v3.25.4
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2024
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
$ / shares
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
$ / shares
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:
Year1
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO2
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO3
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs4, 7
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs3
Total Shareholder Return5
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return5
Net Income ($ millions)
Company Selected Measure (CSM) –Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS6
2025$36,698,337$75,185,008$10,925,377$20,352,904 $670.56$154.11$20,640$27.06
2024$29,242,926$80,583,515$6,090,259($929,092)$478.17$123.43$10,590$16.11
2023$26,565,732$120,865,280$7,836,611$27,249,897 $358.72$118.45$5,240$9.14
2022$21,398,135$64,088,705$5,769,810$13,893,269 $222.94$124.87$6,245$8.55
2021$21,509,985$75,705,116$4,730,690$4,563,545 $166.08$116.73$5,582$8.00
       
Company Selected Measure Name adjusted non-GAAP EPS        
Named Executive Officers, Footnote Non-PEO NEO composition varied by year due to CFO transitions and role changes:
2025: Mr. Montarce; Dr. Skovronsky; Ms. Hakim; and Mr. Van Naarden
2024: Mr. Montarce; Dr. Skovronsky; Ms. Hakim; Mr. Van Naarden; Mr. Brooks (interim CFO, July 15-Sept 8); and Ms. Ashkenazi (CFO, departed July 30)
2023: Ms. Ashkenazi; Dr. Skovronsky; Ms. Hakim; and Mr. Van Naarden
2022: Ms. Ashkenazi; Dr. Skovronsky; Ms. Hakim; and Mr. Jonsson
2021: Ms. Ashkenazi (appointed CFO Feb 9); Dr. Skovronsky; Mr. Van Naarden; Mr. Rau; and Mr. Smiley (CFO, resigned Feb 9)
       
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote TSR for the company and peer group is calculated based on a fixed investment of $100 at the applicable measurement point, on the same cumulative basis as is used in Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K.
In 2025, the company revised the peer group for calculating TSR results. The peer group is comprised of the same companies from our executive compensation peer group (detailed in the Benchmarking Compensation section) as well as Novo Nordisk. Peer TSR amounts in this column reflect the revised peer group for all fiscal years presented. For comparison, under the prior peer group composition, peer group TSR for 2025 would have been $157.61 (compared to $154.11 for the revised peer group).
       
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 36,698,337 $ 29,242,926 $ 26,565,732 $ 21,398,135 $ 21,509,985
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 75,185,008 80,583,515 120,865,280 64,088,705 75,705,116
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote The table below reconciles the PEO Summary Compensation Table (SCT) total to CAP:
YearSCT Total Compensation for PEOSCT Change in Pension ValuePension Service CostSCT Stock ValueChange in Value: Stock Granted in Current YearChange in Value: Unvested StockFinal Value: Vested Stock
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
abcdefga-b+c-d+e+f+g
2025$36,698,337$4,451,636$616,007$23,325,000$10,854,848$(20,935,949)$75,728,401$75,185,008
2024$29,242,926$1,746,483$523,751$19,749,324$(32,793,300)$(16,377,494)$121,483,439$80,583,515
2023$26,565,732$1,439,822$491,959$18,840,250$20,443,264$36,659,046$56,985,351$120,865,280
2022$21,398,135$0$623,346$16,981,250$10,443,998$(2,718,134)$51,322,610$64,088,705
2021$21,509,985$2,442,235$680,872$14,966,000$3,627,520$17,758,456$49,536,518$75,705,116
       
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 10,925,377 6,090,259 7,836,611 5,769,810 4,730,690
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 20,352,904 (929,092) 27,249,897 13,893,269 4,563,545
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote The table below reconciles the Non-PEO NEO SCT totals to CAP:
YearAverage SCT Total Compensation for Non-PEO NEOsAverage SCT Change in Pension ValueAverage Pension Service CostAverage SCT Stock ValueAverage Change in Value: Stock Granted in Current YearAverage Change in Value: Unvested StockAverage Final Value: Vested StockAverage Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
abcdefga-b+c-d+e+f+g
2025$10,925,377$430,369$182,496$6,875,000$5,405,638$(3,353,746)$14,498,508$20,352,904
2024$6,090,259$215,381$159,259$3,378,006$(6,930,869)$(7,775,892)$11,121,538$(929,092)
2023$7,836,611$455,154$159,626$4,387,275$5,693,252$9,514,261$8,888,576$27,249,897
2022$5,769,810$93,171$185,293$3,553,000$2,494,818$1,188,603$7,900,916$13,893,269
2021$4,730,690$159,911$135,445$3,115,360$1,276,786$861,413$834,482$4,563,545
       
Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote When calculating CAP amounts, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of stock awards was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from what was used at the time of grant.        
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
Over the past five years, the company’s total shareholder return (TSR) has exceeded the peer group’s TSR. The chosen peer group is comprised of the same companies from our executive compensation peer group detailed in the Benchmarking Compensation section, as well as Novo Nordisk. Lilly’s relative TSR outperformance was substantially attributable to strong developments in our product pipeline and launches of new products and indications. As reflected in the chart below, this outperformance contributed to the PEO and non-PEOs’ compensation over the five-year period.
PVP Total Shareholder Return.jpg
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
Lilly does not utilize GAAP or non-GAAP net income as a metric in any of its incentive programs. Generally, CAP is not heavily correlated with GAAP net income because GAAP net income includes certain items that the Committee believes are not reflective of underlying business performance. By excluding the impact of (i) amortization of intangible assets primarily associated with costs of marketed products acquired or licensed from third parties, (ii) net losses or gains on investments in equity securities, and (iii) other specified items that are not reflective of underlying business performance, the Committee believes non-GAAP net income better represents the company’s operating performance. For comparison purposes, the graph below reflects both GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income against PEO and average non-PEO NEO CAP.
The GAAP and non-GAAP net income results include significantly higher acquired IPR&D charges. While immediately expensed for accounting purposes, the company views investments in acquired IPR&D as important contributions to its product pipeline, which is a key driver of future company performance. For additional information on financial results, see Appendix A.
PVP Net Income.jpg
*    GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income are discrete outcomes. GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income figures shown in the graphic above both include acquired IPR&D charges, net of taxes, as follows: $785.5 million in 2021, $813.2 million in 2022, $3.70 billion in 2023, $3.18 billion in 2024, and $2.91 billion in 2025.
       
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
Lilly has chosen adjusted non-GAAP EPS as its most important company selected measure (CSM). Lilly leverages annual non-GAAP EPS derived from the board-approved business plan to set targets for the bonus. Significant sustained profitability growth contributes to higher total CAP as seen in the graphic below. For additional information on non-GAAP financial metrics, see Appendix A.
PVP Adjusted NonGAAP EPS.jpg
*     Adjusted non-GAAP EPS data points are discrete outcomes.
       
Tabular List, Table
Most Important Performance Measures
Adjusted non-GAAP EPS1
Total Shareholder Return
Revenue
       
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 670.56 478.17 358.72 222.94 166.08
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 154.11 123.43 118.45 124.87 116.73
Net Income (Loss) $ 20,640,000,000 $ 10,590,000,000 $ 5,240,000,000 $ 6,245,000,000 $ 5,582,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount | $ / shares 27.06 16.11 9.14 8.55 8.00
PEO Name Mr. Ricks        
Additional 402(v) Disclosure CAP amounts are calculated using SEC-required valuation assumptions under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect actual compensation earned by or paid to NEOs. The value realized from unvested awards will be determined when awards fully vest and settle.The adjusted non-GAAP EPS has been revised across all reported years to reflect outcomes for the corporate bonus plan rather than the performance award program, which has been discontinued. Details of those results and the associated adjustments can be found in Appendix A of the proxy statement for each respective year.
The Committee believes in pay for performance and has structured Lilly compensation programs to reward leaders when the company delivers strong results. Lilly has achieved strong cumulative TSR, EPS and revenue growth over the immediately preceding five-year period. As a result, shareholders have been rewarded with significant total stock returns, and leadership has been rewarded with above-target payouts from their incentive compensation programs.
       
Prior Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 157.61        
Measure:: 1          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Adjusted non-GAAP EPS        
Non-GAAP Measure Description For pay versus performance analysis, adjusted non-GAAP EPS is consistent with the adjusted non-GAAP EPS values for the annual cash bonus in Appendix A.        
Measure:: 2          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Name Total Shareholder Return        
Measure:: 3          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Other Measure
Lilly strives to make breakthrough medicines available to patients around the globe. Given a growing portfolio of new medicines, we motivate our entire workforce to reach as many patients as possible. The combination of a strong product portfolio and effective patient delivery yields higher sales volume and, generally, higher revenue. As such, revenue is one of our most important measures to ensure we are continuously growing the number of patients we serve. Generally, our revenue over the preceding five-year period aligns with the growth in PEO and average non-PEO CAP.
PVP Revenue Billions.jpg
*    Revenue data points are discrete outcomes.
       
Name Revenue        
PEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (4,451,636) $ (1,746,483) $ (1,439,822) $ 0 $ (2,442,235)
PEO | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 616,007 523,751 491,959 623,346 680,872
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (23,325,000) (19,749,324) (18,840,250) (16,981,250) (14,966,000)
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 10,854,848 (32,793,300) 20,443,264 10,443,998 3,627,520
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (20,935,949) (16,377,494) 36,659,046 (2,718,134) 17,758,456
PEO | Adjustment, Final Value, Vested Equity [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 75,728,401 121,483,439 56,985,351 51,322,610 49,536,518
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Change in Present Value of Accumulated Benefit for All Pension Plans Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (430,369) (215,381) (455,154) (93,171) (159,911)
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Pension Adjustments Service Cost          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 182,496 159,259 159,626 185,293 135,445
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (6,875,000) (3,378,006) (4,387,275) (3,553,000) (3,115,360)
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 5,405,638 (6,930,869) 5,693,252 2,494,818 1,276,786
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (3,353,746) (7,775,892) 9,514,261 1,188,603 861,413
Non-PEO NEO | Adjustment, Final Value, Vested Equity [Member]          
Pay vs Performance Disclosure          
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 14,498,508 $ 11,121,538 $ 8,888,576 $ 7,900,916 $ 834,482