our product candidates, including manufacturing and conducting clinical trials of our product candidates, providing general and administrative support for these operations and protecting our intellectual property. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have funded our operations primarily through proceeds from our sales of common stock and preferred stock and proceeds from the issuance of notes payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we initiated a strategy to deploy a portion of our capital raised that is not required to provide working capital for our ongoing operations to accumulate digital assets. Zcash is a protocol and blockchain network of connected devices all over the world, working together to validate transactions and maintain the Zcash ledger. ZEC is the monetary unit, or coin, of Zcash. Zcash allows for greater privacy, providing users with options for fully shielded transactions in which the sender, recipient, and amount are encrypted.

We renamed our company “Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.” to reflect the strategic focus on acquiring ZEC, participating in the development of Zcash, and the values of privacy and liberty. Our ongoing research and development operations are conducted under a wholly-owned subsidiary named “Leap Therapeutics, Inc.”

We have incurred net operating losses every year since our inception in 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we had a net operating loss of $41.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, our net operating loss was $70.1 million. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $462.5 million. Our net losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and have operating losses for at least the next several years as we:

We do not expect to generate revenue from therapeutic drug product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years and is subject to significant uncertainty. Accordingly, we will need to raise additional capital prior to the commercialization of sirexatamab or any other product candidate. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial revenue from product sales, we expect to finance our operating activities through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, commercialization, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other arrangements when needed on favorable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital or enter into such other arrangements as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to develop our product candidates, and could force us to significantly limit or reduce the scope of our business, operations and activities.

As of December 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14.0 million. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025 will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least 12 months from the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Financial Overview

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development activities have included conducting nonclinical studies and clinical trials, manufacturing development efforts and activities related to regulatory filings for our product candidates, primarily sirexatamab. We recognize research and development expenses as they are incurred. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of:

52

Table of Contents

We plan to increase our research and development expenses for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of sirexatamab and any other product candidates, subject to the availability of additional funding.

Our direct research and development expenses are tracked on a program-by-program basis and consist primarily of internal and external costs, such as employee costs, including salaries and stock-based compensation, other internal costs, fees paid to consultants, central laboratories, contractors and CROs in connection with our clinical and preclinical trial development activities. We use internal resources to manage our clinical and preclinical trial development activities and perform data analysis for such activities.

We participate, through our subsidiary in Australia, in the Australian government’s R&D Incentive program, such that a percentage of our eligible research and development expenses are reimbursed by the Australian government as a refundable tax offset and such incentives are reflected as other income. This percentage was 43.5% for both the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

The table below summarizes our research and development expenses incurred by development program and the R&D incentive income for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

​

​

The successful development of our clinical product candidates is highly uncertain. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate the nature, timing or costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the remainder of the development of any of our product candidates or the period, if any, in which material net cash inflows from these product candidates may commence. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing drugs, including the uncertainty of:

A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of a product candidate could result in a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, if the FDA or another regulatory authority were to require us to conduct clinical trials beyond those that we currently anticipate will be required for the completion of clinical development of a product candidate, or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development.

53

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel in executive, finance and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include direct and allocated facility-related costs as well as professional fees for legal, patent, consulting, accounting and audit services.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support our continued research activities and development of our product candidates. We also anticipate that we will incur increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance, director and officer insurance costs as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company.

Interest income

Interest income consists primarily of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents.

Research and development incentive income

Research and development incentive income includes payments under the R&D Incentive program from the government of Australia. The R&D Incentive is one of the key elements of the Australian government’s support for Australia’s innovation system. It was developed to assist businesses in recovering some of the costs of undertaking research and development. The research and development tax incentive provides a tax offset to eligible companies that engage in research and development activities.

Companies engaged in research and development may be eligible for either:

-0 to 2% intensity: an 8.5% premium to the company’s tax rate

-Greater than 2% intensity: a 16.5% premium to the company’s tax rate;

We recognize as other income the amount we expect to be reimbursed for qualified expenses.

Foreign currency translation adjustment

Foreign currency translation adjustment consists of gains (losses) due to the revaluation of foreign currency transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates associated with our Australian subsidiary.

Income taxes

Since our inception, we have not recorded any U.S. federal or state income tax benefits for the net losses we have incurred in each year, due to our uncertainty of realizing a benefit from those items. As of December 31, 2025, we had federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $85.1 million and $86.9 million, respectively. The federal NOL’s are indefinitely lived and state NOL’s begin to expire in 2032.

54

Table of Contents

Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. We have completed a study to assess whether an ownership change occurred or whether there were multiple ownership changes since we became a “loss corporation” as defined in Section 382. We experienced multiple ownership changes occurring in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2025. The ownership changes have and will continue to subject our pre-ownership change NOL carryforwards to an annual limitation, which will significantly restrict our ability to use them to offset taxable income in periods following the ownership changes. In general, the annual use limitation equals the aggregate value of our stock at the time of the ownership change multiplied by a specified tax-exempt interest rate. As a result of the latest ownership change, we are limited to an $0.9 million annual limitation on our ability to utilize our NOL’s and R&D credits recognized prior to October 8, 2025. Due to this limitation, approximately $3.5 million of federal R&D tax credits will expire unutilized. As a result, we have reduced our deferred tax assets related to the federal R&D credits which are offset by the corresponding decrease in the valuation allowance.

As of December 31, 2025, we also had federal and state R&D tax credits of $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which begin to expire in 2043 and 2038, respectively, for federal and state tax purposes.

There is no provision for income taxes in the United States because we have historically incurred operating losses and maintain a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions. A provision for income taxes was recorded in Australia based on the results of our foreign subsidiary.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report, we believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical for fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.

Research and Development Expenses

As part of the process of preparing consolidated financial statements, we are required to account for research and development expenses. This process involves communicating with our applicable personnel and service providers to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service. The majority of our service providers invoice us monthly for services performed. Examples of research and development expenses include:

We base our expenses related to clinical trials on the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple research institutions and CROs that conduct and manage clinical trials on our behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of patients and the completion of clinical trial milestones.

55

Table of Contents

Digital Assets

We hold digital assets in the form of Zcash with Gemini, a third-party custodian (“Gemini”). The contractual arrangement represents our enforceable contractual right to receive digital assets from the custodian on demand and is accounted for as a hybrid instrument under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The host contract represents a non-interest bearing receivable collectible on demand and is recorded at the transaction price, representing the fair value of the digital assets at the time of acquisition.

The hybrid instrument contains an embedded derivative that is required to be bifurcated because the embedded exposure to changes in the fair value of the underlying digital assets is not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host receivable. The embedded derivative is subsequently measured at the fair value each reporting period, with changes in fair value recorded as an unrealized gain (loss) on change in fair value of embedded derivative in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The embedded derivative component is measured at fair value at each reporting date, using observable prices in the principal market in accordance with ASC 815-15 and ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). Where quoted prices are directly available in active markets, the embedded derivatives are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy; if observable market prices are not available, we would utilize other relevant inputs and valuation techniques, which may result in Level 2 or Level 3 classification.

We have exercised judgment in determining the principal market, fair value hierarchy, and bifurcation of embedded derivatives. There is diversity in industry practice regarding the measurement and recognition of digital assets. We continually evaluate the principal market and the reliability of inputs to ensure that fair value measurements reflect current market conditions.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have issued stock options to purchase our common stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). We account for stock based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. ASC 718 establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee and non-employee services. Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service or vesting period. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards require the use of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based payment awards and stock price volatility.

We estimate the grant date fair value of stock options and the related compensation expense, using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This option valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions including: (1) expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the options granted, (2) volatility, (3) risk-free rate and (4) dividends. In general, the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but the estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

We expense the fair value of employee RSUs over the associated employee service period on a straight-line basis. Stock-based compensation expense is determined based on the fair value of the award at the grant date and is adjusted each period to reflect actual forfeitures.

56

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024

The following tables summarize our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

​

​

Research and Development Expenses

​

​

Research and development expenses were $25.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $57.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $31.5 million in research and development expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024, was primarily due to a decrease of $13.8 million in clinical trial costs and a decrease of $6.8 million in manufacturing costs, due to the completion of our clinical trials during the year ended December 31, 2025. There was also a decrease of $8.4 million in payroll and other related expenses due to a decrease in headcount of our R&D full-time employees due to a reduction in force, a decrease of $1.8 million in stock based compensation expense as there were no stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2025 to R&D employees and a decrease of $0.7 million in consulting fees related to research and development activities.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $1.9 million in general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024, was primarily due to a $2.6 million decrease in payroll and other related expenses due to a decrease in incentive based compensation expense for our general and administrative employees and a decrease in headcount of our general and administrative employees due to a reduction in force. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of $0.6

57

Table of Contents

million in stock based compensation expense due to RSUs granted to general and administrative employees during the year ended December 31, 2025, and an increase of $0.1 million in professional fees.

Interest Income

We recorded interest income of $0.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The decrease during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the same period in 2024 was due to a lower average cash and cash equivalents balance.

Australian Research and Development Incentives

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we expensed $0.2 million of previously recognized R&D incentive income related to 2023 eligible R&D expenses, due to a reduction to the amount we expect to be refunded, which we determined in connection with the completion of our Australian tax return for that year. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we did not record any R&D incentive income.

Unrealized Gain on Change in Fair Value of Embedded Derivative

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recorded a $50.4 million unrealized gain on the change in fair value of embedded derivative.

Foreign Currency Gain (Loss)

We recorded an immaterial amount of foreign currency gains (losses) for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The change in foreign currency losses is due to the changes in the Australian dollar exchange rate related to activities of the Australian entity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have been engaged in organizational activities, including raising capital, and research and development activities, and in October 2025, we implemented our digital asset treasury strategy. We have not yet achieved profitable operations or generated positive cash flows from operations, and we do not yet have a product that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). There is no assurance that profitable operations from our privacy technology/digital asset treasury strategy or our biotechnology operations, if achieved, could be sustained on a continuing basis. Further, our future operations are dependent on the success of efforts to raise additional capital, the success of our privacy technology/digital asset treasury strategy, our biotechnology research and commercialization efforts, regulatory approval, and, ultimately, the market acceptance of our products.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-40, Going Concern, we have evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued. As of December 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14.0 million and ZEC treasury holdings categorized as a digital asset receivable valued at $147.4 million. Additionally, we had an accumulated deficit of $462.5 million at December 31, 2025, and during the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred net operating losses of $41.1 million. We expect to continue to generate operating losses in the foreseeable future. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents of $14.0 million as of December 31, 2025, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses for at least the next 12 months from the issuance of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, to support our future operations, we will seek additional funding through public or private, equity or debt financings and, for our biotechnology operations, we will seek funding or development program cost-sharing through collaboration agreements or licenses with larger pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies. If we do not obtain additional funding or development program cost-sharing, we could be forced to eliminate certain programs, reduce or eliminate discretionary operating expenses, and delay company expansion, which could adversely affect our business prospects. The inability to obtain funding, as and when needed, could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategies.

58

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:

​

​

Operating activities.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily related to a noncash unrealized gain on the change in fair value of embedded derivative of $50.4 million, and changes in working capital, including a decrease of $10.4 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and a $0.2 million decrease in lease liabilities. These changes were partially offset by net income of $4.8 million, and changes in working capital, including a decrease in research and development incentive receivable of $0.1 million, a decrease of $0.1 million in other assets and a decrease of $0.1 million in prepaid expense and other assets. There was also noncash stock-based compensation expense of $4.9 million, a change in deferred income taxes of $5.1 million and change in a right-of-use asset of $0.2 million.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily related to our net loss of $67.6 million and net changes in working capital, including a decrease in lease liabilities of $0.4 million. These changes were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.9 million, an increase in income tax payable of $0.6 million, a decrease of $0.1 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, a decrease of $0.2 million in other assets, noncash stock-based compensation expense of $5.5 million and change in a right-of-use asset of $0.4 million.

Investing Activities.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 was related to cash used to purchase ZEC. There were no investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Financing Activities.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2025, consisted of $57.2 million in net proceeds from the October 2025 Private Placement and $51.5 million in net proceeds through issuance of common stock through ATM sales, partially offset by payment of $0.6 million of deferred offering costs and $0.4 million of principal payments of insurance financing.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 consisted of $40.0 million in gross proceeds from the April 2024 Private Placement and $0.1 million of proceeds upon the exercise of stock options and warrants, partially offset by $2.9 million of offering costs paid.

Capital Requirements

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities.

Our expenses will also increase as we:

59

Table of Contents

Additional funding may not be available at the time needed on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities

On May 16, 2022, we entered into a third amendment to the 47 Thorndike Street Lease, the (“Third Amendment”). Under the Third Amendment, we extended the term of the 47 Thorndike Street Lease through July 31, 2024. Under the Third Amendment, we paid the monthly base rent amount of $37,000 contemplated by the 47 Thorndike Street Lease through January 31, 2023, with an increase that commenced on February 1, 2023 adjusting the monthly base rent amount to approximately $37,696 through January 31, 2024, and then another increase commencing on February 1, 2024 adjusting the monthly base rent amount to $38,335 for the period of February 2024 through July 31, 2024.

On January 3, 2024, we entered into a fourth amendment to the 47 Thorndike Street Lease, the (“Fourth Amendment”). Under the Fourth Amendment, we extended the term of the 47 Thorndike Street Lease through July 31, 2025. Under the Fourth Amendment, we will continue to pay the current monthly base rent amount of $38,335 contemplated by the 47 Thorndike Street Lease through July 31, 2024, with an increase commencing on August 1, 2024 adjusting the monthly base rent amount to approximately $38,974 through July 31, 2025.

On July 1, 2025 we entered into a Fifth Amendment to Lease (“Fifth Amendment”) with Landlord, extending the 47 Thorndike Street Lease as a tenancy-at will (as amended, the “Lease”). The term of the Lease expires on the last day of any month identified by notice by the Company or Landlord to the other, not less than sixty (60) days in advance. As of December 31, 2025, the monthly base rent is $19,168.

This description of our contractual obligations does not include potential future milestones or royalties that we may be required to make under license and collaboration agreements due to the uncertainty of events requiring payment under these agreements.

We enter into contracts in the normal course of business with clinical research organizations for clinical and preclinical research studies, external manufacturers for product for use in our clinical trials, and other research supplies and other services as part of our operations. These contracts generally provide for termination on notice, and therefore are cancelable contracts and not included as contractual commitments.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

We have reviewed all recently issued standards and have determined that, other than as disclosed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, such standards will not have a material impact on our financial statements or do not otherwise apply to our operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily the result of fluctuations in the price of ZEC, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates.

ZEC Price Risk

We are exposed to risk in the price of ZEC, a digital asset that is a material portion of the assets on our balance sheet. The price of ZEC has been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and is highly volatile. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2025, ZEC has traded between approximately $26.14 and $736.51. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of ZEC will require us to recognize unrealized gains or losses, which could be material to our financial results for the applicable reporting period, which may create significant volatility in our reported earnings. Any decrease in reported earnings or increased volatility of such earnings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities. As ZEC will constitute a substantial part of our balance sheet, if we are unable to generate revenue or secure equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all, we may be required to sell ZEC to satisfy these obligations. Any such sale of ZEC may have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and future prospects, and could impair our ability to secure additional equity or debt financing in the future.

60

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk in the ordinary course of our business. Our cash and cash equivalents are held in highly liquid, readily available checking and money market accounts. As a result, these amounts are not materially affected by changes in interest rates and we do not believe that a 10% change in interest rate would materially impact these amounts.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

All of our employees and the majority of our major operations are currently located in the United States. We contract for manufacturing operations outside the United States through contract manufacturing organizations. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiary in Australia is the Australian dollar, and the R&D Tax Incentive payment is received from the Australian government in Australian dollars, although the majority of the Australian subsidiary’s contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars. We have also engaged in contracts with contractors or other vendors in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, including the British pound. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency risks with respect to the Australian dollar and the British pound which could have the effect of increasing our expenses or reducing the amounts collected under the R&D Tax Incentive from the amounts recorded at the time of the transaction.

​

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Our financial statements required by this Item, together with the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, appear on pages F-1 through F-30 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

​

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

​

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, who is also serving as our Chief Financial Officer and therefore currently serves as both our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of December 31, 2025, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, who is also serving as our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. As a result of the identified material weakness described below, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer has concluded based upon the evaluation described above that, as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level.

61

Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the individuals serving as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, including the existence of the material weakness discussed herein, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on those criteria.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In connection with our first quarter of activity in implementing our new digital asset treasury strategy during the three months ended December 31, 2025, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to our failure to maintain effective controls over the accounting for certain complex and unusual transactions. Specifically, the material weakness relates to the operating effectiveness of controls that had been designed and implemented to account for complex and unusual transactions.

We engage external accounting and tax experts to assist with these complex matters. Although our internal controls were sufficiently designed and implemented for complex and unusual transactions, they did not operate effectively.

This control deficiency resulted in errors which were not detected by management’s existing controls. This material weakness did not result in any material misstatements to our consolidated financial statements or any changes to previously filed financial statements.

Remediation Efforts

To remediate this material weakness, our management, under the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board, has begun and will continue to implement the following remediation plans:

Attestation Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to our status as a smaller reporting company and non-accelerated filer.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In connection with the October 2025 Private Placement and our initiation of a digital asset treasury strategy, we implemented digital asset treasury processes and controls during the quarter ended December 31, 2025. There were no other changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2025 covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

​

62

Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

​

Item 9C. Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable

​

63

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The Company has adopted an insider trading policy that governs the purchase, sale, and/or other transactions of our securities by our directors, officers and employees. A copy of our insider trading policy is filed as Exhibit 19.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. In addition, with regard to the Company’s trading in its own securities, it is the Company’s policy to comply with the federal securities laws and the applicable exchange listing requirements.

The remaining information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2025, and is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

​

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2025, and is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

​

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2025, and is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

​

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2025, and is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

​

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2025, and is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.

​

​

64

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The financial statements listed below are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

​

​

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All financial schedules have been omitted because the required information is either presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto or is not applicable or required.

(a)(3) Exhibits

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(b) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference.

​

65

Table of Contents

​

​

66

Table of Contents

​

​

67

Table of Contents

68

Table of Contents

​

69

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

​

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

​

​

​

70

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

​

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cypherpunk Technologies Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cypherpunk Technologies Inc. (formerly Leap Therapeutics, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Evaluation of Control and Accounting for Digital Assets Held by a Custodian

As discussed in Note 2 – Digital Assets Receivable to the consolidated financial statements, as of December 31, 2025, the Company held a material balance of digital assets acquired as part of a newly implemented digital asset treasury strategy. These digital assets are held by a third-party custodian, which is a related party of the Company. Management exercised significant judgment in determining whether the Company controls the digital assets for financial reporting purposes and the appropriate accounting and presentation through evaluating the terms of the custodial agreement, assessing the Company’s contractual rights to the assets, and interpreting and applying the authoritative accounting guidance and the impact of the assets being held in commingled or omnibus wallets.

F-2

Table of Contents

We identified the assessment of control over the digital assets and the appropriate accounting and presentation as a critical audit matter because it involved complex judgment, significant management assumptions and extensive audit effort and because the conclusions directly affect the recognition, presentation and disclosure of a material balance in the consolidated financial statements.

Addressing the critical audit matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. Our audit procedures related to this matter included:

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.